Journal of Hymenoptera Research Their Late Instars
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Recolecta De Artrópodos Para Prospección De La Biodiversidad En El Área De Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica
Rev. Biol. Trop. 52(1): 119-132, 2004 www.ucr.ac.cr www.ots.ac.cr www.ots.duke.edu Recolecta de artrópodos para prospección de la biodiversidad en el Área de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica Vanessa Nielsen 1,2, Priscilla Hurtado1, Daniel H. Janzen3, Giselle Tamayo1 & Ana Sittenfeld1,4 1 Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INBio), Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica. 2 Dirección actual: Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San José, Costa Rica. 3 Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. 4 Dirección actual: Centro de Investigación en Biología Celular y Molecular, Universidad de Costa Rica. [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Recibido 21-I-2003. Corregido 19-I-2004. Aceptado 04-II-2004. Abstract: This study describes the results and collection practices for obtaining arthropod samples to be stud- ied as potential sources of new medicines in a bioprospecting effort. From 1994 to 1998, 1800 arthropod sam- ples of 6-10 g were collected in 21 sites of the Área de Conservación Guancaste (A.C.G) in Northwestern Costa Rica. The samples corresponded to 642 species distributed in 21 orders and 95 families. Most of the collections were obtained in the rainy season and in the tropical rainforest and dry forest of the ACG. Samples were obtained from a diversity of arthropod orders: 49.72% of the samples collected corresponded to Lepidoptera, 15.75% to Coleoptera, 13.33% to Hymenoptera, 11.43% to Orthoptera, 6.75% to Hemiptera, 3.20% to Homoptera and 7.89% to other groups. -
Extreme Diversity of Tropical Parasitoid Wasps Exposed by Iterative Integration of Natural History, DNA Barcoding, Morphology, and Collections
Extreme diversity of tropical parasitoid wasps exposed by iterative integration of natural history, DNA barcoding, morphology, and collections M. Alex Smith*†, Josephine J. Rodriguez‡, James B. Whitfield‡, Andrew R. Deans§, Daniel H. Janzen†¶, Winnie Hallwachs¶, and Paul D. N. Hebert* *The Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph Ontario, N1G 2W1 Canada; ‡Department of Entomology, 320 Morrill Hall, University of Illinois, 505 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801; §Department of Entomology, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7613, 2301 Gardner Hall, Raleigh, NC 27695-7613; and ¶Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6018 Contributed by Daniel H. Janzen, May 31, 2008 (sent for review April 18, 2008) We DNA barcoded 2,597 parasitoid wasps belonging to 6 microgas- A detailed recognition of species in parasitoid communities is trine braconid genera reared from parapatric tropical dry forest, cloud necessary because of the pivotal role parasitoids play in food web forest, and rain forest in Area de Conservacio´ n Guanacaste (ACG) in structure and dynamics. While generalizations about the effects of northwestern Costa Rica and combined these data with records of parasitoids on community diversity are complex (7), a common- caterpillar hosts and morphological analyses. We asked whether place predictor of the impact of a parasitoid species on local host barcoding and morphology discover the same provisional species and dynamics is whether the parasitoid is a generalist or specialist. A whether the biological entities revealed by our analysis are congruent generalist, especially a mobile one, is viewed as stabilizing food webs with wasp host specificity. Morphological analysis revealed 171 (see ref. -
Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Microgastrinae) Comb
Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 63 (2019) 238–244 REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE Entomologia A Journal on Insect Diversity and Evolution www.rbentomologia.com Systematics, Morphology and Biogeography First record of Cotesia scotti (Valerio and Whitfield, 2009) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Microgastrinae) comb. nov. parasitising Spodoptera cosmioides (Walk, 1858) and Spodoptera eridania (Stoll, 1782) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil a b a a Josiane Garcia de Freitas , Tamara Akemi Takahashi , Lara L. Figueiredo , Paulo M. Fernandes , c d e Luiza Figueiredo Camargo , Isabela Midori Watanabe , Luís Amilton Foerster , f g,∗ José Fernandez-Triana , Eduardo Mitio Shimbori a Universidade Federal de Goiás, Escola de Agronomia, Setor de Entomologia, Programa de Pós-Graduac¸ ão em Agronomia, Goiânia, GO, Brazil b Universidade Federal do Paraná, Setor de Ciências Agrárias, Programa de Pós-Graduac¸ ão em Agronomia – Produc¸ ão Vegetal, Curitiba, PR, Brazil c Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Programa de Pós-Graduac¸ ão em Ecologia e Recursos Naturais, São Carlos, SP, Brazil d Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Departamento de Ecologia e Biologia Evolutiva, São Carlos, SP, Brazil e Universidade Federal do Paraná, Departamento de Zoologia, Curitiba, PR, Brazil f Canadian National Collection of Insects, Ottawa, Canada g Universidade de São Paulo, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Departamento de Entomologia e Acarologia, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil a b s t r a c t a r t i c l e i n f o Article history: This is the first report of Cotesia scotti (Valerio and Whitfield) comb. nov. in Brazil, attacking larvae of the Received 3 December 2018 black armyworm, Spodoptera cosmioides, and the southern armyworm, S. -
Arima Valley Bioblitz 2013 Final Report.Pdf
Final Report Contents Report Credits ........................................................................................................ ii Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 2 Methods Plants......................................................................................................... 3 Birds .......................................................................................................... 3 Mammals .................................................................................................. 4 Reptiles and Amphibians .......................................................................... 4 Freshwater ................................................................................................ 4 Terrestrial Invertebrates ........................................................................... 5 Fungi .......................................................................................................... 6 Public Participation ................................................................................... 7 Results and Discussion Plants......................................................................................................... 7 Birds .......................................................................................................... 7 Mammals ................................................................................................. -
Moths and Butterflies
LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004MOTHS LJL©2004 LJL©2004AND BUTTERFLIES LJL©2004 LJL©2004 (LEPIDOPTERA) LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 FROM LJL©2004 BAHÍA LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004HONDA LJL©2004 LJL©2004 AND CANALES LJL©2004 LJL©2004 DE TIERRA LJL©2004 ISLANDLJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004(VERAGUAS, LJL©2004 LJL©2004 PANAMA LJL©2004) LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 LJL©2004 -
General Herbivore Outbreak Following an El Ni˜No-Related Drought in A
Journal of Tropical Ecology (2004) 20:625–633. Copyright © 2004 Cambridge University Press DOI: 10.1017/S0266467404001725 Printed in the United Kingdom General herbivore outbreak following an El Nino-related˜ drought in a lowland Panamanian forest Sunshine A. Van Bael∗†, Annette Aiello∗, Anayansi Valderrama∗, Enrique Medianero∗, Mirna Samaniego∗ and S. Joseph Wright∗ ∗Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Box 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama †Department of Animal Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA (Accepted 10 February 2004) Abstract: A severe outbreak of Lepidoptera followed the 1997–98 El Nino˜ Southern Oscillation event, during which the climate in central Panama was unusually dry. The outbreak involved the larvae of at least 12 species of Lepidoptera and occurred at a seasonally dry, deciduous forest site, where extensive background data were available regarding climate, tree species and non-outbreak herbivory levels. Most Lepidoptera were associated with only one or two larval host plant species belonging to the same family, and the majority were monophagous during this study. During the outbreak, caterpillar densities for the major outbreak species averaged 1.6 larvae per young leaf and 0.18 larvae per leaf for leaves of all ages. For canopy trees and lianas, the mean level of leaf damage was 13.8%, ranging from 1–100%. Seven out of 20 tree species sustained most of the damage, with 21–37% of the leaf area consumed. Relative to non-outbreak years, damage levels increased by more than 250% during the outbreak. Single-species outbreaks were observed in other areas with a similar drought, but wetter forests in central Panama did not experience outbreaks during this period. -
General Herbivore Outbreak Following an El Nino-Related Drought in a Lowland Panamanian Forest
Journal of Tropical Ecology (2004) 20:1-9. Copyright © 2004 Cambridge University Press DOI: 10.1017/S0266467404001725 Printed in the United Kingdom General herbivore outbreak following an El Nino-related drought in a lowland Panamanian forest Sunshine A. Van Bael, Annette Aiello, Anayansi Valderrama, Enrique IVIedianero, IVIirna Samaniego and S. Josepin Wriglit Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Box 2072, Balboa, Republic of Panama (Accepted 10 February 2004) Abstract: A severe outbreak of Lepidoptera followed the 1997-98 El Niño Southern Oscillation event, during which the climate in central Panama was unusually dry. The outbreak involved the larvae of at least 12 species of Lepidoptera and occurred at a seasonally dry, deciduous forest site, where extensive background data were available regarding climate, tree species and non-outbreak herbivory levels. Most Lepidoptera were associated with only one or two larval host plant species belonging to the same family, and the majority were monophagous during this study. During the outbreak, caterpillar densities for the major outbreak species averaged 1.6 larvae per young leaf and 0.18 larvae per leaf for leaves of all ages. For canopy trees and lianas, the mean level of leaf damage was 13.8%, ranging from 1-100%. Seven out of 20 tree species sustained most of the damage, with 21-3 7% of the leaf area consumed. Relative to non-outbreak years, damage levels increased by more than 250% during the outbreak. Single-species outbreaks were observed in other areas with a similar drought, but wetter forests in central Panama did not experience outbreaks during this period. Historically, fewer outbreaks have been reported from tropical forests than in temperate forests, however, similar El Nino-related outbreaks have occurred recently in several other locations throughout the tropics. -
Insect Outbreaks in Tropical Forests: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Consequences
11 Insect Outbreaks in Tropical Forests: Patterns, Mechanisms, and Consequences Lee A. Dyer, Walter P. Carson, and Egbert G. Leigh Jr. 11.1 Introduction “First of all, the statement that there are no outbreaks in tropical forests (Elton 1958) is wrong.” Wolda (1983) issued this verdict when he demonstrated that over six-year periods, tropical insect populations fluctuated as strongly as temperate ones. Nevertheless, the paradigm that tropical forests are free of outbreaks (Elton 1958) has persisted in the face of strong evidence to the contrary (Nair 2007). In fact, the term “tropical outbreaks” is usually associated with disease outbreak literature or, to a lesser extent, with insect outbreaks in agricultural ecosystems or tree plantations (Nair 2007). However, as studies of insect natural history and population dynamics in the tropics accumulate, it is clear that insect outbreaks occur in most natural tropical terrestrial ecosystems and that these outbreaks may occur moderately frequently (Table 11.1). Our goal is to review what is currently known about the frequency, causes, and consequences of outbreaks both within and among tropical forests worldwide. In this chapter, we do the following: (1) define an outbreak, identify different general types of outbreaks, and outline challenges associated with quantifying and detecting outbreaks in tropical forests; (2) point out potential biotic linkages between outbreaks in managed landscapes and those in more natural forests; (3) identify taxa that are known to outbreak and traits that make species prone to outbreak; (4) predict where outbreaks are likely to occur both within a stand and across gradients from dry to wet forests; (5) discuss the consequences of outbreaks for plant communities and species coexistence; (6) make predictions about how global climate change will alter the frequency and severity of outbreaks; and, finally, (7) propose a series of testable hypotheses concerning outbreaks in the tropics to serve as a guide for future research. -
Revista De Biología Tropical - Recolecta De Artrópodos Para Prospección De La Biodiversidad En El Área De Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica
6/3/2014 Revista de Biología Tropical - Recolecta de artrópodos para prospección de la biodiversidad en el Área de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica Revista de Biología Tropical Services on Demand Print version ISSN 0034-7744 Article Rev. biol. trop vol.52 n.1 San José Mar. 2004 Article in xml format Article references Recolecta de artrópodos para prospección de la biodiversidad en el Área de Conservación Guanacaste, Costa Rica How to cite this article Automatic translation Send this article by e-mail Vanessa Nielsen 1,2 , Priscilla Hurtado1 , Daniel H. Janzen3 , Giselle Tamayo1 & Ana Sittenfeld1,4 Indicators 1 Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INBio), Santo Domingo de Heredia, Costa Rica. Cited by SciELO 2 Dirección actual: Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San José, Related links Costa Rica. Share 3 Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA. ShaSrehaSrehaSrehaSrehaMreorMe ore 4 Dirección actual: Centro de Investigación en Biología Celular y Molecular, Universidad MorMe ore de Costa Rica. Permalink [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Recibido 21-I-2003. Corregido 19-I-2004. Aceptado 04-II-2004. Abstract This study describes the results and collection practices for obtaining arthropod samples to be studied as potential sources of new medicines in a bioprospecting effort. From 1994 to 1998, 1800 arthropod samples of 6-10 g were collected in 21 sites of the Área de Conservación Guancaste (A.C.G) in Northwestern Costa Rica. The samples corresponded to 642 species distributed in 21 orders and 95 families. -
Ocorrência De Lepidópteros De Importância Médica
Biotemas, 25 (4), 279-283, dezembro de 2012 doi: 10.5007/2175-7925.2012v25n4p279279 ISSNe 2175-7925 Comunicação Breve Ocorrência de lepidópteros de importância médica (Lepidoptera: Aididae, Lasiocampidae, Limacodidae e Megalopygidae) no Cerro da Buena, município de Morro Redondo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil Ricardo Russo Siewert ¹* Eduardo José Ely e Silva ² ¹ PPG em Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Avenida Bento Gonçalves, 9500, Prédio 43435, Laboratório 218 CEP 91501-970 Porto Alegre – RS, Brasil ² Museu Entomológico Ceslau Biezanko, Departamento de Fitossanidade Faculdade de Agronomia Eliseu Maciel, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Campus Universitário, s/n., Caixa Postal 354, CEP 96010-900, Pelotas, RS, Brasil *Autor para correspondência [email protected] Submetido em 01/02/2012 Aceito para publicação em 29/08/2012 Resumo O propósito deste estudo foi registrar a fauna de lepidópteros de importância médica ocorrente no Cerro da Buena, município de Morro Redondo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, entre fevereiro de 2009 a janeiro de 2011. Foram registradas 32 espécies de mariposas, pertencentes à Aididae (1), Lasiocampidae (17), Limacodidae (7) e Megalopygidae (7). Três novas ocorrências de Lasiocampidae para o Rio Grande do Sul foram realizadas: Artace argentina Schaus, 1924, Euglyphis kotzschi Draudt, 1927 e Tolype trilinea (Dognin, 1901). Palavras-chave: Inventário; Mariposas; Sul do Brasil Abstract Occurrence of lepidopterans of medical importance (Lepidoptera: Aididae, Lasiocampidae, Limacodidae e Megalopygidae) in the Cerro da Buena, Morro Redondo municipality, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. This study recorded the lepidopterans of medical importance from Cerro da Buena in Rio Grande do Sul State. Field expeditions were carried out from February 2009 to January 2011. -
RAPPORT Trinité
MISSION ENTOMOLOGIQUE Octobre 2010 Réserve Naturelle de la Trinité, site de Roche Bénitier Etude réalisée par la Etude commandée par Mission entomologique SEAG Octobre 2010 – Réserve Trinité / Station Roche Bénitier Réserve Naturelle de la Trinité Site de Roche Bénitier Mission d’inventaire entomologique Octobre 2010 Rapport Objet : Ce rapport fait état des résultats obtenus suite à l’échantillonnage effectué sur le site de Roche Bénitier dans la Réserve Naturelle de la Trinité par la Société Entomologique Antilles-Guyane du 2 octobre 2010 au 10 octobre 2010. Le rapport présente les différentes méthodes mises en œuvre, quelques photos par famille, des commentaires et quelques travaux statistiques sur les familles et ordres étudiés. Les listes d’espèces déterminées ainsi que les déterminateurs sont donnés en annexe. Maître d’ouvrage : Office National des Forêts Direction Régionale de Guyane Contact : Marguerite Delaval, conservateur de la Réserve de la Trinité Réalisation de l’étude Société entomologique Antilles-Guyane Président : Pierre-Henri DALENS Association Loi 1901 06 94 26 14 76 N° SIRET : 498 671 742 00019 Mail : [email protected] 18 Lotissement Amaryllis Secrétaire : Stéphane BRÛLÉ 97354 Rémire-Montjoly 06 94 26 21 19 Mail : [email protected] Citation conseillée du rapport : BRÛLÉ S., TOUROULT J. & DALENS P.-H., (coord.). 2011. -- Résultats de la mission entomologique du site de Roche Bénitier, Réserve de la Trinité (Guyane), Octobre 2010 . Rapport de la Société entomologique Antilles-Guyane, SEAG, ONF, 93 pp.+ annexes. Non publié. Mission entomologique SEAG Octobre 2010 – Réserve Trinité / Station Roche Bénitier Remerciements Nous tenons à remercier Marguerite DELAVAL (ONF), conservateur de la Réserve Naturelle de la Trinité. -
An Annotated List of the Lepidoptera of Honduras
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 2-29-2012 An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Honduras Jacqueline Y. Miller University of Florida, [email protected] Deborah L. Matthews University of Florida, [email protected] Andrew D. Warren University of Florida, [email protected] M. Alma Solis Systematic Entomology Laboratory, PSI, Agriculture Research Service, USDA, [email protected] Donald J. Harvey Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Miller, Jacqueline Y.; Matthews, Deborah L.; Warren, Andrew D.; Solis, M. Alma; Harvey, Donald J.; Gentili- Poole, Patricia; Lehman, Robert; Emmel, Thomas C.; and Covell, Charles V., "An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Honduras" (2012). Insecta Mundi. 725. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/725 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Jacqueline Y. Miller, Deborah L. Matthews, Andrew D. Warren, M. Alma Solis, Donald J. Harvey, Patricia Gentili-Poole, Robert Lehman, Thomas C. Emmel, and Charles V. Covell This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ insectamundi/725 INSECTA A Journal of World Insect Systematics MUNDI 0205 An annotated list of the Lepidoptera of Honduras Jacqueline Y. Miller, Deborah L.