On the Astrid Asteroid Family
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Asteroid Family Ages. 2015. Icarus 257, 275-289
Icarus 257 (2015) 275–289 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Icarus journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/icarus Asteroid family ages ⇑ Federica Spoto a,c, , Andrea Milani a, Zoran Knezˇevic´ b a Dipartimento di Matematica, Università di Pisa, Largo Pontecorvo 5, 56127 Pisa, Italy b Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11060 Belgrade 38, Serbia c SpaceDyS srl, Via Mario Giuntini 63, 56023 Navacchio di Cascina, Italy article info abstract Article history: A new family classification, based on a catalog of proper elements with 384,000 numbered asteroids Received 6 December 2014 and on new methods is available. For the 45 dynamical families with >250 members identified in this Revised 27 April 2015 classification, we present an attempt to obtain statistically significant ages: we succeeded in computing Accepted 30 April 2015 ages for 37 collisional families. Available online 14 May 2015 We used a rigorous method, including a least squares fit of the two sides of a V-shape plot in the proper semimajor axis, inverse diameter plane to determine the corresponding slopes, an advanced error model Keywords: for the uncertainties of asteroid diameters, an iterative outlier rejection scheme and quality control. The Asteroids best available Yarkovsky measurement was used to estimate a calibration of the Yarkovsky effect for each Asteroids, dynamics Impact processes family. The results are presented separately for the families originated in fragmentation or cratering events, for the young, compact families and for the truncated, one-sided families. For all the computed ages the corresponding uncertainties are provided, and the results are discussed and compared with the literature. The ages of several families have been estimated for the first time, in other cases the accu- racy has been improved. -
Asteroid Family Identification 613
Bendjoya and Zappalà: Asteroid Family Identification 613 Asteroid Family Identification Ph. Bendjoya University of Nice V. Zappalà Astronomical Observatory of Torino Asteroid families have long been known to exist, although only recently has the availability of new reliable statistical techniques made it possible to identify a number of very “robust” groupings. These results have laid the foundation for modern physical studies of families, thought to be the direct result of energetic collisional events. A short summary of the current state of affairs in the field of family identification is given, including a list of the most reliable families currently known. Some likely future developments are also discussed. 1. INTRODUCTION calibrate new identification methods. According to the origi- nal papers published in the literature, Brouwer (1951) used The term “asteroid families” is historically linked to the a fairly subjective criterion to subdivide the Flora family name of the Japanese researcher Kiyotsugu Hirayama, who delineated by Hirayama. Arnold (1969) assumed that the was the first to use the concept of orbital proper elements to asteroids are dispersed in the proper-element space in a identify groupings of asteroids characterized by nearly iden- Poisson distribution. Lindblad and Southworth (1971) cali- tical orbits (Hirayama, 1918, 1928, 1933). In interpreting brated their method in such a way as to find good agree- these results, Hirayama made the hypothesis that such a ment with Brouwer’s results. Carusi and Massaro (1978) proximity could not be due to chance and proposed a com- adjusted their method in order to again find the classical mon origin for the members of these groupings. -
The Minor Planet Bulletin Is Open to Papers on All Aspects of 6500 Kodaira (F) 9 25.5 14.8 + 5 0 Minor Planet Study
THE MINOR PLANET BULLETIN OF THE MINOR PLANETS SECTION OF THE BULLETIN ASSOCIATION OF LUNAR AND PLANETARY OBSERVERS VOLUME 32, NUMBER 3, A.D. 2005 JULY-SEPTEMBER 45. 120 LACHESIS – A VERY SLOW ROTATOR were light-time corrected. Aspect data are listed in Table I, which also shows the (small) percentage of the lightcurve observed each Colin Bembrick night, due to the long period. Period analysis was carried out Mt Tarana Observatory using the “AVE” software (Barbera, 2004). Initial results indicated PO Box 1537, Bathurst, NSW, Australia a period close to 1.95 days and many trial phase stacks further [email protected] refined this to 1.910 days. The composite light curve is shown in Figure 1, where the assumption has been made that the two Bill Allen maxima are of approximately equal brightness. The arbitrary zero Vintage Lane Observatory phase maximum is at JD 2453077.240. 83 Vintage Lane, RD3, Blenheim, New Zealand Due to the long period, even nine nights of observations over two (Received: 17 January Revised: 12 May) weeks (less than 8 rotations) have not enabled us to cover the full phase curve. The period of 45.84 hours is the best fit to the current Minor planet 120 Lachesis appears to belong to the data. Further refinement of the period will require (probably) a group of slow rotators, with a synodic period of 45.84 ± combined effort by multiple observers – preferably at several 0.07 hours. The amplitude of the lightcurve at this longitudes. Asteroids of this size commonly have rotation rates of opposition was just over 0.2 magnitudes. -
Asteroid Family Physical Properties, Numerical Sim- Constraints on the Ages of Families
Asteroid Family Physical Properties Joseph R. Masiero NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory/Caltech Francesca DeMeo Harvard/Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Toshihiro Kasuga Planetary Exploration Research Center, Chiba Institute of Technology Alex H. Parker Southwest Research Institute An asteroid family is typically formed when a larger parent body undergoes a catastrophic collisional disruption, and as such family members are expected to show physical properties that closely trace the composition and mineralogical evolution of the parent. Recently a number of new datasets have been released that probe the physical properties of a large number of asteroids, many of which are members of identified families. We review these data sets and the composite properties of asteroid families derived from this plethora of new data. We also discuss the limitations of the current data, and the open questions in the field. 1. INTRODUCTION techniques that rely on simulating the non-gravitational forces that depend on an asteroid’s albedo, diameter, and Asteroid families provide waypoints along the path of density. dynamical evolution of the solar system, as well as labo- In Asteroids III, Zappala` et al. (2002) and Cellino et ratories for studying the massive impacts that were com- al. (2002) reviewed the physical and spectral properties mon during terrestrial planet formation. Catastrophic dis- (respectively) of asteroid families known at that time. Zap- ruptions shattered these asteroids, leaving swarms of bod- pala` et al. (2002) primarily dealt with asteroid size distri- ies behind that evolved dynamically under gravitational per- butions inferred from a combination of observed absolute turbations and the Yarkovsky effect to their present-day lo- H magnitudes and albedo assumptions based on the subset cations, both in the Main Belt and beyond. -
Asteroid Families Interacting with Secular Resonances
Planetary and Space Science 157 (2018) 72–81 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Planetary and Space Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pss Asteroid families interacting with secular resonances V. Carruba a,*, D. Vokrouhlický b, B. Novakovic c a Sao~ Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Natural Sciences and Engineering, Guaratingueta, SP, 12516-410, Brazil b Institute of Astronomy, Charles University, V Holesovickach 2, Prague 8, CZ-18000, Czech Republic c University of Belgrade, Faculty of Mathematics, Department of Astronomy, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Asteroid families are formed as the result of collisions. Large fragments are ejected with speeds of the order of the Minor planets escape velocity from the parent body. After a family has been formed, the fragments' orbits evolve in the space of Asteroids: general proper elements because of gravitational and non-gravitational perturbations, such as the Yarkovsky effect. Celestial mechanics Disentangling the contribution to the current orbital position of family members caused by the initial ejection velocity field and the subsequent orbital evolution is usually a difficult task. Among the more than 100 asteroid families currently known, some interact with linear and non-linear secular resonances. Linear secular resonances occur when there is a commensurability between the precession frequency of the longitude of the pericenter (g)or of the longitude of node (s) of an asteroid and a planet, or a massive asteroid. The linear secular resonance most effective in increasing an asteroid eccentricity is the ν6, that corresponds to a commensurability between the precession frequency g of an asteroid and Saturn's g6. -
Footprints of the YORP Effect in Asteroid Families
Footprints of the YORP effect in asteroid families Paolo Paolicchia, Zoran Kneˇzevi´cb aDept.Physics, University of Pisa, Largo Pontecorvo 3, I-56127 Pisa, Italy bAstronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11060 Belgrade 38, Serbia Abstract The YORP effect affects not only the rotation rate, but also the spin ori- entation of asteroids. For this reason, due to Yarkovsky effect, it influences also the evolution of the semimajor axis with time. In asteroid dynamical families, the combined outcome can be a depletion of objects in the central part of the the family, shown by the absolute magnitude vs. semimajor axis so-called V-plot. A reclassification of asteroid families, extended to a very large database of proper elements, has recently been performed by Milani et al. (2014). Only some of the related V-plots, used to estimate the age of several families, exhibit the depletion predicted above. In this paper we discuss the problem, introducing the concept of the YORP-eye and a general method of analysis. We show that the effect may sometimes be located in the low H tail, and thus difficult to detect. Moreover, it may be hindered by several anomalous physical properties of the family (asymmetry, cratering origin, multiple collisions history and so on). With a new method of analy- sis, we identify the footprints of the effect for most of the analysed families, obtaining also an independent estimate of the age of the family. In spite of the uncertainties, we obtain a very good agreement between these ages and those estimated on the basis of the slope of the V-plot: a result which supports both methods and the underlying physics. -
Asteroid Taxonomic Signatures from Photometric Phase Curves
Asteroid taxonomic signatures from photometric phase curves D. A. Oszkiewicz1;2;3, E. Bowell2, L. H. Wasserman2, K. Muinonen1;4, A. Penttil¨a1, T. Pieniluoma1, D. E. Trilling3, C. A. Thomas3 1 Department of Physics, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland. 2 Lowell Observatory, 1400 West Mars Hill Road, Flagstaff, AZ 86001, U.S.A. 3 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 6010, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, U.S.A. 4 Finnish Geodetic Institute, P.O. Box 15, FI-02431 Masala, Finland. Abstract We explore the correlation between an asteroid's taxonomy and photometric phase curve using the H;G12 photometric phase function, with the shape of the phase function described by the single parameter G12. We explore the usability of G12 in taxonomic classification for individual objects, asteroid families, and dynamical groups. We conclude that the mean values of G12 for the considered taxonomic complexes are statistically different, and also discuss the overall shape of the G12 distribution for each taxonomic complex. Based on the values of G12 for about half a million asteroids, we compute the probabilities of C, S, and X com- plex membership for each asteroid. For an individual asteroid, these probabilities are rather evenly distributed over all of the complexes, thus preventing meaning- ful classification. We then present and discuss the G12 distributions for asteroid families, and predict the taxonomic complex preponderance for asteroid families arXiv:1202.2270v1 [astro-ph.EP] 10 Feb 2012 given the distribution of G12 in each family. For certain asteroid families, the probabilistic prediction of taxonomic complex preponderance can clearly be made. -
Asteroid Family Ages
Asteroid family ages Federica Spotoa,c, Andrea Milania, Zoran Kneˇzevi´cb aDipartimento di Matematica, Universit`adi Pisa, Largo Pontecorvo 5, 56127 Pisa, Italy bAstronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11060 Belgrade 38, Serbia cSpaceDyS srl, Via Mario Giuntini 63, 56023 Navacchio di Cascina, Italy Abstract A new family classification, based on a catalog of proper elements with 384, 000 numbered asteroids and on new methods is available. For the 45 ∼ dynamical families with > 250 members identified in this classification, we present an attempt to obtain statistically significant ages: we succeeded in computing ages for 37 collisional families. We used a rigorous method, including a least squares fit of the two sides of a V-shape plot in the proper semimajor axis, inverse diameter plane to determine the corresponding slopes, an advanced error model for the un- certainties of asteroid diameters, an iterative outlier rejection scheme and quality control. The best available Yarkovsky measurement was used to es- timate a calibration of the Yarkovsky effect for each family. The results are presented separately for the families originated in fragmentation or cratering events, for the young, compact families and for the truncated, one-sided fami- lies. For all the computed ages the corresponding uncertainties are provided, and the results are discussed and compared with the literature. The ages of several families have been estimated for the first time, in other cases the accuracy has been improved. We have been quite successful in computing ages for old families, we have significant results for both young and ancient, while we have little, if any, evidence for primordial families. -
Secular Evolution of Asteroid Families: the Role of Ceres
Asteroids: New Observations, New Models Proceedings IAU Symposium No. 318, 2016 c 2016 International Astronomical Union S. Chesley, A. Morbidelli, R. Jedicke & D. Farnocchia, eds. DOI: 00.0000/X000000000000000X Secular evolution of asteroid families: the role of Ceres Bojan Novakovi´c1 Georgios Tsirvoulis2 Stefano Mar`o3 Vladimir Doˇsovi´c- 1 and Clara Maurel4 1Department of Astronomy, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia email: [email protected] 2Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11060 Belgrade 38, Serbia 3Dipartimento di Matematica, Universit`adi Pisa, Largo B. Pontecorvo 5, 56127 Pisa, Italy 4Institut Sup´erieur de l’a´eronautique et de l’Espace (ISAE-Supa´ero), University of Toulouse, 31055 Toulouse Cedex 4, France Abstract. We consider the role of the dwarf planet Ceres on the secular dynamics of the asteroid main belt. Specifically, we examine the post impact evolution of asteroid families due to the interaction of their members with the linear nodal secular resonance with Ceres. First, we find the location of this resonance and identify which asteroid families are crossed by its path. Next, we summarize our results for three asteroid families, namely (1726) Hoffmeister, (1128) Astrid and (1521) Seinajoki which have irregular distributions of their members in the proper elements space, indicative of the effect of the resonance. We confirm this by performing a set of numerical simulations, showcasing that the perturbing action of Ceres through its linear nodal secular resonance is essential to reproduce the actual shape of the families. Keywords. celestial mechanics; minor planets, asteroids; asteroid families; transport mecha- nisms 1. -
Secular Resonances with Ceres and Vesta
Secular resonances with Ceres and Vesta Georgios Tsirvoulisa,∗, Bojan Novakovi´cb aAstronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, 11060 Belgrade 38, Serbia bDepartment of Astronomy, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Belgrade, Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia Abstract In this work we explore dynamical perturbations induced by the massive aster- oids Ceres and Vesta on main-belt asteroids through secular resonances. First we determine the location of the linear secular resonances with Ceres and Vesta in the main belt, using a purely numerical technique. Then we use a set of numerical simulations of fictitious asteroids to investigate the importance of these secular resonances in the orbital evolution of main-belt asteroids. We found, evaluating the magnitude of the perturbations in the proper elements of the test particles, that in some cases the strength of these secular resonances is comparable to that of known non-linear secular resonances with the giant planets. Finally we explore the asteroid families that are crossed by the secular resonances we studied, and identified several cases where the latter seem to play an important role in their post-impact evolution. Keywords: Asteroids, dynamics, Resonances, orbital, Asteroid, Ceres, Asteroid, Vesta 1. Introduction For more than a century, a lot of studies have been done on the dynamical structure of the Main Asteroid Belt, a large concentration of asteroids with semi-major axes between those of Mars and Jupiter. Daniel Kirkwood proposed and then discovered the famous gaps in the distribution of main belt asteroids, which bear his name. The \Kirkwood gaps" are almost vacant ranges in the distribution of semi-major axes, corresponding to the locations of the strongest mean motion resonances with Jupiter, occurring when the ratio of the orbital motions of an asteroid and a planet (in this case Jupiter) can be expressed as the ratio of two small integers. -
ASTEROID LIGHTCURVE DATA BASE (LCDB) Revised 2021 April 15
ASTEROID LIGHTCURVE DATA BASE (LCDB) Revised 2021 April 15 SPECIAL NOTICES The README.txt file is no longer distributed. Only the bookmarked PDF version is included. 2021 April VERY IMPORTANT Changes Regarding Phase Slope Parameter G(1), G2 To accommodate the currently adopted absolute magnitude/phase slope parameter H-G12 (H- G1,2) systems that replaced the traditional H-G system, new fields have been added to the Summary and Details tables and reports. See section 3.1.1 THE H-G, H-G12, and H-G1,G2 SYSTEMS. Changes Regarding Groups/Families The LCDB has been revised to use a hybrid of the Nesvorny (2015) and Nesvorny et al. (2015) families and those defined on the AstDys (2021) web site. As such, all entries in the “Family” column in those reports that include it, now have a text value that represents a number from either the Nesvorny or AstDys site family definitions. See section 3.1.2 FAMILY/GROUP MEMBERSHIP, DEFAULT ALBEDOS, AND TAXONOIMC CLASS. File Name Changes The file names in the distribution have been changed to match those in the set submitted to the NASA Planetary Data System Small Bodies Node. See section 2.1.0 DISTRIBUTION FILES for the revised file list. As a result of the changes above, column mappings for the lc_summary, lc_details, and lc_diameters reports have changed and there is a new lc_familylookup table. The new listings are given the appropriate subsections of Section 4. 2020 December The CLASS column in the Summary and Details table was expanded to 10 characters. This changed the column mapping for this and all subsequent columns. -
The British Astronomical Association Handbook 2018
THE HANDBOOK OF THE BRITISH ASTRONOMICAL ASSOCIATION 2018 2017 October ISSN 0068–130–X CONTENTS PREFACE . 2 HIGHLIGHTS FOR 2018 . 3 SKY DIARY . .. 4-5 CALENDAR 2018 . 6 SUN . 7-9 ECLIPSES . 10-15 APPEARANCE OF PLANETS . 16 VISIBILITY OF PLANETS . 17 RISING AND SETTING OF THE PLANETS IN LATITUDES 52°N AND 35°S . 18-19 PLANETS – Explanatin of Tables . 20 ELEMENTS OF PLANETARY ORBITS . 21 MERCURY . 22-23 VENUS . 24 EARTH . 25 MOON . 25 LUNAR LIBRATION . 26 MOONRISE AND MOONSET . 27-31 SUN’S SELENOGRAPHIC COLONGITUDE . 32 LUNAR OCCULTATIONS . 33-39 GRAZING LUNAR OCCULTATIONS . 40-41 MARS . 42-43 ASTEROIDS . 44 ASTEROID EPHEMERIDES . 45-49 ASTEROID OCCULTATIONS (incl. TNO Hightlight:1998 WV31) . 50-53 ASTEROIDS: FAVOURABLE OBSERVING OPPORTUNITIES . 54-56 NEO CLOSE APPROACHES TO EARTH . 57 JUPITER . .. 58-62 SATELLITES OF JUPITER . .. 62-66 JUPITER ECLIPSES, OCCULTATIONS AND TRANSITS . 67-76 SATURN . 77-80 SATELLITES OF SATURN . 81-84 URANUS . 85 NEPTUNE . 86 TRANS–NEPTUNIAN & SCATTERED-DISK OBJECTS . 87 DWARF PLANETS . 88-91 COMETS . 92-96 METEOR DIARY . 97-99 VARIABLE STARS (RZ Cassiopeiae; Algol; RS Canum Venaticorum) . 100-101 MIRA STARS . 102 VARIABLE STAR OF THE YEAR (VV Cephei) . .. .. 103-105 EPHEMERIDES OF VISUAL BINARY STARS . 106-107 BRIGHT STARS . 108 ACTIVE GALAXIES . 109 TIME . 110-111 ASTRONOMICAL AND PHYSICAL CONSTANTS . 112-113 INTERNET RESOURCES . 114-115 GREEK ALPHABET . 115 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS / ERRATA . 116 Front Cover: Mars - Apparent Diam. 18.4" taken from Barbados on 2016 June 05 by Damian Peach using a 356mm aper- ture Schmidt-Cassegrain telescope (North up) British Astronomical Association HANDBOOK FOR 2018 NINETY–SEVENTH YEAR OF PUBLICATION BURLINGTON HOUSE, PICCADILLY, LONDON, W1J 0DU Telephone 020 7734 4145 PREFACE Welcome to the 97th Handbook of the British Astronomical Association.