DOCSLIB.ORG

Modern Colonialism, Eurocentrism and Historical Archaeology: Some Engendered Thoughts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modern Colonialism, Eurocentrism and Historical Archaeology: Some Engendered Thoughts European Journal of Archaeology 21 (3) 2018, 455–471 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Modern Colonialism, Eurocentrism and Historical Archaeology: Some Engendered Thoughts 1 2 SANDRA MONTÓN-SUBÍAS AND ALMUDENA HERNANDO 1Departament d’Humanitats, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain; ICREA, Barcelona, Spain 2Departamento de Prehistoria, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain In this article, we would like to share some thoughts related to the values and principles implemented by archaeologists when bringing ‘the other’ into focus. We situate our reflections within the archaeology of modern colonialism, and revisit some aspects related to one of the most vibrant issues in historical archaeology: Eurocentrism. It is our understanding that ‘de-Eurocentring’ the discipline not only requires introducing the disenfranchised as new agents, but also questioning the most profound logics by which narratives of the past have been written. We focus on the idea of history as change, and on the notion of social continuity from a feminist standpoint. We have noticed that certain accounts of colonial situations, even those with the opposite intention, may project the prevailing Western male way of being while trying to explain past social and personal dynamics, thus blurring ontological diversity and unwittingly reinforcing the Eurocentrism we are trying to avoid. Keywords: historical archaeology, modern colonialism, Eurocentrism, feminist archaeology, change and continuity, maintenance activities INTRODUCTION Wolf, 1982; Quijano & Wallerstein, 1992; Dussel, 1995, 2000; Lander, 2000; ‘Quand on aborde un problème aussi Castro Gómez & Grosfoguel, 2007; ’ important que l inventaire des Mignolo, 2008; and, for related ideas, possibilités de compréhension de deux Marks, 2002; Parker, 2010; Gruzinski, peuples différents, on doit redoubler 2012). Profound changes of all types fol- ’ ’ 1 d attention. (Fanon, 1952: 67) lowed. These were not only changes ‘in a In their critique of Eurocentrism, Latin known world that merely altered some of American decolonial thinkers situate the its traits’ but ‘changes in the world as such’ origins of the first true World Order in (Quijano, 2000: 547). the modern conquest and colonization of This new colonial world encompassed the Americas (e.g. Wallerstein, 1974; the emergence of Eurocentrism as a new rationale, and eventually constructed a 1 ‘When one approaches a problem as important as Eurocentric self-legitimating historical dis- that of an inventory of the possibilities for understand- ing between two different peoples, one should be course. Following decolonial authors (e.g. doubly careful’ (translation in Fanon, 1986: 84). Lander, 2000: 14; Quijano, 2000), we © European Association of Archaeologists 2017 doi:10.1017/eaa.2017.83 Manuscript received 14 April 2017, accepted 7 November 2017, revised 25 September 2017 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.226, on 29 Sep 2021 at 09:16:43, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2017.83 456 European Journal of Archaeology 21 (3) 2018 understand that this new rationale orga- Eurocentrism, and strong efforts have nized all peoples of the world, past and been made ever since to identify, scrutin- present, into a single universal narrative, ize, and demolish Eurocentrism in our with Europe representing both the geo- discipline (for a discussion, see Orser, graphical centre and the summit of all 2012). Here, we would like to deepen this temporal movement. This narrative was critique. It is our contention that more fully developed in the nineteenth century attention needs to be paid to the logics (Amin, 1988; Blaut, 1993, 2000; underlying the writing of history. Wallerstein, 2006; Álvarez-Uría, 2015), Otherwise, we may end up strengthening when history and archaeology, as institu- the most profound rationale behind trad- tionalized academic disciplines, replaced itional Eurocentric narratives, hence myth as the discourse to explain the past curbing our ability to appreciate cultural (Hernando, 2012b). New understandings difference and idiosyncrasy in the past. of space, time, and human agency, and, We focus on the idea of history as basically, the glorification of history as change and on the notion of social con- change took the stage (Quijano, 2000: tinuity from a feminist standpoint. Most 547). Archaeology and history thus shared specifically, we stress: 1) that a positive fundamental conceptual foundations: the appraisal of change is always associated assumption that change was the axis with individuality; 2) that individuality through which to think the world, the runs parallel to the emergence and perception of time as a linear trajectory, increase of social hierarchization and and the idea of space as a bi-dimensional technological development; 3) that indi- parameter that could be expanded end- viduality is a type of personhood that, in lessly. This particular, and situated, way of Europe, has characterized most men since understanding the world, which has domi- the Early Modern period; 4) that persons nated the social order since the nineteenth in non-hierarchical societies appreciate century, was considered to be universal stability and continuity more than and inherent to any human reading of the change; 5) that while human history has world. But it was not universal, as we will been a combination of continuity and the discuss in this article. search for change, history as a discourse In the 1960s, modern colonial processes has mainly emphasized change; 6) that, were used to demarcate historical archae- therefore, the logics behind the historical ology, a subfield of the discipline that ori- and archaeological discourse is an expres- ginally emerged in the United States and sion of the modern hegemonic individua- was soon defined as the ‘archaeology of lized masculinity (sensu Connell & the spread of European cultures through- Messerschmidt, 2005); and 7) that the out the world since the fifteenth century, perception of change typical of Western and their impact on and interaction with male individuality has been wrongly the cultures of indigenous peoples’ (Deetz, projected onto the interpretation of the 1996 [1977]: 5).2 Historical archaeologists past. Consequently, we understand that soon expressed concerns against Eurocentrism was/is not so much the imposition of the European understanding 2 We are well aware that historical archaeology is a of the world, but of a specific European controversial term and that there has been an energetic debate about its narrow versus wide chronological adop- understanding of the world: the male or tion. Here, we use the term to refer to the study of all processes connected to the European expansion, con- quest, and colonization that began in the Late Middle shape (Leone & Potter, 1988; Orser, 1996; Little, Ages, and that have moulded the world to its present 2007). Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.202.226, on 29 Sep 2021 at 09:16:43, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/eaa.2017.83 Montón-Subías and Hernando – Modern Colonialism, Eurocentrism and Historical Archaeology 457 patriarchal one operating in Europe at the explanations of the past. Eurocentrism time of the continent’s worldwide expansion. (and androcentrism) has found here one of its most impregnable hideouts, to the point that it often goes unnoticed. An SOME THOUGHTS ON EUROCENTRISM anecdote from a few years ago will illus- AND HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY trate this point (see Montón-Subías & Abejez, 2015: 25). In the session Since Wolf’s(1982) Europe and the People ‘Entangled Colonialism: Changes in Without History, and partly as a reaction to Material Culture and Space in the Late burning critiques of Eurocentrism, many Medieval through to the Modern Period’ historical archaeologists have considered it that took place at the 2012 European an important goal to give voice to the voice- Association of Archaeologists Annual less and, thus, rescue from oblivion all Meeting, Richard Ciolek-Torello those unrecalled in traditional historical explained that some Native American sub- narratives (e.g. Funari, 1991; Orser, 1996; sistence strategies in southern California Hall, 1999; Kelly, 2003; Leone, 2011; had been profoundly modified after the Escribano-Ruiz, 2016). At about the same implantation of the Spanish Catholic mis- time as this goal permeated historical sions. In this way, he emphasized, some archaeology, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak social dynamics that had remained rela- (1988), a feminist and postcolonial scholar tively stable had been truncated. In the scrutinizing pervasive Eurocentrism in Q&A session that followed, one of the postcolonial discourse, was already ques- attendees considered this vision of Native tioning whether it was possible for the Americans as Eurocentric. According to subaltern to speak, making reference to her, in thinking that it had been the mis- the most Western embedded structures of sionaries who had first brought change to thought in the production of knowledge. the area, he was reinforcing an image of Coloniality, a term used later by decolonial native
Load more

Recommended publications
  • China Historians and the Transformation of World History As
    ASIANetwork Exchange | Spring 2015 | volume 22 | 2 From ‘The West and the Rest’ to Global Interconnectedness: China Historians and the Transformation of World History as a Discipline Robert Eng Abstract: David Landes’s The Wealth and Poverty of Nations argues that European culture was key to its achievement of wealth and power, and that China’s “cultural triumphalism” and “petty downward tyranny” doomed that country to failure. By adopting a globalist and comparative framework and disputing European excep- tionalism, Andre Gunder Frank’s ReORIENT: Global Economy in the Asian Age, R. Bin Wong’s China Transformed, and Kenneth Pomeranz’s The Great Divergence contribute to world history scholarship and teaching. These works collectively make the forceful case that Europe’s rise was contingent on external and accidental fac- tors such as the fortuitous abundance of readily accessible coal in Britain along with windfall profits from the Atlantic slave trade and American colonies. These authors propose an inclusive vision of history that emphasizes multiple possibilities rather than the single, inevitable path of the growth of industrialism in the West, thereby stimulating further debate as to the causes of the rise of the West. In reviewing the above-mentioned texts, this article focuses on how China histori- ans have transformed the dynamic discipline of world history in recent years. First, we sketch the emergence of world history post-World War II as a developing field of teaching and research. We then examine a heated debate over the Great Divergence, or the reasons why Europe became dominant over the rest of the world by 1800 or earlier, pitting proponents of European exceptionalism against revisionist scholars of the California School who decenter Europe in global history, as exemplified by some key texts published around 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Glueck 2016 De-Westernisation
    Antje Glück De -Westernisation Key concept paper November 2015 1 The Working Papers in the MeCoDEM series serve to disseminate the research results of work in progress prior to publication in order to encourage the exchange of ideas and academic debate. Inclusion of a paper in the MeCoDEM Working Papers series does not constitute publication and should not limit publication in any other venue. Copyright remains with the authors. Media, Conflict and Democratisation (MeCoDEM) ISSN 2057-4002 De-Westernisation: Key concept paper Copyright for this issue: ©2015 Antje Glück WP Coordination: University of Leeds / Katrin Voltmer Editor: Katy Parry Editorial assistance and English-language copy editing: Emma Tsoneva University of Leeds, United Kingdom 2015 All MeCoDEM Working Papers are available online and free of charge at www.mecodem.eu For further information please contact Barbara Thomass, [email protected] This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement no 613370. Project Term: 1.2.2014 – 31.1.2017. Affiliation of the authors: Antje Glück University of Leeds [email protected] Table of contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 1 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 3. Clarifying the concept: What is De-Westernisation? .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eurocentrism in European History and Memory
    Brolsma, Bruin De & Lok (eds) Eurocentrism in European History and Memory Edited by Marjet Brolsma, Robin de Bruin, and Matthijs Lok Eurocentrism in European History and Memory FOR PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY PRESS Eurocentrism in European History and Memory FOR PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY PRESS Eurocentrism in European History and Memory Edited by Marjet Brolsma, Robin de Bruin, and Matthijs Lok Amsterdam University Press FOR PRIVATE AND NON-COMMERCIAL USE AMSTERDAM UNIVERSITY PRESS Cover illustration: The tympanum of Amsterdam City Hall, as depicted on a 1724 frontispiece from David Fassmann, Der reisende Chineser, a serialized fictional travel account whose Chinese protagonist ‘Herophile’ describes his travels through Europe in letters to his emperor. The satirical use of the foreign visitor to describe Europe’s politics and culture was a typical device of Enlightenment literature. The image shows the world’s four continents bringing tribute to the Stedemaagd or ‘City Maiden’ of Amsterdam. Europe, the only crowned continent, is depicted as superior to Asia, Africa and America. Here, in contrast to the original tympanum, Europe is placed not on the all-important right of the City Maiden, indicating her seniority over the other continents, but on her left. Above the tympanum appears the mythological figure of Periclymenus, one of the Argonauts, who was granted the power of metamorphosis by his grandfather Poseidon. Source: Beeldbank Stadsarchief Amsterdam. See also: David Faßmann, Der auf Ordre und Kosten Seines Käysers reisende Chineser […], Part 2, fascicule 3 (Leipzig: Cornerischen Erben, 1724). The image is discussed by Michael Wintle, The Image of Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009), 263.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Divergence the Princeton Economic History
    THE GREAT DIVERGENCE THE PRINCETON ECONOMIC HISTORY OF THE WESTERN WORLD Joel Mokyr, Editor Growth in a Traditional Society: The French Countryside, 1450–1815, by Philip T. Hoffman The Vanishing Irish: Households, Migration, and the Rural Economy in Ireland, 1850–1914, by Timothy W. Guinnane Black ’47 and Beyond: The Great Irish Famine in History, Economy, and Memory, by Cormac k Gráda The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy, by Kenneth Pomeranz THE GREAT DIVERGENCE CHINA, EUROPE, AND THE MAKING OF THE MODERN WORLD ECONOMY Kenneth Pomeranz PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON AND OXFORD COPYRIGHT 2000 BY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PUBLISHED BY PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, 41 WILLIAM STREET, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY 08540 IN THE UNITED KINGDOM: PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, 3 MARKET PLACE, WOODSTOCK, OXFORDSHIRE OX20 1SY ALL RIGHTS RESERVED LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA POMERANZ, KENNETH THE GREAT DIVERGENCE : CHINA, EUROPE, AND THE MAKING OF THE MODERN WORLD ECONOMY / KENNETH POMERANZ. P. CM. — (THE PRINCETON ECONOMIC HISTORY OF THE WESTERN WORLD) INCLUDES BIBLIOGRAPHICAL REFERENCES AND INDEX. ISBN 0-691-00543-5 (CL : ALK. PAPER) 1. EUROPE—ECONOMIC CONDITIONS—18TH CENTURY. 2. EUROPE—ECONOMIC CONDITIONS—19TH CENTURY. 3. CHINA— ECONOMIC CONDITIONS—1644–1912. 4. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT—HISTORY. 5. COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS. I. TITLE. II. SERIES. HC240.P5965 2000 337—DC21 99-27681 THIS BOOK HAS BEEN COMPOSED IN TIMES ROMAN THE PAPER USED IN THIS PUBLICATION MEETS THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI/NISO Z39.48-1992 (R1997) (PERMANENCE OF PAPER) WWW.PUP.PRINCETON.EDU PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 3579108642 Disclaimer: Some images in the original version of this book are not available for inclusion in the eBook.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise of Eurocentrism
    The Rise of Eurocentrism The Rise of Eurocentrism ANATOMY OF INTERPRETATION Vassilis Lambropoulos PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY Copyright 1993 by Princeton University Press Published by Princeton University Press, 41 William Street, Princeton, New Jersey 08540 In the United Kingdom: Princeton University Press, Oxford All Rights Reserved Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Lambropoulos, Vassilis, 1953– The rise of eurocentrism : anatomy of interpretation / Vassilis Lambropoulos. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-691-06949-2 1. Literature—History and criticism—Theory, etc. 2. Canon (Literature) 3. European literature—History and criticism. 4. Europe—Civilization. I. Title. PN441.L36 1992 809′.894—dc20 92-3690 This book has been composed in Bitstream Electra Princeton University Press books are printed on acid-free paper, and meet the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources Printed in the United States of America 13579108642 To G regor y CONTENTS Acknowledgments ix Preface: The Rule of Autonomy xi CHAPTER ONE The Rites of Interpretation 3 The Law of Interpretation 3 Hebraism and Hellenism 24 The Exercise of Reason 41 Aesthetic Faith 55 The Threat of Paganism 78 CHAPTER TWO The Culture of Atonement 97 The Dialectic of Capitalism 97 The Covenant of Emancipation 115 The Science of Myth 162 The Sin of Assimilation 190 CHAPTER THREE Writing the Law 215 The Spirit and the Letter 215 History and Exile 239 The Future of Tradition 277 The Art of Ruling 311 Epilegomena to Modernity 327 Notes 333 Bibliography 413 Index 459 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I HAVE BENEFITED from the collegial atmosphere of the Department of Judaic and Near Eastern Languages and Literatures of the Ohio State University, where I have been working, first as an assistant and then as an associate professor of Modern Greek.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurocentrism in Teaching About World War One – a Norwegian Case Mari Kristine Jore
    Eurocentrism in Teaching about World War One – a Norwegian Case Mari Kristine Jore Nordidactica - Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education 2019:2 Nordidactica – Journal of Humanities and Social Science Education Nordidactica 2019:2 ISSN 2000-9879 The online version of this paper can be found at: www.kau.se/nordidactica NORDIDACTICA – JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCE EDUCATION ISSN 2000-9879 2019:2 114-135 Eurocentrism in Teaching about World War One – a Norwegian Case Mari Kristine Jore Western Norway University of Applied Sciences Abstract: In this article, I argue that the imperial and colonial aspects of WW1 hold an ambiguous position in teaching about the war, presented as a cause of the war, but not acknowledged as a part of its history. Data was established through observation of history education about WW1 in the context of social studies at a lower secondary school in Norway. Identifying different manifestations of Eurocentrism, I first discuss how the national curriculum and textbook representations both explicitly thematize imperialism and colonialism, but at the same time reproduces Eurocentrism in terms of how non-Western history only enters the curriculum in the context of Western imperialism and colonialism. Secondly, teachers briefly mention colonial rule and exploitation when teaching about a war, which was a global and an imperial conflict. Finally, Eurocentrism emerges in the discrepancy between the image the teachers create, of colonies as resources for colonial rule, and the pupil’s perceptions of Africa as a continent of lack. The article aims to discuss the dilemmas and challenges Eurocentrism poses to history education and argues for the importance of using strategies which deconstruct and challenge Eurocentric narratives.
    [Show full text]
  • Jochen Hippler Eurocentrism
    Jochen Hippler Eurocentrism (English version of Turkish article) One of the more drastic examples of a Eurocentric worldview has been formulated by Samuel Huntington in his well-known article “A Clash of Civilizations?”, published in Foreign Affairs. He opined, that “Western concepts differ fundamentally from those prevalent in other civilizations. Western ideas of individualism, liberalism, constitutionalism, human rights, equality, liberty, the rule of law, democracy, free markets, the separation of church and state, often have little resonance in Islamic, Confucian, Japanese, Hindu, Buddhist or Orthodox cultures.” (Huntington 1993, p. 40) First of all the question arises whether the term “Western” values makes any sense. Whatever these values may be, they obviously are not stable. And they are full of contradictions. The value system in Europe has developed considerably over time, and has kept changing. A few examples: while stable family structures have been very important until into the twentieth century, today family cohesion has lost most of its meaning and importance. Even being married does not matter very much any longer, at least in big cities of Europe. In many of them, some one third of the household are single persons and one third of all marriages end in divorce. Just a few decades ago this would have been unthinkable. But what does it imply for “Western values”? Are family values not any longer part of them, after they were for centuries? Are they forever, even if they are not applied any longer? Or, to give another example: in regard to human rights and constitutionalism the “Western” balance is less from clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Modern Asia Can We Speak of an ‘Early Modern’ World?
    > Comparative Intellectual Histories of Early Modern Asia Can we speak of an ‘early modern’ world? To speak of an ‘early modern’ world raises three awkward problems: the problem of early modernity, the problem of comparison and the problem of globalisation. In what follows, a discussion of these problems will be combined with a case study of the rise of humanism. Peter Burke (rationality, individualism, capitalism, distance’, it is probably best to describe ered at the end of the 15th century). Fol- The ethical wing has been discussed by and so on). the early modern period as at best a lowing the shock of the French invasion Theodore de Bary and others who note The Concept A major problem is the western ori- time of ‘proto-globalisation’, despite the of Italy in 1494, some leading human- the concern of Confucius (Kongzi) and The concept ‘early modern’ was origi- gin of the conceptual apparatus with increasing importance of connections ists, notably Machiavelli, shifted from a his followers and of ‘neo-confucians’ nally coined in the 1940s to refer to a which we are working. As attempts to between the continents, of economic, concern with ethics to a concern with like Zhu Xi with the ideal man, ‘princely period in European history from about study ‘feudalism’ on a world scale have political and intellectual encounters, politics. man’ or ‘noble person’ (chunzi) and also 1500 to 1750 or 1789. It became widely shown, it is very difficult to avoid circu- not only between the ‘West’ and the On the other side, we find the philolo- with the cultivation of the self (xiushen).
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Divergence Reconsidered: Or, Is It Time to Reconsider the Great Divergence Debate?
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR HISTORY, CULTURE AND MODERNITY www.history-culture-modernity.org Published by: Uopen Journals Copyright: © The Author(s). Content is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Licence eISSN: 2213-0624 The Great Divergence Reconsidered: Or, Is it Time to Reconsider the Great Divergence Debate? Joshua Allen Sooter HCM 7: 1067–1079 DOI: 10.18352/hcm.598 Books reviewed Roman Studer, The Great Divergence Reconsidered: Europe, India, and the Rise to Global Economic Power (Cambridge, 2015); Kaveh Yazdani, India, Modernity and the Great Divergence: Mysore and Gujarat (17th to 19th C.) (Leiden, 2017); Prasannan Parthasarathi, Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global Economic Divergence, 1600–1800 (Cambridge, 2011). Abstract Twenty years ago, Kenneth Pomeranz’s The Great Divergence (2000) reshaped debates over the historical causes of Europe’s rapid nineteenth- century industrialization and economic growth. By comparing the Yangzi Delta region of China to Britain, Pomeranz asserted that Europe was not exceptionally dynamic before the nineteenth century and that its divergence from Asia owed to colonial exploitation of the Americas and ecological contingencies, namely abundant coal deposits. Some recent studies have sought to refute or refine Pomeranz’s thesis using the Indian subcontinent as an historical case study. This essay reviews three of these works and, in doing so, demonstrates current meth- odological limitations of this debate. Specifically, recent scholarship, although seeking to critique Pomeranz, employs his two-way compara- tive methodology, but in a manner that operates within a Eurocentric teleology and takes the European historical experience as normative. HCM 2019, VOL. 7 Downloaded from Brill.com09/25/20211067 10:33:37PM via free access SOOTER Instead, I propose that scholars inquire after the historical connections among societies’ plural-yet-connected historical trajectories.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ottoman Age of Exploration
    the ottoman age of exploration the Ottomanof explorationAge Giancarlo Casale 1 2010 3 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dares Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Th ailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2010 by Oxford University Press, Inc. Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 www.oup.com Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Casale, Giancarlo. Th e Ottoman age of exploration / Giancarlo Casale. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-537782-8 1. Turkey—History—16th century. 2. Indian Ocean Region—Discovery and exploration—Turkish. 3. Turkey—Commerce—History—16th century. 4. Navigation—Turkey—History—16th century. I. Title. DR507.C37 2010 910.9182'409031—dc22 2009019822 1 3 5 7 9 8 6 4 2 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper for my several
    [Show full text]
  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE EUROCENTRIC and AFROCENTRIC VIEWS on the ORIGIN of PHILOSOPHY Bassey Samuel Akpan and Charles Clement Odohoedi
    Available online at www.journalijmrr.com INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN RESEARCH AND REVIEWS Int. J. Modn. Res. Revs. IJMRR Volume 4, Issue 12, pp 1431-1434, December, 2016 ISSN: 2347-8314 ORIGINAL ARTICLE EUROCENTRIC AND AFROCENTRIC VIEWS ON THE ORIGIN OF PHILOSOPHY *1Bassey Samuel Akpan and 2Charles Clement Odohoedi *1Department of Philosophy, University of Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria 2 Department of Philosophy, University of Ibadan, Oyo State State, Nigeria Article History: Received 14th October ,2016, Accepted 30th November,2016, Published 1st December,2016 ABSTRACT Eurocentrism is a result of the time when Europe was the predominant power on the planet. Eurocentrism portrays a state of mind which certifies Europe as the cradle of world human advancement. Africa had not been the same since colonial period, which is mostly as a result to Eurocentric ideas. One of the delayed consequences of colonialism is that it tends to over toss cultural values and philosophy of the province and supplant it with the colonials‟ culture and philosophy. Many Afrocentric scholars believe Eurocentric ideas undermine African's rich scholarly and philosophy legacy to humankind. This had brought about pressure between the two schools of contemplation. Philosophy aims to be objectivity but comes into question when we our cultural background and biases begins to play strongly into our perception and thinking. This paper tends to expose the lacunas in Eurocentric and Afrocentric ideas on origin of Philosophy. This paper faults both school of thought assertions that Philosophy originates from its culture. Keywords: Afrocentrism, Eurocentrism, Africa, Philosophy, History. as the cradle of world civilization against other regions (Areji, 1.INTRODUCTION 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Afrocentrism Or Eurocentrism: the Dilemma of African Development
    AFROCENTRISM OR EUROCENTRISM: THE DILEMMA OF AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT J. Chidozie Chukwuokolo Introduction Africa has not remained the same since the rape of its continent by the West who pretended to be on a “civilizing mission”. There was a total distortion of all the values of the African to the advantage of the West. For over two centuries now Africa is not certain as to the path of civilization to follow: Afrocentric or Eurocentric? This became worse as the invaders have dictated the politico-socio-economic trend in the whole world. The index in measuring world development is based on the triad concepts of politics, sociology and economics. Hence, various terminologies have arisen to delineate levels of development namely; developed, undeveloped, developing, first world, etc. The so called developing or third world countries have tasted several passing phases in the European socio-economic and political experimentations with them. This has led to changing perceptions and attitudes. Martin Khor states the reasons for this thus: The reason for the changing perception of and attitude towards globalization are many. Among the important factors are the lack of tangible benefits to developing countries from opening their economies, despite the well publicized claims of export and income gains; the economic losses and social dislocation that are being caused to many developing countries by rapid financial and trade liberalization; the growing inequalities of wealth and opportunities arising from globalization; and the perception that environmental, social and cultural problems have been made worse by the working of the global free market economy 1. This apparent lack of benefit from the passing phases of European experimentation with developing countries dominates the Afrocentic circles especially as globalization is the latest stage of imperialism.
    [Show full text]