DOCSLIB.ORG

Royal Air Force Historical Society Journal 50

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 50 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. First published in the UK in 2011 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All ri hts reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical includin photocopyin , recordin or by any information stora e and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writin . ISSN 1361 4231 Printed by ,indrush -roup ,indrush House Avenue Two Station .ane ,itney O021 40, 3 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President 2arshal of the Royal Air Force Sir 2ichael 3eetham -C3 C3E DFC AFC 7ice8President Air 2arshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KC3 C3E AFC Committee Chairman Air 7ice82arshal N 3 3aldwin C3 C3E 7ice8Chairman -roup Captain 9 D Heron O3E Secretary -roup Captain K 9 Dearman FRAeS 2embership Secretary Dr 9ack Dunham PhD CPsychol A2RAeS Treasurer 9 3oyes TD CA 2embers Air Commodore - R Pitchfork 23E 3A FRAes ,in Commander C Cummin s :9 S Cox Esq 3A 2A :A72 P Dye O3E 3Sc(En ) CEn AC-I 2RAeS :-roup Captain 2 I Hart 2A 2A 2Phil RAF :,in Commander C Hunter 22DS RAF Editor & Publications ,in Commander C - 9efford 23E 3A 2ana er :Ex Officio 4 CONTENTS THE 3ATT.E OF 3RITAIN ? 70 AEARS ON by Dr 2ichael 6 Fopp SU22ARA OF THE 2INUTES OF THE T,ENTA8THIRD 31 ANNUA. -ENERA. 2EETIN- HE.D IN THE ROAA. AIR FORCE C.U3 ON 16 9UNE 2010 BE0ECUTI7E FU..ERCD ? THE ROAA. AIR FORCE AND 34 THE CHANNE. DASH by -p Capt Alistair 3yford THE RIGHT OF THE LINE by 9OHN TERRAINE ? A RE8 62 ASSESS2ENT 2E AEARS ON by Dr 9ohn Peaty ARTHUR TEDDER ? AIR PO,ER 2AESTRO by -p Capt 74 Andrew Thomas THE ,IRE.ESS OPERATOR IN ,, II by , Cdr 9eff 17 9efford THE BHAND AND THUNDER3O.TD 3AD-E by , Cdr 9eff 112 9efford ERRATA 117 UPDATE ON FORTHCO2IN- RAF 2USEU2 E0HI3ITS 111 3OOK RE7IE,S 119 E SELECTED ABBREVIATIONS ACRC Air Crew Reception Centre AI Airborne Interception equipment (ie rader) A2O Air 2inistry Order A2,O Air 2inistry ,eekly Order 3C2H 3ritish Commission for 2ilitary History CDS Chief of the Defence Staff DERA Defence Evaluation and Research A ency D/F Direction Findin FEAF Far East Air Force -APAN -uild of Air Pilots and Navi ators HF Hi h Frequency (radio) IFF Identification Friend or Foe IT, Initial Trainin ,in 2AP 2inistry of Aircraft Production Nav(3) Navi ator additionally qualified as an air bomber Nav(,) Navi ator additionally qualified as a wireless operator Nav(Radio) Navi ator additionally qualified as an AI operator OTU Operational Trainin Unit PRO Public Record Office RC Recruit Centre RDF Radio Direction Findin (later Radar) RUSI Royal United Services Institute SHAEF Supreme Headquarters Allied Expeditionary Force T- Trade -roup T.S Time .iterary Supplement TNA The National Archives ,E2 ,ireless and Electrical 2echanic ,O2 ,ireless Operator 2echanic 6 Our Guest Spe ker t the RAF Club, following the Society,s AG- on .6 June 00.0, w s the recently retired Director Gener l of the Roy l Air Force -useum nd current 2resident of GA2AN Dr -ich el Fopp whose topic w s THE BATTLE OF BRITAIN 3 70 YEARS ON Dr Fopp’s presentation was built around audio tapes and video clips which, by their very nature, do not lend themselves to reproduction in print. What follows, therefore, reflects the content of what was delivered on that occasion but extensively revised, and selectively amplified, to adapt it for publication. Ed For the last seventy years ChurchillDs words predictin BOur Finest HourD have run ever true, both for their historical accuracy and for their eloquence. They conveyed a messa e of defiance and resolution and were a powerful indicator to all who were listenin , at home and abroad, ally, enemy and potential ally or enemy. They have also served as the inspiration for decades of embellishment, analysis, review, revision, hero worship, character assassination and rainforests of paper and books about a relatively short period of 3ritish history. That period is officially 10 9uly to 31 October 1940, the dates promul ated, after the war, to determine who would be entitled to adorn their 193984E Star with the 3attle of 3ritain clasp. To qualify, aircrew were required to have flown one operational sortie with a desi nated unit within Fi hter Command between those dates. Thus they were then cate orised as participants in the 3attle of 3ritain. These are dates with very little supportin evidence to Hustify their existence. Prior to 10 9uly other encounters with the Luftwaffe had been Hust as ferocious as they were to become after that date. On 4 9uly, for example, 9u 17s confirmed their deadly accuracy with E00k bombs on a coastal convoy, and free8ran in 3f 109s flew around Sussex in search of Hurricanes and Spitfires. After 31 October there were also many hard fou ht aerial en a ements ri ht up to December. Few of us appreciate havin our cherished illusions distorted by reality. 2y eneration, which was born soon after the end of the Second ,orld ,ar, was reared on classic films such as The 7 Among the participants in the Battle whose recorded voices featured in Dr Fopp’s presentation were (left to right, with contemporary ranks): his father, Sgt Desmond Fopp of No 17 Sqn; OC 257 Sqn, Sqn Ldr Robert Stanford Tuck and Major Adolf Galland, -eschwaderkommodore 9-26. Dambusters, Reach For The Sky, Carve Her Name With Pride and The Battle Of Britain. In some measure, at least, these epics were BfactionD. Such films are often denounced today, because all of their errors were on the side of enerosity, to emphasise heroism and enlar e achievement. Few people find this practice offensive. BFactionD, especially about the war, chiefly incurs the wrath of the public when it diminishes le ends, rather than enhancin them. Unlike so many historical periods or events, the passin of time has dealt kindly with the 3attle of 3ritain ? because the basic story is true. ,hile the eloquence and rhetoric of Churchill (and others) served to steel the resolve of the 3ritish people, his words were impressively accurate and perceptive. It is interestin to observe that, apart from bein the first decisive aerial battle in history, the 3attle of 3ritain is also probably unique in bein the first battle that was iven a name before it be an and had victory acclaimed before it was over. So what can I do to retell such a well8known story after so many yearsI ,hat can I do, as someone who was not even born at that time, althou h I would claim to have more that a passin interestI First, I am the son of a 3attle of 3ritain veteran. He was an Australian and, as such, one of the BFew of the FewD. 2y father never talked of his 1 experiences, either of the battle itself or of his lon career in war and peace as a Royal Air Force pilot. Secondly, I have, for more than thirty years, made my livin as an aviation historian, lecturin on the subHect and workin at the Royal Air Force 2useum ? for twenty8two of those years as its Director -eneral. I am, therefore, privile ed not only to have known many of the participants in the battle, but also to have had access to the archives and collections of the 2useum that has the most comprehensive array of material relatin to the period. This Society has already iven the subHect careful consideration durin its The Battle Re8T oug t symposium in 1990 and in Dr Alfred PriceDs post8A-2 address in 2002 when he analysed and described the events of 3attle of 3ritain Day itself in some detail. I am not, therefore oin to deal in any reat detail with the facts of the battle, since these are already well documented. I hope instead, to provide an insi ht into some of its aspects that may have been distorted or obscured by the plethora of material which has been published over the past 70 years. How The Story 5 s Told At The Time There was no 248hour Brollin newsD covera e on T7 in 1940, of course, and news bulletins on the radio were strictly censored. 3eyond that, the story of the battle was told in films and newsreels made for propa anda purposes, not least to impress the United States. These films were essentially documentaries, featurin real people, rather than actors, and, despite the underlyin intent and the constraints imposed by security considerations, they do provide us with an impressively accurate impression of the period. I decline to participate in any revisionist debate, because the 3attle of 3ritain story is, essentially, true. There can be no disputin the fact that it was an extraordinary feat of arms ? a Bfinest hourD. Throu hout the summer and autumn of 1940, Fi hter Command translated into reality the rhetoric of ChurchillJs defiance of Nazism. It was, however, a campai n characterised by paradoxes and ironies. For example, the mere fact that the 3ritish were even continuin the war was at odds with lo ic. A overnment of coldly rational men in .ondon in 9une 1940 would surely have made peace with 3erlin. After the fall of France, 3ritain had no realistic prospect of defeatin Hitler alone, even if the war lasted for ever. The ulf between the real and potential 9 resources of the two adversaries was simply too reat.
Recommended publications
  • Royal Air Force Historical Society Journal 29

    Royal Air Force Historical Society Journal 29

    ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY JOURNAL 29 2 The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the contributors concerned and are not necessarily those held by the Royal Air Force Historical Society. Copyright 2003: Royal Air Force Historical Society First published in the UK in 2003 by the Royal Air Force Historical Society All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission from the Publisher in writing. ISSN 1361-4231 Typeset by Creative Associates 115 Magdalen Road Oxford OX4 1RS Printed by Advance Book Printing Unit 9 Northmoor Park Church Road Northmoor OX29 5UH 3 CONTENTS BATTLE OF BRITAIN DAY. Address by Dr Alfred Price at the 5 AGM held on 12th June 2002 WHAT WAS THE IMPACT OF THE LUFTWAFFE’S ‘TIP 24 AND RUN’ BOMBING ATTACKS, MARCH 1942-JUNE 1943? A winning British Two Air Forces Award paper by Sqn Ldr Chris Goss SUMMARY OF THE MINUTES OF THE SIXTEENTH 52 ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING HELD IN THE ROYAL AIR FORCE CLUB ON 12th JUNE 2002 ON THE GROUND BUT ON THE AIR by Charles Mitchell 55 ST-OMER APPEAL UPDATE by Air Cdre Peter Dye 59 LIFE IN THE SHADOWS by Sqn Ldr Stanley Booker 62 THE MUNICIPAL LIAISON SCHEME by Wg Cdr C G Jefford 76 BOOK REVIEWS. 80 4 ROYAL AIR FORCE HISTORICAL SOCIETY President Marshal of the Royal Air Force Sir Michael Beetham GCB CBE DFC AFC Vice-President Air Marshal Sir Frederick Sowrey KCB CBE AFC Committee Chairman Air Vice-Marshal
  • THE RADAR WAR Forward

    THE RADAR WAR Forward

    THE RADAR WAR by Gerhard Hepcke Translated into English by Hannah Liebmann Forward The backbone of any military operation is the Army. However for an international war, a Navy is essential for the security of the sea and for the resupply of land operations. Both services can only be successful if the Air Force has control over the skies in the areas in which they operate. In the WWI the Air Force had a minor role. Telecommunications was developed during this time and in a few cases it played a decisive role. In WWII radar was able to find and locate the enemy and navigation systems existed that allowed aircraft to operate over friendly and enemy territory without visual aids over long range. This development took place at a breath taking speed from the Ultra High Frequency, UHF to the centimeter wave length. The decisive advantage and superiority for the Air Force or the Navy depended on who had the better radar and UHF technology. 0.0 Aviation Radio and Radar Technology Before World War II From the very beginning radar technology was of great importance for aviation. In spite of this fact, the radar equipment of airplanes before World War II was rather modest compared with the progress achieved during the war. 1.0 Long-Wave to Short-Wave Radiotelegraphy In the beginning, when communication took place only via telegraphy, long- and short-wave transmitting and receiving radios were used. 2.0 VHF Radiotelephony Later VHF radios were added, which made communication without trained radio operators possible. 3.0 On-Board Direction Finding A loop antenna served as a navigational aid for airplanes.
  • How the Luftwaffe Lost the Battle of Britain British Courage and Capability Might Not Have Been Enough to Win; German Mistakes Were Also Key

    How the Luftwaffe Lost the Battle of Britain British Courage and Capability Might Not Have Been Enough to Win; German Mistakes Were Also Key

    How the Luftwaffe Lost the Battle of Britain British courage and capability might not have been enough to win; German mistakes were also key. By John T. Correll n July 1940, the situation looked “We shall fight on the beaches, we shall can do more than delay the result.” Gen. dire for Great Britain. It had taken fight on the landing grounds, we shall Maxime Weygand, commander in chief Germany less than two months to fight in the fields and in the streets, we of French military forces until France’s invade and conquer most of Western shall fight in the hills; we shall never surrender, predicted, “In three weeks, IEurope. The fast-moving German Army, surrender.” England will have her neck wrung like supported by panzers and Stuka dive Not everyone agreed with Churchill. a chicken.” bombers, overwhelmed the Netherlands Appeasement and defeatism were rife in Thus it was that the events of July 10 and Belgium in a matter of days. France, the British Foreign Office. The Foreign through Oct. 31—known to history as the which had 114 divisions and outnumbered Secretary, Lord Halifax, believed that Battle of Britain—came as a surprise to the Germany in tanks and artillery, held out a Britain had lost already. To Churchill’s prophets of doom. Britain won. The RAF little longer but surrendered on June 22. fury, the undersecretary of state for for- proved to be a better combat force than Britain was fortunate to have extracted its eign affairs, Richard A. “Rab” Butler, told the Luftwaffe in almost every respect.
  • Volume 7, Issue 2, July 2021 Introduction: New Researchers and the Bright Future of Military History

    Volume 7, Issue 2, July 2021 Introduction: New Researchers and the Bright Future of Military History

    www.bjmh.org.uk British Journal for Military History Volume 7, Issue 2, July 2021 Cover picture: Royal Navy destroyers visiting Derry, Northern Ireland, 11 June 1933. Photo © Imperial War Museum, HU 111339 www.bjmh.org.uk BRITISH JOURNAL FOR MILITARY HISTORY EDITORIAL ADVISORY BOARD The Editorial Team gratefully acknowledges the support of the British Journal for Military History’s Editorial Advisory Board the membership of which is as follows: Chair: Prof Alexander Watson (Goldsmiths, University of London, UK) Dr Laura Aguiar (Public Record Office of Northern Ireland / Nerve Centre, UK) Dr Andrew Ayton (Keele University, UK) Prof Tarak Barkawi (London School of Economics, UK) Prof Ian Beckett (University of Kent, UK) Dr Huw Bennett (University of Cardiff, UK) Prof Martyn Bennett (Nottingham Trent University, UK) Dr Matthew Bennett (University of Winchester, UK) Prof Brian Bond (King’s College London, UK) Dr Timothy Bowman (University of Kent, UK; Member BCMH, UK) Ian Brewer (Treasurer, BCMH, UK) Dr Ambrogio Caiani (University of Kent, UK) Prof Antoine Capet (University of Rouen, France) Dr Erica Charters (University of Oxford, UK) Sqn Ldr (Ret) Rana TS Chhina (United Service Institution of India, India) Dr Gemma Clark (University of Exeter, UK) Dr Marie Coleman (Queens University Belfast, UK) Prof Mark Connelly (University of Kent, UK) Seb Cox (Air Historical Branch, UK) Dr Selena Daly (Royal Holloway, University of London, UK) Dr Susan Edgington (Queen Mary University of London, UK) Prof Catharine Edwards (Birkbeck, University of London,
  • 1 P247 Musketry Regulations, Part II RECORDS' IDENTITY STATEMENT Reference Number

    1 P247 Musketry Regulations, Part II RECORDS' IDENTITY STATEMENT Reference Number

    P247 Musketry Regulations, Part II RECORDS’ IDENTITY STATEMENT Reference number: GB1741/P247 Alternative reference number: Title: Musketry Regulations, Part II Dates of creation: 1910 Level of description: Fonds Extent: 1 volume Format: Paper RECORDS’ CONTEXT Name of creators: The War Office Administrative history: The War Office was a department of the British Government, responsible for the administration of the British Army between the 17th century and 1964, when its functions were transferred to the Ministry of Defence. The name "War Office" is also often given to the former home of the department, the Old War Office Building on Horse Guards Avenue, London. The War Office declined greatly in importance after the First World War, a fact illustrated by the drastic reductions in its staff numbers during the inter-war period. On 1 April 1920, it employed 7,434 civilian staff; this had shrunk to 3,872 by 1 April 1930. Its responsibilities and funding were also reduced. In 1936, the government of Stanley Baldwin appointed a Minister for Co-ordination of Defence, who worked outside of the War Office. When Winston Churchill became Prime Minister in 1940, he bypassed the War Office altogether and appointed himself Minister of Defence (though there was, curiously, no ministry of defence until 1947). Clement Attlee continued this arrangement when he came to power in 1945 but appointed a separate Minister of Defence for the first time in 1947. In 1964, the present form of the Ministry of Nucleus: The Nuclear and Caithness Archives 1 Defence was established, unifying the War Office, Admiralty, and Air Ministry.
  • Freeman's Folly

    Freeman's Folly

    Chapter 9 Freeman’s Folly: The Debate over the Development of the “Unarmed Bomber” and the Genesis of the de Havilland Mosquito, 1935–1940 Sebastian Cox The de Havilland Mosquito is, justifiably, considered one of the most famous and effective military aircraft of the Second World War. The Mosquito’s devel- opment is usually portrayed as being a story of a determined and independent aircraft company producing a revolutionary design with very little input com- ing from the official Royal Air Force design and development process, which normally involved extensive consultation between the Air Ministry’s technical staff and the aircraft’s manufacturer, culminating in an official specification being issued and a prototype built. Instead, so the story goes, de Havilland’s design team thought up the concept of the “unarmed speed bomber” all by themselves and, despite facing determined opposition from the Air Ministry and the raf, got it adopted by persuading one important and influential senior officer, Wilfrid Freeman, to put it into production (Illustration 9.1).1 Thus, before it proved itself in actuality a world-beating design, it was known in the Ministry as “Freeman’s Folly”. Significantly, even the UK Official History on the “Design and Development of Weapons”, published in 1964, perpetuated this explanation, stating that: When … [de Havilland] found itself at the beginning of the war short of orders and anxious to contribute to the war effort they proceeded to design an aeroplane without any official prompting from the Air Minis- try. They had to think out for themselves the whole tactical and strategic purpose of the aircraft, and thus made a number of strategic and tactical assumptions which were not those of the Air Staff.
  • (June 1941) and the Development of the British Tactical Air Doctrine

    (June 1941) and the Development of the British Tactical Air Doctrine

    Journal of Military and Strategic VOLUME 14, ISSUE 1, FALL 2011 Studies A Stepping Stone to Success: Operation Battleaxe (June 1941) and the Development of the British Tactical Air Doctrine Mike Bechthold On 16 February 1943 a meeting was held in Tripoli attended by senior American and British officers to discuss the various lessons learned during the Libyan campaign. The focus of the meeting was a presentation by General Bernard Montgomery. This "gospel according to Montgomery," as it was referred to by Air Chief Marshal Arthur Tedder, set out very clearly Monty's beliefs on how air power should be used to support the army.1 Among the tenets Montgomery articulated was his conviction of the importance of air power: "Any officer who aspires to hold high command in war must understand clearly certain principles regarding the use of air power." Montgomery also believed that flexibility was the greatest asset of air power. This allowed it to be applied as a "battle-winning factor of the first importance." As well, he fully endorsed the air force view of centralized control: "Nothing could be more fatal to successful results than to dissipate the air resource into small packets placed under the control of army formation commanders, with each packet working on its own plan. The soldier must not expect, or wish, to exercise direct command over air striking forces." Montgomery concluded his discussion by stating that it was of prime importance for the army and air 1 Arthur Tedder, With Prejudice: The war memoirs of Marshal of the Royal Air Force, Lord Tedder (London: Cassell, 1966), p.
  • Army Co-Operation Command and Tactical Air Power Development in Britain, 1940-1943: the Role of Army Co-Operation Command in Army Air Support

    Army Co-Operation Command and Tactical Air Power Development in Britain, 1940-1943: the Role of Army Co-Operation Command in Army Air Support

    ARMY CO-OPERATION COMMAND AND TACTICAL AIR POWER DEVELOPMENT IN BRITAIN, 1940-1943: THE ROLE OF ARMY CO-OPERATION COMMAND IN ARMY AIR SUPPORT By MATTHEW LEE POWELL A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of History and Cultures College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham September 2013 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis examines the impact of the developments made during the First World War and the inter-war period in tactical air support. Further to this, it will analyse how these developments led to the creation of Army Co-operation Command and affected the role it played developing army air support in Britain. Army Co-operation Command has been neglected in the literature on the Royal Air Force during the Second World War and this thesis addresses this neglect by adding to the extant knowledge on the development of tactical air support and fills a larger gap that exists in the literature on Royal Air Force Commands. Army Co-operation Command was created at the behest of the army in the wake of the Battle of France.
  • Review of Sebag-Montefiore, Hugh, Dunkirk: Fight to the Last Man James V

    Review of Sebag-Montefiore, Hugh, Dunkirk: Fight to the Last Man James V

    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Economics Faculty Publications Department of Economics 5-2009 Review of Sebag-Montefiore, Hugh, Dunkirk: Fight to the Last Man James V. Koch Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/economics_facpubs Part of the European History Commons, and the Nonfiction Commons Repository Citation Koch, James V., "Review of Sebag-Montefiore, Hugh, Dunkirk: Fight to the Last Man" (2009). Economics Faculty Publications. 14. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/economics_facpubs/14 Original Publication Citation Koch, J. V. (2009). Review of Sebag-Montefiore, Hugh, Dunkirk: Fight to the Last Man. H-Net Reviews, 1-3. This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Economics at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Economics Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. H-Net Revie in the Humanities & Social Hugh Sebag-Montefiore. Dunkirk: Fight to the Last Man. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2006. xvii + 701 pp. $35.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-674-02439-7. Reviewed by James V. Koch (Old Dominion University) Published on H-German (May, 2009) Commissioned by Susan R. Boettcher Definitely a Fight, But Not to the Last Man Hugh Sebag-Montefiore correctly notes that multi- Sebag-Montefiore traces how the 338,226 individu- tudes of books already have been written about the evac- als were evacuated from Dunkirk between May 26 and uation of the British and French troops from Dunkirk in June 4, 1940. British ships rescued more than 200,000 ad- May and June 1940.
  • 571 Write Up.Pdf

    571 Write Up.Pdf

    This paper comprises a brief history of the origins and early development of radar meteorology. Therefore, it will cover the time period from a few years before World War II through about the 1970s. The earliest developments of radar meteorology occurred in England, the United States, and Canada. Among these three nations, however, most of the first discoveries and developments were made in England. With the exception of a few minor details, it is there where the story begins. Even as early as 1900, Nicola Tesla wrote of the potential for using waves of a frequency from the radio part of the electromagnetic spectrum to detect distant objects. Then, on 11 December 1924, E. V. Appleton and M.A.F. Barnett, two Englishmen, used a radio technique to determine the height of the ionosphere using continuous wave (CW) radio energy. This was the first recorded measurement of the height of the ionosphere using such a method, and it got Appleton a Nobel Prize. However, it was Merle A. Tuve and Gregory Breit (the former of Johns Hopkins University, the latter of the Carnegie Institution), both Americans, who six months later – in July 1925 – did the same thing using pulsed radio energy. This was a simpler and more direct way of doing it. As the 1930s rolled on, the British sensed that the next world war was coming. They also knew they would be forced to defend themselves against the German onslaught. Knowing they would be outmanned and outgunned, they began to search for solutions of a technological variety. This is where Robert Alexander Watson Watt – a Scottish physicist and then superintendent of the Radio Department at the National Physical Laboratory in England – came into the story.
  • The Channel Dash April 26

    The Channel Dash April 26

    The Channel Dash April 26 On the night of February 11, 1942, two German battleships, the Scharnhorst and the Gneisenau, along with the heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen left anchor at Brest, France. This was be the beginning of the “Channel Dash” (Operation Thunderbolt-Cerberus) of February The Prinz Eugen 11-13 in which these three ships, despite pursuit by the British Royal Navy and Air Force (RAF), returned intact to Germany via the English Channel. The Dash was ordered by German leader Adolf Hitler—against the advice of his admirals, who believed his plan meant certain destruction for these ships. Yet Hitler expressed the following opinion: “The ships must leave port in daytime as we are dependent on the element of surprise…I don’t think the British capable of making and carrying out lightning decisions.” This time, Hitler was correct. How did the German ships end up in Brest, France? And why was it necessary for them to even make a Channel dash? Germany and Great Britain had been at war since 1939. By the summer of 1940, the seemingly unstoppable Germans had overrun much of the western portion of continental Europe. This included part of France, allowing them use of the port of Brest on the lower end of the English Channel for their surface ships and submarines. The Royal Navy attempted to blockade the Atlantic coast ports, but its resources were stretched thin. The British had been watching German vessels at Brest carefully. In fact, these three ships had been undergoing repairs there for much of 1941.
  • Coastal Command in the Second World War

    Coastal Command in the Second World War

    AIR POWER REVIEW VOL 21 NO 1 COASTAL COMMAND IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR By Professor John Buckley Biography: John Buckley is Professor of Military History at the University of Wolverhampton, UK. His books include The RAF and Trade Defence 1919-1945 (1995), Air Power in the Age of Total War (1999) and Monty’s Men: The British Army 1944-5 (2013). His history of the RAF (co-authored with Paul Beaver) will be published by Oxford University Press in 2018. Abstract: From 1939 to 1945 RAF Coastal Command played a crucial role in maintaining Britain’s maritime communications, thus securing the United Kingdom’s ability to wage war against the Axis powers in Europe. Its primary role was in confronting the German U-boat menace, particularly in the 1940-41 period when Britain came closest to losing the Battle of the Atlantic and with it the war. The importance of air power in the war against the U-boat was amply demonstrated when the closing of the Mid-Atlantic Air Gap in 1943 by Coastal Command aircraft effectively brought victory in the Atlantic campaign. Coastal Command also played a vital role in combating the German surface navy and, in the later stages of the war, in attacking Germany’s maritime links with Scandinavia. Disclaimer: The views expressed are those of the authors concerned, not necessarily the MOD. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form without prior permission in writing from the Editor. 178 COASTAL COMMAND IN THE SECOND WORLD WAR introduction n March 2004, almost sixty years after the end of the Second World War, RAF ICoastal Command finally received its first national monument which was unveiled at Westminster Abbey as a tribute to the many casualties endured by the Command during the War.