PART 1. STRATEGY July 2015 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Workshop East
Co-Making: Research into London’s Open access Makerspaces and Shared Workshops Workshop East January 2015 Co-Making Spaces Study © Workshop East 1 Contents Executive summary 4 Introduction 8 A full report prepared for the London Legacy Development Corporation Key Definitions 9 and the Greater London Authority Methodology 10 Disciplines 12 Background 14 1: Initial findings and overview 17 Map of co-making spaces 18 Summary 38 Research 2014 Published January 2015 2: Workshop Profiles 39 Profiled organisations 40 Chart of profiled organisations 44 3: Themes & Case Studies 47 3.1: Setup & Management 51 Themes & Trends 74 by Workshop East 3.2: Supporting Enterprise & Business Growth 91 Themes & Trends 96 3.3: Community & Placemaking 103 with Themes & Trends 108 Engel Hadley Kirk & Rhianon Morgan-Hatch 4. Conclusions & Recommendations 110 4.1 Setup, management and space requirements 110 4.2 Supporting Enterprise & Business Growth 111 4.3 Community & Placemaking 113 4.4 Planning Strategy 114 4.5 Public Sector Collaboration 116 Glossary 119 Co-making spaces - data table 120 List of Supplementary Data 124 2 Co-Making Spaces Study © Workshop East Co-Making Spaces Study © Workshop East 3 Executive summary Workshop East was commissioned by the The second section profiles 22 spaces located London Legacy Development Corporation across London. It illustrates a variety of (LLDC) and the Greater London Authority operational models within the sector. This (GLA) to undertake research into ‘co-making’ section of information provides a greater level within London. of detail from a selection of representative spaces. Co-making as a sector and as a type of workplace was highlighted in the Local Gathered through visits and interviews, this Economy Study1 and the Artist’s Workspace information is presented in photographic and Study2 produced in 2014 by We Made That, chart form to invite constructive comparisons and in the 2014 GLA commissioned report between spaces. -
Growth Sectors and SME Workspace Study
Tower Hamlets Growth Sectors and SME Workspace Study A Final Report by Regeneris Consulting, We Made That, AspinallVerdi and the Business Centre Specialist London Borough of Tower Hamlets Tower Hamlets Growth Sectors and SME Workspace Study April 2016 Regeneris Consulting Ltd www.regeneris.co.uk Tower Hamlets Growth Sectors and SME Workspace Study Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Study Background and Focus 2 3. Economy and Growth Sectors 9 4. Workspace Supply and Demand 42 5. Economic and Workspace Trajectory 84 6. Moving Forward: Maintaining and Enhancing Workspace Supply 97 All Photography Courtesy of We Made That Tower Hamlets Growth Sectors and SME Workspace Study 1. Introduction Report Contents 1.6 The report is presented in the following chapters: 1.1 Regeneris Consulting, We Made That, AspinallVerdi and the Business Chapter 2: Study Background and Focus Centre Specialist were commissioned to undertake a mapping of Tower Hamlets’ small business and enterprise economy, with a Chapter 2: Economy and Growth Sectors specific focus on economic growth sectors and on demand for and Chapter 3: Workspace Supply and Demand supply of SME workspace. Chapter 4: Economic Trajectory Work Undertaken Chapter 5: Summary and Recommendations. 1.2 The research has comprised a mix of both secondary and primary research. 1.3 To understand the characteristics and trajectory of the Tower Hamlets economy, we have drawn on a range of statistical sources, including the Inter-Departmental Business Register, UK Business Count, ONS Business Demography, Business Register and Employment Survey, the Annual Population Survey and the ONS Census. 1.4 Our mapping of workspace supply in the Borough draws on a mix of desk based research, observational research / site visits and consultation with workspace providers. -
Designing Place Topologies of Maker Labs
Designing Place Topologies of Maker Labs Sascha Rashof PhD Cultural Studies Centre for Cultural Studies Goldsmiths College I declare that the work presented in this thesis is my own. 2 Acknowledgements First of all, I would like to thank my (co-)supervisors Prof. Scott Lash, Dr. Luciana Parisi and Prof. Bernard Stiegler. I also want to thank the Arts and Humanities Research Council for funding this project for three years. I am grateful to my interviewees who generously donated their time, especially to Amitraj Deshmukh and his family for their assistance and care in India. Thanks to Matthew Holder for his support in academic as well as personal matters and for making life as enjoyable as it could be throughout writing up. I finally want to thank Dr. David Cunningham for his help in all things Heideggerian. 3 Abstract This PhD thesis is working towards a techno-social ontology of ‘place’. Place [topos] has been an underdeveloped concept in modern philosophical thought in ‘the West’, mainly subordinated to the more universal/ising terms time and space. Also media theory has often used conceptions of time as its primary category due to its foundation on notions of ‘process’. Even though media theory and geography are increasingly converging, however predominantly through conceptions of space, considerable ontological treatments of medial place are still missing. In order to develop a notion of place/s that is more singular and pluralistic than Deleuze and Guattari’s (spatial) rhizomes, which have now largely become the logics of post-Fordism, this thesis works with Peter Sloterdijk’s topo-logy of Spheres – through, with, beyond and against Heidegger’s ontology. -
Affordable Workspace Strategy and the Action Plan
LB Brent Affordable Workspace Strategy September 2020 Affordable Workspace Strategy & Action Plan Foreword Contents Foreword Councillor Shama Tatler, Lead Member for Regeneration, Property and Planning Whilst demand for affordable workspace has strengthens town centres, we must do more to Foreword from Councillor Shama Tatler 3 significantly increased in Brent, supply is failing protect and support existing workspaces, and ensure to keep up. Brent’s business base of small and new development delivers the infrastructure and Executive Summary 4 medum-sized enterprises (SMEs) has grown from workspace that businesses need and can afford. around 10,000 SMEs in 2010 to over 15,000 SMEs today. The continued loss of industrial Business now feels the immediate shock of the Methodology for Evidence Base 5 land and office space to residential development coronavirus pandemic and lockdown. A fifth of and conversion is, however, choking the supply small businesses are at high risk of closure, How Do We Deliver Affordable Workspace? 6 of workspace affordable to small businesses consumer spending is down and the state of the and negatively impacting town centres. Private high street becomes increasingly precarious. Retail, developers, investors and commercial property accommodation, hospitality and construction What is Affordable Workspace? 22 providers have limited appetite to deliver sectors - all vital to Brent’s economy - are viewed as affordable workspace, due to relatively low values, least resilient to recession and face an uncertain and more -
Co:Making: Research Into London's Open Access Makerspaces And
Co-Making: Research into London’s Open access Makerspaces and Shared Workshops Workshop East January 2015 Co-Making Spaces Study 1 A full report prepared for the London Legacy Development Corporation and the Greater London Authority Research 2014 Published January 2015 by Workshop East with Engel Hadley Kirk & Rhianon Morgan-Hatch 2 Co-Making Spaces Study Contents Executive summary 4 Introduction 8 Key Definitions 9 Methodology 10 Disciplines 12 Background 14 1: Initial findings and overview 17 Map of co-making spaces 18 Summary 38 2: Workshop Profiles 39 Profiled organisations 40 Chart of profiled organisations 44 3: Themes & Case Studies 47 3.1: Setup & Management 51 Themes & Trends 74 3.2: Supporting Enterprise & Business Growth 91 Themes & Trends 96 3.3: Community & Placemaking 103 Themes & Trends 108 4. Conclusions & Recommendations 110 4.1 Location and space requirements 110 4.2 Supporting Enterprise & Business Growth 111 4.3 Community & Placemaking 113 4.4 Planning Strategy 114 4.5 Public Sector Collaboration 116 Glossary 119 Co-making spaces - data table 120 List of Supplementary Data 124 Co-Making Spaces Study 3 Executive summary Workshop East was commissioned by the The second section profiles 22 spaces located London Legacy Development Corporation and across London. It illustrates a variety of the Greater London Authority to undertake operational models within the sector. This research into ‘co-making’ within London. section of information provides a greater level of detail from a selection of representative Co-making as a sector and as a type of spaces. workplace was highlighted in the Local Gathered through visits and interviews, this Economy Study and the Artist’s Workspace information is presented in photographic and Study produced in 2014 by We Made That, chart form to invite constructive comparisons and in the 2014 GLA commissioned report between spaces. -
The Internet of Things the Language and Practice of Early Iot Adopters 2011-2013
The Internet of Things The Language and Practice of Early IoT Adopters 2011-2013 Ilze Strazdina Submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen Mary University of London February 2019 1 ABSTRACT This thesis examines the discourse and practice surrounding the technological development of the Internet of Things, and its expansion at the start of the second decade of the 21st century. The initial motivation for the Internet of Things was a fusion of the physical and digital worlds, enabled by pervasive network connectivity: “anything, anytime, anywhere”. Grounded in a rhetoric of a connected world, future sustainability, and improvements brought by the deployment of innovative techno- socio-economic-environmental systems, claims were made that the IoT would not only deliver solutions to humanity’s ever-growing needs, but would also lead to a shift in the very principles governing such systems. This thesis argues for the need to readdress the dominant IoT discourse, not only by an analysis of discourse, but also by an analysis of the practices that fostered the development of this phenomenon. The study at the centre of this thesis is focused on a community of open source developers, artists, architects and computer enthusiasts who were curious about the possibilities opened up by this next stage of technological development, and who went on to test and re-imagine the use and deployment of the IoT. This ethnographic study follows the development of the first IoT platform, the creation of a community- led air quality network, and the emergence of the Open IoT framework. Through an analysis of practice, and an examination of its conceptual content and organisation in language, this thesis reveals how the space of the IoT was imagined, experienced and lived in.