An Analysis of Prejudice and Discrimination in American History X (1998) Film

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Analysis of Prejudice and Discrimination in American History X (1998) Film AN ANALYSIS OF PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION IN AMERICAN HISTORY X (1998) FILM A Thesis Submitted to Letters and Humanities Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Strata One (S1) Muhammad Aji Akasyah 109026000105 ENGLISH LETTERS DEPARTEMENT LETTERS AND HUMANITIES FACULTY STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA 2014 M/1435 H ABSTRACT Muhammad Aji Akasyah, An Analysis of Prejudice and Discrimination in American History X (1998) Film, Thesis: English Letters Department, Adab and Humanities Faculty, State Islamic University of Syarif Hidayatullah. Jakarta, 2014. This reseach studies about American History X film directed by David McKeena on 1998. The analysis is aimed to find out how prejudice and discrimination issues and the relationship between prejudice and discrimination is described through theories of Prejudice and Discrimination by analyzing the characters. From the analysis, there are several characters involved in act of prejudice and discrimination. After that, it can be concluded that there are two forms of the relationship between prejudice and discrimination. There are prejudice that does not lead into discrimination and prejudice that leads into discrimination. i APPROVEMENT AN ANALYSIS OF PREJUDICE AND DISCRIMINATION IN AMERICAN HISTORY X (1998) FILM A Thesis Submitted to Letters and Humanities Faculty in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Strata One (S1) MUHAMMAD AJI AKASYAH 109026000105 Approved by: Drs. Saefudin, M.Pd NIP. 19640710 199303 1 006 (Day/Date: ) ENGLISH LETTERS DEPARTMENT LETTERS AND HUMANITIES FACULTY STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY SYARIF HIDAYATULLAH JAKARTA 2014 ii LEGALIZATION Name : Muhammad Aji Akasyah NIM : 109026000105 Title :An Analysis of Prejudice and Discrimination in American History X (1998) Film The thesis entitled above has been defended before the Letters and Humanities Faculty’s Examination Comittee onApril 3rd, 2014. It has already been accepted as a partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of strata one. Jakarta, April 3rd, 2014 Examination Committee Signature Date 1. Drs. Saefudin, M.Pd. (Chair Person) ____________ _________ 19640710 199303 1 006 2. Elve Oktafiyani, M.Hum. (Secretary) ____________ _________ 19781003 200112 2 002 3. Drs. Saefudin, M.Pd. (Advisor) ____________ _________ 19640710 199303 1 006 4. Inayatul Chusna, M.Hum. (Examiner I) ____________ _________ 19780126 200312 2 002 5. Elve Oktafiyani, M.Hum. (Examiner II) ____________ _________ 19781003 200112 2 002 iii DECLARATION I hereby declare that this submission is my own work and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief. It contains no material previously published or written by another person nor material which to substantial extent has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma of the university or other institute of higher learning, except where due acknowledgement has been made in the text. Jakarta, April 2014 Muhammad Aji Akasyah iv ACKNOWLEDGMENT In the name of Allah SWT, The most merciful and our beloved prophet Muhammad SAW for peace and blessing. My appreciation in the first place goes to my advisor, Maria Ulfa, M. A, M. Hum, for her guidance, support, encouragement, and thought in finishing this thesis. Many people have helped me in different ways to complete this work. I would like to thank, particulary, Dr. H. Abdul Wahid Hasyim, MA, the Dean of the Faculty of Adab and Humanities, Drs. Asep Saefuddin, M.Pd. the Head of the English Letters Department, Elve Oktafiyani, M.Hum, the Secretary of the English Letters Department. In addition, the writer`s appreciation also goes toInayatul Chusna, M.Hum., Arif Rahman Hakim M.Hum., and alllecturers of English Letters Department, who have taught, inspired and educated the writer during his studying at campus. The most appreciation goes to my parents, Asmad Effendi and Romlah. This thesis and all of my work are dedicated to both of them. Their guidance, advice, prays, and supports are irreplaceable and unchangeable through the time. I love you both so much. Moreover, I also would like to thank to my brothers and sisters, Lia, Iqbal, Iqdam, Kheny, and Tia for their support, help, and sharing time. Another best gratitude goes to all my classmates in C class: Gita, Topik, Heri, Chris, Kos, Yudaris, Yan, Agus, Yudhi (Mamat), Hafid, Ai, Icha, Erna, Dwi, Kiki, Ninu, Tiara, Zata, Talitha, Sri, Chusna, Dini and other friends who v can`t be mentioned one by one here. Next, my classmates in literature class: Andra, Ipin, Agung, Mugni, Suyuti, Vanda, Sapta, Kiput, Aida, Emil, Riri, Isti, Iis, Nenden, Syifa, Nanda, and all friends who can`t be listed in this paper. Then, The Bohemians: Gusti, Hakim, Icul. KKN BETA family: Panji, Aponk, Yopie, Icha, Ruhi, Kiki.My Brothers in Arms; Fian, Ludi, Ilham, Faisal, Harris, Oki. After that, goes to the best foreigner teachers; Mr. Kim Caula and Mr. Khadri Fadzil Rahman. Thank you very much for sharing your support, motivation, thought, laught, and joy. And my last praise goes to you. You are the biggest part of my support system. You have give me so much more than I could ever dreamed, your time, joy, and kindness. Thank you for giving me some memorable songs and I will always remember your beautiful voice when you are singing. Thank you for not turning away when things get uncomfortable. Thank you for caring and loving me. Thank you for everything that you have given me. Thank you for being my happiness, dear. You are the very best God’s gift to me, thank you very much. Finally, I hope this paper will be useful and also can give a lot of benefit for students of English Letters Department who want to do the further research about Prejudice and Discrimination. And I realize that this paper is far from being perfect, therefore it is really a pleasure for me to receive some suggestions and critics. Jakarta, March 2014 M.A.A vi TABLE OF CONTENT ABSTRACT ....................................................................................................... i APPROVEMENT ............................................................................................. ii LEGALIZATION ............................................................................................. iii DECLARATION ............................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENT .................................................................................. v TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................. viii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of Study ................................................ 1 B. Focus of Study .......................................................... 6 C. Research Question ..................................................... 6 D. Significance of the Study .......................................... 6 E. Research Methodology.............................................. 7 1. Objectives of the Study ....................................... 7 2. Method of Research ............................................ 7 3. Technique of Data Analysis ................................ 8 4. Instrument of Research ....................................... 9 5. Unit of Analysis .................................................. 9 F. Time and Place .......................................................... 9 CHAPTER II THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK A. Film Theory ............................................................... 10 1. Character and Characterization Theory .............. 11 vii 2. Prejudice and Discrimination Theory ................. 17 CHAPTER III RESEARCH FINDING A. Characters Identification ........................................... 23 B. American History X, Prejudice, and Discrimination 25 C. The Relation of Prejudice and Discrimination ......... 42 CHAPTER IV CONCLUSIONS A. Conclusions ............................................................. 45 BIBLIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................. 48 viii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION A. Background of Study Humans usually deal with problems in social life, such as prejudice and discrimination. Prejudice and discrimination are two things which have relevance. Both of these can be detrimental to the growth, development, or even integrated in society, from a small occurrence that only involves two individuals to moreextend involving group or even a region. This also accompanied by acts of violence which are very harmful and destructive. Prejudice and discrimination is a complex and a huge problem in social phenomena from the past until this time. First known use of word prejudice was in 13th century1 and discrimination was in 1648.2 The first example is the negative stereotypes and prejudices against Muslims fuelling discrimination especially in education and employment. Muslim women in Europe are being denied jobs and girls prevented from attending regular classes just because they wear traditional forms of dress, such as the headscarf, Men can be dismissed for wearing beards associated with Islam.3 Another example a case of discrimination is Indonesia’s health services. As we can see on the news, many poor people who cannot get health care because of their lack of funds, though they have Jamkesda card. Many 1 “Prejudice,” http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/prejudiceAccessed on September, 25th2013 at 17:38 2 “Discrimination,” http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/discrimination Accessed on September, 4th 2013 at 20:50 3 “Muslim Discriminated
Recommended publications
  • Alexander B. Stohler Modern American Hategroups: Lndoctrination Through Bigotry, Music, Yiolence & the Internet
    Alexander B. Stohler Modern American Hategroups: lndoctrination Through Bigotry, Music, Yiolence & the Internet Alexander B. Stohler FacultyAdviser: Dr, Dennis Klein r'^dw May 13,2020 )ol, Masters of Arts in Holocaust & Genocide Studies Kean University In partialfulfillumt of the rcquirementfar the degee of Moster of A* Abstract: I focused my research on modern, American hate groups. I found some criteria for early- warning signs of antisemitic, bigoted and genocidal activities. I included a summary of neo-Nazi and white supremacy groups in modern American and then moved to a more specific focus on contemporary and prominent groups like Atomwaffen Division, the Proud Boys, the Vinlanders Social Club, the Base, Rise Against Movement, the Hammerskins, and other prominent antisemitic and hate-driven groups. Trends of hate-speech, acts of vandalism and acts of violence within the past fifty years were examined. Also, how law enforcement and the legal system has responded to these activities has been included as well. The different methods these groups use for indoctrination of younger generations has been an important aspect of my research: the consistent use of hate-rock and how hate-groups have co-opted punk and hardcore music to further their ideology. Live-music concerts and festivals surrounding these types of bands and how hate-groups have used music as a means to fund their more violent activities have been crucial components of my research as well. The use of other forms of music and the reactions of non-hate-based artists are also included. The use of the internet, social media and other digital means has also be a primary point of discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening White Nationalists, Persecuted Victims, and Populist Enablers
    RESPONDING TO HATE Screening White Nationalists, Persecuted Victims, and Populist Enablers Lawrence Baron From the end of World War II until 1980, the specter As incidents of racist terrorism escalate and of neo-Nazis has haunted the cinematic imagination. populist politicians exploit the discontent Tainted by the Third Reich’s crimes, fugitive Nazi that fuels it, filmmakers have tried to explain war criminals and new generations of white suprem- the attraction of white supremacy without acists served as sinister villains for action, espionage, inadvertently condoning it ... horror, and science fiction films about fringe conspiracies to found a white utopia. The majority What unites white extremists and populists is outrage of these films were American B movies. With a few over their perceived cultural, economic, and political exceptions, like Pressure Point (1962), they provided displacement by foreigners, non-Christians, and escapist entertainment about fanatics whose people of color. They attribute the erosion of white ideology and transgressions remained intriguingly power to everything from corporate capitalism, evil, but practically irrelevant. These motion pictures demographic decline, and Jewish conspiracies to typically dissociated American political realities from mass immigration, multilateralism, the outsourcing of neo-Nazi cabals by setting them in Argentina, industrial jobs to Third World countries, and policies Austria, Brazil, Germany, dystopian futures, or aimed at achieving gender and racial diversity alternate pasts. and equality. Although screen neo-Nazis continue to be portrayed To convey the appeal of white nationalism, the as ideologues, mad scientists, or thugs, historical dangers it poses, and its potential to expand its docudramas and psychosocial films constitute an influence, directors have resorted to three approaches increasing portion of the movies about neo-Nazis that are not always mutually exclusive.
    [Show full text]
  • “Taking It Back, Making It Strong!”: the Boundary Establishment And
    "Taking It Back, Making It Strong!": The Boundary Establishment And Maintenance Practices Of A Montréal Anti-Racist Skinhead Gang 9833181 Department of Sociology McGill University For the Completion of the Requirements for the Master of Arts Program Final Draft – September 25, 2002 Committee Members: Dr. Lucia Benaquisto Dr. Prue Rains Research Supervisor: Dr. Prue Rains 2 INTRODUCTION For nearly two decades, the skinhead subculture has been nearly universally associated with the most vile manifestations of racism and violence imaginable. As evidenced by popular culture1, racism is a fundamental component of the mainstream definition of skinhead. It may come as a surprise, then, to discover that not only did the skinhead subculture emerge from uniquely multicultural and multiracial origins and not only are the overwhelming majority of skinheads non-racists, but that a very significant proportion of participants in the skinhead subculture actively identify themselves as anti- racist. One such grouping of anti-racist skinheads was the Montréal chapter of Skinheads Against Racial Prejudice (SHARP). Montréal's first SHARP chapter began in 1991 and folded approximately two years later. In 1996, Montréal racist skinheads began a protracted campaign of ambushes and armed assaults on non- and anti-racist skinheads, culminating in a series of "bar raids" in the summer of 1998 that sent over thirty people to emergency rooms. In response to this threat, SHARP Montréal reformed in late July 1998 (SHARP Montréal, 1999) and consisted of a fairly stable group of around two dozen young men and women. As members of an anti-racist skinhead gang2 SHARP members establish their identities as such in both mainstream and subcultural social settings, and, in doing so, 1 Any number of television programs (Law & Order), movies (American History X, Crimson River, Romper Stomper) and even video games (Sony Playstation 2’s Soldier Of Fortune and State Of Emergency) depict skinheads as being synonomous with racists.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward Norton 1 Primal Fear (Film) 9 the People Vs
    Topic relevant selected content from the highest rated entries, typeset, printed and shipped. Combine the advantages of up-to-date and in-depth knowledge with the con- venience of printed books. A portion of the proceeds of each book will be donated to the Wikimedia Foundation to support their mission: to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it e ectively and globally. e content within this book was generated collaboratively by volunteers. Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information. Some information in this book maybe misleading or simply wrong. e publisher does not guarantee the validity of the infor- mation found here. If you need speci c advice (for example, medical, legal, nancial, or risk management) please seek a professional who is licensed or knowledgeable in that area. Sources, licenses and contributors of the articles and images are listed in the section entitled “References”. Parts of the books may be licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. A copy of this license is included in the section entitled “GNU Free Documentation License” All used third-party trademarks belong to their respective owners. Contents Articles Edward Norton 1 Primal Fear (film) 9 The People vs. Larry Flynt 13 Everyone Says I Love You 18 Rounders (film) 22 American History X 26 Fight Club (film) 30 Keeping
    [Show full text]
  • Nazism and Neo-Nazism in Film and Media Nazism and Neo-Nazism in Film and Media
    JASON LEE Nazism and Neo-Nazism in Film and Media Nazism and Neo-Nazism in Film and Media Nazism and Neo-Nazism in Film and Media Jason Lee Amsterdam University Press Cover illustration: Girl Scout confronts neo-Nazi at Czech rally. Photo: Vladimir Cicmanec Cover design: Kok Korpershoek, Amsterdam Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 90 8964 936 2 e-isbn 978 90 4852 829 5 doi 10.5117/9789089649362 nur 670 © J. Lee / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2018 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. Contents Acknowledgements 7 1. Introduction – Beliefs, Boundaries, Culture 9 Background and Context 9 Football Hooligans 19 American Separatists 25 2. Film and Television 39 Memory and Representation 39 Childhood and Adolescence 60 X-Television 66 Conclusions 71 3. Nazism, Neo-Nazism, and Comedy 75 Conclusions – Comedy and Politics 85 4. Necrospectives and Media Transformations 89 Myth and History 89 Until the Next Event 100 Trump and the Rise of the Right 107 Conclusions 116 5. Globalization 119 Europe, Asia, Africa, and Latin America 119 International Nazi Hunters 131 Video Games and Conclusions 135 6. Conclusions – The Infinitely Other 141 Evil and Violence 141 Denial and Memorial 152 Europe’s New Far Right and Conclusions 171 Notes 189 Bibliography 193 Index 199 Acknowledgements A special thank you to Stuart Price, Chair of the Media Discourse Group at De Montfort University (DMU).
    [Show full text]
  • {Download PDF} Skinhead Ebook, Epub
    SKINHEAD PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Richard Allen | 220 pages | 03 Dec 2015 | Dean Street Press | 9781911095415 | English | Salisbury, United Kingdom Racist Skinhead | Southern Poverty Law Center Skinheads will live on as long as there fat cats in power who don't give a sh t about the youth of today. With your intolerance, you're no better than the very nazis and supremacists you ridicule. Open up your eyes before a real skinhead opens up your skull, free of charge We've just got violence in our minds" The Last Resort. Skinheads first started to appear durring the late 60's in England. Skinheads were an off shoot to the mods and football soccer holligans called " boot boys ". Fred Perry polo shirts are also very popular with skinheads as are V neck sweaters and vests. With the punk scene in the 70's came a rebirth of the skins allthough this time the look was exageated a bit, boots were higher and bleached jeans and combat fatigues could be seen worn by the new breed. During this time a right wing political group known as the National Front NF started using skinheads as pawns polititians both right and left have tried using the scene for their own gain. Shortly a new breed of punk music was born thanks to bands like the cockney rejects, this music was called "OI! Today there seems to be a new trend of extreme left wing skins, redskins, communist,socialist,anarchist, who seem to be being used by politics yet again, most however grow up and realize extremist politics are a no win game.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Villain in American Cinema from the 1950S to the Present
    The Evolution of the Villain in American Cinema From the 1950s to the Present The Honors Program Senior Capstone Project Kelsey McClure Terri Hasseler April 2014 Table of Contents Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 1 Objective Methodology Results Conclusion Introduction…………………..…………………………………………………………….…3 Decade Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 6 The 1950s Decade Background…………………………………………………………………...…6 Villain Assessments……...………………………………………………………………8 The 1970s Decade Background………………………………………………………………....…12 Villain Assessments……………………………………………………………………14 The 2000s Decade Background……………………………………………………………………… Villain Assessments……………………………………………………………………… Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. The Villain Evolution .............................................................................................................. Appendices ................................................................................................................................. Appendix A – Final Movie Selection (By decade and director) ............................................. Appendix B – Field Notes: Movie Villain Notes .................................................................... Appendix C – Literature Review from Final Proposal……...……………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Committing Hate
    CHAPTER 3 Committing Hate Who and Why hat images come to your mind when you read the words hate crimes? Red-necked, white-robed men burning crosses? Gangs of W skinheads attacking people of color? Swastika-bedecked neo-Nazis toting copies of Mein Kampf and shouting “Sieg Heil!”? All these are part of the reality of bias in America. The truth, however, is that they make up only a small part of the hate crimes that occur. Contrary to popular notions, most hate crimes are not committed by members of organized white supremacist groups (J. Levin, 2002; Levin & McDevitt, 1993; Ryan & Leeson, 2011). Most, in fact, are committed by people very similar to those you might see sitting in almost any high school or college classroom: teenagers and young adults who are unaffiliated with any racist organization. In fact, hate crimes on campus are a serious problem (Downey & Stage, 1999; Levin & McDevitt, 1993; Wieland, 2007; see In Focus 3.1). IN FOCUS 3.1 Hate on Campus In a report issued in 2001, the Department of Justice concluded that hate crimes on college campuses are a serious problem. The report also concludes that noncriminal acts of prejudice and harassment are common on campuses. Very few hate crimes on campus get reported, so their true extent is unknown, but they occur at colleges and universities of all sizes and in all locations. Hate crimes and harassment are also common at elementary, junior, and high schools. Stotzer & Hozellmann (2012) found that reported hate crimes are less frequent on Draft Proofcampuses that have- Dodiverse faculty not and studentcopy, bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Cedar Creek Productions Presents
    Tribeca Film in partnership with American Express presents a Paper Street Films presentation in association with Kingsgate Films and Appian Way A Tony Kaye Talkie DETACHMENT Featuring: Adrien Brody, Marcia Gay Harden, Christina Hendricks, William Petersen, Bryan Cranston, Tim Blake Nelson, Betty Kaye, Sami Gayle, with Lucy Liu, and Blythe Danner, and James Caan Winner of: International Critics Prize & Cartier Revelation Prize -2011 Deauville American Film Festival Grand Prize & Audience Award -2011 Festival de Cinema Valenciennes Best Artistic Contribution Award – 2011 Tokyo International Film Festival Maverick Award (Tony Kaye) – 2011 Woodstock Film Festival Audience Award– 2011 São Paulo International Film Festival Official selection of: 2011 Tribeca Film Festival 2011 Woodstock Film Festival 2011 Deauville American Film Festival 2011 Tokyo International Film Festival 2011 Festival de Cinema Valenciennes 2011 São Paulo International Film Festival 2011 Muestra Internacional de Cine in Mexico 2011 Filmfest Hamburg RUNNING TIME: 100 MINUTES Distributor Contact: Tribeca Film Publicity Contact: ID PR Tammie Rosen Dani Weinstein, Sara Serlen, Sheri Goldberg 212-941-2003 212-334-0333 [email protected] [email protected] / [email protected] 375 Greenwich Street New York, NY 10011 150 West 30th Street, 19th Floor New York, NY 10001 RELEASE INFO Available On Demand February 24, 2012 Theatrical Release: March 16, 2012 New York at AMC Empire 25 & Village East Cinema March 23, 2012 Brooklyn, NY at indieScreen Los Angeles at Laemmle Monica
    [Show full text]
  • Hollywood Filmmakers' Apologia Following
    Ohio Communication Journal Volume 59 – June 2021 pp. 17-31 “It Was Like I Had Murdered a Baby”: Hollywood Filmmakers’ Apologia Following “Bad” Films Kevin A. Stein Matthew H. Barton Kolton Pierson This study uses Benoit’s (2015) Image Repair Theory to examine the way Hollywood directors, producers, and actors defend or apologize for films universally panned by audiences or containing controversial elements. The sample included movies such as Batman & Robin, Catwoman, The Fantastic Four, Battlefield Earth, Suicide Squad, Wild Wild West, Dragon Ball Evolution, The Last Sect, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull, Showgirls, The Joker, and Cats. The analysis revealed that filmmakers utilize a wide variety of apologia strategies; however, they most often engage in mortification, defeasibility, shifting blame, and attacking the accuser. The paper provides explanations for these discursive choices and why audiences elevate artistic failures to the same level as socially deviant behaviors, such as domestic abuse, sexual infidelity, and racism. Introduction Movies are big business. In 2019, the global film industry generated $103 billion in total revenue (IBIS World, 2019) and in the U.S. alone, box office ticKet sales have remained a multi-billion-dollar juggernaut since 1995 (The Numbers, 2019). In addition to the financial impact of film, movies have dominated the pop culture landscape in a plethora of ways including book adaptations, TV spin-offs, product marketing campaigns, and fan conventions.1 There is no question that people love movies, as they open up their wallets and support the industry in a variety of ways. On an individual level, movies satisfy a variety of human needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Student Essays of the University of North Carolina at Pembroke at Carolina North of University the of Essays Student Best Revisions
    ReVisions Best Student Essays of The University of North Carolina at Pembroke Volume 7 Spring 2007 EACHUM B OEL J ReVisions: Best Student Essays is a publication designed to celebrate the finest nonfiction work composed by undergraduate students at The University of North Carolina at Pembroke. This issue was copyedited, designed, and produced by the students in PRE 345: Computer-Assisted Editing and Publication De- sign. Antoinette Balfour Heather Cagle Chris Frease Chelsea Prior Ricky Tyree Sara Oswald, Instructor Editor Susan Cannata Front: Chris Frease, Chelsea Prior; back: Sara Oswald, Ricky Tyree, Antoinette Balfour, Heather Cagle Dept. of English, Theatre, and Languages All submissions must be nominated by a UNCP faculty member. Students who believe that they Managing Editor have a strong essay for submission are encouraged to ask a faculty member to sponsor that essay. A nomi- Sara Oswald nation form is included on page xx of this issue; forms are also available in the English, Theatre, and Dept. of English, Theatre, and Languages Languages Department in Dial Humanities Building. Forms may be photocopied. Selection Committee Papers may cover any topic within any field of study at UNCP. We do not publish fiction or poetry. Will Collier We encourage submissions from all fields and majors. Dept. of Psychology All submissions must be accompanied by a nomination form. Students should fill out the nomina- Jeff Frederick tion form completely and sign it, granting permission to the editors to edit and publish the essay if ac- Dept. of History cepted. Faculty members should comment briefly on the merits of the essay and any other elements that Anita Guynn Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations of Sexual Assault in American History X
    Approaching Toxic Masculinity through #MeToo: Representations of Sexual Assault in American History X Miranda Brookshier, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign ABSTRACT Since its inception in 2006, Tarana Burke’s #MeToo Movement has continued to affirm and support the experiences of survivors of sexual violence. Other outcomes from the #MeToo Movement include more open conversations about sexual assault and toxic masculinity. Toxic masculinity has been linked to the prevalence of women’s sexual assault; however, in a culture dominated by its values, coming forward proves to be that much harder for male survivors, who are conditioned to believe that assault is a form of weakness. Film operates as one medium that strongly perpetuates this notion; through film, viewers create and take in ideas from popular culture. Highly heteronormative films like American History X subtly reinforce the biases and barriers created by toxic masculinity. This essay develops working definitions of rape, assault, and the prison rape trope and applies these definitions to an analysis of Tony Kaye’s 1998 film, American History X. Through my analysis of American History X, I will show how the trope preserves heteropatriarchal values that undermine the work of #MeToo and its critiques of toxic masculinity, thus muting conversations among male survivors of sexual violence. In spite of the challenges men experience in coming forward, former football player and current actor, Terry Crews, has sought to use his testimony to encourage others to realize that they, too, can find support in speaking up. KEYWORDS American History X, Tony Kaye, #MeToo Movement, Sexual Assault, Prison Rape, Toxic Masculinity, Terry Crews Re:Search Founded in 2006 by Tarana Burke, the #MeToo Movement seeks to support survivors of sexual violence by offering individualized resources and community-based relief in a way that “affirms empowerment through empathy” (#MeToo).
    [Show full text]