DOCSLIB.ORG

A Bibliography of the Supreme Court of Canada Paul Trethewey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Bibliography of the Supreme Court of Canada Paul Trethewey Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 8 Volume 14, Number 2 (October 1976) A Bibliography of the Supreme Court of Canada Paul Trethewey Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Article Citation Information Trethewey, Paul. "A Bibliography of the Supreme Court of Canada." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 14.2 (1976) : 425-443. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol14/iss2/8 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA By PAUL TRETHEWEY* CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE A. Introduction ...................................... 425 B . G eneral ............................................................................ ...... 427 C. Reports, Notes, Digests and Indexes ............................. 427 D . Jurisdiction .................................................................................... 428 E. Practice, Procedure and Evidence ....... ..... .................. 429 F. Opinion Writing and Legal Reasoning ........................................ 430 G. Jurisprudential Analysis .............................. 431 H . P recedent ...................................................................................... 43 1 I. Statutory Construction ................................ ..... ......................... 432 J. The Constitution and Federalism ................................................ 432 K. Civil Liberties and the Bill of Rights ...................... 434 L. Substantive Areas of the Law ............................ ....................... 435 M. History .......................................... 436 N. Biography and Background of Justices ....................... 437 0. Selection of Justices and Composition of the Court ................... 438 P. Judicial Writings and Official Pronouncements ................. 439 Q. Statistical, Behavioural and Decision-Making Analysis ........... 442 R. The Supreme Court as Political Actor ................................ 443 A. INTRODUCTION The following bibliography is intended to provide a guide to the litera- ture on the Supreme Court of Canada that will be of use to both academics and practitioners. The primary vehicle for commentary on the Court has always been the case comment, but the last few years have seen the publica- tion of an increasing number of academic analyses of the Court's work in general1 and of its constitutional and civil rights decision-making in particular. It was accordingly thought useful to compile a summary of publications to date, even though in some areas (such as biography, history, and practice and procedure), its utility lies in showing just how much has yet to be written. The greatest volume of commentary on the substantive decision-making * © Copyright 1976, Paul Trethewey. Paul Trethewey is a member of the 1977 graduating class of Osgoode Hall Law School, York University. The original version of this bibliography was prepared as a research project for Professor S. R. Peck of Osgoode Hall Law School in August, 1975. 1 See, for instance, the various studies by Paul Weiler, S. R. Peck, Mark MacGuigan, and Peter Russell. OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL [VCOL. 14, NO. 2 of the Court is found in that hardy perennial, the case comment, but since most of these comments deal with the narrow issues raised by the case and do not indulge in broader commentary and criticism, they have not been included.2 Exceptions to this rule have been made where warranted, of course; the greatest number fall in the constitutional and civil liberties areas. Articles3 in newspapers and popular periodicals have not been included here. Annotation of all the entries was passed over in favour of the somewhat unorthodox combination of classification by subject matter and notation of the number of pages for each entry. The sections are arranged in a progres- sion from those concerned with practical matters and primary materials, to those containing secondary materials of a more academic nature. Entries that belong to more than one section are duplicated in each. Drawing the line between sections has not been easy, so that entries dealing with various aspects 'of the Court's political role, for instance, are found in the sections on the Constitution and Federalism, The Court as Political Actor, and the Selection of Justices. Entries that deal with the transfer of final appellate jurisdiction to the Supreme Court from the Privy Council are included in the Jurisdiction section. The many articles written prior to the transfer that criticized the Judicial Committee's decisions and recommended the jurisdictional transfer have not been included because in most cases they deal only peripherally with the Supreme Court. Since much legal writing is subject to rapid obsolescence, many of the older entries will retain only historical interest, but they have been listed largely according to the subject matter; the History section lists those items that take a specifically historical approach. Few articles have appeared that deal solely with the criteria used in selecting members of the Court. Those items dealing with proposed reorgani- zations of the Court for constitutional purposes are included in the Consti- tional section, while biographical and historical considerations of the Court's membership are included in the sections with those designations. Articles dealing with the process of judicial appointment rarely refer specifically to the Supreme Court, but those that do are included in the Selection of Justices section; that section contains as well a representative selection of articles dealing with the general process of judicial selection. The section on Judicial Writings and Official Pronouncements is in- tended primarily to aid in showing the concerns and orientations of various Justices for biographical purposes, but it is expected that many of the articles can provide starting points for arguments by appellate litigants; the selection for the current members of the Court has accordingly been made the most 2 The best guide to these comments are R. Boult, A Bibliography of CanadianLaw (Montreal: Wilson and Lafleur, 1966) and M. Scott, ed., Index to CanadianLegal Peri- odical Literature, 1961- (Montreal: Canadian Association of Law Libraries, 1966). 8The most useful can be found in G. R. Logan, Annotated Bibliography of Works Written in the Supreme Court of Canada (1965), 3 Osgoode Hall L.. 173, and MJ. Herman, Bibliography of Material on the Supreme Court of Canada (1976), 8 Ottawa L.R. 102. 1976] Supreme Court Bibliography comprehensive. Even though the largest number of entries are found under Chief Justice Laskin's name, they are only a representative selection; a comprehensive listing would have added several more pages. B. GENERAL Beaudoin, G.A. Le Syst~me JudiciaireCanadien (1968), 28 R. du B. 99. (25 pp.). Cheffins, R.I. The Supreme Court of Canada: The Quiet Court in an Unquiet Country (1966), 4 Osgoode Hall L.J. 259 (17 pp.). Chitty, R.M. The Supreme Court of Canada (1952), 2 Chitty's L.J. 63 (3 pp.). Herman, M.J. Bibliography of Material on the Supreme Court of Canada (1976), 8 Ottawa L.R. 102 (5 pp.). Introduction: The Supreme Court of Canada 1875-1975 (1976), 8 Ottawa L.R. 1 (6 pp.). Laskin, B. The Institutional Characterof the Judge (1972), 7 Israel L.R. 329; Jerusalem: Magnes Press, 1972 (24 pp.). The Role and Function of Final Appellate Courts: The Supreme Court of Canada (1975), 53 Can. B. Rev. 469 (13 pp.). The Supreme Court of Canada: a final court of appeal of and for Canadians (1951), 29 Can. B. Rev. 1038 (42 pp.). Lederman, W.R. "Thoughts on Reform of the Supreme Court of Canada", in Ontario Advisory Committee on Confederation, Background Papers and Reports. Vol. 2, Toronto: Queen's Printer, 1967 at 294; (1970), 8 Alta. L. Rev. 1 (22 pp.). Logan, G.R. Annotated Bibliography of Works Written on the Supreme Court of Canada (1965), 3 Osgoode Hall L.I. 173 (5 pp.). Read, H.E. The JudicialProcess in Common Law Canada (1959), 37 Can. B. Rev. 265 (29 pp.). Russell, P.H. The Supreme Court as a Bilingual and Bicultural Institution. Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1969 (282 pp.). Weiler, P.C. In the Last Resort: a critical study of the Supreme Court of Canada. Toronto: Carswell/Methuen, 1974 (246 pp.). Willis, J. Securing Uniformity of Law in a Federal System - Canada (1944), 5 U. of T. L.J. 352 (16 pp.). C. REPORTS, NOTES, DIGESTS AND INDEXES Bulletin of Proceedings taken in the Supreme Court of Canada. Ottawa: Office of the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Canada, weekly since 1970. Cameron, E.R. Digest of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of Canada; 1904-1918. Toronto: Carswell, 1918. OSGOODE HALL LAW JOURNAL [VOL. 14, NO. 2 Cameron, E.R. Supreme Court Cases: Judgments, 1880-1890. Toronto: Canada Law Book, 1905. Canada Supreme Court Reports/Recueil des arrets de la Cour supreme du Canada. Ottawa: Queen's Printer, 1970 (Between 1878 and 1969 the title has changed twice: Reports of the Supreme Court of Canada, 1876-1922. Canada Law Reports, Supreme Court, 1923- 1969). Canadian Law Information Council. Notes of Recent Judgements in the Supreme Court of Canada, Crane, B.A. ed./Rjsum6 des Ricentes Decisions de la Cour Supreme du Canada, Tanquay, G. ed. Ottawa: 1974. Canadian Law Information Council. Summaries of Cases to be Heard in the Supreme Court of Canada. Session commencing Tues. April 27, 1976. Ottawa. Cassels, R. A Digest of Cases
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Social Contract
    The Social Contract Expression Graphics | March 2013 University of Western Ontario (London, Ontario) The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. Its contents do not reflect the opinion of the University Students’ Council of the University of Western Ontario (“USC”). The USC assumes no responsibility or liability for any error, inaccuracy, omission or comment contained in this publication or for any use that may be made of such information by the reader. -1- Table of Contents Preface 3 Letter from the Editor 4 Editorial Board and Staff 5 Special Thanks 6 POLITICAL THEORY War in the Name of Humanity: Liberal Cosmopolitanism and the Depoliticization 9 of the War on Terror by Monica Kozycz Restitutive Justice: The Key to Social Equality by Philip Henderson 23 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Vacillating on Darfur: Achieving Peace and Security in Sudan’s Forsaken West 34 by Larissa Fulop Symbol or Strategic Constraint?: The Implications of the EU Arms Embargo 49 for EU-China Relations and China’s Strategy by Ross Linden-Fraser COMPARATIVE POLITICS Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences by Robert Salvatore Powers 68 CANADIAN POLITICS The Fight to Regain Indigenous Self-Determination in Canada by Philip Henderson 82 AMERICAN POLITICS American Constitutionalism and International Human Rights: A Legal Perspective 94 by Jeremy Luedi BUSINESS AND GOVERNANCE New Public Management, Public-Private Partnerships and Ethical Conflicts 111 for Civil Servants by André Paul Wilkie Implications of Right-to-Work Legislation in Ontario by Caitlin Dunn 126 IDENTITY POLITICS Race and Romance: Black-White Interracial Relationships since Loving v. Virginia 141 by Monica Kozycz MEDIA AND POLITICS More of the Same: The Internet’s Role in Political Campaigns 154 by Steven Wright -2- Preface On behalf of the Department of Political Science, I am both happy and proud to congratulate you on publishing this year’s issue of The Social Contract.
    [Show full text]
  • The Four Courts of Sir Lyman Duff
    THE FOUR COURTS OF SIR LYMAN DUFF RICHARD GOSSE* Vancouver I. Introduction. Sir Lyman Poore Duff is the dominating figure in the Supreme Court of Canada's first hundred years. He sat on the court for more than one-third of those years, in the middle period, from 1906 to 1944, participating in nearly 2,000 judgments-and throughout that tenure he was commonly regarded as the court's most able judge. Appointed at forty-one, Duff has been the youngest person ever to have been elevated to the court. Twice his appointment was extended by special Acts of Parliament beyond the mandatory retirement age of seventy-five, a recogni- tion never accorded to any other Canadian judge. From 1933, he sat as Chief Justice, having twice previously-in 1918 and 1924 - almost succeeded to that post, although on those occasions he was not the senior judge. During World War 1, when Borden considered resigning over the conscription issue and recommending to the Governor General that an impartial national figure be called upon to form a government, the person foremost in his mind was Duff, although Sir Lyman had never been elected to public office. After Borden had found that he had the support to continue himself, Duff was invited to join the Cabinet but declined. Mackenzie King con- sidered recommending Duff for appointment as the first Canadian Governor General. Duff undertook several inquiries of national interest for the federal government, of particular significance being the 1931-32 Royal Commission on Transportation, of which he was chairman, and the 1942 investigation into the sending of Canadian troops to Hong Kong, in which he was the sole commissioner .
    [Show full text]
  • Legality As Reason: Dicey, Rand, and the Rule of Law
    McGill Law Journal ~ Revue de droit de McGill LEGALITY AS REASON: DICEY, RAND, AND THE RULE OF LAW Mark D. Walters* For many law students in Canada, the Pour bon nombre d’étudiants en droit au idea of the rule of law is associated with the Canada, l’idée d’une primauté du droit est asso- names of Professor A.V. Dicey, Justice Ivan ciée au professeur A.V. Dicey et au juge Ivan Rand, and the case of Roncarelli v. Duplessis. It Rand ainsi qu’à l’affaire Roncarelli c. Duplessis. is common for students to read excerpts from Il est courant pour les étudiants de lire des ex- Dicey’s Law of the Constitution on the rule of traits traitant de la primauté du droit dans law, and then to examine how the rule of law is, l’œuvre de Dicey intitulée Law of the Constitu- as Rand stated in Roncarelli, “a fundamental tion, puis d’examiner comment la primauté du postulate of our constitutional structure.” In- droit est, comme l’a affirmé Rand dans Ronca- deed, Roncarelli marked a point in time, fifty relli, « [l’]un des postulats fondamentaux de no- years ago, at which the academic expression tre structure constitutionnelle ». En effet, l’arrêt “the rule of law” became a meaningful part of Roncarelli a été rendu au moment où, il y a cin- the legal discourse of judges and lawyers in quante ans, l’expression académique « la pri- Canada. mauté du droit » s’intégrait au sein du discours In this article, the author considers the re- des juges et des avocats au Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unlikely Maverick
    CANADIAN MAVERICK: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF IVAN C. RAND 795 “THE MAVERICK CONSTITUTION” — A REVIEW OF CANADIAN MAVERICK: THE LIFE AND TIMES OF IVAN C. RAND, WILLIAM KAPLAN (TORONTO: UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO PRESS FOR THE OSGOODE SOCIETY FOR CANADIAN LEGAL HISTORY, 2009) When a man has risen to great intellectual or moral eminence; the process by which his mind was formed is one of the most instructive circumstances which can be unveiled to mankind. It displays to their view the means of acquiring excellence, and suggests the most persuasive motive to employ them. When, however, we are merely told that a man went to such a school on such a day, and such a college on another, our curiosity may be somewhat gratified, but we have received no lesson. We know not the discipline to which his own will, and the recommendation of his teachers subjected him. James Mill1 While there is today a body of Canadian constitutional jurisprudence that attracts attention throughout the common law world, one may not have foreseen its development in 1949 — the year in which appeals to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (Privy Council) were abolished and the Supreme Court of Canada became a court of last resort. With the exception of some early decisions regarding the division of powers under the British North America Act, 1867,2 one would be hard-pressed to characterize the Supreme Court’s record in the mid-twentieth century as either groundbreaking or original.3 Once the Privy Council asserted its interpretive dominance over the B.N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • FORFEITED Civil Forfeiture and the Canadian Constitution
    FORFEITED Civil Forfeiture and the Canadian Constitution by Joshua Alan Krane A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Master of Laws Graduate Department of the Faculty of Law University of Toronto © Copyright by Joshua Alan Krane (2010) FORFEITED Civil Forfeiture and the Canadian Constitution Joshua Alan Krane, B.Soc.Sc., B.C.L/LL.B. Master of Laws Faculty of Law University of Toronto 2010 Abstract The enactment of civil asset forfeiture legislation by Alberta and Ontario in the fall of 2001, followed by the passage of similar legislation in five other provinces, has signalled a dramatic change in the way Canadian constitutional law ought to be understood. This thesis builds on American legal scholarship by highlighting how deficiencies in Canada’s constitutional law could create space for more inva- sive civil forfeiture statutes. Following a historical overview of forfeiture law in Canada, the thesis (i) examines how the Supreme Court of Canada mischaracter- ized this legislation as a matter of property and civil rights; (ii) considers whether the doctrine of federal paramountcy should have rendered the legislation inoper- able and the consequences of the failure by the Court to do so; and (iii) evaluates -ii- the impact of the absence of an entrenched property right in the constitution, in regard to this matter. -iii- Table of Contents INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1 The Aim of this Project..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Decade of Adjustment 1950-1962
    8 A Decade of Adjustment 1950-1962 When the newly paramount Supreme Court of Canada met for the first timeearlyin 1950,nothing marked theoccasionasspecial. ltwastypicalof much of the institution's history and reflective of its continuing subsidiary status that the event would be allowed to pass without formal recogni- tion. Chief Justice Rinfret had hoped to draw public attention to the Court'snew position throughanotherformalopeningofthebuilding, ora reception, or a dinner. But the government claimed that it could find no funds to cover the expenses; after discussing the matter, the cabinet decided not to ask Parliament for the money because it might give rise to a controversial debate over the Court. Justice Kerwin reported, 'They [the cabinet ministers] decided that they could not ask fora vote in Parliament in theestimates tocoversuchexpensesas they wereafraid that that would give rise to many difficulties, and possibly some unpleasantness." The considerable attention paid to the Supreme Court over the previous few years and the changes in its structure had opened broader debate on aspects of the Court than the federal government was willing to tolerate. The government accordingly avoided making the Court a subject of special attention, even on theimportant occasion of itsindependence. As a result, the Court reverted to a less prominent position in Ottawa, and the status quo ante was confirmed. But the desire to avoid debate about the Court discouraged the possibility of change (and potentially of improvement). The St Laurent and Diefenbaker appointments during the first decade A Decade of Adjustment 197 following termination of appeals showed no apparent recognition of the Court’s new status.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Law Library Review Revue Canadienne Des Bibliothèques Is Published By: De Droit Est Publiée Par: WINNER of the HUGH LAWFORD AWARD EMOND’S CRIMINAL LAW SERIES
    CANADIAN LAW LIBRARY REVIEW REVUE CANADIENNE DES BIBLIOTHÈQUES DE DROIT VOLUME/TOME 44 (2019) No. 2 Hello, Edmonton! London calling... iclr.co.uk The authoritative source of English case law. ‖‖ CONTENTS / SOMMAIRE From the Editor Bibliographic Notes De la rédactrice Chronique bibliographique By Nancy Feeney President’s Message Le mot de la présidente Local and Regional Updates Mise à jour locale et régionale Featured Article By Jonathan Leroux Articles de fond Excerpt from Grace & Wisdom: “Chapter 6: The Conference Report Ontario Court” Rapport du conférence By Stephen G. McKenna Public Companies: Financing, Governance and Compliance By Stef Alexandru Reviews Recensions Edited by Kim Clarke and Elizabeth Bruton News From Further Afield Nouvelles de l’étranger The Canadian Law of Obligations: Private Law Notes from the UK for the 21st Century and Beyond By Jackie Fishleigh Reviewed by John K. Lefurgey Destroying the Caroline: The Frontier Raid That Letter from Australia By Margaret Hutchison Reshaped the Right to War Reviewed by Donata Krakowski-White The US Legal Landscape: News From Across the Border Law and the Whirligig of Time By Julienne E. Grant Reviewed by Katherine Laundy Mistake in Contracting Reviewed by Melanie R. Bueckert, LL.B., LL.M. Public Inquiries in Canada: Law and Practice Reviewed by Alexia Loumankis The Right to Life in Armed Conflict Reviewed by Ken Fox Hello, Edmonton! Social Media and Morality: Losing Our Self Control Reviewed by Sally Sax London calling... CITED AS Can L Libr Rev CITÉ Rev can bibl dr Canadian Law Library Review is published 4 times a year by the Revue canadienne des bibliothéques de droit est publiée 4 fois par iclr.co.uk Canadian Association of Law Libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • THE Osgoode@125 INDEX
    Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Osgoode Digital Commons Osgoode@125 Supporting Material Osgoode@125 2014 The sO goode@125 Index Osgoode Hall Law School of York University Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/supporting125 Recommended Citation Osgoode Hall Law School of York University, "The sgO oode@125 Index" (2014). Osgoode@125 Supporting Material. Paper 1. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/supporting125/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Osgoode@125 at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode@125 Supporting Material by an authorized administrator of Osgoode Digital Commons. THE Osgoode@125 INDEX 6066_York_Osgoode Brief Fall 2014_FA.indd 10 2014-09-26 3:07 PM THE SCHOOL: 1. Number of years Osgoode Hall Law School was the only accredited law school in Ontario: 70 (1889–1959) 2. Number of years Osgoode was known as simply “the Law School” or “The Ontario Law School” before being named Osgoode Hall Law School: 35 3. Number of attempts to create a law school before the permanent establishment of Osgoode Hall Law School in 1889: 3 4. Year of the first attempt to establish a law school in Ontario: 1862 5. Year John A. MacDonald was awarded the degree of “Barrister at Law” by Osgoode Hall: 1836 6. Rank of Osgoode among the oldest common law schools in Canada: 2 7. Rank of Osgoode among the largest common law schools in Canada in 2014: 1 8. Number of students in JD, LLM or PhD programs in 2014: 1300 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic
    Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Engaging Iran Australian and Canadian Relations with the Islamic Republic Robert J. Bookmiller Gulf Research Center i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB Dubai, United Arab Emirates (_}A' !_g B/9lu( s{4'1q {xA' 1_{4 b|5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'=¡(/ *_D |w@_> TBMFT!HSDBF¡CEudA'sGu( XXXHSDBFeCudC­'?B uG_GAE#­'c`}A' i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB9f1s{5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'cAE/ i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uBª E#'Gvp*E#'B!v,¢#'E#'1's{5%­''tDu{xC)/_9%_(n{wGL­i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uAc8mBmA' , ¡dA'E#'c>EuA'&_{3A'B¢#'c}{3'(E#'c j{w*E#'cGuG{y*E#'c A"'E#'c CEudA%'eC_@c {3EE#'{4¢#_(9_,ud{3' i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uBB`{wB¡}.0%'9{ymA'E/B`d{wA'¡>ismd{wd{3 *4#/b_dA{w{wdA'¡A_A'?uA' k pA'v@uBuCc,E9)1Eu{zA_(u`*­E @1_{xA'!'1"'9u`*1's{5%­''tD¡>)/1'==A'uA'f_,E i_m(#ÆA Gulf Research Center 187 Oud Metha Tower, 11th Floor, 303 Sheikh Rashid Road, P. O. Box 80758, Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Tel.: +971 4 324 7770 Fax: +971 3 324 7771 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.grc.ae First published 2009 i_m(#ÆAk pA'v@uB Gulf Research Center (_}A' !_g B/9lu( Dubai, United Arab Emirates s{4'1q {xA' 1_{4 b|5 )smdA'c (uA'f'1_B%­'=¡(/ © Gulf Research Center 2009 *_D All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in |w@_> a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, TBMFT!HSDBF¡CEudA'sGu( XXXHSDBFeCudC­'?B mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the Gulf Research Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Mr. Justice Rand a Triumph of Principle
    MR. JUSTICE RAND A TRIUMPH OF PRINCIPLE E. MARSHALL POLLOCK* Toronto Introduction Ivan Cleveland Rand- was appointed to the Supreme Court of Canada on April 22nd, 1943 in his fifty-ninth year. It would be more accurate to say that he was drafted into the court. His reputation as a man of principle, an independent thinker, and an outstanding lawyer, had preceded him to Ottawa . Rand's appoint- ment to the court, like the universal respect which he enjoyed,, had commanded itself. The purpose of this article, written as the Supreme Court of Canada celebrates its centenary, is to attempt an assessment of Rand's contribution to that institution and the effect of that contribution on the court and on Canadian jurisprudence. In Rand, we are fortunate to have a subject who has written and lectured extensively, thereby leaving a record which supplements his judicial pronouncements and which lends valuable insight into his thought processes. To paraphrase the time-worn admonition to counsel, he told us what he was going to do, he did it, and he told us what he did, even in the doing. The son of a railway mechanic, Rand spent five years in the audit office of the Intercolonial Railway before pursuing his university studies at Mount Allison University. In Rand's valedic tory address of 1909 we find not only a message to his fellow graduates but the. earliest articulation of the credo by which he lived, was judged and-what became very significant in his later years-by which he judged others. It was for Ivan Rand the universal filter through which his whole life passed : The honesty, the courtesy, the dignity, the flush of modesty, the purity of thought, these are characteristics which are not the exclusive property of the possessor.
    [Show full text]
  • PART III.—REGISTER of OFFICIAL APPOINTMENTS* the Following List of Official Appointments Continues That Published in the 1951 Year Book, Pp
    1218 SOURCES OF OFFICIAL INFORMATION Article Contributor Volume Page Transportation— The Development of Aviation in Canada. J. A. WILSON. 1938 710-712 The Trans-Canada Airway J. A. WILSON. 1938 713-715 Pre-War Civil Aviation and the Defence Program J. A. WILSON. 1941 608-612 Wartime Control of Transportation 1943-14 567-575 International Air Conferences 1945 642-644 The Wartime Role of the Steam Railways of Canada C. P. EDWARDS, O.B.E. 1945 648-651 Canada's Northern Airfields A. D. MCLEAN. 1945 705-712 United Nations- Canada and the United Nations C. S. A. RITCHIE. 1946 82-86 Canada and the United Nations 1948-49 122-125 Canada and the United Nations 1950 134-139 PART III.—REGISTER OF OFFICIAL APPOINTMENTS* The following list of official appointments continues that published in the 1951 Year Book, pp. 1181-1186, until Sept. 30, 1952. Governor General's Staff.—1951. June 7, Hon. John Robert Cartwright, Puisne Judge of the Supreme Court of Canada: to be Deputy of His Excellency the Governor General. 1952. Feb. 28, Joseph Francois Delaute: to be Deputy of His Excellency the Governor General. Superintendent Cyril Nordheimer Kenny-Kirk, of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, Ottawa, Ont.: to be Honorary Aide-de-Camp to His Excellency the Governor General, effective Feb. 28, 1952. Mar. 6, The follow­ ing persons to be Deputies of His Excellency the Governor General: Rt. Hon. Thibaudeau Rinfret, LL.D., Hon. Patrick Kerwin, Hon. Robert Taschereau, LL.D., Hon. Ivan Cleveland Rand, Hon. Roy Lindsay Kellock, Hon. James Wilfred Estey. Mar.
    [Show full text]
  • Ian Holloway*
    “yoU MUst Learn to see Life steady and whoLe”: ivan cLeveLand rand and LegaL edUcation Ian Holloway* IVAN RAND: A MAN AND HIS TIMES To understand properly Ivan Rand’s views on legal education, just as to understand 2010 CanLIIDocs 228 properly his jurisprudence, it is critical to appreciate that he was born a Victorian and came of age an Edwardian. He came to national prominence in the Atomic Age – in the middle part of the twentieth century – but he was born in 1884, in the midst of the Mahdi’s Rebellion in the Sudan and a year before the Riel Rebellion in the old Red River Territory. His birth took place in the same year that the British Parliament enacted the Third Reform Bill,1 and only two years after the Married Women’s Property Act came into force.2 Rand was sixteen when Queen Victoria died and, while old enough to have enlisted in the Canadian battalions that fought in the Boer War, he was too old to serve in the First World War. He was thirty years of age when the “Guns of August” started and almost thirty-five when they fell silent in November 1918. To consider Ivan Rand in this context can seem not a little startling, for we – at least those of us who are not students of the political history of the Maritime Provinces or of the Canadian National Railway – tend to think of him in terms of * Dean and Professor, Faculty of Law, University of Western Ontario I acknowledge the assistance given me in this project by my old colleague at the firm of McInnes Cooper, Eric LeDrew, and his articled clerk, Allan White.
    [Show full text]