A Comparison of Classic Human Development Theorists and the Implications for a Model of Developmental Social Interaction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Comparison of Classic Human Development Theorists and the Implications for a Model of Developmental Social Interaction DOCUMENT RESUME ED 407 125 PS 025 355 AUTHOR 011hoff, Jim TITLE Human Development Theories: A Comparison of Classic Human Development Theorists and the Implications for a Model of Developmental Social Interaction. PUB DATE Jun 96 NOTE 20p. PUB TYPE Information Analyses (070) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Child Development; *Friendship; *Individual Development; *Interaction; *Interpersonal Relationship; Models; *Theories IDENTIFIERS *Developmental Theory; Erikson (Erik); Fowler (James); Freud (Sigmund); Kohlberg (Lawrence); Piaget (Jean); Selman (Robert) ABSTRACT This paper explores several theories of human development, with particular attention to the development of social interaction. Part 1 compares and contrasts major developmental theories, including those of Freud, Erikson, Piaget, Kohlberg, Kegan, Fowler, and Selman. From birth to 1 year, infants are laying the foundation that will guide their later social interactions. Between years 2 and 5 the beginnings of autonomy and the dominance of egocentrism can be observed. Children ages 6 to 12 show concrete thinking, the emergence of the self-concept, the freedom from impulses, and the need to be successful. Youth, age 13 and older, show many precursors of adult attitudes and behaviors, with identity formation as a major issue, the possibility of abstract thought, and the beliefs of the community as a source of strength. Part 2 applies those theories to the expanding understanding of friendship, emphasizing the friendships of school-age children. Self-acceptance plays a crucial role in social interaction development. In Stage 1 of friendships, birth to 2 years, children play in each other's presence rather than with each other. Stage 2, ages 2 to 5, involves quickly changing friendships, characterized by creativity, joint fantasy, and shared imagination. Stage 3, ages 6 to 12, entails the emergence of reciprocity, shared activities, increasing peer influence, and the separation of self-perception from social status. Stage 4, ages 13 and following, is characterized by the recognition that friends have rights and relationships that are independent of oneself, increasing stability of self-esteem, and true moral thinking. (Contains 14 references.)(KDFB) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. ******************************************************************************** U.S. DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION , Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) N@ This document has been reproduced as Deceived from the person or organization originating 0. 0 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this docu- ment do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. Human Development Theories A Comparison of Classic Human Development Theorists and the Implications for a Model of Developmental Social Interaction Jim 011hoff PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) I BEST COPY AVM RE 2 A Comparison of Classic Human Development Theorists and the Implications for a Model of Developmental Social Interaction Objective and Abstract This paper intends to explore the various theorists of human development, with particular attention to the development of social interaction. Part one compares and contrasts the majordevelopmental theories, while part 2 applies those theories to the expanding understandings of friendship. The friendships of the school-age child are emphasized. 2 3 ( TABLE OF CONTENTS Part 1: Human Development Overview of the Social Development of Children 4 Stage 1: Ages 0-1 5 Stage 2: Ages 2-5 5 Stage 3: Ages 6-12 6 Stage 4: Ages 13 and following 7 Conclusions about the theorists 8 Part 2: Developmental Social Interaction Overview of Social Interaction 9 The Development of Friendship 11 Stage 1: Ages 0-1 11 Stage 2: Ages 2-5 13 Stage 3: Ages 6-12 14 Stage 4: Ages 13 and following 15 Conclusions 16 Bibliography and References 16 © 1996 by Jim 011hoff 3 Overview of the Social Development of Children Social development can mean many things. Since most development is affected and effected by human interaction, I have included many theorists in the upcoming descriptions. Sigmund Freud (1937/1957) was the first major developmentalist. While his theories have generally lost acceptance, most other theories were built on his work. Erik Erikson (1963), Freud's student,described a life-stage theory that, while largely untestable, is still used today. Jean Piaget (Beard, 1969) identified a series foundational stages, universal and invariant, de- termining our ability to understand and work with concepts. Moral development, the brainchild of Lawrence Kohlberg (1984), defines our growing understandings of ethical situations. Robert Kegan (1982), with work based on Jane Loevinger, identifies the expanding ego and the relations with the world. James Fowler (1981) used the other developmentalists to bring to light a series of stages that identify how we think about issues of faith, spirituality, and our relationship with something larger. Robert Selman (Steuer, 1994) looked at the ways we take (and don't take) the perspectives of others into account when we think and act. Each theorist looks at different aspects of a whole reality. There is a remarkable amount of similarity between the theories. For the most part, the theories can be grouped into stages. What I have called the Four Stages of Childhood are: Stage 1 (ages 0-1); Stage 2 (ages 2-5); Stage 3 (ages 6-12); and Stage 4 (ages 13 and up). Growth and movement through the stages, occurs when the self is lost and a new self is cre- ated (Kegan, 1982). 4 5 BEST Cl PY AVM RE Stage 1: Ages 0-1 Stage 1 is largely a matter of bodily functions. Many of the theorists do not even mention these first two years, because they believe little social development can go on.Piaget labels this stage sensorimotor, learning only what can be achieved kinesthetically. Fowler passesthis stage off as undif- ferentiated, although giving a nod to Erikson's theory. Freud called this stage the oral stage, believing that the libido's needs are met orally. While Freud's theories are not very influential in and of themselves today, Freud identifiedwhat we would today call bonding. Erikson surely takes a lesson from Freud and identifies trust andmistrust as the key psychosocial crisis at this age. Even though infants are not social creatures (as weusually define social), they are laying foundations at this age that will guide social interactions for the restof their lives. Stage 2: Ages 2-5 Stage 2 begins the preoperational cognitions in the child. They are grossly egocentric in their ability to take another person's perspective. Kohlberg characterizes their moral thinking assimply a fear of punishment. We must be obedient or else. Erikson suggests it is here that they learn to be autonomous and independent. A paththat does not include this learning will be sown with shame, self-doubt, lack ofself-esteem, and a reluc- tance to risk or to take control of life. Freud identified this issueof learning to take control over one's 5 6 Maslow Age0 PsychosexualFreudOral SensorimotorCognitivePiaget Undifferenti-UltimacyFowlerated PerspectiveSelman FriendshipSelman S:0:Kegan Reflexes EgoNone IncorporativeKeganEgo KohlbergMoral EriksonTrustIdentityMistrust vs. MotivationSurvival 21 Anal Preopera-tional ProjectiveIntuitive- Egocentric 0:S: ReflexesImpulses Impulsive PunishmentObedience AutonomyShameDoubt & vs. Satisfaction 43 Phallic AssistanceMomentaryPlaymatesOne-Way vs.Initiative Guilt 65 Latency Concrete Mythic-Literal InformationalSocial FairTwo-Way, Weather 0:S: Impulses Wishes Imperial Instramental IndustryInferiority vs. Safety 87 ReflectiveSelf- 109 Mutual tuallyIntimate, Shared Mu- 1112 Convention-Social and 7 1413 Genital Early Formal ConventionalSynthetic- System FriendshipMature S:0: MutualityWishes Interpersonal Interpersonal RoleIdentitysion Confu- vs. BelongingLove and life, although he labeled it a function of toilet training. While the child in Stage 1 was controlled by impulses, the child in Stage 2 can take controlof the impulses--having impulses rather than be them (Kegan, 1982). The child is able torecognize things, but not apart from the perception of them. Stage 3: Ages 6-12 Piaget labels this stage concrete, describing a conceptual array unable to think in the abstract. Selective attention is given to that which is practical, concrete, black-and-white. Fowlerfollows this diagnosis in describing the mythic-literal child. Unable to think critically orreflectively, unable to ab- stract or separate symbols from meaning, the child isconfined to a form of logic that is parametered by wooden literalism. The self-concept emerges for the first time, a perception of oneself. But as Selman reminds us, at the early ages of this stage, there is as yet no shared reality--noability to construct another's point of view (Steuer, 1994). As the child moves toward the end of Stage 3, they enter what Selmancalls the mutual stage, and they begin to understand other perspectives. Kohlberg calls this the stageof instru- mental moral perception. While the child has an inability to understand and incorporateother per- spectives, they are drawn to an understanding of what is socially defined as "nice." The calmness of Freud's latency period
Recommended publications
  • Lawrence Kohlberg
    F. CLARK POWER LAWRENCE KOHLBERG The Vocation of a Moral Educator INTRODUCTION Shortly after Lawrence Kohlberg’s death, I (Power, 1991) noted that perhaps the most revealing statement about Kohlberg’s life was the epilogue to his first book, “Education for Justice: The Vocation of Janusz Korczak” (Kohlberg, 1984). In that Epilogue, which I helped him to compose, he re-told the story of Janusz Korczak, who gave up a lucrative medical practice to work as a moral educator in orphanages for Jewish and Christian children in Warsaw. That work led him to the Warsaw ghetto and finally to Treblinka, where he died with the orphans whom he refused to abandon. Throughout his life, Korczak had a remarkable sense of being called to care for poor and neglected children. In his early career as an author and a medical doctor, he dedicated himself to serving the poor. A champion of children’s rights, he left medicine for education in orphanages because he wanted to treat children’s souls. In establishing “Little Republics” in which children engaged in democratic governance, his orphanage schools resembled the just community programs that Kohlberg himself established. To claim that Kohlberg had a vocation to be a moral educator may strike many as puzzling or even preposterous. Kohlberg is best known for his pioneering contributions to developmental psychology, especially for his stages of moral development. Yet, as one who worked closely with Kohlberg during the latter part of his career, I believe that we cannot understand his life as a whole without considering his vision of moral education and the significance his work in the just community programs had for him.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development from Wikipedia
    ECS 188 First Readings Winter 2017 There are two readings for Wednesday. Both are edited versions of Wikipedia articles. The first reading adapted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Kohlberg's_stages_of_moral_development, and the second reading is adapted from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethics. You can find the references for the footnotes there. As you read the article about moral development please think about you answered the Heinz Dilemma in class, and in which stage did your justification lie. I do not plan on discussing our answers to the Heinz Dilemma any further in class. As you read the ethic article, please think about which Normative ethic appeals to you, and why. This will be one of the questions we will discuss on Wednesday. My goal for both of these readings is to help you realize what values you bring to your life, and our course in particular. Lawrence Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development from Wikipedia Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development constitute an adaptation of a psychological theory originally conceived by the Swiss psychologist Jean Piaget. Kohlberg began work on this topic while a psychology graduate student at the University of Chicago[1] in 1958, and expanded upon the theory throughout his life. The theory holds that moral reasoning, the basis for ethical behavior, has six identifiable developmental stages, each more adequate at responding to moral dilemmas than its predecessor.[2] Kohlberg followed the development of moral judgment far beyond the ages studied earlier by Piaget,[3] who also claimed that logic and morality develop through constructive stages.[2] Expanding on Piaget's work, Kohlberg determined that the process of moral development was principally concerned with justice, and that it continued throughout the individual's lifetime,[4] a notion that spawned dialogue on the philosophical implications of such research.[5][6] The six stages of moral development are grouped into three levels: pre-conventional morality, conventional morality, and post-conventional morality.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Application of the Concepts of Karen Horney in Leadership Development Within the National Management Association of the Boeing Company
    Pepperdine University Pepperdine Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations 2010 A study of the application of the concepts of Karen Horney in leadership development within the National Management Association of the Boeing company Frank Z. Nunez Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd Recommended Citation Nunez, Frank Z., "A study of the application of the concepts of Karen Horney in leadership development within the National Management Association of the Boeing company" (2010). Theses and Dissertations. 90. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/etd/90 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Pepperdine Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Pepperdine Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. Pepperdine University Graduate School of Education and Psychology A STUDY OF THE APPLICATION OF THE CONCEPTS OF KAREN HORNEY IN LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE NATIONAL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION OF THE BOEING COMPANY A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Education in Organizational Change by Frank V. Nunez November, 2010 Susan Nero, Ph.D.– Dissertation Chairperson This dissertation, written by Frank V. Nunez under the guidance of a Faculty Committee and approved by its members, has been submitted to and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF EDUCATION Doctoral Committee: Susan Nero, Ph.D., Chairperson Rogelio Martinez, Ed.D. Kent Rhodes, Ph.D. © Copyright by Frank V. Nunez (2010) All Rights Reserved TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development Working As A
    Kohlberg’s Stages of Moral Development Working as a developmental psychologist then turning his interest to the field of moral education, Lawrence Kohlberg became to be well known for his theory of moral development. His theory spurred the interest of the psychological community on moral development (Nucci, 2002). His ideas were influenced by Jean Piaget, John Dewey, and James Mark Baldwin. He argued that experiences shape children’s understandings of moral concepts such as justice, rights, equality, and human welfare. Kohlberg developed his theory from the research that he conducted at Harvard’s Center for Moral Education (Barger, 2000). To evaluate the moral stages, Kohlberg made a series of moral dilemmas that pit one moral value against another (Kalat, 2002). He observed the explanations, not the choices, that the subject made. The explanations were used to match the subject to one of Kohlberg’s stages. Kohlberg’s theory of levels and stages of moral reasoning is supported by findings from longitudinal and cross-cultural research. Kohlberg divided moral development into six distinguished stages which can be identified into three major levels. The first level is the level of pre-conventional morality. The first stage is defined by punishment and obedience. This stage is characterized by the elementary school level (Barger, 2000). People follow the rules of authority because they are afraid of punishment, which is related to Piaget’s identification of the stage of ego-centrism (Nucci, 2002). In this stage, people consider something to be bad if it is related with punishment. In contrast, if something brings rewards, it is considered as good.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Towards a Deeper Understanding of Epistemic Beliefs Development
    1 Towards a deeper understanding of epistemic beliefs development: The contribution of threshold concepts and implications for understanding the ways of knowing and being of experienced educational developers Julie A. Timmermans Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology McGill University, Montreal November 2011 A dissertation submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Educational Psychology © Julie A. Timmermans 2011 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I have had the privilege of great company for the journey of completing this dissertation. My life has been enriched in so many ways by knowing and working with my supervisor, Dr. Cynthia Weston. Cynthia, my graduate school experience has been stimulating, exciting, and fulfilling thanks to your expert guidance. Your thoughtful questions and feedback have encouraged me to clarify my assumptions and explore new directions for my thinking. I am also deeply grateful for your support of my decisions to make time for (new) life during my studies. You are a model of intelligence, integrity, and grace, and I would be honoured if, one day, someone were to compare me to you. I am grateful to Dr. Alenoush Saroyan for inspiring me to do my best work. Alenoush, you are a model of an intelligent, articulate, and thoughtful professor. Your expert teaching and advising have encouraged rigorous and creative thinking. I came away from your courses feeling transformed as a scholar. I am also deeply grateful for the steadfast support you have shown for my work throughout my doctoral studies, supporting my grant proposals and fellowship applications. It is an honour to have Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Piaget, Kohlberg, Gilligan, and Others on Moral Development
    7. Piaget, Kohlberg, Gilligan, and Others on governing the game of marbles fulfill all the defining conditions of a moral system. The rules control how individuals behave toward Moral Development one another in terms of the actions which comprise the game, they Copyright 2005, 2006 J. S. Fleming, PhD determine individual and property rights, and they are a cultural _______ product which has been passed down from generation to generation . The rules have been developed largely by children. When confronted with a group of parents who asked me “How can we help make our children virtuous?” I had to Therefore, the child’s conception of the game . is subject to little answer as Socrates, “You must think I am very fortunate to adult influence.” know how virtue is acquired. The fact is that far from knowing (As an interesting side note it should be mentioned that whether it can be taught, I have no idea what virtue really is.”. It appears, then, that we must either be totally silent about studying game strategies to learn about behavior and morality is moral education or else speak to the nature of virtue. now very much an accepted part of research in psychology and –Lawrence Kohlberg 1 economics. Game theory can be used to simulate competitive or ________ cooperative conditions in which either selfish strategies benefit only the individual, or cooperative strategies can mutually benefit all parties, as in Robert Trivers (1971) studies of reciprocal I. Piaget on Moral Development altruism – see Robert Wright’s, 1994, The Moral Animal for other game theoretical studies of human behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Seven Kohlberg's Stages of Moral Development
    W.C. Crain. (1985). Theories of Development. Prentice-Hall. pp. 118-136. CHAPTER SEVEN KOHLBERG'S STAGES OF MORAL DEVELOPMENT BIOGRAPHICAL INTRODUCTION An outstanding example of research in the Piagetian tradition is the work of Lawrence Kohlberg. Kohlberg has focused on moral development and has proposed a stage theory of moral thinking which goes well beyond Piaget's initial formulations. Kohlberg, who was born in 1927, grew up in Bronxville, New York, and attended the Andover Academy in Massachusetts, a private high school for bright and usually wealthy students. He did not go immediately to college, but instead went to help the Israeli cause, in which he was made the Second Engineer on an old freighter carrying refugees from parts of Europe to Israel. After this, in 1948, he enrolled at the University of Chicago, where he scored so high on admission tests that he had to take only a few courses to earn his bachelor's degree. This he did in one year. He stayed on at Chicago for graduate work in psychology, at first thinking he would become a clinical psychologist. However, he soon became interested in Piaget and began interviewing children and adolescents on moral issues. The result was his doctoral dissertation (1958a), the first rendition of his new stage theory. Kohlberg is an informal, unassuming man who also is a true scholar; he has thought long and deeply about a wide range of issues in both psychology and philosophy and has done much to help others appreciate the wisdom of many of the "old psychologists," such as Rousseau, John Dewey, and James Mark Baldwin.
    [Show full text]
  • Educational Learning Theories Molly Zhou Dalton State College, [email protected]
    GALILEO, University System of Georgia GALILEO Open Learning Materials Education Open Textbooks Education Spring 2015 Educational Learning Theories Molly Zhou Dalton State College, [email protected] David Brown Dalton State College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://oer.galileo.usg.edu/education-textbooks Part of the Educational Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Zhou, Molly and Brown, David, "Educational Learning Theories" (2015). Education Open Textbooks. Book 1. http://oer.galileo.usg.edu/education-textbooks/1 This Open Textbook is brought to you for free and open access by the Education at GALILEO Open Learning Materials. It has been accepted for inclusion in Education Open Textbooks by an authorized administrator of GALILEO Open Learning Materials. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Open Textbook Dalton State College UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA Molly Zhou, David Brown Educational Learning Theories Educational Learning Theories Molly Zhou Dalton State College David Brown Dalton State College December, 2014 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. 2 Permission for Use Acknowledgements Grateful acknowledgement is made to the following sources for Permission for Use by authors or proper copy right holders: Chapter 1 Source: Standridge, M. (2002). Behaviorism. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieve from http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/ Chapter 2 Source: Wood, K. C., Smith, H., & Grossniklaus, D. (2001). Piaget's stages of cognitive development. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisdom Development of Leaders: a Constructive Developmental Perspective
    WISDOM DEVELOPMENT OF LEADERS: A CONSTRUCTIVE DEVELOPMENTAL PERSPECTIVE John E. Barbuto, Jr. California State University at Fullerton, USA Michele L. Millard Creighton University, USA This paper proposes a framework linking constructive development theory and the development of wisdom in leaders. Kegan’s (1982) theory of constructive development – consisting of five stages (Level 1 – Impulsive; Level 2 – Instrumental; Level 3 – Interpersonal; Level 4 – Institutional; Level 5 – Inter- individual) – is linked with the development of wisdom in leaders. A reciprocal relationship between constructive development and wisdom development is proposed. As leaders increase their capacity for constructive development, they will concurrently develop wisdom. Future research and potential implications of this proposed framework are also discussed. he concept of wisdom has gained increased attention in the literature with attempts to define, operationalize and measure this complex and multidimensional construct T (Webster, 2007; Sternberg, 2007). The concept of wisdom, explored from both explicit and implicit perspectives, has evolved from work in the conceptual realm as well as empirical research. Conceptual studies have explored wisdom using the constructs of compassion (Ardelt, 2004), procedural knowledge and life span contextualism (Baltes & Staudinger, 2000), mental attention and consciousness (Pascual-Leone, 2000), seeing through illusion (McKee & Barber, 1999) and ability to find deeper meanings (Sternberg, 2005a). Empirical studies have complemented this research by exploring constructs of moral reasoning (Pasupathi & Staudinger, 2001), life experience analysis (Bluck & Glück, 2004), integration and embodiment (Yang, 2008b), age and performance (Mickler & Staudinger, 2008), self-transcendence (Le, 2008), scale development (Greene & Brown, 2009), wisdom-related performance (Glück & Baltes, 2006), and age and culture (Takashashi & Overton, 2002).
    [Show full text]
  • HDC 6130 Developmental Counseling Psychology
    VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY PEABODY COLLEGE OF EDUCATION Department of Human and Organizational Development Human Development Counseling Program Instructor: Andy Finch HDC 6130: Developmental Counseling Psychology COURSE DESCRIPTION Developmental Counseling Psychology is a course intended to give students a broad overview of human nature/behavior through knowledge of life span developmental theory, personality development, modern and postmodern approaches to the study of human nature/behavior, and learning theory. Throughout the course, close attention will be given to human ecology or those social/historical/cultural/environmental forces furthering or impeding development. The course approaches foundational works of developmental theory through both a chronological and conceptual complexity progression. Rather than examining human development from the perspective of the human life span, this course will follow the evolution of developmental theory itself as it pertains to the human life span. Learning any new field involves learning its vernacular, and thus each class will contain a lesson in language. The semester is divided into four parts: foundations of developmental counseling, theories with a biological-maturation emphasis, theories with a cognitive-structural emphasis, and theories with a social-contextual emphasis. PREREQUISITES There are no prerequisites for this course. This is a core requirement for all HDC students, and it is designed for master’s-level work. TEXTBOOKS AND MATERIALS Required textbook. Estimated cost ranges are based on prices for used copies found online. Additional readings will be posted in electronic reserves. Kegan, R. (1994). In over our heads: The mental demands of modern life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ISBN: 9780674445888. ESTIMATED COST: $12.00–$30.00 Siegel, D.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Robert Kegan's Orders of Consciousness
    How Consciousness Develops Adequate Complexity to Deal With a Complex World: The Subject-Object Theory of Robert Kegan Robert Kegan’s (1982, 1994) theory of adult development examines and describes the way humans grow and change over the course of their adult lives. This is a constructive-developmental theory ecause it is concerned both with the construction of an individual’s understanding of reality and with the development of that construction to more complex levels over time. Kegan proposes five distinct stages—or orders of mind—through which people may develop. His theory is based on his ideas of “transformation” to qualitatively different stages of meaning making. Kegan explains that transformation is different thatn learning new information or skills. New information may add to the things a person knows, but transformation changes the way he or she knows those things. Transformation, according to Kegan, is about changing the very form of the meaning-making system – making it more complex, more able to deal with multiple demands and uncertainty. Transformation occurs when someone is newly able to step back and reflect on something and make decisions about it. For Kegan (1994), transformative learning happens when someone changes “not just the way he behaves, not just the way he feels, but the way he knows—not just what he knows, but the way he knows.” (p/ 17) Subject and Object Of vital importance in Kegan’s discussion of transformation is the distinction between that which is Subject and that which is Object. Kegan asserts that aspects of our meaning constructing that are Subject are by definition experienced as invisible, simply a part of the self; these things cannot be seen because they are held internally.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Smith March 25.Pdf
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Adult Education THE MEANINGS OF TEACHING FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF EXEMPLARY AND EXPERIENCED TEACHERS A Dissertation in Adult Education by Janice E. Smith 2011 Janice E. Smith Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Education May 2011 ii The dissertation of Janice E. Smith was reviewed and approved* by the following: Patricia A. Cranton Professor of Adult Education Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Edward W. Taylor Professor of Adult Education Denise G. Meister Associate Professor of Education Gina Brelsford Assistant Professor of Psychology Gary Kuhne In Charge of Graduate Programs in Adult Education *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT A qualitative narrative inquiry that explores the meaning of teaching and the development of that meaning throughout the career of exemplary and experienced teachers in kindergarten- through-twelfth-grade (K-12) public schools was conducted. Exemplary teachers were operationalized in this study as any of the 12 teachers chosen each year by the state of Pennsylvania as finalists for Teacher of the Year. The research questions that guided this narrative inquiry are: Which, if any, of Kegan’s (1982, 1994) developmental plateaus can be identified as current or prior meaning-making systems for these exemplary and experienced teachers? What are the current meanings of teaching for these exemplary and experienced teachers? If these meanings have changed, what was the process of change as the meanings of teaching changed throughout their career? Was this process of change developmental? What contextual influences have supported or hindered the teachers’ meaning-making? Literature that explores constructive-developmental theory, connects it to adult education, and advocates a context for learning with an appropriate mix of challenge and support is reviewed.
    [Show full text]