DOCSLIB.ORG

Flint River Basin Regional Water Development and Conservation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Flint River Basin Regional Water Development and Conservation Plan 1 Flint River Basin Regional Water Development and Conservation Plan March 20, 2006 Georgia Dept. of Natural Resources Environmental Protection Division Carol A. Couch Director Robin John McDowell Plan Coordinator 2 Table of Contents Introduction..................................................................................................................... 14 Acknowledgements........................................................................................................ 19 PART I: SUMMARY OF TECHNICAL FINDINGS AND EPD PERMITTING ACTIONS ..................................................................................... 21 A. Summary of technical findings ................................................................................ 21 B. EPD permitting and water resource management actions.................................... 23 PART II: STAKEHOLDER PROCESS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR REGULATION OF AGRICULTURAL WATER WITHDRAWALS ..................................................................................................... 37 SECTION 1: BACKGROUND AND FRAMEWORK ............................................... 37 1.1 Explanation and justification for the Flint Basin Plan.................................... 37 1.2 Agricultural permit and permit application trends............................................... 39 1.3 Conservation, development, and ecologic sustainability....................................... 41 1.3.1 Factors affecting maximum possible development.............................................. 43 1.3.2 Factors limiting maximum conservation ............................................................. 44 1.4 The Flint River Drought Protection Act................................................................. 45 SECTION 2: RECOMMENDED WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND PERMITTING STRATEGIES FOR THE FLINT RIVER BASIN........................... 47 2.1 General Plan goals .................................................................................................... 47 2.2 Stakeholder Advisory Committee ........................................................................... 48 2.3 Technical Advisory Committee .............................................................................. 49 2.4 Guiding principles of the Stakeholder Advisory Committee............................... 50 2.5 Conclusions about “safe yield” ................................................................................ 51 3 2.6 EPD regulatory limits.............................................................................................. 52 2.8 Consensus recommendations for permitting strategies......................................... 52 2.9 Stakeholder recommendations for regulatory and statutory reform .................. 55 PART III: TECHNICAL AND STATUTORY BACKGROUND OF PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................... 58 SECTION 3: STATE OF THE BASIN’S NATURAL RESOURCES ....................... 58 3.1 Basin hydrography.................................................................................................... 58 3.2 Rainfall patterns: normal, drought, and long-term trends................................... 59 3.4 Surficial geology........................................................................................................ 62 3.5 Stream-aquifer interaction....................................................................................... 66 SECTION 4: FISH AND WILDLIFE RESOURCES OF THE LOWER FLINT RIVER BASIN ................................................................................................................ 68 4.1 Mussels....................................................................................................................... 68 4.2 Gulf striped bass ....................................................................................................... 72 SECTION 5: WATER USE IN THE FLINT RIVER BASIN .................................... 75 5.1 Agricultural water withdrawal permitting............................................................. 75 5.1.1 Application for a permit....................................................................................... 75 5.1.2 Application evaluation – ground-water withdrawal permits ............................... 76 5.1.3 Application evaluation – surface-water withdrawal permits ............................... 77 5.1.4 “Grandfathered” farm-use permits....................................................................... 78 5.1.5 Expiration, revocation, modification and transfer of agricultural permits........... 79 5.2 Historical agricultural water use in southwest Georgia........................................ 80 5.2.1 Extension irrigation surveys ................................................................................ 80 5.2.2 Subarea 4 and Flint Basin Sound Science Studies – Irrigated acreage................ 81 5.3 Municipal and industrial ground-water withdrawal permitting.......................... 90 5.3.1 Municipal and industrial ground-water permitting.............................................. 90 5.4 Municipal and industrial surface-water withdrawal permitting.......................... 93 4 5.5 Permitted municipal and industrial withdrawals .................................................. 95 SECTION 6: HYDROLOGIC MODELS IN THE LOWER FLINT RIVER BASIN ........................................................................................................................................... 99 6.1 Ground-water models............................................................................................... 99 6.1.1 Model area and boundaries .................................................................................. 99 6.1.2 Model application and results ............................................................................ 101 6.1.3 Water budget analysis........................................................................................ 102 6.1.4 Base flow reduction by HUC-12 and HUC-8 sub-basin.................................... 104 6.2 Surface-water models ............................................................................................. 120 6.2.1 Description of Model Scenarios......................................................................... 120 6.2.2 Model Results .................................................................................................... 122 6.3 Scenario Impact Evaluation................................................................................... 124 6.3.1 Discussion of In stream Flow Impact Criteria ................................................... 124 6.3.2 Aquatic Habitat Protection Streamflow Criteria................................................ 125 6.3.3 Water Quality Guidelines .................................................................................. 126 6.3.4 Computation of Criteria ..................................................................................... 127 6.3.5 Evaluation of In-Stream Flow Criteria ............................................................. 127 6.3.6 Water Quality Guidelines .................................................................................. 135 6.4 Interpretation of Scenario Impact Model Results ............................................... 137 SECTION 7: HYDROLOGIC EVALUATION OF SPRING CREEK, ICHAWAYNOCHAWAY, AND LOWER FLINT SUB-BASINS........................... 139 7.1 Ichawaynochaway Creek sub-basin ...................................................................... 139 7.2 Spring Creek sub-basin .......................................................................................... 144 7.2.1 Basin hydrography............................................................................................. 144 7.3 Lower Flint River sub-basin .................................................................................. 150 SECTION 8: ECONOMIC STATUS OF THE LOWER FLINT RIVER BASIN . 153 8.1 Agriculture............................................................................................................... 153 8.2 Manufacturing and other sectors .......................................................................... 154 8.3 Modeled economic impacts of reducing irrigation .............................................. 154 SECTION 9 : WATER CONSERVATION IN THE FLINT RIVER BASIN ....... 162 5 8.1 Definition ................................................................................................................ 162 9.2 Proposed strategies ................................................................................................. 163 GLOSSARY................................................................................................................... 166 BIBLIOGRAPHY......................................................................................................... 171 APPENDIX I: SURFACE-WATER MODEL AND APPLICATION................... 177 APPENDIX II: GROUND-WATER MODEL AND APPLICATION .................... 237 6 List of Figures Figure 0.1: The Flint River Basin and sub-basins............................................................. 18 Figure 0.2. Classification of HUC-12 watersheds in the lower Flint River Basin............ 25 Figure 0.3. Classification of HUC-12 watersheds in the Ichawaynochaway Creek sub- basin. ......................................................................................................................... 27 Figure 0.4. Classification
Load more

Recommended publications
  • List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin
    Latest 305(b)/303(d) List of Streams List of Stream Reaches With TMDLs and TMDL Implementation Plans - Updated June 2011 Total Maximum Daily Loadings TMDL TMDL PLAN DELIST BASIN NAME HUC10 REACH NAME LOCATION VIOLATIONS TMDL YEAR TMDL PLAN YEAR YEAR Altamaha 0307010601 Bullard Creek ~0.25 mi u/s Altamaha Road to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River FC 2012 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 2006 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010603 Five Mile Creek Headwaters to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010603 Goose Creek U/S Rd. S1922(Walton Griffis Rd.) to Little Goose Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Mushmelon Creek Headwaters to Delbos Bay Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010604 Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier
    [Show full text]
  • STURGEON HABITAT QUANTIFIED by SIDE-SCAN SONAR IMAGERY By
    STURGEON HABITAT QUANTIFIED BY SIDE-SCAN SONAR IMAGERY by JOHN DAVID HOOK (Under the Direction of Nathan P. Nibbelink and Douglas L. Peterson) ABSTRACT The assessment and monitoring of freshwater habitats is essential to the successful management of imperiled fishes. Recent introduction of recreational multi-beam and side-scan sonar equipment allows rapid, low cost acquisition of bathymetric data and substrate imagery in navigable waters. However, utilization of this data is hindered by a lack of established protocols for processing and classification. I surveyed 298 km of the Ogeechee River, Georgia using low-cost recreational-grade side-scan and bathymetric sonar. I assessed classification accuracy of three approaches to working with recreational- grade sonar and quantified potential spawning grounds for Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus). I demonstrate that ecologically relevant habitat variables can be derived from low-cost sonar imagery at low levels of processing effort. INDEX WORDS: Side-scan sonar, Atlantic sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus oxyrinchus), habitat, classification accuracy STURGEON HABITAT QUANTIFIED BY SIDE-SCAN SONAR IMAGERY by JOHN DAVID HOOK B.S., Cleveland State University, 2008 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE ATHENS, GEORGIA 2011 © 2011 John David Hook All Rights Reserved STURGEON HABITAT QUANTIFIED BY SIDE-SCAN SONAR IMAGERY By JOHN DAVID HOOK Major Professors: Nathan Nibbelink Douglas Peterson Committee: Jeffrey Hepinstall-Cymerman Thomas Jordan Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia December 201 iv DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this to my parents, John and Joyce, whose continued support, encouragement, and enthusiasm have made all my endeavors possible, and to Emily, whose love and patience seem to know no bounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinchafoonee Creek HWI (Lee County)
    1 7/01/2014 Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 What is a Watershed? ..................................................................................................................... 4 Characteristics of a Healthy Watershed ......................................................................................... 4 Benefits of a Healthy Watershed .................................................................................................... 5 Watershed Protection Priorities; Issues and Concerns .................................................................. 5 What is happening in the Watershed (land use, waste water, etc.) .............................................. 6 Description of the Watershed ........................................................................................................ 7 Stakeholder Involvement .............................................................................................................. 10 Identified Resource Issues in the Kinchafoonee Watershed ........................................................ 11 Potential Pollutant Source Assessment ........................................................................................ 12 Recommendations for Maintaining a Healthy Watershed ........................................................... 15 Final Recommendations ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Eating Fish from Georgia Waters 2017
    Guidelines For Eating Fish From Georgia Waters 2017 Georgia Department of Natural Resources 2 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, S.E., Suite 1252 Atlanta, Georgia 30334-9000 i ii For more information on fish consumption in Georgia, contact the Georgia Department of Natural Resources. Environmental Protection Division Watershed Protection Branch 2 Martin Luther King, Jr. Drive, S.E., Suite 1152 Atlanta, GA 30334-9000 (404) 463-1511 Wildlife Resources Division 2070 U.S. Hwy. 278, S.E. Social Circle, GA 30025 (770) 918-6406 Coastal Resources Division One Conservation Way Brunswick, Ga. 31520 (912) 264-7218 Check the DNR Web Site at: http://www.gadnr.org For this booklet: Go to Environmental Protection Division at www.gaepd.org, choose publications, then fish consumption guidelines. For the current Georgia 2015 Freshwater Sport Fishing Regulations, Click on Wild- life Resources Division. Click on Fishing. Choose Fishing Regulations. Or, go to http://www.gofishgeorgia.com For more information on Coastal Fisheries and 2015 Regulations, Click on Coastal Resources Division, or go to http://CoastalGaDNR.org For information on Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) source reduction, reuse options, proper disposal or recycling, go to Georgia Department of Community Affairs at http://www.dca.state.ga.us. Call the DNR Toll Free Tip Line at 1-800-241-4113 to report fish kills, spills, sewer over- flows, dumping or poaching (24 hours a day, seven days a week). Also, report Poaching, via e-mail using [email protected] Check USEPA and USFDA for Federal Guidance on Fish Consumption USEPA: http://www.epa.gov/ost/fishadvice USFDA: http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/seafood.1html Image Credits:Covers: Duane Raver Art Collection, courtesy of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Suwannee River State Park
    HISTORY AND NATURE SUWANNEE RIVER The park contains over 1,800 acres of natural STATE PARK Florida with many features such as sinks, streams, 3631 201st Path SUWANNEE RIVER springs, limestone outcroppings and the rivers. Live Oak, FL 32060 STATE PARK The park has an abundance of plant and animal 386-362-2746 species including gopher tortoise, fox, deer, song Where the scenic Withlacoochee birds, wildflowers and diverse native forests. The joins the historic Suwannee protected Gulf Sturgeon and other fishes and reptiles are abundant in the river. PARK GUIDELINES Early use by Native Americans dates back some • Hours are 8 a.m. until sunset, 365 days a year. 12,000 years. While under Spanish control, the • An entrance fee is required. passage of De Soto’s party occurred in 1540. During • All plants, animals and park property are 1818 Andrew Jackson lead American forces through protected. Collection, destruction or disturbance this area searching for Indian strongholds, believed is prohibited. responsible for raiding settlers. • Pets are permitted in designated areas only. Pets Vestiges of history in the park show how important must be kept on a handheld leash no longer the Suwannee River was to Florida history. One can than six feet and well-behaved at all times. find an earthworks mound built during the Civil • Fishing, boating and fires are allowed in War to defend the railroad crossing that supplied designated areas only. A Florida fishing license confederate troops. The Battle of Olustee in may be required. February 1864 turned back Union forces heading west to destroy this bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Streamflow Maps of Georgia's Major Rivers
    GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 21 STREAMFLOW MAPS OF GEORGIA'S MAJOR RIVERS by M. T. Thomson United States Geological Survey Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey, United States Department of the Interior, Washington, D. C. ATLANTA 1960 STREAMFLOW MAPS OF GEORGIA'S MAJOR RIVERS by M. T. Thomson Maps are commonly used to show the approximate rates of flow at all localities along the river systems. In addition to average flow, this collection of streamflow maps of Georgia's major rivers shows features such as low flows, flood flows, storage requirements, water power, the effects of storage reservoirs and power operations, and some comparisons of streamflows in different parts of the State. Most of the information shown on the streamflow maps was taken from "The Availability and use of Water in Georgia" by M. T. Thomson, S. M. Herrick, Eugene Brown, and others pub­ lished as Bulletin No. 65 in December 1956 by the Georgia Department of Mines, Mining and Geo­ logy. The average flows reported in that publication and sho\vn on these maps were for the years 1937-1955. That publication should be consulted for detailed information. More recent streamflow information may be obtained from the Atlanta District Office of the Surface Water Branch, Water Resources Division, U. S. Geological Survey, 805 Peachtree Street, N.E., Room 609, Atlanta 8, Georgia. In order to show the streamflows and other features clearly, the river locations are distorted slightly, their lengths are not to scale, and some features are shown by block-like patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • July 3-9, 2011
    Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division Law Enforcement Section Field Operations Weekly Report July 3-9, 2011 This report is a broad sampling of events that have taken place in the past week, but does not include all actions taken by the Law Enforcement Section. Region I- Calhoun (Northwest) FLOYD COUNTY On Sunday June 26th, Cpl. Shawn Elmore was working along the Etowah River in Rome and overheard radio traffic from Rome PD about a vehicle getting broken into at the Etowah River boat ramp. Cpl. Elmore responded to the boat ramp and assisted Rome PD officer. Cpl. Elmore located one of the suspects hiding in the woods and the other suspect came out of the river. Three juvenile suspects were detained and charged with entering an auto and criminal damage to property by Rome PD. On June 26th, Cpl. Shawn Elmore was at the Heritage Park boat ramp on the Coosa River in Rome when he was approached by a parent of four teenagers that were caught in a storm on the Etowah River. Cpl. Elmore went to get his patrol vessel and while enroute to the Etowah River boat ramp the four teens called the parents and advised they had gotten out of the river safely and were waiting on a ride on Turner Chapel Rd. On the night of June 26th, Cpl. Shawn Elmore received a call from Floyd E911 about 3 adults and a 3 year-old child stranded on the Etowah River. Cpl. Elmore responded to the scene and assisted Rome/Floyd Fire with a search of the river and the four were located and safely returned to their vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Fish Consumption Guidelines: Rivers & Creeks
    FRESHWATER FISH CONSUMPTION GUIDELINES: RIVERS & CREEKS NO RESTRICTIONS ONE MEAL PER WEEK ONE MEAL PER MONTH DO NOT EAT NO DATA Bass, LargemouthBass, Other Bass, Shoal Bass, Spotted Bass, Striped Bass, White Bass, Bluegill Bowfin Buffalo Bullhead Carp Catfish, Blue Catfish, Channel Catfish,Flathead Catfish, White Crappie StripedMullet, Perch, Yellow Chain Pickerel, Redbreast Redhorse Redear Sucker Green Sunfish, Sunfish, Other Brown Trout, Rainbow Trout, Alapaha River Alapahoochee River Allatoona Crk. (Cobb Co.) Altamaha River Altamaha River (below US Route 25) Apalachee River Beaver Crk. (Taylor Co.) Brier Crk. (Burke Co.) Canoochee River (Hwy 192 to Lotts Crk.) Canoochee River (Lotts Crk. to Ogeechee River) Casey Canal Chattahoochee River (Helen to Lk. Lanier) (Buford Dam to Morgan Falls Dam) (Morgan Falls Dam to Peachtree Crk.) * (Peachtree Crk. to Pea Crk.) * (Pea Crk. to West Point Lk., below Franklin) * (West Point dam to I-85) (Oliver Dam to Upatoi Crk.) Chattooga River (NE Georgia, Rabun County) Chestatee River (below Tesnatee Riv.) Chickamauga Crk. (West) Cohulla Crk. (Whitfield Co.) Conasauga River (below Stateline) <18" Coosa River <20" 18 –32" (River Mile Zero to Hwy 100, Floyd Co.) ≥20" >32" <18" Coosa River <20" 18 –32" (Hwy 100 to Stateline, Floyd Co.) ≥20" >32" Coosa River (Coosa, Etowah below <20" Thompson-Weinman dam, Oostanaula) ≥20" Coosawattee River (below Carters) Etowah River (Dawson Co.) Etowah River (above Lake Allatoona) Etowah River (below Lake Allatoona dam) Flint River (Spalding/Fayette Cos.) Flint River (Meriwether/Upson/Pike Cos.) Flint River (Taylor Co.) Flint River (Macon/Dooly/Worth/Lee Cos.) <16" Flint River (Dougherty/Baker Mitchell Cos.) 16–30" >30" Gum Crk.
    [Show full text]
  • Okefenokee Swamp Hydrology
    OKEFENOKEE SWAMP HYDROLOGY Cynthia S. Loftin' AUTHOR: 'Graduate Research Assistant-Ph.D. Candidate, USGS-BRD Florida Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-0450. REFERENCE: Proceedings of the 1997 Georgia Water Resources Conference, held 20-22 March 1997, at the University of Georgia, Kathryn J. Hatcher, Editor, Institute of Ecology, The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. Abstract. The Okefenokee Swamp is one of North topographic relief is minimal The swamp is a bowl-like America's largest freshwater wetlands. Swamp hydrology depression in the landscape with the trend in ground surface is largely controlled by precipitation and elevation from 38.4 m at Kingfisher Landing in the evapotranspiration; regional topographic features of the Northeast to 33.0 m in the area where the Suwannee River swamp control surface water movements. Manipulations to exits the swamp in the West to 34.75 m at Ellicott's Mound the swamp topography and vegetation communities during in the Southeast near the St. Mary's River outflow. Within this century have affected water movement and variability the swamp are regional topographic highs on large sand- in parts of the swamp. Changes in swamp hydrology since based islands and lows in large prairies. The prairies also the construction of the Suwannee River Sill are generally contain local topographic highs on peat-based islands that restricted to the West Central area bounded by the Pocket, may rise a meter above the surrounding inundated peat Billy's Island, Craven's Island, Minnie's Island, and surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Quick Reference Fact Sheet
    Okefenokee at a Glance The Okefenokee Swamp is located in Ware, Charlton, and Clinch Counties, Georgia and Baker County, Florida. Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge was established by Executive Order in 1936. The Okefenokee Swamp covers 438,000 acres. It is 38 miles in length at its longest point by 25 miles in width at its widest point. The swamp is approximately 700 square miles. The Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge is over 402,000 acres. The wilderness area consists of 353,981 acres and was created by the Okefenokee Wilderness Act of 1974 which is part of the Wilderness Preservation System. Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge is the largest National Wildlife Refuge in the eastern United States. It is administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service which is under the Department of the Interior. The Okefenokee Swamp is approximately 7000 years old. It is a vast peat-filled bog inside a huge, saucer-shaped depression that was once part of the ocean floor. The elevation of the swamp varies. There is a 25 foot drop from the northwest side to the southwest side. The range in elevation is from 128 feet above sea level on the northeast side to 103 feet on the southwest side. The vegetative indicator of the natural swamp line is the presence of the saw palmetto. The Suwannee River is the principle outlet of the swamp. The Suwannee flows from the west side of the swamp and empties into the Gulf of Mexico near Cedar Key, Florida. The Suwannee River is 280 miles long. A small area of the southeastern part of the swamp is drained by the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Analysis of Critical Habitat Designation for the Fat Threeridge, Shinyrayed Pocketbook, Gulf Moccasinshell, Ochlockonee
    ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CRITICAL HABITAT DESIGNATION FOR THE FAT THREERIDGE, SHINYRAYED POCKETBOOK, GULF MOCCASINSHELL, OCHLOCKONEE MOCCASINSHELL, OVAL PIGTOE, CHIPOLA SLABSHELL, AND PURPLE BANKCLIMBER Draft Final Report | September 12, 2007 prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 4401 N. Fairfax Drive Arlington, VA 22203 prepared by: Industrial Economics, Incorporated 2067 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02140 Draft – September 12, 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ES-1T SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION AND FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYSIS 1-1 1.1 Purpose of the Economic Analysis 1-1 1.2 Background 1-2 1.3 Regulatory Alternatives 1-9 1.4 Threats to the Species and Habitat 1-9 1.5 Approach to Estimating Economic Effects 1-9 1.6 Scope of the Analysis 1-13 1.7 Analytic Time Frame 1-16 1.8 Information Sources 1-17 1.9 Structure of Report 1-18 SECTION 2 POTENTIAL CHANGES IN WATER USE AND MANAGEMENT FOR CONSERVATION OF THE SEVEN MUSSELS 2-1 2.1 Summary of Methods for Estimation of Economic Impacts Associated with Flow- Related Conservation Measures 2-2 2.2 Water Use in Proposed Critical Habitat Areas 2-3 2.3 Potential Changes in Water Use in the Flint River Basin 2-5 2.4 Potential Changes in Water Management in the Apalachicola River Complex (Unit 8) 2-10 2.5 Potential Changes in Water Management in the Santa Fe River Complex (Unit 11) 2-22 SECTION 3 POTENTIAL ECONOMIC IMPACTS RELATED TO CHANGES IN WATER USE AND MANAGEMENT 3-1 3.1 Summary 3-6 3.2 Potential Economic Impacts Related to Agricultural Water Uses 3-7 3.3 Potential Economic Impacts Related
    [Show full text]
  • Paddle Georgia 2014 Fall Float on the Flint Oct
    Albany Allemande– Paddle Georgia 2014 Fall Float on the Flint Oct. 10—Flint River Distance: 14 miles Starting Elevation: 190 feet Lat: 31.6022°N Lon: 84.1381°W Ending Elevation: 151 feet Lat: 31.4388°N Lon: 84.1423°W Restroom Facilities: Mile 0 Flint River Hydro Dam Mile 4.7 Radium Springs Boat Ramp Mile 14 Mitchell County Landing Points of Interest: Mile 0.2—Muckafoonee Creek—A short distance up this creek on river right is the 1906 dam that created “Lake Worth.” Today, the dam serves as an overflow spillway for the larger dam on the Flint. This oddly named waterway is a combination of two even more oddly named creeks: Kinchafoonee and Muckalee creeks. The Creek Indian word Kinchafoonee is believed to have meant “Mortar Nutshells” while Muckalee, recorded the Indian Agent Benjamin Hawkins, meant “Pour on me.” While this is the site of one of the first hydro-power dams in South Georgia, the Georgia General Assembly had earlier established laws specifically protecting Kinchafoonee Creek from obstructions that would prevent fish passage. The 1876 law prohibited the construction of any “dam, trap, net, seine or other device for catching fish, unless the channel is left for six feet.” There was, of course, a major loophole in the law: “nothing herein contained shall be so construed to prevent the erection of dams for milling and manufacturing purposes,” and thus a dam came to be built on Kinchafoonee. These lyrical names still echo through the region’s culture. The Kinchafoonee Cowboys is a well-known hony-tonk band from the area and Leesburg’s Luke Bryan, included an ode to fishing, boating, four-wheeling and drinking called “Muckalee Creek Water” on his 2011 album Tailgates and Tanlines.
    [Show full text]