DOCSLIB.ORG

Summary Report September 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Summary Report September 2004 Central and Eastern Europe Information Society Benchmarks Summary Report September 2004 This report was prepared by a consortium led by Danish Management A/S (DK) that included the University of Sunderland (UK) and Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research ISI (D) with financial assistance from the Commission of the European Communities. The views expressed herein are those of the consortium and do not represent any official view of the European Commission. Certain links referenced in this document connect to websites maintained by third parties and such websites may or may not present within a frame on the site. The consortium has not verified the contents of such third party websites and does not endorse, warrant, promote or recommend any services or products which may be provided or accessible through them or any person or body which may provide them. The consortium has not issued or caused to be issued any advertisements which may appear on these websites. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact Danish Management on telephone: +45 87 340 600 Foreword Background European leaders set, at the Lisbon Summit in 2000, the ambitious objective for Europe to “become the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world capable of sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion by 2010”. The EU’s eEurope Action Plan launched in Feira on 19-20 June 2000 aimed at bringing Europe closer to meeting the Lisbon objectives. It provided for concrete actions and targets aimed at making Internet use cheaper and faster, providing modern public services online and progressing a dynamic, e-business environment to attain these goals. In order to meet this challenge and to help accelerate reform and modernisation of their economies, encourage capacity and institutional building, the then 13 Candidate Countries launched a collective action, mirroring this Action Plan, on the occasion of the Göteborg European Council in June 2001, known as the eEurope+ Action Plan. A first picture of the status of implementation of the targets of the eEurope+ Action Plan was subsequently provided with the presentation of the first eEurope+ Progress Report, in June 2002, at the European Ministerial Conference: “Information Society - Connecting Europe” held in Ljubljana, Slovenia. The presentation of the Final eEurope+ Progress Report in February 2004 coincided with the biggest enlargement ever undertaken by the European Union, both in terms of scope and diversity. Ten countries - Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, the Slovak Republic, and Slovenia were set to join the Union on 1st May 2004. The Final eEurope+ Progress Report was based upon statistical information obtained from Surveys carried out within 10 of the 13 candidate countries during 2003: Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, the Slovak Republic, and Slovenia – referred to in this report as the Central and Eastern European Countries (the CEE 10). - I - Central and Eastern European Countries Information Society Benchmarks Summary Report Summary Report This Summary Report of the eEurope+ Benchmarking and Monitoring Project presents the main findings and conclusions resulting from analysis of the results of the Surveys. The Introduction briefly describes the background and circumstances in which the CEE 10 are progressing towards the establishment of their Information Societies. This is followed by a review of the current national landscapes pertinent to telecommunications and their associated infrastructures. Aspects of Internet access are considered before an examination of the current status of ICT within the sphere of education, There is particular focus on Tertiary Education, expected to provide a highly skilled ICT workforce for the future. ICT in the workplace examines the levels of ICT skills within the context of e-Learning followed by a snapshot of the current status of e-commerce/e-business in the CEE 10 countries. With e-Health expected to offer so many opportunities for cost savings and efficiency increases, there is a review of the use of the Internet by General Health Practitioners. Security issues are examined relative to individual Internet use and that of enterprises. Throughout analysis of the data, digital divides have been defined and the factors influencing them are assessed and discussed. A simple benchmarking exercise identifies leaders and trailers amongst the CEE 10 as well as those indicators for which some CEE 10 countries have made particular progress during 2003. Policy recommendations are included throughout wherever data results suggest that further policy action is needed. A summary of the methodology used in the Surveys is included in the Annexes. eEurope Further information on eEurope can be found at: http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/2005/index_en.htm This report and other related documents can be downloaded from: http://europa.eu.int/information_society/eeurope/2005/all_about/benchm arking/index_en.htm - II - Contents Introduction.............................................................................................. 1 Telecommunications Infrastructure ......................................................... 3 Internet .............................................................................................. 5 Access and usage ........................................................................................... 5 Cost and affordability....................................................................................... 6 Usage by individuals ....................................................................................... 7 Inhibitors to individual Internet use.................................................................. 8 Places where the Internet is used ................................................................... 9 Personal use of the Internet .......................................................................... 10 Education ............................................................................................ 11 Primary education ......................................................................................... 11 Secondary education..................................................................................... 12 Tertiary education,......................................................................................... 13 The Workplace ...................................................................................... 15 ICT skills in the workplace............................................................................. 15 e-Learning ..................................................................................................... 16 Enterprises: e-commerce and e-business..................................................... 17 Teleworking ................................................................................................... 19 Health ............................................................................................ 20 e-Health......................................................................................................... 20 Security ............................................................................................ 22 Digital divides ........................................................................................ 25 Leaders and Trailers.............................................................................. 26 Annexes ............................................................................................ 27 Annex 1 Leaders and Trailers ........................................................... 29 CEE 10 Information Society Leaders and Trailers, December 2003 ............ 31 Annex 2 Information Society Development Paths ............................. 37 Annex 3 Benchmarking Survey Methodology ................................... 75 The Policy Cycle as a conceptual framework ............................................... 75 The eEurope+ Action plan objectives and indicators.................................... 76 Questionnaires and surveys.......................................................................... 76 Primary Surveys ............................................................................................ 77 Secondary surveys........................................................................................ 79 Annex 4 Error Margins ...................................................................... 83 Annex 5 Bibliography ........................................................................ 85 - i - Central and Eastern European Countries Information Society Benchmarks Summary Report - ii - Central and Eastern European Countries Information Society Benchmarks Summary Report Introduction This Report presents a summary of the main findings of the surveys carried out by the eEurope+ Benchmarking and Monitoring Project during 2003. The surveys took place within the context of the eEurope+ Action Plan, which paralleled the eEurope Action Plan until enlargement in May 2004. The methodology of the surveys is described in the Annex. Conclusions are drawn from the findings and policy recommendations suggested throughout where appropriate. This Summary Report commences with a brief description of the socio-economic background of the CEE 10 countries and establishes the context within which they are developing their Information
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report on the Progress of the Project of Internet Monitoring of Wildlife Trade in CEE Countries in 2011
    Report on the progress of the project of Internet monitoring of wildlife trade in CEE countries in 2011 In 2011 CEEweb CITES Working Group carried out a monitoring of internet wildlife trade in chosen Central and Eastern European countries. The monitoring consists of two surveys. Each survey last one week and was carried out by qualified expert from the CITES WG member organizations on the basis of the methodology elaborated by the WG. Countries covered by the project: Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia and Ukraine. Organizations/institutions participated in the project: Green Balkans, Birds of Prey Protection Society, Czech Environmental Inspectorate, Nimfea, PTOP “Salamandra”, Milvus Group, Young Researchers of Serbia, ORCA, BROZ and Association Fauna. As deep analysis of the collected data were not the subject of this project, below only some preliminary results are presented. GENERAL RESULTS 3500 3070 3000 2650 2500 2000 1500 1000 640 520 420 420 420 370 320 500 310 300 280 250 190 0 BG CZ HU PL RO RS SK UA 2009 2011 Fig I Estimated average number of CITES specimens' offers available on the websites of monitored countries in 2009 and 2011 30 26,6 25 20 16,3 15 13,7 10 8,2 8 8,6 5,9 5 5,5 4,1 4,6 5 3,1 1,3 0,5 0 BG CZ HU PL RO RS SK UA 2009 2011 Fig II Estimated average number of CITES specimens offered for sale available on the Internet in the monitored countries per 100 thousand citizens in 2009 and 2011 50 45,5 45 40 35 28,6 30 25,3 25 22 20 15,3 13,6 15 12,4 12,9 9,9 9 10 6,7 5,2 4 5 2,4 0 BG CZ
    [Show full text]
  • Ii. Electronic Communications Networks and Services ……
    II. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS AND SERVICES …….. 28 1. Fixed phone networks and fixed phone services provision ……………………. 28 1.1. Fixed phone market players ………………........ 28 1.2. Development of the fixed phone market …………………........ 31 1.3. Fixed telephones ……………………………………….......... 32 1.4. Public telephones …………………………………………………......... 34 1.5. Services provided on the fixed phone market …......... 35 1.6. Regulation of the fixed phone networks and services market ………...... 35 1.7. Imposed price caps on the retail markets for access to public phone networks and of public phone services from a specific location …………………………. 37 2. Mobile cellular networks and services ………………………………………........... 43 2.1. Market players …………………………………………………........... 43 2.2. Mobile cellular network infrastructure ……………………......... 43 2.3. Mobile phone services market development ………………….......... 44 2.4. Services ……………………………………………………………………...... 49 2.5. Prices and Pricing policy …………………………………………………..... 51 3. Prices for interconnection, unbundled and specific access and for joint use. ……........... 56 3.1. Prices for interconnection referring to the markets for call origination from a certain location within public phone networks and call termination in a specific location within individual public phone networks…………………………………. 56 3.2. Prices for interconnection referring to the market of voice call termination within individual mobile networks....................................... 57 3.3 Roaming prices ……………………………………………. 59 3.4. Prices for unbundled access ……………………………………………....... 60 3.5. Prices for specific access ………………………………………………... 61 3.6. Prices for joint use ……………………………….…………......... 63 4. Provision of the universal service …………………………………………..... 63 4.1. Performance of the obligation to provide the universal service on the entire territory of the country ………………………………………..……… 63 4.2. Meeting the obligations for connectivity from a certain location to the public phone network and access to public phone services ………………………………………… 65 4.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Divide in Estonia and How to Bridge It
    Digital Divide In Estonia and How to Bridge It Editors: Mari Kalkun (Emor) Tarmo Kalvet (PRAXIS) Emor and PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies Tallinn 2002 Digital Divide In Estonia and How to Bridge It Editors: Mari Kalkun (Emor) Tarmo Kalvet (PRAXIS) Tallinn 2002 This report was prepared at the order, with funding from and in direct partnership with the Look@World Foundation, the Open Estonia Foundation, and the State Chancellery. Co-financers: The study was co-financed (partial research, pdf-publications, PRAXIS’ Policy Analysis Publications, distribution) by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) for the Information for Development Program (infoDev) by a grant to the PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies for ICT Infrastructure and E-Readiness Assessment (Grant # ICT 016). The translation into Russian and English, and publication of the web-version was supported by the Open Society Institute – Budapest. Contractors: © Emor (Chapters III, V, VI, VII; Annexes 2, 3, 4) Ahtri 12, 10151 Tallinn Tel. (372) 6 268 500; www.emor.ee © PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies (Chapters II, IV, VIII) Estonia Ave. 3/5, 10143 Tallinn Tel. (372) 6 409 072; www.praxis.ee © Emor and PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies (Executive Summary, Chapter I) Materials in the current report are subject to unlimited and free use if references to the authors and financers are provided. ISBN: 9985-78-736-6 Layout: Helena Nagel Contents 4 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Mari Kalkun, Tarmo Kalvet, Daimar Liiv, Ülle Pärnoja . 6 1. Objectives of study . 6 2. “Blue collar” individuals and “passive people” are distinguished among non-users of the Internet .
    [Show full text]
  • No Monitoring Obligations’ the Death of ‘No Monitoring Obligations’ a Story of Untameable Monsters by Giancarlo F
    The Death of ‘No Monitoring Obligations’ The Death of ‘No Monitoring Obligations’ A Story of Untameable Monsters by Giancarlo F. Frosio* Abstract: In imposing a strict liability regime pean Commission, would like to introduce filtering for alleged copyright infringement occurring on You- obligations for intermediaries in both copyright and Tube, Justice Salomão of the Brazilian Superior Tribu- AVMS legislations. Meanwhile, online platforms have nal de Justiça stated that “if Google created an ‘un- already set up miscellaneous filtering schemes on a tameable monster,’ it should be the only one charged voluntary basis. In this paper, I suggest that we are with any disastrous consequences generated by the witnessing the death of “no monitoring obligations,” lack of control of the users of its websites.” In order a well-marked trend in intermediary liability policy to tame the monster, the Brazilian Superior Court that can be contextualized within the emergence of had to impose monitoring obligations on Youtube; a broader move towards private enforcement online this was not an isolated case. Proactive monitoring and intermediaries’ self-intervention. In addition, fil- and filtering found their way into the legal system as tering and monitoring will be dealt almost exclusively a privileged enforcement strategy through legisla- through automatic infringement assessment sys- tion, judicial decisions, and private ordering. In multi- tems. Due process and fundamental guarantees get ple jurisdictions, recent case law has imposed proac- mauled by algorithmic enforcement, which might fi- tive monitoring obligations on intermediaries across nally slay “no monitoring obligations” and fundamen- the entire spectrum of intermediary liability subject tal rights online, together with the untameable mon- matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Generational Use of News Media in Estonia
    Generational Use of News Media in Estonia Contemporary media research highlights the importance of empirically analysing the relationships between media and age; changing user patterns over the life course; and generational experiences within media discourse beyond the widely-hyped buzz terms such as the ‘digital natives’, ‘Google generation’, etc. The Generational Use doctoral thesis seeks to define the ‘repertoires’ of news media that different generations use to obtain topical information and create of News Media their ‘media space’. The thesis contributes to the development of in Estonia a framework within which to analyse generational features in news audiences by putting the main focus on the cultural view of generations. This perspective was first introduced by Karl Mannheim in 1928. Departing from his legacy, generations can be better conceived of as social formations that are built on self- identification, rather than equally distributed cohorts. With the purpose of discussing the emergence of various ‘audiencing’ patterns from the perspectives of age, life course and generational identity, the thesis centres on Estonia – a post-Soviet Baltic state – as an empirical example of a transforming society with a dynamic media landscape that is witnessing the expanding impact of new media and a shift to digitisation, which should have consequences for the process of ‘generationing’. The thesis is based on data from nationally representative cross- section surveys on media use and media attitudes (conducted 2002–2012). In addition to that focus group discussions are used to map similarities and differences between five generation cohorts born 1932–1997 with regard to the access and use of established news media, thematic preferences and spatial orientations of Signe Opermann Signe Opermann media use, and a discursive approach to news formats.
    [Show full text]
  • National Broadband Infrastructure Plan for Next Generation Access
    NATIONAL BROADBAND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FOR NEXT GENERATION ACCESS Decree № 435/ 26.06. 2014 National Broadband Infrastructure Plan for Next Generation Access Sofia, 2014 NATIONAL BROADBAND INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN FOR NEXT GENERATION ACCESS TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 5 II. TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS FOR BUILDING NGA INFRASTRUCTURE .................. 9 2.1. Types of Next Generation Broadband Access Networks............................................ 10 2.2. Hybrid Networks ........................................................................................................... 11 2.2.1. Hybrid Ffiber Ccoaxial Networks ....................................................................... 11 2.2.2. Hybrid VDSL Networks ....................................................................................... 12 2.3. Optical Cable Access Networks (FTTx)........................................................................ 14 2.3.1. FTTN (Fiber to the Node).................................................................................... 14 2.3.2. FTTC (Fiber to the Ccurb) ................................................................................... 14 2.3.3. FTTP (FTTB, FTTH, FTTD).................................................................................. 15 2.3.4. Architectures of Optical Access Networks......................................................... 15 2.4. Technical and Economic Aspects of NGA Technologies
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Study on Blocking, Filtering and Take-Down of Illegal Internet Content
    KDWZd/s^dhz KE BLOCKING, FILTERING AND TAKE-DOWN OF ILLEGAL INTERNET CONTENT Excerpt, pages 100-125 This document is part of the Comparative Study on blocking, filtering and take-down of illegal Internet content in the 47 member States of the Council of Europe, which was prepared by the Swiss Institute of Comparative Law upon an invitation by the Secretary General. The opinions expressed in this document do not engage the responsibility of the Council of Europe. They should not be regarded as placing upon the legal instruments mentioned in it any official interpretation capable of binding the governments of Council of Europe member SƚĂƚĞƐ͕ƚŚĞŽƵŶĐŝůŽĨƵƌŽƉĞ͛Ɛstatutory organs or the European Court of Human Rights. Avis 14-067 Lausanne, 20 December 2015 National reports current at the date indicated at the end of each report. Dorigny ʹ CH ʹ 1015 Lausanne - Tel : +41 (0)21 692 49 11 - Fax : +41 (0)21 692 4949 ʹ www.isdc.ch ʹ [email protected] i I. /EdZKhd/KE On 24th November 2014, the Council of Europe formally mandated the Swiss Institute of Comparative >Ăǁ;͞^/>͟ͿƚŽƉƌŽǀŝĚĞĂĐŽŵƉĂƌĂƚŝǀĞƐƚƵĚLJŽŶƚŚĞůĂǁƐĂŶĚƉƌĂĐƚŝĐĞŝŶƌĞƐƉĞĐƚŽĨĨŝůƚĞƌŝŶŐ͕ďůŽĐŬŝŶŐ and takedown of illegal content on the internet in the 47 Council of Europe member States. As agreed between the SICL and the Council of Europe, the study presents the laws and, in so far as information is easily available, the practices concerning the filtering, blocking and takedown of illegal content on the internet in several contexts. It considers the possibility of such action in cases where public order or internal security concerns are at stake as well as in cases of violation of personality rights and intellectual property rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Wimax Regulatory and Spectrum Policy Track Led by Connect World
    All articles are available for download at www.connect-world.com CONTENTS National development Next step for the e-state: e-state 2.0? 4 by Juhan Parts, Minister of Economic Affairs, and Communications and ex-Prime Minister, 4 8 12 15 Estonia Growing the Internet in Bulgaria 8 by Dr. Plamen Vatchkov, Chairman of State Agency for Information Technologies and Communications, Bulgaria Regulatory affairs 17 20 23 25 The challenge of NGNs 12 by Mathias Kurth, President of Germany’s Federal Network Agency, for Electricity, Gas, Telecommunications, Post and Railway Regional development 28 30 33 36 Business innovation and ICT in the Baltic region 15 by Prof. Edvins Karnitis, Expert Forum for the National Development Plan, and Commissioner of the Public Utilities Commission, Latvia Building ICT usage in South Eastern Europe 17 by Moniu Monev, CEO of Nexcom Bulgaria 41 43 46 Broadband and universal services Broadband - the worsening digital divide 20 by James Blessing, Chief Operations Officer, Entanet International Ltd VoIP Hosted VoIP services in Europe 23 by Konstantin Nikashov, VP, External Economic Activities, MERA Systems & Member, Executive Board, MERA Group Connections Network tendencies From the Editor-In-Chief’s desk 2 Intelligent networks - coping with growth 25 by Fredric J. Morris by Edgar Masri, CEO & Chairman 3Com Imprint 2 Network development Growing the Net in the Balkans 28 by Dino Andreou, CEO, OTEGlobe, Greece Subscription 48 Network evolution - rising expectation 30 Advertorial by Fotis Karonis, Chief Information Officer, Romtelecom,
    [Show full text]
  • The Problems Connected with the Freedom of Expression In
    Paper invited for the International Conference: Freedom of Expression, Censorship, Libraries, Riga, Latvia, October 14-17 1998 Aile Möldre Tallinn Pedagogical Library, Estonia The era of the freedom of expression started in Estonia about ten years ago. The journals for children were the first to be freed from precensorship in the more liberal publishing policy of perestroika in 1987. After that the whole printed word was gradually freed from prepublication control. This process was not accomplished as an initiative of the organ of censorship, Glavlit, which tried to maintain its powers to the last minute, but the editors of various publications declared that they will not be subjected to the control any more. The Estonian government liquidated the Estonian branch of the all-union Glavlit in October 1990 (Veskimägi 1996 : 303) Since the proclamation of the Constitution in 1992 the freedom to express and disseminate one’s ideas, opinions, beliefs and other information in printed word or otherwise is legally guaranteed to all people. There is no censorship. The freedom of speech and press can only be restricted in the interests of protecting public order, morals, the rights, freedom, health, honour and good name of other people. The criminal code provides restrictions prohibiting the inciting of national, racial, religious or political hatred, propagating violence and discrimination, also disseminating pornography and works propagating violence among minors (there also exists a special law on that). The criminal law also treats the issues of protecting people from slander and libel and concerning the invasion of their private life. Although it can be said, that the freedom to publish all kinds of publications has not been "abused" in Estonia by publishing dubious publications there have been some cases, which have brought the issue of the freedom of expression in the centre of the public interest in a negative way.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Challenges of Voice Over Ip Telephony: Analysis for Selected South and Eastern European Countries
    INTERNATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATION UNION ITU WORKSHOP ON Document: FoV/08 12 January 2007 THE FUTURE OF VOICE Geneva, 15-16 January 2007 REGULATORY CHALLENGES OF VOICE OVER IP TELEPHONY: ANALYSIS FOR SELECTED SOUTH AND EASTERN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES © ITU 15-16 January 2007 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This background paper was prepared by Anna Riedel <[email protected]> under the ITU New Initiatives Programmeme project on The Future of Voice to be presented at the workshop held in Geneva in January 2007. The opinions expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the International Telecommunication Union or its membership. The author would like to express her sincere appreciation to the national administrations of Romania, Bulgaria, Turkey and Croatia for supporting this study, and wishes particularly to thank Jaroslaw Ponder, Nathaly Rey and Justus Haucap for their comments and invaluable assistance. The research project on the Future of Voice is managed by Jaroslaw Ponder, Policy Analyst at the ITU Strategy and Policy Unit <[email protected]>, under the direction of Dr. Tim Kelly, Head of the ITU Strategy and Policy Unit <[email protected]>. Other background materials can be found at http://www.itu.int/spu/voice. II TABLE OF CONTENTS page 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 3 2 Voice over Internet Protocol .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Estonia from 11 to 15 June 2018
    Strasbourg, 28 September 2018 CommDH(2018)14 Original version REPORT OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS OF THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE DUNJA MIJATOVIĆ FOLLOWING HER VISIT TO ESTONIA FROM 11 TO 15 JUNE 2018 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 3 1 Gender equality and women’s rights ..................................................................................... 3 1.1 Legal, institutional and policy framework ................................................................................. 4 1.2 Gender equality in practice ....................................................................................................... 5 1.2.1 The gender pay gap ............................................................................................................. 7 1.3 Violence against women ........................................................................................................... 9 1.3.1 Support and protection services ....................................................................................... 10 1.3.2 Access to justice................................................................................................................. 11 1.4 Conclusions and recommendations ........................................................................................ 12 2 The
    [Show full text]
  • ICT Infrastructure and E-Readiness Assessment Report: ESTONIA
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Policy Documentation Center 5 ICT Infrastructure and E-readiness Assessment Report: ESTONIA Andre Krull Aprill 2003 Publication of the current report is financed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) for the Information for Development Program (infoDev) through a grant ICT Infrastructure and E-Readiness Assessment (Grant # ICT 016) allocated to PRAXIS Center for Policy Studies. PRAXIS Working Papers No 5/2003 Table of Contents Executive Summary.....................................................................................................4 1. Introduction..............................................................................................................8 1.1. General introduction to Estonia .....................................................................8 Graph 1.1. Map of Northern Europe..........................................................................8 1.2. Introduction to the report ..................................................................................10 1.2.1. General context ..........................................................................................10 1.2.2. Previous assessments .................................................................................11 1.2.3. Main Conclusions ......................................................................................12 1.3. Main Objectives and Methodology...................................................................12 1.3.1.
    [Show full text]