DOCSLIB.ORG

Rhetorical and Communication Theory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rhetorical and Communication Theory Y DOCOSIST SIMS tilD 175 050 CS 205 113 'ISMS Rhetorical and Communication Tueory: Abstracts of it . 'Doctoral Dissertations Published in *Dissertation Abstracts International,* January. through June1979 S. (Vol: 39 Hos. 1 through 12). USTITOTION ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading andCommunication Skills, Urbana, Ill. teeDATE 79 ROTE '10p. .8DES PRICE IF01/PC01 Plus Posteiev--,1 DESCRIPTORS Athletics: Slack Dialects: 'Cluster Analysis: *Communication (Thought 2rUnsfer): *Discourse Analysis: Doctoral-Thesess *eminismgHomosexuali%:: Humor: *Information TheoryV Irony: models: Poetry: Research; *Rhetoric: Rhetorical Criticism:. Socialization; Social Relations: *Speech Communication IDINTIFIERS *Communilcation Research .ABSTRACT This collection of abstracts in part of a continuing series proiiding information on recentdoctoral dissertations. The 13 titles deal with tbe following topics:confessional rhetoric in the ipoetry Of Anne Sexton, rhetoricalcriticism, the Hippocratic oath, messages communicatedthrough team sports as a medium ofsocial Interaction, the silent black language, humorin a lesbian speech gto munity, inventionin the Carolingian age, Arthur Schopenhauer, Ony. communicationand consciousness, the development of concept d f sion models and their application tothe diffusion of the social concept of race, the rhetoric of contemporaryfeminist song, and .communication as the vehicle of socialisation. (Pi) *********************************************************************** Reproductions suppliedby EDRS are the bestthat cat be made from the origins./ document. o********************************************************************** U.S. DEPARTMENT OP WEALTH. 1101/CATION IMILPARII GNP Notossm.INSTITUTS OP EDUCATION tIllS00CUMENT 'HAS MINREPRO. OUCED EXACTLY ASRECEIVED PROM THE PERSON OR ORDANIZATIONORIGIN. ATM. IT POINTS OP VIEWOR OPINIONS STATED 00 NOT NECESSARILYRIPER. SINT OP MIA!. NATIONALINSTITUTE OP EDUCATION POWS ION QSPOLICY o Avi. 4. Rhetorical and Communication Theory:,. .Abstracts of Doctoral Dissertations Published in Dissertation Abstracts International,.January through Jun* 19)9 (Vol. 39 Nos. 7 through 12) Compiled by the staff of th.e ERIC Clearinghouse onRiading and Communication Skills "PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE114113 MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY University Microfilms Internat tonal TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)." ( The dissertation titles contained 4ftrware.publishedwith permission of the Dtiversity Microfilms International, publishers of Dissertation Abstracts International (copyright01979 by University Microfilms International), and may not be..reproduced without their prior permission. This bibliography hae.beep compiled as part of a gontinuing.series designed to make informationonfrrelevant dissertations Available to users of the ERIC system. Monthly issues of Diviertation Abstracts International arereviewed in order to Compile abstracts of dissertations on related topics,which thus becone accessible in searches of phe ERIC data bass. Odering information for the dissertations themselvqs is included at the endof the bibliography. Abstracts of the following dissertations are included inthis collections i . Capo, Kay Ellen Merriman Swearingen, Carolyn Jan REDEEMING WORDS; A STUDY OF CONFES-. IRONY,. FROM TROPE TO AESTHETIC: A SIONAL RHETORIC IN THE POETRY OF HISTORY OF INDIRECT DISCOURSE IN ANNE SEXTON RHETORIC, LITERARY AESTHETICS, AND SEMEIOTICS Feeney, Martin Daniel THE*ART OF RHETORICAL CRITICISM Thompson, John William TOWARDS THE 21STCENTURY COMMUNICATION AND CONSCIOUSNESS: A DERIVATION OF PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES,- Fritz, Paul Alvin A CLUSTER ANALYSIS OF THE HIPPOCRATIC Vora, Erika Wenzel OATH THE DEVELOPMENT OF CONCEPT DIFFUSION MODELS AND THEIR APPLICATION TO THE Hoffman, Steven Mark DIFFUSION OF THE SOCIAL CONCEPT OF RACE THE NATURE AND.INFLUENCE OF MESSAGES COMMUNICATED THROUGH COMPETITIVE Weiner, Jill Robyn TEAM SPORTS AS A MEDIUM-OF SOCIAL THE FAMILY OF WOMAN: A MYTHOLOGICAL INTERACTION ANALYSIS *OF THE RHETORIC OF CONTEM- .PORARY FEMINIST SONG Kenjyatta, damus Amazulu THE SILENT BLACK LANGUAGE: POETIC Wiseman, Richard Lee MOVEMENT IN CULTURE COMMUNICATION AS THE VEHICLE OF SOCIAL- IZATION: AN INVESTIGATION OF A FOSTER Painter, IklivtawSue GROUP HOME PROGRAM A COMMUNICATIVE STUDY OF HUMOR IN A LESBIAN SPEECH COMMUNITy: BECOMING AMMER Frill, Paul Edward INVENTION IN THE CAROLINGIAN AGE Schroeder, Gale Young ARTHUR SCHOPENHAUER: /CONOCLASM FOR A CONTEMPORARY COMMUNICATION PHILOS- OPHY '" 1r, tHEIDElliING WORDS: A STUW OF CONFESSIONAL RIM. THE ART OF RHETORICAL CRITICISM' TOWARDS THE TOIr DI THE POETRY OF 04013 SEXTON 315T CENTURY Order No. 7901435 Order No. 7903238 FEENEY, Martin Daniel, Ph.D. Bowling drain State Univer.. CAPilHey EllenMerrii6n, Ph.D, Northwestern University, sity, 1978. 507pp. °SOW. Adviser: Wallace A. Bacon The viewpoint expressed is that the historian-journalist- This study argues that *confessions is the key to a specific sciontiet-expert commentator model is now inappropriate as rhetorical process of self-disclosure which establishes a ma. a determining perspective for the practice of rhetorical criti- veSsal, aesthetically appealing tram t of meaning in the cism. The ART of rhetorical criticism is more appropriately AlUte Sexton. Instead of taking an autobiographical encompassed by a poet-novelist-writer model, Ctrytoward heraiersonal subject matter, this inaulry examinee R is within this universe of criticism to suggest that the structural featdres of Sexton's verse which drainatis the pro- nature and practice of rhetorical criticism have both in a the- cess of repentance and reconciliation experienced by her per- oretical and in an applied sense transcended historical, for- sena& Following Xeimeth Burke's view, poetry becomes a ensic, and scientific analogues. It I. within this universe that rhetoric of rebirth that celebrates the human cycle ot guilt- the rhetorical critic must respond to the power of symbols by yurification.redemption. individuating a vision and a judgment based upon critical points Sodom's published books, from To Bedls.m and Part Vday of departure established and a creative apprehension of rhe- Misr to The Awl"' 2fLatirdi17-11contaia torical phenomena. cd at WetliVe-peatiettli-udes: mortification Rhetorical explorations and critical points ot departure be. (scaltegosting), contrition/apologia, mock lyricaelf- tweet 1925-1977 are explicated and analyzed as well as the parody), and edification. Her assumption of these stances es. rhetorical dimensions of rock music, the rhetographY of Holly. tabilehes Sexton's rhetorical distance from and aesthetic con- wood sports films, and the moral universe structured by John trot wit the highly charged experiences which are regularly Cheever's novels. treated in her poetry, including intimate family relations ro MAR) love, fderally crisis, creativitaf, death, and thereligious quest. Each of five analytic chimters discusses theoretical aspects A CLUSTER ANALYSIS OF THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH of one penitential stance named above, It then examines how Order No. 7901437 that posture is used as the rhetorical framework of one impor- tant SOtton poem and surveys her developing use of this literary FRITZ, Paul Alvin, Ph.D. Bowling Green State University, *mention. 1978. 198pp. Sexton's personae often describe potentially guilty acts as forms ed mortitication which point the way toward a reestablish- The Hippocratic Oath appears to dictate moral rectitude and altruism of motive to a physician. This research exam- .meld of innoce---W.-rhe suffering encountered by surgery, mad- ness, ifismiudaa depression, grief, or suicideaittenipts can ined the Oath as it appeared in the Greek Hippocratic Corpus to determine if this motive.actually was present in the orig- thereby heal the persona's alienation from loved ones, mother- inal Oath. hood, and God. Kenneth Burke's cluster analysis was applied to the Oath Sexton employs the framework of victimage (scapegoating) to anlyec motive. An index of terms was constructed by corn- to alleviate the natural guilt feelings that accompany full sexual afiàg words in the Oath with the usage of those words in development and to absorb other personal tensions. While the the twenty-six books of the translated corpus. A concordance scapegoat figure ls often a family member in early poems, of those terms was constructed from the index which showed the object of victimage becomes mythical or abstract in the the contexts of the key terms. If an author's motives can be later verse. This development suggests rhetorical and psycho- detected in the symbols that he uses to describe his scene, logical growth on the part of Sexton's personae. then an examination of the contexts of those symbols will give The rhetorical strategies of contrition and salakt, appeal an indication of the author's motives. to the compassionate forglveness or rational approval which The chief motives found by this analysis were not vari- others can offer the guilt-ridden or wrongly-accused persona, ations of altraism, but a desire to perpetuate a specific meth In bor early books, thee* techniques help remove barriers that odology of medical treatment, a desire to dissociate the Hip- separate the persona from parents, lovers, and analysts. Later, pocratic physician from quacks and religious healers, and a the same strategies help establish more meaningful relation- desire to win high repute from the patient. ships with the ultimate authorities of God and Death. Though altruism is not the chief motive in the original
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Communication Theory and the Disciplines JEFFERSON D
    Communication Theory and the Disciplines JEFFERSON D. POOLEY Muhlenberg College, USA Communication theory, like the communication discipline itself, has a long history but a short past. “Communication” as an organized, self-conscious discipline dates to the 1950s in its earliest, US-based incarnation (though cognate fields like the German Zeitungswissenschaft (newspaper science) began decades earlier). The US field’s first readers and textbooks make frequent and weighty reference to “communication theory”—intellectual putty for a would-be discipline that was, at the time, a collage of media-related work from the existing social sciences. Soon the “communication theory” phrase was claimed by US speech and rhetoric scholars too, who in the 1960s started using the same disciplinary label (“communication”) as the social scientists across campus. “Communication theory” was already, in the organized field’s infancy, an unruly subject. By the time Wilbur Schramm (1954) mapped out the theory domain of the new dis- cipline he was trying to forge, however, other traditions had long grappled with the same fundamental questions—notably the entwined, millennia-old “fields” of philos- ophy, religion, and rhetoric (Peters, 1999). Even if mid-century US communication scholars imagined themselves as breaking with the past—and even if “communica- tion theory” is an anachronistic label for, say, Plato’s Phaedrus—no account of thinking about communication could honor the postwar discipline’s borders. Even those half- forgotten fields dismembered in the Western university’s late 19th-century discipline- building project (Philology, for example, or Political Economy)haddevelopedtheir own bodies of thought on the key communication questions. The same is true for the mainline disciplines—the ones we take as unquestionably legitimate,thoughmostwereformedjustafewdecadesbeforeSchramm’smarch through US journalism schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Models in Law1
    T. Bekrycht: Communication Models in Law 157 COMMUNICATION MODELS IN LAW1 by TOMASZ BEKRYCHT* Communication processes can be generally described with the use of two models. The first one adopts cybernetic perspective, while the second one adopts social per- spective. Cybernetic perspective leads to transmission conception of communication whereas the social one to convergent concept of it. Both communication models are deeply present in the legal discourses, i.e. in lawmaking discourse and discourse of application. The issue related to the analysis of communication models in law is a part of a comprehensive area, which in the literature on the subject is related to the problem of ideology of lawmaking and law application. Dynamic nature of our social and legal reality can be described, on the one hand, by means of the conceptual network of communication models and, on the other hand, by means of many models of law- making and law application created by Jerzy Wróblewski and socio-historical model of lawmaking developed by Ewa Kustra based on the models of law set out in the conception of Phillipe Nonet and Phillip Selznick. The paper describes the position of the above-mentioned models in these discourses. KEYWORDS Modelling, discourse of lawmaking, discourse of law application, communication models 1. INTRODUCTION The issue related to the analysis of communication models in law is a part of a comprehensive area, which in the literature on the subject is related to 1 The following text was prepared as a part of a research grant financed by National Science Center (Poland), No. DEC-2012/05/B/HS5/01111.
    [Show full text]
  • Models of Communication: Theoretical and Philosophical Approaches ECREA Philosophy of Communication Workshop Vilnius, 8-10 October 2015
    Models of Communication: Theoretical and Philosophical Approaches ECREA Philosophy of Communication Workshop Vilnius, 8-10 October 2015 More info: http://philosophyofcommunication.eu/ It is often claimed that the early phases of media and communication studies were dominated by a linear conception of communication, modelled as a process of transmission. The hegemony of this model may have been exaggerated – it never prevailed in studies of interpersonal communication, for instance – but it has undeniably provided a favourite target for critics of various stripes. While some communication theorists have proposed elaborations of the well- known sender-message-receiver schema, others have argued for more radical revisions of modelling rooted in e.g. semiotics, constructivism, and the ritual view of communication. At the same time, scepticism regarding the very notion of a model of communication has grown stronger; and in recent decades, the focus has often switched from first-level conceptions to second-order “meta-models” of the constellations of communication theory. What is the status and relevance of communication models today? The proliferation of new forms of mediated communication seems to require new ways of making sense of a complex and rapidly moving field. Can the established perspectives provide adequate platforms from which to address emerging questions of “social media” and “big data”? Are we actually witnessing a revival of information-theoretical perspectives in the wake of the advance of computer-mediated communications? Should models of media and communication be descriptive or prescriptive? What, if any, exemplars should provide the basis for a future media and communications curriculum? What is their scholarly, scientific, and heuristic value? For this workshop, we invite proposals that explore new models of communication and investigate various aspects of model construction as well as contributions that scrutinise the use and misuse of models in communication theory and education.
    [Show full text]
  • Encompassing the Scope of Western Models of Communication
    Volume : 4 | Issue : 9 | Sept 2015 ISSN - 2250-1991 Research Paper English Encompassing the Scope of Western Models of Communication Research Scholar – Rai University & Associate Professor Dharnat B. Bandhiya Prin. MC Shah Commerce College, Ahmedabad Research Supervisor & Assistant Professor, Atmiya Institute of Dr Alpesh Joshi Technology & Science, Rajkot – 360 005, Gujarat We teach the same models of communication today that we taught forty years ago. This can and should be regarded as a mark of the enduring value of these models in highlighting key elements of that process for students who are taking the process apart for the first time. It remains, however, that the field of communication has evolved considerably since the 1960’s, and it may be appropriate to update our models to account for that evolution. This paper presents the classic communication models that are taught in introducing students to interpersonal communication and mass communication. It then introduces a new model of communication that, it is hoped, more closely maps to the range of materials we teach ABSTRACT and research in the field of communication today. This model attempts to capture the fundamental interaction of language, medium, and message that enables communication, the socially constructed aspects of each element, and the relationship of creators and consumers of messages both to these elements and each other. KEYWORDS The Lasswell model of the Communication Process good’s definition is an illustration. In the most general sense, Western theories and models of communication have their or- he explains, we communicate whenever one (the system), (the igin in Aristotle’s Rhetoric.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Today
    1 Communication today COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL c01CommunicationToday.indd 2 10/12/15 5:13 PM LEARNING OBJECTIVES After studying this chapter, you should be able to: ■ explain the difference between communication and communications ■ discuss the strengths and weaknesses of various communication models ■ explain why communication breaks down and why it succeeds ■ explain the limitations of communication processes. c01CommunicationToday.indd 3 10/12/15 5:13 PM One communication, two communications What is communication? Look it up in a library catalogue or an online bookstore and you could easily become confused. For example, you might be interested in finding out about public speaking or body language or journalism but find that your search is impeded by numerous entries for books on electronics. Or you might be researching the physics of the internet or telephones but instead find countless entries for books on negotiation, public relations and writing skills. So what’s going on? Right from the start — ironically enough — we find confusing communications about communication. The first task, then, is to establish the differences Communication is a between these two concepts. challenging concept, Communication (singular), as applied to human interaction, includes: with a search on ■■ body language or nonverbal communication ‘communication’ likely to ■■ bring up topics as diverse public speaking and presentation skills as team communication, ■■ journalism or writing for the mass media body language and ■■ graphic communication electronics. ■■
    [Show full text]
  • Feedback Tutorial Letter 1 Semester 2017 Assignment 1 Introduction to Communication Ico511s
    FEEDBACK TUTORIAL LETTER 1st SEMESTER 2017 ASSIGNMENT 1 INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNICATION ICO511S 1 cENTRE FOR OPEN AND LIFELONG LEARNING INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNICATION 1B (ICO511S) FEEDBACK TUTORIAL LETTER ASSIGNMENT 2 May 2017 Dear Student, Assignment 2 comprised of two questions, 1 and 2. Question 1 required you to write an essay. When you are asked to write an essay, have a short introduction (first paragraph), then proceed to discuss each point in its own paragraph. And have a sentence or two to conclude your essay. 1. Write an essay comparing and contrasting the models of communication given below. When you are contrasting and comparing, you look for similarities and differences. You need to use your own words as much as possible. Do not write more than 500 words /25/ a. The Linear Model b. The Interactional Model c. The Transactional Model In this question, 3 marks are for the introduction paragraph, 15 marks are for content and language while the remaining 2 marks are allocated t the concluding paragraph. Linda Mupupa’s modified essay below closely models the required essay: The Linear, Interactive and Transactional models are used to explain the human communication process. Although they do share some similarities, they also share notable differences. The Linear model of communication consists of the sender encoding a message to be sent via a channel to the receiver in the presence of noise. This model does not display the feedback element, which indicates continuous exchange of information. The Linear model represents the “one-way communication” (Palmer, 1993). The Linear model best represent mass communication, in which the message is sent out via a transmitter to an audience who will then receive and decode the message, may be vi radio or television.
    [Show full text]
  • Mass Communication (COM 101)
    MIDDLESEX COMMUNITY COLLEGE BEDFORD • MASSACHUSETTS • LOWELL Strategies for Success COURSE GUIDE Mass Communication (COM 101) Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Education Title III Grant, Strategies for Success: Increasing Achievement, Persistence, Retention & Engagement, 2008-2013. Title III Strengthening Institutions Project Strategies for Success: Increasing Achievement, Persistence, Retention and Engagement The Strategies for Success Title III initiative is a major, five‐year project (2009‐2013) funded by a two million dollar grant from the U.S. Department of Education. This initiative is intended to transform Middlesex Community College by improving the academic achievement, persistence, retention, and engagement of its students. The project focuses on reformed curricula and comprehensive advising. Reformed Curriculum involves the design of developmental and college Gateway courses and learning communities embedded with Core Student Success Skills related to critical thinking, communication, collaboration, organization, and self‐assessment. Overall, 45 courses will be impacted over the five years of the project. Comprehensive Advising involves the design of integrated advising services to include identification of academic and career goals, creation of realistic educational plans, and continuous tracking and intervention with an emphasis on the Core Student Success Skills. Comprehensive Advising Services will be specifically tailored to each program of study. Cross‐division curriculum and advising design teams composed of faculty and staff are designing, piloting, and assessing the curriculum and advising initiatives. The Title III grant provides resources to support faculty professional development related to designing and piloting new curriculum and advising students. The grant also supports the purchase of advising software programs and the hiring of a Pedagogical Instructional Designer, Learning Engagement Specialist, Advising Coordinator, and two academic advisors.
    [Show full text]
  • Four Communication Prototypical Figures
    International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 1 No.11 November 2013 Communication Beings: Four Communication Prototypical Figures Ştefan Vlăduţescu, Associate Professor, University of Craiova, A. I. Cuza Street, code 200585, Craiova, Romania Corresponding Address: Rodna Street no. 46, Craiova, Dolj, Romania E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The study falls within the Communication Ontology (Fundamentals of Communication Science component). It addressed the issue of fundamental ontological element of communication: communication being. First, communication being is defined as tangible, modular, computational and functional element. Then, investigation is developed on two axes. On the diachronic axis is made an inventory of denomination of communication beings since the establishment of communication as paradigmatic discipline. It is found that over the three paradigms (1950-1970, 1970-2000, 2000 - ...) talked about source-destination, sender-receiver, speaker-receiver, addresser-addressee, communicator-communicatee, participants etc. On synchronic axis is performing a taxonomy of communication beings. Bring several arguments in favor of the thesis that, in terms of categories, there are four communication prototypical figures: arhireceptor, participant, actor and agent. Keywords: communication being, communication ontology, communication prototypical figures 1. Introduction Communicators agents are tangible, modular, computational and functional elements of communication system. They are ontological and teleological factors
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Model for Communication
    (IJCSIS) International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, Vol. 6, No. 2, 2009 Conceptual Model for Communication Sabah Al-Fedaghi Ala'a Alsaqa Computer Engineering Department Computer Engineering Department Kuwait University Kuwait University P.O. Box 5969 Safat 13060 Kuwait P.O. Box 5969 Safat 13060 Kuwait [email protected] [email protected] Zahra'a Fadel Computer Engineering Department Kuwait University P.O. Box 5969 Safat 13060 Kuwait [email protected] Abstract—A variety of idealized models of communication 2) furnish order and structure to multifaceted systems exist, and all may have something in common. Starting communication events, and with Shannon’s communication model and ending with the OSI 3) lead to insights into hypothetical ideas and relationships model, this paper presents progressively more advanced forms of involved in communication. modeling of communication systems by tying communication models together based on the notion of flow. The basic A variety of communication systems models exist, and communication process is divided into different spheres (sources, “perhaps they all [have] something in common” [12]. channels, and destinations), each with its own five interior stages: Shannon’s model of communication and its variations are the receiving, processing, creating, releasing, and transferring of most common models adopted in many fields. The seven-layer information. The flow of information is ontologically distinguished from the flow of physical signals; accordingly, OSI model is well known as a reference model for describing Shannon’s model, network-based OSI models, and TCP/IP are networks and network applications. It is a reference model for redesigned. the five-layer TCP/IP model.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesson 8 Communication Models
    Lesson 8 Communication Models Contents: Introduction- why do we need to study communication models? What are the basic models of communication, Aristotle’s model and Laswell’ model of communication. Learning Objectives: To understand the flow of communication with help of different models. To understand the three basic concepts of Aristotle’s model. To understand basic concepts of Lasswell’s model. Introduction: Technically communication is a process where a sender sends the message to a receiver through the various channels and with the same or the other channel sender gets the feedback from receiver. In our previous lessons we learned about the different types of communication, i.e., intrapersonal, interpersonal, group and mass communication. Each type of communication includes few basic elements namely- sender, receiver, message, channel, feedback and barrier. To simplify and understand the process of communication different models are interpreted. A model is a representation of real world phenomenon in more abstract terms, which can be applied to different forms. Students of communication often use models to try to present a simplified version of communication, containing the essential 'ingredients' only. With a bit of luck, these models should help us to tease out the factors, which are common to all forms of communication. Communication theory models offer a convenient way to think about communication, providing a graphical checklist, which one can use to create anything from a speech to a major advertising campaign. Communication models are visualizations of communication process. They are basic theories concerning the elements of communication and how they operate and interact. 3 basic components that are part of all communication models: SOURCE MESSAGE RECEIVER S ---------> M --------> R (linear) Aristotle’s model of communication Formal communication theory (rhetorical theory) goes back 2500 years ago to Classical Greece when Plato, Aristotle, and the Sophists were speech teachers.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of the Communication Model
    SAGE Flex for Public Speaking Overview of the Communication Model Brief: Public speaking can be better understood by analyzing the elements of the transactional communication model, which include sender and receiver, message, channel, noise, and feedback. Learning Objective: Identify and understand the elements of the transactional communication model. Key Terms: • Channel: The medium used to transmit the signal from the transmitter to the receiver. • Feedback: A return message sent from the receiver back to the sender. • Linear communication: The type of communication that occurs when a message flows from a source to the receiver without immediate feedback from the receiver. • Noise: Anything that blocks the sending or receiving of a message. • Transactional communication: The type of communication that takes place when one person talks to another person or a group of people in real time, and the sender of the message receives simultaneous feedback. Transactional Model of Communication Models of communication offer conceptual frameworks for understanding the human communication process. Much like a model of a building, a conceptual framework is never an exact replica of what it represents. And to complicate matters even more, there’s more than one type of human communication process. The type of communication you engage in when you watch television or stream video is “linear,” meaning the message flows from a source to you without immediate Watching TV is a linear communication feedback from you. process. When communication takes place with one person talking to another person in real time—or with one person talking to a group of people in real time, as is the case in public speaking—the sender of the message receives simultaneous feedback.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Telecommunication Systems: from Standards to System Architectures
    Modeling Telecommunication Systems: From Standards to System Architectures Von der Fakultat¨ fur¨ Mathematik, Informatik und Naturwissenschaften der Rheinisch-Westfalischen¨ Technischen Hochschule Aachen zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Ingenieurwissenschaften genehmigte Dissertation vorgelegt von Dipl.-Ing., Dipl.-Wirt. Ing. Dominikus Herzberg aus Bonn Berichter: Univ.-Prof. Dr.-Ing. Manfred Nagl Univ.-Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Manfred Broy, TU Munchen¨ Tag der mundlichen¨ Prufung:¨ 17. September 2003 Diese Dissertation ist auf den Internetseiten der Hochschulbibliothek online verfugbar.¨ Abstract The architecture of a technical system reflects significant design decisions about the system’s organization and typically documents a description of key system elements (be they hardware or software), their composition, functioning, and in- terrelation. The process of creating a description of an architecture is called ar- chitecture modeling. In the telecommunication domain, the architecture level has always played an important role in the design and evolution of communication systems and networks. However, the way how telecommunication engineers describe their architec- tures is surprisingly rudimentary: They use natural languages and conceptual draw- ings, as a look into “old” as well as recent standards unveils. Even in the transition phase from standards to the early design phases of systems development, system designers do not go much beyond that level of informality. Therefore, as practice shows, in telecommunications, architecture modeling but not the understanding of architecture as such lacks (i) a suitable, consistent and formal modeling language, which is adapted to the needs of systems designers, and (ii) a methodology to support the modeling process. This work addresses these deficiencies. In this thesis, a systematic approach is presented for modeling architectures of virtually any telecommunication system.
    [Show full text]