DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Bibliography Abbasian-Lintzen, R. 1964. Tabanidae (Diptera) ofIran. X. List, keys, and distribution of species occurring in Iran. Ann. Parasito!' (Paris) 39(3): 258-327. Abuzyarova, R.Ya. 1954. Tertiary palynological complexes of the Turgai and Pavlodar Irtysh area. Abstr. Ph.D. Thesis. Alma-Ata, 16 pp (in Russian). Abuzyarova, R. Y a. 1956. Palynological complexes of the Eocene deposits of Turkmenia (Badghyz). Botan. zhurn. [Bot. Journal), 41(9): 1339-1345 (in Russian). Adamovic, J. 1909. Die Vegetationsverhiiltnisse der Balkanliinder. W. Engelmann, Leipzig, 567 pp. Adamovic, J. 1902. Die Siblijak-Formation, ein wenig bekanntes Buschwerk der Balkanliinder. Engler's Bot. Jahrb. 31: 1-2. Agakhanyants, O.E. 1981. Aridnye gory SSSR [Arid Mountains of the USSR). Mysl', Moscow, 270 pp. (in Russian). Agroklimaticheskie resursy Turkmenskoi SSR [Agroclimatic Resources of the Turkmen SSR). 1974. Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 244 pp. (in Russian). Akhmedov, S.B. and N.N. Shcherbak. 1987. Geographical variation and subspecific taxonomy of the golden mabuya (Mabyua aurata L.). Vestn. zoo!. [Mess. Zoo!.) 5: 20-24 (in Russian). Alekperov, A.M. 1978. Zemnovodnye i presmykayushchiesya Azerbaidzhana [Amphibians and Reptiles of Azerbaijan). Elym, Baku, 263 pp (in Russian). Aleksenko, T.L. and Ya.1. Starobogatov. 1987. Species of Caspia and Turricaspia (Gastropoda, Pectinibranchia, Pyrgulidae) of the Azov-Black Sea basin. Vestn. zoo!. [Mess. Zoo!.] 3: 32-39 (in Russian). Ali-Zade, A.A. 1961. Akchagyl Turkmenistana [The Akchagylian Age in Turkmenistan). Gosgeoltekhizdat, Moscow, 1,300 pp (in Russian). Ali-Zade, A.A. 1967. Akchagyl Turkmenistana [The Akchagylian Age in Turkmenistan). Gosgeoltekhizdat, Moscow, 2, 408 pp (in Russian). Aliev, D.S. 1976. The role of herbivorous fish in a reconstruction of food ichthyofauna and biological melioration of water bodies. Voprosy ikhtiologii [Problems in Ichthyology) 16(2): 247- -262 (in Russian). Aliev, D.S., A.1. Sukhanova, and F.M. Shakirova. 1988. Ryby vnutrennikh vodoyomov Turkmenistana [Fishes ofInland Water Bodies of Turkmenistan). Ylym, Ashkhabad, 156 pp (in Russian). Amanniyazov, K., O. Nigarov, and O. Uzakov. 1979. Petrified animal footprints in an ancient desert. Prob!. Osvoyen. Pustyn [Problems of Desert Development) 5: 80-82 (in Russian). Amanov, A.A. 1985. Ekologiya ryb vodoyomov yuga Uzbekistana i sopredel'nykh respublik [Ecology of Fishes in the Water Bodies of Southern Uzbekistan and Adjacent Republics). Fan, Tashkent, 160 pp (in Russian). Amanova, M. A. 1968. Ekologiya vodopoinogo rezhima i nekotorye osobennosti vodnogo obmena ptits v pustyne [Ecology of the Drinking Regime and Some Characteristics of Water Balance in Desert Birds). Ph.D. Thesis, Ashkhabad, (in Russian). V. Fet & K.I. Atamuradov (eds.), Biogeography and Ecology of Turkmenistan, 545-603. 546 Bibliography Amanova, M.A 1979. Ekologo-morfologicheskie i fiziologicheskie adaptatsii vodnogo obmena ptits Karakumov [Ecologo-morphological and Physiological Adaptations of Water Balance in Birds of the Karakum]. D.Sc. Thesis, Ashkhabad, 57 pp (in Russian). Amanova, M.A, O. Goncharevskaya, and V. Bakhteeva. 1978. Characteristics of the functional organization of the renal cortex in desert birds. Fizio!' zhurn. SSSR [USSR Physio!. Journal] 14 (3): 405-410 (in Russian). Amursky, G.I. 1961. On the tooth of Equus caballus found in the deposits of the Karakum stratum. Izv. AN TSSR, Ser. Geo!. Nauk. [Proc. Acad. Sci. Turkm. SSR, Ser. Geo!. Sci.] 1: 100-101 (in Russian). Ananjeva, N.B. and B.S. Tunijev. 1992. Historical biogeography of the Phrynocephalus species of the USSR. Asiat. Herp. Res. 4: 76-98. Ananyeva, N.B. 1986. On the generic status of Megalochillus mystaceus (Pal!., 1776). Sistematika i ekologiya amfibii i reptiliiffrudy Zoo!. in-ta AN SSSR [Systematics and Ecology of Amphibians and ReptileslTrans. Zoo!. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR], Leningrad 157: 4-13 (in Russian). Ananyeva, N.B. and Ch. Ataev. 1984. Stellio caucasicus triannulatus ssp. nov. - a new subspecies of an agama from southwestern Turkmenia. Ekologiya i faunistika amfibii i reptilii SSSR i sopredel'nykh stranITrudy Zoo!. in-ta AN SSSR [Ecology and Faunistics of Amphibians and Reptiles of the USSR and Adjacent Countries/Trans. Zoo!. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR] Leningrad, 124: 4-11 (in Russian). Ananyeva, N.B. and Yu.K. Gorelov. 1981. On the teeth of the Pliocene lizards found in Baghyz. In: Tez. dokl. V Vsesoyuzn. gerpeto!. konf. [Abstr. Rep. 5th All-Union Herpeto!. Confer.], Nauka, Leningrad: 8 (in Russian). Ananyeva, N.B. and N.L. Orlov. 1977. A record of the olive poloz (Coluber najadum Eichw., 1831) in Southwest Turkmenia. In: Gerpetologichesky sbornikITrudy Zoo!. Inst. AN SSSR [Herpetological PaperslTrans. Zoo!. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR], Leningrad 74: 14-16 (in Russian). Ananyeva, N.B. and 0.1. Tsaruk. 1986. On the systematic position of the steppe agama from Cis­ Caucasia. In: Gerpetologicheskie issledovaniya na KavkazelTrudy Zoo!. Inst. AN SSSR [Herpetological Studies in the CaucasuslTrans. Zoo!. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR], Leningrad 158: 39- 46 (in Russian). Anderson, S.C. 1963. Amphibians and reptiles from Iran. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 31: 417-498. Anderson, S.C. 1968. Zoogeographic analysis of the lizard fauna of Iran. The Cambridge History ofIran. Vo!' I. The Land ofIran. 305-317. Anderson, s.c. 1974. Preliminary key to the turtles, lizards, and amphisbaenids ofIran. Field. Zoo!. 65(4): 27-44. Anderson, S.C. and AE. Leviton. 1965. Amphibians and reptiles collected by the Street Expedition to Afghanistan. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., 4th Ser. 37(2): 25-56. Andreev, V.L. and Yu.S. Reshetnikov. 1978. An analysis based on set theory of the freshwater ichthyofauna of the northeastern USSR. Zoo!. zhurn. [Zoo!. Journ.] 57(2): 165-175 (in Russian). Andreeva, E.M. 1968. Contributions to the fauna of spiders of Tajikistan. III. Mygalomorphae. Trudy Akad. nauk Tadzh. SSR [Trans. Acad. Sci. Tadjik SSR] 11: 68-71 (in Russian). Andreeva, E.M. 1969. Contributions to the fauna of spiders of Tajikistan. V. Salticidae. Izv. Akad. nauk Tadzh. SSR, otde!. bio!. [Proc. Acad. Sci. Tajik. SSR, Bio!. Div.] 37(4): 89-93 (in Russian). Andreeva, E.M. 1975a. Zoogeographical characteristics of the spider fauna of Tajikistan. In: Proc. 6th Int. Arachn. Congr. (Amsterdam IV. 1974): 214-215. Andreeva, E.M. 1975b. Distribution and ecology of spiders (Aranei) in Tajikistan. Fragm. Faunist. 20(19): 323-352. Andreeva, E.M. 1976. Spiders of Tajikistan. Donish, Dushanbe, 195 pp (in Russian). Andreeva, E.M. and V.P. Tystchenko. 1968. Contributions to the fauna of spiders (Aranei) of Tajikistan. II. Zodariidae. Zoo!. zhurn. [Zoo!. Journ.] 47(5): 684-689. Andreeva, E.M. and V.P. Tystchenko. 1969. Contributions to the fauna of spiders of Tajikistan. I. Haplogynae, Cribellatae, Ecribellatae Trionychae (Pholcidae, Palpimanidae, Hersiliidae, Oxyopidae). Entom. Obozr. [Entomo!. Rev.] 48(2): 373-384 (in Russian). Andreeva, E.M. and V.P. Tystchenko. 1970. Contributions to the fauna of spiders (Aranei) of Tajikistan. VI. - Micryphantidae. Zoo!. zhurn. [Zoo!. Journ.] 49(1): 38-44 (in Russian). Bibliography 547 Andreeva, E.M., S. Heciak, and J. Proszynski. 1984. Remarks on Icius and Pseudicius (Araneae, Sa1ticidae) mainly from Central Asia. Ann. Zool. (Warsaw) 37(13-18): 349-376. Andreeva, E.M., A.P. Kononenko, and J. Proszynski. 1981. Remarks on the genus Mogrus Simon, 1882 (Araneae, Salticidae). Ann. Zoo I. (Warsaw) 36(4): 85-104. Andreeva, R.V. 1982. On ecological and morphological types of horse fly larvae (Diptera, Tabanidae). Entomol. obozr. [Entom. Rev.] 61(1): 43-49 (in Russian). Andreeva, R.V. 1984. Ekologiya lichinok slepnei i ikh parazitosy [Ecology of Horse Fly Larvae and Their Parasitic Diseases]. Naukova dumka, Kiev, 171 pp (in Russian). Andreeva, R.V. 1985. Morphology and taxonomy of horse fly larvae belonging to the Tabanus bromius L. group (Tabanidae). Parazitologiya [Parasitology] 19(2): 128-133 (in Russian). Andreeva, R.V. 1986. Development of horse fly larvae belonging to the Tabanus bromius L. group (Tabanidae). Parazitologiya [Parasitology] 20(4): 265-271 (in Russian). Andreeva, R.V. 1987. Life forms of the edaphobiotic larvae of horse flies and their distribution. Vestn. zool. [Mess. Zool.] 2: 42-45 (in Russian). Andreeva, R.V. 1989. The morphological adaptations of horse fly larvae (Diptera, Tabanidae) to developmental sites in the Palearctic region and their relationship to the evolution and distribution of the family. Can. J. Zool. 67(9): 2286-2293. Andreeva, R.V. 1990. Opredelitel' lichinok slepnei [A Key to Horse Fly Larvae]. Naukova dumka, Kiev, 169 pp (in Russian). Andrushko, A.M. and N.E. Mikkau. 1964. Distribution and life habits of the Afghanian Iytorhynch (Lytorhynchus ridgewayi Boulanger, 1887), with an ecological-geographic review of the genus Lytorhynchus Peters, 1862. Vestnik Leningr. Univ., Ser. BioI. Nauk. [Mess. Leningrad Univ., Ser. BioI. Sci.] 9: 5-18 (in Russian). Andrushko, A.M., N.O. Lange, and Ye.N. Yemelyanova. 1939. Ecological observations on the reptiles in the Kizyl-Arvat area, Iskander Station and Krasnovodsk area (Turkmenia). Voprosy ekologii i biotsenologii [Problems of Ecology and Biocoenology], Leningrad 4: 207-252 (in Russian). Antsulevich, A.Ye. and Ya.I. Starobogatov. 1990. First record of a nudibranch mollusk (order Tritoniiformes) in the Caspian Sea. Zool. zhurn. [Zool. J.] 69(11): 138-140 (in Russian). Aranbaev, M.P. 1969. Serozyomy i svetlo-korichnevye sukhostepnye pochvy Tsentralnogo Kopetdaga [Serozems and Light Brown, Dry Steppe Soils of Central Kopetdagh]. Ylym, Ashkhabad, 175 pp (in Russian). Arnold, E.N. 1980. The reptiles and amphibians of Dhofar, Southern Arabia. J. Oman Stud. Spec. Rep. 3: 273-332. Arnoldi, K.V. 1946. Insects of Southern Kirghizian walnut and fruit forests and the significance of entomological data for general biological classification and the problem of origin of these forests. Dokl. AN SSSR [Rep. Acad. Sci. USSR], New Ser. 53(9): 345-348 (in Russian). Arnoldi, L.V. 1960. On the tribe Mesostylini (Coleoptera, Curculionidae) and the problem of the origin of sand desert fauna of Middle Asia. Trudy Zool. inst. AN SSR [Trans. Zool. Inst. Acad. Sci. USSR] 27: 276-292 (in Russian). Ataev, Ch. 1966a.
Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids

    A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids

    Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity.
  • Towards a DNA Barcode Referencedatabasefor Spiders And

    Towards a DNA Barcode Referencedatabasefor Spiders And

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Towards a DNA Barcode Reference Database for Spiders and Harvestmen of Germany Jonas J. Astrin1*, Hubert Höfer2*, Jörg Spelda3*, Joachim Holstein4*, Steffen Bayer2, Lars Hendrich3, Bernhard A. Huber1, Karl-Hinrich Kielhorn5, Hans-Joachim Krammer1, Martin Lemke6, Juan Carlos Monje4, Jérôme Morinière3, Björn Rulik1, Malte Petersen1, Hannah Janssen1, Christoph Muster7 1 ZFMK: Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany, 2 SMNK: Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany, 3 ZSM: Zoologische Staatssammlung München, München, Germany, 4 SMNS: Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Stuttgart,Germany, 5 Karl- a11111 Hinrich Kielhorn, Berlin, Germany, 6 Martin Lemke, Lübeck, Germany, 7 Zoologisches Institut und Museum, Universität Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany * [email protected] (JJA); [email protected] (HH); [email protected] (JS); joachim. [email protected] (JH) OPEN ACCESS Abstract Citation: Astrin JJ, Höfer H, Spelda J, Holstein J, As part of the German Barcode of Life campaign, over 3500 arachnid specimens have been Bayer S, Hendrich L, et al. (2016) Towards a DNA collected and analyzed: ca. 3300 Araneae and 200 Opiliones, belonging to almost 600 spe- Barcode Reference Database for Spiders and Harvestmen of Germany. PLoS ONE 11(9): cies (median: 4 individuals/species). This covers about 60% of the spider fauna and more e0162624. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0162624 than 70% of the harvestmen fauna recorded for Germany. The overwhelming majority of Editor: Matja Kuntner, Scientific Research Centre of species could be readily identified through DNA barcoding: median distances between clos- the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Art, est species lay around 9% in spiders and 13% in harvestmen, while in 95% of the cases, SLOVENIA intraspecific distances were below 2.5% and 8% respectively, with intraspecific medians at Received: June 3, 2016 0.3% and 0.2%.
  • Spiders in Wheat Fields and Semi-Desert in the Negev (Israel)

    Spiders in Wheat Fields and Semi-Desert in the Negev (Israel)

    View metadata, citation2008. and The similar Journal papers of Arachnology at core.ac.uk 36:368–373 brought to you by CORE provided by Bern Open Repository and Information System (BORIS) Spiders in wheat fields and semi-desert in the Negev (Israel) Therese Pluess1,3, Itai Opatovsky2, Efrat Gavish-Regev2, Yael Lubin2 and Martin H. Schmidt1: 1University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland; 2Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, 84990 Midreshet Ben-Gurion, Israel Abstract. Intensively cultivated arable land and semi-desert are two dominant habitat types in the arid agroecosystem in the northwest Negev Desert (Israel). The present study compares activity-densities and species richness of spiders in these distinctive habitat types. Sixteen wheat fields and twelve locations in the semi-desert were sampled during the winter growing season of wheat. Semi-desert habitats had more spider species and higher spider activity-densities than irrigated wheat fields. The majority of spider families, namely Gnaphosidae, Thomisidae, Salticidae, Zodariidae, Philodromidae, Dysderidae, and Clubionidae had significantly higher activity-densities in the semi-desert compared to wheat. Only two families, the Linyphiidae that strongly dominated the arable spider community and Corinnidae had higher activity- densities in wheat than in semi-desert. Out of a total of 94 spider species, fourteen had significantly higher activity-densities in semi-desert than in wheat fields and eight species had significantly higher activity-densities in wheat fields than in semi- desert. Spider families and species that dominated the semi-desert communities also occurred in the wheat fields but at lower activity-densities.
  • Atypus Affinis, Araneae) Im Ruthertal Zwischen Werden Und Kettwig (Essen

    Atypus Affinis, Araneae) Im Ruthertal Zwischen Werden Und Kettwig (Essen

    Elektronische Aufsätze der Biologischen Station Westliches Ruhrgebiet 12 (2008): 1-9 Electronic Publications of the Biological Station of Western Ruhrgebiet 12 (2008): 1-9 Wo die wilden Kerle wohnen: Vogelspinnenverwandtschaft (Atypus affinis, Araneae) im Ruthertal zwischen Werden und Kettwig (Essen) Marcus Schmitt Universität Duisburg-Essen, Abteilung Allgemeine Zoologie, Universitätsstraße 5, 45141 Essen; E-Mail: [email protected] Einleitung Die Ordnung der Webspinnen (Araneae) mit ihren 40.000 bekannten Arten lässt sich in drei Unterordnungen aufteilen (PLATNICK 2007). Es gibt die besonders ursprüngli- chen Gliederspinnen (Unterordung Mesothelae), vertreten nur durch eine einzige Familie (Liphistiidae), die Vogelspinnenartigen (Mygalomorphae) mit 15 Familien und die „modernen“ Echten Webspinnen (Araneomorphae) mit über 90 Familien und den bei weitem meisten Arten (über 37.000). Die Mygalomorphae wurden ehedem auch als Orthognatha, die Araneomorphae als Labidognatha geführt. Diese Namen sind insofern bezeichnend, als sie sich auf das augenfälligste Unterscheidungsmerkmal beider Gruppen beziehen: Die Kiefer der Vogelspinnenartigen sind vor dem Prosoma (Vorderleib) horizontal angeordnet (Abb. 1) und arbeiten nebeneinander auf und ab, die der Echten Webspinnen stehen eher vertikal unter der Prosomafront und bewegen sich pinzettenartig aufeinander zu (vgl. FOELIX 1992). Die mygalomorphen Spinnen leben ganz hauptsächlich in den warmen Gebieten der Erde. Am bekanntesten sind die Theraphosidae, die „eigentlichen“ Vogelspinnen. Sie sind zumeist stark behaart und oft auffällig gefärbt. Unter ihnen befinden sich die größten Spinnen überhaupt, und sie werden nicht selten als Haustiere in Terrarien gehalten (SCHMIDT 1989). Viele Mygalomorphae sind aber weniger spektakuläre Er- scheinungen und führen als Bodenbesiedler, die Wohnröhren in das Erdreich gra- ben, ein sehr verstecktes Leben. Im mediterranen und südöstlichen Europa existie- ren in mehreren Familien immerhin um die 60 Arten (PLATNICK 2007, HELSDINGEN © Biologische Station Westliches Ruhrgebiet e.
  • Sand Transport and Burrow Construction in Sparassid and Lycosid Spiders

    Sand Transport and Burrow Construction in Sparassid and Lycosid Spiders

    2017. Journal of Arachnology 45:255–264 Sand transport and burrow construction in sparassid and lycosid spiders Rainer Foelix1, Ingo Rechenberg2, Bruno Erb3, Andrea Alb´ın4 and Anita Aisenberg4: 1Neue Kantonsschule Aarau, Biology Department, Electron Microscopy Unit, Zelgli, CH-5000 Aarau, Switzerland. Email: [email protected]; 2Technische Universita¨t Berlin, Bionik & Evolutionstechnik, Sekr. ACK 1, Ackerstrasse 71-76, D-13355 Berlin, Germany; 3Kilbigstrasse 15, CH-5018 Erlinsbach, Switzerland; 4Laboratorio de Etolog´ıa, Ecolog´ıa y Evolucio´n, Instituto de Investigaciones Biolo´gicas Clemente Estable, Avenida Italia 3318, CP 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay Abstract. A desert-living spider sparassid (Cebrennus rechenbergi Ja¨ger, 2014) and several lycosid spiders (Evippomma rechenbergi Bayer, Foelix & Alderweireldt 2017, Allocosa senex (Mello-Leita˜o, 1945), Geolycosa missouriensis (Banks, 1895)) were studied with respect to their burrow construction. These spiders face the problem of how to transport dry sand and how to achieve a stable vertical tube. Cebrunnus rechenbergi and A. senex have long bristles on their palps and chelicerae which form a carrying basket (psammophore). Small balls of sand grains are formed at the bottom of a tube and carried to the burrow entrance, where they are dispersed. Psammophores are known in desert ants, but this is the first report in desert spiders. Evippomma rechenbergi has no psammophore but carries sand by using a few sticky threads from the spinnerets; it glues the loose sand grains together, grasps the silk/sand bundle and carries it to the outside. Although C. rechenbergi and E. rechenbergi live in the same environment, they employ different methods to carry sand.
  • Springer Natural Sciences & Engineering Preview

    Springer Natural Sciences & Engineering Preview

    ABC springer.com Springer Natural Sciences & Engineering Preview Top Frontlist January – March 2013 Biomedicine Chemistry Energy Engineering Materials Science Physics FIRST Available from QUARTER 2013 springer.com Order Now! Springer Natural Sciences & Engineering Preview Yes, please send me: Start the New Year with the copies ISBN € copies ISBN € latest titles from Springer copies ISBN € copies ISBN € Dear reader, copies ISBN € This catalog is a special selection of new book publications from Springer in the first quarter copies ISBN € of 2013. It highlights the titles most likely to interest specialists working in the professional field or in academia. copies ISBN € copies ISBN € You will find the international authorship and high quality contributions you have come to expect from the Springer brand in every title. copies ISBN € Please show this catalog to your buyers and acquisition staff. It is a premier and most copies ISBN € authoritative source of new print book titles from Springer. We offer you a wide range of publication types – from contributed volumes focusing on current trends, to handbooks for copies ISBN € in-depth research, to textbooks for graduate students. copies ISBN € If you are looking for something very specific, go to our online catalog at springer.com and search among the 83,000 English books in print by keyword. The Advanced Search makes copies ISBN € it easy to define any scientific subject you have. You can even download a catalog just like this copies ISBN € one with your own personal selection – completely free of charge! copies ISBN € We hope you will enjoy browsing through our new titles and wish you great success throughout the new year! copies ISBN € With best wishes, copies ISBN € Matthew Giannotti Product Manager Trade Marketing Please bill me Please charge my credit card: Eurocard/Access/Mastercard Visa/Barclaycard/Bank/Americard AmericanExpress P.S.
  • Understory Plant Species Diversity of Asalem's Forests, Northern Iran

    Understory Plant Species Diversity of Asalem's Forests, Northern Iran

    Forestry Research and Engineering: International Journal Research Article Open Access Understory plant species diversity of Asalem’s forests, northern Iran Abstract Volume 3 Issue 2 - 2019 The diversity of plants in forests understory is important from different perspectives. Habib Yazdanshenas,1 Mehdi Kalagar,2 Mehdi Thus, present research was carried out to find the chorology, origin and diversity of 3 the understory plants species in Asalem’s forests, northern Iran. Basic studies were Moradipour Toularoud 1Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Iran conducted on the geographic characteristics of the region. The direct visiting forests 2Research and Innovation Center of ETKA Organization, Iran method were selected for investigation of tree and understory plants species (herbs) 3Shafarood Forest Company’s Director of Research and which lasted of the year 2017 to 2018. Sampling of understory vegetation were done, Innovation, Iran recorded and identified based on available scientific references. The results showed that there are more than 152 species belonging to 124 genera and 61 families existed Correspondence: Habib Yazdanshenas, Faculty of Natural in forest understory. The largest families were Asteraceae, Rosaceae, Poaceae and Resources, University of Tehran, Iran +98137546924, Apiaceae with 17, 13, 11 and 10 species, respectively. Investigation of the geographical Email distribution of plant species indicated that there is a composition of Europe–Siberian, Iran-Turan, Mediterranean (and Polyregional and cosmo) plant elements. Plant life Received: January 01, 2019 | Published: March 27, 2019 forms by Raunkiaer method showed that phanerophytes with 28 % and Chameophytes = Therophytes with 26 % are the most frequent life forms in this area. Also, plant diversity was higher in areas with sparse tree cover, but in degraded areas or areas with high tree vegetation understory plants diversity was low.
  • 196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists

    196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists

    196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 A revised checklist of the spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection criteria and lists Alastair Lavery The checklist has two main sections; List A contains all Burach, Carnbo, species proved or suspected to be established and List B Kinross, KY13 0NX species recorded only in specific circumstances. email: [email protected] The criterion for inclusion in list A is evidence that self- sustaining populations of the species are established within Great Britain and Ireland. This is taken to include records Abstract from the same site over a number of years or from a number A revised checklist of spider species found in Great Britain and of sites. Species not recorded after 1919, one hundred years Ireland is presented together with their national distributions, before the publication of this list, are not included, though national and international conservation statuses and syn- this has not been applied strictly for Irish species because of onymies. The list allows users to access the sources most often substantially lower recording levels. used in studying spiders on the archipelago. The list does not differentiate between species naturally Keywords: Araneae • Europe occurring and those that have established with human assis- tance; in practice this can be very difficult to determine. Introduction List A: species established in natural or semi-natural A checklist can have multiple purposes. Its primary pur- habitats pose is to provide an up-to-date list of the species found in the geographical area and, as in this case, to major divisions The main species list, List A1, includes all species found within that area.
  • Vol 30 Svsn.Pdf

    Vol 30 Svsn.Pdf

    c/o Museo di Storia Naturale Fontego dei Turchi, S. Croce 1730 30135 Venezia (Italy) Tel. 041 2750206 - Fax 041 721000 codice fiscale 80014010278 sito web: www.svsn.it e-mail: [email protected] Lavori Vol. 30 Venezia 31 gennaio 2005 La Società Veneziana di Scienze Naturali si è costituita a Venezia nel Dicembre 1975 Consiglio Direttivo Presidente della Società: Giampietro Braga Vice Presidente: Fabrizio Bizzarini Consiglieri (*) Botanica: Linda Bonello Maria Teresa Sammartino Didattica, Ecologia,Tutela ambientale: Giuseppe Gurnari Maria Chiara Lazzari Scienze della Terra e dell’Uomo: Fabrizio Bizzarini Simone Citon Zoologia: Raffaella Trabucco Segretario Tesoriere: Anna Maria Confente Revisori dei Conti: Luigi Bruni Giulio Scarpa Comitato scientifico di redazione: Giovanni Caniglia (Direttore), Fabrizio Bizzarini, Giampietro Braga, Paolo Canestrelli, Corrado Lazzari, Francesco Mezzavilla, Alessandro Minelli, Enrico Negrisolo, Michele Pellizzato Direttore responsabile della rivista: Alberto Vitucci Iniziativa realizzata con il contributo della Regione Veneto Il 15 ottobre 1975 il tribunale di Venezia autorizzava la pubblicazione della rivista scientifica “Lavori” e nel gennaio del 1976 la Società Veneziana di Scienze Naturali presentava ai soci il primo numero della rivista che conteneva 13 con- tributi scientifici. In ordine alfabetico ne elenchiamo gli autori: Lorenzo Bonometto, Silvano Canzoneri, Paolo Cesari, Antonio Dal Corso, Federico De Angeli, Giorgio Ferro, Lorenzo Munari, Helio Pierotti, Leone Rampini, Giampaolo Rallo, Enrico Ratti, Marino Sinibaldi e Roberto Vannucci. Nasceva così quell’impegno editoriale che caratterizza da allora la nostra società non solo nel puntuale rispetto dei tempi di stampa, entro il primo trimestre di ogni anno, del volume degli atti scientifici: “Lavori”, ma anche nelle altre pub- blicazione.
  • SA Spider Checklist

    SA Spider Checklist

    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
  • WO 2017/035099 Al 2 March 2017 (02.03.2017) P O P C T

    WO 2017/035099 Al 2 March 2017 (02.03.2017) P O P C T

    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2017/035099 Al 2 March 2017 (02.03.2017) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, C07C 39/00 (2006.01) C07D 303/32 (2006.01) DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, C07C 49/242 (2006.01) HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, (21) International Application Number: MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PCT/US20 16/048092 PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, (22) International Filing Date: SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, 22 August 2016 (22.08.2016) TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (25) Filing Language: English (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, (26) Publication Language: English GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, RW, SD, SL, ST, SZ, (30) Priority Data: TZ, UG, ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, RU, 62/208,662 22 August 2015 (22.08.2015) US TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, (71) Applicant: NEOZYME INTERNATIONAL, INC.
  • Zoologica Poloniae

    Zoologica Poloniae

    ZOOLOGICA POLONIAE 2015 VOL. 60 FASC. 1-1 ISSN 0044-510X LUBLIN 2015 ZOOLOGICA POLONIAE ARCHIVUM SOCIETATIS ZOOLOGORUM POLONIAE VOL. 60 FASC. 1-1 2015 LUBLIN 2015 POLAND Zoologica Poloniae in open access http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/zoop http://www.umcs.pl/pl/zoologica-poloniae,11696.htm International scientific journal founded by Jarosław Wiącek Zakład Ochrony Przyrody Dept. of Biology and Biotechnology UMCS Lublin © Copyright by Polskie Towarzystwo Zoologiczne Wrocław 2015 ISSN 0044-510X PRINTED IN POLAND Opracowanie do druku: True Colours s.c., ul. I Armii WP 5/2, 20-078 Lublin, www.tcolours.com Nakład: 200 Zdjęcie na pierwszej stronie okładki: fot. M. Piskorski INDEX Łukasz Dawidowicz CONFIRMATION OF THE OCCURRENCE OF THYRIS FENESTRELLA (SCOPOLI, 1763) (LEPIDOPTERA: THYRIDIDAE) IN POLAND AND REMARKS ABOUT ITS BIOLOGY .....5 Grzegorz Gryziak, Grzegorz Makulec BRACHYCHTHONIUS HIRTUS (MORITZ, 1976) AND SUBIASELLA (LALMOPPIA) EUROPAEA (MAHUNKA, 1982) – TWO NEW SPECIES OF ORIBATID MITES (ACARI: ORIBATIDA) TO POLISH FAUNA AND TWO OTHER SPECIES NEW TO THE MAZOVIAN REGION WITHIN POLAND.......................................................................................11 Anna Hirna SPECIMENS OF SPIDER FAUNA FROM UKRAINE IN THE COLLECTION OF THE MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY, WROCLAW UNIVERSITY (ACCORDING TO THE COLLECTION OF STANISŁAW PILAWSKI AND KAZIMIERZ PETRUSEWICZ) .................15 Katarzyna Wołczuk, Teresa Napiórkowska, Robert Socha ANATOMICAL, HISTOLOGICAL AND HISTOCHEMICAL STUDIES OF THE ALIMENTARY CANAL OF MONKEY GOBY NEOGOBIUS FLUVIATILIS (Pallas, 1814) ...35 Maciej Filipiuk & Marcin Polak DISTRIBUTION AND HABITAT PREFERENCES OF EURASIAN BITTERN BOTAURUS STELLARIS AT NATURAL LAKES OF ŁĘCZNA–WŁODAWA LAKELAND ............................51 Michał Piskorski BAT FAUNA OF THE POLESKI NATIONAL PARK AND SOME ADJOINING AREAS .........65 Zoologica Poloniae (2015) 60/1.