Death by 1000 Cuts Full Monograph 2020-06-05
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lyn Nofziger Papers
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt438nf37f No online items Register of the Lyn Nofziger papers Finding aid prepared by Hoover Institution Library and Archives Staff. Revised in 2014 by Haidar Hadi Hoover Institution Library and Archives © 2010 434 Galvez Mall Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6003 [email protected] URL: http://www.hoover.org/library-and-archives Register of the Lyn Nofziger 2010C32 1 papers Title: Lyn Nofziger papers Date (inclusive): 1919-2004 Collection Number: 2010C32 Contributing Institution: Hoover Institution Library and Archives Language of Material: English Physical Description: 22 manuscript boxes, 1 oversize box, 1 motion picture film reel, 1 videotape reel(8.0 Linear Feet) Abstract: The papers primarily consist of Nofziger's writings as reporter, political consultant, writer and satirical poet; collected materials relating to political conditions in California and the United States, and documents generated from work with Republican candidates including Richard M. Nixon and Ronald Reagan. Also included are materials regarding United States vs. Nofziger pertaining to his alleged violation of the Ethics in Government Act. Creator: Nofziger, Lyn Hoover Institution Library & Archives Access The collection is open for research; materials must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Publication Rights For copyright status, please contact the Hoover Institution Library & Archives. Acquisition Information Acquired by the Hoover Institution Library & Archives -
Weights and Measures Standards of the United States: a Brief History
1 .0 11 8 1.25 1.4 I 6_ DOCUMENT RESUME ED 142 418 SE 022 719 AUTHOE Judson, Lewis V. TITLE Weights and Measures Standards of the United States: A Brief History. Updated Edition. INSTITUTION National Bureau of Standards (DOC) ,Washington, D.C. REPORT NO NBS-SP-447 PUB DATE Mar 76 NOTE 42p.; Contains occasional small print; Photographs may not reproduce well AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402 (Stock Number 003-0O3-01654-3, $1.00) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 HC-$2.06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Government Publications; History; *Mathematics Education; *Measurement; *Metric System; *Science History; *Standards ABSTRACT This document was published by the National Bureau of Standards to meet the current demand for information on the history of weights and measures in the United States. It includes an illustrated discussion of this history through 1962 followed by an addendum covering the period 1963-1975. Appendices provide a bibliography and photographic copies of eight documents important to the development of official standards of measurement. (SD) *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * materials not available from other sources. ERIC makes every effort * * -to obtain the best copy available. Nevertheless, items of marginal * * reproducibility are often encountered and this affects the quality * * of the microfiche and hardcopy reproductions ERIC makes available * via the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS). EDRS is not * responsible for the quality of the original document. Reproductions * * supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original. *********************************************************************** U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. -
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 119 998 an Act to Declare a National Policy
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 119 998 SE 020 412 TITLE An Act to Declare a National Policy of Coordinating the Increasing Use of the Metric System in the United States, and to Establish a United States Metric Board to Coordinate the Voluntary Conversion to the Metric System. Public Law 94-168, Ninety-Fourth Congress, H. R. 8674, December 23, 1975. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. House. PUB DATE 23 Dec 75 NOTE 7p.; Not availalbe in hard copy due to small print EDRS PRICE MF-$0.83 Plus Postage. HC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS Curriculum; Elementary Secondary Education; *Federal Legislation; *Mathematics Education; *Measurement; *Metric System; *Public Education; Vocabulary IDENTIFIERS Congressional Record; *Metric Conversion Act 1975 ABSTRACT The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 was passed on December 23, 1975; the act is printed in full in this document, which is excerpted from the Congressional Record. The act provides for the establishment of a 17-member Metric Board, and charges the board with responsibility for devising and executing a program of planning, coordination, and public education. Specifically, the board is to consult with representatives of industries, agencies, and interest groups which are concerned with metrication; plan, facilitate, and publicize conversion programs; and consult with international organizations concerning recognition of United States metric standards. In the area of education the board is obliged to conduct public information programs, and consult with governmental agencies concerned with education to insure that the metric system is included in the curriculum. The board is also charged with conducting periodic research concerning the effectiveness of conversi,,ni (SD) *********************************************************************** Documents acquired by ERIC include many informal unpublished * materials not available from other sources. -
Folder: 16-20-H.R. Haldeman
Richard Nixon Presidential Library Contested Materials Collection Folder List Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 16 20 2/11/1972 Campaign Memo From: Jeb S. Magruder To: The Attorney General RE: Operating Plan for the Wisconsin Primary. 13 pgs. 16 20 Campaign Other Document Graphs RE: Trend of Republican Support by Congressional District. 4 pgs. 16 20 Campaign Other Document Special Survey-The Wisconsin Democratic Primary.1 pg. 16 20 Campaign Memo From: Arthur Renander Jr. To: Senator Robert P. Knowles RE: 1972 Wisconsin Primary Considerations. 8 pgs. Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 1 of 3 Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 16 20 Campaign Other Document General Statement RE: Media Proposals, Wisconsin Primary Campaign. 10 pgs. 16 20 Campaign Letter From: L.B. Thomas To: Mr. Forte RE: Volunteer Card for President Nixon. 2 pgs. 16 20 2/9/1972 Campaign Other Document Wisconsin Primary Speaking Events Prior to April 4, 1972. 1 pg. 16 20 2/26/1972 Campaign Memo From: Hugn W. Sloan Jr. To: Gordon Strachan RE: Finance Committee for the Re- Election of the President. 4 pgs. 16 20 2/28/1972 Campaign Memo From: Lyn Nofziger To: Ronald Reagan RE: California Campaign. 2 pgs. Monday, March 07, 2011 Page 2 of 3 Box Number Folder Number Document Date No Date Subject Document Type Document Description 16 20 2/12/1972 Campaign Memo From: Lyn Nofziger To: Ronald Reagan RE: California Campaign. 1 pg. 16 20 2/19/1972 Campaign Memo From: Lyn Nofziger To: Ronald Reagan RE: California Campaign. -
Weights and Measures Standards of the United States—A Brief History (1963), by Lewis V
WEIGHTS and MEASURES STANDARDS OF THE UMIT a brief history U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS NBS Special Publication 447 WEIGHTS and MEASURES STANDARDS OF THE TP ii 2ri\ ii iEa <2 ^r/V C II llinCAM NBS Special Publication 447 Originally Issued October 1963 Updated March 1976 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Wash., D.C. 20402. Price $1; (Add 25 percent additional for other than U.S. mailing). Stock No. 003-003-01654-3 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 76-600055 Foreword "Weights and Measures," said John Quincy Adams in 1821, "may be ranked among the necessaries of life to every individual of human society." That sentiment, so appropriate to the agrarian past, is even more appropriate to the technology and commerce of today. The order that we enjoy, the confidence we place in weighing and measuring, is in large part due to the measure- ment standards that have been established. This publication, a reprinting and updating of an earlier publication, provides detailed information on the origin of our standards for mass and length. Ernest Ambler Acting Director iii Preface to 1976 Edition Two publications of the National Bureau of Standards, now out of print, that deal with weights and measures have had widespread use and are still in demand. The publications are NBS Circular 593, The Federal Basis for Weights and Measures (1958), by Ralph W. Smith, and NBS Miscellaneous Publication 247, Weights and Measures Standards of the United States—a Brief History (1963), by Lewis V. -
Weights and Measures Standards of the United States
r WEIGHTS and MEASURES STANDARDS OF THE C7 FTr^ E a brief history U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS Miscellaneous Pyblicataon 247 National Bureau of Standards MAY 2 0 1954 U.S. Prototype Kilogram 20, the standard of mass of the United States. U.S. Prototype Meter Bar 27, the standard of length of the United States from 1893 to I960. On October 14, I960, the meter was redefined in terms of a wavelength of the krypton 86 atom. EIGHTS and MEASURES S. DEPARTMENT STANDARDS F COMMERCE fhcr H. Hodges, Secretary OF THE MIONAL BUREAU F STAN D ARDS V. Astin, Director a brief history LEWIS V. iUDSON NBS Miscellaneous Publication 247 Issued October 1963 (Supersedes Scientific Paper No. 17 and Miscellaneous Publication No. 64) Fo^ sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washinston, D.C., 20402 - 35 cents Preface In 1905, Louis A. Fischer, then a distinguished metrologist on the stafF of the National Bureau of Standards, presented a paper entitled "History of the Standard Weights and Measures of the United States" before the First Annual Meeting of the Sealers of Weights and Measures of the United States. This paper quickly came to be considered a classic in its field. It was published by the National Bureau of Standards several times— most recently in 1925 as Miscellaneous Publication 64. For some time it has been out of print and in need of up-to-date revision. The present publication covers the older historical material that Fischer so ably treated; in addition, it includes a brief summary of important later developments affecting the units and standards for length and mass. -
Convention Speech Material 8/14/80 [1]
Convention Speech Material 8/14/80 [1] Folder Citation: Collection: Office of Staff Secretary; Series: Presidential Files; Folder: Convention Speech material 8/14/80 [1]; Container 171 To See Complete Finding Aid: http://www.jimmycarterlibrary.gov/library/findingaids/Staff_Secretary.pdf . �- . "". ·· . · : . .... .... , . 1980 · DEMOCRATIC PLATFORM SUMMARY .··.. · I. ECONOMY··. Tliis was·· one.of ·the mOst .. dfffibult sections to develop in the way we. wan:ted,.>for there wei�· considerable ··.support among the Platform committee .members for a,' stronger·· ant-i�recession program than we have 'adopted. to date·. senator :Kennedy's $1.2.·bili'ion'·stimulus ·prOpof>al was v�ry · attraeffive to ·many .. CoiiUJlitte.e ine.�bers, but in the . end •We were able to hold our members.' Another major problem q()ri.cerned the frankness with which· we wanted to recognize our current ecohomic situation. we ultimately .decided, co:r-rectly I believe, to recognize that we are in a recession, that unemployment is rising, and that there are no easy solutions.to these problems. Finally, the Kennedy people repeatedly wanted to include language stating that no action would be taken which would have any significant increase in unemployment. We successfully resisted this .by saying no such action would be taken with that .intent or design, but Kennedy will still seek a majority plank at the Convention on this subject. A. Economic Strength -- Solutions to Our Economic Problems 1. Full Employment. There is a commitment to achieve the Humphrey�Hawkins goals, at the cu�rently pre scribed dates. we successfully resi�ted.effdrts:to move these goals back to those origiilally ·prescribed· by this legislation. -
DOCUMENT RESUME BD 090 028 SE 017 598 TITLE Metric
DOCUMENT RESUME BD 090 028 SE 017 598 TITLE Metric Conversion Act of 1973. Hearing Before the Committee on Commerce, United States Senate, 93rd Congress, First Session on S. 100. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. Senate Committee on Commerce. PUB DATE 2 Nov 73 NOTE 94p. EDRS PRICE MF-$0.75 HC-$4.20 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTCRS *Economic Factors; *Federal Legislation; Government Publications; Mathematics Education; *Measurement; *Metric System; Reference Materials; Standards ABSTRACT The complete text of the Senate till to make the metric system the predominate system of measurement in the U.S. is given. Next follows testimony of witnesses: Senators, governmental agencies, representatives of labor unions and industries and the director of the National Bureau of Standards. Also included are some letters from other interested sources, including several educators. (LS) METRIC CONVERSION ACT OF 1973 U S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, CC) EDUCATION A WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF C\I EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN NEPRO CD DUCED E.H'TLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSONONORGANIZATION ORIGIN C:::) ATiNG IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NFCESSARILY REPRE a- HEARING SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CD BEFORE THE EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE UNITED STATES SENATE NINETY-THIRD CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON S. 100 TO PROVIDE A NATIONAL PROGRAM IN ORDER TO MAKE THE INTERNATIONAL METRIC SYSTEM THE PREDOMI- NANT BUT NOT EXCLUSIVE SYSTEM OF MEASUREMENT IN THE UNITED STATES AND TO PROVIDE FOR CONVERT- ING TO THE GENERAL USE OF SUCH SYSTEM WITHIN TEN YEARS NOVEMBER 2, 1973 Serial No. 93-50 Printed for the use of the Committee on Commerce U.S. -
Metrication Leaders Guide 2009
Metrication Leaders Guide This resource book will help make your inevitable upgrade to the metric system easy, smooth, cheap, and fast. Pat Naughtin 2009 2 of 89 Make your upgrade to the metric system easy, smooth, cheap, and fast Decision making for metrication leaders !! " ! # $ Appendices % & % ! !! ' ! ( )% ' !* " " + , -&..)--/& , - ,$ # ! ,, 0 * + # ( http://metricationmatters.com [email protected] 3 of 89 Make your upgrade to the metric system easy, smooth, cheap, and fast. Deciding on a metrication program confirms that you are a metrication leader – not a follower. You have the courage to stand aside from the crowd, decide what you think is best for yourself and for others, and you are prepared to differ from other people in your class, your work group, your company, or your industry. As a metrication leader, you will soon discover three things: 1 Metrication is technically a simple process. 2 Metrication doesn't take long if you pursue a planned and timed program. 3 Metrication can provoke deeply felt anti-metrication emotions in people who have had no measurement experience with metric measures, or people who have difficulty with change. The first two encourage confidence – it's simple and it won't take long – but the third factor can give you an intense feeling of isolation when you first begin your metrication program. You feel you are learning a new language (you are – a new measuring language), while people around you not only refuse to learn this language, but will do what they can to prevent you from growing and from making progressive developments in your life. The purpose of this book is to give you some supporting arguments to use in your metrication process. -
Voluntary Metric Labeling Will Be Implemented: Concerns and Benefits
DECEMBER 2009 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 THE METRIC SYSTEM IS THE PREFERRED MEASUREMENT SYSTEM FOR TRADE AND COMMERCE IN THE UNITED STATES AND AROUND THE WORLD he United States adopted the metric system1 for use in trade and commerce in 1866. In 1975 Congress adopted the Metric Conversion Act declaring that the transition to the metric system would be T voluntary. In 1988 Congress declared that the metric system was the preferred system of measurement for trade and commerce for this country but it failed to eliminate all of the legal barriers to its use. In 1992 Congress amended the Fair Packaging and Labeling Act (FPLA) to require metric units on packaged goods so consumers would become familiar with those quantities. Under the current FPLA,2 the net quantity of contents declarations on packages of consumer goods must include both inch‐pound and metric units (“dual‐units” labeling). The purpose of the proposed amendment to FPLA that is shown below is to give packagers the option of displaying only metric units in the net quantity of contents statements on packages. The proposal includes a provision to allow the Secretary of Commerce to provide national coordination of industry conversion on a sector by sector basis to ensure uniformity. The proposal would allow packagers to continue to also display inch‐pound units on packages indefinitely. Prior to 1992, the FPLA required a declaration of quantity to be in inch‐pound units as a dual quantity statement. This meant that a package had to include both ounces and the largest whole unit (e.g., 32 ounces [2 lb]) in the net quantity statement, and ounces had to be primary or listed first. -
NOFZIGER Was to Override Supreme Court Decisions That Rejected the Notion of Racial .Imbal- Lyn Nofziger Ance As Prima Facie Evidence of Employer Discrimination
was unable to find one television show ’ The later reactions-probably the which liberal judges have cloaked their portraying a white male being damaged result of xeroxed copies reaching affir- corruption of the law. These letters rash- by affirmative action. mative action enforcers who don’t nor- ly echoed the response of the California Lynch cites a typical result of this mally bother to read the business press- prisons official quoted by Lynch. Asked systematic denial of reality: California expressed outrage that the article had about reverse discrimination against Democratic Congressman Don Edwards, appeared at all. And there was none of white officers, “He simply smirked and a mouthpiece,of the civil rights establish- this elaborate flimflam about the equal stated, ‘It’s your turn now.’ ” ment, was able to get away with claiming opportunity meaning equal outcomes or This is an argument that even George on the New York Times op-ed page that remediality or transitional periods with Bush could have won. Cl quotas did not exist-within weeks of three Supreme Court decisions about them. And supporters insisted that the (Bush-backed) 1991 Civil Rights Act did not impose quotas, although its key point NOFZIGER was to override Supreme Court decisions that rejected the notion of racial .imbal- Lyn Nofziger ance as prima facie evidence of employer discrimination. The result is a “spiral of’silence,” Regnery Gateway 1370 pages/$21.95 whereby people assume their doubts are not shared and suppress them, thus mutu- ally intimidating each other. But opinion reviewed by VICTOR GOLD polls show quotas are overwhelmingly unpopular, even with the “protected class- es” themselves. -
What Is Metrication?
What is metrication? Pat Naughtin Metrication is the process of upgrading from any of the many and various old pre-metric measurement methods to the modern metric system, which is technically known as The International System of Units (SI). Metrication began in France in the 1790s and then spread rapidly to all other nations in the world. Gradually, through the 1800s, the metric system replaced all of the numerous old historical weighing and measuring methods. By 1900, almost all nations had passed laws that accepted the metric system for use in trade, and during the late 1800s this usually translated into widespread use of the metric system by the public. The metric system is now used by all of the world's people in all nations. The philosopher, Condorcet, proved to be correct when, in 1791, he described the original metric system as: For all people; for all time. As examples, the USA has allowed metric measuring units since 1866, and the UK since 1873. Liberia and Myanmar are the only nations that have not yet passed specific metric laws but the metric system is used in both of those countries every day. Only in France, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America has there been any significant opposition to metrication, the main objections being based on history, tradition, aesthetics, economic conjecture, and a personal distaste for foreign ideas. In France and Japan the opposition faded as soon as people regularly used the metric system. This left only two nations, the UK and the USA, with citizens who have difficulty accepting the reality of worldwide metrication.