DOCSLIB.ORG

C RECORD Coia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
C RECORD Coia RECORDC coiACOPY C-/O-.6 .EPORT NO. GDC-DAA70-004 (VOL. I) COPY NO. 001 EXPERIMENT MODULE CONCEPTS-STUDY FINAL REPORT a (THRU) (ACCESSION NBER) VOLUME I + MANAGEMENT SUMMARY (a I- (PAGES) (CODE) October 1970 (NASA CR OR TMX OR AD NUMBER) (CATEGORY) 2 Reproduced by NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE U S Department of Commerce Springfield VA 22151 ,Prepared for GEORGE C. MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER Huntsville, Alabama Contract NAS8-25051 ' Advanced Space Systems, Research and Engineering I ., _ . CONVAIR AEROSPACE-DIVISION OF GENERAL DYNAMICS San Diego, California \ (NASA-CR-103069) EXPERIMENT MODUILE CONCEPTS STUDY. VOLUME 1: MANAG3E MENT SUMMA:RY Final Report (General Unclas Dynamics/Convair) Oct. 1970 72 p CSCL 22B 12044 G3/31 19~~~ aj GDC-DAA70-004 Contract NAS8-25051 EXPERIMENT MODULE CONCEPTS STUDY FINAL REPORT VOLUME I MANAGEMENT SUMMARY October 1970 V. :.· I . Approved by: D. J. P Study Manager W. W. Withee, Director Advanced Space Systems Research and Engineering Prepared for GEORGE C. MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER Huntsville, Alabama Contract NAS8-25051 Advanced Space Systems, Research and Engineering CONVAIR AEROSPACE DIVISION OF GENERAL DYNAMICS San Diego, California Volume I GDC-DAA70-004 FOREWORD This final report is submitted in accordance with the requirements of Appendix 3 - Reports and Visual Aids Requirements, Statement of Work, Experiment Module Con- cepts Study, Contract NAS8-25051, as amended by Amendment No. 2 dated 9 March 1970. It 6fpfieV~0F theo faollwAng de~auffictfs! Volume I - Management Summary Volume II - Experiments & Mission Operations Volume III - Module & Subsystem Design Volume IV - Resource Requirements Volume V - Book 1 Appendix A Shuttle-Only Task Book 2 Appendix B Commonality Analysis, Appendix C Maintenance Analysis The study was conducted under the program and technical direction of Max E. Nein and Jean R. Olivier, P1-rMP-A, of the George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Dr. Rodney W. Jqhnson, OMSF (Code MF), as study sponsor furnished valuable guidance and assis4ance. Other NASA centers and offices made significant contributions of advice, consulta- tion, and documentation to the performance of the tasks whose reduns are reported here. Personnel from OMSF, OSSA, OART, MSFC, MSC, GSFC,?aRC, and Ames RC took part in periodic reviews during the study. Convair Aerospace Division of General Dynamics was assisted by TRW Systems Group, Redondo Beach, California, in the performance of this contract. Personnel of both companies who contributed to this report are listed below. Contributor Responsibility Convair Aerospace Division of General Dynamics R. E. Bradley Economic Analysis L. J. Brown Manufacturability D. J. Chiarappa Stabilization & Control R. I. Cross Thermal Control D. M. Eggleston Performance J. F. Fischer Structural Analysis H. D. Girouard Propulsion H. Gottschalk Commonality Analysis iii Volume I GDC-DAA70-004 C. M. Hay Electrical Power J. R. Hunter Module Design C. L. Hyde Operations Analysis C. E. McCoy Mass Properties J. M. Macdonald System Engineering H. G. Nulton Safety Analysis J. D. Peterson Experiment Analysis A. H. Ryan System Engineering E. J. Russ Life Support J. N. Sharmahd Maintainability R. A. Smalley Program Schedules M. R. Smith Module Configurations G. E. Taylor Module Configurations A. B. Walburn Thermal Control W. F. Wennhold Structural Design TRW Systems Gr9up E. S. Burnett Project Management L. Brown Guid., Nav., R9 nd. & Dock G. Cato Earth Surveys S, R. Doolittle Cosmic Ray Physics J. Kliger/F. Strubel Communicatio-?Data Mgmt. W. Spindell Human Factoqr#--- Comments or requests for additional information should be directed to the following: M. E. Nein, PD-MP-A D. J. Powell J. R. Olivier, PD-MP-A Convair Aerospace Division of National Aeronautics and Space Administration General Dynamics George C. Marshall Space Flight Center, P.O. Box 1128, Mail Zone 501-10 Alabama 35812 San Diego, California 92112 Telephone: (205) 453-3427 Telephone: (714) 277-8900, Ext. 1941 iv Volume I GDC-DAA70-004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 OBJECTIVES 1-1 1.2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 1-1 1.3 MAJOR GROUND RULES 1-1 2 EXPERIMENTS AND MISSION OPERATIONS 2-1 2.1 CANDIDATE EXPERIMENT PROGRAM 2-1 2.1.1 Experiment Requirements on Modules 2-1 2.2 MISSION OPERATIONS 2-7 2.2.1 Launch Operations 2-9 2.2.2 On-prbit Operations 2-12 2.3 EXPERIMENT MODULE INTERFACES 2-17 2.3.1 Space Station Interface 2-17 2.3.2 Logistic System Interfaces 2-19 2.4 ENVIRONMENT 2-19 3 MODULE AND SUBSYSTEMS DESIGN 3-1 3.1 CONFIGURATIONS 3-1 3.1.1 Baseline Common Modules 3-1 3.1.2 Experiment Integration 3-7 3.1.3 Additional Applications 3-10 3.1.4 Module Diameter Effects on Experiments 3-11 3.2 EXPERIMENT MODULE MASS PROPERTIES 3-13 3.3 STRUCTURE SUBSYSTEM 3-13 3.4 STABILIZATION AND CONTROL SUBSYSTEM 3-15 3.4.1 Requirements 3-15 3.4.2 System Description 3-15 3.4.3 Design Rationale 3-17 3.5 GUIDANCE AND NAVIGATION 3-17 3.6 PROPULSION/REACTION CONTROL SUBSYSTEM 3-19 3.6.1 Requirements 3-19 3.6.2 System Description 3-19 3.6.3 Design Rationale 3-20 3.7 COMMUNICATIONS AND DATA MANAGEMENT SUBSYSTEM 3-21 3.7.1 Requirements 3-21 3.7.2 System Description 3-22 3.7.3 Design Rationale 3-25 3.8 ELECTRICAL POWER SUBSYSTEM 3-26 v Volume I GDC-DAA70-004 TABLE OF CONTENTS, Contd Section Page 3.9 THERMAL CONTROL SUBSYSTEM 3-28 3.9.1 Requirements 3-28 3.9.2 System Description 3-28 3.9.3 Dosign Rationale 3-29 3.10 ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL/LIFE SUPPORT (EC/LS) SUBSYSTEM 3-30 3.11 RELIABILITY/MAINTAINABILITY AND SAFETY ANALYSIS 3-32 3.11.1 Reliability 3-33 3.11.2 Maintainability 3-33 3.11.3 Safety 3-35 3.11.4 Analysis Conclusions 3-35 4 RESOURCEi REQUIREMENTS 4-1 4.1 PROGRAM COST ESTIMATE ; 4-1 4.1.1 Module DDT&E, Unit, and Production Cost 4-1 4.1.2 Experiments, Integration, and Interface Hardware 4-2 4.1.3 Operational Cost 4-2 4.1.4 Phased Funding Requirements 4-3 4.2 DEVELOPMENT PLAN AND SCHEDULES 4-3 4.3 SRT/ART SUMMARY 4-6 5 SHUTTLE-ONLY OPERATING MODE 5-1 6 CONCLUSIONSAND RECOMMENDATIONS 6-1 6.1 CONCLUSIONS 6-1 6.2 RECOMMENDATIONS 6-1 vi Volume I GDC-DAA70-004 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page 1-1 Implementation Hardware for Candidate Experiment Program 1-2 2-1 Experiment Module Operations 2-9 2-2 Shuttle Payload Sensitivity 2-11 2-3 Expondablo Launch Vohiolo Payload Sensitivity 2-11 2-4 Typical Astronomy Module Mission Profile 2-13 2-5 Orbital Motion and Stationkeeping 2-14 2-6 Astronomy Module Relative Orbit Paths 2-16 2-7 Preliminary Logistics to Orbit 2-19 3-1 Baseline Ccmmon Module Set 3-1 3-2 Subsystems Commonality 3-3 3-3 Structural! Commonality, Common Modules 3-4 3-4 External Arrangement, Free-Flying Common Module C.M-1 3-5 3-5 Free-Flyi'ig Common Module CM-1, Inboard Profile 3-5 3-6 Major Experiment-Peculiar Integration Hardware 3-8 3-7 Total Program Commonality 3-9 3-8 Unmanned Transporter Concept Derived from Commqci Module CM-1 3-10 3-9 Manned Transporter Concept 3-11 3-10 Reduced Module Diameter Effects Upon Experiments 3-12 3-11 CM-1 Stability and Control Subsystem 3-16 3-12 Guidance/Navigation Subsystem 3-18 3-13 Monopropellant RCS System 3-19 3-14 Experiment Module CDMS Baseline Concept 3-23 3-15 Electrical Power Subsystem Block Diagram 3-27 3-16 Functional Flow Diagram 3-29 3-17 Module Reliability/Maintainability/Safety Approach 3-32 4-1 Experiment Module Parametric Cost Model 4-2 4-2 Funding Schedule 4-3 4-3 CM-1 Summary Schedule 4-4 4-4 CM-3 Summary Schedule 4-4 4-5 CM-4 Summary Schedule 4-5 4-6 Experiment Module Launch Schedule 4-5 5-1 Shuttle-Only Operating Concepts 5-2 5-2 Shuttle Payload/Module Transfer Orbit Capability 5-3 5-3 Weight Requirements of Module Combinations 5-3 5-4 Support Module - Two Men 5-4 5-5 Phased Funding, 30-Day On-Orbit Case 5-5 vii Volume I GDC-Daa70-004 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2-1 NASA Candidate Experiment Program 2-2 2-2 Summary of Experiment Program - Module Candidates 2-3 2-3 Experiment Requirement Summary 2-4 2-4 Experiment Revisions and Growth Items Inoorporated into Experiment Requirements 2-5 2-5 Summary of Crew Requirements - Experiment Modules 2-6 2-6 Selection of Operating Mode 2-8 2-7 Experiment Module - Launch Vehicle Requirements 2-10 2-8 Astronomy Module Mission Cycle bV Requirements 2-16 2-9 Transporter Trade Study 2-18 2-10 Space Station Interface Summary 2-18 2-11 Radiation Sensitivity by FPE 2-20 3-1 Common Module FPE Allocations 3-2 3-2 CM-1 Subsystems Summary 3-6 3-3 CM-3 Subsystems Summary 3-6 3-4 CM-4 Subsystems Summary 3-8 3-5 Transporter Module Characteristics - 5-Day Mission,,. Crew 2 3-12 3-6 Experiment Module Weight Summary - CM-1 Systems Summary and Nominal Dry Weight 3-13 3-7 Experiment Module Weight Summary - CM-3 Systems Summary and Nominal Dry Weight 3-14 3-8 Experiment Module Weight Summary - CM-4 Systems'Summary and Nominal Dry Weight 3-14 3-9 SCS Summary Data Tabulation 3-16 3-10 Hydrazine Monopropellant RCS Characteristics 3-20 3-11 Propulsion Slice System Characteristics 3-21 3-12 Estimated Information Transfer Rate for FPE 5.11 3-24 3-13 Module Transmitter Power vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • September 2007
    The Newsletter of the Northern Illinois Rocketry Association Nov/Dec 2008 In This Issue Great Holiday Gift Ideas For The Rocketeer Who Has Everything! Page Two The newsletter of the Northern Illinois Rocketry Association Page Two THE LEADING EDGE -T Minus One- Anthony Lentini Launch Windows Newsletter Editor/Publisher NIRA Club Launches [email protected] Mar 15 East Branch Forest Preserve 630-372-4999 NIRA OFFICERS Meeting Calendar NIRA Jim Basile Jan 2 Monthly meeting Helen Plum Library President Feb 7 Monthly meeting / NIRACON Bloomingdale Library Mar 6 Monthly meeting Helen Plum Library Angel Cooper Vice President Fox Valley Rocketeers Jan 5 Monthly meeting McHenry Public Library Rick Gaff Jan 11 Building session Bundick residence Secretary/Treasurer Feb 9 Woodstock Public Library Mar 2 Monthly meeting McHenry Public Library Bob Kaplow Range Safety Officer Marty Schrader NIRA Webmaster Visit our web site & message board; With the Bush presidancy winding down, I have to use up these last few http://www.nira-rocketry.org/ items I found. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ Ed. nirarocketry/ The Leading Edge is published bi- monthly for members of the Northern Illinois Rocketry Association (NIRA) NAR Section#117 Dedicated to the idea that rocketry is fun! ERN ILL TH IN R O I O S N NAR SECTION R 117 O N C IO K T ET IA RY ASSOC Contributors this issue; Articles Tony Lentini Photographs Rick Gaff, Tony Lentini o The newsletter of the Northern Illinois Rocketry Association Page Three Model Of The Month November Winners Joe Charaska took adult with his M.M.M.D.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Gemini: America in Space Series Ebook
    PROJECT GEMINI: AMERICA IN SPACE SERIES PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Eugen Reichl | 144 pages | 28 Mar 2016 | Schiffer Publishing Ltd | 9780764350702 | English | Atglen, United States Project Gemini: America in Space Series PDF Book A-4G Skyhawk. This photo was taken of the two pilots in the spacecraft simulator at the McDonnell plant in St. This program was the turning point in the space race with the USSR; from then on the Americans took the lead. Flights lasting two weeks, into the Van Allen Belt, the first extravehicular activities, rendezvous maneuvers and docking with other spacecraft—all of this was achieved by Gemini, paving the way for the more demanding moon landing program. The channel of the intracoastal waterway can be seen near the bottom center of the image. See all 5 - All listings for this product. McDonnell later sought to extend the Gemini program by proposing a derivative which could be used to fly a cislunar mission and even achieve a crewed lunar landing earlier and at less cost than Apollo, but these proposals were rejected by NASA. Hamilton Crawford's It was not all success, however. President Lyndon B. Like almost every significant undertaking, Project Gemini also had its dramas and tragedies. These were followed by ten flights with crews in and Any condition Any condition. First space rendezvous accomplished, station- keeping for over five hours at distances from 1 to feet 0. This mission was flown by the backup crew. Gemini was the first astronaut-carrying spacecraft to include an onboard computer, the Gemini Guidance Computer , to facilitate management and control of mission maneuvers.
    [Show full text]
  • 1973 Abstract Concepts to Letter Contracts NASA
    i3C-23309 A Shuttle Chronology 1964 — 1973 Abstract Concepts to Letter Contracts VOLUME I Abstract Concepts to Engineering Data;; Defining the Operational Potential of the Shuttle Management Analysis Office Administration Directorate December 1988 NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center Houston, Texas Chapter I Part 2 Final Vehicle Lines and Flight Mechanics (CONFIDENTIAL, downgraded 1 June 1972), Vol. IV - Final Configurations Thermostruetural Design, Sub-Systems, & Weights, 12 July 1968. 1968 In response to a 17 June RPP (request for proposal) July McDonnell Douglas Astronautics Company (MDAC) submitted a 17 proposal to develop a derivative of the Gemini spacecraft for logistic support of a space station. MDAC proposed to examine the design, development and use of various Gemini derivatives in conjunction with Titan and Saturn launch vehicles. The proposal assumed that NASA would "supply the current launch vehicle data" on "the vehicles to be utilized for this study." The initial design requirements were to "provide the capability to transport a nominal 9 man crew and cargo to low earth orbit." The crew size and cargo requirements were to he "further defined from considerations of the requirements of the space stations which will he supported by this vehicle." Both 7 day and 90 day missions were envisioned as was extended "orbital quiesent" storage in orbit for "at least ISO days." The proposal addressed two primary spacecraft concepts. These were ^efbaseline Big G design/^sed on a crew module which dif f ereTTTnEfetlo-J ron the-eTCtsting Gemini capsule, and an Advanced Logistic Spacecraft System (ALSS) which was designed around a 60° cone.
    [Show full text]
  • Spaceshipone Flight 16P
    SpaceShipOne Flight 16P Encyclopedia Astronautica Navigation 0 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Search BrowseEncyclopedia Astronautica Navigation 0 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z Search Browse 0 - A - B - C - D - E - F - G - H - I - J - K - L - M - N - O - P - Q - R - S - T - U - V - W - X - Y - Z - Search Alphabetical Encyclopedia Astronautica Index - Major Articles - People - Chronology - Countries - Spacecraft SpaceShipOne Flight 16P and Satellites - Data and Source Docs - Engines - Families - Manned Flights - Crew: Melvill. Fifth powered flight of Burt Cancelled Flights - Rockets and Missiles - Rocket Stages - Space Rutan's SpaceShipOne and first of two flights Poetry - Space Projects - Propellants - over 100 km that needed to be accomplished Launch Sites - Any Day in Space in a week to win the $10 million X-Prize. Spacecraft did a series of 60 rolls during last stage of engine burn. History USA - A Brief History of the HARP Project - Saturn V - Cape Fifth powered flight of Burt Rutan's SpaceShipOne and first of two flights over 100 km that needed to be Canaveral - Space Suits - Apollo 11 - accomplished in a week to win the $10 million X-Prize. Women of Space - Soviets Recovered an Apollo Capsule! - Apollo 13 - SpaceShipOne coasted to 103 km altitude and successfully completed the first of two X-Prize flights. The motor Apollo 18 - International Space was shut down when the pilot noted that his altitude predictor exceeded the required 100 km mark.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview Transcript
    NASA JOHNSON SPACE CENTER ORAL HISTORY PROJECT ORAL HISTORY TRANSCRIPT PAUL P. HANEY INTERVIEWED BY SANDRA JOHNSON HIGH ROLLS, NEW MEXICO – 20 JANUARY 2003 th JOHNSON: Today is January 20 , 2003. This oral history with Paul Haney is being conducted in High Rolls, New Mexico, for the NASA Johnson Space Center Oral History Project. The interviewer is Sandra Johnson, assisted by Rebecca Wright and Jennifer Ross-Nazzal. I want to thank you again for agreeing to talk with us today, and I’d like to ask you first about when you first started working for NASA in 1958, how that came about. HANEY: I worked for the Washington Evening Star [Washington, DC]. I’d been there about … five years, and for some reason had gotten into a couple of space … odysseys. In 1957, the Russians put up a satellite that absolutely startled the world, and it was one of the few times that I can recall in the five years I was at the Star that they went out and did a man-on-the-street kind of thing. The Star, they used to call it “the gray old lady of 11th Street,” 11th and Pennsylvania. We were the only paper in the world that didn’t have to leave the office to cover a … presidential motorcade, because it came by us. One of the major reporters there was a guy named Bill Hines, who covered the White House…. He wrote very well. And the people running NASA had approached Bill, and said they were about to start this here now space agency, and could he suggest somebody that might come over and help them out in the public information arena.
    [Show full text]
  • EXTEN.Siions of REMARKS
    13574 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS April 19, 1972 of Congress on the occasion of his 88th By Mr. ANDERSON of Tennessee (for Maritime Association; to the Committee on birthday, May 8, 1972; to the Committee on himself, Mr. JONES of Tennessee, Mr. Banking and Currency. the Judiciary. JONES of Nort.h Carolina, Mr. KuY­ 373. Also, a memorial of the House of Rep­ By Mr. ESCH: KENDALL, Mr. LINK, Mr. McCORMACK, resentatives of the Commonwealth of Massa­ H. Con. Res. 585. Concurrent resolution to Mr. MALLARY, Mr. MATHIS Of Geor­ chusetts, relative to regulation of the tele­ encourage an early end to the war in Indo­ gia, Mr. MATSUNAGA, Mr. MAYNE, Mr. vising of certain professional athletic games; china and to bring about the rehab111tation MELCHER, Mr. MOORHEAD, Mr. OBEY, to the Committee on Interstate and Foreign of Indochina, and for other purposes; to the Mr. O'KoNSKI, Mr. O'HARA, Mr. PRICE Commerce. · Conunittee on Foreign Affairs. of Illinois, Mr. RoY, Mr. SARBANES, 374. Also, a memorial of the Legislature of By Mr. HARRINGTON (for himself, Mr. SIKES, and Mr. STUBBLEFIELD): the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, rela­ Mr. BURKE of Massachusetts, Mr. H. Res. 935. Resolution expressing the tive to the protection of certain endangered DoNoHUE, Mr. Dow, Mr. EDWARDS of sense of the House Olf Representatives that species of wild animals; to the Committee on California, Mr. ECKHARDT, and Mr. the full amount appropriated for the rural Interstate and Foreign Commerce. WILLIAM D. FORD): electrification program for fiscal 1972 should 375. Also, a memorial of the Legislature of H. Con.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Unknown, Vol. 4
    Document1 3/25/03 2:14 PM Page 1 Exploring Unknownthe Selected Documents in the History of the U.S. Civil Space Program Volume IV: Accessing Space Edited by John M. Logsdon with Ray A. Williamson, Roger D. Launius, Russell J. Acker, Stephen J. Garber, and Jonathan L. Friedman Ex the Un 4 Inside Cover 3/25/03 2:15 PM Page i EXPLORING THE UNKNOWN Ex the Un 4 Inside Cover 3/25/03 2:15 PM Page ii Ex the Un 4 Inside Cover 3/25/03 2:15 PM Page iii NASA SP-4407 EXPLORING THE UNKNOWN Selected Documents in the History of the U.S. Civil Space Program Volume IV: Accessing Space John M. Logsdon, Editor with Ray A. Williamson, Roger D. Launius, Russell J. Acker, Stephen J. Garber, and Jonathan L. Friedman The NASA History Series National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA History Division Office of Policy and Plans Washington, D.C. 1999 Ex the Un 4 Inside Cover 3/25/03 2:15 PM Page iv Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Exploring the Unknown: Selected Documents in the History of the U.S. Civil Space Program/John M. Logsdon, editor ... [et al.] p. cm.—(The NASA history series) (NASA SP: 4407) Includes bibliographical references and indexes. Contents: v. 1. Organizing for exploration 1. Astronautics—United States—History. I. Logsdon, John M., 1937– II. Series. III. Series V. Series: NASA SP: 4407. TL789.8.U5E87 1999 96-9066 387.8’0973–dc20 CIP Ex the Un 4 Inside Cover 3/25/03 2:15 PM Page v Dedicated to the Memory of Robert H.
    [Show full text]
  • B-173677 Analysis of Cost Estimates for the Space Shuttle and Two
    .. , ‘& (-p-Jy REPORT TO -THE CONGRESS lllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllIllll LM096342 Analysis Of Cost Estimates For The Space Shuttle And Two Alternate Programs g-173677 National Aeronautics and Space Administration BYTHECOMPTROLLERGENERAL OFTHE UNITED STATES JUNE la1973 COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES WASHINGTON. D.C. 20540 B-173677 To the President of the Senate and the '4 Speaker of the House of Representatives This is our report on the analysis of cos-t estimates for the Space Shuttle and two alternate programs of the ! National Aeronautics and Space Administration that we F,: /' Yh1-7_ prepared at the request of Senator Walter F. Mondale. Our review was made pursuant to the Budget and Accounting Act, 1921 (31 U.S.C. .53), and the Accounting and Auditing Act of 1950 (31 U.S.C. 67). Copies of this report are being sent to the Director, Office of Management and Budget, and to the Administrator, National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Comptroller General of the United States Contents Page DIGEST 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 5 What is the Space Shuttle Program? 5 What alternative systems were con- sidered by NASA? 6 Scope 0-f review 8 2 REVIEW OF NASA'S COST ESTIMATES 10 New estimates submitted by NASA, on April 27, 1973 10 Issues regarding NASA's cost estimates 11 3 ECONOMIC AND EFFICIENCY COMPARISONS 25 The economic justification issue 25 Economic comparison method 25 Economic comparison of space transportation systems 26 Total launch system costs per pound of payload placed in orbit 29 NASA's efficiency index
    [Show full text]
  • “Zarya” the Super-Soyuz
    “Zarya” The Super-Soyuz Giuseppe De Chiara 27 – 06 - 2012 All the drawings are copyright of the author Foreword During the 80’s of XX Century the USSR had still its ambition in Astronautics. Thanks to the knowledge gained during the 70’s with the Salyut/Almaz space laboratories, the Russians were ready to take a “giant leap” with the upcoming Mir space station, a brand new Soyuz version (the TM) and the TKS spacecraft fully ready for use (even if it was always tested without any crew onboard), the Buran shuttle almost ready to fly and the Mir-2 design in progress. In such complex scenario the Buran shuttle raised perplexity to Russians, it was conceived only to copy Americans but still without a real mission. Russian space authorities urged the Politbjuro to have a more flexible and cheap manned space system, better if derived by an existing space capsule. To fulfill such mission the RSC Energia group introduced, during 1986, a proposal about a reusable manned space capsule based upon a Soyuz reentry module, greater in size, with the TPS realized for Buran program and the Zenit 2 as launcher (it was initially designed as side booster for the Energia super-rocket). The result of such proposal was one of the most intriguing and rational manned spacecraft ever designed, the Zarya (“Dawn” in Russian, to not mislead with actual ISS FGB) capsule. It was designed to carry a variable number of cosmonauts as also a relevant paylaod to LEO or to Mir/Mir-2 space station and it could be easily regarded as a Russian counterpart of the American Big Gemini of a decade earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview Transcript
    ORAL HISTORY TRANSCRIPT MELVIN F. BROOKS INTERVIEWED BY CAROL BUTLER GLENDALE, ARIZONA – 25 MARCH 2000 BUTLER: Today is March 25, 2000. This oral history with Mel Brooks is being conducted for the Johnson Space Center Oral History Project. Carol Butler is the interviewer and is assisted by Rebecca Wright and Sandra Johnson. We are at Mr. Brooks' home in Glendale, Arizona. Thank you so much for having us here today. BROOKS: My pleasure. It's a pleasure to meet you and participate in this. It's a great idea. BUTLER: Thank you. To begin with, if maybe you could tell us a little bit about your early career and how you decided what you were going to major in in college and how your interest in aviation and aerospace kind of developed. BROOKS: Okay. Well, I really kind of backed into the aerospace business. My degree at Purdue University was in physics and math, and my interest was in particle physics, you know, atomic physics. I went to Purdue because they had one of the early cyclotrons there. But during the time I was there, my interests changed a bit. Then the Korean War came along and I whisked right out from college to the Army and off to Korea. Somewhere along the line I had my degree in physics and math, which I carried around with me, and that's what I got all my jobs with, but my interest in that area had sort of diminished. I finally floundered a little bit, ended up working out in California for a company called Aerophysics Development Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Complete Book of Spaceflight: from Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity
    The Complete Book of Spaceflight From Apollo 1 to Zero Gravity David Darling John Wiley & Sons, Inc. This book is printed on acid-free paper. ●∞ Copyright © 2003 by David Darling. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey Published simultaneously in Canada No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 750-4470, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, email: [email protected]. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and the author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages.
    [Show full text]
  • Precorld Copy O041j? REPORT NO
    pRECORlD coPY o041J? REPORT NO. GDC-DAA70-004 (VOL. II) COPY NO. 03 I EXPERIMENT MODULE CONCEPTS STUDY FINAL REPORT .UIUlif + FYpiAl&T-eYQ[D0btAI KnIPERATIONS (THRU) o (ACCESSIO ftR) October 1970 (CODE) (0a * (NASA CR OR TMX OR AD NUMBER) (CATEGORY) rreparea Tor GEORGE C. MARSHALL SPACE FLIGHT CENTER Huntsville, Alabama Contract NAS8-25051 Advanced Space Systems, Research and Engineering '.,, CONVAIR AEROSPACE DIVISION OF GENERAL DYNAMICS San Diego, California N72- 14892 (NASA-CR.-117655) EXPERIMENT MODULE CONCEPTS STUDY. VOLUME 2: EXPERIMENTS AND MISSION OPERATIONS Final Report J.M. Unclas MacDonald (General Dynamics/Convair) Oct. 12045 1970 188 p CSCL 22B G3/31 QeLQ m [ LJ B INDEX OF FUNCTIONAL PROGRAM ELEMENTS BASIC STUDY FPE NO. TITLE ASSIGNMENT 5.1 Grazing Incidence X-Ray Telescope Module 5.2A Stellar Astronomy Module Module- 5.3A Solar Astronomy Module Module 5.4 UV Stellar Survey Space Station 5.5 High Energy Stellar Astronomy Module 5.6 Space Physics Airlock Experiments Space Station 5.7 Plasma Physics & Environmental Perturbations Module 5.8 Cosmic Ray Physics Laboratory Module 5.9 Small Vertebrates (Bio D) Module 5.10 Plant Specimens (Bio E) Module 5.11 Earth Surveys Module 5.12 Remote Maneuvering Subsatellite Module 5.13 Biomedical & Behavioral Research Space Station 5.14 Man/System Integration Space Station 5.15 Life Support & Protective Systems Space Station 5.16 Materials Science & Processing Module 5.17 Contamination Measurements Module 5.18 Exposure Experiments Module 5.19 Extended Space Structure Development Space Station 5.20 Fluid Physics in Microgravity Module 5.21 Infrared Stellar Survey Space Station 5.22 Component Test & Sensor Calibration Module 5.23 Primates (Bio A) Module 5.24 MSF Engineering & Operations Space Station 5.25 Microbiology (Bio C) Space Station 5.26 Invertebrates (Bio F) Space Station 5.27 Physics & Chemistry Laboratory Module GDC-DAA70-004 Contract NAS8-25051 EXPERIMENT MODULE CONCEPTS STUDY FINAL REPORT VOLUME II EXPERIMENTS AND MISSION OPERATIONS October 1970 Prepared by: J.
    [Show full text]