DOCSLIB.ORG

Growth, Automation and Wage Wars

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Growth, Automation and Wage Wars www.shiftminer.com Shift Miner Magazine Monday November 27, 2017,News Edition 206 READY TO LOAD 2018: GROWTH, AUTOMATION AND WAGE WARS RETURN OF PERMANENTS SKILLS SHORTAGES FORCING FULL-TIME >> Page 15 HOW TO MAKE A QUICK $M45 TERRACOM REVALUES BLAIR ATHOL >> Page 9 November 27, 2017 1 Shift Miner Magazine www.shiftminer.com News CONTENTS NEWS 07 EXPANSION INEVITABLE 08 BIG BED BUY 10 COOK REVIVAL? 14 AUTOMATION ARRIVES REGULARS 19 FRANK THE TANK 19 MAD MUMZIE 22 PUZZLES 25-26 MINER’S TRADER For all general enquiries 07 4921 4333 or [email protected] NEWS & SUBSCRIPTION EDITORIAL Magazine: Only available on bulk subscription to SPQ’s and similar Overall editor is Alex Graham venues. Costs $10 per week [email protected] or 074921 4333 Individual: Weekly subscription news service available direct to inbox, ADVERTISING through the iPhone App and online. Costs $3.99 a week [email protected] or 0428 154 653 Contact [email protected] or 0428 154 653 Shift Miner is published by Fitzroy Publishing Pty Ltd A.B.N 72122739879 36B Williams St Rockhampton QLD 4700 - PO Box 1440 Rockhampton QLD 4700 November 27, 2017 3 Shift Miner Magazine www.shiftminer.com News Expansion has to happen is a problem not seen for a while. “However, new risks are the number one risk to mining ”Due to significant project emerging as the industry switches businesses surveyed. overruns and poorly timed M&A, to growth and while there will be According to EY companies there have been significant relatively less cash commitments are scrambling to get efficiencies impairments across the industry, for debt reduction purposes, out of their businesses by applying and management remains mining and metals companies digital technology to areas like cautious about allocating cash for have signalled intentions to return how they buy and maintain expansion projects,” EY says. cash to shareholders. machinery, how they respond to “But simply returning cash to “Over the last five years, their customers, and of course shareholders is not a long-term CapEx spent on resource automation and machine learning. strategy, ultimately, good projects replacement has declined by 66% “Digital goes beyond adopting executed effectively will offer from US$20.5b to US$6.8b due technology though — it needs better returns for shareholders to lower commodity prices and to be solving a business issue Deciding how much money in the long run…. exercising returns. and is key to resolving the is allocated to new projects good judgment in investment “ Now that growth is back on sector’s number one operational is a significant business risk opportunities are crucial actions the agenda, mining and metals challenge: improving productivity confronting mining companies toward offering shareholders a companies are allocating more across the value chain,” EY said. according to accounting firm unique value proposition.” sustaining or growth capital to get As a consequence, Ernst & Young. In a similar vein two other the most out of current projects…. cybersecurity is now considered Based on discussions with risks titled “Cash optimisation” we have yet to see a significant a significant risk to mining mining companies (number not and “resource replacement” increase in exploration CapEx.” companies coming in at number known), EY has put together a list came in at number six and eight Notably, skills shortages three in the report. of what they think are the top 10 respectively. and infrastructure access risks The risks around the social business risks facing mining and “A recovery in commodity have dropped out of the top 10 licence to operate, regulatory metals. prices and the relentless cost- altogether despite being at the environment and the price of At number two on the list is cutting exercises have resulted in top of the list in 2008’s boom energy, remain perennial business a risk defined as: “competitive higher margins and improved cash times, and perhaps surprisingly risks sitting in the top 10 for more shareholder returns” which EY says generation,” EY said. EY says digital readiness is now than a decade. “Gone to shit” Good solid contract The CFMEU says a meeting yesterday beyond 100 days is a disproportional experience in the Bowen Basin,” with the management of the Glencore response by Glencore. he said. owned Oaky North mine has not “This is likely to mean 180 “Importantly for the broader resolved any differences - in fact, it has workers and their families are going industry as a whole it is a good moved the parties further apart. to be without work or income over the solid contract that is going to be District Vice President for the Christmas period,” Mr Brodsky added. worth people coming back to the CFMEU Chris Brodsky says he expects “The Union is going to look after them, sector for. the industrial dispute to continue and try and keep things as normal as we “For a long time coal has been through Christmas and into the new can, but when workers went on strike a sector where people didn’t see year, with no visible sign of a resolution earlier in the year, Glencore said they any long term opportunity, but in sight. lost 6400 man hours. these are real jobs for real people.” “Yes everything has gone to shit,” “Well by locking them out all this time, Construction of the project he told Shift Miner it has cost them more than 300,000 is scheduled to commence later “We met with them yesterday and had a man hours. BMA has awarded contracts this year and take 18 months to pretty decent meeting. “It’s a discussion I have been having worth more than $50 million complete. “We went, willing to move a little bit with a lot of people lately about what for the construction of a new In addition to the new on the big hitter issues like workplace is a fair or proportional response in this 11-kilometre overland conveyor conveyor, BHP says they will build representation and the disputes clauses, negotiation.” linking Peak Downs mine with the a new stockpile pad and Run-of- but they responded by saying they Glencore has not yet responded to Coal Handling Preparation Plant Mine station at Peak Downs and wanted a whole lot of other smaller requests for comment. However, they (CHPP) at the neighbouring Caval upgrade the Caval Ridge CHPP things included as well, that they had recently told Shift Miner earlier strike Ridge Mine. and stockyard. previously conceded. action cost them 28-thousand hours of Mackay-based G&S BMA will also invest in a “So the result is that we are further labour at the mine. Engineering has been awarded a new mining fleet, including apart.” They also claim the average salary $9.5 million work contract, while excavators, and trucks. Under the Fair Work Act, both for permanent employees at Oaky North CIMIC Groups CPB Contractors “The progression of this employers and employees have levers is about $180,000 a year and increased has been awarded $38 million important project for our business they can pull to influence negotiations around 10% between 2011 and 2016 worth of work. means we can continue to safely during an enterprise negotiation. when wages were adjusted for inflation. G&S CEO Mick Crowe said the and productively produce our The employees can go on strike which According to the CFMEU, short of a project was a great opportunity high-quality metallurgical coal for costs the employer, while the employer resolution between the two parties, the and they will be recruiting new steelmaking around the world.” can lock out the workforce which only thing that can end the lockout now people to get the job done. BMA Asset President, Rag Udd costs the workers. Both actions can be is a Federal Government intervention “This is a great project to said this week. classified as protected by the Fair Work or a new ruling by the Fair Work deliver a homegrown solution, Since coal prices spiked late Commission, meaning they are not Commissioner. They say it’s now bringing together our local in 2016, BMA has been using illegal. the longest lockout of employees in knowledge of the Caval and Peak haul trucks to take coal from Peak However, the CFMEU says the Australian history. sites along with our high-quality Downs to the under utilised Caval Lock-Out - which has now extended infrastructure and construction Ridge CHHP. 4 November 27, 2017 Shift Miner Magazine www.shiftminer.com News An eye watering loss of 2018, and Bounty aims to pro- gressively increase production to a total 1.8 million tonnes of product over 12 months. “These transactions will provide Bounty with revenue from the Cook Colliery and a mid-term development project in Minyan- go, for which a mining lease has already been granted.” While the Minyango under- ground coal project is still a long way from being operational, it does have potential, with previous mine plans allowing for up to 7 Contractor Bounty Mining is likely the time said the takeover would be fourth mining cycle he had worked million tonnes of coal exports a to be a mine owner by Christmas, a “significant step forward in the through. year. following their successful bid of company’s strategy of acquiring However, as former CEO of around $40 million for the Cook more resources investments”. Caledon Coal Brett Garland told Colliery and Minyango mining Bounty mining has historical- Using that experience, he says Shift Miner in 2013 when they lease from liquidators of the ly operated in the Bowen Basin they now plan to reconfigure the hatched their plans for a longwall now-defunct Caledon Resources.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Inquiry Into Environmental Offsets Submission 75
    Committee Secretary Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6277 3526 Fax: +61 2 6277 5818 [email protected] 4th April 2014 http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Environment_and_Communications/Environme ntal_Offsets Terms of Reference 1. That the following matter be referred to the Senate Environment and Communications References Committee for inquiry and report by 16 June 2014: The history, appropriateness and effectiveness of the use of environmental offsets in federal environmental approvals in Australia, including: the principles that underpin the use of offsets; a. the processes used to develop and assess proposed offsets; b. the adequacy of monitoring and evaluation of approved offsets arrangements to determine whether promised environmental outcomes are achieved over the short and long term; and c. any other related matters 2. That in conducting the inquiry the committee consider the terms of reference in (1) with specific regard to, but not restricted to, the following projects in central Queensland in Mackay Conservation Group’s area: a. Waratah Coal’s Galilee Coal Project; p.3 b. North Queensland Bulk Port’s Abbot Point Coal Terminal Capital Dredging Project; p.11 c. Sonoma Coal Mine Coral Creek Expansion and Offset Unlikely to Work; p.13 d. Newlands Wollombi Coal Mines Newland Nature Refuge ; p.13 e. Xstrata’s Rolleston Coal Mine; p.14 2 Case Study 1: Waratah Coal’s Galilee Coal Project: The Legitimacy of Offsetting a Commonwealth listed Nature Refuge Biodiversity offset requirements of the Galilee Coal Project (Northern Export Facility) also referred to as the China First Coal Project, including the development of a Biodiversity Offset Strategy (the Offset Strategy) that assesses the offset requirements at the State and Commonwealth level, identifies an approach for delivery of offsets and analyses potential offset availability.
    [Show full text]
  • Timbuckleyieefa DIRTY POWER BIG COAL's NETWORK of INFLUENCE OVER the COALITION GOVERNMENT CONTENTS
    ICAC investigation: Lobbying, Access and Influence (Op Eclipse) Submission 2 From: Tim Buckley To: Lobbying Subject: THE REGULATION OF LOBBYING, ACCESS AND INFLUENCE IN NSW: A CHANCE TO HAVE YOUR SAY Date: Thursday, 16 May 2019 2:01:39 PM Attachments: Mav2019-GPAP-Dirtv-Power-Report.Ddf Good afternoon I am delighted that the NSW ICAC is looking again into the issue of lobbying and undue access by lobbyists representing self-serving, private special interest groups, and the associated lack of transparency. This is most needed when it relates to the private (often private, foreign tax haven based entities with zero transparency or accountability), use of public assets. IEEFA works in the public interest analysis relating to the energy-fmance-climate space, and so we regularly see the impact of the fossil fuel sector in particular as one that thrives on the ability to privatise the gains for utilising one-time use public assets and in doing so, externalising the costs onto the NSW community. This process is constantly repeated. The community costs, be they in relation to air, particulate and carbon pollution, plus the use of public water, and failure to rehabilitate sites post mining, brings a lasting community cost, particularly in the area of public health costs. The cost-benefit analysis presented to the IPC is prepared by the proponent, who has an ability to present biased self-serving analysis that understates the costs and overstates the benefits. To my understanding, the revolving door of regulators, politicians, fossil fuel companies and their lobbyists is corrosive to our democracy, undermining integrity and fairness.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Draft Access Undertaking Volume 3: Maximum Allowable Revenue and Reference Tariffs
    30 April 2013 2013 Draft Access Undertaking Volume 3: Maximum Allowable Revenue and Reference Tariffs Contents 1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................18 2 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE REVENUE AND REFERENCE TARIFFS ......................................19 2.1 UT4 volume forecasts.......................................................................................................20 2.2 Summary of proposed MAR for UT4 ...............................................................................21 2.3 Summary of reference tariffs ...........................................................................................23 2.4 Key drivers of UT4 tariffs .................................................................................................30 2.5 Relativity of proposed UT4 tariffs to other industry cost drivers ................................32 3 OPENING ASSET VALUE........................................................................................................34 3.1 Process..............................................................................................................................34 3.2 Matters impacting the value of the RAB .........................................................................34 3.3 Summary of UT3 roll-forward ..........................................................................................37 3.4 UT4: Opening Asset Values.............................................................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • Xstrata Finance (Canada) Limited Barclays Capital Citi
    OFFERING MEMORANDUM STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Xstrata Finance (Canada) Limited US$500,000,000 6.90% Notes due 2037 Fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior, unsecured and joint and several basis by Xstrata plc, Xstrata (Schweiz) AG and Xstrata Finance (Dubai) Limited. Issue price: 99.687% Interest payable May 15 and November 15 The 6.90% Notes due 2037 (the ‘‘Notes’’) are being offered by Xstrata Finance (Canada) Limited (the ‘‘Issuer’’) (the ‘‘Notes Issue’’). Upon issue, payment of the principal and interest on the Notes will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior, unsecured, and joint and several basis by Xstrata plc (‘‘Xstrata’’), Xstrata (Schweiz) AG (‘‘Xstrata Schweiz’’) and Xstrata Finance (Dubai) Limited (‘‘Xstrata Dubai’’ and, together with Xstrata and Xstrata Schweiz, the ‘‘Guarantors’’) pursuant to the guarantees relating to the Notes (the ‘‘Guarantees’’) as set forth in the indenture under which the Notes will be issued (the ‘‘Indenture’’). The Notes and the Guarantees will rank pari passu with all other direct, unsecured and unsubordinated obligations (except for certain limited exceptions and those obligations preferred by statute or operation of law) of the Issuer and the Guarantors, respectively. The Notes are redeemable in whole or in part at any time at the option of the Issuer or the Guarantors at a redemption price equal to the make-whole amounts described in ‘‘Description of the Notes and Guarantees’’. In addition, the Notes are redeemable in whole but not in part at the option of the Issuer upon the occurrence of certain changes in taxation at their principal amount with accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption.
    [Show full text]
  • Glencore Supporting Report F
    ANNEXURE F: RCEP EIS Chapter 3 – Project Description Chapter 3 Description of the Project Rolleston Coal Expansion Project EIS Table of Contents 3 Description of the Project _______________________________________________ 3-2 3.1 Location ________________________________________________________ 3-6 3.2 Project construction _______________________________________________ 3-6 3.3 Project operations _______________________________________________ 3-24 3.4 Project product handling ___________________________________________ 3-32 3.5 Infrastructure requirements ________________________________________ 3-33 3.6 Waste management ______________________________________________ 3-36 3.7 Decommissioning and rehabilitation __________________________________ 3-41 Volume 1 | Chapter 3 3-1 October 2014 Rolleston Coal Expansion Project EIS 3 Description of the Project The Rolleston Coal open cut thermal coal mine has been in operation since 2005 and has approval to mine up to 14 million tonnes (Mt) run-of-mine (ROM) per annum. The Rolleston Coal Expansion Project (the Project) would expand the mining area of the existing Rolleston Coal Mine by adding a western and southern mining lease (mining lease applications MLA70415 and MLA70416 respectively). MLA70458 would also form part of the Project for the primary purpose of constructing a water irrigation dam and a creek diversion between Meteor Creek and Sandy Creek and containing the flood afflux from the Meteor Creek flood levee. The increase in mining area would see the Project increase the Rolleston Coal Mine’s production tonnage by 5 Mt ROM per annum to 19 Mt ROM per annum. The location of the Project in a regional context is given in Figure 3.1. To meet the increased tonnage profile, a Marion 8750 dragline and P&H4100 XPC electric rope shovel, with additional support equipment, would operate within MLA70415 and MLA70416.
    [Show full text]
  • And of on and Into of Rail and and Ports
    and of on and into of Rail and and Ports ^ Gladstone Area Promotion & Development Ltd Introduction This submission focuses on providing an overview of the Gladstone (Central Queensland) Region's industry, its capability as a major export hub, its current growth, and opportunities for future development. It highlights the importance of transport infrastructure in this context. Gladstone Area Promotion and Development Limited (GAPDL) the Standing Committee on Transport and Regional Services to consider submission as important regional information for the Inquiry. Organisational Background GAPDL is the key Economic Development Agency and Regional Tourism Organisation for the local government of Gladstone City, Calliope Shire, Banana Shire and Miriam Vale Shire in Central Queensland. As a membership based organisation, GAPDL represents the interests of some 350 industries, local authorities and community based bodies. Overview of The Gladstone Region is a proven strategic location for future growth and is a key area of national and economic development. Its natural resources, availability of efficient infrastructure services, and proximity to place it in a strongly competitive position for major industry investment. It is a export centre. Strategies are actively pursued to develop opportunities in processing and value adding of minerals and chemicals, and associated support industries. The Gladstone State Development Area is a 21,000 hectare area of land set aside by the Queensland Government to provide land with port access for large scale industrial development. A Materials Transport Services Corridor links the Gladstone State Development with the Port of Gladstone. A brochure outlining the role of the Gladstone State Development Area is provided at attachment 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Meteor Downs
    Meteor Downs By Charles Tyson. WK7 METEOR DOWNS By Charles Tyson. Meteor Downs is one of the “name stations”, certainly of Central Queensland, and arguably, Australia. My interest stems from being brought up on a neighbouring property which was once part of “Meteor”. But if you are wondering why you should care, may I suggest that the list of owners include Australia’s first Cattle King, James Tyson (unfortunately, no relation), Darcy Donkin, the first man in Queensland to own and fly his own aeroplane, the one-time richest man in the world, Nelson Bunker Hunt, the oldest pastoral company in Australia, A.A. Company, and one of the largest resource companies in the world, Glencore. There must be something about it to attract their interest, and as well, the story of Meteor Downs can tell the story of pastoral history in Central Queensland. After the aboriginal unchallenged occupation and the story of the European explorers, the story starts with the early precursor to the “White shoe brigade” – the so-called run-hunters, and then to the actual men who settled there, stocked the station, and attempted to make it pay. We will hear of the continuing battle of seasons, and attempts at closer settlement. It would not be Australian history I we did not include stories of bushrangers, so they also get a mention. Then we will move on to the beginnings of farming as opposed to grazing, and early efforts at irrigation. Then the story moves on to mining, and how all these facets of primary production coexist.
    [Show full text]
  • Glencore Regional Interests Development Application
    ROLLESTON COAL EXPANSION PROJECT Regional Interests Development Application Supporting Information Report March 2016 Table of contents Executive summary ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 1 Application ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Context -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 2 Description of project -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 3 Project Justification --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 4 Constraints analysis --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 Regional Planning Interests ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 14 5 Central Queensland Regional Plan ------------------------------------------------------------------ 14 6 Regional Planning Legislative Framework ---------------------------------------------------------- 17 7 Regional Planning Interests Regulation 2014 ------------------------------------------------------- 28 8 Conclusion ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 28 Assessment Table 1 – Priority Agricultural Area ------------------------------------------------------------ 30 Assessment Table 2 – Strategic Cropping Area -------------------------------------------------------------- 40 Annexures
    [Show full text]
  • Mackay Conservation Group
    Mackay Conservation Group The Environment Centre Tel: (07) 49530808 156 Wood St, Mackay Fax: (07) 49530153 PO BOX 826 Email: [email protected] Mackay Qld 4740 Web: www.mackayconservationgroup.org.au ABN: 41 123 903 975 10 April 2017 The Senate Environment and Communications References Committee Parliament House Canberra By email: [email protected] Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission on this important matter of public importance. Mackay Conservation Group is the lead environmental organisation in Central Queensland. We have been working on issues related to the environmental impact of mining since the 1980s. In that time we have made various submissions on mine proposals, undertaken legal action to prevent environmental harm from mining and more recently engaged in a public campaign around the growing problem of regulatory failure regarding mine rehabilitation. This submission has been prepared by Peter McCallum, Mackay Conservation Group coordinator on behalf of the group. Regards Peter McCallum Coordinator Financial Assurance Mackay Conservation Group (MCG) is concerned that the rehabilitation of mine sites in Central Queensland, in particular the large open cut mines in the Bowen Basin is not proceeding fast enough and in some cases may never occur. In correspondence to MCG the Queensland Environment Minister recently outlined the total calculated cost of rehabilitation for all mining in Queensland to be $8.18 billion. The Qld Government holds financial assurances (FA) of $7.06 billion, the difference is due to discounting. The Queensland Government’s policy of providing up to 30 per cent discount on financial assurance will inevitably lead to a shortfall in funding for mining rehabilitation when a mining company fails and no buyer can be found for the mine site.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirty Power Big Coal’S Network of Influence Over the Coalition Government Contents
    DIRTY POWER BIG COAL’S NETWORK OF INFLUENCE OVER THE COALITION GOVERNMENT CONTENTS 03 Executive Summary 05 Introduction 07 Big Coal 08 The lobbyists 09 Media networks 10 The dirty power network 12 Politics and the federal government 19 Case Study 1: Trevor St Baker and the Vales Point power station 21 Case Study 2: Groundwater for Adani’s Carmichael Coal Mine 23 Conclusion 24 Endnotes Greenpeace Australia Pacific Investigative journalist: Michael West Analyst: Simone Marsh May 2019 www.greenpeace.org.au GREENPEACE AUSTRALIA PACIFIC DIRTY POWER BIG COAL’S NETWORK OF INFLUENCE OVER THE COALITION GOVERNMENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The coal industry is powerful and has KEY FINDINGS infiltrated Australian government at the Prime Minister Scott Morrison’s senior staff is dominated highest levels, all the way to the office by former executives and employees of the coal industry, of Prime Minister, Scott Morrison. Its its lobbyists, and pro-coal mastheads at News Corp. They power and influence were key factors include: in the downfall of two prime ministers, • Scott Morrison’s Principal Private Secretary, Yaron Finkelstein, was the former CEO of Crosby Textor (now Kevin Rudd and Malcolm Turnbull, and C|T). in the abolition of a range of policies • Morrison’s chief of staff, John Kunkel, was previously driving action on climate change. Deputy CEO of the Minerals Council of Australia (MCA) and a lobbyist for Rio Tinto. Former coal industry staff now enjoy direct access to senior government ministers. A wide, well-funded • News Corp staffers dominate Morrison’s network of lobbyists, supported by coal’s political and communications team, including his speech-writer, media allies, has been key to protecting the interests of Matthew Fynes-Clinton (formerly with The Courier Mail); coal companies operating in Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Glencore Supporting Report D
    ANNEXURE D: RCEP EIS Chapter - Introduction Chapter 1 Introduction Rolleston Coal Expansion Project EIS Table of Contents 1 Introduction __________________________________________________________ 1-2 1.1 Project proponent _________________________________________________ 1-2 1.2 Project description ________________________________________________ 1-2 1.3 Project objectives and scope ________________________________________ 1-6 1.4 The EIS process __________________________________________________ 1-6 1.5 Public consultation process ________________________________________ 1-15 1.6 Project approvals ________________________________________________ 1-15 1.7 Accredited process for controlled actions under Commonwealth legislation ___ 1-26 Volume 1 | Chapter 1 1-1 October 2014 Rolleston Coal Expansion Project EIS 1 Introduction This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been prepared following the process under the Environmental Protection Act 1994 (EP Act) for the Rolleston Coal Expansion Project (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Project’). The EIS has been prepared specifically in response to the Terms of Reference (ToR) dated 14 January 2012, issued by the Department of Environment and Heritage Protection (DEHP). The EIS addresses matters relevant to the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) and Referral 2011/5965 made under the EPBC Act for the Project, pursuant to the Bilateral Agreement between the Commonwealth and the State of Queensland. An assessment was undertaken to consider and address the potential direct and indirect environmental, social, and economic impacts associated with the construction and operation of the Project. This assessment is documented in the EIS and provides information about the existing environment, the likely impacts and their significance and mitigation measures to be applied to avoid or reduce the identified adverse effects to an acceptable level.
    [Show full text]
  • Glencore Supporting Report G: Land
    ANNEXURE G: RCEP EIS Chapter 6 - Land Chapter 6 Land Rolleston Coal Expansion Project EIS Table of Contents 6 Land _______________________________________________________________ 6-2 6.1 Introduction ______________________________________________________ 6-2 6.2 Scope of assessment ______________________________________________ 6-2 6.3 Legislation and policy ______________________________________________ 6-2 6.4 Methodology _____________________________________________________ 6-6 6.5 Description of environmental values _________________________________ 6-10 6.6 Potential impacts ________________________________________________ 6-50 6.7 Mitigation measures ______________________________________________ 6-70 6.8 Residual impacts ________________________________________________ 6-78 6.9 Summary and conclusions _________________________________________ 6-80 6.10 References _____________________________________________________ 6-82 Volume 1 | Chapter 6 6-1 October 2014 Rolleston Coal Expansion Project EIS 6 Land 6.1 Introduction This chapter provides an assessment of the potential impacts of the Rolleston Coal Expansion Project (the Project) on the land based environmental values of the Project Site. The assessment considers the likely nature and extent of potential impacts from the Project and identifies, where appropriate, safeguards to help mitigate, manage, or avoid adverse impacts over the life of the Project. 6.2 Scope of assessment The purpose of the assessment is to describe and characterise the existing environmental values of the land area that have the potential to be affected by the Project. Where the assessment identifies a potential adverse impact on a land based attribute due to Project activities, mitigation is applied to reduce the potential impact. The assessment has been scoped to address Section 4.2 of the Terms of Reference (ToR) for the Project. Several broad, land based topics are considered as part of this chapter.
    [Show full text]