The Tn3-Family of Replicative Transposons EMILIEN NICOLAS,1,3 MICHAEL LAMBIN,1,2 DAMIEN DANDOY,1,2 CHRISTINE GALLOY,1 NATHAN NGUYEN,1 CÉDRIC A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Tn3-Family of Replicative Transposons EMILIEN NICOLAS,1,3 MICHAEL LAMBIN,1,2 DAMIEN DANDOY,1,2 CHRISTINE GALLOY,1 NATHAN NGUYEN,1 CÉDRIC A The Tn3-family of Replicative Transposons EMILIEN NICOLAS,1,3 MICHAEL LAMBIN,1,2 DAMIEN DANDOY,1,2 CHRISTINE GALLOY,1 NATHAN NGUYEN,1 CÉDRIC A. OGER,1 and BERNARD HALLET1 1Institut des Sciences de la Vie, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; 2GSK Biologicals, B-1300, Wavre, Belgium; 3Laboratoire du Métabolisme de l’ARN FRS/FNRS-IBMM-CMMI- Université Libre de Bruxelles, B-6041 Charleroi-Gosselies, Belgium ABSTRACT Transposons of the Tn3 family form a widespread arsenal of antimicrobial resistance genes, thereby con- and remarkably homogeneous group of bacterial transposable tributing along with other mobile genetic elements, to elements in terms of transposition functions and an extremely the emergence of multi-drug resistances at a rate that versatile system for mediating gene reassortment and genomic challenges the development of new treatments (2–4). plasticity owing to their modular organization. They have made major contributions to antimicrobial drug resistance They are also prevalent in horizontal transfer of large dissemination or to endowing environmental bacteria with novel catabolic operons, allowing bacteria to metabolize var- catabolic capacities. Here, we discuss the dynamic aspects ious families of compounds, including industrial xeno- inherent to the diversity and mosaic structure of Tn3-family biotic pollutants (5, 6). transposons and their derivatives. We also provide an overview A distinguishing feature contributing to the prolifera- of current knowledge of the replicative transposition mechanism tion and evolutionary success of Tn3-family transposons of the family, emphasizing most recent work aimed at is their replicative mode of transposition (7, 8)(Fig. 1). understanding this mechanism at the biochemical level. “ ” “ ” Previous and recent data are put in perspective with those They transpose using a copy-in (or paste-and-copy ) obtained for other transposable elements to build up a tentative mechanism in which replication of the transposon occurs model linking the activities of the Tn3-family transposase protein during integration into the target. Intermolecular trans- with the cellular process of DNA replication, suggesting new position generates a cointegrate intermediate, in which lines for further investigation. Finally, we summarize our current the donor and target molecules are fused by directly re- view of the DNA site-specific recombination mechanisms peated transposon copies (Fig. 1). Cointegrate forma- responsible for converting replicative transposition tion requires both the transposon-encoded transposase intermediates into final products, comparing paradigm systems using a serine recombinase with more recently characterized (TnpA), to cut and rejoin the transposon ends with systems that use a tyrosine recombinase. the target DNA, and the cell replication machinery, to copy the complementary strands of the transposon. INTRODUCTION Received: 31 October 2014, Accepted: 3 November 2014, Published: 23 July 2015 The ampicillin-resistance transposon Tn3 is the arche- Editors: Mick Chandler, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France, type (“Tn3” being synonymous with “Tn1” or “Tn2”; and Nancy Craig, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD Citation: Nicolas E, Lambin M, Dandoy D, Galloy C, Nguyen N, (1)) of a large and widespread family of transposons Oger CA, Hallet B. 2014. The Tn3-family of replicative transposons. with representatives in nearly all bacterial phyla includ- Microbiol Spectrum 3(4):MDNA3-0060-2014. doi:10.1128 ing proteobacteria, firmicutes, and cyanobacteria. Fam- /microbiolspec.MDNA3-0060-2014. ily members are modular platforms allowing assembly, Correspondence: Bernard Hallet, [email protected] © 2015 American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved. diversification, and redistribution of an ever-growing ASMscience.org/MicrobiolSpectrum 1 Downloaded from www.asmscience.org by IP: 200.145.191.169 On: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:06:40 Nicolas et al. to resolve the cointegrate intermediate by catalyzing a re- ciprocal recombination reaction between the newly syn- thesized copies of the element (Fig. 1). Recombination takes place at a specific site, the “resolution site” (res) or “internal recombination site” (IRS) located inside the transposon (7). The reaction completes the transpo- sition cycle, restoring the original donor molecule and producing a target molecule with a transposon copy (Fig. 1). The resolvase of most characterized Tn3-family transposons is a member of the serine recombinase (S- recombinase) family, but in a few cases it is a member of the tyrosine recombinase (Y-recombinase) family (7, 9). Although cointegrate resolution has been the subject of intense biochemical, topological, and structural stud- ies over the past decades, much less is known regarding the transposase-catalyzed reactions in both the transpo- sition and target immunity processes. After an overview of the biological diversity and significance of Tn3-family transposons, this chapter will provide an update of the mechanistic aspects of the transposition cycle with a special focus on the initial steps of the reaction. MODULAR AND DYNAMIC STRUCTURE OF TN3-FAMILY TRANSPOSONS Mobile genetic elements can be described as a juxtapo- FIGURE 1 Overview of the replicative transposition cycle of sition of functional modules, which together provide Tn3-family transposons. Intermolecular transposition (curved each element with its own specificities (10). Members of arrow) from a donor (purple) to a target DNA molecule (blue) the Tn3 transposon family include three types of module generates a cointegrate in which both molecules are fused (Fig. 2): the core transposition module, which is the mo- together by directly repeated copies of the transposon. This bility signature of the family; the cointegrate resolution step requires the transposase and the host replication ma- module, which optimizes the transposition pathway by chinery. The cointegrate is resolved by resolvase-mediated reducing the risk of generating aberrant replicon fu- site-specific recombination (double arrow) between the du- plicated copies of the transposon resolution site (boxed cross). sions and making the transposon less dependent on the Bracketed triangles are the terminal inverted repeats (IRs) of host recombination functions; and various sets of cargo the transposon. The transposase and resolvase genes are rep- genes and operons that were assimilated, presumably be- resented by a purple and a white arrow, respectively. Small cause they proved to be useful for their host under cer- triangles show the short (usually 5-bp) direct repeats (DRs) tain conditions. that are generated upon insertion into the target. The red stip- pled circle indicates that a molecule that contains a copy of The transposition module: the ID of the family the transposon is immunized against further insertions due to target immunity. doi:10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0060 Autonomous Tn3-family members carry a transposition -2014.f1 core module comprising the transposase gene (tnpA)and typical ∼38-bp inverted repeats (IRs) at the transposon The transposase is also involved in a process termed tar- ends (Fig. 2). TnpA proteins are unusually large (from get immunity whereby the transposon avoids inserting ∼950 to ∼1020 amino acids [aa]) compared to other more than once into the same DNA molecule (7). This transposases. A BLAST search performed with any Tn3- process is specific to each member of the family and is family transposase identifies only other members of the thought to act over large distances (up to several dozens family. However, phylogenetic analysis of 924 full-length of kilobases) within the genome. transposases from the Pfam database (http://pfam.xfam Tn3-family transposons generally encode a DNA site- .org/) reveals five protein clusters sharing less than ∼30% specific recombinase, or “resolvase”, whose function is sequence identity (Fig. 3). One large cluster comprising 2 ASMscience.org/MicrobiolSpectrum Downloaded from www.asmscience.org by IP: 200.145.191.169 On: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:06:40 The Tn3-family of Transposons 595 sequences can be further divided into three sub- family (Fig. 3), suggesting that these minimal structures groups exemplified by the Tn4430,Tn5393, and Tn21 have evolved separately. transposases (Fig. 3). An alignment of 21 active trans- posases from the different clusters and separate bacterial The cointegrate resolution modules phyla showed that only 15 residues, including the “DD- S-recombinases and Y-recombinases cleave and reseal E” catalytic triad, are perfectly conserved (11) (see also DNA molecules at specific sequences using a serine or The transposase section, below). a tyrosine nucleophile, respectively. Both recombinase Remarkably, this phylogeny does not faithfully su- families are involved in a broad range of biological pro- perimpose on that of the bacterial species from which cesses such as integration and excision of temperate bac- the transposons were originally isolated, underlining the teriophages, movement of different classes of mobile important level of horizontal transfer associated with genetic elements and control of gene expression through the family. In contrast, there is a good correlation be- programmed DNA rearrangements (17) (see also the tween the transposase phylogeny and the ∼38-bp ter- section on “Conservative site-specific recombination” of minal transposon IRs, suggesting that both transposition this volume). In all of these types of biological process, module partners
Recommended publications
  • Insertion Site Preference of Mu, Tn5, and Tn7 Transposons. Brian Green, Christiane Bouchier, Cécile Fairhead, Nancy Craig, Brendan Cormack
    Insertion site preference of Mu, Tn5, and Tn7 transposons. Brian Green, Christiane Bouchier, Cécile Fairhead, Nancy Craig, Brendan Cormack To cite this version: Brian Green, Christiane Bouchier, Cécile Fairhead, Nancy Craig, Brendan Cormack. Insertion site preference of Mu, Tn5, and Tn7 transposons.. Mobile DNA, BioMed Central, 2012, 3 (1), pp.3. 10.1186/1759-8753-3-3. pasteur-00675691 HAL Id: pasteur-00675691 https://hal-pasteur.archives-ouvertes.fr/pasteur-00675691 Submitted on 1 Mar 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Green et al. Mobile DNA 2012, 3:3 http://www.mobilednajournal.com/content/3/1/3 SHORTREPORT Open Access Insertion site preference of Mu, Tn5, and Tn7 transposons Brian Green1, Christiane Bouchier2, Cécile Fairhead3, Nancy L Craig4 and Brendan P Cormack1* Abstract Background: Transposons, segments of DNA that can mobilize to other locations in a genome, are often used for insertion mutagenesis or to generate priming sites for sequencing of large DNA molecules. For both of these uses, a transposon with minimal insertion bias is desired to allow complete coverage with minimal oversampling. Findings: Three transposons, Mu, Tn5, and Tn7, were used to generate insertions in the same set of fosmids containing Candida glabrata genomic DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Genomes
    81h INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON Small Genomes 1J.00.""", 1. " 400.000 Rsr II 900.000 September 24 -28, 2000 UCLA CONFERENCE CENTER LAKE ARROWHEAD CALIFORNIA . SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM ORGANIZERS Dr. Jeffrey H. Miller, Chair University of California, Los Angeles Dr. George Weinstock University of Texas-Houston Health Sciences Center Dr. Jizhong Zhou Oak Ridge National Laboratory Dr. Monica Riley Woods Hole Dr. Elisabeth Raleigh New England Biolabs Dr. Theresa (Terry) Gaasterland Rockefeller University ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Organizers of the conference gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the following for their support: Amgen Oak Ridge National Laboratory Diversa Corp. National Science Foundation DNASTAR Inc. Department of Energy Dupont De Nemours National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Genencor Health Integrated Genomics, Inc. Merck New England Biolabs Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. Proctor & Gamble SmithKline Beecham CONTACT NUMBER The Arrowhead Conference Center Phone number is: (909) 337-2478 SCIENTIFIC PROGRAM SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 24 4:00-6:00 pm Arrival and Check-in at Lake Arrowhead Conference Center 6:15-7:45 pm Dinner (Dining Room) Opening of Meeting (Pineview Room) 7:45-8:10 pm Jeffrey H. Miller University of California, Los Angeles Welcome 8:10-9:00 pm Keynote Address Julian Davies TerraGen Discovery, Inc. "Evolution of Microbial Resistance to Antibiotics" 9:00 pm Reception (Iris Room) MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 25 7:45-8:30 am Breakfast (Dining Room) Session I Genomes of Pathogens (Pineview Room) 8:45-9:00
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Dissecting the Hermes
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE Dissecting the Hermes Transposase: Residues Important for Target DNA Binding and Phosphorylation A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology by Joshua Allen Knapp December 2011 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Peter W. Atkinson, Chairperson Dr. Julia Bailey-Serres Dr. Howard Judelson Copyright by Joshua Allen Knapp 2011 The Dissertation of Joshua Allen Knapp is approved: ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Chairperson University of California, Riverside ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Peter Atkinson. He has been an outstanding mentor over these years and has helped me grow as a scientist and provided me with amazing research opportunities. I would like to thank my committee members Dr. Howard Judelson and Dr. Julia Bailey-Serres for all of their guidance and valuable input that has enhanced the quality of my dissertation research. I would also like to thank my undergraduate advisor Dr. Martin Case who taught me how to write scientifically. Members of the Atkinson lab have become a family for me – one of them literally. I met my wife and the love of my life, Jennifer Wright, in the Atkinson lab. She has been a rock for me, providing me with love and support in so many ways. I feel blessed to have her my life. I would not be the scientist that I am with out Rob Hice. He has taught me more about science than anyone else in my academic career and I am thankful to have him in my life as both a teacher and a friend.
    [Show full text]
  • JOURNAL of BACTERIOLOGY VOLUME 169 DECEMBER 1987 NUMBER 12 Samuel Kaplan, Editor in Chief (1992) Kenneth N
    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY VOLUME 169 DECEMBER 1987 NUMBER 12 Samuel Kaplan, Editor in Chief (1992) Kenneth N. Timmis, Editor (1992) University of Illinois, Urbana Richard M. Losick, Editor (1988) Centre Medical Universitaire, James D. Friesen, Editor (1992) Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. Geneva, Switzerland University of Toronto, L. Nicholas Ornston, Editor (1992) Graham C. Walker, Editor (1990) Toronto, Canada Yale University, New Haven, Conn. Massachusetts Institute of Stanley C. Holt, Editor (1987) Robert H. Rownd, Editor (1990) Technology, Cambridge, Mass. The University of Texas Health Northwestern Medical School, Robert A. Weisberg, Editor (1990) Science Center, San Antonio Chicago, Ill. National Institute of Child June J. Lascelles, Editor (1989) Health and Human University of California, Los Angeles Development, Bethesda, Md. EDITORIAL BOARD David Apirion (1988) James G. Ferry (1989) Eva R. Kashket (1987) Palmer Rogers (1987) Stuart J. Austin (1987) David Figurski (1987) David E. Kennell (1988) Barry P. Rosen (1989) Frederick M. Ausubel (1989) Timothy J. Foster (1989) Wil N. Konings (1987) Lucia B. Rothman-Denes (1989) Barbara Bachmann (1987) Robert T. Fraley (1988) Jordan Konisky (1987) Rudiger Schmitt (1989) Manfred E. Bayer (1988) David I. Friedman (1989) Dennis J. Kopecko (1987) June R. Scott (1987) Margret H. Bayer (1989) Masamitsu Futai (1988) Viji Krishnapillai (1988) Jane K. Setlow (1987) Claire M. Berg (1989) Robert Gennis (1988) Terry Krulwich (1987) Peter Setlow (1987) Helmut Bertrand (1988) Jane Gibson (1988) Lasse Lindahl (1987) James A. Shapiro (1988) Terry J. Beveridge (1988) Robert D. Goldman (1988) Jack London (1987) Louis A. Sherman (1988) Donald A. Bryant (1988) Susan Gottesman (1989) Sharon Long (1989) Howard A.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Damage and Tn7 Target Activation Page 1 1 2 DNA Damage
    Genetics: Published Articles Ahead of Print, published on June 18, 2008 as 10.1534/genetics.108.088161 DNA damage and Tn7 target activation 1 2 3 DNA damage differentially activates regional chromosomal loci for Tn7 4 transposition in E. coli 5 6 7 Qiaojuan Shi, Adam R. Parks, Benjamin D. Potter, Ilan J. Safir, Yun Luo, Brian 8 M. Forster, Joseph E. Peters* 9 10 Department of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca NY USA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 *To whom correspondences should be addressed Page 1 DNA damage and Tn7 target activation 1 2 3 Running title: DNA damage and Tn7 target activation 4 5 Key Words: replication restart, target site selection, DNA double strand break 6 repair, chromosome structure 7 8 Corresponding authors contact information 9 175A Wing Hall 10 Ithaca, NY 14853 11 Ph.607-255-2271 12 FAX.607-255-3904 13 [email protected] 14 15 16 Page 2 DNA damage and Tn7 target activation 1 ABSTRACT 2 The bacterial transposon Tn7 recognizes replicating DNA as a target with 3 a preference for the region where DNA replication terminates in the Escherichia 4 coli chromosome. It was previously shown that DNA double strand breaks in the 5 chromosome stimulate Tn7 transposition where transposition events occur 6 broadly around the point of the DNA break. We show that individual DNA breaks 7 actually activate a series of small regional hotspots in the chromosome for Tn7 8 insertion. These hotspots are fixed and only become active when a DNA break 9 occurs in the same region of the chromosome.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of Nancy L. Craig
    PROFILE Profile of Nancy L. Craig ancy Craig studies how DNA again. This triggers the transformation moves from place to place: from a quiet hitchhiker in the bacterial Na deceptively simple quest that genome to an active virus bent on repli- has revealed how transposons, cating itself and destroying the bacterial or so-called “DNA cut-and-paste ele- cell (1). ments,” snip themselves from one loca- tion on the chromosome and resettle in From Virus to Transposon another. Craig, a professor of molecular Craig’s love of cutting and pasting led her biology and genetics at Johns Hopkins to the National Institutes of Health University School of Medicine (Baltimore, (NIH) for a postdoctoral position in the MD), an investigator with the Howard laboratory of Howard Nash, inventor of Hughes Medical Institute, and a recently the first in vitro system for studying site- elected member of the National Academy specific recombination, such as the in- of Sciences, has helped uncover how tegration and excision cycle of phage transposable elements jump from one po- lambda. Under his guidance, Craig hoped sition to another to cause disease and to determine molecules necessary to re- sculpt the seemingly infinite variety of locate the virus within the genome. genomes on Earth. While she was at the NIH, a 1982 Even before scientists revealed in 2001 Nature article (2) piqued her interest. that half of the human genome was packed “It was about the seventh transposable with transposable elements, it was clear element described so far, aptly named from Barbara McClintock’s classic studies Tn7, that inserted into a single specific in the 1940s that these so-called “jumping site.
    [Show full text]
  • Chromatic Bacteria – a Broad Host-Range Plasmid and Chromosomal Insertion Toolbox for Fluorescent Protein Expression in Bacteria
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/402172; this version posted September 7, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Chromatic bacteria – A broad host-range plasmid and chromosomal insertion toolbox for fluorescent protein expression in bacteria Rudolf O. Schlechter1,2, Hyunwoo Jun1#, Michał Bernach1,2#, Simisola Oso1, Erica Boyd1, Dian A. Muñoz-Lintz1, Renwick C. J. Dobson1,2,3, Daniela M. Remus1,2,4, and Mitja N. P. Remus-Emsermann1,2* 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. 2Biomolecular Interaction Centre, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. 3Bio21 Molecular Science and Biotechnology Institute, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia. 4Protein Science & Engineering, Callaghan Innovation, School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand. # Both authors contributed equally to this work * Correspondence: Mitja N. P. Remus-Emsermann [email protected] Keywords: fluorophore, fluorescent labelling, tagging, Tn5, Tn7, transposon bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/402172; this version posted September 7, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Abstract Differential fluorescent labelling of bacteria has become instrumental for many aspects of microbiological research, such as the study of biofilm formation, bacterial individuality, evolution, and bacterial behaviour in complex environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Basis for DNA Targeting by the Tn7 Transposon
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.24.445525; this version posted May 25, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Structural basis for DNA targeting by the Tn7 transposon Yao Shen1,2, Josue Gomez-Blanco1,2, Michael T. Petassi3, Joseph E. Peters3, Joaquin Ortega2,4, Alba Guarné1,2,5,* 1Department of Biochemistry, McGill University, Montreal (QC), Canada. 2Centre de Recherche and Biologie Structurale, McGill University, Montreal (QC), Canada. 3Department of Microbiology, Cornell University, Ithaca (NY), USA. 4Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, McGill University Montreal (QC), Canada. 5Lead Contact *Correspondence: [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.05.24.445525; this version posted May 25, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract Tn7 transposable elements are unique for their highly specific, and sometimes programmable, target-site selection mechanisms and precise insertions. All the elements in the Tn7-family utilize a AAA+ adaptor (TnsC) to coordinates target-site selection with transposase activation and prevent insertions at sites already containing a Tn7 element. Due to its multiple functions, TnsC is considered the linchpin in the Tn7 element. Here we present the high-resolution cryo- EM structure of TnsC bound to DNA using a gain-of-function variant of the protein and a DNA substrate that together recapitulate the recruitment to a specific DNA target site.
    [Show full text]
  • Jump Around: Transposons in and out of the Laboratory[Version 1; Peer Review: 2 Approved]
    F1000Research 2020, 9(F1000 Faculty Rev):135 Last updated: 11 MAR 2020 REVIEW Jump around: transposons in and out of the laboratory [version 1; peer review: 2 approved] Anuj Kumar 1,2 1Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA 2Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA First published: 24 Feb 2020, 9(F1000 Faculty Rev):135 ( Open Peer Review v1 https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.21018.1) Latest published: 24 Feb 2020, 9(F1000 Faculty Rev):135 ( https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.21018.1) Reviewer Status Abstract Invited Reviewers Since Barbara McClintock’s groundbreaking discovery of mobile DNA 1 2 sequences some 70 years ago, transposable elements have come to be recognized as important mutagenic agents impacting genome composition, version 1 genome evolution, and human health. Transposable elements are a major 24 Feb 2020 constituent of prokaryotic and eukaryotic genomes, and the transposition mechanisms enabling transposon proliferation over evolutionary time remain engaging topics for study, suggesting complex interactions with the host, both antagonistic and mutualistic. The impact of transposition is F1000 Faculty Reviews are written by members of profound, as over 100 human heritable diseases have been attributed to the prestigious F1000 Faculty. They are transposon insertions. Transposition can be highly mutagenic, perturbing commissioned and are peer reviewed before genome integrity and gene expression in a wide range of organisms. This publication to ensure that the final, published version mutagenic potential has been exploited in the laboratory, where transposons have long been utilized for phenotypic screening and the is comprehensive and accessible.
    [Show full text]
  • Piggybac Transposon KOSUKE YUSA Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK
    piggyBac Transposon KOSUKE YUSA Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK ABSTRACT The piggyBac transposon was originally isolated been identified from another moth species, from frogs, from the cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni, in the 1980s. and for the first time, from a mammal. Moreover, be- Despite its early discovery and dissimilarity to the other DNA cause the piggyBac transposon has a broad host spec- transposon families, the piggyBac transposon was not trum from yeast to mammals, this mobile element has recognized as a member of a large transposon superfamily for a long time. Initially, the piggyBac transposon was thought been widely used for a variety of applications in a to be a rare transposon. This view, however, has now been diverse range of organisms. In this chapter, we will completely revised as a number of fully sequenced genomes describe the discovery and diversity of the piggyBac have revealed the presence of piggyBac-like repetitive elements. transposon, its mechanism of transposition, and its ap- The isolation of active copies of the piggyBac-like elements plication as a genetic tool. We will also provide two from several distinct species further supported this revision. examples of genetic screening that the piggyBac trans- fi This includes the rst isolation of an active mammalian DNA poson has enabled. transposon identified in the bat genome. To date, the piggyBac transposon has been deeply characterized and it represents a number of unique characteristics. In general, all members of the DISCOVERY OF THE piggyBac superfamily use TTAA as their integration target sites. In addition, the piggyBac transposon shows precise excision, piggyBac TRANSPOSON i.e., restoring the sequence to its preintegration state, and can It was known in the late 1970s that when insect DNA transpose in a variety of organisms such as yeasts, malaria viruses, namely Galleria mellonella or Autographa cali- parasites, insects, mammals, and even in plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Profile of Nancy L. Craig
    PROFILE Profile of Nancy L. Craig ancy Craig studies how DNA again. This triggers the transformation moves from place to place: from a quiet hitchhiker in the bacterial Na deceptively simple quest that genome to an active virus bent on repli- has revealed how transposons, cating itself and destroying the bacterial or so-called “DNA cut-and-paste ele- cell (1). ments,” snip themselves from one loca- tion on the chromosome and resettle in From Virus to Transposon another. Craig, a professor of molecular Craig’s love of cutting and pasting led her biology and genetics at Johns Hopkins to the National Institutes of Health University School of Medicine (Baltimore, (NIH) for a postdoctoral position in the MD), an investigator with the Howard laboratory of Howard Nash, inventor of Hughes Medical Institute, and a recently the first in vitro system for studying site- elected member of the National Academy specific recombination, such as the in- of Sciences, has helped uncover how tegration and excision cycle of phage transposable elements jump from one po- lambda. Under his guidance, Craig hoped sition to another to cause disease and to determine molecules necessary to re- sculpt the seemingly infinite variety of locate the virus within the genome. genomes on Earth. While she was at the NIH, a 1982 Even before scientists revealed in 2001 Nature article (2) piqued her interest. that half of the human genome was packed “It was about the seventh transposable with transposable elements, it was clear element described so far, aptly named from Barbara McClintock’s classic studies Tn7, that inserted into a single specific in the 1940s that these so-called “jumping site.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Genomic DNA Transposition Induced by Human PGBD5 Anton G
    1 Genomic DNA transposition induced by human PGBD5 2 3 Anton G. Henssena, Elizabeth Henaffb, Eileen Jianga, Amy R. Eisenberga, Julianne R. Carsona, 4 Camila M. Villasantea, Mondira Raya, Eric Stilla, Melissa Burnsc, Jorge Gandarab, Cedric 5 Feschotted, Christopher E. Masonb, Alex Kentsis a,e,f,1 6 7 8 9 a Molecular Pharmacology Program, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, NY; 10 b Institute for Computational Biomedicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; 11 c Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA; 12 d Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT; 13 e Department of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; 14 f Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY. 15 16 17 18 19 1 To whom correspondence may be addressed: Email: [email protected] 20 21 Author contributions: A.H. and A.K. designed the research, A.H., E.H., A.E., E.J., M.B., J.R.C, 22 C.V. performed the research, A.H., E.H., C.F., C.E.M., A.K. analyzed data, A.H. and A.K. wrote 23 the manuscript in consultation with all authors. 24 25 The authors declare no conflict of interest. 26 27 Data deposition: The data reported in this manuscript have been deposited to the Sequence Read 28 Archive (SRA) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/, accession number SRP061649), the Dryad 29 Digital Repository (http://datadryad.org, doi:10.5061/dryad.b2hc1), and the Zenodo computer 30 archive (http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22206).
    [Show full text]