DOCSLIB.ORG

Indiana Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Freight Railroads in Indiana Rail Fast Facts For 2019 Freight railroads ….............................................................................................................................................................43 Freight railroad mileage …..........................................................................................................................................4,041 Freight rail employees …...............................................................................................................................................5,577 Average wages & benefits per employee …...................................................................................................$132,230 Railroad retirement beneficiaries …......................................................................................................................14,500 Railroad retirement benefits paid ….....................................................................................................................$382 million U.S. Economy: According to a Towson University study, in 2017, America's Class I railroads supported: Sustainability: Railroads are the most fuel efficient way to move freight over land. It would have taken approximately 19.0 million additional trucks to handle the 341.6 million tons of freight that moved by rail in Indiana in 2019. Rail Traffic Originated in 2019 Total Tons: 57.7 million Total Carloads: 676,100 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Coal 17.1 146,300 Primary Metal Products 11.6 126,500 Farm Products 8.6 82,800 Food Products 7.6 78,700 Chemicals 4.3 44,500 Other 8.6 197,200 Source: AAR analysis of industry data 7% (% based on tonnage) Rail Traffic Terminated in 2019 Total Tons: 56.2 million Total Carloads: 606,800 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Coal 24.6 210,500 Primary Metal Products 6.6 72,100 Chemicals 5.8 60,500 Waste and Scrap 4.8 52,600 Coal Petroleum Products 4.7 59,100 44% Other 9.6 152,000 Other Source: AAR analysis of industry data 17% (% based on tonnage) © 1993–2021, Association of American Railroads. For more information about railroads, visit www.aar.org. Jan. 2021 Freight Railroads in Indiana Miles Operated In Indiana Miles Operated Indiana in 2019 2019 Totals Number Excluding Including Class I Railroads of Freight Trackage Trackage Canadian National 103 Railroads Rights Rights Canadian Pacific Railway 154 CSX Transportation 1,507 Class I 5 2,424 3,224 Norfolk Southern Corp. 1,441 Regional 2 223 323 Union Pacific Railroad Co. 19 Short Line 36 1,394 1,618 3,224 Total 43 4,041 5,165 Regional Railroads Decatur & Eastern Illinois Railroad 18 Indiana Rail Road 305 Miles Operated In 323 Indiana in 2019 Short Line Railroads Short Line Railroads, cont. C & NC Railroad 27 Indiana Eastern Railroad 29 Camp Chase Rail 14 Indiana Harbor Belt Railroad 41 Central Indiana & Western Railroad 9 Indiana Northeastern Railroad 46 Central Railroad of Indiana 121 Indiana Southern Railroad 220 Central Railroad of Indianapolis 60 Indiana Southwestern Railway 7 Chesapeake and Indiana Railroad 28 Kankakee, Beaverville & Southern Railroad 76 Chicago, Ft. Wayne & Eastern Railroad 196 Kendallville Terminal Railway 2 Chicago, South Shore & South Bend Railroad 110 Louisville & Indiana Railroad 124 Dubois County Railroad 16 Lucas Oil Rail Lines 8 Elkhart & Western Railroad 47 Madison Railroad 26 Evansville Western Railway 78 MG Rail 11 Flats Industrial Railroad 3 Napoleon, Defiance and Western Railway 3 Fulton County Railroad 13 Ohio Valley Railroad 3 Gary Railway 3 South Chicago & Indiana Harbor Railway 6 Grand Elk Railroad 15 Squaw Creek Southern Railroad 44 Hoosier Southern Railroad 22 Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway 162 Indian Creek Railroad 5 Vermillion Valley Railroad 6 Indiana & Ohio Railway 10 Wabash Central Railroad 27 1,618 Class I Railroad: A railroad with 2019 operating revenues of at least $504.8 million. Regional Railroad: A non-Class I line-haul railroad that has annual revenues of at least $40 million, or that operates at least 350 miles of road and revenues of at least $20 million. Short Line Railroad: A railroad which is neither a Class I nor a Regional Railroad. © 1993–2021, Association of American Railroads. For more information about railroads, visit www.aar.org. Jan. 2021 Freight Railroads in Indiana BNSF CN CP CSX KCS NS UP Short Line/Regional Multiple Owners Map is based on the 2020 National Transportation Atlas Database published by the U.S. DOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Some mileage figures are AAR estimates. © 1993–2021, Association of American Railroads. For more information about railroads, visit www.aar.org. Jan. 2021.
Recommended publications
  • Reporting Marks

    Reporting Marks

    Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR
  • Michigan Railroads Association

    Michigan Railroads Association

    Michigan Railroads Association Local Surface Grade Crossing Railroad Contact list Mark Dobronski, President Tyler Delvaux, Assistant, SLE and Adrian & Blissfield Rail Road Trainmaster 734.641.2300 o Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad [email protected] 906.786.0693 c [email protected] Steven M. Ayala, Roadmaster Ann Arbor Railroad Bob Anderson, SLE & Operations Manager 419.206.8172 c Escanaba & Lake Superior Railroad [email protected] 906.280.2513 o 906.542.3214 c Mark Dobronski, President [email protected] Charlotte Southern Railroad Company 734.641.2300 o Adam Robillard, Roadmaster [email protected] Grand Elk Railroad 269.762.9069 c Thomas Brasseur, Manager of Public Works [email protected] CN 248.452.4854 c Toby Tobias, AVP Engineering [email protected] Grand Rapids Eastern Railroad 855.793.7900 o Kevin T. Voss, Director – Track [email protected] Maintenance Conrail Mark Russell, Chief Engineer 856.231.2055 c Great Lakes Central [email protected] 231.775.2182 o 989.666.2706 c Amanda DeCesare, CSX Engineering [email protected] CSX Transportation 859.372.6124 o Luke Ziesemer, Roadmaster [email protected] Huron & Eastern Railroad 989.797.5129 c Mark Dobronski, President [email protected] Detroit Connecting Railroad Company 734.641.2300 o Scott Sandoval, AVP Engineering [email protected] Indiana & Ohio Railway 614.479.1863 o 231.233.9084 c [email protected] Mark Dobronski, President Toby Tobias, AVP Engineering Jackson & Lansing Railroad Company Michigan Shore Railroad 734.641.2300 o 855.793.7900 o [email protected] [email protected] Mark Pennell, Superintendent MOW Toby Tobias, AVP Engineering Lake State Railway Mid Michigan Railroad 989.393.9820 o 855.793.7900 o 989.529.6640 c [email protected] [email protected] Brent Emerson – Ft.
  • It's a Great Time to Be in the Railroad Business, but If You're a Short Line That's Going to Make It, You've Got to Lear

    It's a Great Time to Be in the Railroad Business, but If You're a Short Line That's Going to Make It, You've Got to Lear

    SHORT TAKES Caddo Valley Railroad Co. Headquarters: Glenwood, Ark. Route: 52.9 miles from Gurdon to Bird Mill, Ark. Interchange: Gurdon, with UP PREX GP16 1610 cuts through the piney woods near Gurdon, Ark. It’s a great time to be in the railroad business, but if you’re a short line that’s going to make it, you’ve got to learn how to add big-time value by Roy Blanchard riters such as Archie Robertson, Lucius road, or about 30 percent of the U.S. rail sys- Beebe, and William S. Young prepared us tem. They handle more than 12 million revenue Wfor short lines of an unhurried nature. Far units a year.* from the hustle and bustle of big-city commerce, Of the short lines operating today, 16 are these railroads went about their business in a lei- owned by Class I railroads, and they fall into two surely way. Robertson captured such lines in categories: switching and terminal railroads, and 1945’s Slow Train to Yesterday; Beebe immortal- actual short lines like the Winston-Salem South- ized them in his 1947 classic Mixed Train Daily; bound (a joint property of Norfolk Southern and and Young kept TRAINS readers informed about CSX, and a holdover from joint control of Norfolk the little roads well into the 1950s with his & Western and Atlantic Coast Line) or the Texas monthly column, “Short Lines.” Mexican (Kansas City Southern). The three best The 1980 Staggers Act [page 10], the subse- known are probably the Belt Railway of Chicago quent deregulation of railroad rates, and Wall (owned by six Class Is), probably the biggest Street have combined to end all that.
  • ERTAC Rail Emissions Inventory Part 3: Class II and III Locomotives

    ERTAC Rail Emissions Inventory Part 3: Class II and III Locomotives

    ERTAC Rail Emissions Inventory Part 3: Class II and III Locomotives Michelle Bergin, GA Environmental Protection Division Matthew Harrell, IL Environmental Protection Agency Mark Janssen, Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium Acknowledgments: Steve Sullivan, American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association David Powell, Genesee & Wyoming Inc. Dennis McGeen, Michigan Dept. of Environmental Quality Lisa Higgins, Maine Dept. of Environmental Protection Laurel Driver, US EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Support Byeong Kim, GA Environmental Protection Division Introduction Air protection agencies from twenty-seven states, coordinated through the Eastern Regional Technical Advisory Committee (ERTAC) and headed by the Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium (LADCO), identified a need to better quantify and characterize rail-related emissions inventories. Traditional locomotives utilize large diesel engines, resulting in emissions of NO x, diesel PM, hydrocarbons, greenhouse gases, and other air pollutants. These emissions are sometimes concentrated in areas exceeding National Ambient Air Quality Standards. No cohesive nationwide railroad emission estimates based on local operations are known to have been made previously. Inventory development methods for locomotive emissions estimates vary from state to state and, in general, lack the spatial or temporal resolution needed to support air quality modeling and planning 1-5. The ERTAC Rail Subcommittee (ERTAC Rail) was established with active representatives from twelve member states, three regional planning offices, and the US EPA. The subcommittee’s goals are to (1) standardize agencies’ inventory development methods through a collaborative effort, (2) improve the quality of data received and the resulting emission inventories, and (3) reduce the administrative burden on railroad companies of providing data.
  • CP's North American Rail

    CP's North American Rail

    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
  • Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)

    Sounder Commuter Rail (Seattle)

    Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Final Report PRC 14-12 F Public Use of Rail Right-of-Way in Urban Areas Texas A&M Transportation Institute PRC 14-12 F December 2014 Authors Jolanda Prozzi Rydell Walthall Megan Kenney Jeff Warner Curtis Morgan Table of Contents List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. 9 Executive Summary .................................................................................................................... 10 Sharing Rail Infrastructure ........................................................................................................ 10 Three Scenarios for Sharing Rail Infrastructure ................................................................... 10 Shared-Use Agreement Components .................................................................................... 12 Freight Railroad Company Perspectives ............................................................................... 12 Keys to Negotiating Successful Shared-Use Agreements .................................................... 13 Rail Infrastructure Relocation ................................................................................................... 15 Benefits of Infrastructure Relocation ...................................................................................
  • October 2017

    October 2017

    May 2017 Error! No text of specified style in document. fff October 2017 September 2016 E r r o r ! No text of specified style in document. | i Indiana State Rail Plan Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ S-1 S.1 PURPOSE OF THE INDIANA STATE RAIL PLAN .................................................................................................. S-1 S.2 VISION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................. S-1 S.3 INDIANA RAIL NETWORK ............................................................................................................................ S-3 S.4 PASSENGER RAIL ISSUES, OPPORTUNITIES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS ................................... S-7 S.5 SAFETY/CROSSING ISSUES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS AND IMPROVEMENTS ....................................................... S-9 S.6 FREIGHT RAIL ISSUES, PROPOSED INVESTMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENTS .............................................................. S-9 S.7 RAIL SERVICE AND INVESTMENT PROGRAM ................................................................................................ S-12 1 THE ROLE OF RAIL IN STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION (OVERVIEW) ................................................ 1 1.1 PURPOSE AND CONTENT .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 MULTIMODAL
  • MDOT Michigan State Rail Plan Tech Memo 2 Existing Conditions

    MDOT Michigan State Rail Plan Tech Memo 2 Existing Conditions

    Technical Memorandum #2 March 2011 Prepared for: Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 2. Freight Rail System Profile ......................................................................................2 2.1. Overview ...........................................................................................................2 2.2. Class I Railroads ...............................................................................................2 2.3. Regional Railroads ............................................................................................6 2.4. Class III Shortline Railroads .............................................................................7 2.5. Switching & Terminal Railroads ....................................................................12 2.7. State Owned Railroads ...................................................................................16 2.8. Abandonments ................................................................................................18 2.10. International Border Crossings .....................................................................22 2.11. Ongoing Border Crossing Activities .............................................................24 2.12. Port Access Facilities ....................................................................................24 3. Freight Rail Traffic ................................................................................................25
  • Michigan Railroads Association Jon Cool, President White Baraga 120 N

    Michigan Railroads Association Jon Cool, President White Baraga 120 N

    MICHIGAN’S RAIL SYSTEM KEWEENAW Give us a call... HOUGHTON 517.482.9413 Michigan Railroads Association Jon Cool, President WHITE BARAGA 120 N. Washington Sq., Suite 701 | Lansing, Michigan 48933 PINE ROCKLAND NESTORIA Michigan’s DUNCAN ELS CN P 517.482.9413 | F 517.482.9225 CN MRI ONTONAGON SIDNAW REPUBLIC [email protected] railroads are ready MINE LSI CN/LSI MARQUETTE GOGEBIC BARAGA LUCE michiganrailroadsassociation.com REPUBLIC to help you with your @MI_FreightRail ELS CN ELS MARQUETTE ALGER MUNISING NEWBERRY SAULT STE.MARIE CN development efforts. CN IRON CHANNING CN SCHOOLCRAFT CHIPPEWA ELS MACKINAC TROUT LAKE The following are economic ELS CN ANTOINE DELTA MANISTIQUE DICKINSON CN development contacts for IRON MOUNTAIN CN ESCANABA each railroad operating in Michigan. FAITHHORN CN POWERS EMMET michiganrailroadsassociation.com MENOMINEE CN CHEBOYGAN PETOSKEY PRESQUE ISLE MENOMINEE Adrian & Blissfield Rail Escanaba & Lake Superior CHARLEVOIX Road Co. Railroad GLC Mark W. Dobronski, President Thomas J. Klimek ELMIRA OTSEGO MONT- 38235 N. Executive Dr. Vice President Marketing ANTRIM MORECY ALPENA GAYLORD Westland, MI 48185 P.O. Box 85 Lapeer Industrial Railroad GLC ALPENA (p) 734.641.2300 (f) 734.641.2323 Mark W. Dobronski, President WILLIAMS- LSRC Green Bay, WI 54305 LEELANAU BURG [email protected] (p) 920.841.5062 38235 N. Executive Dr. GLC LSRC abrailroad.com [email protected] Westland, MI 48185 TRAVERSE KALKASKA CRAWFORD OSCODA ALCONA (p) 734.641.2300 (f) 734.641.2323 CITY GLC elsrr.com GRAND GRAYLING HARRISVILLE [email protected] GRAWN Amtrak BENZIE TRAVERSEGLC Derrick James, Director abrailroad.com Grand Elk Railroad WALTON JCT. Government Affairs-Central Damien Cantrell, General Manager MANISTEE LSRC OSCODA Marquette Rail LCC YUMA Chicago Union Station 75 Mills Street MISSAUKEE OGEMAW IOSCO Robert Bingham 500 W.
  • 2018 Annual Performance and Accountability Report

    2018 Annual Performance and Accountability Report

    N M B 2018 NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD / ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT CHAIRMAN’S November 15, 2018 N LETTER The National Mediation Board had a banner year in FY 2018. The Agency’s mission – to prevent disruption to interstate commerce – remains as critical today as it was in 1934, when the Board was created under amendments to the Railway Labor Act. M NMB is pleased to report that there were no interruptions in the rail or air industry in FY 2018. Through the work of this Agency, the over twelve million jobs directly supported by the rail and air industry continued as usual. By extension, the millions of jobs dependent on the ability to travel and transport goods were also not disrupted. As unemployment B rates reach lows not seen in decades, NMB acts to ensure that work disruptions in the air or rail sectors do not dampen economic growth. NMB is proud to play its part in keeping the United States’ job-producing economy strong. At the start of the fiscal year, the Board’s statutory complement of three members was restored when two new Board Members and one sitting Board Member were unanimously confirmed by the United States Senate. At full strength, the new Board has been able to address issues which have long been of concern at NMB. For example, the Board addressed the fact that NMB has no assigned Inspector General by establishing a Memorandum of Understanding with the Inspector General of the National Labor Relations Board to create an anonymous hotline to report fraud, waste and abuse.
  • Nuclear and Coal in the Postwar US Dissertation Presented in Partial

    Nuclear and Coal in the Postwar US Dissertation Presented in Partial

    Power From the Valley: Nuclear and Coal in the Postwar U.S. Dissertation Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Megan Lenore Chew, M.A. Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Steven Conn, Advisor Randolph Roth David Steigerwald Copyright by Megan Lenore Chew 2014 Abstract In the years after World War II, small towns, villages, and cities in the Ohio River Valley region of Ohio and Indiana experienced a high level of industrialization not seen since the region’s commercial peak in the mid-19th century. The development of industries related to nuclear and coal technologies—including nuclear energy, uranium enrichment, and coal-fired energy—changed the social and physical environments of the Ohio Valley at the time. This industrial growth was part of a movement to decentralize industry from major cities after World War II, involved the efforts of private corporations to sell “free enterprise” in the 1950s, was in some cases related to U.S. national defense in the Cold War, and brought some of the largest industrial complexes in the U.S. to sparsely populated places in the Ohio Valley. In these small cities and villages— including Madison, Indiana, Cheshire, Ohio, Piketon, Ohio, and Waverly, Ohio—the changes brought by nuclear and coal meant modern, enormous industry was taking the place of farms and cornfields. These places had been left behind by the growth seen in major metropolitan areas, and they saw the potential for economic growth in these power plants and related industries.
  • IHB 3001-G Cancels STB IHB 3001-F

    IHB 3001-G Cancels STB IHB 3001-F

    INCLUSIVE OF ALL INCREASES STB IHB 3001-G Cancels STB IHB 3001-F INDIANA HARBOR BELT RAILROAD COMPANY FREIGHT TARIFF IHB 3001-G LOCAL and PROPORTIONAL FREIGHT TARIFF APPLYING ON COMMODITIES BETWEEN AND BURNS HARBOR, IN PORTAGE, IN BURNS HARBOR, IN STATIONS LOCATED WITHIN PORTAGE, IN THE CHICAGO SWITCHING DISTRICT IHB JUNCTIONS WITH CONNECTING LINES IN THE CHICAGO SWITCHING DISTRICT GENERAL COMMODITY TARIFF Governed, except as otherwise provided herein, by the Uniform Classification. (See Item 5) ISSUED: April 10, 2017 EFFECTIVE: May 1, 2017 ISSUED BY: L. A. Pauwels Director, Sales and Industrial Development 2721 161st Street Hammond, IN 46323-1099 Visit our website www.ihbrr.com FREIGHT TARIFF IHB 3001-G TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBJECT ITEM PAGE ALPHABETICAL LIST OF STATIONS FROM AND TO WHICH RATES APPLY ------- 3 ALTERNATION - CARLOAD RATES AND VARYING MINIMUM WEIGHTS 75 5 CAPACITIES AND DIMENSIONS OF CARS 45 4 CONSECUTIVE NUMBERS 40 4 DESCRIPTION OF GOVERNING CLASSIFICATION 5 4 DIMENSIONAL SHIPMENTS 360 6 EMPTY CARS HANDLED IN COMMERCIAL SERVICE 380 6 EXPLANATION OF ABBREVIATIONS ------- 7 EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE MARKS ------- 7 EXPLOSIVES, DANGEROUS ARTICLES 15 4 FUEL SURCHARGE 65 4 IDLER CARS 370 6 INTRASTATE APPLICATION, INDIANA 205 5 LIST OF CONNECTING LINES AND JUNCTIONS IN THE CHICAGO SWITCHING DISTRICT ------- 3 LIST OF INDUSTRIES LOCATED AT BURNS HARBOR, IN AND PORTAGE, IN 1000 7 METHOD OF CANCELING ITEMS 80 5 METHOD OF DENOTING REISSUED MATTER IN SUPPLEMENTS 100 5 NATIONAL SERVICE ORDER TARIFF 60 4 NON APPLICATION OF TRANSIT 210 5 NON APPLICATION OF UFC RULE 24 200 5 PROPORTIONAL RATES APPLICATION 70 5 RATES 310-380 6 REFERENCE TO TARIFFS, ITEMS, NOTES, RULES, ETC.