Morikawa Hawii 0085A 10630.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Morikawa Hawii 0085A 10630.Pdf AFTER THE RUINS: THE 9/11 COMPLEX, MEMORY, AND THE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIʻI AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN AMERICAN STUDIES APRIL 2020 By Tomoaki Morikawa Dissertation Committee: Karen Kosasa, ChairPerson Elizabeth Colwill Vernadette Gonzalez Reece Jones Geoffrey White Keywords: 9/11, Battleground, Commemoration, InterPellation, Memory, The Global War on Terror, Vulnerability Acknowledgements This dissertation project would have not been possible without the assistance of many people. I want to thank Karen Kosasa who has pushed me this far. She has been the most avid reader of my writings. It is her dedicated guidance and numerous edits that enabled me to complete this dissertation. She was always willing to have a conversation with me either in person or online and provided generous support to me not only academically but also mentally. I am also grateful to my committee members, Elizabeth Colwill, Vernadette Gonzalez, Reece Jones, and Geoffrey White. Each chapter has sections that reveal how deeply I am influenced by their work. In my dissertation, I travel across time and space to the period of slavery in New York City, to Pearl Harbor, Hawaiʻi, and to the U.S.-Mexico border. Each journey was made possible because I was fortunate to work with my committee members. I must say that the Department of American Studies at University of Hawai'i at Mānoa took very good care of me. Mari Yoshihara, now the department chair, said to me, “We are watching you,” when I joined the department, and I was watched over with care for the whole of my PhD program. The UH bureaucracy is not easy to deal with, but Rumi Yoshida pushed through many things for me. Without her presence in the department office, things would have been much more difficult. I also want to express gratitude to many participants and TripAdvisor reviewers who shared their experiences and provided materials relevant to my research. They allowed me to critically reflect on my epistemological framework and complicate my thinking. Their voices added depth to my dissertation analysis. i And I would like to thank my comrades. They made my graduate life more than bearable. Special thanks to Yi-hung Liu and Andy Wang. While Yi-hung sometimes “trashed” my writings, she made me think harder, and Andy provided a space to focus on my work in Taiwan. And thank you to Jayson Parba, who cooked me salty Filipino food from time to time and allowed me to stay at his place when I was in Honolulu for my defense. ii Abstract While once a place that defined Lower Manhattan as the mecca of international business, the World Trade Center was destroyed and turned into a site of national trauma called “Ground Zero” by the events of 9/11. Right after the terrorist attacks, efforts to recover and reconstruct the site were quickly taken, and now, a memorial complex stands there. Naming it the Ground Zero memorial complex, this dissertation attempts to understand the significance of this place within the American landscape and American history. For this purpose, I closely trace the reconstruction process of the WTC site and examine the rebuilt memorial complex mainly consisting of the primary tower One World Trade Center, the memorial Reflecting Absence, and the National September 11 Museum. At the same time, I make a methodological decision to move beyond Ground Zero in Lower Manhattan in time and space. Guided by the notion that the site is the focal point of the flow of violence that is foundational to the U.S., this dissertation shifts the sites of investigation from Lower Manhattan to Vietnam, the U.S.-Mexico border, Hawai‘i, and Hiroshima. By situating the Ground Zero memorial complex within much larger contexts, I reveal that the WTC site was reconstructed into a place that sanctioned violence as a result of the American violence perpetrated globally following the 9/11 events. The Ground Zero memorial complex is thus a battleground where people may not physically lose their lives, but are encouraged to sanction the logic of the Global War on Terror as well as other ideological and physical wars waged on behalf of the U.S. To some visitors, the site may appear apolitical and neutral. It may appear to be dedicated to consoling and healing a wounded nation. However, the Ground Zero memorial complex is much more complex than it seems. iii Table of Contents Acknowledgements i Abstract iii Table of Contents iv Table of Figures vi Introduction 1 Chapter 1: Exclusions, Inclusions: The Reconstruction of Ground Zero in Lower Manhattan 25 Chapter 2: The Cartography of Vulnerability: Wars and U.S. Geographies 59 Chapter 3: The Museum as a Battleground: Curating the Global War on Terror 90 Chapter 4: Encoding, Decoding: Visitor Experiences at the Ground Zero Memorial Complex 132 iv Conclusion 168 Appendix A: Email from 9/11 Memorial & Museum (Nov. 11, 2017) 175 Appendix B: Email from 9/11 Memorial & Museum (Nov. 11, 2018) 178 Appendix C: Questionnaire 181 Appendix D: Semi-Structured Interview Questions 182 Appendix E: Profile of Participants 183 Bibliography 184 v Table of Figures Figure 1: “Hibaku Saigen Ningyō” 5 Figure 2: “Visitor Rules of Conduct” 26 Figure 3: Museum Map 94 Figure 4: “Last Column” 96 Figure 5: “Slurry Wall” 97 Figure 6: A Large Map and “We Remember” 99 Figure 7: “Trying to Remember the Color of the Sky on That September Morning” 102 Figure 8: “World Leaders, December 7, 1988” 108 Figure 9: “Al-Qaeda in the Context of Sunni Islam, circa 2000” 114 vi Introduction May the lives remembered, the deeds recognized, and the spirit reawakened be eternal beacons, which reaffirm respect for life, strengthen our resolve to preserve freedom, and inspire an end to hatred, ignorance and intolerance. —National September 11 Memorial and Museum1 Does the state gain anything in exchange? It certainly does, but what it obtains pertains only to its own territory with respect to its own citizens. The state gains the following: that the church will not interfere with but rather approve and uphold the exercise of power by the state. The church promises to obtain for the state the consent of a segment of the governed that the state implicitly acknowledges it cannot obtain on its own. —Antonio Gramsci, Prison Notebooks Volume II, 19752 Trajectory While walking through the National September 11 Museum in summer, 2018, my memory kept turning back to my visit to the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum a few years earlier. For a Japanese national trained in the field of American Studies, I understood the term “ground zero” not only as a reference to the ruined World Trade Center site in Lower Manhattan, but also as a marker signifying the hypocenters of the atomic bombings by the U.S. in August 1945 in Japan. For me, “ground zero” is a multifaceted term. Because my visit to the museum in Hiroshima predated my visit to the National September 11 museum in New York City, I found some of its exhibits perplexing, especially in terms of how it viewed the topic of war. The museum in Lower Manhattan, as one of the following chapters shows, affirms the Global War on 1 “Mission Statement,” https://www.911memorial.org/mission-statement (accessed February 28th). Although the National September 11 Memorial and Museum is the institution’s official name, the word “national” is often omitted. The memorial museum is a product of private and state partnership and thus not a federal institution. Its logo plain and simple: “9/11 Memorial & Museum.” And yet, as will be discussed later, this institution is anything but national. In light of this national status, I will use the official name in this dissertation. 2 Antonio Gramsci, Prison Notebooks Volume II (Ed. and trans. Joseph Buttigieg, New York: Columbia University Press, 1975), 220. 1 Terror.3 In contrast, the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum is thematically antiwar—and this is in line with what I was taught in schools when I grew up in Japan. I was educated to believe that war is evil.4 The museum built adjacent to ground zero in the city of Hiroshima confirms this point. The mission of the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum is to “[convey] to the world the horrors and the inhumane nature of the nuclear weapon and [spread] the message of ‘No More Hiroshimas,’” or no more war, “[t]hrough belongings left by the victims, A-bombed artifacts, testimonies of A-bomb survivors and related materials.5 For me, war is not something to be celebrated. When I encountered the affirmation of war in the National September 11 Museum, I was confused by the differences between the U.S. war culture and the one in which I was raised. That I found some exhibits in the museum in Lower Manhattan disconcerting does not mean that I am morally superior as a Japanese citizen in comparison to Americans. On the contrary, in Hiroshima, I was troubled by my own discriminatory responses towards others. When I saw American-looking people touring around the Hiroshima Peace Memorial park and taking photographs in front of the Atomic Dome, I inwardly condemned them: “Shame on you. You people caused this to us and you are having some fun out of it.” My reaction to them was probably no different from Americans who are troubled when they see “Japs” visiting the Pearl Harbor Historic Sites and viewing the USS Arizona Memorial in Hawai‘i.6 Or, I am not unlike 3 This war is called the (Global) “War on Terror” in the United States.
Recommended publications
  • YALE ARCHITECTURE FALL 2011 Constructs Yale Architecture
    1 CONSTRUCTS YALE ARCHITECTURE FALL 2011 Constructs Yale Architecture Fall 2011 Contents “Permanent Change” symposium review by Brennan Buck 2 David Chipperfield in Conversation Anne Tyng: Inhabiting Geometry 4 Grafton Architecture: Shelley McNamara exhibition review by Alicia Imperiale and Yvonne Farrell in Conversation New Users Group at Yale by David 6 Agents of Change: Geoff Shearcroft and Sadighian and Daniel Bozhkov Daisy Froud in Conversation Machu Picchu Artifacts 7 Kevin Roche: Architecture as 18 Book Reviews: Environment exhibition review by No More Play review by Andrew Lyon Nicholas Adams Architecture in Uniform review by 8 “Thinking Big” symposium review by Jennifer Leung Jacob Reidel Neo-avant-garde and Postmodern 10 “Middle Ground/Middle East: Religious review by Enrique Ramirez Sites in Urban Contexts” symposium Pride in Modesty review by Britt Eversole review by Erene Rafik Morcos 20 Spring 2011 Lectures 11 Commentaries by Karla Britton and 22 Spring 2011 Advanced Studios Michael J. Crosbie 23 Yale School of Architecture Books 12 Yale’s MED Symposium and Fab Lab 24 Faculty News 13 Fall 2011 Exhibitions: Yale Urban Ecology and Design Lab Ceci n’est pas une reverie: In Praise of the Obsolete by Olympia Kazi The Architecture of Stanley Tigerman 26 Alumni News Gwathmey Siegel: Inspiration and New York Dozen review by John Hill Transformation See Yourself Sensing by Madeline 16 In The Field: Schwartzman Jugaad Urbanism exhibition review by Tributes to Douglas Garofalo by Stanley Cynthia Barton Tigerman and Ed Mitchell 2 CONSTRUCTS YALE ARCHITECTURE FALL 2011 David Chipperfield David Chipperfield Architects, Neues Museum, façade, Berlin, Germany 1997–2009.
    [Show full text]
  • USAF Counterproliferation Center CPC Outreach Journal #725
    USAF COUNTERPROLIFERATION CENTER CPC OUTREACH JOURNAL Maxwell AFB, Alabama Issue No. 725, 30 June 2009 Articles & Other Documents: Russia, U.S. to Sign Military Cooperation Deal during U.S. SouthCom Head Warns of Iranian Influence in Obama Trip Region Defence Black Hole 'May Finish Trident' West Hopes for Restart of Multilateral Talks with Iran on Nuke Issue Soon: Solana £20billlion Plan to Replace Britain's Nuclear Missile Ahmadinejad Role Downplayed System Faces the Axe US-Russia Report on Scrapping Nuclear Weapons to Be Britain Gets Ready for Cyber-War Unveiled Mullen "Encouraged" by Progress in START New Cyber-Security Unit for GCHQ, Young Ex-hackers Negotiations to be Staff S. Korea to Bolster Assets against N. Korean Nuclear, U.S. and Russia Differ On a Treaty for Cyberspace Missile Threats N. Korea yet to Change Behavior despite Pressure: U.S. Documents Back Saudi Link to Extremists Official N. Korea Threatens to Shoot Down Japanese Obama Officials Fight Saudi-Qaida-9/11 Revelation Surveillance Planes Uranium Gives N Korea Second Way to Make Bombs N. Africa Qaeda Says it shot American in Mauritania DPRK's Nuclear Weapons Not to Threaten Others: Turks Increasingly Turn to Islamic Extremism Newspaper South Korea Getting U.S. Missiles to Boost Defences: Nuclear Hide and Seek Report N Korea Criticizes US Missile Defense for Hawaii Our Decaying Nuclear Deterrent N. Korea Enriching Uranium as Leader's Health May be Target: Hawaii Relapsing: S. Korea Welcome to the CPC Outreach Journal. As part of USAF Counterproliferation Center’s mission to counter weapons of mass destruction through education and research, we’re providing our government and civilian community a source for timely counterproliferation information.
    [Show full text]
  • Title:​ Never Forget: Ground Zero, Park51, and Constitutive Rhetorics
    Title:​ Never Forget: Ground Zero, Park51, and Constitutive Rhetorics Author:​ Tamara Issak Issue:​ 3 Publication Date:​ November 2020 Stable URL: http://constell8cr.com/issue-3/never-forget-ground-zero-park51-and-constitutive-rh etorics/ constellations a cultural rhetorics publishing space Never Forget: Ground Zero, Park51, and Constitutive Rhetorics Tamara Issak, St. John’s University Introduction It was the summer of 2010 when the story of Park51 exploded in the news. Day after day, media coverage focused on the proposal to create a center for Muslim and interfaith worship and recreational activities in Lower Manhattan. The space envisioned for Park51 was a vacant department store which was damaged on September 11, 2001. Eventually, it was sold to Sharif El-Gamal, a Manhattan realtor and developer, in July of 2009. El-Gamal intended to use this space to build a community center open to the general public, which would feature a performing arts center, swimming pool, fitness center, basketball court, an auditorium, a childcare center, and many other amenities along with a Muslim prayer space/mosque. Despite the approval for construction by a Manhattan community board, the site became a battleground and the project was hotly debated. It has been over ten years since the uproar over Park51, and it is important to revisit the event as it has continued significance and impact today. The main argument against the construction of the community center and mosque was its proximity to Ground Zero. Opponents to Park51 argued that the construction of a mosque so close to Ground Zero was offensive and insensitive because the 9/11 attackers were associated with Islam (see fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvard Conference (Re)Presenting American Muslims: Broadening the Conversation Conference Team
    Harvard Conference (Re)Presenting American Muslims: Broadening the Conversation Conference Team Host and Co-Convener Co-Convener Alwaleed Islamic Studies Program Institute for Social Policy and at Harvard University: Understanding (ISPU): Dr. Ali Asani Kathryn M. Coughlin Farhan Latif Zeba Iqbal Professor of Indo- Executive Director, Prince Chief Operating Officer ISPU Research Team Muslim and Islamic Alwaleed bin Talal Islamic & Director of Policy Editor and Report Religion and Cultures; Studies Program Impact Author Director, Alwaleed Islamic Studies Program Co-Organizers Facilitators Maria Ebrahimji Hussein Rashid, PhD Nadia Firozvi Asim Rehman Journalist, Consultant, Founder, Islamicate, L3C Attorney in Former President, & Co-Founder, I Speak Washington, DC Muslim Bar Association For Myself Inc. of NY ISPU would like to acknowledge the generous supporters whose contributions made this report possible: Mohamed Elnabtity and Rania Zagho, Jamal Ghani, Mahmoud and Nada Hadidi, Mahmood and Annette Hai, Fasahat Hamzavi and Saba Maroof, Rashid Haq, Raghib Hussain, Mohammed Maaieh and Raniah Jaouni, Khawaja Nimr and Beenish Ikram, Ghulam Qadir and Huda Zenati, Nadia Roumani, Quaid Saifee and Azra Hakimi, Abubakar and Mahwish Sheikh, Haanei Shwehdi and Ilaaf Darrat, Ferras Zeni and Serene Katranji Participants (listed alphabetically) Zain Abdullah, PhD, Shakila Ahmad, Debbie Almontaser Sana Amanat, Shahed Amanullah Saud Anwar, Associate Professor President, Islamic President, Board of Editor, Marvel Founder, Multiple Mayor of Windsor, in the
    [Show full text]
  • Rebuilding the Trade Center
    Rebuilding the Trade Center An Interview with Larry A. Silverstein, President and Chief Executive Offi cer, Silverstein Properties, Inc. EDITORS’ NOTE In July 2001, Larry The progress at the Trade Center Silverstein completed the largest real site for many years was very slow. I estate transaction in New York his- was frustrated because I was able to tory when he signed a 99-year lease build 7 World Trade Center in a four- on the 10.6-million-square-foot World year time frame. Trade Center for $3.25 billion only to We went into the ground in 2002, see it destroyed in terrorist attacks six and by 2006, we fi nished it after every- weeks later on September 11, 2001. body had predicted that the building He is currently rebuilding the offi ce would never succeed. We fi nanced it component of the World Trade Center for 40 years. We leased it and today, site, a $7-billion project. Silverstein it’s over 90 percent rented. The build- owns and manages 120 Broadway, ing has been enormously successful. tenancies that have the capacity of occupying 120 Wall Street, 529 Fifth Avenue, Larry A. Silverstein (above); The sad thing is that with the bal- its entirety. So that is gratifying, especially since and 570 Seventh Avenue. In 2008, the World Trade Center ance of the site, we could have done that building is based upon the need of a tenant. Silverstein announced an agree- rendering (right) what we did on 7 if given the opportu- We have the same level of interest in Tower ment with Four Seasons Hotels and nity to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Highlights of What We Will Be Doing in NYC
    “Learning by Experience” LEGACIES OF NEW YORK: The MUNDO Fall Break Experience 2019 Highlights of what we will be doing in NYC John's of Times Square has been voted one of New York's best pizzas because of its unique characteristics. All pizzas are made to order in one of our four coal-fired brick ovens and like a cast iron pan, our ovens season with age, making no two pizzas the same. The 800 degree coal fired ovens have no thermostats to control heat and are operated by our pizza men who have gone through months of extensive training. We pride ourselves on our fresh ingredients and incomparable recipes, making our pizzas second to none. The National September 11 Memorial & Museum (also known as the 9/11 Memorial & Museum) is a memorial and museum in New York City commemorating the September 11, 2001 attacks, which killed 2,977 people, and the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six.[4] The memorial is located at the World Trade Center site, the former location of the Twin Towers that were destroyed during the September 11 attacks. It is operated by a non-profit institution whose mission is to raise funds for, program, and operate the memorial and museum at the World Trade Center site. A memorial was planned in the immediate aftermath of the attacks and destruction of the World Trade Center for the victims and those involved in rescue and recovery operations.[5] The winner of the World Trade Center Site Memorial Competition was Israeli-American architect Michael Arad of Handel Architects, a New York- and San Francisco-based firm.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of Architecture E Summer/Fallc2004h R I 5 C a T6 7
    www.coa.gatech.edu Collegenewsletter of Architecture e summer/fallc2004h r i 5 c a t6 7 ARCHITECTURE ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY/MUSIC BUILDING CONSTRUCTION CITY AND REGIONAL PLANNING CONTINUING EDUCATION INDUSTRIAL DESIGN PH.D. PROGRAM 8 9 QQE 10 Q E q e Letter from the Dean World Trade Center Memorial Competition, Clearly, international immersion of our stu- while another, Hawa Meskinyar, from dents is regarded as an important goal for Afghanistan returned to her home country both the Institute and the College, but why? and founded a humanitarian organization First, this experience is absolutely critical to e committed to helping women and children in the diversity of knowledge we desire for our Afghanistan find their way toward independ- students. This emphasis also has very practical ence. Other of our graduates, such as Mona importance due to the globalization of design, As can be seen in several stories of this El-Mousfy and Samia Rab are on the faculty construction and planning practice and the newsletter issue, the international thrusts of in the School of Architecture and Design at need for our graduates to be competitive in the College are clearlyu evident, involving stu- the American University of Sharjah in the this practice. But it is also important for dents, faculty and alumni. Recent interna- UAE, and another, Mohamed Bechir Kenzari, Georgia Tech and other major research uni- tional engagements of our faculty and stu- is winnere of the 2003 Outstanding Article of versities to continue its long-standing practice dents are quite diverse: the Year from the Association of Collegiate of educating future leaders and professional c• Ecuador –t the work of Professors Ellen Schools of Architecture and is on the faculty experts in the built environment in countries Dunham-Jones, Michael Gamble and Randy of the School of Architectural Engineering at throughout the world.
    [Show full text]
  • 9/11 Families for a Safe & Strong America Www
    9/11 Families for a Safe & Strong America www.911familiesforamerica.org The Honorable Tom Coburn, M.D United States Senate February 9, 2012 Dear Senator Coburn: As family members of the victims of the September 11, 2001 attacks, we are deeply disappointed with your decision to put a procedural hold on the National September 11 Memorial & Museum Act of 2011 (S.1537), effectively killing the proposed legislation that would provide federal funding to this vital organization. We understand that over the years you have consistently taken such action on so-called earmarks which are not accompanied by budget off-sets. We sincerely appreciate and share your concern about the country's alarming debt problem and agree that our children and grandchildren shouldn't have to foot the bill for the spending we engage in today. However, the 9/11 memorial and museum is not a local extravagance aimed at benefiting a few today at the expense of the many tomorrow. The attacks of September 11, 2001 may have centered in New York, Virginia and Pennsylvania, but they were experienced by all Americans and were viewed as an attack on the entire country. The 9/11 memorial and museum is a national project which will tell the comprehensive story of 9/11 and commemorate the victims of the three attack sites, as well as the victims of the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. Those of us who lost loved ones on 9/11 feel an urgent duty to our children, grandchildren and future generations to preserve the history of that day, to faithfully convey the catastrophic nature and emotional impact of the attacks--witnessed in real time--on the nation and the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents PROOF
    PROOF Contents List of Illustrations vii Acknowledgments viii Notes on Contributors x Technologies of Memory in the Arts: An Introduction 1 Liedeke Plate and Anneke Smelik Part I Mediating Memories Introduction: Mediating Memories 15 Liedeke Plate and Anneke Smelik 1 Tourists of History: Souvenirs, Architecture and the Kitschification of Memory 18 Marita Sturken 2 Minimalism, Memory and the Reflection of Absence 36 Wouter Weijers 3 The Virtuality of Time: Memory in Science Fiction Films 52 Anneke Smelik Part II Memory/Counter-memory Introduction: Memory/Counter-memory 71 Liedeke Plate and Anneke Smelik 4 The Astonishing Return of Blake and Mortimer: Francophone Fantasies of Britain as Imperial Power and Retrospective Rewritings 74 Ann Miller 5 Writing Back Together: The Hidden Memories of Rochester and Antoinette in Wide Sargasso Sea 86 Nagihan Haliloglu 6 Liquid Memories: Women’s Rewriting in the Present 100 Liedeke Plate v March 18, 2009 19:28 MAC/TEEM Page-v 9780230_575677_01_prexii PROOF vi Contents Part III Recalling the Past Introduction: Recalling the Past 117 Liedeke Plate and Anneke Smelik 7 The Matter and Meaning of Childhood through Objects 120 Elizabeth Wood 8 The Force of Recalling: Pain in Visual Arts 132 Marta Zarzycka 9 Photographs that Forget: Contemporary Recyclings of the Hitler-Hoffmann Rednerposen 150 Frances Guerin Part IV Unsettling History Introduction: Unsettling History 169 Liedeke Plate and Anneke Smelik 10 Facing Forward with Found Footage: Displacing Colonial Footage in Mother Dao and the Work of Fiona Tan 172
    [Show full text]
  • Libeskind's Jewish Museum Berlin
    Encountering empty architecture: Libeskind’s Jewish Museum Berlin Henrik Reeh Preamble In Art Is Not What You Think It Is, Claire Farago and Donald Preziosi observe how the architecture of contemporary museums inspires active relationships between exhibitions and visitors.1 Referring to the 2006 Denver Art Museum by Daniel Libeskind, they show the potentials germinating in a particular building. When artists and curators are invited to dialog with the spaces of this museum, situations of art-in-architecture may occur which go beyond the ordinary confrontation of exhibitions and spectatorship, works and visitors. Libeskind’s museum is no neutral frame in the modernist tradition of the white cube, but a heterogeneous spatiality. These considerations by Farago and Preziosi recall the encounter with earlier museums by Libeskind. Decisive experiences particularly date back to the year 1999 when his Jewish Museum Berlin was complete as a building, long before being inaugurated as an exhibition hall in 2001. Open to the public for guided tours in the meantime, the empty museum was visited by several hundred thousand people who turned a peripheral frame of future exhibitions into the center of their sensory and mental attention. Yet, the Libeskind building was less an object of contemplation than the occasion for an intense exploration of and in space. Confirming modernity’s close connection between exhibition and architecture, Libeskind’s Jewish Museum Berlin unfolds as a strangely dynamic and fragmented process, the moments of which call for elaboration and reflection. I. Architecture/exhibition Throughout modernity, exhibitions and architecture develop in a remarkably close relationship to one another.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art Atcooper 2 | the Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art
    Winter 2008/09 The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art atCooper 2 | The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art Message from President George Campbell Jr. Union The Cooper Union has a history characterized by extraordinary At Cooper Union resilience. For almost 150 years, without ever charging tuition to a Winter 2008/09 single student, the college has successfully weathered the vagaries of political, economic and social upheaval. Once again, the institution Message from the President 2 is facing a major challenge. The severe downturn afflicting the glob- al economy has had a significant impact on every sector of American News Briefs 3 U.S. News & World Report Ranking economic activity, and higher education is no exception. All across Daniel and Joanna Rose Fund Gift the country, colleges and universities are grappling with the prospect Alumni Roof Terrace of diminished resources from two major sources of funds: endow- Urban Visionaries Benefit ment and contributions. Fortunately, The Cooper Union entered the In Memory of Louis Dorfsman (A’39) current economic slump in its best financial state in recent memory. Sue Ferguson Gussow (A’56): As a result of progress on our Master Plan in recent years, Cooper Architects Draw–Freeing the Hand Union ended fiscal year 2008 in June with the first balanced operat- ing budget in two decades and with a considerably strengthened Features 8 endowment. Due to the excellent work of the Investment Committee Azin Valy (AR’90) & Suzan Wines (AR’90): Simple Gestures of our Board of Trustees, our portfolio continues to outperform the Ryan (A’04) and Trevor Oakes (A’04): major indices, although that is of little solace in view of diminishing The Confluence of Art and Science returns.
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Center Two Bridges South Street Seaport Battery Park City Tribeca
    Neighborhood Map ¯ Worth Street Lafayette Street American Jacob Centre St Hamill Daniel Patrick Moynihan Sentinels Javits Thomas Place Playground 211 2 1 210 Sculpture First Shearith 151 325 United States Plaza Paine New York State Israel Cemetery One 60 Hudson Street Park District Courthouse 347 Hudson Street 1 Jacob K. Javits Supreme Court Oliver Street 45 43 Chinatown St. James Monroe Street 77 Federal Building 51 M9 Partnership Triangle M15SBS M15SBS H M103 Harrison Street Thomas Street St. James Place Church StreetChurch u Broadway West St. Joseph’s d M20 25 s Thomas Street Triumph of o 54 Church Staple Street 55 n the Human Spirit Jay Street PlaceTrimble R Manhattan Sculpture 57 i v Sentinels e M9 St. James’ r United States Court Park Row Knickerbocker 199 Sculpture 200 E Pearl Street M103 James Street M15 137 Tribeca s 332 Greenwich Street 311 Church Village p 42 M20 of International Trade SBS l 165 Tower Plaza a Foley Alfred E. Smith n a M15 d Square Thurgood Marshall Broadway 43 Playground e Borough of Manhattan 331 91 127 125 United States M15 Duane Street 163 151 149 Madison StreetSBS Community College Duane 154 M15 Catherine Street Park Duane Street Duane Street Courthouse 33 M22 Duane Street Chatham 79 African Burial Ground Green Cherry St 29 158 Cardinal Hayes Place West Street National Monument Tanahey African Catholic Church Security zone, M55 2 no access Playground M55 Burial Ground of St. Andrew Monroe Street Visitor Center Pearl Street Alfred E. Smith 130 321 Tribeca 2 Houses 52 50 86 84 Reade Street 120 114 112 Civic 198 Reade Street Washington Reade Street Street Elk Market Park Bogardus Surrogate’s Stuyvesant Sun Plaza 165 156 Two Bridges Court Center Catherine Slip 287 High 95 Building 311 1 Police Madison Street Alfred E.
    [Show full text]