Administrative Report No. 11-39
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
PDF, Guide to Comisión Femenil Mexicana
University of California, Santa Barbara Davidson Library Department of Special Collections California Ethnic and Multicultural Archives GUIDE TO COMISIÓN FEMENIL MEXICANA NACIONAL ARCHIVES 1967-1997 [Bulk dates 1970-1990] Collection Number: CEMA 30. Size Collection: 31 linear feet (63 boxes). Acquisition Information: Donated by CFMN extant board of directors. Gift agreement dated January, 2001. Access restrictions: None. Use Restriction: Copyright has not been assigned to the Department of Special Collections, UCSB. All requests for permission to publish or quote from manuscripts must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections. Permission for publication is given on behalf of the Department of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission of the copyright holder, which also must be obtained. Processing Information: Project Director Salvador Güereña, principle processor Alexander Hauschild, assistant Michelle Welch, 2003. Location: Del Norte. M:\CEMA COLLECTIONS\CFMN\cfmn_guide.doc 1 HISTORY The Comisión Femenil Mexicana Nacional, Inc. was founded by resolution at the 1970 National Issues Conference in Sacramento California. The Founding President was Francisca Flores, a Chicana activist already well respected for her many decades of community works. Recognizing that there were few organizations that met the needs of Latina women, nine resolutions were presented to the full body calling for the establishment of a Chicana/Mexicana women's commission. The resolution called for a commission that could direct it’s efforts toward organizing and networking women that they might assume leadership positions within the Chicano movement and in the community. Designed to disseminate news and information regarding the achievements of Chicana/Mexican women, and promote programs that provide solutions for women and their families; the resolutions read as follows: RESOLUTION TO ESTABLISH COMISIÓN FEMENIL MEXICANA NACIONAL, INC. -
Irma Beserra Núñez: Resumé and Biography - June 10, 2021
Irma Beserra Núñez: Resumé and Biography - June 10, 2021 ARCHIVIST, HISTORICAL PRESERVATIONIST, EDUCATOR & ADVOCATE (2005-present) Doña Irma MAHA: MEXICAN AMERICAN HERITAGE ARTS INSTITUTE Founder/Owner: Archivist, Heritage Arts Educator, and Community RevitalizaLon Advocate (2014-present) RICET Don Juan REVITALIZATION INNOVATIONS Community Cultural EducaLonal Tourism iniLaLve Partner: Director of AdministraLon and Community RelaLons, Assistant Muralist/Designer, and Graphic ArLst (2012-present) COALITION TO SAVE THE FIRST STREET STORE: CHICANO HISTORICAL MONUMENT Co-Founder/Co-Chair: Lead Advocate and ArLst Spokesperson (1970 project concept and theme, architectural/plaza/fountain design and sculpture by internaConally renown arCst “Don Juan” Johnny D. González (1974) nineteen panel mural series designed by “Don Juan” Johnny D. González, David Botello and Robert Arenivar As CO-LEAD ADVOCATE working with Don Juan, Irma formed a countywide Coali?on to preserve this 47 year old, 175 foot long, interna?onally renowned East L.A. Chicano Historical Monument. AJer gathering over 3,000 signatures on pe??ons and rallying 100s to aLend hearings, Don Juan and Irma received major support working closely with the Mural Conservancy of Los Angeles, Los Angeles Conservancy, Los Angeles County Departments of Regional Planning and Public Works, Office of Supervisor Emeritus Gloria Molina, and con?nuing with the Office of Supervisor Hilda Solis. ParLal List of AddiLonal Supporters: Councilmember Gil Cedillo; Eddie Torres (East L.A. Chamber of Commerce); Ben -
Struggles in Forming Chicana Sisterhoods, 1970-1982 A
STRUGGLES IN FORMING CHICANA SISTERHOODS, 1970-1982 A thesis Submitted by Nicole Cedillo In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Master of Arts in History TUFTS UNIVERSITY May, 19 2013 Cedillo 2 Introduction On October 9, 1970 forty women met at the Mexican American National Issues Conference in Sacramento to place the plight of Mexican American women at the forefront of the Chicano movement’s political agenda. Francisca Flores, a veteran of Los Angeles labor politics, urged Mexican women to join together in order to form their own female led workshop that addressed women’s rights, childcare, higher education, abortion and the future of Chicana women. After over six hours of deliberation, the women passed resolutions that called for the representation of Mexican American females in local, state, and national government. They called for the recognition of Chicana women’s issues throughout the Western hemisphere and sought to build a network of women that would cross national boundaries and lead to a world- wide Chicana social movement. At the same time, they wanted to work on community issues, demanding childcare and reproductive rights on the conference agenda in addition to women’s right to self-determination. The outcome of the workshop gave birth to Comision Femenil Mexicana Nacional (The National Mexican Women’s Commission), one of the first Chicana feminist organizations of the nation, which transformed the local concerns of Mexican women to the forefront of state and national political agendas. 1 The Chicano movement, which took place in the late 1960s and 1970s, has been best known for charismatic male leaders, such as Caesar Chavez who led the United Farm Workers in the fight for civil rights or the Brown Berets who used self-defense against police brutality in the 1 “Report on Workshop and Present Women’s Activities,” CFM vol. -
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street, Room 713, Los Angeles, California 90012 (213) 974-1101
County of Los Angeles CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICE Kenneth Hahn Hall of Administration 500 West Temple Street, Room 713, Los Angeles, California 90012 (213) 974-1101 http://ceo.lacounty.gov WILLIAM T FUJIOKA Board of Supervisors Chief Executive Officer GLORIA MOLINA First District MARK RIDLEY-THOMAS August 5, 2014 Second District ZEVYAROSLAVSKY Third District DON KNABE To: Supervisor Don Knabe, Chairman Fourth District Supervisor Gloria Molina MICHAEL D. ANTONOVICH Fifth District Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas Supervisor Zev Yaroslavsky Supervisor Michael D. Antonovich From: William T Fujioka -; ¿ A" D ( / Chief Executive Officer yvv, -r REPORT ON CONSULTANT EVALUATION FOR A POTENTIAL COUNTYWIDE BIOTECHNOLOGY PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM On July 10, 2012, the Board authorized the Chief Executive Office (CEO) to enter into a contract with the Battelle Memorial Institute (Battelle), a biotechnology consultant, to perform a feasibilty assessment and develop a master plan for a public-private biotechnology partnership program with the goal of promoting the public health care system, job creation, and research. This is to provide your Board with Battelle's feasibility assessment and proposed master plan for a public-private biotechnology partnership program (Attachment). Summary Battelle's research and analysis indicates that the biosciences industry in the Los Angeles region has been, and continues to be, a key economic driver for the region and that there is potential to expand this industry to be a top region in the nation. Although the region lags in several key areas (e.g., lack of early-stage venture capital, insufficient wet lab space, etc.), Battelle believes that developing a public-private program is feasible. -
An Oral History with GLORIA MOLINA
CENTER FOR ORAL AND PUBLIC HISTORY CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON Women, Politics, and Activism Since Suffrage Oral History Project An Oral History with GLORIA MOLINA Interviewed By Natalie M. Fousekis On October 10, 2017 OH 5983 Supported by the John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation This is an edited transcription of an interview conducted for the Center for Oral and Public History, sponsored by California State University, Fullerton. The reader should be aware that an oral history document portrays information as recalled by the interviewee. Because of the spontaneous nature of this kind of document, it may contain statements and impressions that are not factual. The Center for Oral and Public History encourages all researchers to listen to the recording while reading the oral history transcription, as some expressions, verbiage, and intent may be lost in the interpretation from audio to written source. Researchers are welcome to utilize short excerpts from this transcription without obtaining permission as long as proper credit is given to the interviewee, the interviewer, and the Center for Oral and Public History. Permission for extensive use of the transcription and related materials, duplication, and/or reproduction can be obtained by contacting the Center for Oral and Public History, California State University, PO Box 6846, Fullerton CA 92834-6846. Email: [email protected] Copyright © 2017 Center for Oral and Public History California State University, Fullerton Gloria Molina, 2017. O.H. 5983 CENTER FOR ORAL AND PUBLIC HISTORY CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, FULLERTON NARRATOR: GLORIA MOLINA INTERVIEWER: Natalie M. Fousekis DATE: October 10, 2017 LOCATION: Los Angeles, California PROJECT: Women, Politics, and Activism Since Suffrage NF: Okay, this is an interview with Gloria Molina on October 10, 2017 for the Women, Politics, and Activism project. -
RELAC Newsletter
Mar/Apr 2021 Vol 56-2 63 Years of Your Pension and Health Care Watchdog Dedicated Service to L.A. www.relac.org • e-mail: [email protected] • (800) 537-3522 County Retirees President’s Repeal of the Windfall Message Elimination Provision and by Brian Berger Government Pension Offset Gaining Ground in Congress As a new face for this space, maybe I should start by Dave Muir, Past President with a simple “Hello.” There have been encouraging new developments You have been seeing Dave Muir’s picture and his in efforts to repeal the unfair Windfall Elimination informative messages for seven years. He decided Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset it was time to take a step back...a tiny bit. No one (GPO). A recent Forbes magazine article reported gets a break on the Board. Yes, Dave is still a member of the RELAC Board, that President Biden has promised to repeal both a member of its Executive Committee and continuing to direct major the WEP and the GPO. responsibilities where he will be a guiding voice and a conscience to all Go to https://www.google.com/amp/s/www. of us on this Board. Thank goodness I have his phone number. forbes.com/sites/ebauer/2020/12/07/why-joe- biden-should-reform-not-repeal-the-windfall- As a reminder, RELAC was started in February 1958. Its purpose was elimination-provision/amp/ to read the article. to preserve and promote the general welfare of its members. It has done so ever since. Our most important mission today is defending The “Biden-Sanders Unity Task Force our pensions and health benefits against the relentless attacks of their Recommendations” includes a section entitled “Guaranteeing a Secure and Dignified Retirement.” critics. -
The History, Development, and Policy Influence of the California Latino Legislative Caucus
The History, Development, and Policy Influence of the California Latino Legislative Caucus Prepared by the Center for Southern California Studies, California State University, Northridge as part of the Faculty Research Fellows Program for the Center for California Studies, California State University, Sacramento Lawrence C. Becker, Ph.D.1 Tyler Hughes, Ph.D.2 Jason L. Morin, Ph.D.2 Abstract: The California Latino Legislative Caucus (CLLC) was established in 1973 to advance the policy interests of both Latinos and the general population in California. As one of the largest legislative caucuses in the Legislature, the CLLC wields a great deal of influence over legislative committees, leadership positions, and policy outcomes. The CLLC expanded its own institutional capacity as its processes and structures became more formalized. Based on interviews with current and former Caucus members and staff as well as various other sources of data, this report examines the history, growth, development, and policy influence of the Caucus. Part I of the report provides a historical overview of the development of the CLLC. Part II explores various aspects of the growth and institutionalization of the Caucus including the development of key sub-networks, sources of Caucus unity, the routinization of Caucus procedures, and the role of leadership within the Caucus. Part III outlines the Caucus’s policy agenda, roll call voting patterns, and influence on the policymaking process. Finally, the report concludes with a summary of findings and a brief discussion -
Molina Papers, 1983-1986
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt72902075 No online items Inventory of the Gloria Molina Papers, 1983-1986 Processed by The California State Archives staff. California State Archives 1020 "O" Street Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: (916) 653-2246 Fax: (916) 653-7363 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.sos.ca.gov/archives/ © 2003 California Secretary of State. All rights reserved. Inventory of the Gloria Molina See series description 1 Papers, 1983-1986 Inventory of the Gloria Molina Papers, 1983-1986 Inventory: See series description California State Archives Office of the Secretary of State Sacramento, California Contact Information: California State Archives 1020 "O" Street Sacramento, California 95814 Phone: (916) 653-2246 Fax: (916) 653-7363 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.sos.ca.gov/archives/ Processed by: The California State Archives staff Date Completed: 2003 Encoded by: W. Lee Holmes © 2003 California Secretary of State. All rights reserved. Descriptive Summary Title: Molina (Gloria) Papers, Date (inclusive): 1983-1986 Collection number: See series description Creator: Molina, Gloria Extent: 3 cubic feet Repository: California State Archives Sacramento, California Abstract: Gloria Molina, Democrat, was a State Assembly member from 1982-1986. Her papers include bill files on AB418-AB3950, AJR110 1983-1984, AB141-AB4303 1985-1986, ACR25, ACR28, AJR26, press releases, newspaper editorials, and background files from 1982-1986. Physical location: California State Archives Language: English. Access Collection is open for research. Publication Rights For permission to reproduce or publish, please contact the California State Archives. Permission for reproduction or publication is given on behalf of the California State Archives as the owner of the physical items. -
Alex Padilla (D) (Incumbent) 25 Ruben Major (D) 26 Mark P
Page 1 Introduction! Hello, and welcome to the DSA-LA Electoral Politics committee’s voter guide to the elections on June 5, 2018. There’s a lot to vote for this year, so we decided to do the research on every contested race on the ballot so you could know who and what you’re voting for when you mark those little dots in the polling booth. Given the huge number of races pertinent to LA county, we decided to create a cheat sheet with our recommendations—many of which represent “lesser evil” calculations. Only Gayle McLaughlin for Lieutenant Governor and Steve Dunwoody for Assembly District 54 have been endorsed by DSA-LA as a whole, so please don’t take these suggestions as the recommendation of the entire chapter—these are just what a few dedicated DSA members in the Electoral Politics committee came up with after hours of researching the races through a pragmatic leftist lens. If you scroll down to a particular race, you’ll see that the information provided varies slightly between races—this was a long and communal effort, but we decided to share as much information as seemed useful for you to make a considered choice. Often, we omitted Republican or Libertarian candidates—if you’re reading this, we don’t imagine you’d vote for them anyway—and occasionally we limited our research to the candidates with a decent chance of winning. Table of Contents Page 2 You might also notice that many of these races are either literally or practically uncontested, or that most of the candidates seem bland, hazily defined, and mildly corrupt. -
Gloria Molina Papers: Finding Aid
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8pc375s No online items Gloria Molina Papers: Finding Aid Finding aid prepared by Xiaoda Wang The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2129 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © May 2017 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Gloria Molina Papers: Finding Aid mssMolina 1 Overview of the Collection Title: Gloria Molina papers Date (inclusive): 1965-2014 Bulk dates: 1991-2005 Collection Number: mssMolina Creator: Molina, Gloria Physical Description: Approx. 546 Linear Feet(Approx. 1,254 boxes, 23 cartons) Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens. Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2129 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: This collection contains the papers of Gloria Molina (born 1948), who was a Los Angeles County Supervisor of the First Supervisorial District from 1991 to 2014. This collection is mainly comprised of records created and accumulated during her years on the Board of Supervisors. These materials -- including correspondence, agenda, motions, reports, press clippings, notes, ephemera, site plans, photographs, audiovisual and electronic resources -- document a wide range of activities performed by Molina and her staff, such as project planning, legislation, lawsuits, redistricting, campaigning, and budget planning. Language: The collection is primarily in English with some material in Spanish. Conditions Governing Access Collection is open to qualified researchers by prior application through the Reader Services Department. Some material in this collection has been sealed: • Items marked CONFIDENTIAL by the donor are sealed for 30 years from date of creation. -
"Beyond Tokenism": the Life and Thought of Grace Montaiiez Davis
I Within tlw Mmdl'lUlpOJlulationin Chicago, the preferred "Beyond Tokenism": The Life and Thought of Grace ethnic Idcnlifk~rHuro Mt'"lcun, Mcxicuna, and Mexicano. (Page Montaiiez Davis 57, puruBruph one, Itocond sentence: "..ethnographers and Mexicunu.'l uuthenticutl~ the quinceuftera.") 2 See ulso Horowitz pp. 52-54,243 n.1. (Page 57, para- In the Spring of 1993, I was among thirteen graduate stu- graph two, fourth sentence: "..one of two Chicago ethnographic dents enrolled in a research seminar in Chicano History at UCLA 1 accounts. ") Five of us planned to conduct research on the historical experi- ences of Chicanas. Each of us already had a research topic in 3 The time under review (1971-1991) does not imply rigid mind upon enrolling in the seminar. My colleagues embarked on periodization. Before the 1970's the Archdiocese of Chicago projects ranging from Mexican women in nineteenth-century Los showed sporadic interest in the Mexican population. Field re- Angeles to Chicana zoot suiters in the 1940s. I planned to con- search was conducted in Chicago between May 1990 and De- duct research on Chicanas in higher education in the early twen- cember 1991. (Page 58, top paragraph, fourth sentence: "..writ- tieth century. While numerous academic resources for research- ten by and for Church specialists.") ing the Chicano experience were available to us2, those of us engaging in historical research on Chicanas confronted the same 4 Lumen Gentium is one document from Vatican II that is problem - the lack of primary source materials. attributed with promoting an acceptance of cultural diversity in This methodological problem of locating and then ob- the Catholic Church. -
LATINOS in TWENTIETH CENTURY CALIFORNIA National Register of Historic Places Context Statement
LATINOS IN TWENTIETH CENTURY CALIFORNIA National Register of Historic Places Context Statement Latinos in Twentieth Century California: National Register of Historic Places Context Statement California Office of Historic Preservation © 2015 California State Parks California State Parks supports equal access. This publication can be made available in alternate formats. For information, call: (916) 445-7000 711, TTY relay service www.ohp.parks.ca.gov Questions about this document or requests for copies should be directed to: California Office of Historic Preservation 1725 23rd Street, Suite 100, Sacramento CA 95816-7100 Phone: (916) 445-7000 [email protected] The activity that is the subject of this publication has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C St NW, Washington DC 20240.