DOCSLIB.ORG

Building Roads and Improving Livelihoods in Nepal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building Roads and Improving Livelihoods in Nepal Building roads and improving livelihoods in Nepal External review of the DISTRICT ROADS SUPPORT PROGRAMME (DRSP) Final Report Paul Starkey (Team Leader) Ansu Tumbahangfe (Social and rural development specialist) Shuva Sharma (Rural Transport Infrastructure Specialist) May 2013 Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation (SDC) Embassy of Switzerland, Ekantakuna, Jawalakhel, PO Box 113, Kathmandu, Nepal District Roads Support Programme (DRSP) Manbhawan, PO Box 113, Kathmandu, Nepal www.drspnepal.org The views in this paper are those of the authors and they do not necessarily reflect the views of the District Roads Support Programme (DRSP) or the Swiss Development Cooperation (SDC) for whom the report was prepared Paul Starkey Team Leader Consultant in Integrated Transport and Rural Livelihoods 64 Northcourt Avenue, Reading RG2 7HQ, UK Tel: +44 118 987 2152 Skype: paulstarkey Email: [email protected] and [email protected] Ansu Tumbahangfe Social and rural development specialist Email: [email protected] Mobile: +977 9851079164 Shuva Sharma Rural Transport Infrastructure Specialist Scott Wilson Nepal Email: [email protected] Mobile: +977 98510 22621 Cover and other photos © Paul Starkey External review of District Roads Support Project: Final Report. May 2013. Page 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary ................................................................................................................. 5 Acronyms and abbreviations ........................................................................................ 8 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 9 2 DRSP structure, activities and achievements: 1999-2013 ............................................. 10 2.1 Development objectives and main focus of the distinct phases ............................. 10 2.2 Operational structure and collaboration framework ................................................ 10 2.3 DRSP Phase one: build-up phase .......................................................................... 12 2.4 DRSP Phase two (April 2002 to July 2006) ............................................................ 13 2.5 DRSP Phase three (July 2006 to July 2010) .......................................................... 13 2.6 DRSP Phase four (July 2010 to July 2013, with extension to 2014) ...................... 14 3 The DRSP road surveyed .............................................................................................. 14 4 Impacts of DRSP roads ................................................................................................. 15 4.1 Access to roads ...................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Access to services .................................................................................................. 16 4.3 Traffic counts and transport services ...................................................................... 17 4.4 Adequacy of transport services .............................................................................. 19 4.5 Impact of roads on rural livelihoods ........................................................................ 20 4.6 Impact on agricultural sub-sector ........................................................................... 21 4.7 Impact on off-farm activities .................................................................................... 21 4.8 Migration and remittances ...................................................................................... 23 4.9 Changes in household incomes ............................................................................. 24 4.10 Changes in household expenses and savings ....................................................... 25 4.11 Changes in living standards ................................................................................... 25 4.12 Gender empowerment ............................................................................................ 26 4.13 Economic impact and benefits ................................................................................ 27 5 Impact of labour-based road construction ..................................................................... 29 5.1 Impact of payments for labour ................................................................................ 29 5.2 Impact at village and community level .................................................................... 31 5.3 District level impact ................................................................................................. 31 5.4 Impact on governance ............................................................................................ 32 5.5 National level impacts in influence ......................................................................... 32 5.6 Impacts through international influences ................................................................ 33 6 Sustainability of DRSP interventions ............................................................................. 33 6.1 Sustainability and durability of road structures ....................................................... 33 6.2 Labour-based construction approach ..................................................................... 34 6.3 Exploration of innovative techniques in rural road surfacing .................................. 34 6.4 Sustainability of maintenance systems ................................................................... 35 6.5 Sustainability of capacity building of stakeholders ................................................. 35 7 Conclusions and recommendations ............................................................................... 36 7.1 Overall effectiveness of social inclusion approach ................................................. 36 7.2 Rural transport policies in Nepal ............................................................................. 37 7.3 SDC comparative advantages ................................................................................ 39 8 References .................................................................................................................... 40 9 Annex 1: Descriptions of surveyed roads and impacts on proximity ............................. 43 10 Annex 2: Survey methodology ................................................................................... 51 11 Annex 3: Economic analyses of three DRSP roads ................................................... 53 12 Annex 4: Some unforeseen consequences of DRSP road building ........................... 63 13 Annex 5: Summary of DRSP activities and achievements in its four phases ............. 65 14 Annex 6: Summary of DRSP publications and documents ........................................ 73 15 Annex 7: List of some of the stakeholders contacted during the review .................... 76 16 Annex 8: Terms of Reference .................................................................................... 78 External review of District Roads Support Project: Final Report. May 2013. Page 3 Acknowledgements The review team would like to thank all the people who contributed to this report. A number of influential people working for the Government of Nepal, donor agencies and development banks assisted by providing their valuable ideas and observations during the course of meetings held in Kathmandu. Many people also participated in district‐level meetings, providing crucial information and feedback. The largest group of contributors comprised the several thousand people who kindly gave their time to participate in focus group meetings and/or respond to the survey questions. The DRSP team provided exemplary assistance and encouragement in many ways. A high proportion of the members of the DRSP teams in Kathmandu and the districts assisted with information provision, logistics, field visits, supervising the various surveys and arranging focus group discussions. The whole team deserve thanks, with particular appreciation due to Josef Zimmerman (Team Leader), Bishnu Shah (Deputy Team Leader), Chandra Bhujel (Community Development Adviser), Youton Lama (Planning and Monitoring Specialist), Kumar Nepal (Mapping and Computer Officer) and Rajesh Sharma (Senior Engineer). The entire review process was only possible thanks to the clear direction and flexible support provided by the SDC team in Nepal, particularly Jun Hada and Aman Jonchhe. The authors would like to thank Ishwar Shrestha for his work on the economic analyses. The review team would like to acknowledge all these people and thank them for their excellent assistance and support. Paul Starkey, Ansu Tumbahangfe and Shuva Sharma May 2013 External review of District Roads Support Project: Final Report. May 2013. Page 4 Executive summary DRSP and the external review process The Swiss Development Cooperation (SDC) commissioned a final review of the impacts of the 13‐year District Roads Support Programme (DRSP). DRSP was established to contribute to better social and economic opportunities for rural people in Nepal through the construction and maintenance of rural roads. Roads were constructed and maintained using labour‐based, environmentally friendly and participatory methods with decentralised systems of organisation. In 1999, DRSP started to assist District
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program
    Environmental Assessment Document Initial Environmental Examination Grant Number: 0093 NEP February 2010 Nepal: Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program Sildhunga-Jethal-Tauthali-Tekanpur Road Subproject, Sindhupalchowk District Prepared by the Government of Nepal The Environmental Assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Government of Nepal Ministry of Local Development Department of Local Infrastructure Development and Agricultural Roads Rural Reconstruction and Rehabilitation Sector Development Program [ADBGrant 0093NEP] Initial Environmental Examination (IEE) Report of Sildhunga-Jethal-Tauthali-Tekanpur Road Subproject, Sindhupalchowk District Submitted to: Ministry of Local Development Government of Nepal Proponent: Office of District Development Committee/ District Technical Office Chautara, Sindhupalchowk Prepared by: Frisa-Iteco Joint Venture (in association with SKAT) District Implementation Support Team (DIST) Chautara, Sindhupalchowk, Nepal Telephone No.: 011-620338 Fax No.: 011-620087 February, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations ………………………………………………………………………….....i Name and Address of Proponent………………………………………………..……...ii Executive Summary in Nepali………………………………………………………….iii Executive summary in English………………………………………………….…… viii Salient Features of the sub-Project………………………………………..………….xiii 1. Introduction ………………………………………………………………………………… 1 1.1. Background………………………………………………………………...........1
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Human Rights Year Book 2021 (ENGLISH EDITION) (This Report Covers the Period - January to December 2020)
    Nepal Human Rights Year Book 2021 (ENGLISH EDITION) (This Report Covers the Period - January to December 2020) Editor-In-Chief Shree Ram Bajagain Editor Aarya Adhikari Editorial Team Govinda Prasad Tripathee Ramesh Prasad Timalsina Data Analyst Anuj KC Cover/Graphic Designer Gita Mali For Human Rights and Social Justice Informal Sector Service Centre (INSEC) Nagarjun Municipality-10, Syuchatar, Kathmandu POBox : 2726, Kathmandu, Nepal Tel: +977-1-5218770 Fax:+977-1-5218251 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.insec.org.np; www.inseconline.org All materials published in this book may be used with due acknowledgement. First Edition 1000 Copies February 19, 2021 © Informal Sector Service Centre (INSEC) ISBN: 978-9937-9239-5-8 Printed at Dream Graphic Press Kathmandu Contents Acknowledgement Acronyms and Abbreviations Foreword CHAPTERS Chapter 1 Situation of Human Rights in 2020: Overall Assessment Accountability Towards Commitment 1 Review of the Social and Political Issues Raised in the Last 29 Years of Nepal Human Rights Year Book 25 Chapter 2 State and Human Rights Chapter 2.1 Judiciary 37 Chapter 2.2 Executive 47 Chapter 2.3 Legislature 57 Chapter 3 Study Report 3.1 Status of Implementation of the Labor Act at Tea Gardens of Province 1 69 3.2 Witchcraft, an Evil Practice: Continuation of Violence against Women 73 3.3 Natural Disasters in Sindhupalchok and Their Effects on Economic and Social Rights 78 3.4 Problems and Challenges of Sugarcane Farmers 82 3.5 Child Marriage and Violations of Child Rights in Karnali Province 88 36 Socio-economic
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence of Changes "Inclusion and Rights of the Persons With
    Evidence of Changes the process document and success stories of "Inclusion and Rights of the Persons with Psychosocial Disabilities" project intervention in Gorkha, Dhading and Sindhupalchok earthquake affected districts of Nepal Evidence of Changes – the process document and success stories of "Inclusion and Rights of the Persons with Psychosocial Disabilities" project intervention in Gorkha, Dhading and Sindhupalchok earthquake affected districts of Nepal © Centre for Mental Health and Counselling-Nepal (CMC-Nepal) CMC-Nepal reserves all rights of ownership to the original materials in this booklet. No part of this document can be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without written permission of CMC-Nepal. Readers, however, are free to use the material for noncommercial purposes in the course of development work which CMC-Nepal acknowledges with appreciation. Disclaimer The stories in the booklet are published with the pre-consent of the story tellers. The stories are representation of project achievements and the good practices that were initiated in the project. It also envisages the success stories with the quality changes in the lives of the rights holders in the project. The materials and the geographical designations in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of CMC-Nepal concerning the legal status of the nation, provinces, districts, municipalities or areas, or concerning the delimitation of its boundaries. Cover Photo: Shankar Malakar, CMC-Nepal
    [Show full text]
  • 3702-NEP: Disaster Resilience of Schools Project and Title: DRSP/CLPIU/076/77-Kavre-02 Contract No
    Invitation for Bids Date: 24 September 2019 Loan No. 3702-NEP: Disaster Resilience of Schools Project and Title: DRSP/CLPIU/076/77-Kavre-02 Contract No. Construction of School Buildings, Toilet and Water Supply Facilities and Title: including Site Development Works in Nine (9) Schools of Kavrepalanchok District Deadline for Submission of 8 November 2019, 12:00 hours Nepal Standard Time (NST) Bids: 1. The Government of Nepal has received a financing from the Asian Development Bank (ADB) toward the cost of Disaster Resilience of Schools Project (DRSP). Part of this financing will be used for payments under the contract named above. Bidding is open to bidders from eligible source countries of ADB. 2. The Central Level Project Implementation Unit (Education), National Reconstruction Authority (NRA) (the “Employer”) invites sealed bids from eligible bidders or joint ventures for the Construction of School Buildings, Toilet and Water Supply Facilities including Site Development Works in Nine (9) Schools of Kavrepalanchok District. Construction period is 18 months after contract signing date. 3. Only eligible bidders with the following key qualifications should participate in the bidding: Key Qualification Minimum Description of works Minimum Lot work to be bid as SINGLE PACKAGE Average Annual S.N. Identification experience, (Construction of following school building Turnover (Last (ID) No. size and complex) three (3) years). nature. • Bhaleswor Mavi, Malpi, Panauti Municipality-8 • Dedithumka Mavi, Mandan Deupur Municipality-9 • Gyaneswori Mavi, Padalichaur, Anaikot-1 • Himalaya Mavi, Pipalbot, Rosh RM-6 At least one (1) • Laxmi Narayan Mavi, Narayantar, Roshi RM-2 DRSP/CLPIU/0 USD 7.00 Million project of Saraswati Mavi, Bhugdeu, Bethanchok RM-6 1 76/77-Kavre -02 • worth USD • Sarbamangala Mavi, Aglekot, Panchkhal Municipality-3 2.52 Million.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Board
    Editorial Board Chief Editor Prof. Dr. Prem Sagar Chapagain Editors Dr. Ashok Pande Dr. Anila Jha Managing Editor Hemanta Dangal This views expressed in the articles are soley of the individual authors and do not nec- essarily reflect the views ofSocial Protection Civil Society Network-Nepal. © Social Protection Civil Society Network (SPCSN)-Nepal About the Journal With an objective to bring learnings, issues and voices on social protection through experts in regard to inform the social protection audiences, practitioners, stakeholders and actors as well as to suggest policymakers to adequately design social protection programs to fill the gaps and delivery transparency and accountability, Social Protection Civil Society Network (SPCSN) expects to publish the introductory issue of Journal of Social Protection in both print and online versions. Review Process This journal was published by Social Protection Civil Society Network (SPCSN) with supports of Save the Children Nepal Country Office in collaboration with Save the Children Finland & Ministry of Foreign Affairs Finland and with management supports from Children, Woman in Social Service and Human Rights (CWISH), Nepal. Editorial and Business Office Published by SPCSN Buddhanagar, Kathmandu Email: [email protected] Website: www.spcsnnepal.org Social Protection Civil Society Network (SPCSN) ISSN: ....................... Designed by: Krishna Subedi Printed at: .................... Journal of Social Protection, 2020 Volumn 1 December 2020 Contents Boosting the Impact of Nepal’s Child Grant through a Parenting Intervention ............................................................................................. 1-10 - Disa Sjöblom Social Protection in Health: Characteristics and Coverage of Health Insurance Program in Nepal ................................................... 11-26 - Geha Nath Khanal and Bhagawan Regmi Making Shock Responsive Social Protection System in Nepalese Context ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Kodari Scheme of Rikaze-Kathmandu Railway
    2017 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Energy and Environment Protection (ICSEEP 2017) ISBN: 978-1-60595-464-6 Study on Kodari Scheme of Rikaze-Kathmandu Railway Location Yaoping ZHANG1,a 1Institute of Vacuum Tube Transport, Xijing University, Xi’an 710123, China a [email protected] Keywords: Rikaze, Kathmandu, Railway location, Rack rail, Linear motor, Himalaya tunnel Abstract: Building Rikaze-Kathmandu Railway will change the broken road situation of Lasa-Rikaze Railway, activate the potential of Qingzang Railway, have Tibet as well as Lasa and Rikaze become the node of south Asia channel of “One Belt and One Road”, strengthen commercial trade and bilateral relations between China and Nepal. It is the shortest route for Rikaze-Kathmandu railway to go through Zhangmu port. By primary analysis, the feasible route should extend from the current Rikaze railway station, going through Qumei county, entering into the current G318 highway belt, then going through Jiding, Liuxiang and Resa, arriving Lazi. The route extends from Lazi, then goes through Jiacuola mountain by tunnel with 45km length, going through Jiacuo county and arriving Dingri. After Dingri, the route extends to west along with Pengqu river valley, going through Zhaguo, then arriving Gangga. Extending to southwest from Gangga, the route goes under Labujikang peak by a 42km tunnel, then arriving Yalai, then Nielamu and Zhangmu. The nature gradient between Nielamu and Zhangmu is 110‰, line mileage 20km, thus the rack rail technology or the linear motor driving should be considered for train to climb the steep slope more than 110‰. Another possible scheme is to build an 88km tunnel with a 28‰ gradient between Gangga and Zhangmu for going under Himalaya, so as to avoid the 110‰ steep slope between Nielamu-Zhangmu.
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Electricity Authority
    NEPAL ELECTRICITY AUTHORITY ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIALMANAGEMENT PLAN OF SUPPLY AND INSTALLATION OF DISTRIBUTION PROJECTS (33KV TRANSMISSION LINE) UNDER THE GRID SOLAR AND ENERGY EFFICIECY PROJECT VOLUME II Prepared and Submitted by: Environment and Social Studies Department Kharipati, Bhaktapur Phone No.: 01-6611580, Fax: 01-6611590 Email: [email protected] September, 2018 SIDP Abbreviations and Acronyms ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS BS : Bikram Sambat (Nepali Era) DADO : District Agriculture Development Office DCC : District Coordination Committee DFO : District Forest Office DoED : Department of Electricity Development ESMF : Environment and Social Management Framework ESMP : Environment and Social Management Plan EPR : Environment Protection Rules, 1997 ESSD : Environment and Social Studies Department GoN : Government of Nepal GSEEP : Grid Tied and Solar Energy Efficiency Project GRC : Grievance Redress Cell GRM : Grievance Redress Mechanism HHs : Households IEE : Initial Environmental Examination MoEWRI : Ministry of Energy, Water Resource and Irrigation MoFE : Ministry of Forest and Environment NEA : Nepal Electricity Authority PAS : Project Affected Settlement PMO : Project Management Office SIDP : Supply and Installation of Distribution Project WB : World Bank Units ha : Hectare km : Kilometer kV : Kilo Volt m2 : Square meter ESMP Report i NEA-ESSD SIDP Table of Contents Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ........................................................................................ I 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Japanese Contributions to Reconstruction and Recovery in Sindhupalchowk
    Seminar on Sustainable Recovery: Experience Sharing between Nepal and Japan Japanese Contributions to Reconstruction and Recovery in Sindhupalchowk 17 January 2019 JICA Nepal Our Support for EQ Recovery Based on the Build Back Better (BBB) concept, a wide range of support has been provided since immediately after the earthquake in April 2015. • Housing Reconstruction • School Reconstruction • Rebuilding Local Public Infrastructure & Facilities • Livelihood Recovery in the Affected Communities • Hazard Maps • District-Level Recovery Planning • Rehabilitation of Cultural Heritage • Earthquake Risk Assessment for Kathmandu Valley 2 As of January 2019 3 1. Hazard Maps Enlargement of Hazard Map (Tatopani) Source: JICA Project Team Enlargement of Hazard Map (Barhabise) 2. District Rehabilitation and Recovery Plan Consultative Process for RRP Formulation ・Preliminary Workshop: Jun.24, 2016 Contents：Explanation of PDDP and RRP, viewpoint of reconstruction ・Cluster Workshop： Aug. 1-10, 2016 Contents： Issue setting in 8 regions in the district ・Vision Workshop ：Sep. 25-26, 2016 Contents：District reconstruction vision setting ・Sectoral Committee ：Nov. 16-17, 2016 Contents： Action list for 5 sectors of PDDP ・Planning Workshop: Nov.22-24,2016 Contents：PDDP Action list elaboration, introduction of the example of reconstruction ・Sectoral Committee :Feb. 8-9, 2017 Contents：RRP Action list elaboration ・Final Presentation: Feb.10, 2017 Contents：Introduction of Draft RRP, introduction of overview of PDDP - Approval of RRP: March 8, 2017 by Board meeting
    [Show full text]
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Landslide Inventory, Characterization and Engineering Design for Mitigation Works of Chure Area in Ten Districts
    LANDSLIDE INVENTORY, CHARACTERIZATION AND ENGINEERING DESIGN FOR MITIGATION WORKS OF CHURE AREA IN TEN DISTRICTS Submitted to: Submitted by: Government of Nepal Central Department of Environmental President Chure-Tarai Madhesh Science Conservation Development Board Tribhuvan University, Kirtipur Kathmandu September, 2016 © September 2016 President Chure-Tarai Madhesh Conservation Development Board and Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University Citation: TU-CDES (2016). Landslide Inventory Characterization and Engineering Design for Mitigation Works of Chure Area in Ten Districts. Central Department of Environmental Science, Tribhuvan University and Government of Nepal, President Chure-Tarai Madhesh Conservation Development Board, Kathmandu. Project Steering Committee Chair Dr. Annapurna Das, Secretary , PCTMCDB/GoN Prof. Dr. Madan Koirala, Professor, TU-CDES Member Prof. Dr. Kedar Rijal, Head of Department, TU-CDES Member Prof. Dr. Rejina Maskey, Project Team Leader, TU-CDES Member Dr. Prem Paudel, Under Secretary, PCTMCDB/GoN Member Dr. Subodh Dhakal, Project Coordinator, TU-CDES Member Mr. Gehendra Keshari Upadhya, Joint Secretary , PCTMCDB/GoN Member Mr. Pashupati Koirala, Under- Secretary, PCTMCDB/GoN Project Team Team Leader Prof. Dr. Rejina Maskey Project Co-ordinator Dr. Subodh Dhakal Geo-Technical Engineer Dr. Ram Chandra Tiwari GIS Expert Mr. Ajay Bhakta Mathema Geologist Mr. Suman Panday Assistant Geologist Mr. Niraj Bal Tamang Assistant GIS Analyst Mr. Padam Bahadur Budha Assistant GIS Analyst Ms. Shanta Banstola Social Surveyor Mr. Kumod Lekhak Field Assistant Mr. Nabin Nepali Review Technical Reviewer: Dr. Ranjan Kumar Dahal English Reviewer: Dr. Dinesh Raj Bhuju ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Hazards like earthquake, landslide, soil erosion and sedimentation all shape the landscape and relief of the Himalaya. Land degradation of the Chure area of Nepal is primarily contributed by different types of landslides and mass wasting phenomena.
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Dolakha District Show Ing Proposed Vdcs for Survey
    Annex 3.6 Annex 3.6 Map of Dolakha district showing proposed VDCs for survey Source: NARMA Inception Report A - 53 Annex 3.7 Annex 3.7 Summary of Periodic District Development Plans Outlay Districts Period Vision Objectives Priorities (Rs in 'ooo) Kavrepalanchok 2000/01- Protection of natural Qualitative change in social condition (i) Development of physical 7,021,441 2006/07 resources, health, of people in general and backward class infrastructure; education; (ii) Children education, agriculture (children, women, Dalit, neglected and and women; (iii) Agriculture; (iv) and tourism down trodden) and remote area people Natural heritage; (v) Health services; development in particular; Increase in agricultural (vi) Institutional development and and industrial production; Tourism and development management; (vii) infrastructure development; Proper Tourism; (viii) Industrial management and utilization of natural development; (ix) Development of resources. backward class and region; (x) Sports and culture Sindhuli Mahottari Ramechhap 2000/01 – Sustainable social, Integrated development in (i) Physical infrastructure (road, 2,131,888 2006/07 economic and socio-economic aspects; Overall electricity, communication), sustainable development of district by mobilizing alternative energy, residence and town development (Able, local resources; Development of human development, industry, mining and Prosperous and resources and information system; tourism; (ii) Education, culture and Civilized Capacity enhancement of local bodies sports; (III) Drinking
    [Show full text]
  • Nepal Earthquake District Profile - Sindhupalchok OSOCC Assessment Cell 08.05.2015
    Nepal Earthquake District Profile - Sindhupalchok OSOCC Assessment Cell 08.05.2015 This report is produced by the OSOCC Assessment Cell based on secondary data from multiplce sources, including the Government of Nepal, UNDAC, United Nations Agencies, non-governmental organisation and media sources. I. Situation Overview Sindhupalchok is one of the worst-affected districts as a result of the earthquake that took place on the 25th April. While the initial epicentre of the earthquake was in Gorkha district, the highest magnitude (6.7) aftershock took place in Sindupolchok district 17km south of Kadari (USGS 2015). As of 7 May, 3057 people were dead and 860 are injured. 3000 people remain unaccounted for. Many VDCs have still not been reached due to remoteness and accessibility both in terms of roads and telecommunications (GoN 8 May). According to district authorities 63,885 houses are severely and 2,751 houses are moderately damaged. Based on government reporting on damaged houses as of 6th May an estimated 109,000 people (Ministry of Home Affairs 7th May) are affected (40% of district population as per the 2011 Census). Around 90,000 people have been identified as in need of assistance based on reporting at the VDC level. This figure is however unconfirmed and represents merely a preliminary estimate based on a combination of reports from a range of sources providing information on needs at the VDC level1 (pls. see below map for an illustration of aggregated number of reported people in need). 1 . Sources include Humanitarian agencies sit-reps, assessment reports, government data, social and news media.
    [Show full text]