Looking for Dark Matter Wimps in Liquid Xenon

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Looking for Dark Matter Wimps in Liquid Xenon XENON Looking for Dark Matter WIMPs in Liquid Xenon Elena Aprile Columbia University Physics Department and Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory http://www.astro.columbia.edu/~lxe/XENON/ Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile The XENON Collaboration Columbia University Elena Aprile (PI),Karl-Ludwig Giboni, Pawel Majewski, Kaixuan Ni, Bhartendu Singh and Masaki Yamashita Brown University Richard Gaitskell, Peter Sorensen, Luiz DeViveiros University of Florida Laura Baudis, David Day Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory William Craig, Adam Bernstein, Chris Hagmann Princeton University Tom Shutt, John Kwong, Kirk McDonald Rice University Uwe Oberlack ,Omar Vargas Yale University Daniel McKinsey, Richard Hasty, Hugh Lippincott Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Promise of Liquid Xenon for WIMPs ! High atomic number (Z=54) and density (ρ=3g/cc) permit a compact self- shielding detector geometry. ! Simultaneous measurement of ionization and scintillation signals produced by WIMP interactions and the different amplitude/time response of these signals for e/n recoils provide powerful and efficient background discrimination. ! It is available in large quantities at a reasonable cost (~1k$/kg). “Easy” cryogenics at –100 oC. ! It can be purified to achieve long distance drift of free ionization electrons . Additional processing can reduce traces of radioactive 85Kr , 42Ar, Ra to the low level required. No long-lived radioactive Xe isotopes. ! It contains even/odd Isotopes suitable for spin-independent/ spin-dependent interactions. Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Projected Sensitivity of XENON vs Current Direct Detection DM Limits ~0.25 event/kg/d ~1 event/kg/yr ~ 1 event/100 kg/yr XENON100 sensitivity ~2x10 -45 cm 2 in 3 months operation at a background level < 1x10-5cts/keVee/kg/day, after rejection Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Typical WIMP Signal Xe Eth=16 keVr gives 1 event/kg/day ∞ dN ∫ dE Er Example cross-section shown is at current (90%) exclusion limits of existing experiments Requirements & XENON Goals " Energy Threshold : as low as possible < 16 keV " Target Mass: as high as possible > 1 ton " e/n Discrimination: as high as possible > 99.5% -5 Dark Matter 2004 " Background: as low as possible < 1x10 cts/keVee/kg/day Elena Aprile XENON Nuclear Recoil Discrimination Simultaneous Measurement of direct scintillation and charge (proportional scintillation) Direct and Proportional scintillation depend Nuclear recoils from on type of recoil and applied electric field. •WIMPs •Neutrons Gas Electron recoils from •Gammas s μ μ •Electrons μ μ 1 ~ anode Alpha scintillation e m i T - t Electron charge f e i r D electron scintillation s E n Liquid 0 Alpha charge 4 ~ γ-ray L/L0 or Q/Q0 (%) Electric Field (kV/cm) cathode Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile The XENON-1T Experiment : Design Overview • XENON-1T design modular. • 10 independent 3D position sensitive XeTPC operated in dual phase. • Fiducial target self-shielded by LXe active scintillator. • Target cooled by shield LXe at ~ 165 K by refrigerator. Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile XENON TPC Signals Time Structure τ~45 ns 150 µs (300 mm) •Three distinct light signals; CsI important for low threshold and trigger •Z from drift time; XY from proportional light signals on PMTs array. •3D event localization gives additional background rejection capability Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Light Collection Efficiency - Simulation Results Assumptions (16 keV nuclear Results: recoil) : Total light collection efficiency ~40%. •Wph : 23.7 eV • Absorption Length: 1 m Sensitivity = 5p.e./ keV for • Scattering Length: 30 cm nuclear recoil • Quenching Factor: 25% • Q.E. of PMTs: 20% • Q.E. of CsI : 30% • PTFE Reflectivity : 95% • Wires Transparency : 90% • 85 PMTs (2 inch) array Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile X-Y Position Resolution - Simulation Results Assumptions: •Ed : 5kV/cm • Prop. Gap: 4 mm (2 atm) • Prop. Field: 13 kV/cm • PMTs: 1cm above Gap Results: 1.2 cm position resolution for uniformly distributed nuclear recoils with 16 keV Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Background Considerations for XENON • Goal: <10-5 counts/kg/keV/day after rejection (99.5%) • Shield: standard, except for use of 5 cm active LXe veto. • Gamma rays from cavern attenuated by Pb (~20 cm) and LXe veto • No long lived Xe isotopes, except 136Xe Neutron 85 β− γ β Readout • Kr " t1/2=10.7y, 678 KeV. and moderator induced background • Commercial research grade Xe: Xe Target • 10 ppm Kr -> ≈ 200 counts/kg/keV/day • Need 0.1 ppb for 1x10-5 counts/kg/keV/day (after discrimination). • 42Ar " More readily removed than Kr. Pb (if needed) SS Xe veto Key issue: radioactivity of readout Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile XENON Baseline PMTs Readout • Hamamatsu Low Temperature Tube (R9288) # Developed for LXe detectors. Shown to work reliably at low T and at P= 5 atm # 2” Metal channel (12 stages, Amplification 106), compact design (4 cm long) # Low Background version under study by Hamamatsu # Quantum Efficiency > 20% # Pulse Rise Time = 2.3 ns, transit time spread = 750ps • Hamamatsu Low Background Tube (R8778) # Developed for XMASS Collaboration # Box and Line Dynodes, 2”, 112 cm long, 5x106 amplification # Low background • Current value ≈ 70 mBq / PMT ( K / U / Th = 60 / 7 / 4) • Goal ≈ 10 mBq/PMT (K / U / Th = 4 / 2 / 4) # Quantum Efficiency >26% # Pulse Rise Time = 5 ns, transit time spread = 4ns Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Background from PMTs- Monte Carlo Simulations With 85 PMTs, each at 10 mBq, total gamma rate < 10 –3 with fiducial volume cut of 5 cm from top and 2 cm from the sides " ~1.5 x 10-5 counts/kg/keVee/day after electron/nuclear recoil discrimination of 99.5%. Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Current Status of XENON NSF Proposal : Sept. 2001 R&D Funding : Sept. 2002 R&D Goals: 1. PMTs immersed in LXe 2. ~1 meter electron attenuation length in LXe 3. Operation with few kV/cm electric field 4. Electron extraction from liquid to gas 5. CsI photocathodes immersed in LXe 6. Efficient/Reliable Cryogenic System 7. Alternatives to PMTs 8. Kr removal 9. MonteCarlo simulations 10. Materials screening 11. Electron/nuclear recoil discrimination & quenching factor for <50 keV recoils Next Phase (2004-6): low activity detector (~10 kg) operating in Soudan Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Single Phase Chamber with 2 PMTs for Charge/Light Studies 4.5kg 57Co Xe σ/E = 9.3 % Circulation 3 p.e./keV Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Gas Circulation for High Purity LXe @ High Field 3kV/cm 4kV/cm 3.5kV/cm 2kV/cm light L/L0 (%) 1kV/cm (%) Q/Q0 ±1% Field (kV/cm) Time (hour) start circulation Single Pass Purification through Getter " ~ 1 month for long drift Continuous Recirculation through Getter " ~2 days for long drift Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Dual Phase Chamber with one PMT for Luminescence Studies Q PMT Anode Vg Grid E Bi-207 LXe Vc Cathode Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Studies of alternative readout schemes - Summary • Charge readout # GEMs (Rice) # MWPC (Princeton) • Light detectors # Burle MCP and LAAPD (Columbia &Brown) # Hamamatsu low-background PMTs (Columbia & Florida) # CsI (Columbia &Princeton) Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Dual Phase TPC Prototype with 7 PMTs Array Pulse Tube Refrigerator 7PMTs CsI PC in LXe. 10 cm drift gap with 5kV/cm. Sept. '03 Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Chamber and Cryostat System Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile 10 kg Dual Phase TPC Signals Readout Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile First results from ongoing experiment 1 kV/cm Feb 2,2004- present PTR for liquefaction and recirculation at ~5lpm Temperature stability to 0.05 C λ ~ 1 m Measured Cooling power: 140W LXe TemperatureLXe (C) Days Start Circulation Long Charge Attenuation Length Demonstrated Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile 122 keV Direct and Proportional Light @ 1 kV/cm … Direct Light Co-57 Proportional Light Co-57 DATA 0.4 0.20 x 0.6+-0.1 122 keV E ⋅Q = γ f × × N pe Pce Qe = 8.2 +-1.4 ESTIMATE-MC Wph 23.6 eV Light Collection (MC)=0.033 Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Consistent with expectation MC Co-57 122 keV @ 5kV/cm No CsI With CsI Next Step: Introduce CsI Photocathode Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile Current Status of XENON-Summary NSF Proposal : Sept. 2001 R&D Funding : Sept. 2002 R&D Goals: 1. PMTs immersed in LXe 2. ~1 meter electron attenuation length in LXe 3. Operation with few kV/cm electric field 4. Electron extraction from liquid to gas 5. Efficient/Reliable Cryogenic System 6. CsI photocathodes immersed in LXe 7. Alternatives to PMTs 8. Kr removal 9. MonteCarlo simulations 10. Materials screening 11. Electron/nuclear recoil discrimination & quenching factor for <50 keV recoils Next Phase (2004-6): low activity detector (~10 kg) operating in Soudan WHAT NEXT? " XENON-100 WHERE? " NUSEL? LNGS? SNOLAB? Dark Matter 2004 Elena Aprile.
Recommended publications
  • Parallel Sessions
    Identification of Dark Matter July 23-27, 2012 9th International Conference Chicago, IL http://kicp-workshops.uchicago.edu/IDM2012/ PARALLEL SESSIONS http://kicp.uchicago.edu/ http://www.nsf.gov/ http://www.uchicago.edu/ http://www.fnal.gov/ International Advisory Committee Daniel Akerib Elena Aprile Rita Bernabei Case Western Reserve University, Columbia University, USA Universita degli Studi di Roma, Italy Cleveland, USA Gianfranco Bertone Joakim Edsjo Katherine Freese University of Amsterdam Oskar Klein Centre / Stockholm University of Michigan, USA University Richard Gaitskell Gilles Gerbier Anne Green Brown University, USA IRFU/ CEA Saclay, France University of Nottingham, UK Karsten Jedamzik Xiangdong Ji Lawrence Krauss Universite de Montpellier, France University of Maryland, USA Arizona State University, USA Vitaly Kudryavtsev Reina Maruyama Leszek Roszkowski University of Sheffield University of Wisconsin-Madison University of Sheffield, UK Bernard Sadoulet Pierre Salati Daniel Santos University of California, Berkeley, USA University of California, Berkeley, USA LPSC/UJF/CNRS Pierre Sikivie Daniel Snowden-Ifft Neil Spooner University of Florida, USA Occidental College University of Sheffield, UK Max Tegmark Karl van Bibber Kavli Institute for Astrophysics & Space Naval Postgraduate School Monterey, Research at MIT, USA USA Local Organizing Committee Daniel Bauer Matthew Buckley Juan Collar Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics Scott Dodelson Aimee
    [Show full text]
  • First Science Results from the LUX Dark Matter Experiment
    First Science Results from the LUX Dark Matter Experiment Daniel McKinsey, LUX Co-Spokesperson, Yale University Richard Gaitskell, LUX Co-Spokesperson, Brown University on behalf of the LUX Collaboration http://luxdarkmatter.org Sanford Underground Research Facility OctoberS 30, 2013 LUX Dark Matter Experiment / Sanford Lab Rick Gaitskell (Brown) / Dan McKinsey (Yale) 1 Composition of the Universe The Higgs particle has been discovered, the last piece of the Standard Model. But as successful as it has been, the Standard Model describes only 5% of the universe. The remaining 95% is in the form of dark energy and dark matter, whose fundamental nature is almost completely unknown. Image: X-ray: NASA/CXC/CfA/M.Markevitch et al.; www.quantumdiaries.org Optical: NASA/STScI; Magellan/U.Arizona/D.Clowe et al.; Lensing Map: NASA/STScI; ESO WFI; Magellan/U.Arizona/D.Clowe et al. LUX Dark Matter Experiment / Sanford Lab 2 Rick Gaitskell (Brown) / Dan McKinsey (Yale) 2 Evidence for Dark Matter Galaxy rotation curves The cosmic microwave background www.quantumdiaries.org Image: ESA and the Planck collaboration Gravitational lensing • 27% of the energy composition of the universe • Properties: • Stable and electrically neutral • Non-baryonic • Non-relativistic • Estimated local density: 0.3±0.1GeV·cm-3 • Candidates: WIMPs, axions, dark photons,... Colley, Turner, Tyson, and NASA LUX Dark Matter Experiment / Sanford Lab 3 Rick Gaitskell (Brown) / Dan McKinsey (Yale) 3 Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) A new particle that only very weakly interacts with ordinary matter could form Cold Dark Matter - Formed in massive amounts in the Big Bang. - Non-relativistic freeze-out.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of a Liquid Xenon Time Projection Chamber for the XENON Dark Matter Search
    Development of a Liquid Xenon Time Projection Chamber for the XENON Dark Matter Search Kaixuan Ni Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2006 c 2006 Kaixuan Ni All rights reserved Development of a Liquid Xenon Time Projection Chamber for the XENON Dark Matter Search Kaixuan Ni Advisor: Professor Elena Aprile Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2006 c 2006 Kaixuan Ni All rights reserved ABSTRACT Development of a Liquid Xenon Time Projection Chamber for the XENON Dark Matter Search Kaixuan Ni This thesis describes the research conducted for the XENON dark matter direct detection experiment. The tiny energy and small cross-section, from the interaction of dark matter particle on the target, requires a low threshold and sufficient background rejection capability of the detector. The XENON experiment uses dual phase technology to detect scintillation and ionization simultaneously from an event in liquid xenon (LXe). The distinct ratio, be- tween scintillation and ionization, for nuclear recoil and electron recoil events provides excellent background rejection potential. The XENON detector is designed to have 3D position sensitivity down to mm scale, which provides additional event information for background rejection. Started in 2002, the XENON project made steady progress in the R&D phase during the past few years. Those include developing sensitive photon detectors in LXe, improving the energy resolution and LXe purity for detect- ing very low energy events.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Matter Working Group Executive Summary (Ness '02)
    Dark Matter Working Group Executive Summary (NeSS ’02) Working Group Leaders: Rick Gaitskell, Brown; and Dick Arnowitt, Texas A&M. (Document Version 020925v21) Working Group Members: Craig Aalseth, PNL; Dan Akerib, CWRU; Elena Aprile, Columbia; Priscilla Cushman, U. Minnesota; John Ellis, CERN; Jonathan Feng, UC Irvine; Gilles Gerbier, Saclay; Alexander Kusenko, UCLA; Kirk McDonald, Princeton; Jeff Martoff, Temple; Richard Schnee, CWRU; and Nigel Smith, RAL. Introduction No currently observed particle is a suitable candidate for cold dark matter. The solution to the non baryonic dark matter problem, both in the universe as a whole, and in our own galaxy, may be resolved by physics found at the intersection of astronomy, high energy particle physics, and cosmology. The main candidates for this dark matter are relic particles generated, in great abundance, shortly after the Big Bang. Currently, there are 20 operating experiments designed to perform the direct detection of these particles being conducted at all the underground physics laboratories worldwide (bar one). One of them is sited at a US underground laboratory, although US sourced funding is made to six experiments. Existing results have put significant constraints on the allowed particle theories of dark matter, with one experiment claiming a positive observation, yet to be confirmed by other experiments. The planned dark matter experiments that were discussed at this workshop would be able to cover most of the parameter space of major theoretical proposals. The new physics required for particle dark matter is also expected to be discovered in the next round of high energy accelerator experiments (LHC, NLC). Theoretically and experimentally there is great complementarity between direct detection and accelerator programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Testing the Purity Monitor for the XENON Dark Matter Search
    Testing the Purity Monitor for the XENON Dark Matter Search Alison Andrews Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso Columbia University REU August 4, 2006 1 Introduction Evidence for dark matter is found in many observed features of the universe. New- q GM(r) tonian gravitation predicts the rotational velocities of galaxies by v(r) = r , where mass is described by M(r) = 4π R ρ(r)r2dr. Actual measurements of the rota- tional velocities of galaxies, however, describe a distribution of mass where M(r) ∝ r. Fritz Zwicky studied this inconsistency in the Coma galaxy cluster in 1933, and he proposed the existence of a non-luminous dark matter. Over thirty years later, Vera Rubin supported Zwickys work with additional observations of galaxy rotational 1 curves. Their studies imply the existence of a halo of dark matter with ρ(r) ∝ r2 . Further evidence of dark matter is gravitational lensing. The General Theory of Relativity predicts the bending of light through areas of gravitational potential. Observations of this phenomenon show that the amount of bending around galaxy clusters corresponds to a greater amount of mass than is visible. Dark matter also helps to explain the formation and temperature distribution of the universe. A favored candidate for cold non-baryonic dark matter is the Weakly Interac- tive Massive Particle (or WIMP). Direct detection of WIMPs in experiments like XENON aim to detect the energy released from the elastic scattering of a WIMP off a terrestrial nucleus. 1 2 The XENON Dark Matter Search The XENON experiment aims to detect dark matter particles by measuring the scintillation and ionization of the nuclear recoils which result from the elastic collision of WIMPs with Xe nuclei using a dual phase (liquid/gas) xenon time projection chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • Elena Aprile Columbia University
    XENON1T: First Results (arXiv:1705.06655) Elena Aprile Columbia University Patras Axion-Wimp 2017 May 15-19 Thessaloniki, Greece 1 XENON World ~130 scientists from 22 institutions Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso (LNGS), Italy XENON1T Elena Aprile (Columbia) XENON1T: First Results @ Patras Axion-WIMP 2017 2 Phases of the XENON program XENON10 XENON100 XENON1T / XENONnT 2005-2007 2008-2016 2013-2018 / 2019-2023 15 cm drift TPC – 25 kg 30 cm drift TPC – 161 kg 100 cm / 144 cm drift TPC - 3200 kg / ~8000 kg Achieved (2007) Achieved (2016) Projected (2018) / Projected (2023) σ -44 2 σ -45 2 σ -47 2 σ -48 2 SI = 8.8 x 10 cm SI = 1.1 x 10 cm SI = 1.6 x 10 cm / SI = 1.6 x 10 cm Elena Aprile (Columbia) XENON1T: First Results @ Patras Axion-WIMP 2017 3 The XENON1T Experiment Elena Aprile (Columbia) XENON1T: First Results @ Patras Axion-WIMP 2017 4 The XENON1T Experiment Elena Aprile (Columbia) XENON1T: First Results @ Patras Axion-WIMP 2017 4 July 2013 Uwe Oberlack LNGS SC Meeting - 29-Oct-2013 17 Aug. 2014 XENON1T Cryostat 7 XENON1T Cryostat 7 XENON1T Cryostat 7 XENON1T Cryostat 7 XENON1T Cryostat 7 Time Projection Chamber Eur. Phys. J. C 75, no. 11, 546 (2015) Elena Aprile (Columbia) XENON1T: First Results @ Patras Axion-WIMP 2017 8 Cryostat in the Water Tank Elena Aprile (Columbia) XENON1T: First Results @ Patras Axion-WIMP 2017 9 Cherenkov Muon Veto • Active shield against muons • 84 high-QE 8'' Hamamatsu R5912 PMTs • Trigger efficiency > 99.5% for neutrons with muons in water tank • Can suppress cosmogenic background to < 0.01 events/ton/year
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
    THE DECADE OF DISCOVERY IN ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS Astronomy and Astrophysics Survey Committee Board on Physics and Astronomy Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications National Research Council NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS Washington, D.C. 1991 NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS • 2101 Constitution Avenue, NW • Washington, DC 20418 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special compe_nces and with regard for appropriate balance. This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. This project was supported by the Department of Energy under Grant No. DE-FGO5- 89ER40421, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation under Grant No. AST-8901685, the Naval Research Laboratory under Contract No. N00173-90-M-9744, and the Smithsonian Institution under Purchase Order No. SF0022430000. Additional support was provided by the Maurice Ewing Earth and Planetary Sciences Fund of the National Academy of Sciences created through a gift from the Palisades Geophysical Institute, Inc., and an anonymous donor. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data National Research Council (U.S.). Astronomy and Astrophysics Survey Committee. The decade of discovery in astronomy and astrophysics / Astronomy and Astrophysics Survey Committee, Board on Physics and Astronomy, Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications, National Research Council.
    [Show full text]
  • Broader Impacts of XENON Research
    XENON: A Liquid Xe Dark Matter Search Experiment at LNGS Columbia University: Elena Aprile, Karl-Ludwig Giboni, Pawel Majewski, Kaixuan Ni, Bhartendu Singh, Masaki Yamashita Brown University: Richard Gaitskell, Peter Sorensen, Luiz DeViveiros University of Florida: Laura Baudis, David Day Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory: William Craig, Adam Bernstein, Chris Hagmann Princeton University: Tom Shutt, John Kwong, Kirk McDonald Rice University: Uwe Oberlack, Omar Vargas Yale University: Daniel McKinsey, Richard Hasty, Hugh Lippincott Contact person Elena Aprile ([email protected]) Letter of Intent 1 1. The physics case The goal of the XENON experimental program is direct detection of dark matter in the form of weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) with an array of ten identical liquid Xe detector modules each with a 100 kg fiducial mass (XENON100).Current theoretical models indicate that WIMP interaction rates probably lie between the current sensitivity of existing experiments which is equivalent to ~0.25 evts/kg/day and ~2 evts/100 kg/yr normalized for a Xe target. The best prospects for the unambiguous identification of a WIMP nuclear recoil signal lie in detectors that have negligible radioactive background competing with the dark matter signal. This can be achieved principally by using nuclear recoil discrimination in order to veto competing electron recoil events (associated with gamma and beta backgrounds), effective neutron shielding, and through the operation of a large homogeneous detector volume with 3-D position resolution. The latter information can be used to select single hit events characteristic of a WIMP interaction while rejecting multiple hit events associated with backgrounds that propagate from the edge of the detector into the fiducial volume.
    [Show full text]
  • European Astroparticle Physics Strategy
    European priorities for Astroparticle Physics M. Spiro IN2P3/CNRS AppEC Chairman 1 What is ApPEC? ¾ ApPEC created in 2001 by the national funding agencies of France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands and UK. ¾ Since then Spain, Belgium, Portugal, Greece, Switzerland and Poland have joined ¾ ApPEC aims to ¾ Promote and facilitate co-operation within the European Particle Astrophysics (PA) community ¾ Develop and promulgate long term strategies for European PA, offering advice to national funding agencies and EU ¾ Assist in improving links and co-ordination between European PA and the scientific programmes of organisations such as CERN, ESA, and ESO ¾ Express their collective views on PA in appropriate international forums, such as OECD, UNESCO etc. 2 Operation ¾ ApPEC operates ¾ Strategically through its Steering Committee, ¾ Operationally through its Peer Review Committee ¾ Steering Committee (SC): ¾ France: M.Spiro, P.Chomaz, S.Katsanevas Germany: T. Berghöfer, R.Köpke, H. Bluemer, Netherlands: F. Linde, UK: D. Miller, J. Womerseley , Italy: R. Petronzio B. Dettore, Spain: J. Fuster, A.Ferrer, Switzerland: M. Bourquin, Belgium: D. Bertrand, C. DeClerq, Portugal K. Gaspar Greece: D. Nanopoulos Poland S. Pokorski , Romania NV. Zamfir, CERN: D. Schlatter ¾ Peer Review Committee (PRC) ¾ Elena Aprile, Laura Baudis, Jose Bernabeu, Pierre Binetruy,Christian Spiering, Franz v. Feilitzsch, Enrique Fernandez,Andrea Giuliani, Werner Hofmann, Uli Katz, Paul Kooijman, Paolo Lipari, Manel Martinez, Antonio Masiero,Benoit Mours, Francesco Ronga, Sheila Rowan, Andre Rubbia, Subir Sarkar, Guenther Sigl, Gerard Smadja, Nigel Smith, Lucia Votano 3 The ASPERA program ¾ ASPERA, 14 countries ( ApPEC+ Czech republic +Sweden + CERN) funded by EU in 2006 for 3 years for coordination actions ¾ Coordinator S.
    [Show full text]
  • Elena Aprile Physics Department and Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory Columbia University
    XENON and Other Cryogenic Noble Liquid Dark Matter Experiments Elena Aprile Physics Department and Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory Columbia University http://www.astro.columbia.edu/~lxe/XENON/ P5 - Fermilab - 19 April 2006 Elena Aprile, Columbia University Plan for Talk Cryogenic Noble Liquids: a brief review LXe Based Detectors XENON, ZEPLIN LAr Based Detectors WARP Other LXe/LAr Detectors P5 - Fermilab - 19 April 2006 Elena Aprile, Columbia University Direct Detection Methods/Experiments XENON, XMASS-II, ZEPLIN2, ZEPLIN3, WARP, ArDM Double Phase (Xe, Ar) DAMA/LIBRA ZEPLIN1 XMASS Mini-CLEAN EDELWEISS CDMS CRESST P5 - Fermilab - 19 April 2006 Elena Aprile, Columbia University Cryogenic Noble Liquids: Basic properties • Suitable materials for detection of ionizing tracks: ! Dense, homogeneous, target and also detector (ionization and scintillation) ! Do not attach electrons ! High electron mobility (except neon in some conditions) ! Commercially easy to obtain and to purify (in particular, liquid Argon) ! Inert, not flammable, very good dielectrics Liquid Radiation Collision Electron Energy loss Boiling point st Element Density length length mobility @ 1 bar (K) Co 3 dE/dx (MeV/cm) (cm2/Vs) (ρ/cm ) X0 (cm) λ (cm) Neon 1.2 1.4 24 80 27.1 high&low Argon 1.4 2.1 14 80 87.3 500 € Krypton 2.4 3.0 4.9 29 120 1200 €€ €€€ Xenon 3.0 3.8 2.8 34 165 2200 P5 - Fermilab - 19 April 2006 Elena Aprile, Columbia University Cryogenic Noble Liquids: Basic challenges • Cryogenics: Efficient, Reliable and Cost Effective Cooling systems • Safety: hazard of
    [Show full text]
  • Two-Phase Xenon Time Projection Chambers for WIMP Searches and Other Applications
    Two-Phase Xenon Time Projection Chambers for WIMP Searches and Other Applications Nicole A. Larsen Yale University Department of Physics Advisor: Daniel McKinsey Thesis Prospectus May 24, 2012 Abstract Astronomical evidence indicates that 23 % of the energy density in the universe is comprised of some form of non-standard, non-baryonic matter that has yet to be observed. One of the predominant theories is that dark matter consists of WIMPs (Weakly Interacting Massive Particles), so named be- cause they do not interact electromagnetically or through the strong nuclear force. In direct dark matter detection experiments the goal is to look for evidence of collisions between WIMPs and other particles such as heavy nuclei. Here, the challenge is to measure exceedingly rare interactions with very high precision. In recent years xenon has risen as a medium for particle detection, exhibiting a number of desirable qualities that make it well-suited for direct WIMP searches. The LUX (Large Underground Xenon) experiment is a 350-kg xenon-based direct dark matter detection experiment currently deployed at the Homestake Mine in Lead, South Dakota, consisting of a two-phase (liq- uid/gas) xenon time projection chamber with a 100-kg fiducial mass. Its projected sensitivity for 300 days of underground data acquisition is a cross-section of 7 × 10-46 cm2 for a WIMP mass of 100 GeV, representing an improvement of nearly an order of magnitude over previous WIMP-nucleon scattering cross-section limits. Furthermore, two-phase xenon-based technologies are useful in many other applications, in- cluding other fundamental physics searches, imaging of special nuclear materials, and medical imaging.
    [Show full text]
  • Springer Proceedings in Physics
    Springer Proceedings in Physics Volume 148 For further volumes: http://www.springer.com/series/361 David Cline Editor Sources and Detection of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe Proceedings of the 10th UCLA Symposium on Sources and Detection of Dark Matter and Dark Energy in the Universe, February 22-24, 2012, Marina del Rey, California Editor David Cline UCLA Physics & Astronomy Los Angeles , USA ISSN 0930-8989 ISSN 1867-4941 (electronic) ISBN 978-94-007-7240-3 ISBN 978-94-007-7241-0 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7241-0 Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg New York London Library of Congress Control Number: 2013955385 © Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifi cally the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfi lms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifi cally for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center.
    [Show full text]