Japanese Contributions to Reconstruction and Recovery in Sindhupalchowk

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Japanese Contributions to Reconstruction and Recovery in Sindhupalchowk Seminar on Sustainable Recovery: Experience Sharing between Nepal and Japan Japanese Contributions to Reconstruction and Recovery in Sindhupalchowk 17 January 2019 JICA Nepal Our Support for EQ Recovery Based on the Build Back Better (BBB) concept, a wide range of support has been provided since immediately after the earthquake in April 2015. • Housing Reconstruction • School Reconstruction • Rebuilding Local Public Infrastructure & Facilities • Livelihood Recovery in the Affected Communities • Hazard Maps • District-Level Recovery Planning • Rehabilitation of Cultural Heritage • Earthquake Risk Assessment for Kathmandu Valley 2 As of January 2019 3 1. Hazard Maps Enlargement of Hazard Map (Tatopani) Source: JICA Project Team Enlargement of Hazard Map (Barhabise) 2. District Rehabilitation and Recovery Plan Consultative Process for RRP Formulation ・Preliminary Workshop: Jun.24, 2016 Contents:Explanation of PDDP and RRP, viewpoint of reconstruction ・Cluster Workshop: Aug. 1-10, 2016 Contents: Issue setting in 8 regions in the district ・Vision Workshop :Sep. 25-26, 2016 Contents:District reconstruction vision setting ・Sectoral Committee :Nov. 16-17, 2016 Contents: Action list for 5 sectors of PDDP ・Planning Workshop: Nov.22-24,2016 Contents:PDDP Action list elaboration, introduction of the example of reconstruction ・Sectoral Committee :Feb. 8-9, 2017 Contents:RRP Action list elaboration ・Final Presentation: Feb.10, 2017 Contents:Introduction of Draft RRP, introduction of overview of PDDP - Approval of RRP: March 8, 2017 by Board meeting of DDC Sindhupalchowk District’s Vision “ Safe, Prosperous and Beautiful Sindhupalchowk” Planning Period : 2016- 2026 (10 years) Basic Policy Recovery of Daily Lives Housing Reconstruction, Restoration of Public Services ( Administration, Health, Education and Social Welfare), Livelihood Restoration of Vulnerable population Building Resilient District Structure Utilization of Hazard Map, Restoration of Resilient Infrastructure, Establishment of DRR System Recovery and Development of Regional Economy Restoration of Agriculture, Restoration of Tourism, Restoration of Cottage and Small Industries 3. Rebuilding Local Infrastructure and Facilities 0 20 km Source: Prepared by the Project Team based 7 on Map of Survey Department Nepal Thalkharka Actual Layout Rehabilitation of Water Majhuwa CC Transmission System in Chautara Thalkharka CC By Grant Aid project & QIPs • Renewal of pipeline totally 21.8 km long Holche CC Chitre CC • Applied seismic resistant pipe material • 5952 beneficiaries • Completed in July 2018 Syaule Junction Legend Collection Chamber (CC) Pressure Breaking Chamber Water Treatment Plant Reservoir Thalkharka Line Majhuwa Line Holche Line WTP 0 1 2 3km District Offices DADO Office, Chautara WCO Office, Chautara Local Government Offices & Community Center Thokarpa VDC Irkhu CTC Maneshwara VDC 9 Agricultural Facilities Small Farmer Agriculture Product Collection Centre Bhotechaur Road & Seed Storage in Bhotechaur Irrigation Facilities in Ichok Seed Storage Seed Storage Seed Storage in Irkhu in Kiwool in Phulpingdanda 10 4. Livelihood Recovery Support Improved vegetable farming for women’s groups • Location: 6 VDCs in Sindhupalchowk • Beneficiaries: 270 people Improvement of maize farming practices • Location: 6 VDCs in Sindhupalchowk • Beneficiaries: 225 people Quality seeds production • Location: 5 VDCs in Sindhupalchowk • Beneficiaries: 218 people • Facility: Construction of seeds storage 11 5. Housing Reconstruction JICA Target Area – Time Series(As of 26 December 2018) 100.0% PA Signing, 98.9% 1st Tranche 1st Tranche, 98.6% 90.0% 2nd Tranche Reconstruction Start, 94.3% 3rd Tranche 80.0% 2nd Tranche, 89.4% PA Signing Reconstruction Completion, 75.8% Reconstruction Start 70.0% 3rd Tranche, 68.5% Reconstruction Completion 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Jul Jul Jul Jul Oct Oct Oct Oct Jan Apr Jan Apr Jan Apr Jan Feb Mar Jun Feb Mar Jun Feb Mar Jun Feb Mar Sep Dec Sep Dec Sep Dec Sep Dec Nov Nov Nov Nov May Aug May Aug May Aug May Aug April June 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 12 Housing Reconstruction Status JICA Target Area – By Ward (As of 26 December 2018) 100.0% 90.0% 80.0% 70.0% Good progress in Reconstruction 60.0% and Tranche Distribution 50.0% Maximum % of completion 40.0% certificate 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 5(Gati) 6(Gati) 8(Irkhu) 2(Batase) 3(Batase) 2(Karthali) 9(Jyamire) 6(Mankha) 7(Mankha) 8(Mankha) 4(Thakani) 9(Ramche) 3(Haibung) 3(Dhuskun) 5(Chautara) 4(Kubhinde) 9(Bhotasipa) 5(Sindhukot) 3(Barhabise) 4(Barhabise) 12(Bansbari) 2(Fulpingkot) 3(Fulpingkot) 9(Kadambas) 11(Melamchi) 10(Sikharpur) 7(Dubachour) 8(Dubachour) 6(Pipaldanda) 10(Bhotasipa) 1(Bhotechaur) 2(Bhotechaur) 13(Fatakshila) 6(Talamarang) Sindhupalchok 10(Sangachok) 11(Sangachok) 12(Sangachok) 8(Maneswnara) 7(Sanusiruwari) 1(Syaule Bazar) 4(Fulpingdanda) 5(Fulpingdanda) 13(Thulo Sirubari) 14(Thulo Sirubari) Balefi Barhabise Chautara Tripura Indrawati Melamchi GP NP Sangachokgadhi NP sundari GP GP GP First Tranche % Second Tranche% Third Tranche % PA signed Start Plinth 1st Inspection Roof Band 2nd Inspection Completion Final Inspection Completion Certificate 13 Community Mobilization Program (CMP) 1) Contents of 1st Phase CMP (Up to March 2018) Orientation Community Technical Assistance Meeting by Mobile Mason for Community Based selected at the each Reconstruction for all the house + + community Committee(CBRC) owners to house owners and unskilled labors 14 Community Mobilization Program (CMP) 2) Contents of 2nd Phase CMP (From April 2018) Technical Ward Level Issue Specific Assistance by Coordination Community Mobile Mason selected at the Correction meeting Meeting each For non- + + + with Ward For community compliant members and Beneficiaries to house houses DLPIU who has owners and Engineers specific issue unskilled labors 15 Status of Vulnerable Beneficiaries 98.7% 100.0% 94.4% 90.4% 89.7% 86.0% 90.0% 80.0% 76.0% 73.9% 68.9% 70.0% 60.0% 57.1% 50.0% 44.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% 1st Tranche Reconstruction Start 2nd Tranche 3rd Tranche Reconstruction Complete Vulnerable Non Vulnerable Total Vulnerable In Target Area: 613 out of 41,345 beneficiaries Status of Resettlement Beneficiaries Sindhupalchok EHRP Target Description Total Area Number of resettlement beneficiaries 849 117 Number of resettlement beneficiaries receiving government support (Max. 172 36 200,0000) 7.7% 6.0% Land Purchase with 30.8% Reconstruction Started Government Support Land Purchase with own Reconstruction Not Money Started Land not Purchased 63.2% 92.3% Major Issues Related to Municipalities Status (41,345 Beneficiaries) Major Issues (As of 9th January 2019) 1. Not Started . No immediate plan to construct : 341 (15.09%) (2,260 Beneficiaries) . Migrated elsewhere : 297 (13.14%) . Out of contact /Unknown Beneficiary : 269 (11.90%) 2. Under Construction . Record keeping not completed : 5,353 (15.96%) (33,547 Beneficiaries) . DLPIU engineer not available : 3,017 (8.99%) . Building permit not completed : 2,346 (6.99%) . No immediate plan to continue 965 (2.88%) . Pending in DLPIU (GMaLI) : 817 (2.44%) 3. Completed, but with some . Record keeping not completed : 531 (14.62%) Problems . Waiting for good quality certificate : 246 (6.77%) (3,631 Beneficiaries) . Building permit not completed : 167 (4.60%) 4. Completed without any problems (1,907 Beneficiaries) Thank you for your attention. .
Recommended publications
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • WASH Cluster Nepal 4W - May 12Th 2015
    WASH Cluster Nepal 4W - May 12th 2015 Please find following the analysis of the 4W data – May 12th Introduction (Round 2) This is the second round of the 4W analysis. As this is the second round and still early in the emergency response, many agencies are still planning their interventions and caseloads, hence much of the data is understandably incomplete. In the coming week/s we will receive far more comprehensive partner data and will be able to show realistic gaps. In addition, we are receiving better affected population data and there are many ongoing assessments, the results of which will help us to understand both the response data and the affected population data and enable us to deliver a far more profound analysis of the WASH response. Please assist us as we have a lot of information gaps in the data provided so far and hence the maps are not yet providing a true picture of the response. We would like to quickly move to VDC mapping including planned/reached beneficiaries. Since the first round of reporting, agencies have provided substantially more VDC‐level data – as of today, of 740 WASH activities identified, 546 of these (74%) are matched to an identified VDC ‐ this is a big improvement from last week (which had VDC data for 192 of 445 activities, or 43%) The Highlights ・ 47 Organisations – number of organisations that reported in Round 1 and/or Round 2 of the WASH 4W ・ 206 VDCs – where WASH interventions taking place/planned (in 15 districts) 4W – WASH May 12th 2015 Water0B Spread of water activities ‐ targeted Temporary
    [Show full text]
  • TSLC PMT Result
    Page 62 of 132 Rank Token No SLC/SEE Reg No Name District Palika WardNo Father Mother Village PMTScore Gender TSLC 1 42060 7574O15075 SOBHA BOHARA BOHARA Darchula Rithachaupata 3 HARI SINGH BOHARA BIMA BOHARA AMKUR 890.1 Female 2 39231 7569013048 Sanju Singh Bajura Gotree 9 Gyanendra Singh Jansara Singh Manikanda 902.7 Male 3 40574 7559004049 LOGAJAN BHANDARI Humla ShreeNagar 1 Hari Bhandari Amani Bhandari Bhandari gau 907 Male 4 40374 6560016016 DHANRAJ TAMATA Mugu Dhainakot 8 Bali Tamata Puni kala Tamata Dalitbada 908.2 Male 5 36515 7569004014 BHUVAN BAHADUR BK Bajura Martadi 3 Karna bahadur bk Dhauli lawar Chaurata 908.5 Male 6 43877 6960005019 NANDA SINGH B K Mugu Kotdanda 9 Jaya bahadur tiruwa Muga tiruwa Luee kotdanda mugu 910.4 Male 7 40945 7535076072 Saroj raut kurmi Rautahat GarudaBairiya 7 biswanath raut pramila devi pipariya dostiya 911.3 Male 8 42712 7569023079 NISHA BUDHa Bajura Sappata 6 GAN BAHADUR BUDHA AABHARI BUDHA CHUDARI 911.4 Female 9 35970 7260012119 RAMU TAMATATA Mugu Seri 5 Padam Bahadur Tamata Manamata Tamata Bamkanda 912.6 Female 10 36673 7375025003 Akbar Od Baitadi Pancheswor 3 Ganesh ram od Kalawati od Kalauti 915.4 Male 11 40529 7335011133 PRAMOD KUMAR PANDIT Rautahat Dharhari 5 MISHRI PANDIT URMILA DEVI 915.8 Male 12 42683 7525055002 BIMALA RAI Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Man Bahadur Rai Gauri Maya Rai Ghodghad 915.9 Female 13 42758 7525055016 SABIN AALE MAGAR Nuwakot Madanpur 4 Raj Kumar Aale Magqar Devi Aale Magar Ghodghad 915.9 Male 14 42459 7217094014 SOBHA DHAKAL Dolakha GhangSukathokar 2 Bishnu Prasad Dhakal
    [Show full text]
  • NEPAL: Sindhupalchok District - Technical Assistance: Short Training Coverage by VDC (As of 25 April 2017) HRRP
    NEPAL: Sindhupalchok District - Technical Assistance: Short Training Coverage by VDC (as of 25 April 2017) HRRP No. of Trained Masons through DUDBC Curriculum by POs Legend Rasuwa JICA/TCN 1459 NRCS 866 SABAL/UCEP-N 474 District Boundary CARE-N/CSRC 452 VDC/Municipality Boundary SCI/TUKI CHINA 428 ARSOW-ASF 366 No. of masons trained PLAN 239 OXFAM/MANK/Janahit 217 549 CA 192 201 - 400 UNDP 184 101 - 200 MC/CDECF 179 CARITAS-N 160 Upto 100 PWJ/ISAP 121 No masons trained BC/ARSOW 83 HELP/TUKI 66 Gumba INCLUSIVE 51 Helumbu Baruwa Motang 86 LWF/GMSP 30 Total trained masons: 5,567 Remaining planned figure: 235 0 82 89 Gloche 90 Note: Tatopani This map highlights the number of masons trained 28 through short training curriculum in Sindhupalchok district. The figure of masons trained was sourced form Thanpalkot HRRP 4W-R30. Further, the labels in the map (Example Nuwakot 154 :Baramchi - 55) means that 55 masons have been trained in the respective VDC/Municipality. Ichok Kiwool Listikot 0 27 ThampalChhap Sindhupalchok 40 155 Gunsakot 97 Banskharka 55 Pangtang Map Doc Name: Short_T_Sindhupalchok_R30 Palchok Fulpingkatti GLIDE Number: EQ-2015-000048-NPL Mahankal BhoteNamlang 30 0 0 Creation Date: 25 Apr 2017 0 30 Dubachour Lagarche Baramchi 114 59 55 Map Data Source: HRRP 4W-R25 (as of 25 Apr 2017) Thakani Dhuyang Marming Selang Hagam 30 Geo Data Source: DoS, MoFALD; 123 40 Web Resource: www.hrrpnepal.org SipalKavre 0 78 65 SyauleBazar Jalbire Melamchi N.P. Gati Haibung 97 0 Nawalpur 59 81 549 Batase 186 91 Maneswor Karthali Bahrabise Bhotechaur 90 84 Fulpingkot 88 ¯ Ghorthali 60 32 Badegau Kunchok 31 (1 : 250,000) 307 375 Chautara N.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Melamchi Municipality, Nepal Situation Analysis for Green Municipal Development
    Melamchi Municipality, Nepal Situation Analysis for Green Municipal Development May 2018 1 a Global Green Growth Institute May 2018 Global Green Growth Institute Jeongdong Building 19F 21-15 Jeongdong-gil Jung-gu, Seoul 04518 Republic of Korea Recommended citation: GGGI (2018). Melamchi Municipality, Nepal: Situation Analysis for Green Municipal Development. Seoul: Global Green Growth Institute. This report is one of a set of seven situation analyses of the Nepalese municipalities of Belkotgadhi, Dakshinkali, Mahalaxmi, Melamchi, Namobuddha, Palungtar and Thaha. All seven reports are available at www.gggi.org/country/nepal/ The Global Green Growth Institute does not make any warranty, either express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or any third party’s use or the results of such use of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed of the information contained herein or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the Global Green Growth Institute. Design and printing by Pentagram, Nepal. Cover photo of Melamchi by Robic Upadhayay. Melamchi Municipality, Nepal Situation Analysis for Green Municipal Development May 2018 Acknowledgements This situational analysis and accompanying report were who provided detailed technical support during the prepared by the Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI) in preparation of the seven reports. GGGI would also Nepal under its Green Municipal Development Program. like to thank the municipal leaders, in particular the GGGI and the program team would like to express their mayors and chief administrative officers (CAOs) of gratitude to the Ministry of Forests and Environment each of the municipalities of Belkotgadhi, Dakshinkali, (MoFE), and in particular to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Water Resources Management & Freshwater
    Philanthropy Support Services, Inc. Assessment Bringing skills, experience, contacts and passion to the worlds of global philanthropy and international development of Water Resources Management & Freshwater Biodiversity in Nepal Final Report George F. Taylor II, Mark R. Weinhold, Susan B. Adams, Nawa Raj Khatiwada, Tara Nidhi Bhattarai and Sona Shakya Prepared for USAID/Nepal by: United States Forest Service International Programs Office, Philanthropy Support Services (PSS) Inc. and Nepal Development Research Institute (NDRI) September 15, 2014 Disclaimer: The views expressed in this document are the views of the authors. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government ! ! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Assessment Team wishes to acknowledge the support of: ! The dynamic USAID Environment Team and its supporters across the USAID Mission and beyond, particularly Bronwyn Llewellyn and Shanker Khagi who provided exemplary support to all phases of the Assessment process. ! USAID/Nepal senior staff, including Director Beth Dunford and SEED Acting Director Don Clark for allowing Bronwyn, Shanker and SEED Summer Intern Madeline Carwile to accompany the Assessment Team on its full five day field trip. Seeing what we saw together, and having a chance to discuss it as we travelled from site to site and during morning and evening meals, provided a very important shared foundation for the Assessment exercise. ! NDRI, including the proactive support of Executive Director Jaya Gurung and the superb logistical support from Sona Shakya. ! The United States Forest Service International Programs Office staff, particularly Sasha Gottlieb, Cynthia Mackie and David Carlisle, without whom none of this would have happened.
    [Show full text]
  • N E P a L Kathmandu ! CEN\TRAL
    86°0'0"E o LANGTANG Helicopter LZ Highway Int. Boundary Accessibility Source Primary road District bound. Within walking 5 distance from road L !f UNHAS Sec. road VDC boundary 1 Within walking !f USMC A 0 distance from 4X4 road R a s u w a f 2 ! NPL Military No road access P e Data Sources: WFP, LC, UNGIWG, Survey Department of Nepal, Date Created: 04 June 2015 Prepared by: LogCluster GeoNames, © OpenStreetMap contributors, E Assessments, UNHAS, USMC, NPL Military, ICIMOD n Contact: [email protected] Map Reference: The boundaries and names and the designations used on this map do u Website: www.logcluster.org NPL_OP_sindupalchokAccessMap_A3L not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. N J - FAR-WESTERN C H I N A MID-WESTERN p Helambu WESTERN a Pop: 2748 N E P A L Kathmandu ! CEN\TRAL M I N D I A EASTERN Gumba s Pop: s Baruwa Bhotang 3677 e Pop: 1962 Pop: 2767 0 2.5 5 10 c Melamchi Ghyang Tembathau c Tembathau Max Heli: Mi-8 f Kilometers f Sunchaur Max Heli: ? f! ± ! A ! f Tarkeghang ! Golche f N Tarkeygyang f f ! " 0 k Ghangkharka ! ' ! 0 f ° Max Heli: 8 ! 2 o Mi-8 Simbakharka h f Tatopani Golche ! G318 c f Pop: 7259 N u w a k o t Bothang Pop: 3870 ! Kamsking l Gumba Beilgaur f 3 f f! Gumba f 0 a !! ! H Singarche Baouara Bhotang Max Heli: ? !f Kodari p ! !f Max Heli:T ?hap!alkot NanLkihdairkLaidrLi arke Pop: 2824 f u Max Heli: ? !f ! f Bolde Kutumsang Rewar ! C H I N A h ! Ichok Kiul Max Heli: Mi-8 f Sanjagaun f Pop: 3161 Chibihang ! f Lissti Rasithau Pop: 5773 f ! f d Max Heli: ? ! f ! Ghunsakot f ! ! Pop: 2038
    [Show full text]
  • Dead Injured Rescued Missing
    MA606_v03 Rasuwa Dead Rasuwa Missing 0 - 25 0 - 2 26 - 100 3 - 8 Helambu Helambu (32) (9) Nepal: Earthquake 101 - 400 Gumba 9 - 32 Baruwa Baruwa Bhotang Gumba Bhotang (220) (15) Emergency - (51) (33) No data (18) No data Details of the affect on Nuwakot Tatopani Nuwakot Tatopani the population in (14) Golche Golche Sindhupalchok Thapalkot (77) Thapalkot (49) (4) Ichok Kiul Ichok Kiul (as at 7 May 2015) (120) (80) Ghuyang Ghunsakot (11) Ghuyang Ghunsakot (Thanpalchap) (46) Listokot (Thanpalchap) (5) Listokot Banskharka (113) (48) Banskharka (10) Palchok (142) Pangtang Palchok (15) Pangtang Bhotenamlang Phulpingkatti Mahangkal (16) (34) Mahangkal (2) Bhotenamlang Phulpingkatti Four maps showing the numbers of (83) (58) (37) Lagarche Dhuyang Lagarche Dhuyang Dubachaur Baramchae Dubachaur Baramchae (26) (3) dead, missing, injured, and rescued (160) (26) (115) (1) Hagam Thakani Selang Hagam Marming Thakani Selang Marming per Village Development Committe (35) Sinpal (57) (51) (23) (4) Sinpal Kavre Syaule Gati Melamchi Melamchi Jalbire Kavre Syaule Jalbire Gati (VDC) or Municipality as reported by Haibung (73) (62) (30) (28) Municipality Municipality Nawalpur Batase Haibung (10) Karthali (24) Nawalpur Batase (293) (40) (115) Maneswar Maneswar Barhabise Karthali the District Disaster Rescue Bhotechaur Phulpingkot Barhabise (21) Bhotechaur (46) (0) Phulpingkot (38) Kunchok (59) (17) Ghorthali Committee (DDRC). Bandegaun Chautara Bandegaun Kunchok Chautara Ghorthali (122) Ramche (6) Ramche (103) Municipality Mangkha (16) Municipality Mangkha Gunsakun
    [Show full text]
  • Transitional Project Implementation Support for Emergency Reconstruction Projects Final Report Project Target Area Area Target Project
    NATIONAL RECONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL TRANSITIONAL PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT FOR EMERGENCY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 2019 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL CO., LTD. MOHRI, ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES, INC. 4R INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF JAPAN JR 19-005 NATIONAL RECONSTRUCTION AUTHORITY FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF NEPAL TRANSITIONAL PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION SUPPORT FOR EMERGENCY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 2019 JAPAN INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION AGENCY ORIENTAL CONSULTANTS GLOBAL CO., LTD. MOHRI, ARCHITECT & ASSOCIATES, INC. INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF JAPAN Transitional Project Implementation Support for Emergency Reconstruction Projects Final Report Project Target Area Area Target Project Transitional Project Implementation Support for Emergency Reconstruction Projects Final Report Project Target Area: Gorkha Transitional Project Implementation Support for Emergency Reconstruction Projects Final Report Project Target Area: Sindhupalchok Area: Target Project Transitional Project Implementation Support for Emergency Reconstruction Projects Final Report Mason Training Mason Training Theatrical Performance at HO Training Public Awareness Campaign, in Gorkha PA Signing, in Hansapur, Ajirkot GP Enrolment Camp Photographs of Project Activities Transitional Project Implementation Support for Emergency Reconstruction Projects Final Report TOT DLPIU Engineers CBRC Orientation, in Irkhu, Chautara Sangachokgadhi NP Community Meeting
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Region of Sindhupalchok District, Central Nepal
    Study on the Bryofloral Diversity, Their Current Status and Conservation Issues in Central and South- eastern Region of Sindhupalchok District, Central Nepal Final Report Submitted to Rufford Small Grant Foundation, U.K. Nirmala Pradhan Kathmandu Nepal February, 2015 Summary First and Second Rufford Small Grant Programs (Ref. Id: 10.09.07 and ID: 10111-2) were implemented at the northern parts of Sindhupalchok district of central Nepal within the elevation range of 1400 – 4000 m which were highly successful to bring a long list of diverse species of bryophytes of the midland and highland areas. These two studies covered the elevation of 1400 to 4000 m where different habitat types were noted and 16 new records of this plant were also made that updated the country’s overall list. Tourism prospect in northern parts of this district was also assessed in these studies. The current study under the Booster Grant (ID:12663-B) was to give continuity to the previous works so was emphasized mostly to unexplored vast areas of the south, east and central parts of this district. This study came up with many interesting findings which revealed out a list of 160 species of bryophytes categorized into 13 orders, 42 families and 75 genera. All the three classes of Bryophytes were represented in this study with new records of 22 species. Rich diversity of the newly recorded species has been noticed at 800 -1400 m of elevations. Of them 14 species belonged to the class Hepaticae and rest 8 species to Musci. Of the recorded species, the class Anthocerotae represented 4 species, Hepaticae 61 and Musci 95 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Tory Monitoring and Evaluation, Knowledge Management and Communication Are the Cross-Cutting Themes Across Its All Program Components
    UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME Nepal Comprehensive Disaster Risk Management Programme Terms of Reference for conducting "Final Review of Results Achieved under Resilient Communities through Building Back Better project being implemented in Sindhupalchowk and Dolakha district under ECHO funding Sindhupalchowk" Background: UNDP has been implementing Comprehensive Disaster Risk Management Programme (CDRMP) since 2011 in close coordination with the Ministry of Home Affairs (as focal ministry) and other concerned ministries including the National Planning Commission. The formulated as part of the Strategic Partnership Framework signed between the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP)/ Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery (BCPR) and UNDP and in accordance with the Nepal Risk Reduction Consortium, aims to strengthen the institutional and legislative aspects of disaster risk management (DRM) in Nepal. Its areas of interventions: institutional and legal system in DRM, climate risk management (CRM), community-based disaster risk management, emergency preparedness, response and early recovery (EPRER) and ultimately strengthen the overall system of DRM in Nepal. Participatory monitoring and evaluation, knowledge management and communication are the cross-cutting themes across its all program components. The April 2015 earthquake exposed the high vulnerability of rural poor in most of the 31 affected districts (14 districts declared by the government as the most affected ones). The ministry of Home Affairs (MoHA) figures indicate casualty of 8,979 with 199 people still missing, while PDNA notes that the number of houses fully or partially damaged exceeded 7,50,000 in all of the 14 most affected districts. The situation after removal of construction debris at site depicted that there was tendency of repairing the house or reconstructing the house using Build as Usual practices.
    [Show full text]
  • A Baseline Study on Socio-Economic Status of Ichok & Simle Vdc of Sindupalchowk District 2017
    A BASELINE STUDY ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC STATUS OF ICHOK & SIMLE VDC OF SINDUPALCHOWK DISTRICT 2017 Conducted By: Supported By: i A Baseline Study on Socio-economic Status of Ichok and Simle VDC of Sindhupalchowk District 2017 Team Leader Dipak Kumar Biswakarma, Executive Director, SDPI – Nepal Research Coordinator Dipak Sharma, Campaign Coordinator, SDPI – Nepal Editor and Research Coordinator Anush Subedhi, Communication and Documentation Officer, SDPI – Nepal Enumerators Ananta Karki Basanta Chapagain Hom Shrestha Research Conducted By: Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI – Nepal) Kathmandu, Nepal Phone: 0977 01 4784288 Email: [email protected] Website: www.sdpi.org.np Copy Right Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI – Nepal) This reported shall not be reproduced in form of printing or any other means for the commercial purpose. However, the essential portions of the report may be used for the educational and intellectual purposes by quoting courtesy of the source. ii FORWARD Baseline Study on Socio-economic Status of Ichok & Simle of Sindupalchowk, 2073 was survey report is prepared by Sustainable Development policy Institute (SDPI). Funding for this study was provided by Community Self Reliance Center (CSRC) who works for land and agrarian rights. The finding mentioned here are solely collected through survey and do not necessarily reflect view of author or Sustainable Development policy Institute. Additional information about the this study or survey research can be obtained from the Sustainable Development policy Institute, Baneshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal; Telephone: (977-1) 01 4784288 E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], Information about the SDPI and its program may be obtained from E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], Internet: http://www.sdpi.org.np.
    [Show full text]