DOCSLIB.ORG

Amicus Brief

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amicus Brief Case 21-888, Document 49, 07/28/2021, 3146569, Page1 of 32 In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit New York Legal Assistance Group, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Miguel A. Cardona, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of Education, and United States Department of Education, Defendants-Appellees. On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York BRIEF OF MASSACHUSETTS, CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MAINE, MARYLAND, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, NORTH CAROLINA, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, VIRGINIA, WASHINGTON, AND WISCONSIN AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT MAURA HEALEY ROB BONTA Attorney General of Massachusetts Attorney General of California Yael Shavit Nicklas A. Akers Miranda Cover Senior Assistant Attorney General Max Weinstein Bernard A. Eskandari Assistant Attorneys General Supervising Deputy Attorney General One Ashburton Place 455 Golden Gate Avenue Boston, MA 02108 San Francisco, CA 94102 (617) 963-2197 (415) 510-3364 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Amicus Curiae the Attorneys for Amicus Curiae the State Commonwealth of Massachusetts of California (Additional counsel listed on signature page) Case 21-888, Document 49, 07/28/2021, 3146569, Page2 of 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction and Statement of Interest .......................................................... 1 Argument ....................................................................................................... 5 The 2019 Borrower Defense Rule Is Not the Product of Lawful Agency Decisionmaking ........................................................... 5 A. ED Irrationally Adopted an Insurmountable Standard of Proof that Functions as an Effective Bar to Relief for Victimized Borrowers ......................... 7 B. ED Ignored Substantial Record Evidence and Failed to Explain Its Change of Position When It Rescinded the Group Discharge Process ...................... 12 C. ED Improperly Premised the 2019 Rule on the Baseless Assertion that Borrowers Widely Submit “Frivolous” Claims ....................................................... 18 Conclusion ................................................................................................... 20 Certificate of Compliance ............................................................................ 27 i Case 21-888, Document 49, 07/28/2021, 3146569, Page3 of 32 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page CASES Animal Legal Def. Fund, Inc. v. Perdue 872 F.3d 602 (D.C. Cir. 2017) ................................................................. 20 Islander E. Pipeline Co. v. McCarthy 525 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 2008) .................................................................. 5, 6 Kan. Gas & Elec. Co. v. FERC 758 F.2d 713 (D.C. Cir. 1985) ................................................................. 11 Massachusetts, et al. v. Cardona, et al. (N.D. Cal. No. 20-0477, filed July 15, 2020) .............................................4 Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass’n of the U.S., Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 463 U.S. 29 (1983)............................................................................. 12, 18 Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. U.S. Envtl. Prot. Agency 961 F.3d 160 (2d Cir. 2020) .......................................................................6 New York Pub. Int. Rsch. Grp., Inc. v. Johnson 427 F.3d 172 (2d Cir. 2005) .................................................................... 19 New York v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs. 414 F. Supp. 3d 475 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) ..................................................... 20 NRDC v. U.S. Dep’t of Energy 362 F. Supp. 3d 126 (S.D.N.Y. 2019) ..................................................... 11 Penobscot Air Servs. v. F.A.A. 164 F.3d 713 (1st Cir. 1999).......................................................................6 Rodolico v. Unisys Corp. 199 F.R.D. 468 (E.D.N.Y. 2001) ............................................................. 16 ii Case 21-888, Document 49, 07/28/2021, 3146569, Page4 of 32 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page U.S. Dep’t of Homeland Sec. v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal. 140 S. Ct. 1891 (2020) ................................................................................6 Vargas v. I.N.S. 938 F.2d 358 (2d Cir. 1991) .......................................................................7 Williams v. DeVos No. 16-11949, 2018 WL 5281741(D. Mass. Oct. 24, 2018) ................... 14 XY Planning Network v. S.E.C. 963 F.3d 244 (2d Cir. 2020) .......................................................................6 STATUTES 5 U.S.C. § 706 ......................................................... 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 12, 17, 20 20 U.S.C. § 1087e ............................................................................................2 20 U.S.C. § 1221e-3 ...................................................................................... 17 Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1788.90-1788.93 ............................................................. 17 Fed. R. App. P. 29 ............................................................................................2 Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 .......................................................................................... 16 OTHER AUTHORITIES 34 C.F.R. § 685.206 .........................................................................................7 59 Fed. Reg. 61,671 ................................................................................. 3, 18 81 Fed. Reg. 75,937 ...................................................................................... 10 81 Fed. Reg. 75,965 ...................................................................................... 12 81 Fed. Reg. 75,971 ...................................................................................... 15 83 Fed. Reg. 37,244 ...................................................................................... 16 iii Case 21-888, Document 49, 07/28/2021, 3146569, Page5 of 32 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (continued) Page 84 Fed. Reg. 49,793 ...................................................................................... 18 84 Fed. Reg. 49,798 ................................................................................ 12, 13 84 Fed. Reg. 49,799 ................................................................................ 13, 14 84 Fed. Reg. 49,800 ............................................................................ 5, 18, 19 84 Fed. Reg. 49,807 .............................................................................. 7, 9, 10 84 Fed. Reg. 49,843 .........................................................................................4 84 Fed. Reg. 49,879 .................................................................................. 5, 13 84 Fed. Reg. 49,895 .................................................................................. 3, 10 Attorney General Kamala D. Harris, Incoming U.S. Education Secretary John King Announce Expanded Debt Relief Options for Corinthian College Students (Nov. 2015), https://oag.ca.gov/news/press-releases/attorney-general- kamala-d-harris-incoming-us-education-secretary-john-king ....................8 Testimony of Sec. DeVos Responding to Questions Submitted by Senator Patty Murray (June 13, 2019), https://www.help.senate.gov/imo/ media/doc/SenMurrayQFRresponses32819LHHS hearing.pdf ............................................................................................... 19 iv Case 21-888, Document 49, 07/28/2021, 3146569, Page6 of 32 INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF INTEREST The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, by and through Attorney General Maura Healey; the State of California, by and through Attorney General Rob Bonta; the State of Connecticut, by and through Attorney General William Tong; the State of Delaware, by and through Attorney General Kathy Jennings; the District of Columbia, by and through Attorney General Karl Racine; the State of Hawaii, by and through Attorney General Clare Connors; the People of the State of Illinois, by and through Attorney General Kwame Raoul; the State of Maine, by and through Attorney General Aaron Frey; the State of Maryland, by and through Attorney General Brian Frosh; the State of Michigan, by and through Attorney General Dana Nessel; the State of Minnesota, by and through Attorney General Keith Ellison; the State of New Jersey, by and through Acting Attorney General Andrew J. Bruck; the State of New Mexico, by and through Attorney General Hector Balderas; the State of New York, by and through Attorney General Letitia James; the State of North Carolina, by and through Attorney General Josh Stein; the State of Oregon, by and through Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum; the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, by and through Attorney General Josh Shapiro; the State of Rhode Island, by and through Attorney General Peter Neronha; the State of Vermont, by and through Attorney General Thomas J. Donovan Jr.; the Commonwealth of Virginia, by and through Attorney General Mark 1 Case 21-888, Document 49, 07/28/2021, 3146569, Page7 of 32 Herring; the State of Washington, by and through Attorney General Bob Ferguson; the State of Wisconsin, by and through Attorney General Joshua Kaul (collectively, “Amici States”) submit this brief under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29(a) to assist the Court in determining whether the final agency action at issue in this litigation is arbitrary and capricious in violation of the Administrative
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Declaration of Cameron R. Azari, Esq. on Implementation of Settlement Notice Plan in the United States District Court for the C
    Case 2:14-cv-01855-GW-GJS Document 123 Filed 05/19/20 Page 1 of 47 Page ID #:6092 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DONALD M. LUSNAK, on behalf of ) himself and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) Case No.: CV 14-1855-GW-GJSx ) v. ) DECLARATION OF CAMERON R. ) AZARI, ESQ. ON BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; and DOES ) IMPLEMENTATION OF 1 through 10, inclusive, ) SETTLEMENT NOTICE PLAN ) Defendants. ) ) I, Cameron Azari, declare as follows : 1. My name is Cameron R. Azari, Esq. I have personal knowledge of the matters set forth herein, and I believe them to be true and correct. 2. I am a nationally recognized expert in the field of legal notice, and I have served as an expert in dozens of federal and state cases involving class action notice plans. 3. I am the Director of Legal Notice for Hilsoft Notifications, a business unit of Epiq Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc. (“Epiq”) that specializes in designing, developing, analyzing and implementing, large-scale legal notific atio n plans. 4. This declaration will describe the implementation of the Settlement Notice Plan (“Notice Plan” or “Plan”) and notices (the “Notice” or “Notices”) for the recent settlement in Lusnak v. Bank of America, N.A. et al., Case No. 14-1855-GW-GJSx in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. I previously executed my Declaration of Cameron R. Azari, Esq, Epiq Class Action & Claims Solutions, Inc. on December 27, 2019 (Dkt. 113), in DECLARATION OF CAMERON R.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2, 2021
    September 2, 2021 The Honorable Chuck Schumer The Honorable Mitch McConnell Senate Majority Leader Senate Minority Leader 322 Hart Senate Office Building 317 Russell Senate Office Building United States Senate United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy 1236 Longworth House Office Building 2468 Rayburn House Office Building Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 Dear Leader Schumer, Leader McConnell, Speaker Pelosi, and Leader McCarthy, As our jurisdictions’ Attorneys General, we are responsible for protecting the health, safety, and well-being of our residents. Although our jurisdictions vary in size, geography, and political composition, we are united in our commitment to an effective criminal justice system that safeguards the communities of our states. To that end, a bipartisan coalition of Attorneys General supported the passage of the First Step Act of 2018—landmark legislation that brought common sense improvements to myriad aspects of the criminal justice system. Central to these reforms was retroactive relief for individuals sentenced under the discredited 100-to-1 crack-to-powder cocaine ratio that Congress abolished in 2010. Following the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Terry v. United States, however, the lowest level crack cocaine offenders remain categorically ineligible for resentencing. We write today to urge Congress to amend the First Step Act, and to clarify that its retroactive relief applies to all individuals sentenced under the prior regime. Congress enacted the historic First Step Act of 2018 to modernize the criminal justice system, implementing comprehensive reform in areas such as corrections, criminal charging, community re-entry, and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • For Publication
    FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS No. 20-55631 COUNCIL; AMERICAN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 3:19-cv-02324- W-AHG v. KAREN ROSS, in her official capacity OPINION as Secretary of the California Department of Food & Agriculture; TOMÁS J. ARAGÓN, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Public Health; ROB BONTA,* in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, Defendants-Appellees, and THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES; ANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND; ANIMAL EQUALITY; THE HUMANE LEAGUE; FARM SANCTUARY; COMPASSION IN * Rob Bonta is substituted for his predecessor, Xavier Becerra, as Attorney General of California; and Tomás J. Aragón is substituted for his predecessor, Sonia Angell, as Director of the California Department of Public Health. Fed. R. App. 43(c)(2). 2 NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL V. ROSS WORLD FARMING USA; COMPASSION OVER KILLING, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Thomas J. Whelan, District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted April 14, 2021 Pasadena, California Filed July 28, 2021 Before: Milan D. Smith, Jr. and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges, and John E. Steele,** District Judge. Opinion by Judge Ikuta ** The Honorable John E. Steele, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation. NATIONAL PORK PRODUCERS COUNCIL V. ROSS 3 SUMMARY*** Constitutional Law The panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim of an action filed by the National Pork Producers Council and the American Farm Bureau Federation, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief on the ground that California’s Proposition 12 violates the dormant Commerce Clause in banning the sale of whole pork meat (no matter where produced) from animals confined in a manner inconsistent with California standards.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Political Contributions
    Johnson & Johnson Political Contributions January 1 - December 31, 2014 Campaign/Payee Name Candidate Amount Account Office ALABAMA Committe to Elect Greg Reed Sen. Gregory Reed (R) $500.00 Corporate State Senate Committee to Elect April Weaver Rep. April Weaver (R) $250.00 J&J PAC State House Dial Campaign of AL Sen. Gerald Dial (R) $500.00 Corporate State Senate Friends of Mike Hubbard Rep. Mike Hubbard (R) $500.00 Corporate State House Jabo Waggoner of AL Sen. J. T. Waggoner (R) $500.00 Corporate State Senate Jim McClendon of AL Sen. Jim McClendon (R) $500.00 Corporate State House Jimmy Martin of AL Jimmy Martin (D) $250.00 Corporate State Senate Laura Hall of AL Rep. Laura Hall (D) $250.00 Corporate State House Mac McCutcheon of AL Rep. Mac McCutcheon (R) $500.00 Corporate State House Marsh for State Senate Sen. Del Marsh (R) $500.00 Corporate State Senate Paul Bussman of AL Sen. Paul Bussman (R) $500.00 Corporate State Senate Ron Johnson of AL Rep. Ronald G. Johnson (R) $250.00 Corporate State House ARKANSAS Asa for Governor Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R) $2,000.00 Corporate Governor Bill Gossage Campaign Rep. Bill Gossage (R) $500.00 Corporate State House Dan Douglas Campaign Rep. Dan M. Douglas (R) $400.00 Corporate State Senate David Meeks Camplain Rep. David Meeks (R) $400.00 Corporate State House Harold R. Copenhaver of AR Harold Copenhaver (D) $400.00 Corporate State House Jim Dotson Campaign Rep. Jim Dotson (R) $900.00 Corporate State House John Cooper for State Senate Sen. John R.
    [Show full text]
  • Case 1:21-Cv-00057-SHS Document 42 Filed 07/12/21 Page 1 of 12
    Case 1:21-cv-00057-SHS Document 42 Filed 07/12/21 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, by LETITIA ) Case No. I :21-Civ.-00057 JAMES, Attorney General of the State of New York, ) ) PEOPLE OF THE STA TE OF CALIFORNIA, by ROB ) BONTA, Attorney General of the State of California, ) ) PEOPLE OF THE STA TE OF COLORADO, by PHILIP J. ) WEISER, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, ) STIPULATION OF ) VOLUNTARY THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, by KARL A. RACINE, ) DISMISSAL WITHOUT Attorney General of the District of Columbia, ) PREJUDICE ) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, by ) MAURA HEALEY, Attorney General of Massachusetts, ) ) THE STATE OF MINNESOTA, by KEITH ELLISON, ) Attorney General of the State of Minnesota, ) ) THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, by GURBIR S. ) GREWAL, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey, ) ) THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA ex rel. JOSHUAH. ) STEIN, Attorney General of North Carolina, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) - against- ) ) THE OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE ) CURRENCY and MICHAEL J. HSU, in his official ) capacity as Acting Comptroller of the Currency, ) ) Defendants. ) ---------------------) WHEREAS Plaintiffs the People of the State of New York, by their attorney, Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, the People of the State of California, by their Case 1:21-cv-00057-SHS Document 42 Filed 07/12/21 Page 2 of 12 attorney, Rob Bonta, Attorney General of the State ofCalifornia, 1 the People of the State of Colorado, by Philip J. Weiser, Attorney General of Colorado, the District of Columbia, by Karl A.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013–14 California Legislature
    Table of Contents California Legislature 2013-14 Table of Contents “I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” I Table of Contents Table of Contents EDMUND G. BROWN JR. GOVERNOR OF CALIFORNIA III Table of Contents GAVIN NEWSOM LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR IV Table of Contents DARRELL STEINbeRG PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE OF THE SENATE V Table of Contents TONI G. ATKINS SPEAKER OF THE ASSEMBLY VI Table of Contents NORA CAMPOS SPEAKER PRO TEMPORE OF THE ASSEMBLY VII Table of Contents Memoranda VIII Table of Contents CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE AT SACRAMENTO Biographies and Photographs of SENATE AND ASSEMBLY MEMBERS AND OFFICERS List of SENATE AND ASSEMBLY MEMBERS, OFFICERS, ATTACHES, COMMITTEES and RULES OF THE TWO HOUSES and Standards of Conduct of the Senate Together With a List of the Members of Congress, State Officers, Etc. 2013–14 REGULAR SESSION (2014 Edition) Convened December 3, 2012 Published July 2014 GREGORY SCHMIDT Secretary of the Senate E. DOTSON WILSON Chief Clerk of the Assembly IX Table of Contents SENATE LEADERSHIP President pro Tempore Darrell Steinberg (D) Majority Leader Ellen M. Corbett (D) Democratic Caucus Chair Jerry Hill Republican Leader Bob Huff Republican Caucus Chair Ted Gaines Senate Rules Committee: Darrell Steinberg (D) (Chair); Jean Fuller (R) (Vice Chair); Steve Knight (R); Ricardo Lara (D); Holly Mitchell (D). X Click on the description to direct you to the corresponding page you to the corresponding page CONTENTS PAge California Representatives in Congress........................ 13 Directory of State Officers...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Case 3:19-Cv-01537-BEN-JLB Document 115 Filed 06/04/21 Pageid.10515 Page 1 of 94
    Case 3:19-cv-01537-BEN-JLB Document 115 Filed 06/04/21 PageID.10515 Page 1 of 94 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JAMES MILLER, et al., Case No.: 19-cv-1537-BEN (JLB) 11 Plaintiffs, DECISION 12 v. 13 ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of 14 California, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 Like the Swiss Army Knife, the popular AR-15 rifle is a perfect combination of 19 home defense weapon and homeland defense equipment. Good for both home and battle, 20 the AR-15 is the kind of versatile gun that lies at the intersection of the kinds of firearms 21 protected under District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008) and United States v 22 Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939). Yet, the State of California makes it a crime to have an AR- 23 15 type rifle. Therefore, this Court declares the California statutes to be unconstitutional. 24 Plaintiffs challenge a net of interlocking statutes which impose strict criminal 25 restrictions on firearms that fall under California’s complex definition of the ignominious 26 “assault weapon.” Hearings on a preliminary injunction were consolidated with a trial on 27 the merits pursuant to F.R.C.P. Rule 65(a)(2). Having considered the evidence, the Court 28 1 19-cv-1537-BEN (JLB) Case 3:19-cv-01537-BEN-JLB Document 115 Filed 06/04/21 PageID.10516 Page 2 of 94 1 issues these findings of fact and conclusions of law,1 finds for the Plaintiffs, and enters 2 Judgment accordingly.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Supreme Court of the United States ______
    No. 20-1029 In the Supreme Court of the United States ____________________ CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS, Petitioner, v. REAGAN NATIONAL ADVERTISING OF AUSTIN, INC., ET AL. Respondents. ____________________ ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _______________________________________________________________________________ BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE FLORIDA, ARKANSAS, CALIFORNIA, CONNECTICUT, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ILLINOIS, IOWA, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSISSIPPI, NEVADA, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OHIO, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, SOUTH DAKOTA, VERMONT, AND WASHINGTON IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER _______________________________________________________________________________ ASHLEY MOODY DAVID M. COSTELLO Attorney General Assistant Solicitor General HENRY C. WHITAKER Office of the Florida Solicitor General Attorney General Counsel of Record PL-01, The Capitol DANIEL W. BELL Tallahassee, Florida 32399 Chief Deputy (850) 414-3300 Solicitor General henry.whitaker@ KEVIN A. GOLEMBIEWSKI myfloridalegal.com Deputy Solicitor General Counsel for Amicus Curiae the State of Florida (Additional counsel with signature block) i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ................................ 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..................................... 1 ARGUMENT ............................................................... 3 I. THE FIFTH CIRCUIT ERRED BY CONCLUDING THAT PETITIONER’S ORDINANCE IS CONTENT-BASED UNDER REED. ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Letters to the U.S. House and U.S. Senate
    April 29, 2021 Senator Patrick Leahy Senator Richard Shelby Chair Ranking Member U.S. Senate Committee U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations on Appropriations 437 Russell Building 304 Russell Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Senator Jeanne Shaheen Senator Jerry Moran Chair Ranking Member U.S. Senate Committee on U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations Appropriations Subcommittee on Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, Commerce, Justice, Science, & Related Agencies & Related Agencies 506 Hart Building 521 Dirksen Building Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 Re: State Attorneys General Support the Legal Services Corporation Dear Chair DeLauro, Ranking Member Granger, Chair Cartwright, and Ranking Member Aderholt, As state attorneys general, we respectfully request that you consider robust funding for the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) in the Fiscal Year 2022 Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies Appropriations bill. Since 1974, LSC funding has provided vital and diverse legal assistance to low-income Americans including victims of natural disasters, survivors of domestic violence, families facing foreclosure, and veterans accessing earned benefits. Today, LSC also provides essential support for struggling families affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. As the single largest funder of civil legal aid in the United States, LSC-funded programs touch every corner of our country with more than 800 offices and a presence in every congressional district. LSC funding has also fostered public-private partnerships between legal aid organizations and private firms and attorneys across the country which donate their time and skills to assist residents in need. Nationwide, 132 independent nonprofit legal aid programs rely on this federal funding to provide services to nearly two million of our constituents on an annual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Contributions
    State Candidate Names Committee Amount Party Office District CA Holmes, Jim Jim Holmes for Supervisor 2020 $ 700 O County Supervisor 3 CA Uhler, Kirk Uhler for Supervisor 2020 $ 500 O County Supervisor 4 CA Gonzalez, Lena Lena Gonzalez for Senate 2020 $ 1,500 D STATE SENATE 33 CA Lee, John John Lee for City Council 2020 - Primary $ 800 O City Council 12 CA Simmons, Les Simmons for City Council 2020 $ 1,000 D City Council 8 CA Porada, Debra Porada for City Council 2020 $ 500 O City Council AL CA California Manufacturers & Technology Association Political Action Committee $ 5,000 CA Desmond, Richard Rich Desmond for Supervisor 2020 $ 1,200 R County Supervisor 3 CA Hewitt, Jeffrey Jeffrey Hewitt for Board of Supervisors Riverside County 2018 $ 1,200 O County Supervisor 5 CA Gustafson, Cindy Elect Cindy Gustafson Placer County Supervisor, District 5 - 2020 $ 700 O County Supervisor 5 CA Cook, Paul Paul Cook for Supervisor 2020 $ 1,000 R County Supervisor 1 CA Flores, Dan Dan Flores for Supervisor 2020 $ 500 County Supervisor 5 CA California Taxpayers Association - Protect Taxpayers Rights $ 800,000 CA Latinas Lead California $ 500 CA Wapner, Alan Wapner for Council $ 1,000 City Council CA Portantino, Anthony Portantino for Senate 2020 $ 2,000 D STATE SENATE 25 CA Burke, Autumn Autumn Burke for Assembly 2020 $ 2,000 D STATE HOUSE 62 CA California Republican Party - State Account $ 15,000 R CA Fong, Vince Vince Fong for Assembly 2020 $ 1,500 D STATE HOUSE 34 CA O'Donnell, Patrick O'Donnell for Assembly 2020 $ 4,700 D STATE HOUSE 70 CA Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber Political Action Committee $ 2,500 CA Patterson, Jim Patterson for Assembly 2020 $ 1,500 R STATE HOUSE 23 CA Arambula, Joaquin Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • State Attorney Generals Matter
    State Attorneys General Matter AG Practice & Investigations State Attorneys General The role of state AGs is unique among elected officials in the U.S. - the state's chief legal officer - investigative powerhouse - consumer protection arbiter and enforcer - prosecutor - multi- jurisdictional litigation - policy advocate. 2 1 Each Attorney General has legal authority per state and federal law [parens patriae per 15 U.S.C. §15c] • Traditional Role of the State AG: • Day to Day counsel for the State and the executive branch of government • Federalism and preemption concerns • Authority often includes: • Issuing legal opinions • Enforcing state Sunshine laws • Defending [or challenging] state and/or federal law and administrative actions • Handling capital criminal appeals and actions before the U.S. Supreme Court • Enforcing Medicaid Fraud, Cybersecurity/Privacy laws, environmental laws, antitrust laws and consumer protection laws • Revoking corporate charters 3 Expanded Role of the State AG: • Aggressive [partisan] investigations and litigation • President Obama • Pro/anti federal statutes and regulatory action, e.g. EPA, CFPB, ACA • 1st Phase President Trump • Pro/anti federal and state statutes regulatory action, e.g. EPA, CFPB, ACA, marijuana, immigration • 2nd Phase President Trump • Emoluments clause • Emergency Declaration to fund border wall • Nation-wide District Court injunctions • Aspiring Governors, Senators & Presidents • Arizona, California, Connecticut, Maine, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, South Carolina, Wyoming 4 2 State
    [Show full text]
  • Amended Complaint
    Case 3:20-cv-06057-RS Document 75 Filed 11/23/20 Page 1 of 92 1 XAVIER BECERRA ROBERT W. FERGUSON Attorney General of California Attorney General of Washington 2 SARAH E. MORRISON, SBN 143459 AURORA JANKE 3 Supervising Deputy Attorney General ELIZABETH HARRIS JAMIE B. JEFFERSON, SBN 197142 Assistant Attorneys General 4 JOSHUA R. PURTLE, SBN 298215 Environmental Protection Division JULIA K. FORGIE, SBN 304701 800 5th Ave Ste. 2000 TB-14 5 LANI M. MAHER, SBN 318637 Seattle, Washington 98104-3188 Deputy Attorneys General Phone: (206) 233-3391 6 1515 Clay Street, 20th Floor Fax: (206) 464-6451 7 P.O. Box 70550 [email protected] Oakland, CA 94612-0550 [email protected] 8 Phone: (510) 879-1002 Fax: (510) 622-2270 Attorneys for Plaintiff State of Washington 9 [email protected] [email protected] [Additional counsel listed on signature 10 page] 11 Attorneys for Plaintiff State of California 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 STATES OF CALIFORNIA, Case No. 3:20-cv-06057 WASHINGTON, COLORADO, 16 CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, ILLINOIS, MAINE, MARYLAND, MINNESOTA, 17 NEVADA, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, NORTH CAROLINA, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR 18 OREGON, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF 19 AND WISCONSIN; PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN; 20 COMMONWEALTHS OF (Administrative Procedure Act, MASSACHUSETTS AND 5 U.S.C. §§ 551–559, 701–706; Endangered 21 PENNSYLVANIA; TERRITORY OF Species Act, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531–1544; GUAM; DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA; National Environmental Policy Act, 22 HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS; CITY OF 42 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]