A Look at the Windows 10 Vs. Linux Performance on AMD Threadripper

ARTICLES & REVIEWS NEWS ARCHIVE FORUMS PREMIUM CATEGORIES Custom Search Search

Latest Linux News

RADV Now Supports On-Demand Compilation Of Built-In Shaders

EXT4 & XFS File-System Updates Submitted For Linux 4.19 A Look At The Windows 10 vs. Linux Performance On AMD NVIDIA CUDA 10 Adding nvJPEG, Turing Threadripper 2990WX Support Written by Michael Larabel in Operating Systems on 13 August 2018. Page 2 of 4. 31 Comments FreeBSD 12.0 Alpha Hits The Web Linux 4.19 Will Fend Off Stack Attacks With Fhourstones v3.1 STACKLEAK Plugin Complex Connect-4 Solving NVIDIA Announces Open-Source MDL SDK Kpos / sec, More Is Better OpenBenchmarking.org NVIDIA Announces Turing-Based Quadro Windows 10 Pro 11132.70 SE +/- 375.75 RTX GPUs As The "World's First Ray-Tracing GPU" Clear Linux 24200 12314.90 SE +/- 40.86 XArray Proposed For Merging In The Linux 4.19 Kernel Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS 13149.33 SE +/- 212.10 DaVinci Resolve 15 Video/Effects Editor

Antergos 18.7-Rolling Released With Linux Support 13901.80 SE +/- 18.10 Btrfs Gets Fixes & Low-Level Improvements

openSUSE Tumbleweed With Linux 4.19 15012.63 SE +/- 35.25

3000 6000 9000 12000 15000

Phoronix Test Suite 8.0.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -O3

Within the Fhourstones CPU benchmark, Windows 10 was the slowest but in this benchmark the spread isn't nearly as wide as some of the other tests... OpenSUSE Tumbleweed was the fastest in this test and came out to being 35% faster than Windows 10. Interestingly Clear Linux in this case was the slowest Linux distribution tested. Crafty v25.2 Elapsed Time

Nodes Per Second, More Is Better OpenBenchmarking.org

Windows 10 Pro 7165467 SE +/- 6670.38 Latest Featured Articles Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS 7391551 SE +/- 57691.93 A Look At The Windows 10 vs. Linux Performance On AMD Threadripper 2990WX Antergos 18.7-Rolling 7561867 SE +/- 21292.36 AMD Threadripper 2990WX Linux Benchmarks: The 32-Core / 64-Thread Beast Clear Linux 24200 7705141 SE +/- 1054.28 AMD Threadripper 2990WX Cooling

openSUSE Tumbleweed Performance - Testing Five Heatsinks & Two 7901571 SE +/- 12072.27 Water Coolers 2000000 4000000 6000000 8000000 10000000 AMD Threadripper 2950X Offers Great Linux Phoronix Test Suite 8.0.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -pthread -lstdc++ -fprofile-use -lm Performance At $900 USD SIGGRAPH 2018: OpenCL-Next Taking Shape, Vulkan Continues Evolving The Crafty multi-threaded chess engine was another one of the cross-platform benchmarks where the spread wasn't all that great: OpenSUSE Tumbleweed again was the fastest but only 10% faster than Windows. x264 v2018-07-28 H.264 Video Encoding Support Phoronix Frames Per Second, More Is Better OpenBenchmarking.org

Windows 10 Pro The mission at Phoronix since 2004 has 127.42 SE +/- 0.13 centered around enriching the Linux hardware experience. In addition to Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS 137.42 SE +/- 2.74 supporting our site through advertisements,

-pipe -fexceptions -fstack-protector -ffat-lto-objects -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math -fassociative-math you can help by subscribing to Phoronix Clear Linux 24200 163.28 SE +/- 0.63 Premium. You can also use our NewEgg.com

40 80 120 160 200 shopping links when making online

Phoronix Test Suite 8.0.0 purchases or contribute to Phoronix through 1. (CC) gcc options: -ldl -m64 -lm -lpthread -O3 -ffast-math -std=gnu99 -fPIC -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-tree-vectorize a PayPal tip.

The x264 video encoding performance was notably faster on Linux than Windows 10 at least on the platforms where there wasn't build configuration issues. GraphicsMagick v1.3.30 Operation: Swirl

Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better OpenBenchmarking.org

Windows 10 Pro 175

-O2 Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS 240

-O2 -lwebp -lwebpmux -llcms2 -ltiff -ljasper -ljpeg -llzma -lxml2 Antergos 18.7-Rolling 244

-O3 -pipe -fexceptions -fstack-protector -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math -fassociative-math -lwebp -lwebpmux -ltiff -lfreetype -ljpeg -llzma -lxml2 Clear Linux 24200 246 SE +/- 1.00

50 100 150 200 250

Phoronix Test Suite 8.0.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -pthread -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread

GraphicsMagick v1.3.30 Operation: Rotate

Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better OpenBenchmarking.org

Windows 10 Pro 176 SE +/- 1.67

-O2 Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS 250 SE +/- 1.20

-O2 -lwebp -lwebpmux -llcms2 -ltiff -ljasper -ljpeg -llzma -lxml2 Antergos 18.7-Rolling 252 SE +/- 0.33

60 120 180 240 300

Phoronix Test Suite 8.0.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -pthread -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread

GraphicsMagick v1.3.30 Operation: Sharpen

Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better OpenBenchmarking.org

Windows 10 Pro 119

-O2 -lwebp -lwebpmux -llcms2 -ltiff -ljasper -ljpeg -llzma -lxml2 Antergos 18.7-Rolling 199

-O2 Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS 207 SE +/- 0.67

-O3 -pipe -fexceptions -fstack-protector -m64 -ffat-lto-objects -fno-signed-zeros -fno-trapping-math -fassociative-math -lwebp -lwebpmux -ltiff -lfreetype -ljpeg -llzma -lxml2 Clear Linux 24200 212

50 100 150 200 250

Phoronix Test Suite 8.0.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -pthread -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread

GraphicsMagick v1.3.30 Operation: Enhanced

Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better OpenBenchmarking.org

Windows 10 Pro 168 SE +/- 0.33

-O2 -lwebp -lwebpmux -llcms2 -ltiff -ljasper -ljpeg -llzma -lxml2 Antergos 18.7-Rolling 213 SE +/- 0.33

-O2 Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS 220 SE +/- 0.33

50 100 150 200 250

Phoronix Test Suite 8.0.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -pthread -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread

GraphicsMagick v1.3.30 Operation: Resizing

Iterations Per Minute, More Is Better OpenBenchmarking.org

Windows 10 Pro 133

-O2 -lwebp -lwebpmux -llcms2 -ltiff -ljasper -ljpeg -llzma -lxml2 Antergos 18.7-Rolling 233 SE +/- 1.76

-O2 Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS 239 SE +/- 1.00

50 100 150 200 250

Phoronix Test Suite 8.0.0 1. (CC) gcc options: -fopenmp -pthread -lXext -lSM -lICE -lX11 -lbz2 -lz -lm -lgomp -lpthread

We've seen it with other hardware too, but the GraphicsMagick imaging program that relies upon OpenMP for multi-threading does perform significantly better with Linux over Windows. But then again Windows users have Adobe products... 7-Zip Compression v16.02 Compress Speed Test

MIPS, More Is Better OpenBenchmarking.org

Windows 10 Pro 41145 SE +/- 78.98

Antergos 18.7-Rolling 77891 SE +/- 960.18

Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS 94492 SE +/- 1156.80

openSUSE Tumbleweed 99098 SE +/- 1000.14

Clear Linux 24200 99764 SE +/- 828.54

20000 40000 60000 80000 100000

Phoronix Test Suite 8.0.0 1. (CXX) g++ options: -pipe -lpthread

With the 7-Zip compression benchmark, the Linux distributions all perform significantly better than the Windows 10 Pro result. (And our Windows 7-Zip result does appear to be in line with what some of the Windows publications reported as their performance.) The Linux distributions in this extreme case were about twice as fast.

Tweet Like 71 Share

Page 2 - Windows 10 vs. Linux Benchmarks

Page: 1 2 3 4 Next Page 31 Comments

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X: Windows 10 vs. Linux Performance

Fresh Docker Linux Benchmarks For Summer 2018

Dell XPS 13: Windows 10 vs. Linux Distribution Benchmarks

Windows Server 2016 vs. FreeBSD 11.2 vs. 8 Linux Distributions Performance

9-Way Linux Desktop Distribution Benchmarks With The Intel Core i7 8086K

Trending Linux News

Rust's Low-Level Graphics Abstraction Layer Is Showing A Lot Of Potential

Linux 4.18 Kernel Officially Released

Xbox One S Controller Rumbling On Linux, Valve Working On Upstreaming SteamOS Changes

Intel IWD Wireless Daemon v0.6 Released

KDE Frameworks 5.49 Released With Many Changes

Phoronix Media Phoronix Premium Share Legal Disclaimer, Privacy Policy | Contact

Copyright © 2004 - 2018 by Phoronix Media. Phoronix Test Suite Support Phoronix Facebook All trademarks used are properties of their OpenBenchmarking.org While Having Ad-Free Browsing, Twitter respective owners. All rights reserved. Phoromatic Single-Page Article Viewing Google Plus

LinuxBenchmarking.com