DOCSLIB.ORG

Download Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download Download Table 1. Some larval characters measured from the specimens collected in this study. All measurements are in µm unless otherwise noted. A) Larvae (mm) HL HW HL/HW A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 Flagellum AR Blade B2 Subfamily Tanypodinae Ablabesmyia (s.s.) sp. 3.2 577.2 402.3 1.4 232.0 72.6 6.6 3.7 – – – – 82.9 2.8 76.0 – Meropelopia americana 7.3 979.2 892.0 1.1 435.7 73.2 8.0 6.7 – – – – 87.9 5.0 77.3 – Meropelopia flavifrons 7.0 748.8 679.2 1.1 281.8only 48.6 6.3 5.6 – – – – 60.5 4.7 52.2 9.2 Nilotanypus fimbriatus 2.3 366.5 203.0 1.8 152.7 44.2 5.8 4.0 – – 54.0 2.8 55.5 4.1 [Journal [Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research 2016; 48:6075] [page 233] Rheopelopia acra group 3.1 433.5 330.3 1.3 158.1 42.5 7.6 3.1 – – – – 53.3 3.0 – 9.2 Procladius (Holotanypus) sp. 5.6 563.0 555.9 1.0 110.5 15.5 6.0 3.9 – – – – 25.4 4.4 21.0 6.1 Subfamily Diamesinae use Diamesa sp. 7.4 390.3 414.9 0.9 73.8 15.2 8.6 2.8 3.9 – – – 30.4 2.4 32.1 – Pagastia orthogonia 2.7 400.0 274.4 1.5 17.2 15.6 5.1 3.4 4.7 – – – 28.8 0.6 20.9 9.1 Potthastia gaedi group 5.3 445.5 391.1 1.1 46.0 18.3 6.5 3.4 5.4 – – – 33.5 1.4 29.6 10.0 Potthastia longimanus group 4.6 293.2 232.2 1.3 11.5 15.7 4.8 2.3 2.6 – – – 25.4 0.5 24.1 – Subfamily Prodiamesinae Monodiamesa sp. 1 7.5 478.1 429.9 1.1 44.6 18.8 3.8 2.9 – – – – 25.6 1.7 – – Monodiamesa sp. 2 5.1 273.6 254.3 1.1 20.6 13.9 2.6 2.1 – – – – 18.6 1.1 22.3 – Subfamily Orthocladiinae Brillia flavifrons 6.5 657.6 549.5 1.2 71.4 25.8 10.3 5.7 – – – – 41.8 1.7 – – Brillia parva 4.7 687.4 456.5 1.5 88.7 37.0 19.8 6.2 – – – – 63.0 1.4 49.9 – Cardiocladius cf. albiplumus 0.2 145.1 128.6 1.1 11.1 7.0 2.4 4.5 3.1 – – – 16.9 0.7 16.0 5.2 Corynoneura sp. 1 1.7 172.5 127.7 1.4 124.9 58.0 79.2 3.3 – – – – 140.5 0.9 – – Corynoneura sp. 2 1.3 178.5 98.4 1.8 114.7 76.6 77.2 6.2 – – – – 160.1 0.7 – – Cricotopus (s.s.) cf. albiforceps 3.9 311.1 300.3 1.0 34.7 9.7 4.6 3.8 3.7 – – – 21.8 1.6 20.7 – Cricotopus mackenziensis 3.1 319.5 331.6 1.0 44.9 15.7 7.1 4.7 5.6 – – – 33.0 1.4 30.2 – Cricotopus (s.s.) tremulus group 3.7 338.4 382.6 0.9 46.6 14.5 6.7 4.8 3.0 – – – 29.0 1.6 28.6 10.0 Cricotopus (s.s.) trifascia 5.2 495.8 495.2 1.0 69.2 17.6 7.2 3.6 3.7 – – – 32.0 2.2 27.0 13.2 Cricotopus (Nostocladius) nostocicola 4.4 494.1 455.9 1.1 27.8 7.3 3.9 2.8 3.0 – – – 17.0 1.6 18.2 5.1 Doncricotopus sp. 4.3 248.9 296.4 0.8 51.9 12.1 7.2 3.2 4.3 – – – 26.8 1.9 17.4 9.0 Epoicocladius sp. #3 JacobsenNon-commercial 3.9 293.1 242.7 1.2 33.7 11.2 2.1 3.8 – – – – 17.1 2.0 16.2 – Eukiefferiella gracei group 5.9 451.0 458.5 1.0 51.4 11.7 4.6 4.6 5.7 – – – 26.6 1.9 23.2 – Euryhapsis cilium 5.1 350.0 325.9 1.1 63.1 22.1 9.5 5.9 – – – – 37.5 1.7 40.5 – Heterotrissocladius marcidus group 2.8 213.3 219.3 1.0 33.6 20.4 4.0 10.7 4.7 3.0 2.2 44.9 0.7 32.8 – Hydrosmittia sp. 2.5 259.1 251.4 1.0 5.3 3.0 2.1 2.2 – – – – 7.3 0.7 8.2 – Krenosmittia sp. 2.3 139.0 144.0 1.0 31.8 17.5 1.1 1.5 2.4 – – – 22.5 1.4 17.4 – Lopescladius (Cordiella) cf. hyporheicus 3.8 152.8 136.2 1.1 80.5 59.2 30.3 9.4 70.7 – – – 169.7 0.5 59.4 – Nanocladius (s.s.) dichromus group 2.6 225.2 269.4 0.8 47.3 17.0 7.6 3.7 2.4 – – – 30.6 1.5 26.4 7.3 Orthocladius (Eud.) dubitatus 3.6 379.4 364.6 1.0 35.5 10.4 4.0 3.2 2.6 – – – 20.2 1.8 23.0 – Orthocladius (Euo.) rivicola 4.3 299.5 327.4 0.9 37.1 9.5 3.8 4.2 3.8 – – – 21.3 1.7 19.5 3.7 Orthocladius (s.s.) cf. clarkei 4.7 368.7 424.2 0.9 40.8 11.4 3.7 3.5 3.2 – – – 21.9 1.9 24.5 – Orthocladius (s.s.) obumbratus 5.1 347.6 400.2 0.9 40.2 11.5 4.6 3.2 4.3 – – – 23.5 1.7 24.6 8.2 Paracricotopus sp. 1.2 141.4 137.5 1.0 17.8 10.2 2.7 2.6 3.1 – – – 18.5 1.0 16.4 – Parakiefferiella sp. 1 2.6 253.3 237.5 1.1 35.3 13.4 2.7 3.3 3.3 5.6 – – 28.3 1.2 15.7 6.4 Parakiefferiella sp. 2 2.2 172.5 188.6 0.9 20.2 9.8 2.8 3.6 3.8 4.3 – – 24.2 0.8 15.9 – Parakiefferiella sp. 3 2.6 122.5 135.6 0.9 15.4 9.3 1.9 2.5 2.6 0.9 – – 17.3 0.9 12.7 5.9 Parakiefferiella sp. 4 2.3 136.1 149.8 0.9 23.4 17.7 2.8 4.2 3.7 2.0 – – 30.4 0.8 – – Parakeifferiella cf. gracillima 2.8 167.8 207.2 0.8 21.2 9.3 2.5 2.5 3.9 4.6 – – 22.9 0.9 14.9 4.9 Parametriocnemus lundbecki 4.0 292.9 321.3 0.9 54.7 19.3 4.2 5.7 4.6 – – – 33.7 1.6 22.9 10.6 Psectrocladius (s.s.) limbatellus 5.9 486.9 469.6 1.0 96.9 14.1 8.8 5.5 4.9 – – – 33.2 2.9 30.9 6.5 Article Rheocricotopus (Psil.) chalybeatus group – 204.8 195.7 1.0 33.4 13.5 3.5 3.3 2.7 – – – 23.0 1.5 16.3 – To be continued on next page [page 234] [Journal of Entomological and Acarological Research 2016; 48:6075] Table 1. Continued from previous page. Article A) Larvae (mm) HL HW HL/HW A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 Flagellum AR Blade B2 Subfamily Orthocladiinae Stictocladius sp. G 5.7 177.8 165.5 1.1 48.5 69.6 6.3 3.2 9.1 – – – 88.2 0.6 65.8 – Thienemanniella xena 2.3 241.0 198.1 1.2 89.8 26.3 25.2 2.2 3.5 – – – 57.3 1.6 19.7 – Tvetenia paucunca 4.0 300.9 269.4 1.1 49.4only 17.4 2.3 3.6 3.8 – – – 27.1 1.8 18.7 – Tvetenia tshernovskii 3.7 374.8 322.9 1.2 62.7 16.8 6.3 4.7 4.4 32.1 1.9 29.6 – Subfamily Chironominae Beckidia tethys 4.6 221.9 259.3 0.9 38.5 21.0 22.2 11.5 2.9 3.9 2.3 63.8 0.6 68.9 – Chernovskiia orbicus 7.8 210.1 208.9 1.0 91.4 26.4 26.9 20.6 6.0 2.3 2.9 2.2 87.2 1.0 43.6 – Chironomus (s.s.) decorus group 13.9 475.7 460.6 1.0 95.1 23.7 6.6 10.3 7.1 – – – 47.7 2.0 43.6 – Chironomus (s.s.) salinarius group 5.8 508.0 566.6 use 0.9 108.1 25.1 6.4 8.0 7.2 – – – 46.7 2.3 45.1 – Cryptochironomus blarina 9.3 505.2 476.5 1.1 64.4 33.2 30.7 3.1 4.4 – – – 71.4 0.9 26.3 6.3 Demicryptochironomus cuneatus 6.5 345.5 292.6 1.2 55.5 12.2 15.7 10.4 4.9 2.2 2.2 47.5 1.2 24.1 6.0 Glyptotendipes (Glyptotendipes) sp. 2.8 233.7 227.0 1.0 29.6 16.2 11.2 11.0 4.8 – – – 43.2 0.7 52.3 5.9 Microtendipes (s.s.) pedellus group 6.9 417.6 409.6 1.0 96.6 15.4 20.1 15.4 11.2 6.5 – – 68.5 1.4 65.5 – Microtendipes (s.s.) rydalensis group 2.1 222.1 201.2 1.1 45.5 13.9 19.1 10.0 6.3 4.2 – – 53.6 0.8 30.8 – Paracladopelma cf.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES and PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS of SHRUB EXPANSION in WESTERN ALASKA by Molly Tankersley Mcdermott, B.A./B.S
    Arthropod communities and passerine diet: effects of shrub expansion in Western Alaska Item Type Thesis Authors McDermott, Molly Tankersley Download date 26/09/2021 06:13:39 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7893 ARTHROPOD COMMUNITIES AND PASSERINE DIET: EFFECTS OF SHRUB EXPANSION IN WESTERN ALASKA By Molly Tankersley McDermott, B.A./B.S. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Biological Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks August 2017 APPROVED: Pat Doak, Committee Chair Greg Breed, Committee Member Colleen Handel, Committee Member Christa Mulder, Committee Member Kris Hundertmark, Chair Department o f Biology and Wildlife Paul Layer, Dean College o f Natural Science and Mathematics Michael Castellini, Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Across the Arctic, taller woody shrubs, particularly willow (Salix spp.), birch (Betula spp.), and alder (Alnus spp.), have been expanding rapidly onto tundra. Changes in vegetation structure can alter the physical habitat structure, thermal environment, and food available to arthropods, which play an important role in the structure and functioning of Arctic ecosystems. Not only do they provide key ecosystem services such as pollination and nutrient cycling, they are an essential food source for migratory birds. In this study I examined the relationships between the abundance, diversity, and community composition of arthropods and the height and cover of several shrub species across a tundra-shrub gradient in northwestern Alaska. To characterize nestling diet of common passerines that occupy this gradient, I used next-generation sequencing of fecal matter. Willow cover was strongly and consistently associated with abundance and biomass of arthropods and significant shifts in arthropod community composition and diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Chironominae 8.1
    CHIRONOMINAE 8.1 SUBFAMILY CHIRONOMINAE 8 DIAGNOSIS: Antennae 4-8 segmented, rarely reduced. Labrum with S I simple, palmate or plumose; S II simple, apically fringed or plumose; S III simple; S IV normal or sometimes on pedicel. Labral lamellae usually well developed, but reduced or absent in some taxa. Mentum usually with 8-16 well sclerotized teeth; sometimes central teeth or entire mentum pale or poorly sclerotized; rarely teeth fewer than 8 or modified as seta-like projections. Ventromental plates well developed and usually striate, but striae reduced or vestigial in some taxa; beard absent. Prementum without dense brushes of setae. Body usually with anterior and posterior parapods and procerci well developed; setal fringe not present, but sometimes with bifurcate pectinate setae. Penultimate segment sometimes with 1-2 pairs of ventral tubules; antepenultimate segment sometimes with lateral tubules. Anal tubules usually present, reduced in brackish water and marine taxa. NOTESTES: Usually the most abundant subfamily (in terms of individuals and taxa) found on the Coastal Plain of the Southeast. Found in fresh, brackish and salt water (at least one truly marine genus). Most larvae build silken tubes in or on substrate; some mine in plants, dead wood or sediments; some are free- living; some build transportable cases. Many larvae feed by spinning silk catch-nets, allowing them to fill with detritus, etc., and then ingesting the net; some taxa are grazers; some are predacious. Larvae of several taxa (especially Chironomus) have haemoglobin that gives them a red color and the ability to live in low oxygen conditions. With only one exception (Skutzia), at the generic level the larvae of all described (as adults) southeastern Chironominae are known.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016
    Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve Management Plan 2011-2016 April 1981 Revised, May 1982 2nd revision, April 1983 3rd revision, December 1999 4th revision, May 2011 Prepared for U.S. Department of Commerce Ohio Department of Natural Resources National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Division of Wildlife Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management 2045 Morse Road, Bldg. G Estuarine Reserves Division Columbus, Ohio 1305 East West Highway 43229-6693 Silver Spring, MD 20910 This management plan has been developed in accordance with NOAA regulations, including all provisions for public involvement. It is consistent with the congressional intent of Section 315 of the Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972, as amended, and the provisions of the Ohio Coastal Management Program. OWC NERR Management Plan, 2011 - 2016 Acknowledgements This management plan was prepared by the staff and Advisory Council of the Old Woman Creek National Estuarine Research Reserve (OWC NERR), in collaboration with the Ohio Department of Natural Resources-Division of Wildlife. Participants in the planning process included: Manager, Frank Lopez; Research Coordinator, Dr. David Klarer; Coastal Training Program Coordinator, Heather Elmer; Education Coordinator, Ann Keefe; Education Specialist Phoebe Van Zoest; and Office Assistant, Gloria Pasterak. Other Reserve staff including Dick Boyer and Marje Bernhardt contributed their expertise to numerous planning meetings. The Reserve is grateful for the input and recommendations provided by members of the Old Woman Creek NERR Advisory Council. The Reserve is appreciative of the review, guidance, and council of Division of Wildlife Executive Administrator Dave Scott and the mapping expertise of Keith Lott and the late Steve Barry.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO Approfondimento Delle
    UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI MILANO Dipartimento di Protezione dei Sistemi Agroalimentare e Urbano e valorizzazione delle biodiversità Scuola di dottorato in Terra, Ambiente e Biodiversità DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN SCIENZE NATURALISTICHE E AMBIENTALI CICLO XXIII Approfondimento delle conoscenze sull'ecologia dei Ditteri Chironomidi nelle acque interne Italiane TUTOR: PROF. BRUNO ROSSARO CO-TUTOR: DOTT.SSA VALERIA LENCIONI COORDINATORE DEL DOTTORATO: PROF. ANDREA TINTORI CANDIDATA: DOTT.SSA VALENTINA GRAZIOLI (…) la motivazione su cui si fonda questo comportamento non va ricercata nell’appetenza verso un’unica azione finale che costituisce lo scopo e che soddisfa la pulsione, ma deriva da un’altra fonte, cui spetta la singolare capacità di attivare molte, o addirittura tutte le coordinazioni ereditarie dell’animale. Questo tipo di acquisizione del sapere (…) viene chiamato comportamento esplorativo o di curiosità.(…).L’elemento qualitativamente nuovo consiste nel fatto che la motivazione è fornita dal processo di apprendimento stesso, e non dall’esecuzione dell’azione finale. Con questo passo apparentemente così piccolo si manifesta un processo cognitivo di tipo del tutto nuovo, che è fondamentalmente identico alla ricerca umana, e che conduce, senza che intervengano modificazioni essenziali, allo studio scientifico della natura. K. Lorenz INDICE 1. PREFAZIONE ................................................................................................... 5 2. SCOPO DELLA TESI ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019
    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 1 Table 1. Current Taxonomic Keys and the Level of Taxonomy Routinely U
    Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Table 1. Current taxonomic keys and the level of taxonomy routinely used by the Ohio EPA in streams and rivers for various macroinvertebrate taxonomic classifications. Genera that are reasonably considered to be monotypic in Ohio are also listed. Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Species Pennak 1989, Thorp & Rogers 2016 Porifera If no gemmules are present identify to family (Spongillidae). Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Cnidaria monotypic genera: Cordylophora caspia and Craspedacusta sowerbii Platyhelminthes Class (Turbellaria) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nemertea Phylum (Nemertea) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Phylum (Nematomorpha) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Nematomorpha Paragordius varius monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Ectoprocta monotypic genera: Cristatella mucedo, Hyalinella punctata, Lophopodella carteri, Paludicella articulata, Pectinatella magnifica, Pottsiella erecta Entoprocta Urnatella gracilis monotypic genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Polychaeta Class (Polychaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Annelida Oligochaeta Subclass (Oligochaeta) Thorp & Rogers 2016 Hirudinida Species Klemm 1982, Klemm et al. 2015 Anostraca Species Thorp & Rogers 2016 Species (Lynceus Laevicaudata Thorp & Rogers 2016 brachyurus) Spinicaudata Genus Thorp & Rogers 2016 Williams 1972, Thorp & Rogers Isopoda Genus 2016 Holsinger 1972, Thorp & Rogers Amphipoda Genus 2016 Gammaridae: Gammarus Species Holsinger 1972 Crustacea monotypic genera: Apocorophium lacustre, Echinogammarus ischnus, Synurella dentata Species (Taphromysis Mysida Thorp & Rogers 2016 louisianae) Crocker & Barr 1968; Jezerinac 1993, 1995; Jezerinac & Thoma 1984; Taylor 2000; Thoma et al. Cambaridae Species 2005; Thoma & Stocker 2009; Crandall & De Grave 2017; Glon et al. 2018 Species (Palaemon Pennak 1989, Palaemonidae kadiakensis) Thorp & Rogers 2016 1 Ohio EPA Macroinvertebrate Taxonomic Level December 2019 Taxon Subtaxon Taxonomic Level Taxonomic Key(ies) Informal grouping of the Arachnida Hydrachnidia Smith 2001 water mites Genus Morse et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Checklist of the Family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 63–90 (2014)Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland 63 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland Lauri Paasivirta1 1 Ruuhikoskenkatu 17 B 5, FI-24240 Salo, Finland Corresponding author: Lauri Paasivirta ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Kahanpää | Received 10 March 2014 | Accepted 26 August 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/F3343ED1-AE2C-43B4-9BA1-029B5EC32763 Citation: Paasivirta L (2014) Checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 63–90. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7461 Abstract A checklist of the family Chironomidae (Diptera) recorded from Finland is presented. Keywords Finland, Chironomidae, species list, biodiversity, faunistics Introduction There are supposedly at least 15 000 species of chironomid midges in the world (Armitage et al. 1995, but see Pape et al. 2011) making it the largest family among the aquatic insects. The European chironomid fauna consists of 1262 species (Sæther and Spies 2013). In Finland, 780 species can be found, of which 37 are still undescribed (Paasivirta 2012). The species checklist written by B. Lindeberg on 23.10.1979 (Hackman 1980) included 409 chironomid species. Twenty of those species have been removed from the checklist due to various reasons. The total number of species increased in the 1980s to 570, mainly due to the identification work by me and J. Tuiskunen (Bergman and Jansson 1983, Tuiskunen and Lindeberg 1986).
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents 2
    Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) List of Freshwater Macroinvertebrate Taxa from California and Adjacent States including Standard Taxonomic Effort Levels 1 March 2011 Austin Brady Richards and D. Christopher Rogers Table of Contents 2 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 Acknowledgments 5 2.0 Standard Taxonomic Effort 5 2.1 Rules for Developing a Standard Taxonomic Effort Document 5 2.2 Changes from the Previous Version 6 2.3 The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic List 6 3.0 Methods and Materials 7 3.1 Habitat information 7 3.2 Geographic Scope 7 3.3 Abbreviations used in the STE List 8 3.4 Life Stage Terminology 8 4.0 Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species 8 5.0 Literature Cited 9 Appendix I. The SAFIT Standard Taxonomic Effort List 10 Phylum Silicea 11 Phylum Cnidaria 12 Phylum Platyhelminthes 14 Phylum Nemertea 15 Phylum Nemata 16 Phylum Nematomorpha 17 Phylum Entoprocta 18 Phylum Ectoprocta 19 Phylum Mollusca 20 Phylum Annelida 32 Class Hirudinea Class Branchiobdella Class Polychaeta Class Oligochaeta Phylum Arthropoda Subphylum Chelicerata, Subclass Acari 35 Subphylum Crustacea 47 Subphylum Hexapoda Class Collembola 69 Class Insecta Order Ephemeroptera 71 Order Odonata 95 Order Plecoptera 112 Order Hemiptera 126 Order Megaloptera 139 Order Neuroptera 141 Order Trichoptera 143 Order Lepidoptera 165 2 Order Coleoptera 167 Order Diptera 219 3 1.0 Introduction The Southwest Association of Freshwater Invertebrate Taxonomists (SAFIT) is charged through its charter to develop standardized levels for the taxonomic identification of aquatic macroinvertebrates in support of bioassessment. This document defines the standard levels of taxonomic effort (STE) for bioassessment data compatible with the Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) bioassessment protocols (Ode, 2007) or similar procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA
    Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4300 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4300 Taxonomic Paper Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA Thomas P. Simon†, Charles C. Morris‡, Joseph R. Robb§, William McCoy | † Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 46403, United States of America ‡ US National Park Service, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore, Porter, IN 47468, United States of America § US Fish and Wildlife Service, Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge, Madison, IN 47250, United States of America | US Fish and Wildlife Service, Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge, Oakland City, IN 47660, United States of America Corresponding author: Thomas P. Simon ([email protected]) Academic editor: Benjamin Price Received: 08 Dec 2014 | Accepted: 09 Jan 2015 | Published: 12 Jan 2015 Citation: Simon T, Morris C, Robb J, McCoy W (2015) Biological Diversity, Ecological Health and Condition of Aquatic Assemblages at National Wildlife Refuges in Southern Indiana, USA. Biodiversity Data Journal 3: e4300. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.3.e4300 Abstract The National Wildlife Refuge system is a vital resource for the protection and conservation of biodiversity and biological integrity in the United States. Surveys were conducted to determine the spatial and temporal patterns of fish, macroinvertebrate, and crayfish populations in two watersheds that encompass three refuges in southern Indiana. The Patoka River National Wildlife Refuge had the highest number of aquatic species with 355 macroinvertebrate taxa, six crayfish species, and 82 fish species, while the Big Oaks National Wildlife Refuge had 163 macroinvertebrate taxa, seven crayfish species, and 37 fish species. The Muscatatuck National Wildlife Refuge had the lowest diversity of macroinvertebrates with 96 taxa and six crayfish species, while possessing the second highest fish species richness with 51 species.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliograp Bibliography
    BIBLIOGRAPHY 9.1 BIBLIOGRAPHY 9 Adam, J.I & O.A. Sæther. 1999. Revision of the records for the southern United States genus Nilothauma Kieffer, 1921 (Diptera: (Diptera: Chironomidae). J. Ga. Ent. Soc. Chironomidae). Ent. scand. Suppl. 56: 1- 15:69-73. 107. Beck, W.M., Jr. & E.C. Beck. 1966. Chironomidae Ali, A. 1991. Perspectives on management of pest- (Diptera) of Florida - I. Pentaneurini (Tany- iferous Chironomidae (Diptera), an emerg- podinae). Bull. Fla. St. Mus. Biol. Sci. ing global problem. J. Am. Mosq. Control 10:305-379. Assoc. 7: 260-281. Beck, W.M., Jr., & E.C. Beck. 1970. The immature Armitage, P., P.S. Cranston & L.C.V. Pinder (eds). stages of some Chironomini (Chiro- 1995. The Chironomidae. Biology and nomidae). Q.J. Fla. Acad. Sci. 33:29-42. ecology of non-biting midges. Chapman & Bilyj, B. 1984. Descriptions of two new species of Hall, London. 572 pp. Tanypodinae (Diptera: Chironomidae) from Ashe, P. 1983. A catalogue of chironomid genera Southern Indian Lake, Canada. Can. J. Fish. and subgenera of the world including syn- Aquat. Sci. 41: 659-671. onyms (Diptera: Chironomidae). Ent. Bilyj, B. 1985. New placement of Tanypus pallens scand. Suppl. 17: 1-68. Coquillett, 1902 nec Larsia pallens (Coq.) Barton, D.R., D.R. Oliver & M.E. Dillon. 1993. sensu Roback 1971 (Diptera: Chironomi- The first Nearctic record of Stackelbergina dae) and redescription of the holotype. Can. Shilova and Zelentsov (Diptera: Chironomi- Ent. 117: 39-42. dae): Taxonomic and ecological observations. Bilyj, B. 1988. A taxonomic review of Guttipelopia Aquatic Insects 15: 57-63. (Diptera: Chironomidae).
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcoding
    Full-time PhD studies of Ecology and Environmental Protection Piotr Gadawski Species diversity and origin of non-biting midges (Chironomidae) from a geologically young lake PhD Thesis and its old spring system Performed in Department of Invertebrate Zoology and Hydrobiology in Institute of Ecology and Environmental Protection Różnorodność gatunkowa i pochodzenie fauny Supervisor: ochotkowatych (Chironomidae) z geologicznie Prof. dr hab. Michał Grabowski młodego jeziora i starego systemu źródlisk Auxiliary supervisor: Dr. Matteo Montagna, Assoc. Prof. Łódź, 2020 Łódź, 2020 Table of contents Acknowledgements ..........................................................................................................3 Summary ...........................................................................................................................4 General introduction .........................................................................................................6 Skadar Lake ...................................................................................................................7 Chironomidae ..............................................................................................................10 Species concept and integrative taxonomy .................................................................12 DNA barcoding ...........................................................................................................14 Chapter I. First insight into the diversity and ecology of non-biting midges (Diptera: Chironomidae)
    [Show full text]
  • This Table Contains a Taxonomic List of Benthic Invertebrates Collected from Streams in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Study
    This table contains a taxonomic list of benthic invertebrates collected from streams in the Upper Mississippi River Basin study unit as part of the USGS National Water Quality Assessemnt (NAWQA) Program. Invertebrates were collected from woody snags in selected streams from 1996-2004. Data Retreival occurred 26-JAN-06 11.10.25 AM from the USGS data warehouse (Taxonomic List Invert http://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/data). The data warehouse currently contains invertebrate data through 09/30/2002. Invertebrate taxa can include provisional and conditional identifications. For more information about invertebrate sample processing and taxonomic standards see, "Methods of analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory -- Processing, taxonomy, and quality control of benthic macroinvertebrate samples", at << http://nwql.usgs.gov/Public/pubs/OFR00-212.html >>. Data Retrieval Precaution: Extreme caution must be exercised when comparing taxonomic lists generated using different search criteria. This is because the number of samples represented by each taxa list will vary depending on the geographic criteria selected for the retrievals. In addition, species lists retrieved at different times using the same criteria may differ because: (1) the taxonomic nomenclature (names) were updated, and/or (2) new samples containing new taxa may Phylum Class Order Family Subfamily Tribe Genus Species Taxon Porifera Porifera Cnidaria Hydrozoa Hydroida Hydridae Hydridae Cnidaria Hydrozoa Hydroida Hydridae Hydra Hydra sp. Platyhelminthes Turbellaria Turbellaria Nematoda Nematoda Bryozoa Bryozoa Mollusca Gastropoda Gastropoda Mollusca Gastropoda Mesogastropoda Mesogastropoda Mollusca Gastropoda Mesogastropoda Viviparidae Campeloma Campeloma sp. Mollusca Gastropoda Mesogastropoda Viviparidae Viviparus Viviparus sp. Mollusca Gastropoda Mesogastropoda Hydrobiidae Hydrobiidae Mollusca Gastropoda Basommatophora Ancylidae Ancylidae Mollusca Gastropoda Basommatophora Ancylidae Ferrissia Ferrissia sp.
    [Show full text]