Coles Baxter Associates LLP Heritage Management, Heritage Led Regeneration & Cultural Tourism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coles Baxter Associates LLP Heritage Management, Heritage Led Regeneration & Cultural Tourism Coles Baxter Associates LLP Heritage Management, Heritage Led Regeneration & Cultural Tourism Report Historic Environment Assessment for the Civil Parish of Croxton Kerrial, Leicestershire. For Croxton Kerrial & Branston Parish Council April 2016 Project Reference: 16-010 Coles Baxter Associates LLP 14 Roselea, Impington, Incorporated at Companies House Cambridge Reference OC403958 CB24 9LB www.colesbaxterassociates.com T: 01476 870 406 Historic Environment Assessment for the Civil Parish of Croxton Kerrial, Leicestershire (Project Ref: 16-010) Final Report Contents: Summary of Findings ……………. ................................................................................................................... iii 1 Purpose ………………………………………………………… ................................................................................. 1 2 Aims ………………………… ...................................................................................................................... 1 3 Methodology …………….. ..................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Standards ...................................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Programme ................................................................................................................................... 3 3.3 Assessment Criteria ...................................................................................................................... 5 3.4 Caveats and Limitations ............................................................................................................... 9 4 Planning Background ........................................................................................................................ 12 4.1 National Planning Policy Framework (March 2012) ................................................................... 12 4.2 Melton Borough Council Local Plan Review ............................................................................... 13 4.3 Melton Borough Draft Local Plan Historic Environment Policies ............................................... 14 5 Environment …………… ..................................................................................................................... 17 5.1 Location ...................................................................................................................................... 17 5.2 Geology ....................................................................................................................................... 17 5.3 Geomorphology & Recent Geological History ............................................................................ 18 5.4 Soils….. ........................................................................................................................................ 19 5.5 Waters - Rivers and Lakes .......................................................................................................... 19 5.6 Vegetation and Ecology .............................................................................................................. 20 5.7 Designated and Protected Sites, Habitats and Species .............................................................. 20 6 Landscape Character, Change and Development Pressures ........................................................... 22 6.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 22 6.2 Landscape Character .................................................................................................................. 22 6.3 Landscape Character Areas ........................................................................................................ 23 6.4 Landscape Change: Impact of Change in Agricultural Practice .................................................. 25 6.5 Landscape Change: Impact of Quarrying and Mining ................................................................ 26 6.6 Landscape Change: Development Pressures ............................................................................. 29 7 The Historic Environment of Croxton Kerrial & Branston Parish .................................................. 31 7.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 31 7.2 Designated Heritage Assets ........................................................................................................ 31 7.3 Conservation Areas .................................................................................................................... 31 7.4 Historic Environment Record Data ............................................................................................. 33 7.5 Aerial Photographs and LIDAR ................................................................................................... 34 7.6 Results of Walk-Over Survey ...................................................................................................... 35 7.7 Results of Geophysical Prospection of Key Sites ........................................................................ 35 8 Summary and Contextualisation of the Historic Environment Record of Croxton Kerrial Parish . 37 8.1 Palaeolithic ................................................................................................................................. 37 8.2 Mesolithic: 10,000 BC to 4000 BC ............................................................................................ 39 8.3 Earlier Neolithic: 4000 BC to 3000 BC (Early & Middle Neolithic) ............................................. 40 Coles Baxter Associates LLP i Historic Environment Assessment for the Civil Parish of Croxton Kerrial, Leicestershire (Project Ref: 16-010) Final Report 8.4 Later Neolithic and Early Bronze Age: 3000 BC to 1500 BC....................................................... 41 8.5 Middle and Late Bronze Age: 1500 BC to 800 BC ...................................................................... 43 8.6 Iron Age: 800 BC to 60 BC .......................................................................................................... 44 8.7 Roman: 60 BC to AD 410............................................................................................................ 45 8.8 Anglo Saxon: AD 410 to AD 1000 ............................................................................................... 47 8.9 Medieval: AD 1050 to AD 1500 ................................................................................................. 49 8.10 Post-Medieval: AD 1500 – AD 1750 ........................................................................................... 53 8.11 Early Modern: AD1750 to AD1900 ............................................................................................ 55 8.12 Modern: 1900 to Present .......................................................................................................... 57 9 Assessment of the Potential, Importance and Sensitivity of the Historic Environment Record ... 60 9.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 60 9.2 The Parish ................................................................................................................................... 60 9.3 Croxton Kerrial ............................................................................................................................ 64 9.4 Branston ..................................................................................................................................... 77 10 Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................................................ 84 10.1 Historic Environment Record and Heritage Resources .............................................................. 84 10.2 A Sense of Place: The Character of the Parish & Its Villages ...................................................... 85 10.3 Sensitivity to Development (“Constraints”) ............................................................................... 87 10.4 Opportunities Presented by the Historic Environment .............................................................. 88 10.5 Recommendations: Appropriate Responses to Proposed Development ................................... 90 10.5 Recommendations for Specific Locations & Site Types .............................................................. 93 10.6 Conclusion .................................................................................................................................. 95 References …………………….. .............................................................................................................. 96 Annex (Volume 2) Drawings and Illustrations ……………………………………………….………………………………………………………………..101 Appendices (Volume 3) Appendix A: Gazetteer of Historic Sites in Croxton Kerrial & Branston Civil Parish as Listed in the Leicestershire Historic Environment Record (LHER) January 2016. Appendix B: Previously Unrecorded Archaeological Sites & Monuments Located during Fieldwork. To be submitted for inclusion in the Leicestershire Historic Environment Record (LHER) Appendix C: Results of Geophysical Survey Employing Magnetometry Techniques on Three Sites in the Village
Recommended publications
  • Mercian 2013 B.Indd
    Former workings in Jurassic ironstone near Grantham Geoffrey Warrington Abstract: The Lower Jurassic Marlstone Rock Formation was formerly worked for ironstone near Denton (SE Lincolnshire), and the Middle Jurassic Northampton Sand Formation near Hungerton and Colsterworth (SE Lincolnshire) and Saltby (NE Leicestershire), southwest and south of Grantham. Two ammonites from the Northampton Sand Formation at Hungerton are illustrated. Four ironstone quarries near Grantham (Fig. 1) were below the Whitby Mudstone Formation (formerly Upper visited during an excursion from the British Association Lias). The ironstone, a slightly calcareous sideritic ore, meeting in Nottingham in 1966. One, at Denton Park in was greenish-black when unweathered, and whitish or SE Lincolnshire, was worked for the Marlstone Rock grey-brown when weathered. Cross-bedding indicated Formation (Upper Pliensbachian – Toarcian; formerly an easterly transport direction, similar to that recorded the Marlstone Rock Bed). The others, at Colsterworth and Hungerton in SE Lincolnshire and Saltby in NE Leicestershire, were worked for the Northampton Sand Formation (Aalenian; formerly the Northampton Sand Ironstone Formation). The lithostratigraphic nomenclature follows Cox et al. (1999) and Carney et al. (2004), with equivalents used in older literature given in parenthesis at the first mention. The Denton and Hungerton sites are now infilled, but exposures remained at Colsterworth and Saltby in 2008. Photographs taken in 1966 record a once- important extractive industry in its last years. (All grid references cited below are [SK]). Denton Park Pit, in Marlstone Rock The history of working at Denton Park [857317], the most easterly of the quarries in this formation in the Woolsthorpe area, was documented by Tonks (1992).
    [Show full text]
  • Ipswich Geological Group
    IPSWICH GEOLOGICAL GROUP BULLETIN No. 1 August 1966 Contents Author Title Original Pages H. E. P. Spencer, F.G.S. Geographic and Geological Notes on the 1-3 Ipswich District R. A. D. Markham Coast Erosion 4 S. J. J. MacFarlane The Crag Exposure to the West of the Water 5-6 &7 Tower on Rushmere Heath R. A. D. Markham Marsupites from the Gipping Valley Chalk 6 R. A. D. Markham Note of some Crag fossils in the Museum of the 6 Geology Department of Birmingham University Colin Holcombe Section through junction of Red and Coralline 10-12 Crags, “The Rocks” Ramsholt R. A. D. Markham Note re Hoxne Palaeoliths 14 C. Allen Fossils collected from the London Clay, 1963 19-20 R. A. D. Markham An excavation in the Coralline Crag at 21-23 Tattingstone R. A. D. Markham Waldringfield Crag 24-25 R. A. D. Markham Notes on Weavers Pit, Tuddenham St. Martin 25-27 R. A. D. Markham Acknowledgement and publication details 27 GEOGRAPHIC AND GEOLOGICAL NOTES ON THE IPSWICH DISTRICT By H. E. P. Spencer, F.G.S. East Suffolk has beds of sand and clay deposited during the closing chapters of the series of geological epochs. In the region there are probably the greatest number of formations to be found in any such limited area. Basically everything rests on the Cretaceous chalk laid down over 70 million years ago. Locally there are at least 250' missing of the upper chalk which is represented on the Norfolk shore at Trimingham by the Ostrea lunata zone.
    [Show full text]
  • LEICESTER AND] FAR 582 [POST OFFICE F4.Rmers-Continul'd
    [LEICESTER AND] FAR 582 [POST OFFICE F4.RMERs-continul'd. IHuhbard G.Parks, Evington, Leicester .Tobnson George, New parks, Leicester HilIMrs.Matilda,N orth Kilworth, RUgbY, Hubbard J ames, Langham, Oakham .T ohnson .f ohn, Bisbrooke, U ppingham Hill Sam!. Hu~bands Bosworth, Rugby Hubbard J. Great Ashby, Llltterworth Johnson John, Kelham Bridge, Raven- Hill Samuel JOhN, Shankton, Leicester Hubbard John, I.angham, Oakham stone, Ashby-de-la-Zouch Hill Thoma~, Whitwick, Leicester Hubbard John, Poultney, Lutterworth .Tohnson John, Sutton-in-the-Elms, HilIWm.Fri~by-on-the-Wreak, Leicstr Hubbard.T. Bitteswell, Lutterworth Broughton Astley, Lutterworth Hill Wm. Great Ashby, Luttprwortll Hubbard 1'. Great Ashby, Luttf"rworth .Tohn~on John, Swanningtoll, Leicester Hill William, Sapcote, Hinckley Huckerby Thos.Hose, Melton Mowbray Johnson Jonathan T. Evington, Leicstr Hill WilIiam, South Kilworth, Rugby Hudson Geo. Diseworth, Loughborough J ohnsonJ sph.Barrw.-on-Soar.Loughbro' Hill William, Wymondham, Oak ham Hughes Henry, Ratby, Leirester .Tohnson Joseph, Branston, Grantham Hillam W. Croxton Kerrial, Grantham Hull G. L. Harrow-on-Soar, Loughboro' Johnson Joseph,Cotteshatch, Lutterwrth Hincks Richard Robinson, Stack House Hull Hy. Leicester forest west, Leicester J ohnson J. N orton-by-Galby, Leicester farm, Humoerstone, Leicester I Hull James, Burton Overy, Leicester Johnson Parker, Dalby-on-the-Wolds, Hind Joseph, Rvhall, Stamford HumphreyW.D. Empingham, Stamford Melton Mowbray Hind Robert, Whetstone, Leicester I Hurnphreys Edward,Ortoll-on-the-Hill,
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Parish of Waltham on the Wolds and Thorpe Arnold
    History of the Parish of Waltham on the Wolds and Thorpe Arnold Waltham-on-the-Wolds The village is situated in the northeast corner of Leicestershire, five miles from Melton Mowbray, eleven miles from Grantham and approximately twenty miles from Leicester, Nottingham, Newark and Stamford. It is positioned on the eastern edge of the Leicestershire Wolds, overlooking the Vale of Belvoir from a height of 168m (560ft), making it the second highest village in the county. Geologically, Waltham stands on a mixture of clay and red marl with underlying strata of Jurassic limestone, which has been quarried locally and used in the building of many of the older houses in the village. There is little evidence of any settlement in the area earlier than AD 800. The Domesday Book reference to Waltham reveals that the village belonged to Hugh of Grandmesnil who, after the Norman Conquest, was the largest landowner in the county. Hugh allowed a man named Walter to hold a major part of the village and surrounding area. Some say that this arrangement gave Waltham its name – Walt’s Ham (Walter’s Town). However, earlier records refer to the village as Wautham – so another theory is that the name may have been derived from Weald (woody), Ham (town) and, the Saxon word, Wold (a hill or high place). THE WALTHAM TIME-LINE • 1086 Waltham mentioned in the Domesday Book • C1200 St Mary Magdalene Church built • C1300 Church rebuilt • Medieval Era Waltham market & annual fair established under a charter granted by Henry III 5h Century The Horseshoes (later the Royal Horseshoes) built and alterations to the Church • 1541 Parts of the village belonging to the various religious houses at the dissolution of the monasteries were granted by Henry VIII to Thomas Manners, Earl of Rutland • 18th Century Market ceases to trade but annual fair continues – seventeen alehouses in the village.
    [Show full text]
  • 88 Belvoib. Leioester~Hire
    88 BELVOIB. LEIOESTER~HIRE. Letters through Grantham arrive at 8 a.m. The nearest BELVOIR RURAL DISTRICT COUNCIL. money order &; telegraph office is at Woolsthorpe, about. Constituted by an Order of the Leicestershire County 1 mile distant Council, dated 7th of August, 1894, for the following Letter Box cleared at 5.30 p.m.; sunday, 4.30 p.m parishes :-Belvoir, Barkston, Bottesford, Croxton-Ker­ rial, Harston, Knipton, Muston, Plungar & Redmile. The area is 17,871 acres; rateable value, £31,074; the COUNTY MAGISTRATES, BELVOIR PETTY SES­ population in 1911 was 3,256 SIONAL DIVISION. The Council meet monthly, on monday, at the Peacock Rutland His Grace the Duke of (Lord Lieut.), Belvoir castie, hotel, Belvoir, at 2.30 p.m Grantham, chairman Chairman, Duke of Rutland Beasley Charles esq. Harston, Grantham Officials. Hare Thomas esq. Harston, Grantham Clerk to the Council, Aubrey Henry Malim, West gate, 8cott Hon. Henry Robert Hepburne, The Lodge, Knipton, Grantham Grantham Clerk to the Highway Committee, Albert E. Pearson, St. Vinoont-Jackson Rev. Canon William M.A. Bottesford Peter's hill, Grantham Rectory, Nottingham Medical Officer of Health, J. Hastings Glover M.B., c.M.Edin. Wright Frank esq. Plungar, Bottesford, Nottingham Bottesford The Chairman for the time being of the Belvoir Rural District Council is an ex-officio magistrate Highway Surveyor &; Sanitary Inspector &; Surveyor, Richard Clerk to the Magistrates, Arthur Henry Marsh, Bank cham­ John Kettleborrow, Normanton, Nottingham bers, Melton Mowbray BELVOIR OUT-RELIEF UNION. Petty Sessions are held at the Peacock hotel, every alter­ nate monday, at 12 noon. The places in the petty ses­ Under an Ord.
    [Show full text]
  • Beneath Our Feet: the Geology of Coldfall Wood
    Beneath our Feet: the geology of Coldfall Wood 2 2 1 3 4 4 1 3 Geology of Coldfall Wood and surrounding area based on the 1:10,000 geological map TQ 29 SE Permit Number CP20/053 British Geological Survey © UKRI 2020. All rights reserved Coldfall Wood is interesting geologically because three different rock types underlie the surface. It is also bisected by streams into a valley that is far larger than would be possible with the present rate of flow. At the highest point abutting the cemetery and allotments glacial till is underfoot, overlying gravel that was transported by a river across what is now the London basin to join the Thames on its ancestral route further north. The bed rock is the London Clay that underlies most of London. Jurassic oyster from the till The Friends of Coldfall Wood www.londongeopartnership.org.uk www.coldfallwoods.co.uk/the-friends-of-coldfall-wood 1. London Clay c. 50-55 million years old The Solid geology of London is mostly underlain by a thick layer of stiff blue clay known as the London Clay. When it is seen in temporary excavations it is usually a rusty orange as the iron within it has oxidised. The clay was laid down as mud about 50 million years ago from rivers eroding the nearest coastline which was probably in the Midlands. Occasionally fossilised fruits and seeds of land plants such as the Nipa palm are found within the marine clay which indicate a tropical climate, but seeds of Magnolia suggest some seasonality.
    [Show full text]
  • LINCOLNSHIRE" (KELLY's
    216 uRANTHAM, LINCOLNSHIRE" (KELLY's Haydor, Honington, Hough, Humby, lngoldsby, Ccunty Polica Station, Spittlegate, Arthur Duffin, Keisby, Lavington, Londonthorpe, Normanton, Os­ superintendent-, 2 sergeants & 18 constables godby, Pickworth, Ropsley, Sapperton, Somerby & Cmt()Wl'! &i Excise & Old Age Pension Office, W estgate hall, West gate, A. Keir, officer Welbv• Meetings are held at the Guildhall, Grantham, on the Electric Theatre, Exchange" hall, High stJ"eet, Charle~t first saturday in each month. J. Carpe:uter, manager Chairman, James Cecil Rudkin esq Exchange Hall, High street, Herbert Scott, sec. ; Wm. Clerk, E. Graptham, I92 Harrowby .road Coleman Pretty, keeper Pl)nsion Officer, A. Keir, Westgate hall, Westgate Farmers' Benevolent Institution, Westgate, A. H. Nalim, sec , • GRA-:\'TH.HI No. 13 (PART OF GRANTHAM RURAL Friendly & Trade Societies Medical Institution, George DISTRICT) SUB-COMMITTEE OF KESTEVEN A. Mitchell M. B., C.M.Edin. medical officer; W. H. LOCAL PE~SION COMMITTEE. t'ulbeck, sec. I St. Catherine's road The folio"Wing parishes are included in the area of the Grantham Baths, 71 Wharf POad, Alfred Ward, lessee Sub-Di~trict :-Barrowby, Burton Coggles, Colster­ Grantham ·Hospital, Manthorpe road, Richa.rd worth, Dent-on, Easton, Gonerby, Gunby, Harlaxton, Wilson M.R.C.S.Eng. consulting surgeon; Harry Wyville, Manthcrpe, Ponton Great, Ponton Little,.._ Poole Berry M.B.Lond. George Arthur C. Shipman Skillington, North Stoke, South .Stoke, Spittlegate, M.A., M.B., B.O.Camb. Charles Halda.ne Denny Stainby, Stroxton, North Witham, South Wi.tham & Robbs JJ.A.Oxon., M.B.Lond., M.R.C.S.Eng. & Charles. Woolsthorpe -Frier ~LB.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to the Geology and Fossils of Essex
    An Introduction to the Geology and Fossils of Essex The Foundations of Essex The rocks of Essex that were formed before the Ice Age are described as the 'solid' or 'bedrock' geology. Much of the solid geology is concealed beneath unconsolidated sediments laid down during the Ice Age. These Ice Age sediments (sand, gravel etc.) are called 'superficial' or 'drift' deposits. The Oldest Rocks The geological story of Essex starts with rocks that are between 440 and 360 million years old. Dating from the Silurian and Devonian periods these rocks consist of hard, slaty shales, mudstones and sandstones and are over 300 metres below the surface. These rocks have been encountered in boreholes at many places in Essex and they represent a time in the distant past when the first animals were leaving the sea to colonise the land. Similar rocks can be seen at the surface in the Welsh Borderland. Lying on top of these ancient rocks is the Gault, a marly clay from a muddy sea that dates from the middle of the Cretaceous period. This means that, beneath Essex, there is a gap in the geological record that represents about 250 million years and includes the Triassic, Jurassic and early Cretaceous periods. After deposition of the Gault, sand spread into this sea to form a deposit called the Upper Greensand. At this time sea levels were rising leading to widespread flooding of the continents, these are the conditions under which the next rock was formed - the Chalk. The Chalk Chalk is effectively the starting point of our geological story as it is the oldest rock exposed at the surface in our county.
    [Show full text]
  • National Sample from the 1851 Census of Great Britain List of Sample Clusters
    NATIONAL SAMPLE FROM THE 1851 CENSUS OF GREAT BRITAIN LIST OF SAMPLE CLUSTERS The listing is arranged in four columns, and is listed in cluster code order, but other orderings are available. The first column gives the county code; this code corresponds with the county code used in the standardised version of the data. An index of the county codes forms Appendix 1 The second column gives the cluster type. These cluster types correspond with the stratification parameter used in sampling and have been listed in Background Paper II. Their definitions are as follows: 11 English category I 'Communities' under 2,000 population 12 Scottish category I 'Communities' under 2,000 population 21 Category IIA and VI 'Towns' and Municipal Boroughs 26 Category IIB Parliamentary Boroughs 31 Category III 'Large non-urban communities' 41 Category IV Residual 'non-urban' areas 51 Category VII Unallocable 'urban' areas 91 Category IX Institutions The third column gives the cluster code numbers. This corresponds to the computing data set name, except that in the computing data set names the code number is preceded by the letters PAR (e.g. PAR0601). The fourth column gives the name of the cluster community. It should be noted that, with the exception of clusters coded 11,12 and 91, the cluster unit is the enumeration district and not the whole community. Clusters coded 11 and 12, however, correspond to total 'communities' (see Background Paper II). Clusters coded 91 comprise twenty successive individuals in every thousand, from a list of all inmates of institutions concatenated into a continuous sampling frame; except that 'families' are not broken, and where the twenty individuals come from more than one institution, each institution forms a separate cluster.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Grass Cutting III Programme 2021 PDF, 42 Kbopens New Window
    ZONE 1 The rural grass cutting takes 6 weeks to complete and is split into 10 zones. The roads surrounding the close by villages and towns fall within Zone 1 DATE RANGE PARISHES WITHIN ZONE 1 30th August - 5th September Primethorpe Broughton Astley Willoughby Waterleys Peatling Magna Ashby Magna Ashby Parva Shearsby Frolesworth Claybrooke Magna Claybrooke Parva Leire Dunton Bassett Ullesthorpe Bitteswell Lutterworth Cotesbach Shawell Catthorpe Swinford South Kilworth Walcote North Kilworth Husbands Bosworth Gilmorton Peatling Parva Bruntingthorpe Upper Bruntingthorpe Kimcote Walton Misterton Arnesby ZONE 2 The rural grass cutting takes 6 weeks to complete and is split into 10 zones. The roads surrounding the close by villages and towns fall within Zone 2 DATE RANGE PARISHES WITHIN ZONE 2 23rd August - 30th August Kibworth Harcourt Kibworth Beauchamp Fleckney Saddington Mowsley Laughton Gumley Foxton Lubenham Theddingworth Newton Harcourt Smeeton Westerby Tur Langton Church Langton East Langton West Langton Thorpe Langton Great Bowden Welham Slawston Cranoe Medbourne Great Easton Drayton Bringhurst Neville Holt Stonton Wyville Great Glen (south) Blaston Horninghold Wistow Kilby ZONE 3 The rural grass cutting takes 6 weeks to complete and is split into 10 zones. The roads surrounding the close by villages and towns fall within Zone 3 DATE RANGE PARISHES WITHIN ZONE 3 16th August - 22nd August Stoughton Houghton on the Hill Billesdon Skeffington Kings Norton Gaulby Tugby East Norton Little Stretton Great Stretton Great Glen (north) Illston the Hill Rolleston Allexton Noseley Burton Overy Carlton Curlieu Shangton Hallaton Stockerston Blaston Goadby Glooston ZONE 4 The rural grass cutting takes 6 weeks to complete and is split into 10 zones.
    [Show full text]
  • River Eye SSSI: Strategic Restoration Plan
    Natural England Commissioned Report NECR184 River Eye SSSI: Strategic Restoration Plan Technical Report First published 15 July 2015 www.gov.uk/natural-england Foreword This report was commissioned by Natural England and overseen by a steering group convened by Natural England in partnership with the Environment Agency. The report was produced by Royal HaskoningDHV. The views in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of Natural England. Background The River Eye is a semi-natural lowland river The water quality is being addressed, but the which rises at Bescaby, approximately 10km physical character of the river channel also north east of Melton Mowbray. It flows for needs to be restored to secure good ecological approximately 21km, becoming the River and hydrological functioning. Wreake as it flows through Melton Mowbray and around Sysonby Lodge. As a result of its In 2014, a geomorphological appraisal of the characteristics as an exceptional example of a River Eye was carried out by Royal semi-natural lowland river, an area covering HaskoningDHV, the result of this appraisal 13.65ha and a length of approximately 7.5km enabled Royal HaskoningDHV to produce the was designated a Site of Special Scientific River Eye SSSI technical report and restoration Interest. This area, situated between Stapleford vision; combined make up the River Eye (National Grid Reference [NGR] SK 802186) Restoration Strategy. This report identifies and and Melton Mowbray (NGR SK 764188) equates prioritises physical restoration measures that will to approximately 40% of the total length of the help to achieve favourable condition and water River Eye.
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCO Scientific Colloquium on Factors Impacting the Underwater Cultural Heritage (Royal Library of Belgium, Brussels, 13 & 14 December 2011)
    UNESCO SCIENTIFIC COLLOQUIUM ON FACTORS IMPACTING UNDERWATER CULTURAL HERITAGE ROYAL LIBRARY OF BELGIUM, BRUSSELS 13 AND 14 DECEMBER 2011 0 1 2 Contents1 1.0 General Context 1.1 The significance of underwater cultural heritage…………………………………………………………5 1.2 The future of underwater archaeology..............................................................................................9 2.0 Commercial exploitation, commercial archaeological interventions and international cooperation 2.1 The extent and the prevention of pillaging on submerged archaeological sites – the French experience.....................................................................................................................................12 2.2 The centenary of the Titanic and the treaty giving legal protection ...............................................17 3.0 Trawling and fishing 3.1 Quantification of trawl damage to pre-modern shipwreck sites: case studies from the Aegean and Black Seas..............................................................................................................................24 4.0 Developing the seabed, resource extraction and renewable energy development at Sea 4.1 The consideration of archaeological sites in oil and gas drilling operations....................................31 4.2 The significance and contribution of marine aggregates.................................................................38 5.0 Environmental impact and climate change 5.1 The appearance of new bacteria (titanic bacterium) and metal corrosion…….................................44
    [Show full text]