DOCSLIB.ORG

The Supremecourt History Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The SupremeCourt of Canada History of the Institution JAMES G. SNELL and FREDERICK VAUGHAN The Osgoode Society 0 The Osgoode Society 1985 Printed in Canada ISBN 0-8020-34179 (cloth) Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Snell, James G. The Supreme Court of Canada lncludes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-802@34179 (bound). - ISBN 08020-3418-7 (pbk.) 1. Canada. Supreme Court - History. I. Vaughan, Frederick. 11. Osgoode Society. 111. Title. ~~8244.5661985 347.71'035 C85-398533-1 Picture credits: all pictures are from the Supreme Court photographic collection except the following: Duff - private collection of David R. Williams, Q.c.;Rand - Public Archives of Canada PA@~I; Laskin - Gilbert Studios, Toronto; Dickson - Michael Bedford, Ottawa. This book has been published with the help of a grant from the Social Science Federation of Canada, using funds provided by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA History of the Institution Unknown and uncelebrated by the public, overshadowed and frequently overruled by the Privy Council, the Supreme Court of Canada before 1949 occupied a rather humble place in Canadian jurisprudence as an intermediate court of appeal. Today its name more accurately reflects its function: it is the court of ultimate appeal and the arbiter of Canada's constitutionalquestions. Appointment to its bench is the highest achieve- ment to which a member of the legal profession can aspire. This history traces the development of the Supreme Court of Canada from its establishment in the earliest days following Confederation, through itsattainment of independence from the Judicial Committeeof the Privy Council in 1949, to the adoption of the Constitution Act, 1982. The authors describe the politics of the judicial appointments and document the internal struggles and tensions between the justices. Central to the story is the attitude of successive federal governments to the need for a strong and intellectually vibrant court. Not all prime ministers and ministers of justice took an interest in the Court, and some of their appointments were of less than outstandingquality. Only in recent times have appointments been of consistently high calibre. Until 1982 the Supreme Court of Canada played a minor role in the history of the Canadian political structure. The Charter of Rights and Freedoms has thrust new responsibilities on the Court, and as those responsibilities are increasingly exercised in the years ahead the Court will become a major participant in our national life. This book explores the foundations on which that participation will be built. JAMES C. SNELL is a professor in the Department of History at the University of Guelph. FREDERICK VAUGHAN is a professor in the Department of Political Studies at the University of Guelph. Interior of the present Supreme Court building For Tricia and Karen Snell and Geoffrey and Kevin Vaughan Contents FOREWORD iX PREFACE Xi I The Founding of the Court 1867-1879 3 2 Early Problems 1879-1892 28 3 The Sbong Court 189z-190~ 52 4 The Court in Decline 1902-1918 82 5 An Instrument of Politics 1918-1933 115 6 Toward Centre Stage 1933-1949 145 7 Supreme at Last 1949 171 8 A Decade of Adjustment 1950-1962 196 9 Changing Expectations 1963-1974 214 10 A New Beginning 1975-1982 233 EPILOGUE 255 APPENDIX 259 NOTES 263 INDEX 313 Illustrations Interior of the present Supreme Court building ii Interior of the old Supreme Court building xvi Between pages 170 mid 171 The Supreme Court of Canada building The old Supreme Court building Sir William Buell Richards Sir William Henry Strong Henri Elzear Taschereau Pierre Bade Mignault Sir Lyman Poore Duff Ivan Cleveland Rand Bora Laskin Brian Dickson Foreword THE OSGOODE SOCIETY The purpose of The Osgoode Society is to encourage research and writing in the history of Canadian law. The Society, which was incorporated in 1979 and is registered as a charity, was founded at the initiative of the Honourable R. Roy McMurtry, former attorney-general of Ontario, and officials of The Law Society of Upper Canada. Its efforts to stimulate legal history in Canada include the sponsorship of a fellowship and an annual lectureship, research support progams, and work in the field of oral history. The Society publishes (at the rate of about one a year) volumes of interest to the Society's members that contribute to legal-historical scholarship in Canada, including studies of the courts, the judiciary, and the legal profession, biographies, collections of documents, studies in criminology and penology, accounts of great trials, and work in the social and economic history of the law. Current directors of The Osgoode Society are Brian Bucknall, Archie G. Campbell, Martin Friedland, Jane Banfield Haynes, John D. Honsberger, Kenneth Jarvis, Laura Legge, Allen M. Linden, James Lisson, R. Roy McMurhy, Brendan OBrien, and Peter Oliver. The annual report and information about membership may be obtained by writing The Osgoode Society, Osgoode Hall, 130 Queen Street West, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M~H2~6. Members receive the annual volumes published by the Society. Canadians know little about the history and kaditions of their highest court. In providing the first comprehensive history of the Supreme Court , x Foreword of Canada, James Snell and Frederick Vaughan make a significant contribution to Canadian history. Their study deals with such central concerns as the Court’s relationships with government and politicians, the perception of the Court on the part of the bar and the public, and the Court‘s internal administration and personnel. Leading cases are dis- cussed in their historical context to illustrate the main tendencies in the Court’s jurisprudential evolution. Throughout, the authors emphasize the relationships between the Court and the larger society. Often the story they tell is a startling one, especially with respect to the all but crippling problems the Court faced during the first half-century of its life. This is not an account of steady or automatic progress but rather of gradual growth in stature in the face of many obstacles. In this history, Professors Snell and Vaughan demon- strate that the life of institutions, like that of individuals, is complex and uncertain. With the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in place as part of the constitution, the Supreme Court now plays a vastly expanded role in Canada’s system of government. This book adds greatly to our under- standing of our judicial heritage and governmental traditions. Brendan OBrien President Peter N. Oliver Editor-in-Chief PUBLICATIONS OF THE OSGOODE SOCIETY 1981 David H. Flaherty, ed. Essays in theHistoryofCanodian Law,volume I 1982 Marian MacRae and Anthony Adamson Cornerstones of Order: Courthouses and Town Halls of Ontario, 1784-1914 1983 David H. Flaherty, ed. Essays in the History of Canadian Law, volume 11 1984 Patrick Brode Sir Iohn Bmerley Robinson: Bone and Sinew of the Compact 1984 David Williams Duff: A Life in fhe Law 1985 James G. SneU and Frederick Vaughan The Supreme Court of Canada: History of the Institution Preface Given the relatively lengthy life of the Supreme Court of Canada and given the emphasis of Canadian historians on political history and consti- tutional development, it is surprising that no basic history of the Court has been written. This volume is an attempt to fill that gap. Rather than examine in depth one theme or one specific problem, we have tried to write a chronological history of the institution. This has been accomplished by examining the personnel of the Supreme Court, its position in the Canadian polity, its relationship with its political masters, the intellectual environment and representative aspects of the jurisprudene of the Court, and the way in which the institution has been perceived by the public and the legal profession. In short, this is a history of an institution. Some basic themes emerge throughout the study. A judicial conserva- tism has long dominated the Supreme Court ofCanada. Judicial conserva- tism is defined here as ‘a tendency literally to conserve or maintain existing law by shictly, even mechanistically, applying established rules and precedents. The conservative judge is unwilling to modify rules and thus little interested in policy arguments about the effect of his decision or the social function of a rule.’ Justices of the Supreme Court of Canada actively and knowingly adopted shict conshuction because they believed ‘in the principle that changing the law is the province of the legislature, not the judge,‘a sentiment in keeping with Canadian judicial and political culture.‘ xii Preface There has traditionally been a lack of consistent government support for the Court. Initially, Canadian political leaders intended the Supreme Court of Canada to occupy a significant position within the national political structure, providing a unified system of law and jurisprudence that would help to unite a country of disparate regions and needs. But very quickly and for a variety of reasons, government support in meeting those institutional goals weakened. Over the succeeding decades govem- ment interest in the Court was sporadic and often half-hearted. At the sametime, however, thegovernmentwasmorethan happytomakeuseof the Supreme Court and its members. The Court and the justices, together or individually, have fulfilled functions that ranged well beyond their normal judicial duties. In general, the Supreme Court of Canada has not been highly regarded ~ for the quality of its judicial work; this book confirms the accuracy of that assessment. But it is only fair to point out that such a court can only be as good as the environment in which it exists. A strong and effectivecourt, wrote A.C. Cairns, is dependent on a variety of supporters. It must be part of a larger system which includes first class law schools, quality legal journals, and an able and sensitive legal fraternity - both teaching and practising.
Recommended publications
  • Daniel G.C. Glover Page 1 Managing IP Milestone Case of the Year for 2016

    Daniel G.C. Glover Page 1 Managing IP Milestone Case of the Year for 2016

    Daniel Glover is national co-lead of our Cyber/Data Group and a Daniel G.C. member of our Intellectual Property, Privacy, Technology, Consumer Glover Products & Retail Group, Franchise & Distribution, and Appellate Groups. Partner Toronto Daniel has significant experience in all aspects of information law. His [email protected] practice takes a 360-degree approach to data: he helps clients extract the tremendous value inherent in data, while at the same time t. +1 416-601-8069 managing the complex risks associated with data. He has worked on the highest-stakes files in the field, having advised clients in relation to the three largest data breaches in Canadian history and having argued landmark cases before the Supreme Court of Canada and other leading appellate courts. Daniel G.C. His insights come from significant exposure to the many different Glover areas of law touching on the exploitation and protection information, Partner including privacy, cybersecurity, breach response, copyright and Toronto trademark infringement, privilege, anti-spam and marketing compliance, confidential information, competition law, constitutional [email protected] law, and Internet law. t. +1 416-601-8069 This exposure touches upon a broad diversity of industries. Daniel has advised numerous clients in the technology, social media, consumer Bar Admission products, retail, financial services, insurance, entertainment, gaming, automotive, industrial and health services fields, including in the class Ontario 2006 action setting and also before key privacy, health privacy, and Law School marketing regulators across Canada. University of Toronto In his litigation practice, Daniel delivered oral submissions on behalf of Practices the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) and other creative industry stakeholders in the landmark decision of Appellate Litigation IP Litigation Equustek Solutions Inc.
  • The Social Contract

    The Social Contract

    The Social Contract Expression Graphics | March 2013 University of Western Ontario (London, Ontario) The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. Its contents do not reflect the opinion of the University Students’ Council of the University of Western Ontario (“USC”). The USC assumes no responsibility or liability for any error, inaccuracy, omission or comment contained in this publication or for any use that may be made of such information by the reader. -1- Table of Contents Preface 3 Letter from the Editor 4 Editorial Board and Staff 5 Special Thanks 6 POLITICAL THEORY War in the Name of Humanity: Liberal Cosmopolitanism and the Depoliticization 9 of the War on Terror by Monica Kozycz Restitutive Justice: The Key to Social Equality by Philip Henderson 23 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Vacillating on Darfur: Achieving Peace and Security in Sudan’s Forsaken West 34 by Larissa Fulop Symbol or Strategic Constraint?: The Implications of the EU Arms Embargo 49 for EU-China Relations and China’s Strategy by Ross Linden-Fraser COMPARATIVE POLITICS Mandatory Minimum Drug Sentences by Robert Salvatore Powers 68 CANADIAN POLITICS The Fight to Regain Indigenous Self-Determination in Canada by Philip Henderson 82 AMERICAN POLITICS American Constitutionalism and International Human Rights: A Legal Perspective 94 by Jeremy Luedi BUSINESS AND GOVERNANCE New Public Management, Public-Private Partnerships and Ethical Conflicts 111 for Civil Servants by André Paul Wilkie Implications of Right-to-Work Legislation in Ontario by Caitlin Dunn 126 IDENTITY POLITICS Race and Romance: Black-White Interracial Relationships since Loving v. Virginia 141 by Monica Kozycz MEDIA AND POLITICS More of the Same: The Internet’s Role in Political Campaigns 154 by Steven Wright -2- Preface On behalf of the Department of Political Science, I am both happy and proud to congratulate you on publishing this year’s issue of The Social Contract.
  • The Four Courts of Sir Lyman Duff

    The Four Courts of Sir Lyman Duff

    THE FOUR COURTS OF SIR LYMAN DUFF RICHARD GOSSE* Vancouver I. Introduction. Sir Lyman Poore Duff is the dominating figure in the Supreme Court of Canada's first hundred years. He sat on the court for more than one-third of those years, in the middle period, from 1906 to 1944, participating in nearly 2,000 judgments-and throughout that tenure he was commonly regarded as the court's most able judge. Appointed at forty-one, Duff has been the youngest person ever to have been elevated to the court. Twice his appointment was extended by special Acts of Parliament beyond the mandatory retirement age of seventy-five, a recogni- tion never accorded to any other Canadian judge. From 1933, he sat as Chief Justice, having twice previously-in 1918 and 1924 - almost succeeded to that post, although on those occasions he was not the senior judge. During World War 1, when Borden considered resigning over the conscription issue and recommending to the Governor General that an impartial national figure be called upon to form a government, the person foremost in his mind was Duff, although Sir Lyman had never been elected to public office. After Borden had found that he had the support to continue himself, Duff was invited to join the Cabinet but declined. Mackenzie King con- sidered recommending Duff for appointment as the first Canadian Governor General. Duff undertook several inquiries of national interest for the federal government, of particular significance being the 1931-32 Royal Commission on Transportation, of which he was chairman, and the 1942 investigation into the sending of Canadian troops to Hong Kong, in which he was the sole commissioner .
  • A THREAT to LEADERSHIP: C.A.Dunning and Mackenzie King

    A THREAT to LEADERSHIP: C.A.Dunning and Mackenzie King

    S. Peter Regenstreif A THREAT TO LEADERSHIP: C.A.Dunning and Mackenzie King BY Now mE STORY of the Progressive revolt and its impact on the Canadian national party system during the 1920's is well documented and known. Various studies, from the pioneering effort of W. L. Morton1 over a decade ago to the second volume of the Mackenzie King official biography2 which has recently appeared, have dealt intensively with the social and economic bases of the movement, the attitudes of its leaders to the institutions and practices of national politics, and the behaviour of its representatives once they arrived in Ottawa. Particularly in biographical analyses, 3 a great deal of attention has also been given to the response of the established leaders and parties to this disrupting influence. It is clearly accepted that the roots of the subsequent multi-party situation in Canada can be traced directly to a specific strain of thought and action underlying the Progressivism of that era. At another level, however, the abatement of the Pro~ gressive tide and the manner of its dispersal by the end of the twenties form the basis for an important piece of Canadian political lore: it is the conventional wisdom that, in his masterful handling of the Progressives, Mackenzie King knew exactly where he was going and that, at all times, matters were under his complete control, much as if the other actors in the play were mere marionettes with King the manipu­ lator. His official biographers have demonstrated just how illusory this conception is and there is little to be added to their efforts on this score.
  • Legality As Reason: Dicey, Rand, and the Rule of Law

    Legality As Reason: Dicey, Rand, and the Rule of Law

    McGill Law Journal ~ Revue de droit de McGill LEGALITY AS REASON: DICEY, RAND, AND THE RULE OF LAW Mark D. Walters* For many law students in Canada, the Pour bon nombre d’étudiants en droit au idea of the rule of law is associated with the Canada, l’idée d’une primauté du droit est asso- names of Professor A.V. Dicey, Justice Ivan ciée au professeur A.V. Dicey et au juge Ivan Rand, and the case of Roncarelli v. Duplessis. It Rand ainsi qu’à l’affaire Roncarelli c. Duplessis. is common for students to read excerpts from Il est courant pour les étudiants de lire des ex- Dicey’s Law of the Constitution on the rule of traits traitant de la primauté du droit dans law, and then to examine how the rule of law is, l’œuvre de Dicey intitulée Law of the Constitu- as Rand stated in Roncarelli, “a fundamental tion, puis d’examiner comment la primauté du postulate of our constitutional structure.” In- droit est, comme l’a affirmé Rand dans Ronca- deed, Roncarelli marked a point in time, fifty relli, « [l’]un des postulats fondamentaux de no- years ago, at which the academic expression tre structure constitutionnelle ». En effet, l’arrêt “the rule of law” became a meaningful part of Roncarelli a été rendu au moment où, il y a cin- the legal discourse of judges and lawyers in quante ans, l’expression académique « la pri- Canada. mauté du droit » s’intégrait au sein du discours In this article, the author considers the re- des juges et des avocats au Canada.
  • The Canadian Bar Review. La Revue Du Barreau Canadien. Volume 97. 2019. Number 2. Numéro 2

    The Canadian Bar Review. La Revue Du Barreau Canadien. Volume 97. 2019. Number 2. Numéro 2

    JUDGING SEXUAL ASSAULT: THE SHIFTING LANDSCAPE OF JUDICIAL EDUCATION IN CANADA Rosemary Cairns-Way and Donna Martinson* The authors, a law professor and a former judge, examine recent events that raise critical questions about judicial education on sexual assault. These include the Inquiry into the conduct of Justice Robin Camp, the consequent unanimous passing by Parliament of Bill C-337, the Judicial Accountability through Sexual Assault Law Training Act, and the institutional response of the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) to the public outcry and the political response. The article considers the tension between the legitimate call for judicial accountability and the equally legitimate desire to protect judicial independence at a time of increasing public and political awareness of entrenched female inequality and its relationship to male sexual violence. They argue that the judicial education provisions of Bill C-337 reflect this tension and, as a result, are likely to be ineffective if proclaimed in force. While they identify many positive aspects to the CJC response to the Bill, the authors conclude that the CJC’s continued insistence that judicial education be controlled, supervised, and implemented by judges is inadequate. They suggest that a respectful, continuous, and dynamic collaboration among judges, legal and other academics, and community members with relevant experience and expertise will contribute to public understanding of the judicial role at the same time as it increases the likelihood that judicial education will enhance women’s equal treatment in the nation’s courtrooms. Les auteures, une professeure de droit et une ancienne juge, examinent les événements récents qui soulèvent des questions cruciales sur la formation des juges en matière d’agression sexuelle.
  • CCPI Memorandum of Argument for Application to Intervene

    CCPI Memorandum of Argument for Application to Intervene

    Court File No. A-408-09 FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN: NELL TOUSSAINT Appellant And MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent MEMORANDUM OF ARGUMENT OF THE PROPOSED INTERVENER THE CHARTER COMMITTEE ON POVERTY ISSUES PART ONE: FACTS A. The Proposed Intervener – The Charter Committee on Poverty Issues (CCPI) 1. The Charter Committee on Poverty Issues (CCPI) was granted intervener status at the Federal Court in the present case to address “issues arising from the requirement to pay fees to process Humanitarian and Compassionate (H & C) Applications for permanent residence pursuant to the IRPA [Immigration and Refugee Protection Act] 1 and the impact of such fees on persons living in poverty.” 1 Decision of Prothonothary Aalto, Toronto, Ontario, March 18, 2009 IMM 2926-08. 2 2. In his decision to grant intervener status, Prothonotary Aalto stated that “CCPI and the other intervener LIFT (Low Income Families Together) would be raising arguments relating to sections 7 and 15 of the Charter as well as other arguments relating to patterns of discrimination and inequality, public policy concerns and competing demands on resources.” He found that “this is one of those unique cases that raise issues of public policy, access to justice and discrimination and inequality” such that the Court will benefit from the participation of CCPI and LIFT.2 3. CCPI seeks leave from this Honourable Court to intervene in the appeal to address these same issues as they arise in the Appeal from the Decision of Madam Justice Snider in the Federal Court (2009 FC 873). 3 B. Qualifications of CCPI 4.
  • Special Series on the Federal Dimensions of Reforming the Supreme Court of Canada

    Special Series on the Federal Dimensions of Reforming the Supreme Court of Canada

    SPECIAL SERIES ON THE FEDERAL DIMENSIONS OF REFORMING THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA The Supreme Court of Canada: A Chronology of Change Jonathan Aiello Institute of Intergovernmental Relations School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University SC Working Paper 2011 21 May 1869 Intent on there being a final court of appeal in Canada following the Bill for creation of a Supreme country’s inception in 1867, John A. Macdonald, along with Court is withdrawn statesmen Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Mackenzie and Edward Blake propose a bill to establish the Supreme Court of Canada. However, the bill is withdrawn due to staunch support for the existing system under which disappointed litigants could appeal the decisions of Canadian courts to the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (JCPC) sitting in London. 18 March 1870 A second attempt at establishing a final court of appeal is again Second bill for creation of a thwarted by traditionalists and Conservative members of Parliament Supreme Court is withdrawn from Quebec, although this time the bill passed first reading in the House. 8 April 1875 The third attempt is successful, thanks largely to the efforts of the Third bill for creation of a same leaders - John A. Macdonald, Télesphore Fournier, Alexander Supreme Court passes Mackenzie and Edward Blake. Governor General Sir O’Grady Haly gives the Supreme Court Act royal assent on September 17th. 30 September 1875 The Honourable William Johnstone Ritchie, Samuel Henry Strong, The first five puisne justices Jean-Thomas Taschereau, Télesphore Fournier, and William are appointed to the Court Alexander Henry are appointed puisne judges to the Supreme Court of Canada.
  • Youth Activity Book (PDF)

    Youth Activity Book (PDF)

    Supreme Court of Canada Youth Activity Book Photos Philippe Landreville, photographer Library and Archives Canada JU5-24/2016E-PDF 978-0-660-06964-7 Supreme Court of Canada, 2019 Hello! My name is Amicus. Welcome to the Supreme Court of Canada. I will be guiding you through this activity book, which is a fun-filled way for you to learn about the role of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Canadian judicial system. I am very proud to have been chosen to represent the highest court in the country. The owl is a good ambassador for the Supreme Court because it symbolizes wisdom and learning and because it is an animal that lives in Canada. The Supreme Court of Canada stands at the top of the Canadian judicial system and is therefore Canada’s highest court. This means that its decisions are final. The cases heard by the Supreme Court of Canada are those that raise questions of public importance or important questions of law. It is time for you to test your knowledge while learning some very cool facts about Canada’s highest court. 1 Colour the official crest of the Supreme Court of Canada! The crest of the Supreme Court is inlaid in the centre of the marble floor of the Grand Entrance Hall. It consists of the letters S and C encircled by a garland of leaves and was designed by Ernest Cormier, the building’s architect. 2 Let’s play detective: Find the words and use the remaining letters to find a hidden phrase. The crest of the Supreme Court is inlaid in the centre of the marble floor of the Grand Entrance Hall.
  • The Impact of the American Doctrine of Discovery on Native Land Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand

    The Impact of the American Doctrine of Discovery on Native Land Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand

    University of Dayton eCommons School of Law Faculty Publications School of Law 2011 The mpI act of the American Doctrine of Discovery on Native Land Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Blake Watson University of Dayton, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/law_fac_pub Part of the Indian and Aboriginal Law Commons eCommons Citation Watson, Blake, "The mpI act of the American Doctrine of Discovery on Native Land Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand" (2011). School of Law Faculty Publications. 73. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/law_fac_pub/73 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Law Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Impact of the American Doctrine of Discovery on Native Land Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand Blake A. Watson† The landmark decision in the United States regarding Indian land rights is Johnson v. McIntosh, an 1823 decision authored by Chief Jus- tice John Marshall. The Supreme Court in Johnson unequivocally re- jected the most favorable view of indigenous land rights—that the native inhabitants own the land they occupy and are free to retain or sell their property.1 Yet the Court did not adopt the least favorable view of Indian land rights either—that the tribes of America are trespassers without ownership or possessory rights. Instead, Marshall endorsed an interme- diate position. On one hand, he declared the Indian nations “to be the rightful occupants of the soil, with a legal as well as just claim to retain possession of it, and to use it according to their own discretion .
  • The Good Fight Marcel Cadieux and Canadian Diplomacy

    The Good Fight Marcel Cadieux and Canadian Diplomacy

    THE GOOD FIGHT MARCEL CADIEUX AND CANADIAN DIPLOMACY BRENDAN KELLY UBC PRESS © SAMPLE MATERIAL CONTENTS Foreword / ix Robert Bothwell and John English Preface / xii 1 The Birth of a French Canadian Nationalist, 1915–41 / 3 2 Premières Armes: Ottawa, London, Brussels, 1941–47 / 24 3 The Making of a Diplomat and Cold Warrior, 1947–55 / 55 4 A Versatile Diplomat, 1955–63 / 98 5 Departmental Tensions: Cadieux, Paul Martin Sr., and Canadian Foreign Policy, 1963–68 / 135 6 A Lonely Fight: Countering France and the Establishment of Quebec’s “International Personality,” 1963–67 / 181 7 The National Unity Crisis: Resisting Quebec and France at Home and in la Francophonie, 1967–70 / 228 UBC PRESS © SAMPLE MATERIAL CONTENTS 8 The Politician and the Civil Servant: Pierre Trudeau, Cadieux, and the DEA, 1968–70 / 260 9 Ambassadorial Woes: Washington, 1970–75 / 296 10 Final Assignments, 1975–81 / 337 Conclusion / 376 Acknowledgments / 380 List of Abbreviations / 382 Notes / 384 Bibliography / 445 Illustration Credits / 461 Index / 463 UBC PRESS ©viii SAMPLE MATERIAL 1 THE BIRTH OF A FRENCH CANADIAN NATIONALIST, 1915–41 n an old christening custom that is all but forgotten today, Joseph David Roméo Marcel Cadieux was marked from birth by a traditional IFrench Canadian Catholicism. As a boy, he was named after Saint Joseph. The Hebraic David was the first name of his godfather, his paternal grandfather, a Montreal plasterer. Marcel’s father, Roméo, joined the Royal Mail and married Berthe Patenaude in 1914. She was one of more than a dozen children of Arthur Patenaude, a “gentleman” landowner whose family had deep roots in what had once been the Seigneury of Longueuil, on the south shore of the St.
  • Rt. Hon. Beverley Mclachlin, P.C. Chief Justice of Canada

    Rt. Hon. Beverley Mclachlin, P.C. Chief Justice of Canada

    Published July 2014 Judicial Profile by Witold Tymowski Rt. Hon. Beverley McLachlin, P.C. Chief Justice of Canada here is little in the early life of Chief Justice Beverley McLachlin that would foreshadow her rise to the highest judicial office in Canada. After all, she was not raised in a large cosmopolitan center, but on a modest Tranch on the outskirts of Pincher Creek, Alberta, a small town in the lee of Canada’s beautiful Rocky Mountains. Her parents, Eleanora Kruschell and Ernest Gietz, did not come from wealth and privilege. They were hard- working ranchers who also took care of a nearby sawmill. Chief Justice McLachlin readily admits that growing up, she had no professional female role models. And so, becoming a lawyer, let alone a judge, was never part of her early career plans. Indeed, the expectation at the time was that women would marry and remain within the home. Girls might aspire to teaching, nursing, or secretarial work, but usually only for a short time before they married. Her childhood, nonetheless, had a distinct influence on her eventual career path. Chief Justice McLachlin proudly refers to herself as a farm girl and has often spoken of a deep affection for Pincher Creek. A Robert McInnes painting depicting a serene pastoral scene, appropriately entitled Pincher Creek, occupies a prominent place in her Supreme Court office and offers a reminder of her humble beginnings. That Chief Justice McLachlin maintains a deep connec- tion with her birthplace is hardly surprising. Despite its geographical remoteness, it nurtured its youth with a It grounded her with a common-sense practicality and culture centered on literacy, hard work, and self-reli- the importance of doing your honest best at whatever ance.