DOCSLIB.ORG

261.Full.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
261.Full.Pdf Journal of the Geological Society, London, Vol. 146, 1989, pp. 261-269,6 figs. Printed in Northern Ireland Reflection seismic evidence for a Moho offset beneath the Walls Boundary strike-slip fault SUSAN McGEARY BIRPS, Bullard Laboratories, Cambridge, CB3 OEZ, UK Present address: Department of Geology, University of Delaware, 101 Penny Hall, Newark, Delaware, 19716 USA Abstract: BIRPS has acquired two deep seismic reflection profiles across the Walls Boundary Fault, a major late Caledonian strike-slip fault that is probably the northern continuation of the Great Glen Fault of Scotland. Where crossed by the SHET deep seismic survey north of the Shetlands, the Walls Boundary Fault appears to be a narrow vertical structure which penetrates the entire crustal thickness and juxtaposes 'crusts of different thicknesses. The seismic data show a Moho offset in travel-time of 1.0-1.5seconds and two high-amplitudediffractions originating at Mohotravel-times. These diffractions are, as yet, unique among seismic data across strike-slip faults and can be used to argue that the Moho is offset in depthby 2-3 km over a lateral distance of less than 6 km. Seismic modelling is used to constrain this interpretation. The preservation of this Moho topography suggests that the structure and rheology of the lower crust of the Shetland Platform was not significantly modified during post-Devonian extension of the North Sea and Atlantic margin. Deep seismic reflection profiling is increasingly being used is exposed as a zone of intensely fractured rock, including to study thenature and geometry atdepth of structures slices of mylonite, which is usually fairly narrow but can be mapped at the surface. Of particular interest are the major up to a kilometre in width (Flinn 1977). The fault can be strike-slip faults found on the continents. Several of these clearly traced on the continental shelf as far south as Fair have been recognized to be the transformboundaries Isle (Fig. 1) and is the likely northern continuation of the between major plates (the San Andreas, Alpine, and Queen transcurrent Great Glen Fault in Scotland (Flinn 1961, 1969; Charlotte faults forexample), while others accommodate McQuillin et al. 1982). stresses within the boundaries of the continents (the Great The Great Glen Fault is the most conspicuous member Glen, North Anatolian,and Garlockfaults). The surface of a set of NE-SW trending wrench faults probably formed expression of these structures is usually well-defined, either in the early Devonian during oblique continental collision in as a single fault zone or as a set of parallel or anastomosing the final stages of the Caledonian orogeny (Watson 1984; faults of measurable width and offset. However, neither the Soper & Hutton 1984; Phillips 1976). The ages, directions deeper geometry of these structures nor the way in which andamounts of movement onthe fault are highly the displacement observed at the surface is accommodated controversial. Palaeomagnetic data have led investigators to at depth within the lithosphere is well understood (Sibson argue for large sinistral displacements ranging from 600 km 1983). in the late Middle Devonian (Storetvedt 1986) to 2000km In August 1984, the British Institutions Reflection during the Carboniferous (Van der Voo & Scotese 1981). Profiling Syndicate (BIRPS) collected 830 km of deep Geological data,on the other hand, suggest an initial multichannel seismic reflection data (the SHET survey) on sinistral displacement of only about 100-200 km before the the continental shelf surrounding the Shetlands, north of end of the Devonian (Smith & Watson 1983), followed by a Scotland (Fig. 1). One of themajor goals of theSHET post-Devonian dextraldisplacement of about 30 km survey was to study thedeep structure of the Walls (Donovan et al. 1976). BoundaryFault (WBF), a major strike-slip fault in the As the northern continuation of the Great Glen Fault, Shetlandsthought to be the northern continuation of the the Walls Boundary Fault is also likely to have experienced Great Glen Fault system in Scotland (Flinn 1961). Two of several episodes of transcurrentmotion both duringand theSHET profiles cross the offshore continuation of the since the end of the Caledonian orogeny. Early transcurrent WBF: UNST north of the Shetlands and FAIR ISLE south motion of the WBF is not directly constrained by Shetland of the Shetlands (Fig. 1). basement geology since the Caledonian metamorphic rocks This paper presents the interesting and somewhat on either side of thefault cannotbe correlated, but the surprising features of these two profiles across the WBF and relative position of the Caledonian front with respect to the shows the results of forward seismic modelling used to Dalradianand Moine equivalents on Shetland suggests constrain theirinterpretation. In particular, this paper 100-200 km of late Caledonian sinistral offset for the WBF investigates the geometry of the WBF at Moho depths and as well (Flinn 1985). Later dextral motion displacing both the bearing of these results on the natureof strike-slip faults the Old Red Sandstone and granitic plutons is estimated to at depth and the rheology of the lower crust. be from 65 km (Flinn 1969; Donovan et al. 1976) to about 95 km (Astin 1982). The timing and nature of the latest movement on either The Walls Boundary Fault theWBF or the Great Glen Fault is again controversial The Walls Boundary Fault is the most important structural (Bacon & Chesher 1974; Bott & Browitt 1975; Flinn 1975; discontinuity in the Shetlands (Flinn 1961; Mykura 1976). It Speight & Mitchell 1979). TheWBF clearly truncates 261 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/jgs/article-pdf/146/2/261/4897852/gsjgs.146.2.0261.pdf by guest on 03 October 2021 262 S. McGEARY Fig. 1. Location map of the SHET deep seismic reflection surveyof BIRPS. Two 15-second profiles, UNST and FAIR ISLE, cross the Walls Boundary strike- slip fault (WBF) north and southof the Shetlands. The WBF is the likely northern continuation of the Great Glen fault (GGF). Line drawing interpreta- tions of each profile are shown in Figs 2 and 3. Land is speckled. Sedimentary basins are dotted. UN Unst island; FI, Fair Isle; FIB, Fair Isle Basin. Permo-Triassic sedimentaryrocks in the West Fair Isle of about 2 km. Beneath the basin and exposed at the sea Basin. Movement onthe Great Glen Fault in the Moray bed to the east is the acoustically transparent metamorphic Firth has affected sediments as young as Lower Cretaceous basement of presumed Caledonian age. (McQuillin et al. 1982; Bacon & Chesher 1974). The latest The most exciting features of the UNST profile lie at movement is therefore post-Early Cretaceous but may have Moho depths within the section (Figs 2 and 4). West of the involved only minor displacement. There is no evidence in WBF, the Moho is interpreted to be the base of a narrow this region east andnorth of Scotlandfor any significant zone of high-amplitude reflections at 9.0-9.5 S TWTT (event Tertiary displacement on the Great Glen Fault or the Walls M1 in Figs 2 and 4). Although there is no nearby refraction Boundary Fault. data to constrain this interpretation, such an interpretation has been justified in other regions by coincident refraction The BIRPS profiles; seismic interpretation and wide-angle reflection data(Barton et al. 1984; Klemperer et al. 1986; Matthews 1986). Immediately east of The SHET survey crosses the WBF both north and southof the WBF, theMoho is not as well defined but can be seen as the Shetlands. Line drawings of the relevant parts of the two a discrete set of horizontal reflections at 10.7 S TWTT (event profiles, UNST and FAIR ISLE, are shown in Figs 2 and 3 M2 in Figs 2 and 4). This abrupt change in reflection time to respectively. Bothsections were recorded to 15 seconds the Moho of about 1.5 S could beproduced either by a two-way travel-time (m)allowing seismic penetration major change in depth to the Moho across the WBF north into the continental crust and mantle to a depth of about of Shetland, a Moho offset, or by a significant difference in 50 km. The data are 30 fold. Below each line drawing is a average crustal velocity across the fault. geological interpretation of the seismic data. The results of The most surprising events in the profile are events D1 thetotal SHET survey will bepresented elsewhere and D2 (Figs 2 and 4). These two events can each be seen to (McGeary 1987). originate at about Moho times and to continue at opposite dips to the base of the section. The slightly curved geometry of events D1 and D2 and the fact that they each collapse to The UNST profile a separate finite area(a ‘point’) upon migration at UNST crosses the WBF 35 km north of the island Unst in reasonable whole crustal velocities suggest that they are the Shetland Isles (Fig. 1)and extendsfrom theFaeroe/ both diffractions, probably from some kind of structure on West Shetland basin to the Viking Graben. Only the 70 km the Moho. The high-amplitudes suggest thatthe seismic section across theWBF is shown in Fig. 2. West of the energy has been focused in some way by this structure. The WBF, Caledonian or Archaean metamorphicbasement is apices of diffractions D1 and D2 are offset in travel-time exposed at the sea bed, and there are few reflections within which makes the diffractions appear asymmetric. This offset the upper crust (Fig. 2). Immediately east of the WBF, and in diffraction apices may be explained in the same way as truncated by it, is a small sedimentary basin, the Sandwick the offset on the Moho, by either Moho structure or velocity Basin, assigned to the Devonian (Hitchen & Ritchie 1987). pulldown.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fault: the Rise of the Rosemarkie Inlier and the Acadian Event in 3 Scotland
    1 Mid-Devonian sinistral transpressional movements on the Great Glen 2 Fault: the rise of the Rosemarkie Inlier and the Acadian Event in 3 Scotland. 4 5 J.R. Mendum1 & S.R. Noble2 6 1British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh, EH9 3LA 7 2NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory, British Geological Survey, Kingsley Dunham 8 Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham, NG12 5GG 9 e-mail: [email protected] 10 11 Abstract 12 The Rosemarkie Inlier is a small fault-bounded lens of interleaved Moine psammites and 13 possible Lewisianoid orthogneisses with distinctive leucogranite veins and pods that lies 14 adjacent to the Great Glen Fault (GGF). The basement rocks and most of the 15 leucogranites are strongly deformed and tightly folded with foliations generally steeply 16 dipping and a locally well-developed NE-plunging rodding lineation. Mid-Devonian 17 sandstone and conglomerate unconformably overlie the inlier on its western side. 18 Monazite from a deformed leucogranite vein gave a mean ID-TIMS 207Pb/235U age of 19 397.6 ± 2.2 Ma and acicular zircons gave a compatible concordant ID-TIMS U-Pb age of 20 400.8 ± 2.6 Ma, dating emplacement as mid-Devonian. Xenocrystic zircons from the 21 leucogranites and complex zoned zircons from two adjacent tonalitic gneisses gave LA- 22 MC-ICP-MS concordant ages between 2720 and 2930 Ma confirming their Archaean 23 Lewisianoid origin. Leucogranite emplacement is interpreted to mark the onset of 24 Acadian transpression and sinistral strike-slip movement on the GGF that resulted in 25 multi-phase deformation and oblique exhumation of the Rosemarkie Inlier.
    [Show full text]
  • Inverness, Ross & Skye
    Strategic Plan Inverness, Ross & Skye Forest District Strategic Plan 2009-2013 Click here to begin Strategic plan 2009-2013 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 3 About Inverness, Ross & Skye Forest District ........................................................................................6 Section one: strategic context .....................................................................................................13 Context ............................................................................................................................................................14 Strategic priorities for Inverness, Ross & Skye Forest District .......................................................16 Forest policy context...................................................................................................................................18 Section two: how Inverness, Ross & Skye Forest District contributes to the delivery of the scottish forestry strategy ....................................................................................19 Key theme one: climate change ..............................................................................................................21 Key theme two: timber ..............................................................................................................................25 Key theme three: business development .............................................................................................30
    [Show full text]
  • Durham Research Online
    Durham Research Online Deposited in DRO: 04 December 2015 Version of attached le: Accepted Version Peer-review status of attached le: Peer-reviewed Citation for published item: Dichiarante, A.M. and Holdsworth, R.E. and Dempsey, E.D. and Selby, D. and Mccarey, K.J.W. and Michie, U. and Morgan, G. and Bonniface, J. (2016) 'New structural and ReOs geochronological evidence constraining the age of faulting and associated mineralization in the Devonian Orcadian Basin, Scotland.', Journal of the Geological Society., 173 (3). pp. 457-473. Further information on publisher's website: http://dx.doi.org/10.1144/jgs2015-118 Publisher's copyright statement: Journal of the Geological Society, 173, 457-473, May 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1144/jgs2015-118 c Geological Society of London 2016. Additional information: Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. Durham University Library, Stockton Road, Durham DH1 3LY, United Kingdom Tel : +44 (0)191 334 3042 | Fax : +44 (0)191 334 2971 https://dro.dur.ac.uk Journal of the Geological Society New structural and
    [Show full text]
  • Discussion on a Tectonic Model for the Emplacement of the Main Donegal Granite, NW Ireland
    Journal of the Geological Society, London, Vol. 144, 1987, pp. 201-203, 1 fig. Printed in Northern Ireland Discussion on a tectonic model for the emplacement of the Main Donegal Granite, NW Ireland Journal, Vol. 139, Part 5, 1982, pp. 615-631. Mr M. J. Arthur writes: Hutton (1982) suggested that the Main DonegalGranite (MDG) was accommodatedin a NE-SW zone of tension(‘elongate hole’), contem- poraneously with NE-SW sinistral shearing aroundthat zoneabout 400 Ma ago (end Silurian-early Devonian times). Calculations from strain studies suggested that the sinistral displacement was about 20 kmat itsmaximum, across the NW boundary of the MDG, but only about 5 km where the NW and SE boundaries united and continued to the SW (Hutton 1982). No figure was given for the offset across the SE boundary, though it was considered to be a major sinistral shear zone (Hutton 1982). However, Hutton (1982) proposed an unorthodox ‘crack opening model’ for the emplacement, which is adequately explained by the well establishedpull-apart model. The MDG has the rhomboidal/elliptical shape (Fig. 1) typical of a pull-apart produced at a releasing bend (cf. Crowell 1974, fig. 3),resulting fromthe intersection of the two throughgoing parts of a left-stepping sinistral wrench fault (cf. Ramsay 1980, fig. 18). The MDG is about 50 km long N and 11 km wide and thus has a length/width ratio of about 4.5, whilst the ratio for pull-aparts is commonly between 2 0U 510f and 5 with an average of about 3(Aydin & Nur 1982). km Emplacementinto an ‘elongate hole’ contemporaneously Donegal AI47 with shearing around it, is precisely a characteristic expected of a pull-apart.
    [Show full text]
  • Cenozoic Reactivation of the Great Glen Fault, Scotland: Additional Evidence and Possible Causes Eline Le Breton, Peter Robert Cobbold, Alain Zanella
    Cenozoic reactivation of the Great Glen Fault, Scotland: additional evidence and possible causes Eline Le Breton, Peter Robert Cobbold, Alain Zanella To cite this version: Eline Le Breton, Peter Robert Cobbold, Alain Zanella. Cenozoic reactivation of the Great Glen Fault, Scotland: additional evidence and possible causes. Journal of the Geological Society, Geological Society of London, 2013, 170 (3), pp.403-410. 10.1144/jgs2012-067. insu-00836055 HAL Id: insu-00836055 https://hal-insu.archives-ouvertes.fr/insu-00836055 Submitted on 20 Jun 2013 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 Cenozoic reactivation of the Great Glen Fault, Scotland: Additional Evidence and 2 Possible Causes 3 4 E. Le Breton1,2*, P.R. Cobbold1, A. Zanella1 5 1 Géosciences Rennes, Université de Rennes 1, CNRS, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc, 6 35042 Rennes, France 7 2 Now at Department of Earth Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany 8 9 *Corresponding author, E. Le Breton, Department of Earth Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, 10 Malterserstr. 74-100, 12249 Berlin, Germany. [email protected] 11 12 13 Abstract 14 The Great Glen Fault (GGF) trends NNE-SSW across northern Scotland.
    [Show full text]
  • Cenozoic Reactivation of the Great Glen Fault, Scotland: Additional Evidence and Possible Causes
    research-articleResearch ArticleXXX10.1144/jgs2012-067E. Le Breton <italic>et al</italic>.Cenozoic Reactivation of the Great Glen Fault 2013 Downloaded from http://jgs.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on April 30, 2013 Journal of the Geological Society, London. doi: 10.1144/jgs2012-067 Published Online First © 2013 The Geological Society of London Cenozoic reactivation of the Great Glen Fault, Scotland: additional evidence and possible causes E. LE BRETON1,2*, P. R. COBBOLD1 & A. ZANELLA1 1Géosciences Rennes, Université de Rennes 1, CNRS, 263 Avenue du Général Leclerc, 35042 Rennes, France 2Present address: Department of Earth Sciences, Freie Universität Berlin, Malteserstr. 74–100, 12249 Berlin, Germany *Corresponding author (e-mail: [email protected]) Abstract: The Great Glen Fault trends NNE–SSW across northern Scotland. According to previous studies, the Great Glen Fault developed as a left-lateral strike-slip fault during the Caledonian Orogeny (Ordovician to Early Devonian). However, it then reactivated right-laterally in the Tertiary. We discuss additional evi- dence for this later phase. At Eathie and Shandwick, minor folds and faults in fossiliferous Jurassic marine strata indicate post-depositional right-lateral slip. In Jurassic shale, we have found bedding-parallel calcite veins (‘beef’ and ‘cone-in-cone’) that may provide evidence for overpressure development and maturation of organic matter at significant depth. Thus, the Jurassic strata at Eathie and Shandwick accumulated deeper offshore in the Moray Firth and were subject to Cenozoic exhumation during right-lateral displacement along the Great Glen Fault, as suggested by previous researchers. Differential sea-floor spreading along the NE Atlantic ridge system generated left-lateral transpressional displacements along the Faroe Fracture Zone from the Early Eocene to the Late Oligocene (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 30, 1994, Year-End Author Index
    Document generated on 09/26/2021 12:24 a.m. Atlantic Geology Volume 30, 1994, Year-End Author Index Volume 30, Number 3, November 1994 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/ageo30_3ind01 See table of contents Publisher(s) Atlantic Geoscience Society ISSN 0843-5561 (print) 1718-7885 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this document (1994). Volume 30, 1994, Year-End Author Index. Atlantic Geology, 30(3), 273–277. All rights reserved © Atlantic Geology, 1994 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ A tlantic G eology 273 Volume 30 1994 Year-End Author Index A brajano, T., see O ’Malley, V., 157. Whiterock Formation - Yarmouth to Meteghan, southwest Adams, M.G., Stewart, K.G., Trupe, C.H., and Willard, Nova Scotia, 69. R.A. Tectonic significance of high-pressure metamorphic Currie, K.L., see Johnston, D.H., 183. rocks and dextral strike-slip faulting in the southern Appa­ Currie, K.L. Tectonostratigraphic development of the north­ lachians, 162. eastern extremity of the Dunnage Zone in Newfoundland, Arne, D.C. Absolute timing of thrust faulting - a 163. thermochronological approach, 68. Arnott, A.A., MacDougall, G.A., and Barr, S.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Inverness - One Day Tours Itineraries
    INVERNESS - ONE DAY TOURS ITINERARIES Inverness - One Day Tours Known as the capital of the Highlands, in Inverness you get to combine city life with all the beauty and nature of the Scottish lands. Explore the wilderness, discover the history, and uncover the culture on our day tours of Scotland. All our tours are hosted by a passionate local expert and travel in comfortable 16 seat coaches. All Inverness tours depart from Stance 7, Inverness Bus Station, Margaret St, Inverness, IV1 1LT. Rates GBP £ Tour Price Code One Day Tours Adult Child Cairngorm National Park & Speyside Whisky INVCA L 34.00 31.00 Tues, Fri - 03/04/20 - 30/03/21 (except 25/12/20, 01/01/21) M 38.00 35.00 Departs: 09.30 Returns: 18.30 H 41.00 38.00 The Complete Loch Ness Experience INVNESS L 27.00 24.00 Daily, MTWTFSS - 02/04/20 - 30/03/21 M 31.00 28.00 (except 26/12/20, 02/01/21) Departs: 10.00 Returns: 17.00 H 35.00 32.00 Skye & Eilean Donan Castle INVSK L 49.00 46.00 Daily, MTWTFSS - 01/04/20 - 31/03/21 (except 24/12/20, 58.00 55.00 25/12/20, 26/12/20, 31/12/20, 01/01/21, 02/01/21) M Departs: 08.00 Returns: 20.00 H 65.00 62.00 Torridon, Applecross & Eilean Donan Castle INVTA L 39.00 36.00 Tue, Thur, Sun - 02/04/20 - 30/03/21 (except 24/12/20, 31/12/20) M 44.00 41.00 Departs: 08.30 Returns: 19.30 H 49.00 46.00 Speyside Whisky & Moray Firth* INVWHIS L 32.00 n/a Mon, Wed - 01/04/20 - 31/03/21 M 35.00 n/a Departs: 09.15 Returns: 18.45 H 39.00 n/a The Best of the Black Isle INVBLACK L 29.00 26.00 Wed, Sat - 01/04/20 - 31/10/20 (except 26/12/20) plus 03/03/21 - 35.00 32.00 31/03/21 M Departs: 09.45 Returns: 17.45 H 39.00 36.00 Glen Affric, Culloden & Clava Cairns - INVGACC 34.00 31.00 NEW FOR 2020 L Mon, Wed, Thu, Sun - 01/04/20 - 31/03/21 M 38.00 35.00 Departs: 09.00 Returns: 18.00 H 42.00 39.00 LOW SEASON 01/04/20 to 05/04/20, 01/11/20 to 17/12/20 and 04/01/21 to 31/03/21 MID SEASON 06/04/20 to 31/05/20, 01/10/20 to 31/10/20 and 18/12/20 to 03/01/21 (Christmas & New Year) HIGH SEASON 01/06/20 to 30/09/20 * No children under the age of 18 are allowed on this tour.
    [Show full text]
  • The Seabed Geomorphology and Geological Structure of the Firth of Lorn, Western Scotland, UK, As Revealed by Multibeam Echo-Sounder Survey John A
    Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 105, 273–284, 2015 (for 2014) The seabed geomorphology and geological structure of the Firth of Lorn, western Scotland, UK, as revealed by multibeam echo-sounder survey John A. Howe1, Roger Anderton2, Riccardo Arosio1, Dayton Dove3, Tom Bradwell3, Philip Crump1, Rhys Cooper3 and Andre Cocuccio4 1 Scottish Association for Marine Science, Scottish Marine Institute, Oban PA37 1QA, UK. 2 Kilmichael House, Kilmichael Glassary, Lochgilphead PA31 8QA, UK. 3 British Geological Survey, Murchison House, West Mains Rd, Edinburgh EH9 3LA, UK. 4 Maritime and Coastguard Agency, Spring Place, 105 Commercial Road, Southampton SO15 1EG, UK. ABSTRACT: This paper presents recently collected swath bathymetry from the Firth of Lorn. 553 km2 of data were collected during 2012–2013 as part of the INIS Hydro (Ireland, Northern Ireland and Scotland Hydrographic Survey) programme. The area proves to consist of bedrock-dominated seabed, divided into narrow, stratigraphically- constrained and glacially-over-deepened basins. The bedrock is composed of late Proterozoic Dalradian metasediments overlain unconformably by Old Red Sandstone (ORS) sediments and lavas of ?Silurian-age. The central region of the Firth of Lorn is dominated by a vertical cliff, up to 150 m high and extending for approximately 24 km. This feature, here termed the Insh Fault, may have originated as a Dalradian extensional fault, been reactivated as an ORS feature and now forms a fault-line scarp with resistant ORS rocks on the downthrown side, flanking the more deeply eroded metasediments exposed in the basin. Tertiary intrusives are common, in particular, swarms of Paleocene dolerite dykes exposed on the sediment-free bedrock surfaces, and can be traced for many kilometres.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long and Moving Story of the Great Glen Fault
    The long and moving story of the Great Glen Fault Mike Allen Abstract: The Great Glen fault is perhaps the best known fault in Britain, and its nature and history have been discussed extensively. It defines a very obvious trough SW-NE across the full width of the Scottish mainland, occupied by a series of lochs and the Caledonian Canal. Concensus is that it is a strike-slip fault within a broad zone of structural complexity, originating towards the end of the Caledonian orogeny. Open to debate have been the amount, direction, timing and number of episodes of movement. The favoured conclusion is of two main periods of movement: sinistral slip of around 100-200 km during the Devonian (late-Caledonian), with dextral slip of up to 30 km during the Mesozoic or Cenozoic, but this generalisation conceals a wealth of varied opinion. The fault zone remains seismically active, and offsets in the modern drainage pattern suggest that movement is far from over. A literature review reveals how methods of research have changed, and ideas have evolved through new technological capabilities and better understanding of the Earth, over the last 180 years. The Great Glen Fault is a major geological feature that traverses southwest to northeast across the Scottish mainland from Fort William to Inverness. The deep trough eroded along its path is occupied by several lochs, which Thomas Telford linked during 1803–1822 by a series of short waterways to form the Caledonian Canal at a cost of about £900,000 (£70 million in today’s money). The floor of this kilometre-wide trough lies at about 40m O.D., with flanks rising to over 700m on either flank (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • CH1-09: the Walls Boundary Fault, Shetland, British Isles
    THE WALLS BOUNDARY FAULT, SHETLAND, BRITISH ISLES DEREK FLINN SUMMARY The Walls Boundary Fault of Shetland is a trans-current fault on which the displacement has been sufficiently gr3at to prevent correlation in Shetland between the rocks on each side. The fault is chiefly remarkable for the number of coastal sections providing complete exposure of the fault and the cataclastic rocks on either side. Offset on the fault took place on the main fracture marked by a narrow zone of gouge and to a much lesser extent on sub-parallel subsidiary fractures. In plan the faults appear to be composed of relatively straight segments jointed by arcs in which a change of trend of up to IOo takes place over a short distance. The rocks on either side of the faults are heavily crushed for hundreds of meters but show no signs of having contributed to the offset by simple shear type deformation. It is suggested that the crushing is the result of movement on the non-planar faults causing a 'working' of the adjacent rocks due to small scale movements on subsidiary fractures. Neomineralisation is limited to the formation of analcite and laumontite in faults and minor shears. Most of the visible fault structures seem to have resulted from move- ments in post-Devonian, possible Mesozoic, times which may have given rise to a dextral displacement of the order of 60 km. There is evidence in the form of mylonites for earlier phases of movement under other conditions. Introduction. Shetland is a small archipelago on the edge of the north-west European continental shelf about 100 km north of Scotland and 300 km west of Bergen, Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Eological Relationships in the Offshore Basins Flanking Northern Scotland
    Journal of the Geological Society, London, Vol. 156, 1999, pp. 1061–1064. Printed in Great Britain. et al. 1997), but many advocatesof o ffshore regional reacti- vation hypotheses present little or no hard evidence to support such models. In the absence of supporting data we see no reason to accept such reactivation hypotheses carte blanche and thispaper illustratesthatit may be instructiveto look at alternative ideas, i.e. that the younger faults represent import- ant onshore kinematic links between spatially separated off- shore fault sets and that they may form independently of basement structure. What follows is a brief appraisal of relevant examplesfrom the o ffshore basins bordering northern Scotland, at the conclusion of which the possible influence of Mesozoic faults onshore will be discussed. The Moray Firth Basin. For a long time, following the work of McQuillin et al. (1982), the Moray Firth basin was taken to be a prima facie case of a Mesozoic basin which had formed by reactivation of a Caledonian fault, in this case dextral slip on the Great Glen Fault (Fig. 1). Subsequently, however, Underhill (1991) hasdemonstratedthat the Great Glen Fault wasdormant during the formation of the Moray Firth and that instead, the basin opened as a result of extensional slip on eological relationships in the offshore basins the Helmsdale Fault (Fig. 1), a structure exposed onshore with flanking northern Scotland suggest that a regional syn-depositional Jurassic sediments in its hanging wall. Caledonian control on the structure of these basins is Kinematically the Great Glen story was very convenient, far from proven, but conversely Mesozoic faults of because by transferring displacement along the length of the Gthe offshore set may extend onshore.
    [Show full text]