DOCSLIB.ORG

檔案編號︰WTSDC 20/220 Pt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
檔案編號︰WTSDC 20/220 Pt Minutes of the 21st Meeting of the HKSAR Third Term of Wong Tai Sin District Council (Summary Translation) Date: 8 March 2011 (Tuesday) Time: 2:30 p.m. Venue: Conference Room, Wong Tai Sin District Office, 6/F, Lung Cheung Office Block, 138 Lung Cheung Road, Wong Tai Sin, Kowloon Present: Chairman: Mr. LI Tak-hong, MH, JP Wong Tai Sin District Council Members: Mr. CHAN Lee-shing Ms. CHAN Man-ki, Maggie Mr. CHAN On-tai Mr. CHAN Wai-kwan, Andie Mr. CHAN Yim-kwong, Joe Mr. CHOI Luk-sing, MH Mr. CHUI Pak-tai Mr. HO Hon-man Mr. HO Yin-fai Mr. HUI Kam-shing Mr. KAN Chi-ho, BBS, MH Ms. KWOK Sau-ying Mr. LAM Man-fai, JP Dr. LAU Chi-wang, James, BBS, JP Mr. LEE Tat-yan, MH Mr. MOK Chung-fai, Rex Mr. MOK Kin-wing Mr. MOK Ying-fan Dr. SHI Lop-tak, Allen, MH, JP Mr. SO Sik-kin Mr. TO Kwan-hang, Andrew Dr. WONG Kam-chiu Mr. WONG Kwok-tung Mr. WONG Kwok-yan Mr. WONG Yat-yuk Mr. WU Chi-wai, MH Mr. YUEN Kwok-keung Absent with Apologies: Mr. CHOW Ching-lam, Tony, MH Mr. LAI Wing-ho, Joe 20110407-3_DC[M21]-e.doc 1 Mr. WONG Kam-chi, MH, JP In attendance: Dr. LAM Ping-yan, JP Director of Health DH ) Re.: Item Dr. MOK Chiu-yau Community Physician DH ) III(i) Dr. Jaime SIN Senior Medical and Health DH ) Officer (Community Liaison) Mr. SO Kam-leung, Under Secretary for Commerce CEDB ) Re.: Item Gregory, JP and Economic Development ) III(ii) Mr. HOU Ka-chun, Senior Economist (Commerce & CEDB ) Desmond Industry) Mr. HON Chi-keung, Director of Civil Engineering & CEDD ) Re.: Item JP Development ) III(iii) Mr. TSOI Cheong-hoi Senior Engineer / CEDD ) Media Communications Mr. IP Wing-cheung Chief Engineer / DSD ) Re.: Item Project Management ) III(iv) Mr. TONG Kin-shing Senior Engineer / DSD ) Project Management 2 ) Mr. CHEUNG Engineer / DSD ) Chun-ning Project Management 8 ) Mr. CHEUNG Engineer / DSD ) Wing-hong Project Management 15 ) Mr. CHAN Ka-lok Principal Engineer Scott Wilson Ltd. ) Mr. TANG Man-bun, Head (Kai Tak Office) CEDD ) Re.: Item Stephen ) III(v) Mr. CHUI Si-kay, Peter Senior Engineer/6 (Kowloon) CEDD ) Mr. SUN Tak-wing, Curator (Archaeology) Antiquities and ) Kevin Monuments Office ) Ms. CHU Ha-fan, Senior Town Planner / Kowloon PlanD ) Jessica 3 ) Mr. CHAN Yuk-ming Principal Engineer AECOM Asia Co Ltd ) Mr. SHIU Wai-chuen, District Officer (WTS) WTSDO William, JP Mr. David Michael District Commander (Wong Tai HKPF GUNTON Sin) Miss Cecilla LI District Social Welfare Officer SWD (Wong Tai Sin/Sai Kung) Mr. Anthony LO Chief Engineer CEDD Kam-yan Mrs. SUNG CHEUNG Chief Manager/Management HD Mun-chi (Wong Tai Sin, Tsing Yi, Tsuen Wan and Islands) Mr. AU Siu-fung, Senior Transport Officer / TD Kelven Wong Tai Sin 20110407-3_DC[M21]-e.doc 2 Mr. WONG Wai-wan, District Environmental Hygiene FEHD MH Superintendent (Wong Tai Sin) Mr. LAM Hok-hay, District Leisure Manager LCSD George (Wong Tai Sin) Mr. CHIK Yu-fai, Assistant District Officer (Wong WTSDO Freddy Tai Sin) Mr. CHUNG Chan-yau, Senior Executive Officer WTSDO Patrick (District Management) Mr. TING Tin-sang Senior Liaison Officer 1 WTSDO Ms. PANG Suk-wah, Senior Liaison Officer 2 WTSDO Phyllis Mr. YAM Yiu-hung, Executive Officer I (District WTSDO Nathan Council) Secretary Ms. LAM Pui-fun, SEO(DC) WTSDO Maggie Opening Remarks The Chairman welcomed everyone to the 21st meeting of the Wong Tai Sin District Council (WTSDC), especially Dr. LAM Ping-yan, JP, Director of Health; Dr. MOK Chiu-yau, Community Physician and Dr. Jaime SIN, Senior Medical and Health Officer (Community Liaison) who attended the meeting for agenda item III(i). 2. The Chairman welcomed Ms. Maggie LAM who replaced the outgoing Secretary of WTSDC Mrs. Teresa SOH. WTSDC endorsed to record a vote of thanks to Mrs. SOH for her contribution. 3. The Chairman welcomed Mr. Freddy CHIK who replaced the outgoing Assistant District Officer Miss Kathy MA. WTSDC endorsed to record a vote of thanks to Miss MA for her contribution. 4. The Chairman welcomed Mr. George LAM who replaced the outgoing District Leisure Manager (Wong Tai Sin) Ms. Lizzy YAU. WTSDC endorsed to record a vote of thanks to Ms. YAU for her contribution. 5. The Chairman welcomed Mr. Kelvin AU, Senior Transport Officer (Wong Tai Sin), who stood in for Mr. Vincent FAN, Chief Transport Officer (Kowloon) who was unable to attend the meeting due to other official commitments. 6. Members noted that Vice-chairman Mr. WONG Kam-chi, MH, JP; Dr. WONG Kam-chiu and Mr. Tong CHOW, MH were absent from the meeting with apologies. Mr. Wong and Dr. WONG would endeavour to attend the meeting. 20110407-3_DC[M21]-e.doc 3 I. Confirmation of the Minutes of the 20th Meeting of WTSDC held on 4 January 2011 7. Mr. SO Sik-kin proposed that the Chinese version of paragraph 5 of the minutes should be amended from “……政府就沙中線(黃大仙段)工程與黃大仙區議 會達成共識前，已於二零一零年十一月二十六日將工程方案刊憲……” to “……政 府就沙中線(黃大仙段)工程與黃大仙區議會未能達成共識前，已於二零一零年十 一月二十六日將工程方案刊憲……”. (The English version of paragraph 5 was not required to amend.) 8. The minutes of the 20th meeting of WTSDC held on 4 January 2011 were then confirmed. II. Progress Report on Matters Arising from the 20th Meeting of the Wong Tai Sin District Council (WTSDC Paper 14/2011) 9. Members noted the paper. 20110407-3_DC[M21]-e.doc 4 III(i) Director of Health’s Visit to the Wong Tai Sin District Council 10. The Chairman welcomed Dr. LAM Ping-yan, JP, Director of Health; Dr. MOK Chiu-yau, Community Physician and Dr. Jaime SIN, Senior Medical and Health Officer (Community Liaison), and invited Dr. LAM to introduce work plan of the Department of Health (DH) in 2011/12. 11. Dr. LAM said it was the second time he had visited WTSDC. He remarked that Wong Tai Sin was always at the forefront of healthy city development, and congratulated the district for its designation of “International Safe Community” in a ceremony attended by him recently. To allow more time to listen to Members’ views, he would only talk about a few major public concerns: (i) Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases (a) Winter and summer were peak seasons of influenza. The winter influenza season in Hong Kong started in mid-January. This year was unusual, as about 90% of the cases were caused by influenza A virus [i.e. H1N1(2009), also known as human swine flu virus], and few cases involved H3N2 or influenza B viruses. It was fortunate that the number of influenza cases had started to drop since early February, and was anticipated that further drop would occur in the coming couple of weeks until the number of cases was back to normal in mid-March. Although there were more influenza cases than in the past two years, it still did not hit the record number in the 2009 influenza pandemic. In other words, the situation was not too serious, and the cases were relatively minor in general; (b) One should try to learn more about influenza as breakout of the disease was natural phenomenon and would occur annually. DH would step up its publicity and risk communication efforts from time to time, with a view to helping people know more about influenza, including its risk and prevention. Although the number of influenza cases was dropping, high risk target groups were still advised to receive influenza vaccinations through the Government’s vaccination programme, which was originally launched to protect people’s health during the winter influenza season. Members of the public should keep vigilant against influenza as they might catch the disease in any time of the year; and (c) The Government always advised people to do more exercise, eat more vegetable and fruit, keep ventilation well, quit smoking etc. In addition, Chinese medicine might also be used to prevent influenza. He hoped members of the public would continue to attach high importance to flu prevention 20110407-3_DC[M21]-e.doc 5 (ii) Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases (a) Non-communicable diseases (NCD) such as diabetes, hypertension etc. accounted for 60% of our healthcare expenditure. While Hong Kong’s population was living longer, but more and more people were suffering from stress. They also ate deep fried food and had other unhealthy eating habits. The above situations, if not changed, would shorten the life expectancy of the coming generation and more people would suffer from cardiac diseases at a younger age. Therefore, it was important to formulate a strategy to control and prevent NCD; and (b) Instead of targeting individual disease, the disease prevention strategy was aimed to improve the living habits of Hong Kong people. The Government had formed a high-level steering committee chaired and vice-chaired by Secretary for Food and Health Dr. York CHOW and Dr. LAM respectively. A number of working groups were formed under the steering committee to work on NCD-causing factors such as over-weight, obesity etc. To tackle these factors, the working groups had proposed a number of actions which would be implemented in phases. (iii) Promotion of Healthy Eating Habits (a) Promotion of healthy eating habits was one of the proposed actions implemented. Although local students were familiar with the Food Guide Pyramid, they tended to choose unhealthy food. In this connection, the Government had to change the school environment and parents’ mindset about parent-child relationship. Also, schools should cooperate with parent-teacher associations to improve the food quality provided by lunch suppliers and their own tuck shops.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 4 Cultural Heritage Impact
    MTR Corpor ation Ltd. SCL – NEX/2206 EIA Study for Tai Wai to Hung Hom Section Final Environmental Impact Assessment Report 4 Cultural Heritage Impact 4.1 Introduction The EIA Study Brief for SCL requires a Cultural Heritage Impact Assessment (CHIA) comprising a Built Heritage Impact Assessment (BHIA) and an Archaeological Impact Assessment (AIA) to be conducted. The BHIA needs to search historic buildings, clan graves and landscape features within the study area while the AIA requires a terrestrial investigation of the archaeological potential of the study area, particularly the former Tai Hom Village Archaeological Site. The field investigation for former Tai Hom Village was carried out in March 2009. Tang/ Song Dynasty remains found are sparse and redeposited and hence of lesser archaeological significance. However, assemblage of Tang/ Song archaeological finds within urban setting is considered rare in Hong Kong. Other than the former Tai Hom Village Archaeological Site, the CHIA has also studied the impacts on the 3 historical buildings within former Tai Hom Village and, after studying their cultural significance and all possible options, recommended the most appropriate mitigation measures. The possible impacts caused by the construction and operation of the Project on other built heritages including but not limited to the Lung Tsun Stone Bridge have also been studied and the impacts have been minimised by adopting alternative construction methodologies. More details of the assessment findings and mitigation measures are given in this Chapter. 4.2 Environmental Legislation, Standards and Guidelines The assessment and protection of cultural heritage within HKSAR is governed by the following legislative standards and guidelines: • Environmental Impact Assessment Ordinance (EIAO); • Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance; and • Hong Kong Planning Standards and Guidelines (HKPSG).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3: Public Participation @ Heritage.Conservation
    70 Chapter 3: Public Participation @ Heritage.Conservation Chapter 3: Public Participation @ Heritage.Conservation Introduction Historic buildings are witnesses of Hong Kong’s urban development that provoke people’s memories. Through the appreciation of their architectural design and layout, the public can understand the living conditions of people from different walks of life in different periods. Historic buildings also act as important urban landmarks and enhance the aesthetics of a city’s environment. Hence, historic buildings are in effect cultural resources to be enjoyed by the public. In this regard, full participation of various stakeholders is necessary for the Government to formulate policies for the revitalisation of historic buildings and heritage conservation. This section will describe how the Government, professional organisations, academic organisations, non-governmental organisations and private organisations promote public participation in heritage conservation. Teachers can make use of this section to teach students how different stakeholders promote heritage conservation and to consider the significance of public participation and the various factors affecting participation. The following is a description on how different stakeholders such as the Government, professional organisations, academic institutions, non-governmental organisations, private organisations and the public take part in heritage conservation. Hong Kong Heritage Liberal Studies Teaching Kit 71 Government @ public participation The Government is responsible
    [Show full text]
  • Creative Arts Space in Hong Kong: Three Tales Through the Lens of Cultural Capital
    c Creative Arts Space in Hong Kong: Three Tales through the lens of Cultural Capital Hoi Ling Anne CHAN (0000-0002-8356-8069) A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning University of Melbourne February 2019 [Intended to leave blank] i Abstract The fact that culture and creativity are often instrumentalised in urban regeneration and/or development points to a pragmatic relationship between culture and the city. Hong Kong, like many post-colonial and post-industrial cities, faced challenges in economic restructuring and in the search of a new identity. Thus, culture came to the centre of the stage in the formulation of development strategies and started to accumulate cultural assets. The accumulation of cultural assets led to the emergence of various forms of cultural assets such as cultural district, infrastructure, projects in order to achieve various aims. However, most of the existing research focused on large-scale flagship projects from an economic or strategic perspective. A holistic understanding of those cultural projects is limited in the literature especially for the small-scale cultural projects. This research examines how the creative arts spaces interact with the host city, Hong Kong through the lens of cultural capital. Three creative arts spaces with different management models are chosen as case studies. Data were collected through field investigation and key informant interviews as well as from secondary sources such as archives and media. The data collected are analysed by executing thematic analysis procedures. The findings reveal that creative arts spaces are different from large-scale flagship projects in their relations to cities.
    [Show full text]
  • LC Paper No. PWSC81/20-21(01) - 2
    LC Paper No. PWSC81/20-21(01) - 2 - Encl. c.c.(w/e) Antiquities and Monuments Office (Attn: Ms. Susanna SIU) Architectural Services Department (Attn: Ms. Jackie LEE) Leisure and Cultural Services Department (Attn: Mr. Horman CHAN) Civil Engineering and Development Department (Attn: Mr. Ricky CHAN) Enclosure Legislative Council Public Works Subcommittee PWP Item 470RO – Lung Tsun Stone Bridge Preservation Corridor at Kai Tak Follow-up Actions arising from the Meeting held on 27 January 2021 The Public Works Subcommittee discussed the LegCo Paper No. PWSC(2020-21)31. In response to the request from the Chairman and Hon Junius HO Kwan-yiu, the Administration hereby provide the following supplementary information to elaborate the heritage and historic value of remnants of Lung Tsun Stone Bridge (LTSB), and how the proposed item of LTSB preservation corridor can effectively preserve and interprete its heritage and historical values. The relevant supplementary information is as follows: History of LTSB 2. Built between 1873 and 1875, Lung Tsun Stone Bridge (LTSB) was was originally about 210 meters in length and 2.6 to 4 meters in width (Photo 1). In 1892, a wooden extension of 80 metres was added by the local charity organisation Lok Sin Tong (樂善堂) after fund raising (Photo 2). In 1910, the timber extension of LTSB was replaced by a concrete structure, which was later modified to become the Kowloon City Pier. Part of LTSB was buried by the Kai Tack Bund reclamation carried out by the Government between 1916 and 1924 at the west shore of Kowloon Bay for property development.
    [Show full text]
  • Preservation of Lung Tsun Stone Bridge (Longjin Bridge) 1
    Appendix 4.5 Preservation of Lung Tsun Stone Bridge (Longjin Bridge) 1 Introduction Lung Tsun Stone Bridge was a landing pier built in 1873-1875 and its timber extension was modified/ dismantled in early 20 th century. The Bridge not only signified the economic growth of that area but also illustrated its strategic position to uphold Chinese jurisdiction on Kowloon Walled City during British colonial period. Lung Tsun Stone Bridge formerly projected from the original shoreline outside Kowloon Walled City into Kowloon Bay. The first phase was constructed in about 1875. Remnants of the Bridge were subsequently buried under reclamations on which former Kai Tak Airport was built. Parts of the original Bridge and a concrete extension to the Bridge constructed in the 1930s have recently been exposed in archaeological excavations. The proposed Shatin to Central Link (SCL) Base Alignment between Kai Tak Station (KAT) and To Kwa Wan Station (TKW) will pass under the 1930s construction, i.e. Former Kowloon City Pier (see Figure 4.1.2A). Lung Tsun Stone Bridge is not yet listed as a declared historical monument on the AMO website (refer PNAP 175) nevertheless efforts will be made to preserve remnants of the Bridge in place. The current approved Kai Tak Development Outline Zoning Plan (OZP) does not show the existence of Lung Tsun Stone Bridge because the bridge was discovered after the preparation and approval of the relevant OZP. Remains of Lung Tsun Stone Bridge are recommended to be preserved in-situ under the Schedule 3 Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of Kai Tak Development (KTD).
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of 959 Meeting of the Town Planning Board Held on 4.6.2010
    Minutes of 959th Meeting of the Town Planning Board held on 4.6.2010 Present Permanent Secretary for Development Chairman (Planning and Lands) Mr. Thomas Chow Mr. Stanley Y.F. Wong Vice-chairman Mr. K.Y. Leung Mr. Walter K.L. Chan Mr. B.W. Chan Ms. Maggie M.K. Chan Mr. Y.K. Cheng Mr. Felix W. Fong Ms. Anna S.Y. Kwong Dr. James C.W. Lau Professor Edwin H.W. Chan Mr. Rock C.N. Chen Mr. Maurice W.M. Lee Dr. Winnie S.M. Tang Professor P.P. Ho Professor Eddie C.M. Hui Dr. C.P. Lau Ms. Julia M.K. Lau Mr. Laurence L.J. Li Dr. W.K. Lo Dr. Roger K.H. Luk Professor S.C. Wong Ms. Pansy L.P. Yau Dr. W.K. Yau Mr. Stephen M.W. Yip Principal Assistant Secretary (Transport) Transport and Housing Bureau Mr. Fletch Chan Deputy Director of Environmental Protection Mr. Benny Wong Assistant Director (2), Home Affairs Department Mr. Andrew Tsang Director of Lands Miss Annie Tam Director of Planning Mrs. Ava S.Y. Ng Deputy Director of Planning/District Secretary Miss Ophelia Y.S. Wong Absent with Apologies Mr. Raymond Y.M. Chan Professor Paul K.S. Lam Mr. Timothy K.W. Ma Professor Joseph H.W. Lee Mr. Clarence W.C. Leung Ms. Anita W.T. Ma In Attendance Assistant Director of Planning/Board Mr. Lau Sing Chief Town Planner/Town Planning Board Ms. Christine K.C. Tse (am) Miss H.Y. Chu (pm) Town Planner/Town Planning Board Ms. Johanna W.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Management Plan for the Site of Lung Tsun Stone Bridge
    Conservation Management Plan for the Site of Lung Tsun Stone Bridge November 2009 Lung Tsun Stone Bridge CMP, November 2009 Executive Summary 1. The Lung Tsun Stone Bridge was a landing pier built between 1873 and 1875 at the coastline of the old Kowloon City. The Stone Bridge was originally about 210 metres in length and from 2.6 to 4 metres in width. It was buried due to Kai Tack Bunds in the 1920s and the former airport development during the Japanese Occupation. 2. In April 2008, the remnants of the Bridge were first identified during an archaeological investigation under the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) study for the Kai Tak Development (KTD). Further investigation to ascertain the extent of Bridge remnants and in-situ preservation of the Bridge remnants were recommended in the approved EIA report of KTD. 3. Apart from the extant sections of the Stone Bridge, the remnants of the Pavilion for Greeting Officials, Former Kowloon City Pier and segments of 1924 and 1930s seawalls were also identified by the further investigation. Levels of significance are assigned to the archaeological features discovered in this document. The extant sections of the Stone Bridge together with the remnants of the Pavilion for Greeting Officials are of high significance. The remnants of the Former Kowloon City Pier and seawalls segments of 1924 and 1930s are classified as medium and low significance respectively. 4. A set of conservation guidelines, based on recognized charters and principles, is proposed as a framework to guide the conservation, management, maintenance and interpretation of the remnants in future.
    [Show full text]
  • An Update on the Planning and Design of the Kai Tak Development
    Task Force on Kai Tak Harbourfront Development For discussion TFKT/12/2013 on 8 October 2013 An Update on the Planning and Design of the Kai Tak Development PURPOSE This paper aims at providing Members with an update on the planning and design of the Kai Tak Development (KTD). OVERVIEW 2. The Kai Tak Airport was an icon of Hong Kong life and beloved by many for more than 70 years before its closure on 6 July 1998. KTD, to transform Kai Tak from an airport to Hong Kong’s single largest urban development of about 323 hectares (ha), opens a new opportunity to create a quality living environment in the urban area for the future generations. 3. KTD is a highly complex development project comprising many high-impact projects, such as the Kai Tak Cruise Terminal (KTCT), the first District Cooling System (DCS) in Hong Kong and a multi-purpose sports complex (MPSC). KTD has been included in the development area of the Energizing Kowloon East (KE) initiative1 and plays an important role to help sustain Hong Kong’s economic growth and stimulate regeneration of adjacent old districts including Kwun Tong, Kowloon City and Wong Tai Sin. To improve connectivity of KE in the long term, an elevated rail-based environmentally friendly linkage system (EFLS) is proposed. 4. KTD has entered into the implementation stage, with early 1 KE is an area comprising KTD area, Kwun Tong business area and Kowloon Bay business area. In the 2011-12 Policy Address, the Chief Executive announced that we will adopt a visionary, co-ordinated and integrated approach to expedite the transformation of KE into an attractive, alternative central business district (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration's Paper on Progress Report on Heritage Conservation
    For discussion on 24 March 2020 Legislative Council Panel on Development Progress Report on Heritage Conservation Initiatives Purpose This paper updates Members on the progress of the heritage conservation initiatives since our last report to the Panel in January 2019. The paper also seeks the Panel’s endorsement on the funding application for the Lung Tsun Stone Bridge Preservation Corridor at Kai Tak. Heritage Conservation Policy Policy statement 2. As promulgated in 2007, the Government seeks “to protect, conserve and revitalise as appropriate historical and heritage sites and buildings through relevant and sustainable approaches for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations. In implementing this policy, due regard should be given to development needs in the public interest, respect for private property rights, budgetary considerations, cross-sector collaboration and active engagement of stakeholders and the general public.” Statutory monument declaration system 3. In accordance with section 3 of the Antiquities and Monuments Ordinance (Cap. 53) (the “Ordinance”), the Antiquities Authority (i.e. the Secretary for Development) may, after consultation with the Antiquities Advisory Board (“AAB”) and with the approval of the Chief Executive, by notice in the Gazette, declare any place, building, site or structure, which the Authority considers to be of public interest by reason of its historical, 1 archaeological or palaeontological significance, to be a monument. Monuments are subject to statutory protection provided under the Ordinance. Pursuant to section 6 of the Ordinance, the protection includes prohibition of any excavation, carrying on building or other works on the monument, and any action to demolish, remove, obstruct, deface or interfere with the monument unless a permit is granted by the Antiquities Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Further Archaeological Excavation Report
    Agreement No. CE 35/2006(CE) Kai Tak Development Engineering Study cum Design and Construction of Advance Works – Investigation, Design and Construction Further Archaeological Excavation Report Agreement No. CE 35/2006(CE) Kai Tak Development Engineering Study cum Design and Construction of Advance Works – Investigation, Design and Construction FURTHER ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATION REPORT Contents Page Abbreviation Abstract 1 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background........................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objective and Structure of Report.......................................................................................... 1 2 OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE OF FURTHER ARCHAEOLOGICAL EXCAVATION................... 3 2.1 Objective of Further Archaeological Excavation ..................................................................... 3 2.2 Scope of Further Archaeological Excavation ......................................................................... 3 3 TASK AND METHODOLOGY............................................................................................... 5 3.1 Desk-top Study ..................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Preparation of Schematic Plans of Longjin Bridge and Former Kowloon City Pier .................. 5 3.3 Excavation Design and On-site Excavation ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paper on Kai Tak Development Prepared by the Legislative
    立法會 Legislative Council LC Paper No. CB(1)1133/17-18(06) Ref: CB1/PL/DEV Panel on Development Meeting on 26 June 2018 Updated background brief on Kai Tak Development Purpose This paper provides background information on the Kai Tak Development ("KTD") and a brief account of the views and concerns expressed by Members on the subject since the 2012-2013 legislative session. Background 2. KTD is a development project spanning a total planning area of over 320 hectares covering the 280-hectare ex-Kai Tak Airport site together with the adjoining waterfront areas of Ma Tau Kok, Kwun Tong and Cha Kwo Ling. 3. After its announcement of the plan to build a new airport at Chep Lap Kok in 1989, the Administration started to plan for KTD. With funds approved by the Finance Committee ("FC") in April 1995, the Administration undertook a comprehensive feasibility study for the South East Kowloon Development. The feasibility study completed in 1998 arrived at a development scheme which aroused public concerns over its proposed extent of harbour reclamation.1 4. Following the judgment handed down by the Court of Final Appeal in January 2004 which ruled that any reclamation projects within the 1 It was then proposed that 299 hectares of land would be reclaimed from Kowloon Bay and Kai Tak Nullah/Kwun Tong Typhoon Shelter. - 2 - harbour should meet the "overriding public need" test, the Administration commissioned the Kai Tak Planning Review with zero reclamation as the starting point to carry out a public participation programme. After three rounds of public engagement, the development scheme of KTD with a mix of community, housing, business, tourism and infrastructural uses was incorporated into the Kai Tak Outline Zoning Plan ("OZP"), which was approved in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • For Discussion
    CB(1)1862/10-11(01) For information Legislative Council Panel on Development Progress Report on Kai Tak Development PURPOSE This paper updates Members on the progress of Kai Tak Development (KTD), and seeks Members’ support on our proposal to part-upgrade three PWP items (465CL, 469CL and 711CL) to Category A, at a total estimated cost of about $1,165 million in money-of-the-day (MOD) prices, for (a) treatment of contaminated sediment at Kai Tak approach channel (KTAC) and Kwun Tong typhoon shelter (KTTS); (b) construction of stage 2 infrastructure in the north apron area; and (c) reprovisoning of radar on top of the cruise terminal building. OVERVIEW 2. KTD is a highly complex development project spanning a total planning area of over 320 hectares covering the ex-Kai Tak airport together with the adjoining hinterland districts of Kowloon City, Wong Tai Sin and Kwun Tong. In view of the scale and complexity of the project, we have been working closely with the public and the Legislative Council (LegCo) in taking forward its implementation. 3. For LegCo, we briefed the Panel on Development (the Panel) on the KTD implementation plan in January 2009. Subsequently, we obtained funding approval from LegCo in 2009 and 2010 for proceeding with a series of KTD-related public works projects with aggregate approved project estimate of about $12.6 billion. These projects are currently either under construction or at the detailed design stage. 4. In November 2009, we updated the Panel on the progress of KTD and obtained support for setting up a dedicated Kai Tak Office (KTO) in the Civil Engineering and Development Department.
    [Show full text]