The Relation Between Spinoza's Monism and Kabbalistic Monotheism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Relation Between Spinoza's Monism and Kabbalistic Monotheism Portland State University PDXScholar University Honors Theses University Honors College 5-22-2020 The Relation Between Spinoza's Monism and Kabbalistic Monotheism Naomi H. Fredgant Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses Part of the Jewish Studies Commons, and the Philosophy Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Fredgant, Naomi H., "The Relation Between Spinoza's Monism and Kabbalistic Monotheism" (2020). University Honors Theses. Paper 846. https://doi.org/10.15760/honors.866 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in University Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. The Relation Between Spinoza’s Monism and Kabbalistic Monotheism By Naomi Fredgant An undergraduate honors thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science University Honors And Philosophy Thesis Advisor Angela Coventry Ph.D. Portland State University 2020 1 Introduction Early modern philosopher Benedict de Spinoza was born in 1632 to a Portuguese-Jewish merchant family in Amsterdam. Spinoza was raised in a strict Jewish community until he was 23, which was when he was excommunicated, described as cherem in Hebrew. Almost a decade ​ ​ later, he wrote one of his most famous works, Ethics. He discusses many things in this book, but ​ ​ the focus here is on his theory of G-d1, or, monism. This is an exploration into Spinoza’s theory through the lens of the theory of G-d Spinoza grew up learning: Kabbalistic monotheism. I examine where his ideas were rooted for the first twenty-three years of his life to better understand how they differed later in his life. This paper has 5 sections: 1) An Introduction to the context Spinoza was living in, 2) A description of Spinoza’s monism and monistic pantheism, 3) A description of Kabbalistic monotheism, 4) A comparison of the two, and 5) A conclusion describing how my understanding of his theory has shifted now that I understand where he came from. Spinoza’s Context To be raised in a Jewish community in Amsterdam in the 17th century was to experience the revitalisation of lost traditions. During the Spanish Inquisition, Jewish people in the Iberian Peninsula were not allowed to practice their religion; if they did, it was in secret, and without instruction. Many of the time-honored traditions were lost, and once people were “free” to practice their religion, they had to relearn their own religious practices, trying to weed out what was theirs from the influences of Iberian Catholicism. An example of this is the way they 1 In the Jewish tradition, anytime the name of G-d is written someplace that could be thrown away, it is written with ​ a dash instead of an “o”. This is because G-d deserves the respect of not being discarded in any sense of the word. I am Jewish, so I will be abiding by this rule. Moss, A. (2004, August 30). Why Don't You Spell Out G-d's Name? ​ 2 celebrated Purim. Purim is, in a very basic sense, a celebration of the story of the Jewish people almost being killed, but ending up being saved by a poor Jewish man named Mordecai, and his beautiful niece Esther. The Jewish people of Amsterdam in the 17th century could be found praying to Saint Esther in this celebration. Saints are not found in the Jewish tradition, so this is an obvious Iberian Catholic intrusion (Nadler, 2001, p. 49). As early as the mid-sixteenth century, Portuguese conversos, or marranos, began fleeing the Inquisitions in Spain and Portugal to go to the Netherlands. Conversos and marranos were the descendants of Jewish people that had outwardly converted to Christianity during the Inquisition, but were suspected of practicing Judaism in private, without large gatherings, or leaders (“Christian-Jewish Relations,” n.d., Para. 1). There are two myths about how and why ​ ​ Jewish people settled in Amsterdam specifically, but the truth is that many Portuguese merchants migrated up from Antwerp (a southern country), because Amsterdam had greater business and economic opportunities. People also migrated to the Netherlands to escape religious persecution and to live in a place without a uniform religion (Nadler, 2001, pgs. 43-44). In 1579, there was a kind of constitution for the United Provinces of the Netherlands called the Union of Utrecht; in article 13, it was stated that every person should have freedom of religion, and no one should be persecuted based on how they choose to worship the divine. The reality was much less tolerant. In the last decades of the sixteenth century up to the middle of the seventeenth, the only religion that was actually allowed to be practiced in most cities and provinces was the Dutch Reformed Church, or Calvinism. In 1604 and 1605, the cities Alkmaar and Haarlem allowed Jewish people to practice Judaism openly, but Amsterdam didn’t allow this until 1619. Even when Amsterdam did allow Jews to practice openly, they had 3 restrictions on their economic and political rights. There were also rules against Jewish people going to certain social activities with Christians, and rules against intermarriage. In the early seventeenth century, there were internal theological and political conflicts in the United Provinces. Christian denominations were always fighting to gain more power over all of the other denominations. In the United Provinces, the two that had the largest disagreements were Calvinists and Remonstrants, both of which were Protestant movements. Calvinists believed in the teachings of John Calvin (1509-1564). In a basic sense, they believed in predestination (or that everything has been destined by G-d), the sovereignty of G-d, and would not tolerate any divergence from doctrinal orthodoxy (Slick, 2017). Remonstrants followed the teachings of Jacobus Arminius, who denied predestination (Nadler, 2001, p. 45). This disagreement quickly bled over from being a religious dispute into a political one. Eventually, in the Synod of Dort of 1618-1619, the Calvinist Church expelled the Remonstrants, which really strengthened the intolerant aspects of Calvinism, resulting in any kind of deviance from orthodoxy being even more unacceptable than before (Nadler, 2001, pgs. 45-46). So when Jewish people were given official recognition in Amsterdam in 1619, they were given it on the condition that they uphold a very strict observance of Jewish law. Their recognition could be taken away if they were seen as letting their religion stray into the other religions around them (namely Christianity), or not being serious about their religion, which must have left them with a strong devotion to being cautious, and keeping a low profile. The Jewish people of Amsterdam needed a way to maintain discipline and enforce conformity in order to stay afloat, so they used a form of punishment called a cherem ​ (excommunication). Cherem is punishment by denying the offender a part in community life, ​ ​ 4 usually only for a couple of days, but sometimes weeks, and more rarely months, or years. Between 1622 and 1683 the Amsterdam Portuguese community used this tactic thirty-six times, and threatened to use it fifty other times to show the community what not to do. For the most part, even after being banned, the person would be let back into the congregation. Usually, if the person just apologized, and paid a fine, he would be let back into the community. The seriousness of the offense dictated how much the person would be denied a part of community life (Nadler, 2001, p. 47). It could go from a denial of eye contact to a denial of being allowed to participate in the community as a whole. There were different kinds of offenses that were punishable, which were attached to each specific community’s rules and regulations. There were religious rules that would result in punishment if broken, such as attendance at synagogue, organization of a minyan (the grouping of 10 or more people required to say specific Jewish ​ ​ prayers), observance of holidays, and the purchase of kosher meat (meat that was blessed by a rabbi). There were ethical regulations, such as gambling, or public lewd behavior. There were social regulations like marrying in secret (i.e. without parental consent, and not in the presence of a rabbi). Some other examples of things that could get someone excommunicated are: making public statements that ridicule what other members of the community (especially the rabbi) say, printing a book without permission, having theological discussions with gentiles (non-Jewish people), Jewish women cutting the hair of gentile women, and writing letters to Spain containing anything about the Jewish religion. (Nadler, 2001, p. 48) The point of the cherem was to enforce social, religious, and ethical conduct that was ​ ​ becoming to a proper Jewish community, and didn’t offend the political-religious powers in Amsterdam. The Jewish community in Amsterdam was founded by the descendants of 5 conversos, who had just recently been reintroduced to the traditions and norms of Judaism. The fact that they were cut off from Jewish texts for so long might have made the Jewish community feel insecure about its practices, making them overcorrect, and feel the need to be rigorously observant. They also had to reassure their Dutch hosts that their community was orthodox and controlled. All of that being said, there were Jewish people that stumbled in being observant Jews, but they weren’t threatened with or punished by a statement of excommunication as scathing and permanent as the one issued to Spinoza: The lords of the ma’amad, having long known of the evil opinions and acts of ​ ​ Baruch de Spinoza, they have endeavored by various means and promises, to turn him from his evil ways.
Recommended publications
  • Book of Zohar ((Itemsitems 666-71).6-71)
    The Path of Kabbalah By Rav Michael Laitman PhD The Path of Kabbalah LAITMAN KABBALAH PUBLISHERS By Rav Michael Laitman PhD Executive Editor: Benzion Giertz Editor: Claire Gerus Translation: Chaim Ratz Compilation: Shlomi Bohana Layout: Baruch Khovov Laitman Kabbalah Publishers Website: www.kabbalah.info Laitman Kabbalah Publishers E-mail: [email protected] THE PATH OF KABBALAH Copyright © 2005 by MICHAEL LAITMAN. All rights reserved. Published by Laitman Kabbalah Publishers, 1057 Steeles Avenue West, Suite 532, Toronto, ON, M2R 3X1, Canada. Printed in Canada. No part of this book may be used or reproduced in any manner without written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews. ISBN: 0-9732315-9-9 FIRST EDITION: DECEMBER 2005 The Path of Kabbalah TA B LE OF CONTEN T S Part One: The Beginning .........................................................................9 Part Two: Phases of Spiritual Evolution ............................................... 70 Part Three: The Structure of the Upper Worlds .................................140 Part Four: Proper Study ...................................................................... 253 Part Five: Religion, Prejudice and Kabbalah ...................................... 306 Part Six: Genesis ................................................................................. 320 Part Seven: The Inner Meaning .......................................................... 333 Detailed Table of Contents ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Monism and Monotheism in Al-Ghaz Lı's Mishk T Al-Anw R
    Monism and Monotheism in al-Ghaz�lı’s Mishk�t al-anw�r Alexander Treiger YALE UNIVERSITY It is appropriate to begin a study on the problem of Monism versus Monotheism in Abü ˘�mid al-Ghaz�lı’s (d. 505/1111) thought by juxtaposing two passages from his famous treatise Mishk�t al-anw�r (‘The Niche of Lights’) which is devoted to an interpretation of the Light Verse (Q. 24:35) and of the Veils ˘adıth (to be discussed below).1 As I will try to show, the two passages represent monistic and monotheistic perspectives respectively. For the purposes of the present study, the term ‘monism’ refers to the theory, put forward by al-Ghaz�lı in a number of contexts, that God is the only existent in existence and the world, considered in itself, is ‘sheer non-existence’ (fiadam ma˛∂); while ‘monotheism’ refers to the view that God is the one of the totality of existents which is the source of existence for the rest of existents. The fundamental difference between the two views lies in their respective assessments of God’s granting existence to what is other than He: the monistic paradigm views the granting of existence as essentially virtual so that in the last analysis God alone exists, whereas the monotheistic paradigm sees the granting of existence as real.2 Let us now turn to the passages in question. Passage A: Mishk�t, Part 1, §§52–43 [§52] The entire world is permeated by external visual and internal intellectual lights … Lower [lights] emanate from one another the way light emanates from a lamp [sir�j, cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiftheriel A.K.A. Tiphtheriel - the Angel of the Sixth Sephira of the Tree of Life
    http://www.morfix.co.il/en/%D7%AA%D6%B4%D7%A4%D7%90%D6%B6%D7%A8%D6%B6%D7%AA https://translate.google.com/#iw/en/%D7%AA%D7%A4%D7%90%D7%A8%D7%AA Tiftheriel a.k.a. Tiphtheriel - the angel of the sixth sephira of the Tree of Life. http://hafapea.com/angelpages/angels6.html Tiferet 1 Tiferet The Sephirot in Jewish Kabbalah Category:Sephirot • v • t [1] • e tifˈʔeʁeθ]) alternately Tifaret, Tifereth, Tyfereth or Tiphereth, is the] תפארת :Tiferet ("Adornment", Hebrew sixth sefira in the kabbalistic Tree of Life. It has the common association of "Spirituality", "Balance", "Integration", "Beauty", "Miracles", and "Compassion". Description In the Bahir it states: "Sixth is the adorned, glorious, delightful throne of glory, the house of the world to come. Its place is engraved in wisdom as it says 'God said: Let there be light, and there was light.'" [2] Tiferet is the force that integrates the Sefira of Chesed ("compassion") and Gevurah ("Strength, or Judgement (din)"). These two forces are, respectively, expansive (giving) and restrictive (receiving). Either of them without the other could not manifest the flow of Divine energy; they must be balanced in perfect proportion by balancing compassion with discipline. This balance can be seen in the role of Tiferet, wherein the conflicting forces are harmonized, and creation flowers forth. Tiferet also balances Netzach and Hod in a similar manner. In that case Hod can be seen as the intellect where Netzach is seen as emotion. Tiferet also occupies a place on the middle pillar, and can be seen as a lower reflection of Kether, as well as a higher reflection of Yesod and Malkuth.
    [Show full text]
  • Ask the Rabbi' L.Judaism- Miscellanea 2
    ~s:kthe Rabbi' By the same author Jewish Prayer A Guide to Rosh Ha-Shanah A Guide to Yom Kippur ut Have Reason to Believe Jewish Values Studies in Talmudic Logic and Methodology The Palm Tree qf Deborah (Translated from the Hebrew of Moses Cordovero, with Introduction and Notes) Tract on Ecstasy (Translated from the Hebrew of Dobh Baer of Lubavitch, with Introduction and Notes) Seeker qf Uniry Faith Principles qf the Jewish Faith: An Ana!Jtical Study A Jewish Theology Helping with Inquiries: An Autobiography The Talmudic Argument Hasidic Prayer God, Torah, Israel Religion and the Individual A Tree qf Life The Jewish Religion: A Companion Beyond Reasonable Doubt ~sk the Rabbi' LOUIS JACOBS VALLENTINE MITCHELL LONDON • PORTLAND, OR First published in 19 9 9 in Great Britain by VALLENTINE l'vJITCHELL Newbury House, 900 Eastern Avenue London IG2 7HH and in the United States qf America by VALLENTINE l'vJITCHELL c/o ISBS, 5804 N.E. Hassalo Street Portland, Oregon 97213-3644 Hlebsite http:/ /www.vmbooks.com Copyright© 1999 LouisJacobs British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Jacobs, Louis 'Ask the Rabbi' l.Judaism- Miscellanea 2. Sociology, Jewish- Miscellanea I. Title 296.3 ISBN 0-85303-352-8 (cloth) Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jacobs, Louis. Ask the rabbi I LouisJacobs. p. cm. ISBN 0-85303-352-8. 1. Judaism-Miscellanea. I. Title. BM5l.J33 1999 296--dc21 98-41119 CIP All rights reserved. No part qf this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval ~stem, or transmitted, in a'!JI form or by a'!JI means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission qf the publisher qf this book.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magician's Kabbalah
    The Magician's Kabbalah By FP The Classical esoteric model of the Universe as practised by a working Magician, with unique details of the theories and practices of modern magic for the general reader. This book demonstrates the integration of Kabbalah with the leading edge of scientific thought in the realms of psychology and cosmology, as well as providing an unparalleled guide to the hidden world of the modern occultist. Acknowledgements I acknowledge the lessons of my teachers and colleagues of the Invisible College, particularly Frater Daleth for the Operation of Sol; Soror Jasinth for love and company in the Circle of the Moon ; Soror Brina for reopening Eden; And the participants in the Illuminated Congregation of Melchizedek, past, present and future, who seek to maintain and preserve the Greatest Work of All. Propositum Perfectio Est F.I.A.T. (5=6) Cognitatione sui secumque colloquio firmitatem petere (6=5) Dedications To Sue, whose friendship was given through a long dark night of the soul. To Carolyne. With love CONTENTS Chapter One : The Tree of Sapphires Chapter Two : The Sephiroth and the Four Worlds Chapter Three Ain Soph Aur Chapter Four : Kether Chapter Five : Chockmah Chapter Six Binah Chapter Seven Chesed Chapter Eight Geburah Chapter Nine Tiphareth Chapter Ten Netzach Chapter Eleven Hod Chapter Twelve Yesod Chapter Thirteen Malkuth Chapter Fourteen The Klippoth Chapter Fifteen Gematria Chapter Sixteen The Twenty-Two Paths Chapter Seventeen The Curtain of Souls Chapter Eighteen Exercises Chapter Nineteen The Rituals of the Sapphire Temple Appendix One Names of the Sephiroth Appendix Two The Lesser Banishing Ritual of the Pentagram Chapter Notes Bibliography Index Chapter One; The Tree of Sapphires Voices of the Word, Leaves of the Light The Kabbalah (a Hebrew word meaning "handed down", or "oral tradition") is the term used to denote a general set of esoteric or mystical teachings originally held within Judaism, but later promulgated to a wider audience in the 12th century onwards through centres of learning such as Spain.
    [Show full text]
  • El Infinito Y El Lenguaje En La Kabbalah Judía: Un Enfoque Matemático, Lingüístico Y Filosófico
    El Infinito y el Lenguaje en la Kabbalah judía: un enfoque matemático, lingüístico y filosófico Mario Javier Saban Cuño DEPARTAMENTO DE MATEMÁTICA APLICADA ESCUELA POLITÉCNICA SUPERIOR EL INFINITO Y EL LENGUAJE EN LA KABBALAH JUDÍA: UN ENFOQUE MATEMÁTICO, LINGÜÍSTICO Y FILOSÓFICO Mario Javier Sabán Cuño Tesis presentada para aspirar al grado de DOCTOR POR LA UNIVERSIDAD DE ALICANTE Métodos Matemáticos y Modelización en Ciencias e Ingeniería DOCTORADO EN MATEMÁTICA Dirigida por: DR. JOSUÉ NESCOLARDE SELVA Agradecimientos Siempre temo olvidarme de alguna persona entre los agradecimientos. Uno no llega nunca solo a obtener una sexta tesis doctoral. Es verdad que medita en la soledad los asuntos fundamentales del universo, pero la gran cantidad de familia y amigos que me han acompañado en estos últimos años son los co-creadores de este trabajo de investigación sobre el Infinito. En primer lugar a mi esposa Jacqueline Claudia Freund quien decidió en el año 2002 acompañarme a Barcelona dejando su vida en la Argentina para crear la hermosa familia que tenemos hoy. Ya mis dos hermosos niños, a Max David Saban Freund y a Lucas Eli Saban Freund para que logren crecer y ser felices en cualquier trabajo que emprendan en sus vidas y que puedan vislumbrar un mundo mejor. Quiero agradecer a mi padre David Saban, quien desde la lejanía geográfica de la Argentina me ha estimulado siempre a crecer a pesar de las dificultades de la vida. De él he aprendido dos de las grandes virtudes que creo poseer, la voluntad y el esfuerzo. Gracias papá. Esta tesis doctoral en Matemática Aplicada tiene una inmensa deuda con el Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Polymorphism and Polysemy in Images of the Sefirot
    Portland State University PDXScholar Systems Science Faculty Publications and Presentations Systems Science Winter 3-16-2021 Polymorphism and Polysemy in Images of the Sefirot Martin Zwick Portland State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/sysc_fac Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, Computer Sciences Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Zwick, Martin (2021). Polymorphism and Polysemy in Images of the Sefirot. Western Judaic Studies Association 25th Annual Conference, online. This Presentation is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Systems Science Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Polymorphism and Polysemy in Images of the Sefirot (Martin Zwick) Polymorphism and Polysemy in Images of the Sefirot Martin Zwick Portland State University, Portland OR 97207 [email protected] Western Judaic Studies Association 25th annual meeting Virtual, University of Nevada, Las Vegas March 16, 2021 web: https://works.bepress.com/martin_zwick/205 (Included in categories ‘Systems Theory and Philosophy’ and ‘Jewish Thought’) https://sites.google.com/view/ohrchadash/home 1 Abstract (1/2) • The resurgence of interest in Kabbalistic diagrams (Segol, Busi, Chajes) raises the question of how diagrams function in religious symbolism. This question can be approached via methods used in the graphical modeling of data. Specifically, graph theory lets one define a repertoire of candidate structures that can be applied not only to quantitative data, but also to symbols consisting of qualitative components.
    [Show full text]
  • JOSHUA L. MOSS Source: Melilah: Atheism, Scepticism and Challenges to Mono
    EDITOR Daniel R. Langton ASSISTANT EDITOR Simon Mayers Title: Satire, Monotheism and Scepticism Author(s): JOSHUA L. MOSS Source: Melilah: Atheism, Scepticism and Challenges to Monotheism, Vol. 12 (2015), pp. 14-21 Published by: University of Manchester and Gorgias Press URL: http://www.melilahjournal.org/p/2015.html ISBN: 978-1-4632-0622-2 ISSN: 1759-1953 A publication of the Centre for Jewish Studies, University of Manchester, United Kingdom. Co-published by SATIRE, MONOTHEISM AND SCEPTICISM Joshua L. Moss* ABSTRACT: The habits of mind which gave Israel’s ancestors cause to doubt the existence of the pagan deities sometimes lead their descendants to doubt the existence of any personal God, however conceived. Monotheism was and is a powerful form of Scepticism. The Hebrew Bible contains notable satires of Paganism, such as Psalm 115 and Isaiah 44 with their biting mockery of idols. Elijah challenged the worshippers of Ba’al to a demonstration of divine power, using satire. The reader knows that nothing will happen in response to the cries of Baal’s worshippers, and laughs. Yet, the worshippers of Israel’s God must also be aware that their own cries for help often go unanswered. The insight that caused Abraham to smash the idols in his father’s shop also shakes the altar erected by Elijah. Doubt, once unleashed, is not easily contained. Scepticism is a natural part of the Jewish experience. In the middle ages Jews were non-believers and dissenters as far as the dominant religions were concerned. With the advent of modernity, those sceptical habits of mind could be applied to religion generally, including Judaism.
    [Show full text]
  • Hinduism and Hindu Philosophy
    Essays on Indian Philosophy UNIVE'aSITY OF HAWAII Uf,FU:{ Essays on Indian Philosophy SHRI KRISHNA SAKSENA UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII PRESS HONOLULU 1970 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 78·114209 Standard Book Number 87022-726-2 Copyright © 1970 by University of Hawaii Press All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contents The Story of Indian Philosophy 3 Basic Tenets of Indian Philosophy 18 Testimony in Indian Philosophy 24 Hinduism 37 Hinduism and Hindu Philosophy 51 The Jain Religion 54 Some Riddles in the Behavior of Gods and Sages in the Epics and the Puranas 64 Autobiography of a Yogi 71 Jainism 73 Svapramanatva and Svapraka!;>atva: An Inconsistency in Kumarila's Philosophy 77 The Nature of Buddhi according to Sankhya-Yoga 82 The Individual in Social Thought and Practice in India 88 Professor Zaehner and the Comparison of Religions 102 A Comparison between the Eastern and Western Portraits of Man in Our Time 117 Acknowledgments The author wishes to make the following acknowledgments for permission to reprint previously published essays: "The Story of Indian Philosophy," in A History of Philosophical Systems. edited by Vergilius Ferm. New York:The Philosophical Library, 1950. "Basic Tenets of Indian Philosophy," previously published as "Are There Any Basic Tenets of Indian Philosophy?" in The Philosophical Quarterly. "Testimony in Indian Philosophy," previously published as "Authority in Indian Philosophy," in Ph ilosophyEast and West. vo!.l,no. 3 (October 1951). "Hinduism," in Studium Generale. no. 10 (1962). "The Jain Religion," previously published as "Jainism," in Religion in the Twentieth Century. edited by Vergilius Ferm.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanya Sources.Pdf
    The Way to the Tree of Life Jewish practice entails fulfilling many laws. Our diet is limited, our days to work are defined, and every aspect of life has governing directives. Is observance of all the laws easy? Is a perfectly righteous life close to our heart and near to our limbs? A righteous life seems to be an impossible goal! However, in the Torah, our great teacher Moshe, Moses, declared that perfect fulfillment of all religious law is very near and easy for each of us. Every word of the Torah rings true in every generation. Lesson one explores how the Tanya resolved these questions. It will shine a light on the infinite strength that is latent in each Jewish soul. When that unending holy desire emerges, observance becomes easy. Lesson One: The Infinite Strength of the Jewish Soul The title page of the Tanya states: A Collection of Teachings ספר PART ONE לקוטי אמרים חלק ראשון Titled הנקרא בשם The Book of the Beinonim ספר של בינונים Compiled from sacred books and Heavenly מלוקט מפי ספרים ומפי סופרים קדושי עליון נ״ע teachers, whose souls are in paradise; based מיוסד על פסוק כי קרוב אליך הדבר מאד בפיך ובלבבך לעשותו upon the verse, “For this matter is very near to לבאר היטב איך הוא קרוב מאד בדרך ארוכה וקצרה ”;you, it is in your mouth and heart to fulfill it בעזה״י and explaining clearly how, in both a long and short way, it is exceedingly near, with the aid of the Holy One, blessed be He. "1 of "393 The Way to the Tree of Life From the outset of his work therefore Rav Shneur Zalman made plain that the Tanya is a guide for those he called “beinonim.” Beinonim, derived from the Hebrew bein, which means “between,” are individuals who are in the middle, neither paragons of virtue, tzadikim, nor sinners, rishoim.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Mysticism, Ritual Murder, and the Trial of Mendel Beilis
    Swarthmore College Works History Faculty Works History 2015 Connecting The Dots: Jewish Mysticism, Ritual Murder, And The Trial Of Mendel Beilis Robert Weinberg Swarthmore College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-history Part of the History Commons Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation Robert Weinberg. (2015). "Connecting The Dots: Jewish Mysticism, Ritual Murder, And The Trial Of Mendel Beilis". Word And Image In Russian History: Essays In Honor Of Gary Marker. 238-252. https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-history/464 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Connecting the Dots: Jewish Mysticism, Ritual Murder, and the Trial of Mendel Beilis Robert Weinberg (Swarthmore College) he prosecution of Mendel Beilis for the murder of thirteen-year-old TAndrei Iushchinskii in Kiev a century ago is perhaps the most publi- cized instance of blood libel since the torture and execution of Jews accused of ritually murdering the infant Simon of Trent in 1475. By the time of the trial in the fall of 1913, the Beilis case had become an inter- national cause célèbre. Like the trials of Alfred Dreyfus in the 1890s and the outcry that accompanied the Damascus Affair in the 1840s, the arrest, incarceration, and trial of Beilis aroused public criticism of Russia’s treatment of Jews and inspired opponents of the autocracy at home and abroad to launch a campaign to condemn the trial.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science by Dr
    Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science By Dr. Charles Wallis Last revision: 1/23/2013 Chapter 2 Greek Metaphysical Speculation: Philosophical Materialisms and Dualisms 2.1 Introduction It may seem odd to the contemporary thinker to suppose that people did not always have a clear conception of the mind and of mental phenomena. Nevertheless, like most contemporary western concepts the development of the notion of the mind and of mental phenomena actually occurs over the course of centuries. Indeed, the development of the notion of “the mind” arguably traces back to the development of the Greek notion of the soul. For most of Greek history the conception of the soul bears little resemblance to its contemporary western counterpart. In fact, the Greeks develop their notion of the soul as part of the development of general ontological frameworks for scientific and metaphysical speculation. Three features of the development of the Greek notion of the soul figure prominently in this rather superficial history. First, the development of the Greek notion of the soul represents a slow accretion of properties and processes associated with three different contemporary distinctions into a single ontological entity; living vs non-living, animate vs inanimate, and mental vs non-mental. Second, as the soul becomes more distinct both in its nature and in its functions, the Greeks begin to more actively debate whether the soul constitutes a fundamental kind of stuff (a distinct substance) or merely one of many permutations of more fundamental kinds of stuff (substances). For instance, early Greek thinkers often supposed that the universe consists of various permutations of one or more fundamental elements.
    [Show full text]