San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Project 2008-2009 Treatment Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Project 2008-2009 Treatment Report 2008-09 SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY INVASIVE SPARTINA PROJECT TREATMENT REPORT FOR 2008-09 San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Project 2008-2009 Treatment Report Prepared by: Erik Grijalva & Drew Kerr for the California State Coastal Conservancy San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Project 2612-A 8th Street Berkeley, CA 94710 February 2011 Acknowledgements The authors of this report wish to gratefully acknowledge the significant contributions of the ISP Monitoring Program in mapping the non-native Spartina infestations each year over 50,000 acres of estuarine habitat around San Francisco Bay. This tireless work informs the ISP Control Program with data used for treatment planning, provides early detection of new pioneering infestations, and produces the net acreage estimates listed at the beginning of each site complex in this report. The staff members involved with Spartina mapping for the 2008 & 2009 seasons included Monitoring Program Manager Ingrid Hogle, Assistant Monitoring Program Manager Tripp McCandlish, Clapper Rail Program Manager Jen McBroom, and ISP Biologists Ode Bernstein, Stephanie Chen, Jeanne Hammond, Jude Stalker, Whitney Thornton, and Vicki Trabold. In addition, Tripp McCandlish produced the site maps which appear in Appendix III. Thanks also to ISP’s Office Administrator Stephanie Ericson for her assistance with formatting the report and for her work on the cover layout. Cover Photos Background – Jose Botello from Aquatic Environments Inc. treating San Pablo Marsh by airboat Inset photos (from left to right) – Drew Kerr from ISP mowing persistent necromass of Spartina densiflora at Creekside Park (photo courtesy of Sandy Guldman, Friends of Corte Madera Creek Watershed); Jay Kasheta from Clean Lakes Inc. spot treating the scattered remnants of hybrid Spartina alterniflora at Elsie Roemer Marsh; James Counts from San Mateo County Mosquito and Vector Control District treating San Bruno Marsh by Argo. This report was prepared for the California Coastal Conservancy’s San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Project with funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 2008-2009 Spartina Control Program ........................................................................................ 3 2008-2010 Site Specific Plans ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Earlier Treatment ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 Conservancy Grantees and Responsibilities .............................................................................................................. 6 Treatment Results and Trends ..................................................................................................................................... 8 Adaptation and Refinement of Treatment Methods ................................................................................................ 8 A Shift from Aerial to Ground-Based Treatment ................................................................................................ 9 Airboat Treatment on Mudflats ............................................................................................................................11 Spartina densiflora Eradication .................................................................................................................................12 Integrated Vegetation Management at Work ......................................................................................................12 Monitoring Program Coordination ...........................................................................................................................13 Treatment Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................14 Data Integrity ...........................................................................................................................................................14 Herbicide Selection for Spartina Treatment .............................................................................................................15 Lessons Learned and Plans for 2010 .........................................................................................................................17 Background Information ......................................................................................................... 19 History of Invasion ......................................................................................................................................................19 Impact of Invasion .......................................................................................................................................................20 Limiting Factors for Spartina Control .......................................................................................................................21 Summary of Invasive Spartina Project .......................................................................................................................22 Regional Planning Approach .................................................................................................................................22 Identify Partners – Provide Grants ......................................................................................................................22 Grants & Collaboration with Partners .................................................................................................................23 Prepare Environmental Documents .....................................................................................................................23 Prepare Site Specific Plans .....................................................................................................................................23 Clapper Rail Monitoring ..............................................................................................................................................23 Regulatory Requirements ........................................................................................................ 25 CEQA/NEPA ..............................................................................................................................................................25 Programmatic PEIS/EIR .......................................................................................................................................25 Tiered CEQA documents ......................................................................................................................................25 Regulatory Compliance ...............................................................................................................................................25 Tiered Biological Opinion ......................................................................................................................................25 NPDES Permitting ......................................................................................................................................................27 Aquatic Pesticide Application Plan (APAP) .......................................................................................................27 Water Quality Monitoring Plan (WQMP) ...........................................................................................................28 Site 1: Alameda Flood Control Channel................................................................................... 29 Acreage Summary .........................................................................................................................................................29 Sub-area 1a - Channel Mouth .....................................................................................................................................30 Site Description .......................................................................................................................................................30 2008 Treatment ........................................................................................................................................................30 2009 Treatment ........................................................................................................................................................30 Sub-area 1b - Lower Channel .....................................................................................................................................30 San Francisco Estuary Invasive Spartina Project i 2008-2009 Treatment Report Site Description ....................................................................................................................................................... 30 2008 Treatment ....................................................................................................................................................... 31 2009 Treatment ....................................................................................................................................................... 32 Sub-area 1c - Upper Channel (a) ..............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Natural Resources Section of the Resources Management Plan
    NATURAL RESOURCES SECTION OF THE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL RECREATION AREA Prepared by Golden Gate National Recreation Area National Park Service Department of the Interior December 20, 1999 Prepared by: ___________________________________ Date:_____________ Division of Natural Resource Management and Research Approved by: ___________________________________ Date:_____________ General Superintendent, Golden Gate National Recreation Area NATURAL RESOURCES SECTION OF THE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Park Establishment 1 1.2 Purpose of the Plan 1 1.3 Compliance/National Environmental Policy Act 2 2 NATURAL RESOURCES VALUES 3 2.1 Geography, Geology and Minerals 3 2.2 Water Resources 4 2.3 Plant Resources 4 2.4 Rare and Endangered Species 4 2.5 Wildlife Resources 5 2.6 Marine Resources 15 2.7 Air Resources and Night Sky 16 3 CONDITIONS AND THREATS TO NATURAL RESOURCES 19 3.1 Geologic and Mineral Resources 19 3.2 Water Resources 20 3.3 Plant Resources 22 3.4 Rare and Endangered Species 24 3.5 Wildlife Resources 31 3.6 Marine Resources 34 3.7 Air Resources and Night Sky 36 4 GGNRA NATURAL RESOURCE PROGRAM 37 4.1 Objectives of the Natural Resource Program 37 4.2 Inventory and Monitoring (Vital Signs) — an Integrated Program 38 4.3 Restoration — an Integrated Program 38 4.4 Wildlife Program 41 4.5 Integrated Pest Management (IPM) 55 4.6 Vegetation Program 55 4.7 Forestry Program 65 4.8 Range Inventory and Management 67 4.9 Prescribed Fire Management 67 4.10 Aquatic/Hydrology
    [Show full text]
  • Get PDF Salt Evaporation Pond
    I7YJMSA8ZXXW > Book # Salt Evaporation Pond Salt Evaporation Pond Filesize: 8.01 MB Reviews This ebook might be worth a read, and superior to other. It is probably the most amazing publication we have read. Your lifestyle period will likely be transform once you total looking over this publication. (Alana McCullough) DISCLAIMER | DMCA KTGINKSOL3G5 ~ Doc Salt Evaporation Pond SALT EVAPORATION POND Betascript Publishers Jan 2010, 2010. Taschenbuch. Condition: Neu. Neuware - High Quality Content by WIKIPEDIA articles! Salt evaporation ponds are shallow man-made ponds designed to produce salts from sea water or other brines. The seawater or brine is fed into large ponds and water is drawn out through natural evaporation which allows the salt to be subsequently harvested. The ponds also provide a productive resting and feeding ground for many species of waterbirds, including several endangered species. The ponds are commonly separated by levees. Due to variable algal concentrations, vivid colors, from pale green to bright red, are created in the evaporation ponds. The color indicates the salinity of the ponds. Micro-organisms change their hues as the salinity of the pond increases. In low to mid-salinity ponds, green algae are predominant. In middle to high salinity ponds, an algae called Dunaliella salina shis the color to red. Millions of tiny brine shrimp create an orange cast in mid- salinity ponds. Other bacteria such as Stichococcus also contribute tints. 80 pp. Englisch. Read Salt Evaporation Pond Online Download PDF Salt Evaporation Pond QLWVIHJYBBW4 < eBook « Salt Evaporation Pond You May Also Like Crochet: Learn How to Make Money with Crochet and Create 10 Most Popular Crochet Patterns for Sale: ( Learn to Read Crochet Patterns, Charts, and Graphs, Beginner s Crochet Guide with Pictures) Createspace, United States, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • South Bay Salt Ponds Initial Stewardship Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement
    South Bay Salt Ponds Initial Stewardship Plan Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement December 2003 Submitted by: California Department of United States Fish and Fish and Game Wildlife Service SOUTH BAY SALT PONDS INITIAL STEWARDSHIP PLAN NOTICE: This document represents a Draft EIR/EIS prepared by California Department of Fish and Game and the US Fish and Wildlife Service. Due to differences in publication requirements, the CEQA and NEPA documents will have different circulation times. CEQA: The Draft EIR/EIS will be circulated for a 45-day public and agency review period, beginning with the publication of this document on December 22, 2003 and ending 45 days after this date. Copies of the document have been made available to applicable local, state, and federal agencies and to interested organizations and individuals wishing to review and comment on the report. Written comments will be received by CDFG at the following address: Carl Wilcox Habitat Conservation Manager California Department of Fish and Game Region 3 Headquarters P.O. Box 47 Yountville, CA 94599 FAX (707) 944-5563 NEPA: USFWS will consider all comments on the DEIR/EIS provided by the public and federal, state, and local agencies within the 45-day comment period starting upon publication in the Federal Register. Written comments will be received by USFWS at the following address: Margaret Kolar Refuge Manager U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service San Francisco Bay NWR Complex P.O. Box 524 Newark, California 94560 FAX: (510) 792-5828 Email: [email protected] Draft South Bay Salt Pond Initial Stewardship Project Environmental Impact Report / Environmental Impact Statement Prepared for: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda, a Geographical History, by Imelda Merlin
    Alameda A Geographical History by Imelda Merlin Friends of the Alameda Free Library Alameda Museum Alameda, California 1 Copyright, 1977 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 77-73071 Cover picture: Fernside Oaks, Cohen Estate, ca. 1900. 2 FOREWORD My initial purpose in writing this book was to satisfy a partial requirement for a Master’s Degree in Geography from the University of California in Berkeley. But, fortunate is the student who enjoys the subject of his research. This slim volume is essentially the original manuscript, except for minor changes in the interest of greater accuracy, which was approved in 1964 by Drs. James Parsons, Gunther Barth and the late Carl Sauer. That it is being published now, perhaps as a response to a new awareness of and interest in our past, is due to the efforts of the “Friends of the Alameda Free Library” who have made a project of getting my thesis into print. I wish to thank the members of this organization and all others, whose continued interest and perseverance have made this publication possible. Imelda Merlin April, 1977 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writer wishes to acknowledge her indebtedness to the many individuals and institutions who gave substantial assistance in assembling much of the material treated in this thesis. Particular thanks are due to Dr. Clarence J. Glacken for suggesting the topic. The writer also greatly appreciates the interest and support rendered by the staff of the Alameda Free Library, especially Mrs. Hendrine Kleinjan, reference librarian, and Mrs. Myrtle Richards, curator of the Alameda Historical Society. The Engineers’ and other departments at the Alameda City Hall supplied valuable maps an information on the historical development of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • East Bay Regional Park District
    East Bay~ Regional Park District TO: PARK ADVISORY COMMITTEE FROM: GLENN KIRBY, CHAIR SUBJECT: PARK ADVISORY COMMITTEE March 24, 2014 Location: Peralta Oaks Court 2950 Peralta Oaks Court Oakland, CA 6:45 pm Social and Refreshments REGULAR MEETING 7:00 p.m. 1. Approval of Minutes - February 24, 2014 2. Introductions 3. Public Comments 7:15 p.m. 4. Presentations: (I) a. Introduction of Cultural Services Coordinator - Jim O'Connor, AGM Operations (I) b. Statewide Drought Effects - Jim O'Connor, AGM Operations & Anne Scheer, Chief of Parks (I) c. Regional Parks Foundation Updates - Carol Johnson, AGM Public Affairs 8:00 p.m. 5. PAC Member Comments· 6. Report from the Vice Chair - John Mercurio 7. Board Committee Reports 8. Status of Recommendations 9. Old Business 10. New Business 11. Adjournment - Next Meeting April 28, 2014 (A) Action (I) Information (R) Recommendation ATTACHMENTS 1. CSC Memo 2. Drought Press Release 3. Regional Parks Foundation Memo 4. Work Plan 2014 5. Status of Recommendations 6. Articles & Correspondence Unapproved Meeting Minutes PARK ADVISORY COMMITTEE February 24, 2014 ATTENDING: Kirby, Madsen, Madison, Godfrey, Kern, Coffey, Vann, Mercurio, Bank, Palacios, Simmons, Beyaert, Volin, Coomber, Shalaby, Gregory NOTATTENDING: Best, Pellegrini, DeMarcus, Yee STAFF ATTENDING: Barial, Pfuehler, Scheer, Johnson GUESTS: Director John Sutter PUBLIC: None. The meeting began at 7:05 p.m. I. Approval of Minutes: PAC member Beyaert moved and PAC member Coomber seconded approval of the January 27, 2014 minutes with one correction. The motion passed unanimously. PAC members Madison and Madsen abstained due to absence from the meeting. 2. Introductions: PAC Chair Kirby asked PAC members, staff and the public to introduce themselves.
    [Show full text]
  • I Regional Oral History Office University of California the Bancroft
    i Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California CHARLES SEIM The Bay Bridge Oral History Project Interviews conducted by Sam Redman in 2012 Copyright © 2013 by the California Department of Transportation This series of interviews was funded through a contract with the Oakland Museum of California, the California Department of Transportation, the California Transportation Commission, and the Bay Area Toll Authority ii Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between the University of California and Charles Seim dated September 4, 2012. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are hereby transferred to and reserved by The California Department of Transportation.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Energy - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Solar energy - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_energy From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Solar energy, radiant light and heat from the sun, has been harnessed by humans since ancient times using a range of ever-evolving technologies. Solar energy technologies include solar heating, solar photovoltaics, solar thermal electricity and solar architecture, which can make considerable contributions to solving some of the most urgent problems the world now faces.[1] Solar technologies are broadly characterized as either passive solar or active solar depending on the way they capture, convert and distribute solar energy. Active solar techniques include the use of photovoltaic panels and solar thermal collectors to harness the energy. Passive solar Nellis Solar Power Plant in the United States, one of techniques include orienting a building to the Sun, selecting the largest photovoltaic power plants in North materials with favorable thermal mass or light dispersing properties, and designing spaces that naturally circulate air. America. In 2011, the International Energy Agency said that "the development of affordable, Renewable energy inexhaustible and clean solar energy technologies will have huge longer-term benefits. It will increase countries’ energy security through reliance on an indigenous, inexhaustible and mostly import-independent resource, enhance sustainability, reduce pollution, lower the costs of mitigating climate change, and keep fossil fuel prices lower than otherwise. These advantages are
    [Show full text]
  • Life in Extreme Environments
    insight review articles Life in extreme environments Lynn J. Rothschild & Rocco L. Mancinelli NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California 94035-1000, USA (e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]) Each recent report of liquid water existing elsewhere in the Solar System has reverberated through the international press and excited the imagination of humankind. Why? Because in the past few decades we have come to realize that where there is liquid water on Earth, virtually no matter what the physical conditions, there is life. What we previously thought of as insurmountable physical and chemical barriers to life, we now see as yet another niche harbouring ‘extremophiles’. This realization, coupled with new data on the survival of microbes in the space environment and modelling of the potential for transfer of life between celestial bodies, suggests that life could be more common than previously thought. Here we examine critically what it means to be an extremophile, and the implications of this for evolution, biotechnology and especially the search for life in the Universe. ormal is passé; extreme is chic. While thriving in biological extremes (for example, nutritional Aristotle cautioned “everything in extremes, and extremes of population density, parasites, moderation”, the Romans, known for their prey, and so on). excesses, coined the word ‘extremus’, the ‘Extremophile’ conjures up images of prokaryotes, yet the superlative of exter (‘being on the outside’). taxonomic range spans all three domains. Although all NBy the fifteenth century ‘extreme’ had arrived, via Middle hyperthermophiles are members of the Archaea and French, to English. At the dawning of the twenty-first Bacteria, eukaryotes are common among the psychrophiles, century we know that the Solar System, and even Earth, acidophiles, alkaliphiles, piezophiles, xerophiles and contain environmental extremes unimaginable to the halophiles (which respectively thrive at low temperatures, low ‘ancients’ of the nineteenth century.
    [Show full text]
  • The San Francisco Bridge Company Was Dredging the Oakland Estuary on Wednesday, January 7, 1920, Near the High Street Bridge. Wh
    I S S U E N U m b E r 1 • A P r IL 2 0 1 8 by Dennis Evanosky An Oakland Tribune photographer set up his camera on Webb Avenue just across from Fire Station #1 and took this panoramic photograph of the damage caused by the 1920 Park Street Fire. The panorama stretches from the Joseph Knowland home and the Southern Pacific Railroad station on Lincoln Avenue on the right to Webb Avenue and the extent of the fire damage along Park Street and at Bank Alley on the left. Image: Oakland Tribune. he San FranciSco Bridge company was stored bicarbonate of soda in the water tank. When the Tdredging the Oakland Estuary on Wednesday, January 7, firefighters added sulfuric acid to the mix, pressure from 1920, near the High Street Bridge. While work was under- the ensuing chemical reaction forced water from the tank way, the company damaged the fourteen-inch main that and into the hoses. Firefighters also arrived at the Lincoln carried water into Alameda. “Dredger Breaks City Water Avenue blaze aboard a Waterous pumper, likely Waterous’ Main,” the Evening Times-Star told its readers. The timing first single-engine fire truck, which the prolific manufac- couldn’t have been worse. turer had delivered to AFD in 1908. At 2:44 p.m., the next day, fire broke out in the packing AFD also used a Seagrave triple-combination truck to room of William and Earl Bolt’s Kellogg Express Company fight the blaze. This truck contained a water tank, a pump at 2418 Lincoln Avenue, just across the street from the to deliver the water and hoses to disperse the water onto Southern Pacific Railroad (SP) station that stood on the site the fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Parameter Analyzes of Salt Evaporation Ponds in Kecamatan Galis Kabupaten Pamekasan, East Java
    PREELIMINARY STUDY: WATER QUALITY PARAMETER ANALYZES OF SALT EVAPORATION PONDS IN KECAMATAN GALIS KABUPATEN PAMEKASAN, EAST JAVA Onie Wiwid Jayanthia,*, Ary Giri Dwi Kartikaa, Widia Yuliati Ningsiha, Zulia Susantia, Ghetra Sanda Saschevaa aMarine Science Departement, Faculty of Agricultural, University of Trunojoyo-Madura Jl. Raya Telang PO BOX 2 Kamal-Bangkalan, East Java * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract Water quality is an important parameter that affects the productivity and quality of salt produced in the traditional salt ponds. Environmental factors of water quality in salt ponds include bouzem plots, brine plots, peminihan ponds, and crystallization tables are important to be analyzed so that the quality of community salt can be improved, but some research is very limited about this so this research needs to be carried out. The method that used in this research is exploratory descriptive method by measuring water quality in bouzem plots, brine plots, evaporation ponds and crystallization tables. The result of water quality in bouzem plots (temperature=32ᴼC; pH=8,5; DO = 5,2 mg/L; salinity=2,5ᴼBe), evaporations ponds (temperature=34ᴼC ; pH=8,5 – 8,6 ; DO=5,4 – 6,2 mg/L; salinity=34ᴼBe), brine plots (temperature=39ᴼC ; pH=7,4 – 7,5 ; DO=2,8 – 3,3 mg/L; salinity=20ᴼBe), and crystallization tables (temperature=38ᴼC ; pH=5,7 – 6,4 ; DO=1,2 – 1,3 mg/L; salinity=29ᴼBe) Keywords: Water quality, Salt Evaporation Ponds, Pamekasan INTRODUCTION that it will help the knowledge of ideal pond locations based on water quality parameters. Indonesia has great marine resource potential, one of which is salt resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 17 – Table of Contents
    Bridge Maintenance Course Series Reference Manual Chapter 17 – Table of Contents Chapter 17 - Movable Bridges ................................................................................................ 17-1 17.1 Common Types of Movable Bridges .................................................................................. 17-2 17.1.1 Terminology ............................................................................................................. 17-2 17.1.2 Bascule Bridges ........................................................................................................ 17-3 17.1.3 Vertical Lift Bridges .................................................................................................. 17-9 17.1.4 Swing Bridges ......................................................................................................... 17-11 17.2 Operation of Movable Bridges ......................................................................................... 17-12 17.2.1 Counterweights ..................................................................................................... 17-15 17.2.2 Mechanical Systems .............................................................................................. 17-17 17.2.2.1 Types of Span Drives .................................................................................................... 17-30 17.2.2.2 Open and Closed Gearing ............................................................................................ 17-34 17.2.2.3 Bearings .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biological and Chemical Features Associated with Salt Production in Solar Saltfields at Dry Creek, South Australia
    ã'à o Biological and chemical features associated with salt production in solar saltfields at Dry Creek, South Australia Fereshteh Ghassemzadeh B.Sc. (Hons), The University of Mashhad,IRAN M.Sc. The University of Oklahoma, USA Department of Zoology University of Adelaide Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Muy, 1997 ØE(DICAqE(D Ío qYßE WrEgyfoq{oç Avl{çAqrßEK (D& ç'H' çT{ASSß9/|ZA(DtE { DECLARATION This work contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma in any university and, to the best of my knowledge and belief, it contains no material previously published or written by another person, except where due reference or acknowledge is made in the text. I give consent for this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the University Líbrary being available for photocopying and loan. Signed Date lqí-l '2'o TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents. Abstract.... V Acknowledgements...... vlll List of Tables .............. .X List of Figures. .xll CHAPTER ONE Introduction .1 1.1. History of solar saltfields.. .J 1.2. Literature review.............. .6 1.3. Study area.......... .9 1.4. Aims of study 13 CHAPTER TWO Physico-Chemical Investigations 15 2.1. Introduction. .............. 15 2.2. Methods and materials............ 16 2.2.1. Field methods ............. I6 2.2.2. Laboratory methods.... t7 2.3. Results 18 2.3.1. Physical parameters .... 20 2.3.2. Chemical parameters .. 22 2.4 Discussion 25 2.4.I Physical parameters.... 26 2.4.2 Chemical parameters .. 28 2.5 Conclusions ..............
    [Show full text]