Native Crayfish Project East Hampshire Rivers Survey
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
NATIVE CRAYFISH PROJECT EAST HAMPSHIRE RIVERS SURVEY AND THE 1997 INTERIM REPORT ON THE PROJECT Prepared for The Environment Agency (Southern Region), English Nature (Species Recovery Programme) and The East Hampshire AONB Project Adrian Hutchings, Project Manager Carol Elliott, Project Assistant Dept. of Fish, Game and Wildlife Management, Sparsholt College, Winchester, Hampshire. SO21 2NF February, 1998 Native Crayfish Project Hampshire EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This is an interim report of a long-term study of the native White-clawed or Atlantic Stream crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes Lereboullet in Hampshire. It principally details the findings of the 1997 survey and monitoring effort in selected rivers and streams in Hampshire, with particular attention to those in the north and east of the County. The survey identified the presence of A. pallipes in the River Rother (Arun catchment) and the Lower Test, the latter being discovered in early 1998. This brings the total known native crayfish sites in Hampshire to six. The Candover Brook population is potentially the largest in Hampshire, but the native crayfish on the Rother appear to be widespread. In contrast the populations in the River Anton and possibly the Lower Test appear to be small and highly vulnerable to extinction. In addition monitoring programmes are now in place for three of the four previously known populations of native crayfish. There appears to be little change in the Upper Candover Brook population over the year, remaining healthy and stable, whilst monitoring has only just started in the two other locations. Signal crayfish P. leniusculus have been found in most rivers surveyed in 1997, including the rivers Anton, Southern Wey, Lyde and Whitewater, and some of these populations are substantial. At several locations both signal and native crayfish can be found in close proximity, the Rivers Anton and Rother being good examples of this. The reasons for the continued survival of native crayfish in these areas is unclear. The Lower Test native crayfish discovery is a highly significant one, being the only lower river population in Hampshire, if not in Southern England generally, and having survived with signal crayfish directly upstream. There are many implications of this find, including giving some hope to discovering other populations of native crayfish in the main Hampshire Rivers. Recommendations are given for conserving the recently discovered populations of native crayfish. This survey represents the largest undertaken by the Native Crayfish Project to date and has substantially enhanced the existing information on the distribution of crayfish species in Hampshire. Native Crayfish Project Hampshire Confidentiality This report contains confidential and sensitive information on the location of an endangered Red Data Book species. It is requested that the locational details of native crayfish in Hampshire remain confidential. In addition all sites where this species is found are in private ownership. Access to the sites should be strictly controlled and only permitted through consultation with the riparian owners, the Environment Agency, English Nature and the manager of the Native Crayfish Project, Sparsholt College Hampshire. Acknowledgements The Authors would like to thank the Environment Agency (Southern Region, Conservation Section), the Species Recovery Programme of English Nature and the East Hampshire AONB Project for their generous support of this work. The assistance in the field by Alison Strange, Susan McIntosh and Howard Colmer is especially acknowledged. Finally, but most important, the many waterkeepers and riparian owners for their help and enthusiasm towards this beleaguered species in Hampshire. Report circulation: Dr. Mary Gibson English Nature (Peterborough) Tim Sykes Environment Agency (Southern Region) Alison Tingley East Hants AONB Project Clive Chatters Hampshire Wildlife Trust Jonathan Brickland Environment Agency (North East Region) Ian Davidson-Watts English Nature (Hampshire Team) Alastair Driver Environment Agency (Thames Region) Mark Elliott Environment Agency (Southern Region) Dr. J. Foster Environment Agency (Southern Region) Jim Glasspool Test and Itchen Association Dr. D. Holdich Nottingham University Shirley Medgett Environment Agency (Southern Region) John Millikin Environment Agency (Southern Region) Dr. R. Mitchell English Nature (Species Recovery Programme) Mike Mullins Environment Agency (Southern Region) Martin Noble Forestry Commission (New Forest) David Pape Hampshire County Council Planning Dept. Graham Roberts SE Region Otters Project Stuart Taylor Environment Agency (Southern Region) David Webb Environment Agency (Thames Region) Lord Ashburton Landowner Mr. W.P Cleland Landowner Mr. M Davy Landowner Mr. R Harrison Landowner Mr. M.J Isaac Landowner Mr. K Kayser Landowner Mr P. Moncaster Water Keeper Native Crayfish Project Hampshire CONTENTS Page Executive Summary 1 Confidentiality 2 Acknowledgements 2 Report circulation list 2 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Legislative background and status of A. pallipes and P. leniusculus 5 1.2 The Native Crayfish Project Hampshire 6 1.2.1 The context of this report 6 2.0 Rivers Survey 2.1 Aims 7 2.2 Extent of survey in 1997 7 2.3 Survey methodology 8 2.4 Limitations of the survey 9 3.0 Survey Results 3.1 Confirmed Native Crayfish locations 10 3.1.1 The River Rother 10 3.1.2 The Lower Test 12 3.1.3 The Lower Candover Brook (Itchen Catchment) 13 3.2 Confirmed Signal Crayfish locations 15 3.2.1 The Southern River Wey 15 3.2.2 The River Loddon (Thames Catchment) 15 3.2.3 The River Lyde (Thames Catchment) 16 3.2.4 The River Whitewater (Thames Catchment) 17 3.2.5 The Upper Basingstoke Canal 17 3.2.6 The River Rother 18 3.2.7 The Upper River Test 18 3.2.8 The River Anton (Test Catchment) 19 3.2.9 The River Dever (Test Catchment) 19 3.2.10 The Crampmoor Stream (Test Catchment) 20 3.2.11 The River Itchen at Winnal 20 3.3 Discussion 3.3.1 The distribution of native crayfish A. pallipes in Hampshire 22 3.3.2 The distribution of signal crayfish P. leniusculus in Hampshire 23 Native Crayfish Project Hampshire Contents continued Page 4.0 Monitoring Programme 4.1 Monitoring methodology 24 4.2 Monitoring Results 4.1.1 River Anton 25 4.1.2 River Alre 26 4.1.3 Upper Candover Brook 26 4.3 Discussion 26 5.0 Other work carried out in 1997 28 6.0 Summary of the work in 1997 29 7.0 Summary of Recommendations for Future Work 30 References 32 Appendices Annex 1: Table 1. Survey Locations and Figure 1. Map identifying rivers mentioned in the report. Annex 2: Table 2. Results from all surveyed locations Annex 3: General habitat and survey notes/survey locations Annex 4: Figure 2. Location of the River Rother native crayfish population Annex 5 : Figure 3. Location of the Lower Test native crayfish population Annex 6: Figure 4. Location of the lower Candover Brook native crayfish population Annex 7; Figure 5. The known distribution of A. pallipes in Hampshire upto January, 1998 Annex 8: Figure 6. The known distribution of P. leniusculus in Hampshire upto January 1998 Annex 9: The standard monitoring procedure (revised January, 1998) Annex 10: Figure 7 Chart showing the age structure of the native crayfish population in the Upper Candover Brook Annex 11: Figure 8. Composite map of native and signal crayfish locations in Hampshire Annex 12: Provisional Action Plan for native crayfish in Hampshire Native Crayfish Project Hampshire 1.0 INTRODUCTION The native crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes Lereboullet is considered to be an endangered species in Europe (Groombridge, 1993). The decline of A. pallipes is well documented and is widely attributed to the introduction of the North American signal crayfish ( Pacifasticus leniusculus Dana), which is a vector of the so called “crayfish plague” - a highly infectious disease caused by the fungus Aphanomyces astaci Schikora (Holdich and Reeve, 1991, Holdich et al, 1995). Several other causal factors may also be important in the decline of this species, including habitat modification, pollution and competitive exclusion by non-native crayfish species, where on the rare occasions mixed populations exist (Holdich and Reeve, 1991). Holdich et al (1995) suggest that 77% of British recorded sites for A pallipes have been or are under threat from crayfish plague or adverse water quality. Hampshire is no exception to this with native crayfish now confined to a small number of sites. Whilst crayfish plague has only been confirmed locally in the Hampshire Avon (David Alderman, pers. comm.) it is still likely that this disease is the main reason for the decline of this species in the County. Much of the information on the status and distribution of A. pallipes in Hampshire is however anecdotal and historical, but in recent years the Native Crayfish Project based at Sparsholt College has begun to fill the gaps. This report is the culmination of the 1997 survey effort and provides fresh information on the known locations of both native and signal crayfish and reports on the health of the surviving populations of native crayfish. 1.1 Legislative background and status The native crayfish is recognised as being globally threatened and as such it is classed as endangered in the IUCN Red Data Book (Groombridge, 1993). A national action plan has been prepared for this species, which is reported in “Biodiversity, the UK Steering Group Report” (Palmer, 1995). In Britain A. pallipes is still relatively widespread, but is listed under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act, 1981, providing protection against taking from the wild or sale and advertisement for sale. A. pallipes is also listed in Appendix III of the Berne Convention and Annexes II and V of the EU Habitats and Species Directive (92/43/EEC), which means that efforts should be made to conserve A.pallipes habitat, including the designation of Special Areas for Conservation (SACs). The introduction of signal crayfish ( P. leniusculus ) is controlled in statute under Section 14 of the Wildlife Countryside Act, 1981 and under Article 22 of the EEC Habitats and Species Directive.