Stellaria Media
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The First Missouri Occurrences of Cerastium Dubium (Anomalous Mouse-Eared Chickweed)
Missouriensis, 34: 20-23. 2017. *pdf effectively published online 30 September 2017 via https://monativeplants.org/missouriensis The first Missouri occurrences of Cerastium dubium (anomalous mouse-eared chickweed) STEVE R. TURNER1 & GERRIT DAVIDSE2 ABSTRACT. – Cerastium dubium is reported new to the Missouri flora from two counties in eastern Missouri. A detailed description is provided based on local populations. Cerastium dubium (Bastard) Guépin (= Cerastium anomalum Waldst. & Kit. ex Willd.; Stellaria dubia Bastard; Dichodon viscidum (M. Bieb.) Holub – see Tropicos.org) is a Eurasian member of the Caryophyllaceae. Commonly called anomalous mouse-eared chickweed, three- styled chickweed, or doubtful chickweed, its first reported appearance in North America was in Washington state in 1966 (Hitchcock and Cronquist 1973). Since then, the plant has been discovered in Illinois (Shildneck and Jones 1986), and is now known from scattered populations in several states bordering Missouri: Illinois, Kentucky, Tennessee, Arkansas, and Kansas. Yatskievych (2006) discusses C. dubium and mentions that although the species had not been reported in Missouri, its arrival is anticipated. According to Yatskievych, the plant generally resembles C. nutans or C. brachypodum, but with the unique characters of three styles and a straight capsule with 6 apical teeth at dehiscence. In March of 2012, while rototilling a garden plot at his residence near Labadie, in Franklin County, Missouri, the first author discovered a small population of plants unfamiliar to him, growing with Lamium amplexicaule and Stellaria media. The flowers of this plant were somewhat showier than the common Stellaria, with wider and less deeply cleft petals. The centers of the flowers were bright yellow due to anthers and profusely shed pollen. -
(Caryophyllaceae), a New North American Genus Segregated from Stellaria Engellaria (Caryophyllaceae), Un Nuevo Género Norteamericano Segregado De Stellaria
Research article Engellaria (Caryophyllaceae), a new North American genus segregated from Stellaria Engellaria (Caryophyllaceae), un nuevo género norteamericano segregado de Stellaria Duilio Iamonico1,2 Abstract: Background and Aims: Stellaria traditionally comprises 150-200 species, mainly distributed in the temperate regions of Eurasia and North America. Molecular studies demonstrated that Stellaria is polyphyletic and includes about 120 species. The genus has a high phenotypic variability which has led to nomenclatural disorders, making the identification of the various species difficult. A note is presented about a taxon currently accepted under the genus Stellaria -Stellaria obtusa- which should be recognized as a separate genus, here proposed as Engellaria gen. nov. Methods: This study is based on examination of specimens of American and European herbaria and analysis of relevant literature. Key results: Available molecular data show that Stellaria obtusa is not included in the Stellaria s.s. clade, but instead is basal to another clade compris- ing the genera Honckenya, Schiedea, and Wilhelmsia. Stellaria obtusa was, therefore, compared with these three groups and with morphologically similar apetalous members of Stellaria s.s. (S. crispa, S. media, S. pallida, and S. irrigua). The results obtained lead to the recognition of S. obtusa as a separate new North American monotypic genus. A diagnostic key of the apetalous members belonging to the American Caryophyllaceae genera is proposed. Finally, the names Stellaria obtusa and S. washingtoniana (= S. obtusa) are lectotypified based on specimens deposited, respectively, at UC (isolectotypes at GH, NY, and YU) and GH (isolectotypes at BM, CAN, CAS, CS, DOV, F, GH, K, MIN, MSC, NY, US, and VT). -
Identifying & Managing Weeds in Gardens
Identifying & Managing Weeds in Gardens Todd Mervosh Valley Laboratory - Windsor The Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station CAES- Spring Open House 2009 www.ct.gov/caes Definitions of WEED ‘Plant out of Place’ - any plant growing where it is not wanted. Plant with generally undesirable properties. Plant that spreads rapidly and competitively. “Plant that has mastered every survival skill except for learning how to grow in rows.” Doug Larson “A plant whose virtues have not yet been discovered.” Ralph Waldo Emerson “Is this a wildflower or a weed?” CAES- Spring Open House 2009 www.ct.gov/caes Field Violet / Field Pansy (Viola arvensis) CAES- Spring Open House 2009 www.ct.gov/caes CAES- Spring Open House 2009 www.ct.gov/caes WEEDS: NEGATIVES 1) Compete with crops / desirable plants for: • WATER, NUTRIENTS, SPACE, LIGHT 2) Reduce air flow in garden, keeping plants wetter & more prone to pathogens. 3) Can be alternate hosts for fungal diseases, or harbor insect pests. 4) Health Problems: Hay fever (ragweed), skin rashes (poison ivy). 5) Unattractive: Detract from beauty of garden or landscape planting. CAES- Spring Open House 2009 www.ct.gov/caes WEEDS: POSITIVES 1) Help protect soil from erosion. 2) Legumes (clovers, vetch) release nitrogen from root nodules into soil – add fertilizer. 3) Some weeds harbor beneficial insects. 4) Food sources for many animals. 5) Many weeds are edible for humans (purslane, lambsquarters, dandelion, etc.) 6) Some “weeds” are beautiful! CAES- Spring Open House 2009 www.ct.gov/caes Photo Credits Randy -
PLANT YOUR YARD with WILDFLOWERSI Sources
BOU /tJ, San Francisco, "The the beautiful, old Roth Golden Gate City," pro Estate with its lovely for vides a perfect setting for mal English gardens in the 41st Annual Meeting Woodside. Visit several of the American Horticul gardens by Tommy tural Society as we focus Church, one of the great on the influence of ori est garden-makers of the ental gardens, plant con century. Observe how the servation, and edible originator of the Califor landscaping. nia living garden incor Often referred to as porated both beauty and "the gateway to the Ori a place for everyday ac ent," San Francisco is tivities into one garden the "most Asian of occi area. dental cities." You will Come to San Fran delight in the beauty of cisco! Join Society mem its oriental gardens as bers and other meeting we study the nature and participants as we ex significance of oriental plore the "Beautiful and gardening and its influ Bountiful: Horticulture's ence on American horti Legacy to the Future." culture. A visit to the Japanese Tea Garden in the Golden Gate Park, a Please send me special advance registration information for the botanical treasure, will Society's 1986 Annual Meeting in offer one of the most au San Francisco, California. thentic examples of Japa NAME ________ nese landscape artistry outside of Japan. Tour the Demonstra Western Plants for Amer ~D~SS _______ tion Gardens of Sunset Explore with us the ican Gardens" as well as CITY ________ joys and practical aspects magazine, magnificent what plant conservation of edible landscaping, private gardens open only efforts are being made STATE ZIP ____ which allows one to en to Meeting participants, from both a world per joy both the beauty and and the 70-acre Strybing spective and a national MAIL TO: Annual Meeting, American Horticultural Society, the bounty of Arboretum. -
Research Article
Received: 10th Jan-2014 Revised: 13th Jan-2014 Accepted: 18th Jan-2014 Research article EVALUATION OF LEAF EXTRACT OF SOME MEDICINAL WILD PLANTS ON THE GROWTH AND SPORULATION OF PAECILOMYCES LILACINUS Rushda Sharf, Hisamuddin, Abbasi and Ambreen akhtar Department of Botany, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh-202002 Email: [email protected] ABSRACT-: In vitro experiment was conducted to determine the effect of leaf extracts of five medicinal wild plant viz, Chenopodium album, Eclipta prostrata, Euphorbia pulcherima, Oxalis corniculata and Stellaria media on the growth and sporulation of fungus Paecilomyces lilacinus. The effect of the leaf extracts of these medicinal wild plant was noted at the different time interval such as, 24hrs, 48hrs, 72hrs, 96hrs and 120hrs. After 120 hrs the maximum mycelial growth was observed in Oxalis corniculata and minimum in Euphorbia pulcherima. However maximum number of spores/cm2 was recorded in Eclipta prostrata and minimum in Stellaria media. Keywords-: Leaf extract, Medicinal plants, Paecilomyces lilacinus. INTRODUCTION Medicinal plants as a group, comprise approximately 8,000 species and account for around 50% of all the higher flowering plant species of India. India possesses almost 8% of the estimated biodiversity of the world with around 0.126% million species. India is one of the 12 mega biodiversity centers with 2 hot-spot of biodiversity in Western Ghat and North-Eastern Region. Chenopodium album It is the fast growing weedy plant belonging to the family Chenopodiaceae. Plant bears seeds which are high in protein, vitamin A, calcium, phosphorus and potassium. The leaves contain considerable amount of soluble oxalate that interact with calcium and induces hypocalcemia. -
On the Flora of Australia
L'IBRARY'OF THE GRAY HERBARIUM HARVARD UNIVERSITY. BOUGHT. THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA, ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION; BEING AN TO THE FLORA OF TASMANIA. BY JOSEPH DALTON HOOKER, M.D., F.R.S., L.S., & G.S.; LATE BOTANIST TO THE ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION. LONDON : LOVELL REEVE, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. r^/f'ORElGN&ENGLISH' <^ . 1859. i^\BOOKSELLERS^.- PR 2G 1.912 Gray Herbarium Harvard University ON THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION. I I / ON THE FLORA OF AUSTRALIA, ITS ORIGIN, AFFINITIES, AND DISTRIBUTION; BEIKG AN TO THE FLORA OF TASMANIA. BY JOSEPH DALTON HOOKER, M.D., F.R.S., L.S., & G.S.; LATE BOTANIST TO THE ANTARCTIC EXPEDITION. Reprinted from the JJotany of the Antarctic Expedition, Part III., Flora of Tasmania, Vol. I. LONDON : LOVELL REEVE, HENRIETTA STREET, COVENT GARDEN. 1859. PRINTED BY JOHN EDWARD TAYLOR, LITTLE QUEEN STREET, LINCOLN'S INN FIELDS. CONTENTS OF THE INTRODUCTORY ESSAY. § i. Preliminary Remarks. PAGE Sources of Information, published and unpublished, materials, collections, etc i Object of arranging them to discuss the Origin, Peculiarities, and Distribution of the Vegetation of Australia, and to regard them in relation to the views of Darwin and others, on the Creation of Species .... iii^ § 2. On the General Phenomena of Variation in the Vegetable Kingdom. All plants more or less variable ; rate, extent, and nature of variability ; differences of amount and degree in different natural groups of plants v Parallelism of features of variability in different groups of individuals (varieties, species, genera, etc.), and in wild and cultivated plants vii Variation a centrifugal force ; the tendency in the progeny of varieties being to depart further from their original types, not to revert to them viii Effects of cross-impregnation and hybridization ultimately favourable to permanence of specific character x Darwin's Theory of Natural Selection ; — its effects on variable organisms under varying conditions is to give a temporary stability to races, species, genera, etc xi § 3. -
2Nd Lone Star Native Regional Plant Conference
Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference SFA Gardens 2003 2nd Lone Star Native Regional Plant Conference David Creech Stephen F. Austin State University Greg Grant Stephen F. Austin State University Mark Norman Stephen F. Austin State University Dawn Parish Stephen F. Austin State University Matt Welch Stephen F. Austin State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/sfa_gardens_lonestar Part of the Other Forestry and Forest Sciences Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Creech, David; Grant, Greg; Norman, Mark; Parish, Dawn; and Welch, Matt, "2nd Lone Star Native Regional Plant Conference" (2003). Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference. 1. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/sfa_gardens_lonestar/1 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the SFA Gardens at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Table of Contents Welcome by David Creech Allen, Wildflowers of Louisiana 5 Breunig, Does Our Mission Matter? 10 Ferguson, The Role of Organic Materials in Gardening 12 Foss, The Texas Wildscapes Program 19 Freeborg, Native Plants and the Hydrological Cycle 24 Goodspeed, Jenkins, Midgley, What's Hot Panel Discussion 30 Grant, Running Wild With the Public 38 Hosage, Natural Historians ofTexas 39 Kip hart, Texas Roadsides: An Endangered Species? -
Rare Plant Register
1 BSBI RARE PLANT REGISTER Berkshire & South Oxfordshire V.C. 22 MICHAEL J. CRAWLEY FRS UPDATED APRIL 2005 2 Symbols and conventions The Latin binomial (from Stace, 1997) appears on the left of the first line in bold, followed by the authority in Roman font and the English Name in italics. Names on subsequent lines in Roman font are synonyms (including names that appear in Druce’s (1897) or Bowen’s (1964) Flora of Berkshire that are different from the name of the same species in Stace). At the right hand side of the first line is a set of symbols showing - status (if non-native) - growth form - flowering time - trend in abundance (if any) The status is one of three categories: if the plant arrived in Britain after the last ice age without the direct help of humans it is defined as a native, and there is no symbol in this position. If the archaeological or documentary evidence indicates that a plant was brought to Berkshire intentionally of unintentionally by people, then that species is an alien. The alien species are in two categories ● neophytes ○ archaeophytes Neophytes are aliens that were introduced by people in recent times (post-1500 by convention) and for which we typically have precise dates for their first British and first Berkshire records. Neophytes may be naturalized (forming self-replacing populations) or casual (relying on repeated introduction). Archaeophytes are naturalized aliens that were carried about by people in pre-historic times, either intentionally for their utility, or unintentionally as contaminants of crop seeds. Archaeophytes were typically classified as natives in older floras. -
Behavior of Euphorbia Heterophylla Seed Bank. Vernon B
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1983 Behavior of Euphorbia Heterophylla Seed Bank. Vernon B. Langston Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Langston, Vernon B., "Behavior of Euphorbia Heterophylla Seed Bank." (1983). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 3929. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/3929 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This reproduction was made from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this document, the quality of the reproduction is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help clarify markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is “Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark, it is an indication of either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, duplicate copy, or copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed. -
Brushy Peak Regional Preserve Checklist of Wild Plants Sorted Alphabetically by Growth Form, Scientific Name
Brushy Peak Regional Preserve Checklist of Wild Plants Sorted Alphabetically by Growth Form, Scientific Name This is a comprehensive list of the wild plants reported to be found in Brushy Peak Regional Preserve. The plants are sorted alphabetically by growth form, then by sci- entific name. This list includes the common name, family, status, invasiveness rating, origin, longevity, habitat, and bloom dates. EBRPD plant names that have changed since the 1993 Jepson Manual are listed alphabetically in an appendix. Column Heading Description Checklist column for marking off the plants you observe Scientific Name According to The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition (JM2) and eFlora (ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html) (JM93 if different) If the scientific name used in the 1993 edition of The Jepson Manual (JM93) is different, the change is noted as (JM93: xxx) Common Name According to JM2 and other references (not standardized) Family Scientific family name according to JM2, abbreviated by replacing the “aceae” ending with “-” (ie. Asteraceae = Aster-) Status Special status rating (if any), listed in 3 categories, divided by vertical bars (‘|’): Federal/California (Fed./Calif.) | California Native Plant Society (CNPS) | East Bay chapter of the CNPS (EBCNPS) Fed./Calif.: FE = Fed. Endangered, FT = Fed. Threatened, CE = Calif. Endangered, CR = Calif. Rare CNPS (online as of 2012-01-23): 1B = Rare, threatened or endangered in Calif, 3 = Review List, 4 = Watch List; 0.1 = Seriously endangered in California, 0.2 = Fairly endangered in California EBCNPS (online as of 2012-01-23): *A = Statewide listed rare; A1 = 2 East Bay regions or less; A1x = extirpated; A2 = 3-5 regions; B = 6-9 Inv California Invasive Plant Council Inventory (Cal-IPCI) Invasiveness rating: H = High, L = Limited, M = Moderate, N = Native OL Origin and Longevity. -
Pocket Field Guide to Kentucky's Common Weeds and Other Unwanted Plants
US EPA Source Reduction Assistance Grant X9-96479407- 0 SRAG - 300 A publication of the Louisville Water Company, Local Planning Team for the Wellhead Protection Plan Pocket Field Guide to US EPA Source Reduction Assistance Grant X9-96479407-0 Kentucky’s Common Weeds SRAG - 300 and Louisville Water Company 550 S. 3rd Street Louisville, KY 40202 Other Unwanted Plants 502-569-3600 http://www.louisvilleky.gov/LWC For additional copies, or more information, contact: Marsha Taylor Meyer Wellhead Protection Coordinator Louisville Water Company Winner of the Exemplary Source Water Protection Award, 2009, Common Dandelion, American Water Works Association 2009 Outstanding Watershed Project Kentucky-Tennessee Water Environment Association Page 20 Page 1 Most of the species listed here may be controlled by a 2% Common Weeds glyphosate solution, which is the approximate solution found in A weed is any plant, considered by the user, to be a nuisance, and many pre-mixed products. Again, READ THE LABEL carefully to is normally applied to unwanted plants in human-made settings, make sure you are purchasing a glyphosate solution that is 1.8% - like a garden, lawn, agricultural area, parks, woods, or other 2%. A lesser amount may not kill the weed successfully. natural settings. More specifically, the term is applied to Exceptions to the 2% rule include: describe native or non-native plants that grow and reproduce Chinese Yam 30% Common Reed* aggressively. Privet 20% Winter Creeper 4% Weeds may be unwanted because they are unsightly, or they limit Common Burdock 20% Common Teasel 12% the growth of other plants by blocking light or using up nutrients *The Common Reed should be controlled by a licensed herbicide from the soil. -
Southern Ontario Vascular Plant Species List
Southern Ontario Vascular Plant Species List (Sorted by Scientific Name) Based on the Ontario Plant List (Newmaster et al. 1998) David J. Bradley Southern Science & Information Section Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources Peterborough, Ontario Revised Edition, 2007 Southern Ontario Vascular Plant Species List This species checklist has been compiled in order to assist field biologists who are sampling vegetative plots in Southern Ontario. It is not intended to be a complete species list for the region. The intended range for this vascular plant list is Ecoregions (Site Regions) 5E, 6E and 7E. i Nomenclature The nomenclature used for this listing of 2,532 plant species, subspecies and varieties, is in accordance with the Ontario Plant List (OPL), 1998 [see Further Reading for full citation]. This is the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resource’s publication which has been selected as the corporate standard for plant nomenclature. There have been many nomenclatural innovations in the past several years since the publication of the Ontario Plant List that are not reflected in this listing. However, the OPL has a listing of many of the synonyms that have been used recently in the botanical literature. For a more up to date listing of scientific plant names visit either of the following web sites: Flora of North America - http://www.efloras.org/flora_page.aspx?flora_id=1 NatureServe - http://www.natureserve.org/explorer/servlet/NatureServe?init=Species People who are familiar with the Natural Heritage Information Centre (NHIC) plant species list for Ontario, will notice some changes in the nomenclature. For example, most of the Aster species have now been put into the genus Symphyotrichum, with a few into the genus Eurybia.