DOCSLIB.ORG

The Problem of Assault Firearms

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Problem of Assault Firearms The Problem of Assault Firearms Franklin E. Zimring Rational discussion of the public law control of assault firearms requires both sustained attention to the definition of assault weapons and historicalperspective on the control of special high-risk firearms. This article reviews sociological, mechanical and functional approaches to the definition of assault firearms and discusses previous attempts in federal law to deal with special categories of high-risk weapons. The debate about gun control in the United States has become something of a bore -the same people saying the same things about the same guns ad nauseam. Our hearts should therefore go out to media producers across the land who keep hoping that events will rescue the controversy about guns and gun control from the repetitive point- counterpoint of the past decade. From that perspective, the schoolyard shooting in Stockton, Califor- nia, in January 1989, as well as reports of drive-by shootings, teenage gang machine-gun fights, and drug dealers with personal assault rifle armories, seems a media coordinator's dream-a new angle on an important subject that had grown tiresome. Media and legislative atten- tion have shifted lately from handguns to what are called assault weapons. 1989 promises to be the year of the assault rifle. For those who wonder whether there is anything really new in all of this, the answer is both yes and no. The specific focus on so-called assault weapons is a new one, but most of the dispute still involves the usual suspects saying the same things. Also as usual, the debate over the wisdom of controlling assault weapons is proceeding in a factual vacuum. Most citizens, including many with strong views on the wis- dom of controls on so-called assault weapons, know little about them. Here are seven questions about assault weapons that do not have answers as of mid-1989: FRANKLIN E. ZIMRING: Professor of Law and Director, Earl Warren Legal Institute, University of California at Berkeley. CRIME & DELINQUENCY, Vol. 35 No. 4, October 1989 538-545 @ 1989 Sage Publications, Inc. 538 from the SAGE Social Science Collections. All Rights Reserved. Zimring / Assault Firearms 539 1. How many assault weapons are owned by civilians in the United States? 2. How much have the ownership and use of these weapons increased in recent years? 3. What sorts of people own these weapons and for what reasons? 4. How many crimes and what sorts of crimes involve assault weapons? 5. Are wounds inflicted by assault firearms more likely to kill than wounds inflicted by other firearms? 6. How many legitimate uses of these weapons would be curtailed if civilian ownership were prohibited? 7. If these weapons were successfully prohibited, what impact would that have on gun crime in the United States and on its costs? Amidst all this ignorance, a rational discussion of the control of assault-type weapons can best be organized around three issues: (1) What is an assault rifle? (2) Why are these guns regarded as a special problem these days? and (3) How should the controversy over these weapons fit into the larger mosaic of the great American gun control debate? WHAT IS ANASSAULTRIFLE? The question of what qualifies as an assault firearm or assault rifle is neither simple nor easy to answer. It is, however, key to understand- ing the subject. Most people, when decrying the proliferation of assault rifles, define their terms by mentioning specific brand names: an as- sault gun means the Uzi, the AK-47, the Mac-10, and other similar weapons. Such guns have actions that are either automatic (one trigger pull will continuously discharge bullets pushed into the chamber from the magazine) or semi-automatic (each trigger pull will discharge a single bullet, but multiple pulls can quickly discharge a large number of bullets stored in the magazine). Since automatic firearms are now covered by restrictive federal law, it is the semi-automatics that have become the focus of new control proposals and debate. The definitional problem is that not all semi-automatic weapons are classified as assault rifles by most of the people who want to ban such rifles. Some semi- automatic rifles are used for sporting purposes. The problem is how to tell the bad semi-automatic weapons from the good ones. Three different strategies have been used to define "assault wea- pons." Some proposals would simply ban a list of specific weapons by brand name and action. An example of this nominal approach is a bill 540 CRIME & DELINQUENCY / OCTOBER 1989 that was recently approved by the California State Assembly Public Safety Committee. A second approach would discriminate among semi- automatic weapons by their mechanical capacities. Thus, some pro- posals would ban semi-automatic rifles with a magazine capacity of over fifteen or twenty rounds of ammunition while allowing those with smaller capacity. The larger magazine size means more bullets are available for rapid-fire release. A third approach would draw the line between good and bad semi- automatic weapons by having experts sort these matters out after the fact of legislation. Thus, some proposals would have a board of ad- visors determine whether a particular type of semi-automatic weapon is unsuitable for sporting purposes and thus subject to special stric- tures. The criteria would include the use for which the weapon was originally designed, the recent history of its use, and mechanical ele- ments such as magazine size. WHY THE FUSS? The diversity of approaches to defining assault rifles puts us on notice that there is no clear consensus on why assault weapons are a special gun control problem. In fact, there are three separate theories on why assault weapons are a problem that mirror the three separate strands of definition discussed above. They can be called sociological, mechanical, and functional complaints about assault rifles. The sociological approach defines the real problem with assault weapons as the people who are using them. The complaint about the Uzi and the AK-47 is that these are the guns used by drug dealers, violent teen gangs, and paramilitary groups. This approach is generally favored by people who wish to define the bad weapons by their reputa- tion and thus by brand name. A mechanical approach defines the reason for special concern with assault weapons as their capacity to discharge a substantial number of bullets quickly. This complaint matches definitions keyed to how quickly weapons discharge ammunition and how much ammunition they can store in magazines for rapid fire. A third approach sorts through good versus bad semi-automatic weapons by the functions they are suited to or were designed to per- form. Semi-automatic weapons might be sorted into those suitable for sporting purposes and those that are only military or primarily military Zimring / Assault Firearms 541 or antipersonnel in character. This approach is usually linked to defini- tions by reference to expert opinion. The theory is that the experts will easily distinguish between real sporting weapons and military weapons. Each of these approaches has advantages and drawbacks. Listing the guns one wishes to ban by brand name is simple and specific. But one problem is that the same sorts of guns can soon be made by different companies. A second problem is that labeling guns solely by brand name conspicuously lacks principle. An approach that discriminates by the mechanical features of wea- pons achieves precision in definition but may do so at the price of being arbitrary. The law can differentiate between allowable and unallowable semi-automatic weapons by features such as barrel length or magazine capacity, and these features do reflect problematic aspects like con- cealability or the amount of ammunition that can be discharged in a short period of time. The problem is arbitrariness at the border. Why is a sixteen-bullet magazine the stuff of outlawry while a fifteen-bullet magazine is considered the ballistic equivalent of kosher? One way around this arbitrariness is to set up a panel of experts to sort out antipersonnel from sporting weapons. The problem here is that the line between sporting and nonsporting weapons may not be so easy to draw. Some of the things that make semi-automatic firearms fun for hunters and target-shooting lawyers make the same weapons attractive to paranoids and drug dealers. Lurking behind these problems of definition is a major-league con- ceptual difficulty: Is the real problem the functional capacity of the guns or the nastiness of the people who use them? A HISTORY LESSON At various times in American history, similar problems have cropped up in other gun laws. In 1934 Congress attempted to deal with the problem of so-called gangster weapons by sharply restricting civilian ownership of all automatic firearms and sawed-off shotguns. The 1934 legislation successfully solved a small problem at a small cost. Machine guns, never an important part of American gun crime, never became a significant problem. Whether the Thompson submachine gun would have fallen back into obscurity without legislation or grown into the menace that the proponents of the legislation made it out to be will never be known. The restriction of machine guns and sawed-off 542 CRIME & DELINQUENCY / OCTOBER 1989 shotguns was achieved at little social cost because these so-called gangster weapons had few sporting purposes that were sacrificed as a result of the prohibition. The 1934 precedent was important as a symbolic compromise. Most of the supporters of this legislation were also after more comprehensive national legislation on other guns, guns that had a significant civilian constituency. The restriction of gangster weapons was a compromise that stopped restricted federal law at the boundary between popular and unpopular guns.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download Enemy-Threat-Weapons
    UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS THE BASIC SCHOOL MARINE CORPS TRAINING COMMAND CAMP BARRETT, VIRGINIA 22134-5019 ENEMY THREAT WEAPONS B2A2177 STUDENT HANDOUT/SELF PACED INSTRUCTION Basic Officer Course B2A2177 Enemy Threat Weapons Enemy Threat Weapons Introduction In 1979, the Soviets invaded Afghanistan. The Soviets assumed this would be a short uneventful battle; however, the Mujahadeen had other plans. The Mujahadeen are guardians of the Afghani way of live and territory. The Soviets went into Afghanistan with the latest weapons to include the AK-74, AKS-74, and AKSU-74, which replaced the venerable AK-47 in the Soviet Arsenals. The Mujahadeen were armed with Soviet-made AK-47s. This twist of fate would prove to be fatal to the Soviets. For nearly 11 years, the Mujahadeen repelled the Soviet attacks with Soviet-made weapons. The Mujahadeen also captured many newer Soviet small arms, which augmented their supplies of weaponry. In 1989, the Soviet Union withdrew from Afghanistan back to the other side of the mountain. The Mujahadeen thwarted a communist take- over with their strong will to resist and the AK-47. This is important to you because it illustrates what an effective weapon the AK-47 is, and in the hands of a well-trained rifleman, what can be accomplished. Importance This is important to you as a Marine because there is not a battlefield or conflict that you will be deployed to, where you will not find a Kalashnikov AK-47 or variant. In This Lesson This lesson will cover history, evolution, description, and characteristics of foreign weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 3:19-Cv-01537-BEN-JLB Document 115 Filed 06/04/21 Pageid.10515 Page 1 of 94
    Case 3:19-cv-01537-BEN-JLB Document 115 Filed 06/04/21 PageID.10515 Page 1 of 94 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JAMES MILLER, et al., Case No.: 19-cv-1537-BEN (JLB) 11 Plaintiffs, DECISION 12 v. 13 ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of 14 California, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Like the Swiss Army Knife, the popular AR-15 rifle is a perfect combination of 19 home defense weapon and homeland defense equipment. Good for both home and battle, 20 the AR-15 is the kind of versatile gun that lies at the intersection of the kinds of firearms 21 protected under District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and United States v 22 Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939). Yet, the State of California makes it a crime to have an AR- 23 15 type rifle. Therefore, this Court declares the California statutes to be unconstitutional. 24 Plaintiffs challenge a net of interlocking statutes which impose strict criminal 25 restrictions on firearms that fall under California’s complex definition of the ignominious 26 “assault weapon.” Hearings on a preliminary injunction were consolidated with a trial on 27 the merits pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 65(a)(2). Having considered the evidence, the Court 28 1 19-cv-1537-BEN (JLB) Case 3:19-cv-01537-BEN-JLB Document 115 Filed 06/04/21 PageID.10516 Page 2 of 94 1 issues these findings of fact and conclusions of law,1 finds for the Plaintiffs, and enters 2 Judgment accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • Weaponomics: the Global Market for Assault Rifles
    WEAPONOMICS: THE GLOBAL MARKET FOR ASSAULT RIFLES Phillip Killicoat Department of Economics Oxford University This paper introduces the first effort to quantitatively document the small arms market by collating field reports and journalist accounts to produce a cross-country time-series price index of Kalashnikov assault rifles. A model of the small arms market is developed and empirically estimated to identify the key determinants of assault rifle prices. Variables which proxy the effective height of trade barriers for illicit trade are consistently significant in determining weapon price variation. When controlling for other factors, the collapse of the Soviet Union does not have as large an impact on weapon prices as is generally believed. Key words: small arms, Kalashnikov prices, black market 1 INTRODUCTION Small arms are estimated to be responsible for between 200,000 - 400,000 deaths around the world each year. Approximately 20,000 – 100,000 of these firearm deaths occur in conflict settings (Small Arms Survey 2005, Kopel, Gallant and Eisen 2004, and Lacina and Gleditsch 2005). As economic commodities, firearms are subject to the forces of demand and supply and are actively traded on legal and illicit markets. The small arms market may be viewed as a function of the incentives and constraints faced by buyers, suppliers and regulators. This paper introduces cross-country, time-series data on assault rifle prices thus making it possible to quantitatively examine the nature of the small arms market. Small arms are attractive tools of violence for several reasons. They are widely available, low in cost, extremely lethal, simple to use, durable, highly portable, easily concealed, and possess legitimate military, police, and civilian uses.
    [Show full text]
  • “Assault Weapon” Myths
    “ASSAULT WEAPON” MYTHS E. Gregory Wallace Scary black rifles that spray bullets like machine guns. Military arms designed solely for killing on the battlefield. Weapons of choice for mass shooters. These are common descriptions of so-called “assault weapons,” a favorite target for those who want to eliminate gun violence by eliminating guns. Several states and localities currently ban “assault weapons,” as did the federal government from 1994-2004. In response to recent mass shootings, bills have been introduced in Congress to create a new national ban. Lawmakers and judges often use these descriptions to justify such bans. But are the descriptions factual? If not, what does that say about the laws and court decisions that rely on them? While there is no generally agreed-upon definition of “assault weapon,” laws banning such weapons typically criminalize possession or transfer of semiautomatic rifles with detachable magazines and at least one specified feature such as a pistol grip, telescoping stock, flash suppressor, barrel shroud, bayonet mount, or grenade launcher.1 Other “assault weapon” bans prohibit certain semiautomatic rifles, shotguns, and pistols by name and by features, along with any copies, duplicates, or variants.2 The main target of these bans is the AR-15 rifle, the most popular rifle in America, owned by millions for lawful purposes including self-defense.3 The AR-15 looks like a fully automatic military M4 carbine or M16 rifle, but it has a semiautomatic firing system like most modern handguns. Legislatures imposing “assault Professor of Law, Campbell University School of Law. Professor Wallace is a competitive shooter and certified firearms instructor.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Saiga AK-74 Assault Rifle Used in the Dallas
    Understanding the Saiga AK-74 Assault Rifle Used in the Dallas Police Shooting Violence Policy Center July 2016 Violence Policy Center www.vpc.org The Saiga AK‐74 Assault Rifle On Thursday, July 7, 2016, Micah Johnson opened fire with a Russian‐made Saiga AK‐74 assault rifle at a peaceful protest rally in Dallas that left five law enforcement officers dead and nine injured, as well as injuring two private citizens, in the most deadly attack on law enforcement since 9/11. In 2014, according to an analysis by the Violence Policy Center, one in five law enforcement officers slain in the line of duty were killed with an assault weapon.i In addition to the Saiga assault rifle equipped with high‐capacity detachable ammunition magazines, Johnson was reportedly also carrying a Glock pistol and a Fraser 25 caliber pistol. Johnson had reportedly bought an AK‐style assault rifle for $600 in 2014 in a private sale arranged through Facebook with the transfer taking place at a Target parking lot, although it is not clear whether it was the weapon used in the Dallas attack. Johnson told the seller that he wanted the assault rifle because he missed the firepower of such rifles since returning to the U.S. from serving in Afghanistan. The Saiga AK‐74 is a classic assault rifle and incorporates many of the characteristics that make this category of firearm so lethal and distinguish it from sporting rifles (see later section Key Points About Assault Weapons). The Saiga is made in Russia by Concern Kalashnikov,ii the manufacturer of the infamous AK‐47 assault rifle.
    [Show full text]
  • Documenting Small Arms and Light Weapons a Basic Guide
    Issue Brief Number 14 July 2015 Documenting Small Arms and Light Weapons A Basic Guide Introduction of accurate identification of arms and both civilian and military weapons that munitions, the basic elements of arms fire a projectile, with the condition that This Issue Brief was written with a tracing, and the relevant legal frame- the unit or system may be carried by an range of professionals in mind. For work, this Issue Brief offers a step-by- individual or a small number of people, those who are involved in the military step approach to documenting small or transported by a pack animal or a or law enforcement communities, or arms and light weapons. It also features light vehicle. This Issue Brief covers who spend time in conflict zones as a section on safety procedures (see techniques applicable to the following journalists or with non-governmental Box 1) and guidelines for undertaking small arms and light weapons: organizations (NGOs) or government documentation work in the field (see agencies, this Brief should provide some Box 2). The Brief concludes with a section small arms: handguns, rifles and insight into the often-murky world on the weapon that is most commonly carbines, assault rifles, shotguns, of arms identification. It is designed observed in conflict zones: the AK rifle sub-machine guns, and light and to serve as a basic how-to guide for and its variants, copies, and derivatives. medium (‘general-purpose’) machine recording relevant identification char- guns; and acteristics of small arms and light light weapons: heavy machine weapons that may be encountered Scope of this Issue Brief guns, grenade launchers, portable in the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Statement of Kristen Rand Legislative Director Violence Policy Center
    STATEMENT OF KRISTEN RAND LEGISLATIVE DIRECTOR VIOLENCE POLICY CENTER BEFORE THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARING “PROTECTING AMERICA FROM ASSAULT WEAPONS” September 25, 2019 Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and members of the committee, for this opportunity to present the views of the Violence Policy Center (VPC).1 The VPC is a national non-profit educational organization working to prevent violence. The VPC has studied the firearms industry for more than 30 years. What is a Semiautomatic Assault Weapon? Semiautomatic assault weapons are civilian versions of automatic military assault rifles (like the M-16 and AK-47), automatic military assault pistols (like the UZI), and semiautomatic shotguns with military features (such as the ability to accept a detachable ammunition magazine). Semiautomatic assault rifles look the same as their military counterparts because they are virtually identical, save for one feature: military assault rifles are machine guns. A machine gun fires continuously as long as the trigger is held back or in bursts of multiple shots with one trigger pull. Civilian assault rifles are semiautomatic weapons. The trigger of a semiautomatic weapon must be pulled back separately for each round fired. Because federal law has banned the sale of new machine guns to civilians since 1986, and heavily regulates sales to civilians of older machine guns, there is virtually no civilian market for fully automatic assault weapons. The gun industry introduced semiautomatic versions of military assault weapons in order to create and exploit new civilian markets for these deadly weapons. Assault weapons did not “just happen.” They were developed to meet well-defined combat needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Treasury Study on Sporting Suitability of Modified Semiautomatic Assault
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. Executive Summary………………………………………………………… 1 2. Background…………………………………………………………………. 4 3. Defining the Type of Weapon Under Review………………………………. 16 4. Scope of “Sporting Purposes”………………………………………………. 16 5. Method of Study…………………………………………………………….. 19 6. Suitability for Sporting Purposes……………………………………………. 21 7. Determination……………………………………………………………….. 36 8. Exhibits: White House Memorandum: Importation of Modified Semiautomatic Assault-type Rifles Study Rifle Models Study Rifles ATF Form 4590, Factoring Criteria for Weapons Military Configuration Memorandum to File From First Meeting of Firearms Advisory Panel State Fish and Game Commission Review 9. Appendix: Summary of Externally Gathered Information 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On November 14, 1997, the President and the Secretary of the Treasury ordered a review of the importation of certain modified versions of semiautomatic assault rifles into the United States.1 The decision to conduct this review stemmed in part from concerns expressed by members of Congress and others that the rifles being imported were essentially the same as semiautomatic assault rifles previously determined to be nonimportable in a 1989 decision by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF). The decision also stemmed from the fact that nearly 10 years had passed since the last comprehensive review of the importation of rifles, and many new rifles had been developed during this time. Under 18 U.S.C. section 925(d)(3), the Secretary shall approve applications for importation only when the firearms are generally recognized as particularly suitable for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes (the “sporting purposes test”). In 1989, ATF denied applications to import a series of semiautomatic versions of automatic-fire military assault rifles.
    [Show full text]
  • Assault Weapons Revisited Policy Options for Regulating Rifles, Shotguns, and Other Firearms 20 Years After the Passage of the Assault Weapons Ban
    AP PHOTO/ALEX BRANDON, FILE BRANDON, PHOTO/ALEX AP Assault Weapons Revisited Policy Options for Regulating Rifles, Shotguns, and Other Firearms 20 Years After the Passage of the Assault Weapons Ban By Arkadi Gerney and Chelsea Parsons September 2014 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Assault Weapons Revisited Policy Options for Regulating Rifles, Shotguns, and Other Firearms 20 Years After the Passage of the Assault Weapons Ban By Arkadi Gerney and Chelsea Parsons September 2014 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 3 The evolution of regulations on different classes of firearms 6 Current laws treat handguns and long guns differently 9 The impact of the assault weapons ban 11 Use of long guns in homicides and violent crime 15 Six recommendations for regulating long guns, assault weapons, and other firearms 19 Conclusion 21 Endnotes Introduction and summary Today—20 years after President Bill Clinton signed the federal assault weapons ban into law in September 1994 and a decade after Congress allowed that law to lapse—the question of whether and how to regulate particularly lethal firearms is no longer the primary focus of the national gun debate. While the question of what to do about the proliferation of certain military-style rifles—so-called “assault weapons”—remains open, advocates for stronger gun laws have recently focused on the question of who may possess guns, rather than which type of guns should receive heightened regulation. In the wake of the December 2012 massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, President Barack Obama, congressional leaders, and gun-violence prevention advocates alike made deterring dangerous people from accessing guns the top legislative priority with a proposal for comprehensive background checks for all gun sales.
    [Show full text]
  • Rwanda Country Report
    SALW Guide Global distribution and visual identification Rwanda Country report https://salw-guide.bicc.de Weapons Distribution SALW Guide Weapons Distribution The following list shows the weapons which can be found in Rwanda and whether there is data on who holds these weapons: AK-47 / AKM G N HK G3 G AK-74 U IWI Tavor TAR-21 G Browning M 2 G MAS 49/56 U FN FAL G MP UZI G FN Herstal FN MAG G RPG 7 G FN High Power U Simonov SKS G Explanation of symbols Country of origin Licensed production Production without a licence G Government: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is held by Governmental agencies. N Non-Government: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is held by non-Governmental armed groups. U Unspecified: Sources indicate that this type of weapon is found in the country, but do not specify whether it is held by Governmental agencies or non-Governmental armed groups. It is entirely possible to have a combination of tags beside each country. For example, if country X is tagged with a G and a U, it means that at least one source of data identifies Governmental agencies as holders of weapon type Y, and at least one other source confirms the presence of the weapon in country X without specifying who holds it. Note: This application is a living, non-comprehensive database, relying to a great extent on active contributions (provision and/or validation of data and information) by either SALW experts from the military and international renowned think tanks or by national and regional focal points of small arms control entities.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Basic AK Type Rifle Identification Jonathan Ferguson & N.R
    Armament Research Services Pty. Ltd. t + 61 8 6365 4401 e [email protected] w www.armamentresearch.com ARES Research Note 6 – An Introduction to Basic AK Type Rifle Identification Jonathan Ferguson & N.R. Jenzen-Jones Introduction The AK rifle, designed in 1947 as the Avtomat Kalashnikova obraztsa 1947 or ‘Kalashnikov Automatic Rifle, model 1947’, represents perhaps the definitive assault rifle design. The development and introduction of the assault rifle represented an important mid-ground for automatic weapons between machine guns, firing full-power rifle cartridges, and submachine guns, firing pistol calibre cartridges. The so-called ‘intermediate cartridge’ allowed for riflemen to deliver comparatively accurate and lethal automatic fire at ranges greater than submachine guns could operate. Early assault rifles were informed by the experiences of the Second World War, which saw close-in fighting in urban terrain and jungles, rather than the longer range engagements of many previous conflicts. The Avtomat Kalashnikova (AK), often referred to in the West as the ‘AK-47’, refined the assault rifle concept, fusing together desirable design features from a number of earlier weapons. It was cheap to produce, reliable, and chambered for the effective 7.62 x 39 mm cartridge. AK type rifles are simple to operate, require little maintenance to remain functional, and can be produced using comparatively rudimentary production machinery. The Soviet Union not only exported vast quantities of AK type rifles (especially the AKM or Avtomat Kalashnikova Modernizirovanniy; ‘Kalashnikov automatic rifle, modernised’, introduced in 1959), but also allowed for the transfer of manufacturing technology and blueprints to a number of satellite states and close allies.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Sporting Rifle Facts the Modern Sporting Rifle, Based on the AR-15 Platform, Is Widely Misunderstood
    Dear Distinguished Members of this Task Force, Below is fact information regarding the AR-15. I urge you to consider this information in your meetings. Modern Sporting Rifle Facts The modern sporting rifle, based on the AR-15 platform, is widely misunderstood. Why? Confusion exists because while these rifles may cosmetically look like military rifles, they do not function the same way. Also, groups wanting to ban these rifles have for years purposely or through ignorance spread misinformation about them to aid their cause. The National Shooting Sports Foundation asks you to be an Download a Pocket Fact Card informed gun owner and to use the following facts to correct misconceptions about these rifles. Remember, that if AR-15-style modern sporting rifles are banned, your favorite traditional-looking hunting or target shooting semi-automatic firearm could be banned, too. AR-15-platform rifles are among the most popular firearms being sold. They are today's modern sporting rifle. The AR in "AR-15" rifle stands for ArmaLite rifle, after the company that developed it in the 1950s. "AR" does NOT stand for "assault rifle" or "automatic rifle." AR-15-style rifles are NOT "assault weapons" or "assault rifles." An assault rifle is fully automatic -- a machine gun. Automatic firearms have been severely restricted from civilian ownership since 1934. If someone calls an AR-15-style rifle an "assault weapon," he or she either supports banning these firearms or does not understand their function and sporting use, or both. Please correct them. "Assault weapon" is a political term created by California anti-gun legislators to ban some semi-automatic rifles there in the 1980s.
    [Show full text]