Removal of Citril Finch from the British & Irish List

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Removal of Citril Finch from the British & Irish List Removal of Citril Finch from the British & Irish List Alan Knox, on behalf of the British Ornithologists' Union Records Committee n 29th January 1904, J. Quinton, a local birdcatcher, caught a small Ofinch on the Denes at Caistor (now Caister), just north of Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, The bird, subsequently identified as a Citril Finch Serinus citrinelk, was kept alive for a few days. It was then prepared as a mounted specimen by T. E. Gunn of Norwich, one of the best-known taxidermists of the period. E. C. Saunders, who was in possession of the bird for a short time, told the ornithologist J. H. Gurney about it (Gurney 1905). Gurney saw the specimen himself and was 'responsible for its identification'. This could mean that it was he who identified it or, more likely, that he confirmed the identification to his own satisfaction. Gurney noted that the bird had been 'an adult female in good feather'. Shortly after stuffing, die specimen passed to the collection of Sir Vauncey Harpur Crewe and, on the dispersal of that collec­ tion, the bird was purchased and presented to the Booth Museum in Brighton, where it remains (plate 123; case no. 460, reg. no. 208113; Boodi & Griffith 1927). The species was admitted to the British List by Howard Saunders on the basis of Gurney's claim (Saunders 1907). No published description, photograph or biometrics of the bird have been located, nor is there any record of the specimen having been examined criti­ cally since Gurney's time. Citril Finch remained on the British & Irish List (in category B) on the basis of the Great Yarmouth specimen alone. The record was recently reassessed as part of an ongoing review of some older records and of species currendy in category B in particular. At die same time as the Committee was gathering information before examining the skin, Lee Evans reported to me (verbally) that he had seen recent photographs of the bird and that it did not appear to be a Citril Finch. Shortly afterwards, I received from Dr Gerald Legg at the Booth Museum some black-and-white \ISrit. Dink UT. 171-173. (Vlnhcr IWH] 47 I 472 Removal ofdtril Finch from the British & Irish list 123. Cape (or Yellow-crowned) Canary Serinus canicollis from near Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, in January 1904, previously identified as a Citril Finch S. cikmella and the sole British record of the latter species (A. G. Knox) photographs which confirmed Lee Evans's suspicions. I visited Brighton and tentatively identified the skin as that of a Cape (or Yellow-crowned) Canary S. canicollis, and was able to verify this when I took the specimen to The Natural History Museum at Tring, where it was further identified as a male (based on plumage characters) of the canicollis group of subspecies. Description Forecrown, centre of throat, breast, belly, ently with droppings. Bill stout, with curved flanks and undertail-coverts bright green, vent culmen and tomia and heavy mandible. whitish; sides of diroat and neck, ear-coverts, hindcrown and nape grey, mixed with green on back and scapulars; rump and uppertail- Measurements coverts bright green; wing and tail feathers Wing 76 mm; tail 54 mm, shallowly forked, blackish with broad green feather edges; with shortest tail feather 7 mm shorter than underside of tail greyish, washed strongly with longest; bill 8.5 mm to feathering, 11.2 mm to green. Tips of tail feathers lightly soiled, appar­ skull, 6.5 mm deep, 5.5 mm wide at base. Discussion The absence of clear wing-bars, die heavy, bulging bill, the greenish underside to the tail, and the bill and tail biometrics rule out Citril Finch and confirm the identification of the bird as Cape Canary; females are less brightly coloured and have brownish backs and streaked crowns. Cape Canary and Citril Finch are part of a superspecies which also con­ tains die Island Canary S. canaria and the European Serin S. serinus (Hall & Moreau 1970). Superficially, some races of Cape Canary are ratiier similar to Citril Finch, and confusion is perhaps understandable. The most obvious dis­ tinguishing features are the former's heavy, bulging bill and the latter's clearer wing-bars. Some races of Cape Canary have well-marked wing-bars, but these races do not have clear grey 'shawls'. At an earlier stage, die Great Yarmoudi 'Citril Finch' was in a case with Removal qfCitril Finch from the British & Irish List 473 some other birds at the Booth Museum. The possibility of specimens being switched by mistake was investigated and ruled out by Jeremy Adams at the Museum. There are no contemporary descriptions or measurements of die Great Yarmouth bird to indicate that the finch trapped in 1904 was different from the specimen now under consideration, apart from the original identifi­ cation as a female. Furthermore, the likelihood of a Cape Canary being mis­ taken for a Citril Finch is fairly high. Cape Canaries were in demand as cage birds in Britain in the 1880s, and one was caught at Brighton Racecourse in 1886 ('Grey-necked Serin', see Booth & Griffith 1927: 270). The species is not considered to be a likely candidate for natural vagrancy to Britain. Following the reidentification of the specimen, the record is clearly no longer acceptable, and the species has been deleted from the British & Irish List (BOU in press). There are very few records of Citril Finches as vagrants at any great distance from their known breeding areas. It may be an opportune time for the reassessment of some of the other, particularly older, occurrences elsewhere in Europe. Acknowledgments I am grateful for the assistance of Dr Gerald Legg and Jeremy Adams at the Booth Museum dur­ ing the reconsideration of this record, to The Natural History Museum for access to the collections and library at Tring, and to Lee Evans for his initial warning that all might not be as claimed. I. K. Dawson, R. A. Hume, T. P. Inskipp, J. H. Marchant and Dr D. T. Parkin pro­ vided useful comments on the manuscript. Summary Citril Finch Sennits atrinella was on the British & Irish List on the basis of a single specimen from near Great Yarmouth, Norfolk, in January 1904. The specimen, now at die Booth Museum in Brighton, has been reidenofied as a Cape (or Yellow-crowned) Canary S. amkollis. The record is clearly no longer acceptable and Citril Finch has been deleted from the British & Irish List. References BOOTH, E. T., & GRIFFITH, A. F. 1927. Catalogue of Cases of Birds in the Dyke Road Museum, Brighton. 5th edn. Brighton. BOU. In press. Records Committee: twenty-first report (May 1994). Ibis 136 (October). GURNEYJ. H. 1905. Ornithological notes from Norfolk, 1904. Zoologist (i905): 85-100. HAU, B. P., & MOREAU, R. E. 1970. An Atlas ofSpedaiwn in African Passerine Birds. London. SAUNDERS, H. 1907. Additions to the List of British birds since 1899. Brit. Birds 1: 4-16. Dr Alan G. Knox, Buckinghamshire County Museum, Tring Road, Halton, Buckinghamshire HP22 5PJ .
Recommended publications
  • Freshwater Fishes
    WESTERN CAPE PROVINCE state oF BIODIVERSITY 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 2 Chapter 2 Methods 17 Chapter 3 Freshwater fishes 18 Chapter 4 Amphibians 36 Chapter 5 Reptiles 55 Chapter 6 Mammals 75 Chapter 7 Avifauna 89 Chapter 8 Flora & Vegetation 112 Chapter 9 Land and Protected Areas 139 Chapter 10 Status of River Health 159 Cover page photographs by Andrew Turner (CapeNature), Roger Bills (SAIAB) & Wicus Leeuwner. ISBN 978-0-620-39289-1 SCIENTIFIC SERVICES 2 Western Cape Province State of Biodiversity 2007 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Andrew Turner [email protected] 1 “We live at a historic moment, a time in which the world’s biological diversity is being rapidly destroyed. The present geological period has more species than any other, yet the current rate of extinction of species is greater now than at any time in the past. Ecosystems and communities are being degraded and destroyed, and species are being driven to extinction. The species that persist are losing genetic variation as the number of individuals in populations shrinks, unique populations and subspecies are destroyed, and remaining populations become increasingly isolated from one another. The cause of this loss of biological diversity at all levels is the range of human activity that alters and destroys natural habitats to suit human needs.” (Primack, 2002). CapeNature launched its State of Biodiversity Programme (SoBP) to assess and monitor the state of biodiversity in the Western Cape in 1999. This programme delivered its first report in 2002 and these reports are updated every five years. The current report (2007) reports on the changes to the state of vertebrate biodiversity and land under conservation usage.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • KOS News the Newsletter of the Kent Ornithological Society
    KOS News The Newsletter of the Kent Ornithological Society Number 527 July 2020 Gull-billed Tern by Steve Ashton ● News & Announcements ● Haunted by a swift ● ●THE WEIRD AND THE WONDERFUL – Escaped birds in Kent ●Bird Sightings - MA Y AND JUNE● ● Fifty Years Ago● KOS Contacts – Committee Members details are available on the society website 1 Newsletter Editor: Norman McCanch: 01304-813208 e-mail: [email protected] Editorial And so, it continues! While the more extreme aspects of lockdown have eased slightly, I still find myself opting to restrict my travels due to a combination of family health concerns and an increasing mobility issue. I have managed a couple of trips out, most notably to Oare where I failed to see any of my target species, but still came away pleased at having seen a few nice birds and added eight species to my ‘lockdown list’. I have been largely confined to garden birding and the immediate surroundings., but still able to enjoy interesting birding in seclusion. I have been able to spend time watching pigeons; Wood Pigeon and Collared Dove both nest in my garden, with Stock Doves breeding this year in a tree close to my boundary. In the past one especially favoured fork in a branch of my old Cherry Plum tree had Woodie, Collared dove and Turtle Dove nest on it sequentially in one summer and I was able to ring all the youngsters. Sadly, the branch came down in a storm and now they all favour other spots close by. Best of all my local Turtle Dove count has increased somewhat, with three males audible from the garden and two others located recently along the lane to the East.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and the Spring Migration of the European Serin Serinus Serinus
    Z. Dolenec: Climate change and the spring migration of the European Serin Serinus serinus 55 26-33 str. Zagreb 2020. LARUS (2020) 3 slike Hrvatska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti Primljeno 18.5.2020. Prihvaćeno od Razreda za prirodne znanosti HAZU 28.11.2020. Original scientific paper UDK 598.296.1+591.543.43 Izvorni znanstveni članak DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.21857/94kl4czo1m CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE SPRING MIGRATION OF THE EUROPEAN SERIN Serinus serinus Klimatske promjene i proljetne migracije žutarice Serinus serinus Zdravko Dolenec Mokrice 132, 49243 Oroslavlje, Croatia ABSTRACT Numerous migratory bird species have advanced their spring ar- rival over the past few decades. These arriving changes may be associ- ated with climate change. The aim of this paper was to examine how the timing of the European Serin Serinus serinus spring migration is related to the year and the local spring air temperatures. The study was con- ducted in the rural area of the village Mokrice in north-western Croatia. This study shows that the European Serins have significantly advanced their first arrival date over the 37-year period by eight days. Over the same research period, the mean spring air temperature has significantly increased as well. The results indicate that the average spring air tem- perature affects the spring migration phenology of the European Serin in north-western Croatia. Keywords: climate change, European Serin, arrival date, NW Croatia INTRODUCTION Earth climate is changing (IPPC 2014), and evidence of the effect of the recent climate warming on plants and animals has rapidly accumulated. For instance, studies from across the world have illustrated that the flowering phenology has advanced in the spring and that this is closely linked with temperature changes (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Niche Analysis and Conservation of Bird Species Using Urban Core Areas
    sustainability Article Niche Analysis and Conservation of Bird Species Using Urban Core Areas Vasilios Liordos 1,* , Jukka Jokimäki 2 , Marja-Liisa Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki 2, Evangelos Valsamidis 1 and Vasileios J. Kontsiotis 1 1 Department of Forest and Natural Environment Sciences, International Hellenic University, 66100 Drama, Greece; [email protected] (E.V.); [email protected] (V.J.K.) 2 Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, 96101 Rovaniemi, Finland; jukka.jokimaki@ulapland.fi (J.J.); marja-liisa.kaisanlahti@ulapland.fi (M.-L.K.-J.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Knowing the ecological requirements of bird species is essential for their successful con- servation. We studied the niche characteristics of birds in managed small-sized green spaces in the urban core areas of southern (Kavala, Greece) and northern Europe (Rovaniemi, Finland), during the breeding season, based on a set of 16 environmental variables and using Outlying Mean Index, a multivariate ordination technique. Overall, 26 bird species in Kavala and 15 in Rovaniemi were recorded in more than 5% of the green spaces and were used in detailed analyses. In both areas, bird species occupied different niches of varying marginality and breadth, indicating varying responses to urban environmental conditions. Birds showed high specialization in niche position, with 12 species in Kavala (46.2%) and six species in Rovaniemi (40.0%) having marginal niches. Niche breadth was narrower in Rovaniemi than in Kavala. Species in both communities were more strongly associated either with large green spaces located further away from the city center and having a high vegetation cover (urban adapters; e.g., Common Chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs), European Greenfinch (Chloris Citation: Liordos, V.; Jokimäki, J.; chloris Cyanistes caeruleus Kaisanlahti-Jokimäki, M.-L.; ), Eurasian Blue Tit ( )) or with green spaces located closer to the city center Valsamidis, E.; Kontsiotis, V.J.
    [Show full text]
  • AERC Wplist July 2015
    AERC Western Palearctic list, July 2015 About the list: 1) The limits of the Western Palearctic region follow for convenience the limits defined in the “Birds of the Western Palearctic” (BWP) series (Oxford University Press). 2) The AERC WP list follows the systematics of Voous (1973; 1977a; 1977b) modified by the changes listed in the AERC TAC systematic recommendations published online on the AERC web site. For species not in Voous (a few introduced or accidental species) the default systematics is the IOC world bird list. 3) Only species either admitted into an "official" national list (for countries with a national avifaunistic commission or national rarities committee) or whose occurrence in the WP has been published in detail (description or photo and circumstances allowing review of the evidence, usually in a journal) have been admitted on the list. Category D species have not been admitted. 4) The information in the "remarks" column is by no mean exhaustive. It is aimed at providing some supporting information for the species whose status on the WP list is less well known than average. This is obviously a subjective criterion. Citation: Crochet P.-A., Joynt G. (2015). AERC list of Western Palearctic birds. July 2015 version. Available at http://www.aerc.eu/tac.html Families Voous sequence 2015 INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME remarks changes since last edition ORDER STRUTHIONIFORMES OSTRICHES Family Struthionidae Ostrich Struthio camelus ORDER ANSERIFORMES DUCKS, GEESE, SWANS Family Anatidae Fulvous Whistling Duck Dendrocygna bicolor cat. A/D in Morocco (flock of 11-12 suggesting natural vagrancy, hence accepted here) Lesser Whistling Duck Dendrocygna javanica cat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogenetic Relationships and Generic Limits of Finches
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 62 (2012) 581–596 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev The phylogenetic relationships and generic limits of finches (Fringillidae) ⇑ Dario Zuccon a, , Robert Pryˆs-Jones b, Pamela C. Rasmussen c, Per G.P. Ericson d a Molecular Systematics Laboratory, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden b Bird Group, Department of Zoology, Natural History Museum, Akeman St., Tring, Herts HP23 6AP, UK c Department of Zoology and MSU Museum, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA d Department of Vertebrate Zoology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden article info abstract Article history: Phylogenetic relationships among the true finches (Fringillidae) have been confounded by the recurrence Received 30 June 2011 of similar plumage patterns and use of similar feeding niches. Using a dense taxon sampling and a com- Revised 27 September 2011 bination of nuclear and mitochondrial sequences we reconstructed a well resolved and strongly sup- Accepted 3 October 2011 ported phylogenetic hypothesis for this family. We identified three well supported, subfamily level Available online 17 October 2011 clades: the Holoarctic genus Fringilla (subfamly Fringillinae), the Neotropical Euphonia and Chlorophonia (subfamily Euphoniinae), and the more widespread subfamily Carduelinae for the remaining taxa. Keywords: Although usually separated in a different
    [Show full text]
  • EUROPEAN BIRDS of CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, Trends and National Responsibilities
    EUROPEAN BIRDS OF CONSERVATION CONCERN Populations, trends and national responsibilities COMPILED BY ANNA STANEVA AND IAN BURFIELD WITH SPONSORSHIP FROM CONTENTS Introduction 4 86 ITALY References 9 89 KOSOVO ALBANIA 10 92 LATVIA ANDORRA 14 95 LIECHTENSTEIN ARMENIA 16 97 LITHUANIA AUSTRIA 19 100 LUXEMBOURG AZERBAIJAN 22 102 MACEDONIA BELARUS 26 105 MALTA BELGIUM 29 107 MOLDOVA BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 32 110 MONTENEGRO BULGARIA 35 113 NETHERLANDS CROATIA 39 116 NORWAY CYPRUS 42 119 POLAND CZECH REPUBLIC 45 122 PORTUGAL DENMARK 48 125 ROMANIA ESTONIA 51 128 RUSSIA BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is a partnership of 48 national conservation organisations and a leader in bird conservation. Our unique local to global FAROE ISLANDS DENMARK 54 132 SERBIA approach enables us to deliver high impact and long term conservation for the beneit of nature and people. BirdLife Europe and Central Asia is one of FINLAND 56 135 SLOVAKIA the six regional secretariats that compose BirdLife International. Based in Brus- sels, it supports the European and Central Asian Partnership and is present FRANCE 60 138 SLOVENIA in 47 countries including all EU Member States. With more than 4,100 staf in Europe, two million members and tens of thousands of skilled volunteers, GEORGIA 64 141 SPAIN BirdLife Europe and Central Asia, together with its national partners, owns or manages more than 6,000 nature sites totaling 320,000 hectares. GERMANY 67 145 SWEDEN GIBRALTAR UNITED KINGDOM 71 148 SWITZERLAND GREECE 72 151 TURKEY GREENLAND DENMARK 76 155 UKRAINE HUNGARY 78 159 UNITED KINGDOM ICELAND 81 162 European population sizes and trends STICHTING BIRDLIFE EUROPE GRATEFULLY ACKNOWLEDGES FINANCIAL SUPPORT FROM THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Long-Term Coloration Trends with Biochemically Unstable
    Downloaded from http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on May 18, 2016 Evolution of long-term coloration trends rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org with biochemically unstable ingredients Dawn M. Higginson, Virginia Belloni†, Sarah N. Davis, Erin S. Morrison, John E. Andrews and Alexander V. Badyaev Research Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA DMH, 0000-0003-4665-5902; VB, 0000-0001-9807-1912; ESM, 0000-0002-4487-6915 Cite this article: Higginson DM, Belloni V, Davis SN, Morrison ES, Andrews JE, Badyaev AV. The evolutionarily persistent and widespread use of carotenoid pigments in 2016 Evolution of long-term coloration trends animal coloration contrasts with their biochemical instability. Consequently, with biochemically unstable ingredients. evolution of carotenoid-based displays should include mechanisms to Proc. R. Soc. B 283: 20160403. accommodate or limit pigment degradation. In birds, this could involve http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.0403 two strategies: (i) evolution of a moult immediately prior to the mating season, enabling the use of particularly fast-degrading carotenoids and (ii) evolution of the ability to stabilize dietary carotenoids through metabolic modification or association with feather keratins. Here, we examine evol- Received: 23 February 2016 utionary lability and transitions between the two strategies across 126 species of birds. We report that species that express mostly unmodified, Accepted: 21 April 2016 fast-degrading, carotenoids have pre-breeding moults, and a particularly short time between carotenoid deposition and the subsequent breeding season. Species that expressed mostly slow-degrading carotenoids in their plumage accomplished this through increased metabolic modification of Subject Areas: dietary carotenoids, and the selective expression of these slow-degrading evolution, ecology compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • This Article Appeared in a Journal Published by Elsevier. the Attached
    This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 52 (2009) 234–240 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev The species status of the Corsican finch Carduelis corsicana assessed by three genetic markers with different rates of evolution Marc I. Förschler a,b,1, Juan Carlos Senar b, Philippe Perret c, Mats Björklund d,* a Max Planck Institute for Ornithology, Vogelwarte Radolfzell, Schlossallee 2, 78315 Radolfzell, Germany b Museu Ciències Naturals, Barcelona, Parc de la Ciutadella, s/n, 08003 Barcelona, Spain c Centre d’Ecologie Fonctionelle et Evolutive, U.M.R. 5175 Montpellier, France d Department of Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyv 18D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden article info abstract Article history: Citril finches Carduelis c. citrinella and Corsican finches Carduelis c. corsicana represent two closely related Received 23 October 2008 forms, endemic to European mountains and some Mediterranean Islands. Their taxonomic status has Revised 17 February 2009 recently been disputed based on the results from mitochondrial genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Avifauna Survey
    AVIFAUNA SURVEY Prepared by: Dr W. Richard J Dean, Research Associate at the DST/NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute of African Ornithology at the University of Cape Town Reviewed and edited by: Dr Penn Lloyd, Principal Ecologist and Director at Biodiversity Assessment and Management Pty Ltd; and Patrick Morant, SACNASP Professional Natural Scientist (Reg. No. 401514/83). Table of content II. SURVEY RESULTS 3 III. INFRASTRUCTURE AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ON BIRDS 10 IV. CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FURTHER LONG-TERM MONITORING AND RESEARCH PROGRAMME WITHIN THE SKA CORE AREA AND KCAAA1 13 V. LIST OF ALL BIRD SPECIES RECORDED WITHIN KCAAA1 14 VI. REFERENCES 22 I. Introduction The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) is situated in the Nama Karoo, so only those bird species that occur in the Nama Karoo will be discussed here. The study area of the strategic environmental assessment (SEA) for the first phase of the SKA project (SKA1_MID) covers 153 Quarter Degree Grid Cells (QDGC)1, fairly well covered by participants in the Bird Atlas project in the late 1980s and early 1990s with lists of bird species for all 153 QDGC. Data for the 153 QDGC are a combination of the South African Bird Atlas Project data, museum specimen data and sight data (WRJD pers. obs.) and includes a recent bird list compiled by Etienne Marais. The avifauna of the Nama Karoo is not distinctive, and there are no families of birds endemic to the Karoo, but there are 25 species that are near-endemic to the region (Table 1). Only two species, Red Lark Calendulauda burra and Sclater's Lark Spizocorys sclateri, whose distribution ranges are almost entirely within the Nama Karoo, can be considered true endemics to the Nama Karoo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best of SOUTH AFRICA October 15-31 2018
    TRIP REPORT: The Best of SOUTH AFRICA October 15-31 2018 The Best of SOUTH AFRICA Birding Safari October 15-31, 2018 Tour leaders: Josh Engel and David Nkosi Click here for the trip photo gallery Next trip: October 10-26, 2020 South Africa never fails to amaze. From the spectacular scenery and endemic birds of the Cape to the megafauna-filled wilderness of Kruger National Park, every single day brings something new, surprising, and awe-inspiring. This trip exceeded expectations—over 400 species of birds and an incredible 60 species of mammals, all seen while staying in interesting, varied, and excellent accommodations, eating delicious food, and thoroughly enjoying all aspects of traveling in South Africa. It’s hard to know where to start with bird and animal highlights. There are, of course, the most sought-after birds, like Protea Canary, Cape Rockjumper, Black Harrier, Rudd’s Lark, Black-eared Sparrowlark, Southern Black Korhaan, and Blue Korhaan. There were also the incredible bird experiences—the Shy Albatrosses surrounding our pelagic boat, the Cape Sugarbird singing from atop of king protea flower, the nest-building Knysna Turacos, the Water Thick-knees trying to chase a Water Monitor away from their nest. Mammals take a front seat in South Africa, too. We had incredible sightings of Leopard and Lion in Kruger, numerous White and a single Black Rhinoceros, along with many encounters with Elephant, Giraffes, and other iconic African animals. But we also saw many awesome small mammals, including Meerkat, Large- and Small- spotted Genet, White-tailed Mongoose, and a Cape Clawless Otter munching on a fish.
    [Show full text]