DOCSLIB.ORG

Study to Identify Potential Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showperson Sites In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study to Identify Potential Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showperson Sites In Study to Identify Potential Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showperson Sites in Cheshire West and Chester ANNEXES Cheshire West and Chester Borough Council July 2011 Annexes - Potential Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showperson Sites Report completed / submitted by: Simon Turner Date: 26 August 2011 Annexes - Potential Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showperson Sites TABLE OF CONTENTS A SCHEDULE OF CONSULTATION ACTIVITY ................................................................... 1 B GYPSY AND TRAVELLER AND TRAVELLING SHOWPERSON CONSULTATION SUMMARY REPORTS ....................................................................................................... 2 C SITE APPRAISAL FRAMEWORK ..................................................................................... 3 D SCHEDULE OF REPRESENTATIONS .............................................................................. 4 E LONG LIST OF POTENTIAL SITES .................................................................................. 5 F LOCATION PLANS FOR SITES ON THE LONG LIST ..................................................... 6 G FILTERED LONG LIST OF POTENTIAL SITES ............................................................... 7 H LOCATION PLAN FOR SITES ON THE FILTERED LONG LIST ..................................... 8 I LIST OF SURVEYED SITES ............................................................................................... 9 J LOCATION PLAN FOR SURVEYED SITES .................................................................... 10 K SITE PLANS FOR SHORTLISTED SITES ...................................................................... 11 Annexes - Potential Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showperson Sites A. Schedule of Consultation Activity 1 CWaC Potential Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showperson Sites Study Consultation Activities • Press release issued October 2009 which went in the local papers. • News of the study was also placed on the front page of the Council website in October 2009, and information has constantly been on the Spatial Planning web pages. • A letter was sent to all Parish Councils in November 09, (approx 97), and Members were briefed in October 2011. • Letters were sent to approximately 150 stakeholders and interested parties in October 2009, and the call for sites and proforma were placed in all libraries and Council offices in October, along with an explanatory letter. The press release, website briefing, letter to members, members briefing and letter to stakeholders follow. Press Release: Date: 20th October 2009 Reference Number: 399/09 STUDY TO IDENTIFY POTENTIAL TRAVELLERS’ SITES THROUGHOUT WEST CHESHIRE Cheshire West and Chester Council have commissioned consultants to undertake a comprehensive study throughout West Cheshire, to identify and shortlist potential sites for Gypsies, Travellers and Travelling Show people. Lasting until next March, the study is designed to enable the Council to meet the Government’s requirements on permanent and and transit site numbers. The Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) has published figures for consultation, which require Cheshire West & Chester to provide a minimum of 45 permanent pitches and 10 transit pitches by 2016. This provision will be met by a mixture of official sites of ten to 15 pitches and smaller private family sites. But Cheshire West and Chester, which already has 59 pitches on 5 sites, has challenged the RSS figures suggesting that new provision should be in a range between 31 to 45 new pitches, reflecting the findings of a comprehensive 2007 Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment. Cllr Herbert Manley, Prosperity Executive Member said: Whilst we have this existing number of pitches, one of the sites only has an ‘accepted‘ status and the remainder are private. The Government want us to increase the number of official pitches to the consultation figure and whilst we are challenging this figure, we do accept the need for additional provision. “ The Council is committed to taking a proactive approach in planning for future provision of sites to meet the needs of this community. This study to identify potential sites will provide a robust evidence base to support the development plan process in line with planning policy requirements. “Having permanent sites provide certainty for everyone.” said Cllr Manley. “Not only are they beneficial for the Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showperson community, but an absence of authorised sites has been used by the Courts and Planning Inspectorate throughout the country to justify retention of some unauthorised developments. “If sites are not identified it is likely that unauthorised encampments and developments will continue, sometimes in inappropriate and unsuitable locations which in the past have led to problems and local tensions, along with considerable expenditure in enforcement action, legal and clear up costs. “ Added Cllr.Manley: “It is important to stress that there will be consultation with the public both before and after a short list is agreed and also at the planning application stage.” The Council is committed to working more effectively in the fields of policy and site allocation, enforcement and effective liaison and community engagement with all parties. Comments are being invited from all members of the public on the proposed criteria which will be used to help appraise and identify suitable sites. A ‘call for sites’ is also being undertaken, and any suggestions of suitable sites and locations will be welcomed. Further details and information on how to submit sites or comments on the proposed criteria can be found on the Council website at http://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/planning/spatial_planning.aspx or by writing to Spatial Planning, Cheshire West and Chester Council, Backford Hall, Chester, CH1 6PZ. The closing date for comments and site suggestions is Friday November 13th. Information is also available at all Council offices and public libraries in Cheshire West and Chester, or you can telephone 01244 973806 or 01244 972854. For further information contact Cllr Herbert Manley on 01606 79977 or Ian Callister on 01244 972216. ends Web Briefing: Potential Gypsy, Traveller and Travelling Showpersons Sites The Council has commissioned a study to identify potential sites for Gypsy, Travellers and Travelling Showpersons throughout Cheshire West. A consultation exercise is underway to seek your views on the criteria which will be used to shortlist potential sites, and for any suggestions for suitable sites to be put forward. This stage of the consultation will close on Friday November 13th. http://www.cheshirewestandchester.gov.uk/planning/spatial_planning/potential_gtt_si tes.aspx Letter to Parish Councils: Dear Sir/Madam Re: Study to Identify Potential Gypsy and Traveller and Travelling Showperson Sites in Cheshire West and Chester The Borough Council is legally required to assess the need for Gypsy and Traveller accommodation in its area and facilitate the provision of pitches to meet any identified need. In terms of assessing accommodation needs, in 2007 a Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment (GTAA) was undertaken for the sub-region of Cheshire, Halton, Warrington and St Helens. It identified a need for between 31 and 45 residential pitches and 10 transit pitches for Gypsies and Travellers in Cheshire West & Chester between 2006-2016. You will have been consulted recently about the Partial Review of the Regional Spatial Strategy (RSS) which identifies in its draft policies a minimum requirement for 45 residential and 10 transit pitches by 2016. The Partial Review still has some way to go before being approved and the Borough Council has objected to the figure of 45 pitches on the grounds that it isn’t consistent with level of need identified in the GTAA. The Borough Council will be pursuing this objection through the RSS Public Examination process. The Council takes its responsibilities for making adequate provision for Gypsies and Travellers very seriously. It is committed to working proactively to ensure that there is adequate accommodation for Gypsy and Travellers. The unacceptable alternative would be a reactive approach and a situation where the Council simply responded to continued unauthorised Gypsy and Traveller developments. We have already seen that in these cases, a lack of pitch provision has often resulted in unauthorised developments obtaining planning permission, particularly at appeal. The purpose of this letter is to advise you that, as part of this proactive approach, the Borough Council has commissioned consultants Ecosgen to carry out a study to identify potential Gypsy and Traveller sites in Cheshire West and Chester to meet the need that has been identified in the GTAA and the requirement of the RSS Partial Review when approved. The Study will also seek to identify sites for the provision of 10 Travelling Showpersons’ pitches by 2016. It is anticipated that the study will be completed in March 2010. There will be a number of stages to the study but, in summary, it will initially involve collating a long list of sites from various data sources. These sites will then be tested against a range of criteria to derive a short-list. These will then be assessed in more detail. The outcome of this ‘testing’ will be the identification of a number of sites that are the most suitable and deliverable for these types of development. The study is being carried out in accordance with a robust methodology and in an open and transparent way. Clearly this will not guarantee
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cheshire Fire Authority Draft IRMP 2020-2024 Consultation Additional Resources and Consultation Responses
    Draft Integrated Risk Management Plan 2020-2024 Consultation Responses and Additional Resources June 2020 Draft Annual Action Plan 2020- 2024 (IRMP 16) Consultation Report Page 1 of 80 Contents Page 1. Introduction 5 2. Additional Resources • Social Media and Online Activity 6 • List of Stakeholders Communicated With 12 • Draft IRMP Summary and Survey 15 3. Individual Public Responses 23 4. Social Media Comments 32 5. Public Survey – Free Text Comments • Contact with the Service in the last 3 years 44 • Overall satisfaction with the Service’s performance 45 • Expand the Safe and Well programme 46 • Developing a road safety plan 53 • Reviewing the Risk Based Inspection Programme 71 • Developing a HMO safety campaign 84 • Replacing the third aerial appliance 94 • Relocating the second engine at Ellesmere Port 102 • Introducing a Day Crewing model at Wilmslow 113 • Expanding the fleet of RRRUs 120 • Other comments 129 6. Focus Group Notes 137 7. Deliberative Workshop Notes 145 8. Staff Survey – Free Text Comments • Expanding the Safe and Well programme 159 Draft IRMP 2020-24 Consultation Feedback Report: Additional Resources & Consultation Responses 2 • Developing a road safety plan 160 • Reviewing the Risk Based Inspection Programme 162 • Developing a HMO safety campaign 164 • Replacing the third aerial appliance 165 • Relocating the second engine at Ellesmere Port 167 • Introducing a Day Crewing model at Wilmslow 169 • Expanding the fleet of RRRUs 170 • Reviewing our water strategy 172 • Developing a wildfire capability 174 • Reviewing special appliances 175 • Other comments 176 9. Staff Visit and Conference Notes • Expanding the Safe and Well programme 178 • Developing a road safety plan 181 • Replacing the third aerial appliance 184 • Introducing a Day Crewing model at Wilmslow 186 • Relocating the second engine at Ellesmere Port 187 • Expanding the fleet of RRRUs 189 • Reviewing our water strategy 191 • Developing a wildfire capability 191 • Reviewing special appliances 192 10.
    [Show full text]
  • 7206 Thf London Gazette, 11 September, 19J 4
    7206 THF LONDON GAZETTE, 11 SEPTEMBER, 19J 4. SECOND SCHEDULE. ESSEX. Municipal Boroughs.—Chelmsford: Colches- PROHIBITED AREAS. ter : Harwich: Maldon: Southend-on-Sea. Urban Districts.—Brentwood: Brightlingeea:. The following areas are prohibited areas in Burnham-on-Crouch: Clacton: Frinton-on- England: — Sea: Grays Thurrock: Leigh-on-Sea: Shoe- CHESHIRE. bury ness : Tilbury: Walton-on-the-Naze. County Boroughs.—Birkenhead: Chester: Witham: Wivenhoe. Wallasey. Rural Districts.—Billericay: Braintree—(Civ: Urban Districts.—Bromborough : Ellesmere Parishes of—Feering, Great Coggeshall Port and Whitby: Higher Bebington: Kelvedon, Little C'oggeshall, MarkshalU Hoole: Hoylake and West Kirby: Lower Rivenhall, Fairsted, Faulkbourne, Hatfield. Bebington: Neston and Parkgate: Runcorn. Peverel, and Terling only) : Chelmsford: Rural Districts.—Chester (Civil Parishes of— Lexden: Maldon : Orsett: Rochf ord: Tend." Bache, Backford, Blacom-cum-Crabwall, ring. Bridge Trafford, Capenhurst, Caughall, GLOUCESTERSHIRE . Chorlton by Backford, Croughton, Dunham- County Borough.—Bristol. on-the-Hill, Elton, Great Saughall, Haps- Urban Districts.—C'oleford : Kingswood. ford, Hoole Village, Ince, Lea by Backford, Rural Districts.—Chipping Sodbury: Lyd- Little Saughall, Little Stanney, Mickle bury: Thornbury: Warmley: West Dean. Trafford, Mollington, Moston, Newton-by- Chester, Picto^i, Shotwick, Shotwick Park, HAMPSHIRE. Stoke, Thornton-le-Moors, Upton-by- County Boroughs.—Bournemouth: Ports- Chester, Wervin, Wimbolds Trafford, and mouth : Southampton. Woodbank only): Runcorn (Civil Parishes Municipal Boroughs.—Christchurch : Lyming- of—Acton Grange, Antrobus, Appleton, ton: Romsey. Bartington, Crowley, Daresbury, Dutton, Urban Districts.—Eastleigh and Bishopstoke . Grappenhall, Great Budworth, Hatton, Fareham: Gosport and Alverstoke. Higher Whitley, Keckwick, Latchford Havant: Itchen: Warblington. Without, Lower Whitley, Moore, Newton- Rural Districts.—Christchurch : Fareham by-Daresbury, Preston-on-the-Hill, Seven Havant: Ljonington: New Forest: Romsey.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE for ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW of CHESHIRE WEST and CHESTER Draft Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in Th
    SHEET 3, MAP 3 Proposed Ward boundaries in Willaston, Burton and Thornton KEY THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND UNITARY AUTHORITY BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY PARISH BOUNDARY ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CHESHIRE WEST AND CHESTER PARISH BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH WARD BOUNDARY PARISH WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH WARD BOUNDARY WEST SUTTON WARD PROPOSED WARD NAME Draft Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in the Unitary Authority of Cheshire West and Chester November 2009 LEDSHAM CP PARISH NAME Sheet 3 of 7 NESTON PARISH WARD PROPOSED PARISH WARD NAME Scale : 1cm = 0.08000 km This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Grid interval 1km Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. The Electoral Commission GD03114G 2009. Glenmoriston Home Farm E K A R M A H T S N A E B E W E N C T H Y E H S E T A E T R H R L O A N A E D H S OOT T ON R G S REE C E N H E T B 51 O 53 O H Hooton Works E L Y Trading Estate L A L N A Woodside N E B E Nursery E 5 N 1 5 A 1 D L Greenwood ROA TON L HOO L Nurseries Chestnut E NESTON WARD B Farm E ANE U ILL L L M B NESTON PARISH WARD Hinderton E B Mill Lane Farm N I A Grange R Church Hooton L K L E Hooton O N S O H Station C H E H C O S D A OA O RY R D W AR L E QU R L N O E O A A N V N D A E E L R L D L W I A D L A A M O E T R R LE OAD E A O R R Recreation Ground D TON R A W IA OO R D H B O A R H 54 ANN K S S 0 HAL Childer Thornton L ROA L D Willaston
    [Show full text]
  • Member Budget Spend 2015-16
    Details of Spend April 2015- March 2016 Cheshire West and Chester Member Budgets Locality Summary Member Budget Spend All Cheshire West and Chester wards 2015-2016 Total Cheshire West and Chester Member ward budget allocation (inc carry forwards from 14-15): 774,151 Total spend: 506,980 Total requested carry forward: 267,171 Underspend: 0 Chester elected members 2015-2016 Total Chester member ward budget allocation (inc carry forwards from 2014-15): 173,674 Total Chester Member ward spend: 126,196 Total requested carry forward: 47,478 Underspend: 0 Ellesmere Port elected members 2015-2016 Total Ellesmere Port ward member budget allocation (inc carry forwards from 2014-15): 145,300 Total Ellesmere Port ward member spend: 80,239 Total requested carry forward: 65,061 Underspend: 0 Rural elected members 2015-2016 Total Rural member ward member allocation (inc carry forwards): 225,177 Total Rural member ward spend: 139,164 Total requested carry forward: 86,013 Underspend: 0 Northwich and Winsford elected members 2015-2016 Total Winsford and Northwich ward member allocation(Iinc carry forward): 230,000 Total Winsford and Northwich ward member spend: 161,381 Total requested carry forward: 68,619 Underspend: 0 Breakdown of ward shown below: Chester locality ward detail member budget spend Blacon ward 2015-2016 Total ward budget (inc carry forwards): 30,000 Total ward spend: 23,077 Total ward requested carry forward: 6,923 Total ward (under)/overspend: 0 Total spend councillor Carolyn Gahan: 7,622 Total spend councillor Reggie Jones: 8,216 Total
    [Show full text]
  • Youth Arts Audit: West Cheshire and Chester: Including Districts of Chester, Ellesmere Port and Neston and Vale Royal 2008
    YOUTH ARTS AUDIT: WEST CHESHIRE AND CHESTER: INCLUDING DISTRICTS OF CHESTER, ELLESMERE PORT AND NESTON AND VALE ROYAL 2008 This project is part of a wider pan Cheshire audit of youth arts supported by Arts Council England-North West and Cheshire County Council Angela Chappell; Strategic Development Officer (Arts & Young People) Chester Performs; 55-57 Watergate Row South, Chester, CH1 2LE Email: [email protected] Tel: 01244 409113 Fax: 01244 401697 Website: www.chesterperforms.com 1 YOUTH ARTS AUDIT: WEST CHESHIRE AND CHESTER JANUARY-SUMMER 2008 CONTENTS PAGES 1 - 2. FOREWORD PAGES 3 – 4. WEST CHESHIRE AND CHESTER PAGES 3 - 18. CHESTER PAGES 19 – 33. ELLESMERE PORT & NESTON PAGES 34 – 55. VALE ROYAL INTRODUCTION 2 This document details Youth arts activity and organisations in West Cheshire and Chester is presented in this document on a district-by-district basis. This project is part of a wider pan Cheshire audit of youth arts including; a separate document also for East Cheshire, a sub-regional and county wide audit in Cheshire as well as a report analysis recommendations for youth arts for the future. This also precedes the new structure of Cheshire’s two county unitary authorities following LGR into East and West Cheshire and Chester, which will come into being in April 2009 An audit of this kind will never be fully accurate, comprehensive and up-to-date. Some data will be out-of-date or incorrect as soon as it’s printed or written, and we apologise for any errors or omissions. The youth arts audit aims to produce a snapshot of the activity that takes place in West Cheshire provided by the many arts, culture and youth organisations based in the county in the spring and summer of 2008– we hope it is a fair and balanced picture, giving a reasonable impression of the scale and scope of youth arts activities, organisations and opportunities – but it is not entirely exhaustive and does not claim to be.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LONDON GAZETTE, 27 OCTOBER, 1914. 8627 Said Appendix Were Substituted for the Afore- Caledonian Canal, and the Following Said Second Schedule
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, 27 OCTOBER, 1914. 8627 said Appendix were substituted for the afore- Caledonian Canal, and the following said Second Schedule. parishes to the south and east of the Canal R. McKENNA, —Kilmallie: Kilmonivaig. One of His Majesty's Principal Secretaries of State. KlNCARDINESHIRE. Home Office, Whitehall. The whole county. 23 October, 1914. Ross AND CROMARTY. So much of the County, including the Western Islands, as is not already included in the list ADDITIONAL AREAS. of prohibited areas. ENGLAND. ESSEX. IRELAND. Rural Districts.—Romford (Civil Parishes of CORK. Cranham, Great Warley, Rainham, and The whole county. Wennington). KENT. KERRY. Municipal Borough.—Tenterden. The whole county. Rural Districts.—Tenterden : Cranbrook. APPENDIX. LINCOLNSHIRE. PROHIBITED AREAS. Municipal Borough.—Boston. Urban Districts.—Holbeach : Long Sutton: The following areas are prohibited areas in Spalding: Sutton Bridge. England:'— Rural Districts.—Boston: Crowland: East Elloe: Sibsey: Spalding. CHESHIRE. County Boroughs.—Birkenhead: Chester: NORFOLK. Wallasey. So much of the County as is not already in- Urban Districts.—Bromborough: Ellesmere cluded in the list of prohibited areas. Port and Whitby: Higher Bebington: Hoole: Hoylake and West Kirby: Lower NORTHUMBERLAND . Bebington: Neston and Parkgate: Runcorn. Municipal Borough.—Berwick-upon-Tweed. Rural Districts.—Chester (Civil Parishes of— Urban Districts.—Alnwick: Amble: Roth- Bache, Backford, Blacom cum Crabwall, bury. Bridge Trafford, C'apenhurst, Caughall, Rural Districts.—Alnwick: Belford : Glen- Chorlton by Backford, Croughton, Dunham- dale: Norham and Islandshires: Rothbury. on-the-Hill, Elton, Great Saughall, Haps- fo-rd, Hoole Village, Ince, Lea by Backford, SUFFOLK. Little Saughall, Little Stanney, Mickle So' much of the County as is not already in- Trafford, Mollington, Moston, Newton-by- cluded in the list of prohibited areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 95 MINUTES of a MEETING of SAUGHALL AND
    MINUTES OF A MEETING OF SAUGHALL AND SHOTWICK PARK PARISH COUNCIL held on 7 November 2005 at the Vernon Institute, Saughall In attendance: Councillor WI Humphrey Councillor Mrs P Humphrey Councillor Mrs J Johnson Councillor B Kerr (in the Chair) Councillor C Moss Councillor R Shukla Councillor Mrs JE Storrar Councillor RA Storrar Councillor Mrs H Thorniley-Jones Councillor A Warrington Councillor Mrs D Whitton Councillor C Wynne-Eyton (Tree Warden) Councillor Mrs M Wynne-Eyton Councillor Mrs J Young 185 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies were received from: County Councillor D Rowlands 186 CODE OF CONDUCT – DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST The Chairman, Councillor B Kerr, declared a Prejudicial Interest in item 13 on the agenda – Chairman’s Allowance. Although he did not leave the meeting whilst the proposal to pay the Chairman an allowance was under discussion, he did not speak or vote on the item. 187 CASUAL VACANCIES No nominations had been received in respect of the vacancy in the Saughall Ward and no election had been called for the Shotwick Park Ward. Consequently, Chester City Council’s Election Officer had advised that the Council should co-opt two parishioners to fill the current vacancies on the Council. RESOLVED: That (1) Mrs H Thorniley-Jones of the Greyhound Inn, Church Road, Saughall be co-opted to fill the vacant Council seat in respect of the Shotwick Park Ward; and (2) Mr WI Humphrey of 1 Smithy Close, Saughall be co-opted to fill the vacant Council seat in respect of the Saughall Ward. 188 ACCEPTANCE OF OFFICE AND SIGNING OF THE CODE OF CONDUCT Councillors WI Humphrey and Mrs H Thorniley-Jones signed an acceptance of office form and undertaking to observe the Parish Council’s Code of Conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Cheshire Place-Names
    INDEX OF CHESHIRE PLACE-NAMES Acton, 12 Bowdon, 14 Adlington, 7 Bradford, 12 Alcumlow, 9 Bradley, 12 Alderley, 3, 9 Bradwall, 14 Aldersey, 10 Bramhall, 14 Aldford, 1,2, 12, 21 Bredbury, 12 Alpraham, 9 Brereton, 14 Alsager, 10 Bridgemere, 14 Altrincham, 7 Bridge Traffbrd, 16 n Alvanley, 10 Brindley, 14 Alvaston, 10 Brinnington, 7 Anderton, 9 Broadbottom, 14 Antrobus, 21 Bromborough, 14 Appleton, 12 Broomhall, 14 Arden, 12 Bruera, 21 Arley, 12 Bucklow, 12 Arrowe, 3 19 Budworth, 10 Ashton, 12 Buerton, 12 Astbury, 13 Buglawton, II n Astle, 13 Bulkeley, 14 Aston, 13 Bunbury, 10, 21 Audlem, 5 Burton, 12 Austerson, 10 Burwardsley, 10 Butley, 10 By ley, 10 Bache, 11 Backford, 13 Baddiley, 10 Caldecote, 14 Baddington, 7 Caldy, 17 Baguley, 10 Calveley, 14 Balderton, 9 Capenhurst, 14 Barnshaw, 10 Garden, 14 Barnston, 10 Carrington, 7 Barnton, 7 Cattenhall, 10 Barrow, 11 Caughall, 14 Barthomley, 9 Chadkirk, 21 Bartington, 7 Cheadle, 3, 21 Barton, 12 Checkley, 10 Batherton, 9 Chelford, 10 Bebington, 7 Chester, 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 12, 16, 17, Beeston, 13 19,21 Bexton, 10 Cheveley, 10 Bickerton, 14 Chidlow, 10 Bickley, 10 Childer Thornton, 13/; Bidston, 10 Cholmondeley, 9 Birkenhead, 14, 19 Cholmondeston, 10 Blackden, 14 Chorley, 12 Blacon, 14 Chorlton, 12 Blakenhall, 14 Chowley, 10 Bollington, 9 Christleton, 3, 6 Bosden, 10 Church Hulme, 21 Bosley, 10 Church Shocklach, 16 n Bostock, 10 Churton, 12 Bough ton, 12 Claughton, 19 171 172 INDEX OF CHESHIRE PLACE-NAMES Claverton, 14 Godley, 10 Clayhanger, 14 Golborne, 14 Clifton, 12 Gore, 11 Clive, 11 Grafton,
    [Show full text]
  • Puddington Parish Council Minutes
    PUDDINGTON PARISH COUNCIL MINUTES Puddington n Shotwick n Woodbank n Two Mills n Shotwick Park Minutes of the Annual Meeting of the Parish Council held at the Gladstone Village Hall, Burton on Thursday 9 May 2019 at 7.30pm. Present: Councillors Ian Speed, Cathrina Moore, Martin Coar, Joanne Ardern, Joanna Brookes, Philip Brookes and Mrs Pat Wells (Clerk). 19.31 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Jenny Davies and Alison Raine. 19.32 LOCAL ELECTIONS MAY 2019 The Parish Council NOTED that following the Local Elections on 2 May 2019, Councillors Ian Speed, Alison Raine, Martin Coar, Cathrina Moore, Jenny Davies, Joanne Ardern, Joanna Brookes and Philip Brookes were elected unopposed and duly elected Parish Councillors for Puddington Parish Council. Parish Councillors signed the Declaration of Acceptance of Office. It was AGREED that the Parish Clerk would contact Councillors Alison Raine and Jenny Davies to arrange for them to sign their forms. 19.33 ELECTION OF CHAIRPERSON Councillor Ian Speed was proposed by Councillor Philip Brookes and seconded by Councillor Joanne Ardern. There being no further nominations, Councillor Speed was duly elected Chairman of the Parish Council for 2019-20 and signed the Declaration of Acceptance of Office. 19.34 APPOINTMENT OF VICE- CHAIR PERSON Although absent, Councillor Alison Raine had indicated that she was willing to continue in the role of Vice Chair. Councillor Raine was nominated by Councillor Cathrina Moore and seconded by Councillor Joanna Brookes. There being no further nominations, Councillor Raine was duly appointed Vice Chairman of the Parish Council for 2019-20.
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTORAL REVIEW of CHESHIRE WEST and CHESTER Final Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in the Unitary Authority of Cheshire
    SHEET 3, MAP 3 Proposed Ward boundaries in Willaston, Burton and Thornton KEY THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND UNITARY AUTHORITY BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY PARISH BOUNDARY ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CHESHIRE WEST AND CHESTER PARISH BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH WARD BOUNDARY PARISH WARD BOUNDARY PARISH WARD BOUNDARY COINCIDENT WITH WARD BOUNDARY Final Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in the Unitary Authority of Cheshire West and Chester July 2010 NESTON WARD PROPOSED WARD NAME Sheet 3 of 7 LEDSHAM CP PARISH NAME NESTON PARISH WARD PROPOSED PARISH WARD NAME This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Scale : 1cm = 0.08000 km Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Grid interval 1km The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2010. Glenmoriston Home Farm E K A R M A H T S N A E B E W E N C T H Y E H S E T A E T R H R L O A N A E D H S OOT T ON R G S REE C E N H E T B 51 O 53 O H Hooton Works E L Y Trading Estate L A L N A Woodside N E B E Nursery E 5 N 1 5 A 1 D L Greenwood ROA TON L HOO L Nurseries Chestnut E NESTON WARD B Farm E ANE U ILL L L M B NESTON PARISH WARD Hinderton E B Mill Lane Farm N I A Grange R Church Hooton L K L E Hooton O N S O H Station C H E H C O S D A OA O RY R D W AR L E QU R L N O E O A A N V N D A E E L R L D L W I A D L A A M O E T R R LE OAD E A O R R Recreation Ground D TON R A W IA OO R D
    [Show full text]
  • Buildings Open to View
    6-9 September 2018 13-16 September 2018 BUILDINGS BUILDINGSOPEN TO OPENVIEW TO VIEW 0 2 Welcome to Heritage Open Days 2018 Heritage Open days celebrates our architecture and culture by allowing FREE access to interesting properties, many of which are not normally open to the public, as well as free tours, events, and other activities. It is organised by a partnership of Chester Civic Trust and Cheshire West and Chester Council, in association with other local societies. It would not be possible without the help of many building owners and local volunteers. Maps are available from Chester Visitor Information Centre and Northwich Information Centre. For the first time in the history of Heritage Open Days the event will take place nationally across two weekends in September the 6-9 and the 13-16. Our local Heritage Open Days team decided that to give everyone the opportunity to fully explore and discover the whole Cheshire West area Chester buildings would open on 6-9 September and Ellesmere Port & Mid Cheshire would open on 13-16 September. Some buildings/ events/tours were unable to do this and have opened their buildings on the other weekend so please check dates thoroughly to avoid disappointment. Events – Tours, Talks & Activities Booking is ESSENTIAL for the majority of HODs events as they have limited places. Please check booking procedures for each individual event you would like to attend. Children MUST be accompanied by adults. Join us If you share our interest in the heritage and future development of Chester we invite you to join Chester Civic Trust.
    [Show full text]
  • WIRRAL CENSUS, 1811 N Corry's History of Macclesfield, &C., Are a I Number of Tables of Population Referring to the Various Towns of Which the Author Treats
    22O WIRRAL CENSUS, 1811 N Corry's History of Macclesfield, &c., are a I number of Tables of Population referring to the various towns of which the author treats. There is also a Table of the Population of the Hundred of Wirral for the year 1811, and in view of the great changes in this Hundred shown by the census for 1911, the figures are of interest for comparison. The contrasts are, of course, most striking in the Birkenhead district, where the township so named had only 105 inhabitants; it was not till the third decade of last century that the town began to advance. The tables are printed as they stand; Mevise and Whitley are obvious errors for Meolse and Whitby. A. H. ARKLE. Wirral Census, 1811 221 LOWER DIVISION Occupations. Inhabitants. No.ofInhabited Families.No.of Houses. Parish or Township. J <c « S5S V jj "rt V 1JM J3 1 V Blu M HgS 0 to £ <: |B BEBINGTON- Higher Bebington . 32 17 ii 5 93 98 191 33 Lower Bebington . 58 24 22 12 125 154 279 58 Poulton with Spittle . 17 16 I 38 45 83 i? 32 22 5 5 98 81 179 32 90 29 3i 34 208 266 474 94 BIDSTONE Bidstone with Ford . 28 3° 6 .101 97 198 3° 17 4 7 7 52 53 i°5 18 Claughton with Grange . 12 12 2 43 45 88 14 40 37 3 I05 125 230 40 Saughall Massey . 20 19 2 58 59 117 21 BROMBORROW (a) 26 21 5 68 55 123 26 HESWALL 16 14 4 I 60 55 "5 19 Heswall with Oldfield .
    [Show full text]