DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Supply Services Activity Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Supply Services Activity Management Plan Draft Water AMP 2018-2028 Prepared by the Drainage and Water Unit Infrastructure Group PLAN STATUS/DOCUMENT CONTROL Signature: Document Approved by: Position Title: Unit: Drainage and Water Version: Document Release State: Internal TDC Use Information: Writing Team: Grant Hall, Drainage and Water Unit Manager Judy Blakemore, Water Services Operations Engineer Gerard Cody, Water Services Reticulation Engineer Selwyn Chang, Water Services Projects Engineer Liberty Guinto, Water Services Strategy Officer Revision History: Version Date Author Section Description Contributions Function Position Water AMP 2018-28 Document # 1124049 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Plan Status/Document Control ........................................................................................................................ 1 Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................................... 2 List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................................ 8 List of Figures .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 12 PART A – OVERVIEW AND GENERAL ACTIVITY MANAGEMENT .................................................. 20 A1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 21 A1.1 About This Plan ...................................................................................................................................... 21 A1.2 Objective of the Plan ............................................................................................................................. 24 A1.3 Relationship with Other Plans, Policies and Strategies ......................................................... 24 A1.4 Relationship with Legislation ........................................................................................................... 27 A1.5 Key Relationships .................................................................................................................................. 29 A2 Strategic Direction ................................................................................................................................... 31 A2.1 Vision, Outcomes and Priorities for Timaru District .............................................................. 31 A2.2 Activity Contribution to District Vision, Outcomes and Priorities .................................... 33 A3 Key Challenges in the Next 10 Years ................................................................................................ 34 A4 Planning Assumptions ........................................................................................................................... 36 A5 The Activity................................................................................................................................................. 45 A5.1 Activity Description .............................................................................................................................. 45 A5.2 Activity Rationale .................................................................................................................................. 46 A5.3 Significant Effects of this Activity ................................................................................................... 46 A5.4 Activity Contribution to Sustainable Development ................................................................. 47 A6 Levels of Service ....................................................................................................................................... 48 A6.1 Key Service Drivers............................................................................................................................... 48 A6.2 Customer Research and Expectations .......................................................................................... 49 A6.3 Levels of Service ..................................................................................................................................... 50 A6.4 Service Delivery ..................................................................................................................................... 61 A7 Demand Forecasting and Management .......................................................................................... 64 A7.1 Assessment of Demand Drivers ....................................................................................................... 64 A7.2 Forecasting Future Demand ............................................................................................................. 68 A7.3 Managing Demand ................................................................................................................................ 69 A7.4 Demand Management Strategy ....................................................................................................... 72 A8 Asset Knowledge ...................................................................................................................................... 72 A8.1 What assets do we have ...................................................................................................................... 72 A8.2 Asset Condition and Performance .................................................................................................. 78 A8.3 Data Confidence ..................................................................................................................................... 81 A9 Asset Life Cycle Management .............................................................................................................. 82 A9.1 Operations and Maintenance Planning ........................................................................................ 83 Water AMP 2018-28 Document # 1124049 2 A9.2 Capital Works Planning....................................................................................................................... 85 A9.2.1 Asset Renewal Strategy ...................................................................................................................... 86 A9.2.2 Asset Upgrading/Development Strategy .................................................................................... 89 A9.2.3 Asset Disposal Strategy ...................................................................................................................... 89 A9.3 Risk Management .................................................................................................................................. 91 A10 Asset Management Information Systems................................................................................ 100 A11 Financial Planning ............................................................................................................................ 105 A11.1 TDC’s Financial Strategy ................................................................................................................... 105 A11.2 Revenue and Financing Policy ....................................................................................................... 107 A11.3 Financial Contributions Policy ....................................................................................................... 108 A11.4 Asset Valuation ..................................................................................................................................... 108 A11.5 Financial Projections 2018-2028 .................................................................................................. 110 A11.6 Key Financial Assumptions, Forecast Reliability and Confidence ................................... 110 A12 Improvement Plan ............................................................................................................................ 111 PART B – SCHEME AMPs .............................................................................................................................. 119 B1 URBAN WATER SUPPLY SCHEME AMPs ..................................................................................... 120 B2 Geraldine Water Supply ..................................................................................................................... 121 B2.1 Scheme Overview ................................................................................................................................ 121 B2.2 Scheme Management ......................................................................................................................... 124 B2.2.1 Asset Summary .................................................................................................................................... 124 B2.2.2 Asset Condition and Performance................................................................................................ 126 B2.2.3 Asset Life Cycle Management ......................................................................................................... 128 B2.3 Risk Management ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TIMARU DISTRICT PLAN Map No 25 Map No 26 Cadastral Information Derived from Land Information New Zealand's Core Record System (CRS)
    IN De Pleasant Point Highway REC 2 Timaru-Temuka Highway REC 2 R 1 R 1 IND L Deferred Washdyke Industrial Expansion Area IND H Deferred Washdyke Industrial IND L Deferred Expansion Area Washdyke Industrial Expansion Area IND H Deferred 1 RES 4 R 2 Flemington Street Seadown Road Randwick Place Washdyke Industrial Expansion Area 1 Hilton Highway RES 1 8 Holmglen Street REC 2 Martin Street IND H REC 2 Racecourse Road Treneglos Street IND L RES 4 5 COM 3 3 Elginshire Street Doncaster Street 4 Laughton Street 2 Meadows Road 196 6 12 WASHDYKE 9 WASHDYKE 050 100 200 300 SCALE 1:5,000 Map (on A3 page) m TIMARU DISTRICT PLAN Map No 25 Map No 26 Cadastral information derived from Land Information New Zealand's Core Record System (CRS). This data may not be digitised or scanned without the permission of the Regional Manager. CROWN COPYRIGHT RESERVED Map No 27 Map No 28 Approved for internal reproduction by TIMARU DISTRICT COUNCIL - License No 133564-01 25 Version Date: August 2018 IND L Deferred R 1 R 2 Washdyke Industrial strial Expansion Area rea IND H Deferred ed Meadows Road 5 Aorangi Road 8 Odour Buffer Washdyke Industrial Expansion Area R 3 Coastal Marine Area Boundary IND H Conical Surface Sheffield Street WASHDYKEWASHDYKE 050 100 200 300 SCALE 1:5,000 Map (on A3 page) m TIMARU DISTRICT PLAN Map No 25 Map No 26 Cadastral information derived from Land Information New Zealand's Core Record System (CRS). This data may not be digitised or scanned without the permission of the Regional Manager.
    [Show full text]
  • No 88, 18 November 1931, 3341
    ~umb. 88. 3341 SUPPLEMENT TO THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE OF THURSDAY. NOVEMBER 12, 1931. WELLINGTON, WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 18, 1931. TY1'its for Election of Members of Pw·liament. [L.S.] BLEDISLOE, Governor-General. A PROCLAJI.'IATION. To ALL WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: GREETING. KNOW ye that J, Charles, Ba.ron Bledisloe, the Governor-General of the Dominion of New Zealand, being desirous that the General Assembly of New Zealand should be holden as soon as may be, do declare that I have this day signed my Warrant directing the Clerk of the Writs to proceed with the election of members of Parliament to serve in the House of Representatives for all the electoral districts within the said Dominion of New Zealand. Given under the hand of His Excellency the' Governor-General of the Dominion of New Zealand, and issued under the Seal of that Dominion, this 12th day of November, 1931. GEO. W. FORBES. GOD SAVE THE KING ! 3342 THE NEW ZE~ GAZETTE. [No. 88 Returning O.fficers appointed. RegiBtrars of Electors appointed. T is hereby notified that each of the undermentioned T is hereby notified that each of the undermentioned persons I persons has been appointed. Registrar of Electors for I has been appointed Ret~ing Officer for the electoral the electoral district the name of which appears opposite district~ the name of which appears opposite his name. his name. Erwin Sharman Molony Auckland Central. Frank Evans Auckland Central. George Chetwyn Parker .. Auckland East. Frank Evans Auckland East. Edward William John Bowden Auckland Suburbs. Frank Evans Auckland Suburbs. Thomas Mitchell Crawford ., Auckland West.
    [Show full text]
  • CEN33 CSI Fish & Game Opihi River Flyer
    ACCESS ETIQUETTE • No dogs • No guns Opihi River • No camping • Leave gates as you find them • Stay within the river margins • Do not litter • Respect private property • Avoid disturbing stock or damaging crops • Do not park vehicles in gateways • Be courteous to local landowners and others Remember the reputation of ALL anglers is reflected by your actions FISHING ETIQUETTE • Respect other anglers already on the water • Enquire politely about their fishing plans • Start your angling in the opposite direction • Refer to your current Sports Fishing Guide for fishing regulations and bag limits A successful angler on the Opihi River Pamphlet published in 2005 Central South Island Region Cover Photo: Lower Opihi River upstream of 32 Richard Pearse Drive, PO Box 150, Temuka, New Zealand State Highway 1 Bridge Telephone (03) 615 8400, Facsimile (03) 615 8401 Photography: by G. McClintock Corporate Print, Timaru Central South Island Region THE OPIHI RIVER Chinook salmon migrate into the Opihi River ANGLING INFORMATION usually in February and at this time the fishing pressure in the lower river increases significantly. FISHERY The Opihi River supports good populations of As a result of warm nor-west rain and snow melt both chinook salmon and brown trout. In the The Opihi River rises in a small modified wetland waters from the mouth to about the State of approximately 2 hectares at Burkes Pass and the larger Rakaia and Rangitata Rivers often flood and during these times the spring fed Opihi Highway 1 bridge there is a remnant population flows in an easterly direction for about 80 km to of rainbow trout, survivors of Acclimatisation enter the Pacific Ocean 10 km east of Temuka.
    [Show full text]
  • GNS Science Consultancy Report 2007/0XX
    Natural Hazards in Canterbury - Planning for Reduction - Stage 2 PJ Forsyth GNS Science Report 2008/17 June 2008 BIBLIOGRAPHIC REFERENCE Natural Hazards in Canterbury - Planning for Reduction - Stage 2. Forsyth, P.J. 2008. GNS Science Report 2008/17. 41 p. P. J. Forsyth, GNS Science, Private Bag 1930, Dunedin © Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limited, 2008 ISSN 1177-2425 ISBN 978-0-478-19624-5 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................1 2.0 METHODS....................................................................................................................1 3.0 THE CANTERBURY REGION .....................................................................................2 4.0 NATURAL HAZARDS MANAGEMENT CONTEXT ....................................................4 4.1 Natural Hazards Management in New Zealand ................................................................... 4 4.2 Emergency Management in Canterbury............................................................................... 6 4.2.1 Canterbury CDEM online ..................................................................................... 9 5.3 ECan online links................................................................................................................ 11 6.0 DISTRICT PLANNING DOCUMENTS .......................................................................12
    [Show full text]
  • Opihi and Tengawai Rivers: Status of Gravel Resources and Management Implications Report U05/31
    Opihi and Tengawai rivers: Status of gravel resources and management implications Report U05/31 Prepared by Dr Henry R. Hudson Environmental Management Associates Limited, Christchurch June 2005 Opihi & Tengawai river gravel resource evaluation Citation: Hudson, H.R. 2005. Opihi and Tengawai rrivers: Status of gravel resources and management implications. Environment Canterbury Report U05/31, Christchurch. 35 pages. Summary Environmental Management Associates (EMA) were commissioned by Environment Canterbury (ECan) to evaluate the status of the river gravel resources and management implications on the Opihi River and Tengawai River, Canterbury. Major findings/recommendations include: • It is likely there is significant under-reporting of recent gravel extraction. As well, some corrections in the gravel returns data base are required; and historic records should be incorporated. • The Opihi and Tengawai River beds are degrading as the result of a combination of factors, notably: ⇒ coastline retreat causing lower Opihi River re-grading; ⇒ uplift causing upper plains incision; ⇒ reduction in gravel supplies from scheme works; and ⇒ gravel extraction. • Large floods in 1986, 1994 and 1997 scoured the bed, or were locally neutral in effect, and transported large quantities of bed material to the sea (e.g. Opuha Dam breach). • Gravel is not being replenished at the rate of extraction and security of supply is uncertain – alternative supplies should be evaluated (e.g. off channel, land based and coastal zone). • The effects of gravel extraction exceeding rates of replenishment are not quantified, but could be significant and should be evaluated. • Historically large quantities of gravel were probably delivered to the coast from channel degradation (>80,000 m 3/y from the surveyed reaches).
    [Show full text]
  • Maori Rock Drawing: the Theo Schoon Interpretations
    MAORI ROCK DRAWING The Thea Schoon Interpretations Robert McDougall Art Gallel)l 704. Chrislchurch City Council New Zealand 03994 MAO MAORI ROCK DRAWING The Theo Schoon Interpretations FOREWORD INTRODUCTION SOUTH ISLAND ROCK DRAWINGS The earliest images crealed in New In many parts or the South Island, or even the type of animal being Zealand. thai have survived \0 our time. particularly where smooth surfaced portrayed, and some of these may well are Ihe drawings made In caves and outcrops 01 Ilmesione occur. prehiS­ represent mylhlcal monsters or Maori shellers by Maori artists as long ago toric Maori drawmgs can be round on legend such as the tamwha - or, as as the hUeenth century or earlier. the rock surface. where they have one leadlllg ethnologist put II. race survlyed ror several centuries. memones of crealures Irom another They have intrigued archaeologists, land. Occaslonafly the drawlOgs are m historians, and anlsts, who. admiring The reason for the aSSOCiation 01 lhe OUlhne, but most are blocked Ill. Ihe strength and elegance 01 the drawmgs With Ilmesione outcrops IS somehmes With a blank Slflp running deSigns. have conjectured abOut lhe,r lwofold: ftrstly. the ltmestone IS ollen down the centre. Frgures drawn m orIgins and slgmflcance. naturally shaped mlO overhangs which profile have lhe head. more olten than prOVided protection from wmd and ram not. laCing the YleWers fight. Only rarely In the late 1940'$lhearllsl Thee Schoon for both the arllsts and Ihelr artwork; are drawmgs lruly reallsllc: moslly the began 10 observe and record Ihe rock and secondly, the I1ghl-coloured shapes are stylized.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Gazette
    ~umb.· 127. 3721 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE WELLINGTON, THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 1940. Additional Land at Belfa,;;t taken far the Piirposes of the Additional Land taken far Post and Telegraph Purposes in the Hiirunui-Waitaki Railway. City of Christchurch. [ L.S.] GALWAY, Governor-General. [L.S.] GALWAY, Governor-General. A PROCLAMATION. A PROCLAl'VIATION. HEREAS it has been found desirable for the use, con­ N pursuance and exercise of the powers and authorities W venience, and enjoyment of the Hurunui-Waitaki I vested in me by the Public Works Act, 1928, and of Ra.ilway to take further land at Belfast in addition to land every other power and authority in anywise enabling me in previously acquired for the purposes of the said railway : this behalf, I, George Vere Arundell, Viscount Galway, Now, therefore, I, George Vere Arundel!, Viscount Galway, Governor-General of the Dominion of New Zealand, do Governor-General of the Dominion of New Zealand, in hereby proclaim and declare that the land described in the exercise of the powers and authorities conferred on me by Schedule hereto is hereby taken for post and telegraph sections thirty-four and two hundred and sixteen of the purposes; and I do also declare that this Proclamation shall Public Works Act, 1928, and of every other power and take effect on and after the twenty-third day of December, authority in anywise enabling me in this behalf, do hereby one thousand nine hundred and forty. proclaim and declare that the land described in the Schedule hereto is hereby taken for the purposes above mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Services Review of Water Storage Projects in Canterbury: the Opihi River Case
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lincoln University Research Archive Ecosystem Services Review of Water Storage Projects in Canterbury: The Opihi River Case By Dr Edward J. S. Hearnshaw1, Prof Ross Cullen1 and Prof Ken F. D. Hughey2 1Faculty of Commerce and 2Faculty of Environment, Society and Design Lincoln University, New Zealand 2 Contents Executive Summary 5 1.0 Introduction 6 2.0 Ecosystem Services 9 3.0 The Opihi River and the Opuha Dam 12 4.0 Ecosystem Services Hypotheses 17 4.1 Hypotheses of Provisioning Ecosystem Services 17 4.2 Hypotheses of Regulating Ecosystem Services 19 4.3 Hypotheses of Cultural Ecosystem Services 20 5.0 Ecosystem Services Indicators 25 5.1 Indicators of Provisioning Ecosystem Services 27 5.2 Indicators of Regulating Ecosystem Services 36 5.3 Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services 44 6.0 Discussion 49 6.1 Ecosystem Services Index Construction 51 6.2 Future Water Storage Projects 56 7.0 Acknowledgements 58 8.0 References 59 3 4 Ecosystem Services Review of Water Storage Projects in Canterbury: The Opihi River Case By Dr Edward J. S. Hearnshaw1, Prof Ross Cullen1 and Prof Ken F. D. Hughey2 1Commerce Faculty and 2Environment, Society and Design Faculty, Lincoln University, New Zealand When the well runs dry we know the true value of water Benjamin Franklin Executive Summary There is an ever‐increasing demand for freshwater that is being used for the purposes of irrigation and land use intensification in Canterbury. But the impact of this demand has lead to unacceptable minimum river flows.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sustainability and Cost-Effectiveness of Water Storage Projects on Canterbury Rivers: the Opihi River Case
    The Sustainability and Cost-Effectiveness of Water Storage Projects on Canterbury Rivers: The Opihi River Case Edward J. S. Hearnshaw Lecturer in Ecological Economics, Faculty of Commerce, Lincoln University e-mail: [email protected] Ross Cullen Professor of Resource Economics, Faculty of Commerce, Lincoln University Paper presented at the 2010 NZARES Conference Tahuna Conference Centre – Nelson, New Zealand. August 26-27, 2010. Copyright by author(s). Readers may make copies of this document for non-commercial purposes only, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. The Sustainability and Cost-Effectiveness of Water Storage Projects on Canterbury Rivers: The Opihi River Case Edward J. S. Hearnshaw1 and Ross Cullen2 1Lecturer in Ecological Economics, Faculty of Commerce, Lincoln University Email: [email protected] 2Professor of Resource Economics, Faculty of Commerce, Lincoln University Water is the classic common property resource. No one really owns the problem. Therefore, no one really owns the solution. Ban Ki-moon Abstract: There is an increasing demand for water resources in the Canterbury region. The impact of this demand has lead to unacceptable minimum river flows, which has resulted in adverse affects to river ecology. In an effort to resolve this problem water storage projects have gained considerable attention. However, in order to consider all values of the impact of water storage projects, a systematic way of implementing an ecosystem services approach is developed. This ecosystem services approach coupled with various appropriate analytical methods are developed for the purposes of evaluating the cost-effectiveness of water storage projects and the sustainability of river systems impacted by water storage projects.
    [Show full text]
  • THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 18
    558 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE No. 18 That, in exercise of the powers conferred on it by section middle of that road, Goodwin Road, and South Boundary 23 of the Counties Act 1956, the Geraldine County Council Road to the middle of Galbraith Road; thence. southerly resolves, by way of special order, as follows: along the middle of that road, Gully Bush Road, RIver Road, and the public road forming the north-western boundary of (1) The present division of the County of Geral.dine into Rural Section 34737 to the point of commencement. three ridings is revoked, and in lieu thereof the saId co.unty shall be divided into six ridings, to be called respectIvely Geraldine Riding, Kakahu Riding, Mount Peel Riding, GERALDINE RIDING Rangitata Riding, Temuka Riding, and Waitohi Riding, which ALL that area in the Geraldine County, Canterbury Land ,said ridings are respectively described in the Schedule attached District bounded by a line commencing at Waitohi Saddle hereto. (Block 'XIII, Opuha Survey District), and proceeding north­ (2) The said Geraldine County Council shall consist of nine westerly and north-easterly along the south-western and members, who shall be elected as follows: north-western boundaries of Section 7A, Four Peaks Settle­ ment, and northerly generally along t~e western. boundary (a) The electors of the Geraldine Riding, Kakahu Riding, of Section 26, Tripp Settle!llent, and Its productIOn to the and Temuka Riding shall each elect two Councillors. middle of the Mowbray RIver; thence south-easterly gener­ (b) The electors of the Mount Peel Riding, Rangitata ally along the middle of that river: to and along the nor~h­ Riding, and Waitohi Riding shall each elect one eastern boundary of Section 26, Tnpp Settleme~t, to a p~mt Councillor.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Inventory Canterbury Map Table 6.20
    Public conservation land inventory Canterbury Map table 6.20 Conservation Conservation Unit Name Legal Status Conservation Legal Description Description Unit number Unit Area I39021 Ahanui Conservation Area CAST 404.6 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 Priority ecosystem J38001 Kakahu River Marginal Strip CAMSM 4.5 Moveable Marginal Strip - s.24(1) & (2) Conservation Act 1987 - J38005 Hae Hae Te Moana River Conservation Reserve RALP 8.2 Local Purpose Reserve - s.23 Reserves Act 1977 - J38017 Conservation Area Waihi Riverbed CAST 0.4 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 - J38021 Conservation Area Geraldine Township CAST 0.1 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 - J38024 Raukapuka Area Office Conservation Area CAST 0.7 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 - J38026 Opihi River Conservation Reserve RALP 16.1 Local Purpose Reserve - s.23 Reserves Act 1977 - J38027 Waihi River Marginal Strip CAMS 0.0 Fixed Marginal Strip - s.24(3) Conservation Act 1987 - J38035 Mawaro Creek Marginal Strip CAMS 0.1 Fixed Marginal Strip - s.24(3) Conservation Act 1987 - J38036 Conservation Area Opihi Riverbed CAST 16.8 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 - J38040 Conservation Area McMasters Road CAST 0.3 Stewardship Area - s.25 Conservation Act 1987 - J38043 Hae Hae Te Moana River Conservation Reserve RALP 43.7 Local Purpose Reserve - s.23 Reserves Act 1977 - J38045 Gravel Reserve Te Moana Road RALP 2.2 Local Purpose Reserve - s.23 Reserves Act 1977 - J38051 Local Purpose Reserve Public Utility Winscombe RALP 0.4
    [Show full text]
  • 140828 Tas Update TRM.Xlsx
    Downstream Residents Contact List Opuha Dam Emergency Action Plan Priority 1 TAS Name Address Phone Fax E-mail Contacted TAS David Williams 231 Opuha Dam Road 03 685 4818 03 685 4815 Ashwick Flat 027 297 4454 RD 17, Fairlie Paul John & Sue Simpson Opuha Dam Road 03 680 6897 [email protected] No House 027 344 8902 - Sue Purchased from Andrew Wilson (2013), Lives in cottage Mt Hay Station, Tekapo Diane Charlie, Robyn & Russell 62 Trentham Road 03 685 4858 [email protected] Crampton Ashwick Flat 027 233 4364 - Robyn RD 17, Fairlie 027 740 9988 - Russell Chonny Andrew & Helen McLaughlan 1283 Geraldine Fairlie Highway 03 685 8456 [email protected] RD 17, Fairlie 027 354 4698 - Helen 027 950 4894 - Andrew TAS Hayden Dwyer 1537 Geraldine Fairlie Highway 03 685 8673 Farm Maager Cattle Valley 027 471 5 736 RD 17, Fairlie Paul Simon & Loren Geary 1891 Geraldine Fairlie Highway 03 685 8815 [email protected] Cattle Valley 027 414 8104 RD 17, Fairlie Diane Colleen & Steve Marett 1741 Geraldine Fairlie Highway 03 685 8789 03 685 8789 [email protected] Mike Mabwinney Cattle Valley 021 873 835 RD 17, Fairlie 027 507 9642 - Mike Own land off Gudex Road which would be affected Chonny Thomas MacFarlane Kowhai Farms - Cottage 2 03 614 8262 [email protected] & Scott Ridgen 379 Gudex Road 027 600 8555 - Thomas Middle Valley 03 685 6071 - Scott RD 12, Pleasant Point Cottage 1 238 Gudex Road Middle Valley RD 12, Pleasant Point Page 1 of 12 Downstream Residents Contact List Opuha Dam Emergency Action Plan Priority 1 TAS Name Address
    [Show full text]