Devonian and Mississippian Rocks of Central Arizona

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Devonian and Mississippian Rocks of Central Arizona Devonian and i Mississippian Rocks of Central Arizona GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 233-D Devonian and Mississippian Rocks of Central Arizona JOHN W. HUDDLE and ERNEST DOBROVOLNY SHORTER CONTRIBUTIONS TO GENERAL GEOLOGY, 19 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 233-D Stratigraphic studies, in the central part of the State, as the basis for postulating stratigraphy and petroleum possibilities in northeastern Arizona UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1952 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 65 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Page Abstract.._ ________________________________ 67 Stratigraphy—Continued Introduction _______________________________ 67 Devonian rocks: Martin formation—Continued Purpose of the investigation-_________.__. 67 Paleogeography__ ________.-_-_-_____._____ 81 Location and geography-________________ Distribution of facies and conditions of Field work _____________________________ deposition. ________________ __ ___________ 83 Acknowledgments__ _ __________________ 68 Correlation ________________________________ 85 Stratigraphy _______________________________ 68 Carboniferous (Mississippian) rocks: Red wall lime­ Pre-Devonian rocks_____________________ 71 stone______________________________________ 86 Pre-Cambrian_ _____________________ 71 Terminology _______________________________ 86 Cambrian__ ______________________ 71 General description. ______________ __________ 86 Devonian rocks: Martin formation______ 71 Thickness__________________________ 87 Terminology ____•__________________- 71 Effects of pre-Pennsyl vanian erosion __________ 88 General description_________________ 73 Correlation ________________________________ 90 Divisions. __________________________ 73 History of Mazatzal land_________-_-_______-__-_____ 90 Lower member_________________ 74 Summary. _________________________________________ "92 Middle member._______________ 75 Upper member_________________ 75 Detailed stratigraphic sections______________________ 93 Relationship to underlying formations. 76 Literature cited__._________________-_-_________--___ 110 Relationship to overlying formation. __ 81 Index. _____--._________________________________ 111 ILLUSTRATIONS Page PLATE 11. Columnar sections along line A-A' from the East Verde River to the Black River, central Arizona______ In pocket 12. Columnar sections along line B-B' from Tornado Peak, central Arizona, to Cedar Mesa, Utah.___________ In pocket 13. Map showing the thickness and facies of the Martin formation in Gila and adjacent counties, Ariz____— In pocket FIGURE 8. Map showing the distribution of outcrops of Devonian and Mississippian. sedimentary rocks in Arizona. _____ 69 9. Index map of northeastern Arizona________----__-_________________-_-__-------_-----------------_--_- 70 10. Pre-Devonian rocks of central Arizona___________________________________-------_------_------------ 72 11. Generalized section of the Martin formation in central Arizona________________.--___-------_----__---- 73 12. View of the Devonian and Mississippian rocks exposed in the Salt River canyon, central Arizona_____-__--__ 74 13. Lower member of the Martin formation as exposed in a road cut on United States Highway No. 60, central Arizona _ ___-___-___-_---____________-_________________________-______-_-___------------__--_-_- 75 14. Diagrammatic sketch of the exposures in Cow Canyon, central Arizona.__________________________________ 77 15. Geologic sketch map of the Cliff House Canyon area, central Arizona_____-_---_-----------_-_----------- 78 16. Diagrammatic section of the Martin formation, near Cliff House Canyon_________________________________ 79 17. Map showing the distribution of Late Devonian paleogeographic elements in Arizona___________-_______ 80 18. Diagrammatic section across Pine Creek at Natural Bridge, northwest of Payson, Ariz__________________ 81 19. Contact between the Martin formation and the Redwall limestone in Flying "V" Canyon, central Arizona_ 81 20. Contact between the Redwall limestone and the basal members of the Naco formation on United States High­ way No. 60, central Arizona____-_____---_______________________-_______-________--_-_---__-------- 87 21. Contact of the Redwall limestone and the Naco formation near the confluence of Horton and Tonto Creeks, Gila County, Ariz_______________-____________________________________-____----__---__---_------ 88 22. Cave fillings in the Redwall limestone on United States Highway No. 60, central Arizona___________________ 89 23. Rubble breccia in the Redwall limestone on United States Highway No. 60, central Arizona___________ 89 24. Chert breccia in the base of the Naco formation, central Arizona_________________________--_---_-__--_-_- 90 25. Restored section across the northern part of Mazatzal land at the end of Mississippian deposition_________ 91 26. Early Mississippian paleogeography of the southwestern United States________-__-________-_-__-_-_-----_ 91 in DEVONIAN AND MISSISSIPPI AN ROCKS OF CENTRAL ARIZONA By JOHN W. HUDDLE and ERNEST DOBROVOLNY ABSTRACT to the Defiance uplift. The mountains, folded in pre-Cambrian time, were deeply eroded, after which late pre-Cambrian and Stratigraphic studies of the late Paleozoic rocks of central Cambrian sediments were deposited on their flanks. Near the Arizona form the basis for postulating the extent and the petro­ Mogollon Rim three prominent ridges of quartzite on Mazatzal leum-bearing possibilities of Devonian and Mississippian rocks land formed peninsulas, islands, or rocky reefs in the Devonian in northeastern Arizona. and Mississippian seas. A northward extension of the ancient The Martin formation of Late Devonian age consists of a mountain chain is indicated by the granitic ridge encountered lower member of conglomeratic sandstone and dolomitic lime­ in wells drilled near Holbrook and by the northeastward trend stone, a middle member of sandstone and cliff-forming limestone, of pre-Cambrian rocks in the Defiance uplift. A gap in the and an upper member of sandstone, sandy limestone, and shale. land mass immediately north of the Mogollon Rim probably per­ The formation, as traced from southeastern Arizona toward mitted the Devonian and Mississippian seas to extend unbroken the central part of the State, becomes increasingly sandy and in from southeastern to northwestern Arizona. the vicinity of the Mogollon Rim laps against ridges of quartzite Mazatzal land, the granitic Holbrook ridge, and the Defiance of Cambrian and pre-Cambrian age. Between these quartzite uplift were residual mountain masses rather than rapidly rising ridges, the Martin formation is present in normal thickness and sources of sediments like the "ancestral Rockies" in Colorado character. It is equivalent, in part, to the Temple Butte lime­ and New Mexico. The distribution and character of late pre- stone of the Grand Canyon area, Merriam's Devils Gate forma­ Oambrian, Cambrian, and Devonian sediments were influenced tion of Nevada, Stevenson's Sly "Gap formation and the Percha by Mazatzal land, which also affected Mississippian sedimenta­ shale of New Mexico, and the Upper Devonian rocks of Colorado tion, although to a less extent. By Pennsylvanian time Maza­ and Iowa. The contact with the overlying Redwall limestone tzal land probably was covered with sediments. The Defiance of Mississippian age is unconformable. uplift, however, was not buried until Permian time. The thin limestone of Mississippian age in central Arizona is Devonian and, Mississipian strata probably are present in the equivalent of the Redwall limestone of northwestern Arizona the subsurface southeast of the granitic Holbrook ridge and and the Escabrosa limestone of southeastern Arizona. The perhaps may be present in the Black Mesa basin to the north. name "Redwall limestone" is extended for use in central Arizona Although this basin owes its shape to Laramide movements, because it is the older of the two names. Typically, the Red- its position may be related to a Paleozoic depositional area. wall consists of a lower impure dark-gray limestone, a middle Deposition in the Black Mesa basin during Devonian and Mis­ massive cliff-forming limestone, and an upper thin- to medium- sissippian time is indicated by the Devonian (?) and Mississip­ bedded cherty limestone. North of the Salt River, however, pian strata found in one of the wells drilled south of Holbrook; these subdivisions tend to disappear, the formation there con­ by Devonian strata at Elden Mountain, about 4 miles northeast sisting of loose blocks of limestone, surrounded by red sandy of Flagstaff; by a thick section of Devonian strata at Jerome; mudstone, and a few solid limestone beds. The Redwall is thin and by thick sections of Devonian and Mississippian strata in in central Arizona; the thinness and fragmentation of the wells in southeastern Utah. The Black Mesa basin probably limestone beds were caused by the erosion that occurred before had a history similar to that of the San Juan basin in New the Pennsylvanian epoch. Principally by solution, the erosion Mexico, where there are Devonian and Mississippian strata produced a red residual soil containing blocks of undissolved containing oil and gas. Hence Devonian and Mississippian limestone and chert. Caves and sinkholes in the limestone later rocks in the Black Mesa basin may also contain some oil and were
Recommended publications
  • Hydrogeology of Jurassic and Triassic Wetlands in the Colorado Plateau and the Origin of Tabular Sandstone Uranium Deposits
    Hydrogeology of Jurassic and Triassic Wetlands in the Colorado Plateau and the Origin of Tabular Sandstone Uranium Deposits U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1548 AVAILABILITY OF BOOKS AND MAPS OF THE U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Instructions on ordering publications of the U.S. Geological Survey, along with prices of the last offerings, are given in the current-year issues of the monthly catalog "New Publications of the U.S. Geological Survey." Prices of available U.S. Geological Survey publications re­ leased prior to the current year are listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List." Publications that may be listed in various U.S. Geological Survey catalogs (see back inside cover) but not listed in the most recent annual "Price and Availability List" may no longer be available. Reports released through the NTIS may be obtained by writing to the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161; please include NTIS report number with inquiry. Order U.S. Geological Survey publications by mail or over the counter from the offices listed below. BY MAIL OVER THE COUNTER Books Books and Maps Professional Papers, Bulletins, Water-Supply Papers, Tech­ Books and maps of the U.S. Geological Survey are available niques of Water-Resources Investigations, Circulars, publications over the counter at the following U.S. Geological Survey offices, all of general interest (such as leaflets, pamphlets, booklets), single of which are authorized agents of the Superintendent of Docu­ copies of Earthquakes & Volcanoes, Preliminary Determination of ments. Epicenters, and some miscellaneous reports, including some of the foregoing series that have gone out of print at the Superintendent of Documents, are obtainable by mail from • ANCHORAGE, Alaska-Rm.
    [Show full text]
  • Area Land Use Plan
    DETAIL VIEW #1 RIM TRAIL ESTATES DETAIL VIEW #2 GIRL SCOUT CAMP 260 KOHL'S RANCH VERDE GLEN FR 199 TONTO CREEK 5 THOMPSON THOMPSON DRAW I E. VERDE RIVER DRAW II BOY SCOUT CAMP FR 64 FR 64 WHISPERING PINES PINE MEADOWS BEAR FLATS FR 199 DETAIL VIEW #3 FLOWING SPRINGS DETAIL VIEW #4 DETAIL VIEW #5 DIAMOND POINT FOREST HOMES & 87 FR 29 COLLINS RANCH E. VERDE RIVER COCONINO COUNTY EAST VERDE PARK FR 64 260 FR 64 TONTO VILLAGE GILA COUNTYLION SPRINGS DETAIL VIEW #6 DETAIL VIEW #7 DETAIL VIEW #8 FR 200 FR FR 291 PONDEROSA SPRINGS CHRISTOPHER CREEK 260 HAIGLER CREEK HAIGLER CREEK (HIGHWAY 260 REALIGNMENT) COLCORD MOUNTAIN HOMESITES HUNTER CREEK FR 200 DETAIL VIEW #9 DETAIL VIEW #10 DETAIL VIEW #11 ROOSEVELT LAKE ESTATES 87 FR 184 188 OXBOW ESTATES SPRING CREEK 188 JAKES CORNER KEY MAP: LEGEND Residential - 3.5 to 5 du/ac Residential - 5 to 10 du/ac Regional Highways and Significant Roadways NORTHWEST NORTHEAST Major Rivers or Streams Residential - 10+ du/ac Gila County Boundary Neighborhood Commercial Community Commercial WEST EAST Federal/Incorporated Area Lands CENTRAL CENTRAL Light Industrial LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS Heavy Industrial SOUTH Residential - 0 to 0.1 du/ac Public Facilities AREA LAND USE PLAN Residential - 0.1 to 0.4 du/ac DETAILED VIEWS Multi-Functional Corridor FIGURE 2.F Residential - 0.4 to 1.0 du/ac Mixed Use Residential - 1 to 2 du/ac Resource Conservation 0' NOVEMBER, 2003 3 Mi Residential - 2 to 3.5 du/ac GILA COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN - 2012 Potential Resort/Lodging Use 1 1/2 Mi GILA COUNTY, ARIZONA DETAIL VIEW #1 RIM TRAIL ESTATES DETAIL VIEW #2 GIRL SCOUT CAMP 260 KOHL'S RANCH VERDE GLEN FR 199 TONTO CREEK 5 THOMPSON THOMPSON DRAW I E.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started
    2019 & 2020 Fishing Regulations for your boat for your boat See how much you could savegeico.com on boat | 1-800-865-4846insurance. | Local Offi ce geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Offi ce See how much you could save on boat insurance. Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. TowBoatU.S. is the preferred towing service provider for GEICO Marine Insurance. The GEICO Gecko Image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO AdPages2019.indd 2 12/4/2018 1:14:48 PM AdPages2019.indd 3 12/4/2018 1:17:19 PM Table of Contents Getting Started License Information and Fees ..........................................3 Douglas A. Ducey Governor Regulation Changes ...........................................................4 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION How to Use This Booklet ...................................................5 JAMES S. ZIELER, CHAIR — St. Johns ERIC S. SPARKS — Tucson General Statewide Fishing Regulations KURT R. DAVIS — Phoenix LELAND S. “BILL” BRAKE — Elgin Bag and Possession Limits ................................................6 JAMES R. AMMONS — Yuma Statewide Fishing Regulations ..........................................7 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Common Violations ...........................................................8 5000 W. Carefree Highway Live Baitfish
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Paleozoic and Cretaceous Stratigraphy of the Hidalgo County Area, New Mexico Eugene Greenwood, F
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/21 Upper Paleozoic and Cretaceous stratigraphy of the Hidalgo County area, New Mexico Eugene Greenwood, F. E. Kottlowski, and A. K. Armstrong, 1970, pp. 33-44 in: Tyrone, Big Hatchet Mountain, Florida Mountains Region, Woodward, L. A.; [ed.], New Mexico Geological Society 21st Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 176 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1970 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand-Canyon-South-Rim-Map.Pdf
    North Rim (see enlargement above) KAIBAB PLATEAU Point Imperial KAIBAB PLATEAU 8803ft Grama Point 2683 m Dragon Head North Rim Bright Angel Vista Encantada Point Sublime 7770 ft Point 7459 ft Tiyo Point Widforss Point Visitor Center 8480ft Confucius Temple 2368m 7900 ft 2585 m 2274 m 7766 ft Grand Canyon Lodge 7081 ft Shiva Temple 2367 m 2403 m Obi Point Chuar Butte Buddha Temple 6394ft Colorado River 2159 m 7570 ft 7928 ft Cape Solitude Little 2308m 7204 ft 2417 m Francois Matthes Point WALHALLA PLATEAU 1949m HINDU 2196 m 8020 ft 6144ft 2445 m 1873m AMPHITHEATER N Cape Final Temple of Osiris YO Temple of Ra Isis Temple N 7916ft From 6637 ft CA Temple Butte 6078 ft 7014 ft L 2413 m Lake 1853 m 2023 m 2138 m Hillers Butte GE Walhalla Overlook 5308ft Powell T N Brahma Temple 7998ft Jupiter Temple 1618m ri 5885 ft A ni T 7851ft Thor Temple ty H 2438 m 7081ft GR 1794 m G 2302 m 6741 ft ANIT I 2158 m E C R Cape Royal PALISADES OF GO r B Zoroaster Temple 2055m RG e k 7865 ft E Tower of Set e ee 7129 ft Venus Temple THE DESERT To k r C 2398 m 6257ft Lake 6026 ft Cheops Pyramid l 2173 m N Pha e Freya Castle Espejo Butte g O 1907 m Mead 1837m 5399 ft nto n m A Y t 7299 ft 1646m C N reek gh Sumner Butte Wotans Throne 2225m Apollo Temple i A Br OTTOMAN 5156 ft C 7633 ft 1572 m AMPHITHEATER 2327 m 2546 ft R E Cocopa Point 768 m T Angels Vishnu Temple Comanche Point M S Co TONTO PLATFOR 6800 ft Phantom Ranch Gate 7829 ft 7073ft lor 2073 m A ado O 2386 m 2156m R Yuma Point Riv Hopi ek er O e 6646 ft Z r Pima Mohave Point Maricopa C Krishna Shrine T
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Paleozoic Stratigraphy of the Grand Canyon
    CHAPTER 2 PALEOZOIC STRATIGRAPHY OF THE GRAND CANYON PAIGE KERCHER INTRODUCTION The Paleozoic Era of the Phanerozoic Eon is defined as the time between 542 and 251 million years before the present (ICS 2010). The Paleozoic Era began with the evolution of most major animal phyla present today, sparked by the novel adaptation of skeletal hard parts. Organisms continued to diversify throughout the Paleozoic into increasingly adaptive and complex life forms, including the first vertebrates, terrestrial plants and animals, forests and seed plants, reptiles, and flying insects. Vast coal swamps covered much of mid- to low-latitude continental environments in the late Paleozoic as the supercontinent Pangaea began to amalgamate. The hardiest taxa survived the multiple global glaciations and mass extinctions that have come to define major time boundaries of this era. Paleozoic North America existed primarily at mid to low latitudes and experienced multiple major orogenies and continental collisions. For much of the Paleozoic, North America’s southwestern margin ran through Nevada and Arizona – California did not yet exist (Appendix B). The flat-lying Paleozoic rocks of the Grand Canyon, though incomplete, form a record of a continental margin repeatedly inundated and vacated by shallow seas (Appendix A). IMPORTANT STRATIGRAPHIC PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTS • Principle of Original Horizontality – In most cases, depositional processes produce flat-lying sedimentary layers. Notable exceptions include blanketing ash sheets, and cross-stratification developed on sloped surfaces. • Principle of Superposition – In an undisturbed sequence, older strata lie below younger strata; a package of sedimentary layers youngs upward. • Principle of Lateral Continuity – A layer of sediment extends laterally in all directions until it naturally pinches out or abuts the walls of its confining basin.
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion. Brachiopod Zonation and Age of the Permian Kapp Starostin Formation (Central Spitsbergen)
    Discussion. Brachiopod zonation and age of the Permian Kapp Starostin Formation (Central Spitsbergen) LARS STEMMERIK Stemmerik, L. 1988: Discussion. Brachiopod zonation and age of the Permian Kapp Starostin Formation (Central Spitsbergen). Polar Research 6, 179-180. Lars Stemmerik, Grgnlands Geologiske Unders~geke,0ster Voldgade 10, 0-1350KQbenhaun K, Denmark; May 1988. The following discussion will concentrate on the rhynchus kempei, and Muirwoodia greenlandica stratigraphical implications of the brachiopod for the Megousia weyprechti Zone and Ptero- zonation proposed by Nakamura et al. (1987). No spirifer alatus, Pleurohorridonia scoresbyensis, such brachiopod zonation can be recognised in Choristites s#derberghi, and Odontospirifer mir- Greenland where in contrast diagnostic species abilis for the Pterospirifer alatus Zone (Nakamura of the upper zones in the Kapp Starostin For- et al. 1987, p. 213). Furthermore, Liosotella spitz- mation co-occur throughout the entire section. bergiana, Paeckelmannia toulai and Kochi- It is therefore concluded that the correlations productus plexicostatus confined to the uppermost proposed by Nakamura et al. (1987) are not valid. zones in the Kapp Starostin Formation are found At best the overall similarities of the East Green- in East Greenland. land and Svalbard faunas may indicate a Kaz- The work of Dunbar (1955) does not imply a anian-early Tatarian age for the upper part of the two-fold zonation of the brachiopods in the Fold- Kapp Starostin Formation. vik Creek Group in East Greenland. As discussed The paper of Nakamura et al. (1987) has wide below the different collections described by Dun- stratigraphic implications both for local cor- bar (1955) include a mixture of species diagnostic relation of the Foldvik Creek Group (sensu for the Megousia weyprechti Zone, Pterospirifer Surlyk et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in the Southwestern Region, 2008
    United States Department of Forest Insect and Agriculture Forest Disease Conditions in Service Southwestern the Southwestern Region Forestry and Forest Health Region, 2008 July 2009 PR-R3-16-5 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Cover photo: Pandora moth caterpillar collected on the North Kaibab Ranger District, Kaibab National Forest. Forest Insect and Disease Conditions in the Southwestern Region, 2008 Southwestern Region Forestry and Forest Health Regional Office Salomon Ramirez, Director Allen White, Pesticide Specialist Forest Health Zones Offices Arizona Zone John Anhold, Zone Leader Mary Lou Fairweather, Pathologist Roberta Fitzgibbon, Entomologist Joel McMillin, Entomologist
    [Show full text]
  • Index 1 INDEX
    Index 1 INDEX A Blue Spring 76, 106, 110, 115 Bluff Spring Trail 184 Adeii Eechii Cliffs 124 Blythe 198 Agate House 140 Blythe Intaglios 199 Agathla Peak 256 Bonita Canyon Drive 221 Agua Fria Nat'l Monument 175 Booger Canyon 194 Ajo 203 Boundary Butte 299 Ajo Mountain Loop 204 Box Canyon 132 Alamo Canyon 205 Box (The) 51 Alamo Lake SP 201 Boyce-Thompson Arboretum 190 Alstrom Point 266, 302 Boynton Canyon 149, 161 Anasazi Bridge 73 Boy Scout Canyon 197 Anasazi Canyon 302 Bright Angel Canyon 25, 51 Anderson Dam 216 Bright Angel Point 15, 25 Angels Window 27 Bright Angel Trail 42, 46, 49, 61, 80, 90 Antelope Canyon 280, 297 Brins Mesa 160 Antelope House 231 Brins Mesa Trail 161 Antelope Point Marina 294, 297 Broken Arrow Trail 155 Apache Junction 184 Buck Farm Canyon 73 Apache Lake 187 Buck Farm Overlook 34, 73, 103 Apache-Sitgreaves Nat'l Forest 167 Buckskin Gulch Confluence 275 Apache Trail 187, 188 Buenos Aires Nat'l Wildlife Refuge 226 Aravaipa Canyon 192 Bulldog Cliffs 186 Aravaipa East trailhead 193 Bullfrog Marina 302 Arch Rock 366 Bull Pen 170 Arizona Canyon Hot Springs 197 Bush Head Canyon 278 Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum 216 Arizona Trail 167 C Artist's Point 250 Aspen Forest Overlook 257 Cabeza Prieta 206 Atlatl Rock 366 Cactus Forest Drive 218 Call of the Canyon 158 B Calloway Trail 171, 203 Cameron Visitor Center 114 Baboquivari Peak 226 Camp Verde 170 Baby Bell Rock 157 Canada Goose Drive 198 Baby Rocks 256 Canyon del Muerto 231 Badger Creek 72 Canyon X 290 Bajada Loop Drive 216 Cape Final 28 Bar-10-Ranch 19 Cape Royal 27 Barrio
    [Show full text]
  • Havasu Canyon Watershed Rapid Watershed Assessment Report June, 2010
    Havasu Canyon Watershed Rapid Watershed Assessment Report June, 2010 Prepared by: USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service University of Arizona, Water Resources Research Center In cooperation with: Coconino Natural Resource Conservation District Arizona Department of Agriculture Arizona Department of Environmental Quality Arizona Department of Water Resources Arizona Game & Fish Department Arizona State Land Department USDA Forest Service USDA Bureau of Land Management Released by: Sharon Megdal David L. McKay Director State Conservationist University of Arizona United States Department of Agriculture Water Resources Research Center Natural Resources Conservation Service Principle Investigators: Dino DeSimone – NRCS, Phoenix Keith Larson – NRCS, Phoenix Kristine Uhlman – Water Resources Research Center Terry Sprouse – Water Resources Research Center Phil Guertin – School of Natural Resources The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disa bility, po litica l be lie fs, sexua l or ien ta tion, an d mar ita l or fam ily s ta tus. (No t a ll prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at 202-720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C., 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal employment opportunity provider and employer. Havasu Canyon Watershed serve as a platform for conservation 15010004 program delivery, provide useful 8-Digit Hydrologic Unit information for development of NRCS Rapid Watershed Assessment and Conservation District business plans, and lay a foundation for future cooperative watershed planning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012
    The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012 (Photographs: Arizona Game and Fish Department) Arizona Game and Fish Department In partnership with the Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ i RECOMMENDED CITATION ........................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ iii DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ iv BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 THE MARICOPA COUNTY WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT ................................... 8 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT AND ASSOCIATED GIS DATA ................................................... 10 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 12 MASTER LIST OF WILDLIFE LINKAGES AND HABITAT BLOCKSAND BARRIERS ................ 16 REFERENCE MAPS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tonto Creek Total Nitrogen TMDL Effectiveness Monitoring Report Recommendation for Delisting
    Tonto Creek Total Nitrogen TMDL Effectiveness Monitoring Report Recommendation for Delisting Executive Summary Tonto Creek was placed on Arizona’s Water Quality Impaired Waters List 303(d) for Total Nitrogen initially in 1996 due to exceeding the aquatic and wildlife cold water (A&Wc) and warm water (A&Ww) designated uses. Total Nitrogen on Tonto Creek has an annual mean standard of 0.5 milligrams per liter (mg/L) and a single sample maximum (SSM) standard of 2.0 mg/L. Two reaches of Tonto Creek were listed as impaired due to exceedances of the annual mean nitrogen standard, Reach 013A is the headwaters to confluence with unnamed tributary at N 34° 18’ 10”/W 111° 04’ 14” and Reach 013B is Tonto Creek from unnamed tributary at N 34° 18’ 10”/W 111° 04’ 14” to Haigler Creek. The Total Nitrogen Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) was completed in June 2005. The TMDL identified several nonpoint sources as contributors to Total Nitrogen concentrations in Tonto Creek including recreational uses and unincorporated communities/summer home clusters (ADEQ 2005). There is also a permitted point source in the watershed, Arizona Game and Fish Department’s (AGFD) Tonto Creek Fish Hatchery. The 2005 Tonto Creek TMDL recommended implementation projects and appropriate best management practices (BMPs) to decrease the Total Nitrogen levels in Tonto Creek. Through Arizona Department of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) Water Quality Improvement Grant (WQIG) funding and other projects, septic system upgrades were made throughout the impaired watershed. AGFD also made several upgrades to the facility. These projects working in concert with each other were effective in reducing Total Nitrogen loads in Tonto Creek.
    [Show full text]