Joey Pomperada Elec 424-81 3/4/03 Debye

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Joey Pomperada Elec 424-81 3/4/03 Debye Joey Pomperada Elec 424-81 3/4/03 Debye Peter Joseph William Debye, a Dutch-American chemical physicist, was one of the most renowned scientists of the modern world. His developments in the concepts of polar molecules, methods for studying chemical substances with x-rays, and the Debye- Huckel theory has paved the way for future discoveries in physics, chemistry, and electrical engineering. Debye was born with the name Petrus Josephus Wilhelmus Debije to Joannes Wilhelmus Debije and Maria Ruemkens, on March 28, 1884 in Maastrict, the Netherlands. He is better known by the Anglicized form of his name, Peter Joseph William (or Wilhelm) Debye. His father worked as a foreman at a metal ware manufacturer, and his mother was a theater cashier. He also had a younger sister. For his primary and secondary education, Debye attended the Hoogere Burger School in Maastricht from 1896 to 1901. At seventeen years old he enrolled at the Technische Hochschule in Aachen, across the Dutch-German border. Debye completed his undergraduate studies at Aachen and received his degree in electrical engineering in 1905 (Biography Resource Center). One of Debye's teachers at Aachen was the great German physicist Arnold Sommerfeld. In 1906, Debye joined Sommerfield as an assistant when Sommerfield was called to the chair of the theoretical physics at the University of Münich. Debye earned his doctorate in physics in 1908, and he continued his research there until 1911. His thesis was on the subject of radiation and its effects on spherical particles with a variety of refractive properties. In his final year there, he served as a lecturer in physics. In 1911, Debye was offered a chair of theoretical physics at the University of Zürich. This was especially impressive because Albert Einstein previously held this position. During his year at the University, Debye studied the dipole moment of molecules. The dipole moment is a molecule’s tendency to rotate in an external magnetic field: a property that is a function of the distribution of electric charge in the molecule. In 1912, Debye continued his research on the dipole of molecules at the University of Utrecht. By 1914, Debye took a position at the University of Göttingen as professor of theoretical and experimental physics. It was at this University where he conducted his most important work: studying x-ray diffraction. The use of x-rays to determine the structure of materials had been developed only a few years earlier by Max Laue and by William Henry Bragg and William Lawrence Bragg. Debye, working with a colleague named Paul Scherrer, discovered that x-ray diffraction could also be used with powders. This solved the most serious problem with the Laue-Bragg discoveries, which was that x-ray diffraction required the preparation of relatively large crystals (Britannica). Debye returned to the University of Zürich in 1920 where he worked as professor of experimental physics and director of the physics laboratory at the Federal Institute of Technology (Macmillan). During his tenure at Zürich, Debye developed the theory of electrolytic dissociation with another colleague, Erich Hückel. The Swedish chemist Svante Arrhenius made new discoveries on the behavior of electrolytes, substances that conduct electricity through the movement of ions, in the late 1880s. Arrhenius had argued that molecules break up spontaneously in solution, with the liberated ions becoming electrolytic agents. Debye found a different approach to the problem by way of redefining the mathematical application to physicochemical data, instead of to each possible configuration of ions (Britannica). He proposed that electrolytes must dissociate almost completely in solution because they are already completely ionic in the solid state. He added that the reason they do not behave as a solid in a solution is that each ion has become surrounded by other ions of opposite charge. The movement of ions through a solution is disturbed by the dragging effect of the surrounding ions. Working with Hückel, Debye generated a mathematical theory that precisely described the behavior of electrolytes in solution (Encyclopedia Americana). In 1923, Debye also developed a theory that mathematically explained the Compton effect - the way the wavelengths of x- rays change when they collide with electrons - and provided additional support for the wave-particle theory of electromagnetic radiation. He continued these studies when he moved to the University of Leipzig from 1927 to 1934 and then to the University of Berlin in 1934. Debye received the Nobel Prize in chemistry in 1936 for his contributions to physics, chemistry, and quantum mechanics, including "his contributions to our knowledge of molecular structure through the investigations of dipole moments and on the diffraction of x rays and electrons in gases" (The Nobel Foundation). In Germany, the rise of National Socialism caused an increase of political issues in German research. Debye was soon required to become a German citizen in order to retain his position in Berlin. He decided to accept an appointment as professor of chemistry and head of the department at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, in 1940 and became a U.S. citizen by 1946. Debye officially retired from his duties at Cornell in 1952, but he continued his research in the field of polymer chemistry for another decade. During this time, Debye was much in demand as a lecturer, both in the United Sates and Europe, and remained active in the scientific community until the age of 81(Macmillan). Debye died of a heart attack, on November 2, 1966, at his home in Ithaca. Peter Debye is perhaps best known for his contribution to the theory of electrolytic dissociation, the Debye-Hückel theory, announced in 1923. Most of Peter Debye's professional work involved the application of physical laws to the structure and behavior of molecules. In the 1910s, he determined the dipole moments of many molecules, obtaining results that allowed him to calculate the polarity of such molecules. In recognition of this work, the unit of dipole moment, the Debye, was named in his honor (Biography Resource Center). During his lifetime, Debye received many honors and awards. Debye was awarded the 1936 Nobel Prize in chemistry for this research. He also received the Rumford Medal of the Royal Society in 1930, the Lorentz Medal of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Sciences in 1935, the Franklin Medal of the Franklin Institute in 1937, the Faraday Medal in 1949, the Gibbs Medal in 1949, the Kendall Award in 1957, the Nichols Medal in 1963, and the Priestley Medal of the American Chemical Society in 1963. Bibliography Prock McKonkey. Topics in Chemical Physics. New York: El Sevier Publishing Company, 1962. Harkins, William D. The Physical Chemistry of Surface Films. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corporation, 1952. “Peter Debye – Biography.” Nobel e-Museum: The Official Web Site of The Nobel Foundation. 2002. The Nobel Foundation. http://www.nobel.se/chemistry/laureates/1936/debye-bio.html. Macmillan Encyclopedia of Chemistry. New York: Simon & Schuster and Prentice Hall International, 1997, Vol. 2. “Debye, Peter (1184-1966).” p. 457. The Encyclopedia Americana: International Edition. Danbury, CT: Grolis Inc., 1999, Vol. 8. “Debye.” p. 582 The New Encyclopedia Britannica. Chicago, Illinois: Encyclopedia Britannica Inc., 2002, Vol. 3. “Debye, Peter.” p. 946-947. “Peter Debye – Biographical Essay.” Biography Resource Center. 2001. Daniel Library, The Citadel – DISCUS http://library- cat.citadel.edu:2056/servlet/BioRC?ste=4&AI=131732&NA=Debye&vrsn=2.0&ca =1&tbst=prp&srchtp=name&n=10&locID=thecitadel&OP=contains. .
Recommended publications
  • Metagenomics Approaches for the Detection and Surveillance of Emerging and Recurrent Plant Pathogens
    microorganisms Review Metagenomics Approaches for the Detection and Surveillance of Emerging and Recurrent Plant Pathogens Edoardo Piombo 1,2 , Ahmed Abdelfattah 3,4 , Samir Droby 5, Michael Wisniewski 6,7, Davide Spadaro 1,8,* and Leonardo Schena 9 1 Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Torino, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Forest Mycology and Plant Pathology, Uppsala Biocenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, P.O. Box 7026, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden 3 Institute of Environmental Biotechnology, Graz University of Technology, Petersgasse 12, 8010 Graz, Austria; [email protected] 4 Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, University of Stockholm, Svante Arrhenius väg 20A, 11418 Stockholm, Sweden 5 Department of Postharvest Science, Agricultural Research Organization (ARO), The Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion 7505101, Israel; [email protected] 6 U.S. Department of Agriculture—Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Kearneysville, WV 25430, USA; [email protected] 7 Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Technical University, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA 8 AGROINNOVA—Centre of Competence for the Innovation in the Agroenvironmental Sector, University of Torino, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy 9 Department of Agriculture, Università Mediterranea, 89122 Reggio Calabria, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0116708942 Abstract: Globalization has a dramatic effect on the trade and movement of seeds, fruits and vegeta- bles, with a corresponding increase in economic losses caused by the introduction of transboundary Citation: Piombo, E.; Abdelfattah, A.; plant pathogens. Current diagnostic techniques provide a useful and precise tool to enact surveillance Droby, S.; Wisniewski, M.; Spadaro, protocols regarding specific organisms, but this approach is strictly targeted, while metabarcoding D.; Schena, L.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Favorite Chemists?
    ability and on uncertainty evaluation of chemical mea- surement results. Participants can take this expertise back to their home countries and/or become regional coordinators for IMEP in their respective countries. In collaboration with EUROMET and CCQM, IMEP samples are offered for the organization of EUROMET key or supplementary comparisons and, where appro- priate, for the organization of CCQM key comparisons or pilot studies. In its role as a neutral, impartial international evalu- ation program, IMEP displays existing problems in chemical measurement. IRMM is dedicated to tackling this problem and will, where possible, collaborate with international bodies, education and accreditation au- thorities, and NMIs to achieve more reliable measure- ments and contribute to setting up an internationally structured measurement system. Ellen Poulsen (Denmark) preparing graphs for the IMEP-9 participants’ report on trace elements in water. Europe’s Favorite Chemists? Choosing Europe’s Top 100 Chemists: birth of Christ is quite forgotten in general. An addi- A Difficult Task tional irony lies in the fact that recent evidence from history, archaeology, and astronomy suggests a birthdate This article by Prof. Colin Russell (Department of His- about seven years earlier, so the real millennium came tory of Science and Technology, Open University, and went unnoticed in the early 1990s. However that Milton Keynes, England MK6 7AA, UK) was com- may be, the grand spirit of revelry and bonhomie can- missioned by Chemistry in Britain and published by not be quenched by such mundane considerations, and that magazine in Vol. 36, pp. 50–52, February 2000. celebration there shall be. Nor are societies to be left The list of Europe’s 100 distinguished chemists was behind in the general euphoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Transport and Reactivity in Confinement
    Molecular Transport and Reactivity in Confinement THU NGOC LE A dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University College London Department of Chemical Engineering Primary Advisor: Professor Alberto Striolo December 2016 Declaration I, Thu Ngoc Le confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that they have been properly indicated in the thesis. 1 To my parents Phuong Le and Thu Do Kính tặng bố mẹ vì tình yêu thương vô bờ dành cho con 2 Acknowledgements It is my genuine pleasure to express my deepest thanks and gratitude to my advisor Professor Alberto Striolo, whose expertise, support and guidance have helped me tremendously in completing my PhD study. I would like to extend my sincere gratitude to Professor Heath Turner from University of Alabama for his generosity, kindness and encouragement on the most difficult topic of my study. I would like to give immense appreciation to Dr. Paul Ashby from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Professor Roy Penny from University of Arkansas for teaching me, not only valuable academic knowledge, but also how to be a better person. Thank you for having much faith in me. This thesis is especially dedicated to my Father and Mother, who have always been my inexorable stronghold. Being brought to the world as your daughter is the upmost divine blessing I could ever ask for in this life. To my sisters Han Le and Tran Le, I am thankful for being my upright idols, my greatest supports, and my best friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Pauling-Linus.Pdf
    NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES L I N U S C A R L P A U L I N G 1901—1994 A Biographical Memoir by J A C K D. D UNITZ Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1997 NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON D.C. LINUS CARL PAULING February 28, 1901–August 19, 1994 BY JACK D. DUNITZ INUS CARL PAULING was born in Portland, Oregon, on LFebruary 28, 1901, and died at his ranch at Big Sur, California, on August 19, 1994. In 1922 he married Ava Helen Miller (died 1981), who bore him four children: Linus Carl, Peter Jeffress, Linda Helen (Kamb), and Edward Crellin. Pauling is widely considered the greatest chemist of this century. Most scientists create a niche for themselves, an area where they feel secure, but Pauling had an enormously wide range of scientific interests: quantum mechanics, crys- tallography, mineralogy, structural chemistry, anesthesia, immunology, medicine, evolution. In all these fields and especially in the border regions between them, he saw where the problems lay, and, backed by his speedy assimilation of the essential facts and by his prodigious memory, he made distinctive and decisive contributions. He is best known, perhaps, for his insights into chemical bonding, for the discovery of the principal elements of protein secondary structure, the alpha-helix and the beta-sheet, and for the first identification of a molecular disease (sickle-cell ane- mia), but there are a multitude of other important contri- This biographical memoir was prepared for publication by both The Royal Society of London and the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
    [Show full text]
  • April 17-19, 2018 the 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates the 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018
    april 17-19, 2018 The 2018 Franklin Institute Laureates The 2018 Franklin Institute AWARDS CONVOCATION APRIL 17–19, 2018 Welcome to The Franklin Institute Awards, the a range of disciplines. The week culminates in a grand United States’ oldest comprehensive science and medaling ceremony, befitting the distinction of this technology awards program. Each year, the Institute historic awards program. celebrates extraordinary people who are shaping our In this convocation book, you will find a schedule of world through their groundbreaking achievements these events and biographies of our 2018 laureates. in science, engineering, and business. They stand as We invite you to read about each one and to attend modern-day exemplars of our namesake, Benjamin the events to learn even more. Unless noted otherwise, Franklin, whose impact as a statesman, scientist, all events are free, open to the public, and located in inventor, and humanitarian remains unmatched Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. in American history. Along with our laureates, we celebrate his legacy, which has fueled the Institute’s We hope this year’s remarkable class of laureates mission since its inception in 1824. sparks your curiosity as much as they have ours. We look forward to seeing you during The Franklin From sparking a gene editing revolution to saving Institute Awards Week. a technology giant, from making strides toward a unified theory to discovering the flow in everything, from finding clues to climate change deep in our forests to seeing the future in a terahertz wave, and from enabling us to unplug to connecting us with the III world, this year’s Franklin Institute laureates personify the trailblazing spirit so crucial to our future with its many challenges and opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • ARIE SKLODOWSKA CURIE Opened up the Science of Radioactivity
    ARIE SKLODOWSKA CURIE opened up the science of radioactivity. She is best known as the discoverer of the radioactive elements polonium and radium and as the first person to win two Nobel prizes. For scientists and the public, her radium was a key to a basic change in our understanding of matter and energy. Her work not only influenced the development of fundamental science but also ushered in a new era in medical research and treatment. This file contains most of the text of the Web exhibit “Marie Curie and the Science of Radioactivity” at http://www.aip.org/history/curie/contents.htm. You must visit the Web exhibit to explore hyperlinks within the exhibit and to other exhibits. Material in this document is copyright © American Institute of Physics and Naomi Pasachoff and is based on the book Marie Curie and the Science of Radioactivity by Naomi Pasachoff, Oxford University Press, copyright © 1996 by Naomi Pasachoff. Site created 2000, revised May 2005 http://www.aip.org/history/curie/contents.htm Page 1 of 79 Table of Contents Polish Girlhood (1867-1891) 3 Nation and Family 3 The Floating University 6 The Governess 6 The Periodic Table of Elements 10 Dmitri Ivanovich Mendeleev (1834-1907) 10 Elements and Their Properties 10 Classifying the Elements 12 A Student in Paris (1891-1897) 13 Years of Study 13 Love and Marriage 15 Working Wife and Mother 18 Work and Family 20 Pierre Curie (1859-1906) 21 Radioactivity: The Unstable Nucleus and its Uses 23 Uses of Radioactivity 25 Radium and Radioactivity 26 On a New, Strongly Radio-active Substance
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Chemistry Newsletter
    FALL 2014 Welcome from the Head Construction Begins on Greetings from the Department of Chemistry! This has been Science Learning Center another successful year for UGA Chemistry, and I am pleased to report more good news about our department, faculty and students. University enrollment continues to grow each year – this fall, the university enrolled 35,197 students. The increase in student numbers, particularly in the rapidly growing engineering program, has created significant extra demand for Chemistry courses. This growth in instructional demand will help us to make a case for the continued growth of our faculty numbers. As I have mentioned in the past, faculty recruiting is one of the most significant and satisfying parts of my job. Jon Amster In the last year, we were able to recruit a new organic faculty member. Prof. Eric Ferreira comes to us from Colorado State University, where he established a successful and well-funded research program in synthetic organic chemistry. Eric and four Rendering of the future Science Learning Center of his graduate students moved to Athens over the summer. While his laboratory renovations are taking place, his students are hard at work in temporary space, and his program has hit he long-awaited Science Learning Center (SLC) the ground running. You can read more about Eric and his research activities inside this has finally become a reality, with groundbreaking issue of the newsletter. We have also just completed the recruitment of an organic lecturer, ceremonies attended by Governor Nathan Deal Doug Jackson. Doug is a product of our department, where he is completing his Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilhelm Ostwald – the Scientist
    ARTICLE-IN-A-BOX Wilhelm Ostwald – The Scientist Friedrich Wilhelm Ostwald was born on September 2, 1853 at Riga, Latvia, Russia to Gottfried Ostwald, a master cooper and Elisabeth Leuckel. He was the second son to his parents who both were descended from German immigrants. He had his early education at Riga. His subsequent education was at the University of Dorpat (now Tartu, Estonia) where he enrolled in 1872. At the university he studied chemistry under the tutelage of Carl ErnstHeinrich Schmidt (1822– 1894) who again was a pupil of Justus von Liebig. Besides Schmidt, Johannes Lemberg (1842– 1902) and Arthur von Oettingen (1836–1920) who were his teachers in physical chemistry were also principal influences. It was in 1877 that he defended his thesis ‘Volumchemische Studien über Affinität’. Subsequently he taught as Privatdozent for a couple of years. During this period, his personal life saw some changes as well. He wedded Helene von Reyher (1854–1946) in 1880. With Helene, he had three sons, and two daughters. Amongst his children, Wolfgang went on to become a famous colloid chemist. On the strength of recommendation from Dorpat, Ostwald was appointed as a Professor at Riga Polytechnicum in 1882. He worked on multiple applications of the law of mass action. He also conducted measurements in chemical reaction kinetics as well as conductivity of solutions. To this end, the pyknometer was developed which was used to determine the density of liquids. He also had a thermostat built and both of these were named after him. He was prolific in his teaching and research which helped establish a school of science at the university.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Samples
    ch08_4569.qxd 8/29/06 3:31 PM Page 223 CHAPTER 8 Global Climate Change and Human Agency Inadvertent Influence and “Archimedean” Interventions J AMES R ODGER F LEMING Wallace Broecker has referred to the global climate sytem as a “massive staggering beast.” To emphasize rapid climate changes, Richard Alley added the adjective “drunken.” When I introduced Richard’s lecture at Colby last year (2005), I noted that it was not wise to anger such a beast, yet this is just what we were doing with anthropogenic emissions, which were, in effect, our sticks to prod the beast. Since then (2006), I have become interested in longer sticks, Archimedean levers to “tip” the climate system in supposedly favorable directions though geoengineering. But what would be the consequences of such intervention? TIPPING POINTS: PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL At the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco in December 2005, climate scientist James Hansen of NASA warned that the Earth’s cli- mate was nearing an unprecedented “tipping point”—a point of no return 223 ch08_4569.qxd 8/29/06 3:31 PM Page 224 INTIMATE UNIVERSALITY that could only be avoided if the “growth of greenhouse gas emissions is slowed” in the next two decades: The Earth’s climate is nearing, but has not passed, a tipping point beyond which it will be impossible to avoid climate change with far- ranging undesirable consequences. These include not only the loss of the Arctic as we know it, with all that implies for wildlife and in- digenous peoples, but losses on a much vaster scale due to rising seas ...
    [Show full text]
  • Theoretical Medicine's Special Issue on the Nobel Prizes and Their Effect
    Current CXmwn43rM@ EUGENE GARFIELD INSTITUTE FOR SCIENTIFIC INFORMATIONCP 3S41 MARKET ST., PHIL40ELPHIA, PA 19104 Theoretical Medicine’s Special Issue on the Nobel Prizes and Their Effect on Science Number 37 September 14, 1992 h the last two issues of Current Contents@ (CC @),we reptited an article by myself and my scientificassistan~Al&d Welljams-llorof, on “Of Nobel Class: A CitationPerspectiveon High Impact Research Authors.’’2.2The essay that follows focuses on the articles in the spe- cial June issue of llieoretical Mediciw+ in which our article appeared. The special issue, published by Kluwer Academic Publishers in The Netherlands,is devoted entirely to paptm coneeming the factors infhreneing the selec- tion of Nobel prize winners, or with the effect of the awards on scienee. An abridged version of the introduction to the issue follows. It has been specially prepared for CC by B. Ingemar B. Lindahl, the journal editor. He rdso edhed the special issue. We’ve also included abstracts and au- thor affiliations for the papers appearing in B. lngemar B. Lindahl the issue, other than our own, in the table. I was pleased to learn from Lindahl that can be tracked over time, showing the criti- earlier citation studies published in CC, es- cal point in the path of discovery.7,s But pecially those forecasting Nobel prize win- even these do not include necessarily the ners, were the prime source of inspiration identification of important qualitative links. for this speeiai issue. He parrictdarly referred As Llndahl points out below, the five ar- to an early paper Ofmine in Nature,5 which ticles in this special issue of Theoretical discussed the use of citation indexing for Medicine highlight the interaction between historical research.
    [Show full text]
  • The World Around Is Physics
    The world around is physics Life in science is hard What we see is engineering Chemistry is harder There is no money in chemistry Future is uncertain There is no need of chemistry Therefore, it is not my option I don’t have to learn chemistry Chemistry is life Chemistry is chemicals Chemistry is memorizing things Chemistry is smell Chemistry is this and that- not sure Chemistry is fumes Chemistry is boring Chemistry is pollution Chemistry does not excite Chemistry is poison Chemistry is a finished subject Chemistry is dirty Chemistry - stands on the legacy of giants Antoine-Laurent Lavoisier (1743-1794) Marie Skłodowska Curie (1867- 1934) John Dalton (1766- 1844) Sir Humphrey Davy (1778 – 1829) Michael Faraday (1791 – 1867) Chemistry – our legacy Mendeleev's Periodic Table Modern Periodic Table Dmitri Ivanovich Mendeleev (1834-1907) Joseph John Thomson (1856 –1940) Great experimentalists Ernest Rutherford (1871-1937) Jagadish Chandra Bose (1858 –1937) Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman (1888-1970) Chemistry and chemical bond Gilbert Newton Lewis (1875 –1946) Harold Clayton Urey (1893- 1981) Glenn Theodore Seaborg (1912- 1999) Linus Carl Pauling (1901– 1994) Master craftsmen Robert Burns Woodward (1917 – 1979) Chemistry and the world Fritz Haber (1868 – 1934) Machines in science R. E. Smalley Great teachers Graduate students : Other students : 1. Werner Heisenberg 1. Herbert Kroemer 2. Wolfgang Pauli 2. Linus Pauling 3. Peter Debye 3. Walter Heitler 4. Paul Sophus Epstein 4. Walter Romberg 5. Hans Bethe 6. Ernst Guillemin 7. Karl Bechert 8. Paul Peter Ewald 9. Herbert Fröhlich 10. Erwin Fues 11. Helmut Hönl 12. Ludwig Hopf 13. Walther Kossel 14.
    [Show full text]
  • By Brendan Gibbons, Pages 4-A and 5-A
    Page 4A — TUESDAY, July 16, 2013 COLUMBIA MISSOURIAN TUESDAY, July 16, 2013 — Page 5A LIFE & LEGACY OF HERMAN SCHLUNDT your firm to the best of my ability.” ratory of Marie Curie, who won a Nobel Prize in New York about 1931 to test two women who had This kind of arrangement seems to have been physics and chemistry for her work on radioac- worked at the Radium Corp. factory in the late against the chemistry department’s rules at the tivity. Curie wrote a thank you letter to Schlundt 1910s, and he published a report of his work there. time. A set of university policies the department through Miner. “The two girls, who after a lapse of nearly 12 recommended to the university’s executive boards “I will soon receive the preparation of Radiotho- years, are still radioactive, present cases of more in 1916 forbade faculty from using university rium, which Mr. Pr. Schlundt offered to prepare in than passing interest, inasmuch as they stand as Schlundt risked health for research laboratories, equipment or materials for commer- his laboratory,” Curie wrote to Miner in French. striking examples of the tolerance of living per- cial activities without the consent of the dean or “I would ask you to thank Mr. Pr. Schlundt on my sons for radium,” he wrote. SCHLUNDT from page 1A The company made mantles for gas lanterns, a department chair. behalf.” crucial item before the rise of electricity. Miner It could have helped that Schlundt was chair Curie’s letter came in 1930 and marks the height Declining health was one of the chemists who perfected the use of of the chemistry department from 1910 until of Schlundt’s prominence in his field.
    [Show full text]