Determinants of Smallholder Commercialization of Horticultural Crops in Gemechis District, West Hararghe Zone, Ethiopia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Determinants of Smallholder Commercialization of Horticultural Crops in Gemechis District, West Hararghe Zone, Ethiopia Vol. 9(3), pp. 310-319, 16 January, 2014 DOI: 10.5897/AJAR2013.6935 African Journal of Agricultural ISSN 1991-637X ©2014 Academic Journals Research http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR Full Length Research Paper Determinants of smallholder commercialization of horticultural crops in Gemechis District, West Hararghe Zone, Ethiopia Aman Tufa*1, Adam Bekele2 and Lemma Zemedu3 1Department of Agricultural Economics, Hawassa University, P. O. Box 5, Hawassa, Ethiopia. 2Department of Agricultural Economics, Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Ethiopia. 3Department of Agricultural Economics, Haramaya University, P.O.BOX 138 Dire Dawa, Ethiopia. Accepted 4 December, 2013 Transforming the subsistence-oriented production system into a market-oriented production system as a way to increase the smallholder farmer’s income and reduce rural poverty has been in the policy spotlight of many developing countries, including Ethiopia. However, there are no adequate studies in Ethiopia, particularly, in study area of West Hararghe zone that focusing on the determinants of smallholder commercialization in horticultural crops. This study has identified household level determinants of the output side commercialization decision and level of commercialization in horticultural crops in Gemechis district, West Hararghe zone, Oromia National Regional State of Ethiopia. The study used cross-sectional data obtained from a sample of 160 smallholder horticultural farmers selected randomly from four peasant associations in the district. A double hurdle model was applied to analyze the determinants of the commercialization decision and level of commercialization. In first hurdle, the result of Probit Regression Model revealed that, gender, distance to the nearest market, and cultivated land played a significant role in smallholder commercialization decision. In the second hurdle, the result of Truncated Regression Model revealed that, household education, household size, access to irrigation, cultivated land, livestock, and distance to the nearest market were the key determinants of the level of commercialization. Synthesis of double hurdle model result showed that farm size and distance to the nearest market were cross-cutting determinants of smallholder horticultural crops commercialization. The study recommends the need for designing appropriate intervention mechanisms focusing on the abovementioned factors so as to improve the performance of horticultural crops commercialization. Key words: Smallholder, commercialization, market participation, double hurdle. INTRODUCTION Ethiopia is one of the Sub-Saharan Africa countries which growth. Agricultural development is viewed as a means to liberalized their economies and developed poverty improve the living standards of smallholders and general reduction strategies that underpin market-led strategies economic growth. In Ethiopia the agricultural sector for broad based agricultural development and economic contributes about 43% of the Gross Domestic Product *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]. Tufa et al. 311 (GDP), 80% of employment, and 90% of export (Demese of the country is limited. The number of small-scale et al., 2010). Smallholder farmers account for the majority producers engaged in horticulture production is estimated of the rural population and more than 85% of the rural at around 6.0 million (CSA, 2008/2009). The production population relies on agricultural production for its estimate of fruit and vegetables, including root crops, is livelihood. However, in agriculture-based economies the 2.16 million tons (9.2% of total national peasant crop smallholder agricultural production is characterized by production of the season) constituting about 351 low output, poor access to land, and poor access to thousand tons of fruits (16%), 600 thousand tons of inputs, poor irrigation system, little access to know-how vegetables (28%), and 1.2 million tons of root crops (risk management, technology, and skill), low level of (56%). This volume is produced on 356 thousand market orientation, poor infrastructure and institutional hectares (2.4% of total cultivated land in 2008/09) of factors (Leggese and Burton, 2004; MoFED, 2005; peasant holdings. Bezabih and Hadera, 2007; Moti, 2007; CSA, 2008/2009; For most Ethiopian smallholders, fruit and vegetable Tilaye, 2010). cultivation is not the main activity rather it is considered Recently, the governments of developing countries supplementary to the production of main crops and the have sought to promote diversification of production and cultivation is on a very small plot of land and is managed exports away from the traditional commodities in order to by a household. This low priority for horticultural crops accelerate economic growth, expand employment cultivation was mainly due to the traditional food opportunities, and reduce rural poverty (Solomon et al., consumption habits that favor grain crops and livestock 2010). Market oriented production can allow households products in most parts of the country resulting in weak to increase their income by producing output with higher domestic market demand for horticultural products. returns to land and labor and using the income generated Horticulture production is an important source of income from sales to purchase goods for consumption for smallholder farmers and demand for the products is (Schneider and Gugerty, 2010). Similarly, in Ethiopia, the raising in both domestic and international markets thus current policy environment and in its Growth and increase smallholder farmers’ participation in the market Transformation Plan (GTP) launched for the period 2010 (Dawit et al., 2004; Bezabih and Hadera, 2007; Yilma, and 2011 up to 2014 to 2015, the Ethiopian Government 2009). attempts to promote production and marketing of high Although there is a wealth of literature on smallholder value agricultural products with a view to increase commercialization in Ethiopia, it is mainly on grain crops competitiveness in domestic, regional, and international and livestock and livestock product however market markets. participation of the smallholder horticultural crops farmers In addition, the shift in the paradigm of strategy for food in the country is still limited. Accordingly, various security from food production oriented to improving food empirical studies pointed out that, in Ethiopia, smallholder access through improving household income and commercialization determined by institutional factors, promoting market oriented production has opened the infrastructural and market related factors, household window for engagement of smallholder farmers in market resource endowments, and household specific oriented production (MoFED, 2010). characteristics (Pender and Dawit, 2007; Berhanu et al., Nowadays, horticultural crops is becoming attractive for 2009; Goitom, 2009; Adam et al., 2010; Berhanu and many poor farmers around the world thus worldwide Moti, 2010). production of fruit and vegetable crops has grown faster In Ethiopia, particularly eastern and western Hararghe than that of cereal crops (Lumpkin et al., 2005). zones have good potential in horticultural crops Horticultural crops play a significant role in developing production for which smallholder farming have diversified country both in income and social spheres for improving from staple food subsistence production into more market income and nutrition status. Farmers involved in oriented and higher value commodities. Despite this horticultural production usually earn much higher farm production potentials and importance of horticultural incomes as compared to cereal producers and per capital crops for the country as well as the study area, there has farm income has been reported up to five times higher. In been limited study with regard to the status and level of addition, horticultural products are considered to be smallholder commercialization of horticultural crops and income-boosting alternatives to basic grains for implications of the challenges on decision making. smallholder farmers, and they contribute to increasing Smallholder access to markets for higher-value employment opportunities (World Bank, 2004). agricultural products is recognized as a vital opportunity In Ethiopia, the importance of horticulture to the to enhance and diversify the livelihoods of lower-income livelihoods of the rural populations in the country farm households and reduce rural poverty more generally accentuates its role as a crop whose production and (World Bank, 2008). Past studies, have not addressed marketing could be a potential pathway of improving rural the study area. To the best of my knowledge, there is livelihoods. Horticulture production in Ethiopia is little empirical evidence on factors governing smallholder undertaken dominantly by smallholder farmers, few horticultural crops commercialization in developing private sectors and its overall contribution to the economy countries, particularly, in Ethiopia. Therefore, improvements 312 Afr. J. Agric. Res. Table 1. Sampling frame and sample size determination. Name of selected Horticultural Proportion of sampled Numbers of sampled peasant association households (number) household (%) households Kuni sagariya 858 40.6 65 Sororo 397 18.8 30 Wellenso harabafanno 383 18.1 29 Homocho sokido 475 22.5 36 Total 2113 100.0 160 Source: DOA, 2012 and own computation. in market participation are necessary to link smallholder The district is found within 1300 to 2400 m above sea level farmers to markets in order
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia
    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
    [Show full text]
  • Ethiopia: 2015 HRF Projects Map (As of 31 December 2015)
    Ethiopia: 2015 HRF projects map (as of 31 December 2015) Countrywide intervention ERITREA Legend UNICEF - Nutrition - $999,753 Concern☃ - VSF-G ☈ ! Refugee camp WFP - Nutrition (CSB) - $1.5m National capital Shimelba Red Sea SUDAN Regional intervention International boundary Hitsa!ts Dalul UNICEF - Health - $1.0m ! !Hitsats ! ! Undetermined boundary ! ! SCI Tigray, Afar, Amhara, Oromia, Kelete Berahile ☃☉ May-Ayni Kola ! Somali, Gambella, SNPR & NRC - ☉ Ts!elemti Temben Awelallo Lake IRC - ★ ! ☄ ! ♫ Tanqua ! SUDAN ! ! ! Dire Dawa Adi Harush ! Enderta Abergele ! Ab Ala Afdera Project woredas Tselemt ! NRC - Debark GAA - ☇ ! WFP (UNHAS) - Coordination ☈ Abergele! Erebti ☋☉ Plan Int. - ACF - ☃ Dabat Sahla ☃Megale Bidu and Support Service - $740,703 Janamora Wegera! Clusters/Activities ! Ziquala Somali region Sekota ! ! Concern - SCI Teru ! Agriculture CRS - Agriculture/Seed - $2,5m ☃ ☃ Kurri ! Dehana ! ☋ ! Gaz Alamata ! Elidar GAA - ☋ Amhara,Ormia and SNNP regions ! ☃☉ Gonder Zuria Gibla ! Gulf of ! Education Plan Int. - Ebenat Kobo SCI☃☉ ☃ ! Gidan ☄ Lasta ! Aden CARE - Lay Guba ! Ewa ! ☃ ! Meket Lafto Gayint ! Food security & livelihood WV - ☃ Dubti ☈ ☉ ! Tach Habru Chifra SCI - ☃ Delanta ! ! - Tigray Region, Eastern Zone, Kelete Awelall, ! Gayint IMC - ☃ Health ☉ Simada Southern Zone, Alamata and Enderta woredas ! ! Mile DJIBOUTI ☊ Mekdela ! Bati Enbise SCI- Nutrition ! Argoba ☃☉ WV - ☃ Sar Midir Legambo ☃ ! Oxfam GB - Enarj ! ☉ ! ! Ayisha Non Food Items - Amhara region, North Gonder (Gonder Zuria), Enawga ! Antsokiya Dalfagi ! ! ! Concern
    [Show full text]
  • Total Affected Population, January-June 2012
    Total Affected Population, January-June 2012 Erob Tahtay Adiyabo Mereb LekeAhferom Laelay Adiyabo Gulomekeda Dalul Legend · Adwa Saesie Tsaedaemba Werei Leke Tigray HawzenKoneba Lakes Asgede Tsimbila Naeder Adet Atsbi Wenberta Berahle Kola Temben Tselemti Tselemt Administrative boundary Tanqua Abergele Enderta Addi Arekay Ab Ala Afdera Beyeda Saharti Samre Hintalo Wejirat Erebti Abergele Region Janamora Megale Bidu Sahla Alaje Ziquala Endamehoni Sekota Raya Azebo Teru Zone West Belesa Ofla Yalo Gonder Zuria Dehana Kurri Gaz Gibla Alamata Elidar Bugna Gulina Awra Woreda Lasta (Ayna)Gidan Kobo Ewa Afar Lay GayintMeket Wadla Guba Lafto Dubti Total affected Population Delanta Habru Chifra Guba Amhara Worebabu Simada Adaa'r Mile 0(no requirment) MekdelaTenta Afambo Bati z Sayint u Telalak m Mehal Sayint u Legambo Dewa HarewaDewe 14-8108 G Antsokiya Ayisha Sherkole l Kurmuk u Gishe Rabel Sirba Abay g Artuma Fursi Gewane n Menz Gera Midir 8109-13746 Bure Mudaytu a DeraMimo Weremo Jille Timuga Erer Shinile h Afdem is Ibantu Menz Mama Midir Assosa n Wara JarsoHidabu Abote Kewet e Simurobi Gele'alo Dembel 13747-21231 Degem Tarema Ber B Abuna G/BeretKuyu Dire Dawa Ginde Beret Gerar Jarso Miesso Dire DawaJarsoChinaksen Meta Robi DulechaAmibara Goro Gutu Jida Argoba Special KersaHarar Jijiga 21232-33163 JelduAdda Berga Doba Meta Gursum Aleltu Gursum Sasiga Ifata Mieso TuloDeder Babile Hareshen Chiro Zuria Bedeno Diga Mesela Hareri Kebribeyah Addis Ababa Goba KorichaGemechisMalka Balo GirawaFedis 33164-59937 AncharHabro Midega TolaBabile Daro Lebu
    [Show full text]
  • 11 HS 000 ETH 013013 A4.Pdf (English)
    ETHIOPIA:Humanitarian Concern Areas Map (as of 04 February 2013) Eritrea > !ª !ª> Note: The following newly created woreda boundaries are not Tahtay !ª E available in the geo-database; hence not represented in this Nutrition Hotspot Priority Laelay Erob R R !ª Adiyabo Mereb Ahferom !ª Tahtay Gulomekeda !ª I E map regardless of their nutrition hot spot priority 1 & 2: Adiyabo Leke T D Adiyabo Adwa Saesie Dalul Priority one Asgede Tahtay R S Kafta Werei Tsaedaemba E E Priority 1: Dawa Sarar (Bale zone), Goro Dola (Guji zone), Abichu Tsimbila Maychew !ª A Humera Leke Hawzen Berahle A Niya( North Showa zone) and Burka Dintu (West Hararge Priority two > T I GR AY > Koneba Central Berahle zone) of Oromia region, Mekoy (Nuer zone) of Gambella Western Naeder Kola Ke>lete Awelallo Priority three Tselemti Adet Temben region, Kersadula and Raso (Afder zone), Ararso, Birkod, Tanqua > Enderta !ª Daror and Yo'ale (Degahabour zone), Kubi (Fik zone), Addi Tselemt Zone 2 No Priority given Arekay Abergele Southern Ab Ala Afdera Mersin (Korahe zone), Dhekasuftu and Mubarek (Liben Beyeda Saharti Erebti Debark Hintalo !ª zone), Hadigala (Shinille zone) and Daratole (Warder Abergele Samre > Megale Erebti Bidu Wejirat zone) of Somali region. Dabat Janamora > Bidu International Boundary Alaje Raya North Lay Sahla Azebo > Wegera Endamehoni > > Priority 2: Saba Boru (Guji zone) of Oromia region and Ber'ano Regional Boundary Gonder Armacho Ziquala > A FA R !ª East Sekota Raya Yalo Teru (Gode zone) and Tulu Guled (Jijiga zone) of Somali region. Ofla Kurri Belesa
    [Show full text]
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)
    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Map Assessment
    Risk Map Assessment A Socio-Economic Study on Vulnerable Children and Adolescents In West Hararge Zone Chiro and Gemechis Woredas Comitato Internazionale per lo Sviluppo dei Popoli (CISP) (International Committee for the Development of Peoples) In the framework of the Italian Cooperation Programme in support of vulnerable children and adolescents in Ethiopia Research Team Desta Ayode Azmeraw Belay Mekdes G/Tinsaye Addis Ababa, June 2006 Risk Map Assessment Table of content Page Acknowledgement ----------------------------------------------------------- i List of Acronyms ------------------------------------------------------------ ii List of Tables and Charts --------------------------------------------------- iii Executive Summary --------------------------------------------------------- 1 Part One; Background ---------------------------------------------- 4 1.1 Introduction------------------------------------------------------------------ 4 1.2 Policy and Legal Framework----------------------------------------------- 5 1.3 Background of the Study--------------------------------------------------- 6 1.4 Objectives of the Study---------------------------------------------- ------ 6 1.5 Overview of the Study Area----------------------------------------- ------ 7 1.6 Structure of the Report----------------------------------------------------- 8 Part Two: Methodology------------------------------------------- 9 2.1 Instruments-------------------------------------------------------------------- 9 2.2 Selection of the Study Sites-------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Improved Napier Cultivars As Livestock Feed Under Farmers Conditions in West Hararghe Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia
    Animal and Veterinary Sciences 2021; 9(1): 5-15 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/avs doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20210901.12 ISSN: 2328-5842 (Print); ISSN: 2328-5850 (Online) Evaluation of Improved Napier Cultivars as Livestock Feed Under Farmers Conditions in West Hararghe Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia Tamrat Dinkale1, *, Tessema Zewdu2, Meseret Girma2 1Oromia Agricultural Research Institute, Mechara Agricultural Research Center, Mechara, Ethiopia 2Department of Animal Sciences and Range, Haramaya University, Dire Dewa, Ethiopia Email address: *Corresponding author To cite this article: Tamrat Dinkale, Tessema Zewdu, Meseret Girma. Evaluation of Improved Napier Cultivars as Livestock Feed Under Farmers Conditions in West Hararghe Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Animal and Veterinary Sciences. Vol. 9, No. 1, 2021, pp. 5-15. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20210901.12 Received: November 6, 2020; Accepted: December 16, 2020; Published: January 30, 2021 Abstract: This study was conducted to evaluate the forage production and farmers preference as livestock feed under farmer’s conditions in West Hararghe Zone of Oromia region, Ethiopia. Four improved Napier grass cultivars (ILRI cultivar number: 16801, 16800, 16798, and 16840) and local check were planted in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with six replications during the main cropping season of 2018/19. The dry matter (DM) yield, fresh biomass yield, plant height, leaf length and leaf-stem ratio and other agronomic data were measured at harvest. Farmers preference of the Napier grass cultivars as livestock feed was collected through visual and hand evaluation of the multiple ranking criteria of the cultivars based on phonological nature. The results shows that, ILRI cultivar no.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group
    DRMTechnical Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group Covering 1 Jan to 31 Dec 2016 Prepared by Clusters and NDRMC Introduction The El Niño global climactic event significantly affected the 2015 meher/summer rains on the heels of failed belg/ spring rains in 2015, driving food insecurity, malnutrition and serious water shortages in many parts of the country. The Government and humanitarian partners issued a joint 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document (HRD) in December 2015 requesting US$1.4 billion to assist 10.2 million people with food, health and nutrition, water, agriculture, shelter and non-food items, protection and emergency education responses. Following the delay and erratic performance of the belg/spring rains in 2016, a Prioritization Statement was issued in May 2016 with updated humanitarian requirements in nutrition (MAM), agriculture, shelter and non-food items and education.The Mid-Year Review of the HRD identified 9.7 million beneficiaries and updated the funding requirements to $1.2 billion. The 2016 HRD is 69 per cent funded, with contributions of $1.08 billion from international donors and the Government of Ethiopia (including carry-over resources from 2015). Under the leadership of the Government of Ethiopia delivery of life-saving and life- sustaining humanitarian assistance continues across the sectors. However, effective humanitarian response was challenged by shortage of resources, limited logistical capacities and associated delays, and weak real-time information management. This Periodic Monitoring Report (PMR) provides a summary of the cluster financial inputs against outputs and achievements against cluster objectives using secured funding since the launch of the 2016 HRD.
    [Show full text]
  • Pastoral Areas Nutrition Update Transportation
    Food and Livelihood Security Update – Pastoral Areas The latest update by the Somali Region Disaster Prevention and Preparedness Bureau (DPPB) and Save the Children UK reports a slight improvement in the food security situation in the region due to good performance of the deyr rains, increased demand for livestock exports and ongoing relief food distributions. The terms of trade for pastoralists have improved in all major markets (Jijiga, Fik and Kebridehar) due to increased livestock demand from Gulf countries ahead of the upcoming Muslim holy pilgrimage (Haj). The deyr rains have also significantly replenished water sources in Gode, Afder, Liben, Degehabur and Fik zones, bringing emergency water tankering interventions to an end. In Korahe, Warder and parts of Shinile zones, however, serious water shortages persist. In Afar, the latest DPPB/Save the Children UK report recommends close monitoring of the food security situation in the region due to the recurrent dry spells and absence of recovery periods between them, which have exhausted the coping strategies of the pastoralist population. Livestock herd sizes, the number of milking animals and productivity have been significantly reduced, especially in terms of cattle. The report further indicates that the terms of trade for pastoralists have not improved due to low livestock prices and increased cereal prices. A joint Government and NGO rapid assessment conducted in Borena zone (Oromia) from 24 to 27 October has found the food and nutritional security of communities in all woredas to be of concern due to the poor performance of the current hagaya rains, coming on top of the previous poor ganna (mid-March to May) harvest.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHIOPIA Food Security Outlook January to June 2011
    ETHIOPIA Food Security Outlook January to June 2011 Following the meher harvest, which began in October Figure 1. Current estimated food security outcomes, 2010, food security has generally improved in the January 2011 meher producing parts of the country. However, due to crop damage caused by widespread floods and other weather related shocks the meher harvest is likely to be lower than initially anticipated. The Humanitarian Requirement Documents outlining assistance needs is expected to be released in February 2011. Although the National Meteorology Agency has not provided a forecast for the April to June gu/genna/belg rains, below normal performance of these rains is considered likely. This is expected to exacerbate prevailing food insecurity which resulted from near complete failure of October to December rains in southern pastoral and agro pastoral areas. Due to close to normal sapie (December/January) 2010 rains food security among the dominant root crop, For more information on FEWS NET’s Food Insecurity Severity Scale, please see: www.fews.net/FoodInsecurityScale mainly sweet potatoes growing areas in central and eastern SNNPR is estimated to remain stable Source: FEWS NET and WFP throughout the outlook period. The poor and very poor households normally rely on these harvests, during the March to May lean season. Staple food prices are likely to follow typical seasonal trends throughout the outlook period, though remain higher than the 2005 to 2009 averages given the current harvest and the continued price stabilization measures taken by the government. Seasonal calendar and critical events Source: FEWS NET FEWS NET Washington FEWS NET Ethiopia FEWS NET is a USAID-funded activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Urgent Need for Integrated Emergency Response in 141 Outbreak and Undernutrition Affected Woredas of Ethiopia in 2020
    JOINT INTER-CLUSTER ADVOCACY PAPER URGENT NEED FOR INTEGRATED EMERGENCY RESPONSE IN 141 OUTBREAK AND UNDERNUTRITION AFFECTED WOREDAS OF ETHIOPIA IN 2020 Ethiopian population is currently facing new crises while past crises are not yet resolved. The recurrent food & undernutrition crises and increased frequency of measles and cholera outbreaks in the course of 2019 are now further exacerbated by desert locust infestations and upcoming COVID-19 pandemic. The complexification of the emergency needs requires to bring together our integrated efforts and expertise to address them. Ethiopia Health Cluster, WASH Cluster and Emergency Nutrition Coordination Unit established Health, WASH and Nutrition Technical Woking Group (HWN TWG) to further boost joint response in 141 woreda and IDP camps of Ethiopia by implementing minimum multi-sectoral response package. OUR ASKS • The HWN TWG asks the EHCT to support our initiative by providing more visibility and attention to this integrated initiative and request an opportunity to provide periodic updates at EHCT meetings. • The HWN TWG asks the Government of Ethiopia, especially NDRMC, MOH, EPHI and MOWIE, to improve the joint Health, WASH and Nutrition collaboration, to foster joint system strengthening and data sharing with humanitarian actors. • The HWN TWG asks Donors, including EHF and all the Rapid Response Mechanisms, to prioritise multisectoral funding in priority woredas and consider the multi-sectoral approach as an example of good practice. • The HWN TWG asks implementing partners to include the pilot of the Health WASH and Nutrition minimum package in their future proposals and project design. Partners are encouraged to work as a consortium to jointly implement the full package.
    [Show full text]
  • 1-10 Prevalence of Bovine Mastitis, Risk Factors
    East African Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (2018) Volume 2 (1): 1-10 Prevalence of Bovine Mastitis, Risk Factors and major Causative Agents in West Hararghe Zone, East Ethiopia Ketema Boggale, Bekele Birru*, Kifle Nigusu, and Shimalis Asras Hirna Regional Veterinary Laboratory, P.O. Box 36, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia Abstract: A cross-sectional study was conducted from October 2009 to March 2010 in Boke, Darolebu, Kuni, Mieso and Tulo districts to estimate the prevalence of bovine mastitis, identify associated risk factors and isolate the predominant bacterial agents. A total of 1019 lactating cows were examined clinically and using California Mastitis Test (CMT) for subclinical mastitis. Standard bacteriological techniques were employed to isolate the bacterial agents. A total of 393 (38.6%) cows were positive for both clinical and subclinical mastitis. Among the risk factors, age, parity, and lactation stages were not significantly (p>0.05) associated with prevalence of mastitis. However, hygienic status of animals was associated with the occurrence of mastitis (p<0.05). Both contagious and environmental bacteria were isolated from milk samples collected from mastitic cows. The predominant bacteria isolate was Staphylococcus aureus with proportion of 14.1% followed by S. agalactiae with isolation proportion of 13.2%. E. coli and S. intermedius were the third predominant isolates with a rate of 10.9% for each. Among the seven antibiotics tested, gentamycin, amoxicillin, oxytetracycline, ampicillin, and cloxacillin were effective, whereas streptomycin and penicillin showed poor efficacy. The study revealed that mastitis is significant problem of dairy cows in the study areas. Hence, awareness creation among dairy farmers should be made about the impact of the disease; and training on hygienic milking practice and treating of subclinically infected cows should be given.
    [Show full text]