DOCSLIB.ORG

"Collaboration" in the National Security Arena

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TOPICAL STRATEGIC MULTI-LAYER ASSESSMENT (SMA) MULTI-AGENCY/MULTI-DISCIPLINARY WHITE PAPERS IN SUPPORT OF COUNTER-TERRORISM AND COUNTER-WMD Collaboration in the National Security Arena: Myths and Reality - What Science and Experience Can Contribute to its Success June 2009 The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the organizations with which they are associated. Editorial Board: Jennifer O’Connor (DHS), Chair Elisa Jayne Bienenstock (NSI), Robert O. Briggs (UNO), Carl "Pappy" Dodd (STRATCOM/GISC), Carl Hunt, (DTI), Kathleen Kiernan (RRTO), Joan McIntyre (ODNI), Randy Pherson (Pherson), Tom Rieger (Gallup) Contributing Authors: Sarah Miller Beebe (Pherson), Keith Bergeron (USAFA), Elisa Jayne Bienenstock (NSI), Deborah Boehm-Davis (GMU), Robert O. Briggs (UNO), Chris Bronk (Rice), Kerry Buckley (MITRE), Joseph Carls (ret), Nancy Chesser (DTI), Lee Cronk (Rutgers), Bert Davis (ERDC), M. Jude Egan (LSU), Justin Franks (ODNI), Nahum Gershon (MITRE), Tamra Hall (MITRE), Col Craig Harm (NASIC), Richards Heuer, Jr. (Consultant), LTC Brad Hilton (US Army), Carl Hunt (DTI), Kathleen Kiernan (RRTO), Larry Kuznar (NSI), John M. Linebarger (Sandia), Joseph Lyons (AFRL/RHXS), Jean MacMillan (Aptima), Joan McIntyre (ODNI), Brian Meadows (SPAWAR), Victoria Moreno-Jackson, (Nat'l Assoc for Community Mediation), Gale Muller (Gallup), S. K. Numrich (IDA), Jennifer O’Connor (DHS), Douglas Palmer (ODNI), Stacy Lovell Pfautz (NSI), Randy Pherson (Pherson), Terry Pierce (DHS & USAFA), Tom Rieger (Gallup), Ned Snead (IDA), Michael Stouder (GWU), Kevin K. Troy (NSI), Dag von Lubitz (MedSMART), Rodd Wagner (Gallup), Sandy Wetzel-Smith (SPAWAR), Wally Wulfeck (SPAWAR) Compiled by: Nancy Chesser (DTI) – [email protected] Collaboration White Paper June 2009 FOREWORD The inter-agency/multi-disciplinary white paper provided in the following pages includes 35 articles addressing USG agency and operational perspectives, scientific disciplines studying collaboration, common barriers to collaboration, findings from applied research on collaboration, and finally potential enablers for collaboration. It is primarily intended for the operational and policy community in DoD, the Intelligence Community (IC), DHS, and other US Government agencies. The authors are from the IC, Services, USG agencies, FFRDCs, academia, and the private sector. The white paper addresses the following set of critical questions: • What kind of collaboration is required to accomplish the mission? • What barriers to that kind of collaboration exist in the status quo? • What actions facilitate this kind of collaboration? • What systems will best enable these actions? By way of background, we developed the concept for this white paper after completing an SMA* effort during 2008 to develop approaches to anticipate rare events such as the nexus of terrorism and WMD. That effort highlighted the fragility of the models and the need for a multi- disciplinary, multi-agency approach to deal with anticipating/forecasting, detecting and interdicting such events. That effort led to the following: 1- Publication in November 2008 of a white paper entitled “Anticipating Rare Events: Can Acts of Terror, Use of Weapons of Mass Destruction or Other High Profile Acts Be Anticipated? A Scientific Perspective on Problems, Pitfalls and Prospective Solutions” (copies available upon request). 2- Development of a concept for an Inter-Agency Limited Objective Experiment (IA LOE) as described in the current white paper This collaboration white paper is published as an adjunct to the aforementioned experiment. Key observations highlighted in this white paper include: 1- The post 9/11 operational and analytical demands which consistently highlight the central role of collaboration across USG Agencies and the negative impact resulting from the absence of common framework, definitions, and vocabulary 2- The lament that many, if not most, US Government organizations follow the hierarchical models developed after WWII which constrain collaborative planning and are now challenged by the following: a. Rapid advances in information technology and related disciplines b. The information “Tsunami” c. Globalization trends and resulting geographically distributed social networks where no one person has the monopoly on what is needed to get the job done d. The growing dispersal of expertise, as the boundaries between analysts, operators, and collectors become increasingly fuzzy * This white paper is a product of the Strategic Multi-Layer Assessment (SMA) effort. For those not familiar with SMA, it provides planning support to Commands with complex operational imperatives requiring multi-agency, multi-disciplinary solutions that are NOT within core Service/Agency competency. Solutions and participants are sought across USG. SMA is accepted and synchronized by Joint Staff and executed by STRATCOM/GISC and OSD/DDRE/RRTO. ii Collaboration White Paper June 2009 e. Military need for National-to-tactical integration f. Outdated regulatory and legal policies that impede information sharing and dissemination g. Organizational cultures that disincentivize collaboration 3- Finally, technologies and tools by themselves will NOT improve collaboration. This collection of papers deliberately challenges the all too prevalent view that collaboration is a pure technology issue. Improvements in collaboration will come from innovative ways and incentives to transform and re-tool organizations, focus attention on the cultural and social impediments, and develop the means to empower individuals while establishing accountability. As a prospective reader, please do not be put off by the size of the report. The short articles are intentionally written to stand alone; however, while a selective reading would offer its own rewards, you are encouraged to read the whole report to expand and enrich your perspective of this critical problem space. I would like to take this opportunity to extend my thanks to the numerous contributors, to the editorial board chaired by Dr. Jennifer O’Connor (DHS), and to Dr. Nancy Chesser (DTI) for compiling the manuscript. Dr. Hriar Cabayan [email protected] iii Collaboration White Paper June 2009 iv Collaboration White Paper June 2009 Table of Contents Executive Summary (Jennifer O’Connor - DHS)........................................................................... 1 1. Agency and Operational Perspectives.................................................................................... 9 1.1. A Framework for Thinking about Collaboration within the Intelligence Community and Beyond (Joan McIntyre, Douglas Palmer and Justin Franks - ODNI) .................. 9 1.2. A Military Perspective on Collaboration: Where the Past Meets the Present (Col Craig Harm - NASIC and Carl Hunt - DTI) ............................................................... 15 1.3. The Law Enforcement Perspective in US Interagency Collaboration: Leveraging the Whole of Government Approach (Kathleen Kiernan - RRTO/Kiernan Group and Carl Hunt - DTI)................................................................................................... 21 1.4. Enabling Collaboration through Teams of Leaders - ToL (LTC Brad Hilton, US Army).................................................................................................................... 27 2. Scientific Disciplines Studying Collaboration ..................................................................... 34 2.1. Overview of Collaboration in the National Security Arena: A Multidisciplinary Collection of Perspectives (Elisa Jayne Bienenstock, Kevin K. Troy, and Stacy Lovell Pfautz - NSI).................................................................................................... 34 2.2. Anthropological Perspectives on Collaboration (Larry Kuznar - NSI) ...................... 40 2.3. An Evolutionary Perspective On Collaboration And Cooperation (Lee Cronk - Rutgers)....................................................................................................................... 47 2.4. Collaboration in the National Security Arena as a Social Dilemma (Elisa Jayne Bienenstock and Kevin K. Troy – NSI)...................................................................... 55 2.5. Collaboration: A Perspective from Organizational Studies (Michael Stouder - GWU).......................................................................................................................... 60 2.6. Analytic Teams, Social Networks, and Collaborative Behavior (Richards Heuer, Jr. - consultant and Randy Pherson and Sarah Miller Beebe, Pherson Assoc.) ................. 68 2.7. The Engagement Economy: Applying Lessons of Economics in Collaboration – Moving from Attention to Engagement (Carl Hunt - DTI) ........................................ 73 2.8. A Seven-Layer Model for Collaboration (Robert O. Briggs - UNO)......................... 80 3. Common Barriers to Collaboration...................................................................................... 96 3.1. Barriers to Collaboration: Imbalanced Empowerment and Accountability (Thomas Rieger - Gallup) .......................................................................................................... 96 3.2. Small Groups, Collaborative Pitfalls, and Remedies (Richards J. Heuer, Jr. - consultant and Sarah Miller Beebe - Pherson Assoc.).............................................. 103 3.3. Building a Culture of Collaboration – Observations from the
Recommended publications
  • Intellipedia-Wrangler.Pdf

    Intellipedia-Wrangler.Pdf

    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-6000 FOIA Case: 81322A 28 April 2017 JOHN GREENEWALD Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is our final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request of 22 May 2015, for Intellipedia pages on WRANGLER. As stated in our previous response, dated 27 May 2015, your request was assigned Case Number 81322. A copy ofyour request is enclosed. For purposes of this request and based on the information you provided in your letter, you are considered an "all other" requester. As such, you are allowed 2 hours of search and the duplication of 100 pages at no cost. There are no assessable fees for this request. Your request has been processed under the FOIA. For your information, NSA provides a service of common concern for the Intelligence Community (IC) by serving as the executive agent for Intelink. As such, NSA provides technical services that enable users to access and share information with peers and stakeholders across the IC and DoD. Intellipedia pages are living documents that may be originated by any user organization, and any user organization may contribute to or edit pages after their origination.
  • Enabling Enterprise Collaboration

    Enabling Enterprise Collaboration

    Enabling enterprise collaboration Summer Hugo Sarrrazin Copyright © McKinsey & Company 2013 Kara Sprague Michael Huskins 2 Enabling enterprise collaboration The success of large organizations often depends on the ability of its employees to work collaboratively across time and distance. Greater collaboration increases productivity, enhances innovation, and reduces time-to-market. There are numerous IT tools that enable collaboration within the enterprise. These tools often overlap in functionality, have different standards, create security concerns, or put additional burdens on a company’s IT organization and infrastructure. Consequently, in many companies, IT infrastructure executives are working through how best to select, deploy, and support the right set of collaboration tools. Although the lines are not clearly drawn, collaboration tools broadly fall into one of several categories: Communication: Tools that enable synchronous and asynchronous communication, including videoconferencing, instant messaging, white-boarding tools, and e-mail. Team collaboration: Tools that help teams organize their work and work product, including file sharing, project planning/management, group calendaring, and event scheduling. Writing/editing: Tools that help teams work together on documents and/or publish documents, including wikis and online document processing tools (e.g., GoogleDocs). Engaging/networking: Sites and tools that enable social media, networking and blogging. We recently convened several Silicon Valley IT executives at the Chief Infrastructure Technology Executive Roundtable (CITER) to discuss how best to derive value from collaboration and collaboration tools. This overview synthesizes the findings from our discussions with the CITER members. 1. The benefits of collaboration tools are there, but it is often difficult to measure these benefits and calculate return on investment.
  • FOIA Request Log for Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), FY 2013

    FOIA Request Log for Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), FY 2013

    Description of document: FOIA Request Log for Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), FY 2013 Requested date: 15-July-2013 Released date: 25-October-2013 Posted date: 19-September-2016 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Request Director, Information Management Division Office of the Director of National Intelligence Washington, D.C. 20511 Fax: (703) 874-8910 Email: [email protected] The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. Office of the Director of National Intelligence Information Management Division Washington, DC 20511 OCT 2 5 2013 Reference: ODNI Case# DF-2013-00155 This is in response to your email dated 15 July 2013, received in the Information Management Division of the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) on 16 July 2013.
  • Making Friends in Dark Shadows: an Examination of the Use

    Making Friends in Dark Shadows: an Examination of the Use

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Directory of Open Access Journals © 2011, Global Media Journal -- Canadian Edition Volume 4, Issue 2, pp. 95-113 ISSN: 1918-5901 (English) -- ISSN: 1918-591X (Français) Making Friends in Dark Shadows: An Examination of the Use of Social Computing Strategy Within the United States Intelligence Community Since 9/11 Andrew Chomik Centre for Military and Strategic Studies, Canada Abstract: The tragic events of 9/11 highlighted failures in communication and cooperation in the U.S. intelligence community. Agencies within the community failed to “connect the dots” in the intelligence they had, which was cited by the 9/11 Commission Report as a reason for the terrorist attacks being allowed to happen. Since then, the U.S. intelligence community has made organizational and operational reforms towards intelligence sharing. As part of this reform, the Director of National Intelligence has introduced web-based social computing technology to be used by all members of the intelligence community. This paper argues that while this technology has been adopted into the intelligence environment, it has reached a “plateau” in its use, and that intelligence failures continue to persist in the U.S. post-9/11 world. It identifies and analyzes the challenge of implementing social computing and Web 2.0 technology into the U.S. intelligence community, as well as account for possible deficiencies in the community that might be contributing to these intelligence failures. Finally, the definition of “success” in intelligence analysis and social computing is explored, and critique against information sharing is put forth.
  • Promoting Research Through Improved Online Collaboration Software

    Promoting Research Through Improved Online Collaboration Software

    51-OVP-A154 Promoting Research through Improved Online Collaboration Software An Interactive Qualifying Project Report submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment for the degree of Bachelor of Science Sponsoring Agency: International Financial Laboratory, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation Submitted to: On-Site Liaison: Alexander Didenko, Dean of “International Economic Relations” faculty at Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation Project Advisor: Oleg Pavlov, WPI Professor Project Co-advisor: Creighton Peet, WPI Professor Submitted by: Elijah Gonzalez Qiaoyu Liao Nicholas Wong Date: 15 October 2015 This report represents the work of three WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of completion of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. i Abstract The purpose of this project was to create an online platform to facilitate and promote research collaboration among faculty and students at the Financial University in Moscow. We gathered data on this problem through holding interviews and focus groups. Using this data we decided which online research collaboration tool would work best for the university, and we developed a prototype SharePoint website that delivers the features we determined to be most essential for successful online research collaboration. ii Acknowledgements Our team would like to express our appreciation to the following individuals for their contribution to the success of this project. Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation: Professor Alexander Didenko, Dean of “International Economics Relation” of Financial University and Project Liaison Inna Lukashenko, Head of International Financial Laboratory of Financial University Vladimir I.
  • New Tools for Collaboration: the Experience of the U.S. Intelligence Community

    New Tools for Collaboration: the Experience of the U.S. Intelligence Community

    JANUARY 2016 1616 Rhode Island Avenue NW Washington, DC 20036 202-887-0200 | www.csis.org Lanham • Boulder • New York • London 4501 Forbes Boulevard Lanham, MD 20706 301- 459- 3366 | www.rowman.com Cover photo: Rawpixel.com/Shutterstock New Tools for Collaboration The Experience of the U.S. Intelligence Community A Report of the CSIS Strategic Technologies Program ISBN 978-1-4422-5912-6 AUTHOR Ë|xHSLEOCy259126z v*:+:!:+:! Gregory F. Treverton Blank New Tools for Collaboration The Experience of the U.S. Intelligence Community AUTHOR Gregory F. Treverton January 2016 A Report of the CSIS Strategic Technologies Program Lanham • Boulder • New York • London About CSIS For over 50 years, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) has worked to develop solutions to the world’s greatest policy challenges. Today, CSIS scholars are providing strategic insights and bipartisan policy solutions to help decisionmakers chart a course toward a better world. CSIS is a nonprofit organization headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Center’s 220 full-time staff and large network of affiliated scholars conduct research and analysis and develop policy initiatives that look into the future and anticipate change. Founded at the height of the Cold War by David M. Abshire and Admiral Arleigh Burke, CSIS was dedicated to finding ways to sustain American prominence and prosperity as a force for good in the world. Since 1962, CSIS has become one of the world’s preeminent international institutions focused on defense and security; regional stability; and transnational challenges ranging from energy and climate to global health and economic integration. Thomas J.
  • Connecting Business Collaboration with Social Networking

    Connecting Business Collaboration with Social Networking

    Chapter 1 Connecting Business Collaboration with Social Networking In This Chapter ▶ Understanding what social collaboration means ▶ Moving beyond the “Facebook inside your company” slogan ▶ Accessing new resources in social collaboration systems ▶ Competing and coexisting with e-mail ▶ Finding practical applications for social collaboration e often talk about having a social life, separate from our work Wlives, recognizing that mingling the two can be hazardous. Social Collaboration For Dummies isn’t a book about being social at work, in the sense of flirting or sharing jokes. By social collaboration, I mean recognizing that business is inherently social, even when social interaction is constrained within the bounds of professionalism. In this chapter, I help you understand what social collaboration is (and what it isn’t), outline some of the benefits of implementing a social collaboration system in your business, and suggest some ways that you can help colleagues shift fromCOPYRIGHTED e-mail to social collaboration tools MATERIAL (and know when to use one over the other). I also give you some real-world examples of how social collabora- tion can help employees solve specific problems and complete tasks more efficiently. 005_9781118658543-ch01.indd5_9781118658543-ch01.indd 7 99/25/13/25/13 111:401:40 AAMM 8 Part I: Getting Started with Social Collaboration Defining Social Collaboration Social collaboration comprises social networking and social media for the purpose of getting work done in an enterprise setting. The collaboration part is just as important as the social part. In this context, collaboration is about getting work done with teams of people, working together toward a common goal — which is essential to any business.
  • Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software

    Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software

    Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software June 2013 INDUSTRY REPORT INSIDE THIS ISSUE Enterprise Collaboration & Social Software 1. Introduction INTRODUCTION 2. Market Trends This report focuses on technologies for collaboration and socialization within the enterprise. A number of forces are currently playing out in the enterprise IT 3. Competitive Landscape environment that are creating an inflection in the adoption and deployment of social and collaboration technologies. This significant uptrend has provided strong 4. M&A Activity growth for the sector and is driving a substantial amount of M&A and investment activity. This report includes a review of the recent M&A and private investing 5. Private Financings activities in enterprise social and collaboration software, particularly within the areas of group collaboration & workspaces, private social platforms, project and 6. Valution Trends social task management, event scheduling, web collaboration, white boarding & diagramming, and other related technologies. We have also profiled about 50 emerging private players in these subcategories to provide an overview of the 7. Emerging Private Companies breadth and diversity of the players targeting this sector. OVERVIEW Socialization and collaboration technologies are currently reshaping the established enterprise collaboration market as well as creating whole new categories of offerings, especially around private social platforms. In addition, many other enterprise applications such as CRM and unified communications are heavily transformed through the incorporation of new technologies including group messaging & activity feeds, document collaboration, and analytics. Much of this change is being driven by the consumerization of IT and the incorporation of social technologies. As businesses look to leverage the benefits of improved “connecting” and “network building” that employees have experienced with Facebook and other social solutions, a convergence is occurring between the enterprise social software and collaboration markets.
  • Anna Politkovskaya

    Anna Politkovskaya

    (U//FOUO) Anna Politkovskaya TOP SECRET//SI//NOFORN See the Wikipedia article Anna Politkovskaya Contents 1 (U) Biography Anna_Politkovskaya) ( 2 (U) Murder 2.1 (U) Reaction 2.2 (U) Investigation 2.3 (U) Trial 3 (U) Professional Work 4 (U) References (U) Biography Journalist Anna Politkovskaya (U) Anna Stepanovna Politkovskaya was born in New York City on 30 August 1958. She was the daughter of Soviet Ukrainian diplomats posted at the United Nations. She studied journalism at Moscow State University and began her career with the newspaper Izvestiya. She became a Russia Portal prominent Russian journalist and was noted for her critical opposition to Putin's administration and her reporting on the war in Chechnya. She had received death threats for years, including one from a police officer which forced her to flee to Vienna in 2001, as well as an attempted poisoning on an aircraft while flying to Beslan to help in hostage negotiations. (TS//SI//REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR, NZL) Russian Federal Intelligence Services (probably FSB) are known to have targeted the webmail account of the murdered Russian journalist Anna Politkovskaya. On 5 December 2005, RFIS initiated an attack against the account annapolitkovskaia@US Provider1, by deploying malicious software which is not available in the public domain. It is not known whether this attack is in any way associated with the death of the journalist.[1] (U) Murder (C//NF) Politkovskaya was assassinated in Moscow on 7 October 2006, probably in relation to her professional activities. She was found shot twice in the head in an elevator in her apartment building.
  • The Future of Collaboration Software – a Qualitative Study

    The Future of Collaboration Software – a Qualitative Study

    THE FUTURE OF COLLABORATION SOFTWARE – A QUALITATIVE STUDY 15 Thought Leaders Share their Predictions for Future Trends & Challenges The Future of Collaboration Software – A Qualitative Study - Introduction 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................. 2 WRIKE.………………………ANDREW FILEV, FOUNDER & CEO ............................................................. 3 SMARTSHEET…………….BRENT FREI, FOUNDER & CMO ................................................................. 5 TRELLO …………………….STELLA GARBER, VP OF MARKETING ......................................................... 7 QUIP ………………………..MOLLY GRAHAM, CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER .......................................... 9 MIKOGO …………………..ERIK BOOS, CO-FOUNDER & DIRECTOR .................................................. 12 DOCUSIGN ……………….BRIANNA DINSMORE, SENIOR MANAGER DEMAND GENERATION ........ 14 MINDMEISTER ………….RAPHAELA BRANDNER, MARKETING MANAGER ..................................... 16 EXO PLATFORM ………..PATRICE LAMARQUE, CHIEF PRODUCT OFFICER .................................... 18 SAMEPAGE ………………..SCOTT SCHREIMAN, CEO ........................................................................ 20 NETDOCUMENTS ……..MARRIOTT MURDOCK MBA, PMP®, MARKETING DIRECTOR.................. 22 HIGHQ ……………………..AJAY PATEL, CO-FOUNDER & CEO ........................................................... 25 TIME DOCTOR ………….LIAM MARTIN, CO-FOUNDER..................................................................
  • The Adoption Process As an Important Collaboration Tool for Increase Employee Productivity

    The Adoption Process As an Important Collaboration Tool for Increase Employee Productivity

    #CiscoLiveLA The Adoption Process as an Important Collaboration Tool for increase employee Productivity Carlos Paris Delivery Consulting Engineer BRKCOL-1162 #CiscoLiveLA Agenda • Introduction • Technology history • Communications - Collaboration • Changing the way of work • User adoption process • Conclusion #CiscoLiveLA SBRKCOL-1162 © 2019 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Public 3 Cisco Webex Teams Questions? Use Cisco Webex Teams to chat with the speaker after the session How 1 Find this session in the Cisco Live Mobile App 2 Click “Join the Discussion” 3 Install Webex Teams or go directly to the team space 4 Enter messages/questions in the team space Webex Teams will be moderated cs.co/ciscolivebot#BRKCOL-1162 by the speaker until November 1st , 2019. #CiscoLiveLA © 2019 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Public 4 Introduction “We need to constantly make changes in order for Cisco to stay relevant over the next three, five, 10 years — especially in today’s rapidly changing environment.” Chuck Robbins Cisco CEO #CiscoLiveLA SBRKCOL-1162 © 2019 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Public 6 The learning inside the companies • Your company understand the importance of the Learning and Development opportunities? • HHRR coordinate the learning with the different areas and technologies used by the employees? • There is a training plan for implement and develop new technologies? #CiscoLiveLA SBRKCOL-1162 © 2019 Cisco and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Cisco Public 7 Technology history The last 50 Years • Man on the Moon • Semiconductors, Intel Processors (4004 the first true microprocessor, 8080, 80x86), Basic Calculators • Video Games • TCP, Ethernet, Fiber Optics, First cell phone call, 19xx?? • Personal Computer • Internet • Smartphones • Siri, Alexa, Echo #CiscoLiveLA SBRKCOL-1162 © 2019 Cisco and/or its affiliates.
  • Intelligence Analysis

    Intelligence Analysis

    BY ORDER OF THE AIR FORCE HANDBOOK 14-133 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE 27 SEPTEMBER 2017 Intelligence INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS ACCESSIBILITY: Publications and forms are available on the e-Publishing website at www.e-Publishing.af.mil for downloading or ordering. RELEASABILITY: There are no releasability restrictions on this publication. OPR: AF/A2OA Certified by: AF/A2O (Brig Gen Aaron M. Prupas) Pages: 104 This Air Force Handbook (AFH) is the reference guide for conducting intelligence analysis as prescribed by Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 14-1, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) Planning, Resources and Operations and supports the operational requirements and processes outlined under Air Force Instruction (AFI) 14-133, Intelligence Analysis and AFI 14-134, Intelligence Analysis Production and Requirements Management. This publication provides the definitions, guidelines, procedures and tools for intelligence analysis operations. It has application and use for Regular Component, Air Force Reserve (AFR), Air National Guard (ANG), and Department of the Air Force (AF) Civilians, except where noted otherwise. Ensure that all records created as a result of processes prescribed in this publication are maintained in accordance with (IAW) Air Force Manual (AFMAN) 33-363, Management of Records, and disposed of IAW the Air Force Records Disposition Schedule (RDS) in the Air Force Records Information Management System (AFRIMS). Refer recommended changes and questions about this publication to the Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) using the AF Form 847, Recommendation for Change of Publication; route AF Forms 847 from the field through the appropriate functional chain of command. This publication may be supplemented at any level, but all direct supplements are routed to the OPR of this publication for coordination prior to certification and approval.