DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Letter DOJ Denaturalization Stateags

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Letter DOJ Denaturalization Stateags Bob Ferguson ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON PO Box 40100 • Olympia WA 98504-0100 • (360) 753-6200 July 2, 2020 Attorney General William Barr U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Joseph H. Hunt Assistant Attorney General, Civil Division U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Dear Attorney General Barr and Assistant Attorney General Hunt: We write to express our concern about the creation of a Denaturalization Section within the Office of Immigration Litigation at the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).1 We are aware of the history of denaturalization work by DOJ, but are alarmed at the lack of transparency as to the purported impetus for directing additional resources toward stripping individuals of citizenship. This lack of transparency has stoked fear in immigrant communities. We request that you provide clarity regarding why the Denaturalization Section was created, explain who DOJ has in mind when it says it will seek to denaturalize “other fraudsters,” and make public any and all guidance developed for or utilized by the Section to ensure denaturalization is only pursued in appropriate circumstances. Citizenship is “essential to the realization of basic human rights.”2 Naturalized citizens enjoy all of the privileges and responsibilities of citizenship, including the right to vote in federal, state, and local elections, the right and responsibility of jury service, the right to travel with a U.S. passport, and legal protection from deportation proceedings. The United States has over 21 million naturalized citizens3 and 49% of immigrants in Washington State are naturalized U.S. 1 U.S. Department of Justice, “The Department of Justice Creates Section Dedicated to Denaturalization Cases,” February 26, 2020, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-creates-section-dedicated- denaturalization-cases (last accessed July 1, 2020). 2 Open Society Justice Initiative, “Unmaking Americans: Insecure Citizenship in the United States,” September 2019, p.6, https://www.justiceinitiative.org/uploads/e05c542e-0db4-40cc-a3ed-2d73abcfd37f/unmaking- americans-insecure-citizenship-in-the-united-states-report-20190916.pdf (last accessed July 1, 2020). 3 Zong, J., Batalova, J. & Burrows, M., “Frequently Requested Statistics on Immigrants and Immigration in the United States,” Migration Policy Inst., Feb. 8, 2018, https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/frequently- requested-statistics-immigrants-and-immigration-united-states-7 (last accessed July 1, 2020). Attorney General of Washington July 2, 2020 Page 2 citizens.4 This new initiative could have devastating consequences for our constituents, our states, and our communities if it is misused as a tool to threaten communities of color or religious minorities with the loss of citizenship. In a 2019 report, the Open Society Justice Initiative found that “forty-nine percent of all civil denaturalization cases filed target citizens whose country of origin is a ‘special interest country,’ an evolving list compiled by the U.S. government that includes India, Nigeria, Bangladesh, and Pakistan, among others.”5 We are highly concerned about repeated actions by the federal government that threaten the safety of immigrant communities, particularly immigrants of color, from its decision to cancel the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) Program to its issuance of the Public Charge Rule. Expanding denaturalization efforts is consistent with this pattern. We are concerned that, without clear policies in place, federal officials in this proposed denaturalization section will disproportionately pursue expanded denaturalization authority in communities of color already targeted repeatedly by the current Administration. We urge you to publicly take immediate steps to prevent this from occurring. We request that the DOJ immediately disclose publicly any internal guidance or other documents and memoranda governing DOJ staff’s denaturalization work, including policies DOJ has put into place to ensure that this new program will not be used as a tool to advance purely political and anti-immigrant policy goals. We call on DOJ to take clear, transparent steps to reassure the public, and vulnerable immigrant communities in particular, that the extraordinary step of denaturalization is being reserved for the most serious cases: terrorists and other national security threats, war criminals, human rights violators, and sex offenders.6 This transparency is essential to provide a measure of stability and certainty to immigrant communities. Sincerely, Bob Ferguson William Tong Washington State Attorney General Connecticut Attorney General 4 American Immigration Council, “Immigrants in Washington,” 2020, p. 1, https://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/sites/default/files/research/immigrants_in_washington.pdf (last accessed July 1, 2020). 5 Open Society Justice Initiative, “Unmaking Americans: Insecure Citizenship in the United States,” September 2019, p.11, https://www.justiceinitiative.org/uploads/e05c542e-0db4-40cc-a3ed- 2d73abcfd37f/unmaking-americans-insecure-citizenship-in-the-united-states-report-20190916.pdf (last accessed July 1, 2020). 6 U.S. Department of Justice, “The Department of Justice Creates Section Dedicated to Denaturalization Cases,” February 26, 2020, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/department-justice-creates-section-dedicated- denaturalization-cases (last accessed July 1, 2020). Attorney General of Washington July 2, 2020 Page 3 Kathleen Jennings Karl A. Racine Delaware Attorney General District of Columbia Attorney General Clare E. Connors Tom Miller Hawaii Attorney General Iowa Attorney General Aaron Frey Brian E. Frosh Maine Attorney General Maryland Attorney General Maura Healey Dana Nessel Massachusetts Attorney General Michigan Attorney General Aaron D. Ford Keith Ellison Nevada Attorney General Minnesota Attorney General Gurbir S. Grewal Hector Balderas New Jersey Attorney General New Mexico Attorney General Attorney General of Washington July 2, 2020 Page 4 Letitia James Ellen F. Rosenblum New York Attorney General Oregon Attorney General Josh Shapiro Thomas J. Donovan, Jr. Pennsylvania Attorney General Vermont Attorney General Mark R. Herring Joshua L. Kaul Virginia Attorney General Wisconsin Attorney General .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • March 24, 2021 Via First Class and Electronic Mail Jack Dorsey Chief
    OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CONNECTICUT william tong attorney general March 24, 2021 Via First Class and Electronic Mail Jack Dorsey Chief Executive Officer Twitter, Inc. 1355 Market St. San Francisco, CA 94103 Mark Zuckerberg Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Facebook, Inc. 1 Hacker Way Menlo Park, CA 94025 Re: Vaccine Disinformation Dear Messrs. Dorsey and Zuckerberg: As Attorneys General committed to protecting the safety and well-being of the residents of our states, we write to express our concern about the use of your platforms to spread fraudulent information about coronavirus vaccines and to seek your cooperation in curtailing the dissemination of such information. The people and groups spreading falsehoods and misleading Americans about the safety of coronavirus vaccines are threatening the health of our communities, slowing progress in getting our residents protected from the virus, and undermining economic recovery in our states. As safe and effective vaccines become available, the end of this pandemic is in sight. This end, however, depends on the widespread acceptance of these vaccines as safe and effective. Unfortunately, misinformation disseminated via your platforms has increased vaccine hesitancy, which will slow economic recovery and, more importantly, ultimately cause even more unnecessary deaths. A small group of individuals use your platforms to downplay the dangers of COVID-19 and spread misinformation about the safety of vaccines. These individuals lack medical expertise and are often motivated by financial interests. According to a recent report by the Center for Countering Digital Hate1, so-called “anti-vaxxer” accounts on Facebook, YouTube, Instagram, and Twitter reach more than 59 million followers.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Statement by Law Enforcement Leaders on Protecting Voters
    Joint Statement by Law Enforcement Leaders on Protecting Voters As law enforcement leaders, elected prosecutors, and chief legal officers of our jurisdictions, we know that the right to vote is fundamental to our democracy and our identity as Americans, regardless of political affiliation. It is a constitutional right and, ultimately, a public trust and safety issue. Public trust in democracy, the rule of law, and the integrity of our government is integral to public safety. When one system is attacked and fails, it compromises the ability of all systems to function, including our criminal justice system. And when communities do not trust us, we cannot effectively keep them safe. Efforts to interfere with the United States Postal Service imperil the democratic process and erode confidence in the integrity of all government systems. Within the context of a pandemic, we should already be deeply concerned that crowds at polling places will endanger our residents. And now, recent threats and intimidation tactics, including deploying law enforcement to police the polls, raises the prospect of voter intimidation, damaging bonds of trust between law enforcement and communities they serve. This is playing out at a time when the number of Americans expressing confidence in law enforcement has fallen to an all-time low. That is why, as leaders charged with protecting public safety, we call for free and fair elections and condemn efforts to interfere with the Postal Service and undermine the voting process. It is more important than ever that we protect the integrity of our democracy, and, in the era of COVID-19, the ability to vote by mail is essential to protecting our cherished democratic process.
    [Show full text]
  • Declaration of Cameron R. Azari, Esq. on Implementation of Settlement Notice Plan in the United States District Court for the C
    Case 2:14-cv-01855-GW-GJS Document 123 Filed 05/19/20 Page 1 of 47 Page ID #:6092 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DONALD M. LUSNAK, on behalf of ) himself and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No.: CV 14-1855-GW-GJSx ) v. ) DECLARATION OF CAMERON R. ) AZARI, ESQ. ON BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; and DOES ) IMPLEMENTATION OF 1 through 10, inclusive, ) SETTLEMENT NOTICE PLAN ) Defendants. ) ) I, Cameron Azari, declare as follows : 1. My name is Cameron R. Azari, Esq. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein, and I believe them to be true and correct. 2. I am a nationally recognized expert in the field of legal notice, and I have served as an expert in dozens of federal and state cases involving class action notice plans. 3. I am the Director of Legal Notice for Hilsoft Notifications, a business unit of Epiq Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc. (“Epiq”) that specializes in designing, developing, analyzing and implementing, large-scale legal notific atio n plans. 4. This declaration will describe the implementation of the Settlement Notice Plan (“Notice Plan” or “Plan”) and notices (the “Notice” or “Notices”) for the recent settlement in Lusnak v. Bank of America, N.A. et al., Case No. 14-1855-GW-GJSx in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. I previously executed my Declaration of Cameron R. Azari, Esq, Epiq Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc. on December 27, 2019 (Dkt. 113), in DECLARATION OF CAMERON R.
    [Show full text]
  • AG Alliance 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting Final Agenda * All Times EDT
    AG Alliance 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting Final Agenda * All times EDT THURSDAY 7/16: 11:30am – 2:30pm EDT (2 panels) • 11:30am – 12:30pm EDT: COVID-19 Impacts and Adaptations by Innovators and Industry, Consumer Warnings and State Government Oversight Roles (60 min) Moderator: Ellen Rosenblum, Attorney General, Oregon Attorney General’s Office o Lev Kubiak, Vice President and Deputy Chief Security Officer, Pfizer o Haley Schaffer, Senior Legal Counsel, 3M o Speaker TBD, Lowe’s Summary: Price gouging laws typically apply to prices of essential items needed in an emergency. Price gouging occurs when a seller increases the price of goods, services or commodities to a level much higher than is considered reasonable or fair. Hear how Attorneys General and industry continue working together to identify and stop this practice during the pandemic. The internet has driven a dramatic increase in the expansion of the counterfeit drug market. Learn about the low- risk/high-reward nature of this criminal industry, and how regulators are stepping up to combat it. • 1pm-2:30pm EDT: COVID-19 Price Gouging Issues (90 min) Moderator: William Tong, Attorney General, Connecticut o Clayton Friedman, Partner, Crowell & Moring LLP o Paul Singer, Senior Counsel for Public Protection, Texas AGO o Victoria Butler, Director, Consumer Protection Division, Florida AGO o Nicholas Trutanich, US Attorney, District of Nevada Summary: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, Attorneys General have been on the watch for price gouging. As a result, several large companies have become subject to Attorney General investigations, and others have been named defendants in class action lawsuits brought by unhappy consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • US Pennsylvania State Attorney General, AG Shapiro
    Stay up to date with information about COVID-19. Click here Share Press Release March 25, 2020 | Topic: Consumers HARRISBURG― Attorney General Josh Shapiro today issued a letter with co-leading Attorneys General Hector Balderas, William Tong, and T.J. Donovan, and 29 of their Attorneys General colleagues, requesting that Amazon, Facebook, Ebay, Walmart, and Craigslist more rigorously monitor price gouging practices by online sellers using their services. “Ripping off consumers by jacking up prices in the middle of a public emergency is against the law and online resellers like Amazon must join in this ght,” said Attorney General Josh Shapiro in his letter. “These companies form the backbone of online retail and have an obligation to stop illegal price gouging now and put strong practices into place to stop it from happening in the future.” “Americans are already worried about their health and the health of their loved ones during this pandemic. They shouldn’t also have to worry about being ripped off on the critical supplies they need to get through it,” said Adam Garber, U.S. PIRG Education Fund Consumer Watchdog. “We’re grateful for the leadership of Pennsylvania Attorney General Shapiro and 33 Attorneys General who joined him in calling for more robust protections on these online marketplaces during this crisis.” The letter lists several examples of price-gouging on these marketplace platforms, all of which took place only in March: on Craigslist, a two-liter bottle of hand sanitizer was being sold for $250; on Facebook Marketplace, an eight-ounce bottle was being sold for $40; and on Ebay, packs of face masks were being sold for $40 and $50.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2, 2021
    September 2, 2021 The Honorable Chuck Schumer The Honorable Mitch McConnell Senate Majority Leader Senate Minority Leader 322 Hart Senate Office Building 317 Russell Senate Office Building United States Senate United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy 1236 Longworth House Office Building 2468 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Leader Schumer, Leader McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, and Leader McCarthy, As our jurisdictions’ Attorneys General, we are responsible for protecting the health, safety, and well-being of our residents. Although our jurisdictions vary in size, geography, and political composition, we are united in our commitment to an effective criminal justice system that safeguards the communities of our states. To that end, a bipartisan coalition of Attorneys General supported the passage of the First Step Act of 2018—landmark legislation that brought common sense improvements to myriad aspects of the criminal justice system. Central to these reforms was retroactive relief for individuals sentenced under the discredited 100-to-1 crack-to-powder cocaine ratio that Congress abolished in 2010. Following the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Terry v. United States, however, the lowest level crack cocaine offenders remain categorically ineligible for resentencing. We write today to urge Congress to amend the First Step Act, and to clarify that its retroactive relief applies to all individuals sentenced under the prior regime. Congress enacted the historic First Step Act of 2018 to modernize the criminal justice system, implementing comprehensive reform in areas such as corrections, criminal charging, community re-entry, and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • January 12, 2021 the Honorable Jeffrey A. Rosen Acting Attorney
    January 12, 2021 The Honorable Jeffrey A. Rosen Acting Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW Washington, DC 20530 Dear Acting Attorney General Rosen: We, the undersigned state attorneys general, are committed to the protection of public safety, the rule of law, and the U.S. Constitution. We are appalled that on January 6, 2021, rioters invaded the U.S. Capitol, defaced the building, and engaged in a range of criminal conduct—including unlawful entry, theft, destruction of U.S. government property, and assault. Worst of all, the riot resulted in the deaths of individuals, including a U.S. Capitol Police officer, and others were physically injured. Beyond these harms, the rioters’ actions temporarily paused government business of the most sacred sort in our system—certifying the result of a presidential election. We all just witnessed a very dark day in America. The events of January 6 represent a direct, physical challenge to the rule of law and our democratic republic itself. Together, we will continue to do our part to repair the damage done to institutions and build a more perfect union. As Americans, and those charged with enforcing the law, we must come together to condemn lawless violence, making clear that such actions will not be allowed to go unchecked. Thank you for your consideration of and work on this crucial priority. Sincerely Phil Weiser Karl A. Racine Colorado Attorney General District of Columbia Attorney General Lawrence Wasden Douglas Peterson Idaho Attorney General Nebraska Attorney General Steve Marshall Clyde “Ed” Sniffen, Jr. Alabama Attorney General Acting Alaska Attorney General Mark Brnovich Leslie Rutledge Arizona Attorney General Arkansas Attorney General Xavier Becerra William Tong California Attorney General Connecticut Attorney General Kathleen Jennings Ashley Moody Delaware Attorney General Florida Attorney General Christopher M.
    [Show full text]
  • June 18, 2021 Honorable Merrick B. Garland Attorney General of The
    DANA NESSEL MICHIGAN ATTORNEY GENERAL June 18, 2021 Honorable Merrick B. Garland Attorney General of the United States U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Lisa O. Monaco Deputy Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530-0001 Re: Department of Justice’s interpretation of Wire Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1084 Dear Attorney General Garland and Deputy Attorney General Monaco: We, the undersigned State Attorneys General, are seeking clarity and finality from the Department of Justice regarding its interpretation of the Wire Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1084. As you may be aware, 25 State Attorneys General wrote to your predecessors on March 21, 2019 to express our strong objection to the Office of Legal Counsel’s (OLC’s) Opinion “Reconsidering Whether the Wire Act Applies to Non- Sports Gambling,” which reversed the Department’s seven-year-old position that the Wire Act applied only to sports betting. Many States relied on that former position to allow online gaming to proceed. Since that letter, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld a challenge to the new OLC Opinion, holding that the Wire Act applies only to sports betting. After the First Circuit decision, it is vital that States get clarity on the Department’s position going forward. States and industry participants need to understand what their rights are under the law without having to file suit in every federal circuit, and finality is needed so the industry may confidently invest in new products and features without fear of criminal prosecution.
    [Show full text]
  • Letters to the U.S. House and U.S. Senate
    April 29, 2021 Senator Patrick Leahy Senator Richard Shelby Chair Ranking Member U.S. Senate Committee U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations on Appropriations 437 Russell Building 304 Russell Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Senator Jeanne Shaheen Senator Jerry Moran Chair Ranking Member U.S. Senate Committee on U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations Appropriations Subcommittee on Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, Commerce, Justice, Science, & Related Agencies & Related Agencies 506 Hart Building 521 Dirksen Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Re: State Attorneys General Support the Legal Services Corporation Dear Chair DeLauro, Ranking Member Granger, Chair Cartwright, and Ranking Member Aderholt, As state attorneys general, we respectfully request that you consider robust funding for the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) in the Fiscal Year 2022 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations bill. Since 1974, LSC funding has provided vital and diverse legal assistance to low-income Americans including victims of natural disasters, survivors of domestic violence, families facing foreclosure, and veterans accessing earned benefits. Today, LSC also provides essential support for struggling families affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. As the single largest funder of civil legal aid in the United States, LSC-funded programs touch every corner of our country with more than 800 offices and a presence in every congressional district. LSC funding has also fostered public-private partnerships between legal aid organizations and private firms and attorneys across the country which donate their time and skills to assist residents in need. Nationwide, 132 independent nonprofit legal aid programs rely on this federal funding to provide services to nearly two million of our constituents on an annual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens United's
    No. 08-205 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- CITIZENS UNITED, Appellant, vs. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION, Appellee. --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- On Appeal From The United States District Court For The District Of Columbia --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- BRIEF OF THE STATES OF MONTANA, ARIZONA, CONNECTICUT, FLORIDA, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, IOWA, KANSAS, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSISSIPPI, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH DAKOTA, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, SOUTH DAKOTA, TENNESSEE, VERMONT, WEST VIRGINIA, AS AMICI CURIAE ADDRESSING JUNE 29, 2009 ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING AND SUPPORTING NEITHER PARTY --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- STEVE BULLOCK TERRY GODDARD Montana Attorney General Arizona Attorney General ANTHONY JOHNSTONE* MARY R. O’GRADY Solicitor Solicitor General MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ARIZONA ATTORNEY P.O. Box 201401 GENERAL’S OFFICE Helena, MT 59620 1275 W. Washington Telephone: (406) 444-2026 Phoenix, AZ 85007 Telephone: (602) 542-8986 *Counsel of Record [Additional Counsel On Inside Cover] ================================================================ COCKLE LAW BRIEF PRINTING CO. (800) 225-6964 OR CALL COLLECT (402) 342-2831 RICHARD BLUMENTAL MARTHA COAKLEY Attorney General of Attorney General of
    [Show full text]
  • Clothes Washers and Dryers
    IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT STATES OF CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, ILLINOIS, MAINE, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, Docket No. NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, NEVADA, OREGON, VERMONT, and WASHINGTON, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, and the CITY OF NEW YORK, Petitioners, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY and DAN BROUILLETTE, Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy, Respondents. PETITION FOR REVIEW Pursuant to Section 336(b)(1) of the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, 42 U.S.C. § 6306(b)(1), Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 702, and Rule 15 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, the States of California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington; the Commonwealth of Massachusetts; the District of Columbia; and the City of New York hereby petition this Court for review of a final action taken by the respondents, published at 85 Fed. Reg. 81,359 (December 16, 2020), entitled “Energy Conservation Program for Appliance Standards: Establishment of New Product Classes for Residential Clothes Washers and Consumer Clothes Dryers.” A copy of the final rule is attached. Petitioners seek a determination by the Court that the rule is unlawful and must be vacated. 1 Dated: January 19, 2020 Respectfully Submitted, FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA XAVIER BECERRA Attorney General of California DAVID ZONANA Supervising Deputy Attorney General /s/ Somerset Perry SOMERSET PERRY JAMIE JEFFERSON ANTHONY AUSTIN Deputy Attorneys General Office of the Attorney General 1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor Oakland, CA 94612 Tel: (510) 879-0852 Email: [email protected] 2 FOR THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT FOR THE STATE OF ILLINOIS WILLIAM TONG KWAME RAOUL Attorney General Attorney General /s/ William Tong /s/ Gerald Karr ROBERT SNOOK GERALD KARR MATTHEW I.
    [Show full text]
  • November 13, 2020 Via E-Mail and U.S. Mail the Honorable William
    November 13, 2020 Via E-mail and U.S. Mail The Honorable William Barr U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 [email protected] [email protected] Dear Attorney General Barr: The 2020 election is over, and the people of the United States have decisively chosen a new President. It is in this context that we express our deep concerns about your November 9 memorandum entitled “Post-Voting Election Irregularity Inquiry.” As the chief legal and law enforcement officers of our respective states, we recognize and appreciate the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) important role in some instances in prosecuting criminal election fraud. Yet we are alarmed by your reversal of long-standing DOJ policy that has served to facilitate that function without allowing it to interfere with election results or create the appearance of political involvement in elections. Your directive to U.S. Attorneys this week threatens to upset that critical balance, with potentially corrosive effects on the electoral processes at the heart of our democracy. State and local officials conduct our elections. Enforcement of the election laws falls primarily to the states and their subdivisions. If there has been fraud in the electoral process, the perpetrators should be brought to justice. We are committed to helping to do so. But, so far, no plausible allegations of widespread misconduct have arisen that would either impact the outcome in any state or warrant a change in DOJ policy. For 40 years, the Department of Justice has followed a policy that recognizes the states’ principal responsibility for overseeing the election process.
    [Show full text]