FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 35 • NUMBER 229 Wednesday, November 25,1970 • Washington, D.C. Pages 18029-18099

Agencies in this issue— p Agricultural Research Service > Army Department Atomic Energy Commission Civil Aeronautics Board Comptroller of the Currency Defense Department Domestic Commerce Bureau Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communications Commission Federal Home Loan Bank Board Federal Power Commission Federal Trade Commission Fish and Wildlife Service Indian Affairs Bureau Internal Revenue Service Interstate Commerce Commission Land Management Bureau National Highway Safety Bureau National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Public Health Service Wage and Hour Division Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Latest Edition Guide to Record Retention Requirements

[Revised as of January 1, 1970]

This useful reference tool is designed they must be kept. Each digest carries to keep businessmen and the general a reference to the full text of the basic public informed concerning the many law or regulation providing for such published requirements in Federal laws retention. and regulations relating to record retention. The booklet’s index, numbering over 2,200 items, lists for ready reference The 89-page “Guide” contains about 1,000 digests which tell the user (1) the categories of persons, companies, what type records must be kept, (2) and products affected by Federal who must keep them, and (3) how long record retention requirements.

Price: $1.00

Compiled by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration

Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402

X

/ * £ \ Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or on the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, National FEDERAL®REGISTER Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration, Washington, D.O. 20408, Area Code 202 > »34 ¿(K Phone 962-8626 pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1936 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., Ch. 15), under regulations prescribed by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, ap­ proved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The F ederal Register will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $2.50 per month or $25 per year, payable in advance. The charge for individual copies is 20 cents for each issue, or 20 cents for each group of pages as actually bound. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code o f F ederal Regulations, which is published, under 50 titles, pursuant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended (44 U.S.C. 1510). The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of new books are listed in the first F ederal Register issue of each month. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the Federal R egister or the Code of F ederal Regulations. Contents

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH DOMESTIC COMMERCE FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE SERVICE BUREAU Rules and Regulations Notices Rules and Regulations Migratory birds; seasons and Foreign quarantine notices; okra. 18033 Duty-free entry of scientific ar­ Hog cholera and other communi­ ticles; decisions on applications limits on certain game birds___ 18053 cable swine diseases; areas quar­ (8 documents)______18082-18084 antined (4 documents)_ 18034-18036 HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND Overtime services relating to- im­ FEDERAL AVIATION WELFARE DEPARTMENT ports and exports; commuted ADMINISTRATION travel time allowances______18036 See Public Health Service. Rules and Regulations Notices Control area and reporting point; INDIAN AFFAIRS BUREAU Stockyards and slaughtering es­ alteration______18039 tablishments; specific approval, 18067 Rules and Regulations Proposed Rule Making AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Airplane and rotorcraft manuals, Leasing and permitting; certain markings, and placards______18054 California lands determined to See Agricultural Research Service. be within Colorado River Reser­ Notices vation ______18051 ARMY DEPARTMENT El Monte Air Traffic Control Tower, Calif.; commissioning_ 18086 Rules and Regulations INTERIOR DEPARTMENT Procurement; miscellaneous FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS See Fish and Wildlife Service; amendments______: 18048 COMMISSION Indian Affairs Bureau; Land ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION Rules and Regulations Management Bureau. Notices Radio broadcast services; stand­ ard broadcasting agreements be­ INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Commonwealth Edison Co.j appli­ tween U.S. and Mexico______18052 cation for construction permits Proposed Rule Making Proposed Rule Making and facility licenses—______18086 Exempt organizations; returns Long Island Lighting Co.; hear­ Television broadcast stations; ing _____ ;______18086 table of assignments; exten­ and annual reports______18055 sions of time: CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Gastonia and Monroe, N.C___ 18059 INTERSTATE COMMERCE * Kerrville-Fredericksburg, Tex_ 18059 Proposed Rule Making COMMISSION Notices MAC minimum rates for overseas and foreign air transportation- 18056 Niagara Communications, Inc.; Notices memorandum opinion and order Increased freight rates; 1970 and Notices designating applications for Hearings, etc.: consolidated hearing on stated 1971 ------18091 Air Haiti, S.A______18086 issues______18089 Motor carriers: Hop Air Freight Forwarder, Inc_ 18086 Applications and certain other International Air Transport As­ FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK proceedings______18091 sociation (3 documents)___ 18087 BOARD Sedalia, Marshall, Boonville Intrastate applications.______18096 Stage Line, Inc______18088 Rules and Regulations Transfer proceedings_____ - __ 18097 Washington Airways, Inc_____ 18088 Conflicts of interest______18038 Secured debt limitation for service LABOR DEPARTMENT COMMERCE DEPARTMENT corporations ______18038 See Domestic Commerce Bureau; See Wage and Hour Division. National Oceanic and Atmos­ FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION pheric Administration. Notices LAND MANAGEMENT BUREAU Hearings, etc.: COMPTROLLER OF THE Alabama Power Co______18062 Notices CURRENCY Columbia Gulf Transmission Classifications of public lands: Co. et al______18060 C alifornia______18065 Rules and Regulations Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. Investment securities; securities et al______18063 Idaho (3 documents) 18065, 18066 eligible for underwriting and un­ Ramsey & Gassaway Oil & Gas Nevada ______18067 limited holding______18037 Properties et al______18061 NATIONAL HIGHWAY FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION DEFENSE DEPARTMENT Rules and Regulations SAFETY BUREAU See also Army Department. Guides: Proposed Rule Making Rules and Regulations Feather and down products in­ Contracting; reporting procedures dustry; deferment of effective Warning devices on passenger on defense-related employment. 18040 d ate------18039 cars, trucks, and buses; motor Foreign tax relief program______18045 Wigs and other hairpieces; vehicle safety standard; correc­ labeling, advertising and sale; tion ------18055 Sale of DOD directives, instruc­ extension of effective date of tions, and indexes to public___ .18047 labeling provisions ______18039 (Continued on next page) 18031 18032 CONTENTS

NATIONAL OCEANIC AND PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT ATMOSPHERIC Rules and Regulations See Federal Aviation Administra- , tion; National Highway Safety ADMINISTRATION Metropolitan Port Smith inter­ state air quality control Bureau. Notices region______18051 TREASURY DEPARTMENT Loan applications: See Comptroller of the Currency; Davis, Harvey Warden------18085 Internal Revenue Service. Hicks, B.P. and Larry W------18085 Johnson, James, Jr., and James WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION R. Henderson------18085 Notices Kinney, Arnold A------’ 18085 Federal Wage Garnishment Law; Larsen, Ottar G------.------18085 application by State of Utah for Martin, Charles Ray, Jr------18086 exemption______.______18090

List of CFR Parts Affected The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today's issue. A cumulative list of parts affected, covering the current month to date, appears at die end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1970, and specifies how they are affected. 593 ______18048 7 CFR 16 CFR 594 _ 18050 319______18033 252 ______-18039 596 _ 18050 253 ____ 18039 597 __ 18050 9 CFR 599______18050 76 (4 documents)___i ------18034-18036 25 CFR 603______18050 97___:______18036 131______„.18051 606______18051 608—______18051 12 CFR 26 CFR 1______18037 P roposed R ules: 42 CFR 555______*______18038 1______18055 81______18051 ' 563__1______18038 301______-______18055 571______18038 47 CFR 32 CFR 73______18052 14 CFR 166______18040 211__ 18045 P roposed R ules: 71______18039 289___ 18047 73 (2 documents)------18059 P roposed R ules: 591______18048 23______18054 49 CFR 27______-18054 P roposed R ules: 91______18054 571______1______18055 121______18054 127______.. 18054 288______18056 50 CFR 399______18056 i o „ ...... 18053 18033 Rules and Regulations

gation with methyl bromide at normal period of fumigation and until the okra atmospheric pressure, under supervision, has been removed to a well-ventilated Title 7— AGRICULTURE in a fumigation chamber which has been location. Strong blasts of air should not Chapter III— Agricultural Research approved for that purpose, as prescribed be directed against the okra. Fumigation Service, Department of Agriculture in this section. This treatment is specific at temperatures in excess of 90° F. may for the pink bollworm (Pectinophora result in injury to okra and should be PART 319—-FOREIGN QUARANTINE gossypiella (Saund.) ) which is known to avoided if possible. Past experience indi­ NOTICES occur in Mexico, the West Indies, and cates that injury may also result from South America. Under certain cultural excess moisture, such as residual mois­ Subpart— Fruits and Vegetables conditions this pest will infest okra. ture from harvesting when dew-covered. E ntry of Okra (2) Approval of fumigation chambers. (5) Supervision of fumigation—(i) (i) Fumigation chambers in the United Other than interior of Mexico. Inspec­ Pursuant to the authority conferred States or elsewhere will be approved only tors will supervise the fumigation of okra by the Fruit and Vegetable Quarantine if they are properly constructed and ade­ at approved fumigation plants in loca­ (Notice of Quarantine No. 56, 7 CFR quately equipped to handle and treat, tions other than those in the interior of 319.56), and § 319.56-2 of the regulations okra. Within the United States the Mexico and will specify safeguards in supplemental thereto (7 CFR 319.56-2), chambers must be located within the specific cases for the packing, other issued under sections 5 and 9 of the practicable supervisory range of inspec­ handling and transportation of the okra Plant Quarantine Act of 1912 and sec­ tors of the Plant Quarantine Division before and subsequent to fumigation, if, tion 106 of the Federal Plant Pest Act stationed at the ports of entry author­ in the opinion of the inspector, this is (7 U.S.C. 159, 162, 150ee), administra­ ized in permits for the importation of necessary to assure that there will be no tive instructions appearing as §§ 319.56- okra. Approval of fumigation chambers risk of introducing plant pests into the 2k, 319.56-20, and 319.56-2q (7 CFR outside the United States will depend United States associated with the treat­ 319.56-2k, 319.56-20, 319.56-2q) are de­ upon the availability of qualified inspec­ ment and importation of the okra. The leted and a new section to appear as tors for assignment to supervise the final release of the okra for entry into the § 319.56-2t is substituted therefor to read treatment and posttreatment handling United States will be conditioned upon as follows: of okra. compliance with the specified safeguards. § 319.56—2t Administrative instructions (ii) Determination of eligibility forSuch supervision at plants within the prescribing treatment and relieving approval under this section of fumiga­ United States will be carried on as a part restrictions regarding importation of tion plants in locations in the interior of of normal port inspection activities. okra from Mexico, the West Indies, Mexico (i.e. not within the practicable (ii) Interior of Mexico. Inspectors will and certain countries in South supervisory range of inspectors stationed supervise the fumigation of okra at ap­ America. at an authorized port of entry) may be proved fumigation plants in the interior (a) Conditions for issuance of permits. made by an inspector of the Plant Pro­ of Mexico and will prescribe safeguards (1) Under § 319.56-2, okra may be im­ tection Division1 at the request of the in specific cases for the packing and ported under permit and in compliance Plant Quarantine Division. Determina­ other handling of the okra at the treat­ with the regulations in this subpart, from tion of eligibility for approval under this ing plant and the transportation of the Mexico, the West Indies, Colombia, Ecua­ section of fumigation plants in other lo­ okra from the time it leaves the treating dor, Peru, and Venezuela and any other cations will be made by an inspector of plant until it reaches the U.S. port of South American country specified in the the Plant Quarantine Division. entry, if in the opinion of the inspector permit, upon presentation of evidence (3) Fumigation schedule. Such fumi­ this is necessary to assure that there will that it has been treated in accordance gation shall be in accordance with the be no risk of introducing plant pests into with the procedure prescribed in para­ following fumigation schedule: the United States associated with the graph (b) of this section. treatment and importation of the okra. (2) Further, it is hereby determined, Dosage (pounds The final release of the okra for entry pursuant to § 319.56, that existing condi­ of methyl Exposure into the United States will be conditioned Temperature (° F.) bromide per period tions as to the pest risk involved in the 1,000 cubic (hours) upon compliance with the prescribed importation of okra from such countries feet) safeguards. make it safe to make less stringent the (6) Ports of entry. Okra required to restrictions contained in § 319.56-2, by 90-96...... 1.0 2 be treated as a condition of importation allowing the importation of okra, as pro­ 80-89...... _...... 1.5 2 will be limited to entry at New Orleans 70-79...... 2.0 2 vided in paragraphs (c), (d), and (e) 60-69...... 2.5 2 or such other South Atlantic or gulf of this section without routinely requir­ 60-69...... 3.0 2 ports with approved treatment facilities ing such treatment. 40-49...... 3.5 2 as may be named in the permit, except (3) As used in this section—(i) “West that, in addition, Mexican okra required Indies” means the foreign islands lying (4) Fumigation procedure. Okra to beto be treated as a condition of impor­ between North and South America, the fumigated may be packed in slatted tation will be enterable at Mexican Bor­ Caribbean Sea, and the Atlantic Ocean, crates or other gas-permeable containers. der ports named in the permit. divided into the Bahamas, the Greater The fumigation chamber shall not be (7) Costs. Persons desiring to import Antilles, and the Lesser Antilles (includ­ loaded to more than two-thirds of its okra required to be treated under this ing the Leeward Islands, the Windward capacity. The containers may be stacked section must make advance arrange­ Islands, and the islands north of Vene­ one on top of another, but a 3- to 4-inch ments for approval of the fumigation zuela) ; and (ii) “Inspector” means an space must be provided between all con­ plant and for supervision of the fumi­ inspector of the Plant Quarantine Divi­ tainers throughout the load. Good air gation by an authorized inspector. All sion; or an inspector of the Plant Pro­ circulation above and below the load shall costs of constructing, maintaining, and tection Division, Agricultural Research be provided as soon as the okra is loaded operating fumigation plants and facil­ Service of the U.S. Department of Agri­ and must be continued during the full ities, and carrying out specified pretreat­ culture, when assigned to perform duties ment and posttreatment safeguards, and under this section pursuant to an agree­ 1 Preliminary inquiries should be directedall additional costs to the Department ment between the two Divisions. to the Regional Supervisor, Plant Protection arising from supervision under this sec­ (b) Authorized treatment procedure. Division, Apartado Postal No. 815, Monterrey, tion, by an inspector away from his (1) The treatment shall consist of fumi­ Nuevo Leon, Mexico. regular place of official duty or outside

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18034 RULES AND REGULATIONS of his regular hours of official duty (in­ North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsyl­ These administrative instructions shall cluding as appropriate, base salary, over­ vania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, become effective upon publication in thé time and holiday pay, travel subsistence, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West Vir­ F ederal R egister, when they shall super­ transportation, employee benefits, and ginia, Wisconsin, or Wyoming, or the sede 7 CFR 319.56-2k, 319.56-2o, and incidental expenses) shall be borne by District of Columbia, or any part of Illi­ 319.56-2q, effective August 14, 1969, the owner of the okra or his representa­ nois, Kentucky, Missouri, or Virginia, February 8, 1962, and April 16, 1968, tive. Where normal inspection activities north of the 38th parallel. respectively. preclude the furnishing of supervision (5) Okra produced in Mexico may en­ The principal purpose of these in­ during regularly assigned hours of duty, ter the United States during the period structions is to relieve the treatment re­ supervision will be furnished on a reim­ May 16 to November 30, inclusive, under quirements for okra imported through bursable ba^is. The owner of the okra permit and subject to port of entry in­ North Atlantic ports into certain north­ or his representative must furnish the spection and fumigation requirements if ern areas under permit from the West Director of the Plant Quarantine Divi­ destined to Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Indies and certain countries in South sion with acceptable assurances that he Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nevada, America. This action will make consistent will provide funds to the U.S. Depart­ North Carolina, South Carolina, or Ten­ the entry requirements for untreated ment of Agriculture to cover all costs of nessee or any part of Illinois, Kentucky, okra, from these localities, with the supervision, in accordance with §§ 354.1 Missouri, or Virginia, south of the 38th present regulations under the domestic and 354.2 of this chapter and this parallel. pink bollworm quarantine (7 CFR 301.52, subparagraph. (6) Okra produced in Mexico is sub­ 301.52-1 et seq.) in respect to movement (8) Department not responsible forject to fumigation requirements if any of untreated okra from regulated areas damage. While the prescribed treatment pests of quarantine significance, in the of the United States into the designated is judged from experimental tests to be judgment of the inspector, are found northern areas. Such importations will safe for use with okra, the Department upon port of entry inspection. not result in the spread of the pink boll­ assumes no responsibility for any dam­ (d) Importations of okra without worm within the United States. Miami, age sustained through or in the course treatment from the West Indies and Fla., is removed from listing in the in­ of treatment or because of pretreatment certain countries in South America. (1) structions as a part of entry where treat­ or posttreatment safeguards. There has Okra produced in the West Indies, Co­ ment is authorized as a condition of not been an opportunity to test these lombia, Ecuador, Peru, Venezuela, or entry of okra because treatment facilities treatments under all conditions or on all other South American country, desig­ are no longer available at that port. okra varieties or on okra from all areas nated in accordance with § 319.56-2 in These administrative instructions in involved. a permit to import okra, may enter the part relieve restrictions and in order to (c) Importations of okra withoutUnited States through any North Atlan­ be of maximum benefit to persons sub­ treatment authorized from Mexico under tic port with approved treatment facili­ ject to the restrictions, they should be the following conditions. (1) Okra pro­ ties, under permit and subject to inspec­ made effective as promptly as possible. duced in Mexico may enter the United tion at the port of entry but without Insofar as the instructions may be States at any time during the year, under fumigation except as provided in sub- deemed in part to impose more stringent permit and subject to inspection at the paragraph (2) of this paragraph if des­ requirements then heretofore prescribed, port of entry, but without fumigation tined to: Alaska, Colorado, Connecticut, they should be made effective promptly except as provided in subparagraph (6) Delaware, Hawaii, Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, to prevent the spread of plant pests into of this paragraph, if destined to an area Kansas, Maine, Maryland, Massachu­ the United States. Therefore, pursuant comprised of the States of Arizona, New setts, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, to the administrative^procedure provi­ Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas, which is Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, sions of 5 U.S.C. 553, it is found upon the generally infested pink bollworm New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, good cause that notice and other public regulated area designated in § 301.52-2a Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Da­ procedure with respect to these instruc­ of this chapter. kota, Utah, Vermont, Washington, West tions are impracticable and unnecessary (2) Okra produced in Mexico may Virginia, Wisconsin, or Wyoming, or the and good cause is found for making the enter the United States during the District of Columbia, or any part of Illi­ instructions effective less than 30 days period December 1 to May 15, inclusive, nois, Kentucky, Missouri, or Virginia, after publication in the F ederal under permit and subject to inspection north of the 38th parallel. R egister. at the port of entry, but without fumi­ (2) Okra subject to subparagraph (1) gation except as provided in subpara­ of this paragraph is subject to fumiga­ Done at Hyattsville, Md., this 19th day graph (6) of this paragraph, if destined tion requirements if any plant pests of of November 1970. to any part of the United States except quarantine significance, in the judgment [seal] F. A. J ohnston, California. of the inspector, other than pink boll- Director, (3) Okra produced in Mexico may worm are found upon port of entry in­ Plant Quarantine Division. spection or the shipment is destined to enter the United States during the [P.R. Doc. 70-15835; Piled, Nov. 24, 1970; period January 1 to March 15, inclusive, a place other than one of those men­ 8:47 a.m.] under permit and subject to port of en­ tioned above. try inspection, but without fumigation (e) Importation of okra without except as provided in subparagraph (6) treatment from Andros Island of the of this paragraph, if destined to Cali­ Bahamas; and okra without treatment fornia. (Okra produced in Mexico and from the West Indies for importation Title 9— ANIMALS AND destined to California is subject to per­ into the American Virgin Islands. Okra mit, port of entry inspection and fumi­ produced in Andros Island, Bahamas, ANIMAL PRODUCTS gation requirements if it is to enter may enter the United States under per­ the United States during the period mit through any port named in the per­ Chapter I— Agricultural Research March 16 to December 31, inclusive.) mit, without fumigation but subject to Service, Department of Agriculture (4) Okra produced in Mexico may en­ inspection at the port of entry. Okra SUBCHAPTER C— INTERSTATE TRANSPORTATION ter the United States during thé period produced in the West Indies may enter OF ANIMALS AND POULTRY May 16 to November 30, inclusive, under the American Virgin Islands without permit and subject to port of entry fumigation but subject to inspection at [Docket No. 70-299] inspection, but without fumigation ex­ the port of entry. Okra within this para­ PART 76— HOG CHOLERA AND cept as provided in subparagraph (6) of graph shall be subject to fumigation re­ OTHER COMMUNICABLE SWINE this paragraph, if destined to Alaska, quirements if any plant pests of quaran­ DISEASES Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, tine significance, in the judgment of the inspector, are found upon port of entry Areas Quarantined Idaho, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Maine, inspection. Pursuant to provisions of the Act of Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, (Secs. 5, 9, 37 Stat. 316, 318, sec. 106, 71 Stat. Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New 33; 7 U.S.C. 150ee 159, 162, 29 FH. 16210, as May 29, 1884, as amended, the Act of Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, amended; 7 OPR 319.56, 319.56-2) February 2,1903, as amended, the Act of FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18035

March 3, 1905, as amended, the Act of (12) North Carolina, (i) Pasquotankinterest, and good cause is found for September 6,1961, and the Act of July 2, County. making them effective less than 30 days 1962 (21 U.S.C, 111-H3, 114g, 115, 117 3. In § 76.2, in paragraph (e) (14) after publication in the F ederal 120, 121, 123-126, 134b, 134f), Part 76, relating to the State of South Carolina, R egister. Title 9, Code of Federal Regulations, re­ subdivision (ii) relating to Williamsburg Done at Washington, D.C., this 19th stricting the interstate movement of County is amended to read: day of November 1970. swine and certain products because of (14) South Carolina. * * * hog cholera and other communicable (ii) That portion of Williamsburg F. J. Mulhern, swine diseases, is hereby amended in the County bounded by a line beginning at Acting Administrator, following respects: the junction of the Seaboard Coast Line Agricultural Research Service. 1. In § 76.2, in paragraph (e) (15) re­ Railroad and State Highway 512; thence, [F.R. Doc. 70-15832; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; lating to the State of Texas, subdivision following the Seaboard Coast Line Rail­ 8:46 a.m.] (x) relating to Randall County is de­ road in a northeasterly direction to State leted, and new subdivisions (xvi) relat­ Highway 261; thence, following State ing to Smith County, and (xvii) relating Highway 261 in an easterly direction to [Docket No. 70-300] to Stephens County are added to read: c Secondary Highway 242; thence, follow­ PART 76— HOG CHOLERA AND (15) Texas. * * * ing Secondary Highway 242 in a south­ OTHER COMMUNICABLE SWINE (xvi) That portion of Smith County easterly direction to State Highway 513; DISEASES bounded by a line beginning at the junc­ thence, following State Highway 513 in tion of Farm-to-Market Road 16 and a southwesterly direction to State High­ Areas Quarantined Farm-to-Market Road 849 in the town way 512; thence, following State High­ of Lindale; thence, following Farm-to- way 512 in a northwesterly direction to Pursuant to provisions of the Act of Market Road 16 in a generally easterly its junction with the Seaboard Coast Line May 29, 1884, as amended, the Act of direction to Farm-to-Market Road 2015; February 2, 1903, as amended, the Act Railroad. of March 3, 1905, as amended, the Act of thence, following Farm-to-Market Road (Secs. 4-7, 23 Stat. 32, as amended, secs. 1, 2015 in a southwesterly direction to In­ September 6, 1961, and the Act of July 2, 2, 32 Stat. 791-792, as amended, secs. 1-4, 33 1962 (21 U.S.C. 111-113, 114g, 115, 117, terstate Highway 20; thence, following Stat. 1264, 1265, as amended, sec. 1, 75 Interstate Highway 20 in a southeasterly Stat. 481, secs. 3 and 11, 76 Stat. 130, 132; 120, 121, 123-126, 134b, 1340, Part 76, direction to U.S. Highway 271; thence, 21 U.S.C. 111, 112, 113, 114g, 115, 117, 120, Title 9, Code of Federal Regulations, following U.S. Highway 271 in a south­ 121, 123-126, 134b, 134f; 29 FH. 16210, as restricting the interstate movement of westerly direction to Farm-to-Market amended) swine and certain products because of Road 2908; thence, following Farm-to- hog cholera and other communicable Effective date. The foregoing amend­ swine diseases, is hereby amended in the Market Road 2908 in a generally south­ ments shall become effective upon westerly direction to State Highway 31; following respects: issuance. 1. In § 76.2, the introductory portion thence, following State Highway 31 in a The amendments quarantine portions southwesterly direction to State High­ of paragraph (e) is amended by adding of Smith and Stephens Counties in Texas the name of the State of Indiana, and way 64; thence, following State Highway because of the existence of hog cholera. 64 in a northwesterly direction to Farm- a new paragraph (e) (4) relating to the This action is deemed necessary to pre­ State of Indiana is added to read: to-Market Road 724; thence, following vent further spread of the disease. The Farm-to-Market Road 724 in a north­ (4) Indiana. That portion of Wayne restrictions pertaining to the interstate County comprised of New Garden westerly direction to State Highway 110; movement of swine and swine products Township. thence, following State Highway 110 in from or through quarantined areas as 2. In § 76.2, in paragraph (e) (12) a southeasterly direction to Farm-to- contained in 9 CFR Part 76, as amended; relating to the State of North Carolina, Market Road 849; thence, following will apply to the quarantined portions of Farm-to-Market Road 849 in a north­ subdivision (i) relating to Pasquotank such counties. County is deleted. easterly direction to its junction with The amendments also exclude all of Farm-to-Market Road 16 in the town of (Secs. 4-7, 23 Stat. 32, as amended, secs. 1, Randall County, Tex.; a portion of Wil­ 2, 32 Stat. 791-792, as amended, secs. 1-4, 33 Lindale. liamsburg County, S.C.; and all of Cam­ (xvii) That portion of Stephens Stat. 1264, 1265, as amended, sec. 1, 75 Stat. den County, N.C., from the areas quaran­ 481, secs. 3 and 11, 76 Stat. 130, 132; 21 County bounded by a line beginning at tined because of hog cholera. Therefore, U.S.C. 111, 112, 113, 114g, 115, 117, 120, 121, the junction of U.S. Highway 183 (also the restrictions pertaining to the inter­ 123-126, 134b, 134f; 29 FJR. 16210, as State Highway 6) and U.S. Highway 180 amended) (also State Highway 67); thence, fol­ state movement of swine and swine prod­ lowing U.S. Highway 180 (also State ucts from or through quarantined areas Effective date. The foregoing amend­ Highway 67) in an easterly direction to as contained in 9 CFR Part 76, as ments shall become effective upon the division of U.S. Highway 180 and amended, will not apply to the excluded issuance. State Highway 67; thence, following areas, but will continue to apply to the The amendments quarantine a portion State Highway 67 in a northeasterly di­ quarantined areas described in § 76.2(e). of Wayne County, Ind., because of the Further, the restrictions pertaining to the existence of hog cholera. This action is rection to Farm-to-Market Road 717; interstate movement of swine and swine thence, following Farm-to-Market Road deemed necessary to prevent further products from nonquarantined areas spread of the disease. The restrictions 717 in a generally southeasterly direc­ contained in said Part 76 will apply to tion to Farm-to-Market Road 207; pertaining to the interstate movement of thence, following Farm-to-Market Road the areas excluded from quarantine. swine and swine products from or 207 in a westerly, then northwesterly di­ Insofar as the amendments impose through quarantined areas as contained certain further restrictions necessary to in 9 CFR Part 76, as amended, will apply rection to Farm-to-Market Road 576; prevent the interstate spread of hog thence, following Farm-to-Market Road .to the quarantined portion of such 576 in a westerly direction to U.S. High­ cholera, they must be made effective im­ county. mediately to accomplish their purpose The amendments also exclude all of way 183 (also State Highway 6); thence, in the public interest. Insofar as they following U.S. Highway 183 (also State Pasquotank County, N.C., from the areas relieve restrictions, they should be made quarantined because of hog cholera. Highway 6) in. a northerly direction to effective promptly in order to be of maxi­ its junction with U.S. Highway 180 (also Therefore, the restrictions pertaining to State Highway 67). mum benefit to affected persons. the interstate movement of swine and Accordingly, under the administrative swine products from or through quaran­ 2. In § 76.2, in paragraph (e) (12) re­ procedure provisions in 5 U.S.C. 553, it lating to the State of North Carolina, is found upon good cause that notice tined areas as contained in 9 CFR Part subdivision (i) relating to Camden and and other public procedure with respect 76, as amended, will not apply to the Pasquotank Comities is amended to to the amendments are impracticable, excluded area, but will continue to apply read: unnecessary, and contrary to the public to the quarantined areas described in

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18036 RULES AND REGULATIONS § 76.2(e). Further, the restrictions per­ Effective date. The foregoing amend­ the restrictions pertaining to the inter­ taining to the interstate movement of ment shall become effective upon state movement of swine and swine swine and swine products from non- issuance. products from or through quarantined quarantined areas contained in said Part The amendment quarantines a portion areas as contained in 9 CFR Part 76, as 76 will apply to the area excluded from of Darke County, Ohio, because of the amended, will not apply to the excluded quarantine. existence of hog cholera. This action is area, but will continue to apply to the Insofar as the amendments impose deemed necessary to prevent further quarantined areas described in § 76.2(e). certain further restrictions necessary to spread of the disease. The restrictions Further, the restrictions pertaining to prevent the interstate spread of hog pertaining to the interstate movement the interstate movement of swine and cholera, they must be made effective im­ of swine and swine products from or swine products from nonquarantined mediately to accomplish their purpose in through quarantined areas as contained areas contained in said Part 76 will the public interest. Insofar as they re­ in 9 CFR Part 76, as amended, will apply apply to the excluded area. The amend­ lieve restrictions, they should be made to the quarantined portion of such ment releases Alabama from the list of effective promptly in order to be of maxi­ county. States quarantined because of hog mum benefit to affected persons. The amendment imposes certain fur­ cholera. Accordingly, under the administrative ther restrictions necessary to prevent the The amendment also adds the State procedure provisions in 5 U.S.C. 553, it is interstate spread of hog cholera and of Alabama to the list of hog cholera found upon good cause that notice and must be made effective immediately to eradication States as set forth in other public procedure with respect to the accomplish its purpose in the public § 76.2(f). amendments are impracticable, unneces­ interest. Accordingly, under the admin­ The amendment relieves certain re­ sary, and contrary to the public interest, istrative procedure provisions in 5 U.S.C. strictions presently imposed and must be and good cause is found for making them 553, it is found upon good cause that made effective immediately to be of effective less than 30 days after publica­ notice and other public procedure with maximum benefit to affected persons. tion in the F ederal R egister. respect to the amendment are imprac­ Accordingly, under the administrative Done at Washington, D.C., this 19th ticable and contrary to the public inter­ procedure provisions in 5 U.S.C. 553, it is day of November 1970. est, and good cause is found for making found upon good cause that notice and it effective less than 30 days after pub­ other public procedure with respect to F. J. Mtjlhern, lication in the F ederal R egister. the amendment are impracticable and Acting Administrator, unnecessary, and good cause is found for Agricultural Research Service. Done at Washington, D.C., this 19th day of November 1970. making it effective less than 30 days after [F.R. Doc. 70-15833; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; publication in the F ederal R egister. 8:46 a.m.] F. J. Mulhern, Acting Administrator, Done at Washington, D.C., this 20th Agricultural Research Service. day of November 1970. [Docket No. 70-301] [F.R. Doc. 70-15834; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; F. J. Mulhern, PART 76— HOG CHOLERA AND 8:46 a.m.] Acting Administrator, OTHER COMMUNICABLE SWINE Agricultural Research Service. DISEASES [Docket No. 70-302] [F.R. Doc. 70-15875; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; 8:50 a.m.] Areas Quarantined PART 76— HOG CHOLERA AND Pursuant to provisions of the Act'of OTHER COMMUNICABLE SWINE May 29, 1884, as amended, the Act of DISEASES SUBCHAPTER D— EXPORTATION AND IMPORTA­ February 2, 1903, as amended, the Act TION OF ANIMALS AND ANIMAL PRODUCTS of March 3, 1905, as amended, the Act of Areas Quarantined PART 97— OVERTIME SERVICES RE­ September 6, 1961, and the Act of July 2, Pursuant to provisions of the Act of LATING TO IMPORTS AND EXPORTS 1962 (21 U.S.C. 111-113, 114g, 115, 117, May 29, 1884, as amended, the Act of 120, 121, 123-126, 134b, 134f), Part 76, February 2, 1903, as amended, the Act of Administrative Instructions Prescribing Title 9, Code of Federal Regulations, re­ March 3, >1905, as amended, the Act of Commuted Traveltime Allowances stricting the interstate movement of September 6, 1961, and the Act of July 2, Pursuant to the authority conferred swine and certain products because of 1962 (21 U.S.C. 111-113, 114g, 115, 117, upon the Director of the Animal Health hog cholera and other communicable 120, 121, 123-126, 134b, 134f), Part 76, Division by § 97.1 of the regulations con­ swine diseases, is hereby amended in the Title 9, Code of Federal Regulations, re­ cerning overtime services relating to following respects: stricting the interstate movement of imports and exports (9 CFR 97.1), ad­ In § 76.2, in paragraph (e) (13) relat­ swine and certain products because of ministrative instructions 9 CFR 97.2 ing to the State of Ohio, a new subdivi­ hog cholera and other communicable (1939 ed.), as amended February 1, 1969 sion (v) relating to Darke County is swine diseases, is hereby amended in the (34 F.R. 1586), June 3, 1969 (34 F.R. added to read: following respects: 8697), July 1, 1969 (34 F.R. 11081), (13) Ohio. * * * In § 76.2, the reference to the State of August 1, 1969 (34 F.R. 12581), Novem­ (v) That portion of Darke County Alabama in the introductory portion of ber 27, 1969 (34 F.R. 12661), April 16, bounded by a line beginning at the junc­ paragraph (e) and paragraph (e) (1) re­ 1970 (35 F.R. 6175), May 21, 1970 (35 tion of State Highway 185 and U.S. High­ lating to the State of Alabama are de­ F.R. 7781), July 28, 1970 (35 F.R. 12058), way 127; thence, following State High­ leted, and paragraph (f) is amended by and September 5, 1970 (35 F.R. 11127), way 185 in a westerly direction to Rhy- adding thereto the name of the State of prescribing the commuted traveltime nard Fink Road; thence, following the Alabama. that shall be included in each period of Rhynard Fink Road in a northerly di­ (Secs. 4-7, 23 Stat. 32, as amended, secs. 1, 2, overtime or holiday duty, are hereby rection to the Mercer-Darke County line; 32 Stat. 791-792, as amended, secs. 1-4, 33 amended by adding to or deleting from thence, following the Mercer-Darke Stat. 1264, 1265, as amended, sec. 1, 75 Stat. the respective “lists” therein as follows: County line in an easterly direction to 481, secs. 3 and 11, 76 Stat. 130, 132; 21 TJ.S.C. U.S. Highway 127; thence, following Ill, 112, 113, 114g, 115, 117, 120, 121, With in Metropolitan Area U.S. Highway 127 in a southerly direc­ 123-126, 134b, 134f; 29 F.R. 16210. as tion to its junction with State Highway amended) two HOURS 185. Effective date. The foregoing amend­ Delete: Houston, Tex. (Secs. 4-7, 23 Stat. 32, as amended, secs. 1, 2, ment shall become effective upon issu­ Add: Houston, Tex. (except Houston 32 Stat. 791-792, as amended, secs. 1-4, 33 ance. Intercontinental Airport). Stat. 1264, 1265, as amended, sec. 1, 75 Stat. This amendment excludes Covington THREE HOURS 481, secs. 3 and 11, 76 Stat. 130, 132; 21 U.S.C. 111, 112, 113, 114g, 116, 117, 120, 121, 123-126, County, Ala. from the areas quaran­ Add: Houston Injtercontdnental Airport, 134b, 134f; 29 F.R. 16210, as amended) tined because of hog cholera. Therefore, Houston, Tex.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18037

Outside Metropolitan Area Sec. (b) Opinion. (1) The San Bernardino 1.279 San Bernardino County-Victorville ONE HOUR County-Victorville Public Facilities Au­ Public Facilities Authority, City Hall thority is a public entity created under Delete: Port of Oregon (served from Coos Revenue Bonds. Bay, Oreg.). 1.280 Jackson County Sports Complex Au­ the laws of California by an agreement Add: Port of Bandon, Oreg. (served from thority (Missouri). between the City of Victorville and the Coos Bay, Oreg.). 1.281 City of Inglewood-Los Angeles County County of San Bernardino. Under this Civic Center Authority. agreement, the Authority is authorized TW O H O U R S A u t h o r i t y : §§ 1.277-1.281 issued under to acquire sites and to acquire, construct, Add: Port of Port Orford, Oreg. (served R.S. 324, et seq., as amended, paragraph maintain, operate and lease public build­ from Coos Bay, Oreg.). Seventh of RS. 5136, as amended; 12 U.S.C. ings and related facilities for library and Delete: Port of Orford, Oreg. (served from 1, et seq., 24(7), unless otherwise noted. administrative purposes, and to issue Coos Bay, Oreg.). bonds to finance such projects. The Au­ Add: Stony Point, N.Y. (served from § 1.277 Parking Authority of the city of Newburgh, N.Y.). thority is issuing these bonds to finance San Fernando. the construction of a new library in the THREE HOURS (a) Request. The Comptroller of the City which will be leased to and operated Delete: Hilo, Hawaii (served from Kailua- Currency has been requested to rule on by the County. Kona, Hawaii). the eligibility of the $750,000 Revenue (2) The County, as required by its Add: Hilo, Hawaii (served from Waimea, Bonds of the Parking Authority of the agreement with the City, has uncondi­ Hawaii). city of San Fernando for purchase, deal­ tionally promised in the lease rental These commuted travel time periods ing in, underwriting and unlimited hold­ agreement to pay annual rentals to the have been established as nearly as may ing by national banks under paragraph Authority in an amount sufficient to be practicable to cover the time neces­ Seventh of 12 U.S.C. 24. meet annual interest and principal pay­ sarily spent in reporting to and return­ (b) Opinion. (1) The Parking Author­ ments on these bonds as well as other ing from the place at which the employee ity of the City of San Fernando is a pub­ necessary expenses. The County which performs such overtime or holiday lic body corporate and politic created by possesses general power of taxation has duty when such travel is performed the laws of California but authorized to thus committed its faith and credit in solely on account of such overtime or function only upon a finding of need. support of the bonds. holiday duty. Such establishment de­ The City Council has made the appro­ (c) Ruling. It is our conclusion that pends upon facts within the knowledge priate finding and, in accordance with the $215,000 Victorville Library Revenue of the Animal Health Division. the law, has declared itself to be the Bonds of the San Bernardino County- It is to the benefit of the public that Parking Authority. Under the law a park­ Victorville Public Facilities Authority these instructions be made effective at ing authority is authorized to issue reve­ are general obligations of a State or a the earliest practicable date. Accordingly, nue bonds to finance public parking political subdivision thereof under para­ pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553, it is found up­ facilities and may issue such bonds with­ graph Seventh of 12 U.S.C. 24 and ac­ on good cause that notice and public out obtaining the approval of the electors cordingly are eligible for purchase, deal­ procedure on these instructions are im­ of the city where the bonds are issued to ing in, underwriting and unlimited practicable, unnecessary, and contrary finance a project which is to be leased to holding by national banks. (Comptrol­ to the public interest, and good cause is the city and where the principal of and ler’s letter dated Nov. 9,1970.) found for making them effective less interest on the bonds are to be payable from rentals paid by the city under such § 1.279 San Bernardino County-Victor- than 30 days after publication in the ville Public Facilities Authority, City F ederal Register. lease. The Authority is issuing these bonds to finance the acquisition and Hall Revenue Bonds. (64 Stat. 561, 7 U.S.C. 2260) construction of a multilevel parking (a) Request. The Comptroller of the Effective date. The foregoing amend­ structure which will be leased to the City. Currency has been requested to rule on ments shall become effective upon pub­ (2) Under the lease rental agreementthe eligibility of the $775,000 Victorville lication in the F ederal R egister. the City has unconditionally promised City Hall Revenue Bonds of the San to pay annual rentals to the Authority in Bernardino County-Victorville Public Done at Hyattsville, Md., this 19th day an amount sufficient to meet fl.nrmq.1 in­ Facilities Authority for purchase, deal­ of November 1970. terest and principal payments on these ing in, underwriting and unlimited hold­ R. E. Omohundro, bonds as well as other necessary ex­ ing by national banks under paragraph Acting Director, Animal Health penses. The City which possesses general Seventh of 12 UJ3.C. 24. Division, Agricultural Re­ powers of taxation has thus committed (b) Opinion. (1) The San Bernardino search Service. its faith and credit in support of the County-Victorville Public Facilities Au­ bonds. (F.R. Doc. 70-15874; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; thority is a public entity created under 8:50 a.m.] (c) Ruling. It is our conclusion that the laws of California by an agreement the $750,000 Revenue Bonds of the between the City of Victorville and the Parking Authority of the City of San County of San Bernardino. Under this Fernando are general obligations of a agreement, the Authority is authorized State or a political subdivision thereof to acquire sites and to acquire, construct, Title 12— BANKS AND BANKING under paragraph Seventh of 12 U.S.C. maintain, operate, and lease public Chapter I—-Bureau of the Comptroller 24 and accordingly are eligible for pur­ buildings and related facilities for li­ of the Currency, Department of the chase, dealing in, underwriting and un­ brary and administrative purposes, and Treasury limited holding by national banks. to issue bonds to fiance such projects. (Comptroller’s letter dated Nov. 5, 1970.) The Authority is issuing these bonds to PART 1— INVESTMENT SECURITIES § 1.278 San Bernardino County-Victor- finance the construction of a new Vic­ REGULATION ville Public Facilities Authority, Li­ torville City Hall and related facilities brary Revenue Bonds. which will be leased to the City. Securities Eligible for Underwriting (2) The City, as required by its agree­ and Unlimited Holding (a) Request. The Comptroller of thement with the County, has uncondi­ Currency has been requested to rule on tionally promised in the lease rental The following new sections are added the eligibility of the $215,000 Victorville agreement to pay annual rentals to the to P a rti of Title 12: Library Revenue Bonds of the San Ber­ Authority in an amount sufficient to Sec. nardino County-Victorville Public Facili­ meet annual interest and principal pay­ 1.277 Parking Authority of the City of San ties Authority for purchase, dealing in, ments on these bonds as well as other Fernando. underwriting and unlimited holding by necessary expenses. The City which pos­ 1.278 San Bernardino County-Victorville sesses general powers of taxation has Public Facilties Authority, library national banks under paragraph Seventh thus committed its faith and credit in Revenue Bonds. of 12 U.S.C. 24. support of the bonds.

Ho. 229----- 2 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18038 RULES AND REGULATIONS (c) Ruling. It is our conclusion thatInglewood-Los Angeles County Civic only against the security property and the $775,000 Victorville City Hall Reve­ Center Authority, Civic Center Revenue has no legal basis for recovery of any nue Bonds of the San Bernardino Coun­ Bonds, Series A, for purchase, dealing in, deficiency from a service corporation ty-Victorville Public Facilities Author­ underwriting and unlimited holding by which executed such note, the unpaid ity are general obligations of a State or national banks under paragraph Seventh balance of the note nontheless shall a political subdivision thereof under par­ of 12 U.S.C. 24. constitute debt of the service corpora­ agraph Seventh of 12 U.S.C. 24 and ac­ (b) Opinion. (1) The City of Ingle­ tion within the meaning of § 545.9-1 (b) cordingly are eligible for purchase, deal­ wood-Los Angeles County Civic Center (3) of this subchapter. ing in, underwriting and unlimited hold­ Authority is a public entity created under (Sec. 5, 48 Stat. 132, as amended; 12 U.S.C. ing by national banks. (Comptroller’s the laws of California by an agreement 1464. Reorg. Plan No. 3 of 1947, 12 F.R. 4981, letter dated Nov. 9,1970.) between the City of Inglewood and the 3 CFR, 1943-48 Comp., p. 1071) County of Los Angeles. Under this agree­ § 1.280 Jackson County Sports Complex ment, the Authority is authorized to ac­ By the Federal Home Loan Bank Authority (Missouri). quire, construct, and lease public build­ Board. (a) Request. The Comptroller of the ings, and to issue bonds to finance such [seal] J ack Carter, Currency has been requested to rule on projects. The Authority is issuing these Secretary. the eligibility of the $13 million Jackson bonds for the purpose of financing the [F.R. Doc. 70-15849; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; County Sports Complex Authority Reve­ construction of a fire station, a city em­ 8:48 a.m.] nue Bonds 1970 for purchase and holding ployees’ building and a city vehicle fuel by national banks under paragraph and wash facility, all of which will be Seventh of 12 U.S.C. 24. leased to the City. SUBCHAPTER D—FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN (b) Opinion. (1) The Jackson County (2) The City has unconditionally INSURANCE CORPORATION Sports Complex Authority is a body cor­ promised in the lease rental agreement to [No. 70-427] porate and politic and a political sub­ pay annual rentals to the Authority in an division of the State of Missouri. Under amount sufficient to meet annual interest PART 563— OPERATIONS the laws of Missouri, the Authority is and principal payments on these bonds, authorized to acquire, construct, operate as well as other necessary expenses. The PART 571— STATEMENTS OF POLICY and maintain, or to lease to others for City, which possesses general powers of Conflicts of Interest construction, opération and mainte­ taxation, has thus committed its faith nance, a stadium sports complex and and'credit in support of the bonds. November 19, 1970. related facilities and to issue revenue (c) Ruling. It is our conclusion that Resolved that, notice and public pro­ bonds to finance such projects. the $2,440,000 City of Inglewood-Los cedure having been duly afforded (35 (2) The County of Jackson has issuedAngeles County Civic Center Authority, F.R. 12216) and all relevant material $43 million of its general obligation Civic Center Revenue Bonds, Series A, presented or available having been con­ bonds to finance the construction of the are general obligations of a State or a sidered by it, the Federal Home Loan Harry S. Truman Sports Complex, has political subdivision thereof under para­ Bank Board, upon the basis of such con­ leased the project to the Authority, and graph Seventh of 12 U.S.C. 24 and ac­ sideration, determines that it is advisable has granted the Authority the right to cordingly are eligible for purchase, deal­ to amend Parts 563 and 571 of the rules sublease the project. The Authority in ing in, underwriting and unlimited hold­ and regulations for Insurance of Ac­ turn has agreed to issue and sell revenue ing by national banks. (Comptroller’s counts (12 CFR Parts 563, 571) for the bonds and to apply the proceeds thereof letter dated November 13, 1970.) following purposes: (1) Regulating the to complete the construction of the depositary arrangements of insured in­ project. The Authority has also entered Dated: November 20, 1970. stitutions; (2) regulating the provisions into 25-year lease rental agreements [seal] W illiam B. Camp, of certain services to borrowers from in­ with both the Kansas City Chiefs Foot­ Comptroller of the Currency. sured institutions; and (3) clarifying the ball Club, Inc., and the Kansas City [F.R. Doc. 70-15873; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; , policy of the Board regarding conflicts Royals Baseball Corp. Under the agree­ 8:50 a.m.] 'of interest. Accordingly, said Parts 563 ments, each lessee has agreed to make and 571 are amended as follows, effective minimum annual lease payments in Chapter V— Federal Home Loan December 28, 1979: amounts which will be sufficient to pro­ 1. Part 563 is amended by adding at vide for the regular payment of all Bank Board the end thereof new §§ 563.34 and 563.35 principal and interest as such become SUBCHAPTER C— FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN (reserving § 563.33 for future use), to due. A portion of the lease rental obli­ SYSTEM read as follows: gation of the Kansas City Chiefs has [No. 70-420] been guaranteed by the owner, Mr. § 563.34 Selection of depositary. Lamar Hunt. PART 555— BOARD RULINGS (a) Except with the prior written ap­ (c) Ruling. It is our conclusion that a proval of the Corporation, no insured in­ national bank may purchase and hold Secured Debt Limitation for Service stitution may establish a depositary ar­ the serial bonds of the $13 million Jack- Corporations rangement with a depositary on or after son County Sports Complex Authority November 17, 1970. December 28, 1970, of which any officer, Revenue Bonds 1970 (those maturing be­ director, employee, attorney regularly tween November 1972 and 1982) as an Resolved that the Federal Home Loan serving the institution in the capacity of investment in community development Bank Board considers it advisable to attorney at law, or the spouse of any such subject to a purchase limitation of 2 per­ amend Part 555 of the rules and regula­ officer, director, employee, or attorney is cent of the bank’s capital and surplus tions for the Federal Savings and Loan an officer, partner, director, or trustee, or and to a holding limitation of 5 percent System (12 CFR Part 555) by the adop­ owner of 10 percent or more of such de­ of the bank’s capital and surplus for the tion of a ruling for the purpose of clari­ positary’s stock. Any such depositary ar­ aggregate of all holdings in community fying the secured debt limit for service rangement existing prior to December 28, development investments. All holdings corporations. Accordingly, the Board 1970, may be continued Unless disap­ in community development investments hereby amends such Part 555 by adding proved by the Corporation. will also be subject to regular review by a new § 555.10, immediately after § 555.9 (b) Any request for such Corporation examiners. (Comptroller’s letter dated thereof, to read as follows: approval shall be filed with a Supervisory Nov. 13, 1970.) § 555.10 Service corporations; secured Agent of the Corporation at the Federal debt limitation. Home Loan Bank of the district in which § 1.281 City of Inglewood-Los Angeles the institution is located. In taking ac­ County Civic Center Authority. When a note secured by a mortgage, tion with respect to depositary arrange­ (a) Request. The Comptroller of theor similar obligation, is executed under ments, including disapproval of existing Currency has been requested to rule on circumstances where the holder of such arrangements, the Corporation will con­ the eligibility of the $2,440,000 City of note, in the event of default, may proceed sider the size of the depositary relative

fEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18039 to the deposits maintained by the in­ mental duty to avoid placing himself in a R egister, Airspace Docket No. 70-SO-55 stitution, the amount of the deposits position which creates, or which leads to is amended as hereinafter set forth. relative to the size of the institution, the or could lead to, a conflict of interest or Airspace Docket No. 70-SO-55 is degree of the interlocking relationships, appearance of a conflict of interest hav­ amended as follows: “effective 0901 and any other factor which is or may be ing such adverse effects. G.m.t., December 10,1970” is deleted and detrimental to the institution or inves­ (c) The Board recognizes that it is im­“effective 0901 G.m.t., March 4, 1971” is tors or depositors therein or borrowers possible to define every practice or con­ substituted therefor. therefrom. dition which falls within the broad con­ (Sec. 307(a), 1110, Federal Aviation Act of § 563.35 Certain conditions prohibited. cept of objectionable conflict of interest. 1958, 49 U.S.C. 1348, 1510; Executive Order The Board has nevertheless issued vari­ 10854 ( 24 F.R. 9565) ; sec. 6(c), Department of (a) No insured institution or director, ous regulations to limit or prohibit cer­ Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) officer, or employee thereof may grant tain conflicts of interest to reflect its Issued in Washington, D.C., on Novem­ any loan or extend any other service of conclusion that the conflicts so limited or the institution on the prior condition, ber 19, 1970. prohibited are especially inimical to the H. B. H elstrom, agreement, or understanding that the accomplishment of the purposes of title borrower contract for any of the follow­ Chief, Airspace and Air IV. However, the omission by the Board Traffic Rules Division. ing with any specific firm, agency, or to specifically limit or prohibit other con­ person: flicts of interest should not be interpreted [F.R. Doc. 70-15824; Piled, Nov. 24, 1970; (1) Insurance (except insurance or a as tacit approval thereof. The Board or 8:46 a.m.] guaranty provided by a government its Supervisory Agents will continue to agency); examine those conflict-of-interest situa­ (2) Building materials; tions which are not specifically limited or (3) Legal services, including title ex­ prohibited under the regulations and Title 16— COMMERCIAL amination, and escrow and abstract serv­ will, when circumstances so warrant, ices; and take appropriate action to prevent, cir­ PRACTICES (4) Services of a real estate agent or cumscribe or eliminate such situations. Chapter I— Federal Trade Commission broker. (Secs. 402, 403, 407, 48 Stat. 1256, 1257, 1260, (b) The prohibition contained in as amended; 12 U.S.C. 1725, 1726, 1730. Reorg. PART 252— GUIDES FOR LABELING, subparagraph (1) of paragraph (a) of Plan No. 3 of 1947, 12 F.R. 4981, 3 CPR, 1943- ADVERTISING, AND SALE OF WIGS this section shall not be construed to 48 Comp., p. 1071) AND OTHER HAIRPIECES prohibit an insured institution from re­ By the Federal Home Loan Bank fusing to grant a loan or extend any Board. Extension of Effective Date of other service if the borrower wishes to Labeling Provisions contract, in connection with such loan or [seal] J ack Carter, service, with a particular company, firm, Secretary. Pursuant to numerous requests re­ ceived indicating a need for additional agency, or person whose services, in [F.R. Doc. 70-15850; Piled, Nov. 24, 1970; such connection, are believed by the in­ 8:48 a.m.] time to effect compliance with the label­ sured institution, on reasonable grounds, ing provisions of the Commission’s to afford it insufficient protection. guides for labeling, advertising, and sale (c) The prohibition contained in sub- of wigs and other hairpieces, the Com­ paragraph (3) of paragraph (a) of this Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND mission has extended the operative date section shall not be construed to prohibit of such provisions, to wit §§252.2 and the insured institution from requiring 252.3(a). The Commission will expect all the borrower to pay an initial loan SPACE wigs and other hairpieces to be labeled Chapter I— Federal Aviation Adminis­ in conformance with the Guides by charge to reimburse the institution for February 8,1971. legal services rendered to it by an at­ tration, Department of Transportation torney selected by the institution in con­ All provisions of the Guides except nection with the processing and closing ' [Airspace Docket No. 70-SO-55] those just mentioned became operative of a loan. on the originally established effective PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL date of November 9,1970. 2. Part 571 is amended by revising AIRWAYS, AREA LOW ROUTES, § 571.7 to read as follows. CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, AND RE­ Approved: November 20,1970. § 571.7 Conflicts of interest. PORTING POINTS By direction of the Commission. (a) The Board has a paramount in­ Alteration of Control Area and [seal] J oseph W. S hea, terest in the prevention and elimination Reporting Point; Amendment Secretary. of practices and conditions which ad­ [F.R. Doc. 70-15923; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; versely affect: The interests of members On August 21, 1970, there was pub­ 8:50 a.m.] in insured institutions; the soundness of lished in the F ederal R egister (35 F.R. such institutions; the provision of eco­ 13363) an amendment to Part 71 of the nomical home financing for the Nation; Federal Aviation Regulations which re­ PART 253 — GUIDES FOR THE and the accomplishment of the other designated Control 1153 and the Trout FEATHER AND DOWN PRODUCTS purposes of title IV of the National Hous­ Intersection reporting point. These ac­ INDUSTRY ing Act, as amended. tions were to become effective Decem­ Deferment of Effective Date (b) Among the practices and condi-' ber 10, 1970. tions which have such adverse effects are Because of a delay in relocating the The effective date for the Guides for conflicts between the accomplishment of Jacksonville, Fla., radio beacon, action is the Feather and Down Products Indus­ the purposes of title IV set forth in para­ taken herein to alter Airspace Docket No. try promulgated September 23, 1970, graph (a) of this section and the per­ 70-SO-55 by postponing the effective has been deferred indefinitely in order sonal financial interests of directors, date until March 4,1971. to provide time for the Commission to officers, and other affiliated persons of Since this amendment is minor in consider additional information respect­ insured institutions. Conflicts of this type nature and no substantive change in the ing the matter. which have demonstrably resulted in regulation is effected, notice and public Approved: November 20,1970. such adverse effects are considered by the procedure thereon are unnecessary, and Board to be inherently unsafe and un­ good cause exists for making this amend­ By direction of the Commission. sound practices and conditions. The ment effective less than 30 days after [seal] J oseph W. Shea, Board accordingly holds that each di­ publication. Secretary. rector, officer, or other affiliated person In consideration of the foregoing, ef­ [F.R. Doc. 70-15924; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; of an insured institution has a funda- fective upon publication in th e F ederal 8:50 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18040 RULES AND REGULATIONS (2) If they represented a defense con­ $14,409 in 1968. Title 32-NATIONAL DEFENSE tractor at a hearing, trial, appeal, or $13,507 in 1967. other action in which the United States § 166.4 Reporting procedures. Chapter I— Office of the Secretary of was a party and which involved services Defense and materials provided or to be provided A report prepared and forwarded as to the DOD by such contractor, or prescribed in § 166.9 shall be submitted SUBCHAPTER E— DEFENSE CONTRACTING not later than November 15 following (3) If they represented a defense con­ the close of each fiscal year, by the fol­ PART 166— REPORTING PROCEDURES tractor in any transaction with DOD lowing categories of individuals. ON DEFENSE RELATED EMPLOYMENT involving services or materials provided or to be provided by such contractor to (a) Any former or retired military The Deputy Secretary of Defense ap­ DOD. commissioned officer who: proved the following on October 30,1970: (c) “Defense contractor” means any (1) At the time of release from active individual, firm, corporation, partner­ duty or retirement was serving on active Sec. duty as a major or lieutenant com­ 166.1 Purpose and scope. ship, association, or other legal entity mander, or above; and 166.2 Applicability. that enters into a contract directly with 166.3 Terms and general guidance. the DOD to furnish services or materials (2) Had served on extended active duty 166.4 Reporting procedures. to DOD. It thus excludes subcontractors. for 10 or more years; and 166.5 Actions required. Also, a subsidiary of a large corporation (3) During any part of any fiscal year 166.6 Other reporting requirements. may be a separate legal entity and con­ beginning with fiscal year 1971: 166.7 Review of and disposition of the (i) Is employed by or performed serv­ forms submitted by former and tract directly with the DOD in its own ices for a defense prime contractor, who, present personnel. name. In such a case the “defense con­ during such year, received $10 million or 166.8 Instructions for completing § 166.9. tractor” would be the subsidiary, not the more in defense contract awards, and 166.9 Report of DOD and defense related parent corporation. Thus, only the dollar (ii) Is employed by the defense prime employment as required by Public' amount of contracts awarded by the DOD Law 91-121. to a subsidiary contracting with DOD contractor at a salary rate of $15,000 or 166.10 Listing of present or former employ­ in its own name during a fiscal year more per year. ees of defense contractors for FY would be considered in determining (b) Any former DOD civilian officer or _____ prepared pursuant to sec. whether a person employed or formerly employee (including consultants and 410, Public Law 91-121. ' part time employees) who: 166.11 DOD contractors receiving negotiated employed by it is required to report. (1) At any time during the 3-year pe­ contract awards of $10 million or (d) No person is required to file a re­ riod immediately preceding the termina­ more. port for any fiscal year during which the defense contractor by whom he is or was tion of last employment with DOD was Authority : The provisions of this Part 166 employed received less than $10 million paid at a rate equal to or greater than are published under authority of Public Law in contracts awarded by DOD. For the the minimum rate (at such time) for a 91-121, sec. 410 (N ot* 19,1969). grade GS-13; and purpose of this Directive “contracts (2) During any part of any fiscal § 166.1 Purpose and scope. awarded” means contracts awarded by year beginning with fiscal year 1971: This part: negotiation only, including the net (i) Is employed by or performed serv­ (a) Establishes criteria and prescribes amount of modifications to or options ices for a defense prime contractor who, the procedures to be followed by certain exercised under such contracts. All trans­ during such year received $10 million or (1) former and retired military officers actions under $10,000 each are excluded,. more in defense contract awards, and and former civilian officers and em­ Thus, if a person was employed by a (ii) Is employed by the defense prime ployees of DOD presently employed by defense contractor during a fiscal year contractor at a salary rate of $15,000 or defense contractors, and (2) former in which the contractor received from more per year. civilian officers and employees of defense the DOD $8 million in negotiated con­ (c) Any DOD civilian officer or em­ contractors presently employed by the tract awards and $2 million in contracts ployee (including consultants and part DOD in submitting employment reports awarded by formal advertising, the per­ time employees) who: son would not have to report his em­ (1) During any part of any fiscal year in compliance with Public Law 91-121, ployment for that year. sec. 410 (Nov. 19, 1969). Failure to file (e) “Services and materials” means beginning with fiscal year 1971 is em­ required reports is punishable by a maxi­ either services or materials, or services ployed by DOD at a salary rate equal to mum of 6 months imprisonment, or a and materials, and includes construction. or greater than the minimum rate for a fine of not more than $1,000 or both. Therefore a company that performs con­ grade GS-13; and (b) Assigns responsibilities for moni­ struction under contracts with DOD is (2) Was previously employed by or toring the program within the Depart­ a “defense contractor” under this section. performed services, during any fiscal ment of Defense. year, for a defense prime contractor (f) “Fiscal year” means a year begin­ who, during such year, received $10 mil­ § 166.2 Applicability. ning on July 1, and ending on June 30 of the next succeeding year; it is designated lion or more in defense contract awards; The provisions of this part apply to all and by the year in which it ends. For ex­ (3) Was employed by the defense elements of the Department of Defense, ample, fiscal year 1971 begins on July 1, including the Office of the Secretary of 1970 and ends on June 30,1971. prime contractor at a salary rate of Defense, the Military Departments, and (g) For the purposes of these reporting $15,000 or more per year. the Defense Agencies, and to certain requirements, a “retired military officer” (d) The following categories of per­ present and former military and civilian is any officer entitled to receive military sons are exempt from the reporting personnel of the Department of Defense, retired pay, even though such pay may requirements: including employees of non-appropriated be waived. A “former military officer” (1) Retired military officers, former fund activities. includes Reserve officers not on active military officers, and former civilian of­ § 166.3 Terms and general guidance. duty. ficers and employees are not required to (h) For the purposes of these report­ file a report of employment with a de­ (a) “Employed” or “employment,” is ing requirements, “former DOD civilian fense contractor for such employment used in a broad sense to include services officer or employee paid at a rate equal to during a fiscal year that begins 3 years performed as a consultant or otherwise or greater than the minimum rate (at or more after their extended active duty either for a defense contractor or the such time) for a grade GS-13” includes or employment with the DOD DOD. former wage board employees, former terminated. (b) Retired military officers, former employees in the lower General Schedule (2) DOD civilian officers and em­ military officers and former civilian offi­ grades, Public Law 313 categories, con­ ployees are not required to file a report cers and employees of the DOD are sultants, and persons in the executive for a fiscal year on account of previous included: levels, whose rates of pay equaled or employment With a defense contractor (1) If they are “employed” by a de­exceeded : if such employment was terminated 3 fense contractor as a consultant or $16,760 in 1970. or more years prior to the beginning of otherwise, $15,812 in 1969. such fiscal year. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18041

(e) Reports submitted in accordanceorientation. Civilian personnel who be­ pared in accordance with the format pre­ with this part will be forwarded as come subject to the reporting require­ scribed in § 166.10. follows: ment by virtue of a promotion or step (2) Two copies of each report. Sub­ (1) Retired military officers, and for­ increase after initial employment will be mitted in accordance with § 166.4. mer military officers—to the Secretary notified of the reporting requirement at Not later than December 31, thereafter, of the Military Department of which the time of such promotion or step the Assistant Secretary of Defense they are or were a member. increase. (Manpower and Reserve Affairs)’, will (2) Former civilian officers and em­ (2) Review reports as described below forward a copy of all such listings and ployees—to the Secretary of Military De­ and furnish these reports and the list reports to the President of the Senate partment, or the Director of the Defense referred to in § 166.7 to the Assistant and the Speaker of the House of Repre­ Agency by which they were employed. Secretary of Defense (Manpower and sentatives as prescribed in § 166.5(b) (2). In the case of civilian officers or em­ Reserve Affairs), by November 30 of each ployees of the Office of the Secretary year, beginning in 1971. § 166.8 Instructions for completing of Defense or the Joint Chiefs of Staff— (3) It is recognized that personal § 166.9. to the Assistant Secretary of Defense Before beginning to complete § 166.9 read notification of each affected former mili­ carefully Part 166. (Administration). tary officer and civilian employee who The following numbered instructions are (3) DOD civilian officers or em­ was separated before the publication of keyed to the numbered items on § 166.9. ployees—to the Secretary of the Military this part is not feasible. However, inten­ 1. Self explanatory. Department, or the Director of the De­ sive information efforts will be under­ 2. Self explanatory. fense Agency by which employed, or in taken, using all appropriate channels 3. Self explanatory. case of civilian officers or employees of with the objective of bringing the re­ 4. For the purpose of this reporting re­ the Office of the Secretary of Defense quirements of Public Law 91-121 and this quirement: or the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the Assist­ (a) A “retired officer” is one who is pres­ part to the attention of all such former ently entitled to reoelve military retired pay ant Secretary of Defense (Administra­ personnel. even though he may have waived such pay; tion) . _ In the case of military personnel, the (b) A Reserve officer, not on active duty § 166.5 Actions required. who is not a “retired officer” as defined in (a), actions prescribed by this paragraph will is a “former officer” for the purpose of this (a) The Assistant Secretary of De­ be taken by the Military Department report even though he currently holds a fense (Comptroller) will prepare a list­ concerned for all affected military per­ commission in a Reserve component; and ing of the defense contractors who re­ sonnel of that department, even though (c) Persons formerly in GS-13 and above ceived $10 million or more in negotiated the member’s last assignment was with are subject to the filing requirement. In ad­ contracts awarded in each fiscal year another department or agency. dition persons formerly in the Civil Service and cause that listing to be published in § 166.6 Other reporting requirements. including Wage Board employees, employees the F ederal R egister not later than Sep­ in the lower General Schedule grades, Public tember 15 following the end of the fiscal The reporting requirements prescribed Law 313 categories, consultants, and persons year; in addition a listing will also be by this part are in addition to the re­ in the Executive levels whose rates of pay on ports required from Retired Regular an annual basis would have equaled or ex­ published covering FY’s 1968 and 1969 ceeded the amounts set forth in the (see § 166.11). officers (DD Form 1357) and the state­ following years are subject to the filing (b) The Assistant Secretary of De­ ments of employment and financial in­ requirement. fense (Manpower and Reserve Affairs) terests required of certain civilian Fiscal will: employees and active duty military of­ year Amount * (1) Receive the lists and reports sub­ ficers (DD Forms 1555 and 1555-1) 1967 ...... — $13,607 mitted as provided in § 166.7(b). A copy under the provisions of Part 40 of this 1968 _____ 14,409 of such reports will be maintained for title. 1969 ______15, 812 3 years and will be available for public § 166.7 Review of and disposition of the 1970 ______16,760 inspection at all times during normal forms submitted by former and pres­ 5. The “employer” should be clearly iden­ ent personnel. tified. The term “employer” also includes the working hours; and organization for which the services as a con­ (2) Submit not later than Decem­ (a) The Assistant Secretary of De­ sultant were provided. ber 31, 1971, and each December 31 fense (Administration), the Secretaries 6. If employed by two or more defense thereafter a letter transmitting to the of the Military Departments and the Di­ contractors include date of acceptance of President of the Senate and the Speaker rectors of the Defense Agencies will es­ employment (and termination of employ­ of the House of Representatives a list tablish procedures to review the forms ment) by each. Use a continuation sheet if prepared in accordance with the format submitted by former and present per­ necessary. prescribed in § 166.10 of the names of 7. Self explanatory. sonnel in accordance with the terms of 8. Include sufficient detail to clearly iden­ all persons who have filed such reports this part to determine whether: tify employing agency. for the preceding fiscal-year in compli­ (1) Each form as submitted is in fact 9. If more than one position held give posi­ ance with this part, and a copy of each required under the terms of the part. tion title and brief description of work per­ such report. (2) All required information has been formed for each position. (c) The Assistant Secretary of De­ furnished. 10. Give sufficient detail to permit clear fense (Administration), the Secretaries (3) The information as submitted in­ understanding of work actually being of the Military Departments, and the performed. dicates the possibility of a violation of 11. 12, 13. Self explanatory. Directors of the Defense Agencies will: law or part. 14. Give sufficient information to clearly (1) Except as provided in (3) below,If there is any indication that a law or identify the Defense Contractor. If employed notify each person in the categories de­ part may have been violated, the matter by more than one, list each. scribed in § 166.4 (a), (b), and (c) above will be referred to the appropriate au­ 15. If employed by, or served as a consult­ of the requirements of this part and thority of the office, Department or ant to more than one defense contractor, Public Law 91-121, sec. 410, and provide Agency concerned to determine the ac­ give inclusive dates for each. to each such person a copy of this part tion which should be taken. 16. Give sufficient detail to permit clear or implementing Military Service or De­ (b) Not later than November 30 of understanding of work actually performed. fense Agency regulations together with each year, the Assistant Secretary of De­ 17. Enter signature as usually written. a supply of the forms prepared in accord­ fense (Administration), the Secretaries § 166.9 Report of DOD and defense re­ ance with the reporting format as set of the Military Departments, and the Di­ lated employment as required by out in § 166.9. In the case of personnel rectors of the Defense Agencies will for­ Public Law 91—121. being separated or retired this notifica­ ward to the Assistant Secretary of De­ OMB Approval tion will be included in the exit interview fense (Manpower and Reserve Affairs): No. 22—R0288 or separation counselling procedures. 1. Name _.______...______- (1) A listing of the names of indi­ (Last, First, Middle) Civilian personnel who become subject viduals submitting reports segregated by 2. Current home address______to the reporting requirement on initial the defense contractor by whom now or (Street) employment will be notified of this re­ formerly employed, or for whom they porting requirement during the entrance performed services. The list will be pre­ (City, State, Zip) FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18042 RULES AND REGULATIONS

3. Social Security N o.______(Sample Listing) Booz Allen Applied Research, Inc. 4. Reporting category. Check appropriate Borg Warner Corp. box and enter in space provided the military Bowen McLaughlin York, Inc. grade, civilian grade, or annual DOD salary. (Department or Agency) Brads Machine Products, Inc. A [ ] Retired military offi­ § 166.10 Listing of present or former Braniff Airways, Inc. cer—Ma j./Lt. Comdr. employees of defense contractors for Brunswick Corp. or above ______FY ------prepared pursuant to sec. Bulova Watch Co., Inc. B [ ] Former military offi­ 410, Public Law 91-121. Bunker Ramo Corp. cer—Maj./Lt. Comdr. Burroughs Corp. or above ______XYZ CORPORATION California Stevedore & Ballast Co. C [ ] Former civilian em­ (name of contractor California, University of. ployee whose salary Caltex Oil Products Co. was equal to or above Last name, First, Grade Last day of Capitol Airways, Inc. minimum G S - 1 3 Middle initial active duty Cardinal Meat Co. during 3 years pre­ Caterpillar Tractor Co. ceding termination REPORTING CATEGORY A Cavalier Bag Co. of service with DOD______Central Beef Co, D [ ] Former employee of, Doen, John A ...... Lieutenant May 31, 1968 Colonel. Central Gulf Steamship Corp. or consultant to, de­ Roen, Richard N ___ Colonel...... July 31, 1968 Cessna Aircraft Co. fense contractor who Chamberlain Corp. during last fiscal year Chandler Evans Corp. was employed by REPORTING CATEGORY B Charrier & McAteer. DOD at salary equal Chicago Aerial Industries. to or above minimum Renn, William A ___ Major______Dec. 31, 1968 Chromalloy American Corp. GS-13 salary ______Chrysler Corp. Items 5 through 10 apply to reporting cate­ REPORTING CATEGORY C Cities Service Oil Co. gories A, B, and C Only. Cities Service Tankers Corp. 5. Name and address of defense contractor Last day of Cievite Corp. employer(s) ______:______Federal Coastal States Petrochemical Co. employment Collins Radio Co. 6. Date(s) of acceptance of employmentPenn, Donald R ____GS-12 (Step 7 ) .... Mar. 16, 1968 Colts, Inc. with defense contractor employer(s) (if no Columbus Milpar Manufacturing Co. longer employed by a defense contractor em­ REPORTING CATEGORY D Computer Sciences Corp. ployer give inclusive date of all such em­ Condec Corp. Consolibag, Inc. ployment) ______:______Date entered present Continental Air Lines, Inc. 7. Date of separation from active duty or employment Continental Aviation & Engineering Corp. termination of DOD employment______Robin, Ronald R ___G S -1 4 ..______July 1, 1969 Continental Motors Corp. Continental Oil Co. 8. Name, in detail, of last agency of DOD N o t e s : 1. “Reporting Category”—those cat­ Control Data Corp. by which employed-.______egories listed in Item 4, DD F o rm ____ _ Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Inc. 2. Use a separate sheet for each contractor. Cubic Corp. 3. Arrange names alphabetically within Curtis Wright Corp. 9. Position title(s) and brief descrip­category. Cutler Hammer, Inc. tion^) of work performed during last 3 years (Sample Listing) Danish Construction Corp. of your service with DOD. Day & Zimmerman, Inc. § 166.11 DOD contractors receiving ne­ Defoe Shipbuilding Co. gotiated contract awards of $10 mil­ Delaware Valley Armaments, Inc. lion or more. Donovan Construction Co. 10. Position title(s) and brief descrip­ Dow Chemical Co. tion (s) of work performed for defense con­ (a) Fiscal year 1968. Du Pont, E. I., de Nemours & Co. tractor employ er ( s ). A.A.I. Corp. Dynalectron Corp. Action Manufacturing Co. Dynamics Corp. of America. Aerodex, Inc. Eastern Airlines, Inc. Aerojet General Corp. Eastman Kodak Co. Items 11 through 16 apply to reporting cate­ Aerospace Corp. Edgington Oil Refinery. gory D Only Air America, Inc. Electro Optical Systems, Inc. 11. Name, in detail, of Department of De­Airlift International, Inc. Electronic Communications, Ino. fense agency by which employed at any time Alaska Barge & Transport Co. Emerson Electric Manufacturing Co. during the last fiscal year. Albatross Tanker Corp. Esso International Corp. Allis Chalmers Manufacturing Co. F.M.C. Corp. v Alsco, Inc. Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. Aluminum Company of America. Fairchild Hiller Corp. 12. Date accepted DOD employment___ _ American Airlines, Inc. Federal Cartridge Corp. 13. Position title (s) and brief descrip­ Ambac Industries, Inc. Federal Electric Corp. tion (s) of duties with Department of De­ American Electric Co. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. fense employer during last fiscal year. American Export Isbrandsten Lines. Flying Tiger Line, Inc. American Machine & Foundry Co. Ford Motor Co. American Manufacturing Co. of Texas. Frequency Engineering Laboratories, American President Lines, Ltd. Garrett Corp. 14. Name(s) of defense contractor(s) byAmerican Telephone & Telegraph Co. General Dynamics Corp. whom you were employed or whom you Ampex Corp. served as a consultant or otherwise. General Electric Co. Amion Corp. General Foods Corp. ARO Inc. Asiatic Petroleum Corp. General Instrument Corp. 15. Inclusive dates of employment by, orAtlantic Research Corp. General Motors Corp. service with, Defense contractor employer (s). Atlantic Richfield Co, General Precision Systems, Inc. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc. General Time Corp. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. Global Associates. 16. Position title(s) and brief descrip­AVCO Corp. Golden Eagle Refining Co., Inc. tion (s) of work performed for Defense con­ Batesville Manufacturing Co. Goodrich, B. F., Co. tractor (s). Battelle Memorial Institute. Goodyear Aerospace Corp. Beech Aircraft Corp. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. Bell & Howell Co. Grumman Aircraft Engineering Co. Bell Aerospace Corp. Gulf OU Corp. 17. I certify the above information is cor­Bendix Corp. H.R.B. Singer, Inc. rect to the best of my knowledge and belief. Bethlehem Steel Co. Hallicrafters Co. Blue Star Foods, Inc. HamUton Watch Co. (Signature) Boeing Co. Harrington & Richardson, Inc. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18043

Harvey Aluminum, Inc. P.R.D. Electronics, Inc. Whittaker Corp. Harvey Aluminum Sales, Pace Corp. World Airways, Inc. Hayes Holding. Pacific Architects & Engineers, Inc. Hazeltine Corp. Pacific Far East Line, Inc. (b) Fiscal year 1969. Hercules Engines, Inc. Page Aircraft Maintenance, Inc. A. A. I. Corp. Hercules, Inc. Page Communications Engineers, Inc. Action Manufacturing Co. Hewlett Packard Co. Pan American World Airways, Inc. Aerodex, Inc. Honeywell, Inc. Parsons, Ralph M., Co., Inc. Aerojet General Corp. Hudson Waterways Corp. Pennsylvania State University. Aerospace Corp. Hughes Aircraft Co. Perkin Elmer Corp. Air America, Inc. Hughes Tool Co. Philco Ford Corp. Airlift International, Inc. Humble OU & Refining Co. Planning Research Corp. Airport Machining Corp. I.I.T. Research Institute. Pòloron Products, Inc. Alaska Barge & Transport Co. I.T.T. Gilfillan, Inc. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co. Alsco, Inc. Ingalls Shipbuilding Corp. Radiation, Inc. Aluminium Company of America. Institute for Defense Analysis. Radio Corp. of America. American Electric Co. Intercontinental Manufacturing Co. Rand Corp. American Export Isbrandtsen Lines. International Business Machine Co. Raymond Morrison Knudsen. American Machine & Foundry Co. International Dairy Engineering Co. Raytheon Co. American Manufacturing Company of Texas. International Harvester Co. Remington Arms Co. American President Lines, Ltd. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. Research Analysis Corp. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. Interstate Electronics. Reynolds, R. J., Tobacco Co. Amron Corp. Itek Corp. Rochester, University of. Amron Orlando Carp. Johns Hopkins University. Royal Industries, Inc. Amtron, Inc. Jones, J. A. Construction Co. Rulon Co. ARO Inc. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. Ryan Aeronautical Co. Asiatic Petroleum Corp. Kaiser Jeep Corp. Sanders Associates, Inc. Atlantic Richfield Co. Kaiser Steel Corp. Saturn Airways, Inc. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc. Kaman Corp. Scope, Inc. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. Kennedy Van Saun Manufacturing & En­ Sea Land Service, Inc. AVCO Corp. gineering Corp. Sea Transport Corp. B P Trading, Ltd. Kisco Co., Inc. Seaboard World Airlines, Inc. Batesville Manufacturing Co. Koehring Co. Seatrain Lines, Inc. Bath Industries, Inc. Kollsman Instrument Corp. Serv Air, Inc. Battelle Memorial Institute. Kurz, Charles, & Co. Shell Oil Co. Bell & Howell Co. L.S.I. Service Corp. Shipping & Coal Co. Bell Aerospace Corp. L.T.V. Electrosystems. Simplex Wire & Cable Co. Bendix Corp. L.T.V. Aerospace Corp. Sinclair Refining Co. Bethlehem Steel Co. Lasko Metal Products, Inc. Smith, A. O., Corp. Blackman Bros. Nebraska. Lawson, Lester D., & Co. Southern Airways, Inc. Boeing Co. Lear Siegler, Inc. Sperry Rand Corp. Booz Allen Applied Research, Inc. Letourneau, R. G., Inc. Standard Container. Borg-Wamer Corp. Levinson Steel Co. Standard Oil Co. of California. Brads Machine Products, Inc. Ling Temco Vaught, Inc. Stanford Research Institute. Braniff Airways, Inc. Litton Industries. Stanford University. Brunswick Corp. Litton Systems, Inc. States Marine Lines, Inc. Bulova Watch Co., Inc. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. States Steamship Co. Bunker Ramo Corp. Loral Corp. Stewart Warner Corp. «Burroughs Corp. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc. Straza Industries, Inc. C.C.I. Marquardt Corp. Machlett Laboratories, Inc. Sundstrand Corp. California Stevedore & Ballast Co. Mack Trucks, Inc. Swift & Co. California, University of. Magline, Inc. Sylvania Electric Products, Ino. Caltex Oil Products Co. Magnavox Co. System Development Corp. Capitol Airways, Inc. Maremont Corp. T. R.W., Inc. Carborundum Co. Marine Terminals Corp. Talley Industries. Caterpillar Tractor Co. Marine Transport Lines, Inc. Teledyne, Inc. Cavalier Bag Co. Marquardt Corp. Teletype Corp. Central Gulf Steamship Corp. Martin & Zachry Constructors. Texaco Export, Inc. Cessna Aircraft Co. Martin Marietta Corp. Texaco, Inc. Chamberlain Manufacturing Corp. Mason & Hanger Silas Mason Co. Texas Instruments, Inc. Chicago Aerial Industries. Mason & Rust JV. Textron, Inc. Chromalloy American Corp. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Thiokoi Chemical Corp. Chrysler Corp. Mathiasens Tanker Industries, Inc. Thompson Stearns Roger JV. Clevite Corp. Matson Terminals, Inc. Tracor, Inc. Collins Radio Co. Maxson Electronics Corp. Trans Caribbean Airways, Inc. Colts, Inc. Mayer Oscar & Co. Trans International Airlines, Inc. Communication & Systems, Inc. McDonnell Douglas Corp. Trans World Airlines, Inc. Computer Sciences Corp. McGraw Edison Co. Trenton Textile Engineering Manufacturing Condec Corp. Metals Engineering Co. Co. Conductron Corp. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. Tumpane Co. Continental Air Lines, Inc. Mitre Corp. U. M.C. Industries, Inc. Continental Aviation & Engineering Corp. Mobile Oil Corp. Union Carbide Corp. Continental Motors Corp. Moore McCormack Lines, Inc. Union Oil Co. of California. Control Data Corp. Motorola, Inc. Uniroyal, Inc. Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Inc. National Dairy Products Corp. United Aircraft Corp. Curtis Wright Corp. National Gypsum Co. United Fruit Co. Cutler Hammer, Inc. National Presto Industries, Inc. United States Lines Co. Dae Lim Ind & Morrison Knudsen JV. National Union Electric Corp. United States Steel Corp. Day & Zimmerman, Inc. Nebraska Beef Processors. United States Time Corp. Delavel Turbine, Inc. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. Universal Airlines, Inc. Delaware Valley Armaments, Inc. Norris Industries. Varian Associates. Donovan Construction Co. North American Rockwell Corp. Varo, Inc. Du Pont, E. I. de Nemours & Co. Northrop Carolina, Inc. Vinnell Corp. Dynalectron Corp. Northrop Corp. Vitro Corp. of America. Dynamics Corp. of America. Waterman Steamship Corp. E. G. & G., Inc. Northwest Airlines, Inc. Western Electric Co., Inc. Eastman Kodak Co. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. Western Union Telegraph Co. Edgington Oil Refinery. Otis Elevator Co. Westinghouse Electric Corp. Eisen Brothers, Inc. Overseas National Airways, Inc. White Motor Co. Electromagnetic Technology Corp.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18044 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Electronic Communications, Inc. Mack Trucks, Inc. Teletype Corp. Emerson Electric Co. Magnavox Co. Temco, Inc. Esso International Corp. Maremont Corp. Texaco Export, Inc. F.M.C. Corp. Marine Terminals Corp. Texas Instruments, Inc. P.T.S. Corp. Martin Marietta Corp. Textron, Inc., Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. Marwais Steel Co. Thiokol Chemical Corp. Fairchild Hiller Corp. Mason & Hanger Silas Mason CO. Trans Caribbean Airways, Inc. Federal Cartridge Corp. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Trans International Airlines, Inc. Federal Electric Corp. Matson Navigation Co. Trans World Airlines, Inc. Fegles Construction & C & I Girdler JV. Matson Terminals, Inc. Tumpane Co. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. Maxson Electronics Corp. U.M.C. Industries, Inc. Fletcher Oil Co. McDonnell Douglas Corp. Uniroyal, Inc. Flinchbaugh Products, Inc. McGraw Edison Co. United Air Lines, Inc. Flying Tiger Line, Inc. Meadow Gold Dairies. United Aircraft Corp. Ford Motor Co. Melpar, Inc. United Fruit Co. Garrett Corp. Metals Engineering Co. United States Lines Co. Gary Aircraft Corp. Michigan, University of. United States Steel Corp. General Dynamics Corp. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. United States Time Corp. General Electric Co. Mitre Corp. Universal Airlines, Inc. General Foods Corp. Mobil Oil Corp. Varían Associates. General Instrument Corp. Moore McCormack Lines, Inc. Varo, Inc. General Motors Corp. Motorola, Inc. Victory Carriers, Inc. General Time Corp. Muncie Gear Works. « Vinnell Corp. Gibbs Manufacturing Research Corp. National Gypsum Co. Vinnel Corp. & Hyun Dia Construction Co. Global Associates. National Presto Industries, Inc. JV. Gold Pak Meat Co., Inc. National Union Electric Corp. Vitro Corp. of America. Golden Eagle Refining Co., Inc. Needham Packing Co., Inc, Waterman Steamship Corp. Goodrich, B. F. Co. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. Weatherhead Co. Goodyear Aerospace Corp. Norris Industries. Wells Marine, Inc. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. North American Rockwell Corp. Western Electric Co., Inc. Grumman Aircraft Engineering Co. North Electric Co. Western Union Telegraph Co. Gulf Oil Corp. Northrop Corp. Westinghouse Air Brake Co. Halllcrafters Co. Northwest Airlines, Inc. Westinghouse Electric Corp. Hamilton Watch Co. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. Whirlpool Corp. Hamischfeger Corp. Overseas National Airways, Inc. White Motor Corp. Harrington & Richardson, Inc . P.RD. Electronics, Inc. Whittaker Corp. Harvey Aluminum, Inc. Pace Corp. World Airways, Inc. Harvey Aluminum Sales. Pacific Architects & Engineers, Inc. Zenith Radio Corp. Hayes Holding Co. (Hayes Inti. Corp.). Pacific Far East.Line, Inc. (c) Fiscal year 1970. Hazeltine Corp. Page Aircraft Maintenance, Inc. . Hercules Engines, Inc. Page Communications Engineers, Inc. A.A.I. Corp. Hercules, Inc. Pan American World Airways, Inc. A. M.F., Inc. Hewlett Packard Co. Parsons, Ralph M., Co., Inc. Aerodex, Inc. Hoffman Electronics Corp. Pennsylvania State University. Aerojet General Corp. Hollingsworth, John R., Co. Perkin Elmer Corp. Aerospace Corp. Honeywell, Inc. Philco Ford Corp. Air America, Inc. Hudson Waterways Corp. Planning Research Corp. Airlift International, Inc. Hughes Aircraft Co. Polorpn Products, Inc. Alaska Barge & Transport Co. Hughes Tool Co. Proctor & Gamble Distributing Co. Amercargo Shipping Corp. Humble Oil & Refining Co. Radiation, Inc. American Airlines, Inc. I.I.T. Research Institute. RCA, Corp. American Electric Co. I.T.T. Gilfillan, Inc. Rand Corp. American Export Isbrandsten Lines. Illinois, University of. Raymond Morrison Knudsen. American Manufacturing Co, of Texas. Institute for Defense Analysis. Raytheon Co. American President Lines, Ltd. Intercontinental Manufacturing CO. Remington Arms Co. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. International Business Machine Co. Reynolds, R. J., Industries, Inc. ARO, Inc. International Dairy Engineering Co. Rochester, University of. Asiatic Petroleum Corp. International Harvester Co. Rulon Co. Atlantic Richfield Co. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. Ryan Aeronautical Co. Atlas Chemical Industries, Inc. Interstate Electronics. Sanders Associates, Inc. AVCO Corp. Itek Corp. Saturn Airways, Inc. B. P. Trading, Ltd. Johns Hopkins University. Sed Land Service, Inc. Batesville Manufacturing Co. K. D.I. Corp. Seaboard World Airlines, Inc. Battello Memorial Institute; Kaiser Jeep Corp. Seatrain Lines, Inc. Beech Aircraft Corp. Kaman Corp. Serv Air, Inc. Bell & Howell Co. Kennedy Van Saun Manufacturing & Engi­ Service Technology Corp. Bell Aerospace Corp. neering Corp. Shell Oil Co. Bendix Corp. Kentron Hawaii, Ltd. Singer General Precision, Inc. Boeing Co. Kidde Walter & Co., Inc. Smith, A. O., Corp. Booz Allen Applied Research, Inc. Kilgore Corp. Southern Airways, Inc. Borg Warner Corp. Kisco Co., Inc. Sperry Rand Corp. Braniff Airways, Inc. Kollsman Instrument Corp. Standard Container. Bulova Watch Co., Inc. Korea Oil Corp. Standard Oil Co. of California. Bunker Ramo Corp. Korean Express & Keang Nam, Ltd. Stanford Research Institute. C. C.I. Marquardt Corp. Kraftco Corp. Stanford University. California, University of. L. S.I. Service Corp. States Marine Lines, Inc. Caltex Oil Products Co. L.T.V. Electrosystems. States Steamship Co. Capitol Airways, Inc. L.T.V. Aerospace Corp. Stewart Warner Corp. Caterpillar Tractor Co. Lasko Metal Products, Inc. Stolte & Santa Fe Engineering & Korea Central Beef Co. Lear Siegler, Inc. Development. Central Gulf Steamship Corp. Letourneau, R. G., Inc. Straightline Manufacturing Co. Cessna Aircraft Co. Levinson Steel Co. Sundstrand Corp. Chamberlain Manufacturing Corp. Ling Temco Vought, Inc. Susquehanna Corp. Chandler Evans Corp. Litton Industries. Swift & Co. Chinese Petroleum Corp. Litton Systems, Inc. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. Chromalloy American Corp. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. System Development Corp. Chrysler Corp. Luther Werke G.M.B.H. & Co. T.R.W., Inc. Clevite Corp. Luzon Stevedoring Corp. Talley Industries, Inc. Coastal States Petrochemical Co. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc. Teledyne, Inc. Collins Radio Co.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18045

Colts, Inc. Levinson Steel Co. Trans Caribbean Airways, Inc. Columbia Steamship Co., Ino. Ling Temco Vought, Inc. Trans International Airlines, Inc. Computer Sciences Corp. Litton Systems, Inc. Trans World Airlines, Inc. Conductron Corp. Lockheed Aircraft Corp. Tumpane Co. Continental Air Lines, Inc. Long Quinn & Boylan Co. Uniroyal, Ino. Continental Aviation & Engineering Corp. Luer Packing Co. United Air Lines, Inc. Continental Motors Corp. Luther Werke GmbH. & Co. United Aircraft Corp. Luzon Stevedoring Corp. United Fruit Co. Control Data Corp. United States Lines Co. Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Inc. Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc. Magnavox Co. United States Steel Corp. Crescent Precision Products, Inc. Universal Airlines, Inc. Curtis Wright Corp. Maremont Corp. Martin & Zachry Constructors. Varian Associates. Cutler Hammer, Inc. Varo, Inc. Danish Construction Corp. Martin Marietta Corp. Mason & Hanger Silas Mason Co. Vinnell Corp. Day & Zimmerman, Inc. Vitro Corp. of America. Délavai Turbine, Inc. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. McDonnell Douglas Corp. Waterman Steamship Corp. Donovan Construction Co. Western Electric Co., Inc. Dynalectron Corp. Meadow Gold Dairies. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. Western Union Telegraph Co. Dynamics Corp. of America. Westinghouse Electric Corp. E. G. & G., Inc. Mitre Corp. White Motor Corp. Eastern Airlines, Inc. Mobil Oil Corp. Moore McCormack Lines, Inc. Whittaker Corp. Eastman Kodak Co. World Airways, Inc. Eisen Metal Products. Motorola, Inc. National Metals Manufacturing Co., Inc. World Wide Metals, Inc. Emerson Electric Co. Xerox Corp. Esso International Corp. National Presto Industries, Inc. P. M. C. Corp. Needham Packing Co., Inc. Maurice W. R oche, Fairchild Camera & Instrument Corp. Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. Director,- Correspondence and Fairchild Hiller Corp. Norris Industries. Directives Division, OASD Federal Cartridge Corp. North American Rockwell Corp. (Administration). Federal Electric Corp. North Electric Co. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. Northrop Corp. [F.R. Doc. 70-15846; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; Fischbach & Moore, Inc. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 8:47 a.m.] Flying Tiger Line, Inc. Olin Corp. Ford Motor Co. Overseas National Airways, Inc. Garrett Corp. P.RD. Electronics, Inc. SUBCHAPTER M— MISCELLANEOUS Gary Aircraft Corp. Pace Corp. General Dynamics Corp. Pacific Architects & Engineers, Inc. PART 211— DEPARTMENT OF DE­ General Electric Co. Pacific Far East Line, Inc. FENSE FOREIGN TAX RELIEF PRO­ General Foods Corp. Page Aircraft Maintenance, Inc. General Instrument Corp. Page Communications Engineers, Inc. GRAM General Motors Corp. Pan American World Airways, Inc. The Deputy Secretary of Defense ap­ General Time Corp. Parsons, Ralph M. Co., Inc. proved the f ollowing on August 12,1970: Global Associates. Philco Ford Corp. Gold Pak Meat Co., Inc. Physics International Co. Sec. Golden Eagle Refining Co., Inc. Poloron Products, Inc. 211.1 Purpose. Goodrich, B. F., Co. Procter & Gamble Distributing Co. 211.2 Applicability. Goodyear Aerospace Corp. Radiation, Inc. 211.3 Definitions. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. RCA Corp. 211.4 Policy. / Grumman Aerospace Corp. RCA Global Communications, Inc. 211.5 Scope. Grumman Corp. Rand Corp. 211.6 Responsibilities. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc. Raymond Morrison Knudsen. 211.7 Country tax law studies. Hallicrafters Co. Raytheon Co. 211.8 Effective date and implementation. Hamilton Watch Co. Remington Arms CO. 211.9 GAO report to the Congress on the Harnischfeger Corp. Reynolds, R. J. Industries, Inc. questionable payment of taxes to Harvey Aluminum Sales. Rochester, University of. other governments on U.S. defense Hayes Holding Co. (Hayes International Rulon Co. activities overseas, January 20, Corp.) Teledyne Ryan Aeronautical Co. 1970 (B—133267). Hazeltine Corp. Sanders Associates, Inc. Saturn Airways, Inc. Authority: The provisions of this Part 211 Hercules, Inc. issued under 5 U.S.C. 301 and 10 U.S.C. 133. Hewlett Packard Co. Sea Land Service, Inc. Hoffman Electronics Corp. Seaboard World Airlines, Inc. § 211.1 Purpose. Honeywell, Inc. Seatrain Lines, Inc. Hudson Waterways Corp. Serv Air, Inc. This part defines Department of De­ Hughes Aircraft Co. Shell Oil Co. fense policy on the subject program, Hughes Tool Co. Shipping & Coal Co. designates the organizational element Humblé Oil & Refining Co. Simplex Wire & Cable Co. which has continuing responsibility for I.I.T. Research Institute. Singer General Precision, Inc. the overall direction of the Department I.T.T. Gilfillan, Inc. Southern Airways, Inc. Sparton Corp. of Defense participation in the U.S. Illinois, University of. Foreign Tax Relief Program, delineates Institute for Defense Analysis. Sperry Rand Corp. Intercontinental Manufacturing Co. Standard Oil Co. of California. the responsibilities of various other or­ International Business Machine Co. Stanford Research Institute. ganizational elements to implement and International Dairy Engineering Co. Stanford University. monitor the subject program, and re­ International Harvester Co. States Marine Lines, Inc. quires the preparation and maintenance International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. States Steamship Co. of specified foreign country tax law Interstate Electronics. Stelma, Inc. Sundstrand Corp. studies in order to facilitate the institu­ Itek Corp. tion of statistical reporting procedures. Johns Hopkins University. Susquehanna Corp. Kaman Corp. Swift & Co. § 211.2 Applicability. Kentron Hawaii, Ltd. Sylvania Electric Products, Inc. Kings Point Manufacturing Co. System Development Corp. This part applies to all organizational Kisco Co., Inc. T.R.W., Inc. elements of the Department of Defense, Kollsman Instrument Corp. Teledyne, Inc. including the Office of the Secretary of Korea Oil Corp. Teletype Corp. Defense, the Organization of the Joint Kraftco Corp. Texaco Export, Inc. Chiefs of Staff, the Departments of the L.T.V. Electrosystems. Texas Instruments, Inc. L.T.V. Aerospace Corp. Textron, Inc. Army, Navy, and Air Force, and all Lear Siegler, Ino. Thiokol Chemical Corp. Defense agencies and other DOD Letourneau, R. G., Inc. Todd Shipyards Corp. components.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 No. 229- 18046 RULES AND REGULATIONS

§ 211.3 Definitions. DOD shall determine, with policy guid­ cies. The Secretary of each of the Mili­ (a) Tax and taxes. The words “tax” ance, as appropriate, from the Assistant tary Departments and the Director of and “taxes,” as used in this part, include Secretary of Defense (International Se­ each of the Defense Agencies will issue all foreign customs duties, import and curity Affairs), the identity of such other instructions or regulations implement­ export taxes, excises, fees, and any other countries which are within the scope of ing this part and will charge a single charges, except for services rendered or this paragraph. office within his respective Military De­ other Consideration actually received (b) Military assistance expenditures.partment or Defense Agency (herein re­ therefor, whether direct or indirect, The policy set forth under § 211.4 applies ferred to as the “Cognizant Office”) with whether imposed at the national, local, to military assistance expenditures in all continuing responsibility for supervising or an intermediate level of a foreign countries. and monitoring the implementation of country, and regardless how the tax is § 211.6 Responsibilities. the foreign tax relief program within denominated in foreign law or regulation such department or agency. Such in­ (or in translation thereof). For example, (a) General Counsel of the Depart­ structions or regulations will delegate to such taxes may include but are not ment of Defense. In accordance with the the Cognizant Office authority commen­ limited to purchase tax, sales tax, use provisions of 24 F.R. 6101 and § 211.9, the surate with the responsibility of the tax, gross receipts tax, stamp tax, trans­ Office of the General Counsel of the De­ Cognizant Office. fer tax, transaction tax, turnover tax, partment of Defense is designated as the (f) Commanders of Unified Com­ value added tax, service tax, trade tax, central office within the Office of the mands. Commanders of Unified Com­ business tax, license tax, transportation Secretary of Defense charged with con­ mands, as appropriate, will promulgate tax, circulation tax, luxury tax, posses­ tinuing responsibility for the overall management procedures to guide and co­ sion tax, production tax, registration tax, supervision and direction of the Depart­ ordinate the administration of the for­ consumption tax, gasoline tax, real prop­ ment of Defense Foreign Tax Relief Pro­ eign tax relief program throughout their erty tax, personal property tax, and gross gram and as the central point for the respective area commands. income tax. ultimate consideration and resolution of (g) Designated Commanding Officer. (b) Relief. The word "relief,” as used significant issues relating to the pro­ For each foreign country in which United in this part, includes any method, tech­ gram. The General Counsel of the DOD States expenditures are made in the in­ nique, or procedure by which the ultimate is responsible for developing and issuing terest of the common defense (within the economic burden of a tax on Department implementing instructions governing the scope of § 211.5(a)), a single military of Defense funds may be avoided or policy of the Department of Defense commander shall be designated by the otherwise remedied, such as exemption, Foreign Tax Relief Program and its commander of the unified command for refund, or drawback. administration. the area in which such foreign country (b) Assistant Secretary of Defense is located or, in those areas for which no § 211.4 Policy. (International Security Affairs). The such unified command exists, by the It is the policy of the Department of Assistant Secretary of Defense (ISA) General Counsel of the DOD. The Desig­ Defense to secure, to the maximum ex­ will consult with the General Counsel of nated Commanding Officer shall be the tent practicable, effective relief from all the DOD to insure that the actions taken same commanding officer, if any, desig­ foreign taxes wherever the ultimate eco­ pursuant to DOD Instruction 5100.61, nated pursuant to the procedures set nomic burden of those taxes would, in the “International Agreements Concerning forth under § 151.3(c) of this chapter. In absence of such relief, be demonstrably Military Facilities, Operating Rights and addition to his responsibilities to make borne by funds appropriated or available Status of Forces Matters.” January 22, and maintain a current country tax law to the Department of Defense, including 19691 are compatible with the policy of study in accordance with § 211.7, the military assistance appropriations, or the Department of Defense Foreign Tax Designated Commanding Officer shall under the control of its nonappropriated Relief Program as set forth under § 211.4 serve as (1) a single point of contact for fund activities. The identity of the coun­ and with the implementing instructions U.S. contracting officers and activities for tries whose taxes are covered by this issued pursuant to paragraph (a) of this the investigation and resolution, as ap­ policy shall be determined in accordance section. propriate, of specific matters which arise with § 211.5. In those cases in which the (c) Assistant Secretary of Defense relating to the foreign tax relief program total economic burden of a tax not (Installations and Logistics). Pursuant within the country for which he is desig­ readily identifiable in the normal course to 24 F.R. 2260, the Assistant Secretary nated and, where necessary, for forward­ of business is so small that it may be con­ of Defense (I&L) will coordinate with ing major problems affecting that pro­ sidered a de minimis matter, or where the the General Counsel of the DOD prior gram through proper channels to the administrative burden of securing effec­ to the issuance, amendment, or revision Office of the General Counsel of the tive relief from such a tax in a particular of any portion of the Armed Services DOD, and (2) a point of liaison with the instance would be out of proportion to Procurement Regulation (or other regu­ responsible diplomatic mission on cur­ the amount of the relief obtained, tax lation, directive, Defense Procurement rent tax relief problems and, where ap­ relief shall be deemed not practicable to Circular, or other publication within the propriate, with local foreign tax be secured. scope of 32 F.R. 10518) which pertains authorities. to the implementation of the Depart­ § 211.5 Scope. ment of Defense Foreign Tax Relief § 211.7 Country tax law studies. (a) Common defense expenditures.Program. (a) Each Designated Commanding The policy set forth under § 211.4 applies (d) Assistant Secretary of Defense Officer shall make and maintain a cur­ to all military functions expenditures by (.Comptroller). The Assistant Secretary rent study of the tax laws and regulations the Department of Defense and to ex­ of Defense (Comptroller) will advise and and the tax relief procedures, if any, in penditures by nonappropriated fund ac­ assist in performing such fiscal functions effect in the country for which he is tivities subject to taxes imposed by those as may be required to implement the designated. The taxes covered by each countries in which U.S. military forces Department of Defense Foreign Tax study shall be limited to those which, in are regularly stationed (other than at­ Relief Program, including advice and as­ tache personnel and other military per­ the absence of tax relief, would affect, sistance in the institution of procedures or would appear to affect, U.S. Govern­ sonnel serving under the direction of a for collecting data, compiling reports, chief of a diplomatic mission). That and performing internal audits. ment expenditures, even as a de minimis policy also applies to those expenditures (e) Secretaries of Military Depart­ matter, all such taxes being herein re­ subject to taxes imposed by any other ments and Directors of Defense Agen- ferred to as applicable taxes. The for­ foreign country in which all or most U.S. mats of the tax law -studies for all defense activities, in a collective sense, countries will be similar insofar as prac­ are conducted in the interest of the com­ 1 Filed as part of original document. Copiesticable and designed to facilitate the available from the U.S. Naval Publications mon defense or otherwise significantly and Forms Center, 5801 Tabor Avenue, institution of statistical reporting pro­ improve the military security of such Philadelphia, PA 10120, Attention: Code cedures. The commanders of unified country. The General Counsel of the NPA-1. commands will supervise and coordinate

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18047 the preparation and maintenance of the curred in attempting to obtain relief in within the Office of the Secretary Of De­ tax law studies for countries in their re­ particular cases; and fense to serve as the point of continuing spective area commands with a view to (5) A conclusion with regard to theresponsibility for the overall direction of the practical utilization by U.S. contract­ adequacy of current tax relief measures; Department of Defense participation in ing officers and activities of the studies and such recommendations as may be the U.S. foreign tax relief program. As for purposes of making reliable estimates appropriate for effectuating more effi­ such, the Office of the General Counsel, of the total amount of taxes applicable ciently the policy set forth under § 211.4. DOD, is charged with the primary re­ to any particular contract and the (c) Appended to each country tax law sponsibility to oversee and insure that amount thereof for which tax relief is study shall be a verbatim quotation of all the Department of Defense implements available. * provisions relating to tax relief afforded the commitments it has undertaken in (b) Each country tax law study will by such country which are contained in the joint State/Defense reply, dated consist of the following: international agreements in force February 16, 1970, to the GAO Report. (1) A general survey of all applicable (within the scope of DOD Instruction (b) The General Counsel of the De­ taxes, together with translations, as ap­ 5530.2, "Central Repository for Agree­ partment of Defense is authorized and propriate, of the salient features of the ments with Foreign Governments or directed to establish a Defense Commit­ law or regulations imposing those taxes; International Organizations,” Sept. 11, tee On Foreign Taxation (DECOFT) in (2) For each such applicable tax, a 1962x), order to assist in the discharge of De­ summary statement containing its name; (d) Studies of the tax laws and regu­ partment of Defense responsibilities in its rate (or rates); the taxing authority lations and the tax relief procedures, if paragraph (a) of this section for for­ (e.g., national, provincial, municipal); any, in effect in countries other than eign tax relief matters, and to designate the legal incidence of the tax (i.e., the those within the scope of § 211.5(a) the Chairman thereof. Those depart­ nature of the taxpayer or other entity shall be made as directed by the General ments, offices, and agencies of the De­ liable for the payment of the tax to the Counsel of the DOD. partment of Defense which perform sig­ taxing authority under the law of the (e) One copy of each country tax law nificant functions in connection with country); and its description (including study shall be forwarded to the Office of foreign tax relief matters shall be re­ the base or bases on which the tax is - the General Counsel of the DOD and to quested by the General Counsel, DOD, to imposed; the applicability of the tax to each of the Cognizant Offices of the Mili­ name one or more representatives to various types of contracts (e.g., supplies, tary Departments and Defense Agencies serve as members of DECOFT. DECOFT services, construction) in the event the within 30 days after its approval by the shall continue in existence for 2 years tax is applicable to only one or several Designated Commanding Officer. The in­ from March 13,1970, or until completion of such types of contracts; the applica­ formation contained in such studies will of its mission, whichever is earlier. bility of the tax to the prime contract, be disseminated by the Cognizant Offices (c) The General Counsel, DOD, is also as well as to any subcontracts or pur­ to U.S. contracting officers and activities authorized to designate the Department chase orders issued by the prime con­ as required. of Defense member of the State/Defense tractor or subcontractor; the applica­ (f) Country tax law studies shall be, Interdepartmental Committee on For­ bility of the tax to contractor and sub­ subject to a continuing review, and eign Tax Relief after it has been estab­ contractor personnel; the variation, if whenever in any country for which a lished by the Department of State. any, of the applicability of the tax de­ study has been approved there is a sig­ pending upon the domicile of the con­ nificant change in its tax laws, regula­ Maurice W. R oche, tractor or contractor personnel (e.g., tions, tax relief procedures, or in perti­ Director, Correspondence and United States, host country, or third nent international agreements in force, Directives Division, OASD country); any applicable exemptions or the corresponding revision shall be (Administration). deductions of significance; and the promptly forwarded by the Designated [P.R. Doc. 70-15847; Piled, Nov. 24, 1970; method of collection of £he tax ); Commanding Officer to each of the offices 8:48 ajn.] (3) The basis upon which it is con­ referred to in paragraph (e) of this cluded that each such applicable tax, in section. SUBCHAPTER P— RECORDS absence of tax relief, would affect, or § 211.8 Effective date and implementa­ would appear to affect, U.S. Government tion. PART 289— SALE OF DEPARTMENT OF expenditures; and any evidence of the DEFENSE DIRECTIVES, INSTRUC­ degree to which its ultimate economic (a) This part is effective immediately. burden would, in absence of tax relief, (b) Country tax law studies required TIONS, AND INDEXES TO THE be borne by the U.S. Government rather under § 211.7 shall be completed and ap­ PUBLIC proved by the Designated Commanding than be absorbed by others; Subscription Service (4) The substantive tax relief, if any, Officer as rapidly as possible and in any from each such applicable tax which is event on or before August 12, 1971. Tax The following miscellaneous amend­ available to the U.S. Government either law studies for those other countries de­ ment to Part 289 has been authorized: by international agreements in force or termined by the General Counsel of the Section 289.1(b) (1) has been changed under the tax law or other regulation DOD to be within the scope of § 211.5(a) to read as follows: of the country; the procedures which shall be completed and approved by the § 289.1 Subscription service. may be used to obtain any such relief; Designated Commanding Officer as rap­ * * * * * the requirement, if any, of the issuance idly as possible and in any event within of a tax exemption certificate by the one (1) year from the date of such (b) * * * military procuring agency or by an determination. (1) Orders may be forwarded at any agency of the country in order to secure time to the Director, Navy Publications an exemption; the entitlement, if any, § 211.9 GAO report to the Congress on and Printing Service, Eastern Division, of the taxpayer to interest on any tax the questionable payment of taxes to Building 4, Section D, 700 Robbins Ave­ other governments on U.S. defense nue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, in any form, refund made by the host country; the activities overseas, January 20, 1970 credits, if any, that may be available (B—133267). accompanied by a certified bank check against any other taxes otherwise pay­ or postal money order payable to the able by the taxpayer resulting from the (a) In addition to the provisions ofTreasurer of the United States. payment of the tax under analysis; the § 211.6(a), the Office of the General ***** approximate amount of the tax that Counsel of the Department of Defense should be involved in a particular case, is hereby designated the central office Maurice W. R oche, if such can be estimated taking into ac­ Director, Correspondence and count the costs of filing a claim for re­ Directives Division, OASD 1 Piled as part of original document. Copies (Administration). fund by a contractor, to warrant filing available from the U.S. Naval Publications such a claim; and a brief narration of and Forms Center, 5601 Tabor Avenue, Phil­ [F.R. Doc. 70-15845; Plied, Nov. 24, 1970; any significant problems which have oc- adelphia, PA 19120, attention: Code NPA-1. 8:47 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18048 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Chapter V— Department of the Army including amendments, extensions, ad­ 3. In § 593.216-2 paragraph (d) is re­ ditions, or supplements which are of a vised; the Footnote 1, following the for­ SUBCHAPTER G— PROCUREMENT substantive nature or which will require mat of the letter of transmittal in MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS TO additional funding, without evidence of § 593.306-51 is revised, as follows: SUBCHAPTER prior approval of the Assistant Secre­ tary of the Army (Financial Manage­ § 593.216—2 Application. Title 32, Chapter V, Subchapter G, is ment) for ADP services in excess of ***** amended as follows: $10,000. Contracting for ADP services (d) Procedures pertaining to approval PART 591— GENERAL PROVISIONS through a series of incremental type con­ of industrial mobilization projects are set tractual arrangements involving more forth in AR 700-90. However, the fact 1. Section 591.405 is amended by re­than one contract of $10,000 or less, none that a project falls under the Army Pro­ voking paragraph (e) ; § 591.450-9 is re­ of which provides a usable end product, duction Base Support Program does not vised; § 591.451 is amended by adding a is prohibited. necessarily justify use of negotiation un­ new paragraph (c), as follows: (d) Contracting officers shall be alert der 10 U.S.C. 2304(a) (16). If the work § 591.405 Selection, appointment, and to requests for mixed contract studies to be performed under production engi­ termination of appointment of con­ which have not been classified under any neering is virtually all design, develop­ tracting officers. one of the above as “Management,” ment and test (i.e. design and test of a ***** “Operations Research,” or “Automatic new, untried pilot line and of new pro­ Data Processing.” Contracting officers duction engineering solutions, develop­ (e) [Revoked] shall insure that appropriate approval ment of production type specifications, § 591.450—9 Management studies, oper­ has been obtained, as determined by the design of new special tooling or of new ations research studies and ADP Comptroller of the Army (COA) prior special test equipment), the negotiation services. to soliciting bids or proposals or award­ exception under § 3.211 of this title ing contracts or modifications, including might be appropriate, notwithstanding (a) Management studies obtained by that PEMA funds are to be used. For contract are explained in Chapter 2, amendments, extensions, additions, or AR 1-110. With respect to such studies, supplements which are of a substantive example, § 3.211 of thk title might be contracting officers shall not solicit bids nature or which will require additional appropriate when the contract effort is— or proposals nor award contracts or funding. ***** modifications* including amendments, (e) AR 1-110 is not applicable to the § 593.306—51 Letter o f transmittal. extensions, additions or supplements employment of experts or consultants * * * * * which are of a substantive nature or on a per diem basis (see § 591.450-3). F ootnotes: which will require additional funding, § 591.451 Participation of legal counsel 1 Here show any intermediate headquarters without evidence of prior approval of the in the procurement process. in procurement channels through which the request is forwarded. In addition, if RDTE Assistant Secretary of the Army (Finan­ ***** cial Management). funded, show “Chief, Research and Develop­ (c) Any contract is essentially a legalment”; if funded otherwise, show “Deputy (b) Operations research studies ob­ for Procurement.” tained by contract are explained in document and, as such, every action lead­ Chapter 3, AR 1-110. With respect to ing to the award of a contract, contract * * * * * such studies, contracting officers shall performance, and completion or termina­ 4. Sections 593.605-3 and 593.608-9(f) not solicit bids or proposals nor award tion of a contract inherently involves are revised; and a new § 593.650 is added legal considerations. While the contract­ as follows : contracts or modifications, including ing officer is the exclusive agent of the amendments, extensions, additions, or Government for entering into and ad­ § 593.650—3 Establishment of blanket supplements which are of a substantive ministering contracts and is responsible purchase agreements. nature or which will require additional for coordinating his team of advisors, he (a) Blanket purchase agreements funding, without evidence of prior is not completely free to evaluate the shall not be established— approval of— legal advice of his legal counsel and act (1) For supplies or services for which (1) The Assistant Secretary of the in a manner inconsistent therewith. The unpriced purchase orders should be used Army (Research and Development) for contracting officer can not properly make (§ 3.608-3 of this title), e.g. repair serv­ operations research studies which are an award of a contract which fails to ices where disassembly of the item to be estimated to cost in excess of $100,000; meet all legal requirements. If a pro­ repaired is required to determine the (2) The Chief of Research and De­ posed course of action is determined by nature and extent of repairs or where velopment, Department of the Army, for procurement legal counsel to be legally exact prices of repair services are not operations research studies which are known at the time the services are estimated to cost $100,000 or less and insufficient, the contracting officer shall ordered; or which use RDTE funds; take steps to overcome the legal objec­ (2) With suppliers having Brand (3) The sponsoring Department of tions to the proposed action. Failing such Name Contracts for commissary resale the Army staff agency after coordination resolution at purchasing office level, the items available thereunder (§ 594.5102 with the Assistant Vice Chief of Staff, contracting officer shall refer the matter of this chapter), except— Army (Director of Studies), for opera­ to the cognizant head of procuring ac­ (i) When a Brand Name Contract tions research studies sponsored by specifies a minimum shipping quantity, Department of the Army staff agencies tivity for resolution. (ii) The resale items are normally which are estimated to cost $100,000 or purchased in quantities less than the less and which use OMA funds; or minimum shipping quantity, and PART 593— PROCUREMENT BY (iii) The supplier is willing to sell the (4) The sponsoring major Depart­ NEGOTIATION ment of the Army command for opera­ items in lesser quantities at reasonable tions research studies sponsored by major 2. The table of contents for Part 593prices. Department of the Army commands is amended by adding at the end thereof (b) Contracting officers shall, when­ which are estimated to cost $100,000 or the following: ever practicable, establish prepriced less and which use other than RDTE BPA’s by negotiating firm unit prices funds. Subpart I— [Reserved] for specific periods of time or by incorpo­ rating in or attaching to BPA’s supplier’s (c) Automatic data processing (ADP) Subpart J— [Reserved] price lists or catalogs. services obtained by contract are ex­ Subpart K— Acquisition of Automatic Data (c) Responsibility for the function of plained in Chapter 4, AR 1-110. With re­ Processing Equipment placing calls under BPA’s rests with the spect to such services, contracting Sec. 593.1100 Contracting acquisition of auto­ contracting officer, who may— officers shall not solicit bids or proposals matic data processing equipment (1) Authorize individuals assigned to nor award contracts or modifications, (ADPE) his purchasing office to place calls in any

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18049 dollar amount within the limitation in § 593.650 Postaward reviews of small (h) Upon completing his review, the § 3.605-2 of this title under BPA’s purchases. reviewer shall annotate each purchase established by him; and (a) Quarterly postaward reviews of order file with the date of his review and (2) Authorize individuals in requiring noncompetitive small purchases in excess shall prepare his findings in writing, activities such as commissaries, hospitals, of $250 shall be made at installation/ furnishing the original to the installa- research laboratories, or isolated off- activity level to evaluate determinations tion/activity commander and a copy to post locations to place calls whose aggre­ of the reasonableness of prices paid, to the chief of the purchasing office. As a gate dollar amount does not exceed $250 determine adequacy of documentation in m inim um, review findings shall include— under BPA’s established by him; except purchase order files, and to detect-in­ (1) Purchase order number and name that individuals in commissaries may stances or trends in overpricing by sup­ of supplier ; be authorized to place calls for subsist­ pliers. (2) Brief description of item pur­ ence items without monetary limitation (b) Reviews shall be made by chiefs of chased; when the BPA contains the Examination purchasing offices or by other individuals (3) Dollar value; of Records clause (§7.104-15 of this who were not involved in processing the (4) Basis for the buyer’s or contract­ title). small purchases being reviewed. ing officer’s determination of reasonable­ (d) Prior to making authorizations (c) The selection of purchases to be ness of price; pursuant to paragraph (c) (2) of this reviewed shall be made by the reviewer (5) Basis for the reviewer’s deter­ section contracting officers shall— .in accordance with an acceptable ran­ mination of reasonableness of price; and (1) Determine in writing that the au­ dom selection procedure using the total (6) For each line item for which the thorization is essential for the efficient number of noncompetitive small pur­ price was determined unreasonable— operation of the procurement mission chase actions in excess of $250 awarded (i) Address of supplier; and is not made for the purpose of de­ during the preceding quarter as the uni­ (ii) Line item identification and Fed­ centralizing the procurement function; verse to be reviewed. Purchases made eral Stock number, if any; and from Federal Supply Schedule contracts (iii) Quantity purchased and unit (2) Insure that individuals authorized and from Brand Name contracts pub­ price paid; to place calls have the time available lished in DSA Supply Bulletins in the (iv) Name of buyer and contracting to perform the function without 10-500 or 10-600 series shall be excluded officer; redelegating the authority to others. from the review. (v) The price estimated by the re­ (e) Contracting officers who authorize (d) The size of the sampling shall viewer to be reasonable for the item with individuals to place calls under BPA’s be— method used by the reviewer to deter­ pursuant to paragraph (c) of this (1) 40 actions or less, review all; mine same; or, if the reviewer was un­ section shall— (2) 41 to 200 actions, review 40; able to determine a reasonable price for (1) Instruct the individuals in the (3) 201 to 400 actions, review 60; the item, reasons therefor. proper use of BPA’s; (4) 401 to 1,000 actions, review 90; (2) Furnish copies of BPA’s to (i) The chief of the purchasing office (5) 1,001 to 2,000 actions, review 150; shall retain copies of all findings for 1 each individual authorized to calls (6) Over 2,000 actions, review 240. thereunder; ' year for review by heads of procuring (e) The reviewer shall make an inde­ activities, Inspectors General, represent­ (3) Insure that individuals have pendent evaluation as to whether the ready access to price lists or cat­ atives of the Army Audit Agency or Gen­ price paid for each item on the purchase eral Accounting Office, or for forwarding alogs incorporated in or attached to order being reviewed was, in his opinion, BPA’s; to the addressee in § 591.150(b) (6) of reasonable or unreasonable. If the docu­ this chapter. (4) Insure that individuals equitably mentation in the file is insufficient to distribute calls among suppliers with support a determination of reasonable­ (j) Whenever the findings identify a whom BPA’s have been established; ness of price, or if the reviewer cannot line item as being unreasonable in price, (5) Insure that individuals do not split determine whether the price paid was the chief of the purchasing office shall purchase transactions to evade mone­ reasonable by using the criteria in para­ review all transactions with the supplier tary limitations; graph (f) of this section, the price shall concerned made during the preceding (6) Require that individuals refer all be considered unreasonable. three quarters to determining whether cases where prices are not considered (f) Reasonableness of price may there is any evidence or suspicion of reasonable to the contracting officer for be based upon any of the following overpricing. Where there is clear evi­ determination; criteria— dence that five or more (or 5 percent of (7) Obtain from individuals at the end (1) Price is based upon supplier’s cur­ the total, whichever is less) of the line of each billing period copies of delivery rent established commercial catalog or items purchased from the supplier were tickets or sales slips so that suppliers’ in­ published price list; overpriced, or where overpricing is sus­ voices may be promptly paid; (2) Price is based upon current estab­ pected in 20 percent of such line items, (8) Maintain continuing surveillance lished market prices; the chief of the purchasing office shall over individuals to insure compliance (3) Price compares favorably with forward full details of each purchase to with procurement regulations and need price previously paid for the same or the addressee in § 591.150(b) (6) of this for retention of authorization of each in­ similar item in like quantities, provided chapter for guidance as to remedial ac­ dividual; and the previous price was determined to be tion to be taken. Pending receipt of such (9) Insure that suppliers are informed reasonable; guidance, the chief of the purchasing of­ of the names of individuals authorized (4) Value analysis by buyer/user/ fice shall ensure that each subsequent to place calls. technical personnel; transaction with the supplier is carefully (5) Other acceptable pricing criteria analyzed before a purchase is made from § 593.608-9 Ord e r— invoice— voucher for small purchases. the supplier. Where there is clear evi­ method. (g) Reasonableness of price may n

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18050 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Subpart I— [Reserved! quired for public use is not applicable to the ernment upon delivery of such devices or procurement of the supplies described herein equipment - by the vendor. The Contractor, Subpart J— [Reserved! because said procurement is within the non­ during the term of this contract or any ex­ availability exception stated in the Act. In tension thereof, shall maintain and keep in Subpart K— Acquisition of Automatic accordance with the Balance of Payments good condition and repair in accordance with Program, it is determined that the require­ sound industrial practice all such devices Data Processing Equipment ment cannot be foregone and that there is and equipment. § 593.1100 Contractor acquisition of no U.S. substitute. Therefore, authority is (d) The Contracting Officer and designated automatic data processing equipment granted to the contracting officer (insert security inspection personnel at all times (ADPE). name of installation/activity) to procure during the performance of this contract or (describe supplies) of foreign origin at an any extension thereof shall have access to § 593.1100—2 Review of decision to (estimated) (actual) total cost of $_____, the portions of the plant staffed and operated lease. including duty and transportation costs to by the Contractor, under which the Con­ destination. tractor furnishes plant protection and (a) The Senior ADPE policy official of physical security services, to inspect compli­ the Department of the Army from whom (Signature) ance by the Contractor with his plant pro­ approval of leasing arrangements of tection plan and in order to inspect, ADPE shall be obtained pursuant to ***** inventory, or remove in cooperation with the § 3.1100-2(a) (5) of this title is the Contractor any plant protection and physical Assistant Secretary of the Army (Finan­ PART 597— CONTRACT CLAUSES security devices and equipment. cial Management). 8. Paragraph (c) of § 597.150-1 and§ 597.1651 Commercial warehousing (b) Requests for approval of ADPE § 597.1651 are revised, as follows: and related services^ to be leased on a noncompetitive basis (a) Chapter 10, AR 55-356, governs shall be forwarded to the Assistant Sec­ § 597.150—1 Plant protection. the commercial warehousing and related retary of Defense (Comptroller) through ***** services for household goods for military the Office, Assistant Vice Chief of Staff, (c) P lant P rotection (Government- and civilian personnel (see § 606.551 of Department of the Army, Attention: owned Contractor-operated Plants) (Sep. CSAVCS-M, and shall include the justi­ 1970). this chapter). fication specified in Army § 15.205-48(d) (a) Subsequent to the execution of this (b) Ordering officers may be appointed of this title. contract, and within 45 calendar days from pursuant to § 591.452 of this chapter to (c) Requests for technical ADP assist­ the date thereof, the Contractor shall submit place service orders under such con­ ance pursuant to § 3.1100-2(c) of this to the Contracting Officer a written plant tracts. Instructions in Chapter 10, AR protection plan with a proposed security 55-356 shall be followed in placing serv­ title shall be directed to the Office, Assist­ staffing pattern. The Contractor shall use the ant Vice Chief of Staff, Department of Army Materiel Command Regulation No. ice orders and ordering officers shall not the Army, Attention: CSAVCS-M. 190-3, March 1968, Preservation of Order be authorized to change terms and con­ Activities, as a guide in the Preparation of the ditions of contracts in any way. plant protection plan. PART 594— SPECIAL TYPES AND In his endeavor to maintain an adequate METHODS OF PROCUREMENT degree of plant protection and physical PART 599— PATENTS, DATA, AND security, the Contractor shall cooperate with COPYRIGHTS 6. Subpart J of this Part 594 is revokedthe Contracting Officer in the administration in its entirety, and § 594.5103 is revised, of the plant protection and physical security 9. Section 599.406-50(a) is revised, as program. Failure to agree on any or all ele­ follows: as follows: ments of the plant protection plan within Subpart J— Procurement of Expert, 30 calendar days after submission of the plan § 599.406—50 Authorizations. shall be considered a dispute concerning a Consultant, and Stenographic Re­ question of fact within the m eaning of the (a) Acquistion of Licenses and Re­ porting Services. [Revoked! clause of this contract entitled “Disputes.” leases of Past Infringement—the Com­ (b) At any time during the term of this manding General, U.S. Army Materiel § 594.5103 Blanket purchase agree­ contract, the Contracting Officer, by a Command: the Chief of Engineers; The ments. written order, may require the Contractor Surgeon General; the SAFEGUARD Contracting officers may establish (i) to increase or decrease plant protection System Manager; and the designees of blanket purchase agreements and au­ and physical security devices and equipment any of the foregoing are authorized, sub­ thorize individuals in Army commissary and (ii) to increase or decrease the number ject to the limitations of this part and of Contractor personnel assigned to plant Subpart D, Part 9 of this title, to acquire stores to place calls under BPA’s in protection duties. If any such change causes accordance with § 593.605-3 of this an increase or decrease in the cost of, or the the items and rights described in 10 chapter. time required for the performance of any U.S.C. 2386 and to enter into agreements part of the work under this contract, whether in settlement of claims thereunder. changed or not changed by any such order, Other procuring activities shall obtain PART 596— FOREIGN PURCHASES an equitable adjustment shall be made in written approval of a proposed agree­ 7. Section 596.103-2 (b) is revised asthe contract price or delivery schedule or ment from the addressee in § 591.150(b) follows: both and the contract shall be modified in (1) of this chapter through the Chief, writing accordingly. Any claim by the Con­ Patents Division, except for agreements §596.103—2 Nonavailability in the tractor for adjustment under this clause for acquisition of the right to reproduce United States. must be asserted within 30 calendar days from the date of receipt by the Contractor of copyrighted material where such acqui­ * • * • * the notification of change: Provided,-how­ sition cost is $2,500 or less. (b) Chiefs of purchasing offices, pro­ ever, That the Contracting Officer, if he ***** vided they are not acting as the con­ decides that the facts Justify such action, tracting officer for the procurement may receive and act upon any such claim involved, may approve procurements asserted at any time prior to final payment PART 603— GOVERNMENT pursuant to § 6.103-2 (b) (4) of this title. under the contract. Failure to agree to any PROPERTY Approvals of officials in § 6.103-2(b) (2), adjustment shall be considered a dispute (3), and (4) of this title (approval for concerning a question of fact within the 10. Sections 603.301 and 603.302(b) meaning of the clause of this contract en­ are revised, as follows: procurement of items listed in § 6.105 of titled "Disputes.” However, nothing in this this title is required in accordance with clause shall excuse the Contractor from pro­ § 603.301 Providing facilities. § 6.103-2 (b)) shall be prepared in the ceeding with the contract as changed. ***** format below and shall be signed by the (c) Title to all plant protection and (a) Requests for a Secretarial deter­ approving authority— physical security devices and equipment added under paragraph (b) of this clause and mination pursuant to § 13.301(a) (3) of F oreign Source Procurement purchased by the Contractor, for the cost of this title shall be forwarded through the D etermination ' which the Contractor is entitled to be reim­ cognizant head of procuring activity to The requirement of the Buy American Act bursed as a direct item of cost under this the addressee in § 591.150(b) (6) of this that domestic source end products be ac­ contract, shall pass to and vest in the Gov­ chapter.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18051 (b) New commercially available auto­ [Rev. 4, APP, Sept. 1, 1970] (Secs. 2301-2314, course of the Colorado River and south matic data processing equipment 3012, 70A Stat. 127-433, 157; 10 U.S.C. 2301- of sec. 12 of T. 5 S., R. 23 E., San Ber­ (ADPE) does not generally qualify as a 2314, 3012) nardino base and meridian in California facility to be furnished by the Govern­ For the Adjutant General. and shall not be construed to affect the ment. resolution of any controversy over the (c) The Senior ADPE policy official of R. location B. of B theelnap boundary, of the Colorado the Department of the Army from whom Special Advisor to TAG. River Reservation; * * * approval shall be obtained pursuant to [F.R. Doc. 70-15825; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; § 13.301(h) (2) of this title is the Assist­ 8:46 a.m.] Louis R. Bruce, ant Secretary of the Army (Financial Commissioner. Management). [F.R. Doc. 70-15843; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; (d) Requests for approval for acqui­ 8:47 a.m.] sition of ADPE to be acquired on a non­ Title 25— INDIANS competitive basis shall be forwarded to Chapter I— Bureau of Indian Affairs, the Assistant Secretary of Defense Department of the Interior (Comptroller) through the Office, As­ Title 42— PUBLIC HEALTH sistant Vice Chief of Staff, Department SUBCHAPTER L— LEASING AND PERMITTING Chapter I— Public Health Service, De­ of the Army, Attention: CSAVCS-M, PART 131— LEASING AND and shall include the justification speci­ partment of Health, Education, and fied in § 15.205-48(d) of this title. PERMITTING Welfare § 603.302 Securing approval for facili­ Certain California Lands Determined SUBCHAPTER G— PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND ties projects. To Be Within Colorado River Reser­ ABATEMENT OF AIR POLLUTION * * • * * * vation PART 81— AIR QUALITY CONTROL (b) PEMA and R&D financed facili­ November 12, 1970. REGIONS, CRITERIA, AND CONTROL ties projects involving expenditures of This notice is published in the exercise less than $1 million shall be approved in of rule making authority delegated by TECHNIQUES accordance with AR 37-120 and AR the Secretary of the Interior to the Com­ Metropolitan Fort Smith Interstate Air 700-90. missioner of Indian Affairs by 230 DM 2. Quality Control Region * * * * * The authority to issue regulations is vested in the Secretary of the Interior by .On May 20, 1970, notice of proposed rule making was published in the F ed­ PART 606— PROCUREMENT FORMS sections 161, 463, and 465 of the Revised Statutes (5 U.S.C. 301; 25 U.S.C. 2 and 9). eral R egister (35 F.R. 7740) to amend 11. Section 606.551 is revised as fol­ The following amendment is made to Part 81 by designating the Fort Smith lows: Title 25—Indians, Part 131 to extend the (Arkansas)—Muskogee (Oklahoma) In­ § 606.551 Commercial warehousing and application of this Part 131 to those terstate Air Quality Control Region, related services for household goods. lands which the Secretary of the Interior hereafter referred to as the Metropolitan (a) DD Form 1162, Basic-Agreement has -determined, pursuant to the Act of Fort Smith Interstate Air Quality Con­ for Storage of Household Goods and Re­ April 30,1964 (78 Stat. 188), to be within trol Region. lated Services, shall be used in accord­ the Colorado River Reservation. The Interested persons were afforded an additional lands to which this Part 131 opportunity to participate in the rule ance with instructions in Chapter 10, making through the submission of com­ AR 55-356. is extended are described as lying west ments, and a consultation with appro­ (b) DD Form 1164, Service Order for of the present course of the Colorado priate State and local authorities pur­ Household Goods, shall be used to place River and south of sec. 25 of T. 2 S., R. suant to section 107(a) of the Clean Air orders under Basic Agreements in ac­ 23 E., to the south line of sec. 12 of T. 5 Act (42 U.S.C. 1857o-2(a)) was held on cordance with instructions in Chapter S., R. 23 E., San Bernardino base and July 7, 1970. Due consideration has been 10, AR 55-356 (see also §§ 591.452-1 and meridian in California. Since the Secre­ given to all relevant material presented 597.1651 of this chapter). tary of the Interior did, on January 17, with the result that Haskell, Latimer, 1969, make the determination that the McIntosh, Muskogee, Okmulgee, and above-described lands are within the Pittsburg Counties, in the State of Okla­ PART 608— PROCUREMENT OF CON­ Colorado River Reservation, which de­ STRUCTION AND CONTRACTING homa, have been deleted from the re­ termination was again recognized by the gion; Adair and Cherokee Counties, in FOR ARCHITECT-ENGINEER SERV­ Secretary of the Interior on June 2,1970, the State of Oklahoma, have been added ICES and since the Act of April 30, 1964 (78 to the region; and the name has been 12. Sections 608.508-1 and 608.508-2Stat. 188), provides that when any of changed to the Metropolitan Fort Smith are revised, as follows: the lands in California are determined Interstate Air Quality Control Region. to be within the reservation they shall § 608.508—1 Nonavailability in the be subject to the provisions of said act, In consideration of the foregoing and United States. in accordance with the statement in the advance notice and public procedure notice of proposed rule making, section Letter requests for Secretarial ap­ thereon are impracticable and unneces­ 81.63, as set forth below, designating the proval shall contain the information re­ sary and are, therefore, dispensed with Metropolitan Fort Smith Interstate Air quired by § 596.103-2(c) or § 596.805-2 under the exceptions provided in section Quality Control Region, is adopted effec­ (а) , as applicable and shall be forwarded (d)(3) of 5 U.S.C. 553 (Supp. m , tive on publication. through the cognizant head' of procuring 1965-67). Accordingly, the amendment activity to the addressee in § 591.150(b) will become effective upon publication in § 81.63 Metropolitan Fort Smith Inter­ (б) of this chapter. the F ederal R egister. state Air Quality Control Region. § 608.508—2 Unreasonable costs or im­ Section 131.18 is amended by deleting The Metropolitan Fort Smith In­ practicability. from the first proviso the words, “section terstate Air Quality Control Region 25 of Township 2 South” and substitut­ (Arkansas-Oklahoma) consists of the Letter requests for Secretarial ap­ ing therefor, “section 12 of Township 5 territorial area encompassed by the proval shall contain the information re­ South." As so amended the first proviso boundaries of the following jurisdictions quired by § 18.509-3 of this title and of § 131.18 reads as follows: § 596.805—2(a) of this chapter when ap­ or described area (including the terri­ § 131.18 Colorado River Reservation. torial area of all municipalities (as de­ plicable and shall be forwarded through fined in section 302(f) of the Clean Air the cognizant head of procuring activity • * * Provided, however, That appli­ Act, 42 U.S.C. 1857h(f)) geographically to the addressee in § 591.150(b) (6) of cation of this Part 13.1 shall not extend this chapter. located within the outermost boundaries to any lands lying west of the present of the area so delimited):

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18052 RULES AND REGULATIONS In the State of Arkansas: of these concepts.1 Authority for the power is limited to 250 watts, daytime Crawford County. Sebastian County. promulgation of these amendments is and nighttime). In the State of Oklahoma: found in sections 4(i), 303(c), and 303 (r) ***** of the Communications Act of 1934, as N ote 1: Under NARBA, the power ceiling Adair County. Le Flore County. amended. for Class IV stations is 250 watts daytime, as Cherokee County. Sequoyah County. 4. Accordingly, it is ordered, Effectivewell as nighttime. The U.S./Mexican Agree­ (Secs. 107(a), 301(a), 81 Stat. 490, 504; 42 November 18, 1970, that Part 73 of the ment permits such stations to operate with U.S.C. 1857c—2(a) * 1857g(a)) rules and regulations is amended as set power not in excess of 1 kilowatt daytime. forth below. Pursuant to the U.S./Mexican Agreement and Dated: October 26,1970. informal coordination with the NARBA (Secs. 4, 303, 48 sTat., as amended, 1066,1082; signatories, the Commission will consider J ohn H. Ludwig, 47 U.S.C. 154, 303) applications for Class IV stations on local Acting Commissioner, National channels with daytime powers in excess of Air Pollution Control Ad­ Adopted: October 21,1970. 250 watts, up to 1 kilowatt, if such stations ministration. Released: November 19,1970. are outside of the area specified in paragraph (c) of this section, and if no objectionable Approved: November 17, 1970. F ederal Communications interference would be caused (under the E lliot L. R ichardson, Commission, standards set forth in the pertinent inter­ Secretary. [seal] Ben F. W aple, national agreement) to a duly notified sta­ Secretary. tion in Mexico, Haiti, or any foreign country [F.R. Doc. 70-15758; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; signatory to NARBA. 8:45 a.m.] The action herein does not prejudge N ote 2: Class IV stations located within the matters at issue in reconsideration of 100 kilometers (62 miles) of the Mexican the decision in Dockets 17562, 18023 and border, and presently authorized to operate 18036 (FCC 69-844, released Aug. 1, with a daytime power of 250 watts, may file applications for increases in daytime power Title 47— TELECOMMUNICATION 1969). to 1 kilowatt. However, such an application 1. Section 73.15 is amended to read as will be granted only after coordination with Chapter I— Federal Communications follows: Commission Mexico of the proposed increase, if required, § 73.15 NARBA and U.S./Mexican pursuant to Annex IV to the U.S./Mexican (FCC 70-1137] Agreement. Agreement. Note 3: All authorizations of new or PART 73— RADIO BROADCAST The term “NARBA” where used in this changed Class I-B, Class II-B, Class II-D, SERVICES part means the North American Regional Class III, or Class IV facilities after Octo­ Broadcasting Agreement, signed at ber 30, 1961, are subject to whatever inter­ Standard Broadcasting Agreements ference may be received from, or whatever Washington, D.C., November 15, 1950, overlap of 2.0 mv/m and 25 mv/m ground- Between the United States and Mexico which entered into force April 19, 1960, wave contours or overlap of 25 mv/m ground- Order. L The agreement between the and to which the signatory countries are wave contours may be involved with, pre­ United States of America and the United, The Bahama Islands and Jamaica, viously or subsequently authorized Class n-A Mexican States Concerning Radio Canada, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, facilities. Broadcasting in the Standard Broadcast and the United States of America. The 3. In § 73.25, Note 6 to paragraph (a) Band (535-1605 kHz) and the agreement term “U.S./Mexican Agreement” where is amended; in paragraph (b) Note 1 is between the United States of America used in this part means the Agreement deleted and present Note 2 is redesig­ and the United Mexican States Concern­ between the United States of America nated as “Note”; in paragraph (e) (3) a ing the Operation of Broadcasting Sta­ and the United Mexican States Concern­ new Note 1 is added and present Note is tions in the Standard Broadcast Band ing Radio Broadcasting in the Standard redesignated as Note 2. The amended or (535-1605 kHz), During a Limited Period Broadcasting Band (535-1605 kHz), added notes read as follows: Prior to Sunrise (Pre-sunrise) and After signed at Mexico, D.F., December 11, Sunset (Post-sunset), both signed at 1968, which entered into force November § 73.25 Clear channels; Classes I and II Mexico, D.P., December 11, 1968, ratified 18, 1970. stations. by the United States of America on 2. In § 73.21(c), the introductory text * * * * * July 2, 1969, and by the United Mexican and Note 1 are amended, a new Note 2 is (a) * * * States on September 14, 1970, entered added, and present Note 2 is redesignated Note 6: See the UH./Mexican Agreement into force on November 18, 1970. as Note 3 to read as follows: concerning Mexican use of 660, 760, 830, 2. Amendments of Part 73 of the Com­ § 73.21 Classes of standard broadcast 1020,1030, and 1180 kc/s. mission’s rules and regulations, made channels and stations. (b) * * * necessary or found to be desirable in view * * * * .* of the provisions of these agreements, are N ote : Class I and Class n stations on 1540 (c) Local channel. A local channel is kc/s shall deliver not over 5 microvolts per set forth below. one on which several stations operate meter groundwave or 25 microvolts per meter 3. Because the changes herein ordered with powers no greater than provided in 10 percent time skywave at any point of relate to the implementation of interna­ land in the Bahama Islands, and such sta­ tional agreements, relax existing restric­ this paragraph. The primary service area tions operating nighttime (i.e., sunset to sun­ tions on operating hours and daytime of a station operating on any such rise at the location of the Class II station) power of some Class IV stations, and have channel may be limited to a given field shall be located not less than 650 miles from in large measure already been coordi­ intensity contour as a consequence of the nearest point of land in the Bahama interference. Such stations operate with Islands. nated with affected stations and their power no greater than 250 watts night­ representatives; compliance with the time, and no greater than 1 kilowatt day­ (e) * * * notice and effective date provisions of time (except that for stations in an area (3) * * * section 4 of the Administrative Procedure N ote 1: See U.S./Mexican Agreement con­ Act (5 UJ3.C. 553) are unnecessary and in the State of Florida south of the paral­ cerning a specific U.S. unlimited time as­ would serve no useful purpose. This is lel 28° north latitude, and between the signment on this channel. also true because in the chief respects in meridians 80° and 82° west longitude, Note 2: See § 2.106 of this chapter with which the rules are modified herein— respect to use of 540 kc/s. permitting presunrise operation by U.S. iWe have never reached such conclusions 4. In § 73.99, paragraphs (a)(1), (b) Class II stations on Mexican I-A clear as to “postsunset” operation by daytime (1), and (c) (2) are amended to read as channels, and permitting increases in stations, and accordingly the rules as follows: daytime power by certain Class IV sta­ amended herein do not make provision for such operation, even though the new agree­ § 73.99 Presunrise service authority. tions located near the Mexican border— ment with Mexico deals with the subject. the benefits from increased and im­ Presunrise operation involves considerations, (a) * * * proved radio service outweigh any e.g., the history of such operation under (1) Class II stations operating on possible adverse effects, as the Commis­ former permissive rules, and the importance clear -channels other than Class I-A sion has concluded in previous decisions of early-morning informational material, clear channels; Class n stations operat­ concerning the more general application which do not apply postsunset. ing on Class I-A clear channels assigned FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18053 to the United States under the NARBA cated east of cochannel Mexican Class July 25,1970 (35 FJR. 12000), is amended or the U.S./Mexican Agreement, where I-B stations, a showing under the engi­ to read: such Class n stations are located west neering standards of the United States/ of cochannel Class I-A stations; and Mexican Agreement that the Class II § 10.53 Seasons and limits on waterfowl, Class II stations operating on the Class station does not produce a signal in ex­ coots, gallinule, and common snipe I-A clear channels 730, 800, 900, 1050, cess of 25 fiv/m 10 percent skywave at (Wilson’s). 1220, and 1570 kc/s, which are assigned any point on the cochannel Mexican * * * * * to Mexico under the aforementioned Class I station’s 0.5 mv/m 50 percent (d) Horicon Zone: agreements. skywave contour which falls on Mexican ***** * ♦ * * * territory, or more than 50 /¿v/m 10 per­ (b) * * * cent skywave at any point on the Mexi­ (2) The Horicon Zone includes por­ (1) Class II stations operating on can border or boundary where the signal tions of Columbia, Dodge, Fond du Lac, Mexican Class I-A clear channels to of the Mexican Class I station exceeds Green Lake, Washington, and Winne­ commence operation with their daytime 0.5 mv/m 50 percent skywave in bago Counties, bounded on the north by antenna systems at 6 a.m. local time, and strength. In addition, the applicant must show that foreign Class n stations (if State Highways 23 and 44, on the east by to continue such operation until the sun­ U.S. Highway 45 from Oshkosh to Fond rise times specified in their basic in­ any) assigned to the same channel as the struments of authorization; and other U.S. Class II station will receive full du Lac and then State Highways 175 Class II stations, where eligible under protection under the standards for night­ and 83, on the south by State Highway paragraph (a) (1) of this section, to time operation set forth in the applicable 60, and on the west by State Highway 73. commence operation with their daytime agreement. If the foregoing protections or critical hours antenna systems either cannot be achieved by the Class II station ★ * * * 4c at 6 a.m. local time, or at the time of while operating with 500 watts, a showing When the Director, Bureau of Sports sunrise at the westernmost Class I station may be submitted to establish the level to Fisheries and Wildlife, has determined located east of the Class n stations which power must be limited to preclude objectionable interference: Provided, the date upon which the quota of Canada (whichever is later), and to continue geese will have been killed, the season will such operation until the sunrise times That in relation to Canadian Class n sta­ specified in their basic instruments of tions, the permissible power level may be closed by the Director by giving public authorization: Provided, That the per­ be established in the manner described notice thereof through public informa­ missible power to be specified in a PSA in subparagraph (3) of this paragraph tion media no less than 48 hours in ad­ shall not exceed 500 watts (or the au­ by the use of Figure 12 of § 73.190. vance of the time and date of closing, or thorized daytime or critical hours power, ***** the season will close on December 11, if less than 500 watts), or such lesser -[F.R. Doc. 70-15836; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; power as may be determined by compu­ 8:47 a.m.] 1970, whichever occurs first. tations made pursuant to paragraph (c) Since this amendment relieves an of this section. existing restriction by permitting holders * * * * * of current Canada goose hunting permits (c) * * * Title 50— WILDLIFE AND to hunt Canada geese in an area not pres­ (2) For Class II stations operating ently open to such hunting, it is deter­ on clear channels other than Class I-A FISHERIES mined that notice and public procedure clear channels, a showing that objection­ able interference as determined by the Chapter I— Bureau of Sport Fisheries thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, Standard Broadcast Technical Stand­ and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife and contrary to the public interest and ards (§§ 73.182 to 73.190), or by the engi­ Service, Department of the Interior that this amendment will become effec­ neering standards of the NARBA (which­ SUBCHAPTER B— HUNTING AND POSSESSION OF tive on November 28,1970. ever is controlling), will not be caused WILDLIFE within the 0.5 mv/m 50 percent skywave (40 Stat. 755; 16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.) contour of any domestic Class I-B sta­ PART 10— MIGRATORY BIRDS Abram V. T ünison, tion, or of a Class I-B station in any Open Seasons, Bag Limits, and Pos­ Acting Director, Bureau of country signatory to the NARBA, where Sport Fisheries and Wildlife. the Class II station is located east of the session of Certain Migratory Game Class I-B station; for Class II stations Birds November 20, 1970. operating on Mexican Class I-A clear Paragraph (d) of § 10.53 as published [F.R. Doc. 70-15877; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; channels, and for Class II stations lo- in the F ederal R egister of Saturday, 8:50 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 No. 229---- A 18054 Proposed Rule Making

The service experience of airplanes of from § 121.141 and to insert the words DEPARTMENT OF 6.000 pounds or less maximum weight “Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual” that do not have an Airplane Flight in their place. It is also proposed to strike TRANSPORTATION Manual indicates that an Airplane Flight out the words “flight manual” from Manual is not necessary for these light § 127.63(b) (22) and “Helicopter Flight Federal Aviation Administration airplanes. The FAA believes that this Manual” from § 127.81 and to insert the service experience also justifies the elim­ words “Rotorcraft Flight Manual” in [ 14 CFR Parts 23, 27, 91, 121, 127 3 ination of the requirement for an Air­ those places. [Docket No. 9826; Notice 70-47] plane Flight Manual for airplanes of Finally, it would be necessary to revise 6.000 pounds or less maximum weight § 91.31(b) to make the operating rules AIRPLANE AND ROTORCRAFT MAN­ that are certificated in more than one consistent with the revised airworthiness UALS, MARKINGS, AND PLACARDS category. In this connection, the FAA be­ rules. It is, therefore, proposed to revise lieves that the operating limitations and § 91.31(b) to require that each operating Notice of Proposed Rule Making information which must be provided for limitation prescribed for an aircraft must The Federal Aviation Administration the categories for which the airplane is be in an FAA-approved Airplane Flight is considering amending Parts 23, 27, 91, not marked and placarded could be pre­ Manual or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, or 121, and 127 of the Federal Aviation Reg­ sented in the form of “approved manual in approved manual material, and in ulations to revise the requirements for material” rather than an Airplane Flight placards and Instrument markings. The / airplane and rotorcraft manuals, mark­ Manual (AFM). “Approved manual ma­ word “listings” would be deleted, since ings, and placards. terial” would take the form of individual this term is no longer used. Under the Interested persons are invited to par­ sheets contained the necessary operat­ proposal, the term “approved manual ticipate in the making of the proposed ing limitations and information for in­ material” would include the material rule by submitting such written data, sertion in other manuals, e.g., an formerly referred to as “listings”. views, or arguments as they may desire. owner’s manual, or in a folder or other In consideration of the foregoing, it is Communications should identify the suitable permanent form. In any event, proposed to amend Farts 23, 27, 91, 121, docket number and be submitted in du­ the approved manual material would and 127 as follows: plicate to the Federal Aviation Admin­ have to be available in the airplane and 1. By amending § 23.31 (b) to read as istration, Office of the General Counsel, the operating limitations and informa­ follows: Attention; Rules Docket, 800 Independ­ tion in the manual material would have § 23.31 Removable ballast. ence Avenue SW., Washington, DC to be clearly identified, and not easily * * * * * 20590. All communications received on or erased, disfigured, or misplaced. More­ before February 23, 1971, will be consid­ over, the FAA believes that in certain (b) Instructions are included in the ered by the Administrator before taking cases safety considerations would permit Airplane Flight Manual, approved man­ action upon the proposed rule. The pro­ the installation of placards containing ual material, or markings and placards, posals contained in this notice may be specified operating limitations applicable for the proper placement of the remov­ changed in the light of comments re­ to more than one category. It should be able ballast under each loading condition ceived. All comments will be available, noted that an Airplane Flight Manual for which removable ballast is necessary. both before and after the closing date for must contain all of the applicable infor­ 2. Section 23.1541 is amended as comments, in the Rules Docket, for ex­ mation prescribed in §§ 23.1583 through follows: amination by interested persons. 23.1589, together with any other infor­ § 23.1541 General. Section 23.1541 (c) of the Federal Avia­ mation necessary for safe operation of * * * * * tion Regulations (FAR’s) requires that the airplane. However, the proposed “ap­ if an airplane is to be type certificated in proved manual material” would contain (c) For airplanes having a maximum more than one category, the applicant only that portion of the required infor­ weight of more than 6,000 pounds and for the type certificate must select one mation that was not presented in the which are to be certificated in more than category on which the placards and form of markings and placards. Except as one category— markings are to be based. The marking otherwise required, the manufacturer (1) The applicant must select one and placard information required for the would be permitted at his option to pre­ category upon which the placards and other categories in which the airplane is sent any portion of the required infor­ markings are to be based; and to be certificated must be recorded in mation in the form of “approved manual (2) The placard and marking infor­ the Airplane Flight Manual. However, material” with the balance of the infor­ mation for the other categories in which § 23.1581(a) permits airplanes of 6,000 mation being presented in the form of the airplane is to be certificated must be pounds or less maximum weight to be markings and placards. recorded in the Airplane Flight Manual. type certificated without an Airplane In implementation of the foregoing, (d) For airplanes having a maximum Flight Manual, if the applicable informa­ it is proposed to revise the wording of weight of 6,000 pounds or less and which tion is contained “in any combination of § 23.31(b) to include approved manual are to be certificated in more than one manuals, markings, and placards.” material, markings, and placards. It is category—. This situation has created some confu­ also proposed to strike out the word (1) The applicant must select one cat­ sion concerning the recording of mark­ “manuals” where it now appears in egory upon which the placards and mark­ ing and placard information for multiple §§ 23.1559, 13.1581, and 27.1581, and to ings are to be based, except that he may category airplanes of 6,000 pounds or less insert the words “approved manual ma­ include operating limitations covering maximum weight. terial.” In addition, it is proposed to re­ more than one category on a single plac­ The Aerospace Industries Association vise the wording of § 27.1501 to make it ard ipthe differences between the cate­ (AIA) has petitioned the FAA to amend consistent with § 27.1581. This would gories involve only a difference in maxi­ §§ 23.1541(c) and 23.1581 to permit air­ make it clear that for helicopters, the mum weights; a difference in the center planes of 6,000 pounds or less maximum operating limitations may be furnished of gravity range at the corresponding weight which are type certificated in in either a Rotorcraft Flight Manual or maximum weight; a difference involving more than one category to be certificated in approved manual material, unless the approved maneuvers and corresponding without requiring that the operating operating rules require a Rotorcraft entry speeds; or any combination thereof. limitations and information for one cate­ Flight Manual, and in markings and gory be recorded in an Airplane Flight placards. It is further proposed to strike (2) Except as provided in subpara­ Manual. out the words “Aircraft Flight Manual”, graph (1) of this paragraph, the placard

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 18055 and marking information for the other (b) For each helicopter, be included in § 121.133 containing the information re­ categories in which the airplane is to be a Rotorcraft Flight Manual or in ap­ quired for the Airplane or Rotorcraft certificated must be recorded in the Air­ proved manual material, unless the op­ Flight Manual, in each transport cate­ plane Flight Manual or in approved erating rules of this chapter require a gory aircraft. Jf sections of the required manual material. Rotorcraft Flight Manual, and expressed information from the Airplane or Rotor­ 3. By amending § 23.1559(a) to read in placards and markings; and craft Flight Manual are incorporated in as follows : (c) Be made available by any other the manual required by § 121.133, the means that will convey the information holder shall clearly identify the sections § 23.1559 Operating limitations placard. to the crewmembers. as Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual (a) For airplanes certificated in more 6. By changing the subtitle following requirements. than one category, there must be a § 27.1565 to read “Rotorcraft Flight Man­ These amendments are proposed under placard in clear view of the pilot ual and Approved Manual Material”, and the authority of sections 313(a), 601, and stating— by amending § 27.1581(a)(2) and (b) to 603 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (1) For airplanes of more than 6,000 read as follows: (49 U.S.C. 1354(a), 1421, and 1423), and pounds maximum weight: “The mark­ § 27.1581 General. of section 6(c) of the Department of ings and placards installed on this air­ Transportation Act (49 U.S.C. 1655(c)). plane contain operating limitations for (a) * * * operation of this airplane in the * * * * * Issued in Washington, D.C., on Novem­ ______category. Other operating ber 18, 1970. (2) For each helicopter— Edward C. H odson, limitations for the operation of the air­ (i) In the Rotorcraft Flight Manual or plane in this category or in ______Acting Director, in approved manual material, unless the Flight Standards Service. category are contained in the Airplane operating rules of this chapter require Flight Manual.” (Insert the correct a Rotorcraft Flight Manual; and [F.R. Doc. 70-15823; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; categories.) (ii) In markings and placards. 8:46 aon.] (2) For airplanes of 6,000 pounds or (b) Approval and segregation of in­ less maximum weight: “Except as may formation. Each part of the Rotorcraft National Highway Safety Bureau be otherwise indicated on a placard, the Flight Manual containing information markings and placards installed on this prescribed in §§ 27.1583 through 27.1589 [ 49 CFR Part 571 1 airplane contain operating limitations must be approved, segregated, identified, [Docket No. 4—2; Notice 4] for the operation of this airplane in the and clearly distinguished from each un­ ______category. Other operating approved part of the Rotorcraft Flight WARNING D EV IC ES— PASSENGER limitations for the operation of the air­ Manual. All approved manual material CARS, MULTIPURPOSE PASSENGER plane in this category or in ______must be approved, clearly identified, and category are contained in the Airplane VEHICLES, TRUCKS, AND BUSES, not easily erased, disfigured or misplaced. AND WARNING DEVICES FOR USE Flight Manual or approved manual ***** material.” (Insert the correct categories WITH THOSE VEHICLES and forms.) 7. By amending § 91.31(b) to read as follows: Proposed Motor Vehicle Safety * * ♦ * - * Standard; Correction 4. By changing the subtitle following § 91.31 Civil aircraft operating limita­ § 23.1567 to read “Airplane Flight Man­ tions and marking requirements. In the notice of proposed rulemaking ual and Approved Manual Material” and ***** -to amend 49 CFR 571.21 by adding a new by amending § 23.1581 (a) (2) and (b) to (b) No person may operate a U.S. reg­ motor vehicle safety standard, “Warning read as follows : istered civil aircraft unless there is avail­ Devices” (F.R. Doc. 70-15118), appearing at page 17350 in the issue of Wednesday, § 23.1581 General. able in the aircraft a current Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual, approved November 11,1970, the expression “2,584° (a) * * * manual material, markings and placards, Kelvin” in S5.2 is corrected to . read * * * * * or any combination thereof, containing “2,854° Kelvin.” (2) For each airplane of 6,000 pounds each operating limitation prescribed for This notice of correction is issued un­ or less maximum weight, in an Airplane that aircraft by the Administrator, in­ der the authority of sections 103 and 119 Flight Manual, or in any combination cluding the following: of the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle of approved manual material, markings, ***** Safety Act of 1966 (15 U.S.C. 1392 and 1407), and the delegations of authority and placards. § 127.63 [Amended] (b) Approval and segregation of in­ at 49 CFR 1.51 (35 F.R. 4955) and 49 formation. Each part of the Airplane 8. By amending § 127.63(b) (22) by CFR 501.8 (35F.R. 11126). Flight Manual containing information striking out the words “approved flight Issued on November 20, 1970. prescribed in §§ 23.1583 through 23.1589 manual” and inserting the words “ap­ must be approved, segregated, identified, proved Rotorcraft Flight Manual”, in R odolfo A. Diaz, and clearly distinguished from each un­ place thereof. Acting Associate Director» approved part of that Airplane Flight § 127.81 [Amended] Motor Vehicle Programs. Manual. All approved manual material [F.R. Doc. 70-15848; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; must be approved, clearly identified, 9. By amending § 127.81 by striking 8:48 a.m.] and not easily erased, disfigured, or out the words “Helicopter Flight Man­ misplaced. ual” and inserting the words “Rotorcraft Flight Manual”, in place thereof. ***** 10. By amending § 121.141 to read as DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 5. By amending § 27.1501 to read as follows: follows : Internal Revenue Service § 121.141 Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight § 27.1501 General. Manual. [ 26 CFR Parts 1, 301 1 Each operating limitation specified in (a) Each certificate holder shall keep RETURNS AND ANNUAL REPORTS OF §§ 27.1503 through 27.1525 and other a current approved Airplane or Rotor­ EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS information necessary for safe operation craft Flight Manual for each type of must— transport category aircraft that it Notice of Hearing on Proposed (a) For each rotorcraft, other than a operates. Regulations helicopter, be included in a Rotorcraft (b) Each certificate holder shall carry The proposed amendment to the regu­ Flight Manual and expressed in placards an approved Airplane or Rotorcraft lations under sections 6001, 6033, 6056, and markings; Flight Manual, or manual required by and 6104 of the Code, relating to returns

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18056 PROPOSED RULE MAKING and annual reports of exempt organiza­ 758, and 771, as amended; 49 U.S.C. 1324, Since rates for individually waybilled tions, appears in the F ederal R egister 1373, and 1386) and 5 U.S.C. 552. and ticketed Categories A, X, and Z for October 13, 1970 (35 F.R. 16049). Interested persons may participate in transportation are essentially tied to the A public hearing on the provisions of the proposed rule making through sub­ long-range charter rates, it is proposed this proposed amendment to the regula­ mission of twelve (12) copies of written to adjust these rates by 10.5 percent. tions will be held on Thursday, Decem­ data, views, or arguments pertaining The proposed rates are principally ber 17, 1970, at 2 p.m., e.s.t., in Room thereto, addressed to the Docket Section, based upon data furnished for the base 3313, Internal Revenue Building, 1111 Civil Aeronautics Board, Washington, period with reference to Form 41 and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20428. All relevant material in com­ part 243 reports as well. In the past, DC. munications received on or before cargo rates have been computed by The hearing is to be conducted under December 14, 1970, and reply comments eliminating costs attributable to the pas­ the rules of § 601.601(a) (3) of the State­ received on or before December 29, 1970, senger service function from passenger ment on Procedural Rules, which ap­ will be considered by the Board before cost data. However, in the interest of peared in the F ederal R egister for Octo­ taking final action on the proposed rules. expedition, we have not attempted to de­ ber 24, 1970 (35 F.R. 16593). Copies of Copies of such communications will be rive cargo costs in this fashion. Rather, these rules will be furnished on request. available for examination by interested the proposed rate increases for passenger Under such § 601.601(a) (3) persons . persons in "the Docket Section of the services have been applied directly to who desire to present oral comments (in Board, Room 712, Universal Building, cargo rates. In view of the similarity of addition to having submitted written 1825 Connecticut Avenue NW., Wash­ this methodology to that which we have comments or suggestions by December 7, ington, DC upon receipt thereof. used in the past, and because MAC has 1970) should submit by December 7, By the Civil Aeronautics Board. indicated that cargo procurement will 1970, an outline of the topics and the be relatively small in the future,3 we be­ time they wish to devote to each topic. [seal] H arry J. Zin k , lieve the procedure followed herein is a The outline should be submitted to the Secretary. reasonable one. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, At­ Explanatory statement. A number of The base period data submitted by tention: CC:LR:T, Washington, D.C. carriers have petitioned the 'Board to the carriers has been adjusted to reflect 20224. to increase the minimum rates applica­ constructive ownership of leased air­ The time for the submission of com­ ble to services performed for MAC in craft,1 depreciation based on a 14-year ments and suggestions regarding the overseas and foreign air transportation. service life and a 15 percent residual notice of proposed rule making relating Subsequently, the carriers involved in value,5 taxes on the basis of 48 percent hereto is hereby extended to December 7, such services were asked to submit data for Federal income taxes,8 and invest­ 1970. on their MAC operations for the 12- ment as of April 1,1970. Persons who plan to attend the hear­ month period ending March 31, 1970.1 Unit costs for depreciation, insurance, ings and persons who desire a copy (fur­ MAC, in addition, submitted its com­ and amortization of preoperating ex­ nished only at the above address) of such ments on the carriers’ data. Pending the penses have been adjusted to reflect a written comments, suggestions, or out­ analysis of these data and comments, reasonably attainable utilization rate for lines should notify the Commissioner at the Board instituted this proceeding by fiscal year 1971. The average utilization the above address or telephone 202-964- EDR-185, dated August 5, 1970, in order upon which the current rates are based 3935 by December 10,1970. that all persons would be on notice that (ER^-536, adopted Apr. 25, 1968) is 11.8 K. Martin Worthy, the Board was considering a revision hours for long-range aircraft (B-707, Chief Counsel. of the rates effective August 5, 1970. DC-8-50, and the DC-8-61/63 stretched jets) and 9.2 hours for the short-range J ames F. Dring, It appears from the data submitted1* that the carriers’ earnings related to jets (primarily the B-727). The carriers, Director, Legislation and in their special reports submitted for Regulations Division. MAC operations during the base period fell short by a considerable margin of this proceeding covering the year ending [F.R. Doc. 70-15945; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; the 9 percent return on investment con­ 8:50 a.mr} sidered reasonable by the Board for s Hearings before the Subcommittee on MAC operations and it appears that ad­ Military Airlift of the Committee on Armed ditional revenues are necessary to Services, House of Representatives, 91st achieve a reasonable rate of return.2 Ac­ Cong., second session (H.A.S.C. 91-51), p. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD cordingly, upon consideration of these 6256. data and comments, and as explained in * Aircraft rental charges have been elimi­ [1 4 CFR Parts 288, 399 1 nated, and in lieu thereof, provision has greater detail below, the Board has ten­ been made for depreciation expense and a [Docket No. 22443; EDR-185A, PSDR-29] tatively determined to increase rates for return on investment. While this is one of MAC charters in foreign and overseas the items scheduled for ratemaking in the MAC MINIMUM RATES FOR OVER­ air transportation by 10.5 percent for current Domestic Passenger-Fare Investiga­ SEAS AND FOREIGN AIR TRANS­ operations conducted with long-range tion (Docket 21866), and it may be that a PORTATION aircraft, and 11.0 percent for operations different treatment of leased aircraft will with short-range aircraft. The only char­ result from that proceeding, we are propos­ Notice of Proposed Rule Making ing to treat this in the same manner as in ter rates we propose to leave unchanged the past for MAC rate purposes pending the November 18,1970. are the charter rates for turboprop and Board’s resolution of the issue in the pas­ Notice is hereby given that the Civil piston aircraft, no carrier having re­ senger-fare investigation. In any event, this Aeronautics Board has under considera­ quested revision of these rates.' adjustment .is not of major significance in the overall rate. tion proposed amendments to Parts 288 5 While the current MAC foreign rates are and 399 of its regulations (14 CFR Parts 1 The carriers, however, were not requested based upon a 12-year life and 15 percent 288 and 399) which would increase, effec­ to submit forecasts of their costs for the residual, the rate proposed herein is that tive August 5, 1970, certain minimum future period. The 12 months ending Mar. 31, used in the most recent MAC rate review, rates for services performed for MAC in 1970, has been used as the base period for which involved domestic Logair and Quick- overseas and foreign air transportation. the purposes of this rate review. trans services, and is the same depreciation The principal features of the proposed la Appendix A filed as part of original docu­ rate proposed by the Board in Phase 1 of its ment. pending Domestic Passenger-Fare Investiga­ amendments are described in the ex­ 2 For the year ended Mar. 31, 1970, the tion (PSDR-25, Aug. 6, 1970). The 12-year planatory statement below and the pro­ average return on investment reported by service life and 15 percent residual used posed amendments are set forth in the the carriers for their MAC operations was heretofore in MAC international rates is, proposed rules. The amendments are 5.3 percent, while the overall return on the however, reflected in the carriers’ adjusted proposed under the authority of sections carriers’ “systems” (i.e., the carrier entities investment up to Mar. 31,1970. 204, 403, and 416 of the Federal Aviation which encompass MAC operations) was 4.9 6 Provision for State taxes was made for Act of 1958, as amended (72 Stat. 743, percent. those carriers where it appeared appropriate.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 18057

March 31,1970, show for long-range air­ fleets “ * * * the generally reduced level Tiger’s domestic services. Our tentative craft, an average utilization of 10.7 hours of the MAC airlift procurement * * utilization conclusions for long-range in MAC services and 10.1 hours overall The Department of Defense concludes aircraft are shown below together with for the aircraft types used in MAC serv­ that no valid basis exists upon which to other relevant data. ices. For short-range aircraft the average project a lower utilization for aircraft MAC utilization of the B-727’s was 7.7 utilized in future MAC international MAC hours, and 7.4 hours overall. operations than the year ending System YE These data and data for the year end­ March 31,1970. per Form 41 Mar. 31, 1970 Fore­ ing March 31,1970, as reported on Form Neither the carriers’ nor DOD’s con­ Quarter per castYE 417 are shown in Appendix B and are clusions regarding the first quarter of Mar. 31, Mar. 31, special summarized by groups below:8 1970 appear to be valid without qualifi­ 1970 1970 reports cation. It seems clear that the substan­ Combi­ AH Supple­ All tial drop in MAC volume during that nation cargo mental carriers American B-707... 11.5 11.6 12.9 12.0 quarter contributed to the decline to 6.59 Braniff B-707. . . 13.2 12.5 13.5 13.0 hours in the utilization for the supple­ Continental B-707. 11.5 10.5 13.7 12.0 Long-range aircraft: Eastern DC-8-63.. . . 10.5 11.1 11.6 11.0 E R-536 forecast. . 11.7 12.8 11.4 11.8 mental carriers. On the other hand, the Northwest B-707.. 9.9 9.9 9.8 10.0 Year ending 3¡31 ¡70: data does indicate that the first quarter Pan Am B-707___ 10.4 9.5 10.5 10.0 Special reports: TWA B-707______11.8 11.0 11.8 11.0 MAC...... 11.5 11.5 9.3 10.7 tends to be below average and, therefore, United DC-8-61-. _ 9.4 9.0 8.7 9.0 Commercial___ 10.4 9.5 8.1 9.3 such quarter should not be used to pro­ Airlift DC-8-63. . . 10.5 7.4 10.7 10.0 Overall...... 11.1 10.8 8.5 10.1 Flying Tiger Per Form 41: ject annual utilization. DC-8-63...... 10.4 9.8 I t 5 11.0 Overall...... : 11.0 10.7 8.6 10.0 DOD’s witnesses, when testifying at the Seaboard DC-8-63. 11. 0 11.0 12.4 11.0 Short-range aircraft: American Flyers E R-536 forecast _ . 9.1 10.0 9.0 9.2 Congressional hearings on military air­ DC-8-63...... 7.0 6.5 9.3 7.0 Year ending 3/31/70: lift,® forecast that MAC’S civil airlift pro­ Capitol D C -8...... 6.4 3.3 6.5 7.0 Special reports: DC-8-83...... 8.7 6.3 8.5 8.0 MAC...... 8.8 7.3 7.7 curement (excluding Logair, Quicktrans, ONA D C -8______8.3 6.4 8.3 8.0 Commercial____ 7.5 6.9 7.1 and Alaska) for fiscal 1971 would be DC-8-63______9.3 7.1 9.3 9.0 Overall______8.3 7.1 7.4 $380.1 million,1® while in fiscal 1969 it was Saturn DC -8...... 7.7 4.0 9.3 8.0 Per Form 41: DC-8-61...... - ; 8.9 6.0 10.0 9.0 Overall...... 8.8 8.3 7.0 7.6 $527.9 million.11 In fiscal 1970, the pro­ TIA DC-8-61...... 8.8 7.4 9.6 9.0 curement was $449.8 million. In view of DC-8-63...... - 10.6 9.6 9.5 9.0 Universal DC-8... 4.9 4.2 7.2 7.0 Thé following table, for long-range the fact that the year ending March 31, DC-8-61______8.7 8.2 9.4 9.0 aircraft, shows that there has been an 1970, period includes a high quarter from World B-707_____ 10.7 6.3 10.8 10.0 fiscal 1969 and does not reflect the im­ 10.0 10.7 appreciable decline in utilization as com­ pact of the sharp drop of 15.5 percent Average 1„ .. 8.9 10.0 pared with that forecast in connection when the forecast for fiscal 1971 is com­ with the rates now in effect. 1 For carriers having two aircraft types, the average of pared with fiscal 1970, the base year ex­ both types is used for that carrier in determining the perience is not indicative of fiscal 1971 overall average, weighted according to miles flown by Combi­ All­ Supple­ All each type. nation cargo mental carriers utilization and DOD’s reliance upon that period for the future is not realistic. As a generalization, our tentative uti­ E R-536 Forecast__ 11.69 12.75 11.40 11.78 Appendix B lla shows that the supple­ lization conclusions are pegged close to Per Form 41: mental carriers as a rule tend to have the system average, subject to the fol­ Year ending Mar. 31,1970.... 11.03 10.66 8.61 10.01 utilization in commercial services inferior lowing qualifications: (1) Despite an 1st quarter 1970... 10.63 9.40 6.59 8.85 to that in their MAC services. In all cases allowance for some decrease in MAC 1st quarter 1969... 10.13 10.59 10.17 10.22 utilization, the system utilization has MAC______11.54 11.52 9.28 10.66 the supplemental carriers’ utilization in Overall...... 11.14 10.79 8.51 10.06 been increased as explained above, in the year ending March 31, 1970, even in recognition that in the cases of Amer­ MAC services, is well under the forecast ican, Continental, Eastern, and Flying The decline has least affected the com­ for fiscal 1969 for these carriers. In order Tiger the system utilization is depressed bination carriers and has most seriously to avoid making MAC pay for the com­ by significant intermediate-haul situa­ affected the supplemental carriers. The mercial slack, the overall MAC/commer­ carriers argue that the annual average tions; (2) in the case of combination for the base year is not a good bench­ cial utilization is not a proper standard. route carriers (e.g., United) it has been mark and would stress the first quarter However, because of the steady decline in assumed that 9 hours is a reasonable 1970 as more indicative of future utiliza­ MAC volume which can be expected to minimum and ^ in the case of supple­ tion. DOD in its recommendations on , continue, the MAC base-year level is not mental carriers, 7 hours; and (3) MAC July 22 points out that this quarter is a an appropriate measure. utilization would decline below that low quarter for commercial charters by In the case of the scheduled carriers, experienced in the base year.12 the supplemental carriers and also re- the system basis presents additional The conclusions for short-range air­ problems in that in some instances it re­ craft follow: 13 flects intermediate-haul services that 7 The carriers’ special reports generally are consistent with Form 41 reports and, hence, tend to generate lower utilization in­ 12 Additional detailed background utiliza­ appear to be reasonably accurate. The in­ consistent with the characteristic MAC tion data are provided on page 2 to Appendix long-haul operations. This applies to B, which is filed as part of the original docu­ dividual significant disparities are tabulated ment. These data confirm that the Mar. 31, below: American’s Mexican service and Conti­ 1970 quarter is not suitable by Itself for pro­ nental’s, Eastern’s, United’s, and Flying jection in view of the upturn in the June 30, Carrier Form Special Difference 1970 quarter. The sag below the base-year 41 reports level is attributable to the supplemental 9 Hearings, op. cit. carriers. However, the low utilization of Am erican..___ 11.54 11.86 0.32 19 Hearings, page 6343. MAC’S RFP’s for fis­ World appears to be related to its strike situ­ Braniff____. . . . 13.15 11.99 (1.16) cal 1971 included advice to the prospective ation, and, as we have found above, it does Continental___ 11.45 13.66 2.21 Seaboard...... 11.00 11.39 0.39 bidders that the international buy for pas­ not appear reasonable to recognize deteriora­ Saturn...... 8.33 8.78 0.46 sengers would be $328 million and that the tion of utilization for these carriers below TIA------. . . . . 9.69 8.90 (0.79) cargo requirements for fiscal 1971 have not 7 hours. Universal...... 7.75 7.40 (0.35) been developed. For the past several years 13 While our utilization forecasts for long- MAC has been informing the carriers that it range aircraft have been rounded to even 8 The “system per Form 41” data shown inexpects the cargo volume available for civil hours, we have not done so in the case of our Appendix B tor these carriers reflect the des­ air carriers to shrink to a very minor level. short-range forecast, 6ince in the latter case ignated entities that include MAC opera­ 11 Hearings, page 6348. fractional hours assume greater significance tions. Appendix B is filed as part of the n> Appendix B filed as part of original due to the smaller sample of carriers and the original document. document. lower utilization achieved in such services.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18058 PROPOSED RULE MAKING That carrier’s operations reflect a service curve” of the various aircraft types may, MAC involving three Atlantic coast points as they have in the past, contribute to System YE per Form 41 • Mar.-31, which necessitated substantial ferrying. economies of operation. Also, the car­ 1970 Fore­ This service is not included in fiscal year riers’ current efforts in cost control may YE Quarter per cast Mar. 31, Mar. 31, special 1971 contracts.15 produce results for this period which 19/0 c 1970 reports DOD has proposed to exclude PAA’s were not reflected in their base-year cost data from the computation of long- data. In light of the foregoing, and in Alaska...... 8.76 8.61 N R 8.5 range rates on the ground that these data view of the fact that a full-scale review Airlift...... 8.30 7.95 8.76 8.0 include the costs of that carrier’s short- of these rates is planned for fiscal 1972, American Flyers__ 6.65 7.71 6.21 7.0 TIA ...... 4.81 3.26 6.02 7.0 range operations as well.-17 For the pur­ the ratées proposed herein reflect, in our World...... 9.40 9.12 9.81 9.2 poses of computing the rates proposed judgment, reasonable rate levels for the 7.70 7.94 herein, we have used PAA’s cost data interim period. Average_____ 7.58 7. .33 as submitted, except for the adjustments In keeping with the Board’s policy as The forecast presumes that 7 hours is detailed above. However, there may be expressed in EDR-185, it is proposed the minimum reasonable utilization for merit in DOD’s contention that PAA’s that the rate herein be made effective as MAC charters. In other cases, the system costs include expenses of operations of August 5, 1970. While petitions for utilization is the basis, rounded down which should be assigned to the short- reconsideration of this proposal have slightly to reflect the impact of some de­ range services which bear a higher rate, been filed,18 the Board has determined to cline in MAC chanters. The average fore­ particularly in light of the fact that defer disposition of this issue for de­ cast of 7.94 is considerably under the PAA’s costs are well above those of other termination with the final rule. Any per­ forecast of 9.17 for fiscal 1989 reflected carriers using the same aircraft type. son who so desires may include his views in the current short-haul aircraft rates. Thus, in the absence of separate data for on this issue in his comments. The reduction is due, as shown below, PAA’s long-range operations, we will Proposed rule. It is proposed to amend primarily to Braniff’s and Southern’s consider, in light of the comments re­ Parts 288 and 399 of the regulations (14 nonparticipation, the inclusion of Ameri­ ceived, making appropriate adjustments CFR Parts 288 and 399), effective Au­ can Flyers, which has experienced low to PAA’s submitted costs. gust 5,1970,19 as follows: utilization, and the decline in Airlift’s It is recognized that there are contin­ 1. Amend § 288.7 (a)(1), (d) (1) and and TIA’s experience below forecast uing inflationary pressures on costs ac­ (2), and (e) to read as follows: levels. companied by a decline in the volume of § 288.7 Reasonable level of compensa­ MAC business. On the other hand, it is tion. reasonable to believe that the inflation­ ****** System per MAG Form 41 Y E Forecasts ary increases will be offset to a consider­ (a) * * * ------Mar. 31,------able degree by cost savings not fully re­ YE Quarter 1970 per F Y ER- (1) Performed with turbine-powered Mar. 31, Mar. 31, special 1971 536 flected in the base-period cost data. For aircraft: 1970 1970 repofts example, changes in aircraft mix toward more efficient aircraft types as well as “ Petitions were filed by PAA and Conti­ Alaska—...... —.. 8.76 8.61 N R 8.5 8.50 greater experience on the “learning nental. Answers in support of the petitions Branifl...... 8.73 8.83 9.68 were filed by Airlift, Braniff, Flying Tiger, A irlift...... 8.30 7.95 8.76 8.0 10.00 18 Inclusion of American Flyers’ data would Seaboard, and jointly by American Flyers, American result in a rate increase for short-range serv­ ONA, Saturn, TIA, and Universal. Flyers...... 6.65 7.71 6.21 7.0 Southern...... 6.48 3.73 N R 8.84 ices of 15 percent rather than the 11 per­ 10 This effective date applies to charter rates TIA ______4.81 3.26 6.02 7.0 9.00 cent proposed herein. and Categories A and X rates. Since Cate­ World______9.40. 9.12 9.81 9.2 9.00 17 DOD asserts that in fiscal 1970, 20 percent gory Z rates are embodied in tariffs, the pro­ of PAA’s MAC contract revenue was received posed change in those minimum rates would Average._ 7.59 7.03 7.70 • 7.94 9.17 from the short-range rate. not be made retroactively effective. Convertible Mixed passenger-cargo, per In addition to the foregoing adjust­ Passengers, per Cargo, per revenue plane-mile ments, the carriers’ costs were adjusted passenger-mile ton-mile Passenger Cargo to provide for a 2.2 percent increase in Aircraft type leg, per leg, Roundtrip One way Round- One Round- One passenger- per costs over the base period. This adjust­ trip way trip way mile ton- Variable Fixed Variable Fixed ment represents an annualization of mile. wage and salary cost increases incurred Cents Cents Cents Cents Cents Cents Dollars Dollars Dollars Dollars during the base year, but not fully re­ Turboprops: ■CL-44...... 2.00 3.60 9.36 17.19 2.15 10.67 ...... flected in base-year data. Appendix C L-382...... 10.05 19.64 attached hereto14 details these increases Regular turbojets...... 11.934 3.481 7.801 15.525 2. 088" "¿.üifi ~ " and the methodology used to compute Passengers-pallets: 165 and 0...... i 3.448 3.193 6. 022 5.746 the adjustment. In addition, we have 117 and 3...... 3.337 3.094 5.989 5.724 made appropriate adjustments to reflect 105 and 4...... 3. 315 3.072 5.989 6.713 93 and 5— ______—...... 3.282 3.039 5.978 5.713 an increase in public liability and prop­ 81 and 6______3.260 3.017 5.978 5.702 erty damage insurance rates effective 63 and 7______- 3.216 2.984 5.967 5.702 51 and 8 ....i______i i ...... 3.193 2.950 5.956 5.691 June 19, 1970, reported by Airlift. 0 and 12______3.072 2.851 *5.934 5.669 Finally, DOD has pointed out that the DC-8F-61, -63._____ 1.934 3.481 7.801 15. 525 2.088 9.116 Passengers-pallets: price of military fuel was reduced by 11.1 219 and 0______-____ - ______4.575 4.232 7.934 7.625 percent effective July 1, 1970. Since fuel 159 and 5— '______- ...... 4.387 4.033 7.757 7.448 constitutes 19 percent of the cost of long- 65 and 12______±.______4.077 3.724 7.492 7.171 47 and 13—______.______4.022 3.669 7.437 7.127 range operations and 15 percent of short- 0 and 18— ______-___ 3.879 3.514 7.293 6.984 range costs, this price decrease results in B-727, CV-880, CV- 990 Pacific Inter­ an overall decrease in costs of 1 percent island...... 2.553 4. 829 12. 987 25.974 2.819 15.851 for long-range operations and 0.8 per­ Passengers-pallets: 105 andO______2.964 2.686 5.350 5.073 cent in short-range operations.15 ‘61 and 2______. ______J&,------2.819 2.542 5.184 4.906 Data for American Flyers have been 60 and 3______2.775 2.498 5.139 4.862 46 and 4______;______.... 2.764 2.486 5.128 4.851 excluded for the purposes of determining 0 and 7______2.620 2.342 4.951 4.673 the short-range rates proposed herein. B-727, CV-880, CV- 990, all other...... 2. 775 6.250 14. 430 28. 860 3.041 17.430 “ Appendix C filed as *part of original Passengers-pallets: 105 and 0______3.197 2.919 5.794 5. 517 document. 61 and 2______3.064 2.786 5.661 5.384 16 In view of the disparate estimates of the 50 and 3______3.030 2.753 5.628 5.350 proportion of fuel purchased from the mili­ 46 and 4...... 3.019 2.742 5.617 5.339 tary, in our judgment it is reasonable to as­ 0 and 7____ ...... 2.875 2.697 6.472 5.195 sume that 50 percent of the carriers' fuel is l The minimum rate for operation of B-707 aircraft in Recreation and Rehabilitation (RAR) service between the so purchased. This judgment is reflected in Republic of South Vietnam, on the one hand, and Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, the Republic of the Philippines, the above computation. Hong Kong, and Taiwan, on the other, shall be 2.553 cents per passenger-mile. FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, <1970 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 18059

* # * * * of Assignments, Television Broadcast t 47 CFR Part 73 ] (d) For Category A transportation: y Stations (Gastonia and Monroe, N.C.), (1) Passengers, 3.481 cents per pas­ Docket No. 19046. [Docket No. 18979] senger-mile. 1. This proceeding was begun by no­ TELEVISION BROADCAST STATIONS (2) Cargo: Outbound, 13.26 cents per ton-mile; and inbound, 11.05 cents per tice of proposed rule making (FCC 70- Table of Assignments, Kerrville- ton-mile. 1102) adopted October 7, 1970, released Fredericksburg, Tex.; Order Extend­ * * * * * October 12, 1970, and published in the ing Time for Filing Reply Comments F edekal R egister on October 15, 1970, (e) For Category X transportation, In the matter of amendment of § 73.- 1.934 cents per passenger-mile and 7.801 35 F.R. 16182. The dates for filing com­ 606(b) Table of Assignments, Television cents per cargo ton-mile. ments and reply comments are presently Broadcast Stations (Kerrville-Freder- * * * * * November 16, 1970, and November 27, icksburg, Tex.), Docket No. 18979, RM- 1387. 2. Amend § 399.16(b) to read as fol­1970, respectively. lows: 2. On November 12, 1970, Carolina 1. This proceeding was begun by no­ Broadcasting Co. (Carolina), licensee of tice of proposed rule making (FCC 70- 927) adopted August 26, 1970, released §399.16 Military exemptions. Station WSOC-TV, Charlotte, N.C., filed * * * * * August 31, 1970, and published in the a request to extend the time for filing F ederal R egister September 4, 1970, 35 (b) The minimum charges considered comments and reply comments to and F.R. 14095. The date for filing comments fair and reasonable for the transporta­ including November 30, 1970, and De­ has expired. The date presently desig­ tion of Category Z individually ticketed cember 11, 1970, respectively. Carolina nated for filing reply comments is No­ passengers in foreign and overseas air vember 20,1970. transportation and in air transportation states that the significant issues raised 2. On November 13, 1970, United between the 48 contiguous States on the by the Commission respecting additional Tecon, proponent of the rule making, one hand and Hawaii or Alaska on the UHF allocations in the Charlotte area filed a request to extend the time for fil­ other hand will be 3.481 cents per pas­ are of paramount importance to the ing reply comments to and including senger-mile, applied to the shortest mile­ public interest in terms of television December 21, 1970. It states its request age between the commercial air carrier service and warrant sufficient research is occasioned by the extensive engineer­ points as set forth in the current IATA ing material filed with the comments of Mileage Manual to compute point-to- by interested parties. the Southwest Republic Corp. and of point passenger fares. 3. We are of the view that the addi­ Channel Twenty-four Corp. It further [F.R. Doc. 70-15742; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; tional time requested is warranted and states that both these parties have con­ 8:45 a.xn.] would serve the public interest. Accord­ sented to the extension of time requested ingly, it is ordered, That the time for herein. 3. We are of the view that the addi­ filing comments and reply comments in tional time is warranted and would serve Docket 19046 is extended to and includ­ the public interest: Accordingly, it is ing November 30,1970, and December 11, ordered, That the request of United 1970, respectively. Tecon is granted and the date for filing 4. This action is taken pursuant to reply comments is extended to and in­ cluding December 21, 1970. [ 47 CFR Part 73 I authority found in sections 4(i), 5(d) 4. This action is .taken pursuant to [Docket No. 19046] (1), and 303 (r) of the Communications authority found in sections 4(i) and Act of 1934, as amended, and § 0.281 303 (r) of the Communications Act of TELEVISION BROADCAST STATIONS (d) (8) of the Commission’s rules. 1£)34, as amended, and § 02.81(d) (8) of' the Commission’s rules and regulations. Table of Assignments, Gastonia and Adopted: November 13, 1970. Adopted: November 18, 1970. Monroe, N.C.; Order Extending Released: November 17, 1970. Time for Filing Comments and Reply Released: November 19, 1970. Comments [seal] F rancis R. Walsh, [seal] F rancis R. Walsh, Chief, Broadcast Bureau. In the matter of amendment of § 73.- Chief, Broadcast Bureau. [F.R. Doc. 70-15838; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; [F.R. Doc. 70-15837; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; 606(b) of the Commission’s rules, Table 8:47 ajn.] 8:47 a.m.l

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18060 Notices

ing the increased cost of Tennessee Gas’ poses of hearing, we will grant its inter­ FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION rate increase in Docket No. RP71-6 and vention in the proceedings of its im­ [RP71-18—RP71-25] proposing to become effective simultane­ mediate supplier, Seaboard, and the lat­ ously therewith on March 17, 1971. Four ter’s upstream suppliers, United Fuel COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION CO. other applicants, Seaboard, Kentucky and Columbia Gulf. ET AL. Gas, Manufacturers, and Home, in turn, Review of the aforementioned filings also filed revised tariff sheets, proposed indicates that certain issues are raised Order Providing for Hearing, Suspend­ to become effective March 17, 1971, re­ therein which require development in ing Proposed Revised Tariff Sheets flecting the effect of Tennessee Gas’ in­ evidentiary proceedings. Among such is­ and Granting Petitions To Intervene creased rates upon United Fuel’s and sues, but not limited thereto, are the their own costs of service.8 various grounds enumerated above of­ November 13, 1970. The proposed increased rates which fered by applicants in support of their Columbia Gulf Transmission Co., would track the effect of Tennessee Gas’ increased rates and charges and the con­ RP71-18; United Fuel Gas Co., RP71-19; rate increase are included in the rates solidated effective tax rate issue. In ad­ Atlantic Seaboard Corp., RP71-20; Ken­ proposed to become effective Novem­ dition, Cumberland proposes to super­ tucky Gas Transmission Corp., RP71-21; ber 16, and the costs of service support­ sede its First Revised Volume No. 1 with The Ohio Fuel Gas Co., RP71-22; Cum­ ing the rates of all of the applicants, a new Second Revised Volume No. 1 for berland and Allegheny Gas Co., RP71- except Columbia Gulf which is not af­ the stated purpose of providing uniform­ 23; The Manufacturers light and Heat fected by Tennessee Gas’ rates. The ap­ ity with the FPC Gas Tariffs of its Co­ Co., RP71-24; Home Gas Co., RP71-25. proximate annual tracking increases lumbia wholesale affiliates. Six of the The eight pipeline companies named in are: United Fuel $17 million, Seaboard applicants (excluding Columbia Gulf these proceedings, each of which is an $5.3 million, Kentucky Gas $2.6 million and Cumberland), propose to eliminate affiliate of the Columbia Gas System, Manufacturers $7.9 million, and Home section 10 of Rate Schedule WS (Winter Inc., on October 1, 1970, by separate ap­ $831,000. Service), stating that the purpose is to plications, tendered for filing proposed In support of their proposed overall place all wholesale customers on a com­ changes in their FPC Gas Tariffs, reflect­ rate increases, the eight applicants each parable basis with respect to entitlement ing increased rates and charges which state that there are three principal to excess gas service. aggregate approximately $214.2 million, causes necessitating their increased rate The proposed increased rates and to become effective November 16, 1970.1 filings: (i) The claimed need for an charges have not been shown to be justi­ For administrative purposes only, these increase in overall rate of return from fied and may be unjust, unreasonable, applications are treated together in this 7.5 percent to 8.25 percent in order to unduly discriminatory, or preferential, or order, but are not at this time deemed to attract additional capital to develop new otherwise unlawful. be consolidated for purposes of hearing sources of gas supply; (ii) proposed The Commission finds: It is necessary and decision. ' changes in depreciation methods and ac­ and proper in the public interest and The impact of these increased rates crual rates; and (iii) proposed change to aid in the enforcement of the provi­ upon the ultimate consumers is approxi­ in the determination of allowance for sions of the Natural Gas Act that the mately half of the aggregate amount of income taxes from “flow-through” to Commission enter upon hearings con­ $214.2 million because the rate increases “normalization” with respect to liberal­ cerning the lawfulness of the rates and cover sales of gas for resale among the ized depreciation. Also included in sup­ charges contained in the FPC gas tariffs eight applicants, as well as to non- porting material is the claim that tax of the eight applicants in these pro­ Columbia. customers. Columbia Gulf savings should be eliminated from the ceedings, as proposed to be amended, and transports gfis for United Fuel, which in consolidated effective income tax rate that the proposed revised tariff volume turn sells gas to Seaboard, Kentucky computations. and revised tariff sheets listed in Ap­ "Gas, Cumberland, and Manufacturers. Thirty-one parties have filed notices pendices A and B hereto be suspended Seaboard sells a portion of its gas to of intervention and petitions to inter­ and the use thereof deferred as herein Manufacturers and to Cumberland. Man­ vene in one or more of these proceed­ provided. ufacturers sells gas to Home and both ings.3 In addition, the cities of Barbour- The Commission orders: Kentucky and Manufacturers sell gas to ville and Manchester, Ky., filed protests, . (A) Pursuant to the authority of the Ohio Fuel. In addition, as many as six but did not petition to intervene. Vir­ Natural Gas Act, particularly sections non-Columbia pipeline companies supply ginia Pipe Line Co.’s petition lists all of 4 and 15 thereof, the Commission’s rules gas to United Fuel, Ohio Fuel, Seaboard, the above-captioned proceedings which of. practice and procedure, and the reg­ and Manufacturers. One of these six were listed in the Commission’s pub­ ulations under the Natural Gas Act (18 companies, Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., lished notice of the rate filings. All other CFR Ch. I), public hearings shall be has filed increased rates now suspended petitions seek intervention only in the held at the time and place to be fixed until March 17, 1971, in Docket No. proceedings involving their immediate by orders of the Commission or notices RP71-6. gas supplier and those supplying such of the Commission Secretary, concerning The approximate annual amounts of supplier upstream. Assuming that Vir­ the lawfulness of the rates, charges, clas­ the rate increases filed by the eight appli­ ginia Pipe Line’s petition was based upon sifications, and services contained in the cants, to become effective November 16, the incorrect assumption that these pro­ are: Columbia Gulf $42.6 million, United eight applicants’ FPC gas tariffs as pro­ Fuel $63 million, Seaboard $27.5 million, ceedings have been consolidated for pur- posed to be amended. Kentucky Gas $12.2 million, Ohio Fuel (B) Pending such hearings and deci­ $33.3 million, Cumberland $740,000, Man­ 2 The revised tariff sheets proposed to be­ sions thereon, the proposed revised tariff ufacturers $30.6 million and Home $3.8 come effective Max. 17, 1971, are listed in volume and revised tariff sheets listed million. Appendix A hereto. By applicants’ letter filed in Appendix B hereto are suspended and Oct. 19, 1970, the requested effective date their use is deferred until April 16, United Fuel’s rate filing also includes for “tracking” Tennessee’s RP71-6 proposed 1971, and until such further time as they revised tariff sheets which propose in­ increase was postponed from Oct. 17, 1970, to are made effective in the manner pre­ creased rates and charges, solely reflect- Mar. 17, 1971. 3 The petitions to intervene are listed in scribed by the Natural Gas Act; and 1 The revised tariff sheets proposed to be­ Appendix C hereto, together with the dock­ the proposed revised tariff sheets listed come effective November 16 axe listed in Ap­ eted proceedings in which they are granted in Appendix A hereto are sus­ pendix B hereto. leave to intervene by this order. pended and their use is deferred until

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18061

March 17, 1971, and until such fur­ Kentucky Gas Transmission Corp. Cumberland and Allegheny Gas Co. ther- time as the proposed increased Second Revised Volume No. 1: Second Revised Volume No. 1: rates and charges of Tennessee Gas Pipe­ Third Revised Sheet No. 23. Original Sheets Nos. 1 through 36. Fourth Revised Sheet No, 32. Cancellation of: line Co. become effective in Docket No. Fifth Revised Sheet No. 31. Second Revised Sheet No. 21. RP71-6. Sixth Revised Sheet No. 26. First Revised Sheet No. 22. (C) The petitioners listed in Appen­ Eighth Revised Sheets Nos. 25-A and 29. The Manufacturers Light and Heat Co. dix C hereto are hereby permitted to Ninth Revised Sheets Nos. 6, 7, and 21. Fifth Revised Volume No. 1: intervene in the indicated proceedings Tenth Revised Sheets Nos. 5 and 18. Second Revised Sheet No. 27. listed therein, subject to the rules and The Ohio Fuel Gas Co. Fourth Revised Sheets Nos. 22 and 23. regulations of the Commission: Pro­ Sixth Revised Sheet No. 31. Fourth Revised Volume No. 1: Seventh Revised Sheets Noe. 6, 7, 8, and vided, however, That the participation Second Revised Sheets Nos. 43 and 50. 30. of such interveners shall be limited to Fifth Revised Sheet No. 47. Ninth Revised Sheet No. 26. matters affecting rights and interests Twelfth Revised Sheet No. 10. Home Gas Co. specifically set forth in the respective Thirteenth Revised Sheets Nos. 6, 7, 8, Fourth Revised Volume No. 1: petitions to intervene: And provided, fur­ 11, 12, 13, 16, 17, 21, 22, and 42. Second Revised Sheet No. 34. ther, That the admission of such inter­ Fourteenth Revised Sheets Nos. 15, 20, Third Revised Sheet No. 30. veners shall not be construed as recog­ 38, 40, and 45. Sixth Revised Sheets Nos. 6, 7, and 8. nition by the Commission that they, or any of them, might be aggrieved be­ Appendix C cause of any order or orders issued by COLUMBIA GULF TRANSMISSION COMPANY, ET AL. the Commission in these proceedings. Dockets Nos. RP71- By the Commission. Petitions to intervene [seal] G ordon M. G rant, 21 22 23 24 25 Secretary, P arty Appendix A Administrator of General Services Administration...... X X X X X X REVISED FPC CAS TARIFF FILINGS Baltimore Gas & Electric Co...... X X X Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp...... X X (Proposed to become effective Mar. 17, 1971) The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. and The Union Light, Heat, and Power Co...... >______X ___ _ X X ______United Fuel Gas Co. City of Charlottesville, Va...... *______... ____ X X Sixth Revised Volume No. 1.1 City of Cincinnati, Ohio______\______X _ X Columbia Gas of Kentucky, Inc..______J___. . . i ______...... X X _ Seventh Revised Sheet No. 25-A. Columbia Gas of Maryland, Inc______£.______X Eighth Revised Sheets Nos. 5, 6, 7, and 21. Columbia Gas of New York, Inc______.-______...'______X X Ninth Revised Sheet No. 18. Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc ______X Atlantic Seaboard Corp. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc...... X X ...... X _____ X ___ Columbia Gas of West Virginia, Inc...... X X ______X X ___ Eighth Revised Volume No. 1 : Commonwealth North Gas Corp__ ;...... X X X ______Seventh Revised Sheet No. 39-A. Cumberland and Allegheny Gas Co______X ______Eighth Revised Sheets Nos. 6, 7, and 32. The Dayton Power & Light Co______X X ______X ____ X Ninth Revised Sheet No. 5. The Manufacturers Light & Heat Co______X X X 1.1______III...... II.I New York State Electric & Gas Corp...... x Kentucky Gas Transmission Corp. The Ohio Fuel Gas C o ______X X ______X ______Second Revised Volume No. 1 : Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc______X X Fourth Revised Sheet No. 31. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co______X X ____ X X Seventh Revised Sheet No. 25-A. Roanoke Gas Co...... X X X UGI Corp...... X X ...... X . . . . Eighth Revised Sheets Nos. 6, 7, and 21. United Natural Gas Co...... *______x ___ Ninth Revised Sheets Nos. 5 and 18. Virginia Gas Distribution Corp . ______X X X* IIIIIIIIIIII.II.I...... i.II The Manufacturers Light and Heat Co. Virginia Pipe Line Co______;_____ X X X ______Fifth Revised Volume No. 1: Washington Gas Light Co...... -______X X X ...... Fifth Revised Sheet No. 31. West Ohio Gas Co...... ~...... ;...... x ...... Sixth Revised Sheets Nos. 6, 7, 8, and 30. N otices of Intervention Eighth Revised Sheet No. 26. Public Service Commission of the State of New York______X X ...... X Home Gas Co. Public Utility Commission of Ohio______. X X _____ X X _____ X Fourth Revised Volume No. 1 : Pennsylvania Public Utility C ommission...... |______X Fourth Revised Sheet No. 38. Public Service Commission of Kentucky______II__ I j ______Fifth Revised Sheets Nos. 6, 7, 8, and 37. Sixth Revised Sheet No. 33. [F.R. Doc. 70-15696; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; 8:45 a.m.] Appendix B [Docket No. CS71-21 etc.] reasonable rates have been established, REVISED FPC GAS TARIFF FILINGS all as more fully set forth in the appli­ RAMSEY & GASSAWAY OIL & GAS (Proposed to become effective Nov. 16, 1970) cations which are on file with the Com­ PROPERTIES ET AL. mission and open to public inspection. Columbia Gulf Transmission Co. Any person desiring to be heard or to Original Volume No. 1: Notice of Applications for “Small Fourth Revised Sheet No. 8. make any protest with reference to said Nineteenth Revised Sheet No. 7. Producer” Certificates 1 applications should on or before Decem­ United Fuel Gas Co. November 17,1970. ber 11, 1970, file with the Federal Power Sixth Revised Volume No. 1: Commission, Washington, D.C. 20426, Third Revised Sheets Nos. 23 and 8. Take notice that each of the appli­ petitions to intervene or protests in ac­ Fourth Revised Sheet No. 29. cants listed herein has filed an applica­ cordance with the requirements of the Sixth Revised Sheet No. 26. tion pursuant to section 7(c) of the Nat­ Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ Eighth Revised Sheet No. 25-A. ural Gas Act and § 157.40 of the regula­ cedure <18 CFR 1.8 or 1.10). All protests Ninth Revised Sheets Nos. 5, 6, 7, and 21. Tenth Revised Sheet No. 18. tions thereunder for a “small producer” filed with the Commission will be consid­ Atlantic Seaboard Corp. certificate of public convenience and ne­ ered by it in determining the appropriate Eighth Revised Volume No. 1: cessity authorizing the sale for resale and action to be taken but will not serve to Third Revised Sheet No. 37. delivery of natural gas in interstate com­ make the protestants parties to the pro­ Fifth Revised Sheet No. 47. merce from areas for which just and ceeding. Persons wishing to become par­ Sixth Revised Sheet No. 50. ties to a proceeding or to participate as Eighth Revised Sheet No. 39-A, 1 This notice does not provide for consolida­ a party in any hearing therein must file Ninth Revised Sheets Nos. 6. 7, and 32. tion for hearing of the several matters cov­ petitions to intervene in accordance with Tenth Revised Sheet No. 5» ered herein. the Commission’s rules.

No. 229- FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18062 NOTICES heretofore total-requirements custom­ Take further notice that, pursuant to Docket Date - Name of applicant the authority contained in and subject No. filed ers of Alabama, will in the future re­ to the jurisdiction conferred upon the ceive allotments of power from the Federal Power Commission by sections CS71-39__ . 16-22-70 Martha Clayton Estes Southeastern Power Administration 7 and 15 of the Natural Gas Act and the (Operator) et al., c/o Sanders, (SEPA), over Alabama’s transmission Scott, Saunders, Brian & system. Alabama proposed that the 30- Commission’s rules of practice and pro­ Humphrey, 730 Amarillo cedure, a hearing will be held without Bldg., Amarillo, T X 79101. day public notice requirement of section CS71-40__ . 10-22-70 Earl Clayton et al., c/o Sanders, 205(d) of the Federal Power Act and further notice before the Commission on Scott, Saunders, Brian & all applications in which no petition to Humphrey, 730 Amarillo § 35.3 of the Commission’s regulations intervene is filed within the time re­ Bldg., Amarillo, T X 79101; thereunder be waived to permit the con­ CS71-41__ . 10-26-70 Kingwood Oil Co., 6th Floor, quired herein if the Commission on its 100 Park Avenue Bldg., tract amendments to become effective own review of the matter believes that Oklahoma City, OK 73102; retroactively on June 19, 1970, or, in the CS71-42__ . 10-27-70 Kirkpatrick Oil & Gas Co., alternative, that they become effective a grant of the certificates is required by 1300 North Broadway, the public convenience and necessity. Oklahoma City, OK 73103. 30 days after filing. CS71-43__ . 10-26-70 Byron McKnight, Box 297, Where a petition for leave to intervene Hobbs, NM 88240. The tendered filing does not alter is timely filed, or where the Commission CS71-44__ . 10-26-70 Panhandle Producing Co. Alabama’s basic rates. The contracts on its own motion believes that a for­ et al., 705 Alamo National with the individual municipal and co­ Bldg., San Antonio, T X mal hearing is required, further notice 78205. operative customers (Appendix A, part of such hearing will be duly given. CS71-45__ . 10-28-70 G.W. Green et al., 212 Bldg, (A)) would be amended to provide that of the Southwest, Midland, Under the procedure herein provided T X 79701. in computing bills for these customers for, unless otherwise advised, it will be CS71-46__ . 16-28-70 Rip C. Underwood, c/o Alabama shall “deduct from the Cus­ Jerry F. Lyons, attorney, unnecessary for applicants to appear or Post Office Box 9158, tomer’s monthly capacity and energy be represented at the hearing. Amarillo, T X 79105. requirements at the point of delivery the CS71-47... . 10-28-70 Husky Oil Co. of Delaware, amount of capacity from the [SEPA] K enneth F. P lumb, Post Office Box 380, Acting Secretary. Cody, WY 82414. Projects assigned to said point of deliv- CS71-48... . 10-29-70 Glen S. Söderström, Barfield ery * * The new contract with Bldg., Suite 707, Amarillo, Docket Date Name of applicant T X 79101. Alabama Electric Cooperative (Appendix No. filed CS71-49_ . 10-29-70 Frank F. DuBose, c/o Jerry F. A, Part B) (a generation and transmis­ Lyons, attorney, Post Office Box 9158, Amarillo, TX sion cooperative) contains a similar pro­ CS71-21___ 10-16-70 Roy H. Ramsey and Clyde M. 79105. vision and also provides for a new Gassaway, d.b.a. Ramsey & CS71-50.. . 16-29-70 Nathan Appleman, 654 Madison delivery point, a change from kVA. to Gassaway Oil & Gas Proper­ Avenue, New York, NY ties, 300 Panhandle Bank & 10021. kW. billing with a minimum billing de­ Trust Bldg., Borger, T X CS71-51.. .. 10-29-70 Calvert Exploration Co., 2300 mand of 20,000 kW., and an adjustment 79007. Fourth National Bank Bldg., CS71-22 -- 10-16-70 Northern Pump Co. et al., 1915 Tulsa, OK 74119. to 95 percent required power factor in 57th Ave. North, Minneapolis, CS71-52.. .. 10-30-70 Herbert L. Coppock and Stan­ the event Alabama Electric Cooperative’s MN 55430. ley Coppock,Jr., Route No. power factor falls below that level. CS71-23 . . 10-15-70 The Bradley Producing Corp., 2, Cherokee, OK 73728. 313 North Main St.,Wellsville, CS71-53-. .. 16-30-70 Sam K. Viersen, Jr., Post Office Alabama Electric Cooperative, on be­ N Y 14895. Box 280, Okmulgee, OK 74447. CS71-24 -- 10-16-70 B. M. Britain, Post Office Box CS71-54.. L. 10-30-70 Sam K. Viersen, Post Office Box half of nine cooperative customers, reg­ 189, Amarillo, T X 79105. 280, Okmulgee, OK 74447. istered a protest by letters of August 13, CS71-25__ 10-19-70 Producer’s Gas Co., Post Office CS71-55-. .. 10-36-70 Viersen & Cochran, Post Office Box 7303, Amarillo, T X 79109. Box 280, Okmulgee, OK 74447. and October 23, 1970. Its protest con­ CS71-26 — 10-19-70 Lear Petroleum Corp., Post CS71-56.. .. 16-30-70 Leben Drilling, Inc., % Richard cerned the provision for deduction of the Office Box 7512, Amarillo, T X L. Harris, attorney, 602 SEPA allotment from the total require­ 79109. National Bank of Tulsa Bldg., CS71-27 -. 10-19-70 Cecil L. Lanier et al., Post Office Tulsa, OK 74103. ments of the customers in computing Box 578, McAllen, T X 78501. CS71-57.. .. 10-30-70 Ruth C. Rice et al., 110 North bills, which it asserted would result in CS71-28___ 10-20-70 Coral Gas & Oil, Inc. (formerly Hamilton, Lakin, KS 67860. applying Alabama’s existing 75 percent Crown Petroleum, Inc.), 409 CS71-58-- . 16-30-70 E. J. Dunigan, Jr., trustee, Post Bank of the Southwest Bldg., Office Box 261, Pampa, T X demand ratchet in a manner that would Amarillo, T X 79109. 79065. increase ratchet penalties.2 The coopera­ CS71-29___ 10-21-70 Rimrock Exploration Co., Inc., CS71-59-- .. 10-30-70 E. J. Dunigan, Jr., et al., Post 863 First National Bldg., Okla­ Office Box 261, Pampa, T X tives urge that the ratchet be interpreted homa City, OK 73102. 79065. to apply to the total requirements de­ CS71-30___ 10-22-70 Texstar Exploration, Inc., Post Office Box 919, Pampa, livered to them by Alabama, including T X 79065. [F.R. Doc. 70-15754; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; the SEPA power. They argue that the CS71-31 — 10-22-70 Earl T. Smith & Associates, 8:45 a.m.] Inc., Post Office Box 7407, interpretation proposed by Alabama Amarillo, T X 79109. would result in greater ratchet penalties CS71-32 . 10-23-70 Philcon Development Co., than existed before SEPA power be­ Post Office Box 2242, [Docket No. E-7576] Amarillo, T X 79106 came available, while the burden on CS71-33___ 10-22-70 J. M. Hawley et al., c/o Sanders, ALABAMA POWER CO. Alabama’s transmission system is no Scott, Saunders, Brian & Humphrey, 730 Amarillo greater, and the availability to Alabama Bldg., Amarillo, T X 79101. Order Suspending Tendered Rate of SEPA power for peak shaving purposes CS71-34..-. 10-22-70 Jane Clayton Russell et al., Schedule Supplements, Denying Re-, c/o Sanders, Scott, Saunders, will improve its position with respect to Brian & Humphrey, 730 quest for Waiver of Notice, and generation. Alabama asserts that the Amarillo Bldg., Amarillo, swings on its system will be greater with T X 79101. Providing for Hearing CS71-35___ 10-22-70 W. H. Taylor Estate et al., . SEPA power than without and that the c/o Sanders, Scott, Saunders, November 13, 1970; application of the ratchet provision Brian & Humphrey, 730 Amarillo Bldg., Amarillo, This order provides for a hearing, urged by the cooperatives would be in­ T X 79101. denies a requested waiver of notice pro-: consistent with its terms. The coopera­ CS71-36___ 10-22-70 Clayton-Dwyer Drilling Co., c/o Sanders, Scott, Saunders, visions, and suspends for 1 day raté tives do not raise any question with re­ Brian & Humphrey, 730 schedule supplements tendered by Ala­ spect to the propriety of the ratchet Amarillo Bldg., Amarillo, T X 79101. bama Power Co. (Alabama). CS71-37___ 10-22-70 Helen J. Clayton et al., c/o Alabama, a public utility subject to 2 The ratchet provision is as follows: Sanders, Scott, Saunders, the jurisdiction of this Commission, filed Brian & Humphrey, 730 Determination o f B illing Demand Amarillo Bldg., Amarillo, on August 10 and 11, 1970, amendments T X 79101. to its existing power supply contracts The kilovolt-ampere demand for billing CS71-38___ 10-22-70 Earl Clayton and J. M. Hawley, with various municipal and rural electric purposes shall be based on the Consumer’s individually and as Executor maximum integrated 15-minute demand and Trustee of the Estate of cooperative customers.1 These customers, W. H , Taylor, deceased, c/o during each service month: Provided, That . Sanders, Scott, Saunders, i The designations of the various rate such demand shall not be less than 75% of Brian & Humphrey, 730 schedules and the names of the customers the demand established during any of the Amarillo Bldg., Amarillo, T X 79101. are set out in Appendix A hereto. 11 preceding months, nor less than 50 kVA.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18063 itself, or with respect to the other in support of the subject rate schedule ’ Appendix A—Continued changes made in the Alabama-Alabama supplements, including testimony of wit­ Electric Cooperative contract. The pro­ nesses and exhibits. The parties may D esigna­ test of the cooperatives and Alabama’s submit to the Presiding Examiner, on or tion s— answer thereto raise an issue which can before February 5, 1971, proposed dates Sup- To rate Customer Delivery point (s) pie- sched- best be resolved through a public hearing. for commencement o,f cross-examination m ent ule Thus, we are suspending the rate sched­ of Alabama’s witnesses. If any party be­ No. No. ule supplements for 1 day and order­ lieves that a prehearing conference ing a hearing to determine the just and would serve to expedite the proceedings, 2 52 Clarke-W ashington Coffeeville, Ful­ reasonable application of the ratchet he may file with the Chief Examiner or EMC ton. provision. the designated Presiding Examiner, on or 1 53 ...... do...... Dry Fork. The Commission further finds: 1 55 ____d o ...... McIntosh; before February 5, 1971, a motion for a 2 113 Coosa Valley E C __ (*). (1) The supplements to Alabama’s prehearing conference, including a state­ 1 28 Dixie E C ...... Barachias, Wood- rate schedules, identified in Appendix A ley, Y Com­ ment of how the proceeding would be munity; hereto, may be unjust, unreasonable, un­ expedited thereby and a proposed agenda 1 26 ...... do...... Notasulga; duly discriminatory, or preferential, or for such prehearing conference. All fur­ 2 27 ____do...... Union Springs. 1 114 Pea Biver EC_____ Newton. otherwise unlawful under the Federal ther procedural dates shall be as ordered 2 93 ____do______Gerald; Power Act. by the Presiding Examiner. 2 115 Ozark: (2) It is necessary and appropriate 2 6; 30-day notice requirement of section tions to intervene in this proceeding may 3 68 Wiregrass E C ...... Ashford, Slocomb. 205(d) of the Federal Power Act and be filed with the Federal Power Com­ 1 69 ...... do...... — ...... Cottonwood; § 35.3 of the Commission’s regulations mission, Washington, D.C. 20426, on or 1 67 ...... do...... Hartford; thereunder. before December. 18, 1970, in accordance The Commission orders: with the Commission’s rules of practice (A) Pursuant to the authority con­ and procedure (18 CFR 1.8 or 1.37). *A11 delivery points covered by one contract. tained in and subject to the jurisdiction 1 Electric Membership Corporation. By the Commission. 2 Electric Cooperative. conferred upon the Federal Power Com­ B. Superseding agreement with Alabama Electric mission by the Federal Power Act and [seal] K enneth F. P lumb, Cooperative dated June 19,1970: pursuant to the Commission’s rules of Acting Secretary. Alabama Power Co., Bate Schedule FPC No. 121 practice and procedure, a public hearing (Supersedes Bate Schedule F P C No. 24). shall be convened at the offices of the A p p e n d ix A Federal Power Commission in Washing­ ALABAMA POWER CO. FPC RATE SCHEDULE DESIGNATIONS [F.R. Doc. 70-15779; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; A: Amendments to service contracts with SEPA 8:45 a.m.] ton, D.C., at a date and time to be set preference customers: by the hearing examiner of the Commis­ sion designated to preside over these Designa­ proceedings, concerning the issues tions— NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORP. raised in the protest of Alabama Electric Sup- To rate Customer Delivery point (s) ET AL. Cooperative and Alabama’s answer pie- sched- ment ule thereto with regard to the lawfulness of No. No. Notice of Expiration Alabama’s rate schedule supplements identified in Appendix A hereto. November 20, 1970. 1 - 106 Alexander City____ (*). ■ (B) Pending such hearing and deci­ 1 116 City of Dothan...... (*)• So that the Congress may have an sion thereon, Alabama’s proposed rate 1 30 City of Evergreen No. 1. adequate opportunity to decide whether 1 90 ...... do...... No. 2. schedule supplements identified in Ap­ 1 100 City of Fairhope___ (*). upon the expiration of the licenses, to pendix A are hereby suspended and the 1 120 City of Foley...... (*). take over the projects under section 14 of use thereof deferred until November 17, 1 32 Town of Fulton____ (*). 1 97 Town of Hartford... (*). the Federal Power Act, as amended (16 1970. On that date, the supplement shall 1 98 City of Lafeyette__ (*). take effect in the manner prescribed by 1 104 City of L anett...... (*). U.S.C. 807), and that the licensees for 1 108 City of Luveme___ (*). the Federal Power Act, subject to further 1 112 City of Opelika...... (*). the projects and others may have ade­ order of the Commission in this pro­ 1 103 City of Piedmont__ (*). quate notice and opportunity to file 1 118 City of Sylacauga... (*). ceeding, subject to Alabama’s keeping 1 36 City of Tuskegee___ (*). timely applications for new licenses un­ an accurate account in detail of all 5 83 Baldwin County (*). EMC.1 der section 15 of the act, as amended amounts received by reason of the 1 102 Black Warrior EMC. (*)• ratchet provision in the rate schedule 2 107 C entraL Alabama Bradford. (16 U.S.C. 808), public notice is hereby EC.» given that the licenses issued for the supplements, and subject to such refund 2 72 .___ d o 2...... Evergreen; as the Commission may order all in ac­ 2 73 ____d o 2______Friendship, designated and described projects on the cordance with section 205(e) of the Fed­ Wetumpka; 4 74 .____do 2...... Enterprise, Maples- appended list will expire on the dates eral Power Act. ville, Thorsby. specified. 2 71 ...... d o 2...... Prattville. K enneth P lumb, (C) Alabama shall file with the Com­ 3 70 ...... do2...... Bockford; F. mission and serve on all parties, on or 3 75 ...... d o 2...... Speigner. ‘ Acting Secretary. before January 15, 1971, its case in chief

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18064 18064 Licenses for P rojects Which Will E xpire Between July 1,1970, and June 30,1976, Which Are Subject to T akeover ‘

License Installa­ Period expiration Licensee Project State County or town Stream tion (kilo­ Facilities under license of No. watts) license date (years)

Mar. 2,1971' Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.. 13 New York...... Albany, Saratoga, Hudson River...... 3,280 Powerhouse...... — 50 Rensselaer. Do...... Southern California Edison Co. 67 California...... Fresno...... Tributaries Of San Joaquin 133,500 2 storage reservoirs, diversion dams, conduits, 2 60 River. powerhouses, transmission lines. Mar. 3,1971...... do...... , ...... 120 . Fresno, Kern, Madera, San Joaquin River...... 110,000 Diversion dam, tunnel, penstock, powerhouse, m Los Angeles, Tulare. transmission lines. June 26,1971 Alabama Power Co...... 82 Alabama...... Coosa and C h ilto n ....__ . Coosa River...... ■ 72,500 Dam, reservoir, powerhouse...... 60 Aug. 8,1971 Northern States Power Co...... 108 Wisconsin...... Sawyer...... Chippewa River...... Dam and reservoir...... j----- 60 Sept. 16,1971 Georgia Power C o ...... 1218 Georgia...... Dougherty and Lee...... Flint River...... 5,400 2 dams, 2 reservoirs, powerhouse...... 38% Dec. 31,1971 Leonard Lundgren...... 1097 Oregon...... Jefferson...... Jack Creek...... 90 Diversion dam, canal, penstock, powerhouse, 20 transmission line. Feb. 22,1972 Pacific Gas & Electric Co...... 184 California...... Alpine, Amador, and South Fork, American 20,000 4 storage reservoirs, conduit, powerhpuse, trans­ 60 Eldorado. River. mission line. A pr. 14,1972 ...... do...... ; ...... 77 ...... do...... i ...... Mendocino...... Eel and Russian Rivers... 8,800 Storage reservoir, diversion dam, forebay, pres­ 50 sure conduit, $ powerhouses, discharge canal. Ju ly 27,1972 ...... do...... 175 ...... do...... Fresno...... North Fork, Kings River. 128,200 Diversion dam, afterbay dam, conduit, power­ 60 house, transmission line. Sept. 26,1972 Portland General Electric Co.. 135 Oregon...... Clackamas...... Clackamas River and Oak 51,000 Storage reservoir, diversion dam, forebay reser­ 60 Grove River. voir, conduit, powerhouse, and transmission line. Oct. 12,1972 Pennsylvania Electric Co... 309 Pennsylvania...... Clairon...... Clarion River...... 28,800 Dam and powerhouse____...... ' ...... 60 Oct. 31,1972 Jesse I. Smith...... 719 Washington...... Chelan...... James and Phelps Creeks. 318 2 diversion dams, 2 conduits and powerhouse...... 20 Dec. 1,1972 Pacific Gas & Electric Co__ 96 California...... Madera and Fresno...... San Joaquin River...... 34,100 • Dam, conduit, powerhouse, transmission lines. . . 60 Feb. 6,1973 Arkansas Power & Light Co. 271 Arkansas...... Montgomery, Garland, Ouachita River...... 65,300 2 dams, 2 reservoirs, 2 powerhouses...... 60 Hot Springs. 60 Apr. 26,1973 Southern California Edison Co. 344 California...... _ Riverside and San San Gorgonio River...... 2,300 2 diversion dams, 2 canals, 2 forebay tanks, 2 Bernardino. penstocks, 2 powerhouses, and transmission line. 362 Minnesota...... Hennepin and Ramsey.. . Mississippi River...... 14,400 Powerhouse...... ;______60 June 6,1973 Ford Motor Co...... 50 June 8,1973 Alabama Power CO.. 349 Alabama...... Elmore, Tallapoosa and Tallapoosa River...... 154,200 Dam, reservoir, powerhouse.------Coosa. June 30,1973 Owens-Illinois In c ...... 2180 Wisconsin...... Lincoln...... Wisconsin R iver...... 3,000 Dam, integral powerhouse, transmission line------35^ NOTICES . Bannock and Caribou__ . Bear River...... 14,000 Dam and integral powerhouse, reservoir...... 50 Ju ly 4,1973 Utah Power & Light C o .___ 20 Idaho...... 50 Aug. 24,1973 Minnesota Power & Light Co. 346 Minnesota...... Morrison...... Mississippi River______12,000 Dam and integral powerhouse - ...... 401 . St. Joseph...... St. Joseph River...... 1,700 ____do...... 60 Sept. 18,1973 Michigan Gas & Electric C o .. Michigan...... 50 Oct. 23,1973 233 California...... Shasta...... Pit River...... 292,260 3 dams, 3 powerhouses, 3 reservoirs, penstocks, Pacific Gas & Electric Co___ pressure tunnels, surge tanks, transmission lines. 49>6 Oct. 26,1973 Minnesota Power & Light C o ...... - 469 Minnesota...... _ St. Louis and Lake...... Kawishiwi River...... 4,000 Dam, reservoir, penstocks, powerhouse, and transmission line. .. LaSalle...... Fox...... 3,689 Dam, reservoir, headrace, and powevplant...... 60 Apr. 10,1974 North Counties Hydro-Electric C o .... 287 Illinois...... 60 June 24,1974 Escondido Mutual Water Co...... J76 California...... _ San Diego...... San Luis Rey...... 760 Diversion dam, conduit, dam, reservoir, 2 power- plants, and transmission lines. 60 June 26,1974 Pacific Power & Light Co. 308 Oregon.. 1...... _ Wallowa...... East Fork Wallowa River 800 2 diversion dams, 2 pipe conduits, and power­ and Roval Purple house. Creek. . Lincoln..•...... Wisconsin...... 4,200 Dam, reservoir, and powerhouse...... 36*3 June 30,1974 Wisconsin Public Service Corp. 1979 Wisconsin______36J* Do...... Wisconsin Michigan Power Co. 2131 Wisconsin and Michigan.. . Florence, Wis. and Menominee...... 7,200 Dam, reservoir, powerhouse, and transmission Dickinson, Mich. line. . Wayne and Pike...... Wallenpaupack...... 40,000 Dam, dike, reservoir, conduits, and powerhouse.. 60 Sept. 28,1974 Pennsylvania Power & Light Co. 487 Pennsylvania— ...... 60 Dec. 14,1974 Georgia Power Co...... 486 Alabama and Georgia.._L . Chambers and Lee, Ala.; Chattahoochee...... t>0,000 Dam, reservoir, powerhouse, and transmission Harris, Ga. line. 37 Dec. 31,1974 Mosinee Paper Mills Co____ ... 2207 Wisconsin...... Mosinee...... Wisconsin...... 3,050 Dam, reservoir, 2 powerhouses, and 2 transmis­ sion lines. 50 Feb. 27,1975 Southern California Edison Co. 382 California...... Kern.*...... Kern...... - ...... 9,200 Diversion dam, conduit, powerhouse, and transmission line. 50 Apr. 29,1975 Pacific Gas & Electric Co. 178 8,500 Diversion dam, conduit, powerhouse, and transmission line. 50 Nov. 6,1975 Alabama Power Co...... 618 Alabama...... Elmore, Chilton, and Coosa...... 100,000 Dam, powerhouse, storage reservoir, and trans­ mission line. f Coosa. 50 Nov. 10,1975 Louisville Gas & Electric Co. 289 Kentucky...... Jefferson...... Ohio...... 80,320 Powerhouse and appurtenant facilities...... 137 California...... Amador and Calaveras— . North Fork Mokelumne... 192,800 6 dams and storage reservoirs, forebays, diver­ 60 Nov. 23,1975 Pacific Gas & Electric Co___ sion facilities, water conduits, 5 powerhouses, transmission fines. 38 Dec. 31,1975 The Montana Power Co...... 1869 Montana...... Sanders...... Clark Fork...... 30,000 Dam, powerhouse, reservoir, dnd transmission fine. 38 D o ...___ Public Service Co. of New Hampshire. 2140- New Hampshire...... Merrimack...... * Merrimack...... 7,200 Dam, reservoir, and powerhouse...... See footnote at end of table

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 Licenses fob Projects Which Will E xpire B etween J uly 1, 1970, and J une 30, 1976, Which Are Subject to Takeover1— Continued

License Installa­ Period expiration Licensee Project State County or town Stream tion (kilo­ Facilities under license of date No. watts) license (years)

Feb. 19,1976 The Susquehanna Power Co. & Phila­ 405 Maryland and Pennsyl­ Cecil, Harford, Md., Susquehanna______474,500 Dam, reservoir, powerhouse, and transmission 50 delphia Electric Power Co. vania. York, Lancaster, Pa. line. Feb. 24,1976 Union Electric Co______459 Missouri...... Miller, Morgan and Osage...... ___ 172,000 Dams, reservoir, powerhouse, and transmission 50 Camden. line. lane 3,1976 Crown Zellerbach Corp...... 588 Washington...... Clallam...... Elwha...... 12,000 Dam, reservoir, powerhouse, and transmission 60 line. June 7,1976 The Washington Water Power Co 621 Idaho...... Nez Perce...... ___ Clearwater...... 10,000 Dam, reservoir, powerhouse, and 2 transmission 50 lines.

* Section 14 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 807) reserves the right to the United States to recapture the project works upon expiration of each license listed in this table at a price to be determined under that section: [F.R. Doc. 70-15829; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; 8:45 a.m.]

The Department’s regulations, 43 CFR The area described aggregates 560.95 Idaho, in Butte County along Highway DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 2351.4(cc) (formerly 43 CFR2311.13(c)), acres in Kern County, Calif. 26-20-93A between Arco and Craters of provide that the authorized officer of the the Moon National Monument. Surface is Bureau of Land Management W alter F. H olmes, Bureau of Land Management will under­ Assistant Land Office Manager. gently rolling. Vegetation is sage-grass. CALIFORNIA take such investigations as are necessary Soil is silt loam. to determine the existing and potential [F.R. Doc. 70-15820; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; 8:46 am.] 3. The lands in T. 3 N., R. 26 E. are Notice of Proposed Withdrawal and demand for the lands and their resources. located about 5 miles south and south­ Reservation of Lands He will also undertake negotiations with west of Arco, Idaho, in Butte County. the applicant agency with the view of ad­ November 18, 1970. [Serial No. Idaho 3579] Elevation is rfc nut 5,350 feet. Access is by justing the application to reduce the area the Arco-Minidoka Road, unimproved The Forest Service, U.S. Department of to the minimum essential to meet the IDAHO farm roads from the highway or unim­ Agriculture has filed an application, applicant’s need, to provide for the max­ proved truck trails from a county road NOTICES Serial No. R 3439, for the withdrawal of imum concurrent utilization of the lands Order Providing for Opening of Public Lands located about 2 miles to the east. Soils lands described below from prospecting, for purposes other than the applicant’s are a silt or sandy loam, generally deep location, entry, and purchase under the and to reach an agreement on the con­ November 17, 1970. with some rock outcroppings. Vegetation mining laws, subject to valid existing current management of the lands and 1. In an exchange of lands made under is sagebrush with an understory of na­ rights. their resources. the provisions of section 8 of the Act of tive grasses and some squirrel tail. The lands have previously been with­ The authorized officer will also prepare June 28,1934 (48 Stat. 1269), as amended 4. The lands in T. 9 N., R. 32 E. are drawn for the Sierra Forest Reserve by a report for consideration by the Secre­ Presidential Proclamation No. 43 of Feb­ (43 U.S.C. 315g), the following described located about 25 miles southwest of Du­ tary of the Interior who will determine lands have been reconveyed to the United bois, Idaho, in Clark County. Surface is ruary 14,1893, now the Sequoia National whether or not the lands will be with­ Forest, and as such have been open to States: rolling with areas of rock outcrop. Soils drawn as requested by the applicant B oise Meridian, Idaho are light-colored silt loam.v Vegetative entry under the mining laws. agency. The applicant desires the exclusion of T. 3 N., R. 25 E., cover varies from improved stands of The determination of the Secretary on Sec. 32, NR%NE%, SE%; crested wheatgrass to native grasses and mining activity to permit use of such the application will be published in the lands as a botanical area for scientific Sec. 33, NW^NEi/i, NWV4, W%BW&. sagebrush. F ederal R egister. A separate notice will T. 3 N., R. 26 E , 5. The lands in T. 10 N., R. 26 E. are study, research, demonstration, and edu­ be sent to each interested party of record. Sec. 21, NE^SE%; cation, which use is incompatible with Sec. 22, NW'/4SWy4; located in the Little Lost River Valley mineral development. If circumstances warrant, a public sec. 24, swy4sw>/4; of Butte County about 25 miles north­ For a period of 30 days from the date hearing will be held at a convenient time Sec. 25, Si/aHE^, NWftSW}4, E&SE%. west of Howe, Idaho. Elevation is about of publication of this notice, all persons and place which will be announced. T. 9 N., R. 32 E., 6,100 feet. Range fences cross or border Sec. 25, N ^. who wish to submit comments, sugges­ The lands involved in the application the lands and they are crossed by live tions, or objections in connection with T. 10 N., R. 26 E., streams. Vegetation is crested wheat- are: Sec. 2, Sy2NWv4, N1/2SW14; grass, native sagebrush and grass. Soils the proposed withdrawal may present Sec. 35, sy2NEl4, N&SE%. their views in writing to the undersigned Mount D iablo Meridian, California are shallow and gravelly with low fertil­ officer of the Bureau of Land Manage­ The areas described aggregate 1,440 ity. An improved gravelled road crosses ment, Department of the Interior, 1414 SEQUOIA NATIONAL FOREST acres. Sec. 35. University Avenue, Post Office Box 723, T. 27 S., R. 33 E., 2. The lands in T. 3 N., R. 25 E. are 6. Subject to valid existing rights, the Riverside, CA 92502. Sec. 31, lots 1 to 12, inclusive, SE*4. located about 14 miles southwest of Arco, provisions of existing withdrawals, and 18065

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18066 NOTICES the requirements of applicable law, the [1-3786] Sec. 27, lots 14 and 15, portions described lands are hereby opened to application, as follows: Beginning at the closing IDAHO corner on the original meander line for petition, location and selection. All valid the left bank between secs. 27 and 28; applications received at or prior to 10 Notice of Offer of Lands thence S. 44°56' E., 3.17 chains to angle a.m., on December 22, 1970, shall be con­ November 18,1970. point 8; thence S. 66°00' E., 19.97 chains sidered as simultaneously filed at that 1. Pursuant to the provisions of the to angle point No. 9; thenee S. 39°28' time. Those received thereafter shall be Act of May 31, 1962 (76 Stat. 89), the E., 21.97 chains to angle point No. 10; considered in the order of filing. following lands, found upon survey to thence S. 70° 46' E. approximately 5 7. The mineral rights were not ex­ chains to intersection with north-south be omitted lands of the United States, fence line along field boundary; thence changed. Therefore, the mineral status will be offered for sale: of the lands are not affected by this south along fence line to point of inter­ B oise Meridian, I daho section with an east-west boundary order. fence; thence westerly and northwesterly Inquiries concerning the lands should T. 5 N„ R. 37 E., along fence line in field boundary to the be addressed to the Manager, Land Of­ Sec. 14, lots 8, 13, and 14, portions de­ section line between secs. 27 and 28; fice, Bureau of Land Management, Boise, scribed as follows: Beginning at a point thence N. 0°02' E. along section line to on the original meander line for the left closing corner, point of beginning; Idaho 83702. bank of the Snake River in sec. 14, be­ E. D. Barnes, containing approximately 54.25 acres. tween angle points 1 and 2 at the Sec. 28, lots 6, 10, and 11, portions de­ Acting Manager, Land Office. point of intersection with the centerline scribed as follows: Beginning at the [F.R. Doc. 70-15840; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; of the Flood Control dike; thence S. closing corner on the left bank of the 8:47 a.m.] 60° 10' W. along the original meander river between secs. 27 and 28; thence S. line to angle point No. 2; thence S. 51° 45°04' W., -2.53 chains to angle point 58' W., 25J.0 chains along the original [Serial No. Idaho 3774] No. 6; thence S. 0°04’ W., 19.47 chains meander line to angle point No. 3; thence to angle point No. 7; thence S. 44° 56' IDAHO S. 60°24' W., 20.08 chains along the orig­ E., 2.82 chains to the closing corner inal meander line to angle point No. 4; between secs. 27 and 28; thence S. 0°02' Order Providing for Opening of thence N. 89°47' W. along the original W. along section line to intersection with Public Lands meander line to intersection with center- fence line on field boundary; thence line of Flood Control dike; thence north­ northwesterly, northerly, and northeast­ November 17,1970. easterly along centerline of Flood Con­ erly along fence line across lots 11, 10, 1. The State of Idaho has certified trol dike to the point of beginning; con­ and 6 to intersection with the left bank taining approximately 32 acres. of the river; thence easterly along mean­ that the hereinafter described lands Sec. 22, lot 12, containing 18.06 acres; lots der line of record to the closing corner patented to the State under the provi­ 13 and 14, portions described as follows: between secs. 27 and 28, the point of sions of section 4 of the Act of August 18, Beginning at a point on the original beginning; containing approximately 1894 (28 Stat. 422, 43 U.S.C. sec. 641), as meander line for the left bank in sec. 24.51 acres. amended, commonly known as the Carey 22 between angle points 3 and 4 at the Sec. 34, lots 10, 11, and 12, portions de­ Act, have not been reclaimed as required point of intersection with the northerly scribed as follows: Beginning at a point by the Carey Act and that water is not boundary of the field; thence S. 46° 30' on the original meander line for the available for the irrigation of these W. along original meander line to angle right bank in sec. 34 between angle point No. 4; thence S. 22°57' W., 8.97 points 3 and 4 at intersection with cen­ tracts. The State of Idaho has therefore chains aloijg original meander line to the terline of Highway 48; thence southerly reconveyed the lands to the United original meander corner between secs. along the original meander line through States ; 22 and 27; thence N. 89° 55' W. along the angle points 3, 4, 5, and 6, to the original B oise Meridian, Idaho section line to the intersection with the meander corner of the south section T. 3 N„ R. 26 E., westerly boundary of the field and lot line of sec. 34; thence S. 89°40' E., 5.03 Sec. 22, N E^SE^. 13; thence northeasterly along the field chains to the right bank of the river; boundary to the point of beginning; con­ thence northerly along the right bank The area described totals 40 acres in taining approximately 6.99 acres. of the river to the special meander corner Butte County. Sec. 26, lots 5 and 8, containing 30.98 acres; marking intersection of the right bank 2. Since the described lands are clas­ Secs. 27, lot 10, portions described as of the river with the original meander follows: Beginning at the original line for the left bank; thence northerly sified for multiple use management un­ meander corner on the left bank on the along the original meander line for the der the Act of September 19, 1964 (43 section line between secs. 22 and 27; left bank through angle points 4 and 3 U. S.C. 1411-18) and the regulations in thence S. 23°7' W., 7 chains to angle to intersection with the centerline of 43 CFR Parts 2420 and 2461, the lands point No. 1; thence S. 68°38' W., 4.01 Highway 48; thence westerly along the will not be subject to disposition under chains to angle point No. 2; thence centerline of Highway 48 to the point of the agricultural land laws (43 U.S.C. S. 80°05' W., 4.01 chains to angle point beginning; containing approximately Parts 7 and 9; 24 U.S.C. sec. 334) and No. 3; thence N. 81°58' W. approxi­ 40.5 acres. mately 7 chains to the westerly bound­ from sales under section 2455 of the Re­ ary of a field; thence northeasterly The areas described above aggregate vised Statutes (43 U.S.C. 1171). along the westerly boundary of the approximately 216.18 acres. 3. Subject to valid existing rights, the field to the intersection with the sec­ 2. A plat of survey was filed (see 34 provisions of existing withdrawals, the tion line between secs. 22 and 27; F.R. 14441) in the Land Office, Boise, provisions of the Multiple-Use Classifi­ thence S. 89°55' E. approximately 11 Idaho, at 10 a.m. on October 23, 1969. cation of November 2, 1967, and the re­ chains along the section line between 3. Persons claiming a preference right quirements of applicable law, the lands secs. 22 and 27 to the original meander corner, point of beginning; containing in accordance with the provisions of the are hereby restored to the public domain approximately 9.00 acres. Act, must file with the Manager, Land status and open to application, petition, Lot 11, containing 1.83 acres. Office, Room 334 Federal Building, 550 location, and selection, including loca­ Lot 12, portions described as follows: West Fort Street, Boise, ID 83702, before tion under the U.S. mining laws and to Beginning at a point on the original January 27, 1971, a notice of their inten­ mineral leasing. All valid applications re­ meander line for the left bank in tion to apply to purchase all or part of ceived at or prior to December 22, 1970, sec. 27 between angle points 15 and the lands as qualified preference right 16 and the original meander corner shall be considered as simultaneously between secs. 26 and 27, at the inter­ claimants. filed at that time. Those received there­ section of the original meander line 4. The Act grants a preference right after shall be considered in the order of with the centerline bf the Flood Con­ to purchase the above lands to any citi­ filing. trol dike; thence in a southwesterly zens of the United States (including cor­ direction along the centerline of the Inquiries concerning the lands should dike to a point on the dike marked porations, partnership, firm, or other be addressed to the Manager, Land Office, by a brass cap; thence west approxi­ legal entity having authority to hold Bureau of Land Management, Boise, mately 5 chains to intersection with title to lands in the State of Idaho) who, Idaho. the original meander line between in good faith, under color of title or E. D. Barnes, angle points 14 and 15; thence north­ erly and easterly along the original claiming as a riparian owner has, prior Acting Manager, Land Office. meander line to the point of begin­ to March 30, 1961, placed valuable im­ [F.R. Doc. 70-15841; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; ning; containing approximately 3 provements upon, reduced to cultivation, 8:47 a.m.] acres. or occupied any of the lands so offered FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18067 for sale, or whose ancestors or predeces­ F ederal R egister, all persons who wish ♦Kennett-Murray & Company, Montgomery. to submit comments, objections, or sug­ ♦King Livestock Auction Company, Florence. sors in interest have taken such action. ♦Limestone County Stockyard, Athens. 5. The lands are determined to begestions in connection with the proposed ♦Linden Stockyard, Linden. ; suitable for sale and will be sold at their classification may present their views in ♦Livingston Stockyard, Livingston. fair market value subject to: writing to the District Manager, Bureau ♦Madison County Livestock Market, Hunts­ (a) Qualified preference right claims. of Land Management, Carson City Dis­ ville. (b) A reservation to the United States trict Office, 801 North Plaza Street, ♦Pickens County Livestock Commission, of all the coal, oil, gas, shale, phosphate, Carson City, NE 89701. Aliceville. potash, sodium, native asphalt, solid and ♦Ramsey & Sons, Inc., Dothan. A. J ohn H illsamer, ♦Roanoke Stockyards, Inc., Roanoke. semisolid bitumen and bitumen rock, in­ Acting Land Office Manager. cluding oil-impregnated rock or sands ♦Robertsdale Livestock Auction, Inc., Rob- [F.R. Doc. 70-15821; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; ertsdale. from which oil is recoverable only by 8:46 a.m.[ ♦L. A. Roll & Son Cattle Company, Mont­ special treatment after-the deposit is gomery. mined or quarried. ♦Stokes & Brogden Stockyard, Inc., Anda­ (c) A right of access for the public, lusia. 100 feet wide along the river front for ♦Triple S Stockyards, Inc., Montgomery. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ♦Union Stockyards, Eufaula. those lots abutting the Snake River. ♦Valley Stock Yard, Decatur. E. D. Barnes, Agricultural Research Service ♦West Alabama Stockyards, Inc., Eutaw. Acting Manager, Land Office. ♦White Livestock Commission Company, SPECIFIC APPROVAL OF STOCKYARDS Inc., Morris. [F.R. Doc. 70-15842; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; AND SLAUGHTERING ESTABLISH­ ♦Winfield Livestock Commission Company, 8:47 a.m.] MENTS Winfield. Arizona Pursuant to §§ 78.14(b), 78.15(b), and [Serial No. N-2573] Arizona Livestock Auction, Phoenix. 78.16(b) of the regulations in Part 78, Laveen Livestock Auction, Laveen. NEVADA as amended, Title 9, Code of Federal Nelson Livestock Auction, Wilcox. Regulations, containing restrictions on Phoenix Livestock Auction, Phoenix. Notice of Proposed Classification of the movement of certain animals be­ •Wentz Bros. Livestock Auction, Tucson. cause of brucellosis, under the Acts of Public Lands for Transfer Out of Arkansas Federal Ownership May 29, 1884, as amended, February 2, 1903, as amended, and March 3, 1905, Allen Auction Company, Harrison. November 16, 1970. as amended (21 U.S.C. 111-113, 114a-l, Ash Flat Sale Barn, Ash Flat. y B & S Livestock Sales, Marianna. 1. Pursuant to the Act of Septem­ 115, 117, 120, 121, 125), notice is hereby Beebe Auction Company, Beebe. ber 19, 1964 (43 U.S.C. 1412) it is given that the following stockyards and Bentonville Commission Sales, Bentonville. proposed to classify the public lands de­ slaughtering establishments are specifi­ CarrollCounty L.S. Auction, Berryville. scribed in paragraph 4 below for trans­ cally approved under said regulations Central Arkansas Livestock Auction Sale, fer out of Federal ownership under the as indicated below: Inc., (formerly Roy Chaney Sale Barn) Morrilton. following statute: section 8 of the Taylor Specifically Approved Stockyards Grazing Act (43 U.S.C. 316g.). Clark County Livestock Auction, Arkadelphia. 2. Notice of this proposal has been The following stockyards preceded by Corning Sales Co., Corning. an asterisk are specifically approved for County Line Sale, Ratcliff. sent to Nevada State and local govern­ Davis Livestock Auction (formerly Glenn ment officials, State and District Advis­ the purposes of § 78.5, Title 9, Code of Edgar Auction), Batesville. ory Boards, range users, and other inter­ Federal Regulations, concerning brucel­ Decatur Livestock Auction, Decatur. ested parties. losis reactors and of paragraphs (b) and Drew County Auction Company, Monticello. 3. Publication of this notice segregates (c) of § 78.12 of said Title 9, concerning Eudora Sale Barn, Eudora. the affected lands from all forms of cattle not known to be affected with Farmers Livestock Auction, Springdale. disposal under the public land laws, in­ brucellosis. The following stockyards not Glover Livestock Commission Co., Pine Bluff. preceded by an asterisk are specifically Bob Gorden Livestock Auction (formerly Polk cluding the general mining laws, except County Auction), Mena. the form of disposal for which it is pro­ approved for the purposes of paragraphs Gravette Community Sales, Gravette. posed to classify the lands. However, (b) and (c) of § 78.12 only: Harrison Stockyards (formerly Farmers L. S. publication does not alter the applica­ Alabama Auction), Harrison. bility of the public lands laws governing Hill Livestock Auction Nuel (formerly Hill & the use of the lands under lease, license, ♦Adams & Eagle, Inc., Marion. Montgomery Livestock Auction), Batesville. or permit, or governing the disposal of ♦Arab Stock Yard, Arab. Hope Livestock Commission Co., Hope. their mineral and vegetative resources, ♦Atmore Truckers Association, Inc., Atmore. Jonesboro Stockyards, Jonesboro. other than under the general mining * Cherokee County Stockyard, Centre. Magnolia Livestock Auction, Magnolia. ♦Covington Livestock Auction, Inc., Anda­ Montgomery L. S. Auction Co. (formerly laws. lusia. Carson & Montgomery), Searcy. 4. The public lands affected by this ♦Dadeville Stockyards, Inc., Dadeville. Mountain Home Livestock Auction, Mountain proposed classification are shown on the ♦Enterprise Livestock Company, Enterprise. Home. map on file in the Carson City District ♦Escambia County Cooperative, Inc., Brew- Nettleton Stockyards, Jonesboro. Office, 801 North Plaza Street, Carson ton. Randolph County Livestock Auction, Poca­ City, NE 89701. The lands are located ♦Farmers Cooperative Market, Inc., Frisco hontas. City. Scott County Livestock Auction, Waldron. in Washoe County, Nev., and are de­ ♦Farmers Cooperative Market, Inc., Opp. Searcy County Auction, Marshall. scribed as follows: ♦Fayette Stockyards, Fayette. Shantz & Rodman Livestock Auction, North Mount D iablo Meridian, N evada ♦Florence Trading Post, Florence. Little Rock. ♦Fort Payne Livestock Commission, Fort T. 21 N„ R. 21 E., Siloam Springs Sale Barn, Siloam Springs. Payne. Washington County Sale Barn, Fayetteville. Sec. 36, all. ♦Geneva Stockyard, Geneva. T. 21 N„ R. 22 E., ♦Hartford Livestock Company, Hartford. California Sec. 12, all; ♦Headland Stock Yard, Inc., Headland. Sec. 24, all; ♦Henry County Livestock Association, Inc., ♦Chino Stockyards, Chino. Sec. 32, all; Abbeville. ♦Producers Livestock Marketing Assn., Sec. 34, all; ♦Hodges-Capital Stockyards, Montgomery. Artesia (Dairy Valley). Sec. 36, Ni/2NWi4, SW&NW^, NW ^SW ^. ♦Hodges-Hurtsboro Stockyards, Hurtsboro. ♦California Livestock Marketing Assn., Rejl T. 22 N„ R. 22 E„ ♦Hodges-Selma Stockyards, Selma. Bluff. Sec. 36, W%, SW%SE%. ♦Hooper Auction Company, Inc., Mont­ Colorado gomery. ♦Alamosa Livestock Sales, Alamosa. The lands described above aggregate ♦Jackson County Livestock Company, ♦Basin Livestock Commission Company, 3,720 acres. Scottsboro. Durango. 5. For a period of 60 days from the ♦Kennamer Livestock Company, Inc., Gun­ ♦Brush Livestock Commission Company, date of publication of this notice in the ters ville. Brush.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18068 NOTICES ♦Burlington Livestock Sales Company, ♦Georgia Farm Products Sale Corp., Thomas- Kankakee Livestock Co., Bourbonnais. Burlington. ton. Kewanee Sale Barn, Kewanee. ♦Calhan Cash Auction Market, Calhan. ♦Georgia Farmer’s Livestock, Inc., Cumming. Knoxville Community Sale Co., Knoxville. ♦Cortez Sales Barn, Cortez. ♦Georgia Livestock Terminal Market, Inc., LaSalle Co. Livestock Market Center, Ottawa. ♦Craig Sale Barn, Craig. Macon. Mercer County Livestock Auction, Viola. ♦Delta Sales Yard, Delta. ♦Irwin County Livestock Co., Inc., Ocilla. Paris Livestock Sales Co., Paris. ♦Elizabeth Livestock Auction, Elizabeth. * Jepeway-Craig Commission Co., Dublin. ♦Peoria Union Stockyards, Peoria. ♦Fowler Auction Company, Fowler. ♦LaGrange Stockyards, LaGrange. Rock Island Auction Sales, Inc., Rock Island. ♦Farmer & Rancher Commission Company, ♦Livestock Marketers, Inc., Douglas. Schrader, Harry, Consignment, Dakota. Fort Collins. ♦McClure-Burnett Commission Co., Rome. Souders Stock Yards, Brookport. ♦Grand Junction Livestock Auction, Grand ♦Metter Livestock Market, Metter. ♦Springfield Stockyards, Springfield. Junction. ♦Mitchell Co. Livestock Market, Inc., Camilla. Trainor’s Livestock Sales, Clinton. ♦Haxtun Cooperative Livestock Exchange, ♦Moultrie Livestock Co., Moultrie. Winslow Marketing Center, Inc., Winslow. Haxtun. ♦North Ga. Farmers Livestock Market, Cum­ I ndiana *K & R Livestock Commission Company, ming. - Broomfield. ♦North Ga. Livestock Auction, Inc., Athens. ♦Boswell Livestock Commission, Boswell. ♦La Junta Livestock Commission Company, ♦Peoples Stockyard, Cuthbert. ♦Delta Livestock Auction & Commission Co., La Junta. ♦Pierce County Stockyard, Blackshear. Fort Wayne. ♦Livestock Exchange, Brush. ♦Pulaski Stockyard, Hawkinsville. ♦Lowell Livestock Auction, Inc., Lowell. ♦Limon Livestock Commission Company, ♦Seminole L/S Auction Market, Donalson- ♦Producers Marketing Assn., Inc. Montpelier. Limon. ville. ♦Producers Marketing Assn., Inc., Centerville. ♦Longmont Sales Yard, Longmont. ♦Hagan Livestock Market,^ Inc. (formerly ♦Producers Marketing Assn., Inc., Terre ♦McCanless Livestock Commission Company, Shuman Livestock Market, Inc.), Hagan. Haute. Lamar. ♦Soperton Stockyard, Soperton. ♦Producers Livestock Auction (formerly Pro­ ♦Mellott Livestock Commission Company, ♦Sumter Livestock Assoc., Inc., Americus. ducers Marketing Assn., Inc.), Vincennes. Pueblo (formerly Hess Livestock Commis­ ♦Sutton Livestock Co., Sylvester. ♦Reynolds Sale Barn, Reynolds. sion Company). ♦Sylvania Stockyards, Sylvania. ♦Shipshewana Auction Co., Shipshewana. ♦Monte Vista Livestock Commission Com­ ♦Thomas County Stockyard, Inc., Thomas- ♦Valparaiso Community Sale, Valparaiso. pany, Monte Vista. ville. Iowa ♦Ranchland Livestock Commission Company ♦Thomson Stockyard, Thomson. Wray. ♦Tifton Stockyards, Tifton. Ackley Sales Pavilion, Ackley. ♦Rifle Sale Yard, Rifle. ♦Toccoa Livestock Auction Co. (formerly Adams County Auction Company, Corning. ♦Salida Livestock Commission Company, McClure-Burnett Comm. Co.), Toccoa. Adel Sales Pavilion, Adel. Salida. ♦Tri-County Livestock Co., Social Circle. Albia Sales Company, Albia. ♦Sterling Livestock Commission Company, ♦Turner County Stockyard, Ashbum. Algona Livestock Auction, Algona. Sterling. ♦Union Stockyards, Albany. Anamosa Livestock Auction, Anamosa. ♦Sunset Livestock Commission Company, ♦Valdosta Livestock Co., Inc., Valdosta. Anita Auction Company, Anita. Greeley (formerly Greeley Livestock Comm. ♦Wayne County Livestock Co., Jesup. Aplington Livestock Auction, Inc., Aplington. Company). ♦Wilkes County Stockyard, Washington. Audubon Livestock Auction Market, Audu­ bon. ♦Valley Livestock Auction Company, Grand Idaho Junction. Avoca Auction Company, Avoca. ♦Weld County Livestock Commission Com­ ♦Bonners Ferry Livestock, Inc., Bonners, B & H Cattle Company, Ida Grove. pany, Greeley. Ferry. Baxter Sales Company, Baxter. ♦Western Slope Livestock Auction, Montrose. ♦Burley Livestock Commission Co., Inc., Bedford Sales Company, Bedford. ♦Winter Livestock Commission Company, La Burley. ♦Belle Plaine Livestock Auction, Inc., Belle Junta. ♦Cache Valley Livestock Auction, Preston. Plaine. ♦Yuma Livestock Auction, Yuma. ♦Coeur d’Alene Livestock Yards, Coeur Belmond Sales Pavilion, Belmond. d’Alene. ♦Bingley Sales Company, Knoxville. ♦Zavislan Livestock Commission Company, ♦Cottonwood Salesyard, Cottonwood. Boone Sales Company, Boone. Pueblo. ♦Emmett Livestock Comm. Co., Inc., Emmett. Bradley Livestock Auction, Red Oak. *R. P. Lewis & Son Auction Company, La ♦Gooding Livestock Comm. Co., Inc., Gooding. Cedar Valley Livestock Exchange, Vinton. Junta. ♦Jerome Producers Livestock Marketing Centerville Sales Company, Centerville. Connecticut Assoc., Jerome. Chariton Sales Company, Chariton. Middlesex Livestock Auction, Durham. ♦Meridian Salesyard, Meridian. Clarinda Auction Company, Clarinda. Kahn’s North Franklin Sales, North Franklin. ♦Nampa Livestock Markets, Inc., Nampa. Clear Lake Auction Company, Clear Lake. ♦Rexburg Livestock Auction, Rexburg. Coggon Livestock Sales Company, Coggon. D elaware ♦Salmon River Livestock Comm. Co., Salmon. Colfax Livestock Sales Company (formerly ♦Carroll’s Sale Company, Felton. ♦Sandpoint Livestock Auction Co., Sand- Colfax Sales Company), Colfax. ♦Goldinger Brothers, Inc., Smyrna. point. Cow Palace, Inc., Forest City. Charles F. Poore Livestock Market, Smyrna. ♦Shoshone Salesyard, Inc., Shoshone. Creston Livestock Auction Market, Creston. F lorida ♦Stockgrower’s Commission Co., Inc., Twin Davis County Sales Company, Bloomfield. Falls. DeVries Auction Company, Buffalo. ♦Cattlemen’s Livestock Auction Market of ♦Twin City Salesyard, Lewiston. Diagonal Livestock Auction, Inc., Diagonal. Tampa, Inc., Tampa. ♦Valley Livestock Commission Co., Rupert. Donnellson Livestock Sales, Inc., Donnellson. Chipley Livestock Company, Chipley. ♦Weiser Livestock Commission Co., Weiser. Dunlap Livestock Auction, Dunlap. Interstate Livestock Auction Market, Inc., Dyersville Sales Barn, Dyersvllle. Seffner. I llinois Eastern Iowa Livestock Commission, Inc., ♦Jay Livestock Auction Market, Jay. Barnard Livestock Auction Market, Wayne Mechanicsville. Tindel Livestock Auction Market, Inc., City. Eddyville Sales Company, Eddyville. Graceville. Breed’s Livestock Sale, Elizabeth. Edgewood Sale Barn, Edgewood. Georgia Carthage Community Sale Co., Carthage. Eldora Livestock Sales, Inc., Eldora. ♦Bainbridge Auction Market, Inc., Bain- Chicago Stockyards-Atkinson Market, Inc. Fairfield Livestock Commission, Inc., Fair- bridge. (formerly Arnold Cattle Co.), Atkinson. field. ♦Bartow Livestock Commission Co., Carters- Dameron Livestock Auction, Vienna. Farmers Auction Market, Eldora. ville. Danville Livestock Commission Co., Danville. Farmers Sale Company, Carroll. ♦Carroll Co. L/S Sale Barn, Carrollton. Decker’s Livestock, Inc. ; (formerly Decker- Fonda Livestock Sales Company, Fonda. ♦ Chatham Livestock Company, Savannah. Milford Sales & Comm. Co.), Milford. Garner Livestock Sales, Inc., Garner. ♦Citizens Stockyard, Arlington. DeWane’s Livestock Exchange, Belvidere. Greenfield Community Sale, Inc., Greenfield. ♦Columbus-Muscogee Stockyard Co., Colum­ Greenville Livestock Auction Co., Greenville. Grinnell Livestock Exchange, Grinnell. bus. Heinhold Cattle Market (formerly Feller, Art, ♦Guthrie Stock Pavilion Company, Inc., ♦Cordele Livestock Company, Cordele. Livestock Auction), El Paso. Guthrie Center. ♦Dublin Livestock Commission Co., Dublin. Illinois Auction Commission Co. (formerly Hampton Auction, Hampton. ♦Duvall-Wheeler Livestock Co., Greensboro. Edgar Co. Mktg. Assoc., d.b.a. 111. Auction Harlan Auction Company, Harlan. ♦Farmers’ Stockyard, Sylvania. Comm. Co.), Paris. Hawkeye Livestock Auction, Fairfax. ♦Fitzgerald Farmers Auction, Fitzgerald. Interstate Producers Livestock Assoc., Shel- Humeston Sale Barn, Humeston. ♦Flint River Livestock Auction, Bainbridge. byville. Independence Sale Company, Independence. ♦Franklin Co. L/S Market, Inc., Carnesville. Interstate Producers Livestock Ass’n., Sulli­ Indianola Sale Company, Indianola. ♦Gainesville Livestock Auction (formerly van. Interstate Producers Livestock Association, Queen City L/S Auc. Co.), Gainesville. Jennings Sale Company, Macomb. Waukon.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18069

Iowa Palls Livestock, Iowa Palls. K ansas ♦Farmers Livestock Market, London. Irwin Sales Company, Irwin. ♦Abilene Livestock Sales Company, Abilene. ♦Farmers Livestock Market, Mayfield. Jansma & Van Kley, Sioux Center. ♦Allen County Livestock Auction, Gas City. ♦Farmers Livestock Sales, Louisa. Kalona Salebarn, Kalona. ♦Anderson County Sale Company, Garnett. ♦Farmers Stockyards, Flemingsburg. Keoco Auction Company, Sigourney. ♦Anthony Livestock Company, Anthony. ♦Farmers Stockyards, Mt. Sterling. Kimballton Auction Company, Kimballton. ♦Ashland Sales Company, Inc., Ashland. ♦Floyd County Livestock Market, Ivel. Keosauqua Sale Company, Inc., Keosauqua. ♦Atchison County Auction Company, Atchi­ ♦Franklin Livestock Market, Franklin. Knickman Livestock Sales Company, Council son. ♦Garfield.Auction Barn, Garfield. Bluffs.'/ ♦Atwood Sale Barn, Atwood. ♦Garrard County Stockyard, Lancaster. Lamoni Livestock Sales Company, Inc., ♦Beloit Livestock Auction, Inc., Beloit. ♦Gibson Livestock Co., Inc., Marion. Lamoni. ♦Beverly Stockyard Company, Salina. ♦Glasgow Livestock Market, Glasgow. LeMars Sales Company, LeMars. ♦Caldwell Community Sale, Caldwell. ♦Green County Stockyards, Greensburg. Lenox Livestock Auction, Lenox. ♦Cedar Vale Sales Company, Cedar Vale. ♦Horse Cave Stockyards, Horse Cave. Livestock Auction Company, Denison. ♦Central Livestock Sales Company, S. ♦Kentuckiana Livestock Market, Owensboro. Lizer Livestock Auction, Gowrie. Hutchinson. ♦Kentucky-Tennessee Livestock Market, Madison County Auction, Winterset. ♦Chandler Sales Company, Smith Center. Guthrie. Mapleton Livestock Auction Company (for­ ♦Chanute Sale Pavilion, Chanute. ♦Knox County Stockyards, Barbourville. merly Mapleton Auction Company), Ma­ ♦Clay Center Sales Company, Clay Center. ♦Laurel Sales Company, London. pleton. ♦Cloud County Livestock Commission Co., ♦Lebanon Stockyards, Inc., Lebanon. Maquoketa Sales Company, Maquoketa. Concordia. ♦Logan County Livestock Co., Russellville. Marengo Livestock Commission Co., Marengo. ♦Coffeyville Livestock Commission Co., Inc., ♦Fred Madison Sales Barn, Bowling Green. Marshalltown Livestock Auction, Marshall­ Coffeyville. ♦Madison Sales Co., Richmond. town. ♦Colby Livestock Auction, Inc., Colby. ♦Mayfield Livestock Sales, Mayfield. Massena Livestock Auction, Massena. ♦Coldwater Sales Company, Inc., Coldwater. ♦Maysville Stockyards, Maysville. McCreary Sales Company, Centerville. ♦Concordia Sales Company, Concordia. ♦Middlesboro Livestock Market, Middle :boro. McIntosh Livestock Auction, Inc., Ida Grove. ♦Council Grove Livestock Auction, Council ♦Monticello Stockyards, Monticello. Middletown Auction Sales, Inc., Middletown. Grove. ♦Morganfield Stockyards, Morganfield. Montezuma Sales Company, Inc., Montezuma. ♦Dighton Livestock Auction Market, Inc., ♦Murray Livestock Co., Murray. Monticello Sales, Monticello. Dighton. ♦Ohio Valley Producers, Burna. Moorhead Auction Company, Moorhead. ♦Dodge City Livestock Commission Co., Inc., ♦Ohio Valley Producers, Clinton. Mount Ayr Livestock Market, Mount Ayr. Dodge City. ♦O.K. Stockyards, Maysville. Mountain States Stockyards, Inc., Sioux City. ♦Douglass Livestock Commission Company, ♦Olive Hill Livestock Co., Olive Hill. New Liberty Sale Barn, New Liberty. Douglass. ♦Owen County Stockyards, Owenton. New Sharon Sales Company, Inc., New ♦Downs Sale Company, Downs. ♦Paducah Livestock Auction,"Paducah. Sharon. . ♦Effingham Auction Company, Effingham. ♦Paintsville Livestock Market, Paintsville. Nishna Valley Auction (formerly Ruby Auc­ ♦El Dorado Sales, Inc., El Dorado. ♦Paris Stockyards, Paris. tion Company), Shenandoah. ♦Emporia Livestock Sale Company, Inc., ♦Pulaski Co. Livestock Market, Inc., Somer­ Northeast Iowa Sales Commission, Waukon. Emporia. set. Northside Sales Company, Sibley. ♦Eureka Auction Sale, Eureka. ♦Ratliff Stockyards, Mt. Sterling. Northwest Iowa Livestock Exchange, Alta. ♦Farmers Livestock Exchange, Inc., ♦Russell County Stockyards, Russell Springs. Northwood Sales Company, Northwood. Wakarusa. ♦Smith Livestock Co., Symsonia. O & W Auction Market, Wadena. ♦Farmers Marketing Sales Corp., Inc., Hill ♦Smithland Livestock Co., Smithland. - Oelwein Dairy Sales, Oelwein. City. . ♦Warren Co. Farmer Marketing Co-op., Oelwein Livestock Exchange, Oelwein. ♦Farmers and Ranchers Livestock Comm. Co., Bowling Green. Ollie Livestock Exchange, Ollie. Salina. ♦Williamstown Stockyards, Williamstown. Orient Sales Company, Inc., Orient. ♦Flint Hills Livestock Auction, Eskridge. ♦Winchester Stockyards, Winchester. Osceola Sales Company, Osceola. ♦Fort Scott Sale Company, Fort Scott. Oskaloosa Livestock Auction, Inc., Oskaloosa. ♦Frankfort Community Sale, Frankfort. Louisiana Pella Sales Company, Pella. ♦Franklin County Sale Company, Inc., ♦Abbeville Commission Company, Abbeville. Perry Sales Pavilion, Perry. Ottawa. ♦Alsbrooks-Guilbeau Stockyards, Inc., Baton Riceville Sales Pavilion, Riceville. ♦Fredonia Livestock Sales Company, Inc., Rouge. Rock Valley Sales Company, Rock Valley. Fredonia. ♦Alsbrooks-Guilbeau Stockyards* Inc., Op­ Rubey Auction Company, Red Oak. ♦The Garden City Sale Company, Inc., elousas. Russell Sales Company, Russell. Garden City. ♦Amite Livestock Co., Inc., Amite. Sales Company of Hawarden, Hawarden. ♦Glasco Livestock Exchange, Glasco. ♦Avoyelles Livestock Commission Market, Sharp Livestock, Inc., Grundy Center. ♦Goodland Livestock Commission Co., Inc., Mansura. Sheldon Livestock Company (formerly Shel­ Goodland. ♦Bastrop Livestock Auction, Bastrop. don Sales Company), Sheldon. ♦Harper Livestock Sales Company, Harper. ♦Charles A. Brown, Baton Rouge. Smylie-Haupert Livestock, Inc. (formerly ♦Hays Livestock Commission Company, Inc., ♦Clark Livestock Commission Company, Smylie Livestock Company),: Columbus Hays. Benton. Junction. ♦Herington Livestock Auction Company, ♦Delhi Livestock Auction, Delhi. Spencer Livestock Sales, Spencer. Herington. ♦DeQuincy Livestock Commission Company, Spencer North Y Auction, Inc., Spencer. ♦Hiawatha Auction Company, Hiawatha. DeQuincy. Stanton Livestock Auction, Stanton. ♦Holton Community Sale, Holton. ♦DeRidder Livestock Market, DeRidder. Storm Lake Auction Company, Storm Lake. ♦Holton Livestock Exchange, Holton. ♦Dominique’s Cow Palace, Marksville. Story City Auction Sales, Story City. ♦Dominique’s Livestock Auction, Alexandria. Sumner Livestock Auction, Sumner. Kentucky ♦Dominique’s Stockyards, Inc., Baton Rouge. Tabor Sale Barn, Tabor. ♦Adair County Stockyards, Columbia. ♦Dominique’s Stockyards, Inc., Lafayette. Tama Livestock Auction Company, Tama. ♦Albany Stockyards, Albany. ♦Dominique’s Stockyards, Inc., Opelousas. Thompson Livestock Commission Company, • ♦Barren County Stockyards, Glasgow. ♦Farmer & Stockman Auction, Inc., Clarence. Lamoni. ♦Blue Grass Stockyards, Lexington. ♦Franklin Livestock Auction, Inc., Winns- Traer Sales Company, Traer. ♦Bowling Green Livestock Market, Bowling boro. Tri-States Livestock Auction Company, Inc., Green. ♦Franklinton Stockyards, Inc., Franklinton. Sioux Center. ♦Boyle County Stockyards, Danville. ♦Hodges & Co., W. H., Alexandria. United Livestock Auction Exchange, Inc., ♦Breckinridge County Livestock Sales, ♦Hodges & Co., W. H., Crowley. Maquoketa. Irvington. ♦Hodges & Co., W. H„ New Roads. Walker Sales Company, Walker. ♦Don Brown Stockyard, Kevil. ♦Hodges Stock Yards, Inc., Raceland. Wapello Livestock Sales, Inc., Wapello. ♦Bullitt County Stockyards, Shepherdsville. ♦Homer Livestock Commission Co., Homer. Washington Livestock Auction Market, Inc., ♦Burkesville Stockyards, Burkesville. ♦Kentwood Livestock Sales, Inc., Kentwood. Washington. ♦Carlisle Stockyards, Carlisle. ♦LacasSine Stockyards, Lacassine. Waverly Sales Company, Waverly. ♦Catlettsburg Livestock Sales, Catlettsburg. ♦Lacy Stockyard, J. D„ Alexandria. Wayland Sale Company, Inc., Wayland. ♦Christian County Livestock Market, Hop­ kinsville. ♦Livestock Producers, Inc., Bossier City. Webster City ^Livestock Market, Inc. (for­ ♦Lum Brothers Stockyards, Vidalia. merly Webster City Livestock Auction, ♦Clay Wachs Stockyards, Lexington. Inc.), Webster City. ♦Cynthiana Stockyards, Cynthiana. ♦Lyles Auction Co., Bill, Grand Cane. ♦Edmonton Livestock Market, Edmonton. ♦Mansfield Livestock Auction, Mansfield. West Union Auction Exchange, West Union. ♦Farmers Commission Company, Tompkins- ♦Micelle’s Commission Yard, Lake Charles. Winneshiek Coop Sales Commission, Decorah. ville. ♦Miller & Dominique, Eunice.

No. 229----- 6 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18070 NOTICES •North Tangipahoa Stockyard, Inc., Kent­ •Lum Commission Company, Vicksburg. Gallatin Livestock Auction, Gallatin. wood. •Meridian Stockyards, Inc., Meridian. Golden Valley Auction Company, Clinton. •Rayville Livestock Auction, Inc., Rayville. •Mid-South Order Buyers, Inc., Jackson. Goodman Auction Market, Goodman. •Red River Livestock Auction, Inc., Coushatta. •Mississippi Livestock Producers Assoc. Grant City Sale Barn, Inc., Grant City. •Tate Commission Barn, Joe, Ville Platte. (North Yard), Jackson. Green City Auction Company, Inc., Green •Tate Commission Barn, Joe, LeBeau. •Mississippi Livestock Producers Association City. •Voiron’s Stockyard, Inc., Thibodaux. (South Yard), Jackson. H. R. H. Auction Company, Hamilton. •West Monroe Livestock Auction, West •Moore & Woods Commission Company, Inc., Halsey-Riley Sales Company, Inc., Marshall. Monroe. Macon. Hannibal Sale Company, Inc., Hannibal. •Zachary Stockyards, Zachary. •Natchez Stockyard, Natchez (formerly Allen Hayes Cattle, Inc., Chillicothe. Bros. Natchez Stkyd. and Natchez Stock- Hinds Sale Company, Memphis. Massachusetts yard) , Natchez. Interstate Producers Livestock Association, Flame, Inc., Littleton. •New Albany Sales Company, New Albany. Callao. Michelson’s Livestock Commission Auctions, •Olive Branch Sales Company, Olive Branch. Interstate Producers Livestock Association, Inc., South Easton. •Oxford Livestock Commission Company, Marshall. Northampton Cooperative Auction, Whately. Oxford. Interstate Producers Livestock Association, •Pontotoc Livestock Commission Company, Perryville. Maryland Pontotoc: Johnson County Livestock Market, Inc., •Aberdeen Sales Company, Aberdeen. Prairie Livestock, Inc., West Point. Warrensburg. Caroline Sales Company, Denton. •Ripley Sales Company, Ripley. Kahoka Sale Company, Inc., Kahoka. •Cumberland Stockyards, Inc., Cumberland. *S & A Livestock, Inc. (formerly S & S Live­ Kennett Sales Company, Inc., Kennett. •Farmers’ Livestock Exchange, Inc., Boons- stock Dealers, Inc.), Tupelo. Kirksville Community Sale, Kirksville. boro. •Southeast Mississippi Livestock Farmers LaClede County Livestock Producers Asso­ Farmers’ Market & Auction, Charlotte Hall. Association (formerly South Mississippi ciation, Lebanon. •Four States Livestock Sales, Inc., Hagers­ Livestock Market), Hattiesburg. Lamar Auction Market, Lamar. town. Southwest Mississippi Livestock Producers Lewis County Auction Company, Lewistown. •Frederick Livestock Auction, Inc., Frederick. Association, Liberty. Lexington Livestock Auction, Lexington. •Friend’s Stockyard, Inc., Accident. •Southwest Stockyards, Inc., Port Gibson. Licking Auction Sales Company, Licking. •Grantsville Community Sales, Inc., Grants- •Spicer Brothers Stockyard (same as Spicer Lincoln County Livestock Market, Inc. ville. Brothers), Tupelo. (formerly Troy Sales Co., Inc.), Troy. •Rudnick & Sons, Inc., Harry, Galena. •Starkville Livestock Commission Company, Linn County Auction Company, Brookfield. West Nottingham Livestock, Inc., Rising Sun. Starkville. Linn County Beef Producers Association, •Western Maryland Stockyards, Inc., West­ Stiles Livestock Commission Co., Sturgis. Brookfield. minster. •Stringer Sale Bam, Columbia. Lockwood Community Sale, Inc., Lockwood. Woodsboro Livestock Sales, Inc., Woodsboro. •Tri-State Stockyards, Inc., Greenville. Lolli Sales Pavilion, Macon. •Walnut Sales Company, Walnut. Mansfield Livestock Auction, Mansfield. Michigan •Waynesboro Livestock Yards, Inc., Waynes­ Maryville Auction Company, Maryville. •Andy Adams Sale Barn, Hillsdale. boro. Means Auction Company, Boonville. •Coldwater Livestock Auction, Coldwater. •West Point Livestock Auction, Inc. West Mercer County Auction, Princeton. •Dundee Livestock Sales, Inc., Dundee. Point. Mercer County Producers Association, Linsmeier Livestock Auction, Menominee. •Winston County Community Sales, Louis­ Princeton. •Michigan Livestock Exchange, Cassopolis. ville. Merrigan Bros. Livestock Auction Market, •Napoleon Livestock Auction, Napoleon. Missouri Inc., Maryville. •Ravenna Livestock Sales, Ravenna. Milan Livestock Auction, Milan. •Three Rivers Livestock Auction, Three Alton Sales Company, Alton. Moberly Livestock Auction Company, Rivers. Ava Sales Company, Ava. Moberly. < Benton County Producers Association, Minnesota Monett Sale Company, Monett. Warsaw. Montgomery County Livestock Auction Com­ Farmers Livestock Auction Market, Cale­ Bollinger County Livestock Assoc., Marble pany, Montgomery City. donia. Hill. Moore, C. H. & Son, Memphis. Arends Sale Yard, Inc., BlueEarth. Bowling Green Livestock Markets, Inc. Bowl­ Mountain Grove Livestock Auction, Moun­ ing Green. tain Grove. Mississippi Brunswick Sale Company, Brunswick. Nevada Livestock Auction, Nevada. •Alcorn County Stockyard, Corinth. Buffalo Sale Barn, Buffalo. New Cambria Community Sale, New Cambria. •Batesville Livestock Commission Company, Bullshippers, Inc., Rich Hill. North Missouri Sale Pavilion, Trenton. Batesville. Butler Community Sale (formerly Butler Odessa Community Sale, Odessa. •Billingsley’s Auction Sale, “Doc”, Senato- Livestock Auction), Butler. Olean Sale Company, Olean. bia. Cabool Livestock Market, Cabool. Oregon Livestock Sales Company, Oregon. •Booneville Commission Company, Boone- Callaway Stock Sales Association, Fulton. Palmyra Livestock Auction Market, Palmyra. ville. Cantrell & Sons Sale Company, Archie. Pasley (C. M.) Auction Company, Osceola. Carl’s Commission Company, Pontotoc. Carrollton Livestock Auction, Carrollton. Payne Auction Sales, Lebanon. •Chickasaw Commission Company, Houston. Central Missouri Livestock Auction, Inc., Platte County Sales Company, Inc., Platte •Clarksdale Livestock Sales Company, Mexico. City. Clarksdale. Central Missouri Sales Company, Sedalia. Poplar Bluff Sales Company, Poplar Bluff. •Corinth Livestock Commission Company, Central Ozark Livestock Market, West Plains. Potosi Auction Company, Inc., Potosi. Corinth. •Charleston Auction Company, Charleston. Puxico Stockyards and Auction Company, •Decatur Stockyards, Decatur. Chillicothe Livestock Auctiijn, Inc., Chilli- Inc., Puxico. •Dixie Stockyards, Inc., Meridian. cothe. Ray County Sales Company, Inc., Richmond. •Farmers Livestock Yards (formerly South­ Circle “S” Livestock Auction, Stanberry. Roberts Brothers Auction, Bolivar. ern Stockyards & Hub City Stockyards), Clark County Sales Company, Kahoka. Robertsons Community Sale, Bethany. Hattiesburg. Clinton Community Sale, Clinton. Rock Port Sales Pavilion, Inc., Rock Port. •Fayette Stockyards, Inc., (formerly Jeffer­ Columbia Livestock Auction, Inc., Columbia. St. Clair Auction, St. Clair. son County Stockyards, Inc.), Fayette. Concordia Livestock Auction, Concordia. St. James Auction Company, St. James. •Felders Livestock Sales Company, Summit. Cox (Noel) Auction Sale, Ozark. Salem Auction Sale Company, Salem. •George County Stockyards, Lucedale. Doniphan Auction Sales Company, Savannah Sale Company, Savannah. •Graves Livestock Company, Winona. Doniphan. Schuyler County Sales Company, Lancaster. •Grenada Livestock Exchange, Grenada. Edina Auction Company, Edina. Sedgewickville Auction Barn, Sedgewickville. •Gulfport Livestock Yards, Gulfport. El Dorado Sales Company, El Dorado Seneca Community Sale, Inc., Seneca. •Highway 84 West Stockyard, Laurel. Springs. Shelbina Auction Company, Shelbina. Holton’s Livestock Sale, J. W. Centreville. Fair Play Sale and Auction Company, Fair Sivils (Jack) Sale Company, Butler. •Jackson Union Stockyards (& Quinns), Play. Stewarts Sales Pavilion, Cameron. Jackson. Farmers Auction Company, Mountain View. Stockman Sale Barn, Meta. •Knight Brothers Sale, Carthage. Farmers and Traders Commission Company, Summersville Auction Sale, Summersville. •Laurel Stockyards, Laurel. Inc., Palmyra. Thayer Sales Company, Thayer. •Lexington Sales Company, Lexington. Farmington Auction Company, Inc., Unionville Sale Company, Unionville. •Lincoln County livestock Commission Co., Farmington. Urbana Sale Barn, Urbana. Brookhaven. Fredericktown Auction Company, Inc., Van Meter Auction Company, Kingsville. •Lipscomb Commission Company, Como. Fredericktown. Versailles Auction, Versailles. •Livestock Producers' Association, Tylertown. Gainesville Livestock Auction, Gainesville. Warsaw Sales Company, Warsaw.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18071

Welty Sales Pavillon, Nevada. •Superior Livestock Commission Co., Inc., North Carolina Wentzville Auction Company, Wentzville. Superior. West Plains City Scales, West Plains. •Thedford Livestock Commission Co., Thed- Benthall’s Stockyard, Rich Square. West Plains Livestock Auction, West Plains. ford. Brite and Tatum Livestock Co., Inc., Eliza­ Wheaton Livestock Auction, Wheaton. •Tri-State Livestock Commission Co., beth City. Windsor Auction Company, Windsor. McCook. Carolina Stockyards Co., Siler City. •Twin City Livestock Auction Co., Gering. Cattleman’s Livestock Yard, Inc., Canton. Montana •Valentine Livestock Market, Valentine. Central Carolina Farmers Livestock Market, * Billings Livestock Commission Company, •Verdigre Livestock Market, Verdigre.' Hillsborough. Billings. •Wahoo Livestock Auction Market, Wahoo. Creech Livestock Market, Inc., Norlina. * Glendive Livestock Sales Company, Glen- •Wayne Livestock Auction Co., Inc., Wayne. Dedmon’s Livestock Yards, Shelby. r dive. •Wells Commission Co., Fremont. Farmers Livestock Exchange, Marshville. »Sidney Livestock Market Center, Sidney. •West Point Sales Co., West Point. D. F. Foust Livestock Co., Inc., Greensboro. •Wisner Livestock Sales Co., Wisner. Franklin Livestock Auction, Franklin. Nebraska •York Livestock Sales Co., York. Hill’s Stockyard, Kinston. »Ainsworth Livestock Market, Ainsworth. •Western Livestock Auction Co., North John F. Hobbs Stockyard, Inc., Goldsboro. »Albion Livestock Market, Inc., Albion. Platte. Gus Z. Lancaster Stockyards, Inc., Rocky •Alliance Livestock Auction Company, Alli­ Mount. ance. Nevada Lumberton Auction Co., Inc., Lumberton. »Alma Sale Barn, Alma. •Gallagher Livestock Co., Fallon. R. D. Martin Livestock Market, Aberdeen. »Arnold Livestock Sales Co., Inc., Arnold. Morris Livestock Co., Charlotte. »Ashland Sale Bam, Ashland. N ew Jersey Mount Airy Livestock Market, Inc., Mount •Atkinson Livestock Market, Atkinson. •Community Livestock Auction, Woodstown. Airy. •Augustin Brothers, Shelby. •Cowtown Auctioneers (formerly Harris Sales Murphy Livestock Auction Co., Murphy. ♦Bassett Livestock Auction, Inc., Bassett. Company), Woodstown. Norwood Stockyard, Norwood. ♦Beatrice Sales Pavilion, Beatrice. •Flemington Agricultural Marketing Co-op, Oxford Livestock Market, Inc., Oxford. »Beatrice 77 Livestock Sales Co., Beatrice. Inc., Flemington. Pates Stockyard, Pembroke. »Beaver Valley Livestock Co., Inc., Beaver •Jaeger’s Livestock Auction Market, Sussex. Powell Livestock Co., Smithfield. City. •Livestock Cooperative Auction Market Shelby Sales Barn, Shelby. »Bloomfield Livestock Auction, Bloomfield. Ass’n. of North Jersey, Inc., Hackettstown. Union County Livestock Auction, Inc., •Blue Hill Livestock Co., Blue Hill. •Henry Zlotkin Auction, Freehold. Mineral Springs. •Burwell Livestock Market, Burwell. Watauga Livestock Market, Inc., Boone. »Butte Livestock Market, Butte. New Mexico Western Carolina Livestock Market, Inc., »Central Nebraska Commission Co., Broken Five States Livestock Auction, Inc., Clayton. Asheville. Bow. Portales Livestock Commission Company, West Jefferson Livestock Market, West •Chadron Sales Co., Chadron. Portales. Jefferson. N orth D akota •Chappell Livestock Auction, Inc., Chappell. N ew Y ork •Columbus Sales Pavilion, Inc., Columbus. •Ashley Livestock Sales Company, AsMley. »Crawford Livestock Market, Crawford. Burton’s Livestock Exchange, Inc., Vernon. •Badlands Auction Company, Watford City. »Creighton Livestock Market, Creighton. Cambridge Valley Livestock Market, Cam­ •Beulah Livestock Auction Market, Inc., •Elkhorn Valley Cattle Co., Norfolk. bridge. Beulah. »Ewing Livestock Market, Ewing. Chambers, D. R. & Sons, Inc., Unadilla. •Fairbury Livestock Co., Fairbury. •Carrington Livestock Sales, Inc. (formerly Chatham Area Auction Cooperative, Inc., Carrington Livestock Auction, Inc.), •Falls City Auction Co., Falls City. Chatham. Carrington. •Farmers Livestock Sales Co., Benkelman. Condon’s Auction Market, Cherry Creek. •Garden County Commission Co., Oshkosh. County Livestock Market, Amsterdam. •Edgeley Livestock Sales Company, Edgeley. •Gordon Livestock Auction Co., Inc., Gordon. DiBello, Ben Commission Sales, Hannibal. •Hamann Livestock Company, Hettinger. •Grand Island Livestock Auction, Inc., Grand Empire Livestock Marketing Cooperative, Inc., •Harrington Brothers Livestock Auction, Island. Minot. Bath, New York (Burn’s Property). •Harvey Livestock Auction, Harvey. »Hebron Livestock Commission Co., Hebron. Empire Livestock Marketing Cooperative, Inc., »Holdrege Commission Co., Holdrege. •Hettinger Livestock Sales, Hettinger. Bath (120 Wilson Avenue). •Home Base Auction Company, Bowman. »Imperial Auction Market, Inc., Imperial. Empire Livestock Marketing Cooperative, Inc., •Kearney Livestock Commission Co., Kearney. Caledonia. •Jamestown Livestock Sales, Jamestown. »Kimball Livestock Auction, Kimball. Empire Livestock Marketing Cooperative, Inc., •JKL Cattle Company, Williston. *Klug Brothers Livestock Co., Columbus. Dryden. •Kamrath Sales Pavilion, Mott. •Lexington Livestock Commission Co., Lex­ Empire Livestock Marketing Cooperative, Inc., •Kist Livestock Auction Company, Mandan. ington. •Lake Region Auction and Livestock Market, Gouverneur. Inc., Devils Lake. •Lockwood Livestock Auction, South Sioux Empire Livestock Marketing Cooperative, Inc., City. •Linton Livestock Sales, Inc., Linton. Oneonta. •Lorenz Livestock Sales, Hazen. »Minden Livestock Sales Co., Minden. Empire Livestock Marketing Cooperative, Inc., •Morris Livestock Auction, Plattsmouth. Watertown. •Meyer’s Livestock Sales (formerly Willis­ •Nebraska City Salebarn, Inc., Nebraska City. Empire Livestock Marketing Cooperative, Inc., ton Livestock Commission Company), •Nebraska Livestock Sales Co., Lincoln. Whitney Point. Williston. •Neligh Livestock Commission Co., Neligh. Finger Lakes Livestock Market, Inc., Canan­ •Minot Livestock Auction, Minot. •Newman Grove Livestock Market, Newman •Missouri Slope Livestock Auction, Inc., daigua. Bismarck. Grove. Gentner, Raymond Commission Market, •Nollett Livestock Sales, Valentine. Springville. »Napoleon Livestock Sales (formerly Napo­ •Norfolk Livestock Market, Inc., Norfolk. Hillsdale Farmers Auction, Inc., Hillsdale. leon Livestock Auction), Napoleon. •Ogallala Livestock Commission Co., Ogallala. Kaplan, J. M. & Son, Inc., Millerton. •Oakes Livestock Terminal, Oakes. •O’Neill Livestock Market. O’Neill. Luther’s Livestock Commission Market, •Park River Livestock Auction Market, Park •Oxford Livestock Commission Co., Oxford. Wassaic. River. Pawnee Livestock Co., Pawnee City. Maplehurst Livestock Market, Hinsdale. •Rugby Livestock Auction Market, Inc. ^Pender Livestock Sales Co., Pender. Milford Commission Sales Stable, Inc., (formerly Rugby Livestock Sales), Rugby. Producers Livestock Marketing Association, •Schlichenmayer Livestock Sales, Turtle Franklin. Lake. Gering. Miller’s Livestock Market, Argyle. Producers Livestock Marketing Association, •Schnell Livestock Auction Company, Dick­ Miller’s Livestock Market of Johnstown, inson. McCook. Johnstown. •Bed Cloud Livestock Commission Co., Inc., •Sitting Bull Auction, Williston. Red Cloud. Norwich Commission Sales, Norwich. •Valley City Livestock Auction, Valley City. Republican Valley Livestock Auction, North County Livestock Exchange, Inc., •Wahpeton Livestock Company, Wahpeton. Franklin. Chazy. •Western Livestock Company, Dickinson.' ~ n Livestock Commission Co., Rush- Pavilion Livestock Market, Inc., Pavilion. •Wishek Livestock Market, Wishek. Peter’s Livestock Exchange, Jeffersonville. •Sidney Livestock Sales Pavilion, Inc., Sidney. Norvel Reed & Sons, Inc., Jamestown. Ohio bi°ux County Livestock Commission Co„ Norvel Reed & Sons, Inc., Sherman. •Athens Livestock Sales, Athens. Harrison. Sullivan Brothers Livestock Exchange, Utica. •Bamesville Livestock Exchange, Bamesville. •Spalding Livestock Market, Spalding, Wallkill Livestock Market, Walden. •Bloomfield Livestock Auction, North Bloom­ stickehnan Livestock Commission Co., Welch Livestock Market, Inc., West Edmes- Gothenburg. field. ton. •Bowling Stockyard, Clrcleville.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18072 NOTICES •Canfield Livestock Auction, Canfield. •Panhandle Livestock Commission Co., Guy- Walterboro Stockyards Company, Inc., Wal- •Carrollton Livestock Auction, Carrollton. mon. terboro. •Creston Livestock Sales, Creston. •Pawnee Sale Company, Pawnee. York County Stockyards, Inc., York. •Damascus Livestock Auction, Damascus. •Perkins Y Livestock Auction, Perkins. •Delta Livestock Auction & Commission Co., •Perry Livestock Exchange, Perry. T ennessee Delta. •Pryor Livestock Auction, Pryor. •Athens Livestock Auction Co., Athens. •Dorset Livestock Sales, Dorset. •Seiling Sales Association, Inc., Seiling. •Beasley Community Auction, Franklin. •Farmers Livestock Auction, Inc., Marietta. •Stigler Livestock Auction, Stigler. •Botts & Evans Livestock Co., Union City. •Fremont Livestock Exchange, Fremont. •Tahlequah Sale Barn, Tahlequah. *C & M Livestock Market, Jamestown. •Kenton Farmers Marketing Co., Kenton. •Texhoma Livestock Commission Co., Tex- •Chattanooga Union Stockyard, Chatta­ •Kidron Auction, Inc., Kidron. homa. nooga. •Lugbill Brothers, Inc., Archbold. •Tonkawa Livestock Auction, Tonkawa. •Clarksville Livestock Company, Clarksville. •Lugbill Brothers, Inc., Columbus Grove. •Waurika Auction Sale, Waurika. •Clarksville Livestock Market, Clarksville. •Muskingum Livestock Sales Co., Zanesville. •Webb Livestock Sale, Sayre. •Cleveland Livestock Auction Co., Inc., Cleve­ •Ohio Valley Livestock Company, Gallipolis. •Western Oklahoma Livestock Auction, Elk land. •Peoples Livestock Exchange, Greenville. City. •Clinton Livestock Auction Co., Inc., Clinton. •Producers Livestock Association, Bucyrus. •Woodward Livestock Commission Co., Wood­ •Coffee County Livestock Market, Man­ •Producers Livestock Association, Columbus. ward. chester. •Producers Livestock Association, Coshocton. P ennsylvania •Collierville Livestock Auction Company, •Producers Livestock Association, Eaton. Belknap Auction Sales, Dayton. Collierville. •Producers Livestock Association, Findlay. Belleville Livestock Market, Belleville. •Cookeville Livestock Company, Inc., Cooke­ •Producers Livestock Association, Hillsboro. Carlisle Livestock Market, Carlisle. ville. •Producers Livestock Association, Lancaster. Chambersburg Livestock Sales, Chambers- •Covington Sales Company, Covington. •Producers Livestock Association, Marion. burg. •Crockett County Sales Company, Maury •Producers Livestock Association, Mount Chesley’s Livestock Market, North East. City. Vernon. Coudersport Livestock Market, Coudersport. •Cumberland City Stockyard, Cumberland •Producers Livestock Association, Wapako- Cowanesque Valley Livestock Market, Knox­ City. neta. ville. •Dayton Livestock Auction Company, Dayton. •Producers Livestock Association, Washing­ Dewart Livestock Market, Dewart. •DeKalb County Livestock Company, Alexan­ ton, C.H. Eighty-Four Auction Sales, Eighty-Four. dria. •Producers Livestock Association, Wilming­ Enon Valley Community Sales, Enon Valley. •East Tennessee Livestock Center, Inc., ton. Farmer’s Tri-County Auction, Inc., Scenery Sweetwater. •Rothschild Livestock Company, Stony Hill. •Farmers Auction Company, Fayetteville. Ridge. Fayette Stockyard Company, Uniontown. •Farmers Commission Company, Carthage. •Scio Auction Market, Scio. Greencastle Livestock Market, Greencastle. •Farmers Livestock Exchange, Union City. •Scioto Livestock Sales Co., Chillicothe. Green Dragon Livestock Sale, Ephrata. •Farmers Livestock Market, Inc., Greeneville. •Tiffin Livestock Sales Co., Tiffin. Hickory Auction Sales, Inc., Hickory. •Gallatin Livestock Market, Inc., Gallatin. •Union Stockyards Company, Hillsboro. Indiana Livestock Auction, Inc., Homer City. •Gamaliel Livestock Market, Inc., Gamaliel. •Woodsfield Livestock Sales, Inc., Woodsfield. Lebanon Valley Livestock Market, Freder­ •Giles County Stockyard, Pulaski. •Zanesville Community Sales, Zanesville. icksburg. •Greeneville Livestock Company, Inc., Oklahoma Leesport Market & Auction, Leesport. Greeneville. Meadville Livestock Auction, Saegertown. •Hardin County Stockyards, Savannah. •Ada Livestock Auction, Inc., Ada. Mercer Livestock Auction, Mercer. •Hartsville Livestock Market, Hartsville. •Alva Sales Company, Alva. Middleburg Auction Sales, Inc., Middleburg. •Henderson Sales Company, Henderson. •Antler Livestock Auction, Antlers. Montague Livestock Auction, Union City. •Jackson County Commission Company, •Ardmore Livestock Auction, Inc., Ardmore. Montour Farmers Livestock Market, Danville. Gainesboro. •Atoka Livestock Auction, Atoka. Morrisons Cove Livestock Market, Martins- •Johnson City Livestock Market, Johnson •Beaver Livestock Sale, Beaver. burg. City. •Big Pasture Auction, Frederick. New Holland Sales Stable, New Holland. •Kingsport Livestock Market, Kingsport. •Blackwell Livestock Auction, Blackwell. New Wilmington Livestock Auction, Inc., •Lawrence County Stockyards, Lawrence- •Buffalo Livestock Commission Co., Buffalo. New Wilmington. burg. * •Cattlemen’s Stockyards, Commanche. Nicholson Sales Company, Nicholson. •Lewis County Stockyard, Hohenwald. •Chandler Auction, Chandler. Penns Valley Livestock Auction, Centre Hall. •Lexington Livestock Market, Lexington. •Cherokee Sales Company, Cherokee. Pennsylvania Livestock Auction, Die., •Logan Livestock Company, Union City. •Clinton Livestock Auction, Clinton. Waynesburg. •McNairy County Livestock & Auction Corp., •Cornwell-Ochsner Commission Sale, Yu­ Perkiomenville Sales Stable, Perkiomenville. Selmer. kon. Quakertown Livestock Sale, Quakertown. •Macon County Livestock Market, Lafayette. •Covington Sale Barn, Covington. Sechrist Sales Company, Inc., Fawn Grove. •Madisonville Livestock Auction Company, •Dewey Livestock Sale, Dewey. Showalter’s Livestock Exchange, Duncans- Madisonville. •Durant Stockyards Company, Durant. ville. •Mid-South Livestock Commission Company, •Elk City Livestock Auction, Elk City. Silver Springs Livestock Market, Mechanics- Columbia. •Enid Livestock Market, Inc., Enid. burg. •Middleton Sale Company, Middleton. •Fairview Sale Barn, Fairview. Troy Sales Cooperative, Troy. •Morristown Stockyards, Inc., Morristown. •Farmers and Ranchers Livestock Auction, Valley Stockyards, Inc., Athens. •Murfreesboro Livestock Market, Murfrees­ Vinita. Vintage Sales Stables, Inc., Paradise. boro. •Four-Way Stockyards Company, McAlester. Wayne County Livestock Exchange, Hones- •New Tazewell Livestock Market, New Taze­ •Grove Sales Company, Grove. dale. well. •Hollis Livestock Commission Company, Wyalusing Sales Company, Wyalusing. •Newbern Sales Company, Inc., Newbern. Hollis. York Livestock Market, Inc., York. •Newport Livestock Auction Company, New­ •Hobart Stockyards, Hobart. port. •Holton Brothers Stockyards, Hugo. South Carolina •Nichols & Moore Sales Barn, Thompson Sta­ •Hugo Sales Commission Company, Hugo. tion. •Idabel Livestock Commission Co., Idabel. Bruce & Co., P. L., Greenville. Chesnee Livestock Co., Chesnee. •Oliver Livestock Company, Union City. •LeFlore County Livestock Auction, Wister. Conder Co., Inc., J. W., Columbia. •O’Neill, Sam Livestock Commission Com­ •Donald Leslie Commission Co., Hugo. Darlington Auction Market, Inc., Darlington. pany, Chattanooga. •Locust Grove Sale, Locust Grove. Fanner’s Livestock Market, Leesville. •Paris Livestock Commission Company, •Loopers Auction, Stillwater. Greenwood Stockyard, Inc., Greenwood. Paris. Herndon Stockyards, Inc., Ehrhardt. •Payne Livestock Market, Telford. •Mangum Livestock Company, Mangum. •Peoples Stockyard, Fayetteville. •Marietta Auction Sale, Marietta. Hutto Stockyards, Inc., Holly Hill. Johnson Livestock Market, Honea Path. •People Stockyards, Cookeville, •Maxson Sales Company, Inc., South Coffey- Nichols Auction Market, Nichols. •Plateau Livestock Exchange, Crossville. ville. Orangeburg Stockyards, Inc., Orangeburg. •Pulaski Stockyard, Pulaski. •Maxson Sales Company, Inc., Welch. •Rogersville Livestock Market, Rogersville. Pickens Auction Market, Inc., Pickens. •Sampson Livestock Auction, Lewisburg. •Meeker Livestock Auction, Meeker. Rock Hill Sales Barn, Rock Hill. •Scotts Hill Auction Company, Inc., Scotts •Muskogee Stockyards and Livestock Auc­ Saluda County Stockyards, Inc., Saluda. Hill. tion, Inc., Muskogee. Springfield Stockyards, Springfield. •Sevier County Livestock Auction Company, •Newkirk Livestock Auction, Newkirk. Spartanburg Livestock Yards, Spartanburg. Seymour. •Oklahoma Auction Yards, Hominy. Taylor Stockyards, John C., Anderson. •Shelbyville Stockyard, Shelbyville.

FÉDÉRAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18073 ♦Smith County Commission Company, ♦Lampasas Auction, Inc. (formerly Lampasas ♦Utah Valley Auction, Spanish Fork. Carthage. Livestock Auction, Inc.), Lampasas. ♦Vernal Livestock Auction Co., Vernal. ♦Smithville Stockyards, Smith ville. ♦Lometa Commission Company, Lometa. ♦Southern Livestock Auction Company, Co­ ♦Longview Livestock Commission, Longview. Vermont lumbia. ♦Lufkin Livestock Exchange, Lufkin. Addison County Commission Sale, East Mid- ♦Southwestern Sales Company, Inc., Hunt­ ♦McCulloch County Commission Co., Brady. dlebury. ingdon. ♦McDougal Livestock Auction, Comanche. Crosby’s Commission Sale, Whiting. ♦Tennessee Producers Livestock Market Assn., ♦McKinney Livestock Commission Co., Mc­ East Thetford Commission Sale, East Thet- Fayetteville. Kinney. ford. ♦Thompson Livestock Company, Obion. ♦Madison County Livestock Commission Co., Vergennes'Livestock Market, Vergennes. ♦Trenton Livestock Sales Company, Trenton. Madisonville. Westminster Commission Sale, Westminster. ♦Tri-County Stockyards, McKenzie. ♦Mansfield Livestock Commission Company ♦Trousdale County Livestock Market, Harts- (formerly Mansfield Commission Com­ Virginia ville. pany) , Mansfield. ♦Abingdon Livestock Market, Inc., Abingdon. ♦Union Livestock Yards, Inc., Knoxville. ♦Marshall Livestock Commission Company, ♦Bedford Livestock Market, Inc., Bedford. ♦Union ville Livestock Market, Union ville. Marshall. ♦Christiansburg Livestock Market, Inc., ♦Ward, William Livestock, South Fulton. ♦Meridian Livestock Auction, Meridian. Christiansburg. ♦Warren County Livestock Company, Mc­ ♦Midland Livestock Market, Inc., Midland. ♦Creech Livestock Market (formerly South Minnville. ♦Mineral Wells Stockyards Co., Mineral Wells. Hill Livestock Market), South Hill. ♦West Tennessee Auction Company, Martin. ♦Moore’s Livestock Commission Company, ♦Farmers Livestock Market, Inc., Ewing. ♦White County Livestock Market, Sparta. Inc. (formerly Moore’s Livestock Commis­ ♦Farmers Livestock Exchange, Inc., Win­ ♦Wilson County Livestock Market, Lebanon. sion) , McKinney. chester. ♦Wilson Livestock Market, Newport. ♦Muenster Livestock Commission Company, ♦Fauquier Livestock Exchange, Inc., Mar­ Texas Muenster. shall. ♦Olney Livestock Auction, Olney. ♦Front Royal Livestock Market, Front Royal. ♦Abilene Auction, Abilene. ♦Panola County Livestock Commission Co., ♦Galax Livestock Market, Inc., Galax. ♦Amarillo Livestock Auction Co. (formerly Inc. (formerly Panola County Livestock ♦Highland County Livestock Market, Inc., Amarillo Livestock Auction Company #4), Commission Co.), Carthage. Monterey. Amarillo. ♦Paris Livestock Commission Company, Paris. ♦Lee Farmers Livestock Market, Inc., Jones- ♦Athens Commission Company, Athens. ♦Parker County Livestock Commission Co. ville. ♦Bay City Livestock Commission Co., Bay (formerly Parker County Livestock ♦Loudoun County Livestock Market, Inc., City. Comm.), Weatherford. Leesburg. ♦Belton, Livestock Auction, Belton. ♦Patton Auction Barn, Macogdoches. ♦Lynchburg Livestock Market, Lynchburg. ♦Blanco Livestock Auction Co., Blanco. ♦Pilot Point Livestock Exchange, Pilot Point. ♦Narrows Livestock Market, Inc., Narrows. ♦Bonham Livestock Commission Co., Bon­ ♦Pittsburg Livestock Commission Company, ♦Nokesville Livestock Auction, Inc., Nokes- ham. ville. ♦Breckenridge Livestock Exchange Brecken- Pittsburg. ♦Port City Stockyards, Sealy. ♦Orange Livestock Market, Inc., Orange. ridge. ♦Phénix Livestock Market, Phénix. ♦Bridgeport Auction Sale (formerly Bridge­ ♦Quanah Livestock Commission, Quanah. ♦Rains County Livestock Commission, ♦Pulaski Livestock Market, Dublin. port Sale Barn), Bridgeport. ♦Roanoke Livestock Market, Roanoke. ♦Brownwood Cattle Auction, Brownwood. Emory. ♦Ranchers & Farmers Livestock Commission ♦Rockingham Livestock Sales, Inc., Harrison­ ♦Buffalo Livestock Commission Co., Buffalo. burg. ♦Burleson Dairy Cow Sale, Inc., Burleson. Co. (formerly Ranchers & Farmers Com­ mission Co.), Abilene. ♦Scott County Livestock Market, Gate City. ♦Canyon Livestock Commission Company ♦Shenandoah Valley Livestock Sales, Inc., (formerly Canyon Livestock Commission ♦San Augustine Livestock Commission, San Augustine. Harrisonburg. Company #2), Canyon. ♦Smithfield Livestock Market, Inc., Smith- ♦Cattleman Exchange, Inc., Edinburg. ♦Seymour Stockyards, Inc., Seymour. ♦Southwest Livestock Exchange, Uvalde. fiçld. ♦Center Auction .Company, Center. ♦South Boston Livestock Market, South Bos­ ♦Childress Livestock Auction, Childress. ♦Southwest Livestock Sales Co., Round Mountain. ton. ♦Clarksville Livestock Exchange, Clarksville. ♦Southside Stockyards, Inc., Petersburg. ♦Cole Livestock Commission Company, ♦Sulphur Springs Livestock Commission Co., Sulphur Springs. ♦Staunton Union Stockyards, Staunton*. Brownwood. ♦Staunton Livestock Market, Inc., Staunton. ♦Coleman Livestock Auction, Coleman. ♦Terrell Commission Company (formerly ♦Tazewell Livestock Market, Inc., Tazewell. ♦O. L. Colley Livestock Commission Co., Mt. Terrell Livestock Commission Co.), ♦Tri-State Livestock Market, Inc., Abingdon. Pleasant. Terrell. ♦Victoria Livestock Market, Victoria. ♦Dalhart Livestock Auction Company, Dal- ♦Tulia Livestock Auction, Tulia. ♦Woodstock Livestock Market, Woodstock. hart. ♦Tyler Livestock Marketing Company (for­ ♦Wytheville Livestock Market, Inc., Wythe- ♦Decatur Auction Sale, Decatur. merly Tyler Livestock Marketing Commis­ sion Company), Tyler. ville. ♦Ennis Auction Company, Ennis. • W ashington ♦Farmers & Ranchers Livestock Co., Denton. ♦Vernon Stockyards Company, Inc., Vernon. ♦Farmers & Ranchers Livestock Commission ♦Weatherford Livestock Commission Co., ♦Auburn Livestock Market, Inc., Auburn. Co., Paris. Weatherford. ♦Colville Auction Co., Colville. ♦Frio Livestock Sale (formerly Frio Live­ ♦Wellington Livestock Commission Co. ♦Prosser Salesyard, Inc., Prosser. stock Sale Company), Pearsall. (formerly Wellington Livestock Commis­ Vancouver Livestock Auction Market, Van­ ♦Gainesville Livestock Auction, Gainesville. sion) , Wellington. couver. ♦Gillespie Livestock Co., Inc. (formerly Gil­ ♦Whitesboro Livestock & Commission Com­ ♦Walla Walla Livestock Commission Co., lespie County Livestock Auction), Fred­ pany- (formerly Whitesboro Livestock & Walla Walla. Commission), Whitesboro. ericksburg. West Virginia ♦Gilmore Livestock Commission Co., Bowie. ♦Wichita Livestock Auction (formerly Wich­ ♦Graham Livestock Auction (formerly ita Falls Cattle Auction), Wichita Falls. ♦Alderson Livestock Market, Alderson. Graham Livestock Commission Co.), ♦Wills Point Livestock Commission Company ♦Bluegrass Market, Inc., North Caldwell. Graham. (formerly Wills Point Livestock Comm.), ♦Blueridge Livestock Sales, Inc,, Charles ♦Groesbeck Commission Company, Groes- Wills Point. • Town. beck. ♦Winnsboro Livestock Commission, ♦Bridgeport Stbckyards, Inc., Bridgeport. ♦Groveton Livestock Commission Company, Winnsboro. ♦Buckhannon Stockyards, Buckhannon. Groveton. ♦Wood County Livestock Auction, Mineola. ♦Elkins Stockyards, Inc., Elkins. ♦Haskell Livestock Auction, Haskell. ♦Woodville Livestock Commission Co., ♦Gassawày Livestock Market, Inc., Gassaway. ♦Henderson County Livestock Auction, Inc. Woodville. ♦Jackson County Livestock Market, Inc., (formerly Henderson County Livestock U tah Ripley. ^Commission Company), Athens. •Mannington Stockyards, Inc., Mannington. ♦Delta Livestock Auction Company, Delta. ♦Moundsville Livestock Auction Company, Hopkins County Livestock Commission Co. ♦Richfield Auction Market, Richfield. (formerly Hopkins County Livestock), Moundsville. Sulphur Spring. ♦Salina Auction Co., Salina. ♦New River Livestock Market, Inc., Beckley. ♦Smithfield Livestock Auction, Inc., ♦Ohio County Livestock Auction, Inc., West ♦Huntsville Livestock Auction (formerly Smithfield. Alexander, Pa. ■ Huntsville Auction Company), Huntsville. ♦Spanish Fork Livestock Auction, Inc., Span­ ♦Pocahontas Producers Cooperative Associa­ Jacksonville Livestock Commission Com­ ish Fork. pany, Jacksonville. tion, Marlinton. ♦Southern Utah Auction, Cedar City. •Point Pleasant Livestcok Company, Point ♦Kir by ville Auction Barn, Kirbyville. ♦Uintah Sales Barn, Roosevelt. Pleasant.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18074 NOTICES

•South Branch Stockyard, Inc., Moorefleld. Arkansas •Summyland Packing Company, Gainesville. •Spencer Livestock Exchange, Inc., Spencer. Suwannee Packing Company, live Oak. Barnett’s Slaughter House, Crossett. •Taylor Industries, Jay. •Terra Alta Stockyards, Inc., Terra Alta. Bramlett’s Country Market (formerly •Union Livestock Sales Company, Inc., Par­ Clough’s Country Market), Lowell. Georgia kersburg. Brawner Packing Co., Wynne. •Weston Livestock Sales Company, Inc., •Roy Burton Wholesale Meats, North Little AcuffJMeat Processing Plant, Ringgold. Weston. Rock. •Beavers Packing Company, Newnan. W isconsin Brooks County Packing Company, Quitman. Butcher Wholesale Meats, Camden. Bullard’s Sausage Plant, Summerville. •Beetown Sales Barn, Beetown. Carroll Packing Co., Paragould. Carroll Packing Company, Valdosta. •Benoit Livestock Market, Mason. Charleston Frozen Foods, Charleston. City Abattoir, Albany. •Clear Lake Livestock Market, Clear Lake. •Columbia Packing Co., Magnolia. •Cochran Provision Company, Dublin. •Drees Livestock Market, Peshtigo. •Community Abattoir, Inc., Ft. Smith. Dalton Slaughterhouse, Dalton. •Equity Co-op. Livestock Sales Association, Dumas Packing Co., El Dorado. Duffey Sausage Company, Inc., Carrollton. Bonduel. Philip Freer & Son, Ivan. Harrell Sausage Company, Bainbridge. •Equity Livestock Market, Coon Valley. Garner’s Abbatoir & Meat Processing Co., D. L. Lee & Sons, Alma. •Equity Co-op, Sales Association, Johnson Van Buren. Levinson Bros., Inc,, Rome. Creek. Gude Packing Co., Blytheville. Quitman Abattoir, Quitman. •Equity Co-op. Livestock Market, Sparta. •Hawthorne Packing Co., Hot Springs. Evans Locker Plant, Evans. •Geurkink, Bill, Baldwin. Huber Slaughter Plant, Subiaco. Lowell Packing Company, Fitzgerald. •Matthes Market, Viola. •Leo Hunt, Pine Bluff. *R. H. McEver Packing Company, Talmo. •Mondovi NFO Collection Point, Mondovi. •Hot Springs Packing Co., Inc., Hot Springs. •Moree Packing Company, Albany. •Randall, Jerry (formerly Central Wisconsin •Kierre & Sons, North Little Rock. •Rome Provision Company, Inc., Rome. Livestock Market), Augusta. •Kindervater & Sons Market, R., Little Rock. •South Central Livestock Exchange, Portage. •Kruse Packing Company, Alexander. •Scott Meat Packers, Augusta. Lasiter Packing Co. (formerly Robertson •Southern Foods, Inc., Columbus. W yoming Packing Co.), Booneville. Idaho Lawton Wholesale Meats, Warren. •Douglas Livestock Exchange Co., Douglas. •Ball Packing Corp., Idaho Falls. •Gillette Livestock Auction, Gillette. •Meacham Packing Company, Batesville. Bendel’s Packing Plant, Troy. •Greybull Livestock Commission Co., Mhoon Beef, Co., Fayetteville. •Boise Valley Packing Co., Eagle. Greybull. •Middleton Packing Company, Newport. •Lander Livestock Commission Co., Lander. •Miller Packing Company (formerly Steed Bryant Packing Co., Burley. •Laramie Livestock Exchange, Inc., Laramie. Pkg. Co.), Judsonia. Dahmen Pood Lockers, Lewiston. •Lusk Livestock Exchange, Lusk. Mitchell Locker Plant (formerly Riggan •Gem Meat Packing Co., Boise. •Powell Auction Market, Powell. Brothers Locker Plant), Sheridan. Gooby and Sons Meats, Inc., Sandpoint. •Riverton Auction & Livestock Co. (formerly Montgomery, Ralph Grocery & Market, Hope. •Grimes Packing Co., Nampa. Monticello Packing Co. (formerly McKiever’s HiBoy Meats, Emmett. - Riverton Livestock Auction), Riverton. Hillcrest Packing Co., Nampa. •Sheridan Livestock Commission Co., Sheri­ Wholesale Meats), Monticello. Howard’s Meat Processing Plant, Grangeville. dan. Morrilton Packing Co., Morrilton. •Stockman Livestock Commission, Inc., North West Arkansas Packing Co., Rogers. •Idaho Falls Meat Co., Idaho Falls. •Oliver Slaughtering House, Stuttgart. •Independent Meat Co., Inc., Twin Falls. Torrington. Jenson Custom Packing Co., Rupert. •Torrington Livestock Commission”' Co., Pruett Meat Market, Batesville. Johnston Bros. Packing Co., Caldwell. Torrington. Redd Slaughter House, Harrisburg. •Knudson Packing Co., Preston. •Worland Livestock Auction, Worland. •Reeder Meat Company, Arkadelphia. Russellville Packing Co., Russellville. •Michelson Pack, Blackfoot. S pecifically Approved Slaughtering •Ryburn & Glover Meat Co. (formerly Mon­ Nampa Packing Co., Nampa. Establishments roe Ryburn Meats), Pine Bluff. Owyhee Meat Packers, Homedale. St. Scholastica, Ft. Smith. Penguin Lockers, Fruitland. The following slaughtering establish­ •Searcy Frozen Foods, Searcy. Peoples Packing Co., Rupert. ments preceded by an asterisk are spe­ •Taylor Brothers Wholesale Meats, Gurdon. Williams Customs Service, Council. cifically approved for the purposes of •White County Packing Co., Searcy. •Y-J Packing Co., Coeur d’Alene. Illinois § 78.5 of Title 9, Code of Federal Regula­ California tions, concerning brucellosis reactors Al’s Packing Plant, Maperville. and of paragraph (b) of § 78.12 of said •Crum Meat Co., McArthur. •Hill Top Meat Co., Roseville. Bartlow Bros., Inc'., Rushville. Title 9, concerning cattle not known to •Moller & Sons, Pleasanton. Bergman Meat Packing Co., Inc., Pittsfield. be affected with brucellosis, and those •Moxon’s Gold Star Meats, Eureka. Brighton Locker Plant, Brighton. not preceded by an asterisk are specif­ *C. V. Panizzera, Occidental. Callihan & Company, Peoria. ically approved for the purposes of para­ Covemaker Packing Company, Moline. •Regusci Meat Co., Napa. David’s Frozen Food Center, Milford. graph (b) of § 78.12 only. •Trophy Meat Co., San Miguel. DeSchepper Packing Co., Milan. Alabama Colorado Ducey Packing Co., Jerseyville. Barney’s Pork House, Decatur. •Colorado Packing Company, La Junta. DuQuoin Packing Company, DuQuoin. •Beesley Packing Co., Inc., Andalusia. Eckert Orchard Association, Belleville. Bird Packing Co., Inc., Midland City. Connecticut Edgar County Locker Service, Paris. •Decatur Packing Co., Decatur. Elmwood Locker Service, Elmwood. E. & J. Farms, Windham. Goble, Howard, Danville. •East Alabama Frozen Foods & Provision Co., •Connecticut Packing Company, Bloomfield. Hamilton Locker Service, Hamilton. Opelika. •Dan Brook Packing Company, New Milford. Hansen Packing Co., Jerseyville. Florence Frozen Foods Slaughter Plant, Flor­ F. DeMartino & Son, Seymour. Harmon Packing Co., Paris. ence. Hazardville Packing, Hazardville. Hartrich Meat Processing Plant, St. Marie. Florence Packing Company, Florence. •Shore Line Packing Co., East Haven. Hill Packing Company, Danville. •Haas-Davis Packing Company, Mobile. •Southington Packing, Southington. Hinote Packing Co., Loxley. Hoopeston Food Lockers, Hoopeston. Delaware Hubbard Packing Company, Chicago. •Lumberjack Meats, Inc. (formerly Leeds Humphrey Packing Co., Lawrenceville. Packing Company), Leeds. Goldberg Brothers, Wilmington. Johannes Market, Quincy. Nelms & Son, Decatur. Sidney Hendler, Wilmington. Jones Packing Company, Harvard. •Roanoke Packing Co., Inc., Roanoke. Kemp’s Meats, Wyoming. Kabrick Locker Plant, Plainville. Williams Packing Co., Gadsden. Anthony G. Messina, Wilmington. L & M Slaughter House, Georgetown. •R. L. Zeigler, Inc., Selma. Townsend Locker Plant, Townsend. McLain’s Locker Plant, Warren. •R. L. Zeigler, Inc., Tuscaloosa. Marengo Packing Co. (formerly Burnside & Florida Arizona Son), Marengo. •Busby, Vern, Meat Co., Tucson. •Beesley Packing Company of Florida, Inc., Margolin Packing Co., Danville. Evans Meat Co., Phoenix. Pensacola. Metamora Abattoir, Metamora. •Herseth Meat Packing Co., Phoenix. •Economy Packing House, Hialeah. Papineau Lockers, Papineau. Maricopa Packing Co., Phoenix. Florida Packing & Provision Co., Division of Parks Processing Plant, Warren. Paramount Packing Co., Casa Grande. Triangle Lockers, Palatka. Petroff Packing Company, Benton. Southwest Meat Co., Yuma. •Jones-Chambliss Co., Jacksonville. Potomac Slaughter Rouse, Potomac. Stone & Randall Meat Co., Mesa. •Meat Supply Co., Pensacola. Raber Packing Company, Peoria. •Tempe Meat Packing Co., Tempe. Register Meat Company, Inc., Cottondale. Rock River Provision Company, Rock Falls.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18075 Rocke’s Cold Storage, Morton. Grandia Locker, Otley. Grinnell Locker, Grinnell. Ruff Locker Service, Quincy. Groff Locker Service, Blockton. Haag Locker Plant, Fairview. Sheldon Market & Food Lockers, Sheldon. Hamburg Lockers, Hamburg. Haddam Locker, Haddam. Sievers, Tony, Slaughter House, Palestine. Haviland Brothers, Sergeant Bluffs. Harrell Packing Company, Hugoton. Smith Packing Co., Harrisburg. Holst’s Frozen Foods, Forest City. Hentzler Packing Company, Topeka. Stone Meat Packing, Chicago Heights. Inwood Locker, Inwood. Herndon and Sons, Syracuse. Streck Packing Company, Belleville. Jim & Dean’s Town & County Market, Inc., Herrmann Locker, Waterville. Tuscola Locker Service, Tuscola. Council Bluffs. ‘Hinman Packing Company, Wichita. Virginia Packing Company, Virginia. Johnson Market and Locker, Rake. Hoseney’s Dressed Beef, Coffeyville. Weyhaupt Bros. Packing Co., Belleville. K & K Locker Service, Milton. Howard Packing Company, Howard. Wunderlich Packing Co., Sharon (Wiscon­ Keosauqua Locker, Keosauqua. Howell’s Market, St. Francis. sin) . Lansing Lockers, Lansing. Jesco Meat Products, Caldwell. Y. T. Packing Company, Springfield. Lime Springs Locker, Lime Springs. Jones Packing Company, Dodge City. Little Rock Locker (formerly Meendering’s K-12 Meat Company, Baxter Springs. Indiana Locker Plant), Little Rock. Kane’s Packing Plant, Meade. Barney’s Meat Packing (formerly Vale City Manufactures Surplus Outlet, West Burling­ Katches Packing Company, Wichita. Packing Co.), Valparaiso. > ton. Kaw Valley Packing Company, Kansas City. Berne Locker, Berne. Martin Meat Processing Company, Under­ Kier Grocery & Market, Mankato. Bloomington Packing Co., Bloomington. wood. Kimmal Packing Company, Norton. Brook Locker Plant, Brook. Moulton Locker, Moulton. Kiowa Locker System, Kiowa. Cable Line Meats, Elkhart. Nissen & Son Packing Company, Inc., Web­ C. W. Lee Packing Company, Portis. Carpenter, K. & Sons, Shipshewana. ster City. Liberal Packing Company, Liberal. Clark & Moore Processing Plant, Monticello. Northwood Locker Service, Northwood. Louie’s Zero Locker, Girard. Clinton Packing Co., Clinton. Paullina Locker Plant, Paullina. ‘McArthur Meats, Inc., Hutchinson. Cole, Mark Packing Co., Sharpsville. Pella Packing Company, Pella. McFerron Bros. Wholesale Meats, Lawton. Dewig Bros. Packing Co., Haubstadt. Pierce Lockers, Armstrong. *M & M Packing Company, Iola. Elcona Foods Inc. (formerly Elkhart Packing Potter Cheese Factories, Inc., New Albin. W. A. Mathes Meat Company, Kansas City. Co.), Elkhart. Preston Locker, Preston. ‘Menghini Bros. Slaughtering Establishment, Farm Boy Meats of Evansville, Inc., Evans­ Pulaski Locker Service, Pulaski. Frontenac. ville. Puritan Ice Cream Company, Cresco. Miller Locker System, Erie. Fisher Packing Co., Portland. Riceville Locker, Riceville. Miller Packing Company, Wilson. Greenfield Abattoir, Inc., Greenfield. Richard & Sons, Inc., Muscatine. Modern Market & Lockers, Winona. Gustin Slaughter House, Antwerp, Ohio. Risetter Pack, Jewell. Oberlin Locker, Oberlin. Gutzweiler Packing Co., Jasper. Rock Rapids Locker & Freezer Provisioning, •O. K. Packing Company, Goodland. Hanford Packing. Co., Thayer. Rock Rapids. Old Fashion Meat Market, DeSoto. Hargis, Inc. (formerly Hamilton Locker Co.), Scarville Food Market, Scarville. *P & B Packing Company, Hays. Hamilton. Steele Packing Company, Centerville. Palace Market, St. Francis. Harlow Meat Market, Seymour. Swea City Locker, Swea City. Phillips Slaughterhouse, Hill City. Helm Market, Winchester. Thompsons Locker and Grocery, Harris. Phillipsburg Locker, Phillipsburg. Hitch Packing Co., Princeton. Thompson Processing Service, Bloomfield. Pratt Frozen Food Locker, Pratt. Kucan Food Shop, Gary. Valley Locker Service, Rock Valley. Ragsdale Slaughtering Establishment, Lib­ Lengerich Slaughter House, Monroe. Younie Processing Plant, Hawarden. eral. Main Meat Market, Inc., Brookville. Rindt Slaughtering Company, Galena. Manley, Glen Custom Butchering, Decatur. K ansas S & S Packing Co., Inc., Girard. Marburger Packing Inc., Peru. A & H Butchers, Arkansas City. Schnelle’s Wholesale Meats, Greensburg. Merkley & Sons, Inc., Jaspen *Abilene Packing Company, Abilene. Snow’s Locker Plant, Kansas City. Miller Packing Co., Kokomo^ ‘Adams Bros. Packing Company, Colby. Spring Hill Packing Company, Spring Hill. Miller Processing Co., Georgetown. Addington Slaughtering Establishment, Elk­ •Sunflower Packing Company, Wichita. Mischler Packing Co., Lagrange. hart. Stoney Bros. Slaughterhouse, Herndon. Monticello Packing Co. Inc., Monticello. Anthony Meat, Anthony. Swim Locker Service, Marysville. Moore Packing, Gary. Ayres Packing Plant, Greenleaf. Synovec Grocery & Locker, Morrowville. Ossian Locker Plant, Ossian. Ball Lockers, Baxter Springs. •Thies Packing Company, Inc., Great Bend. Parrott Packing Co., Ft. Wayne. Barnes Beef Company, Parsons. Tonganoxie Frozen Foods Locker, Tonga- Price, Walter Abattoir, Plymouth. Beattie Lockers, Beattie. noxie. Producers Marketing Assn., Columbia City. Beverly Independent Slaughtering Establish., Valley Vista Locker Service, Topeka. Rahe, Wm. J. & Sons, Muncie. Salina. Joseph Vlach & Sons, Hanover. Rockville Packing Co., Rockville. Beverly Meat & Locker, Inc., Salina. Washburn Packing Company, Hutchinson. Roos Packing Co„ Indianapolis. Blchelmeyer Slaughterhouse, Kansas City. Welch’s Frozen Food Center, Frankfort. Rose City Packing Co., Inc., New Castle. Brooks Locker Service, Blue Rapids. Wiley & Green Packing Company, Leaven­ Rowe, A. & Sons, Terre Haute. Burd Locker and Grocery, Atwood. worth. Rutzel Slaughter House, Aurora. Butchers Packing Company, Coffeyville. Wilkerson Meat Company, Pittsburg. Schmitt, H. P. Packing Co., Decatur. Claude Cady Slaughtering Establishment, ♦Winchester Packing Company, Inc., South Schuler Packing Co., Ferdinand. Osborne. Hutchinson. Shackelford, W. E., Owensville. Colby Lockers, Colby. Winkler’s Slaughterhouse, Liberal. Standard Packing Co., Kokomo. Coldwater Lockers, Coldwater. ‘Woody’s Wholesale Meats, St. Marys. ’ State Line Packing Co., Momencee, Illinois. C. C. Wurst Locker Service, Grainfield. Stephens, M. M. & Sons Packing Co., Chester­ Columbus Wholesale & Retail Meat Market, Columbus. K entucky ton. Comanche Meat Company, Witchita. Straub & Smith Packing Co., Indianapolis. Community Locker Service, Medicine Lodge. Ashland Meat Company, Ashland. Top of Indiana Beef Co., Fort Wayne. Cramer Food Bank, Washington. Boone’s Abattoir, Bardstown. Troy Packing Co., Indianapolis. Davenport Meat Plant, Lawrence. S. M. Campbell Co., Gray. Valentine Co., Inc., Terre Haute. Loren DeGraeve Slaughtering Establishment, ♦Elm Hill Meats, Inc., Lexington. Vetter Meat Co., Kokomo. Bucyrus. Emory Gillum Warehouse Meats, Inc., Ash­ Vletti Bros. Packing Co., Clinton. •Dunn Packing Company, Wichita. land. Ward Packing Co., Monon. Dye Slaughterhouse, Meade. ♦Field Packing Company, Owensboro. Wilcox Inc., North Liberty. Economy Lockers, Sharon Springs. Field Packing Co., Bowling Green. Wolf Meat Market, New Albany. Emporia Packing Company, Emporia. Frosty Foods Locker, Taylorsville. Wright Packing Co., Chandler. ‘Fanestil Packing Company, Emporia. Griffin Packing Company, Danville. Young Bros. Market, Ladoga. Roy Fisher Grocery & Locker, Bird City. Henderson Slaughtering, Henderson. Iowa ♦Fredonia Packing Company, Fredonia. Jones Packing Co., Paducah. ♦Fort Scott Packing Company, Inc., Fort ♦Koch Beef Company, Louisville. Bryant’s Locker, Donnellson. Scott. ♦Louisville Beef Company, Louisville. Carstensen Meats & Processing Service, Lake ‘Gallagher Processing, Concordia. Metzger Bros., Paducah. Park. Garden City Packing Company, Hutchinson. ‘Mt. Sterling Packing Co., Mt. Sterling. Community Meat Processors, Mount Ayr. Gardner Packing Company, Hutchinson. ♦Parker Sausage Company, Georgetown. d & H Storage Company, Sibley. ♦Gettle Packing Company, Haysville. *C. Rice Packing Co., Covington. * *** s Lockers, Ocheyedan. Glenn’s Frozen Food Service, Dighton. Riverside Packing Co., Paducah. Frozen Foods Center, Akron. •Griffith Provision Company, Inc., Downs. ‘Harry Ross Packing Co., Paducah.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18076 NOTICES

J. F. Schneider & Son, Inc., Middlesboro. Michigan Cloud (Ned) and Son Packing Company, Shroat Meat Market, Murray. ♦Ada Beef Company, Ada. Springfield. ♦Walton Locker & Slaughtering House, Wal­ Cope’s Slaughter Company, Palmyra. ton. Allen Packing Company, Charlotte. ♦Allendale Beef Co., Allendale. Crandal’s Frozen Food Lockers, Warrensburg. ♦Bob White Packing Co., Bowling Green. Bellefeuil Bros., Wilson. Crenshaw Packing Company, Charleston. Winman Packing Company, Madisonville. ♦Besbris & Sons, Max, Kalamazoo. Cummins Custom Butchery, Webb City. Louisiana Brady’s Midway Market, Cassopolis. Delaloye, Robert and Sons, Troy. ♦Choice Packing Co., Detroit. Dexter Packing Company, Inc., Dexter. ♦Autin Packing Co., Houma. DeBoer & Son, Mark, St. Johns. Edwards Slaughter House, Salem. ♦Berry Packing Co., H. O., Bastrop. ♦Dykstra Wholesale Beef, Grand Rapids. F & J Meat Producers Slaughtering House, Crawford’s Super Market, Covington. Edson, Inc., Lee, Hudsonville. W arr ensburg. ♦Guillot, Inc., Arthur J., Slidell. Feldman Brothers, Detroit. Francis Packing Company, St. Louis. - *H & S Packing Co., Baton Rouge. ♦Fillmore Beef Company, Holland. Frick Slaughter Service, Union. ♦Micelle’s Packing Plant (John Micelle), ♦Gemmen & Sons, Inc., A. Allendale. Frick’s Super Market, Inc., Washington. Lake Charles. Gerding Packing Co., Davison. Grand Packing Company, Imperial. ♦Millwood Packing Company, Scotlandville. Haarer’s Meat Processing Plant, Saline. Grote, T. J., St. Louis. Port City Packing Co., Inc., Satsuma. Hazekamp & Sons, Bert, Muskegon. Herrod Packing Company, Inc., Joplin. ♦Thompson Packing Company, Thibodaux. . Hillsdale County Meats, Waldron. Hester, A. L„ Packing Company, Bernie. Western Packing Co., Slidell. Houghton Beef Packers, Ionia. Lebanon Packing Company, Lebanon. LeDuc Packing Company, Springfield. Maryland ♦Johnson, Inc., Carl R., Kalamazoo. Johnson & Son, Felix, Escanaba. Liberty Locker Company, Liberty. ♦Bauerlien, Edward C., Hampstead. Kappler Packing Co., Ann Arbor. McGee’s Home Killed Meats, Mexico. ♦Benson Meat Products Company, Fallston. Kastel Slaughtering House, Riga. Manning Dressed Beef, Springfield. ♦Boyle, B. H., Emmitsburg. Keefer’s Market, Morenci. Maryville Packing Company, Maryville. ♦Brook Meadow Provision Company, Hagers­ Kiebler & Sons, A. M., Glinton. Moberly Packing Plant, Moberly. town. Laden Packing Company, Hillsdale. Modlin, Jack, Slaughtering Establishment, ♦Bullocks, G. Winston, Westminster. Lake Superior Beef, Dafter. Joplin. ♦Burger, Ray, Halfway Processing, Williams­ Little River Packing, Menominee. Ogden, Cottle P„ Slaughtering Establish­ port. Marshall-Collicker Packing, Bay City. ment, Vandalia. ♦Burtner’s Meats, Middletown. ♦Merritt Packing Co., Carrollton. Paige Packing Company, St. Louis. ♦Cecil Provision Co., Elkton. Meyer Provision Co., Iron River. Paris Lockers and Abattoir, Inc., Paris. ♦Cumberland Meats, Inc., Cumberland. ♦Midway Packing Company, Wayland. Pemiscot Packing Company, Wardell. ♦Dameron Butcher Shop, Dameron. ♦Monarch Packing, Detroit. Pipkin-Boyd-Neal Packing Company, Cape ♦Gladhill Brothers (formerly Gladhill Meat Moor’s Slaughterhouse, Don, Homer. Girardeau. Market, Damascus. Nemetz, James <41 Super Market), Porter, Kay M., “Deep Freeze”, Poplar Bluff. ♦Greise, Prances A. & Franklin, Cumber­ Menominee. Raders, Inc., Columbia. land. Parsell Beef Co., Flint. Sikeston Food Lockers, Sikeston. ♦Garvick’s Meat Market, Westminster. ♦Peet Packing Co., Bay City. Twin City Packing Company, Festus. ♦Harsh’s Meat Market (formerly Harsh, Sr., ♦Peet Packing Co., Grand Rapids. United Meat Company, Inc., St. Louis. M. D.), Williamsport. Perry Packing Co., J., Hart. Urbana Locker, Urbana. ♦Heinzerling’s Meats, Inc., Baltimore. ♦Rochester Packing Co., Rochester. V & B Meat Company, Washington. ♦Hemp & Sons, R. D., Jefferson. ♦Reznik’s Slaughtering Establishment, South Welsh Packing Company, Inc., Springfield. ♦Hoffman & Son, Roy L., Hagerstown. Haven. Westerman, John, Troy. ♦Lotz Wholesale Meats, John F., Frostburg, ♦Smallegan, Arthur, Forest Grove. Willy, Leo, Rolla. ♦Martins Meats, Joppa. Wuestling Packing Company, St. Louis. Smith, Hubert H„ Muskegon. Yontz Packing Company, Tipton. ♦Maurer & Miller Meats, Inc., Manchester. ♦Snow & Company, Morris, Detroit. ♦Mount Airy Locker Company, Mount Airy. ♦Standard Beef, Inc. (East), Detroit. Montana * 135 Meat Market, Mountain Lake Park. ♦Standard Beef, Inc. (West), Detroit. ♦Reid, Inc., George L., Baltimore. Stone’s Meat Packing Co., Inc., South Haven. Biastock Meats, Inc., Butte. ♦Ruppersberger & Sons, Inc., George G., Superior Packing, Ironwood. City Meat Company, Wolf Point. Baltimore. Oljar Meat, Glendive. ♦Tamaren Beef Co., Inc., Detroit. Rahr Meat Service, Glendive, ♦Schmidt & Son, Inc., A. W., Baltimore. ♦Taimehill & DeYoung, Inc., Traverse City. Rick’s Packing Company, Livingston. ♦Schmidt, C. J., Baltimore. Telfer Packing Co., Inc., Owosso. ♦Shrivers, Mark A., Millstone Grocery, Cum­ Sidney Locker and Creamery Company, Terrill Supermarket, Marcellus. Sidney. berland. Van Alstine Packing, Inc., East Lansing. Valley Meat Packing Company, Sidney. ♦Shriver, Jr., Norman J., Emmitsburg. ♦Victory Beef Co., Detroit. ♦Shuff’s Meats (formerly Shuflf, Harry Wil­ ♦Wall Packing Co., Sturgis. Nebraska liam) , Thurmont. Weeks & Sons, Co., Inc., Ray, Richmond. ♦Stapf, August, Baltimore. ♦Weiss, George J., Inc., Detroit. Consumers Packing Co., Superior. ♦Thompson’s Food Market, Maryland Line. ♦Zandbergen Slaughterhouse, Grandville. Dundy County Processors, Benkelman. ♦Will, Weldon W., Sykesville. Flicker Packing Co., Scottsbluflf. Mississippi Hersch Packing Co., Scottsbluflf. ♦Working, H. R., Hagerstown. North Platte Packing Co., North Platte. ♦Yoder’s Locker Plant, Grantsville. Barnes & Son, Poplarville. Schorzman Locker Plant, Haigler. Massachusetts Brown’s Slaughter House, Walnut. Yost Packing Plant, Inc. (formerly Red Cloud Burk’s Slaughter House, Carriere. Packing Company), Red Cloud. Adams, Lewis, Athol. Columbus Provision Company, Columbus. Arena & Sons, A., Hopkinton. ♦Dedeaux Packing Company, Inc., Gulfport. Nevada Blood & Son, E. L., W. Groton. ♦Delta Packing Company, Inc., Clarksdale. Carson Valley Meat Co., Minden. Bonanno, Rocco, Methuen. K. Pack (formerly Heck’s Market), Fallon. Brito’s Market, Dartmouth. ♦Gilbert’s Slaughter House, McComb. Budnlck & Son, E., W. Boxford. Jackson Packing Company, Jackson. Ruby Mountain Packing Co., Elko. Cohen Beef Company, Inc., Jacob, Ipswich. Jones Slaughter House, Mrs. Ruby, Summit. New Hampshire Cook’s Slaughterhouse, Edric, Leyden. ♦Owen Brothers Packing Company, Meridian. Crestfield Meat Packing, Brockton. Passbach Slaughter House, Natchez. Eastern Beef Slaughtering Establishment, Hatfield Beef Company, Hatfield. ♦Robinson Brothers Packing Company, Lancaster. Jaeschke Slaughterhouse, Carl, Cheshire. Batesville. George Edwards, Walpole. Mason, Frank, Williams town. ♦Valley Farm, Inc., Laurel. Pel-Son Meats, Inc., Grantham. Molinari, John, Milford. Van Norman Slaughter House, McComb. George Taylor, Dover. Reynolds Slaughterhouse, Shelburne. Well’s Processing and Meat Company, Drew. N ew Jersey Scibelli’s, Anthony, Southwick. Scibelli’s, George, Southwick. Missouri ♦Borden Company, Trenton. Sheinhit, Jacob, Peabody. Alewel Brothers Locker Plant, Concordia. ♦Bringhurst Brothers, Berlin. Stearns, Ed., Charlton. Anderman, Edward, Raytown. Dealaman, George, Plainfield. Streeter’s Slaughterhouse, Bernardston. Baker Packing Company, Mexico. ♦DeVries, John, Sussex. Szala, John, N. Hadley. Dielmann, Fritz, Oak Ridge. Warmesit Abattoir, Tewksbury. Barton County Packing Company, Inc., Lamar. Earrusso, Joseph, Whippany. Weigert Company, George, Worcester. ♦Green Village Packing Company, Green Wilbur, Joseph H., S. Easton. Bouckaert Packing Company, St. Louis. Woods Slaughterhouse, Westport. Central Packing Company, Cape Girardeau. Village.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18077 ♦Irell Packing, Monroeville. Sipperly Bros., Inc., Albany. ♦Henry Packing Company, Lime City. Maresca’s, Stockton. Smith’s Slaughterhouse, H. J., Pine Plains. Herberth, W. J. & Son, Cincinnati. ♦Marx Brothers, Shrewsbury. South Dayton Meat Market, South Dayton. Hermann, C. & Son Slaughtering Establish­ Moonlight Hog Farm, Flemington. Steiger’s Slaughterhouse, Ithaca. ment, Portsmouth. ♦Muench, Egon, Trenton. Steiner, Roger, Otego. Homung Packing Plant, Hamilton. Russo Packing Company, Green Village. Strandburg’s Wholesale Meats, Jamestown. Hunt Meat Packing Company, Grove City. ♦Salem Packing Company, Salem. Tears, Erwin, Penn Yan. Ideal Provision Packing Company, Martins Sussex Packing Company, Sussex. Van Camps, Newark. Ferry. ♦Vineland Dressed Beef, Vineland. Wagner, Harry G„ Alden. Jacoby, Hal C., West Unity. Vogel’s Farm, Bound Brook. Willard, Ward & Son, Heuvelton. Kelble Brothers Packing Co., Berlin Heights. Ziff, Herbert M., Inc., Elnlira. Krugh’s Slaughtering Establishment, Wren. Hew Mexico Lloyd Packing Company, Youngstown. Ben’s Slaughter House, Las Vegas. N orth Carolina Mahan Slaughtering Establishment, Bristol- Curry County Meat Co., Clovis. ♦Aberdeen Packing Co., Aberdeen. ville. Deming Packing Co., Deming. Asheville Packing Co., West Asheville. ♦Marks and Sons, Inc., Cleveland. Hatch Packing Co., Portales. ♦Bonanza Meat Processing Co., Mineral Martin Farm Slaughter House, Fremont. Joe’s Packing Co., Raton. Springs. Meloni’s Meats, Kinsman. Las Cruces Meat Co., Las Cruces. John Boyd and Son’s, Gastonia. Myers and Son, Archbold. New Mexico Packing Co., Inc., Carlsbad. Z. B. Bulluck, Inc., Rocky Mount. New Cooperative Company, Dillonvale. Rayjax Packing Co., Fort Sumner. ♦Carolina Packers, Smithfleld. Nosse, Joe, Packing, Middlefteld. Rollins Packing Co., Clovis. Charlotte Abattoir, Charlotte. ♦Pacer Packing Company, Toledo. Schwartzman Packing Co., Albuquerque. Cook’s Packing Co., Inc., Concord. Parkman Packing Company, Parkman. 66 Packing Co., Tucumcari. ♦Curtis Packing Co., Greensboro. Peden’s Meat Establishment, Kinsman. Stephens Packing Co., Albuquerque. Draughon Abattoir, Fayetteville. Pershing Packing Company, Sardinia. Zero Locker Plant, Portales. Edwards Abattoir, Eden. Piper and Son Provision Company, Dorset. Fritts Packing Co., Inc., Lexington. Pride of Lima Provision Company, Lima. N ew Y ork Greenville Packing Co., Greenville. Rittberger Bros., Zanesville. Acer, Inc., Buffalo. ♦Hickory Packing Co., Hickory. Rockford Locker Service, Rockford. Adams Meat Company, Adams.. Land’s Slaughterhouse, Eden. Ross Abattoir Company, Springfield. Ahl, Charles F., Warsaw. Martin’s Abattoir, Godwin. ♦Routh Packing Company, Tiffin. Apthorpe, Charles F., Jamestown. Mechlenburg Abattoir, Charlotte. Siekkinen, Harold W., Williamsfleld. Aronson, Jerome & Milton, Glens Falls. Moricle Abattoir, Reidsville. Stehlin, John & Sons, Cincinnati. Barbalich’s Slaughterhouse, Watertown. Mount Airy Abattoir, Mount Airy. Sturgis Packing Company, Kenton. Bernacki Brothers, Depew. Norris Packing Co., Shelby. Suter’s Meat Market, Greenville. Bertch’s Slaughterhouse & Processing Plant, Peacock Meat Co., Inc., Rocky Mount. ♦Tanks Meats, Elmore. Almond. Randolph Packing Co., Asheboro. Valley Packing Company, Lansing. Bond, Frederick, West Valley. Robersonville Packing Co., Robersonvllle. Village Packing Company, Columbus. Booth, Harry L„ Poughkeepsie. A. J. Schlosser and Sons, Greensboro. Warren and Bever Processing, Whipple. Bostwick, J. M. and Son, Inc., Caledonia. Scottish Packing Co., Lumberton. Weber Packing, Marietta. Brennan, Patrick, Inc., Buffalo. Stewart’s Abattoir, Mount Airy. Werling, Eleanora, Slaughtering Establish­ Bricetti’s Bedford Market, Yorktown Heights. White Packing Co., Inc., Salisbury. ment, Burkettsville. Canastota Frozen Food Locker, Canastota. Whiteville Packing Co., Whiteville. Williams, B. J. Slaughtering Establishment, Carelas, Peter, Greenville. Williamston Packing Co., Williamston. Pierpont. Conley, George, Slaughterhouse, Bath. Yadkin Valley Packers, Inc., Elkin. Willimans, Van Wert. Conti Packing Company, Inc., Henrietta. Winner, Robert F„ Sons, Osgood. Country Butcher Service, Nichols. North D akota Young’s Slaughter Plant, Manchester. Cuomo, Alphonso, Altamont. Abercrombie Meat Processing, Abercrombie. Zimmerman Packing Company, Youngstown. Cuomo, Neil, Schenectady. Brown’s Meat and Lockers, Ellendale. Davis Brothers, Oswego. Goldade’s Butcher Shop, Linton. Oklahoma Dillon, Edward, Wyoming. Hillside Meat Company, Williston. ♦Akins and Fincannon, Sand Springs. Dye’s Meat Market, Bridgewater. Houghton Meat Market, Ellendale. Antlers Slaughter House, Antlers. Ehmer, Karl Farms Corp., LaGrangeville. Merwin Pack, Hettinger. B & B Grocery and Locker, Dacoma. F. K. & Sons, Inc., Buffalo. Northland Packing Company, Grand Forks. B & B Packing Company, Oklahoma City. Frank Brothers Farms, Inc., Poughkeepsie. Pembina Locker Plant, Pembina. ♦Braden’s Slaughter Establishment, Ponca Geerken Packers, Inc., Worcester. Schmaltz Meats, Linton. City. Gorham Meat Products Co., Gorham. Wagner’s Super Market, Strasburg. •Brooks Packing Company, Tulsa. Hanlon, Gilfus & Foltz, Weedsport. Whelan’s Processing Plant, Ellendale. ♦Brown’s Slaughtering Establishment, Joe H obart’s Refrigerated Service, Clarence S„ Tulsa. Center. Ohio ♦Butcher Packing Company, W. H., Okla­ Hokan’s Slaughter House, Angola. Arnett’s Packing House, Laura. homa City. Kamery’s Wholesale Meats, Olean. Barnes Provision, Inc., Alliance. Butcher Slaughtering Establishment, Kingston Beef Corp., Inc., Kingston. Boliantz, E. R., Co., Mansfield. Bartlesville. Klink Bros., Inc., Buffalo. Boll, John & Son, Ironton. ♦Butch’s Meat Cottage, Seminole. L & c Meat Co., Split Rock. Boomershine Slaughtering Establishment, ♦Canadian Valley Slaughtering Establish­ Lashway, Victor & Sons, Saranac. Germantown. ment, Oklahoma City. Lewis Market, Rome. Brewster Slaughtering Establishment, ♦Central Packing Company, Muskogee. Lillie’s Wholesale Meats, Auburn. Mason. City Packing Company, Shawnee. Locker, Plant, The, Randolph, Randolph. Buchy, Chas. G., Packing Co., Greenville. Cleveland Lockers, Cleveland. Lynch, Don J. Packing House, Chaffee. Busse, L. W. & Sons, Port Loramie. Coly’s, H. H„ Boise City. Maori Beef & Veal Co., Inc., Utica. Conneaut Frozen Food Locker, Conneaut. Cones Packing Company, Miami. Maple Grove Farms, Warners. Convoy Meat Market, Convoy. ♦Cornett Slaughtering Establishment, Okla­ McGuire, B. Frank, Granville. ♦Copley Packing Co., Copley. homa City. Medina Provision Company, Inc., Medina. Cuyahoga Meat Co., Cleveland. Crosby & Crosby Slaughtering Establish­ Mest, William G. Packing Co., Strykersville. Dayton Packing Co., Dayton. ment, Wright City. Morandi Packing Co., Inc., Hillsdale. DeLuca Slaughtering Establishment, Cushing Packing and Provision Co., Cushing. Nadler, Vergil, Moravia. Rayland. ♦Custom Slaughtering, Inc., Tulsa. Newell, Donald, Morrisonville. ♦Evans Packing Company, Gallipolis. ♦Daack Packing Company, Ponca City. Orleans Meat Processing Co., Albion. Fairmont Provision Co., Alliance. Douglas-Pierce Company, Norman. Packer’s Wholesale Meats, Amsterdam. -Falter, Herman, Packing Co., Columbus. Pagliuso, Joe & Bors., Inc., Ontario. Feher’s, Martins Ferry. Dudley Tucker Slaughter, Durant. Pat’s Market, Batavia. Fidel Bros., Packing Co., Unionville. Elkins Market, Waurika. Polyniak, Victoria, Newark Valley. Flechtner Bros. Packing Co., Inc., Fostoria. ♦Enid Packing Company, Enid. Potter Packing Company, Middlesex. Frame, Myron, Slaughtering Establishment, Fairfax Packing Company, Fairfax. Manchester. Fairview Packing Company, Fairview. Puritan Provisions, Cohoes. Gibson Packing Co., Zanesville. Frazer Packing Company, Aline. Riteway Processing Co., Middleport. Goldsberry Meat Market, Ripley. Frazer Wholesale Meat Company, Ardmore. Saltsman, Glenn L., Fonda. ♦Hall Bros., Inc., Olmstead Falls. Gibson Meat Company, Nowata. Schreiber, Frank & Sons, Webster. Hasselback, E. E. & Son, Fremont. Grant, R. O., Slaughtering Establishment, Shappee & Shelve Meat Plant, Pine City. ♦Henderson Meats, Waterloo. Idabel.

No 229_____7 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18078 NOTICES

Halstead Slaughtering Establishment, P ennsylvania J. T. Provision Co., Inc., McKeesport. Fairview. Joseph Packing Co., Connellsville. Harris Meat & Produce Company, Oklahoma Ahrens, E. F., & Sons, Inc., York. Kaufman Beef & Provision Co., Dalton. City. Alan Beef Co., Dunmore. Kelly’s Packing, Connellsville. Harrison’s Meat House, Oklahoma City. Albert Packing Co., Washington. ♦Kessler’s, Lemoyne. Hilburn Meat Market, Madill. Alfrey’s Sausage Co., Greensbqrg. Kline Brothers, Hollidaysburg. Hominy Food Lockers, Hominy. Alinkoff’s Harry & Son, Wilkes-Barre. Knapp, Lee & Son, Albion. ♦Husband Brothers Slaughtering Establish­ American Foods, Inc. (formerly Delfrate Kolb, Samuel, Spring City. ment, Oklahoma City. Packing Co.), Slovan. Kovacevic Brothers, Sewickley. Hutchinson Slaughtering Establishment, Anderson, Roy, East Berlin. Kreisl Brothers, Hazleton. W. R., Waynoka. Aquilante, Congens, Berwyn. Kunzler & Co., Inc., Lancaster. Bladerston Brothers, Newtown. Kverages Meat Plant, Rome. Jackson Slaughtering Establishment, Earl, Bardine Packing Co., Crabtree. Pawhuska. Barnes, T. William, Waynesburg. y Lakeview Packing Co., Inc., Sandy Lake. ♦Jones Packing Co., Madill. Battles Meat Processing, Saegertown. Landis Brothers, Skippack. Kay Packing Company, Ponca City. Baumgardner Packing Co., Finleyville. Lavella, Victor L., Kersey. Klein’s Meats, Perry. Beaver Valley Packing Co., New Brighton, Lawrence, H. M. & Son, Albion. ♦Lawton Meat Supply, Lawton. Bilskl, Joseph, Waterford. Leali Brothers, Wheatland. ♦Little Dixie Packing Company, McÀlester. Bingman Packing Co., Berlin. Leona Meat Plant, Troy. Manschreck Wholesale Meats, Krebs. Blough’s Slaughter House, Hooversville. Lepidi & Sons, Inc., Jeanette. ♦Miller Packing Company, Sapulpa. Bovalina Packing Co., Slovan. Levchik, Mike, Hooversville. Miller Slaughtering Establishment, Elmer, Boyer, Kenneth L„ Klingerstown. Lichliter, J. C. & Co., Salisbury. Covington. Brann’s Slaughtering House, Canton. Livezey, Merrill, Sugar Grove. Morris Slaughtering Establishment, J. C., Breauchy, Harry H„ Sharon. Locustdale Packing Co., Locustdale. Stilwell. Bristol Beef Co., Bristol. Loutsion Packing Co., Canonsburg. Norman Wholesale Meat Company, Norman. Broadwater, Forrest, Salisbury. Lovewell, Thomas, Waterford. ♦OK Packing Company, Tecumseh. Brown’s Slaughter House, Smethport. Lukon Meats, Burgettstown. ♦Oklahoma Packing Company, Oklahoma Brown, Victor, Port Allegany. Madrigale, Frank, Bristol. City. Burkee’s Food Market, McSherrystown. Mamula, Pete, Aliquippa. ♦Okmulgee Packing Company, Okmulgee. Burkholder, Eugene, Garrett. Martin, Ezra W., Lancaster. Panhandle A&M College, Goodwell. Butler Packing Co., Butler. Martin, Gerald, Chambersburg. Puckett Packing Company, Sayre. Carpenter, Rex Packing Co., Townville. Martin, John F. & Sons, Inc., Denver. Ralph’s Packing Company, Perkins. Carpenter, Simon T., Sheridan. Melvin, Arthur G., Greenville. ♦Reeves Packing Company, W. E., Ada. Castle Provision Co., Darragh. Midway Market, Milan. Riber Custom Slaughtering Establishment, Center Valley Packing Co., Center Valley. Miller, E. R., Hanover. Hominy. Clark Packing Co., Paxinos. Millers Fayetteville Abattoir (formerly Fay­ Ridley Packing Company, Duncan. Clark, William A., Homer City. etteville Abattoir), Fayetteville. ♦Santa Fe Packing Company, Muskogee. Coffaro, Frank B., Sugar Grove. Mitman, Vernon K., Nazareth. ♦Shalloup Slaughtering Establishment, Alva. Crissman Brothers, Castanea. Moxham Packing Co., Johnstown. Shults Slaughtering Establishment, Strat­ Cunningham Locker & Slaughter House, Moyer Brothers, Reinholds. ford. Meyersdale. Myers Brothers, Spring Mills. Simank’s Frozen Food Center, Stillwater. Danko, Matthew, Latrobe. Nace, Melvin M., Hanover. Tri-State Super Market, Guymon. Darling, Howard, La Plume. Nell, Charles & Wayne N„ East Berlin. ♦Tulsa Beef and Provision Company, Tulsa. DeFranco, Philip & Son (formerly Philip Northrup, Gerry C., North East. Turner Brothers, Mowata. DeFranco), North Bangor, Northwestern Packing Co., Pittsburgh. Turner, C. L., Slaughtering Establishment, Devault Packing Co., Devault. Olijnyk, M. & B., Harrison City. Moore. Dressier, Norman, Exeter. Patterson’s Meat Market, Littlestown. ♦Turvey, Inc., Oklahoma City. Dysinger, B. C. & Son, Thompsontown. Peluso, John M„ New Castle. ♦Turvey Packing Company, Blackwell. East Carson Packing Co., Pittsburgh. Pennsylvania State University, University ♦Virginia B., Slaughtering Establishment, Edward Brothers, Dalton. Park. Tulsa. Eremic, George N.» Monroeville. Perry Packing Co., Daisytown. Whitten Slaughter House, Broken Bow. Fine, Dave, Saxonburg. Peters Bros. Meat Market, Lenhartsville. ♦Wickham Packing Company, Ada. Fischer, J. Fred & Sons, Inc., York. Pezzner Brothers, Ashley. ♦Wickham Packing Company, Sapulpa. Fisher, Wellington J., Selinsgrove. Pieniazek, Walter, Waterford. Wiley Brewer Slaughtering Establishment, Frazier, Charles E„ Stoystown. Pleasant Unity Packing Co., Pleasant Unity. Selling. Frigid-Freeze Lockers, Riegelsville. Prim Packing Co., McDonald. Wolfe Processing Plant, Perry. Froehlich Packing Co., Johnstown. Princz, August, Mars. Woods, Lloyd, Westville. Gajan, John, Coal Center. Pudliner’s Home Dressed Meats, Johnstown. Woodward Packing Company, Woodward. Gashel, Lee, Claysville. Putnak, Robert L., Monongahela. Oregon Ginther, Urban, St. Mary’s. Rehrig Slaughter House, Ashfield. Glick Brothers, Mt. Pleasant. Rendulic, Frank D., McKeesport. Alpine Meat Company, Inc., Grants Pass. Godfrey Brothers, Felton. Rex, George Slaughter House, Ashfield. Bond Brothers, Lakeview. Gouldey, Wesley R. & Sons, Pipersville. Rice, Robert L. Abattoir & Market, Waynes­ Boston’s Beef House, Ontario. Gourley, James P., New Bethlehem. burg. Boyer Meat Co., Roseburg. Grande Bros. Packing, Farrell. Riley, James C., Greenville. ♦Bruce Packing Co., Sublimity. Green Valley Packing Co., Claysville. Riverside Meat Packing Co., New Castle. Cannon Meat Co., Salem. Greenville Packing Co., Greenville. Robie Meat Packers, Inc., Erie. Cinder Butte Packing Co., Redmond. Grettler’s Market, Girard. Rockhill’s Meat Processing, Greenville. Coos Bay Packing Co., Inc., Coos Bay. Gurgacz, Mike P., New Castle. Rothermel, Wellington A., Danville. ♦Crooked River Meat Co., Prineville. Haibach Brothers, Erie. Shade Meat Packing, Hooversville. Erdman Packing Co., Bandon. Heckel & Ferlan, Pittsburgh. Shaffer, Arthur L., New Cumberland. Farmer’s Packing Co., Medford. Heinnickel, S. & A., Crabtree. Shamokin Packing Co., Shamokin. H & M Meat Co., Union. Hershey, R. E. Meats, Inc., Elizabethtown. Sharon Best Meats, Sharon. Hill Meat Co., Pendleton. Hervitz Packing Co., Harrisburg. Shively Brothers, Mifllinburg. Hillcrest Packing Co., Inc. (formerly Prime Silverberg Meats, Bradford. ♦Hopkins Wholesale Meats, Nyssa. Slagle’s Packihg House, Kittanning. Jacobsmuhlen Slaughterhouse, Cornelius. Packing Co.), Philadelphia. Hill-N-Dale Farm Meat Co., Downingtown. Smalstig, Fred, Pittsburgh. Lewis Meat Co., Gresham. Hilltop Beef & Provision Co., Loyalhanna. Smelko Brothers; Mt. Pleasant. Merrill Meat Co., Merrill. Hippey, Samuel W., Willow Street. Smith, Wilbur, Blairsville. Mt. Angel Meat Co., Mt. Angel. Hirsch, William R., Kossuth. Stairs, James, Confluence. Myrtle Packing Co., Coquille. Holli’nger Meat Products Co., Mechanicsburg. Stehle, Julius, Eighty-Four. Ponderosa Packing Co., Ashland. Horne’s Slaughter House, Marianna. Stepniak, William, Hop Bottom. . Steen Bros. Meat Co., Albany. Hostoffer, E. B. & Sons, Mt. Pleasant. Sterner’s Grocery, Inc., Hanover. ♦TP Packing Co., Inc., Klamath Falls. Hynes, O. J. Abattoir, Cedars. Taylor, J. V. Company, Wyalusing. The Dalles City Pack, The Dalles. Indiana Slaughter Co., Philadelphia. Thoma, Paul, Saxonburg. Van Dine Meat Co., Myrtle Creek. Ishman, Robert J., Worthington. Thomas & Diehl, Glen Rock. Western Meats, Milton-Freewater. J & B Meat Plant, Friendsville. Thomas, Ralph E., Hungerford.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18079 Thompson Packing Co., Jersey Shore. Herron Packing Company, Concord. •Ogden Dressed Meat Co., Ogden. Thornton, Howard J. Erie. •Hill’s Meat Processing Company, Cleveland. •Tri-Miller Packing Co., Hyrum. Troutman Brothers, Klingerstown. •Hiwassee College Slaughter House, Madison- •Eliason Packing Co., Logan. Troutman, M. S. & C. H., Freeburg. ville. Troy Meat Packing, Inc., South of Troy. •Howard, James Slaughter House, Lexington. Vermont Venezia, Carl, Conshohocken. •Hutchins Brothers Packing House, Kings­ Lawrence Bailey, Hardwick. Warner, Paul Frozen Food Center, Union port. Baker’s Market, Pittsford. City. •Jones Locker & Cold Storage System, Mur­ Delair’s Slaughtering Establishment, East Warrington Packing Co., Inc., Chalfont. freesboro. Montpelier. Wayne Meats & Processing Co., Honesdale. •Laine, Gilliam, Lebanon. Gallerani’s Market, Bradford. Waynesburg Packing Co., Waynesburg. •Lehman’s Packing Company, McEwen. Jewett Meat Processing Plant, Randolph. Weaver Bros., Wellsville. •Lingo Packing Company, Jonesboro. Ourensma Slaughter House, Ferrisburg Weise, R. A., Hyndman. •Loomis Packing Company, Inc., Sweetwater. Center. Weiss Packing Co., Donora. •McDonald Meats, Carthage. Preseau’s Slaughter House, Poultney. •Weller, Frank & Sons, Plymouth Meeting. *M & G Slaughter House, Dresden. Werry Provision, Scottdale. •Mac’s Slaughtering & Processing, Winches­ Virginia West Apollo Packing House, West Apollo. ter. Weyandt, Hughey, Jr., Claysburg. •Meek’s Slaughter House, Dickson. Corn Valley Packers, Inc., Danville. Wilkes-Barre Abattoir, Wilkes-Barre. •Mitchell’s Processing Plant, Selmer. * Fleet and Co., Inc., Winchester. Williamson’s Wholesale Meats, Turbotville. Modem Slaughters, Greeneville. * Green HÌH, Inc., Elliston. Wlllrich, Thomas B. & Son, Edinboro. Moore’s Slaughter House, Fayetteville. Isom’s Slaughter House, Galex. Winner Packing Co., Lock Haven. Morrissey Meats & Provisions, Nashville. Lee Packing Co., Pennington Gap. Wisnieski, Steve, New Castle. Morristown Provision Company, Russellville. * Dinner Bell Meat Products, Lynchburg. Worthington, Warren H., Pennsdale. New 20 Packing Company, Alamo. * Orndorff, Charles, Abattoir, Winchester. Yakubik, Frank, New Castle. •Norman’s Packing Plant, Covington. * Perry’s Abattoir, Winchester. Yambrovich, Steve, Sharpsville. •Parks, Harris & Company, Columbia. Rosenbaum Slaughterhouse, Clyde, Glade Yoder, Kermit C., Hollsopple. •Processors, Inc., Celina. Springs. Yoder’s Meat Market, Shoemakersville. •Rebel Packing Company, Martin. * Southern Packing Corp., Norfolk. Yost, Dale, Loganville. •S & H Honey Farms, Columbia. * Suffolk Packing Co., Inc., Suffolk. Youndt Brothers, Denver. •Savannah Processing & Locker Company, * Woodstock Wholesale Meats, Woodstock. Zaluski Meats, Aliquippa. Savannah. Zrile, Mike, Sharon. •Sell Meat Company, Johnson City. Washington •Smelcer, Charles Slaughter, Newport. Chambers Packing Company, No. 36, Olympia. South Carolina •Smith, Jamei Slaughter House, Huntingdon. Colfax Meat Packing Plant No. 117, Colfax. •Azalea Meats, Inc., Orangeburg. Southern Abattoir & Meat Supply Co., Knox­ * Curdo Meats No. 76, Walla Walla. •Carolina Abattoir, Columbia. ville. Evergreen Packing Co., No. 92, Vancouver. •Caughman Meat Plant, Lexington. •Southern Provision Company, Inc., Chat­ * Federal Meat Co., No. 38, Tacoma. Cheraw Packing Co., Cheraw. tanooga. Ferry Bros., Inc., No. 16, Ferndale. •Harvin Packing Co., Sumter. •Swaggerty Sausage Company, Kodak. Florence Packing Co., No. 6043 (formerly No. Hodges Sale Co., Abbeville. •Tennessee Valley Packing Company, Inc., 6), Stanwood. •Kemmerlin Wholesale Meat Packing Plant, Columbia. * Grandview Packing Co., No. 6083 (formerly Orangeburg. •Tri-City Packing Company, Kingsport. No. 15), GTandview. Lancaster Frozen Foods, Inc., Lancaster. •Tucker’s Sausage, Lebanon. Kratzig Meat Co., No. 6110 (formerly No. •Old Fort Packing Co., Walterboro. •University of Tennessee-Méat Laboratory, 81), Bellingham. Oconee County Abattoir, Seneca. Knoxville. * Lewis River Meat Co., No. 118, Woodland. Rick’s Meat Packers, Aiken. Wampler’s Wholesale Meats, Inc., Lenoir City. Mclnroy Meat Co., No. 94, Wilbur. •Spartanburg Abattoir, Spartanburg. •Wells Processing Plant, Brighton. * McKinley Meat Packing Co., No. 39, Long­ •Sumter Frozen Foods, Inc., Sumter. view. •Truesdale Wholesale Meat Co., West Colum­ T exas Midway Meats No. 62, Centralia. bia. ABC Packing Company, Wichita Falls. Moses Lake Meat Co., No. 32 Moses Lake. •Vaughn Packing Company, Greer. •ALLEN’S Wholesale Meats, McKinney. Mt. Vernon Meat Co., Inc., No. 6039 (formerly S outh Dakota Anderson Slaughtering & Processing Plant, No. 93 ), Mount Vernon. Sherman. Pasco Meat Packers, Inc., No. 6040 (formerly Siouxland Packing Company, Sioux Falls. Apache Packing Company, San Antonio. No. 37), Pasco. T ennessee Ed Auge Packing Company, San Antonio. Rice Meat Packing Co., No. 103, Veradale. Azle Food Locker Corporation, Azle. Sierk Meat Packing Co., No. 55, Wenatchee. •Ausmus, Wade Slaughter House, Speedwell. Berryhill Packing Company, Inc., Levelland. Sky Valley Meats No. 51, Monroe. •B & J Packing Company, Humboldt. Big 4 Packing Company, Perryton. * Valley Packing Co., No. 18, Puyallup. •Baltz Brothers Packing Company, Nashville. Big “M” Packing Co., Inc., Denison. Weber, Inc., No. 6041 (formerly No. 20), •Benton, Lewis Slaughter House, Hixson. Brown’s Slaughter House, Annona. Sumner. Bolivar Packing Company, Bolivar. Burton Brothers Public Abattoir, Houston. •Wenatchee Packing Co., No. 22, Wenatchee. •Bradley Processing Company, Cleveland. •Caddo Packing Company, Marshall. •Bulla, Wade Slaughter, Wautauga. •Central Packing Company, Wichita Falls. West Virginia •Carrier, Phil Slaughter, Bluff City. Chief Packing Company, Quanah. •Davis Country Sausage, Dyersburg. Bluegrass Market, Inc., Lewisburg. •DeLozier, E. A., Sevierville. Columbia Packing Company, Dallas. •Byard’s Famous Meats, Kenova. •DeLozier, W. R. Sausage Co., Inc., Seymour. Floyd Locker, Spearman. Camp Packing Company, Parkersburg. •Dixie Sausage Company, Lebanon. •Freedman Packing Company, Houston. Chadwick and Son, Wayne. •Dunn Packing Company, Union City. Graham Packing Company, Graham. Chapman Packing Company, Ona. •E & K Processing Plant, White Bluff. Haley’s Food Locker, Crowley. •Cloverdale Packing Company, Parkersburg. •Ed’s Processing Company, Cleveland. Morton Packing Company, Morton. Coleman, M. E. Packing Company, Oak Hill. •Elm Hill Meats, Inc., Lenoir City. Nemecek Brothers, West. Elm Grove Packing, Wheeling. •Estepp Slaughter, Limestone. *P & S Meat Company, Texarkana. Ennis Slaughter House, Ufflngton. •Fayette Packing Company, Eads. Pitner & Hensley, Denton. Fancher, R. L„ Shinnston. •Ferguson Packing Plant, Atoka. •Pratt Packing Company, Inc., Sulphur •Fisher’s Quality Meats, Sissonsville. •Fortenberry Sausage Company, Kodak. Springs. Fotos and Company, Beckley. Foutch, J. j. & Son Packing Company, Cooke­ Smith’s Frozen Food Plant, Atlanta*. Gamble’s Market, Moundsville. ville. •Southern Packing Company, Denison. Gissell Packing Company, Inc., Huntington. •Fuller Locker Service, Maryville. Steuernagel Packing Company, San Antonio. Batten Wholesale Meat Company, Hunting- •Garrett’s Slaughter House, Bell Buckle. Swindell’s Country Sausage Plant, Quanah. ton. •Gilbert’s Slaughter House, Paris. Tyler Packing Company, Tyler. P. E. Holz Sons Company, Charleston. Glasgow’s Market, Dresden. Wickham Packing Company, Inc., Longview. Independent Dressed Beef Company, Morgan­ •Goodman’s Custom Slaughter, Lafayette. Wilburn & Miller Wholesale Meats, Denison. town. •Groce Provision Company, Fayetteville. Zummo Meat Company, Beaumont. •Jeffries Slaughterhouse, Lewisburg. •Harvey’s Slaughter House, Brownsville. Jenkins, Frank M., Martinsburg. U tah Kidwiler, Frank E„ Harpers Ferry. •Hayes, Harold Slaughter Plant, Huntingdon. Lambert and Beavers, Squire. •Hendon’s Meat Plant, Milan. •Langston Packing Company, Hurricane. Logan, S. S. Packing Company, Huntington. •Henson & Courtner, Butler. •Midvale Packing Company, Midvale. •McCown & Sons Company, L. M., Charleston.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18080 NOTICES

Martini Packing Company, Inc., Wheeling. Stockyards Oregon Miller Brothers, Martinsburg. Alabama Cedar Point Packing Company, Coquille. Niebergall Meats Slaughtering Establishment, Montgomery’s Meat Company, Silverton. Wheeling. Monroe Livestock Market, Inc., Monroeville. Tualatin Packing, Inc., Sherwood. Places Butchering Quarters, Martinsburg. Montgomery Livestock Commission, Mont­ Rupert Meat-Poultry Supply, Rupert. gomery. P ennsylvania Smittle Packing Company, Paden City. Samson Livestock Auction, Samson. Soloman’s Establishment, Prank, Fairview. Hatfield Livestock Market, Hatfield. Spitznogle, Glen L. Slaughtering Establish­ Colorado S outh Carolina ment, Blacksville. Alsbury Sales Pavilion, Glenwood Springs. Staggs Meat Market, Burlington. Lenox Stockyards, Bennettsville. Springfield Livestock Commission Company, Pageland Livestock Barn, Pageland. Stuart, Nate & Sons Inc., Mount Clare. Springfield. Smith Stockyards, Columbia. Thomas and Wolfe Slaughtering Establish­ Georgia ment, Ripley. Twin States Auction Market, Tabor City. Thompson Brothers Packing Company, Blue- McClure-Burnett Commission Company, Texas field. Atlanta. Tony’s Super Market, Beckley. Waycross Hog & Cattle Market, Waycross. Coastal Cattle Association, Beaumont. Tri-County Processing Plant, Inc., Martins­ North Houston Livestock Auction, Houston. burg. I owa Rusk County Auction, Henderson. V & G Slaughterhouse, Sweetland. Fort Dodge Livestock Auction, Inc., Fort Wisconsin Wade’s Slaughter House, Mount Morris. Dodge. Weimer Packing Company, Wheeling. Humboldt Livestock Exchange, Inc., Hum­ Brigham, Forrest, Evansville. West Virginia Sausage, New Haven. boldt. Central Wisconsin Livestock Market, Wooddell’s Meats, Green Bank. Iowa City Sales Company, Iowa City. Augusta. ♦Young and Stout, Inc., Clarksburg. Mahaska Sales Company, Inc., Oskaloosa. Slaughtering Establishments Wisconsin Ossian Livestock Exchange, Ossian. Troutman Auction Sales, Bonaparte. Alabama Black Creek Meat Market, Black Creek. Bartel’s Frozen Foods, Atmore. ♦Born & Son, August, Milwaukee. K entucky Brewton Abattoir, Brewton. Clinton Packing Co., Inc., Clinton. Morehead Stockyard, Morehead. Daulphin’s Clover Farm and Processing Coenen Packing Company, Appleton. Sparta Stockyard, Sparta. Plant,- Brewton. Coloma Meat Products, Coloma. Morgan Packing Company, Tuscaloosa. Dobratz Meat Service, Shawano. Louisiana Robertsdale Locker Plant, Robertsdale. Dohr’s Market, Grafton. Coltharp’s Livestock Market, DeRidder. White Rock Packing Company, Dothan. Faust & Sons, Hy, Mayville. Vernon Livestock Co-operative, Inc., Leesville. Foss Locker Plant, Sparta. Arizona Hagert’s Locker, Siren. Mississippi O. K. Wholesale Meat Company, Phoenix. Harry Hanson Meat Service, Franksville. Safford Packing Company, Safford. Helland’s Food & Locker, Juda. ♦Amory Commission Company, Amory. ♦Hattiesburg Livestock Market, Hattiesburg. Arkansas Holmen Locker Service, Holmen. ♦Mississippi Livestock Yards, Laurel. Kimmes Hereford Farm, Superior. Broadaway Packing Co., Jonesboro. Kress Packing Co., Inc., Waterloo. ♦North Mississippi Livestock Cooperative, Corinth. Brown Packing Co., Little Rock. Lake Geneva Packing House, Lake Geneva. ♦Sardis Livestock Sales Company, Sardis. Calhoun General Merchandise, Brown, Marchant, W. J., Brussels. ♦Tadlock Stockyards, Forest. Monticello. Meier Slaughtering Establishment, A. Fletcher Beef Co., Jim, Fayetteville. Monroe. Missouri Little Rock Packing Co., Little Rock. Osseo Locker, Osseo. Mann Slaughtering and Processing Company, Paulus Market, Cedarburg. Bethany Livestock Auction, Bethany. Producers Livestock Market, Marshall Piggott. Royal Meats, Watertown. Mazzanti Food Bank, Monticello. Sawyer Meat Plant, East Troy. Junction. Sikeston Auction Company, Inc., Sikeston. Melbourne Packing Co., Melbourne. Schaefer Sausage Co., Inc., Oshkosh. Morris Packing Company, Hope. Schams Company, J., La Crosse. Montana Nance and Rutledge Meat Co., Batesville. Schroedl Market, Jefferson. Miles City Saleyards, Miles City. O. E. Owens Wholesale Butcher, Pearcy. Seymour Locker Storage, Peshtigo. Paul Payne Meats, Paragould. Sorg Farm Packing, Inc., Darien. N ebraska Phillips Packing Company, Magnolia. Super Lockers, Amery. Prairie Grove Locker Plant, Prairie Grove. S & S Meats, Stoughton. Grant Sales, Grant. Prickett Packing Co., Batesville. Tarlton Company, L., Athelstane. Producers Platte Valley Livestock Auction, Sutton Slaughter Plant, Claud H., Hope. Thomson Packing Co., West De Pere. Kearney. Townsend Processing Co., Texarkana. Townsend-Piller Packing Co., Cumberland. Tecumseh Livestock Market, Tecumseh. Webb Packing Company, Helena. ♦Valley Meat Service, Appleton. Western Meat Packers, Inc., Little Rock. Weber’s Processing Plant, Inc., Cuba City. N ew Jersey Weinstein Slaughtering Establishment, Nixon Sales Stable, Mount Holly. Georgia Superior. N ew York ♦Meddin Packing Company, Savannah. ♦Wolf River Sausage, Co., Weyauwega. Grady Packing Company, Cairo. W yoming Empire Livestock Marketing Cooperative, Javetz Abbatoir, Savannah. Inc., Bullville. Perkins Processing Plant, Chickamauga. Big Horn Processing, Lovell. Ray’s Auction Service, Owego. Gillette Meat Service, Gillette. Steuben County Livestock Market, Bath. Illinois Jim’s Place, Cheyenne. Dad’s Country Market, Beaverville. K & B Coldt Storage Co., Afton. N orth Carolina Foremost Packing Company, East Moline. Kelly Slaughtering Establishment, Raleigh Stockyards, Raleigh. Kreps Locker Service, Bushnell. Torrington. Sweet and Turner, Inc., Elizabeth City. Kunkel Packing and Provision Co., Quincy. Ken’s Locker and Slaughtering, South Whiteville Livestock Auction, Inc., Whiteville. Quincy Beef and Veal Company, Quincy. Laramie. North D akota Shanks Packing Company, Mattoon. Lincoln Meats, Rock Springs. Ursa Cooperative Locker Service, Ursa. Nield Cold Storage and Supply, Afton. Dobler’s Ellendale Livestock Sales Co., Frankfort Packing Company, West Frankfort. Pilch Slaughtering & Processing Service, Ellendale. Acme. Ohio Iowa Rock Springs Butchering, Rock Springs. Union Stockyards Company, Washington Besse Pack, Cincinnati. ♦Roitz Meat Cutting, Fort Bridger. C. H. Ford Lockers, Spirit Lake. Triangle Packing Co., Worland. Oklahoma Marshall Packing Company, Marshalltown. The following stockyards and slaugh­ Mountain View Community Sale, Mountain Louisiana tering establishments are deleted from View. ♦Britt Packing Co., Shreveport. the specifically approved lists: Osage Sale Barn, Fairfax. ♦Old South Packing Company, Baton Rouge.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18081

R hode Island Ohio Stratford Food Locker, Stratford. Parillo, Inc., Anthony, Johnston. Bussard Slaughter House, Germantown. O. B. Jackson Wholesale Meats, Plainview. Bruno’s Slaughterhouse, Westerly. Winfree Packing Company, Orange. Ciralsky Packing Company, Toledo. Wingate Brothers, Orange. Mississippi David Davies, Inc., Columbus. Dicillo, A. and Sons, Inc., Cleveland. Utah "■Beard’s Slaughter House, Waynesboro. Fink and Heine Company, Springfield. Lamey’s Slaughter House, Biloxi. Giles, K. C., Slaughtering Establishment, ♦Parke and Son, William C., Ogden. • Cleveland. Washington Missouri Petrigalla Meat Company, Hubbard. Poplar Bluff Packing Company, Poplar Bluff. Samuel, Sigi, Slaughter House, Jefferson. Johansen’s Meats, Inc., Enumclaw. Sandusky Dressed Beef Company, Sandusky. ♦Longview Meat Company, Longview. Montana Sears Meat Market, Greenville. Methow Valley Meat Company, Twisp. - New Butte Butchering Company, Butte. Teufel, Howard A., Company, Cleveland. Schoner Meat Company, Silver dale. Webb Beef Company, Cleveland. Thorps Meat, Snohomish. Nebraska Wisconsin Brauer Packing Co., Shappell. Pennsylvania Bridgmon Wholesale, Tecumseh. Baker’s Meat Market, Biglerville. Bohrer’s Packing Company, Muskego. Community Locker Center, Fullerton. Bongiorni Brothers, Hickory. Bruinsma, Casey, Union Grove. Custom Pack, Hastings. Brown Brothers and Sons, Inc., Fairview. Falls Locker Service, Kaukauna. Deerson Meat Packing Plant, Elkhorn. Cary, William L., Harrison Valley. Goldberg Establishment, Superior. F & S Sausage Company, Cozad. DeFranco, Nick, Bangor. Sykes Packing Company, Cameron. Farmers Union Co-op Gas and Oil Co., Big Detwiler’s Abattoir, Pottstown. Valley Packing Company, Kaukauna. Springs. Elizabethville Abattoir, Elizabethville. Effective Date. The foregoing notice ♦Flicker Packing Co., Scottsbluff. Esposito, Attilio, Philadelphia. Ford Packing Co., Grand Island. Flagler, Glenn Co., Raubsville. shall become effective upon publication Gude, O. A., Nebraska City. Freed’s Store, Gilbertsville. in the F ederal R egister. H & B Packing Co., Scottsbluff. Gartner and Harf, Waterford. Certain additional stockyards and ♦Hersch Packing Co., Scottsbluff. Ginther, Gervase, St. Mary’s. slaughtering establishments are added to Hollstein’s Packing Company, Rushville. Giunta, Joseph L. and Sons, Philadelphia. the list of those heretofore specifically Ideal Market, Gordon. Goldberg Provision Co., Greensburg. approved under the regulations in 9 CFR Jurgens Meat Service, Big Springs. Haas, Raymond, East Weissport. Part 78. It has been determined that the Kauf Packing Co., Hastings. Hershey Estate Abattoir, Hershey. inspection and handling of livestock or Nebraska Ice and Locker Service, Falls City. Hess, Bob G. Meats, Winfield. Osborn’s I.G.A. Store, Hay Springs. Hoffman Brothers, York. carcasses or products thereof at such ♦Red Cloud Packing Co., Red Cloud. Johnson Packing Co., Emigh. stockyards or establishments are ade­ Roman Packing Company, Norfolk. Juniata Packing Co., Tyrone. quate to effectuate the purposes of such Sanitary Market, Mitchell. Kudasik, Andy, Central City. regulations. Certain stockyards and Saum Lockers, Davenport. — Landis, Abram A., Harleysville. slaughtering establishments are removed Shald Market, Gordon. Landis, T. M., Mainland. from the list of those heretofore spe­ Standard Market, Hebron. Lesnett’s Green Top Farm, Greenville. cifically approved under said regulations, Sterling Packing Company, Sidney. Liddiard, Richard W., South Waverly. Superior Locker, Superior. Little, L. D. and Son, Hanover. because it has been determined that such Swayze Packing Company, S. E., Edison. McGee, G. Fred, Connellsville. stockyards and establishments no longer Martocci, Anthony, Roseto. qualify for specific approval under the New Hampshire Marvin, Russell T., Covington. regulations. Name changes affecting cer­ French Brothers, Hooksett. Meadow Valley Abattoir, Inc., Gettysburg. tain stockyards and slaughtering estab­ Luciene Langelier, Rochester. ♦Medford’s Inc., Chester. lishments are also set forth in the fore­ Samuel Satzow, Claremont. Palgon Brothers, Tarentum. going notice. This action, therefore, Sherman’s Market, Grantham. Palumbo, Dominic, Du Bois. imposes certain restrictions necessary to Tri-City Beef and Pork Company, Paul’s Market, Penfleld. Somersworth. People’s Meat Market, Brackenridge. prevent the spread of brucellosis, relieves Pettello, Charles A., Keiser. certain restrictions presently imposed, New Jersey Price, B. J., Division of Shane Enterprises, and makes certain changes which do not Fisher Brothers, Bridgeton. Chester. affect the substance of the restrictions Haskell Packing, Haskell. Reitz, Maynard M., Winfield. set forth in 9 CFR Part 78. The action Clarence Rome, Sussex. Rook B. A., Milroy. should become effective promptly in J. Tindik Sons, Bordentown. S and H Country Butchers, Littlestown. Shaw Brothers, Newry. order to accomplish its purpose in the Trenton Packing Company, Trenton. public interest, to be of maximum benefit Victory Beef, Trenton. Smith, John Raymond, Titusville. A. A. Young, Phillipsburg. ♦Spungin’s Abattoir, Inc., Harrisburg. to persons subject to the restrictions Stockton’s Wholesale Meats, Columbus. which are relieved hereby, and to N ew York Taddio, Fred, Monaca. promptly correct the names of all listed Easton Market, Kanona. Union Provision and Packing Company, stockyards and slaughtering establish­ East River Packing Company, East River. Pittsburgh. ments. Therefore, under the administra­ Ford, E. D. and Sons, West Valley. Utz, Harold Meat Market, Hanover. tive procedure provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, Kennedy Meat Market, Kennedy. Venezia, Joseph, Norristown. Venuto, Joseph, Philadelphia. it is found upon good cause that notice Kittle, Nicholas A., Hudson. and other public procedure with respect Klinck and Schaller, Inc., Buffalo. Weiss Packing Company, Inc., Uniontown. Kross-Ahl, Albany. Wilcox, Gilbert, Milan. to this action are impracticable, unneces­ Lucarelli, John W., Mechanicville. Wildasin’s Meat Market, Hanover. sary, and contrary to the public inter­ Maplevale Farms, Clymer. Winters, Walter W., Mahoningtown. est, and good cause is found for mak­ Morris Mendel and Company, Norwich. S outh Carolina ing this notice effective less than 30 Newburgh Superior Packing Company, Newburgh. Fairview Abattoir, Greenville. days after publication in the F ederal Scott, Herbert R., Brocton. Harman Provision Company, Saluda. R egister. Waldenmaier, George and Sons, Feura Bush. Hughey’s Market, Easley. Done at Hyattsville, Md., this 20th day Wallens-Byrne Packing Corporation, Buffalo. Roddey Packing Company, Columbia. Turner Abattoir, T. M., Woodruff. of November 1970. N orth Carolina S outh D akota R. S. Sharman, Azalea Meats Corporation, New Bern. Acting Director, Animal Health Caldwell Packing Company, Cramerton. Dean Packing Company, Vermillion. Elliott Packing Company, me., Goldsboro. Division, Agricultural Re­ Jones Abattoir Company, Garner. T exas search Service. E. T. Nivens, Charlotte. Shamrock Slaughtering Plant, Shamrock. [F.R. Doc. 70-15876; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; * Piedmont Packing Company, Hillsborough. H & R Meat Company, Vernon. 8:45 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18082 NOTICES

FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION Docket No. 71-00150-00-46040. Appli­ DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE cant: Stanford University, Purchasing Notice of Decision on Application for Department, 820 Quarry Road, Palo Alto, Bureau of Domestic Commerce Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Article CA. 94304. Article: Shutter/Exposure AMERICAN ONCOLOGIC HOSPITAL The following is a decision on an appli­ Meter. Manufacturer: Siemens A.G., cation for duty-free entry of a scientific West Germany. Notice of Decision on Application for article pursuant to section 6(c) of the Intended use of article: The article is Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Article ah accessory for an existing Elmiskop LA Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Electron Microscope. The following is a decision on an ap­ Materials Importation Act of 1966 Comments: No comments have been plication for duty-free entry of a scien­ (Public Law 89-651, 80 Stat. 897) received with respect to this application. tific- article pursuant to section 6(c) of and the regulations issued thereunder as Decision: Application approved. No the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural amended (34 F.R. 15787 et seq.). instrument or apparatus of equivalent Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub­ A copy of the record pertaining to this scientific value to the foreign article, for lic Law 89-651, 80 Stat. 897) and decision is available for public review such purposes as this article is intended the regulations issued thereunder as during ordinary business hours of the to be used, is being manufactured in the amended (34 F.R. 15787 et. seq.). Department of Commerce, at the Scien­ United States. A copy of the record pertaining to this tific Instrument Evaluation Division, De­ Reasons: The application relates to an decision is available for public review partment of Commerce, Washington, accessory for an instrument that had during ordinary business hours of the D.C. been previously imported for the use of Department of Commerce, at the Scien­ Docket No. 71-00152-00-46040. Appli­ the applicant institution. The article is tific Instrument Evaluation Division, De­ cant: DHEW/Public Health Service, being furnished by the manufacturer partment of Commerce, Washington, Food and Drug Administration, 5600 which produced the instrument with D.C. Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20852. Arti­ which the article is intended to be used. Docket No. 70-00803-33-83000. Appli­ cle: Plate magazine camera. Manufac­ The Department of Commerce knows of cant: American Oncologic Hospital, turer: Associated Electrical Industries, no similar accessory being manufactured Central and Shelmire Avenues, Phila­ Ltd., United Kingdom. in the United States, which is inter­ delphia, PA 19111. Article: Medical Intended use of article: The article is changeable with or can be readily thermography unit, Model PD-780. Man­ an accessory for an existing Model EM adapted to the instrument with which 6B Electron Microscope. the foreign article is intended to be used. ufacturer: Smith’s Industries Ltd., Comments: No comments have been United Kingdom. received with respect to this application. Charley M. Denton, Intended use of article: The article Decision: Application approved. No Bureau of Domestic Commerce. will be used for medical research and instrument or apparatus of equivalent [F.R. Doc. 70-15860; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; diagnosis concerning malignant and scientific value to the foreign article, for 8:49 a.m.] benign diseases by means of infrared such purposes as this article is intended radiation detection and associated map­ to be used, is being manufactured in the ping of actual patient body sites. United States. UNIVERSITY OF IOWA Comments: No comments have been Reasons: The application relates to an Notice of Decision on Application for received with respect to this application. accessory for an instrument that had Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Article Decision: Application approved. No been previously imported for the use of instrument or apparatus of equivalent the applicant institution. The article is The following is a decision on an ap­ scientific value to the foreign article, for being furnished by the manufacturer plication for duty-free entry of a scien­ which produced the instrument with tific article pursuant to section 6(c) of such purposes as this article is intended which the article is intended to be used. the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural to be used, is being manufactured in the The Department of Commerce knows Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub­ United States. of no similar accessory being manufac­ lic Law 89-651, 80 Stat. 897) and the reg­ Reasons: The foreign article provides tured in the United States, which is ulations issued thereunder as amended an optical resolution of 0.120 inches (in.) interchangeable with or can be readily (34F.R. 15787 et seq.). square at the patient, thermal discrimi­ adapted to the instrument with which A copy of the record pertaining to this nation of 0.02° centigrade, 30,000 resolu­ the foreign article is intended to be used. decision is available for public review tion elements per full frame, horizontal during ordinary business hours of the Charley M. Denton, Department of Comr erce, at the Scien­ resolution of 100 or 300 lines per inch Bureau of Domestic Commerce. tific Instrument Evaluation Division, De­ and a frame size of 19 inches by 19 [F.R. Doc. 70-15859; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; partment of Commerce, Washington, inches. We are advised by the Depart­ 8:49 a.m.] D.C. ment of Health, Education, and Welfare Docket No. 70-00820-33-46040. Appli­ (HEW) in its memorandum dated Octo­ cant: University of Iowa, Biochemistry ber 23, 1970, that the resolution and STANFORD UNIVERSITY Department, Medical Research Center, suitability for large scale use of the for­ Notice of Decision on Application for Iowa City, IA 52240. Article: Electron Microscope, Model HU-125E-1. Manu­ eign article are pertinent to the appli­ Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Article cant’s research studies. HEW further facturer: Hitachi, Ltd., Japan. advises that it knows of no comparable The following is a decision on an ap­ Intended use of article: The article plication for duty-free entry of a scien­ will be used to study nucleohistones, the domestic instrument which matches the tific article pursuant to section 6(c) of nuclear membrane, interface chromo­ pertinent characteristics of the article. the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural somes, DNA, end yeast phosphofructo- The Department of Commerce knows Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub­ kinase with emphasis on possible inter­ of no other instrument or apparatus of lic Law 89-651, 80 Stat. 897) and the reg­ actions between the nuclear membrane equivalent scientific value to the foreign ulations issued thereunder as amended and isolated interphase chromosomes. article for the purposes for which such (34F.R. 15787 et seq.) . The experiments involve shadowing with article is intended to be used, which is A copy of the record pertaining to this metal and the use of negative staining being manufactured in the United States. decision is available for public review technique. during ordinary business hours of the Comments: No comments have been Charley M. Denton, Department of Commerce, at the Scien­ received with respect to this application. Bureau of Domestic Commerce. tific Instrument Evaluation Division, De­ Decision: Application approved. No in­ {F.R. Doc. 70-15858; Piled, Nov. 24, 1970; partment of Commerce, Washington, strument or apparatus of equivalent sci­ 8:49 a.m.] D.C. entific value to the foreign article, for

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18083 such purposes as this article is intended Engineering Classroom Building, College for diagnostic purpose. Application re­ to be used, is being manufactured in the Park, MD 20740. Article: Scanning elec­ ceived by Commissioner of Customs: United States. tron microscope, Model SEM-IIA-68. October 22,1970. Reasons: The foreign article has a Manufacturer: Cambridge Instrument Docket No. 71-00227-00-07795. Appli­ specified resolving capability of 3.5 ang­ Co., Ltd., United Kingdom. Intended use cant: National Aeronautics & Space Ad­ stroms. The most closely comparable do­ of article: The article will be used for re­ ministration, Manned Spacecraft Center, mestic instrument is the Model EMU-4B search on the mechanisms involved in Houston, TX 77058, R&D Procurement electron microscope which was formerly the rusting of various types of steel; the Branch, Space Station & Special Proj­ manufactured by the Radio Corp. of nature of fracture surfaces in order to ects Contract Section JC44. Article: Ac­ America and which is presently being determine the mechanism for cracking; cessories for an aerial camera system. supplied by the Forgflo Corp. The Model and the effectiveness of plastic-fiber Manufacturer: Goteberg Co., Sweden. EMU-4B has a specified resolving capa­ bonding. In-depth exposure to electron Intended use of article: The articles bility of 5 angstroms. (The lower the microscopy, as it pertains to engineering are accessories for an existing Hasselblad numerical rating in terms of angstrom materials, will be taught in four courses. electric data camera system. Application units, the better the resolving capabil­ Application received by Commissioner of received by Commissioner of Customs: ity.) We are advised by the Department Customs: October 21,1970. October 26,1970. of Health, Education, and Welfare Docket No. 71-00222-75-65600. Appli­ Docket No. 71-00228-98-78000. Appli­ (HEW) in its memorandum of October cant: University of California, Los Ala­ cant: Indiana University, Department of 23,1970 that the additional resolving ca­ mos Scientific Laboratory, Post Office Physics, Bloomington, IN 47401. Article: pability of the foreign article is pertinent Box 990, Los Alamos, NM 87544. Article: Spectrophotometer, Model FS-720. Man­ to the purposes for which the foreign High voltage power supply. Manufac­ ufacturer: Beckman-RHC Ltd., United article is intended to be used. We, there­ turer: Emile Haefely Co., Ltd., Switzer­ Kingdom. Intended use of article: The fore, find that the Model EMU-4B is not land. Intended use of article: The article article will be used for the determination of equivalent scientific value to the for­ is designed to produce 750 kilovolts of of the lasing frequency of a far-infrared eign article for such purposes as this potential and at the same time to deliver gas laser which the applicant has con­ article is intended to be used. 13 milliampheres of current. Application structed. Various gases and solids will be The Department of Commerce knows received by Commissioner of Customs: used and absorption strength will also be of no other instrument or apparatus of October 21,1970. measured. Application received by Com­ equivalent scientific value to the foreign Docket No. 71-00223-33-46040. Appli­ missioner of Customs: October 26, 1970. article, for such purposes as this article cant: Harvard University, Purchasing. Docket No. 71-00234-55-17500. Appli­ is intended to be used, which is being Department, 75 Mourit Auburn Street, cant: University of Miami, Coral Gables, manufactured in the United States. Cambridge, MA 02138. Article: Electron FL 33124. Article: Recording current microscope, Model 801. Manufacturer: Charley M. Denton, meter, Model 4. Manufacturer: Ivar Bureau of Domestic Commerce. Associated Electrical Industries, Ltd., Aanderaa, Norway. Intended use of arti­ United Kingdom. Intended use of article: cle: The article is to be attached to a [F.R. Doc. 70-15861; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; The article will be used for research in neutrally buoyant float which the appli­ 8:49 a.m.] three areas, the cell junctions of the en­ cant has designated as a pynocline fol­ dothelium of small blood vessels, the gap lower. This device is weighted precisely intercellular junctions which possibly are so that it will remain at the depth of a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND ET AL. involved in intercellular communication, constant density surface. The objective and the structural basis of glomerular of the experiment is to distinguish be­ Notice of Applications for Duty-Free permeability. Application received by tween motions of the density surface due Entry of Scientific Articles Commissioner of Customs: October 22, to internal waves and apparent motions The following are notices of the re­ 1970. of a temperature surface. Application re­ ceipt of applications for duty-free entry Docket No. 71-00224-33-46040. Appli­ ceived by Commissioner of Customs: Oc­ of scientific articles pursuant to section cant: The University of Texas at Austin, tober 27,1970. 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Box 7306, University Station, Austin, TX Docket No. 71-00235-33-46040. Appli­ Cultural Materials Importation Act of 78712. Article: Electron microscope, cant: Passavant Memorial Hospital, 303 1966 (Public Law 89-651; 80 Stat. 897). Model Elmiskop IA. Manufacturer: Sie­ East Superior Street, Chicago, IL 60611. Interested persons may present their mens A.G., West Germany. Intended use Article: Electron microscope, Model views with respect to the question of of article: The article will be used for HU-12. Manufacturer: Hitachi, Ltd., whether an instrument or apparatus of research on the ultrastructural changes Japan. Intended use of article: The arti­ equivalent scientific value for the pur­ in responding tissues during and after cle will be used in the study of a wide poses for which the article is intended embryonic induction; for studies of the variety of materials for both diagnostic to be used is being manufactured in the developmental basis of genetic lethals in and research purposes. Routine tissue United States. Such comments must be Drosophila; for studies of confor­ section techniques will be used for the filed in triplicate with the Director, Sci­ mational changes in ribosomes and study of surgical biopsy material, par­ entific Instrument Evaluation Division, transferase enzymes during peptide chain ticularly renal biopsies and tumor path­ Bureau of Domestic Commerce, Wash­ elongation in the rabbit reticulocyte sys­ ology. Also, material is being collected ington, D.c. 20230, within 20 calendar tem; and for autoradiographic electron for the study of the relationship of vi­ days after date on which this notice of microscope studies of the distribution of ruses to human disease, particularly their application is published in the F ederal radioactive hormone within endometrial presence in certain tumors. Application Register. cells of the rat uterus. Application re­ received by Commissioner of Customs: Amended regulations issued under ceived by Commissioner of Customs: October 27,1970. cited Act, as published in the October 14, October 22,1970. Docket No. 71-00236-33-90000. Appli­ 1969, issue of the F ederal R egister, pre­ Docket No. 71-00225-33-46500. Appli­ cant: The Rockefeller University, 66th scribe the requirements applicable to cant: Passavant Memorial Hospital, 303 Street and York Avenue, New York, NY comments. East Superior Street, Chicago, IL 60611. 10021. Article: Rotating anode X-ray A copy of each application is on file, Article: Ultramicrotome, Model LKB generator. Manufacturer: Elliot Auto­ and may be examined during ordinary 8800. Manufacturer: LKB Produkter mation Radar Systems, Ltd., United Commerce Department business hours at A.B., Sweden. Intended use of article: Kingdom. Intended use of article: The the Scientific Instrument Evaluation Di­ The article will be used for sectioning of article will be used to provide a uniquely vision, Department of Commerce, Wash­ a variety of materials including renal and powerful and finely focussed source of ington, D.C. surgical biopsy material. An initial and X-rays for crystallographic determina­ Docket No. 71-00220-65-46070. Appli­ essential part of the work will be devel­ tion of the three-dimensional structures cant: The University of Maryland, De­ opment of techniques for the rapid em­ of protein molecules of immunological partment of Mechanical Engineering, bedding and sectioning of biopsy material importance. This knowledge will extend

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18084 NOTICES the understanding of the mechanism of tron spectrometer manufactured by capability of 5 angstroms. (The lower the immune reaction, of certain reactions Varian Associates (Varian). We are ad­ the numerical rating in terms of ang­ of cell walls, and of the factors determin­ vised by the National Bureau of Stand­ strom units, the better the resolving ing the three-dimensional arrangement ards (NBS) in its memorandum dated capability.) We are advised by the De­ of atoms in protein molecules. Applica­ October 6, 1970, that the very high partment of Health, Education, and tion received by Commissioner of Cus­ vacuum provided by the foreign article Welfare (HEW) in its memorandum toms: October 27,1970. is pertinent to the applicant’s research dated October 23, 1970, that the addi­ Docket No. 71-00237-33-46040. Appli­ studies. NBS further advises that the tional resolving capability of the foreign cant: Louisiana State Univélsity, 510 Model VIEE-15 does not provide a article is pertinent to the purposes for East Stoner Avenue, Shreveport, LA vacuum as good as 10~9 torr. We, there­ which the foreign article is intended to 71101. Article: Electron microscope, fore, find that the Model VIEE-15 was be used. We, therefore, find that the Model EM 300. Manufacturer: Philips not of equivalent scientific value to the Model EMU-4C is not of equivalent Electronics NVD, The Netherlands. In­ foreign article for such purposes as this scientific value to the foreign article for tended use of article : The article will be article is intended to be used. such purposes as this article is intended used for high resolution studies of the The Department of Commerce knows to be used. micromorphology and capsomere struc­ of no other instrument or apparatus of The Department of Commerce knows ture of papo va viruses, picorna viruses and equivalent scientific value to the foreign of no other instrument or apparatus of picodnaviruses; for comparative studies article for the purposes for which such equivalent scientific value to the foreign of osteolytic and osteogenic states in­ article is intended to be used, which is article, for such purposes as this article duced by picodnaviruses in fetal ham­ being manufactured in the United is intended to be used, which is being sters; and for attempts to identify States. manufactured in the United States. Charley M. Denton, virus-like particles in human osteosar­ Charley M. Denton, coma. Application received by Commis­ Bureau of Domestic Commerce. Bureau of Domestic Commerce. sioner of Customs: October 26,1970. [F.R. Doc. 70-15863; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; 8:49 a.m.] [F.R. Doc. 70-15864; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; Charley M. Denton, 8:49 a.m.] Bureau of Domestic Commerce. [F.R. Doc. 70-15862; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN 8:49 am.] VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE Notice of Decision on Application for Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Article Notice of Decision on Application for UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Article The following is a decision on an appli­ Notice of Decision on Application for cation for duty-free entry of a scientific The following is a decision on an ap­ plication for duty-free entry of a scien­ Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Article article pursuant to section 6(c) of the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural tific article pursuant to section 6 (c) of The following is a decision on an Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pubic the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural application for duty-free entry of a Law 89-651,80 Stat. 897) and the regula­ Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub- scientific article pursuant to section 6(c) tions issued thereunder as amended (34 lit Law 89-651, 80 Stat. 897) and the reg­ of the Educational, Scientific, and Cul­ F.R. 15787 et seq.). ulations issued thereunder as amended tural Materials Importation Act of 1966 A copy of the record pertaining to this (34 F.R. 15787 et seq.). (Public Law 89-651, 80 Stat. 897) and the decision is available for public review A copy of the record pertaining to regulations issued thereunder as during ordinary business hours of the this decision is available for public re­ amended (34 P.R. 15787 et. seq.). Department of Commerce, at the Scien­ view during ordinary business hours of A copy of the record pertaining to this tific Instrument Evaluation Division, the Department of Commerce, at the decision is available for public review Department of Commerce, Washington, Scientific Instrument Evaluation Divi­ during ordinary business hours of the D.C. sion, Department of Commerce, Wash­ Department of Commerce, at the Scien­ Docket No. 70-00813-33-46040. Appli­ ington, D.C. tific Instrument Evaluation Division, cant: University of Wisconsin, 750 Docket No. 70-00817-33-46040. Ap­ Department of Commerce, Washington, University Avenue, Madison, WT. 53706. plicant: Virginia Polytechnic Institute, D.C. Article: Electron microscope, Model EM Purchasing Department, 222 • Burruss Docket No. 71-00026-98-77095. Appli­ 300. Manufacturer: Philips Electronics Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061. Article: cant: University of Rochester, River NVD, The Netherlands. Electron microscope, Model JEM-100B. Campus Station, Rochester, NY 14627. Intended use of article: The article Manufacturer: Japan Electron Optics Article: Photoelectron spectrometer, will be used for research on the determi­ Laboratory Co., Ltd., Japan. Model ESCA. Manufacturer: Vacuum nation of the structure of several poly­ Intended use of article: The article Generators Ltd., United Kingdom, morphic forms of tubes of glutamate will be used for the examination of bac­ s intended use of article: The article will dehydrogenase; for ultrastructural teria and other micro-organisms at low be used for research experiments to ob­ studies of mitochondrial membrane and and medium magnification to determine tain the binding energies (ionization crystalline membrane structure protein the presence or absence of appendages potentials) of the valence and core elec­ in respiratory deficient mutants of such as pili, microcapsules and spores, tron states of molecules. The ultraviolet Neurospora; and for studies on the struc­ and- the nature and arrangement of photoelectron spectra of organic and in­ ture and length distribution of repli­ flagella; of subcellular fractions pro­ organic compounds in the energy range cating and nonreplicating DNA of duced by the mechanical disintegration from 0-40.8 eV and under high resolution bacterial episomes. of micro-organisms, such as cell wall will be measured. Comments: No comments have been fragments, membrane fragments, inter­ Comments: No comments have been received with respect to this application. nal fibrils, ribosomes and high molec­ received with respect to this application, Decision: Application approved. No ular weight DNA fraction; and to ex­ Decision: Application approved. No instrument or apparatus of equivalent amine plant tissues at low magnification instrument or apparatus of equivalent scientific value to the foreign article, for orientation, followed by examina­ scientific value to the foreign article, for for such purposes as this article is in­ tion at high magnification to detect virus such purposes as this article is intended tended to be used, is being manufactured particles in the selected areas. to be used, is being manufactured in the in the United States. Comments: No comments have been United States. Reasons: The foreign article has a specified resolving capability of 3.5 ang­ received with respect to this application. Reasons: The foreign article has a Decision: Application approved. No vacuum system that can provide a stroms. The most closely comparable domestic instrument is the Model EMU- instrument or apparatus of equivalent vacuum of 10-9 Torricelli (torr). The scientific value to the foreign article, tor most closely comparable domestic instru­ 40 manufactured by Forgflo Corp. The ment is the Model VIEE-15 photoelec­ Model EMU-4C has a specified resolving such purposes as this article is intended

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18085 to be used, is being manufactured in the [Docket No. G-472] be available before making a determina­ tion that the contemplated operation of United States. JAMES JOHNSON, JR., AND Reasons: The foreign article has a the vessel will or will not cause such specified resolving capability of 3 ang­ JAMES R. HENDERSON economic hardship or injury. stroms. The most closely comparable do­ Notice of Loan Application J ames F. Murdock, mestic instrument is the Model EMU-4C Chief, manufactured by Forgflo Corp. (Forgflo). November 19, 1970. Division of Financial Assistance. The Model EMU-4C has a specified re­ James Johnson, Jr., and James R. solving capability of 5 angstroms. (The Henderson, 524 West 17th Street, Jack­ [F.R. Doc. 70-15815; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; lower the numerical rating in terms of sonville, FL 32206, have applied for a 8:45 a.m.] angstrom units, the better the resolving loan from the Fisheries Loan Fund to capability.) We are advised by the De­ aid in financing the purchase of a new [Docket No. B-495] partment of Health, Education, and Wel­ 70-foot length overall wood vessel to op­ fare (HEW) in its memorandum dated erate in the fishery for shrimp. ARNOLD A. KINNEY October 23, 1970, that the additional re­ Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Notice of Loan Application solving capability of the foreign article provisions of 16 U.S.C. 742c, Fisheries is pertinent to the purposes for which Loan Fund Procedures (50 CFR Part 250, November 19,1970. the foreign article is intended to be used. as revised), and Reorganization Plan Arnold A. Kinney, Spruce Head, Maine We, therefore, find that the Model EMU- No. 4 of 1970, that the above entitled 04859, has applied for a loan from the 40 is not of equivalent scientific value to application is being considered by the Fisheries Loan Fund to aid in financing the foreign article for such purposes as National Marine Fisheries Service, Na­ the purchase of a new 34-foot length this article is intended to be used. tional Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin­ over-all wood vessel to engage in the The Department of Commerce knows istration, Department of Commerce, In­ fishery for lobsters, shrimp, scallops, of no other instrument or apparatus of terior Building, Washington, DC 20235. halibut, and groundfish. equivalent scientific value to the foreign Any person desiring to submit evidence Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the article, for such purposes as this article that the contemplated operation of such provisions of 16 U.S.C. 742c, Fisheries is intended to be used, which is being vessel will cause economic hardship or Loan Fund Procedures (50 CFR Part 250, manufactured in the United States. injury to efficient vessel operators al­ as revised), and Reorganization Plan No. ready operating in that fishery must sub­ 4 of 1970, that the above entitled applica­ Charley M. D enton, mit such evidence in writing to the tion is being considered by the National Bureau of Domestic Commerce. Director, National Marine Fisheries Marine Fisheries Service, National [F.R. Doc. 70-15865; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; Service, within 30 days from the date of Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra­ 8:49 a.m.] publication of this notice. If such evi­ tion, Department of Commerce, Interior dence is received it will be evaluated Building, Washington, DC 20235. Any along with such other evidence as may be person desiring to submit evidence that National Oceanic and Atmospheric available before making a determination the contemplated operation of such ves­ Administration that the contemplated operation of the sel will cause economic hardship or in­ [Docket No. A-559] vessel will or will not cause such eco­ jury to efficient vessel operators already nomic hardship or injury. operating in that fishery must submit HARVEY WARDEN DAVIS such evidence in writing to the Director, J ames F. Murdock, Notice of Loan Application Chief, National Marine Fisheries Service, within Division of Financial Assistance. 30 days from the date of publication of November 19, 1970. this notice. If such evidence is received it Harvey Warden Davis, Box 1268, Sitka, [FJ4. Doc. 70-15816; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; will be evaluated along with such other AK 99835, has applied for a loan from 8:45 a.m.] evidence as may be available before the Fisheries Loan Fund to aid in financ­ making a determination that the con­ ing the purchases of a used 36.8-foot [Docket No. G—476] templated operation of the vessel will registered length wood vessel to engage or will not cause such economic hard­ in the fishery for salmon. B. P. AND LARRY W. HICKS ship or injury. Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Notice of Loan Application J ames F. Murdock, provisions of 16 U.S.C. 742c, Fisheries Chief, Loan Fund Procedures (50 CFR Part 250, November 19, 1970. Division of Financial Assistance. as revised), and Reorganization Plan No. B. P. Hicks and Larry W. Hicks, Route [F.R. Doc. 70-15817; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; 4 of 1970, that the above entitled appli­ 1, Box 48, Niceville, FL 32578, have ap­ 8:45 a.m.] cation is being considered by the National plied for a loan from the Fisheries Loan Marine Fisheries Service, National Fund to aid in financing the purchase of Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra­ a new 62-foot length overall wood ves­ [Docket No. S-520] tion, Department of Commerce, Interior sel to engage in the fishery for shrimp. OTTAR G. LARSEN Building, Washington, DC 20235. Any Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the person desiring to submit evidence that provisions of 16 U.S.C. 742c, Fisheries Notice of Loan Application the contemplated operation of such ves­ Loan Fund Procedures (50 CFR Part 250, sel will cause economic hardship or in­ as revised), and Reorganization Plan November 19,1970. jury to efficient vessel operators already No. 4 of 1970, that the above entitled Ottar G. Larsen, Box 365, Grayland, operating in that fishery must submit application is being considered by the WA 98547, has applied for a loan from such evidence in writing to the Director, National Marine Fisheries Service, Na­ the Fisheries Loan Fund to aid in financ­ National Marine Fisheries Service, with- tional Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin­ ing the purchase of a used, 45-foot m 30 days from the date of publication istration, Department of Commerce, In­ length overall wood vessel to engage in of this notice. If such evidence is received terior Building, Washington, DC 20235. the fishery for salmon, albacore, and it will be evaluated along with such other Any person desiring to submit evidence Dungeness crab. evidence as may be available before mak- that the contemplated operation of such Notice is hereby given, pursuant to a determination that the contem­ vessel will cause economic hardship or the provisions of 16 U.S.C. 742c, Fisheries plated operation of the vessel will or will injury to efficient vessel operators al­ Loan Fund Procedures (50 CFR Part Pot cause such economic hardship or in­ ready operating in that fishery must sub­ 250, as revised), and Reorganization Plan jury. mit such evidence in writing to the No. 4 of 1970, that the above entitled J ames F. Murdock, Director, National Marine Fisheries application is being considered by the Chief, Service, within 30 days from the date of National Marine Fisheries Service, Na­ Division of Financial Assistance. publication of this notice. If such evi­ tional Oceanic and Atmospheric Admin­ [F.R.D oc. 70-15814; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; dence is received it will be evaluated istration, Department of Commerce, In­ 8:45 a.m.] along with such other evidence as may terior Building, Washington, DC 20235.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 No. 229-----8 18086 NOTICES Any person desiring to submit evidence Control Tower at El Monte, Calif., will Dated: November 19,1970. that the contemplated operation of such be operationally commissioned. This in­ Atomic Safety and Licens­ vessel will cause economic hardship or formation will be reflected in the FAA ing Board, injury to efficient vessel operators al­ Organization Statement the next time it J ack 1.1. Campbell, ready operating in that fishery must is reissued. Communications to the El Chairman. submit such evidence in writing to the Monte Airport Traffic Control Tower Director, National Marine Fisheries should be addressed as follows: [F.R. Doc. 70-15828; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; 8:46 a.m.] Service, within 30 days from the date El Monte Airport Traffic Control Tower, of publication of this notice. If such Department of Transportation, Federal evidence is received it will be evaluated Aviation Administration, 10924 Lambert along with such other evidence as may Avenue, El Monte, CA 91731. be available before making a determina­ CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD Issued in Los Angeles, Calif., on [Docket No. 22577] tion that the contemplated operation of November 13,1970. the vessel will or will not cause such AIR HAITI, S.A. economic hardship or injury. Lee E. W arren, Acting Director, Western Region. Notice of Hearing J ames F. Murdock, Chief, [F.R. Doc. 70-15822; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the Division of Financial Assistance. 8:46 a.m.] provisions of the Federal Aviation Act [F.R. Doc. 70-15818; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; of 1958, as amended, that a hearing in 8:45 a.m.] the above-entitled proceeding will be held on December 8, 1970, at 10 a.m., [Docket No. A—555] ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION e.s.t., in Room 911, Universal Building, [Docket Nos. 50-373, 50-374] 1825 Connecticut Avenue NW., Washing­ CHARLES RAY MARTIN, JR. ton, DC, before the undersigned exam­ COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. Notice of Loan Application iner. November 19, 1970. Notice of Receipt of Application for Dated at Washington, D.C., Novem­ Charles Ray Martin, Jr., Box 513, Construction Permits and Facility ber 19,1970. Kodiak, AK 99615, has applied for a Licenses [seal] W illiam H. Dapper, loan from the Fisheries Loan Fund to aid Commonwealth Edison Co., 1 First Hearing Examiner. in financing the purchase of a used 32- National Plaza, Chicago, IL 60690, pur­ [F.R. Doc. 70-15866; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; foot registered length wood vessel to en­ suant to section 104(b) of the Atomic 8:49 a.m.] gage in the fishery for salmon. Energy Act of 1954, as amended, has filed Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the an application dated November 3, 1970, provisions of 16 U.S.C. 742c, Fisheries for authorization to construct and [Docket No. 22779; Order 70-11-84] Loan Fund Procedure (50 CFR Part 250, operate two single-cycle, forced circula­ HOP AIR FREIGHT FORWARDER, INC. as revised), and Reorganization Plan No. tion, boiling water nuclear reactors at 4 of 1970, that the above-entitled applica­ its site, located in Brookfield Township, Order of Suspension and Investigation tion is being considered by the National La Salle County, HI. The proposed site is Marine Fisheries Service, National located approximately 5 miles south- Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics Oceanic and Atmospheric Administra­ Board at its office in Washington, D.C., southwest of- Seneca, 111. on the 19th day of November 1970. tion, Department of Commerce, Interior The proposed facilities are designated Building, Washington, DC 20235. Any by the applicant as La Salle County By tariff revision1 filed October 23, person desiring to submit evidence that Nuclear Power Station, Units, 1 and 2. 1970, and marked to become effective the contemplated operation of such Each reactor is designed for initial opera­ November 22, 1970, Hop Air Freight For­ vessel will cause economic hardship or tion at approximately 3,293 megawatts warder, Inc. (Hop) an air freight for­ injury to efficient vessel operators already (thermal) with a net electrical output of warder, proposes to increase“ its excess operating in that fishery must submit approximately 1,078 megawatts. valuation rate on all commodities from such evidence in writing to the Director, 20 to 30 cents for each $100 (or fraction National Marine Fisheries Service, within A copy of the application is available thereof) by which the declared value of 30 days from the date of publication of for public inspection at the Commission’s the shipment exceeds 50 cents per pound this notice. If such evidence is received Public Document Room, 1717 H Street or $50 per shipment, whichever is higher. it will be evaluated along with such other NW., Washington, DC. Most major forwarders currently have evidence as may be available before mak­ Dated at Bethesda, Md., this 19th day an excess valuation rate of 15 cents per ing a determination that the contem­ of November 1970. $100 by which the declared value exceeds plated operation of the vessel will or will 50 cents per pound or $50 per shipment, not cause such economic hardship or For the Atomic Energy Commission. whichever is greater. The Board has con­ sistently suspended, pending investiga­ injury. P eter A. Morris, J ames F. Murdock, Director, tion, proposed increases above this level.2 Chief, Division of Reactor Licensing. Hop has provided no data on the rela­ Division of Financial Assistance. tionship between revenues from current [F.R. Doc. 70-15844; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; [F.R. Doc. 70-15819; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; 8:47 a.m.] excess value charges and losses from 8:45 a.m.] claims paid on shipments for which such charges have been paid, nor otherwise [Docket No. 50-322] supported the proposed increase. Upon consideration of all relevant fac­ DEPARTMENT OF LONG ISLAND LIGHTING CO. tors, the Board finds that the proposed TRANSPORTATION Schedule for Hearing In the matter of Long Island Light­ 1 Revision to Hop Air Freight Forwarder, Inc., Tariff CAB No. 5. Federal Aviation Administration ing Co. Shoreham Nuclear Power Station 2 In recent actions, the Board suspended, Unit No. 1. pending investigation, increased excess valu­ EL MONTE AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL The hearing in the captioned matter ation charges proposed by: (1) Shulman Air TOWER will be continued on Tuesday, Decem­ Freight (Order 69-5-78, May 19, 1969, and Order 69-9-107, Sept. 18, 1969); (2) Eagle Notice of Commissioning ber 1, 1970, at 10 a.m., local time, in the Air Dispatch, Inc. (Order 69-10-155, Oct. 31, Notice is hereby given that on or about Holiday Inn, 4089 Nesconset, Port Jeffer­ 1969); and (3) Satellite Air Freight, Inc. January 15, 1971, the Airport Traffic son Highway, Centereach, NY 11720. (Order 70-10-92, Oct. 19,1970).

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18087 excess valuation rates may be unjust, un­ The agreement amends, revalidates R-34: reasonable, unjustly discriminatory, un­ and amends, and readopts a number of Commodity Item No. 1992—Animal Hunt­ duly preferential, unduly prejudicial or fare resolutions applicable within the ing Trophies, 196 cents per kg., minimum otherwise unlawful, and should be sus­ area composed of Asia/Australasia/South weight 100 kgs., Dar Es Salaam to New pended pending investigation. Pacific Islands (Traffic Conference 3). In York. R-35: Accordingly, pursuant to the Federal addition, the agreement includes two Commodity Item No. 6002—Chemicals, Aviation Act of 1958, and particularly new resolutions establishing certain Dyes, Fertilizers, Insecticides, Paints, sections 204(a) and 1002 thereof: group inclusive tour fares and youth Pigments, Varnishes, Drugs, Pharmaceu­ It is ordered, That: fares valid for travel within TC3. None of ticals etc.1 84 cents per kg., minimum 1. An investigation be instituted to these resolutions which are incorporated weight 1,000 kgs., Auckland to Los determine whether the charge and pro­ in the agreement involve U.S. points Angeles. visions in Rule No. 80(b) on 2d Revised within TC3 nor are the fares combinable Page 6 of Hop Air Freight Forwarder, in air transportation. Pursuant to authority duly delegated Inc.’s, CAB No. 5 and rules, regulations, The Board, acting pursuant to sections by the Board in the Board’s regulations, or practices affecting such charge are, or 102, 204(a), and 412 of the Act, finds 14 GFR 385.14, it is not found, on a will be, unjust, unreasonable, unjustly that the following resolutions, which are tentative basis, that the subject agree­ discriminatory, unduly preferential, un­ incorporated in the agreement indicated, ment is adverse to the public interest or duly prejudicial, or otherwise unlawful, do not affect air transportation within in violation of the Act: Provided, That tentative approval thereof is conditioned and if found to be unlawful, to determine the meaning of the Act: as hereinafter ordered. and prescribe the lawful charge, and Agreement CAB: Accordingly, it is ordered, That: rules, regulations, or practices affecting 22628: I AT A Resolutions Action on Agreement CAB 21753, R-34 such charge; R-28 333/070h. and R-35, be and hereby is deferred with 2. Pending hearing and decision by R—29 ______333/070n. the Board, the charge and provisions in R—33 ------1 333/075g. a view toward eventual approval: Pro­ Rule No. 80(b) on 2d Revised Page 6 R-38 ------333/077b. vided, That approval shall not consti­ of Hop Air Freight Forwarder, Inc.’s, R—39 ------333/077C. tute approval of the specific commodity CAB No. 5 are suspended and their use R-45 ______333/080f. descriptions contained therein for pur­ deferred to and including February 19, R-48 ------"v____,C__ 333/081j. poses of tariff publication. 1970, unless otherwise ordered by the R—51 ------333/084k. Persons entitled to petition the Board R-53 ------333/091f. for review of this order, pursuant to the Board, and that no changes be made R-54 ------333/092e. therein during the period of suspension Board’s regulations, 14 CFR 385.50, may, except by Order or special permission of Accordingly, it is ordered, That: within 10 days after the date of service the Board; Jurisdiction is disclaimed with respect of this order, file such petitions in sup­ 3. The proceeding herein be assigned to those portions of Agreement CAB port of or in opposition to our proposed before an examiner of the Board at a 22036 as set forth above. action herein. time and place hereafter to be desig­ Persons entitled to petition the Board This order will be published in the nated; and for review of this order, pursuant to the F ederal R egister. “ 4. Copies of this order shall be filed Board’s regulation, 14 CFR 385.50, may, within 10 days after the date of service [seal] H arry J. Zink, with the tariffs and served upon Hop Air Secretary. Freight Forwarder, Inc., who is hereby of this order, file such petitions in sup­ made a party to this proceeding. port of or in opposition to our proposed [F.R. Doc. 70-15869; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; action herein. 8:49 a.m.] This order will be published in the This order will be published in the F ederal R egister. F ederal R egister. [Docket No. 20993; Order 70-11-78] By the Civil Aeronautics Board. [seal] Harry J. Zin k, INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT I seal] H arry J. Zin k , - Secretary. ASSOCIATION Secretary. [F.R. Doc. 70-15868; Filed, Nov. 24; 1970; Order Regarding Specific Commodity [F.R. Doc. 70-15867; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; 8:49 a.m.] Rates 8:49 a.m.] Issued under delegated authority No­ [Docket No. 20993; Order 70-11-77] vember 18,1970. {Docket No. 22628; Order 70-11-68] INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT By Order 70-11-10, dated November 3, INTERNATIONAL AIR TRANSPORT ASSOCIATION 1970, action was deferred, with a view toward eventual approval, on an agree­ ASSOCIATION Order Regarding Specific Commodity ment adopted by the International Air Order Regarding Fare Matters Rates Transport Association (IATA), relating to specific commodity rates. The agree­ Issued under delegated authority No­ Issued under delegated authority No­ ment would amend the existing specific vember 17, 1970. vember 18, 1970. commodity rate structure within the An agreement has been filed with the An agreement has been filed with the Western Hemisphere by the inclusion of Board pursuant to section 412(a) of the Board pursuant to section 412(a) of the rates for Commodity Item 0380 (Shrimp) Federal Aviation Act of 1958 (the Act) Federal Aviation'Act of 1958 (the Act) to be applied from Santiago on the one and Part 261 of the Board’s economic and Part 261 of the Board’s economic hand to Los Angeles and San Francisco regulations, between various air carriers, regulations, between various air carriers, on the other. foreign air carriers, and other carriers, foreign air carriers, and other carriers, In deferring action on the agreement embodied in the resolutions of the Traffic embodied in the resolutions of the Joint 10 days were granted in which interested Conferences of the International Air Conferences of J;he International Air persons might file petitions in support of Transport Association (LATA). The Transport Association (LATA), and or in opposition to the proposed action. agreement, which has been assigned the adopted pursuant to the provisions of No petitions have been received within above-designated CAB agreement num­ Resolution 590 dealing with specific com­ the filing period, and the tentative con­ ber, was adopted at meetings held in modity rates. clusions in Order 70-11-10 will herein be Honolulu in the fall of 1970, and is in­ The agreement, adopted pursuant to made final. tended to be effective for a 2-year period unprotested notices to the carriers and Accordingly, it is ordered, That: hlTi cer*ia*n Exceptions1 from April 1, promulgated in an LATA letter dated Agreement CAB 22026 be and it hereby November 10,1970, names additional spe­ is approved: Provided, That approval cific commodity rates, as set forth be­ 1R-33 is for indefinite duration, while R^54 low, which reflect significant reductions 1For complete and accurate description is lor a 1-year period. from the general cargo rates. see applicable tariffs

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18088 NOTICES shall not constitute approval of the spe­ It is ordered, That: WAI was first certificated to serve cific commodity description contained 1. Sedalia, Marshall, Boonville Stage route 160 in 1968 in the Washington therein for purposes of tariff publication. Line, Inc., the Postmaster General, and Baltimore Helicopter Service Investiga­ all other interested persons are directed tion, Docket 17665, when it was selected This order will be published in the to show cause why the Board should not over other applicants for authority to F ederal R egister. adopt the foregoing proposed findings provide city center and interairport serv­ [seal] H arry J. Zin k, and conclusions and fix, determine, and ice in the Washington-Baltimore metro­ .Secretary. publish the final rate specified above for politan area.1 Since December 8, 1969, [F.R. Doc. 70-15870; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; the transportation of mail by aircraft, when WAI’s authority first became effec­ 8:50 a.m.] the facilities used and useful therefor, tive, the Board has granted permission and the services connected therewith as for several postponements of inaugura­ specified above as the fair and reason­ tion of service on route 160.2 [Docket No. 21811; Order 70-11-87] able rate of compensation to be paid to WAI’s present application to abandon SEDAUA, MARSHALL, BOONVILLE Sedalia, Marshall, Boonville Stage Line, this route comes in response to the Inc.; Board’s suggestion in Order 70-7-118, STAGE LINE, INC. 2. Further procedures herein shall be dated July 24, 1970, that such a course Order To Show Cause Regarding in accordance with 14 CFR Part 302, and of action might be appropriate in the notice of any objection to the rate or to event that the carrier found itself un­ Establishment of Service Mail Rate the other findings and conclusions pro­ willing or unable to institute service by Issued under delegated authority No­ posed herein, shall be filed within 10 October 19, 1970.® In making this sug­ vember 19,1970. days, and if notice is filed, written gestion, and in denying the carrier’s re­ - A final service mail rate for the trans­ answer and supporting documents shall quest for a 1-year additional postpone­ portation of mail by aircraft, established be filed within 30 days after service 9f ment of service, we concluded that the by Order 70-4-106, April 21, 1970, in this this order; absence of a downtown Washington heli­ docket, is currently in effect for the 3. If notice of objection is not filed port site was not a sufficient basis for above-captioned air taxi operating under within 10 days after service of this order, extending the postponement period be­ 14 CFR Part 298. This rate is based on or if notice is filed and answer is not yond October 19, 1970.* two one-way trips 6 days per week be­ filed within 30 days after service of this Answers to WAI’s application to aban­ tween Chicago, HI., and Louisville, Ky. order, all persons shall be deemed to don have been filed by three of the par­ The Postmaster General filed a peti­ have waived the right to a hearing and ties to the original certification proceed­ tion on October 28, 1970, stating that the all other procedural steps short of a final ing. Hutter Ports has filed an answer needs of the Postal Service can be effi­ decision by the Board, and the Board supporting the application for abandon­ ciently met with less frequent service and may enter an order incorporating the ment and urging that it be awarded au­ he has been authorized by the carrier to findings and conclusions proposed herein thority on route 160. Answers in opposi­ petition for a new rate of 58.26 cents per and fix and determine the final rate tion to the application have been filed great circle aircraft mile, based on five specified herein; by Pioneer Airlines, Inc. (formerly, round trips per week. The carrier and the 4. If answer is filed presenting issues Washington-Baltimore Helicopter Air­ Post Office Department have agreed that for hearing, the issues involved in de­ ways, Inc.), and by the Metropolitan the proposed rate is a fair and reasonable termining the fair and reasonable final Washington Board of Trade. In addition, rate for these services. rate shall be limited to those specifically National Capital Airlines, Inc. (NCA), The Board finds it in the public inter­ raised by the answer, except insofar as has filed a letter, dated October 20, 1970, other issues are raised in accordance opposing the abandonment application est to fix and determine the fair and rea­ with Rule 307 of the rules of practice sonable rate of compensation to be paid and urging that WAI be directed to in­ (14 CFR 302.307); and stitute service by November 18, 1970. by the Postmaster General for the trans­ 5. This order shall be served upon portation of mail by aircraft between the WAI filed a memorandum in response to Sedalia, Marshall, Boonville Stage Line, the foregoing answers on October 30, aforesaid points. Upon "consideration of Inc., and the Postmaster General. the petition and other matters officially 1970." noticed, it is proposed to issue an order1 This order will be published in the to include the following findings and F ederal R egister. 1 WAI’s certificate for route 160 was issued [seal] H arry J. Zin k, pursuant to Orders 68—11—71 and 68-11-72, conclusions: dated Nov. 18, 1968. Petitions for reconsider­ 1. The fair and reasonable final serv­ Secretary. ation and motions for stay pendente lite of ice mail rate to be paid on and after [F.R. Doc. 70-15871; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; the Board’s orders were denied by Order October 28, 1970, to Sedalia, Marshall, 8:50 a.m.] 63-3-55, dated Mar. 17, 1969, and WAI’s Boonville Stage Line, Inc., pursuant to certificate became effective on Mar. 28, 1969, but was subsequently stayed until Dec. 8, section 406 of the Act for the transporta­ [Dockets Nos. 22566, 17665; Order 70-11-85] 1969, by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the tion of mail by aircraft, the facilities used District of Columbia Circuit pending review and useful therefor, and the services con­ WASHINGTON AIRWAYS, INC. (419 F. 2d 668). nected therewith, shall be 58.26 per great 2 Orders 70-3-30, dated Mar. 6, 1970; 70- circle aircraft mile between Chicago, 111., Order Setting Application for Hearing 4-45, dated Aur. 9, 1970; 70-7-118, dated and Louisville, Ky.; and Instituting Limited Reopening Julv 24, 1970; 70-10-75, dated Oct. 13, 1970. *The Oct. 19, 1970, date was established by 2. This final rate, to be paid entirely by of Proceeding Order 70-4-45, in response to WAI’s request the Postmaster General, is based on five Adopted by the Civil Aeronautics for a postponement until Mar. 8, 1971. Id round trips per week flown with Beech- Board at its office in Washington, D.C., Order 70-7-118, we denied the carrier’s peti­ craft 18 aircraft; on the 19th day of November 1970. tion for reconsideration of our prior refusal Accordingly, pursuant to the Federal Application of Washington Airways, > grant a 1-year extension. Aviation Act of 1958, and particularly 4 This date was subsequently extended by Inc., for permission to abandon route rder 70-10-75, dated Oct. 13, 1970, until sections 204(a) and 406 thereof, and 160 pursuant to section 401(j) of the ov. 18, 1970, in order to afford sufficient time regulations promulgated in 14 CFR Part Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as ir consideration of the matters raised by 302, 14 CFR Part 298, and 14 CFR amended, Docket 22566; reopened Wash­ rAI’s application and the answers thereto, 385.16(f). ington/Baltimore Helicopter Service y this order, we are authorizing an exten­ Investigation, Docket 17665. on of the postponement period until 60 ays after final decision in the reopened 1 As this order to show cause is not a final On September 16, 1970, Washington roceeding hereby instituted. action, it is not regarded as subject to the Airways, Inc. (WAI), filed an application 5 Permission to file a response to the op- review provisions of 14 CFR Part 385. These seeking permission to abandon route 160 osing pleadings was granted by the Chief provisions will apply to final action taken by xaminer in a letter to counsel for wax, the staff under authority delegated In pursuant to section 401(j) of the Federal § 385.16(g). Aviation Act of 1958. ated Oct. 20,1970.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18089 Upon consideration of the foregoing the question of a possible new certifica­ pleadings and other relevant facts, we tion for route 160 in an evidentiary pro­ have decided to consolidate WAI’s appli­ ceeding in which there can be full FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS cation to abandon for simultaneous consideration of the comparative qualifi­ hearing with a Reopened Washington/ cation and fitness of all applicants for COMMISSION Baltimore Helicopter Service Investiga­ route 160. [Dockets Nos. 19080-19085; FCC 70-1203} tion, Docket 17665, hereby instituted for Accordingly, it is ordered, That: the limited purpose of considering appli­ 1. The application of Washington Air­ NIAGARA COMMUNICATIONS, cations for authority over route 160.6 ways, Inc., for authority to abandon its INC., ET A L Our decision to institute a proceeding route 160 pursuant to section 401(j) of Memorandum Opinion and Order is based on a number of considerations. the Act, be and it hereby is set for hear­ There appears to be at least one appli­ ing and consolidated with the Washing- Designating Applications for Con­ cant with helicopter operating experi­ ton/Baltimore Helicopter Service In­ solidated Hearing on Stated Issues ence which is willing to undertake the vestigation, Docket 17665; In the matter of application of Niagara certificate obligations of route 160, and 2. The Washington/Baltimore Heli­ Communications, Inc., for a construction stands ready to provide scheduled inter­ copter Service Investigation, Docket permit for a new public Class IH-B coast airport service at the present time. In 17665, be and it hereby is reopened pur­ station to be located at Bay Shore, N.Y., addition, both Pioneer and the Board of suant to sections 204(a) and 401(g) of Docket No. 19080, File No. 750-M-P-89; Trade assert that WAI’s fruitless efforts the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, as application of Niagara Communications, to obtain a downtown Washington site amended, to consider the following is­ Inc., for a construction permit for a new for a commercial heliport on privately sues: Whether the application of Wash­ public Class m - B coast station to be owned land have left unexplored the al­ ington Airways, Inc., in Docket 22566 to located at East Hampton, N.Y., Docket ternative possibility of establishing a abandon route 160 should be granted; No. 19081, File No. 807-M-P-99; applica­ heliport on Federal property, which is whether the area exemption issued to tion of Niagara Communications, Inc., not subject to District zoning require­ Washington Airways, Inc., by Order for a construction permit for a new pub­ ments. Pioneer urges that it would ener­ 68-11-72, dated November 18, 1968, lic Class m - B coast station to be located getically pursue the latter course, and should be terminated or otherwise at Providence," R.I., Docket No. 19082, has indicated 4hat it would withdraw its amended; and in the event Washington File No. 876-M-L-109; application of opposition to WAI’s abandonment appli­ Airways, Inc.’s application for abandon­ Great Eastern Communications Co. for cation in the event that a transfer of ment is granted ; whether the public con­ license modification to authorize an addi­ route 160 to Pioneer could be effected. venience and necessity require the certi­ tional working frequency at its Groton, Similarly, the Board of Trade’s opposi­ fication of another carrier for route 160; 3. All parties to the Investigation in Conn., station, Docket No. 19083, File No. tion to abandonment is predicated pri­ 856- M-ML-70; applications of Great marily on its desire to have helicopter Docket 17665 shall be deemed to be par­ Eastern Communications Co. for license service inaugurated, and it would be ties in the Reopened proceeding, without satisfied by a transfer of WAI’s authority further action, and, in addition, the modification to authorize an additional to a more willing operator. Zoning Commission of the District oF working frequency at its New Bedford, Columbia, the District of Columbia Board Mass., station, Docket No. 19084, File No. In these circumstances, we believe it 857- M-ML-70; application of Radio appropriate to examine the question of of Zoning Adjustment, and the National Capital Planning Commission are invited Telephone Answering Service, Inc., for a whether permitting WAI to abandon its construction permit for a new public certificate would be in the public inter­ to participate in the Reopened proceed­ ing by filing appropriate pleadings under Class m - B coast station to be located at est and, if so, whether another applicant Richmond (Staten Island), N.Y., Docket should be authorized to serve route 160.7 Rule 14 or Rule 15 of the Board’s rules of practice; No. 19085, File No. 744-M-L-40. In reaching our decision to reopen the 4. Applications and motions to con­ 1. The above-captioned applications prior investigation, we have considered solidate and motions or petitions seeking are for authority to operate new or addi­ the alternative procedure, urged by modification or reconsideration of this tional facilities for Class m - B public Pioneer, that we may simply transfer order shall be filed no later than 20 days coast stations. This class of station pro­ WAI’s route 160 to Pioneer, following a after the date of service of this order, and vides ship-shore radiotelephone common determination that such transfer is in answers to such pleadings shall be filed carrier service, primarily of a local char­ the public interest. We believe that it within 15 days thereafter; acter, on VHF channels.1 The applicants would be more appropriate to examine 5. This proceeding shall be set for seek authority to serve portions of an hearing at a time anjf place to be desig­ area from New York Harbor to Cape Cod. nated hereafter; 2. On August 25, 1969, and by amend­ 8 We will require that applications for au­ ment on October 22, 1970, Niagara Com- thority over route 160 and motions to con­ 6. Washington Airways, Inc., be and solidate such applications in the reopened it hereby is authorized to postpone the in­ munciations, Inc. (Niagara), applied for proceeding be filed not later than 20 days auguration of service pursuant to its cer­ a construction permit for a new station at after the date of service of this order. Our tificate for route 160 until 60 days after Bay Shore, N.Y. On September 15, 1969, consolidation of the two issues (abandon­ issuance of a final order with respect to Niagara filed a similar application for ment and replacement carrier selection) into its abandonment application in the re­ East Hampton, N.Y., and, on October 2, a single investigation should not be con­ opened proceeding instituted herein; and 1969, for Warwick (since amended for strued as a prejudgment of WAI’s application Providence), R.I. The two New York ap­ to abandon route 160. We believe, however, 7. A copy of this order shall be served that the interrelationship of the two issues upon each carrier and civic party to plications seek authority to serve por­ warrants a consolidated proceeding. Docket 17665 and, in addition, upon all tions of the Long Island Coast. The 7 All parties to the prior proceeding shall persons listed in paragraph 3 above, and Providence application seeks to serve the be deemed to be parties with equivalent upon those persons designated for serv­ Narrangansett Bay area. status in the reopened proceeding without ice in the memorandum of Washington 3. Francis I. Lambert and Harry L. urther action. In addition, we will invite Brock, then doing business as Advanced he participation of those agencies having Airways, Inc., in response to answers, juirsdiction over zoning matters' in the Dis- dated October 30,1970, in Docket 22566. r ct of Columbia, in the interest of develop- »Section 81.3(J) of the rules defines a Class hg a more complete record with respect to This order will be published in the F ed­ III-B coast station as one “* * * licensed to eral R egister. provide a maritime mobile service primarily of a downtown Washington of a local character * * *” as distinguished m. i ° r site. In addition to the abandon- By the Civil Aeronautics Board. from Class I stations which provide service r ; i " eStT ' we wm also Price in issue [seal] Harry J. Zin k , “* * * up to several thousand miles * * *” emutirfw1ulatlon of WAI’S present area ex- and Class n stations which “* * * provide suhn-v, ’ y[hich it is authorized to provide Secretary. service primarily of a regional charac­ ton Bnl«~hellCOpter service in the Washing­ [F.R. Doc. 70-15872; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; ter * • *” as defined in §§ 81.3 (h) and (1) ton-Baltimore metropolitan area. 8:50 a.m.] of our rules.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18090 NOTICES Communications Co. (Advanced), filed for Channel 27 or of the East Hampton 12. It is further ordered, That cover­ petitions to deny all three of the Niagara application for Channel 26. age areas will be computed on the basis applications. The petition to deny the 9. An analysis of the applications and of the information in Commission notice Bay Shore station was filed on Novem­ pleadings does not establish conclusively of proposed rule making, Docket No. ber 12, 1969; to deny the Warwick whether, or to what extent, there is now 18944. (Providence) station on November 14, an unfilled need for public radio mari­ 13. It is further ordered, That the Ni­ 1969; and to deny the East Hampton time communications service facilities to agara oppositions to the Great Eastern station on November 17, 1969. Since the serve the areas here involved. Addition­ petitions to deny, to the extent they de­ filing of these petitions to deny, Francis I. ally, there is a fundamental question pend on an allegation of ineffective li­ Lambert accepted assignment of all the whether boating communities in places cense transfers from Advanced Commu­ public coast station licenses formerly such as Bay Shore and East Hampton nications Co. to Great Eastern Commu­ held by Advanced and reincorporated would be entitled to local service not­ nications Co. (see paragraph 3 above), under the name Great Eastern Commun­ withstanding the fact that they may be are denied. ications Co. (Great Eastern). As a result within the coverage of a station in an­ 14. It is further ordered, That the bur­ of these transactions, Francis I. Lambert other locality. Accordingly, in view of den of proof and the burden of proceed­ is now doing business as Great Eastern these substantial and material questions ing with the introduction of evidence on Communications Co. of which he is a 100 of fact the Commission is unable to issue (c) is on Great Eastern Communi­ percent stockholder and successor in in­ make a determination that it would be cations Co., and on New York Telephone terest to the public coast licenses in the public interest to grant the appli­ Co. with respect to issues (d) and (e). formerly held by Advanced. Great East­ cations; therefore, an evidentiary hear­ On all other issues, the burden is on each ern is presently the licensee of Station ing is required to resolve the questions applicant with respect to its applications KLU785 at Monroe (Bridgeport), Conn.; of fact and to determine if the public except on issue (g) the burden is on the of Station KWB437 at Groton, Conn.; interest would be served by the grant of petitioner who alleges interference. and of Station KJC737 at New Bedford, any or all of the subject applications. 15. It is further ordered, That to avail Mass. The Commission, by a consent to 10. It is ordered, That the above- themselves of an opportunity to be heard, assignment, approved the assignments on captioned applications of Niagara Com­ Niagara Communications Co., Great April 22, 1970. munications, Inc., Great Eastern Com­ Eastern Communications Co., New York 4. New York Telephone Co. (New munications Co., and Radio Telephone Telephone Co., and Radio Telephone York) is the licensee of Station KEA693 Answering Service, Inc., are designated Answering Service, Inc., pursuant to at New York, N.Y., and of Station for hearing in a consolidated proceeding § 1.221(c) of the rules of the Commission, KLU786 at Riverhead, N.Y. New York at a time and place to be specified in a in person or by attorney, shall within filed petitions to deny Niagara’s Bay subsequent order on the following issues: twenty (20) days of the mailing of this Shore and East Hampton applications on a. To determine the facts with respect order, file with the Commission in trip­ January 19, 1970. Niagara filed opposi­ to the proposed facilities, rates, practices licate a written appearing stating an tions to both of these petitions and New and services of the applicants, including intention to appear on the date set for York has replied. areas to be served. hearing and present evidence on the is­ 5. On July 29, 1970, Great Eastern b. To determine the nature, source and sues specified in this order. applied for modification of its existing amount of traffic to be handled by each station licenses to provide an additional station. Adopted: November 10,1970. working frequency for its New Bedford c. To determine the economic impact Released: November 19,1970. and Groton stations respectively. Great on Stations KLU785, KWB437, and KJC Eastern already has been issued an au­ 737 if the applications of Niagara are F ederal Communications thorization for a second frequency at its granted. Com m ission,2 Groton station, thus the subject applica­ d. To determine the economic impact [seal] B en F. W aple, tion is for a third frequency at that site. on Station KEA693 if the application of Secretary. Radio Telephone is granted. Niagara has filed petitions to deny the [F.R. Doc. 70-158,39; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; grant of the additional frequencies to e. To determine the economic impact 8:47 a.m.] Great Eastern. Great Eastern has filed on Station KLU786 if the applications of oppositions to these petitions to deny. Niagara for Bay Shore and East Hamp­ 6. On April 8, 1970, Radio Telephone ton are granted. Answering Service, Inc. (Radio Tele­ f. To determine if there is a need for DEPARTMENT OF LABOR phone), filed an application for a new any or all of the proposed public coast Class III-B public coast station to be facilities, taking Into consideration the Wage and Hour Division located at Richmond (Staten Island), existing stations. FEDERAL WAGE GARNISHMENT LAW N.Y. On May 15, 1970, New York filed a g. To determine the nature and ex­ petition to deny the application. On tent of cochannel interference, if any, Application by the State of Utah for June 23, 1970, Radio Telephone filed an Exemption; Opportunity To Comment opposition to the petition to deny. which would result from simultaneous 7. Except for the issues specified operation of the proposed and existing 1. Pursuant to section 305 of the Con­ herein, each applicant is otherwise facilities, and whether such interference sumer Credit Protection Act (CCPA) (15 qualified. All petitioners are found to be would be tolerable or mutually destruc­ U.S.C. 1675) and Subpart C of 29 CFK parties in interest. The Safety and Spe­ tive. Part 870 (35 F.R. 8226, May 26, 1970; 35 cial Radio Services Bureau and the Com­ h. To determine, in' the light of the F.R. 14368, Sept. 11, 1970), the State mon Carrier Bureau of the Federal Com­ evidence adduced on all of the foregoing of Utah has filed an application with the munications Commission are parties to issues, whether the public interest, con­ Administrator of the Wage and Hour this proceeding. venience, and necessity will be served by Division for exemption of State-regulate 8. It is evident from an analysis of the the grant of any or all of the subject ap­ plications. garnishments from the provisions of sec applications and related pleadings that tion 303(a) of the CCPA. overlap in service areas will be substan­ 11. it is further ordered, Tfjat the petitions to deny, filed herein by Great 2. Interested persons are hereby af­ tial if all of the applications are granted. forded an opportunity to comment in In addition, disruptive electrical inter­ Eastern Communications Co. against the applications of Niagara Communications, writing concerning this apphcat ference could result. Potential electrical within 30 days following publication oi interference could result to the River- Inc., and by New York Telephone Co. head station by the grant of the Rich­ against the applications of Niagara Com­ this, notice in the F ederal He®ist. ’ mond application; the Monroe station munications, Inc., and Radio Telephone Comments should be addressed to t by the grant of the Bay Shore applica­ Answering Service, Inc., are granted to tion; and. by simultaneous grant of the the extent indicated herein and are a Commissioner Bartley absent. Groton and East Hampton applications otherwise denied.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18091 Administrator, Wage and Hour Divi­ that oral argument, if held, will be set 1970, and republished this issue. Appli­ sion, U.S. Department of Labor, Wash­ for one or more days in mid-January cant: BADGER LINES, INC., 3109 West ington, D.C.20210. 1971. Lisbon Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53208. 3. Copies of the application of the (3) Briefs may be filed by any partyApplicant’s representative: Philip H. State will be available for public inspec­ to these proceedings on or before Janu­ Porter, 121 South Pinckney Street, Madi­ tion and copying during business hours ary 22,1971. Briefs may, if desired, argue son, WI 53703. The modified procedure at the National Office of the Wage and separately the issues in X-265 and X-267, has been followed in this proceeding and Hour Division and in the Regional Office but such is not required. Any party who an order of the Commission, Operating of the Wage and Hour Division in Kansas has heretofore filed a brief or separately Rights Board, dated November 5, 1970, City, Mo. filed argument in either X-265 or X-267 and served November 16,1970, finds; that 4. The rules published in 29 CFR Part may incorporate such by reference and the present and future public conven­ 870 shall govern action upon this need not repeat the contents thereof. ience and necessity require operation by application. By the Commission, Division 2. applicant, in interstate or foreign com­ Signed at Washington, D.C., this 19th merce, as a common carrier by motor day of November 1970. [seal] R obert L. Oswald, vehicle, over irregular routes, malt bever­ Secretary. ages, from Sheboygan and La Crosse, R obert D. Moran, [F.R. Doc. 70-15856; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970 Wis., to points in Cook, Kane, Lake, Mc­ Administrator. 8:48 a.m.] Henry, and Will Counties, HI., that ap­ [FH. Doc. 70-15857; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; plicant is fit, willing, and able properly 8:48 a.m.] to perform such service and to conform [Notice 106] to the requirements of the Interstate MOTOR CARRIER APPLICATIONS AND Commerce Act and the Commission’s rules and regulations thereunder and INTERSTATE COMMERCE CERTAIN OTHER PROCEEDINGS that an appropriate certificate be issued v November 20, 1970. concurrently with or subsequent to the COMMISSION The following publications are gov­ issuance to applicant of appropriate cer­ tificates and the cancellation of appli­ [Ex Farte Nos. 265, 267] erned by the new Special Rule 247 of the Commission’s rules of practice, published cant’s outstanding permits in No. MC INCREASED FREIGHT RATES, in the F ederal R egister, issue of Decem­ 29990, and subs thereunder, and, that 1970 AND 1971 ber 3, 1963, which became effective Jan­ should the conversion proceedings in Nos. uary 1, 1964. MC 29990 and subs thereunder be dis­ At a session of the Interstate Com­ approved by the Commission, the instant merce Commission, Division 2, held at its The publications hereinafter set forth reflect the scope of the applications as application will stand denied in its en­ office in Washington, D.C., on the 13th tirety. Because it is possible that other day of November, A.D. 1970. filed by applicant, and may include de­ scriptions, restrictions, or limitations persons who have relied upon the notice Upon consideration of the records in of the application as published, may have the above-entitled proceedings, a petition which are not in a form acceptable to the Commission. Authority which ulti­ an interest in and would be prejudiced filed by the National Industrial Traffic by the lack of proper notice of the au­ League on November 10, 1970, seeking mately may be granted as a result of the applications here noticed will not neces­ thority described in the findings in this postponement of certain further hearings order a notice of authority actually for cross-examination, a telegraphic re­ sarily reflect the phraseology set forth in the application as filed, but also will granted will be published in the F ederal quest by Atlantic City Electric Co. et al., R egister and issuance of a certificate in and a request entered upon the record in eliminate any restrictions which are not acceptable to the Commission. this proceeding will be withheld for a the proceedings on November 13,1970, by period of 30 days from the date of such the State of California seeking similar Applications Assigned for Oral H earing publication, during which period miy relief, and of a reply thereto by the re­ MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY proper party in interest may file a peti­ spondents similarly entered upon the rec­ tion to reopen or for other appropriate ord in these proceedings on November 13, No. MC 114028 (Sub-No. 18) (Republi­ relief setting forth in detail the precise 1970, and good cause appearing therefor, cation) .filed October 13,1970. Published manner in which it has been so It is ordered, That the order of the in F ederal R egister, issue of November 5, prejudiced. Commission entered September 2, 1970, 1970, and republished this issue to reflect No. MC 48501 (Sub-No. 14) (Republi­ as most recently amended by the order the hearing information. Applicant: of the Commission, Division 2, entered cation) , filed May 25, 1970, published in ROWLEY INTERSTATE TRANSPOR- the F ederal R egister issue of June 25, October 5, 1970, be, and it is hereby, fur­ , TATION COMPANY, INC., 1717 Maple ther amended to reflect the following Street, Dubuque, IA 52001. Applicant’s 1970, and republished this issue. Appli­ changes: cant: INDIANA MOTOR BUS COM­ representative: Wilmer B. Hill, 705 Mc- PANY, a corporation, 715 South Michi­ (1) The further hearing provided in Lachlen Bank Building, 666 11th Street gan Street, South Bend, IN 46624. Ap­ subparagraph (6) of the order of the NW., Washington, DC 20001. Authority commission (Division 2) entered Octo­ sought to operate as a common carrier, plicant’s representative: Harry J ber 5, 1970, for the purpose of cross- Harman, 1110 Fidelity Building, Indian­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, apolis, IN 46204. The modified procedure Qflvrïlina^ on witnesses with respect to transporting: Dairy products between innate data be and it is hereby post­ Dubuque, Iowa, on the one hand, and, has been followed in this proceeding and poned to December 7, 1970, at 9:30 a.m., on the other, points in Connecticut, an order of the Commission, Operating istrict of Columbia standard time at the Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Rights Board, dated October 30,1970, and mces of the Interstate Commerce Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Penn­ served November 17, 1970, finds: That Commission, Washington, D.C. sylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, and the present and future public conven­ (2) ° n or before December 7, 1970, the District of Columbia. Note: Appli­ ience and necessity require operation by thJ Party desiring oral argument before cant states that the requested authority applicant, -in interstate or foreign com­ nf ^ ^ i s s i o n on the merits of either cannot be tacked with its existing merce, as a common carrier by motor n i l a Proceedings shall make such re- authority. vehicle, over irregular routes; (1) of tnrrT writing addressed to the Secre- HEARING: December 10, 1970, before passengers and their baggage in the same ^erstate Commerce Commission, an examiner to be later designated at vehicle with passengers, in special oper­ thp roc?gton,.L D,C‘ 20423, stating in full Chicago, HI., in Room 2302C Everett Mc­ ations; and (2) of general commodities timP r ons,therefor and the amount of Kinley Dirksen Building, 219 South (except classes A and B explosives, and d®sired-. Based upon such requests Dearborn Street. household goods as defined by the Com­ Cnnw6 ?onsideration of the record, the No. MC 29990 (Sub-No. 8) (Republi­ mission, commodities in bulk, and com­ recpiv^8810? wiU determine whether to cation) , filed April 6, 1970, published in oral argument. It is contemplated modities requiring special .equipment), the F ederal R egister issue of May 7, restricted (a) to the transportation of

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18092 NOTICES shipments in the same vehicle with pas­ authority actually granted will be pub­ from those ports of entry on the inter­ sengers; and (b) against the transporta­ lished in the F ederal R egister and issu­ national boundary line between the tion of packages or articles weighing ance of a certificate in this proceeding United States and Canada located in more than 100 pounds in the aggregate will be withheld for a period of 30 days Minnesota and North Dakota to points in from one consignor at one location to from the date of such publication, during Minnesota, Montana, North Dakota, one consignee at one location during a which period any proper party in inter­ South Dakota, and Wisconsin; that ap­ single day, between South Bend, Ind., est may file a petition to reopen the pro­ plicant is fit, willing, and able properly on the one hand, and, on the other ceeding or for other appropriate relief to perform such service and to conform O’Hara International Airport, at Chi­ setting forth in detail the precise man­ to the requirements of the Interstate cago, HI., and Midway Airport, at Chi­ ner in which it has been so prejudiced. Commerce Act and the Commission’s cago, HI., and restricted to the transpor­ No. MC 107403 (Sub-No. 795) (Repub­ rules and regulations thereunder. Be­ tation of passengers and their baggage, lication) , filed May 14,1970, published in cause it is possible that other parties who in (1) above, and traffic, in (2) above, the F ederal R egister issue of June 11, have relied upon the notice of the appli­ having a prior or subsequent movement 1970, and republished this issue. Appli­ cation as previously published may have by air; that applicant is fit, willing, and cant: MATLACK, INC., 10 West Balti­ an interest in and would be prejudiced by able properly to perform such service and more Avenue, Lansdowne, PA 19050. the lack of proper notice of the authority to conform to the requirements of the Applicant’s representatives: John Nelson described in the findings in this order, Interstate Commerce Act and the Com­ (same address as applicant), and Harry a notice of the authority actually granted mission’s rules and regulations there­ C. Ames, Jr., 666 11th Street NW., Wash­ will be published in the F ederal R egister under. Because it is possible that other ington, DC 20001. The modified proce­ and issuance of a certificate in this pro­ persons, who relied upon the notice of dure has been followed in this proceeding ceeding will be withheld for a period of the application as published, may have and an order of the Commission, Oper­ 30 days from the date of such publica­ an interest in and would be prejudiced ating Rights Board, dated October 15, tion, during which period any proper by the lack of proper notice of the au­ 1970, and served November 17, 1970, party in interest may file an appropriate thority described in the findings in this finds: That the present and future public petition to reopen or for other appropri­ order, a notice of authority actually convenience and necessity require oper­ ate relief setting forth in detail the granted will be published in the F ederal ation by applicant, in interstate or precise manner in which it has been so R egister and issuance of a certificate in foreign commerce, as a common carrier prejudiced. the proceeding will be withheld for a by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, No. MC 125785 (Sub-No. 5) (Repub­ period of 30 days from the''date of such of cement byproducts, from the plant- lication), filed November 7, 1968, pub­ publication, during which period any site of Atlantic Cement Co., Ravena, lished in the F ederal R egister issue of proper party in interest may file a N.Y., to points in Connecticut, Massa­ December 5, 1968, and republished this petition to reopen or for other appro­ chusetts, New Jersey (except points in issue. Applicant: SATURN EXPRESS, priate relief setting forth in detail the Cumberland, Salem, Gloucester, Cape INC., 605 South 14th Street, Post Office precise manner in which it has been May, Atlantic, Camden, and Burlington Box 2028, Lincoln, NE 68501. Applicant’s so prejudiced. Counties), and New Hampshire; that representative: J. Max Harding (same No. MC 100666 (Sub-No. 163) (Repub­ applicant is fit, willing, and able properly address as above). An order of the Com­ lication) , filed February 20, 1970, pub­ to perform such service and to conform mission, Division 1, Acting as an Ap­ lished in the F ederal R egister issue of to the requirements of the Interstate pellate Division, dated November 2,1970, April 2, 1970, and republished this issue. Commerce Act and the Commission’s and served November 10, 1970, finds; Applicant: MELTON TRUCK LINES, rules and regulations thereunder. Be­ that operation by applicant, in Interstate INC., Post Office Box 7666, Shreveport, cause it is possible that other parties who or foreign commerce, as a contract car­ LA 71107. Applicant’s representatives: have relied upon the notice of the appli­ rier by motor vehicles over irregular Wilburn L. Williamson, 600 Leininger cation as published, may have an interest routes, of rope and cord (a) from St. Building, Oklahoma City, OK 73112, and in and would be prejudiced by the lack Louis, Mo., Beverly, N.J., New Orleans, Paul Caplinger, Post Office Box 7666, of proper notice of the authority de­ La., and Chicago, HI., to the plantsite of Shreveport, LA 71107. The modified pro­ scribed in the findings in this order, a Dan H. Shield Cordage Co., located ap­ cedure has been followed in this proceed­ notice of the authority actually granted proximately 15 miles from Woodstock, ing and an order of the Commission, Op­ will be published in the F ederal R egister 111., and (b) from the said plantsite to erating Rights Board, dated October 29, and issuance of a certificate in this pro­ St. Louis, Mo., Beverly, N.J., Houston, 1970, served November 17, 1970, finds; ceeding will be withheld for a period of Tex., Norcross, Ga., Linthicum Heights, that the present and future public con­ 30 days from the date of such publica­ Md., Boston and Lawrence, Mass., Min­ venience and necessity require operation tion, during which period any proper neapolis, Minn., Denver, Colo., Los An­ by applicant in interstate or foreign parly in interest may file a petition for geles and San Francisco, Calif., Seattle, commerce, as a common carrier by motor leave to reopen the proceeding or for Wash., Portland, Oreg., and points in vehicle, over irregular routes, of gypsum other appropriate relief setting forth in Queens County, N.Y., under a continu­ products, asbestos products, and build­ detail the precise manner in whichit has ing contract with Dan H. Shield Cordage ing materials (except commodities in been so prejudiced. Co., of Chicago, 111., will be consistent bulk), from the plantsites and stor­ No. MC 118806 (Sub-No. 11) (Repub­ with the public interest and the national age facilities of the National Gypsum lication), filed January 22, 1970, pub­ transportation policy; that applicant is Co. at Westwego and New Orleans, lished in the F ederal R egister issue of fit, willing, and able properly to perform La., to points in Alabama, Arkan­ March 26, 1970, and republished this such service and to conform to the re­ sas, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, issue. Applicant: ARNOLD BROS. quirements of the Interstate Commerce Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, New TRANSPORT, LTD., 1101 Dawson Road, Act and the Commission’s rules and reg­ Mexico, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Winnipeg, MB Canada. Applicant’s rep­ ulations thereunder. Because it is possi­ South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Vir­ resentative: Charles W. Singer, 33 ble that other persons, who relied upon ginia, and West Virginia; that applicant North Dearborn Street, Chicago, IL the notice of the application as pub­ is fit, willing, and able properly to per­ 60602. The modified procedure has been form such service and to conform to the followed in this proceeding and an order lished, may have an interest in and requirements of the Interstate Commerce of the Commission, Operating Rights would be prejudiced by the lack of proper Act and the Commission’s rules and Board, dated September 30, 1970, and notice of the authority described in the regulations thereunder. Because it is pos­ served October 26, 1970, finds: That the findings in this order, a notice of author­ sible that other parties, who have relied present and future public convenience ity actually granted will be published in upon the notice of the application as and necessity require operation by ap­ the F ederal R egister and issuance of a published, may have an interest in and plicant, in interstate or foreign com­ permit in the proceeding will be withheld would be prejudiced by the lack of proper merce, as a common carrier by motor for a period of 30 days from the date of notice of the authority described in the vehicle over irregular routes, of iron and such publication, during which period findings in this order, a notice of the steel products, and aluminum products, any proper party in interest may file a

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18093 petition to reopen or for other appropri­ section A and C of appendix I to the else manner in which it has been so ate relief setting forth in detail the pre­ report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier prejudiced. cise manner in which it has been so Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from prejudiced. Omaha, Neb., to points in Cook and Du Applications for Certificates or P er­ No. MC 128866 (Sub-No. 13) (Repub­ Page Counties, 111.; Cedar Rapids and mits W hich Are To Be P rocessed Con­ lication), filed April 17, 1970, published currently With Applications Under Waterloo, Iowa; and Milwaukee, Ke­ Section 5 Governed by Special R ule in the F ederal R egister May 28, 1970, nosha, Madison, and Green Bay, Wis.; and republished this issue. Applicant: under a continuing contract with J. F. 240 to the Extent Applicable B & B TRUCKING, INC., Post Office Box O’Neill Packing Co., of Omaha, Nebr., will No. MC 43442 (Sub-No. 22), filed Octo­ 128, Cherry Hill, NJ 08034. Applicant’s be consistent with the public interest and ber 19, 1970. Applicant: TRANSPORTA­ representative: Daniel L. O’Connor, 1815 the national transportation policy. Be­ TION SERVICE, INC., 2021 South H Street NW., Washington, DC 20006. cause it is possible that other persons, Schaefer Highway, Detroit, MI 48217. The modified procedure has been fol­ who relied upon the notice of the appli­ Applicant’s representatives: A. Charles lowed in this proceeding and an order of cation as published, may have an interest Tell, 100 East Broad Street, Columbus, the Commission, Operating Rights in and would be prejudiced by the lack OH 43215, and John Graham (same ad­ Board, dated October 21,1970, and served of proper notice of the authority de­ dress as applicant). Authority sought to November 10, 1970, finds: That the pres­ scribed in the findings in this order a no­ operate as a common carrier, by motor ent and future public convenience and tice of authority actually granted will be vehicle, over regular routes, transport­ necessity require operation by applicant, published in the F ederal R egister and ing: General commodities (except those in interstate or foreign commerce, as a issuance of a permit in the proceeding of unusual value, classes A and B ex­ contract carrier by motor vehicle, over will be withheld for a period of 30 days plosives, household goods as defined by irregular routes, of new aluminum stock, from the date of such publication, during the Commission, commodities in bulk, from the plantsites of Penny Plate, Inc., which period any proper party in interest and those requiring special equipment), at Cherry Hill, N.J., and Searcy, Ark., to may file a petition to reopen or for other serving all points in Ohio as off-route the plantsite of the Aluminum Co. of appropriate relief setting forth in detail points in connection with applicant’s America at Davenport, Iowa, under a the precise manner in which it has been regular route service at Bellefontaine, continuing contract with Penny Plate, so prejudiced. Ohio. Note: This application is directly Ihc., of Cherry Hill, N.J., will be consist­ No. MC 134648 (Republication) filed related to MC-F-10998, published in the ent with the public interest and the na­ May 11, 1970, published in the F ederal F ederal R egister issue of October 28, tional transportation policy; that appli­ R egister issue of June 18, 1970, and re­ 1970, wherein Transportation Service, cant is fit, willing, and able properly to published this issue. Applicant: MOR­ Inc., seeks to purchase the rights from perform such service and to conform to GAN COUNTY TRUCKING INC., 1010 Atkinson Lines, Inc., a certificate of reg­ the requirements of the Interstate Com­ East Nutter Street, Martinsville, IN istration No. MC 120247 Sub 2. If a hear­ merce Act and the Commission’s rules 46151. Applicant’s representative: Wil­ ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ and regulations thereunder. Because it is liam H. Hancock (same address as ap­ quests it be held at Columbus, Ohio, or possible that other parties who have re­ plicant). The modified procedure has Detroit, Mich. lied upon the notice of the application as been followed in this proceeding and an No. MC 120516 (Sub-No. 3), filed Octo­ published, may have an interest in and order of the Commission, Operating ber 27, 1970. Applicant: THOMAS H. would be prejudiced by the lack of proper Rights Board, dated October 13, 1970, MARROW TRUCKING CO., a corpora­ notice of the authority described in the and served November 16, 1970, finds: tion, 8050 Othello Street, San Diego, findings in this order, a notice of the au­ That operation by applicant, in interstate CA 92111. Applicant’s representatives: thority actually granted will be pub­ or foreign commerce, as a contract car­ Frank Loughran and Marshall G. Berol, lished in the F ederal R egister and is­ rier by motor vehicle, over irregular 100 Bush Street, San Francisco, CA suance of a permit in this proceeding will routes, of malt beverages (1) from Mil­ 94104. Authority sought to operate as a be withheld for a period of 30 days from waukee, Wis.; Cleveland, Ohio; Newport common carrier, by motor vehicle, over the date of such publication, during and Louisville, Ky.; Fort Wayne, South regular and irregular routes, transport­ which period any proper party in inter­ Bend, and Evansville, Ind.; St. Louis, ing: General commodities (except used est may file a petition for leave to re­ household goods as defined by the Com­ open the proceeding or for other ap­ Mo.; Detroit, Mich.; and Peoria, HI.; to Martinsville, Ind.; and (2) from Milwau­ mission, automobiles, trucks, buses, live­ propriate relief setting forth in detail kee, Wis.; Chicago, 111.; and Newport, stock, commodities in bulk, and com­ the precise manner in which it has been modities requiring special equipment); so prejudiced. Ky.; to Bloomington, Ind., under con­ tinuing contracts with Morgan County Irregular routes: (1) Between points in No. MC 134114 (Sub-No. 1) (Republi­ Beverage, Inc., of Martinsville, Ind.; in the Los Angeles Basin California Area as cation) , filed October 20, 1969, published (1) above and with Monroe County Bev­ follows: Beginning at the intersection of in the Federal R egister issue of Novem­ erage, Inc., of Bloomington, 111., in (2) Sunset Boulevard and U.S. Highway 101, ber 14, 1969, and republished this issue. above, will be consistent with the public alternate, thence northeasterly on Sun­ Applicant: ELMER WILSON, doing busi­ interest and the national transpor­ set Boulevard to California Highway 7; ness as NEBRASKA BEEF EXPRESS, tation policy; that applicant is fit, northerly along California Highway 7 to 8024 State Street, Ralston, NE 68051. Ap­ willing, and able properly to perform Ventura Boulevard; westerly along Ven­ plicant’s representative: Kenneth P. such service and to conform to tjie tura Boulevard to Topanga Canyon Weiner, 630 City National Bank Building, requirements of the Interstate Com­ Boulevard; northerly along Topanga Omaha, NE 68102. A report and recom­ merce Act and the Commission’s rules Canyon Boulevard to Santa Susana Ave­ mended order of the Hearing Examiner and regulations thereunder. Because it nue, northerly along Santa Susana Ave­ served October 9, 1970, was made of ef­ is possible that other parties who have nue to San Femando''Mission Boulevard; fective and served November 18, 1970, relied upon the notice of the application easterly and northeasterly along San and finds, upon consideration of all evi­ as published, may have an interest in an Fernando Mission Boulevard and its pro­ dence of record, that applicant is fit, would be prejudiced by the lack of longation to the Angeles National Forest willing, and able properly to perform the proper notice of the authority described boundary; southeasterly and easterly service of a contract carrier by motor ve­ in the findings in this order, a notice of along the Angeles National Forest bound­ hicle and to conform to thé provisions of ary and San Bernardino National Interstate Commerce Act and with the authority actually granted will be published in the F ederal R egister and Forest boundary to the Riverside County the lawful requirements, rules, and regu­ issuance of a permit in this proceeding boundary east of Yucaipa; southerly lations of the Commission thereunder, will be withheld for a period of 30 days and westerly along the Riverside County and that operation in interstate or for­ boundary to a point directly north of eign commerce by applicant as a con­ from the date of such publication, during which period any proper party in inter­ Redlands Boulevard; southerly from tract carrier by motor vehicle, over irreg­ said point along an imaginary line and ular routes, of meat, meat products, and est may file a petition for leave to reopen along Redlands Boulevard to Alessandro meat byproducts, and articles distributed the proceeding or for other appropriate Avenue in Moreno; westerly along Ales­ y meat packinghouses as described in relief setting forth in detail the pre- sandro Avenue to Perris Boulevard;

No. 229---- 9 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18094 NOTICES southerly along Perris Boulevard to the MC-F-10925, published in the F ederal Note: They have amended the section county road paralleling the southerly R egister issue of August 26, 1970. The 210a(b) application to include in the au­ boundary of March Air Force Base; west­ instant application seeks to convert its thority the additional operating rights erly along said county road to U.S. High­ certificate of registration under MC they wish to acquire. way 395; northerly and easterly along 120516 (Sub-No. 2) into a certificate of No. MC-F-11014 (Supplemental) U.S. Highway 395 to California Highway public convenience and necessity. Com­ (CAMPBELL SIXTY-SIX EXPRESS, 18; southwesterly along California mon control may be involved. If a hear­ INC.—Control—R E P U B L IC TRUCK Highway 18 to U.S. Highway 91; westerly ing is deemed necessary, applicant re­ LINES, INC.), in connection with the along U.S. Highway 91 to California quests it be held at Los Angeles or San notice published in the F ederal R egister Highway 55; southerly on California Diego, Calif. on November 18, 1970, of the filing of the Highway 55 to the Pacific Ocean; west­ applications under sections 5 and 210a(b) erly and northerly along the shoreline Applications Under S ections 5 and of the Interstate Commerce Act in the of the. Pacific Ocean to a point directly 210a(b) above-numbered proceeding, the follow­ south of the intersection of Sunset Boule­ The following applications are gov­ ing information is furnished: Prior ap­ vard and U.S. Highway 101, alternate; erned by the Interstate Commerce Com­ plications under the same sections are thence northerly along an imaginary line mission’s Special Rules governing notice pending under section 5, in No. MC-F- to point of beginning; and of filing of applications by motor carriers 10573, BESTWAY FREIGHT LINES, (2) Between points in the San Diego- of property or passengers under sections INC.—Control—R E P U B L IC TRUCK Escondido, Calif., territory as follows: 5(a) and 210a(b) of the Interstate Com­ LINES, INC., and under section 207, in Beginning at Oceanside at the junction merce Act and certain other proceedings No. MC-48963 (Sub-No. 6), REPUBLIC of U.S. Highway 101 and California High­ with respect thereto. (49 CFR 1.240). TRUCK LINES, INC., as noticed in the way 76, thence easterly on California F ederal R egister of August 13, 1969. Highway 76 and county roads to Vista; MOTOR CARRIERS OF PROPERTY Temporary authority is outstanding in thence southeasterly on California 78 to No. MC-F-10903. (Amendment) No. MC-F-10573 and the proceedings in Escondido; thence southerly on U.S. (COLE IS EXPRESS — Purchase — the latter and No. MC-48963 (Sub-No. 6) Highway 395 and county roads via to HUNNEWELL TRUCKING, INC.), pub­ were the subject of a report and recom­ Miramar on U.S. Highway 395; thence lished in August 5,1970, issue of the F ed­ mended order served November 9, 1970. southeasterly to Lakeside on the El eral R egister on page 12.511, repub­ Applicants in No. MC-F-11014 advise Cajon-Ramona Highway; thence south­ lished correction in August 19,1970, issue that, if temporary authority is granted erly to Bostonia on U.S. Highway 80; of F ederal R egister on page 13236. and exercised therein, it is their under­ thence southeasterly to Jamul on Cali­ Amendment is to eliminate the following standing that temporary authority in fornia Highway 94; thence due south to authority. General commodities, except­ force with regard to No. MC-F-10573 the international boundary line; thence ing, among others, classes A and B ex­ will thereupon be terminated and the westerly to the Pacific Ocean; thence plosives, commodities in bulk, as a com­ section 5 application in No. MC-F- north along the Pacific Ocean including mon carrier over irregular routes, be­ 10573 dismissed; and they request that, North Island and Coronado to the point tween Boston, Mass., and points in Mas­ in such cases the application in No. MC- of beginning at Oceanside; Regular sachusetts within 15 miles of Boston, on 48963 (Sub-No. 6) be treated as a matter routes: (3) Between all points in said the one hand, and, on the other, points directly related to the transaction pro­ Los Angeles Basin Area, on the one hand, in that part of Maine on and south of a posed in No. MC-F-11014. and, on the other, all points in said San line beginning at the Maine-New Hamp­ No. MC-F-11017. Authority sought for Diego-Escondido territory as follows: (a) shire State line and extending along purchase by JOHNSON MOTOR LINES, Over UJS. Highway 101, serving all inter­ Maine Highway 16 to Milo, Maine, thence INC., 2426 North Graham Street, Post mediate points and all off-route points along unnumbered highway (formerly Office Box 10877, Charlotte, NC 28201, of on and along and within 3 miles laterally portion Main Highway 16) to West En­ a portion of the operating rights of of said highway and the off-route points field, Maine, thence along Maine High­ EAZOR EXPRESS, INC., Eazor Square, of El Toro Marine Base, Camp Pendleton, way 155 (formerly portion Maine High­ 30th Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15201, and Fallbrook Valley Center, and Bonsall; way 16) to Lincoln, Maine, thence along for acquisition by H. BEALE ROLLINS, (b) over U.S. Highway 395, serving all Maine Highway 6 (formerly Maine High­ Sixth Floor, Title Building, Baltimore, intermediate points and all off-route way 16) to the United States-Canada MD 21202, of control of such rights points on and along and within 3 miles boundary line, except points in York, through the purchase. Applicants’ attor­ laterally of said highway between Escon­ Cumberland, Hancock Counties and neys: Donald E. Cross, 917 Munsey Build­ dido and San Diego and the off-route those points in Penobscot and Washing­ ing, 1329 E Street NW., Washington, DC point of Poway; Regular routes: (4) ton Counties on and south of Maine 20004, and David Axelrod, 39 South La Between said San Diego-Escondido ter­ Highway 6, with restriction. Salle Street, Chicago, IL 60603. Op­ ritory, on the one hand, and, on the No. MC-F-10996. (Amendment) (NEL­ erating rights sought to be transferred: other, El Centro and points in Imperial SON FREIGHTWAYS, INC.—Purchase General commodities, except those of un­ County, Calif., over U.S. Highway 80 Portion—C. RICKARD & SONS, INC.), usual value, classes A and B explosives, serving all intermediate points on and amendment so as to include in purchase tobacco, liquor, commodities in bulk, and along said highway; and <1) rights to transport general com­ those requiring special equipment, as a Regular routes: (5) Between all points modities excepting, among others, classes common carrier over regular routes, be­ in said Los Angeles Basin Area, on the A and B explosives, household goods and tween Cartersville, Ga., and Parkersburg, one hand, and, on the other, El Centro commodities in bulk, as a common car­ W. Va., between Atlanta, Ga., and Chat­ and points in Imperial County, Calif., rier, over irregular routes, between points tanooga, Tenn., with restriction; general over U.S. Highways 60 and 10 between in Fairfield County, Conn., on the one 'commodities, except those of unusual the eastern boundary of said Los Angeles hand, and on the other, points in Suffolk value, classes A and B explosives, com­ Basin Area and their junction at or near County, N.Y.; (2) petroleum and pe­ modities in bulk, commodities requiring Beaumont, Calif., and via California troleum products (except commodities in special equipment, and those injurious Highways 86 or 111 between the said bulk) and advertising materials, from or contaminating to other lading, over junction and the northern boundary of Reno, Rouseville, and Oil City, Pa., to irregular routes, restricted to the trans­ the said El Centro Area, consisting of El points in Connecticut, Maine, Massa­ portation of traffic between the Georgia Centro and points in Imperial County, chusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, points authorized on the one hand, and, Calif. When using this alternate route, and New York (except points on and on the other, points in West Virginia, and applicant shall provide no service at east of U.S. Highway 11 from the New points in that part of Pennsylvania on points intermediate between said Los York-Pennsylvania State line to junc­ and west of U.S. Highway 219, via the Angeles Basin Area and the said El tion New York Highway 57 near Syra­ gateway of Belpre, Ohio; between Belpre Centro Area, as an alternate route oper­ cuse, N7Y., and points on and west of (Washington County), Ohio on the one ating convenience only. Note: This ap­ New York Highway 57 from Syracuse to hand, and, on the other, points in West plication is a matter directly related to Oswego), Rhode Island, and Vermont. Virginia, and points in that part of

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18095 Pennsylvania on and west of U.S. High­ Baltimore, Md., certain specified points from the town of Sheboygan Falls, way 219; general commodities, except in Pennsylvania, certain specified points WI, to points in Michigan, Ohio, Ken­ those of unusual value, classes A and B in West Virginia, Knoxville, and Chat­ tucky, and Missouri. Vendee is author­ explosives, tobacco, liquor, commodities tanooga, Tenn., Camden, N.J., and ized to operate as a common carrier in bulk, commodities requiring special points in that part of New York and New in Wisconsin, Illinois, Iowa, Indiana, equipment, and those injurious or con­ Jersey within 15 miles of. Columbus Cir­ Connecticut, Delaware, Kentucky, Mary­ taminating to other lading, between At­ cle, New York, N.Y., and the District land, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missis­ lanta, Albany, Columbus, Fort Benning, of Columbia, from Lenoir, N.C., and sippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Ga., and points in Georgia within 100 points within 5 miles of Lenoir, to points Jersey, NeW York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, miles of Atlanta, Ga., on the one hand, in Virginia (with exceptions), those in Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, Vir­ and, on the other, Parkersburg and Maryland (except Baltimore), those in ginia, West Virginia, Maine, Colorado, Charleston, W. Va., with restriction. Ven­ Pennsylvania (with exceptions), those Nebraska, Texas, and the District of Co­ dee is authorized to operate as a com­ in New Jersey (except Camden and those lumbia. Application has not been filed mon carrier in Rhode Island, Massachu­ in New Jersey within 15 miles of Colum­ for temporary authority under section setts, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Dela­ bus Circle, New York, N.Y.), and those 210a(b). ware, Virginia, North Carolina, South in Delaware; petroleum products, in No. MC-F-11020. Authority sought for Carolina, Georgia, New York, Connecti­ containers, from Coraopolis, Pa., to purchase by GRAF BROS., INC., 180 cut, Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Missis­ Lincolnton, N.C.; tobacco pipes, burls, Main Street, Salisbury, MA 01950, of the sippi, and the District of Columbia. Ap­ stumps, stummels, and dimension wood operating rights of JET SERVICE plication has been filed for temporary blocks, and materials including ma­ MOTOR TRANSPORTATION CO., 601 authority under section 210a(b). chinery and equipment used in the Newport Avenue, Pawtucket, RI 02861, No. MC-F-11018. Authority sought for manufacture and shipping of tobacco and for acquisition by FRED WM. GRAF, control by THURSTON, INC., Pest Of­ pipes, such machinery and equipment HENRY GRAFF, HI and DANIEL A. fice Box 10638, Charlotte, NC 28201, of limited to individual pieces weighing GRAF, all also of 180 Main Street, Salis­ BUSH MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., 327 1,000 pounds or less and not requiring bury, MA 01950, of control of such rights West Avenue, Lenoir, NC 28645, and for special equipment to transport, between through the purchase. Applicants’ atr acquisition by D. J. THURSTON, JR., Boone, N.C., and points in North Caro­ tomey: Kenneth B. William, 111 State Post Office Box 10638, Charlotte, NC lina within 75 miles of Boone, on the one Street, Boston, MA 02109. Operating 28201, of control of BUSH MOTOR hand, and, on the other, points in Vir­ rights sought to be transferred: Under a FREIGHT, INC., through the acquisition ginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New Jer­ certificate of registration, in Docket No. by THURSTON, INC. Applicants’ attor­ sey, Delaware, New York, and the District MC-120632 Sub-1, covering the trans­ neys: Drew L. Carraway, 1111 E, Street pf Columbia; portation of general commodities, as a Nursery materials, supplies, and equip­ common carrier in interstate commerce, NW., Washington, DC 20004 and Edward ment, from Stoudsburg, Pa., to Jonas J. Allen, Post Office Box 1086, Jackson­ within the State of Rhode Island. Vendee Ridge, N.C.; petroleum oils and greases, is authorized to operate as a common ville, FL 32201. Operating rights sought in containers, from Marcus Hook and carrier in New York, New Jersey, Massa­ to be controlled: General commodities, Oil City, Pa., to Whitnel, N.C.; and new excepting among others, dangerous ex­ chusetts', Maine, New Hampshire, Rhode furniture and new furniture parts, from Island, Connecticut, Vermont, and Penn­ plosives, commodities in bulk, but not ex­ the plantsites of Broyhill Furniture sylvania. Application has not been filed cepting household goods, as a common Factories, at or near Rutherfordton, in for temporary authority under section carrier, over regular routes, between Rutherford County, N.C., to points in Boone, N.C., and Conover, N.C., between 210a(b). Note: No. MC-15821 Sub-No. Virginia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New 13, is a matter directly related. Conover, N.C., and Charlotte, N.C., be­ Jersey, Delaware, New York, N.Y., and No. MC-F-11021. Authority sought for tween Lenoir, N.C., and Morganton, N.C.;. points in New York within 15 miles of general commodities, excepting among purchase by CONSOLIDATED DELIV­ Columbus Circle, N.Y., certain rpecified ERY CO., INC., 614 Market Street, Sioux others, dangerous explosives, household points in South Carolina, certain speci­ City, IA 51101, of the operating rights of goods, and commodities in bulk, over ir­ fied points in West Virginia, Knoxville WALTER O. SCHRIER, doing business regular routes, from New York, N.Y., and Chattanooga, Tenn., and the Dis­ Philadelphia, Pa., Baltimore, Md., and as CONSOLIDATED DELIVERY CO., trict of Columbia. THURSTON, INC., 614 Market Street, Sioux City, IA 51101, certain specified points in Virginia, to holds no authority from this Commis­ Lenoir, N.C., and points, in North Caro­ and for acquisition by IRVING NOGG, sion. However, it controls THURSTON 3263 Stone Park Boulevard, Sioux City, lina within 45 miles of'Lenoir, between MOTOR LINES, INC., 601 Johnson Road, IA, of control of such rights through the Lenoir, N.C., on the one hand, and, on Post Office Box 10638, Charlotte^. NC the other, points in Virginia (with ex­ purchase. Applicants’ attorney: E. A. 28201, which is authorized to operate as Hutchison, 414 Security Bank Building, ceptions), Maryland (except from Bal­ a common carrier in North Carolina, Sioux City, IA 51101. Operating rights timore) , Pennsylvania (except from Phil­ Virginia, Maryland, South Carolina, sought to be transferred: Such commod­ adelphia), Delaware, New Jersey, the Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama, Missis­ ities as are dealt in by retail department District of Columbia, and points in New sippi, Louisiana, Kentucky, West Vir­ and dry goods stores, as a contract car­ York within the New York, N.Y., com­ ginia, and Arkansas. Application has rier, over irregular routes, from Sioux mercial zone, as defined by the Commis- been filed for temporary authority under City, Iowa, to points in Minnesota, Ne­ sicn (except from New York City); glass, section 210a(b). braska, and South Dakota Within 150 from Ford City, Pa., to Lenoir, N.C., and No. MC-F-11019. Authority sought for miles of Sioux City, Iowa; and returned, points within 5 miles of Lenoir; purchase by CHAIR CITY MOTOR damaged or trade-in shipments of the Pager, from Hopewell, Va., to Lenoir, EXPRESS COMPANY, 3321 Highway 141 above-specified commodities, from the N.C., and points within 5 miles of Lenoir; South, Sheboygan, W I53081, of a portion above-specified destination points to roofing, from York, Pa., to points in of the operating rights of HENSEL Sioux City, Iowa, with restriction. Vendee N >rth Carolina on and west of U.S. TRANSFER & WAREHOUSE COM­ holds no authority from this Commis­ Highway 1; nursery stock, from -Lenoir, PANY, 1209 South 11th Street, Sheboy­ sion. However, its controlling stockholder N.C., and points within 45 miles of Le­ gan, WI 53081, and for acquisition by (IRVING NOGG) which controls I-GO noir, to Washington, D.C., New York, ELDRED A. BECKER, 1024 Main Ave­ VAN AND STORAGE COMPANY, who N.Y., points on Long Island, N.Y., and nue, Sheboygan, WI, and RONALD E. is authorized to operate as a common those in Maryland, Pennsylvania, Dela­ BECKER, 1409 Carmen Avenue, Sheboy­ carrier in Kansas, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, ware, and New Jersey, from Jonas Ridge, gan, WI, of control of such rights through Minnesota, Wyoming, Nebraska, Okla­ N.C to points in Virginia, and New the purchase. Applicants’ attorney: homa, Wisconsin, Ohio, Colorado, Mis­ rork (except New York, N.Y. and points John L. Bruemmer, 121 West Doty souri, Arkansas, South Dakota, Texas, on Long Island, N.Y.); new furniture, Street, Madison, WI 53703. Operat­ Maryland, Virginia, and the District of . m Lenoir, N.C., and points within 5 ing rights sought to be transferred: Columbia. Application has not been filed miles of Lenoir, to certain specified New furniture, uncrated, as a com­ for temporary authority under section Points in South Carolina, Virginia, mon carrier over irregular routes, 210a(b).

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 18096 NOTICES No. MC-F-11022. Application under New Hampshire, Vermont, Kentucky, Street, Louisville, KY 40202 and for ac­ section 5(1) of the Interstate Commerce and Tennessee. Application has hot been quisition by CONTINENTAL TRAIL- Act for approval of an agreement be­ filed for temporary authority under sec­ WAYS, INC., 315 Continental Avenue, tween common carriers for the pooling of tion 210a(b). Dallas, TX 75207, and TCO INDUS­ traffic. Applicants: PACIFIC INTER­ No. MC-F-11025. Authority sought for TRIES, INC., 1500 Jackson Street, Dal­ MOUNTAIN EXPRESS CO., 1417 Clay purchase by VIRGINIA-CAROLINA las, TX 75202, of control of such rights Street, Post Office Box 958, Oakland, FREIGHT LINES, INCORPORATED, through the purchase. Applicants’ at­ CA 94606 (MC-730), CONSOLIDATED V-C Drive, Martinsville, VA 24112, of torney: James Clarence Evans, 1800 FREIGHTWAYS CORPORATION OF the operating rights of MERIT TRANS­ Third National Bank Building, Nash­ DELAWARE, 175 Linfield Drive, Menlo PORT CORPORATION (JOSEPH ville, TN 37219. Operating rights sought Park, CA 94025 (MC-42487), EASTERN KEANE, STATUTORY RECEIVER), to be transferred: Passengers and their EXPRESS, INC., 1450 Wabash Avenue, North Central National Bank, 40 Jour­ baggage, and express and newspapers in Terre Häute, IN 47801 (MC-106943), nal Square, Jersey City, NJ 07306, and the same vehicle with passengers, as a GRAVES TRUCK LINE, INC., 739 North for acquisition by JAMES C. STONE, common carrier over regular routes, be­ 10th Street, Post Office Box 838, Salina, V-C Drive, Martinsville, VA 24112 of tween Louisville, Ky., and Paducah, Ky., KS 67401 (MC-53965), seeks to enter into control of such rights through the pur­ between junction U.S. Highway 62 and an agreement for the pooling of traffic chase. Applicants’ attorney: Mr. Spen­ Kentucky Highway 282, near Gilberts- consisting of general commodities mov­ cer T. Money, 110 Park Lane Building, ville, Ky., and junction Kentucky High­ ing in interstate commerce between cer­ 2025 Eye Street NW., Washington, DC way 95 and U.S. Highway 62, between tain specified points in Kansas. Attorney: 20006. Operating rights sought to be Nortonville, Ky., and Madisonville, Ky., Ronald D. Eastman, 1660 L Street NW., transferred: General commodities, ex­ between junction U.S. Highway 41 and Washington, DC 20036. cepting among others, classes A and B Kentucky Highway 112; near Earling- No. MC-F-11023. Authority sought for explosives, household goods, and com­ ton, Ky., and junction Kentucky High­ control by DUNDEE TRUCK LINE, INC., modities in bulk, as a common carrier way 112 and U.S. Highway 62, near Daw­ 6006 Stickney Avenue, Toledo, OH 43612, over irregular routes, between points in son Springs, Ky., serving all inter­ of the operating rights of MODERN New Jersey, on the one hand, and, on mediate points. Vendee is authorized to MOTOR EXPRESS, INC., 2701 Lakeside the other, Washington, D.C., between operate as a common carrier in Ten­ Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44114, and for points in Philadelphia, Pa. Vendee is nessee and Kentucky. Application has acquisition by DUNDEE MOTOR EX­ authorized to operate as a common car­ not been filed for temporary authority PRESS, INC., 623 Manitou Drive, rier in South Carolina, Virginia, North under section 210a(b). Note: No. MC- Maumee, OH 43537, and in turn by Carolina, Georgia, Maryland, Tennes­ 55312 Sub-13 is a matter directly related. JOHN D. PHILLIPS also of Toledo, see, Pennsylvania, Delaware, New Jersey, Ohio, of control of such rights through West Virginia, Kentucky, and the Dis­ By the Commission. the purchase. Applicants’ attorney: trict of Columbia. Application has been [seal] R obert L. Oswald, Arthur R. Cline, 420 Security Building, filed for temporary authority under sec­ Secretary. Toledo, OH 43604. Operating rights tion 210a(b). [F.R. Doc. 70-15852; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; sought to be controlled: Under a certifi­ 8:48 a.m.] cate of registration, in Docket No. MC- M otor Carrier of P assengers 58116 Sub 4, covering the transportation No. MC-F-11015. Authority sought for of property, as a common carrier, in purchase by NORTH STAR LINE, INC., NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTOR interstate commerce, within the State 341 Ellsworth SW., Grand Rapids, MI CARRIER INTRASTATE APPLICATIONS of Ohio. Vendee is authorized to operate 49502, of a portion of the operating as a common carrier in Michigan, Ohio, rights of GREYHOUND LINES, INC., November 20,1970. and Indiana. Application has been filed 1400 West Third Street, Cleveland, OH The following applications for mo­ for temporary authority under section 44113, and for acquisition by WILLIAM tor common carrier authority to operate 210a(b). W. POST, JENNIE R. POST, and LAW­ in intrastate commerce seek concurrent No. MC-F-11024. Authority sought for RENCE E. POST, all of 341 Ellsworth, motor carrier authorization in inter­ purchase by SMITH’S TRUCK LINES, Grand Rapids, MI 49502. Applicants’ state or foreign commerce within the Post Office Box 88, Muncy, PA 17756, of attorneys: William B. Elmer, 22644 limits of the intrastate authority sought, the operating rights of HAROLD Gratiot Avenue, East Detroit MI 48021, pursuant to section 206(a)(6) of the ZEISLOFT, JR., INTERNAL REVE­ and Anthony P. Carr, 1400 West Third Interstate Commerce Act, as amended NUE SERVICE (SUCCESSOR-IN- Street, Cleveland, OH 44113. Operating October 15, 1962. These applications are INTEREST RECEIVER), 401 North rights sought to be transferred: Pas­ governed by special rule 1.245 of the Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA, and for sengers and their baggage, and express, Commission’s rules of practice, published acquisition by WALTER F. SMITH, also and newspapers, in the same vehicle in the F ederal R egister, issue of April 11, of Muncy, Pa., of control of such rights with passengers, as a common carrier, 1963, page 3533, which provides, among through the purchase. Applicants’ attor­ over regular routes, between Holland other things, that protests and requests ney: John M. Musselman, 400 North and Petoskey, Mich., being part of a for information concerning the time and Third Street, Harrisburg, PA 17108. longer route, viz., between South Bend, place of State Commission hearings or Operating rights sought to be trans­ ind., and Sault Ste. Marie, Mich., shown other proceedings, any subsequent ferred: Soy bean meal, as a common as route 16, pages 6 and 7 of certificate changes therein, any other related mat­ carrier, over irregular routes, from issue in No. MC-1515 Sub-No. 6; and ters shall be directed to the State Com­ Delphos and Bellevue, Ohio to certain passengers and their baggage; this route mission with which the application is specified points in Pennsylvania; brick, is described in Certificate No. MC-1501 filed and shall not be addressed to or from the plantsites of Glen-Gary Shale Sub-No. 33, issued to Greyhound Lines’ filed with the Interstate Commerce Brick Corp., located in Royal ton predecessor in interest and assigned No. Commission. Borough, Dauphin County, Pa., Susque­ MC-1515 Sub-No. 8, and is presently State Docket No. MC-5495, filed No­ hanna Township, Dauphin County, Pa., pending before the Commission. Vendee vember 13,1970. Applicant: CRAWFORD Delaware Township, Northumberland is authorized to operate as a common County and Spring Garden Township, carrier in Michigan and Indiana. Ap­ FREIGHT LINE, INC., 606 West Main York County, Pa., to points in the Lower plication has not been filed for tempo­ Street, McMinnville, TN 37011. Appli­ Pennisula of Michigan, with restriction. rary authority under section 210a(b). cant’s representative: Robert L. Baker, Vendee is authorized to operate as a No. MC-F-11026. Authority sought for 500 Court Square Building, 300 James common carrier in Maryland, New purchase by CONTINENTAL TENNES­ Robertson Parkway, Nashville, TN 37201. Jersey, New York, District of Columbia, SEE LINES, INC., 418 Fifth Avenue, Certificate of public convenience and Pennsylvania, Delaware, Virginia, Ohio, South Nashville, TN 37203, of a portion necessity sought to operate a freight Connecticut, West Virginia, Indiana, of the operating rights of KENTUCKY service as follows: Transportation of Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Maine, BUS LINES, INC., 213 West Liberty General commodities (except household

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 25, 1970 NOTICES 18097 goods, classes A and B explosives, com­ PAWHUSKA MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., [Notice 617] modities in bulk and articles requiring 321 North Detroit, Tulsa, OK 74120. Ap­ special equipment), between Nashville, plicant’s representative: William L. An­ MOTOR CARRIER TRANSFER Tenn., on the one hand, and all points derson, 4400 North Lincoln, Suite 35, PROCEEDINGS and places in Warren County, Tenn., on Oklahoma City, OK 73105. Certificate November 20, 1970. the other hand, over the following routes: of public convenience and necessity (1) From Nashville over U.S. Highway sought to operate a freight service as Application filed for temporary author­ 70S to the Warren County line, thence follows: Transportation of general com­ ity under section 210a(b) in connection over any and all highways and roads to modities, as a common carrier, over with transfer application under section all points and places in Warren County, regular routes, as follows: From Tulsa 212(b) and Transfer Rules, 49 CFR Part and return over the same route, serving over U.S. Highway 75 to Collinsville; 1132: no intermediate points between Nash­ thence via Highway 20 to Skiatook and No. MC-PC-72511. By application filed ville and the Warren County line; (2) from Tulsa over State Highway 11 to November 18, 1970, DOUGLASS MOV­ from Nashville over U.S. Highway 41 Pawhuska, serving the intermediate ING AND TRANSFER COMPANY, and/or Interstate^ Highway 24 to Man­ points of Turley^ Sperry, Skiatook, 441 Idaho Street, Girard, OH 44420, seeks chester, thence over Tennessee Highway Avant, Barnsdall, Waled, Pawhuska, temporary authority to lease the operat­ 55 to the Warren County line, thence Collinsville, Owasso, Pershing, and Tal- ing rights of ANDREW J. DOUGLASS, over any and all highways and roads to lant, and return, serving all points in all points and places in Warren County, both directions. Both intrastate and doing business as DOUGLASS MOVING and return over the same route, serving interstate authority sought. & TRANSFER COMPANY, 320 West no intermediate points between Nash­ HEARING: December 28, 1970, 9 a.m., Ravenwood Avenue, Youngstown, OH ville and the Warren County line. Both Third floor, Jim Thorpe Building, Okla­ 44511, under section 210a(b). The trans­ intrastate and interstate authority homa City, OK. Requests for procedural fer to DOUGLASS MOVING AND sought. information including the time for filing TRANSFER COMPANY, of the operating HEARING: January 26,1971, 9:30 a.m., protests concerning this application C-l-110 Cordell Hull Building, Nashville, Should be addressed to the Oklahoma rights of ANDREW J. DOUGLASS, do­ TN 37219. Requests for procedural in­ Corporation Commission, 300 Jim Thorpe ing business as DOUGLASS MOVING & formation including the time for filing Building, Oklahoma City, OK 73105, and TRANSFER COMPANY, is presently protests concerning this application should not be directed to the Interstate pending. Should be addressed to the Tennessee Commerce Commission. Public Service Commission, Cordell Hull By the Commission. Bldg., Nashville, TN 37219, and should By the Commission. not be directed to the Interstate [seal] R obert L. Oswald, [seal] R obert L. Oswald, Commerce Commission. Secretary. Secretary. State Docket No. MC 23323 (Sub-No. [F.R. Doc. 70-15853; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; [F.R. Doc. 70-15854; Filed, Nov. 24, 1970; 1), filed September 29, 1970. Applicant: 8:48 a.m.] 8:48 a.m.]

CUMULATIVE LIST OF PARTS AFFECTED— NOVEMBER

The following numerical guide is a list of parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during November.

3 CFR Pase 7 CFR—Continued Page 7 CFR—Continued Page Proclamations : 319—______17777,18033 P roposed R ules—Continued Oct. 5,1906 (revoked in part by 401------17935 932------L;______17046 PLO 4942) ______17948 722------17029, 17653 966— ______17745 4020 ------16903 729______17705 993------17953 4021 ------17235 871______;______17831 1001______17663 Executive Orders: 905_l______16909,17167,17936-17938 1006______17340 907------17107,17321,17778 July 2, 1910 (revoked in part 1012------17340 909 ______17653 1013— ______17340 by PLO 4941)______17786 910 ______17237,17527,17528, 17939 July 1, 1913 (revoked by PLO 1050______17046 4943) ------— ------17948 912—______17168, 17654 1064------17188, 17554,17789,17859 913 ______17168, 17654 1126------17954 Nov. 24, 1916 (revoked in part 914 ______17169 by PLO 4941)______17786 929___ — ______17706 8 CFR 5327: 932______17778 See PLO 4933______17107 944_------17107 100------17322 Revoked in part by PLO 967------17528 214------17939 4938___ • 17546 987------17174, 17528 235------17322 11567 _ 17701 238------17323 11568 ______991------17237 17703 1136------17238 264------17529 1446------17321 335------17530 5 CFR 1464— ______16910,17397,17989 151__ ------17705 1472______17321 9 CFR 213 __ ------16905, 1520------16911 76______16912, 17167, 17322, 17527, 17705, 17935 1806______17238 16917, 16918, 16973, 17108, 17167, 1810____ 17243 17244, 17323, 17397, 17706-17708, 7 CFR P roposed R ules: 18034-18036 27__ 17935 70— ______- ____ _ 17340 78______17244 46__ 97— ------18036 52__ 17527 811------17422 215__ 16906 814------17953 P roposed R u l e s: 16973 930------17726 311------17188

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 35, NO. 229— WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 2*5, 1970 18098 FEDERAL REGISTER Page Page 10 CFR Page 14 CFR— Continued 21 CFR— Continued 34 17397 P roposed R ules—Continued 147______— — 17539 50______17530 373— ______17195 148b______17324 378— 17199t 17674 148c______17402,17840 P roposed R ules: 148d------_____ 17405 60______17271 378a______-17199,17674 399— 17273, 18001, 18056 148m______17539 148v______17406 12 CFR 15 CFR 191______------17540 1 ______17174,18037 ______17536 P roposed R ules 226 ______16919,17029 377——— 3______16937,17116,17191 26lZIZ______16973 P roposed R ules: 19______17191 555______18038 7______17670 30______17663 563______18038 367— 17189 120______16980 571______18038 130______16937,17191 700 ______17398 16 CFR 146______17191 701 _ 17398 13______17177,17940-17943 191______17663,17746 702 ______17398 252 _ 18039 320______17998 706 _____- ______17398 253 ______18039 707 ______17398 P roposed R ules: 22 CFR 708—______17398 18001 41. 17178 709 _-______17398 502 710 ______-__i 17398 24 CFR 715______17398 17 CFR 200______17779,17989 201______- ______17545 720______-______17398 210______-______17400 207______17709 P roposed R ules: 231____ »______16919,17990 213______17709 226______- ______17061 239 ______- 17992 221__ 17709 545______17360 240 ______17537,17538 232______—__.______17710 556______17360 241 ______-_____ 17990 1914 ______17112,17655,17838 561______17361 249______16919 1915 ______17113,17656,17839,17995 563______17361 261_____ 17990 25 CFR P roposed Rules: 17840 13 CFR 249—______-____ 17431 41______121______17989 131______18051 124______;_____ 17833 P roposed R ules: 18 CFR 221______17662,17789 P roposed R ules: ______-_____ 17040 121______16930,16940,17119 2 154___ —______-__ 17040,17041,17109 26 CFR 14 CFR 157______17041 1______17326-17329,17710, 17840,17995 P roposed R ules: 13 ______17331,17406 39_____ -______- ______17030, 2 17427,17428 31_ 17328 17234, 17246, 17398, 17533, 17534, 48______17408 17834 101______17956 71______17031-17036, 104______17956 301______- ______17329 17246-17249, 17398, 17535, 17536, 141__ 17956 402____ 17265 17708, 17834, 18039 154______17061,17790,17957,18001 P roposed R ules: 73______17249,17536 157______17428,17957,18001 201______17431,17956 1__ 17336,17844,17845,17858,18055 91______17036 245 ______17952 95______17835 204 ______17431,17956 301______17268,18055 97______17109,17398,17837 205 ______17431 121______17037, 17176 250______18001 127______— 17176 260_j ______17188,17431,17956 28 CFR 198_—- ______17038 0______17332 208______17177 T9 CFR 302______!______17657 4______r.______17042 29 CFR 1209______— ______17323 _____ 17841 12______- ______17992 551_____ P roposed R ules: P roposed R ules: P roposed R ules: 17665 Ch, I______16980 22______——______17724 60— 23______— 18054 462_ ___ 17270 27______18054 541— 17116.17424 37______L--___ 17192 20 CFR 39______16937,17054,17427,17789 609—______17400 30 CFR 614______— 17400 71__ 17554, 75____-— SIP 17890 17555, 17790, 17859, 17860, 17955 P roposed R ules: 301 ____ 17711 73______- ______17555 405______17343 75______17556 P roposed R ules: 91______18054 503— __ 17062 121______17193, 18054 21 CFR 127_____ 18054 19 ___;______— 17110 31 CFR Ch. n ______17955 120 ______16974,17111,17708,17780 inn __ 17841 207 ______17195 121 ______17400,17781,17994 31R „ 17602 208 ______17195 128a______1—__ 17401,17840 332 _ 17502 212______17195,17556 135c______;_____ 17708,17781,17995 605 1 17250 214______17195,17556 141______17539 217______17556 141c______17539 32 CFR 221______— _ 17273,18001 144 ______17654 16974 241______17356 145 ______17539 62 _____—. 288____ 18056 146c______—______— 17539 75— — 17711 295______17195 146d______17250 76______—. — 17711 FEDERAL REGISTER 18099

32 CFR— Continued Page 41 CFR— Continued Page 47 CFR Page 80______17540 8- 16______17252 0 ------17332 80a—:____ 17540 9- 5______17181 1 17QQO 90______17540 50-201______17782 2 ------IT 7547, 17720 94______- ______17540 101-19______17782 5------16926 126_____ 17711 101-32______17782 43------17411 127— ______1W11 101-35______17114 67------__ 17111 166______18040 101-47— ______17256 73— ------16926, 211______— - 18045 16977, 17042, 17549, 17720, 17950, 289______18047 42 CFR 18052 591______18048 81______16927, 81------17412, 17548 593—______18048 16976, 16977, 17042, 17256, 17418, 83_------17412, 17548 594______18050 17545, 17785, 18051 85------17412 596 ______18050 P roposed R ules: 87------17334 597 ______18050 89-,.------17548 599—______18050 73------17954 91------17548 603______18050 81______17191, 17342,17664 93__------17548 606______— 18051 P roposed R ules: 608______18051 43 CFR 817______— 17716 1850______17996 23— ------17057 25—------17674, 17956 821______17542 P ublic Land Orders: 846______17543 42------17119 861______17543 1256 (see PLO 4941)______17786 73------l.______16983, 890______17544 1726 (revoked in part by PLO 17121,17202, 17357, 17359, 17746, 901______17717 4942)______17948 17956, 18059 908____ 17657 3140 (revoked by PLO 4939) __ 17785 83------17360 1001______17545 3623 (revoked in part by 89------17747 1807-______17997 PLO 4934)______17182 91------17747 3871 (see PLO 4941)______17786 93------17747 32A CFR 4342 (see PLO 4934)____ —_ 17182 4522: 49 CFR BDC (Ch. V I): See PLO 4933______17107 Reg. 5______17781 Revoked in part by PLO 1—1------17044, 17658, 17722 Reg. 6______1____ 17781 4938______17546 174------17950 Reg. 7______17781 4582 (modified by PLO 4940)__ 17786 179------17418 OIA (Ch. X ): 4933 ______17107 192------17335, 17659 OI Reg. 1______16976 4934 ______17182 195— ------17183 390 ------17787 Proposed R u les: 4935 ______i______17182 4936 ______17257 391 ------17419 Ch. X______17725 4937 ______17546 392 ------I741t 4938 ______17546 571------1______16927 33 CFR 4939 ______:______„ 17785 574------17257 153______17944 4940 ______17786 603------— ______17186 204------17178, 17841 4941 ______17786 1033------16931, P roposed R u les: 4942 ______17948 16933, 16934, 17114, 17421, 17552, 117______17425,17426,17673 4943 __k______17948 17841,17842,17951 4944 ______17949 1056______16935 36 CFR 4945 ______17949 1060______17264 7------17946 4946 ______17949 1131------17045 50------17042, 17552 4947 ______17949 P roposed R ules: Proposed R u l es: 45 CFR 71______17195 7------17663 179------16983,17790 3______17409 392 ______17194, 17343 38 CFR 85______172S8 393 ______17194,17343,17427 17______16920,17946 202______17719 395______17194 36------17179 205______17546 571______16937, 233______17719 17055, 17116, 17117, 17272, 17345, 39 CFR 248— ______17719 17350, 17999, 18001, 18055 300 ______17411 575______17057,17353 155_------17038 1048______17063 Proposed R ules : 301 ______— 17411 151------17662 302 ______17411 306 ______.______17411 50 CFR 41 CFR 307 ______17411 10______17843,18053 3-1______16920 308 ______17411 12______16935 3-7______:______16922 309— ______17411 16_____ — ______17265 3-11------16923 310______17411 28______17029 3- 75------16924 315______17411 32 ______17787 4- 1------17181 320______—_ 17411 33____ _ 17029,17722,17787,17788, 17950 4-4______17181 80______17421 5A~2------17949 5A-60------17250 46 CFR P roposed R ules : 5A-76______17252 2_____ —______17997 280______17424 know UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION MANUAL -1970/71

OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration.

U N IT E D STA TES GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATION MANUAL 1970/71 presents essential information about Government agencies (up­ dated and republished annually). Describes the creation and authority, organization, and functions of the agencies in the legislative, judicial, and executive branches. This handbook is an indispensable reference tool for teachers, students, librarians, researchers, businessmen, and lawyers who need current official information about the U.S. Govern­ ment. The United States Government Organization Manual is the official guide to the functions of the Federal Government, published by the Office of the Federal Register, GSA.

$ 0.00 « 3 per copy. Paperbound, with charts

Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402