Institute of Classical Studies Library
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Heraclitus Anecdote: De Partibus Animalium I 5.645A17-23
Ancient Philosophy 21 (2001) ©Mathesis Publications 1 The Heraclitus Anecdote: De Partibus Animalium i 5.645a17-23 Pavel Gregoric Chapter 5 of the first book of Aristotle’s De Partibus Animalium contains a short self-contained treatise (644b22-645a36) which has been characterised as a ‘protreptic to the study of animals’ (Peck in Aristotle 1937, 97). Such a charac- terisation of the treatise may be misleading, because Aristotle does not seem to have composed it in order to motivate his audience to go out in the field and study animals, but rather to kindle their interest in the scientific account of ani- mals which he is about to provide. It is reasonable to suppose that Aristotle’s audience, eager to learn something valuable and dignified, needed an explanation of why they should like to hear, amongst other animals, about sponges, snails, grubs, and other humble creatures which are displeasing even to look at, not to mention witnessing the dissections that might have accompanied Aristotle’s lec- tures on animals (cf. Bonitz 1870, 104a4-17; Lloyd 1978). Aristotle explains why such ignoble animals deserve a place in a scientific account of animals and he illustrates that with an anecdote about Heraclitus. So one must not be childishly repelled by the examination of the humbler animals. For in all things of nature there is some- thing wonderful. And just as Heraclitus is said to have spoken to the visitors who wanted to meet him and who stopped as they were approaching when they saw him warming himself by the oven (e‰don aÈtÚn yerÒmenon prÚw t“ fipn“)—he urged them to come in without fear (§k°leue går aÈtoÁw efisi°nai yarroËntaw), for there were gods there too (e‰nai går ka‹ §ntaËya yeoÊw)—so one must approach the inquiry about each animal without aversion, since in all of them there is something natural and beautiful. -
Courtenay Arthur Ralegh Radford
Courtenay Arthur Ralegh Radford Book or Report Section Published Version Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0 (CC-BY) Open Access Gilchrist, R. (2013) Courtenay Arthur Ralegh Radford. In: Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the British Academy, XII. British Academy, pp. 341-358. ISBN 9780197265512 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/35690/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Published version at: http://www.britac.ac.uk/memoirs/12.cfm Publisher: British Academy All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online RALEGH RADFORD Pictured in 1957, in front of the ruins of the church at Glastonbury Abbey (Somerset). Reproduced with permission of English Heritage: NMR GLA/Pub/1/2. Courtenay Arthur Ralegh Radford 1900–1998 C. A. RALEGH RADFORD was one of the major figures of archaeology in the mid-twentieth century: his intellectual contribution to the discipline is rated by some as being comparable to giants such as Mortimer Wheeler, Christopher Hawkes and Gordon Childe.1 Radford is credited with help- ing to shape the field of medieval archaeology and in particular with inaug- urating study of the ‘Early Christian’ archaeology of western Britain. -
A New Testimony on the Platonist Gaius
A New Testimony on the Platonist Gaius Michele Trizio PART FROM a single Delphic inscription (FD III.4 103), the testimonia of the life and work of second-century AMiddle Platonist Gaius fall into two classes.1 The first includes first-hand observations of later philosophers up to Proclus: Porphyry, for instance, reports that Gaius was one of several authors read regularly by Plotinus’ entourage.2 Galen tells us that he followed the classes of two of Gaius’ pupils in Pergamum and Smyrna respectively.3 As to Proclus, he twice mentions Gaius, among other Platonists, in his commentaries on the Republic and the Timaeus.4 The second class of testimonia includes statements concerning Gaius’ scholarship on Plato in three important Greek MSS. The first of these, Paris.gr. 1962, is a ninth-century MS. of the so-called ‘philosophical collection’, which, among others entries, contains a pinax at f. 146v men- tioning ᾿Αλβίνου τῶν Γαίου σχολῶν ὑποτυπώσεων πλατωνικῶν δογµάτων. That is to say, Albinus’ edition of Gaius’ scholia on 1 On Gaius and the related bibliography see J. Whittaker, “Gaius,” in R. Goulet (ed.), Dictionnaire de philosophes antiques III (Paris 2000) 437–440. All testimonia on Gaius are collected and discussed with reference to previous literature in A. Gioè, Filosofi medioplatonici del II secolo d.c. (Naples 2002). 2 V.Plot. 14, ed. P. Henry and H.-R. Schwyzer, Plotini opera I (Leiden 1951) 19.10–14. 3 De propriorum animi 41, ed. W. de Boer (CMG V.4.1.1, Leipzig 1937); Libr.propr. 2.1, ed. V. Boudon-Millot (Paris 2007). -
Annual Review 2014–15 British School at Rome
2014–15 Annual Review 2014–15 British School at Rome Patron: HM The Queen President: HRH Princess Alexandra, the Hon. Lady Ogilvy, KG GCVO The BSR is a centre of interdisciplinary research excellence in the Mediterranean supporting the full range of arts, humanities and social sciences. We create an environment for work of international standing and impact from Britain and the Commonwealth, and a bridge into the intellectual and cultural heart of Rome and Italy. The BSR supports: • residential awards for visual artists and architects • residential awards for research in the archaeology, history, art history, society and culture of Italy and the Mediterranean • exhibitions, especially in contemporary art and architecture • a multidisciplinary programme of lectures and conferences • internationally collaborative research projects, including archaeological fieldwork • a specialist research library • monograph publications of research and our highly rated journal, Papers of the British School at Rome • specialist taught courses. Illustration acknowledgements British School at Rome Page 6: Sophie Hay. Pages 8 & 9: Antonio Palmieri. Page 10: Via Gramsci 61 Guido Petruccioli. Page 11: Roberto Apa. Page 12: Daniela 00197 Rome, Italy Pellegrini. Page 14: Leandro Cucinotta and Dimosthenis T +39 06 3264939 Kosmopoulos. Page 15: Sophie Hay. Pages 17 & 18: BSR F +39 06 3221201 Photographic Archive. Pages 20 & 21: Guido Petruccioli. Page 22: E [email protected] Sky Emery. Page 25: Antonio Palmieri. Page 26: Adam Nathaniel Furman (top), Roberto Apa (bottom). Pages 28 & 29: BSR BSR London Office (for awards, committees, Photographic Archive. Page 31: Sophie Hay. Page 32: Daniela development and publications enquiries) Pellegrini (top), Sophie Hay (bottom). Page 33: Sophie Hay. -
Lost Worlds of Ancient and Modern Greece
Lost Worlds of Ancient and Modern Greece Gilbert Bagnani: The Adventures of a Young Italo-Canadian Archaeologist in Greece, 1921-1924 D. J. Ian Begg Archaeopress Archaeological Lives Archaeopress Publishing Ltd Summertown Pavilion 18-24 Middle Way Summertown Oxford OX2 7LG ISBN 978-1-78969-452-9 ISBN 978-1-78969-453-6 (e-Pdf) © Archaeopress and D. J. Ian Begg 2020 Cover illustration: The burning of Smyrna as seen from a ship out in the bay, design by D. J. Ian Begg, drawn by Duncan Irvine All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright owners. Printed in England by Severn, Gloucester This book is available direct from Archaeopress or from our website www.archaeopress.com To Prof. Thomas H. B. Symons, for his steadfast support and humanist par excellence Contents Foreword ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������iii Preface �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������vii Acknowledgements ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ix Introduction ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������xiii Timeline ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������xix -
Historical Synopsis of the Aristotelian Commentary Tradition (In Less Than Sixty Minutes)
HISTORICAL SYNOPSIS OF THE ARISTOTELIAN COMMENTARY TRADITION (IN LESS THAN SIXTY MINUTES) Fred D. Miller, Jr. CHAPTER 1 PERIPATETIC SCHOLARS Aristotle of Stagira (384–322 BCE) Exoteric works: Protrepticus, On Philosophy, Eudemus, etc. Esoteric works: Categories, Physics, De Caelo, Metaphysics, De Anima, etc. The legend of Aristotle’s misappropriated works Andronicus of Rhodes: first edition of Aristotle’s works (40 BCE) Early Peripatetic commentators Boethus of Sidon (c. 75—c. 10 BCE) comm. on Categories Alexander of Aegae (1st century CE)comm. on Categories and De Caelo Adrastus of Aphrodisias (early 1st century) comm. on Categories Aspasius (c. 131) comm. on Nicomachean Ethics Emperor Marcus Aurelius establishes four chairs of philosophy in Athens: Platonic, Peripatetic, Stoic, Epicurean (c. 170) Alexander of Aphrodisias (late 2nd —early 3rd century) Extant commentaries on Prior Analytics, De Sensu, etc. Lost comm. on Physics, De Caelo, etc. Exemplar for all subsequent commentators. Comm. on Aristotle’s Metaphysics Only books 1—5 of Alexander’s comm. are genuine; books 6—14 are by ps.-Alexander . whodunit? Themistius (c. 317—c. 388) Paraphrases of Physics, De Anima, etc. Paraphrase of Metaphysics Λ (Hebrew translation) Last of the Peripatetics CHAPTER 2 NEOPLATONIC SCHOLARS Origins of Neoplatonism Ammonius Saccas (c. 175—242) forefather of Neoplatonism Plotinus (c. 205—260) the Enneads Reality explained in terms of hypostases: THE ONE—> THE INTELLECT—>WORLD SOUL—>PERCEPTIBLE WORLD Porphyry of Tyre (232–309) Life of Plotinus On the School of Plato and Aristotle Being One On the Difference Between Plato and Aristotle Isagoge (Introduction to Aristotle’s Categories) What is Neoplatonism? A broad intellectual movement based on the philosophy of Plotinus that sought to incorporate and reconcile the doctrines of Plato, Pythagoras, and Aristotle with each other and with the universal beliefs and practices of popular religion (e.g. -
The British School at Rome, 2009–2017
BRITISH INTERNATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES SUMMER 2017 BRITISH ACADEMY REVIEW Moving ideas: The British School at Rome, 2009–2017 Christopher Smith reveals how the movement of people and ideas across the centuries has been studied through the work of the BSR The British School at Rome (BSR) was French academies at Rome, and the Consiglio Nazionale founded in 1901 to support UK and delle Ricerche, we have been looking at the transmission Commonwealth research on Italy and the of ideas from and about the East to the western Mediter- western Mediterranean. We host a world- ranean in the 8th to 6th centuries BC. The culmination class specialist library of 110,000 volumes, was a conference which focused on Italy. The painstaking and make a substantial annual investment work of tracing artistic influence in everything from from our own and British Academy funds decorative motifs that spread almost virally, to highly Christopher Smith is to support residencies for over 30 artists wrought gilt silver Ugaritic plates with royal imagery Professor of Ancient and scholars a year, in subjects ranging that are found in a handful of Italian tombs, has to be History at the University from antiquity to contemporary art understood within a broader paradigm of the movement of St Andrews, and practice, prehistoric archaeology to the of people and the movement of ideas, in which the Director of the British post-colonial novel, medieval manuscripts East was as much conceptual as geographic. Highlights School at Rome (2009– 2017). In 2017 he was to postmodern architecture, and most included Stéphane Verger’s brilliant reconstruction of the awarded the Premio stops in between. -
Arabatzis.Ffinal Version
Michael of Ephesus and the philosophy of living things (In De partibus animalium, 22.25–23.9) GEORGE ARABATZIS Introduction As in other scientific disciplines, for biological knowledge the Byzantines depended largely on ancient Greek science, especially of the Hellenistic pe- riod. Under the appellation ‘biology’, we should understand those sciences which had to do with medicine, pharmacology, veterinary medicine, zool- ogy, and botany.1 As regards theories about living things (animals and plants), Byzantium carried on a tradition that synthesized elements from an- cient Greek philosophy and the Christian religion (especially the philosophy of the Church Fathers). The crucial point here is the introduction by Christianity of the theory of the historical creation of the world, from its initial elements to the formation of humans, who were seen as the crown of the universe. In a rural civilization like Byzantium, proximity to the world of plants and animals produced popular literary works that played with the idea of human primacy over all other living beings, primarily animals, often through prosopopoeia.2 Since Greco-Roman times, Aristotelian reflection on the conditions of knowledge of biological phenomena, in other words Aristotle’s biological epistemology, had fallen into oblivion;3 what re- mained from his contribution to biology was the collection of natural data and curiosities that offered, together with other sources, material for late ancient compilations. We have to wait for the eleventh–twelfth centuries in order to see, in the person of Michael of Ephesus, a commentator on Aristotle’s philosophy of biology, and this paper will focus on him. -
TAO DUFOUR Ph.D. RIBA Assistant Professor Department Of
TAO DUFOUR Ph.D. RIBA Assistant Professor Department of Architecture Cornell University College of Architecture, Art, and Planning E: [email protected] / P: 1 414 736 1047 ACADEMIC POSITIONS 2018-present Assistant Professor Department of Architecture, College of Architecture, Art, and Planning, Cornell University 2016-2018 Visiting Assistant Professor Department of Architecture, College of Architecture, Art, and Planning, Cornell University 2014-2016 Visiting Critic Department of Architecture, College of Architecture, Art, and Planning, Cornell University POST-DOCTORAL FELLOWSHIPS 2013-14 Architecture Fellow & Distinguished Visiting Design Critic School of Architecture & Urban Planning, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee 2012-13 Rome Prize in Architecture British Academy, British School at Rome PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATION 2015 Chartered Architect, Royal Institute of British Architects (RIBA), UK 2007 Registered Architect, Architects Registration Board (ARB), UK / Registration Number: 072991D EDUCATION 2006-12 Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, UK Dissertation title: The Sense of Architecture in Husserlian Phenomenology: The Example of a Candomblé-Caboclo Ritual of Tupinikim, supervised by Professor Peter Carl 2007 Postgraduate Certificate in Professional Practice in Architecture, University of Cambridge, UK 2003-04 Master of Philosophy, Department of Architecture, University of Cambridge, UK History and Philosophy of Architecture, dissertation title: The Living Stone of Rome: The Praxis Implicated by -
ARISTOTELIAN ETHICS in BYZANTIUM* York: George Braziller
Linos G. BENAKIS Vahanian, G. (1965b, December 8). Swallowed Vahanian, G. (1966b). Theology and ‘The End UDC 1/14:17 up by Godlessness. The ChristianCen- of the Age of Religion’. (J. B. Metz, Linos G. BENAKIS tury, LXXXII(49), 1505-1507. Ed.) Concilium: Theology in the Age Vahanian, G. (1966a). No other God. New of Renewal, XVI, 99-110. ARISTOTELIAN ETHICS IN BYZANTIUM* York: George Braziller. Abstract This paper argues that research in the primary sources must precede the investigation of Byzan- tine philosophy. Two points are to be considered, on the one hand, the gathering of texts, and, on the other hand, the study of texts in relation to their sources. Thus the external evidence as well as the internal evidence of texts should be examined. In this double regard, the manuscripts containing Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics are considered. Their authors are Michael of Ephesos, Eustratios of Nicaea, “Anonymus”, Heliodoros of Prussa, Georgios Pachymeres, Michael Psellos, John Italos, Nikephoros Blemmydes, George Gemistos Plethon. Keywords: Byzantine philosophy, Aristotle’s Byzantine Commentators, Michael of Ephesos, Eustratios of Nicaea, “Anonymus”, Heliodoros of Prussa, Georgios Pachymeres, Michael Psellos, John Italos, Nikephoros Blemmydes, George Gemistos Plethon. This paper is primarily technical in nature. b. The study of texts in relation to their It will argue that when one begins to examine a sources. Namely, the identification of less investigated area of the field of Byzantine sources – distinguishing between instan- Philosophy, research in the primary sources ces of mere borrowing and instances of a must still precede every interpretative act and more critical incorporation of such sour- critical approach. -
Political Philosophy in Michael Psellos: the Chronographia Read in Relation to His Philosophical Work
Political philosophy in Michael Psellos: the Chronographia read in relation to his philosophical work DOMINIC J. O’MEARA The political thought explicitly or implicitly present in Michael Psellos’ historical masterpiece, the Chronographia, has attracted the attention of modern readers and given rise to studies using diverse methods and reaching diverse results.1 In general, however, this has been done without taking much account of the large body of texts produced by Psellos in relation to his teaching activities as a philosopher, with one notable exception: the autobiographical section in the Chronographia (VI 36ff.) where Psellos presents his philosophical education and interests, a passage evidently con- nected with Psellos’ own philosophical work. The absence of research com- paring the political thought of the Chronographia with what might be found in Psellos’ philosophical works has the disadvantage of giving the impres- sion of a double personality in Psellos: the political thinker and actor of the Chronographia and the teacher in the philosophical works. There is also the danger that we may deprive ourselves of means allowing us better to under- stand passages in the Chronographia involving fairly technical concepts and theoretical constructs which find fuller expression in the philosophical works, with the result that we may fail to grasp, or even misinterpret, Psellos’ views in the Chronographia. One reason for this situation is the long-standing absence of critical edi- tions of Psellos’ philosophical works, a problem which is now slowly being resolved. A further reason may be that historians might be tempted to think sometimes (may Clio forgive my rudeness!) that they can adequately dis- cuss philosophers of the past without having a serious grasp of their phi- losophy. -
Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-44089-9 — Sight, Touch, and Imagination in Byzantium Roland Betancourt Index More Information
Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-44089-9 — Sight, Touch, and Imagination in Byzantium Roland Betancourt Index More Information Index The family name emerged only in middle Byzantium. Late antique and early Byzantine persons are normally listed by first name; later on, by family name. Abgar, Alexios I Komnenos, absence, see presence Al-Kindī, Achilles Tatius, –, Alkmaeon of Croton, activity, see energeia Anderson, David, adsensus, see synkatathesis Andida, see Nicholas and Theodore of Andida Aelian, Annas, Julia, Aenesidemus, , Annunciation, –, Aeschines, anointing, – Aeschylus, sense organs, – Aetios of Amida, , Anthemios of Tralles, Aetios of Antioch, , , , , antilambano (grasp), –; see also antilepsis; aporroe, , – katalambano, kataleptikos influence on Nemesios, Photios, Michael Psellos and, sight and, – theory of vision, – antilepsis (apprehension), , , ; see also Agathias, , – antilambano air Photios, cognitive medium, – Porphyry, –, linked with hearing, – Aphthonios, –, –, linked with light, – Apollodorus, nerves and, – Apollonius of Tyana, – relation to pneuma, – aporroe (efflux), –, – walking stick, Aetios, aisthesis (sensation), , , Alexander of Aphrodisias, common sense and, applicable to exteriority, differentiated from sense organ, compared to prochysis, mediates phantasia and the body, evil eye, akatalēptikē, see katalambano, kataleptikos Michael Psellos, – akatalēptikē phantasia (non-graspable fantasy), Theophrastus, Akbari, Suzanne Conklin, , apotyposis, see typosis Alcinous, apples, –