Alternative Fuels for Military Applications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alternative Fuels for Military Applications CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore the RAND National Defense Research Institute View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. This product is part of the RAND Corporation monograph series. RAND monographs present major research findings that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors. All RAND mono- graphs undergo rigorous peer review to ensure high standards for research quality and objectivity. Alternative Fuels for Military Applications James T. Bartis | Lawrence Van Bibber Prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense Approved for public release; distribution unlimited NATIONAL DEFENSE RESEARCH INSTITUTE The research described in this report was prepared for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The research was conducted in the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center sponsored by the Office of the OSD, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Department of the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intelligence Community under Contract W74V8H-06-C-0002. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data is available for this publication. ISBN 978-0-8330-5000-7 The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit research organization providing objective analysis and effective solutions that address the challenges facing the public and private sectors around the world. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors. R® is a registered trademark. Cover photo by Tom Reynolds: X-35A Joint Strike Fighter being refueled by a KC-135 tanker. © Copyright 2011 RAND Corporation Permission is given to duplicate this document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND documents are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND permissions page (http://www.rand.org/ publications/permissions.html). Published 2011 by the RAND Corporation 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138 1200 South Hayes Street, Arlington, VA 22202-5050 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665 RAND URL: http://www.rand.org To order RAND documents or to obtain additional information, contact Distribution Services: Telephone: (310) 451-7002; Fax: (310) 451-6915; Email: [email protected] Preface Over the past few years, the U.S. Department of Defense has spent hundreds of mil- lions of dollars on the development, testing, and certification of alternative fuels that can substitute for petroleum-derived fuels used by the Army, Navy and Marine Corps, and Air Force in their tactical weapon systems. This monograph summarizes research directed at understanding key policy, management, and technical issues associated with these efforts. This document is called for in the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 (P.L. 110-417). As called for in the act, this monograph includes a review of alternative approaches for reducing lifecycle green- house gas emissions; an examination of the military utility of mobile, in-theater syn- thetic fuel processes; and a review of the goals and progress of the military departments in the research, testing, and certification of alternative fuels. This monograph is intended for delivery to the Secretary of Defense and the congressional defense committees. Beyond federal officials who have responsibility for research and policymaking affecting transportation fuels, this monograph should be of interest to potential investors in alternative fuel technologies and production facilities. This research was sponsored by the Defense Logistics Agency Energy, and con- ducted within the Acquisition and Technology Policy Center of the RAND National Defense Research Institute, a federally funded research and development center spon- sored by the Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Joint Staff, the Unified Combatant Commands, the Navy, the Marine Corps, the defense agencies, and the defense Intel- ligence Community. The RAND research reported herein began in May 2009 and was completed in early 2010. For more information on RAND’s Acquisition and Technology Policy Center, contact the Director, Philip Antón. He can be reached by email at atpc-director@rand. org; by phone at 310-393-0411, extension 7798; or by mail at the RAND Corpora- tion, 1776 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, California 90407-2138. More information about RAND is available at www.rand.org. iii Contents Preface ................................................................................................. iii Figures and Tables ...................................................................................vii Summary .............................................................................................. ix Acknowledgments .................................................................................. xxi Abbreviations ...................................................................................... xxiii CHAPTER ONE Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 Imported Oil and U.S. National Security ........................................................... 1 Study Scope ............................................................................................. 2 Study Approach ........................................................................................ 3 CHAPTER TWO Fuels for U.S. Military Operations ................................................................ 5 Critical Properties of Military Fuels ................................................................. 7 Candidate Alternative Fuels for Military Use ...................................................... 9 CHAPTER THREE Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................................17 Greenhouse Gas Management for Fischer-Tropsch Liquids .....................................18 Greenhouse Gas Management for Renewable Oils .............................................. 27 Alternative Fuel Production with Greenhouse-Gas-Free Power .................................31 CHAPTER FOUR Forward-Based Military Fuel Production .......................................................39 Local-Feedstock-Based Production ................................................................ 40 Liquid Fuels from Military Wastes................................................................. 42 Summary .............................................................................................. 43 CHAPTER FIVE Alternative Fuel Activities in the U.S. Department of Defense .............................45 Framing Our Examination ..........................................................................45 v vi Alternative Fuels for Military Applications Fuel Testing and Certification .......................................................................53 Developing Advanced Technology ..................................................................62 Promoting Commercial Production ................................................................67 CHAPTER SIX Industrial Preparedness ............................................................................71 Potential Alternative Fuel Demand by the U.S. Department of Defense ......................71 The Investment Climate for Military Alternative Fuel Production .............................72 Fischer-Tropsch Fuels .................................................................................73 Hydrotreated Renewable Oils .......................................................................76 CHAPTER SEVEN Findings and Recommendations ..................................................................81 APPENDIXES A. Public Law 110-417, Section 334 ............................................................. 87 B. Alternative Liquid Fuel Production with Hydrogen Addition ..........................89 C. DoD Organizations Contacted ................................................................95 References ............................................................................................ 97
Recommended publications
  • Renewable Diesel Fuel
    Renewable Diesel Fuel Robert McCormick and Teresa Alleman July 18, 2016 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Renewable Diesel Fuel Nomenclature • Renewable diesel goes by many names: o Generic names – Hydrogenated esters and fatty acids (HEFA) diesel – Hydrogenation derived renewable diesel (HDRD) – Green diesel (colloquialism) o Company trademark names – Green Diesel™ (Honeywell/UOP) – NExBTL® (Neste) – SoladieselRD® (Solazyme) – Biofene® (Amyris) – HPR Diesel (Propel branded product) – REG-9000™/RHD • Not the same as biodiesel, may be improperly called second generation biodiesel, paraffinic biodiesel – but it is incorrect and misleading to refer to it as biodiesel 2 RD is a Very Broad Term • Renewable diesel (RD) is essentially any diesel fuel produced from a renewable feedstock that is predominantly hydrocarbon (not oxygenates) and meets the requirements for use in a diesel engine • Today almost all renewable diesel is produced from vegetable oil, animal fat, waste cooking oil, and algal oil o Paraffin/isoparaffin mixture, distribution of chain lengths • One producer ferments sugar to produce a hydrocarbon (Amyris – more economical to sell this hydrocarbon into other markets) o Single molecule isoparaffin product 3 RD and Biodiesel • Biodiesel is solely produced through esterification of fats/oils • RD can be produced through multiple processes o Hydrogenation (hydrotreating) of fats/oils/esters o Fermentation
    [Show full text]
  • Building a Sustainable Future Together: Malaysian Palm Oil and European Consumption Frank Vogelgesang, Uttaya Kumar & Kalyana Sundram
    Journal of Oil Palm, Environment & Health An official publication of the Malaysian Palm Oil Council (MPOC) EDITORIAL Open Access Journal of Oil Palm, Environment & Health 2018, 9:01-49 doi:10.5366/jope.2018.01 Building a Sustainable Future Together: Malaysian Palm Oil and European Consumption Frank Vogelgesang, Uttaya Kumar & Kalyana Sundram SUMMARY OF THE KEY POSITION explains in detail which those are. By way of STATEMENTS summary: This paper is born out of the desire to put into First, as a newly industrialized country we perspective the resolution on “Palm oil and stress the importance of rural and economic the Deforestation of Rain Forests” the development enshrined in the sustainable European Parliament (EP) passed by an development goals (SDGs) of United Nations. overwhelming majority in April 2017 Palm oil is vital to the Malaysian economy. For (henceforth: “the Resolution”). a more detailed discussion of this, turn to Section 2.3. What to make of the Resolution? Secondly, we do not accept some of the It calls for EU policy measures to combat fundamental premises on which the Resolution deforestation in the tropics as well as the rests. They contain several key errors, mainly associated effects on climate change and for two reasons: biodiversity. 1) The parliamentary committees that drafted the Resolution in the process The two main recommendations contained in misquoted or misinterpreted parts of the Resolution are the phasing out of palm oil the research they drew upon as feedstock for biodiesel and to switch to 2) Some of the original research itself is 100% certified sustainable palm oil, both by flawed (see Section 4.2 and 4.3).
    [Show full text]
  • Creating Alternative Fuel Options for the Aviation Industry: Role of Biofuels
    CreatingCreating AlternativeAlternative FuelFuel OptionsOptions forfor thethe AviationAviation Industry:Industry: RoleRole ofof BiofuelsBiofuels JenniferJennifer HolmgrenHolmgren UOPUOP LLCLLC ICAO Alternative Fuels Workshop Montreal, Canada February 11, 2009 © 2009 UOP LLC. All rights reserved. UOP 5139-01 UOP • Leading supplier and licensor of process technology, catalysts, adsorbents, process plants, and technical services to the petroleum refining, petrochemical, and gas processing industries • UOP technology furnishes 60% of the world’s gasoline, 85% of the world’s biodegradable detergents, and 60% of the world’s para-xylene • Strong relationships with leading refining and petrochemical customers worldwide 2003 National Medal of • UOP’s innovations enabled lead removal from Technology Recipient gasoline, biodegradable detergents, and the first commercial catalytic converter for automobiles Biofuels: Next in a Series of Sustainable Solutions UOP 5139-02 Macromarket Summary: Through 2015 • Global energy demand is expected to grow at CAGR 1.6%. - Feedstock diversity will become increasingly important over this period with coal, natural gas & renewables playing bigger roles. • Fossil fuels are expected to supply 83% of energy and 95% of liquid transportation needs • Biofuels are expected to grow at 8-12%/year to > 2.2 MBPD Key: Overlaying Sustainability Criteria on Alternatives (GHG, water etc.) Source: IEA, 2008 UOP 5139-03 Biofuel Targets Biodiesel Production from Oils Targets 700 Source: Fulton et. al 84 Region Current Future 600 Brazil 25% Ethanol in 500 70 gasoline 5.0% of diesel 400 56 2.0% of diesel by by 2011 2008 300 42 China 2.0% of gasoline & 8.0% by 2020 200 28 diesel by 2010 Million BTU/acre Gallons per acre 100 14 Europe 5.75%* of gasoline 10%* by 2020 0 0 & diesel by 2010 Soybean Caster Sunflower Rape- Jatropha Palm bean seed seed India 5.0% Ethanol in E5, B5 by 2012 gasoline Ethanol Production from Sugars 700 USA 15.2 B gal 2012 36 B gal by 2022 Source: Fulton et.
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Biofuels on the Market
    Bringing biofuels on the market Options to increase EU biofuels volumes beyond the current blending limits Report Delft, July 2013 Author(s): Bettina Kampman (CE Delft) Ruud Verbeek (TNO) Anouk van Grinsven (CE Delft) Pim van Mensch (TNO) Harry Croezen (CE Delft) Artur Patuleia (TNO) Publication Data Bibliographical data: Bettina Kampman (CE Delft), Ruud Verbeek (TNO), Anouk van Grinsven (CE Delft), Pim van Mensch (TNO), Harry Croezen (CE Delft), Artur Patuleia (TNO) Bringing biofuels on the market Options to increase EU biofuels volumes beyond the current blending limits Delft, CE Delft, July 2013 Fuels / Renewable / Blends / Increase / Market / Scenarios / Policy / Technical / Measures / Standards FT: Biofuels Publication code: 13.4567.46 CE Delft publications are available from www.cedelft.eu Commissioned by: The European Commission, DG Energy. Further information on this study can be obtained from the contact person, Bettina Kampman. Disclaimer: This study Bringing biofuels on the market. Options to increase EU biofuels volumes beyond the current blending limits was produced for the European Commission by the consortium of CE Delft and TNO. The views represented in the report are those of its authors and do not represent the views or official position of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. © copyright, CE Delft, Delft CE Delft Committed to the Environment CE Delft is an independent research and consultancy organisation specialised in developing structural and innovative solutions to environmental problems. CE Delft’s solutions are characterised in being politically feasible, technologically sound, economically prudent and socially equitable.
    [Show full text]
  • A Feasibility Study for the Construction of a Fischer-Tropsch Liquid Fuels Production Plant with Power Co-Production at NSA Crane (Naval Support Activity Crane)
    CCTR A report prepared for Crane Technology Incorporated under the sponsorship of the United States Department of Labor A Feasibility Study for the Construction of a Fischer-Tropsch Liquid Fuels Production Plant with Power Co-Production at NSA Crane (Naval Support Activity Crane) May 31, 2007 Marty W. Irwin, Brian H. Bowen Center for Coal Technology Research (CCTR) The Energy Center at Discovery Park, Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907-2022 Email: [email protected]. Fax: 765-494-6298 Paul V. Preckel, Zuwei Yu State Utility Forecasting Group (SUFG) The Energy Center at Discovery Park, Purdue University West Lafayette, IN 47907-2022 John Rupp, Fritz H. Hieb, Maria Mastalerz Indiana Geological Survey (IGS) Indiana University Bloomington, IN 47405 The contributions of the following research assistants from the Energy Center at Discovery Park, Purdue University, for helping to develop this report are gratefully acknowledged: Akiner Tuzuner, Sisi Guo, Sika Gbègbèlègbè Dofonsou, and Devendra Canchi. Editorial assistance from Suzanne Black and Barbara Gotham is also gratefully acknowledged. A Feasibility Study for the Construction of a FT Liquid Fuels Production Plant with Power Co-Production at NSA Crane Acknowledgements This feasibility assessment, coordinated through the Center for Coal Technology Research (CCTR, Energy Center at Discovery Park, Purdue University) has been a joint project including experts from the State Utility Forecasting Group (SUFG, Energy Center at Discovery Park, Purdue University), and the Indiana Geological Survey (IGS, Indiana University). The complete list of team members is shown on the cover page. This short six-week feasibility study, forms part of a larger Clean Coal Technology (CCT) project supported by the CCTR, started April 12, 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Reference Case Projections 1990-2020
    Wyoming Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Reference Case Projections 1990-2020 Center for Climate Strategies Spring 2007 Principal Authors: Alison Bailie, Randy Strait, Steve Roe, Alison Jamison, Holly Lindquist Wyoming GHG Inventory and Reference Case Projection CCS, Spring 2007 Disclaimer The Center for Climate Strategies (CCS) prepared this report for the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WYDEQ) through an effort of the Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP). This report presents a preliminary draft greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions inventory and forecast from 1990 to 2020 for Wyoming. This report provides an initial comprehensive understanding of Wyoming’s current and possible future GHG emissions. The information presented provides the State with a starting point for revising the initial estimates as improvements to data sources and assumptions are identified. Please contact Mr. Brian Bohlman of the WYDEQ to determine if Wyoming has developed any updates to the information presented in this report. Wyoming Department of ii Center for Climate Strategies Environmental Quality www.climatestrategies.us Wyoming GHG Inventory and Reference Case Projection CCS, Spring 2007 Executive Summary The Center for Climate Strategies (CCS) prepared this report for the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (WYDEQ) through an effort of the Western Regional Air Partnership (WRAP). The report contains an inventory and forecast of the State’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from 1990 to 2020 to provide an initial comprehensive understanding of Wyoming’s current and possible future GHG emissions. The information presented provides the State with a starting point for revising the initial estimates as improvements to data sources and assumptions are identified. Wyoming’s anthropogenic GHG emissions and anthropogenic/natural sinks (carbon storage) were estimated for the period from 1990 to 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing AOCS 2.0
    inform June 2010 June www.aocs.org Volume 21 (6) 325–384 Volume International News on Fats, Oils, and Related Materials Introducing AOCS 2.0 Pittcon report High-GLA saffl ower oil Soy symposium preview ®,...-• Our unique Offie0/19 technology guarantees that t)........., your revenues will rise substantially thanks to the optimum processing of fish oil! • Omega-3 fatty adds with a concentration of at least 600/o health-boosting EPA and DHA • High-quality, standardised biofuel manu­ factured from the remaining 2/3 of the flsh oil • Our experience in processing fats and oils guarantees the superior quality and purity 801 ~ of all our products, thus pushing up your our future - dean energy revenues. For almost 20 years, BDl's core compe­ tence has fo cused on technologies for For more information contact [email protected] converting "waste to energy". or visit our website www.bdi-biodiesel.com DURABILITY REPEATABLE RESULTS df> This new Anderson Dry Do /Hivex™ Expander reduces oil content to 19-25% R.O. and efficiently shears oil cells to increase Expeller® capacities 40-100%. Features: • Oil Draina11e ca11e • Anderson Expeller® Shafts • V-belt drive • Manually Operated Choke • VFD Driven Feeder ANDERSON Contact us today to learn more INTERNATIONAL 6. ~L__ about how this unique oilseed processing machinery can benefit CORP your current or future requirements. 6200 Harvard Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44105 U.S.A. Phone: (216) 641-1112 • Fax: (216) 641-0709 Website: http://www.andersonlntl .net www.aocs.org *UNE 6OLUME n Departments !/#3 DEBUTS and Information ! DRUM ROLL PLEASE 4HE NEW !/#3 WEB EXPERIENCE OTHERWISE KNOWN AS !/#3 DEBUTED IN EARLY -AY #ATHERINE 7ATKINS DETAILS 328 Index to Advertisers what users of the new site can expect.
    [Show full text]
  • Rentech, Inc. December 15, 2010 (RTK:AMEX) Company Comment Pavel Molchanov, (713) 278-5270, [email protected] Rating ______Cory Garcia, Sr
    U.S. Research Published by Raymond James & Associates Rentech, Inc. December 15, 2010 (RTK:AMEX) Company Comment Pavel Molchanov, (713) 278-5270, [email protected] Rating _________________________________ Cory Garcia, Sr. Res. Assoc., (713) 278-5240, [email protected] Market Perform 3 Stacey Hudson, Res. Assoc., (713) 278-5258, [email protected] Current and Target Price __________________ Alternative Energy: Alternative Fuels_____________________________________ Current Price (12/15/2010 close) $1.31 Target Price: NM RTK: F4Q10 Misses the Mark, but Rialto Remains on Track 52-Week Range $1.63 - $0.68 ♦ Suitability High Risk Rentech reported a fiscal 4Q10 net loss of $0.04 per share, below consensus of $(0.02) and our EPS estimate of $0.01. Revenue of $34.5 million was 37% lower than our estimate of Market Data ____________________________ $54.6 million, while gross margin of 23.6% was also weaker than expected. Shares Out. (mil.) 221.7 ♦ REMC continues to keep the lights on. Rentech’s fertilizer business, REMC, generated plant- Market Cap. (mil.) $290 level EBITDA of $32.1 million in FY10. Looking to FY11, management expects the recent trend Avg. Daily Vol. (10 day) 2,227,580 of record-high fertilizer margins, driven by low natural gas prices and strong fertilizer Dividend/Yield $0.00/0.0% demand, to persist. With more than half of planned deliveries for FY11 already contracted at Book Value (09/10) $0.20 fixed prices and corresponding natural gas hedges in place, EBITDA guidance for the fertilizer LT Debt (mil.)/% Cap. $90/69% plant is $60 million, a near doubling y/y.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Protection Agency
    Vol. 77 Thursday, No. 3 January 5, 2012 Part V Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 80 Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Identification of Additional Qualifying Renewable Fuel Pathways Under the Renewable Fuel Standard Program; Direct Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 16:50 Jan 04, 2012 Jkt 226001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\05JAR3.SGM 05JAR3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3 700 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 3 / Thursday, January 5, 2012 / Rules and Regulations ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, Docket: All documents in the docket AGENCY identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ– are listed in the www.regulations.gov OAR–2011–0542, by one of the index. Although listed in the index, 40 CFR Part 80 following methods: some information is not publicly • [EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0542; FRL–9502–2] www.regulations.gov: Follow the available, e.g., CBI or other information on-line instructions for submitting whose disclosure is restricted by statute. RIN 2060–AR07 comments. Certain other material, such as • Email: [email protected], copyrighted material, will be publicly Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Attention Air and Radiation Docket ID available only in hard copy. Publicly Additives: Identification of Additional EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0542 available docket materials are available Qualifying Renewable Fuel Pathways • Fax: [Insert fax number]. either electronically in Under the Renewable Fuel Standard • Mail: Air and Radiation Docket, www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at Program Docket No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2011–0542, the Air and Radiation Docket and Environmental Protection Agency, AGENCY: Environmental Protection Information Center, EPA/DC, EPA West, Mailcode: 6406J, 1200 Pennsylvania Agency (EPA).
    [Show full text]
  • Media and Scientific Research on Energy and the Environment
    City of Los Angeles California SVANC VIRTUAL FORUM ON CLEAN ENERGY FOR THE SAN FERNANDO VALLEY Friday, March 5, 2021 11:00 am – 1:00 pm Zoom Meeting Online ID: 987 6658 0221 Media and Scientific Research on Energy and the Environment Following are articles and papers on energy and the environment for further information. Sun Valley Area Neighborhood Council Mailing Address: P.O. Box 457 Sun Valley, CA 91353-0457 Telephone: 818-767-8262 Email: [email protected] www.svanc.com Wildfire smoke may contain harmful fungi and bacteria - Los Angeles Times https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-02-01/wildfire-smoke-mi... BREAKING NEWS Saudi crown prince targeted Jamal Khashoggi, U.S. report says ADVERTISEMENT CALIFORNIA Wildfire smoke may carry ‘mind-bending’ amounts of fungi and bacteria, scientists say 1 of 12 2/26/21, 10:27 AM Wildfire smoke may contain harmful fungi and bacteria - Los Angeles Times https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2021-02-01/wildfire-smoke-mi... Cars drive along the Golden Gate Bridge under an orange, smoke-filled sky in the middle of the day as massive wildfires burned in Northern California on Sept. 12. Scientists are concerned that wildfire smoke contains microbes that can cause illness. (Harold Postic / AFP/ Getty Images) By JOSEPH SERNA FEB. 1, 2021 6 AM PT When wildfires roar through a forest and bulldozers dig into the earth to stop advancing flames, they may be churning more into the air than just clouds of dust and smoke, scientists say. Those dark, billowing plumes of smoke that rise on waves of heat during the day and sink into valleys as the night air cools may be transporting countless living microbes that can seep into our lungs or cling to our skin and clothing, according to research published recently in Science.
    [Show full text]
  • RENTECH NITROGEN PARTNERS, L.P. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 11, 2015 RENTECH NITROGEN PARTNERS, L.P. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 001-35334 45-2714747 (State or other jurisdiction (Commission (IRS Employer of incorporation) File No.) Identification No.) 10877 Wilshire Boulevard, 10th Floor Los Angeles, California 90024 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code): (310) 571-9800 Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2 below): ý Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13a-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial Conditions. On August 11, 2015, Rentech Nitrogen Partners, L.P. issued a press release announcing its financial results for the three months ended June 30, 2015. A copy of the press release is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this report. Item 8.01 Other Events. To the extent required, the information set forth in Item 2.02 is incorporated into this Item 8.01 by reference .
    [Show full text]
  • The Wall Street Analyst Forum
    TheThe WallWall StreetStreet AnalystAnalyst ForumForum 19th19th AnnualAnnual InstitutionalInstitutional AlternativeAlternative EnergyEnergy && CleanClean TechnologyTechnology InvestorInvestor ConferenceConference Rentech, Inc. March 26, 2008 Safe Harbor Statement This presentation contains forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 about matters such as the Company’s timing for completion and production of its product demonstration unit and development of projects and the projected economics of such projects. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and actual results may differ materially as a result of various risks and uncertainties. Other factors that could cause actual results to differ from those reflected in the forward-looking statements include the ability of Rentech to have the financial means to fund proposed construction of the fuels plants, whether Rentech’s proposed product demonstration unit will operate successfully and other risks, including those set forth in the Company’s press releases and periodic public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are available via Rentech’s website at www.rentechinc.com. The forward-looking statements in this presentation are made as of date given, and Rentech does not undertake to revise or update these forward-looking statements, except to the extent that it is required to do so under applicable law. RentechRentech –– U.S.U.S. LeaderLeader inin SyntheticSynthetic FuelsFuels ProductionProduction
    [Show full text]