28Th March 2016 EIA Presentation

Proceedings for 161st Meeting of SEAC held on 28th and 29th March 2016

28th March 2016 Members Present in the meeting:

Shri. N. Naganna - Chairman Prof. D.L. Manjunath - Member Dr. S. Manjappa - Member Dr. B.S. Jayaprakash - Member Dr. M.I. Hussain - Member Shri. B. Chikkappaiah - Member Dr. N. Krishnamurthy - Member Dr. S. Prashanth - Member Dr. K.C. Jayaramu - Member Shri H. Srinivasaiah - Member Dr. K.B. Umesh - Member Shri. M. Subramany - Member Shri. Vijaya Kumar - Secretary

The Chairman, SEAC, Karnataka welcomed the members of the Committee and others present. The following proposals listed in the agenda were appraised in accordance of the provision of EIA Notification 2006. The observation and decision of the Committee are recorded under each of the agenda items.

Confirmation of the proceedings of 160th SEAC meeting held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016.

The State Expert Appraisal Committee, Karnataka perused the proceedings of 160th SEAC meeting held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 and confirmed the same.

A special meeting of SEAC was convened on 17-03-2016 at 4.00 PM in the chambers of the Secretary, Environment & Ecology, Forest, Ecology & Environment Dept., and Room. No. 709, 7th floor, MS building, Bangalore, to discuss the Notification No. S.O.648(E) dated 03-03- 2016 issued by MoEF & CC. The committee perused the proceedings & confirmed the same. EIA Presentation:

161.1 Establishment of Industrial Areas at Adakanahalli Industrial Area, Adakanahalli Village, Nanjangud Taluk, Mysore District. 222.75 Ha (550 Acres) of CEO & Executive Member, 14/3, 2nd Floor, Rashtrothana Parishat Building (RP), Nrupatunga Road, Bengaluru - 560 001.(SEIAA 11 IND 2013)

Project Proponent: CEO & Executive Member, KIADB Environment Consultant: M/s. Ramky Enviro Engineers Limited

M/s. Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) have applied for EC for their proposed new project “Development of Adakanahalli Industrial Area at various Sy. Nos. of Adakanahalli Village” in Nanjangud Taluk & Mysore District.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

Common Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) and Common Sewage Treatment Plant (CSTP) are proposed for treatment of Trade Effluent and domestic sewage respectively.

Project Details: (1) Total Plot Area: 222.75 Hectares (550 Acres); (2) Total requirement & source of water: Quantum not indicated. Source is Kabini River (3) Total power requirement: 5 MW through KPTCL and Stand by provision for DG Set 2500 KVA X 1 No.

1. Details of Project site surroundings within 15 km radius:  Kabini River-1.5 km (SW),  Dodadahalli Talnk-4.5 km (NW),  Undabatto Kere -5.0 km (NW),  Kashi Vishwanatha Swamy Temple – 3.5 km (S),  Chamundi Hill – 8 km (N),  Varuna Lake – 7.5 km (NE),  Halepura Kere – 11 km (S) and  Thandavapura – 1.5 km (W). 2. Densely Populated:  Nanjangud – 5 km South direction,  Thandavapura – 1.2 km west direction,  Kadakola – 2.5 km North West direction,  Yechagalli – 3 km West direction,  Bokkahalli – 4 km South-East direction and  Basavanapura – 2.5 km South direction.

The Proponent have furnished the Gazette Notification dated 22.11.2007 under Rule 28(4) of Karnataka Industrial Area Development Rules, 1956 issued by C&I Department for land to an extent of 531-03 Acres ; Gazette Notification dated 03.04.2008 under Rule 28(4) of Karnataka Industrial Area Development Rules, 1956 issued by C&I Department for land to an extent of 546-25 Acres and Gazette Notification dated 27.05.2010 under Rule 28(4) of Karnataka Industrial Area Development Rules, 1956 issued by C&I Department for land to an extent of 318-18 Acres for Acquisition for the said purpose.

Project proponent have furnished PFR & proposed ToR along with the application.

EIA Consultant presented the proposal before the Committee including the proposed ToR in the 103rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th May 2013. On observation that the land is not in possession of KIADB,the Committee suggested that the EIA should be carried out only after possession of the land as the study pertains to proposed land and EC issued only for the land in possession of KIADB. Also, the project proponent brought to the notice of the Committee that only orange & green industries are proposed to be established in the said area.

The Committee observed that the location of the proposed project site is such that it is contiguous to the existing Thandya industrial estate where granite polishing units are established. Therefore, the Committee felt the sensitivity of the ambient air quality, quality of

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

surface & ground water and hence proposed following additional ToRs apart from general ToR and the proposed ToR,

1. Extensive study on health status of habitants in nearby villages. 2. Extensive study on meteorological data including air quality model studies. 3. Extensive water quality analysis of all bore wells in Thandya industrial estate. 4. Document for possession of land to be incorporated in the EIA.

Accordingly ToR was issued on 13.06.2013. The proponent submitted the EIA report vide letter dated 12.01.2016. The project proponent and NABET accredited EIA coordinator Sri. V. Vijay Kumar from M/s. Ramky Enviro Engineers Pvt. Ltd. were present in the meeting and presented the EIA report. The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility report, EIA report, and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed the following points.

1. Regarding water requirement for the project, the proponent has submitted a letter from Irrigation department allocating 5 MGD water to be drawn from Kabini river near Nanjanagud, but, there is no specific mention about quantity of water allocated for this project. And also the letter was given in 1991 and latest position of availability of water is not known & the proponent has failed to explain the same. The recent letter from the irrigation department regarding availability of water is to be submitted along with the competitive users and the impact of the same. 2. The recent meteorological data has not submitted. 3. The allotment of 20 KLD/Ha for green belt is on higher which is for Irrigation purpose & for green belt it is much lower. 4. List of Industries coming in the proposed layout & their water requirement is not submitted. 5. It is informed that, for the establishment of common ETP, the inlet standards are fixed and the proponent has to put a condition for the industries establishing in the area, they have to abide to this and let out the effluents, meeting to the inlet standards fixed for CETP which can be prescribed as one of the conditions to member industries. 6. The date of collection of base line data is not mentioned in the report. 7. The Xerox copies of analysis reports are submitted. 8. in surface water analysis, the presence of Fluoride is noticed which may be verified. 9. There is Irrigation canals running in the proposed industrial layout. The proponent informed that, since, the entire area is acquired, there is no Irrigation in that area & hence canals are closed. In this regard, a letter from the Irrigation department is to be obtained & submitted. 10. During Public hearing, there was a question that, houses are abutting to the industrial area. But the proponent informed that, a minimum distance of 150 m has been

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

maintained. The proponent has been asked to submit a letter from the village panchayat regarding distance from the industrial area to the houses. 11. Replies submitted to the public hearing is not convincing. The concerns raised by the persons during public hearing are not addressed properly. 12. Regarding additional ToR’s, health studies of nearby villages is not done which may be conducted and submitted & meteorological data is collected considering SPM instead of P.M.2.5 They should have considered AAQMS protocol of 2009 13. Regarding monitoring of soil erosion, details are not given. 14. In the layout plan, the residential zone is kept on the western side of the village & it is suggested to relocate the same towards the north side which is adjoining village side. 15. There was no mention in the report regarding the protection of existing water ponds. Scheme for the same may be given 16. Land acquisition details not submitted.

The committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the revised EIA report incorporating the above observations.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information. Referred Back from Authority:

161.2 Expansion and Modification of Sugar factory of capacity from 4000 TCD to 5500 TCD and additional power generation of 15 MW (12 to 27 MW) at Sankonatti,Athani,Belgaum of M/s Krishna Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamit (KSSKN), Sankonatti Post- 591304, Athani Taluk, Belgaum District (SEIAA 26 IND 2015)

M/s. Krishna Sahakari Sakkare Karkhane Niyamit (KSSKN), have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for expansion and Modernization of Sugar Unit, at Sy. No.s 1141, 1142, 1143, 1136, 1137, 225 and 226 of Sankonatti Village, Athani Taluk and Belgaum District under category B.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 150th meeting of SEAC held on 7th, 8th and 9th October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility report, Conceptual Plan, and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the following information.

1. Before submission of EIA report, permission from competent authority for getting additional water 2. Explore the possibility of using the recycled water avoiding fresh water demand. 3. Development of green belt area all round the project area with list of species proposed for plantation.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The proponent was invited for the 157th meeting of SEAC held on 11th, 12th and 13th January 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The Committee had decided to provide final opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The proposal was placed before the SEAC in the 159th SEAC meeting held on 22nd and 23rd February 2016.

The proponent has submitted the EMP data on the day of meeting.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted and agreed with the replies. The proponent informed the committee that, though the capacity is increased, they are not using coal as fuel and only bagass will be used as fuel. The Secretary, SEAC informed the committee that the proposal has to be appraised as category B1 under EIA Notification 2006. Since, the committee has appraised the proposal as B2 in its earlier meeting and further information sought by the proponent for appraisal, the committee decided to appraise the proposal as B2. The committee observed that, the botanical names for the species proposed to be planted in green belt is not given.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after submission of botanical names of the species to be planted in green belt area.

The Authority perused the proposal and took note of the recommendation of the SEAC during the 113th SEIAA meeting held on 8th February 2016.

The Authority noted that as per the OM No. J-13012/12/2013-IA-II (I) dated 24th December, 2013, the proposed activity is to be appraised as B1 category activity, whereas the SEAC have recommended the proposal as a B2 category activity without adequate justification and the recommendation is not in accordance with the said OM of MoEF. Hence, the Authority is in disagreement with the recommendation of SEAC.

The Authority therefore decided to refer the proposal back to SEAC to appraise as B1 category activity following the due procedure of law and send the recommendation deemed fit based on the merit.

The committee took note of the Authority and decided to appraise the proposal as B1 Category activity.

The project proponent attended the meeting of SEAC to receive the ToRs.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre-feasibility report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion decided to appraise the proposal as B1 and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue Standard ToR for conducting EIA study in 5

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

accordance with EIA Notification 2006 along with public consultation process and the relevant guidelines. The proponent has informed the committee that, since they have already undertaken base line data studies, and requested the committee to exempt from collecting fresh base line data. The committee after examining the report submitted, decided to exempt the proponent from collecting fresh base line data. The committee also decided to prescribe the following additional ToR.

1. The proponent may improve the process by reducing the consumption of steam to ton of cane crushing explain the medication and improvement made in the process 2. Impact on the traffic due to increase in movement of vehicles due to expansion of the project and also considering the other developments in the region including expansions of other industries. 3. Availability of the sugar cane for increase in capacity considering the expansions of other industries in the region and its impact. 4. Expansion of co-generation capacity fuel used availability and its justification with no of days of operation, disposal waste of generated in the industry be given 5. Availability of land for disposal of treated waste water along with quality and quantity of total waste water generated to be given.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for issuing of ToRs

161.3 Expansion of Specialty Detergent Liquid Blend, Bio fuel Briquette, Detergent Bars & Scouring Bars Project at Plot No.61 & 62 of Koorandahally Village, Malur Taluk, Kolara District of M/s. ECOF INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.Plot No.61 & 62 KIADB Industrial Area, Malur Taluk, Kolara District - 563130. (SEIAA 28 IND 2015)

M/s. ECOF Industries Pvt. Ltd., have applied for Environmental Clearance from SEIAA for their proposed Expansion of additional Product Manufacturing at Plot No.61 & 62, Malur KIADB Industrial area, Malur-563130, Kolar District.

This is a project falling under the category 5(f) of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006, Under Category – B. The total land area is 8,036 Sq.mts, Existing factory area 2,374 Sq.mts, proposed Expansion is 1,372 Sq.mts, Total plot area is 3,746 Sq.mts.

1. Proposed Activity: The proposed activity will involve in the Expansion of additional

product manufacturing of

1. Specialty Detergent Liquid Blend. 2. Biofuel Briquette 3. Detergent Bars & scouring bars.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

2. Proposed Manufacturing Capacities:

Sl. Proposed capacity in Product Existing No. MT Capacity Per Month (in MT)

Sugar Esters 1 360 -

2 CAPB 50 - 3 CDEA 25 - Detergent Scouring New machinery will be 4 Powder 2000 installled

New machinery will be Detergent Powder 3000 5 installed

Specialty Detergent - 1500 6 Liquid Blend

7. Biofuel/Briquettes - 300 Detergent - 8. Bar/scouring Bar 2000

3. Capital Investment: Rs.6,00,00,000/- (Six Crore Rupees only)

4. Water Requirement: The water used for expansion is fully consumed in the process. Thus no additional water is required. The Source of water is from the KIADB water supply.

5. Solid Waste Management: Total ash generated in the project is 500 Kg/day; will be

disposed as manure, given to farmers. 6. Hazardous waste management: Waste oil of 200 kg/year will be generated from the industry as spent lubricants and coolants from gear and D.G. sets. The total quantity thus generated is small in quantity which shall be sold to the reprocessors.

7. Energy Requirement: The power requirement for the proposed project is 25 KVA obtained from BESCOM. 500 KVA DG set will be installed for emergency power supply during power failure.

8. Green Belt Development: Proposed to develop in 2,700 Sq.mts

9. Enclosures: Sample Test Reports, Analysis reports, Plant layout

The proponent was invited for the 152nd meeting of SEAC held on 2nd and 3rd November 2015 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent with intimation.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Committee had decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report and clarification/information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance after the submission of the following information.

1. Combined water balance chart (Existing & proposed) 2. Comparative statement between earlier (for which EC issued) & and present proposal 3. Details of energy and water requirement

The Authority perused the proposal and took note of the recommendation of SEAC along with the reply submitted by the proponent vide letter dated 17.12.2015 during the 111th SEIAA meeting held on 11th January 2016.

The Authority noted that as per the OM No. J-13012/12/2013-IA-II (I) dated 24th December, 2013, the activities listed at Sl. No. 5(f) of schedule to EIA Notification, 2006 are to be appraised as B1 category activity, whereas the minutes of SEAC meeting do not reveal as to how the project has been recommended for Environmental Clearance. The Authority therefore decided to refer the proposal back to SEAC to appraise as B1 category activity following the due procedure of law and send the recommendation deemed fit based on merit.

The committee took note of the Authority and noted that the activity is not covered under EIA Notification 2006. Since it is an expansion project for which the EC has been issued by SEIAA vide letter No. SEIAA 10 IND 2012 dated 24th November 2012 the Committee had decided to recommend the proposal for issue of modification of EC in its earlier meeting. Now the proposal is referred back to SEAC to appraise the proposal as B1 Category from SEIAA. Hence, the committee decided to defer the proposal to next meeting and get the clarification on OM No. J-13012/12/2013-IA-II (I) dated 24th December, 2013, Sl. No. 5(f) of schedule to EIA Notification, 2006 from the Authority and to take appropriate decision

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal after getting the clarity on the above matter.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.4 Proposed Residential & Commercial Building at Sy.No.119/1, 119/2D, 119/3D, 119/4B, 119/5B, 119/6B, 120/1, 120/2, 120/3B, 120/4B, 120/5B, 120/6B, 123/1, 123/2, 123/3, 125/5 and 126 of Pantharapalya Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urbna District of Sri. P.K. Mishra, Vice President, M/s. Salarpuria Properties Pvt. Ltd., #3, 4th floor, Salarpuria Windsor, Ulsoor Road, Bangalore-560 042. (SEIAA 21 CON 2015)

This is a proposal submitted by M/s. Salarpuria Properties Pvt. Ltd., seeking Environmental Clearance for Construction of Residential and Commercial Building Project on a plot area of 44009.22 Sq.mts at Sy.No’s 119/1, 119/2D, 119/3D, 119/4B, 119/5B, 119/6B, 120/1, 120/2, 120/3B, 120/4B, 120/5B, 120/6B, 123/1, 123/2, 123/3, 125/5 and 126 of Pantharapalya Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urban District. The total built up area of 17,8200 Sq.mts.

Total water requirement of for Residential & Club House is 580 KLD. 464 KLD of waste water expected is proposed to be treated in a STP of 475 KLD capacity. For Commercial Building the total water requirement is 200 KLD 160 KLD of waste water expected is proposed to be treated in a STP of capacity 160 KLD .

Municipal Solid waste of 2637 Kgs/day (Includes 1747 Kgs/day Residential + 890 Kgs/day Commercial ) is proposed to be handled Insitu

Parking facility for 405 Nos.vehicle is proposed to be provided.

Total energy requirement for Residential Building and Club House is 6364 KVA and for Commercial Building is 1721 KVA proposed to obtained from BESCOM. It is proposed to establish 750 KVA x 2 Nos and 2 x 500 KVA of DG Sets for Residential Building and Club House and 750 KVA x 3 No’s for Commercial Building to meet the energy requirement in case of non-supplies.

Total Estimated excavated earth is 52995 Cum. Filling done to fill up low lying areas at site is about 25200 Cum.

It is proposed to develop a Greenbelt of 22.8%.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 133rd meeting of SEAC held on 19th and 20th March 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to appraise the proposal as B1 as the built up area is more than 1,50,000 Sqm and decided to issue Standard ToR for conducting EIA study in accordance with EIA Notification 2006 and the relevant guidelines. The committee also decided to prescribe the following additional ToR.

1. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an appropriate plan thereof with due calculations.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

2. Scheme for providing dual fuel generators for backup power with provision for CNG. 3. Scheme for utilisation of entire Rain Water harvested in the project site (both from the roof top and from the surface runoff) within the Project premises only. 4. Details of excavated earth and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal site 5. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow. 6. Explore the possibility to increase greenery in the ground itself 7. Explore the possibility of increasing the use of treated water in order to reduce the fresh water demand 8. Scheme of treating sewage and sullage separately and use of treated water within the project site 9. Due diligence report

Accordingly the ToR was issued on 31.03.2015.

The project proponent has submitted the EIA report vide letter dated 08.09.2015.

The proponent was invited for the 152nd meeting of SEAC held on 2nd and 3rd November 2015 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent with intimation.

The Committee had decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

Some of the committee members have expressed that they have not received the materials. Since it is an EIA project without the materials, it is not possible to appraise the proposal.

The committee after discussion decided to defer the proposal providing one more opportunity to the proponent in the subsequent meeting.

The proponent and the Environmental Consultant are invited for the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015 to provide required clarification/information. But they remained absent.

The committee observed that, the proponent remained absent for the third time after submitting the EIA report. Since it is an EIA project, the committee felt that, it cannot be appraised in the absence of the proponent & consultant.

The committee after discussion had decided to recommend the proposal for closure.

The Authority perused the proposal during the 112th SEIAA meeting held on 28th January 2016 and took note of the recommendation of SEAC. The Authority opined that since it is a project wherein EIA report has been submitted, one more opportunity need to be 10

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

provided with prior intimation as required under the notification. The proposal need to be appraised based on the information available in Form 1, 1A, Conceptual plan and EIA report.

The Authority therefore decided to refer the file back to SEAC to provide one more opportunity to the proponent for the presentation and to appraise the proposal following the due procedure of law.

The committee took note of the decision of the Authority and decided to invite the proponent for appraisal.

The proponent and EIA Consultant are invited for the SEAC meeting to provide required clarification/information. But the proponent remained absent.

The proponent submitted the letter dated 26.03.2016 requesting to consider their proposal in the next SEAC meeting as their MoEF Consultant Mr. M. Kori & Mr. Hemanth is not able to present the proposal.

The committee decided to defer the proposal as requested by the proponent providing final opportunity with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in the subsequent meeting.

161.5 Limestone Mining Project, Sy.Nos.115/1, 116/1 &130/3 of Lakapur Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot Dist. (4.92 Ha) of Sri Venkappa R.B. Patil Jalikatti B.K. Lokapur Post, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District - 587 122 (SEIAA 484 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal and production Expansion proposal submitted by Sri Venkappa R.B. Patil, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Limestone in an area of 4.92 Ha at Sy.Nos.115/1, 116/1 &130/3 of Lokapur Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The Quarry plan has been prepared by RQP Dr.S.K.Myageri approved by Indian Bureau of Mines. Capacity of mining is Avg. 1,00,000 TPA.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 143rd meeting of SEAC held on 24th to 29th July 2015 to give clarification/additional information.

The Committee noted that many proposals have been cleared in this area and if the proposed area is likely to result in to a cluster situation with a total lease area of 25 Ha or more as defined in the O.M dated 24.12.2013 issued by the Ministry of Envoronment and Forest, Government of India then the proposal has to be appraised category B1. The committee therefore directed the proponent to get the details of all the leases of Lakapur village with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The committee observed that the proponent have not submitted the NA. The proponent stated that they have not applied for NA. Therefore the committee directed the proponent to get the NA. The committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 09.11.2015.

The proponent was invited for the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The committee observed that the proponent have not submitted the combined sketch sought by the committee.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan.

The committee opined that the appraisal cannot be completed for want of the above information and since the proponent also remained absent to provide the required clarification.

The committee therefore had decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

The Authority during the meeting held on 17th December 2015 had perused the proposal and took note of the recommendation of SEAC. The Authority had decided to close the file and delist from the pendency.

Subsequently, it was noticed that by oversight representation dated 4.12.2015 submitted by the proponent requesting not to close the file could not be placed before the Authority. The proponent have stated that the delay is due to non-receipt of combined sketch from the Department Mines and Geology.

The subject was therefore placed before the Authority for consideration. The Authority perused the reply submitted by the proponent vide letter dated 4.12.2015.

The Authority after discussion decided to refer the file back to SEAC for appraisal following the due procedure of law.

The committee took note of the decision of the Authority and also reviewed the reply submitted by the proponent vide letter dated 28.03.2016. The committee noted that as per the Gazette Notification No. S.O. 423 (E) dated 10.02.2015, The central Government declares the list of minerals as minor minerals. The lime stone does not come under minor minerals. The committee therefore decided to appraise the proposal as B1 category and also decided to invite the proponent to receive the standard ToRs and additional site specific ToRs if any. Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in the subsequent meeting.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.6 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.47 of Mahanthalingapura Village, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru District (2-30 Acres) (QL No.710) (SEIAA 691 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri. V.Nagaraja, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building stone in an area of 2.30 Acres at Sy.no. 47 of Mahanthalingapura Village, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru District. It is a Govt. Gomala Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri. B.N.Krishnamurthy and approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bengaluru. Capacity of mining is Av. 20,660 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 146th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th August 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The proponent stated that the quarry site is 1.3 Km from the Bannergatta National Park.

The Committee noted that if the proposed area is likely to result in to a cluster situation with a total lease area of 5 Ha or more.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. An undertaking that the proponent shall make the approach road pucca by providing GSB, WMM & asphalting. 2. All the leases of Sy. No. 47 and adjacent Sy Nos with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 14.10.2015.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant are invited for the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. But they remained absent.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted by the proponent. The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application- Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that clearance from BNP not submitted.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the NOC from BNP.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The proposal was again placed before the committed during the 157th meeting of SEAC held on 11th, 12th and 13th January 2016.

The proponent has not submitted the NOC from BNP. Since, the proposed quarry lies within 5 Km from the BNP boundary, the committee observed that, already proposals to an extent of 12.12 acres (threshold limit for Eco Sensitive Zone) have been recommended for EC by the committee. Therefore the committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

The Authority perused the proposal during the 113th meeting of SEIAA held on 8th February 2016 and took note of the recommendation of SEAC. The Authority noted that as per the Notification No. S.O.141(E) dated 15th January 2016, the activity of mining of minor minerals of category ‘B2’ (upto 25 Ha of mining lease area) is exempted from applicability of General Condition.

The Authority therefore had decided to refer the proposal back to SEAC for appraisal in the light of this amendment.

The committee took note of the decision of the Authority and also noted the OM issued by MoEF & CC, New Delhi dated 15.03.2016. Since the proposal has been referred back from Authority for appraisal, it amounts to fresh appraisal. The committee opined that as per above OM it is not appropriate to appraise the proposal. Hence, the committee decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.7 Black Granite Quarry Project, Sy.Nos.157, 158, 159/2, 159/3, 169/2 & 169/3 of Meluru Village, Chamarajanagar Taluk & Dist. (6-03 Acres) of M/s. Sanria Homes Pvt. Ltd. No.37, Classic Orchids, Behind Meenakshi Temple, Bannerghatta Main Road, Bangalore -560076 (SEIAA 871 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by M/s. Sanria Homes Pvt. Ltd, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Black Granite in an area of 6-03 Acres at Sy.Nos.157, 158, 159/2, 159/3, 169/2 & 169/3 of Meluru Village, Chamarajanagar Taluk & District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.M.Sudheendra Kumar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is Av. 1,424 Cu.m/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 150th meeting of SEAC held on 7th, 8th and 9th October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

lease area is 6.03 Acre and the land use plan is approved for 6.03 Acres instead of 2 Acre 36 Gunta

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the clarification regarding the land use plan by DMG.

The proponent and Environmental Consultant/RQP attended the 157th meeting of SEAC held on 11th, 12th and 13th January 2016 to provide required clarification and additional information.

The proponent has submitted the reply on the day of meeting vide letter dated 11.01.2016.

The committee not accepted the reply.

The committee therefore had decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

The Authority perused the proposal during the 113th meeting of SEIAA held on 8th February 2016 and took note of the recommendation of SEAC.

The Authority noted that the proposal has been recommended for closure without due appraisal and without assigning proper reason. The proposal need to be appraised based on the information available in Form-1, pre-feasibility report and quarry plan. The SEAC may recommend the proposal for a suitable decision either for issue of E.C or for rejection based on merit as the case may be.

The Authority therefore had decided to refer back the file to SEAC for further appraisal.

The Proponent attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The proponent has submitted the corrected copy of the quarry sketch approved by DMG vide letter dated 22.03.2016.

The committee agreed with the reply made by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the following conditions in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

1. Safe drinking water has to be provided at the quarry site. 2. The project proponent shall construct the compound wall all along the lease boundary 3. Dust suppression measures have to be strictly followed. 4. Project Proponent to plant fruit yielding and shade bearing tree species namely Pongemia pinneta (Honge), Jatorpha,Ficus riligiosa(Arali) Ficus bengahalensis as agreed by project proponent on the day of meeting in the areas outside the lease.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

5. Project Proponent shall prevent damage to adjoining government land from fire due to activities during quarrying operation. 6. Haulage approach road should not be through villages till the main road is reached. 7. As agreed by Project Proponent plantation to an extent of 33% in the project area has to be carried out. 8. The drilling machines Employed shall be fitted with dust extraction unit while undertake quarrying activity.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.8 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.129/2D & 129/2C, Syed Chincholi Village, Kalaburagi Village, Kalaburgi Taluk, Kalaburgi District (7-0 Acres) of Sri.Khaleel Masood Ali, #- E/41220,E/4/1151 to E/4/1312,Bhagawan Galli, Bavani Nagar, Kalaburgi -585103. (SEIAA 1197 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri.Khaleel Masood Ali seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 7-0 Acres¸ at Sy.No.129/2D & 129/2C, Syed Chincholi Village, Kalaburagi Village, Kalaburgi Taluk, Kalaburgi District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri.B.N.Krishnamurthy and approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Kalaburgi. Capacity of mining is Avg. 12,016 Tonnes per annum.

The proponent was invited for the 151st meeting of SEAC held on 19th, 20th and 21st October 2015 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The committee appraised the proposal in his absence considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining and additional information provided in the file. The committee observed that since the quarry area is patta land, the proponent has not submitted the approach road details.

The proponent was asked to submit the above information.

The Committee had decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The proponent was invited for the 158th meeting of SEAC held on 27th and 28th January 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent for the second time.

The committee appraised the proposal in his absence considering the information provided in the statutory application Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and additional information provided in the file. The committee observed that the proponent has not 16

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

submitted the approach road detail which was asked by the committee in its earlier meeting. The committee opined that the appraisal cannot be completed for want of the above information and since the proponent also remained absent to provide the required clarification.

The committee therefore had decided recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

The proponent vide letter dated 11.02.2016 have submitted the revised Form1, EMP, Pre- feasibility report & approved modified quarry plan to the Authority.

The Authority perused the proposal during the 114th meeting of SEIAA held on 26th February 2016 and took note of the recommendation of SEAC. The Authority perused the reply submitted by the proponent vide letter dated 11.02.2016.

The Authority after discussion decided to refer the file back to SEAC for appraisal taking the information furnished by the proponent to consideration.

The proposal has been deferred to the next meeting as the proposal has not been discussed in the meeting.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in the subsequent meeting.

161.9 Building Stone Quarrry Project at Sy.No.69, Shivanahalli Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District 2.0 Acres (0.80 Ha) of M/s. Kushal Stone Crushers, Sri. R.D. Rajanna, No.165, Ragihalli Village, Jigani Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District. (SEIAA 1208 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by M/s. Kushal Stone Crushers seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres¸ at Sy.No.69, Shivanahalli Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore District. It is a Govt. Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri.Ramachandra.K.T. approved by Senior Geologist, Dept of Mines & Geology, Bangalore Urban District. Capacity of mining is Avg. 30,000 TPA.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant appeared before the committee during the 151st meeting of SEAC held on 19th, 20th and 21st October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the proposed quarry area is falls within 5 km from the interstate boundary. The committee therefore directed the proponent to get the details of all the leases & Notifications issued to Shivanahalli Village, Anekal Taluk with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the combined sketch of leases & Notifications as explained above.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are attended the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

The Authority perused the proposal during the 112th SEIAA meeting held on 28th January 2016 and took note of the recommendation of SEAC. The Authority noted that as per the Notification No. S.O.141(E) dated 15th January 2016, the activity of mining of minor minerals of category ‘B2’ (upto 25 Ha of mining lease area) is exempted from applicability of General Condition.

The Authority therefore decided to refer the proposal back to SEAC for appraisal in the light of this amendment.

The committee took note of the decision of the Authority and also noted the OM issued by MoEF & CC, New Delhi dated 15.03.2016. Since the proposal has been referred back from Authority for appraisal it amounts to fresh appraisal. The committee opined that as per above OM it is not appropriate to appraise the proposal. Hence, the committee decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.10 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.104 of Shamashettihalli Village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District (4-25 Acres) (QL No.998) of M/s. Blue Stone Products (India), #G2, Mulberry Lane Apartments, Raja Ram Mohan Roy Road, Sampangi Ram Nagar, Bengaluru. (SEIAA 1333 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by M/s. Blue Stone Products (India) seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 4-25 Acres¸ at Sy.No.104 of Shamashettihalli Village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District. It is a Govt. Gomala(Kharab) Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006. 18

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri.Ganapati.S.Hegde and approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Kolar. Capacity of mining is total 3,68,740 Tonnes for 5 years.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that in form – 1, the interstate boundary is at a distance of 2.5 Km from the proposed quarry area. As per no. of files received, already three proposals with an total area of 8.10 Acre are cleared, and considering the present proposal of area 4-25 Acres, the total area is 12-35 Acres which exceeds the threshold limit of 12-12 Acres (5 ha) (within 5 Km from Interstate boundary) as per EIA Notification 2006, and the proposal is to be considered in category – A. The committee therefore directed the proponent to get the details of all the leases & Notifications issued of Shamashettihalli village with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the combined sketch showing all the leases and notifications issued by DMG.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 17.12.2015.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 157th meeting of SEAC held on 11th, 12th and 13th January 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent and observed that the proponent has submitted a letter to DMG, Kolar for surrendering of land of 0-25 Acres to limit the quarrying area to the threshold limit and it has not approved by the DMG, Kolar. Now the proponent have come up with the proposal to surrender 0-25 Acres and retaining 4- 00 Acres for which no approvals has been obtained by the competent Authority. The committee opined that in the absence of the approvals from the competent authorities the proposal will falls under category ‘A’ for which the proponent has to be approach MoEF, New Delhi for EC. The proponent is advised to approach MoEF, New Delhi for necessary approvals.

The committee therefore had decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

The Authority perused the proposal during the 113th meeting of SEAC held on 8th February 2016 and took note of the recommendation of SEAC. The Authority noted that as per the Notification No. S.O.141(E) dated 15th January 2016, the activity of mining of minor minerals of category ‘B2’ (upto 25 Ha of mining lease area) is exempted from applicability of General Condition. 19

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Authority therefore had decided to refer the proposal back to SEAC for appraisal in the light of this amendment.

The committee took note of the decision of the Authority and also perused the letter submitted by the proponent dated 02.02.2016. The proponent has requested the committee to consider their original application for an extent of 4-25 Acres and issue EC since there is an exemption from applicability of General Conditions as per the Notification No. S.O.141(E) dated 15th January 2016.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

Deferred Subjects:

161.11 "Surbacon Cedar" Residential Apartment Project at Sy.No.51/5 of Kammasandra Village, Attibele Hobli, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. Surbacon Development Pvt. Ltd., #301, The Hibiscus, No.11, 1st Main Road, 1st Block, Koramangala, Bangalore - 560034. (SEIAA 206 CON 2015)

The project details prepared as per the revised application submitted by the proponent on 19.02.2016.

M/s. Surbacon Development Pvt. Ltd, has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for Development of "Surbacon Cedar" Residential Apartment Project at Sy.No.51/5 of Kammasandra Village, Attibele Hobli,, Bengaluru Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. 1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 9108.74 Sq.mts. 2. The proposed residential buildings consists of B + GF + 3 UF + terrace with Total Built up area of 25,886.12 Sq.mts. The total no. of units is 159 and other civic amenities. The site lies in Seismic Zone II. 3. Land use details: Landscape area (proposed): 1147.13 Sq.mts (12.60 % ) (on natural earth) 632.00 Sq.mts (6.93%) (on podium) Ground coverage area = 5151 Sqm (56.55%) Paved area (Driveway) = 2178.24 Sqm (23.92%) The permissible FAR is 3.0 and achieved FAR is 2.998. 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 119 KLD (73 KLD fresh (@ 90 lpcd) + 46 KLD Recycled). The source of water is Hebbagodi Gram panchayat. NOC from Gram panchayat submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 105 KLD (considering 90% waste generation) and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 110 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generated = 10000 Cum. 20

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

All the earth generated will be utilised within the project site for landscaping & road making. 7. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 900 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 1X250 KVA. 8. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 172 Nos. 9. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. EMP budget not submitted. 10. Other details: Rain water harvesting is proposed. There are four lakes nearby.

a. Kammasandra Lak : 0.12 Km. b. Dassy’s Garden lake : 0.35 Km. c. Hebbagodi lake: 1.00 Km. d. Veerasandra lake: 1.80 Km.

The proponent and Environmental consultant was invited for the 158th SEAC meeting held don 27th and 28th January 2016 to provide required clarification and additional information. But they remained absent.

The proponent has submitted the letter requesting for postponement to the next meeting.

The committee accepted the request letter given by the proponent and had decided to provide final opportunity to the proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The proponent and Environmental consultant was invited for the 159th SEAC meeting held on 22nd and 23rd February 2016 to provide required clarification and additional information. But they remained absent with intimation.

The revised proposal submitted to authority on

The proponent and EIA Consultant Organization M/s. Aditya Environmental Services Pvt. Ltd. attended the meeting of SEAC to present the proposal and to provide required clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the statutory application Form – I, Form IA, Conceptual plan and additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent has submitted the revised application on 19.02.2016. The committee observed the following points.

1. As per rural water supply norms, only 55 LPCD fresh water is to be drawn & balance 80 LPCD will be met up by tertiary treatment/recycled water. But this procedure is not followed during the preparation of water balance chart. 2. Only 12% green belt area is proposed. 21

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

3. Driveway all round the building for smooth movement of fire tenders is not provided. 4. A detail of relinquishment of land for road widening is not given. 5. There is a drain passing in front of the proposed site along the side of road and its leadoff is not shown. 6. Surface hydrology study considering micro water shed network is not submitted. 7. Scheme of disposal of RO rejection not forth coming in the report. 8. The max. Intensity of rainfall, i.e., 100 mm/hr instead of 500 mm/hr is to be considered.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information. 1. Revised water balance chart considering 55 LPCD for fresh water drawl as per rural water supply norms and also treatment scheme to obtain 135 LPCD from the domestic waste water generated . 2. Scheme of disposal of RO reject if RO is used in the treatment scheme. 3. Scheme of compensating balance 21% green belt. 4. All round driveway for smooth movement of fire tenders is to be provided by revising the conceptual plan. 5. Details of relinquishment of land for road widening. 6. Surface hydrology study considering micro water shed network. 7. Details of leadoff of drain passing in front of the site.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

161.12 Proposed Residential Apartment project at Sy. No. 139, 140 and 141 Munnekolaru village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore of M/s. Akshaya Builders Promoters (SEIAA 214 CON 2015)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Akshaya Builders Promoters M/s. Akshaya Builders Promoters has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their Residential Apartment Project at Sy.No. 139, 140 and 141 Munnekolaru village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost = Rs. 40 Cr.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 10,126.35 Sqm 2. The proposed residential buildings consists of 170 units and the configuration of the building is B+G+4UF in a total built up area of 28,657.68 Sqm. Ht of the building is 14.95 m, Right of way is 18 m. 3. Land use details: Total plot area -10,126.35 Sqm Green belt area -3,341.6 Sqm (33%) Driveway or pavedc area -2,282.6 Sqm (22.54%) Ground coverage -4,502.09 Sqm (44.46%) Permissible FAR is 2.24 and proposed is 2.25.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 135 KLD calculated 150 LPCD (95 KLD fresh water + 40 KLD Recycled water). The source of water is from BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB not submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 130 KLD (considering 95% waste generation) and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 135 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generated is about 22,000 Cum. which will be utilized within the project site for landscaping of gardens and road making. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 383 Kgs/day; where 230 kgs/day is the organic waste and 153 kgs/day is inorganic waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers. Sludge generated is 5 Kg/day. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1700 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 2X220 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Not submitted. Parking required is 198 and provided is 198. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. 11. Other details: 16 Nos of recharge pits have been provided to recharge the ground water within the site. 12. Environmental sensitive area: Munekolala lake is 100 m from the project site.

The proponent was invited for the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The Committee had decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The proponent and EIA Coordinator was invited for the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The Committee had decided to provide final opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in the subsequent meeting.

161.13 Residential Apartment Project at Sy.No.186/4 of Kaggadasapura Village, Varthur Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District of Smt. H Shailaja (SEIAA 3 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - Smt. H Shailaja Smt. H Shailaja has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their Residential Apartment Project at Sy.No.186/4 of Kaggadasapura Village, Varthur Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost = Rs. 40 Cr.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 7,836.48 Sqm 2. The proposed residential apartment comprising 2 blocks: Block A having B+G+4 UF+TF+Club house and Block 2 having G+4 UF+TF. Total no of units is 175. BUA is 27,647.33 Sqm. Ht of the building is 14.75 m, Right of way is 9 m. 3. Land use details: Total plot area -7,836.48 Sqm Land scape -2,612.58 Sqm (46.88%) Roads and open space area -870.00 Sqm (12.86%) Ground coverage -4,353.90 Sqm (40.26%) Permissible FAR is 2.50 and proposed is 2.48. 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 122.09 KLD.(82.7 KLD fresh water + 39.38 KLD Recycled water) The source of water is from BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB not submitted 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 103.77 KLD (considering 85% waste generation) and treated is proposed in STP of design capacity of 115 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generated = 13,061.70 Cum. which will be used for back filling between the retaining wall, underground sumps/tanks, foundations and landscaping. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 350 Kgs/day; where 210 kgs/day is the organic waste and 140 kgs/day is inorganic waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 787 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 2X500 KVA transformers and backup power of 1x450 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: not submitted. Parking provided is 198. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. 11. Other details: 3 Nos of recharge pits have been provided 12. Environmental sensitive area: a. Kaggadaspura Lake - 0.5 km (W direction) b. Doddanekundi lake - 0.85 km (E direction) c. L B Sastry Nagar lake - 1.3 km (S direction)

The proponent was invited for the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, in the absence of the proponent. The committee observed the following points.

1. NOC from BWSSB not submitted. 2. Detailed earthwork generation supported by calculation and its use and disposal not submitted.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

3. Clarification regarding the project area is not falling under eco sensitive area from BDA 4. Hydrology study of the area influencing the surface water flow considering the micro water shed network. 5. Solar energy harvesting along its use not provided 6. Rain water harvesting and its use not provided. 7. Sewage treatment scheme and its complete use in the premises not provided

The committee after discussion had decided to give one more opportunity to the proponent after the submission of the above information, & the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The proponent and EIA Coordinator was invited for the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The Committee had decided to provide final opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in the subsequent meeting.

161.14 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.73 of Kavalagirena Halli Village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District (1-0 Acre) (QL No.782) of Smt. Noorjahan (SEIAA 1583 MIN 2015)

This is an existing proposal submitted by Smt. Noorjahan, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-00 Acres at Sy.No.73 of Kavalagirena Halli Village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District. It is a Government gomal land.

The proponent submitted the following information:

1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP 2. Approved quarry plan dated 05.12.2015. 3. NOC from DCF, Kolar dated 16.11.2005. 4. Lease is expiring on 07.05.2016. Renewal application not submitted. 5. RTC not submitted. 6. Audit report from 2008-09 to 2012-13 submitted. Total production is 11,180 Tonnes 7. DMG, Kolar issued an order No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/»¨sÀÆ(PÉÆÃ¯ÁgÀ)/PÀUÀ.UÀÄ/782/15-16 dated 04.12.2015 for buffer zone exemption since the lease area is 133 m length and 30 m width.

Land Use Plan: As per the approved quarry plan out of 0.4047 Ha, 0.3947 Ha is for quarry working/roads and 0.0100 Ha is for Rest shelter. Proposed production is shown only for one year ie., 2015-16 is 68,125 tonnes.

The proponent was invited for the 158th SEAC meeting held on 27th and 28th January 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The proponent is asked to submit the above information for further appraisal.

The committee after discussion had decided to provide one more opportunity to the proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The noted the OM issued by MoEF & CC, New Delhi dated 15.03.2016. Since the proposal has been deferred in the earlier meeting it amounts to fresh appraisal. The committee opined that as per above OM it is not appropriate to appraise the proposal. Hence, the committee decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.15 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.10 of Korachanur Village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District (1-0 Acre) (QL No.920) of M/s. Habeeb & Company (SEIAA 1584 MIN 2015)

This is an existing proposal submitted by M/s. Habeeb & Company, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-00 Acres at Sy.No.10 of Korachanur Village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District. It is a Government revenue land.

The proponent submitted the following information:

1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP 2. Approved quarry plan dated 05.12.2015. 3. DMG Notification dated 17.07.2009 for 10 years. 4. Lease is expiring on 03.07.2018. 5. RTC not submitted. 6. Audit report from 2008-09 to 2012-13 submitted. Total production is 3,347 Tonnes 7. DMG, Kolar issued an order No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/»¨sÀÆ(PÉÆÃ¯ÁgÀ)/PÀUÀ.UÀÄ/920/15-16 dated 04.12.2015 for buffer zone exemption since the lease area is 160 m length and 12m to 36m width and depth of mining proposed is 18 m.

Land Use Plan: As per the approved quarry plan out of 0.4047 Ha, 0.3947 Ha is for quarry working/roads and 0.0100 Ha is for Rest shelter. Proposed production is shown only for three years ie., 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18 is 99,744 tonnes.

The proponent was invited for the 158th SEAC meeting held on 27th and 28th January 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The proponent is asked to submit the above information for further appraisal.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.16 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.73 of Kavalagirena Halli Village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District (2-20 Acres) (QL No.918) of M/s. Habeeb & Company (SEIAA 1585 MIN 2015)

This is an existing proposal submitted by M/s. Habeeb & Company, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-00 Acres at Sy.No.73 of Kavalagirena Halli Village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District. It is a Government revenue land.

The proponent submitted the following information:

1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP 2. Approved quarry plan dated 05.12.2015. 3. DMG Notification not submitted. 4. Lease is expiring on 03.07.2018. 5. RTC not submitted. 6. Audit report from 2008-09 to 2012-13 submitted. Total production is 6,940 Tonnes 7. DMG, Kolar issued an order No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/»¨sÀÆ(PÉÆÃ¯ÁgÀ)/PÀUÀ.UÀÄ/918/15-16 dated 04.12.2015 for buffer zone exemption since the lease area is 111 m length and 90m width and depth of mining proposed is 28 m.

Land Use Plan: As per the approved quarry plan out of 0.891 Ha, 0.740 Ha is for quarry working/roads, 0.141 Ha is for dumping and 0.010 Ha is for Rest shelter. Proposed production is shown only for three years ie., 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18 is 2,36,416 tonnes.

The proponent was invited for the 158th SEAC meeting held on 27th and 28th January 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The proponent is asked to submit the above information for further appraisal.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.17 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.73 of Kavalagirena Halli Village, Malur Taluk, Kolar District (1-20 Acres) (QL No.919) of M/s. Habeeb & Company (SEIAA 1586 MIN 2015)

The proponent submitted the following information:

1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP 2. Approved quarry plan dated 05.12.2015. 3. DMG Notification not submitted. 4. Lease is expiring on 03.07.2018. 5. RTC not submitted. 6. Audit report from 2008-09 to 2012-13 submitted. Total production is 3,595 Tonnes 7. DMG, Kolar issued an order No. UÀ¨sÀÆE/»¨sÀÆ(PÉÆÃ¯ÁgÀ)/PÀUÀ.UÀÄ/919/15-16 dated 04.12.2015 for buffer zone exemption since the lease area is 100 m length and 55m width and depth of mining proposed is 28 m.

Land Use Plan: As per the approved quarry plan out of 0.486 Ha, 0.376 Ha is for quarry working/roads, 0.100 Ha is for dumping and 0.010 Ha is for Rest shelter. Proposed production is shown only for three years ie., 2015-16, 2016-17 and 2017-18 is 1,21,586 tonnes.

The proponent was invited for the 158th SEAC meeting held on 27th and 28th January 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The proponent is asked to submit the above information for further appraisal.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.18 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.13 of Ivagalu Village, Ramanagara Taluk & District (2- 38 Acres) (QL No.1253 - 1-28 Acres & QL No.1270 - 1-10 Acres) of Sri K Rajashekhara Nayaka (SEIAA 17 MIN 2016)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri K Rajashekhara Nayaka, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-38 Acres at Sy.No.13 of Ivagalu Village, Ramanagara Taluk & District. It is a Government Land. The total extent of the land as per RTC is 59.21 Acres.

1. The quarry plan was approved by DMG on 10-04-2015. 2. The lease period is valid upto 06-11-2016 & 18-04-2016. The DMG has issued amalgamation Notification merging 2 quarry leases – QL no. 1253 & 1270 and combined quarry plan has been submitted. 3. NOC’s from Tahsildar, and from DCF, Not submitted. 4. Audit reports for the years 2013-14 submitted.

QL no. 1253

The proposed Land use pattern is 0.390 Ha mining, 0.012 Ha for roads, 0.030 Ha for overburden dump, 0.022 Ha for mineral storage, for green belt 0.202 Ha, Infrastructure 0.011 Ha and for Untouched area 0.021 Ha.

QL no. 1270

The proposed Land use pattern is 0.290 Ha mining, 0.032 Ha for roads, 0.022 Ha for overburden dump, 0.011 Ha for mineral storage, for green belt 0.079 Ha, Untouched area 0.065 Ha and for Infrastructure 0.007 Ha.

The total production as per the approved quarry plan is QL no. 1253- 92624 cum, QL no. 1270- 54506 Cum.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The proponent sought some more time to present the proposal as they have not fully prepared for the presentation. Hence the committee had decided to defer the proposal as requested by the proponent.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.19 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.57 of Athigatte Village, Tarikere Taluk, Chikmangaluru District (4-0 Acres) of Sri A T Srinivasa (SEIAA 29 MIN 2016)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri A T Srinivasa, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 4-00 Acres at Sy.No.57 of Athigatte Village, Tarikere Taluk, Chikmangaluru District. It is a Government Land. The total extent of the land as per RTC is 28.10 Acres.

1. The quarry plan was approved by DMG on 01-08-2015. 2. The DMG has issued Notification on 18-06-2015 for 5 years. 3. NOC’s from Subdivision officer, Tarikere sub division, Chikkamagalore District dated 14.03.2014 and from DCF, Badravathi dated 06.08.2013.

The proposed Land use pattern is 1-35 acres mining, 0-04 acres for roads, 0-02 acres for overburden dump, 0-02 acres for mineral storage, for green belt 1-00 acres, 0-04 area for Infrastructur & Top soil Stroage and for others 0-33 acres.

The total production as per the approved quarry plan is 50760 Tons.

The proponent was invited for the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The Committee had decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

Pendency proposals:

161.20 Change in fuel configuration to 100% coal, for Two Boilers (1 x 100 TPH for Phase – 1 & 1 x 120 TPH for Phase – 2) and Thermic Fluid Heaters 4 x 9.5 MMKCal/h for the Proposed Manufacturing of Pure Terephthalic Acid (PTA) & Polyester Chips / PET Chips of Various Types & Grades and Power Generation through Captive Power Plant at Sy. No 12, 14,15,16,17,18,19,20,22,23,24,27,28,29,30,138,149,189, Mangalore SEZ, Bajpe Village, Mangalore Taluk, Dakshin Kannada District of JBF Petrochemicals Ltd (SEIAA 35 IND 2015)

Name of the Project: Proposed part change in fuel configuration for Two of the Four Thermic Fluid Heaters for the proposed manufacturing of pure Terephthalic Acid (PTA) 7 Polyester Chips of various types & grades and power generation through captive power plant.

Name of the Company: M/s. JBF Petrochemicals Ltd.,

Name of the Applicant: Mr.A.Gopalkrishna Pai

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

M/s. JBF Petrochemicals Ltd., have applied for Environmental Clearance from SEIAA for their modification of project in various sy.No’s. of Bajpe Village, Mangalore Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District. This is a project falling under the category 5(e) of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006, Under Category – B. The total Plot area is 115.3 Acres.

2. Proposed Activity: The proposed activity will involve in Change in fuel configuration to 100% coal, for Two Boilers (1 x 100 TPH for Phase – 1 & 1 x 120 TPH for Phase – 2) and Thermic Fluid Heaters 4 x 9.5 MMKCal/h for the Proposed Manufacturing of Pure Terephthalic Acid (PTA) & Polyester Chips / PET Chips of Various Types & Grades and

Power Generation through Captive Power Plant

3. Raw Materials: The raw materials used for the proposed project as follows:

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

5. Proposed Products from the project:

6. Capital Investment: Rs.3566 Crores 7. Water Requirement:

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

8. Waste Water Generation Management: The proposed project will have effluent treatment plant consisting of Physico-chemical treatment. Primary treatment & secondary treatment. After micro filtration and RO (Teritary treatment), 70% of the treated effluent is recycled to the plant. The remaining 30% of the treated effluent meeting Environmental norms will be discharged to the final outlet as approved to Mangalore SEZ.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

9. Hazardous Waste Management:

Solid waste Management: Ash Generation From PTA Boilers

Assuming 8-10% Ash content in Coal (Indonesian Coal), the Ash generation per day shall be about 60 MT/day which is trapped using a high efficiency ESP (> 99.5% Dust removal efficiency), and pneumatically conveyed to Ash silo thus avoiding the problems associated with wet ash handling.

From PET Plant:

Assuming 8-10% Ash content in Coal (Indonesian Coal),, the Ash generation per day shall be about 20 MT/day. A high efficiency ESP (> 99.5% dust removal efficiency) may be proposed if suitable, and ash pneumatically conveyed to Ash Silo, in a similar manner as envisaged for PTA Plant Boilers, thereby avoiding the problems associated with ash handling.

Total ash generation from both PTA and PET Plants will be 80MT/day.

Power Requirement:

Power plant consisting of 2 numbers of 15 MW each rated capacity which can be able to generate net 12 MW per turbine during performance running at around 350c.Initially diesel will be used as main fuel for power generation and change over to natural gas will be made as and when gas will be available.

10. Hazardous waste Management:

All the hazardous and non-hazardous waste will be stored in an integrated scrap yard in a segregated manner. Some of the wastes, like contaminated packing material,

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016 sweeping material and other non-hazardous waste will be disposed through registered recycler and re-processor having KSPCB/CPCB approval.

Hazardous Chemical Storage & Handling:

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

11. Summary of Proposed Changes:

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 157th meeting of SEAC held on 11th, 12th and 13th January 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Prefeasibility report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed the following points.

1. Earlier it was proposed to use briquette as fuel and accordingly, the boilers are designed, but now, the fuel is changed from briquette to coal, is there any change in the design of the boilers, for which, the proponent informed the committee that, they have designed the boilers considering both briquette & coal as fuel and hence no need of change in design of boilers is required. 2. By using the coal as fuel, generation of ash quantity is increased from 30 TPD to 80 TPD and correspondingly disposal of the same is not forthcoming in the report. The proponent informed the committee that, they will supply ash to cement & brick manufacture industry and RMC.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

3. Since limestone is added to coal and used as fuel, there will be generation of calcium sulphate which will be mixed with ash and comes out as waste. The disposal of ash containing calcium sulphate is a concern since calcium sulphate is a hazardous material

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following.

1. Plan of action for handling of coal and disposal of fly ash and bottom ash with necessary MoU with cement & Brick manufacture industries for utilizing the ash. 2. Ambient air quality study for use with lime & without lime as fuel with standard of emissions.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 20.01.2016.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent and agreed with the replies. The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance with the following conditions.

1. Adequate no. of water jets to be provided for throwing water whenever there is incidents of fire in place of coal stock yard. 2. Water peculated from coal stock yard to be collected and treated and reused in the industry 3. Interlocking system to be provided for ESP and fuel conveyer system so that if ESP fails fuel entry to furnace should stop and emissions from the stack should reduce.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.21 2 BHK housing projects phase 1 & phase-II at Sy. No. 30 of Kommaghatta Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore of Bangalore Development Authority,(SEIAA 108 CON 2015)

Bangalore Development Authority (B.D.A) have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed 2 BHK housing projects phase 1 & phase-II at Sy. No. 30 of Kommaghatta Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore. The project is categorized as 8 (B2)

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 31403.65 Sq.m (7.76 Acres) 2. The project consists of 536 Nos of Flats in two phases (1st Phase 216 Nos (S+G+8) & 2nd phase 320 Nos. (S+G+9)) & Commercial area of 1584.24 Sq.m. Total Built up

area is 45290.75 Sqm 3. Landscape area (proposed): Not mentioned.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 342 KLD. For 228 KLD, the

source of water is BWSSB and for 118 KLD is from STP treated water. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated will be treated in the 226 KLD. 6. Excavated Earth Management:- Not mentioned. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 634 Kg/day; out of which 254kg/day is non biodegradable and 380 Kg/day is biodegradable 8. Hazardous Waste Management: The oil sludge generated from the D.G. sets will be given to recyclers. 9. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement is sourced from BESCOM, along with 2 DG sets of capacity 125 KVa

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 149th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th September 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the corrected and modified documents.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 08.01.2016.

The proponent has submitted the letter dated 08.01.2016 requesting for postponement to the next meeting.

The committee accepted the request letter made by the proponent during the 157th meeting of SEAC held on 11th, 12th and 13th January 2016 and decided to provide final opportunity to the proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The proponent & Environmental consultant attended the 158th SEAC meeting held on 27th and 28th January 2016 to provide required clarification and additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent has informed the committee that, they have changed the consultant and the new consultant has presented the project. The committee observed that, comparative statement showing the comparison between earlier & present proposal is not submitted. The project is abetting to the 38

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

BDA proposed Kempegowda Layout. The Proponent informed the committee that, the project site is at a distance of 50 m form NICE road & about 2 Km from Vrishabhavathi valley. The committee advised the proponent to provide 1.50 m width staircase & 6.00 m width driveway for smooth movement of fire tenders. Details of surface hydrology studies not submitted. Detailed traffic study and its impact on the road considering other developments coming near the proposed project is to be given. The proponent informed the committee that, there is a nala running on the lower side of the project site at distance of about 150 m from the project site. In the RTC copy, Sy.no.36, having an extent of 57.37 acres, Kharab was not mentioned. Therefore details of the nala running in the project area are to be given.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information.

1. Comparative statement, comparing earlier & present proposal details. 2. An undertaking to provided 1.50 m staircase & 6.00 m width driveway. 3. Revised form – 1 incorporating the change in the configuration. 4. The total peripheral length & width to be left for green belt zone. 5. Detailed surface hydrology study. 6. Quantification of terrace area for generation of solar power. 7. Traffic study details. 8. Details of the nala running in the project area 9. Green belt all along the project boundary with species design 10. Necessary buffer to be left on both side of the nala.

The proponent has submitted the letter dated 23.03.2016 requesting for postponement to the next meeting.

The committee accepted the request letter made by the proponent and decided to provide final opportunity to the proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in the subsequent meeting.

161.22 Housing projects phase II & phase-III at Sy. No. 95 of Kanminike Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore of Bangalore Development Authority, T.Chowdaiah Road, Kumara Park West, Bangalore- 560020. (SEIAA 109 CON 2015)

Bangalore Development Authority (B.D.A) have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed Housing projects phase II & phase-III at Sy. No. 95 of Kanminike Village, Kengeri Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore.The project is categorized as 8 (B2)

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 202342.80 Sq.m

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

2. The project consists of 1068 Nos of Flats in two phases (II Phase LIG-Type A 384 Nos. (S+G+7) & Type B – 288 Nos. (S+G+8) & III phase 288 Nos. (S+G+8) & IV Phase 108 Nos. (S+G+8) & Commercial area of 10655.11 Sq.m. The total Built up

area is 91957.35 Sqm 3. Landscape area (proposed): Not mentioned. 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 649 KLD. For 433 KLD, the

source of water is BWSSB and for 216 KLD is from STP treated water. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated will be treated in the 506 KLD. 6. Excavated Earth Management:- Not mentioned. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 1202 Kg/day; out of which 481kg/day is non biodegradable and 721 Kg/day is biodegradable 8. Hazardous Waste Management: The oil sludge generated from the D.G. sets will be given to recyclers. 9. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement is sourced from BESCOM, along with 2 DG sets of capacity 125 KVA & 1 X 250 KVA

10. Traffic Details: Not mentioned.

11. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 149th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th September 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the corrected and modified documents.

The proponent has submitted the letter dated 08.01.2016 requesting for postponement to the next meeting.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 11.01.2016.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The proponent & Environmental consultant attended the 158th SEAC meeting held on 27th and 28th January 2016 to provide required clarification and additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, there is a change in the configuration & also increase in built up area from 91957.35 Sqm to 105498.33 Sqm. The modified application form incorporating the modifications has been submitted by the proponent. But, comparative statement showing the comparison between earlier & present proposal is not submitted. Details of surface hydrology studies not submitted. Detailed traffic study and its impact on the road considering other developments coming near the proposed project are to be given. The Bengaluru – Mysore railway line is passing by the side of the proposed project site. The proponent informed the committee that, they have left 30 m from the railway line as buffer. But the committee felt that more land has to be left between railway line and the property.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information.

1. Comparative statement, comparing earlier & present proposal details. 2. Detailed surface hydrology study. 3. Scientific assessment of bore well water for quantity & quality & its impact on competitive users. 4. Traffic study details. 5. Revised water balance chart considering 55 lpcd as per rural water supply norms. 6. Details regarding the quality of ground water in pre monsoon period

The proponent has submitted the letter dated 23.03.2016 requesting for postponement to the next meeting.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in the subsequent meeting.

161.23 Residential Group Housing project at Municipal No.5, Lalbagh Road, Ward No. 48, Sudhamanagar Ward, Pid No.48-31-5, Bangalore of M/s. Puravankara Projects Limited (SEIAA 118 CON 2015)

M/s. Puravankara Projects Limited., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed Development of Residential Group Housing project at Municipal No.5, Lalbagh Road, Ward No. 48, Sudhamanagar Ward, Pid No.48-31-5, , Bengaluru. Total Project cost is 75.00 Crores.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 4678.19 Sq.mts

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

2. The project consists of 97 Units and a club house with a configuration of 2B + G + 24 UF with Total Built up area is 27794.60 Sq.mts. Ht. of Building is 84.75 M.

3. Landscape area (proposed): 1543.80 Sq.mts (33.00%) Ground coverage area : 763.75 Sq.mts (16.33%) Drive way area : 2082.26 Sq.mts (44.51%) Permissible FAR is 4.50 & achieved is 4.499 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 67.40 KLD. (51.40 KLD Fresh water + 16 KLD Recycled water).The source of water is from BWSSB.

5. Wastewater Management:- The total quantity of waste water generated is 54 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 70 KLD with SBR

Technology.

6. Excavated Earth Management:- - Total Excavated Earth is 20000 m3 Scheme of disposal of excess earth is not given. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 193.8 Kg/day; where 116.4 Kg/day is the biodegradable waste and 77.4 kg/day non biodegradable waste 8. Hazardous waste Management: Waste oil from the DG sets will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers. 9. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1173 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG set of 2 X 500 KVA. 10. Traffic Details: For traffic studies Lalbagh road is considered. The level of service is C - D – D Parking proposed: 250. Nos. 11. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted 12. Other details: Provision of Rain water Harvesting is made. Total power savings per annum is 20%.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 149th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th September 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed that, the building abutting to the proposed project site is Govt. Pharmacy College. The committee observed the following points.

1. Water balance chart is prepared considering135 LPD which needs to be revised. 2. There is a discrepancy between form 1A & form 1

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the following information.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

1. Revised water balance chart considering 90 LPD fresh water & 45 LPD recycled water and also considering 5% evaporation loss 2. Quantification of excavated earth & scheme for safe and scientific management of excess excavated earth within the project site only 3. Revised Form 1 A 4. Bi fuel Gen sets to be provided 5. Scheme of dust suppression & noise control during construction since the adjoining building is Pharmacy College. 6. EMP during construction & operation phase 7. An undertaking with regard to taking construction material directly to the project area and will not be dumped on road. 8. Study of air & noise quality based on NAAQ standard 2009 and the report 9. Detailed Hydrological study of the influencing the area

The project proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 06.01.2016.

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the 157th meeting of SEAC held on 11th, 12th and 13th January 2016 to provide required information/ additional information.

The committee perused and agreed the reply submitted by the proponent except the excavated earth utilization which cannot be acceptable. The committee therefore had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of a proposal for excavated earth utilization within the project site with detailed calculation.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 15.02.2016.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent and agreed with the replies. The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.24 Expansion of Office complex project at Sy. Nos. 22/1A, 22/2, 25, 29, 33/2 & 35, Katha No. 169/1 of Kadubeesanahalli Village, Varthur Hobli, Outer Ring Road, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. Oracle India Private Limited (SEIAA 120 CON 2015)

M/s. Oracle India Private Limited, have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for Expansion of office Complex at Sy. Nos. 22/1A, 22/2, 25, 29, 33/2 & 35, Katha No. 169/1 of Kadubeesanahalli Village, Varthur Hobli, Outer Ring Road, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost = Rs. 865.00 Cr.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 55,616.97 Sq.mts. The proposed project comprises 3blocks, Block1- 2B+Stilt+9UF with a height of 41.65m, Block2- 3B+G+9UF with a height of 41.65m, Block3- 3B+G+9UF with a height of 37.45m, Amenities Block -3B+Stilt+6UF with a height of 33.25 with Total Built up area of 270254.79 Sq.mts

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

Landscape area (proposed): 9825.00 Sq.mts (22.73 % )

Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 842 KLD. The source of water is BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB submitted.

Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 673 Cum/day and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 680 Cum/day with SBR Technology.

Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generated = 220000 Cum. All the earth generated will be utilised within the project site for landscaping & road making.

Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 4353 Kgs/day; where 2618 kgs/day is the organic waste and 1735 kgs/day is inorganic waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers.

Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 11000 KW is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 8X2000 KVA.

Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 3191. Nos.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that there is change in the name of the project. Hence the proponent has to submit revised application in this regard.

The Committee after discussion decided to appraise the proposal as B1 as the built up area is more than 1,50,000 Sqm and decided to issue Standard ToR for conducting EIA study in accordance with EIA Notification 2006 and the relevant guidelines. The committee also decided to prescribe the following additional ToR.

1. Increase the green belt area to 33%. 2. Details of karab land to be given. 3. Terrace area to be used for generation of solar energy. 4. Minimise the outflow of treated water. 5. Storm water to be fully utilised. 6. Scheme for utilization of Entire earthwork within the project site only. 7. Hydrological study of the surface area considering about 10 Sq. Km. 8. Explore the possibility of providing fire escape chutes. 9. Solar power generation and construction of eco pond

Accordingly ToR was issued on 10.09.2015.

The proponent submitted the EIA report vide letter dated 29.01.2016.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information. 44

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

1. As per application and ToR presentation, total plot are was 55,616.97 Sqm and in the EIA presentation 55,390.75 Sqm (reduction in the plot area of 226.22 Sqm) 2. As per application and ToR presentation the built up area was270254.79 Sq.mts and in the EIA presentation it is shown 2,74,376.64 Sqm 3. As per application and ToR presentation the configuration was comprises 3blocks, Block1- 2B+Stilt+9UF with a height of 41.65m, Block2- 3B+G+9UF with a height of 41.65m, Block3- 3B+G+9UF with a height of 37.45m, Amenities Block -3B+Stilt+6UF with a height of 33.25. But in the EIA presentation it is changed to Block A – 2B+G+9 UF+TF with a ht of 42,675 m; Block B – 3B+G+9UF+TF with a ht of 42.675 m; Block C – 3B+G+9 UF+TF with a ht of 42.675 m; Block D Amenities block – 3B+Stilt+8UF+TF with a ht of 38.475 m and Utility Block (Block –E) – B+G+1UF with a ht of 8.95 m. 4. There is a discrepancy in the earth work calculation in the Form 1 and EIA presentation. 5. There is a nala flowing in the project site and the proponent informed that they are diverting the nala with the permission of the storm water management authority 6. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy not complied 7. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow considering the micro shed area where the project site is located is not carried out 8. The compliance for providing fire escape chutes is not acceptable 9. The proponent is providing the eco pond but the eco pond design, capacity and monitoring protocols not submitted

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Comparative statement between the changes in ToR presented and EIA presentation along with justification. 2. Detailed excavated earth calculation and its utilization within the project site 3. Permission from the competent authority for diverting the nala which is flowing in the project site 4. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy 5. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow considering the micro shed area where the project site is located 6. Provision for providing fire escape chutes 7. Eco pond design details with monitoring protocol. 8. List of tree species proposed to plan with native species and fruit yielding.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 09.03.2016.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent and observed the following points:

1. Justification and Comparative statement between the changes in ToR presented and EIA presentation given is not convincing. 2. Hydrology study is not properly carried out 3. Detailed excavated earth calculation and its utilization within the project site is not properly done 4. Eco pond design details with monitoring protocol submitted is not convincing.

The committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after submission of the following information:

1. Comparative statement between the changes in ToR presented and EIA presentation along with justification. 2. Hydrology study to be carried out taking in to consideration of micro and mini water shed area where the project site is located and also maximum flood discharge considering the maximum rain fall accordingly the capacity of the existing drain details to be given 3. Detailed excavated earth calculation and its utilization within the project site along with break up calculation 4. Eco pond design details with periodical monitoring protocol

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in the subsequent meeting.

161.25 Commercial Development Project at Khatha No. 242/189/48,49 of Nagashetty Halli Division, Kodigehalli Ward, (Survey No.48/3, 48/4, 48/6, 49/2, 49/3, 49/4 & 49/5), Boopasandra Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of Abraham Koshy, Authorized Signatory, 29th and 30th Floor, World Trade Centre, Brigade Gateway Campus, 26/1, Dr. Rajkumar Road, Malleswaram - Rajajinagar, Bangalore. (SEIAA 121 CON 2015)

M/s. Brigade Enterprises Limited have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for Development of commercial development project at Khatha No. 242/189/48,49 of Nagashetty Halli Division, Kodigehalli Ward, (Survey No.48/3, 48/4, 48/6, 49/2, 49/3, 49/4 & 49/5), Boopasandra Village, Kasaba Hobli, Bangalore North Taluk, Bangalore (U) 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 8,700.75 Sq.mts 2. The proposed Development of Commercial Building Project consists with 2B+G+17UF and Car Parking with 2B+GF+3UF and Total Built up area of 65,777.67 Sq.mts. 3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 266 KLD. The source of water is BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB is submitted.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

4. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 257 KLD and treated is proposed as Grey Water treatment plant of 170 KLD, Black

Water treatment plant of 90 KLD.

5. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 885 Kgs/day; where 295 Kg/day is the organic waste and 590 Kg/day is inorganic waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers. 6. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 2500 KVA is sourced from

BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 3X1000 KVA. 7. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 880 Nos. 8. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted

9. Other details: Rain water harvesting is proposed.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 148th meeting of SEAC held on 21st, 22nd and 23rd September 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed the committee that the Jakkur Airport Authority has issued a letter restricting the height of the building to 64 m.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Revised land use plan (Area Statement) loading TDR 2. Revised rain water harvesting calculation 3. NOC issued from Jakkur Airport Authority to be submitted 4. Scheme for safe and scientific management of excess excavated earth within the project site only and explore the possibility of providing 11/2 basement below ground level and ½ basement above the ground level to reduce the earth work generation. 5. Detailed Hydrological study of nearby Lake 6. The possibility of submergence of the some of the lowest area of the project when the tank was full/Max discharge is to be given.(Distance from the lake boundary to the project area, waste weir level and lowest level of the project area) 7. Soil and water test reports

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 03.11.2015.

The committee reviewed the replies during the 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 and observed the following points.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

1. Rain water harvesting calculation is not done properly and the same has to be revised considering maximum rain fall in a day, and accordingly for two days storage, tanks has to be designed. 2. Detailed hydrological study influencing the surface water flow is not carried out.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the above information.

The project proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 06.01.2016.

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the 157th meeting of SEAC held on 11th, 12th and 13th January 2016 to provide required clarification and additional information.

The committee perused and agreed with the reply submitted by the proponent. The committee observed that the project site is abutting the lake and also the plan has not sanctioned by the BDA. Therefore the committee asked the proponent to get the following information from the competent authority for further consideration.

1. The certified copy of the lake details from the competent authority showing the exact location of the boundary (water spread area) and the extent of area of the lake. 2. Clarification regarding the project site is not declared as Sensitive Zone Area from BDA.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 10.03.2016.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent. The committee observed that there is no clarity on the reply submitted with regard to the authenticated document. The proponent has not submitted the certified copy.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of the certified copy of the lake details from the competent authority showing the exact location of the boundary (water spread area) and the extent of area of the lake.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.26 Development of Residential Apartment and Commercial Building at Sy. No. 15/2, Geddalahalli Village, K. R. Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru of M/s. Unishire Housing LLP, No. 36, Railway Parallel Road, Nehru Nagar, Kumarapark (West), Bengaluru – 560 020 (SEIAA 149 CON 2015)

M/s. Unishare Housing LLP., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed development of Residential Apartment Project at Sy. No. 15/2, Geddalahalli Village, K. R. Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost is 35 Crores.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 5,211.68 Sq.mts

2. The proposed project consisting of 2B + G + 20 UF with 144 no of units with Total Built up area is 24,840.09 Sqm. Ht. of Building is 62.99 M. 3. Landscape area (proposed): 1,730.19 Sq.mts (35.30% ) 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 109 KLD. The source of water is BWSSB. Copy of NOC is submitted.

5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 98 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 110 KLD with SBR Technology.

6. Excavated Earth Management: - Total Excavated Earth is 9,450 m3 Back Filling in Foundation is 1,418 m3 For Landscaping - 1,384 m3 Roads and walkways – 2,731 m3 Preparation of soil cement blocks- 1,100 m3 For site formation - 2,817 m3 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 437 Kg/day; where 239 kg/day is the biodegradable waste and 198 kg/day is non biodegradable waste. 8. Hazardous waste Management: Waste oil from DG sets to the amount of 0.243l/running hour of DG, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers. 9. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 923 Kw is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG set of 1 X 500 KVA.

10. Traffic Details: The approach road infront of the project site is 28m wide, termed as collector road as per standards, connecting outer ring road to Hennur- Byrathi, Kalkere, Kannur & Chickgubbi. LoS of service road connecting site is C/D-C-B. Parking proposed: 160 Nos. 11. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted 12. Other details: Rain water Harvesting will be implementing with roof rain water collection sump of capacity 40 cu.m and also provided 8 no’s of recharge pits. The ROW is 28 M. Total Energy savings from the project is 20%.

The Proponent was invited for the 151st meeting of SEAC held on 19th, 20th and 21st October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. The proponent remained absent and proponent has given letter informing the committee that he is unable to attend the meeting and will attend the next meeting.

The Committee decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The Proponent was invited for the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. But they remained absent.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

1. Details of excavated earth (with calculations) and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal site 2. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow 3. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an appropriate plan thereof with due calculations

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, for the commercial shop users’ vehicles, separate parking space is not earmarked in the parking area, and NOC from BWSSB not submitted. Detailed earthwork calculation and disposal of the same is not submitted.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information.

1. Details of excavated earth(with calculations) and scheme of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal 2. Earmark separate parking space for commercial shop users’ vehicles. 3. NOC from BWSSB regarding supply of water.

The proponent has given a letter dated 26.03.2016 stating that they are not able to submit the query reply and they are not attending the meeting as there is change in the site plan.

The committee opined that the proposal cannot be appraised for want of above information and since the proposal is under revision and also the proponent is remained absent to provide clarification.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.27 Construction of 5 Star hotel project with Restaurants, Banquet Hall, Coffee Shop, Health club & Bar at R.S. no.11-3A, 11-4C, 11-7, 11/3B, 11/8, 11/5B2, 11/6A, 11/6B, of no. 154, Penamburu Village, Mangalore Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District of Mr. A.Janardhana Shetty, Managing Director, M/s. Hotel Moti Mahal Private Limited., Falnir Road,Mangalore-575001 (SEIAA 165 CON 2015)

M/s. Hotel Moti Mahal Private Limited., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of Five Star Hotel Project with Restaurants, Banquet Hall, Coffee Shop, Health club & Bar at R.S. no.11-3A, 11-4C, 11-7, 11/3B, 11/8, 11/5B2, 11/6A, 11/6B, of no. 154, Penamburu Village, Mangalore Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. The total cost of the project is 36 crores.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 24,240.33 Sq.mts (5.99 Acres)

1. The proposed project consists of total builtup area 23,001.11 Sq.mts with

G + 10 UF

2. Landscape area (proposed): 7,590.4 Sq.mts (33.00%)

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 123KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met by Mangalore City Corporation. Copy of NOC is submitted.

4. Wastewater Management:- The total quantity of waste water generated is 103 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 110 KLD with SBR Technology.

5. Excavated Earth Management: - Total Excavated Earth is 8,000 m3 For Back Filling 3000 m3 For Landscaping - 5000 m3

6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 363 Kg/day; where 218 kg/day is the organic waste and 145 kg/day is inorganic waste, organic waste will be treated in organic waste convertor and the product is used as manure. Inorganic waste is sent for recycling. 7. Hazardous Waste Management: waste oil from DG sets to the amount of 50-100 liters/annum of DG which will be stored and handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement is sourced from MESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG set of 1 X 750 KVA.

9. Traffic Details: Traffic details not mentioned. Parking proposed: 323. Number of cars. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted 11. Other details: Rain water harvesting system is proposed.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 152nd meeting of SEAC held on 2nd and 3rd November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and 51

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the project is coming under CRZ II, which requires CRZ clearance form MOEF, New Delhi. The proponent informed the committee that, already the proposal is in MOEF, New Delhi for clearance.

The Committee after discussion had decided to appraise the proposal after receiving the clearance from MOEF.

The proponent has not submitted the clearance from the MoEF, New Delhi for the above project which is coming under CRZ II.

The committee therefore decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.28 Proposed Residential Apartments project at Sy No.14/16, Doddanagamangala Village Begur Hobali, Bangalore South Taluk Bangalore of M/s. Esteem Alchemy, #32, 33 & 34, 3rd Floor, SNS Chambers, Sankey Road, Sadshivanagar, Bangalore - 560080. (SEIAA 180 CON 2015)

M/s. Esteem Alchemy has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of Residential apartments Project at Sy No.14/16, Doddanagamangala Village Begur Hobali, Bangalore South Taluk Bangalore under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 12,849.23 Sq.mts 2. The proposed project consists total builtup area of 38,302.98 Sq.mts comprising 243 No’s of residential flats with building configuration B + GF +9 UF and a Club house. Total cost of the project is Rs. 40 Crores. 3. Landscape area (proposed): 4006.6 Sq.mts (33% on natural earth) 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 164 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met by Gramphanchayat. Copy of NOC is not submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 131 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 140 KLD with SBR Technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management: The total earth excavation carried out is about 23,000 m3[[ will be used within the project site. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 546 kg/day; which includes organic waste is 327 kg/day and inorganic waste is 219 kg/day. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1000 KW is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 2 x 220 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 310 No’s of cars. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted. Doddanagama Lake 600 meters distance from the project site. 11. Other details: Height of the building is 29.90 M. Rain water harvesting system proposed. Width of the road (ROW) is 12.5 meters.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that in the water balance chart 135 LPCD is considered for quantification of requirement of water and mitigation measures to protect the nala running within the project site not submitted.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information. 1. Revised water balance calculating fresh water demand at the rate of 55 LPCD as per the norms prescribed for rural water supply and the scheme of treatment for reusing the treated water 2. Measures taken to protect the nala running within the project site. 3. Provision for e-waste disposal

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 22.03.2016.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent. The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance with the following conditions:

1. RO rejects of 18 KLD shall be disposed scientifically as per norms 2. Nala has to be protected permanently by constructing the retaining wall

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.29 Proposed Residential Apartment project “Krishna Gold Field” at Survey Nos. 5/7, 35/1, 38/1 and 46, Andapura Village, Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore of M/s. Krishna Enterprises (Housing & Infrastructures) India Pvt. Ltd., No. 32, PSR Marvel, Bellary Main Road, Hebbal, Bangalore – 560 024. (SEIAA 183 CON 2015)

M/s. Krishna Enterprises (Housing & Infrastructure) India Pvt.Ltd., has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of “Krishna Gold Field” at Survey No’s. 5/7, 35/1, 38/1 and 46, Andapura Village, Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

2. Land details: - Total Plot area is 26,485 Sq.mts (6.54 Acres) 3. The proposed project consists total builtup area of 72,882 Sq.mts comprising 585 No’s of residential units with building configuration B + GF + 14 UF + Terrace. Total cost of the project is Rs. 140 Crores. 4. Landscape area (proposed): 9,232.51 Sq.mts (35.01%) 5. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 435 KLD. The source of the water for the project is from Borewells with the permission of KGWA (Karnataka Ground Water Authority). Copy of NOC is not submitted.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

6. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 460 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 460 KLD. 7. Excavated Earth Management: The total earth excavation carried out is about 32,000 cu.m. About 10,000 Cu.m will be used for landscape development, 10,000 Cu.m will be used for backfilling and 12,000 cu.m will be used for hardscaping. 8. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 1,170 kg/day; which includes organic waste is 702 kg/day and inorganic waste is 468 kg/day. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers. 9. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 3,527 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 2 x 750 KVA. Total energy savings is 24.89% mentioned. 10. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 651 No’s of cars. 11. Other details: Height of the building is 24.54 M. Rain water harvesting system proposed.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information.

1. Revised water balance calculating fresh water demand at the rate of 55 LPCD as per the norms prescribed for rural water supply and the scheme of treatment for reusing the treated water 2. Requisition letter given to ground water authority 3. Baseline data

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 21.12.2015.

1. Regenerated softener liquid shall be disposed scientifically as per norms 2. Ground Water Authority permission shall be obtained before drawing the water from the bore well

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.30 Multi Colour Granite Quarry Project, Sy.No.572 of Maralabekuppe Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara Dist. (11 Acres) (QL No.361) of M/s. Henraux (India) Pvt. Ltd. Director, no.11/2,

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

I.B.H.Prakashana, 2nd Floor, N.J.H.C.Complex, 5th Maim, Gandhinagara, Bangalore -560009 (SEIAA 654 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by K.Vinod Kumar, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying Multi-Colour Granite in an area of 11-00 Acres at Sy.no. 572 of Maralabekuppe Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara Kannada District. It is a Govt. Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri. B.N. Krishnamurthy and approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bengaluru Dist. Capacity of mining is Av. 21,731 Cum.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 146th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th August 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

Committee noted that distance between the Maralabekuppe village and the Cauvery wild life is 5.11 Km as given by DCF, Wild Life Ramanagar District. Committee wants to ascertain the exact distance between quarry boundary to Cauvery wild life since the committee have already recommended 12-00 Acres in the same Sy. No. vide File No. SEIAA 653 MIN 2015.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the following information.

1. Distance between the quarry boundary and Cauvery Wild life from the Wild life authority 2. Scheme for waste dump. 3. An undertaking that the proponent shall make the approach road pucca by providing GSB, WMM & asphalting

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 22.01.2016.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent during the 158th SEAC meeting held on 27th and 28th January 2016 and agreed with the reply except the scheme for waste dump. The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the waste dump details with detailed calculation.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 27.03.2016.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The committee perused and agreed with the reply submitted by the proponent. The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.31 Ordinary Clay Quarry Project, Sy.No.98/2 of Ramagurwadi Village, Khanapura Taluk & Belagavi Dist. (1 Acre) (QL No.1450) of Sri Vinayaka H Punage S/o.Sri.Hanumanth, 30/B, Sai Residency Angol, 1st Cross, Tilakwadi, Belagavi (SEIAA 850 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri Vinayaka H Punage, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Ordinary Clay Quarry in an area of 1-00 Acres at Sy.No.98/2 of Ramagurwadi Village, Khanapura Taluk & Belagavi District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.Ramasubba Reddy approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Belgaum District. Capacity of mining is Av. 7,200 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 150th meeting of SEAC held on 7th, 8th and 9th October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that since it is ordinary clay, as per MOEF memorandum dated 24.12.2013, the depth of quarrying should not be more than 2 m below general ground level. The proponent has already removed 6000 Cum of clay and already depth excavated is 2 m below general ground level.

The Committee after discussion opined that it is not possible for further mining as per MOEF guide lines decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the modified land use plan limiting the production.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 08.12.2015.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the replies submitted. The committee observed that, since already mining has been done to a depth of 2 m and, the same was not shown in the approved geological cross sectional plan. In the approved C/s plan, it was shown that, mining will be carried from the ground level only.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the revised cross sectional plan duly approved by DMG.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 19.03.2016.

The committee observed that this being a ordinary clay quarry, the depth of the quarry is restricted to 2 m from the ground level. The proponent has stated that there is a level difference of 3 m in the quarry area from one end to another. Due to this level difference the proponent can get an average of 1.5 m advantage. The quarrying area is indicated is 0-17 Acres and already extracted is 6,000 Cum and the proponent has already achieved the threshold limit of 2 m. The committee opined that no further mining can be allowed as per the norms.

In view of the above the committee decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for rejection of Environmental Clearance.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.32 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.88 of Manchegowdanapalya Village, Ramanagar TaluK & Dist. (2-00 Acres) of M/s.Oriental Quarries & Mines Pvt. Ltd., Site No.717/2, Flat No.2, 1st Floor, Marigangappa Layout, Behind Silk Farm, Bidadi Hobli Ramanagara Taluk & District (SEIAA 1200 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by M/s.Oriental Quarries & Mines Pvt. Ltd seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres¸ at Sy.No.88 of Manchegowdanapalya Village, Ramanagar Taluk & Dist. It is a Govt. Revenue Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Dr.C.P.Prasannakumar and Sri.N.Shamsundar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Ramanagara. Capacity of mining is Avg. 22,473 TPA.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 151st meeting of SEAC held on 19th, 20th and 21st October 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed already many no. of proposals from this village have been cleared by the committee. The committee therefore directed the proponent to get the details of all the leases & Notifications issued of Manchegowdanapalya village with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the combined sketch of leases & Notifications as explained above.

The proponent has submitted the combined sketch during the meeting.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The committee reviewed the combined sketch and observed that in this area there are three cluster. This quarry area is falling in Manchegowdanapalya – Uragahalli cluster. In this cluster 11 proposals have been considered by SEAC for EC for total extent of 53-10 Acres and EC issued by the Authority. However the next proposal M/s. Robo Silicon Pvt. Ltd. (SEIAA 437 CMIN 2015) received to an extent of 15-00 Acres which will exceed the threshold limit of 62 Acres. Hence, ToR was issued for this proposal. Now this proposal for an extent of 2-00 Acres, the proponent requested the committee to consider this proposal as B2 category since the EC issued only for 53-10 Acres. However, Committee opined that the earlier proposal which is senior to this has already classified as B1 and this proposal cannot be taken up as B2 category.

The committee therefore decided to appraise the proposal as B1 and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of ToRs for conduct the EIA studies in accordance with the EIA Notification 2006 and relevant guidelines.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.33 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.88 of Manchegowdanapalya Village, Ramanagara Taluk & Dist. (1-14 Acres) of M/s.Oriental Quarries & Mines Pvt. Ltd., Site No.717/2, Flat No.2, 1st Floor, Marigangappa Layout, Behind Silk Farm, Bidadi Hobli Ramanagara Taluk & District (SEIAA 1234 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by M/s. Oriental Quarries & Mines Pvt. Ltd, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-14 Acres at Sy.No.88 of Manchegowdanapalya Village, Ramanagara Taluk & District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Dr.C.P.Prasanna Kumar and Sri.N.Sham Sundar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Ramanagara District. Capacity of mining is Av. 35,102 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 152nd meeting of SEAC held on 2nd and 3rd November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form 1, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed already many no. of proposals from this village have been cleared by the committee. The committee therefore directed the proponent to get the details of all the leases & Notifications issued of Manchegowdanapalya village with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

The Committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the combined sketch of leases & Notifications as explained above.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The proponent has submitted the combined sketch during the meeting.

The committee reviewed the combined sketch and observed that in this area there are three cluster. This quarry area is falling in Manchegowdanapalya – Uragahalli cluster. In this cluster 11 proposals have been considered by SEAC for EC for total extent of 53-10 Acres and EC issued by the Authority. However the next proposal M/s. Robo Silicon Pvt. Ltd. (SEIAA 437 CMIN 2015) received to an extent of 15-00 Acres which will exceed the threshold limit of 62 Acres. Hence, ToR was issued for this proposal. Now this proposal for an extent of 1-14 Acres, the proponent requested the committee to consider this proposal as B2 category since the EC issued only for 53-10 Acres. However, Committee opined that the earlier proposal which is senior to this has already classified as B1 and this proposal cannot be taken up as B2 category.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.34 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.29 of Huluvenahalli Village, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District (1-27 Acres) of M/s. Venkateshwara Stones, Sri. J. Yogasagar S/o Janardhan, Jigani Village & Post, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru District. (SEIAA 1293 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by M/s. Venkateshwara Stones, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-27 Acres at Sy.No.29 of Huluvenahalli Village, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District. It is a Government Gomala Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP P.S.Gopal Krishnappa approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is Av. 34,923 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, already many no. of proposals from this village have been cleared by the committee. The committee therefore directed the proponent to get the details of all the leases & Notifications issued of Huluvenahalli village with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the combined sketch of leases & Notifications as explained above. The proponent has not submitted the information sought by the committee in its earlier meeting.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and information provided in the file. The committee observed that, already many no. of proposals from this village have been cleared by the committee and it exceeds 25 Ha.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.35 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.343 of Kamanadurga Village, Pavagada Taluk, Tumkur District (8-0 Acres) of Smt. S.K. Vagdevi, No.2090, 4th Cross, Judicial Layout, GKVK Post, Bengaluru-560065. (SEIAA 1322 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Smt. S. K. Vagdevi, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 8-00 Acres at Sy No. 343, Kamanadurga Village, Nagalamadike Hobli, Pavagada Taluk, Tumkur District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Ganesha C R approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Tumkur District. Capacity of mining is Av. 1,61,562 TPA

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are invited for the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. The proponent remained absent.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, in the absence of the proponent.

The Committee after discussion decided to provide one more opportunity to the proponent since it is not possible to appraise the proposal in the absence of the proponent, and the following information’s are to be submitted.

1. Revised Geological & Mineable reserve calculation 2. Copy of RTC 3. Revised EMP Budget with a provision of check dams & CSR provision 4. Scheme of disposal of quarry waste

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. 60

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

1. RTC copy not submitted 2. Distance from interstate boundary not mentioned 3. Details of other quarries surrounding the proposed quarry area not given. 4. Soil test results not given

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of above information.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 18.03.2016.

The committee perused and agreed with the reply submitted by the proponent. The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.36 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.15/6 of Navadgi Village, Muddebihal Taluk, Vijayapura District (2-0 Acres) of Sri. Basanagowda Allikote S/o Sri. Mallanagowda Allikote, E/C/3/1, Rajanakollur, Shorapur Taluk, Yadgir District. (SEIAA 1375 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Basanagowda Allikote, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.15/6 of Navadgi Village, Muddebihal Taluk, Vijayapura District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Subban.H.V approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bijapur District. Capacity of mining is Av. 11412 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the above information.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 18.03.2016 along with the consent letter from Sri. Muddebihal, Vijayapura for use the road as approach road which is passing through their land.

The committee perused and agreed with the reply submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of EC.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.37 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.15 of Belur Village, Muddebihal Taluk, Vijayapura District (2-0 Acres) of Sri. Sharangopal S Desai S/o Sri. Sanganna C Desai, Belur Village, Muddebihal Taluk, Vijayapura District (SEIAA 1376 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Sharangopal S Desai, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.15 of Belur Village, Muddebihal Taluk, Vijayapura District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Subban.H.V approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bijapur District. Capacity of mining is Av. 11,730 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the above information.

The committee perused and agreed with the reply submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of EC.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.38 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.63/2 (P) of Bilkundi Village, Gokak Taluk, Belgaum District (2-0 Acres) of Sri. Shivappa Shivappa Madihalli, #170, Bilkundi Village, Gokak Taluk, Belgaum District (SEIAA 1410 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Shivappa Shivappa Madihalli, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.63/2 (P) of Bilkundi Village, Gokak Taluk, Belgaum District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.M.Sudheendra Kumar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Belgaum District. Capacity of mining is Av. 9,312 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee noted that many proposals have been cleared in this area and if the proposed area is likely to result in to a cluster situation with a total lease area of 25 Ha or more as defined in the O.M dated 24.12.2013 issued by the Ministry of Environment and Forest, Government of India then the proposal has to be appraised category B1. The committee therefore directed the proponent to get the details of all the leases & Notifications issued of Bilkundi village with the extent of lease area, lease Nos., latitude & longitude and distance between the boundaries (OUTER) of each lease area and to be marked on combined sketch plotted on a village map which shall be attested by a competent authority.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information.

1. Combined sketch of leases & Notifications as explained above 2. District Task Force proceedings

The proponent has submitted the District Task Force meeting proceedings held on 27.06.2014 and combined sketch vide letter dated 08.03.2016.

The committee perused the combined sketch submitted by the proponent and observed that in Bilakundi village the Sy. No. 123 is forming one cluster and Sy. No. 2, Sy. No. 76 and Sy. No. 63/2 is forming another cluster. This proposed area is falling in Sy. No. 63/2 (P) and in this cluster the total area of 58-10 Acres has already been considered for EC. By adding this proposal the total area will be 60-10 Acres which is less than threshold limit of 25 Ha.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

Hence the committee has decided to consider the proposal as B2 and recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of EC.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.39 Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.87 of Anamanahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District (6-0 Acres) (QL No.1351) of M/s. Sowmya Stones, Sy.No. 289, Kanakapura Bangalore Road, Near Ayyappa Swamy Temple, Next to Sri. Siradi Sai Choultry, Kanakapura town, Ramanagara District-562126. (SEIAA 1443 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by M/s. Sowmya Stones, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 6-00 Acres at Sy.No.87 of Anamanahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District. It is a Government Gomala Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP N.Sham Sunder and A.Kalaivendhan approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Ramanagara District. Capacity of mining is Av. 157,437 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to limit the production to 60%(Restricting the depth of mining to 10m below lowest level in the quarry area) of the total estimated production keeping the minable area quantity and the sustainability of the mine in the mind and had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information.

1. Modified quarry plan for the above quantity approved by DMG 2. Revised land use plan showing the corrected buffer area 3. Details of other quarries existing in and around the present quarry lease within 500 m radius from the proposed quarry lease duly approved by DMG. 4. RTC copy

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 08.03.2016.

The committee perused and agreed with the reply submitted by the proponent. The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of EC.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

29th March 2016 10.00 AM to 11.30 AM

Members Present in the meeting:

Shri. N. Naganna - Chairman Prof. D.L. Manjunath - Member Dr. S. Manjappa - Member Dr. B.S. Jayaprakash - Member Dr. M.I. Husain - Member Shri. B. Chikkappaiah - Member Dr. N. Krishnamurthy - Member Dr. K.C. Jayaramu - Member Shri H. Srinivasaiah - Member Dr. K.B. Umesh - Member Shri. M. Subramany - Member Shri. Vijaya Kumar - Secretary

EIA Presentation:

161.40 Expansion of Sugar plant of 15,000 TCD to 20,000 TCD and co-generation plant from 62 MW to 94 MW at Sy. No. 166, Kulali Cross, Jamakhandi Road, Mudhol-567 313, Bagalkot District of Sri Rajshekhar S. Nuli, CEO, M/s Nirani Sugars Limited (SEIAA 7 IND 2015)

This is a proposal seeking Environment Clearance for Expansion of Sugar plant of 15,000 TCD to 20,000 TCD and co-generation plant from 62 MW to 94 MW at Sy. No. 166, Kulali Cross, Jamakhandi Road, Mudhol-567 313, Bagalkot District by Sri Rajshekhar S. Nuli, CEO, M/s Nirani Sugars Limited.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 129th meeting of SEAC held on 9th, 10th and 11th February 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, pre-feasibility report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. 65

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Committee after discussion decided to appraise the proposal as B1 and decided to issue Standard ToR for conducting EIA study in accordance with EIA Notification 2006 and the relevant guidelines after duly incorporating outcome of the public consultation.

The committee also suggested to assess cumulative impact of the other industries in the vicinity considering the distance factor.

Accordingly the ToR was issued vide letter dated 03.03.2015.

The proponent submitted the EIA report vide letter dated 15.03.2016.

The project proponent and NABET accredited EIA coordinator from Environmental health & safety consultants’ pvt. ltd, Bangalore. were present in the meeting and presented the EIA report. The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility report, EIA report, and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed the following points. 1. Requirement of water during non crushing season for generation of power, considering worst case scenario is not forthcoming in the report. 2. In the nearby Janata colony, air monitoring studies has not been carried out. 3. Noise studies have not been conducted near turbine area. 4. The proponent informed that, they are doing flaring manually. 5. Press mud was transported through trucks. 6. Use of domestic waste & waste oil residue as burning materials for boilers is not done. 7. Compliance given to earlier issued EC is not satisfactory. 8. In the layout plan all the infrastructure existing in the premises is not shown.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information & conditions.

1. Water requirement during non crushing season for co- generation power plant. 2. Noise study report nearby turbine area to be provided 3. Transportation of press mud through conveyors maybe studied and implemented. 4. Use of lime paste instead of lime stone (burnt) to avoid solid grit generation and its disposal. 5. Use of domestic solid waste (combustible)& waste oil residue may be used along with baggase as a fuel in the boilers 6. Updated compliance to earlier issued EC. 7. Revised layout plan showing the entire infrastructure. 8. Green belt to a minimum width of 20 to 30 m all round the premises. 9. Details of water used by farmers for their lands (Cropping pattern, No. of applications, frequency of supply 10Analysis soil for Nitrate/Nitrogen along with other parameters may also be reported.

11 scheme proposed to reduce fresh water drawl from the river may be explained

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

conditions: 1. Waste water should not be allowed outside the premises & also agreement with farmers for taking treated waste water for their lands. 2. Online monitoring system for air quality and water quality to be implemented as per MoEF/CPCB norms 3. Dyke wall to be provided for molasses tank to contain the molasses in unforeseen damage of the tank 4. Health check up records of workers in the industry to be maintained

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

Pendency proposals:

161.41 Proposed Residential Apartment project at Survey Nos. 48/1, 48/3, 48/4A, 48/4B, 48/5, 48/6 and 49/2, Kyalasanahalli Village, K R Puram Hobli, Bangalore East, Bangalore of M/s Rohan Builders, # 1201, 1st floor, Divyashakthi, 100 feet Road, indiranagar (SEIAA 184 CON 2015)

M/s Rohan Builders have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of Residential apartments Project at Survey Nos. 48/1, 48/3, 48/4A, 48/4B, 48/5, 48/6 and 49/2, Kyalasanahalli Village, K R Puram Hobli, Bangalore East, Bangalore under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 53,494.64 Sq.mts (13.21 Acres) 2. The proposed project consists total builtup area of 1,49,471 Sq.mts comprising 975 No’s of residential flats with building configuration 2B + GF +14 UF. Total cost of the project is Rs. 313 Crores. 3. Landscape area (proposed): 16,014.69 Sq.mts (32.39% on natural earth) 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 681 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met by BWSSB. Copy of NOC is not submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 545 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 600 KLD. 6. Excavated Earth Management: The total earth excavation carried out is about 50,000 m3. About 15,000 Cu.m will be used for landscape development, about 16,000 Cu.m will be used for backfilling and 19,000 Cu.m will be used for formation and Hardscaping activities. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 1950 kg/day; which includes organic waste is 1170 kg/day and inorganic waste is 780 kg/day. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 5,145 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 1 x 250 KVA and 3 x 500 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 1090 No’s of cars. 10. Environment sensitivity: Kalkere Lake at 565 meters (South West) , Rampura Lake 2Km (South East) distance from the project site. 11. Other details: Height of the building is 24.54 M. Rain water harvesting system proposed.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information.

1. Revised water balance considering 95% sewage generation and the scheme of treatment for reusing the treated water 2. Details of excavated earth(with calculation) and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal site 3. Detailed Hydrological study of the influencing area 4. UGD carrying capacity to take additional discharge of excess trated water 5. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an appropriate plan thereof with due calculations. 6. Detailed area calculation to be shown in land use plan 7. Baseline data

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 31-12-2015

The committee reviewed the replies submitted by the proponent during the 158th meeting of SEAC held on 27th and 28th January 2016. The committee observed the following points.

1. The replies furnished regarding scientific handling of excavated earth, are not convincing and have to be reworked based on actual calculation and to be resubmitted. 2. Status of NOC from BWSSB not forthcoming in the replies.

The committee is not convinced with the replies submitted. The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the above information. The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 01.03.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent. The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.42 Proposed residential building development project SENORITA II at Sy. No. 6/2, Bengaluru East Taluku, Bengaluru District of M/s. Salarpuria Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., # 3, 4th Floor, Salarpuria Windsor, Ulsoor Road, Bengaluru, Pin: 560 042. (SEIAA 185 CON 2015)

M/s. Salarpuria Real Estate Pvt. Ltd (SREPL) have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of SENORITA II Residential building 68

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016 at Sy. No. 6/2, Bengaluru East Taluku, Bengaluru District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 10061.41 Sq.mts

2. The proposed project consists gross builtup area of 42,672.57 Sq.mts comprising 132 No’s of residential flats with building configuration 2B + GF +17 UF. Total cost of the project is Rs. 98.61 Crores. 3. Landscape area (proposed): 3063 Sq.mts 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 110 Cu.m/day. Water requirement for the project will be met by BWSSB. Copy of NOC is submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 88 Cu.m/day and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 90 Cu.m by SBR Technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management: The total earth excavation carried out is about 12,370 m3. About 3,000 Cu.m will be used for backfilling done between foundations, 3,000 Cu.m will be used for backfilling done on the backside of retaining walls & underground tanks, 3,220 Cu.m will be used for filling up low level areas, and 3,150 Cu.m top soil is used for landscape development. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 297 kgs/day; which includes organic waste is 119 kgs/day and inorganic waste is 119 kgs/day. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers. 8. Hazardous Waste Management: Waste oil from D.G. sets about 1KL per annum, is stored in drum and handed over to KSPCB authorized waste oil reprocessors. 9. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1838 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 2 x 500 KVA. 10. Traffic Details: Traffic details mentioned. Parking proposed: 323 No’s of cars. L.O.S is B-B-B. 11. Environment sensitivity: Bellandur Lake, Kaikondrahalli Lake, Saul Kere, Kasavanahalli Lake, Iblur Lake, Halanayakanahalli Lake, Doddakanneli Lake & Agara Lake at 2.66 Kms, 0.73 Kms, 0.70 Kms, 1.20 Kms, 1.98 Kms, 1.5 Kms, 1.33 Kms & 4.12 Kms respectively. 12. Other details: Height of the building is 59.9 M. Rain water harvesting system proposed. Total energy savings is 20.85% mentioned.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 24.02.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent except the earth work utilization within the project site and hydrological study.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Rework the earth work calculation by reducing the earth work generation or utilizing the entire earth generated within the project site only.

2. Hydrological study considering the micro and mini water shed area where the project site is located and accordingly the details of the drain/nala to be furnished.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

161.43 Proposed Residential apartment at Sy. No. 17/1A, 17/1C,17/2, Dasarahalli Village Yeshwantpur of M/s. Salarpuria Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., # 3, 4th floor, Salarpuria Windsor, Ulsoor road, Bengaluru - 560 042. (SEIAA 186 CON 2015)

M/s.Sattva Developers Pvt. Ltd (SDPL) have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of Residential building at Sy. No. 6/2, Bengaluru East Taluku, Bengaluru District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. 1. Land details: - Total gross Plot area is 11039.995 Sq.mts 2. The proposed project consists gross builtup area of 53,532 Sq.mts comprising 286 No’s of residential flats with building configuration consists of 3 Towers 2B + GF +24 UF. Total cost of the project is Rs.116.34 Crores. 3. Landscape area (proposed): 4,520 Sq.mts (Natural Ground) 1,071 Sq.mts (on Podium) 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 160 Cu.m/day. Water requirement for the project will be met by BWSSB. Copy of NOC is submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 130 Cu.m/day and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 130 Cu.m by SBR Technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management: The total earth excavation carried out is about 19,598.16m3. About 6,000 Cu.m will be used for backfilling done between foundations, 5,150 Cu.m will be used for backfilling done on the backside of 70

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

retaining walls & underground tanks, 4,700 Cu.m will be used for filling up low level areas, and 3,748 Cu.m top soil is used for landscape development. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 583 kgs/day; which includes organic waste is 350 kgs/day and inorganic waste is 233 kgs/day. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers. 8. Hazardous Waste Management: Waste oil from D.G. sets about 1KL per annum, is stored in drum and handed over to KSPCB authorized waste oil reprocessors. 9. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 2058 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 2 x 360 KVA. Total energy savings is 20% mentioned. 10. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 333 No’s of cars. L.O.S is B-B-B. 11. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted. Dasarahalli Tank, Doddabidirakallu kere, Anchepalya Lake, Chikkabanavara Lake, at 0.49 Kms, 1.19 Kms, 2.9 Kms, 3.96 Kms and three water bodies at 2.28kms, 2.49 kms & 4.5 kms respectively. 12. Other details: Height of the building is 76.5 M(Max.ht w.r.to all 3 Towers) Rain water harvesting system proposed. 13. Connectivity: The project is located along Tumkur road of RoW 45m which connects to Nelamanagala on one side and to Yeshwanthpur on another side.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information.

1. Revised water balance considering 95% sewage generation and the scheme of treatment for reusing the treated water 2. Details of excavated earth(with calculation) and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal site 3. Detailed Hydrological study of the influencing area 4. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an appropriate plan thereof with due calculations. 5. Baseline data

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 25.02.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent except the earth work utilization within the project site and hydrological study.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

1. Rework the earth work calculation by reducing the earth work generation or utilizing the entire earth generated within the project site only. 2. Hydrological study considering the micro and mini water shed area where the project site is located and accordingly the details of the drain/nala to be furnished.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

161.44 Expansion of "SKYLARK ARCADIA" Residential Villas Project at Sy.No.22/1, 23/2 & 24/1, Sadaramangala, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangaluru East Taluk, Bangaluru Urban District of M/s. Skylark Mansions Pvt. Ltd., #37/21, Skylark Chambers, Ulsoor Road, Bangalore - 560 042. (SEIAA 189 CON 2015)

M/s. Skylark Mansions Pvt. Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed Expansion of Residential Villas Project at Sy.No.22/1, 23/2 & 24/1, Sadaramangala, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangaluru East Taluk, Bangaluru Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 64,445.69 Sq.mts (Earlier it was 68,362.89 Sq.mtrs)

1. The proposed project consists of total builtup area of 44,920.02 Sq.mts increasing from 44,435.22 Sq.mts (+484.8 Sq.mtrs) with increase in the residential villas from 106 no’s to 114 villas, the building configuration remains same, GF +2UF Total cost of the project is Rs. 4.98 Crores.(increase of investment from 124 crores

to 128.9 crores)

2. Landscape area: 23528.15 Sq.mts (38.43%)

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 195 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met by BWSSSB. Copy of NOC is submitted. 4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 240 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 240 KLD with SBR

Technology.

5. Excavated Earth Management: The total estimated earth quantity is about 20,000 Cu.m, Backfilling to be done between foundations is 8,000 Cu.m. Topsoil

reused for landscaping work is 12,000 Cu.m. [[ 6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 330 kgs/day; which includes organic waste and inorganic waste, organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers. 7. Hazardous Waste Management: Waste oil from D.G. sets is stored in leak proof

sealed barrels and handed over to KSPCB authorized waste oil reprocessors. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1445 KVA is sourced from

BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 4 x 500 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 368 No’s of cars. 10. Other details: Height of the building is 13.30 M. Rain water harvesting system proposed. [

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, there is a decrease in the plot area. The committee also observed that, in the water balance chart, 200 LPCD has been considered instead of 135 LPCD for calculation of water demand. Also, it is phase- 2 project and already construction of phase – 1 project has completed. The proponent informed the committee that, the decrease in the plot area is due to relinquishment of about 3917.20 sq.m of land to BDA for road widening purpose. And they have already constructed an STP of capacity 240 KLD to cater the needs of the both phases.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information.

1. Revised water balance chart considering 135 LPCD 2. An undertaking regarding the operation and usage of STP for the both the phases 3. The relinquishment document regarding handing over of land to BDA 4. Detailed Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow 5. Break up of solar generation and energy savings 6. Combined water balance chart considering both the phases.

The proponent have submitted the reply vide letter dated 29.01.2016.

The committee reviewed the reply submitted by the proponent during the 159th meeting of SEAC held on 22nd and 23rd February 2016. In their reply, regarding conducting detailed hydrological study, instead of conducting the studies, the proponent informed that, there is no much influence on the runoff due to the proposed project, and also reply given for the breakup of solar generation & energy savings is not convincing.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information.

1. Taking into consideration micro water shed in which the project site is located, hydrological studies is to be conducted. 2. Break up of solar generation and energy savings

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 24.03.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.45 Residetial Apartment Project at Sy.No.72 of Bommasandra Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. Krishna Enterprises (Housing Infrastructures) India Pvt. Ltd., No.32, 73

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

Second Floor, PSR Marvel, Near Canara Bank, Bellary Road, Hebbal, Bengaluru – 560 008 (SEIAA 190 CON 2015)

M/s. Krishna Enterprises (Housing Infrastructures) India Pvt. Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of Residential apartment Project at Sy.No.72 of Bommasandra Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 22,575 Sq.mts 1. The proposed project consists of total builtup area of 58,762 Sq.mts comprising 300 No’s of flats with building configuration B + GF +4 UF. Total cost of the

project is Rs. 139 Crores.

2. Landscape area (proposed): 1,985.08 Sq.mts (29.61%) on natural Earth 3,806.85 Sq.mts on Podium

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 213 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met by borewell sources in the project site by obtaining the permission from KGWA. 4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is

192 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 235 KLD.

5. Excavated Earth Management: The quantity of earthwork involved on-site is estimated to be about 41,000 Cu.m, about 12,500 Cu.m will be used for backfilling, 7,500 Cu.m will be hardscaping and formation activities within the project site. Excess excavated earth of 21,000 Cu.m will be used for landscape

development within the project site. [

[[ 6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 600 Kg/day; where 360 kg/day is the organic waste and 240 kg/day is inorganic waste, organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers. 7. Hazardous Waste Management: 100 Liters/annum waste oil from DG sets, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 3527 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 3 x 630 KVA. Total energy

savings is not mentioned. 9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 379 No’s of ECS. 10. Environment sensitivity: Kammasandra Lake at 0.08 Km (East), Bannerughatta National Park is about 14kms from the project site. 11. Other details: Height of the building is 14.95 M. Rain water harvesting system proposed.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, the proposed project site is abetting kammasandra lake. The proponent informed the committee that, as per requirement, they have left 30 meter buffer from the lake.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information.

1. The details of waste weir level, height of spill and thereby maximum water level of the adjoining lake. 2. With respect to MWL of tank, site lowest level & boundary. 3. Sketch indicating the lake boundary (MWL) & site location 4. Scientific assessment of ground water for both quantity & quality, and scheme of treatment to use the treated water, and its impact on competitive users. 5. Revised water balance calculating fresh water demand at the rate of 55 LPCD as per the norms prescribed for rural water supply and the scheme of treatment for reusing the treated water 6. Revised rain water harvesting calculation considering minimum two days rainfall and accordingly design of storage tank 7. Justify the pumping hours against the duration availability of power. 8. Recharge pits are to be provided away from water body 9. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an appropriate plan thereof with due calculations

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 29.02.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance with a condition that the softner liquid in the treatment scheme to be disposed scientifically as per the norms.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.46 “Infosys Limited, Electronics City Phase 2” Office Building Project at Survey Nos. 40 (P) & 41 (P), Electronics City Phase 2 Industrial Area, Konappana Agrahara, Begur Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengalururict Urban District – 560100 of M/s. Infosys Limited, 44, Electronics City, Hosur Road, Bengaluru - 560 100 (SEIAA 194 CON 2015)

M/s. Infosys Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed “Infosys Limited, Electronic City Phase 2” development of office building project at Survey Nos. 40 (P) & 41 (P), Electronics City Phase 2 Industrial Area, Konappana Agrahara,

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

Begur Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details: - Total site area is 14,206.12 Sq.mts. 1. The project involves construction of Software building with configuration of 2B+G+6 Floors with height of 29.10m and MLCP with configuration of G + 8 Floors with height of 30.8 meters. The total cost of the project is 186.06 crores. 2. Landscape area (proposed): 4,950.98 Sq.mtrs (34.85%) 3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 207 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met by ELCITA. Copy of NOC submitted. 4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 127 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 140 KLD treated by MBR Technology. 5. Excavated Earth Management: The quantity of earthwork involved on-site is estimated to be about 20,290 Cu.m. For Back Filling in foundation & side of retaining wall-1,100 Cu.m Backfilling for formation of MLCP – 3,600 Cu.m For Landscaping - 3,300 Cu.m Back filling in formation of Roads– 4,300 Cu.m Excess amount - 7,990 Cu.m 6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 800 Kgs/day; where 320 kgs/day is the organic waste and 480 kgs/day is inorganic waste, organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers. 7. Hazardous Waste Management: waste oil from DG sets, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers.The generated E-waste will be handed over to authorized E-waste processors approved by KSPCB. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement is 1250 KVA from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of No’s, 750 KVA X 3No’ 9. Parking proposed: 532 No’s of cars provided.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, there is a building having plinth area of 4600 Sq.m existing in the proposed project site. The proponent informed that, at present the building is abandoned and not in use and also the building was not use for any industrial activity.

The committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the following information.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

1. Quantification of debris of the existing building after demolition and scheme of disposal 2. List of species existing with numbers and the no. Of trees to be cut and design of three tier green belt all along the boundary of the proposed project site using local fruit yielding trees. 3. An undertaking regarding not to cut the trees and instead transplantation of some of the trees. 4. Details of excavated earth(with calculations) and scheme of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal site & explore the possibility of providing 1 ½ basement below ground level & ½ basement above GL, thereby reducing the quantity of excavated earth. 5. A site plan showing the existing building and indicating present status and super imposing the proposed conceptual plan 6. Commitment for sustainable water supply scheme since, the ELCITA while giving NOC for supplying of water, has written that, the water will be supplied through tankers, since supply of water through tankers is not allowed. 7. Alternate source of water 8. Revised rain water harvesting calculation 9. Revised soil analysis considering physical & chemical parameters 10. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow 11. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an appropriate plan thereof with due calculations 12. Revised EMP budget incorporating CSR provision 13. Lead certificate

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 28.01.2016.

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the 159th SEAC meeting held on 22nd and 23rd February 2016 to provide required clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the reply submitted by the proponent and agreed with the reply submitted except the earth work calculation and its utilization and the proponent has not carried out the hydrology study of the area influencing the surface water flow. Hence the committee asked the proponent to submit the revised earth work calculation and its utilization within the project site and hydrology study report.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the above information.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 02.03.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.47 Proposed residential building apartment project at Sy. No. 412, 416/1, 416/2 of Devanahalli village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk Bangalore Rural District of M/s. Sanchaya Land and Estate Pvt Ltd., No. 482, 3rd Floor, 80 ft. Road, HMT Layout, Near R.T. Nagar Bus Depot, Above Cuppa Restaurant, Bangalore – 560032. (SEIAA 198 CON 2015)

M/s. Sanchaya Land and Estate Pvt Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of Residential Apartment Project at Sy. No. 412, 416/1, 416/2 of Devanahalli village, Kasaba Hobli, Devanahalli Taluk Bangalore Rural District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details:- Total Plot area is 30,065.87 Sq.mts 1. The proposed project consists total builtup area of 82,954.79 Sq.mts comprising of

B+GF+12UF+TF with 1173 Flats. Total cost of the project is Rs. 176 Crores.

2. Landscape area (proposed): 10523 Sq.mts (35%)

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 792 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met from Gramphanchayat. Copy of NOC is submitted. 4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 712 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 720 KLD treated with

SBR Technology.

5. Excavated Earth Management: The total quantity of excavation from the

proposed project is 5,900 Cu.m[. Backfilling to be done between foundations is about 2,900 Cu.m. Backfilling to be done on the backside of retaining walls &

underground tanks is about 2,000 Cu.m.

[[ 6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 2838 Kgs/day; where 1703 kg/day is organic waste and 1135 kg/day is inorganic waste is worked out as per guidelines of IS 6924-1973. 7. Hazardous Waste Management: Around 3KL/annum waste oil from DG sets, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers. 8. Energy Requirement: Total connected load shall be 4,700 KVA, Demand load shall be 3,500 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 3 x 1000 KVA and 500 x 1 KVA.

9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 665 No’s of Cars.

Note: Proposed to provide only 665 number of cars for 1173

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

1. The spacing of the buildings is very close and there will be no cross ventilation between buildings. 2. The nearest fire station mentioned as Airport fire station. 3. The height limit of the building (45 m) is as per the Airport authority directions. 4. Water balance chart is wrong 5. Quality of RO reject not given 6. Disposal of inorganic waste & solid waste management not properly addressed. 7. Availability of sustainable water quantity is not submitted.

The committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the following information.

1. The nearest fire station location to be changed 2. Revised concept plan ensuring cross ventilation to all the units 3. RO reject quality to be rechecked and revised water balance chart 4. The width of fire safety stair case to be kept @ 1.50 m 5. Scheme of disposal of inorganic waste & proper management of solid waste 6. Establishing the availability of sustainable water supply and its impact on competitive users

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 30.01.2016.

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the 159th SEAC meeting held on 22nd and 23rd February 2016 to provide required clarification/additional information.

The committee reviewed the reply submitted by the proponent and agreed with the reply submitted except the rain water calculation details which the proponent has failed to explain and the proponent informed the committee that the excess of 163 KLD of treated water will be given to TMC for parks and avenue plantation for which the MOU with the TMC to take the excess treated water.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Revised rain water calculation 2. An MOU with the TMC to take the excess treated water for the parks and avenue plantations.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 26.03.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.48 “Sethna Power Tower” Residential Apartment at Khatha No. 11, Sy. No. 50, Chelekere Village, K.R. Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru of M/s. Bramhall Developers Pvt. Ltd, No. 13, Kensington Gardens, Kensington Road, Ulsoor, Bengaluru (SEIAA 202 CON 2015)

M/s. Bramhall Developers Pvt. Ltd, have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of “Sethna Power Tower” residential apartment project at Khatha No. 11, Sy. No. 50, Chelekere Village, K.R. Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details:- Total Plot area is 14,647.84 Sq.mts (3 Acres 24.8 Guntas) 1. The proposed project consists of total builtup area of 35,789.92 Sq.mts consisting of 172 units sprawled across B+G+14UF in Block A & B +G+4UF in Block – B with a maximum height of 44.85m. The construction work for Block- A has been completed and it is occupied. The work is yet to start for Block –B. The total cost

of the project is 49.65 Crores. 2. Landscape area (proposed): 4,370.02 Sq.mts (37.29%)

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 120 KLD. Water requirement for the project will be met from BWSSB. Copy of NOC is submitted. 4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 108 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 115 KLD treated with

SBR Technology.

1. Excavated Earth Management: Total Excavated Earth is 6,250 m3 For Back Filling and Levelling 4,000 m3 For Landscaping - 2,000 m3 For Roads and walkway formation–250 m3

[[ 5. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 387 Kgs/day; where 232 kg/day is organic waste and 155 kg/day is inorganic waste. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers. 6. Hazardous Waste Management: 0.243 liter/ running hour of waste oil from DG sets, which will be given to KSPCB, designated waste oil recyclers handed over to KSPCB designated waste oil recyclers. 7. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1000 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 2x250 KVA. Total energy savings is 20%.

8. Traffic Details: Approach road infront of the project site is 15m wide termed as collector road connecting ORR to Bidrahalli, kalkere & Aduru. L.O.S is B-B-B Parking proposed: 236 No’s of Cars.

9. Environment sensitivity: Chelekere Lake – 500 meters Jarkabandi State Forest- 12 Kms. 10. Other Details: Rainwater harvesting facility has been implemented with a roof rain water collection sump of capacity 100 cu.m and also 20 no’s recharge pits.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are invited for the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information. But they remained absent.

1. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an appropriate plan thereof with due calculations. 2. Scheme for utilisation of entire Rain Water harvested in the project site (both from the roof top and from the surface runoff) within the Project premises only. 3. Details of excavated earth and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal site 4. Hydrological study of the area influencing the surface water flow. 5. Explore the possibility to increase greenery in the ground itself 6. Explore the possibility of increasing the use of treated water in order to reduce the fresh water demand 7. Scheme of treating sewage and sullage separately and use of treated water within the project site 8. Scientific analysis of ground water foe quantity & quality and its impact on competitive users.

The committee after discussion had decided to provide final opportunity to the proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent and the proponent is asked to submit the above information.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 159th SEAC meeting held on 22nd and 23rd February 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the construction of Block ‘A’ is already completed and it is a clear violation of EIA Notification 2006. The proponent accepted the same. The proponent has not submitted the information sought in the earlier meeting. The proponent is asked to submit the same. Since the proposal has been appraised in the absence of the proponent in the earlier meeting the same has been again appraised in the presence of the proponent. The violation may be reported to Authority to take credible action.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the information sought in the earlier meeting. [

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 26.02.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance and also decided to report the violation to the Authority to take credible action.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.49 "Skylark Royume" Residential Apartment Project at Sy.Nos. 26/1 & 26/2 of Beratana Agrahara Village, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District of M/s. Royaume Estates Pvt. Ltd., #37/21, Skylark Chambers, Yellappachetty Layout, Ulsoor Road, Bengaluru - 560042. (SEIAA 209 CON 2015)

M/s. Royaume Estates Pvt.Ltd, have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for Development of Residential apartment project “Skylark Royaume” at Sy. Nos.26/1, 26/2 of Beratana Agrahara, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 29339.46 Sq.mts with kharab land of 910.53 Sqm 2. The proposed residential apartment consists of 3 Blocks with 6 towers. Block – 1 – (Tower A,B & C) – B+G+14 UF, Block – 2 – (Tower D& E) 2B + G + 14 UF & Block – 3 (Tower F) 2B + G + 14 UF.1, & 729 (72 EWS+657 general) Nos. of units and a Club house with a height of 45 m. with Total Built up area of 1,25,727.36 Sq.mts. The site lies in Seismic Zone II. 3. Land use details: Landscape area (proposed): 6125.28 Sq.mts (22.68 % ) (on natural earth) 6419.86 Sq.mts (23.77%) (on podium) Ground coverage area = 5900.00 Sqm (21.85%) Driveway,paved,ramps area = 8193.13 Sqm (30.33%) Other services (transformer yard) = 369.21 Sq.mts. (1.37%) The permissible FAR is 3.6 & achieved is 3.03 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 560 KLD (318 KLD fresh water (@90 lpcd) + 242 KLD Recycled water). The source of water is BWSSB. Requistion letter to BWSSB submitted.

5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 425 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 440 KLD with SBR

Technology.

6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generated = 80000 Cum. All the earth generated will be utilised within the project site for landscaping & road making. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 1400 Kgs/day; where 700 kgs/day is the organic waste and 560 kgs/day is inorganic waste & 140 Kgs/day inert waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 4.9 MVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 4X630 KVA. The

total energy savings is 19.31%. 9. Traffic Details: Not submitted. Parking proposed: 792. Nos. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted 11. Other details: Rain water harvesting is proposed. There are four lakes near by a. Doddanagamangala Lake : 0.50 Km. b. Rayasandra lake : 1.00 Km. c. Chikka Togur lake: 1.00 Km. d. Begur lake: 3.80 Km.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

12. There are about 200 coconut trees existing, out of which 50 trees will be transplanted, 8 trees at the periphery will be retained & remaining 142 trees will be cut.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 158th SEAC meeting held on 27th and 28th January 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed the following points.

1. The earth work calculation for foundation is not done properly. 2. Utilization of solar power and its generation not given. 3. Only 22% area is left for green belt as against 33%. 4. The soil & water analysis tests were conducted in laboratory which was not accredited by NABET. 5. The water balance chart, quantity shown for different process is not matching which needs to be reworked. 6. Traffic data was submitted during presentation.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following documents.

1. Revised quantification of earthwork generation & its disposal. 2. Quantification of terrace area for solar power generation with calculation. 3. Revised water balance chart. 4. Soil and water analysis report from NABET accredited laboratory. 5. Explore the possibility of providing fire escape chutes. 6. Compensate the reduced green belt area with avenue plantation.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 25.02.2016.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.50 Residential Apartment with Club House Project at Survey Nos. 18/4B, 18/4C, 18/5B2 & 18/5B3, Doddanagamangala Village, Begur Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District of M/s. Radiant Structures (P) Ltd. (SEIAA 213 CON 2015)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Radiant Structures (P) Ltd., Name of the Consultancy Firm: - M/s. Aqua Engineering solutions M/s. Radiant Structures (P) Ltd., has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their Residential Apartment Project at Sy.No. 18/4B, 18/4C, 18/5B2 & 18/5B3, Doddanagamangala Village, Begur Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost = Rs. 46 Cr.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 17,502.67 Sqm 2. The proposed residential buildings consists of 369 units and the configuration of the building is G+9UF and a club house in a total built up area of 45,788.68 Sqm. Ht of the building is 29.95 m, Right of way is 12.50 m. 3. Land use details: Total plot area -17,502.67 Sqm Green belt area -7,876.20 (45%) Driveway and hardscape ared -2,906.20 Sqm (16.61%) Ground coverage -6,720.27 Sqm (38.39%) Permissible FAR is 1.5 and proposed is 1.499. 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 256 KLD.(105 KLD fresh water + 151 KLD Recycled water) The source of water is Konappana Agrahara village panchayat. NOC from Konappana Agrahara village panchayat submitted. Scientific assessment of the water in the gram panchayat submitted. Fresh water requirement calculated for 55 LPCD. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 243 KLD (considering 95% waste generation) and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 250 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generated = 10,080 Cum. for backfilling - 4,032.16 Cum; landscaping – 3,150.48 Cum; roads and walk ways – 1,162.48 Cum and for site formation (Level difference in the project site is 3m) – 1,734.88 Cum. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 951 Kgs/day; where 571 kgs/day is the organic waste and 380 kgs/day is inorganic waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers. Sludge generated is 12 Kg/day. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1707 KW is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 1X750 KVA. Power savings is 26.13% 9. Traffic Details: submitted. Parking required is 364 and provided is 364. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. 11. Other details: 20 Nos of recharge pits have been provided to recharge the ground water within the site. 12. Environmental sensitive area: Konappana agrahara lake is falls within 500 m from the project site as per the google image submitted by the proponent.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

agrahara lake is within 500 m from the project site. Therefore the committee directed the proponent to get clarification from competent authority (MI/LDA/BDA/BBMP) that the propolect area is not coming under lake bed or water spread area. Also the source of water shown is from village panchayat & hence it is instructed to conduct scientific assessment for availability of water for quantity & quality and its impact on the competitive users.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following.

1. Clarification from competent authority (MI/LDA/BDA/BBMP) regarding the project site is not coming under lake bed or water spread area. 2. Scientific assessment of availability of water for quality & quantity & its impact on competitive users.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 21.03.2016.

The committee perused the replies submitted by the proponent. The committee observed that, the letter given by Tahsildar is for kharab land only & is silent about water/lake bed. As per the Google map, the lake appears to be about 100 m away from the project site, but, as per CDP, the lake is abutting the site and accordingly 30 m buffer has been left. The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the clarification regarding distance of lake from the site by the competent authority as sought in the earlier meeting.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

161.51 Residential Apartment Project at Khatha No.421, Sy.No.26/27, Chunchaghatta Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District of M/s. Majestic Property Developers Pvt. Ltd. (SEIAA 1 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Majestic Property Developers Pvt. Ltd. M/s. Majestic Property Developers Pvt. Ltd., has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their Residential Apartment Project at Sy.No. No.421, Sy.No.26/27, Chunchaghatta Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost = Rs. 65 Cr. Land details: - Total Plot area is 18,109.43 Sqm 1. The proposed residential buildings comprising 2 blocks: Block A having B+G+4 UF+Terrace Floor with 215 units and Block B having G+4 UF+ Terrace Floor with 100 units with a total built up area of 49,963.70 Sqm. Ht of the building is 14.95 m, Right of way is 9.28 m. 2. Land use details: Total plot area -18,109.43 Sqm Green belt area -8,489.96 Sqm (46.88%) 85

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

Ground coverage -7,290 Sqm (40.26%) Permissible FAR is 1.75 and proposed is 1.74. 3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 219 KLD.(149 KLD fresh water + 70 KLD Recycled water) The source of water is from BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB not submitted. 4. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 187 KLD (considering 85% waste generation) and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 200 KLD with SBR technology. 5. Excavated Earth Management: - details not submitted 6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 630 Kgs/day; where 378 kgs/day is the organic waste and 252 kgs/day is inorganic waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers. 7. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1420 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 3X450 KVA. Energy savings is 16.279%. 8. Traffic Details: Not submitted. Parking provided is 347. 9. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. 10. Other details: 8 Nos of recharge pits have been provided to recharge the ground water within the site. 11. Environmental sensitive area: Sarakki Lake – 0.1 km; Puttenahalli Lake – 1.3 km; Chunchugatta Lake – 0.25 Kms.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent submitted the detailed earth work calculation and traffic study report during the presentation. The committee made the following observations:

1. Sarakki lake is 0.1 km and Chunchugatta lake is 0.25 km from the project site 2. There was discrepancy in the water balance chart. 3. Base line data not submitted

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Clarification regarding the project area is not falling under eco sensitive area from sensitive zone clearance committee of BDA 2. Hydrology study of the area influencing the surface water flow considering the Sarakki lake and Chunchugatta lake. 3. Revised water balance chart 4. EMP & baseline data for the environmental parameters

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 28.03.2016.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The committee perused the replies submitted by the proponent. The committee observed that, Hydrological study is not conducted considering Sarakki & Chunchagatta lake (Micro water shed network). The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the revised hydrology study considering Sarakki & Chunchagatta lake (Micro water shed network).

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

161.52 Residential Apartment Project at Sy.Nos.69/1, 125/1 & 70/1 of Pattandur Agrahara Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District of M/s. Sai Raghavendra Constructions and Developers. (SEIAA 2 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Sai Raghavendra Constructions and Developers. M/s. Sai Raghavendra Constructions and Developers., has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their Residential Apartment Project at Sy.Nos.69/1, 125/1 & 70/1 of Pattandur Agrahara Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost = Rs. 60 Cr.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 16,166.29 Sqm 2. The proposed residential apartment comprising 2 blocks: Block A having Lower Basement + Upper Basement + Ground Floor+ 4 Uper Floors + Terrace Floor with 160 units & Block B having B+G+4 UF+ Terrace Floor with 119 units in a built up area of 40,664.14 Sqm. Ht of the building is 14.99 m, Right of way is 13.18 m. 3. Land use details: Total plot area -16,166.29 Sqm Land scape -6,065.98 Sqm (37.52%) Roads and open space area -4,145.85 Sqm (25.65%) Ground coverage -5,954.46 Sqm (36.83%) Permissible FAR is 2.25 and proposed is 1.905. 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 194.63 KLD.(83 KLD fresh water + 111 KLD Recycled water) The source of water is from BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB not submitted 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 165.43 KLD (considering 85% waste generation) and treated is proposed in 2 STP of design capacity of 100 + 70 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generated = 32,809 Cum. which will be used for back filling between the retaining wall, underground sumps/tanks, foundations and landscaping.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 558 Kgs/day; where 334.8 kgs/day is the organic waste and 223.2 kgs/day is inorganic waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1255 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 2X500, 1x300 KVA, 2x450 KVA and 1x250 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: not submitted. Parking provided is 307. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. 11. Other details: 14 Nos of recharge pits have been provided 12. Environmental sensitive area: Nallurhalli lake is 0.3 kms (South direction).

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee observed that the proponent has not submitted the kharab land details and lake details showing the exact boundary of the lake, extent from the competent authority.

The committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the following information

1. Details of kharab land 2. Lake details showing the exact boundary certified by competent authority and buffer left from the boundery as per norms. 3. Study of surface hydrology report taking in to consideration of micro water shed area of the region 4. Solar power generation/energy harvesting and its utilisation. 5. Earthen and debris generated and its scientific disposalin the premises. 6. Useof treated sewage scheme adopted to use the entire treated sewage in the premises 7. Greenery development along with species may be provided Clarification regarding the project area is not falling under eco sensitive area from sensitive zone clearance committee of BDA

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 28.03.2016.

The committee perused the replies submitted by the proponent. The committee observed that, the information sought in the earlier meeting regarding details of lake is not submitted. The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the details of lake boundary from the competent authority and after ascertaining the same, the necessary buffer of 30 m is to be fixed and accordingly conceptual plan to be prepared.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.53 Residential Apartment and Club House Project at Sy.No.109/4 (P) of Avalahalli Village, Bengaluru North Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District of M/s. BCIL REALTY PVT. LTD. (SEIAA 5 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. BCIL REALTY PVT. LTD M/s. BCIL REALTY PVT. LTD has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their Residential Apartment and club house Project at Sy.No.109/4 (P) of Avalahalli Village, Bengaluru North Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost = Rs. 35 Cr.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 8,098.12 Sqm; 2. The total built up area of the project is 24,939.28 Sqm, compring of 120 Nos of units in Block – A & Block – B, distributed over B+G+4UFD & a club house in G+2UF with a maximum height of 14.95 m. 3. Land use details: Total plot area -8,098.12 Sqm Land scape -2,675.20 Sqm (33.03%) Roads and open space area -1,822.68 Sqm (22.51%) Ground coverage -3,600.24 Sqm (50%) Permissible FAR is 1.75 and achieved is 1.74. 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 83 KLD.(34 KLD fresh water + 49 KLD Recycled water) The source of water is from Singanaayakanahalli village panchayath. NOC submitted and scientific assessment of water source in Singanaayakanahalli grama panchayath submitted. Fresh water requirement calculated for 55 lpcd. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 79 KLD (considering 95% waste generation) and treated is proposed in STP of design capacity of 80 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generated is 10,800 Cum. out of which for back filling in foundation - 2,160 Cum; for landscaping - 2,675 cum; for roads and walkways – 1,458 cum and for site formation – 4,507 cum (level difference is 3.42 m) 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 309 Kgs/day; where 185 kgs/day is the organic waste and 124 kgs/day is inorganic waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 841 KW is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity 2x125 KVA. Energy savings is 30.61% 9. Traffic Details: submitted. Parking provided is 141. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. 11. Other details: 16 Nos of recharge pits have been provided

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Revised water balance chart for reusing the tertiary treated water 2. Scientific assessment of availability of water for quality & quantity & its impact on competitive users.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 21.03.2016.

The committee perused the replies submitted by the proponent. It is highly regretted to note that, the water balance chart submitted earlier has been resubmitted now without any changes.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the revised water balance chart & also clarification regarding submission of the same balance chart submitted earlier as revised one.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

161.54 Residential Apartment Project at Sy.No.132 of Iggaluru Village Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District of M/s. Shweta and Gita Constructions India Pvt. Ltd. (SEIAA 6 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Shweta and Gita Constructions India Pvt. Ltd. M/s. Shweta and Gita Constructions India Pvt. Ltd. has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their Residential Apartment Project at at Sy.No.132 of Iggaluru Village Attibele Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost = Rs. 40 Cr.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 9,004.29 Sqm; 2. The total built up area of the project is 26,631.19 Sqm, compring of 160 Nos of units with configuration of B+GF+7UF with a maximum height of 23.7 m. Right of way is 12.5 m 3. Land use details: Total plot area -9,004.29 Sqm Land scape -1,712 Sqm (19.0%) Roads and open space area -3,041.16 Sqm (33.8%)

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

Ground coverage -4,251.13 Sqm (47.2%) Permissible FAR is 2.0 and achieved is 1.98. 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 108 KLD.(68 KLD fresh water + 40 KLD Recycled water) The source of water is from Chandapur Gramapanchayath. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 97 KLD (considering 90% waste generation) and treated is proposed in STP of design capacity of 100 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generated is 24,000 Cum. Which will be used within the project site for landscaping of gardens and road making etc. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 350 Kgs/day; where 216 kgs/day is the organic waste and 144 kgs/day is inorganic waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers. Sludge generated is 5 kg/day. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1000 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity 2x220 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: submitted. Parking provided is 176. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. 11. Other details: rain water harvesting is proposed.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Scientific assessment of availability of water for quality & quantity & its impact on competitive users 2. Revised water balance chart considering the fresh water requirement at the rate of 55 LPCD as per rural water supply norms and scheme for recovery of water for meeting the additional water requirement from treated sewage. 3. Proposal for compensatory afforestation of 14%.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 22.03.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance with a condition that the RO rejects in the water balance chart shall be disposed scientifically as per the norms and compensate the balance 14% green belt in the outside the area.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.55 "WTC OPAL" Tech Park Project at Sy.Nos. 102 & 103 of Mahadevapura Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. Bagmane Developers Pvt. Ltd. (SEIAA 7 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Bagmane Developers Pvt. Ltd. M/s. Bagmane Developers Pvt. Ltd. has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their 160.42 "WTC OPAL" Tech Park Project at Sy.Nos. 102 & 103 of Mahadevapura Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost = Rs. 195 Cr.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 10,509.15 Sqm; 2. The total built up area of the project is 93,417.24 Sqm, compring 3B+G+14 UF with a maximum height of 55 m. Right of way is 18 m 3. Land use details: details not submitted 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 338 KLD.(225 KLD fresh water + 113 KLD Recycled water) The source of water is from BWSSB. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 321 KLD (considering 95% waste generation) and treated is proposed in STP of design capacity of 325 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management: - details not submittted 7. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 5200 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity 5x1500 KVA. 8. Traffic Details: submitted. Parking provided is 1215. 9. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. 10. Other details: 16 Nos of recharge pits have been provided

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent stated that the project site falls in the sensitive zone of BDA and they have applied to the sensitive zone clearance committee for the clearance.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Clarification regarding the project area is not falling under eco sensitive area from BDA 2. Revised water balance chart considering use of water for landscaping and HVAC 3. Revised HVAC flow diagram incorporating the softeners for further treatment to use in HVAC 92

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

4. Detailed earth work generation calculation and its utilization within the project site 5. Detailed traffic study report 6. Detailed hydrological study of the influencing the surface water flow considering the nearby two water bodies 7. Explore the possibility of providing in house fire station.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 23.03.2016.

The committee perused the replies submitted by the proponent. The committee observed the following points. 1. Disposal of waste from UF treatment is not given. 2. Earth work generation & utilization with detailed calculation is not given. 3. While clearing the proposed site, the eco sensitive committee of BDA has put a condition vide letter No. 2516/2011-12 dated 12-08-11, that, the ground water level is to be taken in to consideration before fixing of basement level and, in the present case, 3 basement has been proposed and whether the ground water level is ascertained as per the BDA committee is not known. 4. Compliance to the conditions put forth by the eco sensitive committee of BDA is not given. 5. Surface hydrology study is not carried out considering micro water shed net work.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information. 1. Disposal of waste from UF treatment. 2. Earth work generation & utilization with detailed calculation. 3. Ascertain the ground water level before fixing the basement level of the building. 4. Compliance to the conditions put forth by the eco sensitive committee of BDA. 5. Surface drainage hydrology considering micro water shed net work where the project site is located and also study should cover the capacity of the existing nala to carry the flood discharge taking into consideration max. Intensity of rainfall received in Bangalore.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information. [

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.56 "FOUNTAINHEAD" Residential Apartment Project at Survey Nos. 46/1, 47/1 and 48/1 of Ambalipura, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. Krishna E Campus Pvt. Ltd., #344, Nirmal RMV II Stage, II Block, 1st Cross, RMV Extension, Bangalore – 560 094. (SEIAA 14 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Krishna E Campus Pvt. Ltd,

M/s. Krishna E Campus Pvt. Ltd, has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for the proposed Expansion & modification of project "FOUNTAINHEAD" at Survey Nos. 46/1, 47/1 and 48/1 of Ambalipura, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk,, Bangalore Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B2. Total Project cost=Rs.43 Cr. Max. Ht. Of the building is 49.95 m. Width of road in front of the project site is 31.42 Mts.

For the proposed residential development at the above said premises, EC was issued on 23-12-2011 for construction of Residential apartment with 91 flats & Hotel with 165 rooms on a plot area of 13890.14 Sqm & the total built up area is 65029.54 Sqm. Now, application for EC is submitted for construction of addition 59 flats (Total 150 flats) & shelving of hotel project & in its place studio apartment with 143 units with no additional plot area & additional built up area of 15691.46 Sqm (Total built up area is 80721.00 Sqm). Compliance to earlier EC submitted. Presently residential apartment block is under construction and studio apartment is yet to be constructed.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 13890.14 Sqm 2. The proposed expansion & modification of residential apartments comprising 2 Blocks (Residential Apartment & Studio Aparftment), with residential apartment with 2B + GF + 15 UF having 150 flats & studio apartment with 2B+GF+13 UF with 143 units & Total Built up area of 80721.00 Sqm. 3. Land use details: Green belt area (proposed): 4460.43 Sq.mts (32.13 %) Ground coverage area = 5129.00 Sqm (36.92%) Paved area = 4300.71 Sqm (30.95%) The permissible FAR including TDR is 5.2 and achieved FAR is 4.24. 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 135 KLD. (Fresh water 107 KLD + 28 KLD Recycled water). The source of water is BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB not

submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 122 KLD (considering 90% waste generation) and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 150 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generated =9000Cum.(only for Studio apartments) Back filling for footings: 3500 cum For hard scaping: 2500 cum Filling for internal roads: 3000 cum

7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 366 Kgs/day; where 220 kgs/day is the organic waste and 146 kgs/day is inorganic waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1850 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 3X500 KVA &

1x350 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Not submitted. Parking proposed: 442 cars. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. EMP budget not submitted. 11. Other details: Rain water harvesting is proposed. 12. Eco sensitive area details: a) Kaikondanahalli Lake – 0.75 Km SE b) Saul kere – 1.10 Km E c) Ibbalur lake – 0.50 Km NW d) Bellandur lake – 1.50 Km N e) Haralur lake – 1.40 Km S f) Bannerghatta National Park – 30 Km

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Clarification from BDA regarding the project site is not falling in the sensitive zone. 2. Quantification of the earth generation and its utilization within the project site. 3. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy 4. Comparative statement for the earthwork generation and utilization of the same within the project site for earlier EC issued and now proposed. 5. Hydrology study of the area influencing the surface water flow. 6. Baseline date for environmental parameters

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 24.03.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.57 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.20 (P) of Hattihalu Village, Honnalli Taluk & Davanagere District (3.50 Acres) of M/s. Hattihallu Stone Quarry, Haleshpura Village, Channagiri Taluk, Davangere-577 213 (SEIAA 1470 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by M/s. Hattihallu Stone Quarry, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 3.50 Acres at Sy.No.20 (P) of Hattihalu Village, Honnalli Taluk & Davanagere District. 95

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP S.B. Naganur approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Davanagere District. Capacity of mining is Av. 22534 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 155th meeting of SEAC held on 10th and 11th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The Committee observed that, the proposal is consisting of 5 Quarry leases having of 0-20 Acres of 4 Quarry leases and 1-20 Acres of one quarry lease and there is no Cluster Notification for all the quarry leases whereas the quarry plan has been approved by the DMG for 3-20 Acres.

The committee directed the proponent to get the Cluster Notification from DMG for all the quarry leases.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of information. [ The proponent has submitted the reply received on 19.01.2016.

The proponent and RQP/Environmental Consultant attended the 159th SEAC meeting held on 22nd and 23rd February 2016 to provide required clarification and additional information.

The committee perused the Cluster Notification issued by DMG and observed that the Cluster Notification is for all the existing quarry leases and upcoming quarry leases having an extent of 0-20 acres in the Sy. No. 20, Hattihalu village has declared as ‘Hattihalu Stone Quarry Cluster’ and there is one more quarry lease of 1-20 Acres in the EC proposal is not included in the Cluster Notification for which the proponent and Environmental Consultant failed to explain the same.

The committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the clarification regarding the Cluster Notification.

The proponent has not submitted the information sought by the committee.

The noted the OM issued by MoEF & CC, New Delhi dated 15.03.2016. Since the proposal has been recalled for want of additional information for appraisal in the earlier meeting it amounts to fresh appraisal. The committee opined that as per above OM it is not appropriate to appraise the proposal. Hence, the committee decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.58 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.58/A (P) of Seethalahari Village, Gadag Taluk & District (2-0 Acres) (QL No.707) of Sri N.H.V. Ramarao, #5/26, Shirahatti Taluk, Gadag District - 582120. (SEIAA 1484 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri N.H.V. Ramarao, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.58/A (P) of Seethalahari Village, Gadag Taluk & District.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP S.B.Naganur approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Gadag District. Capacity of mining is Av. 13,635 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the above information.

The proponent has submitted on 05.02.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.59 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.58/A (P) of Seethalahari Village, Gadag Taluk & District (2-0 Acres) (QL No.708) of Sri N.H.V. Ramarao, #5/26, Shirahatti Taluk, Gadag District - 582120. (SEIAA 1485 MIN 2015)

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP S.B.Naganur approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Gadag District. Capacity of mining is Av. 15,020 TPA

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the above information.

The proponent has submitted the information on 05.02.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action. [

161.60 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.18 of Shanubhoganahalli Village, Nagamangala Taluk, Mandya District (5-0 Acres) (QL No.627) of Sri Devaraju C K. No.4600, 22nd Cross, V.V.Nagar, Kallahalli Town, Mandya District. (SEIAA 1486 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri Devaraju C K, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 5-00 Acres at Sy.No.18 of Shanubhoganahalli Village, Nagamangala Taluk, Mandya District. It is a Government Gomala Land. It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006. The mining plan has been prepared by RQP B.M.Sudheendra Kumar approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Mandya District. Capacity of mining is Av. 8015 Cu.m/annum The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee made the following observations:

1. It is an existing quarry proposal and lease has been granted in 2003. The proponent has submitted the audit report for 2009-2014. 2. In the approved quarry plan, minable reserve calculations, geological calculations and five year productions are wrong. 3. No land use plan in the quarry plan. 4. There are lot of inconsistency between the quarry plan and the presentation made.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the revised quarry plan after incorporating the above information along with the mining audit report from 2003 to 2009.

The proponent has not submitted the information sought by the committee.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.61 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.542 (P) of Danayakanakere Villag, Hospet Taluk, Bellary District (2-0 Acres) (QL No.384) of Sri Gurubasavaraj, No.1710/B, 10th Cross, M.J.Nagar, Govt. Hospital Road, Hospet Taluk, Ballari District - 583203. (SEIAA 1487 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Sri Gurubasavaraj, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.542 (P) of Danayakanakere Villag, Hospet Taluk, Bellary District. It is a Patta Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP S.B.Naganur approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bellary District. Capacity of mining is Av. 16,067 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee observed that there is a discrepancy in the land use plan as per the approved quarry plan and presentation made. The proponent is asked to submit the revised land use plan duly approved by the DMG.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information.

The proponent has submitted the information on 29.01.2016.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.62 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.461/3 (P) of Hiremallanakere Village, Hoovinahadagali Taluk, Bellary District (4-0 Acres) (QL No.317) of Sri K. Vasanthkumar, #169, Ward No.6, Kudligi Taluk, Ballari District - 583 134. (SEIAA 1488 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri K. Vasanthkumar, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 4-00 Acres at Sy.No.461/3 (P) of Hiremallanakere Village, Hoovinahadagali Taluk, Bellary District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP S.B.Naganur approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bellary District. Capacity of mining is Av. 25,028 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information. The proponent has submitted the information on 29.01.2016.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.63 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.95 (P) of Halagera Village, Yadgir Taluk & District (7-0 Acres) of Sri Nagappa, Kotagarwad, Ward No.10, Yadgir Town & Taluk, District - 585201. (SEIAA 1489 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Nagappa, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 7-00 Acres at Sy.No.95 (P) of Halagera Village, Yadgir Taluk & District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP S.B.Naganur approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Yadgir District. Capacity of mining is Av. 25,021 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015to provide clarification/additional information.

100

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information.

The proponent has submitted the information on 29.01.2016.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.64 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.372/c of Dashamapura Village, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Bellary District (12-0 Acres) of M/s. Clariya Enterprises, #610, Sree Vilasa, 15th Ward, Bharathi Nagar, Amravathi, Hospet - 583201. (SEIAA 1491 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by M/s. Clariya Enterprises, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 12-00 Acres at Sy.No.372/c of Dashamapura Village, Hagaribommanahalli Taluk, Bellary District. It is a Government Revenue Land. It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006. The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sanjay Kumar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bellary District. Capacity of mining is Av. 1,20,000 TPA

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the following information.

1. Combined impact study of all the three QL’s regarding transportation of quarry material and accordingly design of pavement with crust thickness 2. Revised EMP budget with provision for CSR activities. 101

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

3. Historical back ground of the area if any to be studied

The proponent has submitted the information vide letter dated 20.02.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.65 Multi Colour Granite Quarry Project at Sy.No.94 of Gerahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District (3-0 Acres) (QL No.858) of M/s. Sree Murugan Granites, #196, 11th Main, Nagendra Block, Bangalore - 560050. (SEIAA 1500 MIN 2015)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by M/s. Sree Murugan Granites, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Multi Colour Granite in an area of 3-00 Acres at Sy.No.94 of Gerahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District. It is a Government Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Dr.C.P.Prasanna Kumar and N.Sham Sundar approved by Deputy Director, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore District. Capacity of mining is Av. 4,200 Cu.m/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 156th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th December 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to limit the production to 80%(Restricting the depth of mining to 10m below lowest level in the quarry area) of the total estimated production keeping the minable area quantity and the sustainability of the mine in the mind and decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information. Modified quarry plan for the above quantity approved by DMG

102

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

1. A copy of the original lease deed. 2. Revised EMP budget with a provision for mitigative measures to protect adjoining land from fire. 3. Revised soil test reports 4. Green belt to be provided in the outside the lease area.

The proponent has submitted the information vide letter dated 01.03.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.66 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.212/2 of Karimanelu Village, Belthangadi Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District (0.50 Acre + 0.47 Acre) of Sri Herald D'Souza, #58-2, Ujire Belthangadi Talu, Dakshina Kannada District (SEIAA 1543 MIN 2015)

This proposal submitted by Sri Herald D'Souza, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 0.50+0.47 Acre at Sy.No.212/2 of Karimanelu Village, Belthangadi Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District. It is a Patta Land. The lease deed is valid up to 02-12-2019. The proposed land use plan is 0.2024 ha for mineable, 0.005 ha for roads, 0.005 ha for infrastructure, 0.010 ha for quarry waste dump, 0.005 ha for mineral dump & for green belt 0.1663 ha. The total production as per the approved quarry plan is 14880 cum.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 157th meeting of SEAC held on 11th, 12th and 13th January 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above details.

The proponent has submitted the information vide letter dated 09.03.2016.

103

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.67 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.153/2 of Puchamogaru Village, Mangaluru Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District (1-0 Acre) (QL No.147) of Sri Jagadhish Alva, #3-337, Phajeer Village, Bantwal Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District – 575018 (SEIAA 1559 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri Jagadhish Alva, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-00 Acre at Sy.No.153/2 of Puchamogaru Village, Mangaluru Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District. It is a Patta Land. The lease deed is valid up to 12-11-2018. NOC’s from Tahsildar, Mangalore dtd 19-04-2012, and from DCF, Kundapur, dtd. 23-01-2014 was submitted. The proposed Land use pattern is 0.1981 ha for mining, 0.01 ha for quarry waste dump, 0.01 ha for mineral stock, for green belt 0.1716 ha & others 0.015 ha. The total production as per the approved quarry plan is 17800 cum or 46280 MT.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 157th meeting of SEAC held on 11th, 12th and 13th January 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the above information.

The proponent has submitted the information during the meeting.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

104

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.68 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.178/1A2 of Tenkayedapadavu Village, Mangalore Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District (0.75 Acres) (QL No.62) of Sri Jagadish Pai, #4-24/1, Shreya Towers, Opp. To Vidyadayini School, Suratkal, Mangalore Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District - 575104. (SEIAA 1564 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri Jagadish Pai, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 0.75 Acre at Sy.No.178/1A2 of Tenkayedapadavu Village, Mangalore Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District. It is a Patta Land. Th DMG has issued Notification on 20.04.2015 for 10 years. NOC’s from DCF, Mangalore, dtd. 0.01.2015 was submitted. The proposed land use details is 1.15 acres for mining, 0.03 acres for quarry waste dump, 0.03 acres for mineral stock, 1.00 acre for buffer zone and for other use 0.09 acres. The total production as per the approved quarry plan is 62400 cum or 168480 MT.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 157th meeting of SEAC held on 11th, 12th and 13th January 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the above information. [

The proponent has submitted the information vide letter dated 22.02.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.69 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.135/2C of Tenkayedapadavu Village, Mangalore Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District (0.50 Acres) (QL No.195) of Sri Abdul Gafoor, K.M.House, Pollayil, Kandangod Cheruvathoor Post, Kasargod District, Kerala State - 670313. (SEIAA 1565 MIN 2015)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri Abdul Gafoor, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 0.50 + 0.43 Acres Buffer Zone at Sy.No.135/2C of Tenkayedapadavu Village, Mangalore Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District. It is a Patta Land. The DMG has issued Notification on 20-04-2015 for 10 yers. NOC’s from Tahsildar, Mangalore dtd 21.01.2015, and from DCF, Mangalore dtd. 02.02.2015 was submitted. The proposed land use details is 0.2024 ha for mining, 0.01 ha for quarry waste

105

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

dump, 0.005 ha for mineral stock, 0.1498 ha for green belt and for other use 0.01 ha. The total production for five years as approved quarry plan is 8230 cum or 21398 MT.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 157th meeting of SEAC held on 11th, 12th and 13th January 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the above information.

The proponent has submitted the information vide letter dated 22.02.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.70 Shahabad Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.187/1 of Madakal Village, Sedam Taluk, Kalburgi District (1-30 Acres) of Sri Thirupathi (SEIAA 1575 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri Thirupathi, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Shahabad Stone in an area of 1-30 Acres at Sy.No.187/1 of Madakal Village, Sedam Taluk, Kalburgi District. It is a Patta Land.

The proponent submitted the following information:

1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP 2. Land conversion order dated 21.11.2014 for 1-00 Acre and 23.12.2014 for 0-30 Acres. 3. Approved quarry plan dated 25.08.2015 4. Notification not submitted. DMG has put a condition while approving the quarry plan that after obtaining EC further processing of lease will be carried out. 5. NOC from DCF, Kalburgi dated 27.02.2015 6. NOC from Thasildar, Sedam Taluk dated 28.02.2015.

Land Use Plan: As per the approved quarry plan out of 1-30 Acre, 0-19 Acre is for working area; 0-03 Acre is for waste dump yard; 0-02 Acre is for roads, 0-01 Acre is for

106

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

infrastructure; 0.24 Acre for buffer zone and 0-23 is for undisturbed area. Proposed production for five years is 233941 MT including saleable 60% and waste 40%.

Note: Karnataka-Telangana interstate boundary is 2.60 km (E) from the quarry site as per the application submitted.

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 158th SEAC meeting held on 27th and 28th January 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the corrected land use details.

The proponent has submitted the information vide letter dated 26.03.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.71 Black Granite Quarry Project at Sy.No.24/1 of Halliyur Village, Alur Taluk, Hassa District (7-20 Acres) of Smt. K V Apeksha D/o K S Vishwanath, #3/A, Balerakoppala, Rayarakoppalu-Post, Alur Taluk, Hassan District (SEIAA 1626 MIN 2015)

This is an existing proposal submitted by Smt. K V Apeksha, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Black Granite in an area of 7-20 Acres at Sy.No.24/1 of Halliyur Village, Alur Taluk, Hassan District. It is a patta land. The proponent submitted the following information: 1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP 2. Quarry plan approved by DD, DMG, Bangalore dated 23.03.2015. 3. Working permission given by DMG, Hassan vide letter dated 15.02.2005 4. Mining audit report not submitted.

Land Use Plan: As per the approved quarry plan out of 7-20 Acres, 5.74 Acres is for area to be excavated; 0-02 Acres is for Roads; 0.50 Acres is for overburden dumps; 0.02 Acres is for mineral storage; 0.02 Acres is for infrastructure and 1.20 Acres is for buffer zone/green belt. Proposed production is 15,005 Cum for five years (out of 42,865 Cum 35% recovery and 65% waste)

107

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 159th SEAC meeting held on 22nd and 23rd February 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The proponent submitted the mining audit report for the 2015 during the meeting. The committee observed that there was a discrepancy in the land use plan.

The committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the revised land use plan earmarking the area for top soil storage and mining audit report from 2005-2015.

The proponent has submitted the information during the meeting.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.72 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.47 of Mahanthalingapura Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District (1-0 Acre) (QL No.578) of Smt. P. Gowramma W/o Narayanappa, Harapanahalli Village, Jigani Hobly, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District(SEIAA 1629 MIN 2015)

This is a renewal proposal submitted by Smt. P. Gowramma, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of building stone in an area of 1-00 Acre at Sy.No.47 of Mahanthalingapura Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District. It is a Government gomala land.

The proponent submitted the following information:

1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP 2. Lease granted on 19.04.2006 for five years and expired on 18.04.2016. 3. New DMG Notification dated 09.12.2015 for 10 years 4. Quarry plan approved by DMG on 16.12.2015. 5. Audit report not submitted

Land Use Plan: As per the approved quarry plan out of 1-00 Acre 0-20 Acre is for area to be excavated; 0-01 Acres is for roads; 0-01 Acres is for waste dump; 0-01 is for infrastructure; 0-17 Acres is for green belt. Proposed production is 62,084 Tons for five year.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

108

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The proponent submitted the joint inspection report, audit report, District Task Force meeting proceedings and combined sketch during the meeting. The committee observed that Ragihalli State Forest is 1.20 km from the project area which is a part of BNP. The committee also observed that, based on the elevation of the quarry site above ground level (Difference in level ), depth proposed, area of quarrying (as per land use plan), and with the available area, it is not possible to go that depth, because lifting of quarrying material from that depth & movement of vehicles will be very difficult.

1. Modified quarry plan for the above quantity approved by the DMG 2. RTC Copy 3. Distance from the quarry boundary to Ragihalli State Forest from the DCF, Wild Life Authority. 4. Measures proposed to protect the nearby flora and fauna from the fire due to this activity The proponent has not submitted the information sought by the committee in the earlier meetings.

The committee opined that the appraisal cannot be completed for want of the above information and since the proponent also remained absent to provide the required clarification.

The committee therefore decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.73 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.102 of Hanagal Village, Molakalmur Taluk, Chitradurga District (10-0 Acres) of Sri. D. Anandaswamy S/o C.K. Doddaiah, Prop: Vinayaka Industries, #152, Cholanayakanahalli Post, Thavarekere Hobli, Bangalore South, Bangalore- 562130 (SEIAA 1631 MIN 2015)

This is new proposal submitted by Sri. D. Anandaswamy, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of building stone in an area of 10-00 Acre at Sy.No.102 of Hanagal Village, Molakalmur Taluk, Chitradurga District. It is a government revenue land.

The proponent submitted the following information:

1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP 2. DMG Notification dated 19.10.2015 for 20 years 3. Approved quarry plan dated 04.12.2015 submitted.

109

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

Land Use Plan: As per the approved quarry plan out of 4.047 Ha, 1.460 Ha is for area to be excavated; 0.015 Ha is for mineral storage; 0.010 Ha is for infrastructure; 0.040 Ha is for roads; 0.100 Ha is for others (parapet walls, settling tank) and 2.422 Ha is for undisturbed area. Proposed production is 6,73,960 Tons for five year.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. Proposed production is calculated with the available area and quantity is ok. The committee observed that in this area many proposals have been appraised and recommended to SEIAA for issue of EC which may account for morethan 25 hectares therefore the proponent has asked to submit the combined sketch showing all the leases & notifications issued by DMG in this village.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Combined sketch showing the all the leases and notifications issued by DMG in this village with latitude and longitude, distance from each boundaries plotted on village map approved by the competent authority. 2. Measures proposed to protect the nearby flora and fauna from the fire due to this activity

The proponent has not submitted the information sought by the committee in the earlier meetings.

The committee opined that the appraisal cannot be completed for want of the above information and since the proponent also remained absent to provide the required clarification.

The committee therefore decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action. [

161.74 Black Granite Quarry Project at Sy.No.223/6 of Heradappanahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District (1-04 Acres) of Sri H C Minchu (SEIAA 7 MIN 2016)

This is an existing proposal submitted by Sri H C Minchu, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Black Granite in an area of 1-04 Acres at Sy.No. 223/6 of Heradappanahalli Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District. It is a patta land.

The proponent submitted the following information:

1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP 2. Land conversion dated 21.10.2010 for 1.04 Acres including kharab 3. DMG Notification not submitted. 110

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

4. Approved quarry plan dated 04.08.2015. 5. RTC submitted.

Land Use Plan: As per the approved quarry plan out of 0.421 Ha, 0.250 Ha is for quarry workings; 0.100 Ha is for overburden dups; 0.050 Ha is for stock yard; 0.001 Ha is for roads and 0.020 Ha is for green belt. Proposed saleable production is 13,800 Cum for five year calculated 40% recovery.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee had appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the letter given by DCF, Cauvery Wild Life Division, Kollegal dated 09.11.2015 stating that the proposed Sy. No. 223/6 is 8.50 km from the Cauvery Wild Life ie., within 10 km from the Cauvery Wild Life Boundary which is the Eco Sensitive Zone as per the Directions of Supreme Court of India, vide letter No. F.No.1-9/2007-WL-I dated 31.07.2013. However in the recent notification issued by the MoEF, Government of India No.S.O.1599(E) Dated 25/06/2014 has reduced the distance from 10 Km to 5 Km from protected areas notified under wildelife (protectrion) Act, 1972. Hence the committee has appraised the proposal. However, the proponent is asked to get the reasons from the DCF, Cauvery Wild Life Division, Kollegal for prohibiting the mining activities in this area for further consideration.

The committee after discussion and deliberation had decided to reconsider the proposal only after submission of the clarification from the DCF, Cauvery Wild Life Division for his letter dated 31-07-2013.

The proponent has not submitted the information sought by the committee in the earlier meetings.

The committee opined that the appraisal cannot be completed for want of the above information and since the proponent also remained absent to provide the required clarification.

The committee therefore decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.75 Grey Granite Quarry Project at Sy.No.41/1(P) of Halasal Village, Khanapur Taluk, Belgaum District (2.43 Ha) of Smt. Meenakshi Vijay Naik (SEIAA 19 MIN 2016)

This is a New proposal submitted by Smt. Meenakshi Vijay Naik, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Grey Granite in an area of 2.43 Ha at Sy.No.41/1(P) of Halasal Village, Khanapur Taluk, Belgaum District. It is a Patta Land. The total extent of the land as per RTC is 10.13 Acres.

1. The quarry plan was approved by DMG on 25-11-2015 with a condition that the above approval is subject to production of a certified copy of EC from SEIAA. 111

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

2. NOC’s from Tahsildar, Khanapur dtd 20-03-2015, and from DCF, Belagavi, dtd. 12- 08-2015 were submitted. 3. Land conversion document is submitted dtd 28-04-2015.

The proposed Land use pattern is 1.971 Ha mining, 0.009 Ha for roads, for green belt 0.376 Ha and for others 0.074 Ha.

The total production as per the approved quarry plan is 15,000 Cum/year.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. An undertaking that the quarry waste will be dumped within the lease area along with the scheme of dumping to be given 2. Mitigation measures taken to protect the nearby flora and fauna 3. Mitigation measures taken to stabilize the river bank adjoining to the quarry lease area.

The proponent has submitted the information vide letter dated 28.03.2016.

The committee perused the reply and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent and decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance with a condition that proponent shall leave 100m buffer from the river bank.

The Committee also decided to recommend the proposal imposing the conditions as at 161.7 in addition to the Standard Conditions that are being imposed;

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.76 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.329 (P) of Yarlapadi Village, Karkala Taluk, Udupi District (2-0 Acres) (QL No.3232) of Sri Ramakrishna Shetty (SEIAA 30 MIN 2016)

This is a Renewal proposal submitted by Sri Ramakrishna Shetty, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 2-00 Acres at Sy.No.329 (P) of Yarlapadi Village, Karkala Taluk, Udupi District. It is a Government Land. The total extent of the land as per RTC is 46.82 Acres.

1. The quarry plan was approved by DMG on 06-01-2016. 2. The DMG has issued Notification on 04-01-2016 for 10 years. 3. NOC’s from Tahsildar, Karkala dtd 13-12-2011, and from DCF, Kundapura, dtd. 10- 05-2012 were submitted. 112

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

4. Audit reports for the years 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 submitted.

The existing land use plan is 0-20 acres mineable, 0-02 acres for roads & unused 1-18 acres. The proposed Land use pattern is 1-13 acres mining, 0-02 acres for roads, for green belt 0-25 acres.

The total production as per the approved quarry plan is 1,34,190 tons.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility Report, approved mining plan and clarification/information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the letter issued by DCF, Kundapur stating that out of 42.25 Acres of Government land in this Sy. No. 10.00 Acres land is included in the deemed forest list. Hence, the committee asked the proponent to get the clarification from the DCF, Kundapur whether this area is falls inside or outside the deemed forest. The minable quantity is ok.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the above information.

The proponent has not submitted the information sought by the committee in the earlier meetings.

The committee opined that the appraisal cannot be completed for want of the above information and since the proponent also remained absent to provide the required clarification.

The committee therefore decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.77 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.14/P1 of Echalanagenahalli Village, Chitradurga Taluk & District (1-0 Acre) (QL No.453) of Smt. G S Rathnamma (SEIAA 26 MIN 2016)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by Smt. G S Rathnamma, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-00 Acres at Sy.No.14/P1 of Echalanagenahalli Village, Chitradurga Taluk & District. It is a Government Revenue Land. The total extent of the land as per RTC is 24.28 Acres.

1. The quarry plan was approved by DMG on 23.12.2015 with a condition that the above approval is subject to production of a certified copy of EC from SEIAA. 2. The lease period expired on 04-09-2014. Renewal application submitted to DMG on 12.09.2014. 3. Audit reports for the years 2010-11, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 submitted.

113

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The proposed Land use pattern is 0.54 acres mining, for green belt 0.46 acres.

The total production as per the approved quarry plan is 42796 tons.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee asked the proponent to submit the District Task Force meeting proceedings for further consideration.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the District Task Force meeting proceedings.

The proponent has submitted the information during the meeting.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.78 Building Stone Quarry Project at Sy.No.14/P1 of Echalanagenahalli Village, Chitradurga Taluk & District (1-0 Acre) (QL No.440) of M/s. Mylareshwara Stone Crushers (SEIAA 27 MIN 2016)

This is a Existing proposal submitted by M/s. Mylareshwara Stone Crushers, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone in an area of 1-00 Acres at Sy.No.14/P1 of Echalanagenahalli Village, Chitradurga Taluk & District. It is a Government Revenue Land. The total extent of the land as per RTC is 24.28 Acres.

1. The quarry plan was approved by DMG on 23-12-2015 with a condition that the above approval is subject to production of a certified copy of EC from SEIAA. 2. The lease period expired on 06-08-2012. Renewal application copy not submitted 3. Audit reports for the years 2010-11, 2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14, 2014-15 submitted.

The proposed Land use pattern is 0.60 acres mining, for green belt 0.40 acres.

The total production as per the approved quarry plan is 49920 tons.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee asked the proponent to submit the District Task Force meeting proceedings and copy of the lease renewal application submitted to the DMG for further consideration.

The Committee after discussion had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information.

114

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The proponent has submitted the information during the meeting.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action. Subject taken with the permission of the Chair:

161.79. Building Stone Quarry Project, Sy.No.23 of Thammanayakanahalli Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban Dist. (4-20 Acres) of Sri K.S. Rohith S/o. Srinivas Roa, 7th Main Road, 16th Cross, Lakkasandra, Bangalore -560030 (SEIAA 421 MIN 2015)

This is a New proposal submitted by Sri K.S. Rohith, seeking Environmental clearance for quarrying of Building Stone Quarry in an area of 4.20 Acres at Sy.No.23 of Thammanayakanahalli Village, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore Urban District. It is a Govt.Revenue Land.

It is stated that the project do not attract General conditions of EIA Notification of 2006.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Dr.C.P.Prasanna Kumar. and approved by Senior Geologist, Dept. of Mines & Geology, Bangalore. Capacity of mining is Av. 2,13,696 T/annum

The Proponent and the RQP/Environment Consultant attended the 143rd meeting of SEAC held on 24th to 29th July 2015 to give clarification/additional information.

The committee observed that, the quarry site is very near to the Bannergatta National Park and the proponent have not submitted the NOC from the Wild Life Authority.

The committee therefore had decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information.

The proponent appeared before the committee during the 153rd meeting of SEAC held on 17th and 18th November 2015 and had sought some more time to submit the information sought by the committee.

The committee after discussion had decided to provide final opportunity to the proponent to submit the information or otherwise the proposal will be appraised in his absence and decision will be taken as per merits.

115

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

The Proponent and Environment Consultant are invited to attend the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information. But they remained absent.

The Committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

The Authority perused the proposal and took note of the recommendation of SEAC. The Authority noted that as per the Notification No. S.O.141(E) dated 15th January 2016, the activity of mining of minor minerals of category ‘B2” (upto 25 Ha of mining lease area) is exempted from applicability of General condition. The Authority therefore decided to refer the proposal back to SEAC for appraisal in the light of this amendment.

The committee took note of the decision of the Authority and also noted the OM issued by MoEF & CC, New Delhi dated 15.03.2016. Since the proposal has been referred back from Authority for appraisal it amounts to fresh appraisal. The committee opined that as per above OM it is not appropriate to appraise the proposal. Hence, the committee decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.80 Proposed Scientific Landfill Project at Muddaiahnapalya Quarry pits in BBMP South Zone, Bangalore Urban District – By M/s Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (SEIAA 05 IND 2016) M/s Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike has submitted a proposal for Scientific Landfill Project at Muddaiahnapalya Quarry pits in BBMP South Zone, Bangalore Urban District (SEIAA 05 IND 2016) under section 7(i) Common Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility (CMSWMF), of EIA Notification 2006. The proposed project is comes under category B1.

The proposed project consists of filling the existing quarry site in phase manner, with phase – 1 for 5 acres designed for 250 TPD with design period for 3 years.

The committee appraised the proposal based on the information submitted by the proponent. The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of standard ToR along with the following additional ToR’s. The EIA report should be prepared by NABET/QCI Accredited consultants only.

116

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

1. Scheme and design of land fill site construction/scheme of development which should comply to MSW Rules 2000. 2. Third party evaluation scheme both at development phase and at operation phase of the site may be provided. 3. Details of the surroundings of the site, proposed measures taken to avoid the accidents during unloading of the material, provision made to avoid dust emission and noise may be given. 4. Details of approach road, mode of transportation to avoid accidents and spillages of the material to be given. 5. Protocols/methods to avoid organic or degradable or toxic/industrial waste entering in to land fill site. 6. Scheme/procedure followed for the operation of the land fill site may be explained. 7. The quarry pit shall be securely fenced before handing it over to BBMP/operator to be explained. 8. There shall be round the clock supervision of the site to prevent dumping of non permitted material and the accidental fires, also to prevent entry of unauthorized access to any unlawful activity. Perhaps providing CCTV cameras is also ideal.

117

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

9. Available depth of quarry and scheme proposed to fill up the quarry and its impact on ground water to be explained.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.81 Proposed development of Scientific Landfill for disposal of Inerts at Maragondanahalli Quarry pits in Rajarajeshwarinagar Zone, Bangalore – By M/s Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (SEIAA 06 IND 2016)

M/s Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike has submitted a proposal for development of Scientific Landfill for disposal of Inerts at Maragondanahalli Quarry pits in Rajarajeshwarinagar Zone, Bangalore (SEIAA 06 IND 2016) under section 7(i) Common Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility (CMSWMF), of EIA Notification 2006. The proposed project is comes under category B1.

The proposed project consists of filling the existing quarry site in phase manner, with phase – 1 for 5 acres designed for 250 TPD with design period for 3 years.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

118

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

161.82 Proposed development of Scientific Landfill for disposal of Inerts Project at Bettahalsur Quarry pits in Dasarahalli Zone, Bangalore– By M/s Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (SEIAA 07 IND 2016)

M/s Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike has submitted a proposal for development of Scientific Landfill for disposal of Inerts Project at Bettahalsur Quarry pits in Dasarahalli Zone, Bangalore (SEIAA 07 IND 2016) under section 7(i) Common Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility (CMSWMF), of EIA Notification 2006. The proposed project is comes under category B1.

The proposed project consists of filling the existing quarry site in phase manner, with phase – 1 for 5 acres designed for 220 TPD with design period for 3 years.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.83 Proposed development of Scientific Landfill for disposal of solid waste and Inerts at Kada Agrahara Quarry pits in Mahadevapura Zone, Bangalore– By M/s Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (SEIAA 08 IND 2016)

M/s Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike has submitted a proposal for development of Scientific Landfill for disposal of solid waste and Inerts at Kada Agrahara Quarry pits in

119

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

Mahadevapura Zone, Bangalore (SEIAA 08 IND 2016) under section 7(i) Common Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility (CMSWMF), of EIA Notification 2006. The proposed project is comes under category B1.

The proposed project consists of filling the existing quarry site in phase manner, with phase – 1 for 5 acres designed for 250 TPD with design period for 3 years.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

161.84 Proposed development of Scientific Landfill for Inerts at Mittiganahalli Quarry pits in BBMP West Zone, Bangalore– By M/s Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (SEIAA 09 IND 2016)

M/s Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike has submitted a proposal for development of Scientific Landfill for Inerts at Mittiganahalli Quarry pits in BBMP West Zone, Bangalore (SEIAA 09 IND 2016) under section 7(i) Common Municipal Solid Waste Management Facility (CMSWMF), of EIA Notification 2006. The proposed project is comes under category B1.

The proposed project consists of filling the existing quarry site in phase manner, with phase – 1 for 5 acres designed for 250 TPD with design period for 3 years.

120

161st SEAC meeting proceedings 28th and 29th March 2016

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Meeting ended with thanks to the Chair.

Secretary, SEAC Chairman, SEAC Karnataka Karnataka

121