DOCSLIB.ORG

Voyager 1 Encounter with the Saturnian System Author(S): E

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Voyager 1 Encounter with the Saturnian System Author(S): E Voyager 1 Encounter with the Saturnian System Author(s): E. C. Stone and E. D. Miner Source: Science, New Series, Vol. 212, No. 4491 (Apr. 10, 1981), pp. 159-163 Published by: American Association for the Advancement of Science Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1685660 . Accessed: 04/02/2014 18:59 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. American Association for the Advancement of Science is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Science. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 131.215.71.79 on Tue, 4 Feb 2014 18:59:21 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions was complicated by several factors. Sat- urn's greater distance necessitated a fac- tor of 3 reduction in the rate of data transmission (44,800 bits per second at Saturn compared to 115,200 bits per sec- Reports ond at Jupiter). Furthermore, Saturn's satellites and rings provided twice as many objects to be studied at Saturn as at Jupiter, and the close approaches to Voyager 1 Encounter with the Saturnian System these objects all occurred within a 24- hour period, compared to nearly 72 Abstract. An overview of the Voyager I encounter with Saturn is presented, hours at Jupiter. including a brief discussion of the flight, trajectory, science plan formulation, and Scientific studies included investiga- highlights of the results described in the subsequent reports. tion of the ring system, satellites, and magnetosphere of Saturn and of the at- The Voyager 1 encounter with Saturn ultraviolet occultation studies of Sat- mospheres of Saturn and Titan. Studies marked the successful accomplishment urn's atmosphere; and (iv) spacecraft of the planetary atmosphere focused on of the third step in the NASA Voyager passage through the ring plane at Dione's dynamics, composition, structure, and program to explore the interplanetary orbit in order to minimize hazards from magnetospheric effects (auroras). Stud- and planetary environments of the outer impinging ring particles. The actual Voy- ies of Titan were designed to determine solar system (1). The Voyager spacecraft ager 1 trajectory and the planned Voyag- the diameter of the solid surface, atmo- was described in detail by Draper et al. er 2 trajectory also provide complemen- spheric temperature and pressure pro- (2). Voyager 1, launched on 5 September tary sets of satellite close-approach dis- files, and atmospheric composition and 1977, had its closest approach to Jupiter tances (Table 2). to search for an intrinsic magnetic field on 5 March 1979, during a 98-day period Voyager 1 encounter activities began of Titan. The other satellites of Saturn of intensive acquisition of science data on 22 August 1980, when the spacecraft were studied to determine their size, on the Jovian system and its environs was 109,000,000 km (68,000,000 miles) density, surface geology, temperature (3). Voyager 2 was not far behind Voyag- from Saturn. Closest approach, at a dis- structure, and reflective properties. Ring er 1, with closest approach to Jupiter on tance of 126,000 km (78,000 miles) above studies included radial structure, tem- 9 July 1979 (4). With assistance from Saturn's cloud tops, occurred at 2346 perature, and particle size determina- Jupiter's gravity and a post-encounter UTC (coordinated universal time) on 12 tions and searches for azimuthal differ- trajectory correction maneuver, Voyag- November 1980. Titan closest approach ences and for a ring atmosphere. Magne- er I continued on toward Saturn. occurred before that of Saturn, at 0541 tospheric studies addressed the source of During its cruise from Jupiter to Sat- UTC on 12 November 1980. A view of Saturnian radio emissions, motions and urn, at a velocity of nearly 15 km/sec the Voyager 1 trajectory through the other variations within the magneto- (34,000 miles per hour), Voyager 1 ex- Saturnian system is shown in Figs. 1 and sphere, and interactions between the plored the interplanetary medium and 2. Figure 3 depicts the planned comple- magnetosphere and the rings and satel- selected celestial sources of interest. In mentarity of latitude coverage by Voyag- lites. addition, each of its science instruments ers 1 and 2. Some highlights from the following was recalibrated in preparation for the Design of the spacecraft sequences detailed reports are summarized below. Saturn observations. During this 20- month cruise period, Voyager personnel developed and tested the detailed space- Table 1. Voyager science investigations. craft sequences needed to perform the Abbre- planned scientific studies during the 4- Investigation viation Principalinvestigator month encounter with the multiringed science ISS B. A. planet. Imaging Smith, Universityof Arizona (team leader) The Voyager 1 scientific investigations Infraredradiation IRIS R. A. Hanel, are listed in Table 1. The locations of the GoddardSpace Flight Center instruments and essential subsystem Photopolarimetry PPS A. L. Lane, hardware are shown in the 1 Jet PropulsionLaboratory Voyager Ultraviolet UVS A. L. All instruments func- spectroscopy Broadfoot, Jupiter report (3). University of SouthernCalifornia, tioned nominally with the exception of Space Sciences Institute the photopolarimeter, which developed Radio science RSS G. L. Tyler, anomalous behavior during the Jupiter StanfordUniversity (team leader) Magneticfields MAG N. F. Ness, encounter and has remained inoperable GoddardSpace Flight Center since then. Plasmaparticles PLS H. S. Bridge, The trajectory of Voyager 1 was cho- MassachusettsInstitute of Technology sen to provide (i) a close encounter with Plasmawaves PWS F. L. Scarf, Titan before Saturn closest so TRW Defense and Space Systems Group approach radio PRA J. W. that Planetary astronomy Warwick, atmospheric occultations, high-reso- Radiophysics,Inc. lution imaging, Titan magnetic field stud- Low-energy'charged particles LECP S. M. Krimigis, ies, and solar wind and magnetospheric Johns Hopkins University, wake studies could be accommodated; Applied Physics Laboratory CRS R. E. (ii) optimum geometry for radio occulta- Cosmic-rayparticles Vogt, CaliforniaInstitute of Technology tion studies of the rings; (iii) radio and SCIENCE,VOL. 212, 10 APRIL 1981 0036-8075/81/0410-0159$01.00/0Copyright ? 1981AAAS 159 This content downloaded from 131.215.71.79 on Tue, 4 Feb 2014 18:59:21 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions All of these studies benefited from the emissions from molecular hydrogen marked by a few narrow features that prior ground-basedobservations of Sat- were also seen near the sunlit edges of correspond to orbital resonances with urn and from the Pioneer 11 Saturn re- the planet at very low latitudes. satellites 1980S1 and 1980S3. There is sults (5). The bulk of Saturn's atmosphere is evidence for satellite-driven density Saturn's atmosphere. One principal hydrogen. Helium accounts for only waves in the region of the Encke divi- objective of the Voyager mission was a about 11 percent of the mass of the sion. Radio transmission through the comparative study of the dynamics of atmosphereabove the clouds of Saturn rings indicated that the effective diame- the atmospheres of Saturn and Jupiter. compared to 19 percent in the same ter of A ringparticles is 10 m. The small Because Saturnis colder, the cloud lay- regionon Jupiter.This differenceis con- satellite 1980S28is just beyond the outer ers are deeper in the atmospherethan at sistent with a gravitationalseparation of edge of the A ring. Jupiter and are blander in appearance helium and hydrogen in Saturn's interi- The A and B ringsare separatedby the (5). Alternating dark belts and light or, which could generate the excess en- Cassini division, which contains five zones are visible in the clouds of Saturn ergy radiatedby Saturnover that which broad rings that have additional struc- and extend to much higherlatitudes than it receives from the sun. Methane, am- ture. The effective particle diameter on Jupiter. monia,ethane, acetylene, and phosphine from radio transmissionis about 8 m. The velocities of the clouds have been are also detected in the atmosphere, al- The middle, or B, ring is strikingly measuredwith respect to the motion of thoughthere was relativelylittle gaseous different,consisting of numerousnarrow the interior of Saturn, as indicated ammonia due to the low atmospheric ringlets with no apparentlarge-scale or- by the 10 hour 39.4 minute rotational temperature. Temperatures decrease der. It is possible that the ringlets are period of the magnetic field. Eastward from - 150K in the upperatmosphere to formedby the action of a largenumber of wind speeds in Saturn's near-equatorial a minimumof - 85 K at a pressure of moonlets embeddedwithin the ring. The clouds of up to 480 m/sec (1100 miles per 100 mbarand increase to - 160 K at 1.4 B ring region is also characterized by hour) are four times the highest speed bars. Temperatures in the southern sporadic radial markings or "spokes," measured in Jupiter's clouds. These hemisphere are warmer, apparently a perhaps the result of levitation of small winds, which are not stronglycorrelated seasonal effect. particlesabove the ringplane. The possi- with the belt and zone boundaries, de- Rings. Since first seen by Galileo in ble importanceof electrostatic charging crease smoothly to nearly zero at lati- 1610, Saturn's primary distinguishing effects in spoke formationand dynamics tudes near 40?N and 40?S. characteristic has been its rings. The is suggested by the detection at radio The nighttimeface of Saturnis illumi- distinct, broad A, B, and C rings, which wavelengths of electrostatic discharges nated by ringlight, degradingthe thresh- are easily observable from Earth, were from the rings.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mars Marathon Frozen Formula Pixel Puzzler Hear
    π IN THE SKY 2 Pi is back in our skies, helping mathematical sleuths like yourself solve stellar problems. Find the dizzying number of times a Mars rover’s wheels have rotated in 11 years. Learn how many images it takes to map a new world. Estimate the volume of an alien ocean. And discover just how powerful -- or faint -- our most distant spacecraft’s voice can be. Pi leads the way. MARS MARATHON The Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity has been driving on the Red Planet for more than 11 years -- not bad for a mission only planned to last for three months! Opportunity has already beat the off-Earth driving distance record of 39 kilometers and is approaching a marathon distance: 42.195 kilometers. When Opportunity reaches the marathon mark, how many times will its 25-centimeter diameter wheels have rotated? LEARN MORE ABOUT THE MISSION mars.nasa.gov/mer 25 cm PIXEL PUZZLER The Dawn spacecraft is orbiting Ceres -- a nearly spherical dwarf planet with an average radius of 475 kilometers -- in a perfectly circular polar orbit. While in orbit, Dawn will snap images of Ceres’ surface to piece together a global map. From its lowest altitude orbit of 370 kilometers, Dawn’s camera can see a patch of Ceres about 26 kilometers on a side. Assuming no overlap in the images, how many photographs would Dawn have to take to fully map the surface of Ceres? LEARN MORE ABOUT THE MISSION dawn.jpl.nasa.gov FROZEN FORMULA 2 km - 30 km Scientists have good reason to believe that Jupiter’s moon Europa has a liquid ocean wedged between its ice 3.5 km - 100 km shell and a rocky sea floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Stardust Comet Flyby
    NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION Stardust Comet Flyby Press Kit January 2004 Contacts Don Savage Policy/Program Management 202/358-1727 NASA Headquarters, Washington DC Agle Stardust Mission 818/393-9011 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. Vince Stricherz Science Investigation 206/543-2580 University of Washington, Seattle, WA Contents General Release ……………………………………......………….......................…...…… 3 Media Services Information ……………………….................…………….................……. 5 Quick Facts …………………………………………..................………....…........…....….. 6 Why Stardust?..................…………………………..................………….....………......... 7 Other Comet Missions ....................................................................................... 10 NASA's Discovery Program ............................................................................... 12 Mission Overview …………………………………….................……….....……........…… 15 Spacecraft ………………………………………………..................…..……........……… 25 Science Objectives …………………………………..................……………...…........….. 34 Program/Project Management …………………………...................…..…..………...... 37 1 2 GENERAL RELEASE: NASA COMET HUNTER CLOSING ON QUARRY Having trekked 3.2 billion kilometers (2 billion miles) across cold, radiation-charged and interstellar-dust-swept space in just under five years, NASA's Stardust spacecraft is closing in on the main target of its mission -- a comet flyby. "As the saying goes, 'We are good to go,'" said project manager Tom Duxbury at NASA's Jet
    [Show full text]
  • 3.1 Discipline Science Results
    CASSINI FINAL MISSION REPORT 2019 1 SATURN Before Cassini, scientists viewed Saturn’s unique features only from Earth and from a few spacecraft flybys. During more than a decade orbiting the gas giant, Cassini studied the composition and temperature of Saturn’s upper atmosphere as the seasons changed there. Cassini also provided up-close observations of Saturn’s exotic storms and jet streams, and heard Saturn’s lightning, which cannot be detected from Earth. The Grand Finale orbits provided valuable data for understanding Saturn’s interior structure and magnetic dynamo, in addition to providing insight into material falling into the atmosphere from parts of the rings. Cassini’s Saturn science objectives were overseen by the Saturn Working Group (SWG). This group consisted of the scientists on the mission interested in studying the planet itself and phenomena which influenced it. The Saturn Atmospheric Modeling Working Group (SAMWG) was formed to specifically characterize Saturn’s uppermost atmosphere (thermosphere) and its variation with time, define the shape of Saturn’s 100 mbar and 1 bar pressure levels, and determine when the Saturn safely eclipsed Cassini from the Sun. Its membership consisted of experts in studying Saturn’s upper atmosphere and members of the engineering team. 2 VOLUME 1: MISSION OVERVIEW & SCIENCE OBJECTIVES AND RESULTS CONTENTS SATURN ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive
    [Show full text]
  • + New Horizons
    Media Contacts NASA Headquarters Policy/Program Management Dwayne Brown New Horizons Nuclear Safety (202) 358-1726 [email protected] The Johns Hopkins University Mission Management Applied Physics Laboratory Spacecraft Operations Michael Buckley (240) 228-7536 or (443) 778-7536 [email protected] Southwest Research Institute Principal Investigator Institution Maria Martinez (210) 522-3305 [email protected] NASA Kennedy Space Center Launch Operations George Diller (321) 867-2468 [email protected] Lockheed Martin Space Systems Launch Vehicle Julie Andrews (321) 853-1567 [email protected] International Launch Services Launch Vehicle Fran Slimmer (571) 633-7462 [email protected] NEW HORIZONS Table of Contents Media Services Information ................................................................................................ 2 Quick Facts .............................................................................................................................. 3 Pluto at a Glance ...................................................................................................................... 5 Why Pluto and the Kuiper Belt? The Science of New Horizons ............................... 7 NASA’s New Frontiers Program ........................................................................................14 The Spacecraft ........................................................................................................................15 Science Payload ...............................................................................................................16
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Planet / Kuiper Belt Flyby
    Giant Planet / Kuiper Belt Flyby Amanda Zangari (SwRI) Tiffany Finley (SwRI) with Cecilia Leung (LPL/SwRI) Simon Porter (SwRI) OPAG: February 23, 2017 Take Away • New Horizons provided scientifically valuable exploration of the Kuiper Belt in the New Frontiers cost cap. • The Kuiper Belt is full of objects with a diverse range of stories that go beyond what we learned from Pluto. • Giant Planet flybys add scientific value to a Kuiper Belt mission • Found preliminary trajectory examples for high interest KBOs-- Haumea, Varuna, 2015 RR245 can be reached via Jupiter AND Saturn, Uranus or Neptune flyby in the 2030s. • To be a candidate New Frontiers mission, a 2 Giant planet+KBO mission must be endorsed by a decadal survey according to current rules. New Horizons Heritage NH Jupiter Encounter planned around Pluto flyby timing, which was dominated by achieving quadruple occultations, “interesting” side up. New Horizons Heritage Pluto flyby took advantage of Ecliptic crossing, enabling access to the cold classical belt (where 2014 MU69 is located). New Horizons Heritage 2014 MU69 discovered while in flight. Targeting was from spacecraft propulsion and took advantage of cold classical population density. Object is small, reddish ~40 km diameter. Saturn’s moons show incredible diversity NASA/JPL As do Uranus and Neptune Some Kuiper Belt Geography Where do we want to go? Getting there- JGA “anytime” New Horizons model: Fast Launch, Jupiter Flyby, Launch window every 11 years McGranaghan et al 2011 Can we go to more than just Jupiter? If so, where, what? New Horizons 2 • 2008 launch using New Horizons flight spares • Proposed Jupiter flyby, equinox flyby of Uranus, and flyby of (47171) 1999 TC36 (now know to be trinary).
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's MESSENGER Sends Flyby Data to Earth Using
    Press Release For immediate release Special Delivery: NASA’s MESSENGER Sends Flyby Data to Earth Using CCSDS File Delivery Protocol Developed for Deep Space by International Team WASHINGTON, Aug. 10 (CCSDS) – NASA’s MESSENGER team is using the CCSDS File Delivery Protocol (CFDP), a highly specialized protocol designed to overcome space operations communications challenges, to download data captured during a successful flyby of Earth last week. A team of international space data communications experts, collaborating through the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS), developed CFDP to reliably and efficiently downlink files from a spacecraft even in the strenuous environment of deep space. Since the MESSENGER spacecraft’s launch a year ago, it has successfully used CFDP to enable mission communications and will use it throughout its 7.9-billion kilometer journey to Mercury. In using CFDP, MESSENGER communications represents a change in the standard method of storing science and housekeeping data on spacecraft built by the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (JHU/APL). MESSENGER is also the first U.S. space flight mission to use CFDP in mission operations. Prior to MESSENGER, JHU/APL missions used a raw storage model of storing data, but new mission and operational requirements meant that MESSENGER would have to incorporate a file system of data storage into its spacecraft software architecture. A reliable method of downlinking files to the ground had to be found and CFDP was chosen by mission planners to do the job. CFDP is included in the MESSENGER software architecture through a reuse of a NASA Jet Propulsion Lab (NASA JPL) implementation on the ground and a JHU/APL “CFDP-lite” implementation on the flight side.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars
    NASA Facts National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109 Mariner to Mercury, Venus and Mars Between 1962 and late 1973, NASA’s Jet carry a host of scientific instruments. Some of the Propulsion Laboratory designed and built 10 space- instruments, such as cameras, would need to be point- craft named Mariner to explore the inner solar system ed at the target body it was studying. Other instru- -- visiting the planets Venus, Mars and Mercury for ments were non-directional and studied phenomena the first time, and returning to Venus and Mars for such as magnetic fields and charged particles. JPL additional close observations. The final mission in the engineers proposed to make the Mariners “three-axis- series, Mariner 10, flew past Venus before going on to stabilized,” meaning that unlike other space probes encounter Mercury, after which it returned to Mercury they would not spin. for a total of three flybys. The next-to-last, Mariner Each of the Mariner projects was designed to have 9, became the first ever to orbit another planet when two spacecraft launched on separate rockets, in case it rached Mars for about a year of mapping and mea- of difficulties with the nearly untried launch vehicles. surement. Mariner 1, Mariner 3, and Mariner 8 were in fact lost The Mariners were all relatively small robotic during launch, but their backups were successful. No explorers, each launched on an Atlas rocket with Mariners were lost in later flight to their destination either an Agena or Centaur upper-stage booster, and planets or before completing their scientific missions.
    [Show full text]
  • Elements of Astronomy and Cosmology Outline 1
    ELEMENTS OF ASTRONOMY AND COSMOLOGY OUTLINE 1. The Solar System The Four Inner Planets The Asteroid Belt The Giant Planets The Kuiper Belt 2. The Milky Way Galaxy Neighborhood of the Solar System Exoplanets Star Terminology 3. The Early Universe Twentieth Century Progress Recent Progress 4. Observation Telescopes Ground-Based Telescopes Space-Based Telescopes Exploration of Space 1 – The Solar System The Solar System - 4.6 billion years old - Planet formation lasted 100s millions years - Four rocky planets (Mercury Venus, Earth and Mars) - Four gas giants (Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune) Figure 2-2: Schematics of the Solar System The Solar System - Asteroid belt (meteorites) - Kuiper belt (comets) Figure 2-3: Circular orbits of the planets in the solar system The Sun - Contains mostly hydrogen and helium plasma - Sustained nuclear fusion - Temperatures ~ 15 million K - Elements up to Fe form - Is some 5 billion years old - Will last another 5 billion years Figure 2-4: Photo of the sun showing highly textured plasma, dark sunspots, bright active regions, coronal mass ejections at the surface and the sun’s atmosphere. The Sun - Dynamo effect - Magnetic storms - 11-year cycle - Solar wind (energetic protons) Figure 2-5: Close up of dark spots on the sun surface Probe Sent to Observe the Sun - Distance Sun-Earth = 1 AU - 1 AU = 150 million km - Light from the Sun takes 8 minutes to reach Earth - The solar wind takes 4 days to reach Earth Figure 5-11: Space probe used to monitor the sun Venus - Brightest planet at night - 0.7 AU from the
    [Show full text]
  • EPOXI COMET ENCOUNTER FACT SHEET Nov
    EPOXI COMET ENCOUNTER FACT SHEET Nov. 2, 2010 Quick Facts Flyby Spacecraft Dimensions: 3.3 meters (10.8 feet) long, 1.7 meters (5.6 feet) wide, and 2.3 meters (7.5 feet) high Weight: 601 kilograms (1,325 pounds) at launch, consisting of 517 kilograms (1,140 pounds) spacecraft and 84 kilograms (185 pounds) fuel. On 10/25/10 there was 4 kilograms (8.8 pounds) of fuel remaining. Power: 2.8-meter-by-2.8-meter (9-foot-by-9 foot) solar panel providing up to 750 watts, depending on distance from sun. Power storage via small, 16-amp- hourrechargeable nickel hydrogen battery Comet Hartley 2 Nucleus shape: Elongated Nucleus size (estimated): About 2.2 kilometers (1.4 miles) long Nucleus mass: Roughly 280 million metric tons Nucleus rotation period: About 18 hours Nucleus composition: Water ice, carbon dioxide ice, silicate dust Mission Launch: Jan. 12, 2005 Launch site: Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Florida Launch vehicle: Delta II 7925 with Star 48 upper stage Impact with Tempel 1: 10:52 p.m. PDT July 3, 2005 (1:52 a.m. EDT July 4, 2005) Earth-comet distance at time of impact: 133.6 million kilometers (83 million miles) Total distance traveled by spacecraft from Earth to Tempel 1: 431 million kilometers (268 million miles) Flyby of Hartley 2: About 10 a.m. EDT or 7 a.m. PDT Nov. 4, 2010 Additional distance traveled by spacecraft to Hartley 2: About 4.6 billion kilometers (2.9 billion miles) Program Cost of Deep Impact: $267 million total (not including launch vehicle), consisting of $252 million spacecraft development and $15 million mission operations Cost of EPOXI extended mission: $42 million, for operations from 2007 to end of project at the end of fiscal year 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Sector Brochure
    SPACE SPACE REVOLUTIONIZING THE WAY TO SPACE SPACECRAFT TECHNOLOGIES PROPULSION Moog provides components and subsystems for cold gas, chemical, and electric Moog is a proven leader in components, subsystems, and systems propulsion and designs, develops, and manufactures complete chemical propulsion for spacecraft of all sizes, from smallsats to GEO spacecraft. systems, including tanks, to accelerate the spacecraft for orbit-insertion, station Moog has been successfully providing spacecraft controls, in- keeping, or attitude control. Moog makes thrusters from <1N to 500N to support the space propulsion, and major subsystems for science, military, propulsion requirements for small to large spacecraft. and commercial operations for more than 60 years. AVIONICS Moog is a proven provider of high performance and reliable space-rated avionics hardware and software for command and data handling, power distribution, payload processing, memory, GPS receivers, motor controllers, and onboard computing. POWER SYSTEMS Moog leverages its proven spacecraft avionics and high-power control systems to supply hardware for telemetry, as well as solar array and battery power management and switching. Applications include bus line power to valves, motors, torque rods, and other end effectors. Moog has developed products for Power Management and Distribution (PMAD) Systems, such as high power DC converters, switching, and power stabilization. MECHANISMS Moog has produced spacecraft motion control products for more than 50 years, dating back to the historic Apollo and Pioneer programs. Today, we offer rotary, linear, and specialized mechanisms for spacecraft motion control needs. Moog is a world-class manufacturer of solar array drives, propulsion positioning gimbals, electric propulsion gimbals, antenna positioner mechanisms, docking and release mechanisms, and specialty payload positioners.
    [Show full text]
  • Method for Rapid Interplanetary Trajectory Analysis Using Δv Maps with Flyby Options
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DSpace@MIT METHOD FOR RAPID INTERPLANETARY TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS USING ΔV MAPS WITH FLYBY OPTIONS TAKUTO ISHIMATSU*, JEFFREY HOFFMAN†, AND OLIVIER DE WECK‡ Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. Email: [email protected]*, [email protected]†, [email protected]‡ This paper develops a convenient tool which is capable of calculating ballistic interplanetary trajectories with planetary flyby options to create exhaustive ΔV contour plots for both direct trajectories without flybys and flyby trajectories in a single chart. The contours of ΔV for a range of departure dates (x-axis) and times of flight (y-axis) serve as a “visual calendar” of launch windows, which are useful for the creation of a long-term transportation schedule for mission planning purposes. For planetary flybys, a simple powered flyby maneuver with a reasonably small velocity impulse at periapsis is allowed to expand the flyby mission windows. The procedure of creating a ΔV contour plot for direct trajectories is a straightforward full-factorial computation with two input variables of departure and arrival dates solving Lambert’s problem for each combination. For flyby trajectories, a “pseudo full-factorial” computation is conducted by decomposing the problem into two separate full-factorial computations. Mars missions including Venus flyby opportunities are used to illustrate the application of this model for the 2020-2040 time frame. The “competitiveness” of launch windows is defined and determined for each launch opportunity. Keywords: Interplanetary trajectory, C3, delta-V, pork-chop plot, launch window, Mars, Venus flyby 1.
    [Show full text]
  • In Situ Exploration of the Giant Planets Olivier Mousis, David H
    In situ Exploration of the Giant Planets Olivier Mousis, David H. Atkinson, Richard Ambrosi, Sushil Atreya, Don Banfield, Stas Barabash, Michel Blanc, T. Cavalié, Athena Coustenis, Magali Deleuil, et al. To cite this version: Olivier Mousis, David H. Atkinson, Richard Ambrosi, Sushil Atreya, Don Banfield, et al.. In situ Exploration of the Giant Planets. 2019. hal-02282409 HAL Id: hal-02282409 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02282409 Submitted on 2 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. In Situ Exploration of the Giant Planets A White Paper Submitted to ESA’s Voyage 2050 Call arXiv:1908.00917v1 [astro-ph.EP] 31 Jul 2019 Olivier Mousis Contact Person: Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LAM, Marseille, France ([email protected]) July 31, 2019 WHITE PAPER RESPONSE TO ESA CALL FOR VOYAGE 2050 SCIENCE THEME In Situ Exploration of the Giant Planets Abstract Remote sensing observations suffer significant limitations when used to study the bulk atmospheric composition of the giant planets of our solar system. This impacts our knowledge of the formation of these planets and the physics of their atmospheres. A remarkable example of the superiority of in situ probe measurements was illustrated by the exploration of Jupiter, where key measurements such as the determination of the noble gases’ abundances and the precise measurement of the helium mixing ratio were only made available through in situ measurements by the Galileo probe.
    [Show full text]