Hotspot Report Mendenhall Wetlands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hotspot Report Mendenhall Wetlands HOTSPOTS: BIRD SURVEY OF MENDENHALL WETLANDS APRIL 2002 to MAY 2003 Photo 1 Long-billed Dowitcher.jpg Robert H. Armstrong, Richard L. Carstensen, and Mary F. Willson Juneau Audubon Society and Taku Conservation Society 2004 Some of the data for this paper were gathered by the authors under a contract between Discovery Southeast and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), and were provided to FWS in a report entitled “Bird use of the Mendenhall Wetlands April 2002 to May 2003.” The authors have included data from that report in this paper, along with additional information they have collected. Any conclusions and recommendations presented herein are the authors’ personal views, and have not been endorsed by Discovery Southeast. The Juneau Audubon Society and Taku Conservation Society provided financial support for the printing and distribution of this report. All recommendations in this report are those of the authors and have not been officially endorsed by the Juneau Audubon Society. Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................... 2 1 Methods ...................................................................................................... 2 Study site and field methods for hotspots ..................................................... 2 GIS mapping of data .................................................................................... 3 Phenology .................................................................................................... 3 Connections ................................................................................................. 4 2 Overview of diversity and abundance on the wetlands .......................... 4 3 Summary maps and charts........................................................................ 5 4 Glacial rebound, vegetation and birds ................................................... 10 5 Hotspot descriptions ............................................................................... 17 Mendenhall River mouth (r05) .................................................................... 17 Fritz Cove (r06) .......................................................................................... 18 Western mudflat sand lance area (r08) ...................................................... 19 Lower Fish Creek estuary (f08) .................................................................. 20 Upper Fish Creek estuary (f01) .................................................................. 21 Salmon Creek estuary (s01)....................................................................... 22 Otter Pond (a01) ........................................................................................ 23 Sedge flats west of Otter Pond (a08) ......................................................... 24 ERA heliport (e02) ...................................................................................... 25 Western Channel (f09) ............................................................................... 26 Upper Mendenhall River (r02, 13, 03, 07 and 04) ..................................... 27 Wigeon Ponds (p02) .................................................................................. 28 Phalarope Slough (a10) ............................................................................. 29 Junk Car Slough (a02) ............................................................................... 30 Miller-Honsinger Pond (a04) ...................................................................... 31 Float Plane Basin Finger Ponds (a03) ....................................................... 32 Auke Lake (x01) ......................................................................................... 33 Twin Lakes (t02) ......................................................................................... 34 6 Comparisons with Cain et al. 1988 ......................................................... 35 7 Phenology and distribution ..................................................................... 36 8 Connections with the rest of the world .................................................. 44 9 Animal food resources on the wetlands ................................................ 45 Fish ............................................................................................................ 45 Mammals .................................................................................................... 48 Invertebrates .............................................................................................. 48 10 Synthesis and recommendations ......................................................... 51 Shorebirds .................................................................................................. 51 Past and pending habitat loss .................................................................... 53 Birds and airplane safety ............................................................................ 53 Dogs and birds ...........................................................................................56 Hunting .......................................................................................................57 Infrequently surveyed areas of the wetlands .............................................58 Further research needs ..............................................................................59 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................ 59 Literature Cited ............................................................................................. 59 Appendices ................................................................................................... 61 Appendix A Common and scientific names ............................................... 61 Appendix B Species distribution maps ...................................................... 62 Appendix C Phenology tables for all refuge species ................................. 65 1 HOTSPOTS: BIRD SURVEY OF MENDENHALL WETLANDS, APRIL 2002 to MAY 2003 Robert H. Armstrong, Richard L. Carstensen, and Mary F. Willson Introduction For 14 months we conducted bird surveys on the Birding Association’s publication titled North American Mendenhall Wetlands State Game Refuge. The principal Birds and the existing Mendenhall Wetlands bird list goal of this survey was to document areas of the wetlands (Armstrong and Gordon 2002): that hosted large concentrations of birds at various Fall (August-November) seasons; these areas were called ‘hotspots’ of bird activity. Winter (December-February) A secondary goal was a rough comparison of present bird Spring (March-May) abundances with those recorded by Cain et al. (1988), Summer (June–July). using different methods. A third goal, which emerged as we were conducting the bird surveys, was a synopsis of Table 1.1. Dates of full surveys of the wetland. April and bird phenology on the wetlands, showing seasonal patterns early May surveys were done in both 2002 and 2003. of use. Season Dates Number/season Spring 2002 April 2-5 5 April 11-14 1 Methods April 27 Study site and field methods for hotspots. May 3-5 We surveyed most of the wetlands between the end May 14 Summer 2002 June 13 2 of the Mendenhall Peninsula and Fritz Cove and the July 1-2 southeastern edge of the Salmon Creek delta (Map 1.1). Fall 2002 August 12-15 5 Primary survey areas are those visited on all full surveys September 3 of the wetlands. Secondary survey areas were visited September 22-25 occasionally. One section of the wetlands north of Johnson October 24-25 Creek was not covered, because of poor access (Map November 29-30 10.4). For place names used in the text, see orthophoto on Winter 2003-03 December 14 3 back cover. January 21 Eighteen full surveys were completed between April February 18 Spring 2003 March 20 3 2002 and May 2003 (Table 1.1), unequally distributed April 23 among seasons. Seasons were defined as in the American May 5 Map 1.1 Location of primary survey areas (z) on 9 subunits of Mendenhall Wetlands. p = peninsula; r = river; f = fish; a = airport; n = ninemile; k = king’s; L = lemon; e = era; t = twin lakes; s = salmon. = secondary survey areas 2 Surveys were conducted by observers on foot, using all observations for Canada Goose involving resting binoculars and spotting scopes. We recorded all bird groups of more than 100 birds, then compare that to all concentrations we saw, with notes on tide, weather, feeding observations for groups of similar size. All dots location, number of individuals, habitat and activity. (survey areas) satisfying the query change color. Species present in smaller numbers were also recorded in To compare our observations to those of Cain et al. order to build a record of species diversity for each survey (1988) we also entered 422 of their largest counts (biggest area. All full surveys included each of the 42 primary bird concentrations - equivalent to our hotspot records) survey areas, timed to center around low tides in daylight into ArcView. In that study, counts were listed for 32 hours. Hotspot analyses used only these full-survey separate units of the refuge, a slightly different approach records, and omitted observations of single or small bird than in our hotspot study, which was more focused on key groups. This basic data set comprised 794 records. concentration areas. Still, the two ArcView projects make it In addition to the 18 full surveys, 41 “ancillary possible to detect changes
Recommended publications
  • Gastineau Channel Juneau, Alaska Feasibility Report
    Gastineau Channel Juneau, Alaska Feasibility Report CHANNEL DEEPENING FOR NAVIGATION ALASKA D l STR l CT CORPS OF ENGl NEEWS NOVEMBER 1977 FEASIBILITY REPORT APPENDIX A - ECONOMICS GASTINEAU CHANNEL, ALASKA PRESENT AND FUTURE ECONOMIC CONDITIONS Natural and human resources and developmental trends of the study area are presented to provide a general understanding of their relation to the problems and needs of the area and to establish a "most probable future" for the purpose of benefit and impact analysis. Of particular importance is the role waterways play in the social and economic well-being of the comunity. All waterborne traffic to and from Juneau must use Gastineau Channel. The channel southeast of Juneau is navigable by all classes of vessels, but the northern portion from Juneau-Douglas bridge to Fritz Cove is navigable only by shallow- draft vessels at selected tide levels. A shoaled reach, south of Juneau Airport, is navigable only at high tide and even then, only with current know1 edge of channel conditions. These restrictions cause the majority of traffic to take the longer route around Douglas Island, resulting in increased operating time and costs, a reduction in the navigation season due to adverse weather conditions, and the added risk of life and property because of the longer voyage through unprotected waters. TRIBUTARY AREA Gastineau Channel, a narrow strait about 16 miles long that separates Doug1 as Is1 and from the mainland of southeastern A1 aska, connects Stephens Passage on the east with Fritz Cove on the west. Although much of Southeast Alaska is a general tributary area, the Juneau-Douglas area is the principal contributor.
    [Show full text]
  • DOUGLAS ISLAND UNITS 08ND North Douglas Geography, Subsheds, Ownership CBJ's 08ND Map Page Contains 13 Priority Areas Totalling 1,275 Acres
    ND units DOUGLAS ISLAND UNITS 08ND North Douglas Geography, subsheds, ownership CBJ's 08ND map page contains 13 Priority Areas totalling 1,275 acres. All but 40 of those acres (PA 1.03, eastern Hendrickson Point) are on City land. We've divided the assessed portion of this map page into 11 ‘subsheds,’ shown with blue lines. Where possible and intuitively apparent, we have named JWMP subsheds after their dominant streams: Fish, Ninemile, Hendrickson, etc. In 2 subsheds lacking a single dominant stream, our names reflect residential features: Sundown,T urnoff. An unusual, outly- ing subshed lies north of the highway on a lobed, heart-shaped and unpointed feature that's confusingly labeled "Hendrickson Point" on some maps. Rather than converging, as in most low-gradient subsheds, small ephemeral streams radiate out across this 307 • Supplement to the JWMP Richard Carstensen • 2016 bi-lobed peninsula. We call this the Heart low-relief acres centered on the first turnoff to Ninemile Creek Road. Johnson Creek subshed drains 786 acres subshed. onto the channel aross from the east end of the runway. Working from west to east across this The narrowest part of Mendenhall wetlands is between Sunny Point on the mainland and Hendrickson Point map, the Fish Creek watershed drains 13.7 on Douglas Island. Here lies the tidal divide, where rising waters from Fritz Cove meet incoming waters from square miles into the largest and most the Juneau side. Although currents sometimes relocate this divide slightly east or west, what this generally ecologically significant estuary on Douglas means is that the subsheds so far described communicate primarily with marine waters of Auke Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolly Varden Sport Fishery-Juneau Area
    Volume 12 Job No. R-IV-C STATE OF ALASKA William A. Egan" Governor Annual Progress Report for DOLLY VARDEN SPORT FISHERY ­ JUNEAU AREA by Richard D. Reed and Robert H. Armstrong DIVISION OF SPORT FISH Rupert E. Andrews" Director Howard E. Metsker" Coordinator AJaskaResources Library & Information Services Anchorahff' Alaska TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. RECOMMENDATIONS 0 0 2 OBJECTIVES 0 • 0 0 • 4 INTRODUCTION • • 0 • 0 4 TECHNIQUES USED 0 e 0 0 0 0 • 0 5 FINDINGS 0 • 0 0 8 WATERSHED SURVEYS LAKES: Auke 0 10 Cropley 0 •• 0 0 0 ••• • 0 0 0 0 0 16 Dredge • 0 0 0 17 Glacier and Moraine 0 0 0 26 Louie 0 0 0 0 43 Marshall Ponds 0 0 • 44 Mendenhall 0 44 Norton 0 0 0 0 56 Peterson 0 0 0 • 0 0 59 QT 0 0 • 64 Salmon Creek Reservoir 0 0 0 0 67 Windfall 0 0 0 • 0 0 82 STREAMS : Auke Creek 0 8 Auke Nu Creek 0 0 0 12 Bay Creek 0 • 0 •• 0 0 0 14 Bear Creek 0 0 • 0 15 Cove Creek 0 • 0 0 15 Cross Bay Creek 0 0 16 Duck Creek • 18 Eagle Creek 0 • •• 0 19 Eagle River 0 0 20 Elevenmile Creek 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 22 0 0 23 Falls Creek 0 0 0 0 • 0 Fish Creek 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 Gold Creek 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 Grant Creek 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 Hendrickson Creek 0 0 0 30 Herbert River • 0 0 0 31 Johnson Creek 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 32 Jordan Creek 0 0 • 0 0 34 i Page No.
    [Show full text]
  • Mendenhall Wetlands State Game Refuge Final Management Plan
    MENDENHALL WETLANDS STATE GAME REFUGE MANAGEMENT PLAN March 1990 Prepared by the Divisions of Habitat and Wildlife Conservation Alaska Department of Fish and Game Island Center Building P. O. Box 20 Douglas, Alaska 99824 Don W. Collinsworth, Commissioner The Alaska Department of Fish and Game operates all of its public programs and activities free from discrimination on the basis of race, religion, color, national origin, age, sex, or handicap. Because the department receives federal funding, any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against should write to: OEO, U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Mendenhall Wetlands State Game Refuge Draft Management Plan has been prepared by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) biologists Debra Clausen and Janet Hall Schempf (Habitat Division) and Bruce Dinneford (Division of Wildlife Conservation) with special assistance from clerical staff Ann Wilkinson and technical support from Frances Inoue. The plan has been developed with the aid of an inter-agency planning team composed of representatives from state, federal and local agencies with jurisdiction over the refuge. The planning team has participated in the plan's development from its initiation. Planning team members who participated in development of the plan are as follows: Nate Johnson, Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities; Rita Romans and Elizaveta Shadura, Alaska Department of Natural Resources; Ron Flinn and Gene Rehfield, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation; Gary Gunstrom, ADF&G Commercial Fisheries Division; Ron Josephson, ADF&G Fisheries Rehabilitation, Enhancement, and Development Division; Murray Walsh and Ira Winograd, City and Borough of Juneau; Paul Bowers, City and Borough of Juneau (Airport); Duane Peterson, National Marine Fisheries Service; Rich Seagrave, U.
    [Show full text]
  • Restoration,Enhancement,And Mitigation Opportunities Within
    RESTORATION, ENHANCEMENT, AND MITIGATION OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN JUNEAU WATERSHEDS VOL. I LITERATURE REVIEW JUNEAU WATERSHED PARTNERSHIP Our mission is to Organization Name: Juneau Watershed Partnership promote watershed Contact: Amy Sumner, Project Coordinator integrity in the City Mailing Address: PO Box 35132 and Borough of Juneau, AK 99803-5132 Juneau through Email: [email protected] education, research and communication while encouraging sustainable use and development. This report is funded with qualified outer continental shelf oil and gas revenues by the Coastal Impact Assistance Program, Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S. Department of Interior GRANT # 10 – CIAP – 030 CFDA 15.688 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose and Methods ................................................................................................................................... 9 Watersheds Outside The USAB ................................................................................................................... 13 Watersheds within the USAB ...................................................................................................................... 22 Mendenhall River ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Juneau Fish Habitat Assessment (Revised)
    Regional Information Report 5J12-03 Juneau Fish Habitat Assessment (Revised) by Mike Bethers, Kristen Munk, and Cheryl Seifert March 2012 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries ,­ JUNEAU FISH HABITAT· ASSESSMENT by .. Mike Bethers Kris Munk. Cheryl Seifert Revised June 1995 . Alaska Department of Fish and Game Division of Sport Fish Douglas,Alaska The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. The department administers all programs and activities in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire further information please write to ADF&G, P.O. Box 25526, Juneau, AK 99802-5526; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4040 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 300 Webb, Arlington, VA 22203 or O.E.O., U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington DC 20240. For information on alternative formats for this and other department publications, please contact the department ADA Coordinator at (voice) 907-465-6077, (TDD) 907-465-3646, or (FAX) 907-465-6078. Contents Introduction ..................................... ~ ......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report, Juneau Coastal Management Program
    INTERIM REPORT JUNEAU COASTAL·. MANAGEMENT PROGRAM PHASE·l @01F\1 £~@ ·OO@~@(W@[}{] @[F JJ01J~~~01J [¥)[L£~~0~@ \ [Q)~~£~1Y~~~ll I N TE R I M RE P 0 RT . JUNEAU COASTAL r~ANAGEMENT PROGRAM - PHASE I This program-vtas supported in part by Federal Coastal Zone Manage­ ment Program Development funds {P.L. 92-583, Sec. 305), granted to the State of Alaska by the Office of Coastal Zone Hanagement, NOAA, U.S. Department of Commerce; the Alaska Department of Community and Regional Affairs, and the City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska. CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU PLANNING DEPARTf1ENT October, 1977 JUNEAU COASTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM - PHASE I INTERIM REPORT CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU ASSEMBLY William D. Overstreet, Mayor David Freer Roger Allington Harry Aase B. W. Finley John Jensen Jeffrey Morrison Raymond Paddock James R. Wakefield I Mar Winegar, City/Borough Manager PLANNING COMMISSION Kay Diebels, Chairperson Stan Beadle Marjorie Gorsuch Hugh Grant Malcolm Menzies Bob Minch Terry Quinn Waco Shelley James Triplette Art Hartenberger, Planning Director PARTICIPATING PLANNING STAFF Ronald D. Bolton, Assistant Planning Director Robert Fishel John Kem Tom Lawson CONSULTANT R. W. PAVITT AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Bob Pavitt Dan Bishop Frank Homan Eric McDowell · • ,--- JUNEAU C01\STAL !vtANAGEMENT PROGRN~ - PHASE I --- -i- • TABLE 0~ CONTENTS I I 1 ~ T R0 DU C T I 0 N A. RELEVANT STUDIES - 1- B. PRELIMINARY. DEFINITION OF PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY - 2- c. REVIEW OF RELEVANT LEGISLATION - 4- ' D. DESCRIPTION OF FEDERAL AtlD STATE AGENCY ACTIVITIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES E. DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION ACTIVITIES - 9- 1 I I BACKGRQUND FOR COASTAL PLANKING A.
    [Show full text]
  • Juneau Fish Habitat Assessment
    Regional Information Report 5J12-02 Juneau Fish Habitat Assessment by Mike Bethers, Kristen Munk, and Cheryl Seifert March 2012 Alaska Department of Fish and Game Divisions of Sport Fish and Commercial Fisheries r----­ JUNEAU FISH HABITAT ASSESSMENT by Mike Bethers KrisMunk Cheryl Seifert March 1993 Alaska Depanment of Fish and Game Division of Span Fish Douglas, Alaska The Alaska Department of Fish and Game administers all programs and activities free from discrimination based on race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, marital status, pregnancy, parenthood, or disability. The department administers all programs and activities in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility, or if you desire further information please write to ADF&G, P.O. Box 25526, Juneau, AK 99802-5526; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 4040 N. Fairfax Drive, Suite 300 Webb, Arlington, VA 22203 or O.E.O., U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington DC 20240. For information on alternative formats for this and other department publications, please contact the department ADA Coordinator at (voice) 907-465-6077, (TDD) 907-465-3646, or (FAX) 907-465-6078. Contents Introduction........................................................................................... 1 Species present in Juneau waters Stream types Developmental impacts Chapter 1: Auke Creek ................... g ••••••••••••• II •• """ ...... II •••• ~ •• II •••••••••••••• 11 Chapter 2: Auke Lake ............................ .,,. .... ,, .. ,,,, ...........,,,.......,,,,, ....... .,.,,..,,...... 15 Chapter 3: Auke Nu Creek .................................................•...........
    [Show full text]
  • The Mendenhall Wetlands,The Bird Area Recognized a Globally Important Birds Come to Mendenhall Wetlands from Many Places
    The Mendenhall Wetlands, a globally recognized Important a globally recognized Bird Area The Mendenhall Wetlands, Birds come to Mendenhall Wetlands from many places Bald Eagle Rock Sandpiper (resident) (breeds in western and northern Alaska) Lesser Black-backed Gull (vagrant from Asia) Armstrong • Trumpeter Swan (winters in Lower 48) Pectoral Sandpiper Carstensen • Willson Hermans Osborn (winters in South America) Robert H. Armstrong • Richard L. Carstensen • Mary F. Willson • Marge Hermans Osborn $12.00 9 781578 3 34438 7 21925 1 1052 9 Arctic Tern (winters in Antarctica) Robert H. Armstrong Richard L. Carstensen Mary F. Willson Marge Hermans Osborn Acknowledgements We are especially grateful to Jim King for allowing us to excerpt from his book Attending Alaska’s Birds information on the establishment of the Mendenhall Wetlands State Game Refuge. Jim also reviewed the entire book and provided several insights on the Wetlands. Others that reviewed the book and provided useful comments included Rich Gordon, Matt Kirchhoff, Paul Suchanek, and Mark Schwan. Paul Suchanek graciously provided us with his bird database for the Wetlands that included more than 15,000 entries on the numbers of birds by species. Rich Gordon gave us his notes on bird abundance by species that included information he had gathered on the Wetlands for over 40 years. Pauline Strong produced the monthly summaries of this data on pages 33-40. Patty Rose and Gus van Vliet reviewed the phenology chart and made several useful corrections. Rich Gordon and Steve Zimmerman helped prepare the application for the establish- ment of the Wetlands as an Important Bird Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrology, Geomorphology, and Flood Profiles of the Mendenhall River, Juneau, Alaska
    Prepared in cooperation with the Alaska Department of Fish and Game and City and Borough of Juneau Hydrology, Geomorphology, and Flood Profiles of the Mendenhall River, Juneau, Alaska Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4150 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Surveying flood marks on the Mendenhall River near cross section 74 Hydrology, Geomorphology, and Flood Profiles of the Mendenhall River, Juneau, Alaska By Edward G. Neal and Randy H. Host __________________________________________________________________ U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4150 Prepared in cooperation with the ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME and CITY AND BOROUGH OF JUNEAU Anchorage, Alaska 1999 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Use of trade names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information: Copies of this report may be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services 4230 University Drive, Suite 201 Box 25286 Anchorage, AK 99508-4664 Denver, CO 80225-0286 http://ak.water.usgs.gov CONTENTS Abstract . .1 Introduction . .1 Purpose and Scope . .2 Description of Study Area . .2 Hydrology of the Mendenhall River Basin . .4 Geomorphology of the Mendenhall River . .4 Mendenhall River Channel Formation . .4 Present Channel Conditions . .5 Regional Uplift . .13 Mendenhall River Channel Adjustments . .14 Methods of Analysis . .15 Hydrologic Analysis . .15 Hydraulic Analysis . .16 Peak Flow of October 20, 1998 . .16 Flood Profile Computations . .19 Flood Profiles . .20 Summary .
    [Show full text]