DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 1: Introduction to Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 1: Introduction to Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines ����� �� �� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � ��� � STATE OF MICHIGAN � � � � ������� DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Number 32 October 2004 Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II: with Periodic Updates James L. Dexter, Jr. and Richard P. O’Neal Editors www.michigan.gov/dnr/ FISHERIES DIVISION SPECIAL REPORT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Special Report 32 October 2004 Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II: with Periodic Updates James L. Dexter, Jr. and Richard P. O’Neal Editors The Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR), provides equal opportunities for employment and access to Michigan’s natural resources. Both State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, disability, age, sex, height, weight or marital status under the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, as amended, (1976 MI P.A. 453 and 1976 MI P.A. 220, Title V of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and the Americans with Disabilities Act). If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility, or if you desire additional information, please write the MDNR Office of Legal Services, P.O. Box 30028, Lansing, MI 48909; or the Michigan Department of Civil Rights, State of Michigan, Plaza Building, 1200 6th Ave., Detroit, MI 48226 or the Office of Human Resources, U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office for Diversity and Civil Rights Programs, 4040 North Fairfax Drive, Arlington, VA. 22203. For information or assistance on this publication, contact the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, Box 30446, Lansing, MI 48909, or call 517-373-1280. This publication is available in alternative formats. ����� �� �� � � � � � � � � � � � � Printed under authority of Michigan Department of Natural Resources � � � ��� � � � � Total number of copies printed 135 — Total cost $1,822.98 — Cost per copy $13.50 � ������� Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II October 2004 Suggested Citation Format Dexter, J. L., Jr., and R. P. O’Neal, editors. 2004. Michigan fish stocking guidelines II: with periodic updates. Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Special Report 32, Ann Arbor. Suggested Citation ii Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II October 2004 Acknowledgements This report was compiled by Fisheries Division employees over a several-year period in an effort to update the Department of Natural Resource’s fish stocking guidelines. Substantial effort was put forth to use Michigan research and management examples whenever possible. This is a reflection upon the quality work done by division employees to further the knowledge of these species in our own waters. References from outside of Michigan were also used to either verify our own work, or provide information where it was lacking for Michigan. Contributors to this report are listed alphabetically. James Dexter, Jr. Richard O’Neal Todd Grischke James Schneider Ralph Hay John Schrouder Liz Hay-Chmielewski Kim Scribner Michael Herman Paul Seelbach Jory Jonas Gary Towns Roger Martin Steve Vanderlaan Bill McClay Gary Whelan Andrew Nuhfer Martha Wolgamood Vern Nurenberg Alan D. Sutton, Graphics Tina M. Tincher, Publication Design Ellen S. G. Johnston, Desktop Publisher James C. Schneider and Paul W. Seelbach, Reviewers Approved by James E. Johnson This report will be updated periodically as new advancements in fish stocking are confirmed effective and implemented. Acknowledgements iii Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II October 2004 Acknowledgements iv Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II October 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................ III TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................V CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO MICHIGAN FISH STOCKING GUIDELINES ... 1 1.1 Historical Stocking Perspective...............................................................................2 1.2 References.................................................................................................................3 CHAPTER 2: GENERAL GUIDELINES ................................................................... 1 2.1 Introducing a New Species.......................................................................................1 2.2 Continuous and Supplemental Stocking ................................................................1 2.3 Stocking in Public Waters ........................................................................................1 2.4 Stocking in Private Waters .......................................................................................2 2.5 Genetic Issues...........................................................................................................3 2.6 Fish for Research Purposes.....................................................................................3 2.7 References.................................................................................................................5 2.8 Appendices................................................................................................................7 CHAPTER 3: DEPARTMENTAL PROCEDURES.................................................... 1 3.1 Fish Stocking Request and Review Process..........................................................1 3.2 Allocations, Surpluses, and Shortages of Fish......................................................1 3.3 Fish Transfers............................................................................................................1 3.4 Permits and Inspections for Private Stocking........................................................2 3.5 Reporting ...................................................................................................................2 3.6 References.................................................................................................................3 3.7 Appendices................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 4: STOCKING GUIDELINES FOR LAKES AND STREAMS................. 1 4.1 Determining the Size of Fish and Time of Year to Stock.......................................1 Trout Size.................................................................................................................... 1 Trout Stocking Period.................................................................................................. 1 Coolwater Species ...................................................................................................... 2 4.2 Great Lakes and Connecting Waters.......................................................................3 Lake Superior.............................................................................................................. 4 Lake Michigan ............................................................................................................. 4 Lake Huron.................................................................................................................. 5 Lake Erie ..................................................................................................................... 6 4.3 Inland Lakes...............................................................................................................9 4.4 Inland Streams.........................................................................................................13 Coldwater Streams and General Stocking Rates...................................................... 13 Top-quality Trout Streams and General Stocking Rates........................................... 16 Top-quality Potamodromous Streams....................................................................... 16 Second-Quality Trout Streams and General Stocking Rates .................................... 17 Second-quality potamodromous streams.................................................................. 17 Warmwater streams .................................................................................................. 17 Potamodromous fish streams general notes............................................................. 18 4.5 Figures .....................................................................................................................19 4.6 Tables.......................................................................................................................27 4.7 References...............................................................................................................37 4.8 Appendices..............................................................................................................41 Table of Contents v Michigan Fish Stocking Guidelines II October 2004 CHAPTER 5: STOCKING GUIDELINES FOR VARIOUS SPECIES OF FISH.........1 5.1 Brown Trout...............................................................................................................1 5.2 Brook Trout................................................................................................................3 5.3 Rainbow Trout and Steelhead..................................................................................5 Lake Michigan ............................................................................................................. 6 Lake Huron.................................................................................................................. 7 Lake Superior.............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chocolay Township History Then And
    n ... I ' J r ' l r ' r ) J l I : J J; J' ' J. On the cover: this photograph was taken on top of the "Rock Cut" on March 6, 2008 at 11 :00 a.m. by Tom Shaw. In response to why this place, Tom answered: "Exercise, fresh air, beauty, quiet time with Him, to step back and look at the big picture and because I can. The best short answer is that I love it. The view brings me back to simpler times." CHOCOLAY TOWNSHIP . .. Just the combination of those two words CHOCOLAY TOWNSHIP brings some vision to your mind. It may be the one on the cover of this booklet or any of the various scenes throughout the other pages. All of them are special to someone, but whatever picture comes to your mind and the fact that you are reading this booklet reinforces that this is a special place for you. As you read this historical writing, I just want to join you in thanking the dozens of people who made it possible. First the township board located a woman, Elizabeth Delene who had the gift for writing and arranging the many contributions that came her way. Elizabeth, thank you for making the time to put these facts in a very readable form! Next on the list of volunteers is Cathy Phelps from the township office. She went above and beyond the call of duty to solicit information and assist Elizabeth in putting together this manuscript. A local committee of Lula Sarka, Elry Reetz, Marilyn Heitman, and Ben Mukkala were ever ready to assist joined together to read the facts, and add comments and reach out for additional information to make this a factual, fascinating piece.
    [Show full text]
  • Chocolay River Watershed Management Plan
    Chocolay River Watershed Restoration and Adaptive Management Plan Prepared by White Water Associates, Inc., under contract with the Marquette County Soil Conservation District and under direction of the Chocolay River Watershed Council. Funding provided by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Surface Water Quality Division, using U.S. Environmental Protection Agency funds allocated from Section 319 of the Clean Water Act. Preface The assignment of White Water Associates, Inc., was to prepare a management plan for the Chocolay River Watershed that focused on long-term water quality and ecosystem health. It is, of course, presumptuous to assume that it is possible to assemble, analyze, plan, and convey sufficient expertise to manage for ecosystem health in such a complex system as the 160 square mile Chocolay Watershed. All scientists and resource managers share this predicament. We seek to understand even the simplest aspects of ecosystems and biodiversity and how human activities affect them. The time and budget resources available for this project, combined with the inherent diversity of the Chocolay system, make a prescriptive plan impossible, in fact undesirable. What is most desirable is an adaptive plan that includes and involves all of the potential stakeholders in the watershed. This document lays the groundwork and beginnings of an adaptive watershed restoration plan and suggests a system (in the form of Watershed Restoration Action Cards) for implementation. This document points the way to plan and implement actions directed at opportunities for improvement and maintenance of a healthy watershed. Throughout this project, we have relied on our own research and education experience in watershed and ecosystem management with a variety of entities including the forest industry and other types of corporations, municipalities, state and federal resource agencies, watershed organizations, and environmental groups.
    [Show full text]
  • FISH CONDITION and MOVEMENT Rachael A
    Northern Michigan University NMU Commons All NMU Master's Theses Student Works 2013 URBANIZATION EFFECTS ON OVERWINTERING BROOK AND BROWN TROUT: FISH CONDITION AND MOVEMENT Rachael A. Guth Northern Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.nmu.edu/theses Recommended Citation Guth, Rachael A., "URBANIZATION EFFECTS ON OVERWINTERING BROOK AND BROWN TROUT: FISH CONDITION AND MOVEMENT" (2013). All NMU Master's Theses. 401. https://commons.nmu.edu/theses/401 This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at NMU Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in All NMU Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of NMU Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. URBANIZATION EFFECTS ON OVERWINTERING BROOK AND BROWN TROUT: FISH CONDITION AND MOVEMENT By Rachael A. Guth THESIS Submitted to Northern Michigan University In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Office of Graduate Education and Research 2013 SIGNATURE APPROVAL LINE This thesis by Rachael A. Guth is recommended for approval by the student's thesis committee in the Department of Biology and by the Assistant Provost for Graduate Education and Research. ______________________________________________________________________________ Committee Chair: Dr. Jill B.K. Leonard Date ________________________________________________________________________ First Reader: Dr. Alan Rebertus Date ________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Sands Township Master Plan
    SANDS TOWNSHIP MASTER PLAN Drafted April/May 2010 Reviewed July 2010 Public Hearing Director Zoning/Planning CUPPAD Month day 2011 Randall L. Yelle Michelle Dewitt Planning Commission September 22, 2010 Month 2011 Adopted Month Day 2011 Town Hall Meeting County review Sands Township Board Adopted per the Michigan Planning Enabling Act, PA 33 of 2008 0 Thanks As with any publication of this scope, there are many to whom I owe my thanks. First: thanks to Mark Wyckoff, Professor and Sr. Associate Director of the Land Policy Institute and Director of the Planning and Zoning Center at Michigan State University (input, guidance and direction). Second: thanks to Mrs. Lee Yelle and Ms. Carolyn Sironen, Sands Township’s Administrative Assistants (clerical support and research). Third: thanks to Ms. Michelle Dewitt, CUPPAD consultant, Eric Anderson & Marquette County Planning Commission (document review and input). Fourth: thanks to West Branch, Marquette, Richmond, Forsyth, and Negaunee Townships (providing copies of their comprehensive plans). Fifth: thanks to the residents of Sands Township who participated in the Town-hall meeting and Township work sessions. Sixth: thanks to Kurt Taavola, County Road Commission, along with many other county personnel (document review and input). Last but not least, thanks to the commissioners of the Sands Township Planning Commission. Randall L. Yelle Director of Zoning and Planning Sands Township, County of Marquette, State of Michigan [email protected] 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Master Plan Reasoning
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior Geological Survey
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING IN MARQUETTE COUNTY, MICHIGAN U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water Resources Investigations 80-90 48°00 MARQUETTE COUNTY 47°Oe 46°00 9000 89°00' Eurod 45°00 Prepared in cooperation with 0o40o80 MILES the Michigan Department of 44°001 0o60o120 KILOMETERS Natural Resources 43°00' 42°00' 83°00 87000. woe 85°00 84°O0 REPORT DOCUMENTATION 1. REPORT NO. 2. 3.oRecipient's Accession No. PAGE 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Geology and Hydrology for Environmental Planning in February 1981 Marquette County, Michigan - 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Rept. No. F. R. Twenter USGS/WRI 80-90 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division 11. Contract(C) or Grant(G) No. 6520 Mercantile Way, Suite 5 (C) Lansing, Michigan 48910 (G) 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report & Period Covered U.S. Geological Survey Final Water Resources Division 6520 Mercantile Way, Suite 5 14. Lansing, Michigan 48910 15. Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with the Michigan Department of Natural Resources 16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) Marquette County, in the glaciated area of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan, includes 1,878 square miles.P Precipitation averages 32 inches per year. Bedrock and glacial deposits contain materials that are good aquifers. Sedimentary bedrock units generally yield sufficient water for domestic supply and, in places, may yield more than 100 gallons per minute to large-diameter wells.P In the glacial deposits, sand and gravel beds are the principal aquifers; yields to wells range from less than 10 to 200 gallons per minute.P Igneous and metamorphic rocks yield little or no water to wells.
    [Show full text]
  • 2057 Cover.Indd
    Michigan STATE OF MICHIGAN DNR DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Number 2057 July, 2001 Population Dynamics of Juvenile Steelhead and Coho Salmon in Michigan’s Lake Superior Tributaries, 1982-97 James W. Peck www.dnr.state.mi.us FISHERIES DIVISION RESEARCH REPORT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FISHERIES DIVISION Fisheries Research Report 2057 July 2001 Population dynamics of juvenile steelhead and coho salmon in Michigan’s Lake Superior tributaries, 1982-97 James W. Peck The Michigan Department of Natural Resources, (MDNR) provides equal opportunities for employment and for access to Michigan’s natural resources. State and Federal laws prohibit discrimination on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, religion, disability, age, marital status, height and weight. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity or facility, please write the MDNR Equal Opportunity Office, P.O. Box 30028, Lansing, MI 48909, or the Michigan Department of Civil Rights, 1200 6th Avenue, Detroit, MI 48226, or the Office of Human Resources, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C. 20204. For more information about this publication or the American Disabilities Act (ADA), contact, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, Fisheries Division, Box 30446, Lansing, MI 48909, or call 517-373-1280. Printed under authority of Michigan Department of Natural Resources Michigan DNR Total number of copies printed 200 — Total cost $412.63 — Cost per copy $2.06 Michigan Department of Natural Resources Fisheries Research Report 2057, 2001 Population dynamics of juvenile steelhead and coho salmon in Michigan’s Lake Superior tributaries, 1982-97 James W. Peck Michigan Department of Natural Resources Marquette Fisheries Research Station Abstract.–This study was initiated because fisheries managers were concerned, and anglers were complaining, that steelhead Oncorhynchus mykiss populations in Lake Superior tributaries were declining during the late 1970s and early 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Mitigation Plan
    HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN COUNTY OF MARQUETTE, MICHIGAN Prepared by the Resource Management and Development Department, Planning Division. Date of adoption: July 21st, 2015 Table of Contents Chapter 1 The Planning Process ......................................................................................................... 7 Implementation and Monitoring of Projects ......................................................................................... 9 Emergency Management ................................................................................................................. 10 The Planning Area ........................................................................................................................... 11 Geography and Geology .................................................................................................................. 11 Climate ............................................................................................................................................. 12 Population ........................................................................................................................................ 12 Critical Facilities and Organizations .................................................................................................. 13 Medical ......................................................................................................................................... 13 Education ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]