Durham E-Theses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Durham E-Theses Durham E-Theses Anglo-Scandinavians in north east England and south east Scotland between the eighth and eleventh centuries CARSON, JOHN,LUKE How to cite: CARSON, JOHN,LUKE (2017) Anglo-Scandinavians in north east England and south east Scotland between the eighth and eleventh centuries, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/13997/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Anglo-Scandinavians in north east England and south east Scotland between the eighth and eleventh centuries Volume 1 of 2 John Luke Carson MA Archaeology by Research Department of Archaeology Durham University 2017 3 John Luke Carson Anglo-Scandinavians in north east England and south east Scotland between the eighth and eleventh centuries Abstract The aim of this thesis is to provide a better understanding of Anglo-Scandinavian presence in north east England and south east Scotland between the eighth and eleventh centuries, the form it took and the impact it had. Despite recent developments in the field of Anglo-Scandinavian archaeology in Britain and the new perspectives brought by new evidence to the understanding of Anglo-Scandinavian presence in Britain, very few of these have been applied or used in relation to north east England and south east Scotland. The result of this is that these regions have been left understudied and consequently the picture of Anglo-Scandinavian presence in these regions is outdated and does not reflect current developments. A study of current debates and modern developments will suggest which terminology offers the most accurate option for recognising material associated with the incoming Scandinavians in the archaeological record of eighth to eleventh century north east England and south east Scotland. The term Anglo-Scandinavian was seen as the most accurate alternative description to ‘Viking’. The collection of data for Anglo-Scandinavian presence in the region reflected recent debates and developments. The evidence was plotted and analysed to provide an understanding about Anglo-Scandinavian presence in the study region, the form it took and the impact it had. The main conclusion from this study is that the form and impact of Anglo-Scandinavian presence varied significantly throughout the study region. This project recommends that sites that which have produced significant sculptural or artefactual evidence for Anglo-Scandinavian activity be targeted for further investigation to provide a better understanding of the nature of Anglo-Scandinavian activity in the region. The study and creation of a typology for existing artefacts such as lead weights would provide a better understanding of the nature of activities such as trade, carried out by Anglo-Scandinavians. Keywords: Viking, Scandinavian, Anglo-Scandinavian, presence, impact, form, north east England, south east Scotland i Table of Contents Volume 1 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. 7 List of Figures ........................................................................................................................... 8 List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................... 12 Statement of Copyright ........................................................................................................... 13 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................. 14 1.Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 15 1.1 Sites................................................................................................................................ 15 1.2 Burials ............................................................................................................................ 16 1.3 Sculpture ........................................................................................................................ 17 1.4 Research Focus .............................................................................................................. 20 1.5 Overall Research Aim and Individual Research Objectives .......................................... 22 1.6 Value of this Research ................................................................................................... 24 2.Literature Review ................................................................................................................. 26 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 26 2.2 Sources of evidence for the study of Anglo-Scandinavian presence in north east England and south east Scotland .................................................................................. 26 2.2.01 Historical Sources ..................................................................................................... 26 2.2.02 Artefacts .................................................................................................................... 28 2.2.03 Place-names .............................................................................................................. 29 2.2.04 Sculpture ................................................................................................................... 30 2.3 Debates about the number of settlers and their impact .................................................. 30 2.3.01 Maximalist Position .................................................................................................. 30 2.3.02 Maximalist Position in relation to Northumbria ....................................................... 32 2.3.03 Minimalist Position ................................................................................................... 33 2.3.04 Minimalist Position in relation to Northumbria ........................................................ 34 2.3.05 Conclusion about past debates on numbers and extent of presence ......................... 37 2.4 New Debates: Identity and Terminology ....................................................................... 40 2.4.01 Problems with the term ‘Viking’ .............................................................................. 40 1 2.4.02 Complexities of identities and factors contributing to identity ................................ 42 2.4.03 Political influence on identity ................................................................................... 43 2.4.04 Scandinavian influence on identity ........................................................................... 44 2.4.05 Conclusion about political and Scandinavian influence ........................................... 47 2.5 Alternatives to ‘Viking’ ................................................................................................. 49 2.5.01 Hybrid Identities and Viking diaspora ...................................................................... 49 2.5.02 Hybrid Identities – Definition, Application and Proponents .................................... 50 2.5.03 Disadvantages of hybrid identities............................................................................ 52 2.5.04 Advantages of hybrid identities ................................................................................ 53 2.5.05 Viking diaspora – Definition, Application, Proponents and Advantages ................. 55 2.5.06 Disadvantages of Viking diaspora ............................................................................ 56 2.5.07 Identity Conclusion – The best alternative to ‘Viking’ ............................................ 59 2.6 Overall Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 60 3.Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 61 3.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................... 61 3.2 Data Collection .............................................................................................................. 61 3.3 Framework for data analysis .......................................................................................... 65 3.4 Limitations and potential problems ............................................................................... 66 4.Data Collection ..................................................................................................................... 69 4.1 Tees Valley and southern County Durham ...................................................................
Recommended publications
  • North Riding Yorkshire. 8S
    DIRECTORY. J NORTH RIDING YORKSHIRE. FINGALL. 8S Feliskirk. Hutchinson Peter, stone mason Kettlewell Matthew, shoe maker Clayforth Rev. Henry B.A. Vicarage Hutchinson William, joiner & carpenter Newball Thomas, farmer Bosville Hon. Mrs. Mount St. Johu Keel James, blacksmith Newbould Thomas, sen. farmer Barker James, farmer Kirby Robert, farmer Parvin Tom, farmer . Gregson Thomas, farmer Knaggs Bateson, farmer, High Paradise Porter Ann (Mrs.), shopkeeper Gregson Timothy, bicycle repairer Pickard Alfred Jas.Jobnstone Arms P.H Rider Pawson, farmer Hebden John, farmer Prest Robert, shopkeeper Sturdy John, farmer Kirk George, farmer Richmond John, farmer Suffill Elizabeth (Miss), farmer Milner Valentine, farmer Robinson James, butcher Thompson ueorge, Star P.H. & farmer Prest George, co" keeper Robinson Thomas, farmer Tyrman Edward, farmer Spivey Joseph, Carpenters' Arms P.H. Stokell Thomas, farmer, West.acre Walker Isaac, farmer, Cleeves & farmer Rtokell Thos. jun. Carpenters' Arms P.H Walker Joseph, carpenter & joiner Todd J ames, farmer Weatherill William, farmer & miller Williamson James, pig dealer TurnAr William, farmer & Clydesdale (water), Raventhorpe Wood James, grocer horse proprietor, Moor house Williamson John, tailor Walker Thomas, farmer, Rymer house Thirlby. Wright Richard, land surveyor, Post off Sutton-under-Whitestone- Boltby. cli:ffe. COMMERCIAL. Johnstone Rev. Frederick Richard M.A. Dunn Miss, Sutton hall Barr Francis, farmer Ravensthorpe manor Geipel Herbert Brough W"illiam,farmer,Kelmer grange SandwithMajor-Gen. WilliamFrederick,
    [Show full text]
  • Bishop Press, Press, January May 30Th, 9Th, 2010.2009 Page 1 BURNS NIGHT EVENT TRAIN STATION SET for Bishop Auckland Town Hall Band
    Issue No. 21 Holdforth Interiors Holdforth Crest, B.A. Tel: 01388 664777 Fax: 01388 665982 Soft Furnishings, Your local Curtains, Alterations Community Newspaper (both clothing & soft furnishings) Bishop Auckland, Saturday, January 9th, 2010. Telephone/Fax: 01388 775896 www.bishoppress.com Free Estimates Email: [email protected] - Duty journalist 0790 999 2731 No job too small Published at 3-4 First Floor Offices, Shildon Town Council, Civic Hall Square, Shildon, DL4 1AH. Competitive Rates PUBLIC CONSULTATION TO BE FREE LIFE HELD ON BRIDGE CLOSURE SKILLS COURSE A week-long People in Bishop Auckland part of the session, which will public exhibition are being offered the chance to involve a DIY lesson, where will provide join in free basic skills classes experts from Gentoo will show information to help them get the most out participants how to build flat- on an essential of life. pack furniture. scheme to repair Anyone can sign up for the Course co-ordinator, Damian a busy road half-day courses and go home Pearson, said, “We have had a bridge in Bishop with a piece of furniture they really positive response from Auckland. built themselves. the people who have done our Cockton Hill The courses have been held course so far. Railway Bridge regularly for the past year by “It is aimed at anyone in the will be closed to housing management company area and participants get to vehicles for up to Dale & Valley Homes and have keep what they build.” five weeks while proved popular with those who The next course will take Durham County have signed up.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION
    CALIFORNIA HISTORIC MILITARY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES INVENTORY VOLUME II: THE HISTORY AND HISTORIC RESOURCES OF THE MILITARY IN CALIFORNIA, 1769-1989 by Stephen D. Mikesell Prepared for: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Sacramento District 1325 J Street Sacramento, California Contract: DACA05-97-D-0013, Task 0001 FOSTER WHEELER ENVIRONMENTAL CORPORATION Prepared by: JRP JRP HISTORICAL CONSULTING SERVICES Davis, California 95616 March 2000 California llistoric Military Buildings and Stnictures Inventory, Volume II CONTENTS CONTENTS ..................................................................................................................................... i FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF ACRONYMS .................................................................................................................. iv PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... viii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1-1 2.0 COLONIAL ERA (1769-1846) .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Spanish-Mexican Era Buildings Owned by the Military ............................................... 2-8 2.2 Conclusions ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Escomb Saxon Church
    Escomb Saxon Church The church was built around 675 AD with stone probably from the Roman Fort at Binchester. It was originally thought that the church was an offshoot of one of the local monasteries for example Whitby or Hartlepool, but this is only one of several possibilities as there are no known written records until 990 AD. Escomb is situated two miles west of Bishop Auckland in the Wear Valley. The church is one of five parishes grouped with Etherley, Hamsterley, Witton Park and Witton-le-Wear. Our church is on the national register of the Small Pilgrim Places Network. These places are small, spiritual oases, offering an atmosphere that encourages stillness, prayer and reflection for people of all faiths or none. Guides available by arrangement if required. Please contact us or visit our website for details of services. When is it on? Time of day Morning Afternoon Evening Session Day time and evening. information Who to contact Contact name Elisheva Mechanic Contact Vicar position Telephone 01388 768 898 E-mail [email protected] Website escombsaxonchurch.co.uk Where to go Name Escomb Church Address Escomb Green Escomb County Durham Postcode DL14 7SY Local Offer Local Offer Interior not accessible by wheelchair. description Disclaimer Durham County Council's Families Information Service does not promote nor endorse the services advertised on this website. Anyone seeking to use/access such services does so at their own risk and may make all appropriate enquiries about fitness for purpose and suitability to meet their needs. Call the Families Information Service: 03000 269 995 or email: [email protected] Disclaimer: Durham County Council's Families Information Service encourages and promotes the use of plain English.
    [Show full text]
  • Template:Ælfgifu Theories ­ Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Template:Ælfgifu Theories from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    2/6/2016 Template:Ælfgifu theories ­ Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Template:Ælfgifu theories From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Family tree, showing two theories relating Aelgifu to Eadwig, King of England Æthelred Æthelwulf Mucel King of Osburh Ealdorman Eadburh Wessex of the Gaini ?–839­858 fl. 867­895 Alfred Æthelred I the Great Æthelbald Burgred Æthelberht Æthelwulf Æthelstan King of King of the King of King of Æthelswith King of Ealhswith Ealdorman King of Kent Wessex Anglo­ Wessex Mercia d. 888 Wessex d. 902 of the Gaini ?–839­855 c.848–865­ Saxons ?–856­860 ?–852­874 ?–860­865 d. 901 871 849–871­ 899 Edward the Elder Æthelfrith King of the (2)Ælfflæd Ealdorman Æthelhelm Æthelwold (1)Ecgwynn (3)Eadgifu Æthelgyth Anglo­ fl. 900s­ of S. Mercia fl. 880s d. 901 fl. 890s x903–966x fl. 903 Saxons 910s fl. 883­ c.875–899­ 904/915 924 unknown Æthelstan Æthelstan Edmund I Eadric Eadred Ælfstan Half­King Æthelwald King of King of Ealdorman King of Ealdorman Ealdorman Ealdorman unknown Æthelgifu the English the English of Wessex the English of Mercia of East of Kent c.894–924­ 921–939­ fl. 942­ 923­946­955 fl. 930­934 Anglia fl. 940­946 939 946 949 fl. 932­956 Eadwig Edgar I Æthelwald Æthelwine All­Fair the Peaceful Æthelweard Ælfgifu Ealdorman Ealdorman King of King of historian ? Ælfweard Ælfwaru fl. 956x957­ of East of East England England d. c.998 971 Anglia Anglia c.940­955­ c.943–959­ d. 962 d. 992 959 975 Two theories for the relationship of Ælfgifu and Eadwig King of England, whose marriage was annulled in 958 on grounds of consanguinuity.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, Issue 32932, Page 3535
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 2 MAY, 1924. 3535 5. An Area comprising : — The petty sessional divisions of Dukinfield, In the county of Durham. Stockport, Altrincham, Daresbury, Kuncorn, Bucklow, Prestbury and Congleton; and The county boroughs of West Hartlepool and Darlington. The parishes of Crowley, Aston-by-Bud worth, Great Budworth, Marston, Pickmere, The boroughs of Hartlepool and Stockton- Wincham, Nether Peover, Allostock, Cranage, on-Tees. Church Hulme, Twemlow, Goostrey-cum- The petty sessional divisions of West Hartle- Barnshaw, Blackden and Brereton-cum- pool County, Stockton County (except the Smethwick. parishes of Garmondsway Moor and Fishburn) and Darlington County. And also comprising: — The county borough of Stockport. In the North Riding of Yorkshire. The county borough of Middlesbrough. 8. An Area comprising: — The boroughs of Thornaby-on-Tees and The counties of Leicester and Stafford, Richmond. including all county and other boroughs The petty sessional divisions of Langbaurgh situated therein. West, Langbaurgh North, Thornaby and The county of Warwick, including all county Yarm, Allertonshire (including its detached and other boroughs situated therein (but part) Gilling Bast, Hang East, Hallikeld and excluding the boroughs of Warwick, Leaming- Birdforth; and ton and Stratford-on-Avon, the petty sessional divisions of Alcester, Kentlworth, Warwick, The parishes of Aldbrough, Melsonby, Stratford and Snitterfield, Burton Bassett and Gilling, Aske, Skeeby, Easby, Hudswell, Kineton, Brailes, Southam (except the parishes Hipswell, St. Martin, Scotton, Whashton, of Leamington, Hastings, Grandborough and Grinton, Ellerton Abbey, Downholnae, Stain- Wolfhampcote), and Henley (except the, ton, Walburn, Barden, West Hauxwell, East parishes of Tanworth, Packwood, Nuthurst, Hauxwell, Hunton, Arrathorne, Akebar, Con- Lapworth and Bushwood).
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Language and Linguistics Vol
    International Journal of Language and Linguistics Vol. 7, No. 3, September 2020 doi:10.30845/ijll.v7n3p2 Skaldic Panegyric and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle Poem on the Redemption of the Five Boroughs Leading Researcher Inna Matyushina Russian State University for the Humanities Miusskaya Ploshchad korpus 6, Moscow Russia, 125047 Honorary Professor, University of Exeter Queen's Building, The Queen's Drive Streatham Campus, Exeter, EX4 4QJ Summary: The paper attempts to reveal the affinities between skaldic panegyric poetry and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle poem on the ‘Redemption of the Five Boroughs’ included into four manuscripts (Parker, Worcester and both Abingdon) for the year 942. The thirteen lines of the Chronicle poem are laden with toponyms and ethnonyms, prompting scholars to suggest that its main function is mnemonic. However comparison with skaldic drápur points to the communicative aim of the lists of toponyms and ethnonyms, whose function is to mark the restoration of the space defining the historical significance of Edmund’s victory. The Chronicle poem unites the motifs of glory, spatial conquest and protection of land which are also present in Sighvat’s Knútsdrápa (SkP I 660. 9. 1-8), bearing thematic, situational, structural and functional affinity with the former. Like that of Knútsdrápa, the function of the Chronicle poem is to glorify the ruler by formally reconstructing space. The poem, which, unlike most Anglo-Saxon poetry, is centred not on a past but on a contemporary event, is encomium regis, traditional for skaldic poetry. ‘The Redemption of the Five Boroughs’ can be called an Anglo-Saxon equivalent of erfidrápa, directed to posterity and ensuring eternal fame for the ruler who reconstructed the spatial identity of his kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • Drjonespodiatryleaflet.Pdf
    DARLINGTON NHS Foundation Trust Hundens Rehabilitation Centre Building A Hundens Willington Health Centre DERWENTSIDE EASINGTON Chapel Street, Willington DL15 0EQ Service Lane Darlington DL1 1JE Shotley Bridge Community Hospital Murton Clinic delivered by County Durham & Darlington NHS Service delivered by County Durham & Consett DH8 0NB 21 Woods Terrace, Murton SR7 9AG Foundation Trust. Darlington NHS Foundation Trust. Service delivered by County Durham & Service by NHS City Hospitals Sunderland Darlington NHS Foundation Trust CDDFT provide assessment and ongoing care at CDDFT provide assessment and ongoing care Peterlee Community Hospital O’Neill Drive, the clinics indicated above, they also provide at the clinics indicated above, they also Stanley Primary Care Centre Clifford Road, Peterlee SR8 5UQ Service by North Tees & following an initial assessment clinics at the provide following an initial assessment clinics Stanley DH9 0AB Service delivered by County Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust following venues:- at the following venues:- Durham & Darlington NHS Foundation Trust. Cockfield GP Surgery Peterlee Health Centre Gainford GP Surgery Flemming Place, Peterlee SR8 1AD Evenwood GP Surgery CDDFT provide assessment and ongoing care at Whinfield Medical Practice Whinbush Way, Service by Minor Ops Limited Middleton-in-Teasdale GP Surgery the clinics indicated above, they also provide Darlington DL1 3RT Service by Minor Ops Limited following an initial assessment clinics at the Seaham Primary Care Centre following venues:- DURHAM DALES
    [Show full text]
  • Leyburn Housing Need Report
    Leyburn and Surrounding Villages Housing Need Report Draft Report March 2019 Amanda Madden Rural Housing Enabler Richmondshire District Council Mercury House, Station Road Richmond Tel: 01748 901117 Email: [email protected] CONTENTS page Areas covered – population and household data 3 Leyburn Town Plan Background 4 Summary 1. Parish Summary 5 2. Introduction 5 3 Aim 5-6 4. Survey distribution and response 6 5 Existing Household Composition 6 6. Key findings Housing need 7 - 10 7 Comments from respondents 10 8 Housing Need Table 11 - 16 9. Recommendations 17 2 AREAS COVERED IN THE REPORT – POPULATION & HOUSEHOLD DATA PARISH NAME POPULATION HOUSEHOLD Nos LEYBURN 2183 1160 SPENNITHORNE (inc Hutton Hang) 198 99 HARMBY 371 198 MIDDLEHAM 825 476 FINGHALL (inc Akebar) 166 74 REDMIRE (inc Castle Bolton with E & W Bolton) 384 237 WENSLEY 151 74 BELLERBY 364 193 PRESTON UNDER SCAR 170 109 2011 Census has not been able to breakdown some of the areas and has included small settlements as indicated in the table above LEYBURN TOWN PLAN BACKGROUND In late 2017 residents and businesses in Leyburn and the surrounding area were invited to take part in a comprehensive survey to find out what people thought about the town and the future challenges it faced. More than 1000 respondents gave their views on issues ranging from Council services to public events and car parking; the responses, including more than 5000 written comments, were analysed, prioritised and published in May 2018 as the Leyburn Town Plan. With reference to Richmondshire District Council’s current Local Plan calling for a large number of new houses to be built in and around Leyburn the survey solicited views on the type and tenure of houses in any new developments.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RURAL ECONOMY of NORTH EAST of ENGLAND M Whitby Et Al
    THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND M Whitby et al Centre for Rural Economy Research Report THE RURAL ECONOMY OF NORTH EAST ENGLAND Martin Whitby, Alan Townsend1 Matthew Gorton and David Parsisson With additional contributions by Mike Coombes2, David Charles2 and Paul Benneworth2 Edited by Philip Lowe December 1999 1 Department of Geography, University of Durham 2 Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies, University of Newcastle upon Tyne Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Scope of the Study 1 1.2 The Regional Context 3 1.3 The Shape of the Report 8 2. THE NATURAL RESOURCES OF THE REGION 2.1 Land 9 2.2 Water Resources 11 2.3 Environment and Heritage 11 3. THE RURAL WORKFORCE 3.1 Long Term Trends in Employment 13 3.2 Recent Employment Trends 15 3.3 The Pattern of Labour Supply 18 3.4 Aggregate Output per Head 23 4 SOCIAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL DYNAMICS 4.1 Distribution of Employment by Gender and Employment Status 25 4.2 Differential Trends in the Remoter Areas and the Coalfield Districts 28 4.3 Commuting Patterns in the North East 29 5 BUSINESS PERFORMANCE AND INFRASTRUCTURE 5.1 Formation and Turnover of Firms 39 5.2 Inward investment 44 5.3 Business Development and Support 46 5.4 Developing infrastructure 49 5.5 Skills Gaps 53 6. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS 55 References Appendices 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The scope of the study This report is on the rural economy of the North East of England1. It seeks to establish the major trends in rural employment and the pattern of labour supply.
    [Show full text]
  • Lordship of Bretts (Also Known As Bretts Place)
    Lordship of Bretts (also known as Bretts Place) Parish/ Aveley Principal Victoria County County Essex Source Histories Date History of Lordship Monarchs 871 Creation of the English Monarchy Alfred the Great 871-899 Edward Elder 899-924 Athelstan 924-939 Edmund I 939-946 Edred 946-955 Edwy 955-959 Edgar 959-975 Edward the Martyr 975-978 Ethelred 978-1016 Edmund II 1016 Canute 1016-1035 Harold I 1035-1040 Harthacnut 1040-1042 Pre 1066 Ulstan (or Wulfstan) is holding one hide in Kenningtons that Edward the Confessor 1042-1066 will form the Manor of Bretts. Harold II 1066 1066 Norman Conquest- Battle of Hastings William I 1066-1087 1066 William the Conqueror gives the Manor to Swein of Essex. 1086 Domesday 1086 At Domesday the Manor was held in Overlordship by Lewin as part of the Honour of Rayleigh. William II 1087-1100 Henry I 1100-35 Stephen 1135-54 Henry II 1154-89 Richard I 1189-99 Early 13th The Manor is named by the Bret family who are the demesne John 1199-1216 Century tenants 1212 Hugh le Bret is holding ¼ knight’s fee in Kenningtons. 1215 Magna Carta Henry III 1216-72 1215-1217 First Barons War 1239-1248 Second Barons War 1267 Hugh le Bret or his son and heir die leaving the Manor to John le Bret. © Copyright Manorial Counsel Limited 2018 Lordship of Bretts (also known as Bretts Place) Date History of Lordship Monarchs 1298 John dies and his son and heir Simon succeeds him. The Edward I 1272-1307 Manor comprises 238a.
    [Show full text]
  • Car Parking Charges for the Station, Richmond Swimming
    CAR PARKING CHARGES FOR THE STATION, RICHMOND SWIMMING POOL AND GYM CUSTOMERS ARE ON THE WAY; HOWEVER, YOU CAN MAKE THEM FAIRER IF YOU ACT IMMEDIATELY BY EXPRESSING YOUR VIEWS Richmondshire District Council is proposing to introduce car parking charges in The Station Yard Car Park this spring. We understand that the ticket machines have been ordered . This car park is currently used by customers of The Station, Richmond Swimming Pool and Liberty Gym. All of these buildings and the activities which take place in them are organised and maintained through the efforts of two local volunteer-led charities: The Station – Is operated by The Richmondshire Building Preservation Trust The Pool and Gym – Are operated by the Richmond Leisure Trust If you regularly use these ‘much loved’ charity-run-facilities , and choose to park your vehicle in the council owned Station Yard Car Park, you will shortly be charged for your visit. The charities that operate these facilities believe that what is being proposed will have an immediate and detrimental impact on these community amenities which are run on a ‘not-for profit’ basis - and could ultimately force them to close. The local authority appear to have little or no relevant research on which to justify their position. Your help is needed NOW to ensure that the views of people like you, who value The Station, pool and gym, to make your voices heard on this critical issue by writing to or phoning your district councillor, if you live in Richmondshire or writing to the head of the local authority if you don't.
    [Show full text]